Slashdot Mirror


Children Struggle To Hold Pencils Due To Too Much Tech, Doctors Say (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: Children are increasingly finding it hard to hold pens and pencils because of an excessive use of technology, senior pediatric doctors have warned. An overuse of touchscreen phones and tablets is preventing children's finger muscles from developing sufficiently to enable them to hold a pencil correctly, they say. "Children are not coming into school with the hand strength and dexterity they had 10 years ago," said Sally Payne, the head pediatric occupational therapist at the Heart of England foundation NHS Trust. "Children coming into school are being given a pencil but are increasingly not be able to hold it because they don't have the fundamental movement skills. "To be able to grip a pencil and move it, you need strong control of the fine muscles in your fingers,. Children need lots of opportunity to develop those skills." Payne said the nature of play had changed. "It's easier to give a child an iPad than encouraging them to do muscle-building play such as building blocks, cutting and sticking, or pulling toys and ropes. Because of this, they're not developing the underlying foundation skills they need to grip and hold a pencil."

314 comments

  1. Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the need to hold a pencil will not be needed in the future. This is an early sign of a biological change.

    1. Re:Coming biological mutation? by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      It's not needed right now. I generally only use a pencil or pen to sign my name or, increasingly rarely, fill out a paper form.

    2. Re: Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      if you had a girlfriend, sheâ(TM)d be very acquainted with something pencil sized

    3. Re:Coming biological mutation? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Perhaps the need to hold a pencil will not be needed in the future.

      Everyone who is posting using a pencil or stylus, please raise your hands . . . ?

      I have terrible hand-writing and therefore took an after school typing class in 9th grade, back in the late '70s.

      Since then, I rarely write anything; just type. In the early 80's, in the terminal room while I was studying CS, I often pitied the poor folks hen-pecking in their code at a snail's pace.

      About the only time I take a pen in my hand, is when I need to put a signature on something.

      Handwriting can be a fine art, and I really admire folks who have beautiful and inspiring handwriting . . . it's just something I can't do, but don't need to do it.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re: Coming biological mutation? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, shouldn't he also be very acquainted with something pencil sized?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only if females view mail non pencil holders more desirable AND somehow this triggers a DNA mutation in the non pencil holders (will require magic)

    6. Re:Coming biological mutation? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Typing, at least typing the proper way, also builds up hand strength. Hunt and peck with 2 fingers does not. If you really want to build hand strength, make them learn to play the piano.

    7. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find myself using pen and paper more these days than less in my work, notebooks are lightweight and don't need batteries nor do they suddenly freeze up or crash.

    8. Re:Coming biological mutation? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I expect it is more environmental then biological.

      However when I was a kid I had the same problems, and still I hold my pencil with the death grip that everyone tells me is wrong, yet no-one has showed me the correct way where the pencil doesn't just fall out of my hand.
      So prolonged writing tires my hand out. And you can see that in my writing where the first few paragraphs are done with easy to read hand writing (Cursive or in print) then it degrades down to unreadable near the end.

      When I learned to write, I didn't have ready access to keyboard for typing (While I had a TI99/4a at home, it didn't have a printer), and touch screens were fancy tech that you only saw on Star Trek. The classrooms had 1 computer used for the reward for students who finished their classwork early. While I was struggling because it took me forever to write because it needed to be legible. In general throughout school, teachers labeled me as the stupid kid, and said I would never make it academically (I have a Masters Degree Now).

      The point of this rambling it isn't the new technology that is the problem, but the general lack of effort into teaching the students the skills needed to perform actions. When I was a kid, I was just labeled stupid, so I wasn't worth the time, for a little bit of extra one on one to fix some of the skills deficits. Today's kids may need less teaching on how to use computers and more on how to write, just because they already have such skills in that area and need to focus on a different area. It isn't useful to blame, technology as the cause, where the real cause is lack of training of the children of skills.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Blymie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thing is -- different usages build different areas of muscles. And the brain learns different types of movements.

      When growing up, one summer I used to bike 40km to work at age 16. 80km round trip. I'd work a physical job for a full shift, and return. And growing up in the country, overall I was in fairly good shape. Lots and lots of outdoor/physical chores.

      And clearly, one is in excellent shape when doing the above 5 days a week.

      Anyhow, I took up water skying. For the first week, I could barely *stand* after a mere 15 minutes. My legs would shake. Part of my leg muscles were not even used in bicycling, walking, and whatever else I did.

      People talk about 'swimmer's bodies' and all that, but there is truth to it. Different activities use different muscles, and using a pen/pencil is the same sort of thing. And then, on top of that, the brain needs to learn the specific / fine motions akin to that specific action.

      I'm positive that gross hand/eye coordination is improved with playing games. And typing. But, if you've never typed? All the video game playing in the world, won't provide you with the strength and coordination to make all those repetitive typing movements. Your body still needs training.

    10. Re: Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not after the anti-puberty hormones to treat his misdiagnosed ADD. See:

      https://transtherapy.wordpress...

    11. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typing, at least typing the proper way, also builds up hand strength. ...

      WHAT

      THE

      FUCK?!?!?

      Typing builds up hand strength? Compared to what? Stuffing marshmallows into your pie hole as you lie in bed?

      What are you aiming for when you grow up? Being able to bench press an empty bar?

    12. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are also harder to accidentally wipe, and if you use pencils, reasonably spill resistant.

    13. Re:Coming biological mutation? by DickBreath · · Score: 0

      It's true. If the USPTO cannot read or write, then why should children need to be able to read or write. He is an example of the innovative accomplishment of American will. Even if you are unable to read, write or speak in complete sentences, you can still be the USPTO! It should inspire us all.

      Anyone can become USPTO. No qualifications required. Furthermore, America is more welcoming an open that any other nation on Earth today. What other nation is equal opportunity enough to allow mentally ill persons to be elected to the highest office?

      Therefore the Childrens needs to be focuseding on the nesscessassarry skils for becoming president. If they master these then they will have the skills for any other job where their carreer path may took them.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    14. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Memnos · · Score: 1

      I have terrible handwriting too, and terrible typing skills for someone who does it every day, a lot. But I take written notes. The reason is that I can scrawl faster than I can type, although I'm the only one who could ever read it and make sense of it. The formulation of ideas that you're on the receiving end of has been pretty well shown to enhance the recall of them later. It cements the memories in your brain and allows your mind to process them further. For me, the only way to get this effect is to scrawl shit down. Even if I never read it again, I remember it better and can use it better. If I could type it fast enough to do this, maybe I would. But I can't, so I scrawl it. If I write down a grocery list and then lose it, I usually remember it just right.

      If typing does this for you, then great. Handwriting does it for me.

      --
      I don't trust atoms -- they make up stuff.
    15. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      skiing

    16. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also have fun trying to type on a tablet in sub-freezing weather while wearing gloves while the screen is slow to respond and the battery keeps running out faster than normal (not every tech job is in an office.)

    17. Re:Coming biological mutation? by war4peace · · Score: 3, Funny

      stop ogling that mirror.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    18. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, they are seldom stolen and are less of a burden when going through TSA.

    19. Re:Coming biological mutation? by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Typing, at least typing the proper way, also builds up hand strength. Hunt and peck with 2 fingers does not. If you really want to build hand strength, make them learn to play the piano.

      You are talking about typing on a real typewriter (if you know what I'm talking about), then I agree that your fingers/hands will build up some muscle. However, if you are talking about computer keyboard, I highly doubt that it really help building up fingers/hands muscle that much.

    20. Re: Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who else cleans themselves with a KFC wetwipe?

    21. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So by USPTO, do you mean "United States Patent & Trademark Office" or "United States President The Of"? I think you meant POTUS.

    22. Re: Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the only one.

    23. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Typing builds up hand strength?

      I take it you have never used an upright Imperial.

      I am guessing he did not mean a Vaio laptop keyboard or SInclair ZX81.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    24. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool story bro.

    25. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, pen and paper, the original data loss device. The paper tears, water gets spilled on it, or you just plain lose it in a pile with a bunch of other dead trees that could still be alive today.

      I can say typing does build in finger dexterity, especially when you use different keyboards regularly. Tablets and electronic devices do have their limitations as well, of course most can last a full work shift no problem if you're just using it for note taking. That should cut down on the porn apps causing your computer to suddenly freeze up or crash.

    26. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Depends. Using an old IBM-Keyboard (you know, the ones that are bulletproof up to 9mm)...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    27. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Judging by your writing, I see you're working there. Good for you!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:Coming biological mutation? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I have noticed that some people can run 10+ miles a day but cannot hike or do much requiring strength without falling out like a couch potato.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    29. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where you at? Ice Station Zebra? At least the flamethrower will keep you warm for a while...

    30. Re:Coming biological mutation? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Bottom line it is always the teachers.

      There are enthusiastic teachers with great results but you have to expect them to burn out.
      There are teachers that just teach facts and basic stuff instead of principles and concepts.

      But there are also school systems problems. E.g. in Germany correct spelling, especially of foreign languages is so over rated, a person that had B grades in England or France would have a D or even E in Germany. Well, that was at my time. I have heard it has improved, but never checked it.

      Consider this: you are supposed to write an english 5 pages work (a test) about the differences between English Rugby and German Soccer. You can have a perfect essay but with 5 typos per page you get an E.

      Most teachers in my schools "cheated" and awarded for spelling mistakes only half an error point. The transition from a language like german or italian to a language like french or english is just to big. In German nearly everything is spelled like it is pronounced. And that already leads to many spelling mistakes that could be avoided if there would be an easy way to proofread your own text ;D

      Anyway, good teachers *grasp* why/what the student is not understanding. And then adjust and give a different metaphor or analogy.

      I never ever had a student who did not learn what I wanted to teach him/her. Many of my students in private coaching jumped from D and E grades to B's in a course of 4 or 6 weeks.

      Right now I only teach martial arts ... but brining a student who was a brown belt for 5 years to black belt level usually does not take long. I simply "understand" somehow at what exact point they are stuck and bring them beyond that point.

      A few weeks ago I watched this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      So I think some great teachers are also just great because of personality. My math teacher in university Prof. Harro Heuser was such a guy. He was not really talking about math, he was a kind of German philologist. You always wondered if he studied the wrong topic or if you are in the wrong class. Never met anyone who was so fluent in German without looking old fashioned.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    31. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might be writing parking tickets in somewhere in northern Europe. ;-)

      (Thermometer shows about -10 C outside atm, which translates as about 13 F.)

    32. Re:Coming biological mutation? by KixWooder · · Score: 1

      That's true. I don't run 10 mi every day, but at least once a week (6 mi or so the other days). After a winter of running, I started hiking again in the spring and was winded like none other in a short amount of time. Surprising since I only run off-road and on trials.

      --
      I hate fat people.
    33. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the paper tears you're reckless. You're probably going to wreck your computer too.

      If you spill water on it, you should have used a pencil. Also, I fail to see how most computer devices handles water any better than most paper. It seems like it's more a case of the paper being cheaper to replace... while still retaining the data in a legible form

      If you lose it, you're disorganized, a computer will never help you with that either. If you lose your notes, you're losing your files too by not remembering what you stored in what file and or storing everything in one gigantic directory.

      Paper kills trees, computers kills humans who have to mine rare metals in appalling conditions.

      Typing does build dexterity, but that's not much of win, it's a different set of muscles though, and like running compared to skating, and you're not getting the same fine tuned control over your movements.

    34. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me also, but I make up the time working on cars, woodworking, painting and eating

    35. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That’s not how mutation and selection works.

    36. Re: Coming biological mutation? by gherdicnotua26 · · Score: 1

      True :)

    37. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyhow, I took up water skying. For the first week, I could barely *stand* after a mere 15 minutes. My legs would shake. Part of my leg muscles were not even used in bicycling, walking, and whatever else I did.

      Part of that'll be that your previous exercise was using your muscles to get lots of quick movement. For water skiing you needed your muscles to lock and hold you in the same position for long periods of time. That'd be using your slow twitch muscles instead of your fast muscles. It's not just which muscles you were using but also which type of fibre your body had built up within those muscles.

    38. Re: Coming biological mutation? by zifn4b · · Score: 2

      if you had a girlfriend, sheâ(TM)d be very acquainted with something pencil sized

      You're acquainted with something much smaller than a pencil that is quite vacuous between your ears.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    39. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dispute that claim. Try shaking hands with someone who builds houses or an auto mechanic and you'll feel like a little girl in their iron grip. Been touch typing over 100wpm for over 20 years and my hand strength is nothing.

