Like Mr. Clinton and Carter before him, the democrats have confirmed that the party is not nearly so "liberal" as the weenies like to think. About half of them are every bit as conservative as the republicans, more so if you check deeply at all into their past. They keep a "liberal" faction so those people don't go off and form an alternative party and take their money with them. That is what Sanders' function was during this year's primaries, and it works like a charm every time. How many independents do you think will win congressional seats this year? My money is on zero. And if one or two do win, they will do like Lieberman (and Sanders) did and caucus with the party that provides the biggest rewards. The democrats run a much more deceptive game than the republicans do because they have to. And now it takes a man like Trump to push votes their way, because they put forth such weak, even false "opposition".
Cyanogen Inc is turning into just another Wall Street hedge fund like Uber and Pokemon, whose main business will be in the derivatives markets. "Android applications" is irrelevant to the portfolio. Lots of weird shit happening in the markets. I wonder if if all this "capitalization" is nothing a setup for a big crash (correction, amirite?) this fall. Might be a good idea to cash out by the end of August, and then pick up some good bargains in December.
Just as good. Who wants the liability and maintenance headaches of owning a car anymore, especially when they go autonomous? With all the cameras and road rage out there, you just can't have fun anymore, except on the track. It's better to make them into a throwaway appliance.
If you need a vehicle, just get a 1970 3/4 ton Chevy out of the boneyard and put a sign on it saying, "Go rent a U-Haul you cheap bastard!" to warn off your neighbors.
Well, yeah, if you're looking for what is actually a lesser evil.
He may or may not be an actual libertarian, but he got himself on the ballot in all 50 states. The anti Trump people can make good use of that without sacrificing their character by voting for Clinton. And if he gets enough votes, they can't lock the party out of future debates. I mean, they can, but suddenly changing the rules would be a pretty bad PR move.
Let's hope he starts raising his voice once the conventions are finished and the two bettas start going after each other, and then like SPECTRE, he strikes.
Yes, it appears to be that way by design. I believe the intention there is to keep congress as close to 50/50 as possible to make it easier to pass blame back and forth in a game that is called "rotating villain", which came to the forefront during passage of "Obamacare" and removal of the single payer option. In other words, the democrats threw the 2010 midterm elections, and they are doing the exact same thing now.
Regardless of the results for the presidency, congress should be able to maintain their 95% reelection rate. SNAFU
On the contrary. Civil asset forfeiture, as evil as it is, would have a much greater effect. In fact, this is exactly the kind of thing it is supposed to be used for. Tattooing "I am a thief" on their foreheads would be a nice supplementary measure to make sure that nobody forgets. Let's save the prison space for the button men and truly violent people who present a real danger to the public.
Either way, what about the story seems so implausible? Recent history should indicate that they could do much worse, like hire hitmen, or start wars. The sociopath is today's dominant "species" in this trade.
Exactly, this kind of thing is an absolute disaster for the food rationing business. Now they just lost one more reason for starving people. Even the charity business will suffer for this. Note, I am not mocking you. These sociopaths really think that way. And now they have to keep this stuff in the warehouse even longer before it rots.
If you really want to crash the computer, just order a quarter *pounder* (eww, gross!) without cheese. They can't find the button on the keypad. May as well send everybody home for the night.
It appears you need to take a remedial course in reading. I feel so very sorry if your 386 running DOS 3.3 won't upgrade. However, if you can do that, I will be very impressed.
Slashdot Mirror
Like Mr. Clinton and Carter before him, the democrats have confirmed that the party is not nearly so "liberal" as the weenies like to think. About half of them are every bit as conservative as the republicans, more so if you check deeply at all into their past. They keep a "liberal" faction so those people don't go off and form an alternative party and take their money with them. That is what Sanders' function was during this year's primaries, and it works like a charm every time. How many independents do you think will win congressional seats this year? My money is on zero. And if one or two do win, they will do like Lieberman (and Sanders) did and caucus with the party that provides the biggest rewards. The democrats run a much more deceptive game than the republicans do because they have to. And now it takes a man like Trump to push votes their way, because they put forth such weak, even false "opposition".
