Slashdot Mirror


2 Men Accused of Trying To Make X-Ray Weapon

gurps_npc writes "Two radical pro-Israel terrorists were caught in upstate NY when they tried to solicit money from various honorable Jewish organizations to build a truck based x-ray weapon. They intended to drive the truck around and then turn on the x-ray machine, focusing on enemies of Israel. But the Jewish organizations they tried to solicit money from refused to participate. Instead they called the FBI, who promptly set up a sting. The men were arrested before the machine was in working order."

470 comments

  1. A conspiracy... by Roachie · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... I can see right thru it.

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    1. Re:A conspiracy... by hutsell · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ... I can see right thru it.

      It reads more like a modern day version of someone trying to sell the Brooklyn Bridge. However, IANAR[aygun engineer].

      --
      Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
    2. Re:A conspiracy... by similar_name · · Score: 5, Funny

      My x-ray gun is purely for hunting.

    3. Re:A conspiracy... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 0

      is this whole thing a joke? why would the terrorists solicit money from jewish organizations? also, doesn't the TSA have similar vans already?

    4. Re:A conspiracy... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      They were caught with their pants down (or invisible)

    5. Re:A conspiracy... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 0

      is this whole thing a joke? why would the terrorists solicit money from jewish organizations?

      In case you haven't noticed, not every terrorist and terrorist-wannabe is a genius.

      Unfortunately, this idea is out there now.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:A conspiracy... by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "the undercover investigator brought Crawford X-ray tubes to examine for possible use in the weapon, followed by their technical specifications a month later. ... Investigators gave Feight $1,000 to build the control device and showed the men pictures of industrial X-ray machines they said they could obtain."

      Hmm.. wonder whose idea this whole plot was. We've only heard one side so far.

    7. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because there is a hole in the middle of the douchebagel...

    8. Re:A conspiracy... by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They weren't Islamic terrorists. Think People's Front of Judea.

    9. Re:A conspiracy... by flayzernax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is just CIA/NSA propaganda. Grocery store celeb news mags for people "afraid". Something "terrible" is gonna happen one day if we don't justify our fucked society.

    10. Re:A conspiracy... by anagama · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Apparently, Crawford was an industrial engineer for GE and a KKK member -- which just makes it all that much weirder that they'd try to sell it to Jewish organizations.

      http://news.yahoo.com/york-men-accused-plotting-build-radiation-weapon-204445880.html

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    11. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not build something real dangerous like a desintegrator or a plasmagun

    12. Re:A conspiracy... by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      is this whole thing a joke? why would the terrorists solicit money from jewish organizations?

      Not sure whether to believe this story or not. But the summary clearly states that the terrrorists where pro-Israel terrorists, which means it makes sense to solicit money from Jewish organizations. Not every terrorist in this world is a Muslim you know. ( If you were joking, I was appropriately whooshed)

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    13. Re:A conspiracy... by durrr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you seriously expect something refined from a KKK member? Their sole existence seems to be oriented towards being used for parody.

    14. Re:A conspiracy... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      is this whole thing a joke? why would the terrorists solicit money from jewish organizations? also, doesn't the TSA have similar vans already?

      It's possible (read, likely) that this guy was not exactly a mental giant. That said, there is an interesting subcultural twist in certain subsections of American conservatism: they don't necessarily like judaism; but their particular flavor of Christian millennialism requires Jews in order to fulfill assorted 'prophesy' related events shortly before the end times.

    15. Re:A conspiracy... by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Easy mistake. I made the same mistake when I first read it. Had to go back and read it a couple times before I saw it. Yeah, we all know know that not all terrorists are Muslim. But we're not used to it.

    16. Re:A conspiracy... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 0

      to be fair, in the US (where the story is set) so many terrorists are muslim that you can assume that a terrorist is muslim until shown to be otherwise. prove me wrong?

    17. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they have vans like this already. That's why this is a threat. They don't like the competition.

      Usually they're posted at border crossings and other high traffic areas so they can be used to x-ray your whole vehicle for inspections. Sometimes they even let you get out of it before they x-ray it.

    18. Re:A conspiracy... by flyneye · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ra-di-a-tion. Yes, indeed. You hear the most outrageous lies about it. Half-baked goggle-box do-gooders telling everybody it's bad for you. Pernicious nonsense! Everybody could stand a hundred chest X-rays a year! They oughta have 'em, too. --Dr.J.Frank Parnell

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    19. Re:A conspiracy... by flyneye · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, The Judean Peoples Front.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    20. Re:A conspiracy... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you seriously expect something refined from a KKK member? Their sole existence seems to be oriented towards being used for parody.