    40. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anecdote: I took a calligraphy class. I can spend a lot of time and write perfectly, I can spend some time and write well, or I can scribble quickly and no one else can read it. What helped me the most was the O exercise. Tracing a page of Os a number of times, makes my handwriting more bubbly and easier to read. But it definitely was exercising muscles I didn't typically use (and I was in college and I used to play piano). In my spare time I worked on some being able to write with my left hand. After writing the alphabet a large number of times, I found that my mind knows how to use my fingers, and the skill for writing was very transferable from hand to hand. The problem was my left hand's dexterity muscles were extremely weaker than my other hand. So I tried doing hand exercises instead and my left handed writing improved much quicker. But hand exercises are less challenging and less interesting so I haven't worked on it any more. But got up to about a 4th grade writing level, and if my right hand is full I jot things down left handed because its easier. YMMV

    41. Re:Coming biological mutation? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well how do you define a teacher?
      As a community it is our responsibility to teach the youth. So we are all teachers in a way. And if we see child who is struggling, then we need the community to help them out. Not just a government employee who is tasked managing 2-3 dozen additional children at the same time. Where if the child isn't raising any flags will probably be ignored.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    42. Re:Coming biological mutation? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      If you lose it, you're disorganized, a computer will never help you with that either. If you lose your notes, you're losing your files too by not remembering what you stored in what file and or storing everything in one gigantic directory.

      My online notes are organized chronologically and easily searchable by keyword.

      When I used to take notes on paper, they were also organized chronologically, but I had no way to search.

      If I remember discussing something in a meeting a couple months ago and wanted to look up the details, I'd have to do a manual search through many pages to try to find the subject I'm looking for (and my handwriting doesn't lend itself well to quickly scanning the page). It'd be really hard to index handwritten notes by subject since a single meeting could touch a dozen different subjects.

      While with my notes on computer, I just do a keyword search in the timeframe I'm looking for. It's not perfect, since context matters, but far better than searching handwritten notes.

      Though in my company, Slack has almost entirely replaced note taking, many meetings have been replaced by Slack discussions.

      I still take handwritten notes during meetings, but almost never refer to them after the meeting, I find that I retain information better if I write it down, but if there's anything I want to refer to later, I type it into a note. If I type during the meeting, I find that I retain a lot less information and pretty much only remember what I typed.

    43. Re: Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you use to search in your typed notes?

    44. Re:Coming biological mutation? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I agree with that.
      In france they even lowered the bar to become a 1st and 2nd grade teacher to be a person who has raised a child to school age. Of course that is only for simple stuff like the french language and math.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    45. Re:Coming biological mutation? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Going from soccer to skiing, my legs were fine. But I couldn't lift my arms. The muscles to hold on are similar to doing a pull up for hours, but at an odd angle.

      But holding a pencil isn't proof of a lack of "fine motor skills". It's proof of lack of "holding a pencil" skills. The person with trouble holding pencils may be better at building Lego. But a complete condemnation of a generation for not using pencils, when pencils are falling out of use seems to be throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

    46. Re: Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you've never used Cherry mx Blues.

    47. Re:Coming biological mutation? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      I have dealt with people like that in the Army. Grip strong enough to crush a rock. As they go up in rank, they are assigned different work. Now, have them try writing. They don't have the endurance to do the fine work. Different kind of strength.

    48. Re:Coming biological mutation? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem after I learned drafting in high school. This was before it was computerized. The writing was very precise block lettering. Ruined my handwriting. I started writing the same way as drafting, only really fast. Looks awful.

    49. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There are lots of other things you need fine finger muscles for. Using tools for example. That's a big thing that separates humans from apes for example. I don't foresee a date soon where we just tap the ipad and have it screw on a bolt or hammer a nail.

    50. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I can type very fast, I was like that in the 80s zipping away on the computer keyboard. But I also use a pen to take notes. My handwriting isn't as good as it used to be but I am most definitely still writing. I'm writing on paper, on whiteboards, on postit notes, etc. It's easier and faster in a meeting to jot down notes with pen and paper than on a tablet, and it's less disruptive than typing on a laptop.

    51. Re: Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that's why people became controls engineers...

    52. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I learned typing on a manual typewriter. That really built up the strength, but also muscle memory. You really learn to type if you have to press every key with firmly with confidence.

    53. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who is a occupational therapist who specializes in hand function (i.e. rehab after a hand injury or surgery). He has told me several years ago average hand strength has declined significantly in the younger, "millennial" generation and it's very well-documented. So it's no surprise to me that the same trend is continuing down the generations. It's due to the greater use of all technology in our lives (not just just phones and tablets) and reduced importance/need for manual work/play in general. I am not a millennials basher or one to opine about good old days, but this is a change between generations that is demonstrably true.

    54. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Bengie · · Score: 1

      I find typing too structured to take good notes. And I can't draw very well on a smooth surface, I need some resistance, like that of paper and a felt-tipped pen.

    55. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I have terrible hand-writing and therefore took an after school typing class in 9th grade, back in the late '70s.

      I took typing class during summer school in the mid 1980s but to make up for my terrible handwriting, I printed.

    56. Re:Coming biological mutation? by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      Grade A AC post. You start with a baffling lack of understanding for how "biological change" works, and then go on to completely miss the point of strength and dexterity in your hands.

      We may not be using pens or pencils to any large extent today, but perhaps we still play sports? Anything where hands and a ball are both used greatly benefits from strength and dexterity in the fingers. What about music? I reckon both pianos and guitars are easier to play if you have dexterous hands. How about typing, cooking, sewing, massaging, carpentry, painting, sex, engineering of several kinds, playing games on a console, or even just fidgeting when you're bored?

      Building strong and flexible hands opens up a plethora of doors for us, both in the personal and professional spheres. If we lose that, society will be poorer for it. And if you want to develop your hands, the best time to do it is in the early years when your brain is still malleable.

    57. Re:Coming biological mutation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Slashdot somehow decided to eat my initial response.

      You can do the same with notes. It's called using a register. The tabby stuff you can put in binders, you know. You can buy notebooks with tabs precut or you can create them yourself if you know how to use a pair of scissors. Admittedly that only works the large categories stuff, but then there is this thing called "index" where you can create a note for where your note concerning a certain topic are. If you want to you could put one at the end of each "chapter"/meeting, if you number your pages and put index numbers in your text.

      I'm not saying written notes are always the most optimal, but many of your issues actually are solved problems, since people had the same problems in the BC era (BC being "before computers"). It's just that we've forgotten how.

      Finally I'd like to add another benefit to taking written notes, and that is that you're a lot more present and free to participate in a meeting if you're writing on paper compared to if you're trying to make notes on a computer. And you're less clickety-clacking disruptive to other participants. The downside is that you have to invest a bit more work in post-processing.

    58. Re:Coming biological mutation? by PaulMacGuysScott · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know they will be telling us people who own cars have a hard time holding buggy whips.

    59. Re:Coming biological mutation? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      How does that muscle memory help when you switch to a different keyboard layout? I switch, several times a day, between EN_UK, RU_RU, PO_PO and DE_DE. Sometimes several times per document.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Seriously? by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is the biggest load of BS. Hand / Eye Coordination and muscular definition have been shown in COUNTLESS studies to IMPROVE DRAMATICALLY after a good amount of video game playing. Pretty much the opposite of this "Study" I grew up with a gameboy in my hand, and have better reflexes and coordination at 40, than most of the people half my age. And can STILL game better than 75% of them, type 120wpm, and... Wait for it.... USE A FREAKIN PENCIL! :-D

    1. Re:Seriously? by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who says these kids are playing games? They are most likely watching youtube videos or similar. Even if they are playing games, on an iPad or smartphone the game is going to involve tapping or dragging, not using buttons and a directional pad like a Gameboy.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can STILL game better than 75% of them

      You're delusional, or you don't play any multiplayer. At 40 your reflexes are shit compared to a teen / early 20 year old.

    3. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Using a game controller is completely different from using a touchscreen smart phone/tablet. That's what kids do today. The only thing they use their hands for are swiping from one YouTube video to the next.

      Decades from now YouTube will be blamed for all of this. I mean hell, they're shifting their whole damn business model to cater to kids and push everyone else off. Gotta get that money and kids are easily addicted targets.

    4. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Hand / Eye Coordination "

      Are we all going to become brain surgeons? So what's the point? Can you explain why " Hand / Eye Coordination " would be an important metric?

      "muscular definition "

      Yes, those Mr Universe contests when they flex their fingers always get me hard.

      Do you realize how absurd you sound?

    5. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So why do you type and argue like a 12 year old?

    6. Re:Seriously? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At 40, like me, you would have learned to use a pencil first. We had Atari, we had Nintendo, we had C64, but they weren't quite as prevalent as smart-phones and iPads, which are what my kids grow up on.

      My kids have definitely had issue with pencils and scissors in their early years. Of course, they got over it. These tests are designed to identify developmental disorders, and one failing one test in a series does not a developmental disorder make.

      But, not shown are that kids are learning their letters and learning to read at a younger age. While my kids struggled a bit with using pencils, they both went in to pre-school, at 3 years of age knowing their alphabet and knowing how to read. My son in particular went in to kindergarten reading at a 7th grade level, he learned all of it from his iPad and learning to read to play games that he saw me playing.

      So while kindergarten teachers may need to spend more time with pencils and scissors and developing hand strength, they will not need to spend as much time teaching the alphabet and reading, both of which are pretty much 90% of the kindergarten curriculum.

    7. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're getting the wrong take-away from the article.

      Kids don't have the hand dexterity to hold a pencil, this also translates to not having the hand dexterity to drive or operate power tools later in life.

      The solution is simple enough though, stop giving them these fucking touch-screens. Get some old-school games like the SNES Mini Classic, let them play your PS3/4/5 every so often.

      What really causes the problem with hand dexterity is that children have no use for pencils and pens anymore. Everything is typed out. I've been using computers since I was like 8, and playing console games since I was like 10. My hand writing has always been terrible. ALWAYS. It's not the games. What actually influences the ability to hold a pencil with any dexterity at all is having teachers actually show you how to hold it.

      I can do very neat, tidy, legible printing and writing when I want to, but I can't do it at a speed that would be acceptable for a high school essay question.

    8. Re:Seriously? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      You can still put most of us 40+ against teens and we'll still win - if the controls are keyboard+mouse.

      But me? I can't use these stupid tiny-ass analog thumbsticks. They're so bad that games need to have aim-assist built-in.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    9. Re:Seriously? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      The other 10% being "do not eat glue".

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    10. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the story isn't about kids' hand/eye coordination, it's about their ability to manipulate a pencil. Today's kids, not adults who were kids 30+ years ago.

    11. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen the roster of any professional eSports team? Not a lot of 40 year olds...

    12. Re:Seriously? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of players are not professional eSports players.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    13. Re:Seriously? by fazig · · Score: 1

      Do you have any evidence for that? I mean for the 40+ against teens.
      I don't doubt that you don't do that well with thumbsticks as I've got my problems with them either (34). I do well with full sized joysticks, even when using one in each hand, which is what it takes when you play modern space sims with 6DoF flight. But I also play a bit of RTS and FPS games and know from experience that there's a high number of young players that do pretty well. It's especially true for those games that mostly favour twitch gameplay and are less focused on tactical thinking and or teamwork.

      Where things could become problematic for teens is when they're mostly used to touchsceen input and sitting comfortable on a sofa or couch. They may not do very well with KB+M or full sized joysticks until they develop their motor memory for those devices.

    14. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are talking about 2 different things here.

    15. Re:Seriously? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Kids don't have the hand dexterity to hold a pencil, this also translates to not having the hand dexterity to drive or operate power tools later in life.

      To say nothing of hand tools like tweezers, chisels and knives, which are incredibly useful, but require precision and control.

    16. Re:Seriously? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      I would say, having experience in the matter, "bathroom activities".

    17. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like your kids are abnormal ... they have parents who parent. Your children's experience is, sadly, irrelevant.

    18. Re:Seriously? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      COUNTLESS studies to IMPROVE DRAMATICALLY after a good amount of video game playing.

      Indeed they have. All of these countless studies involved games that actually had hand eye co-ordination and fine motor skills, i.e. using a mouse / keyboard or a game controller.

      Have you seen a child play on an iPad? They just smack the screen with their hand and get rewarded, that is assuming they are playing games at all. There is a big difference between playing with an iPad and working your way through an FPS game on an Xbox.

    19. Re:Seriously? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      children have no use for pencils and pens anymore. Everything is typed out.

      I don't even think this is remotely true. My first-grader does all her assignments in pencil. Also, both my kids have been enthusiastic about coloring since they could hold a crayon, at age 15. No, kidding, from age 1. Our modern world also has all kinds of things I couldn't get as a kid, like books with a coating of dark/flaky stuff that you scratch off with a wooden stylus (kind of like the lottery ticket gray stuff) to reveal pictures or make your own designs. Let me tell you, kids will go town on that stuff. Like, ignore instructions saying you could be making lines and patterns, and instead just scrape off every square centimeter of it.

