If there is one thing in this whole world that has already been proven, it's that the market is highly irrational, panicky, capricious, and fickle. The market already sets government policy. This is why we are in this situation.
Doesn't work on Slashdot, which hates Tor and has banned all the exit nodes.
See, that's the problem with TOR. It can't hide its exits nodes and blend in with all the other traffic. An exit node shouldn't look any different than any other http(s) request.
So waddya gonna do, eh? Vote republican???? BWAHAHAHA!
Boy, these bastards got you good... And to watch all you all get tied up in knots about 'right and wrong' instead of finding ways to defeat it makes them laugh even harder..
Maybe you missed it the first time it was pointed out... So I'm gonna jump in and help out a little, for those in the viewing audience who don't like to click links, and maybe you personally:
14.9.2 What May be Stored by Caches
no-store
The purpose of the no-store directive is to prevent the inadvertent release or retention of sensitive information (for example, on backup tapes). The no-store directive applies to the entire message, and MAY be sent either in a response or in a request. If sent in a request, a cache MUST NOT store any part of either this request or any response to it. If sent in a response, a cache MUST NOT store any part of either this response or the request that elicited it. This directive applies to both non- shared and shared caches. "MUST NOT store" in this context means that the cache MUST NOT intentionally store the information in non-volatile storage, and MUST make a best-effort attempt to remove the information from volatile storage as promptly as possible after forwarding it.
Even when this directive is associated with a response, users might explicitly store such a response outside of the caching system (e.g., with a "Save As" dialog). History buffers MAY store such responses as part of their normal operation.
The purpose of this directive is to meet the stated requirements of certain users and service authors who are concerned about accidental releases of information via unanticipated accesses to cache data structures. While the use of this directive might improve privacy in some cases, we caution that it is NOT in any way a reliable or sufficient mechanism for ensuring privacy. In particular, malicious or compromised caches might not recognize or obey this directive, and communications networks might be vulnerable to eavesdropping.
They will just do it anyway, a bit more covertly perhaps. Public opinion is bullshit. The majority of us are against war (I assume), yet we are at war. We hate congress, yet reliably reelect almost all of them. Eh, that's politics for ya. Doesn't matter the country.
Star Wars is an old fashion western shoot-em-up(not a civil rights lecture), in space, so it looked more like world war 2, couldn't have been more obvious. It's still fun to watch.
...you'd think the Rebel Alliance would weld some insignia on their.. uh.. prominent facing trunk, for recognition.
Oh yeah! How would you like it if somebody came along and burned a 'medal of honor' on your chest with a hot iron? I bet not very much... And besides, R2D2 did receive recognition for heroism in the first episode...
Slashdot Mirror
I gotta a great deal on a famous bridge on a Florida swamp.
The system is fraudulent and corrupt by design. It is not 'broken' by any means. It proves the old adage of nature itself: Might makes right.
If there is one thing in this whole world that has already been proven, it's that the market is highly irrational, panicky, capricious, and fickle. The market already sets government policy. This is why we are in this situation.
Are XBox Live Points money?
Can they be transferred?
Oh well, so much for that...
Terrorism is determined by its target, not its methods..
They do nothing!
Yes, you get better encryption when you type unicode on Slashdot..
Doesn't work on Slashdot, which hates Tor and has banned all the exit nodes.
See, that's the problem with TOR. It can't hide its exits nodes and blend in with all the other traffic. An exit node shouldn't look any different than any other http(s) request.
Ship by air! The passengers don't have to know.
So waddya gonna do, eh? Vote republican???? BWAHAHAHA!
Boy, these bastards got you good... And to watch all you all get tied up in knots about 'right and wrong' instead of finding ways to defeat it makes them laugh even harder..
Maybe you missed it the first time it was pointed out ... So I'm gonna jump in and help out a little, for those in the viewing audience who don't like to click links, and maybe you personally:
14.9.2 What May be Stored by Caches
no-store
The purpose of the no-store directive is to prevent the inadvertent release or retention of sensitive information (for example, on backup tapes). The no-store directive applies to the entire message, and MAY be sent either in a response or in a request. If sent in a request, a cache MUST NOT store any part of either this request or any response to it. If sent in a response, a cache MUST NOT store any part of either this response or the request that elicited it. This directive applies to both non- shared and shared caches. "MUST NOT store" in this context means that the cache MUST NOT intentionally store the information in non-volatile storage, and MUST make a best-effort attempt to remove the information from volatile storage as promptly as possible after forwarding it.
Even when this directive is associated with a response, users might explicitly store such a response outside of the caching system (e.g., with a "Save As" dialog). History buffers MAY store such responses as part of their normal operation.
The purpose of this directive is to meet the stated requirements of certain users and service authors who are concerned about accidental releases of information via unanticipated accesses to cache data structures. While the use of this directive might improve privacy in some cases, we caution that it is NOT in any way a reliable or sufficient mechanism for ensuring privacy. In particular, malicious or compromised caches might not recognize or obey this directive, and communications networks might be vulnerable to eavesdropping.
Does this resolve the issue?
No, Barack Obama and Joe Biden are actors.. And they're the real deal, more convincing than those putzes from Hollywood.
Nixon got the troops out. I've always felt he didn't get the credit for that he deserved.
Credit?! What the fuck are you talking about?
They will just do it anyway, a bit more covertly perhaps. Public opinion is bullshit. The majority of us are against war (I assume), yet we are at war. We hate congress, yet reliably reelect almost all of them. Eh, that's politics for ya. Doesn't matter the country.
I didn't know HSBC was part of the Fed... Oh wait, which government are we talking about?
But how do you get more privacy out of a centralized repository? Centralization and privacy don't mix. And that word... trusted... please...
Everybody is a little bit crazy. You never know what will set them off...
How convenient, hot and cold running war...
No such thing!
Star Wars is an old fashion western shoot-em-up(not a civil rights lecture), in space, so it looked more like world war 2, couldn't have been more obvious. It's still fun to watch.
That's funny, because I know people who say, "Excuse me", to the dog when they push him out of the way.
...you'd think the Rebel Alliance would weld some insignia on their .. uh .. prominent facing trunk, for recognition.
Oh yeah! How would you like it if somebody came along and burned a 'medal of honor' on your chest with a hot iron? I bet not very much... And besides, R2D2 did receive recognition for heroism in the first episode...
Does anyone know if they are actually going to bring the rover up the mountain...?
Patience, grasshopper. With enough time, the mountain will come down to the rover.
It only gives legitimacy to the corrupt patent system.