Cyanogen Inc is turning into just another Wall Street hedge fund like Uber and Pokemon, whose main business will be in the derivatives markets. "Android applications" is irrelevant to the portfolio. Lots of weird shit happening in the markets. I wonder if if all this "capitalization" is nothing a setup for a big crash (correction, amirite?) this fall. Might be a good idea to cash out by the end of August, and then pick up some good bargains in December.
Just as good. Who wants the liability and maintenance headaches of owning a car anymore, especially when they go autonomous? With all the cameras and road rage out there, you just can't have fun anymore, except on the track. It's better to make them into a throwaway appliance.
If you need a vehicle, just get a 1970 3/4 ton Chevy out of the boneyard and put a sign on it saying, "Go rent a U-Haul you cheap bastard!" to warn off your neighbors.
Well, yeah, if you're looking for what is actually a lesser evil.
He may or may not be an actual libertarian, but he got himself on the ballot in all 50 states. The anti Trump people can make good use of that without sacrificing their character by voting for Clinton. And if he gets enough votes, they can't lock the party out of future debates. I mean, they can, but suddenly changing the rules would be a pretty bad PR move.
Let's hope he starts raising his voice once the conventions are finished and the two bettas start going after each other, and then like SPECTRE, he strikes.
Yes, it appears to be that way by design. I believe the intention there is to keep congress as close to 50/50 as possible to make it easier to pass blame back and forth in a game that is called "rotating villain", which came to the forefront during passage of "Obamacare" and removal of the single payer option. In other words, the democrats threw the 2010 midterm elections, and they are doing the exact same thing now.
Regardless of the results for the presidency, congress should be able to maintain their 95% reelection rate. SNAFU
But remember that it does reflect your character.
The democrats need Trump even more. D.C. would be awash with republicans without the fear factor he provides for the dems.
And the ratings would be in the toilet.
Win-win...
I mean, who would vote for this ticket if not for him? Trump is Hillary's biggest asset in this election.
Yeah, they want to block impersonators. I want to block the real thing. Just give us the ability to white-list calls and the problem will be solved.
On the contrary. Civil asset forfeiture, as evil as it is, would have a much greater effect. In fact, this is exactly the kind of thing it is supposed to be used for. Tattooing "I am a thief" on their foreheads would be a nice supplementary measure to make sure that nobody forgets. Let's save the prison space for the button men and truly violent people who present a real danger to the public.
Either way, what about the story seems so implausible? Recent history should indicate that they could do much worse, like hire hitmen, or start wars. The sociopath is today's dominant "species" in this trade.
You taking us for suckers, or what?
But I simply have to ask.
How did the Quarter Pounder® get out the door?
Look, Anna Nicole Smith is dead. Let her rest in peace already!
The entire globe is subject to US law. That thing in Ireland was just a small glitch. That judge will be dispatched post haste.
Exactly, this kind of thing is an absolute disaster for the food rationing business. Now they just lost one more reason for starving people. Even the charity business will suffer for this. Note, I am not mocking you. These sociopaths really think that way. And now they have to keep this stuff in the warehouse even longer before it rots.
I, for one, think somebody confused methane for hydrogen. Maybe that should be reversed... Anyway, something about cow farts...
If you really want to crash the computer, just order a quarter *pounder* (eww, gross!) without cheese. They can't find the button on the keypad. May as well send everybody home for the night.
It appears you need to take a remedial course in reading. I feel so very sorry if your 386 running DOS 3.3 won't upgrade. However, if you can do that, I will be very impressed.
They order the house to be demolished.
Can you get a "Fapple" without the mayonnaise? Or is that just not possible?
I wonder if they'll ever look into Get Shorty.
But really, if you want to securely launder drug money, just take it to the bank. They are invincible to any prosecution.
This stuff just writes itself, really.
Shh! Don't tell the Screen Writers Guild.
Where does it come from? Isn't it obvious? HSBC of course!
Tony Blair is going after the makers of Wag the Dog...