      There's also: using silverware to feed themselves, learning how to tie shoes, getting themselves dressed, working with kid versions of tools (mine have toy screwdrivers and hammers, at least), and even things like doing puzzles, which doesn't take much strength, but definitely requires precision. All of this is normal kid activity, as far as I'm concerned.

    20. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I played a lot of PSP games and becoming really skillfull with the analog stick is something that made my girfriend more than happy ;-)

    21. Re:Seriously? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Children grow up differently. There's the parental aspect, and then there's just DNA. My son, while smart and picking up knowledge and thinking abstractly, really doesn't do well sitting down to learn unless it captures his attention. He's extremely active (as any boy would be), but loves sports more than anything. I'm thinking he might actually be ADHD, but so long as his grades don't suffer, i'm going to chalk this up to him being a normal human being (damn the labels of conformity). It's quite a setback from me having an INTJ personality; being more introverted and all that. He's the exact opposite. He's far more extroverted than I was at that age. I'd say he's more extroverted even in my adult age now.

      My overall point is simply that people are dynamic, as is their development. As parents, our jobs is to guide and assist with any deficiencies children grow up with so they can cope and adapt. For anything else, just accept them for who they are, not what you want them to be. A child is his/her own person. They're not machines you can program and expect a perfect result.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    22. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the same reason you troll like a little girl?

    23. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my gosh, aren't your kids just sooooo special and smart and better than all the other kids and talented and special and wonderful and really just gosh darn special and we know it's all because their parents are special, too!

      Where is Mr. Rogers when you need him at such a precious and special moment like this?

      God damnit, even Captain Kangaroo is dead. Now we just have these useless youtube morons instead.

    24. Re:Seriously? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Are we all going to become brain surgeons? So what's the point? Can you explain why " Hand / Eye Coordination " would be an important metric?

      - You stepped on a splinter. Are you going to use a sharp knife and pincers to remove it without breaking it, or are you going to sit down, cry and wait for an ambulance?
      - A wire came lose in your expensive keyboard, amplifier, headphones, vaporizer, guitar or whatever. Are you going to spend a minute with a soldering iron fixing it, or spend hours looking for somewhere that can repair it, or toss it and buy new?
      - Your child comes crying with a broken toy and asks if you can fix it.
      - You received a hand written invitation in the mail, marked RSVP.

      There are so many different scenarios where hand coordination is important that you're bound to encounter them regularly. I don't expect my dog to be able to do detail work, but are you a dog?

    25. Re:Seriously? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      hand tools like tweezers, chisels and knives

      They have probably never seen any of those things, due to the health and safety risk.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    26. Re:Seriously? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, we tend to have real jobs.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    27. Re:Seriously? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      As you have already correctly identified, twitch-based games put us old folks at a disadvantage. But the more tactical and psychological a game gets, the more we manage to complete or out-compete younger players. We tend to excel at games where stealth and planning along with "playing the players" is the road to winning.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree and so do many of my peers.

    29. Re:Seriously? by suutar · · Score: 1

      paintbrushes. Watercolors are still a thing, right?

    30. Re:Seriously? by zifn4b · · Score: 2

      At 40, like me, you would have learned to use a pencil first. We had Atari, we had Nintendo, we had C64, but they weren't quite as prevalent as smart-phones and iPads, which are what my kids grow up on.

      My kids have definitely had issue with pencils and scissors in their early years. Of course, they got over it. These tests are designed to identify developmental disorders, and one failing one test in a series does not a developmental disorder make.

      We also played with legos and erector sets.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    31. Re:Seriously? by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Ya, but you grew up with video games where you had real buttons so you could use them without having to watch your hands.

      Now days the touch screen has the controls on the display and you always have to keep checking your positioning to make sure you are hitting the right thing.

    32. Re:Seriously? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      hand coordination can be learned a myriad of better ways without holding a thin rod with a few fingers (which is provably harmful). what a stupid notion this article is trying to reinforce

    33. Re:Seriously? by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Have you seen what passes for art these days?

    34. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A wire came lose in your expensive keyboard

      Argh!

      I've seen tons of poor spellers use "loose" (not tight or secure) when they should use "lose" (opposite of win), but this is one of the very few I've seen that was wrong the other way. Way to go! /grammar nazi

    35. Re:Seriously? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Argh!

      I've seen tons of poor spellers use "loose" (not tight or secure) when they should use "lose" (opposite of win), but this is one of the very few I've seen that was wrong the other way.

      It would never have happened had I written with a pen...

    36. Re:Seriously? by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Using a game controller is completely different from using a touchscreen smart phone/tablet. That's what kids do today. The only thing they use their hands for are swiping from one YouTube video to the next.

      Decades from now YouTube will be blamed for all of this. I mean hell, they're shifting their whole damn business model to cater to kids and push everyone else off. Gotta get that money and kids are easily addicted targets.

      I'd just like to point out we've officially reached the point where Millennials are looking down their noses at "kids these days" for being too lazy and not playing video games like they did as kids.

      Congrats, and welcome to old.

  3. wish by NikeHerc · · Score: 2

    I wish I could say this tech-addicted story surprised me.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  4. Problems ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're not developing the underlying foundation skills they need to grip and hold a pencil.

    Those boys are going to have a bigger problem when they hit puberty.

  5. Science fiction had a hidden truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All those shows where people used thumb prints to sign things was an unexpected pointer to the problem of tech in schools. Apparently most of them couldn't hold a pencil/pen to the real world.

  6. Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by Vermonter · · Score: 5, Funny

    As the newfangled quill became more popular, we began to see more and more children lack the hand strength to use a hammer and chisel. Sadly, we have yet to recover from such a blow to society. Once again technology has degraded our quality of life.

    1. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by fermion · · Score: 1
      I have seen teaching objectives include phrases like "learn to add numbers with and without technology." Does that mean with a pencil and in their heads?

      To too many people, technology is simply something they do not understand. They are afraid of it, afraid that it will make them obsolete, and desperate to show how bad it is.

      With me, I have never been able to use a pencil, and I did not touch "technology" until middle school.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by geekmux · · Score: 2

      As the newfangled quill became more popular, we began to see more and more children lack the hand strength to use a hammer and chisel. Sadly, we have yet to recover from such a blow to society. Once again technology has degraded our quality of life.

      Kids today still don't know how to use a fucking hammer, which is ironically STILL a very useful tool 4,000 years later. That has nothing to do with the adaption of the quill, and has everything to do with the real issue, which is sheltering the living shit out of children and letting them grow up in a fucking fantasyland that doesn't even come close to resembling real life.

      It's pretty sad to think that an EMP bomb would be just as deadly as any nuclear bomb to this generation.

    3. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that swyping is a thing this means that proper typing skills have become lackluster and no longer do these youngins know how to use a keyboard without looking at the keys. I can type at a reasonable speed but these whippersnappers are unable to type at any acceptable speed. People who cannot type at least 50wpm should not be allowed near a computer.

      Technology has destroyed the keyboard.

    4. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      As someone with arthritis that makes his handwriting bad and painful to do, I can confirm that it's not much of a hindrance these days. The only major issue is reproducing my signature.

      Of more interest would be the effect of touch screen use on children's ability to type.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      EMP = indirect death from societal breakdown of civility.

      Blast = direct death from physical damage.

      FUBAR either way.

      Thinking being at the epicenter might be best so as to make it quick and painless

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Technology isn't really to blame for lack of hammer skills. it is the rise of the economy, bartering and capitalism. this led to job specialization, a Baker spends all his time baking, a hammer isn't much use to him in his job. if he needs a new shelf built he bakes some bread then barters it or sells it and hires a carpenter, that is skilled in using a hammer and would do a much better job than the baker could. meanwhile the carpenter might be able to build a kitchen, but that doesn't mean he is able to bake.

    7. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty sad to think that an EMP bomb would be just as deadly as any nuclear bomb to this generation.

      You can remove the tinfoil hat.

      EMP bombs isn't a credible device.
      If you want to generate a pulse strong enough to knock out something more than unshielded electronics from further than a couple of feet away your best bet is a nuclear device that will still cause a lot more thermal damage than electronic.
      Traditional bombs targeted specifically at sensitive targets would be a lot easier and more likely to succeed than some sort of EMP-only device.

      Regardless off method the damage will be reduced with the square of the distance and regular shielding applies so you know, a pulse strong enough to melt steel beams aren't going to have impact on the next block.

    8. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Saved me from saying much the same thing.

      It should also be noted that kids today can't handle a carriage pulled by even a single horse, much less a proper team. And most of them couldn't harvest wheat with a sickle to save their lives....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    9. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Technology isn't really to blame for lack of hammer skills. it is the rise of the economy, bartering and capitalism. this led to job specialization, a Baker spends all his time baking, a hammer isn't much use to him in his job. if he needs a new shelf built he bakes some bread then barters it or sells it and hires a carpenter, that is skilled in using a hammer and would do a much better job than the baker could. meanwhile the carpenter might be able to build a kitchen, but that doesn't mean he is able to bake.

      Basic baking or carpentry skills are not exactly reserved for licensed specialists. Both hold value in normal everyday life, and can save you a lot of money.

      I know that the default excuse to growing up in life and having essentially no knowledge is "teh interwebs", but there is some value in not having to call up Mommy or download a 7-step instructables guide in order to learn how to boil water. I guess the concept of being self-sufficient is rapidly becoming extinct.

    10. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saving *a lot* of money is relative to the value of a more important commodity: Time. I never learned how to change my spark plugs or oil. or to replace the cabinets in my kitchen. But I make FAR more per hour it takes a mechanic or carpenter to do it during that same period, not even including the time to actually LEARN the skill, much less perform it. It's not an issue of "self-sufficiency", it's an issue of time efficiency, and this shit doesn't even fucking register. Conversely, there are things I do in my own time, at loss of efficiency return, because I actually enjoy it. For example, I don't take broken laptops and computers into the shop to get repaired, I do it because I don't mind it, and it's a nice distraction. Sure, it "saves" me money, but not when accounting for time invested.

    11. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey now, Hey now..
      Don't dream it's over

    12. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the newfangled quill became more popular, we began to see more and more children lack the hand strength to use a hammer and chisel. Sadly, we have yet to recover from such a blow to society. Once again technology has degraded our quality of life.

      It IS a problem.

      Trading in the hammer and chisel for a quill pen didn't result in a sheltered twerp who didn't know how the world really worked.

      Waaay too many today can be and actually are so sheltered and so far removed from the real world that their naiveté would be totes adorbs if it wasn't so damn destructive.

      For example: "I hate fracking and oil drilling! Stop it ALL now!" - First you quit demanding oil and give up your energy-intensive lifestyle first? Put down that electricity-using smartphone, get off that energy-sucking computer, trash that amperage-black-hole stereo system, give up that video game, turn off that video stream. Get rid of all your plastic and all your synthetic clothing. Quit driving to the mall. Put down those prepackaged snack foods. Give up the energy-sucking beef.

      Naaah, you'd rather be an oblivious hypocrite, right? With a lifestyle totally at odds with what you feel is right.

      Like the protesters who yell to stop killing cattle, instead, get your meat from the supermarket, where no animals are harmed.

      Yes, some people really ARE this clueless. I have met a few, and they scare me.

    13. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Saving *a lot* of money is relative to the value of a more important commodity: Time. I never learned how to change my spark plugs or oil. or to replace the cabinets in my kitchen. But I make FAR more per hour it takes a mechanic or carpenter to do it during that same period, not even including the time to actually LEARN the skill, much less perform it. It's not an issue of "self-sufficiency", it's an issue of time efficiency, and this shit doesn't even fucking register. Conversely, there are things I do in my own time, at loss of efficiency return, because I actually enjoy it. For example, I don't take broken laptops and computers into the shop to get repaired, I do it because I don't mind it, and it's a nice distraction. Sure, it "saves" me money, but not when accounting for time invested.

      Did you ever consider that changing spark plugs or oil, or even DIYing a kitchen is a nice distraction for others, in the same way that I no longer piss away precious time fucking around with broken laptops and computers?

      To each their own. We all recognize time as the precious commodity, especially as we get older. But each of us define distractions in different ways. As a salaried employee,I feel I get paid 24/7 anyway, and distractions are often a good thing to stave off being burned out from overwork. The money saved is just a bonus.

