Permanent crunch is not really an issue in most of Europe (mostly due to labour laws not allowing it), at least in IT, it IS though a reality for doctors. And not just in the first few years. So if anything, this is the exact opposite over here and yet the same effect can be observed, so I doubt it's a matter of work time.
Europe here, same deal. I can't remember when I actually used that magstrip of my card outside of the US. Even third world countries have had chip readers in operation for years now, only in the US this seems to be a huge issue.
What I meant is that he's one of those people who are still alive because ridding the world of them would make you for some odd reason a criminal and you'd go to jail for it.
In a civilized world, you'd get some sort of medal.
Whatever. I now know how to deal with you. What I "admit" is that I fell for your trick. Well played. But you know, fool me once and all that shit. Enjoy your "victory".
Personally, I'll just let whoever happens to read this be the judge.
According to them, it would be cheapest to just strap a solid fuel can underneath the pod, don't limit thrust so we can easily reach 15+ g and simply let it fall into the big pond next to the launch site.
This is what I deduced from the vague hints you dropped that doubles as arguments for you. I will not make this mistake again. From now on, I'll simply wait for you to say something worth while.
I guess this alone will pretty much end any kind of conversation between us. Farewell.
I said that because you fail to provide any direct, resilient argument. All I get from you is hints, allegations and weasel words. So ffs, could you please make your argument?
No. Bullshit. Not everything is hackable. Not by a long shot. And certainly not without direct physical access.
Want proof? Here's my laptop. It comes with a physical switch that turns WiFi off. Try to hack it remotely. Oh, you might be able when I turn WiFi on, true, but how about I only do that in a controlled environment, with shielded walls surrounding me and the laptop's peer so I can ensure that only these two devices communicate while WiFi is turned on, and outside the controlled environment, I turn any over-the-air connectivity off.
You're invited to hack it, but no touching!
And since the insulin pump in question is outside the body, adding such a switch is trivial at best. But I guess it would cost 5 cents more, so the markup on the device would drop to 999999999%.
Proximity required? Like, say, in a school cafeteria where some geek prankster who doesn't even know what damage he might do could give it a try?
Kids don't give a shit about consequences. But fortunately, kids being killed by improper medial equipment cause enough of a stir to get things done. I guess some minor will have to croak so we see something being done, but hey, at least it's not going to kill someone whose education already costed an arm and a leg. From an economic point of view, better some snotty kid than an adult.
Slashdot Mirror
What does he know about making yourself useful?
Because in direct confrontations, geeks are usually not really the ones that come out on top.
Permanent crunch is not really an issue in most of Europe (mostly due to labour laws not allowing it), at least in IT, it IS though a reality for doctors. And not just in the first few years. So if anything, this is the exact opposite over here and yet the same effect can be observed, so I doubt it's a matter of work time.
Europe here, same deal. I can't remember when I actually used that magstrip of my card outside of the US. Even third world countries have had chip readers in operation for years now, only in the US this seems to be a huge issue.
What I meant is that he's one of those people who are still alive because ridding the world of them would make you for some odd reason a criminal and you'd go to jail for it.
In a civilized world, you'd get some sort of medal.
Whatever. I now know how to deal with you. What I "admit" is that I fell for your trick. Well played. But you know, fool me once and all that shit. Enjoy your "victory".
Personally, I'll just let whoever happens to read this be the judge.
According to them, it would be cheapest to just strap a solid fuel can underneath the pod, don't limit thrust so we can easily reach 15+ g and simply let it fall into the big pond next to the launch site.
Sadly this is absolutely logical and most likely correct. Thanks, now I can go home depressed...
Because that garbage ain't worth a nanosecond of jail time.
Next question?
What is the "other" doing in that sentence? It does not belong there.
Well, then maybe an add-on question would be "What does it feel like to kill off the poor?"
Yes, of course he can. Mostly by not understanding what the hell should be wrong with anything he did.
I've worked with psychopaths before. They honestly don't get why you're outraged when they pull the shit they do.
It's much easier to say "You caught us red handed and now we gotta weasel out by shoveling manure on it 'til you get dizzy".
See? It is actually THAT easy.
It's less cancer, more insanity.
Money. Duh. Next question?
And how much money could change your mind?
I mean, after all he's pretty much reduced human life to a question of money, it's only fair to ask him how much for his.
But it can be summed up with one:
"How much for you to kill yourself? Maybe if we all chip in, we could get rid of you."
This is what I deduced from the vague hints you dropped that doubles as arguments for you. I will not make this mistake again. From now on, I'll simply wait for you to say something worth while.
I guess this alone will pretty much end any kind of conversation between us. Farewell.
You think that recertification will be less expensive after someone died?
Could someone find out whether it's cheaper to fly them to the sun?
I said that because you fail to provide any direct, resilient argument. All I get from you is hints, allegations and weasel words. So ffs, could you please make your argument?
Well, pretty much the US and Europe, with the US being actually more in danger than the EU from what I can currently see.
No. Bullshit. Not everything is hackable. Not by a long shot. And certainly not without direct physical access.
Want proof? Here's my laptop. It comes with a physical switch that turns WiFi off. Try to hack it remotely. Oh, you might be able when I turn WiFi on, true, but how about I only do that in a controlled environment, with shielded walls surrounding me and the laptop's peer so I can ensure that only these two devices communicate while WiFi is turned on, and outside the controlled environment, I turn any over-the-air connectivity off.
You're invited to hack it, but no touching!
And since the insulin pump in question is outside the body, adding such a switch is trivial at best. But I guess it would cost 5 cents more, so the markup on the device would drop to 999999999%.
Proximity required? Like, say, in a school cafeteria where some geek prankster who doesn't even know what damage he might do could give it a try?
Kids don't give a shit about consequences. But fortunately, kids being killed by improper medial equipment cause enough of a stir to get things done. I guess some minor will have to croak so we see something being done, but hey, at least it's not going to kill someone whose education already costed an arm and a leg. From an economic point of view, better some snotty kid than an adult.