    14. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold on there, Sparky. The reason I followed up with the "distraction" in original reply is to highlight the very point you made. I don't need to concede a point I've already prior. My point is that the inability to do these things isn't some horrible event. As things change, we're leaving an era where folks needed to have this broad general set of skills. So, if you were originally making a fiscal argument, for more than some, it isn't a very good one - so it does NOT, in fact, "hold value in everyday life" as that concept is relative. If you were making an argument in favor of a hobby or something that's of general interest, fantastic, but that's a bit out of the context of the original comment is all.

    15. Re:Yeah this was a problem 4000 years ago, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      math and language are both technology

  7. There's a long-standing solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Montessori methods. Especially the physical manifestation of the foundations of arithmetic: the beads, etc.

  8. Wait until they hit puberty by kilodelta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then they'll develop the dexterity they need.

    1. Re:Wait until they hit puberty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they'll develop the dexterity they need.

      Comments like this are why I keep coming and coming back to Slashdot.

    2. Re:Wait until they hit puberty by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hopefully in the correct hand, you never know...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Wait until they hit puberty by Subm · · Score: 1

      It won't solve the problem. The pencils will slip from their hands.

    4. Re:Wait until they hit puberty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teach them to put away your dirty magazines, and that, right there, is your perfected home schooled kid, with the dexterity and all.

    5. Re:Wait until they hit puberty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dont tell your right hand, baby, what your left hand do"

      -beck hanson, but matthew meant something different

    6. Re:Wait until they hit puberty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did that but I could only write with a Sharpie Magnum.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsOPOc-gHzk

  9. Need more practice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing in the end they just need more practice. It does make me wonder if well before they would ever use a pencil children already have a little bit of practice in because they watch their parents writing things out, and they mimic that as best as they can. I have an 11 month old daughter and I've noticed that she presses buttons on her toy with her thumb, I'm thinking that she's watching my my wife and I interact with our smart phones.
     
    Then again, I wonder how much coloring kids are doing these days.

  10. In other news by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pencils are going the way of the Dodo. Not saying that is good (I don't actually think it is, there are a lot of other instruments that are basically similar to hold like a pencil), but that seems to be what is happening.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ayup - on the odd occasion that I have to sign my name on some official document, I have to practise it, since I almost never write anymore. This coming from an old fart who used to have a crooked first finger due to clutching pens and pencils in school. Now that I took a look at it - the finger straightened out and isn't crooked anymore.

    2. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Pencils are going the way of the Dodo. Not saying that is good (I don't actually think it is, there are a lot of other instruments that are basically similar to hold like a pencil), but that seems to be what is happening.

      I still know of many people who attend daily meetings with pen (or pencil) and paper, because trying to converse with someone face to face in a meeting is kind of difficult when everyone has a laptop propped up in front of their face, which also makes me wonder if the person is actually taking notes or fucking off surfing the web during a meeting.

      And ironically enough, it now may be more secure to write a letter to someone than to send them any form of electronic transmission these days.

      We'll get rid of pencils just as soon as that whole paperless office gets adapted everywhere. I hear that's on the schedule right after the masses adopt IPv6...

    3. Re:In other news by Zobeid · · Score: 1

      It's not just about handwriting. If they don't have the strength and coordination to hold a pencil properly, how are they going to handle a soldering iron?!

    4. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people used to say it was unnecessary to teach writing ("cursive") because kids could either block-print words if necessary or type. (those 52 letters, which look a lot like the other 52 letters we use, were such a burden to teach -- even though Chinese and Japanese kids learn thousands of their own characters as well as those 104.)

      now we have dumbasses saying basically "what is handwriting needed for?"

      other than being the foundation of human civilization, right?

      we'll always have some gizmo to type on. never in someone's life will he or she need to handwrite anything.

    5. Re:In other news by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      If I didn't use a drawing tablet every other day I think I might use a pen/pencil maybe four times a year??

      When you use a stylus of any kind a lot you build up your hand as well as just learn to write and draw some things almost as a reflex. When diagramming on whiteboards or making scratch notes coworkers almost always comment on how neat and orderly it is - but like I say most people don't wrap their hands around any kind of writing utensil for months so I chalk it up to experience.

      I guess they've phased out cursive writing in schools (I don't know, getting this second hand), I can't say I'm surprised if that's true.

      Does anyone use cursive anymore?

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    6. Re:In other news by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Well, I do that too. Sure, it is not a "pencil", but one black and one red high-quality ink-roller, but it works on the same principle. I find that making notes on paper not only works much better in a meeting, I do remember more of the meeting and have better prioritization, even if I never look at the notes again. And you can make drawings and diagrams much more easily and precisely.

      So I fully agree with you. I do not think the paperless office is going to happen though. (Not sure about IPv6 on mass-scale.) What is going to happen is that we will have a high-literacy class of people, i.e. people that can use paper to take notes competently and a low-literacy class were they can only use electronic gadgets. In the more distant future, with reliable voice-recognition, we may also get a large class in the west that needs a voice interface as they are basically illiterate. The thing that is going to change is that the second and third class basically can do everything an ordinary citizen needs. But forget about them getting into some jobs, like science or engineering.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:In other news by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I say "cursive" is sadistic torture and has no actual use today unless you are an art student. I dropped it in the first week of university, because it just did not work for note-taking at all and was damaging my hand at the speeds required and I have never looked back. Same for the today horribly broken idea of a fountain-pen. I just regret that I did not ritually destroy this torture implement, but fortunately we were allowed to use modern tools (ink-roller for me) several years before finishing school. However, being able to bring notes and text and also drawings to paper is something else. That is a cornerstone of civilization and will remain so for quite some time.

      Cursive basically evolved from writing implements that made it hard to remove the pen from the paper often (classical ink-quill) and also in a time when paper was very expensive and you spend time on writing to make it work and to make it beautiful in a way adequate to the worth of the paper. That time is past and cursive has no place anymore as a tool. It has a place as an art-form, but that is it.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird, if I stop between every letter to remove the pen from the page, move it, and replace it I write slower and it makes my hands ache from how awkward it feels. I don't have pretty handwriting but cursive means it's very fast. I wouldn't use a fountain pen for writing fast though - I'd use a biro or I'd damage the nib. It'd only be slow if I was trying to make it look at nice as possible, which I wouldn't do for note taking.

      It sounds more like you mean calligraphy than cursive.

    9. Re:In other news by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I mean cursive. And being a bit more advanced on my way, correcting student exams (regarding readability) is worst when they are using cursive.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:In other news by Huge_UID · · Score: 1

      Reading immediately after the "Wait until they hit puberty" comment, I read this as "Pencils are going the way of the Dildo."

    11. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading immediately after the "Wait until they hit puberty" comment, I read this as "Pencils are going the way of the Dildo."

      A pencil would be a really small dildo.

      Just saying ...

  11. haptics by Tom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It might be just because I'm a very kinaesthetic person, but this is something I find in general computer tech has failed to grasp: How important it is to hold something, to touch something, to feel something touching you.

    Among other things, this is the primary reason most keyboards on the market suck, and why VR still hasn't taken off. We techies tend to believe too much that 80% of the human perception is visual, and that is just plain out wrong. The largest sensory organ in your body is your skin.

    Computers make great toys for kids, they allow so much creativity and agency, and there are so many skills you can develop with them. But kids should also play with sticks, with Legos, with tools, with wood and metal and stone.

    And, frankly speaking, if you don't give your child real, physical books to read, IMHO you should be locked up for child abuse.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:haptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More to the point, most computer experiences are exclusively visual.

      Have you ever played a game that you only use your ears? I can't think of one. This is why so many games, while having great music tracks, have otherwise no use of stereo or surround. All center channel.

      Haptic feedback is important for typing, and when I started doing stuff on the ipad I found it disturbing to not have a touch or audible feedback (yes I know you can turn it on, but the "tick-tick-tick" of the same sound is not the same as how different keys on a keyboard make different sounds depending on their travel distance and size of the key.

      But more than that, most games don't really make use of haptic feedback either. They shake/vibrate when the screen shakes/vibrates, and some games go a little further and vibrate every time you bump into things, but that makes little sense coming from a 2D stance. There is so much latency between the controller vibration and the input/visual's and the audio that sometimes it feels like we need to go back to 1994 and re-learn all those lessons between the SNES and the PSX.

    2. Re:haptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legos

      You didn't put an apostrophe in so you're only stupid, not retarded.

    3. Re:haptics by Zobeid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Have you noticed the resurgent interest in mechanical keyboards recently? I see this (at least partly) as a reaction against the aesthetic that Steve Jobs pushed so hard, and which so many companies then copied. Jobs never saw a device (including a keyboard) that was thin enough or flat enough to please him. It's not natural, though, for human beings to poke at flat surfaces. We're adapted to manipulating objects in three dimensions.

    4. Re:haptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How important it is to hold something, to touch something, to feel something touching you."

      Agreed... that's why I spend so much time with your mom.

    5. Re:haptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be just because I'm a very kinaesthetic person, but this is something I find in general computer tech has failed to grasp: How important it is to hold something, to touch something, to feel something touching you.

      Pervert.

    6. Re:haptics by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      You make some good points, but then you throw in this rape-cage culture bit:

      And, frankly speaking, if you don't give your child real, physical books to read, IMHO you should be locked up for child abuse.

      which needs to be called out. If you meant it literally, which I'm not assuming, then that's a separate issue.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:haptics by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      Have you noticed the resurgent interest in mechanical keyboards recently? I see this (at least partly) as a reaction against the aesthetic that Steve Jobs pushed so hard, and which so many companies then copied. Jobs never saw a device (including a keyboard) that was thin enough or flat enough to please him. It's not natural, though, for human beings to poke at flat surfaces. We're adapted to manipulating objects in three dimensions.

      That's a bit hyperbolic - thin keyboards are thin, but certainly not flat. And while YMMV, I personally find them easier and faster to use, due to the very short key travel distance. My fingers can fly over the keys, barely grazing them, hardly needing to push at all to type; on a "regular" keyboard, I have to lift my fingers pretty high after pressing each key to clear the surrounding ones.

    8. Re:haptics by Tunefix · · Score: 1

      on a "regular" keyboard, I have to lift my fingers pretty high after pressing each key to clear the surrounding ones.

      Then you are probably typing too "hard". On most mechanical keyboards, you don't have to push the button all the way to the bottom to register a press. Some variants have keys with a little "bump" much further up to let you know when you have pushed far enough. And with some training, you will learn where this "bump" is, and use smaller key-presses.

    9. Re:haptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thin keyboards are thin, but certainly not flat.

      The tops of the keys on Apple keyboards are entirely flat, which is really annoying. The curve is how you tell if you are moving off center as you type. Making if flat is as stupid as those glossy screens. It is putting style (aka being different) over function.

    10. Re:haptics by Solandri · · Score: 1
      I actually preferred the rubber dome keyboards when they began replacing the mechanical keyboards. I didn't like the sharp clicky response of the mechanical keyboards, and liked the softer feel of the dome keyboards. I like short-travel laptop keyboards for the reasons you outline. But I ran some speed tests versus a Thinkpad keyboard, and was surprised to find I can type faster on the Thinkpad keyboards. And I found that when typing for an extended period of time it was actually more comfortable. The increased feedback you get from the clicky-ness I dislike seems to help with certainty when touch typing, allowing me to type more quickly without worrying as much about whether I hit that key enough.

      That's a bit hyperbolic - thin keyboards are thin, but certainly not flat.

      The keys are in fact perfectly flat. Compare against the slightly cupped keys on a desktop keyboard and on the Thinkpad keyboards. I didn't realize how much the cupped design helped until I moved back to a keyboard with the cupping. I now consider chiclet keys to be the greatest step backwards in the modern history of keyboard design. And while Apple didn't invent it, they are responsible for making it popular.

    11. Re:haptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, frankly speaking, if you don't give your child real, physical books to read, IMHO you should be locked up for child abuse.

      You were doing so well until the last sentence. Before the end I viewed you as a rational person with an interesting point of view.

      After the last sentence I realized a broken clock is correct twice a day and I was giving you far too much credit.

    12. Re:haptics by Aviation+Pete · · Score: 1
      Couldn't agree more, except for one thing: Playing with Legos will prevent the fine haptics for feeling surfaces from developing. Always touching only polished ABS surfaces will stunt the sensory development of the child's fingertips, so as a grown-up it will have trouble with sensing a surface's texture.

      Best to let it play with wood, raw and unpolished, or cloth, stones, whatever has a texture to feel and experience.

      --
      You know it's time for the next revolution when your rulers' names end with roman numerals.
    13. Re:haptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I prefer the Apple keyboards. I wanted a wireless one with a numberpad and found one that was close, but didn't feel nearly as good and I switched back to the wired one.

      So all I ask is for a numberpad on the wireless keyboard - which they finally decided to offer only recently.

    14. Re:haptics by Joopsy · · Score: 1

      No use for stereo.... I am fairly sure I have played numerous games that game me positional awareness through the sound.
      (Yesterday in Rocket League I heard someone coming from a specific side so I nudged a ball up, in numerous first person shooters I have had awareness of someones location through the ears).
      (I will concede I could be imagining this)

      Also, VR games massively use stereo. (and Binaural, which I just learned is super stereo)
      https://www.vrheads.com/what-a...

    15. Re:haptics by Joopsy · · Score: 1

      Have you played VR....? Having seen my friends and families reaction to it, I think most people find it pretty damn immersive.

      I have been a gamer for maybe 30 years, and there's things I have experienced in VR games that are entirely unlike anything else.
      (also, I have *never* seen people to be so impressed with a technology on first exposure).

      Although a couple of people have gotten motion sick. (1 minor, 1 quite sudden and quite extreme)

    16. Re:haptics by fponias · · Score: 1

      what? my spring-loaded keyboard from the 80s in in vogue again? Sweet. *tries to plug in the serial connector to macbook's usb-c socket* why won't it go in? Goes out to buy the official apple converter (well 3 converters actually) for $80 retail. Plugs in the keyboard and shouts at the sky because assorted keys have stopped working from being in storage for 30 years, the macbook doesn't know what to do with all those F keys, and there's no way to hit the Command button. For sale: retro mechanical keyboard.

    17. Re:haptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find the opposite to be true for me. With a keyboard with keys that travel far, but not needing to go all the way down to the bottom to register the keypress, I type faster and with less stress on my fingers than with a keyboard where I "bottom out" with each keypress.

      Right now I am typing this with an Apple A1048 keyboard, but on my PC I have a mechanical keyboard with Cherry MX brown switches that are a joy to type on.

      Still, if you cannot use a pencil, you probably have a hard time using other kinds of tools and utensils. Just giving the kid a tablet and teach them to point at things and grant them the high reward feedback cycle might prevent them from developing motor skills. I for one am happy that I played with Lego as a kid, built things in the woodshop, picked apart mechanical stuff and made drawings of things. All of these have helped me in my adult life. Perhaps most jobs in 20+ years will be performed with a tablet. If I am lucky I have retired by then.

    18. Re:haptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Tom is a conservatard jackass who thinks he knows everything cause he rocks a 3 digit ID. He is one of the deplorables.

    19. Re:haptics by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      It might be just because I'm a very kinaesthetic person, but this is something I find in general computer tech has failed to grasp: How important it is to hold something, to touch something, to feel something touching you.

      Every time I read an article about Tesla, I wince. Only Silicon Valley could design a car that replaces every gauge and button with a single tablet display, and convince us it's the greatest advancement ever. Say what you want about writing down on a piece of paper, but operating a 2-ton machine at high velocities (or even enabling cruise control) isn't something that should be done with a glass display with no physical feedback.

      Don't even get me started about the forklifts I used to operate at my old job. The newer computerized ones with a single joystick were impossible to drive compared to the old hydraulic models with real levers and buttons.

    20. Re:haptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The primary reason VR hasn't taken off is the price.

      It is just because you are a very kinaesthetic person. Not everyone is like you.

    21. Re:haptics by Tom · · Score: 1

      Have you played VR....?

      Yes, but not for extended periods of time. The visual is definitely a dramatic difference to looking at a screen. No doubt about that. I'm waiting for the day that affordable, light VR goggles combine with 3D movie technology - that would be my constant companion on flights.

      However, I strongly notice the disconnect between a convincing visual environment and the need to manipulate it with a joystick or other device. This is probably related to the uncanny valley, but the more convincing the graphics are, the more I notice that I can't touch anything, don't feel anything when I run into walls, and don't get any body-motion feedback.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    22. Re:haptics by Tom · · Score: 1

      I don't care what you think, physical books are in every way but one (weight) superior to e-books. Don't deny a child the experience of handling an actual, physical book. If later in live you decide that e-books suit you better - fine, that can be your decision.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    23. Re:haptics by Tom · · Score: 1

      In which universe is abuse equal to rape? There are so many ways in which you can abuse a person. I have literally no idea where you pulled that association from.

      And of course I'm being hyperbolical. I don't literally mean to lock anyone up, but people who deny their children the pleasure and experience of physical books are doing them a massive disservice.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    24. Re:haptics by Tom · · Score: 1

      True that. I'm a hardcore Mac fan, but their keyboards are crap. I'm typing this on an ancient Cherry keyboard I still have from my pre-Mac times. It even has a Tux key as the Cmd key. :-)

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    25. Re:haptics by Tom · · Score: 1

      Of course, didn't mean ONLY Legos. They are great for putting things together, though. But same as computers, they should not be the only diet.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  12. What? by burtosis · · Score: 1

    I heard there was a problem with using offline styluses but the clickbait was unclear.

  13. They're fine. by RyanFenton · · Score: 2

    They'll be fine. Whenever I had to write cursive, it grated by wrist bones after a while. Like most physical adjustments for a task, you do a little damage, your body heals, and over a couple of weeks you're a halfway-capable writing machine.

    Writing isn't going away even in some far flung future - but it's understandable why kids don't want to use it constantly anymore compared with alternatives.

    That particular kind of bone pain involved with mashing those wrist bones into shapes is validly a
    thing that makes you not want to practice writing.

    But kids would still end up doing it, even if there aren't lesson plans. If there stuck somewhere and want to make a crude sign, they're not going to be unable to. They'll still write words in the sand with s a stick, and countless other interactions with language we're drawn to.

    The kids will be fine. It's the adults we should really be worried about - there's some things really wrong with them.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:They're fine. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I was a precocious child who was always done with my work first, and correctly too. A teacher in third grade who was a shit teacher (and who was only a teacher at my school for about two years) didn't like the way I disrupted the class by looking at the other children, true story. I was supposed to put my head down on my desk, another true story, and wait quietly for the other children to finish. So he started assigning me lines to write. Hundreds of them. Ever since, it causes me physical pain to write in cursive.

      Fuck you, Mr. Knudsen. You're a piece of shit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:They're fine. by hjf · · Score: 2

      until the day they want to get into electronics and realize they can't hold a soldering iron.
      oh well. who needs electronics. we'll have robots that will do that for us

    3. Re:They're fine. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      They'll be fine. Whenever I had to write cursive, it grated by wrist bones after a while.

      And now look at you, you type just bine!!

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:They're fine. by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      There's already plenty of stuff you can't really solder back together by hand... with integrated chips there are hardly any discrete components anyway, so the electronic gadget either works or doesn't. It'll be a hobby that used to be a trade like building furniture by hand or sewing clothes.

    5. Re:They're fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is still plenty of stuff that can be handworked with either an iron or hot-air reflow. It's still an important skill for debugging and development, even if the final boards are going to be mass produced with pick and place machines.

    6. Re:They're fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, looking at someone while they're trying to work IS disruptive.

    7. Re:They're fine. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      To be fair, looking at someone while they're trying to work IS disruptive.

      To be fair, his job is to teach, and if he can't imagine something else for me to do then he's a shitty teacher. I presume that's why he moved along or quit or whatever happened after such a short period. He was there just long enough to give me carpal.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:They're fine. by cyn1c77 · · Score: 2

      Writing isn't going away even in some far flung future - but it's understandable why kids don't want to use it constantly anymore compared with alternatives.

      That particular kind of bone pain involved with mashing those wrist bones into shapes is validly a
      thing that makes you not want to practice writing.

      If it hurts to write, you are actually doing it incorrectly. I only learned the proper technique as an adult for calligraphy, after I got frustrated with having had poor handwriting for my entire life. Here are some tips:
      1. Your back should be upright and straight.
      2. Your table should be adjusted to be just below your hand when your elbow is at a 90 degree angle and ideally, slightly sloped upward.
      3. Your wrist, forearm, and finger joints should not actually move at all (or as little as possible) when writing. Your shoulder, arm, chest, and back muscles should be doing all of the work.
      4. Ballpoint pens are horrible as they require you to push too hard. Rollerballs aren't much better. Use a pencil, felt tip marker, or fountain pen.
      5. You should only be writing over a very limited area (about 1/4 the length of a piece of paper) so you don't need to adjust your posture or arm angle. Move the paper as you write to keep your pencil in this area.

      They don't teach these things in school (at least not to me) and these modifications can be difficult to implement if you have a lifetime of bad writing habits, but will make a world of difference reducing your finger/wrist pain and also improving your technique. Also, writing properly actually requires you to improve your core muscles to be able to hold good posture, so it is overall beneficial.

    9. Re:They're fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCK you FOR writing YOUR own NAME.

    10. Re:They're fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you still look at people funny?

    11. Re:They're fine. by hjf · · Score: 1

      Not sure if i should call you an ignorant, or an imbecile.
      I'll go with both.

  14. This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

    Has it not occurred to anyone that you don't even start writing until you're five or six? Everyone has this same weakness in their hands at this time in life. It has nothing to do with technology, unless tablets and smartphones can travel through time and occupy our hands when we were kids.

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    1. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. Kids should be using crayons, markers, and paint brushes much younger than 5 or 6. It isn't just about pencils and writing.

    2. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Do kids seriously not draw pictures for their parents to put up under a fridge magnet anymore?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has it not occurred to anyone that you don't even start writing until you're five or six?

      And at what fucking age do they start using goddamned crayons?

      I'm sorry, but by the age of 5 or 6 you should already have learned to handle a pencil or a crayon. That shit happens at more like 3 or 4 years of age. This is pretty basic stuff for kids.

      If your child is reaching school and has never held one, you've failed as a parent, and let digital devices tend them until you can ship them off to someone else to fix your shitty parenting.

    4. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the summary states:

      "It's easier to give a child an iPad than encouraging them to do muscle-building play such as building blocks, cutting and sticking, or pulling toys and ropes."

      Reading comprehension is also apparently lacking.

    5. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      We actually did writing exercises from 3 on in kindergarden, but except for e's and l's and kinds of a's and o's it wheren really letters.

      On the other hand I really wonder what the guys publishing this expect? If kids don't draw/paint with pencils anymore, obvioulsy they have lower skills when entering school. I guess they just overemphasize the problem, if there is any, instead of simply adjusting the way how they teach.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Its literally in the summary that the kids aren't using physical toys for play as much as they used to.

    7. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, your comment is the dumbest thing I've ever read.

      Correction, the second dumbest thing.

      The first dumbest thing I ever read was the news on the morning of November 9th, 2016.

    8. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by omnichad · · Score: 1

      This is the first I've heard of kindergarten having prerequisites. They certainly weren't published anywhere.

    9. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      And on top of it all, who cares? I'm guessing soon that elementary school won't spend any time teaching students to write cursively, since it was only used to legibly write text by hand as quickly as possible. No one writes letters or books by hand anymore. There certainly won't be a need for it at some point after 2030 anyway. Why aren't they studying teenagers decreased hand/eye coordination from not playing baseball as a kid?

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    10. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Considering your signature, I think you talk about America.
      I write with my hand once a week minimum, albeit I usually write in capital letters.
      I bought a Lenovo Yoga Book last year to have a nice tablet with two wacom digitizers.
      Many of my frineds are asian. They write with a pen every day.

      Americans, sorry to say it so simple and bluntly: a country with no culture losing its remnants of culter it still has, or had, day for day, and then having the audiacy to impose that non culture on the rest of the world, and niw it is hand writing. You don't even realize what a loss that is. The craft alone ...

      When I'm in a foreign country I can write a question on a piece of paper ... as soon as people lost the art of writing they are not really 'people' anymore to me.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Not prerequesites, preparations for school.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Do kids seriously not draw pictures for their parents to put up under a fridge magnet anymore?

      They might be doing while holding the crayons wrong like a toddler or someone stiring a large pot rather than someone trying to control a pen with finger muscles.

    13. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, your comment is the dumbest thing I've ever read.

      Correction, the second dumbest thing.

      The first dumbest thing I ever read was the news on the morning of November 9th, 2016.

      Still bitter that the hag lost, huh?

      Life must really suck for you.

    14. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most children in older generations would have spent plenty of time drawing with crayons or other tools which develop their fine motor skills. The pathway from imagination through the neural system, the hand, the writing implement, and onto the paper is a pathway that must be developed. This is far easier to do when you're 3 than when you're 30, or even when you're 6.

    15. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      as soon as people lost the art of writing they are not really 'people' anymore to me

      That's IMO an excessively high bar, not to mention a bit elitist. Nonetheless, I think you are on to something.

      Historically, most people were illiterate. The invention of the printing press 500-odd years ago threatened this, thereby threatening, and indeed deposing, many of the power structures of yesteryear.

      Today, however, the ruling elites have found the perfect way to erode the power of literacy: they've invented, via public "education," a way to teach people to understand the words, but not the historical and cultural context that would give them meaning. So, today, people think they are literate, but still have no idea of the literature, art, law, or knowledge in general beyond their own, as you aptly describe, non-culture. They confuse the crap they see in the media or the classroom or the workplace with objective reality. And those who point out that it might not be, are viewed as being insane.

      I'll be done with this nonsense pretty soon. My children however will still have to deal with it. My wife and I try our best to teach them ourselves, and not just to feed them with disconnected facts, but to encourage their natural love for learning. They are aware that their dad is a cantankerous old curmudgeon who keeps telling them to git off his lawn. But that is what I thought about my own late father as well, and, as I approached my late 20s, I came to realize he was right, about a great deal of things (not everything but a lot more than I'd previously thought). His encouragement to think and to question have probably done more for me than all of the memorized facts of my schooling days combined. I hope my own children will be similarly motivated to think and learn for themselves and not just accept prepackaged "facts" and "culture" as if they were anything other than the willful and dangerous deceptions that they in fact are.

    16. Re:This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever read by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well,
      a friend of mine had an interesting father, too.
      He forbade them to read certain books in his library ...

      Guess which books they read first :D

      As they all where lazy readers, not reading much, he made them interested in the "forbidden books" ... and it worked.

      But they are still all lazy readers ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  15. Pass me the by buravirgil · · Score: 1

    Chopsticks

    --
    Would were! Should is! Could be! And live a hundred times three.
  16. Agreed by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This story seems like complete, made-up bullshit. It has:

    - Doctors and scientists making a claim that seems ridiculous on it's face
    - Focuses on children and learning for reader and interest
    - A bogeyman
    - No actual scientific study mentioned
    - An audience ready to believe

    1. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up, you're talking out your ass

    2. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see the doctor is in

    3. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Doctors and scientists making a claim that seems ridiculous on it's face"

      it's means IT IS . Is it that fucking hard to understand?

    4. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To complete the anecdote: I remember a lot of kids having trouble holding pencils when I was little. They had these triangle plastic things they'd put on the tips to force proper finger placement. It was a mark of shame.

    5. Re:Agreed by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      This story seems like complete, made-up bullshit. It has:

      - Doctors and scientists making a claim that seems ridiculous on it's face

      The part that's bullshit is: Children have less fine motor skills to grip a pencil compared to another time in history because ________. It must be, screen time! There is absolutely no logical connection between the problem and the cause.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    6. Re:Agreed by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      And:

      - Posted by BeauHD at slashdot

      The only thing missing is some gratuitous Trump bashing.

    7. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans oughtta love it!!

      How much you wanna bet "Faux-"News" will be reporting on it tonight?

    8. Re:Agreed by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      Almost every point you made could be applied right back to your own post.

      "Doctors and scientists making a claim that seems ridiculous on it's face"

      Well, you may not actually be a doctor or scientist, but which sounds more ridiculous on its face?

      A) Toddlers who play more with touch-screens have a harder time learning to write than toddlers who play more with physical things (which for most kids involve plenty of crayons and markers).

      B) That seems like complete, made-up bullshit. I can't see any way that playing with things like crayons and markers could possibly improve hand-writing skills.

      "A bogeyman"

      You calling out doctors for announcing concerns is calling out your own bogeymen. As a parent, when pediatricians spot worrying trends, I want to know about it BEFORE my kids have left the nest (which usually requires announcing it BEFORE official studies have been completed). Yes, I'm aware that doctors don't know everything, but that doesn't mean I don't want to at least hear about potential advice/concerns/trends.

      "No actual scientific study mentioned"

      You have even less evidence to back up your claims than they do. Sorry, but I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that pediatricians and the "vice-chair of the National Handwriting Association who runs a research clinic at Brunel University London" have access to just a little bit more information than either of us on this subject. Again, they don't know everything, but in this case they just have to know more than some random guy on the Internet.

      "An audience ready to believe"

      No more than your Slashdot audience. The people already letting their kids play with electronics will automatically rule it out like you did, the people already attempting to shame others for letting their kids play with electronics will feel justified, and the rest will consider it and decide what they want to do about it.

    9. Re:Agreed by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't just mention screen time, it mentions EXCESSIVE screen time, which is just as bad as EXCESSIVE anything else.

      The logical connection is crystal clear. If a child does too much of ANY activity that doesn't practice fine hand motor skills, that child is likely to have this problem. It doesn't matter what activity that is. A child could become addicted to playing soccer, and as far as hand-writing is concerned, the result would be the same.

      The only question left to answer to complete the logical connection is this: What is it in today's society that grabs kids attention the most? What activity is it that most kids will choose over almost any other? What do today's kids spend more time doing than anything else if their parents let them? (Hint: It's not soccer.)

    10. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought your fart was a page, my bad.

    11. Re:Agreed by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Your claim is pure conjecture and anecdotal. The claim that ALL declines in children's fine motor skills are EXCLUSIVELY due to screen time is nonsense and in fact if you knew how you would have to support that claim to make it irrefutable, you would realize the burden is really large. It would be much easier to make a claim that more screen time is a contributing factor and then we can all debate on how much impact that is having on the problem but you're making the claim ALL of the problem is due to screen time which is you have any higher level educational background especially in logic and statistics, you would know this is HIGHLY unlikely. But if you want to make that somewhat extraordinary claim then burden is on you to present empirical data that supports this claim.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    12. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fake news!

  17. Bad parenting ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Children are not coming into school with the hand strength and dexterity they had 10 years ago"

    If you are allowing your child to reach school age and they've only used tech ... then quite honestly, you suck as a parent.

    I see way too many kids who are just given the phone to shut them up, and I'm hearing about way too many kids who lack even basic skills you'd expect.

    If you child lack the strength and dexterity to hold a fucking pencil, you don't deserve to be a parent. Unfortunately, any moron can be a parent.

    My friend's kids all read, write, and pretty much everything well above their peers. And it's not because they're baby geniuses, it's because their parents made damned sure to actually parent and teach the fundamental stuff ... the younger kid has just read the books and played with the toys of the older kid, so he's catching up to his sister as she moves up to more advanced stuff. They've just given their kids every opportunity to learn and grow, and made sure that tech is a fairly low part of that.

    I've lost count of the number of times I've seen some mother standing in a store negotiating with a 3 year old, or just giving the child the phone to shut it up.

    Apparently this is the consequence of that.

  18. Children Struggle To Hold Pencils Due To Too Much by rickyslashdot · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a conversation with my doctor - where he dreams he is assigned to a nursing home as a physical rehab clinician. The primary rehab issue is getting the old people help and retraining to overcome the crippling arthritis of their thumbs resulting from a lifetime of thumb button pushing and swiping on their mobile phones . . .

    --
    redneck geek
  19. Easy solution to develop fine motor skills by zifn4b · · Score: 2

    Have your child play a musical instrument.

    --
    We'll make great pets
    1. Re:Easy solution to develop fine motor skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like your skin flute, perv?

    2. Re:Easy solution to develop fine motor skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, why?
      A computer can simulate any physical instrument, and then some more. Why go to the pains of *manually* producing sound?

    3. Re:Easy solution to develop fine motor skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just download the app.

    4. Re:Easy solution to develop fine motor skills by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      OMG, why? A computer can simulate any physical instrument, and then some more. Why go to the pains of *manually* producing sound?

      You can actually do both. For example, using Garage Band on an iPad you can plug a MIDI keyboard into it with the right adapter. It's remarkably easier to play a keyed instrument, for example, using actual weighted keys as opposed to a touch screen. You can do it with a touch screen but it's a lot harder and it doesn't have a way to send how hard you play the keys for natural volume purposes. For electronica, techno, trance, etc. yeah I'd say inline with the Roland 808/909, it would make more sense to do it that way. But then again, we're talking about ways to develop motor skills and using the touch screen isn't going to help you with that.

      --
      We'll make great pets
  20. Alternate headline: by ledow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Children adapt to best adjust to what they need to do."

    Handwriting is dead. The writing is on the wall. (Sorry!)

    These kids have 4 years of touchscreen and keyboard skills before they go to school now and we're teaching them to use pencils? Why? A lot of schools are issuing tablets to individual pupils from a young age and most certainly they still teach ICT skills.

    We had to be taught how to write because it's not natural and "you'll need to be able to write when you grow up."

    They need to be taught how to use a keyboard / touchscreen because it's not natural and "you'll need to be able to type when you grow up"

    For myself, I literally have had NO NEED of handwriting beyond block capitals for the entirety of my adult life. Sure, I can do it. But I don't need it. And I have a degree and still didn't need it. In fact, I would argue that my degree is in one of the few areas where touchscreens and computers are useless for transcribing information - mathematics. I can out-formula anyone using LaTeX or equivalent by hand. But that's because I was made to use my hand, rather than a computer language with a GUI for laying out maths equations.

    Rather than force these kids to hurt themselves (building up muscles like that is done by tearing and healing, tearing and healing enough that they strengthen the right areas - do you not remember wrist-pain when writing in school, because I do, yet I've never suffered from RSI even a tiny bit), to learn an outdated, obsolete and (to them) secondary skill, let them use the skills they ALREADY HAVE by the time they hit school, on a lot more relevant technology, which is much closer to what they'll require when they are older.

    Fact is, I work in prep schools* - these kids are literally entering school able to type on QWERTY and do every swipe, sweep, drag, drop, tap and hold they will need until at least adulthood. And then we sit them in the ICT suite and try to teach them "home keys" (an outdated concept once you are able to type at any speed at all, like telling a rally driver to keep his hands on the ten-to-two position). And then we sit them in the English classes and force them to write with a stick for YEARS on end until they've learned to break their hands enough to hold the stick just right so that they don't have illegible scrawl but proper joined-up writing that they will NEVER NEED TO READ in their life (how much of what you read is printed or screen typefaces only? Almost everything).

    No matter how much you disagree with abolishing handwriting, it's a stupid suggestion to forcibly train kids on an alternative older technology when they are so accustomed to the current technology that it comes natural to them anyway.

    *Private education, age 3-13. The headmaster's 3-year-old son smashed their laptop screen because he assumed it was touchscreen like EVERYTHING ELSE he's used in his life and so kept applying pressure when it didn't respond to touch. I'm not even joking. And if the live-in son of the live-in headmaster of an exclusive expensive prep school (who still do "pen licences" for handwriting, etc. and teach Latin) is already that familiar with touchscreens, you can be sure that most people have that skill.

    1. Re:Alternate headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The headmaster's 3-year-old son smashed their laptop screen because he assumed it was touchscreen like EVERYTHING ELSE he's used in his life and so kept applying pressure when it didn't respond to touch. I'm not even joking. And if the live-in son of the live-in headmaster of an exclusive expensive prep school (who still do "pen licences" for handwriting, etc. and teach Latin) is already that familiar with touchscreens, you can be sure that most people have that skill.

      The fact that the live-in son of the live-in headmaster only knew about touchscreen technology and nothing else says a hell of a lot as to the stupidity and ignorance of the parent raising a technically brilliant idiot.

      Touchscreens are a first-world interface. God forbid that sheltered moron travel anywhere...

    2. Re:Alternate headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because no one could ever be in a situation with no power? Never need to write a note?

      Hey, if we teach handwriting with a stylus, would that be acceptably digital enough?

    3. Re:Alternate headline: by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but I'm not sure the point is to preserve (archaic) handwriting. But we *do* need to preserve finger dexterity. It's useful for many things like tying your shoes.

    4. Re:Alternate headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And therein lies the problem. The privilege of being a kid who goes to a prep school and has all sorts of technology handed to him is actually quite rare. Many public school kids don't have the regular access to technology we tend to think they do. Some schools only use their computers for testing, and even if teachers wanted to use them for teaching, they can't get access to them. As someone who has been asked to teach technology classes, I've seen 13-year-old students who are as proficient as you mentioned and also many who don't even know the basics. The worst part is that they don't level classes or offer technology remediation like they would for math, so they'll probably never catch up. Many of them will grow up and still not have a firm grasp on how to do anything but basic web searching.

    5. Re:Alternate headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Handwriting is dead. The writing is on the wall. (Sorry!)

      Fine motor control is used for a lot more than just handwriting. If you apply some critical thinking skills, you could see a lifetime of impact from a failure to develop fine motor control as a child. Things like voice control everything and autonomous vehicles go from being a luxury to a necessity as people lose the ability to do things with their hands. This is a change that could reshape our entire society. The pencil is just the first warning sign, not the extent of the problem. We are removing handwriting from scool curricula without understanding the full extent of its utility in childhood development and ensuring that what is lost is covered via alternate instruction. And now we see that the problem goes even further back.

      But, just as kids are entering school without fine motor control, they are exiting it without critical thinking skills. Not to worry though, we'll have magic boxes that can take care of that for us, too.

    6. Re:Alternate headline: by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      Then it would seem that shoe-tying would be a better replacement lesson. Hell, a general knot-tying course would probably be better for kids than pencil-use.

      I've had way more times in my adult life where I just needed something to stay tight/still than when I've needed cursive.

    7. Re:Alternate headline: by CODiNE · · Score: 2

      I've strangely had a resurgence of cursive use lately thanks to taking notes on a tablet with a stylus. It's noisy and irritating in a tactile way to lift and touch down between words or letters so I've gradually switched back to long hand cursive. Others with tablets I've asked have also noticed the tendency and shared an initial period of googling how to make capital Q and Z for example. My writing is now getting better than it was in childhood when I used it more often.

      As a funny aside we're noticing many millennials are completely unable to read it at all. If vinyl albums and cassette tapes have had a small resurgence I'm sure kids will be taking handwriting classes as electives and showing off their old school writing skills. It might soon be a good time for people who have paid handwriting businesses.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    8. Re:Alternate headline: by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      The point is that children aren't getting *any* of these lessons at home. Inability to hold a writing implement was what they used as visible evidence of lack of strength/dexterity. The actual article isn't about teaching to hold a pencil. It's about the fact that there is a physical development issue that results from playing less with physical things and more with virtual things.

    9. Re:Alternate headline: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Hand writing is still useful for making quick notes. We are in an awkward time period where tablets aren't cheap enough and batteries don't last long enough for them to be adequate paper replacements, but at the same time we want everything to be digital and searchable. There are bridging technologies like Evernote and Google Keep that can OCR your scrawlings, but I'm really looking forward to having a pile of tablets and a stylus on my desk.

      Yes, a stylus. As well as being able to sketch, on-screen swipe keyboard + stylus is the next best thing to a decent physical keyboard.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Alternate headline: by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      These kids have 4 years of touchscreen and keyboard skills before they go to school now and we're teaching them to use pencils?
      Because otherwise they never really know how a character is written. They have no piccture in mind where to start and how to draw the lines.

      Btw: why should handwriting be dead? It was once considered an art. And sooner or later everyone will have to sign something. Better he is able to write his own name somewhat properly, or not?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re:Alternate headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "home keys" (an outdated concept once you are able to type at any speed at all

      WTF dude? It's not even a little bit outdated. It's fundamental to the entire concept of typing. Perhaps you're not as fast at typing as you think? No idea how to type at high speed without looking at a keyboard when your fingers aren't sitting on the home row.

    12. Re:Alternate headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck doing your math homework without pencil and paper. Computers suck for that...

    13. Re:Alternate headline: by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You never use a whiteboard at work?
      Never draw someone a diagram on a piece of paper?
      Haven't ever scribbled your name and phone number on a napkin?

      I will continue to pity any poor fucker that can't write.

    14. Re:Alternate headline: by ledow · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      I have interactive whiteboards everywhere, and normal whiteboards everywhere, and I use neither. I use the projectors as display devices, but the whiteboard, by my desk, in my office, for my use, is blank. Except for maybe one day a year. And we use shared documents for anything like that. Scribbles, sure. I get that. Not necessary at all.

      Diagram on paper? That's drawing. Entirely different. And for all the times I need it, I don't think years of education on how to hold a pencil are necessary. Pick up tablet, swipe a map, send to the person - they now have their own, permanent, non-degradable, shareable electronic copy. I draw on maps all the time. Printed maps. With coloured pens. To highlight areas and maybe draw a line. Again, not really worth the years of pencil-holding.

      Napkin? Nope. Don't you do what I do? Get the number from the other person, ring them, bang you're now in each other's phone book synced to all their devices and backed up forever. Don't want to type the number? NFC. Bluetooth.

      It's not that it's can't be USED. It's that it's not worth the YEARS AND YEARS of learning to hold a pen (which is less intuitive and more difficult a skill to acquire than pointing a finger at an electronic screen, as proven by the article and my experiences with young children doing just that). Use those years for something much more useful.

    15. Re:Alternate headline: by ledow · · Score: 1

      160-180WPM last time I checked (which was 20 years ago, and I've not gotten slower).

      Home-key typing slows you down but you do it because you were told to do it. My typing is rarely over the home keys at all, and my right hand wanders 2/3rds of the keyboard. Why? Because it's quicker. Little fingers are virtually unused, by the way. Row-migration of the entire hand at a time. Resting place, right hand diagonal from B to P, left hand almost home keys but also tilted, A to T.

      Why? BECAUSE IT'S FASTER. And it's the way my hands have learned to type by 30+ years of almost 24/7 typing.

      P.S. I can type blindfold no problem at all. I actually really annoy people because I can type while talking to someone in the doorway, literally typing an email on a subject that I'm not talking about, while not looking at either the screen or keyboard, and carrying out a separate conversation.

      Try it. Seriously. The home row is a load of bollocks that you teach kids to get them started at best, but that they should abandon the second they have a natural rhythm and movement that's fast enough. Hint: Touchscreen typing doesn't take home-key typing well...

    16. Re:Alternate headline: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'I've had way more times in my adult life where I just needed something to stay tight/still than when I've needed cursive'

      did the people escape eventually?

    17. Re:Alternate headline: by Bengie · · Score: 1

      I rarely need to do sustained typing and find it more useful to type in bursts. My hands cross all over the place because it's faster. While one hand is preoccupied, the other one can be doing something rather than waiting. Maybe if I was transcribing, sustained WPM would be beneficial, but I have to think before I type, and proof-read, and change my words.

    18. Re:Alternate headline: by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Becoming physically unable to write is even worse. I am left handed and developed carpel tunnel and numbness in that hand, not from writing but from decades of holding vibrating farm tractor steering wheels. An operation stopped the pain but the numbness remains.

  21. Fine motor control is used in many things. by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    It is a large part of what makes us human: the ability to handle tools I have to wonder what the larger loss is if children do not learn to be experts in hand control early in life because not only is hand control necessary in interacting with this complex society, but use of our bodies also forms our brains. If they are not touching the things they would be using with their hands their brains are not getting experience with the textures and physics of the real world. Computers and video games are also taking children away from other physical activities like jumping, running, pulling, pushing, climbing etc. in the real world and this is how we learn the rules of the real world and how we shape our bodies and minds for the real world. Are we making "virtual humans?" Are people becoming Matrix-like? You would not really be able to be born into a computer simulation, disconnect, and interact just fine in the real world as they do in the movie.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
    1. Re:Fine motor control is used in many things. by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      I say the same thing about all those kids who wasted their childhood reading books.

  22. Juggling really helped my dexterity, in my 20s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think juggling should be a required course. Would have helped me earlier/sooner.

  23. This is why anime artists are in Japan by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    My understanding is they have been hard core into training "penmanship" due to Japanese Kanji characters and such. It is not a surprise to me that a ton of people in Japan are good at drawing. This study makes me think the opposite is going to happen in America or wherever kids are using iPads to both learn and waste time instead of using a pencil or crayons.

    1. Re:This is why anime artists are in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the need of knowing how to write kanji with or without electronic assistants is a long and heated debate in the japanese educational community. That "japenese youngsters are forgetting how to properly write" is a cry that arises from time to time, again and again. Nothing new.

      I mean, we are discussing this problem with our alphabet. Now imagine with 2000 kanji.

  24. Not really news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I struggle to hold a pen for more than 30 minutes or so. This is because I haven't had to do it in over 20 years. I bet I wouldn't be much good writing cuneiform with a hamer and chisel on stone tablets either.

  25. Restrict use of screens for little ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was a huge tech kid in the 80's wrote several games in 6510 assembly on my c64 when I was 11 years old. My degree is in CS, my job is infosec. I'm in tech 24/7. I have 2 kids, and I can tell you I see the impact of bad tech parenting all them time when I see my kids friends. My kids are 12 and 7 and their whole lives they have only had limited exposure to "screens". I didn't even let them look at a TV/ipad etc until after they were 2 years old. And then their time using any system ( including TV ) is limited to 1-2 hours on weekdays and 3-4 on weekends. I do this because no one thing should dominate your life and lazy parenting ( or moire likely over committed lifestyles ) cause parents to just give into the magic compliance box. A tablet and a tv are not babysitters. Kids need to feel, touch, play, run, experience things... and experience each other. I still meet parents that think their 3 year old is smart because he can use their iPad and find his own Youtube videos. They have such high hopes for him. Don't buy into the myth that technology equals intelligence.

    And for slashdotters in particular, don't pray to the gods of technology so blindly. Technology is meant to help you achieve greater things in the human experience, not *be* the human experience. I know YOU love tech, and you bathe yourself in "cool" ... just step back and ask yourself how is it affecting your life? Do you have any other dreams, or are you a permanent consumer? It's great that you have your reputation in EVE or Overwatch or DOTA. Or that you have that new smartwatch that is totally awesome... until next year. Don't be consumed by tech. Find balance.
    Don't start your kids off when they are 3 on something you didn't experience until your 20's.

    1. Re:Restrict use of screens for little ones by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I was a huge tech kid in the 80's.

      In the 80's, you were not a huge tech kid. You were a nerd.

      I'm glad that most people also have to use tech now, because it means that unlike the 80's, now they NEED us.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  26. references? peer review? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having read the article, I have to ask:
            1) where are the references backing up these claims
            2) where are the peer-reviewed papers backing up these claims?
            3) what was the sample set? how was it controlled for external factors?
    There are many and good arguments both for, and against, computer/ipad/console ("games") time. As ever, a polarised, Mobius view would most likely not reflect the full balance and nuance of this. Development is less of a pathway more of a landscape: there are many avenues for advance, and many pitfalls. Children should be guided in this.

    Yes: "games" in moderation could likely help develop visual acuity and stimulus/response times
    No: an upbringing heavy in "games" is not likely to be be beneficial without other activities to balance

  27. F*ck them. Hard. Handwriting was torture for me. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    And I figure it was the same for many others who like to type. This goes to show how we have something of a regime of handwriting nazis going on. My mother made me copywrite books to improve my handwriting. Still hate her for that. It was torture.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  28. I mus be a sicko because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I misread the title as "Children Struggle To Hold Penis...".

    1. Re:I mus be a sicko because... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Do you know about penisland?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:I mus be a sicko because... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      is that where the expertsexchange.com is hosted?

  29. Much ado about nothing by mysidia · · Score: 1

    A skill that was once necessary for learning and communication no longer is.
    Electronic media has replaced pen and paper, so the skill to hold a pen isn't particular useful,
    except perhaps as an input device to aid in artistic creativity.... I don't see graphics artists turning in their stylus and drawing tablets for a touchscreen,
    but other than that.... Pens are soon to be extinct

    1. Re:Much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never had to write a quick note?

    2. Re:Much ado about nothing by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Open Kindle, write note, duct-tape Kindle to the fridge.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Much ado about nothing by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Not in the U.S... When these kids grow up, they will still need to sign legal documents and even use a stylus for the electronic credit card reader. If they just sign with an "X", then I predict massive fraud and identity theft.

    4. Re:Much ado about nothing by mysidia · · Score: 1

      they will still need to sign legal documents and even use a stylus for the electronic credit card reader.

      Legal paper documents can be signed by a stamp, a thumbprint, or a crudely drawn figure with no need for handwriting.
      BUT Legal paper documents are going away --- by the time today's kids are 18, to sign a document: you'll probably swipe your driver's license and just scan a finger to create your unique digital imprint.

      All the electronic-sign credit card readers i've encountered let you sign with a few strokes of your index finger.

      And the requirement is being phased out for EMV chip cards --- the formality of "signing the receipt" is being eliminated by Visa and well on the road towards completely going away already, and by the time today's kids are 18 you won't have to sign any CC receipts.

      On extremely rare occassions, you might sign a check perhaps ---- but a lot of people don't even carry those or ever use them anymore.
      Ultimately cryptocurrencies could replace these; again, Today's kids probably won't be using them, and by the time they're 18 they may no longer exist.

    5. Re:Much ado about nothing by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      guess what, in the USA you can sign a legal document electronically.

    6. Re:Much ado about nothing by Cederic · · Score: 1

      the skill to hold a pen isn't particular useful

      Frequently heard question, "Does anybody have a pen I can borrow?" or (the variant when they know who has a pen,) "Can I borrow your pen?"

      Far far too common an occurrence to even remotely believe that pens aren't useful.

  30. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elders Struggle With Tech Due to Outdated Notions About What's Important

  31. BS by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Whats the difference between hplding a stylis and holdind a pencil

    1. Re:BS by Quirkz · · Score: 4, Funny

      The kinds of typos it generates, apparently.

    2. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      never mind typos. I read that as "Children Struggle To Hold Pencils Due To Too Much Meth". Whew.

  32. American kids will have Trump hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And no, masturbating will not grow larger hands. Your kids WILL have tiny Trump hands in less than a generation.

  33. Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's true, I can't hold a pencil due to my use of fire, agriculture, and the wheel.

  34. Re: why anime artists in Japan (Crayon shin-chan). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > My understanding is they have been hard core into training "penmanship" due to Japanese Kanji characters and such. It is not a surprise to me that a ton of people in Japan are good at drawing.

    There actually is a long-running anime series titled "Crayon shin-chan" which is aimed at the youngest japanese generation.

    (Although Tomoko Kuroki has recently disclosed that the entire voice-actor staff of the Crayon shin-chan franchise has also participated in ecchi, hentai and eroge themed productions, which shocked many. If you don't know what those genres are, just feel happy and lucky, really!)

  35. Does it really work that way? by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

    If you found a bunch of third world illiterates who never learned to write, with pencil or any other way, would they have reduced fine motor skills compared to people with pretty handwriting?

    1. Re:Does it really work that way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason third world countries are in the state they're in. Literacy is the foundation of society.

    2. Re:Does it really work that way? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      literacy can be had without unnaturally grasping a thin rod for hours, that is unnatural and can cause health problems from blisters to carpal tunnel. let's get that stupid notion that skill with a pencil is necessary out of our heads

    3. Re:Does it really work that way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs literacy when you have Alexa?

    4. Re:Does it really work that way? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Actually, Alexa can neither read nor write, but she is a good listener and only speaks when spoken too. Teach her to cook, clean and give blowjobs, and men won't need to get married any more. Oh, is that sexist? I'm sorry, I meant teach *it* to cook, clean and give blowjobs....

  36. Re: why anime artists in Japan (Crayon shin-chan). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Crayon Shin Chan is seinen, meaning it's aimed at a teenage to adult audience.

  37. Re: why anime artists in Japan (Crayon shin-chan). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Although Tomoko Kuroki has recently disclosed that the entire voice-actor staff of the Crayon shin-chan franchise has also participated in ecchi, hentai and eroge themed productions, which shocked many. If you don't know what those genres are, just feel happy and lucky, really!

    If you don't know what those genres are, look into it.

    FTFY.

  38. RIP Stylus, re: tablets by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

    If they had been designed from the start with support for (and actually included, and had a slot to store) an active stylus, and the industry had managed to standardize an interface for such, I might actually own one of these things... still struggling to understand the appeal of a machine that is, for seemingly any given generation, less usable (and an order of magnitude more expensive) than an 8-year-old touch screen laptop with a broken keyboard. Seems like a reasonable stylus interface would've likely made this topic a relative non-issue, also.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
  39. Re:F*ck them. Hard. Handwriting was torture for me by Zobeid · · Score: 1

    I collect fountain pens and build my own keyboards (you insensitive clod!). I don't see any reason why somebody wouldn't want to be skilled at both handwriting and typing. It does seem like both are on the decline, though.

  40. Re: why anime artists in Japan (Crayon shin-chan). by Wulf2k · · Score: 2

    Is there anybody left who doesn't know what hentai is?

  41. Re:F*ck them. Hard. Handwriting was torture for me by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Still hate her for that.

    You need to get over that. She was trying to give you a good life.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  42. they can't hold a hammer and drive nail in wood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they can't hold a hammer and drive nail in wood either..

  43. dont let preschoolers have gadets by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    give them a box of crayons and a coloring book, that should fix it

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  44. Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it, this isn't april.

    When did slashdot turn into the dailymail full of weird silly stories meant to be click bait?

    I saw another one about something stupid with black holes...and another about politics and I just...What the fuck?

    I want to hear about robots and advances in technology, things that could change my life and the lives of others. This fluff crap needs to cease.

    I give /. one more day, if there are no new stories concerning technology which are of value to me, then my bookmark for the site is being deleted. After all if I wanted to read garbage I'd go read rags off the grocery store checkout line shelfs.

    1. Re:Joke by Cederic · · Score: 1

      wtf? Black holes are hard core science, and you're saying that's not news for nerds?

      This isn't Tom's fucking Hardware.

  45. Finger muscles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Minor point and interesting fact: human fingers do not have any muscles. (Well, aside from the tiny muscles that make your hair stand on end.) Everything your fingers do are controlled by muscles in your hand and forearm.

  46. Re: This has to be the dumbest thing I've ever rea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a confessional from you. Your kids probably loathe you assuming you can actually get a woman pregnant.

  47. Or a Guitar Pick. by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Learning to play the Guitar is hard, can't a computer fake it for me!

    1. Re:Or a Guitar Pick. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Learning to play the Guitar is hard

      Luckily you don't need to play any instrument to be a YouTube rock star. Everyone wants to be famous, they don't actually want to learn to play music.

      can't a computer fake it for me!

      Definitely.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  48. Sad.... by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    ...but they can hold the shit out of a game controller or Smartphone though! Pathetic. And it's only the beginning. I'm waiting for the thumb and finger/hand problems to start being reported.

    1. Re:Sad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hopeless.

  49. something sinister by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that there are plenty of fine motor skills involved in using tech, maybe we should adapt handwriting technique to embrace those skills. It's not like controlling a pencil has just one aspect to it.

    For all I know the conventional pencil grasp between the thumb and first two fingertips is degraded but the ability to control the pencil when it is sandwiched between the first two fingers is improved.

    Or what about non-dominant hand writing, maybe tech has improved the spread of motor skills between dominant and non-dominant hand. I don't notice myself typing right-handedly.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  50. Buy a stylus. Get some coloring books. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No really. Use a stylus for this stuff with your kids.

    And obviously don't let them play games on tablets so much. Give them some coloring books. Learning to color within the lines is an excellent way to develop the dexterity for writing.

    Struggling to write in school is going to be stressful for your kid. Being challenged by something that the rest of us consider so simple is completely demoralizing for a child and can impact how they view school for the rest of their lives.

  51. Invention by PPH · · Score: 1

    Mouse-shaped pencil holder. User cups holder in hand and manipulates it much like a computer mouse. Buttons to raise lower an assortment of pen/pencil tips.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  52. So wait... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...you're suggesting that just tossing your kid on the couch with an iPad is NOT a successful parenting strategy?

    Next you're going to tell me they're going to end up antisocial web-leeches that don't know how to actually interact with other humans.

    On the bright side, though, if there's ever an evolutionary advantage to the skills for playing Kandy Krush they're fucking SET.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:So wait... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you're confused.

      This article just proves that normally humans don't have a few weirdly developed muscles in a couple fingers for gripping a thin rod for hours. Good thing we're getting away from that abusive treatment of children to better tech solution. Keyboards and touch pads are a better way to do things the rubbing graphene on dead trees.

  53. Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Children in China have no problem using chopsticks...

  54. so what? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    holding a thin rod for hours isn't natural, I remember cramps and blisters from having to write for hours. maybe we we've been abusing children for decades making them do that!

    1. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's truth to that, but I think at least basic writing skills are still good to learn. Also, it's been shown that hand writing is about 3x better at getting your brain to remember something than typing it.

    2. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blisters? Seriously?

  55. They can't tie their shoes either by mpercy · · Score: 1

    Mommy bought them velcro shoes.

    One kid I know didn't learn to tie his shoes until he was 14 or 15. And even now it takes huge concentration and effort on his part, like Chief Brody in Jaws. He's not stupid, he just never did anything in his life that required that kind of manipulation. And yep, his handwriting is like a caveman holding a stick. Chopsticks? Hell no, seeing him use a knife and fork looks like Vikings eating in the meadhall.

  56. tutoring students by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    I have high school tutoring students that cannot fit their handwriting on college-ruled paper. It's very interesting to see. My 5th grade son has basically the same handwriting skill that he had in 2nd grade. I remember spending like 20% of 3rd grade on handwriting; now the schools don't seem to teach it at any level. I don't think it's the fault of "technology" that curricula have morphed into a handwriting-free zone.

    On the one hand, I think that spending hours each day practicing cursive was probably overkill. On the other hand, if a student can't tell whether he has just written x^7 or y^2 because his handwriting is THAT bad, it makes it hard to succeed. It seems like there should be some middle-of-the-road option that doesn't cause hand cramps. The really strange thing is that it's not like they have eschewed handwriting in favor of typing. They teach a little bit of typing, but not much.

    In trying to convince my son the need for nice penmanship, I mentioned to that we used to pass notes in class. I was trying to imply that girls like it when boys have nice handwriting. He pointed out that nobody does that anymore. They just text each other.

  57. Take them to a playground once in a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ones with Jungle Gyms (adult-sized or tyke sized) will be fun for the whole family. Who had problems with pencils, again? Remember to go outdoors with them, too.

  58. Solution by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    You give them a bunch of pron. Hand strength will come, don't worry.

    --
    I tend to rant.
  59. Congratulations Millennial's! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are raising an entire generation of limp-wristed pansies, no wonder they all want to turn gay and get sex-change operations to go with their anxiety meds.

  60. larger issue...too much of a gap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had a kindergarten teacher tell us that they were seeing kids with a 5 year gap between the least adept to most adept in kindergarten, and that it carried through to high school where the gap was still at least 2-3 years. Tech is a cheap babysitter for many, and the children never learn anything other than pushing buttons.

    It all starts at home where basic learning or lack three of takes place.

  61. Defince suficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the summary:
    developing sufficiently to...hold a pencil correctly

    So we used to have an unnatural process of holding a pencil for an extended period of use, and it was so taxing that it required we strengthen certain muscles just for the task. Now that we have more ergonomic methods of writing, we only use pencils for short periods of time, and we don't have to adapt to them.

    I don't see anything wrong with this.

  62. Do they still learn to type? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean with touch screens becoming so popular on phones and tablets, I have to wonder if any of them have any difficulty using a keyboard and mouse.

    Is there anyone who is a teacher out there?

  63. C64 Wrist by BBF_BBF · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised my wrist isn't permanently damaged by playing "Summer Games" with the "designed to flout ergonomics" Wico "The Boss" joystick on the Commodore 64 when I was a kid.

  64. Who cares? by JThundley · · Score: 1

    Why is this a problem? I stopped writing after I graduated school, the next generation is growing up with even more tech than I had. If they're poor enough, they'll write and have the finger muscles.

    1. Re:Who cares? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Sally Payne, the head pediatric occupational therapist at the Heart of England foundation NHS Trust; represents senior pediatric doctors; my ass she does. Holding a pencil? Really? Not all children develop at the same rate; and anyone that has raised 2 or more children understand it.

      As for my comment on parents of "Only Children". Your not real parents. When an item in the Living Room is broken, everyone knows who did it. When parents have 2 or more children no one knows who broke the item in the living room. That's when Parenting begins.

  65. "Children struggle to use abacus" by JohnStock · · Score: 1

    ...due to not needing one.

  66. Less Tablet Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More time playing with toys and coloring books. In other news, water is wet.

  67. Touch-Screen, Begone! - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in addition to being the worst general purpose input device to hit the mass market since the trackpoint, touch-screens are now the epicenter of a pediatric health crisis. Great!

    By the way, this is damage these children will likely never, ever recover from. What you do during your formative years stays with you for the rest of your life. I would be shocked if any of these kids suffering from these problems now grow up to have what is considered normal hand-eye coordination and manual dexterity for people today.

    Please, for the love of humanity, do not give your kids a pad or a smartphone, and keep your kids off the Internet until they're at least in their teens. Your negligence is crippling them for life.

  68. Re: why anime artists in Japan (Crayon shin-chan). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > If you don't know what those genres are, look into it.

    Do you really wish more people could learn about e.g. the imouto, netorare and tentacle sub-genres of hentai? That's because you wish Japan be nuked for a third and a fourth time?

  69. bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clickasaurs and chknlittlesaurs are up in arms over, once again, nothing.

  70. They Can't Learn???!!?!??!?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't school a place where children go to learn, not just academically, but socially and physically? Or, are you saying that tech has irreparably harmed these children and that they will never be able to hold a pen or pencil?

    Something don't pass the sniff test on this one.

  71. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  72. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  73. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  74. Galaxy Notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew it all along. Parents should have been buying their kids Galaxy Note phones instead of stupid, muscle-atrophying iPhones.