      It's kind of a nuisance that the biggest fans of the 'white race' tend to be walking arguments against it. Why don't they try the "Ha! I'll show the mud races what's what by being a successful human being!" a bit more often?

    21. Re:A conspiracy... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Always trying to claim credit. It wasn't the Peoples' Front of Judea. Those guys are bumbling idiots. This was the Judean Peoples' Front.

    22. Re:A conspiracy... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      The thing that surprises me is that this person went to Jewish organizations and thought "Hey. Jews trust the KKK, right?" (Helpful tip for other KKK members: We tend not to trust KKK members. They tend to be grouped along with Neo-Nazis and other hate groups.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    23. Re:A conspiracy... by kesuki · · Score: 2

      "Ionizing radiation includes both subatomic particles of matter moving at relativistic speeds and electromagnetic waves on the short wavelength end of the electromagnetic spectrum. Common particles include alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons, and various other particles such as mesons that constitute cosmic rays.[2][3][1] Electromagnetic waves are ionizing if their wavelength is short enough that the photons have enough energy to ionize. Gamma rays, X-rays, and the upper vacuum ultraviolet part of the ultraviolet spectrum are ionizing, while the lower ultraviolet, visible light (including laser light), infrared, microwaves and radio waves are considered non-ionizing radiation"
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionizing_radiation
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acute_radiation_syndrome
      so an xray weapon would easily be able to cause radiation sickness. while explaining why sunlight can cause sunburn but why beach goers don't all keel over from being in the sunlight. i was surprised that microwaves aren't ionizing rads since they are often referred to as cooking from the insides...it helps that the earth has a magnetic pole since that sweeps away most of the bad radiation, by deflecting it to the poles.

    24. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Paul Ross Evans: attempted bombing of an abortion clinic.
      Kevin W. Harpham: attempted bombing of a civil rights parade.
      Marie Mason: firebombing of a Michigan State University research lab.

      Muslim terrorists are in the minority in the US. It's just that the others don't usually get more than regional coverage.

    25. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My x-ray gun is purely for hunting.

      That is noble. Mine is only for fighting domestic tyranny. I'm considering getting a couple more: one for fighting foreign terrorism, and one for self-defense. You can't be too careful these days.

    26. Re:A conspiracy... by sjwt · · Score: 4, Informative

      " i was surprised that microwaves aren't ionizing rads since they are often referred to as cooking from the insides.."

      But they don't cook from the inside out.. Extremely old microwaves used to come with a thermometer that stuck down into the middle of what you were cooking so they could slowly cook from the outside in and would stop when your food was fully cooked. Newer microwaves realised that ppl quickly catch on to how to use them and a billion microwave cookbooks out there and removed the mostly redundant piece of equipment.

      Not sure why you are spreading that old myth, and haven't worked it out yourself when you undercook something your self and find its still cold in the middle, but eh.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    27. Re:A conspiracy... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Easy mistake. I made the same mistake when I first read it. Had to go back and read it a couple times before I saw it. Yeah, we all know know that not all terrorists are Muslim. But we're not used to it.

      Short memories. I remember when a large proportion of terrorists were Catholic.

    28. Re:A conspiracy... by aXis100 · · Score: 2

      Visible, Infrared, Microwave, and Radio can all cause heating (it is energy after all), but this is not ionising and not considered damaging unless it exceeds your body's thresholds for temperature regulation.

      Microwave and Radio can penetrate deeper and create heat through a dielectric effect, but the end result is still the same.

    29. Re:A conspiracy... by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      In case you haven't noticed, not every terrorist and terrorist-wannabe is a genius.

      Bitch, please. Muslim terrorists build bombs out of pressure cookers. These Jewish terrorists wanted to build a fucking death ray.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    30. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judean People's Front!

    31. Re: A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nutjob.

    32. Re:A conspiracy... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      My x-ray gun is purely for hunting.

      The department of game and wildlife might like to have a few words with you, about that device that is not a lawful hunting weapon :)

      You do realize: what kind of weapons you can use to hunt with are highly regulated?

      They want to make sure the hunter doesn't have an unfair advantage / 'cheat' by using a weapon such as an automatic firearm with high-capacity magazine that guarantees them a kill.

      Generally in most states you are limited to bows and arrows and rifles that carry 5 rounds per magazine or less.

    33. Re:A conspiracy... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Apparently, Crawford was an industrial engineer for GE and a KKK member -- which just makes it all that much weirder that they'd try to sell it to Jewish organizations.

      Maybe, maybe not.

      Klan members are able to prioritize their hate to suit their concerns.
      David Duke of the KKK hates Jews/Zionists more than blacks
      United In Hate? Fmr. KKK Leader David Duke Endorses Black Anti-Zionist For Congress

      There are many Muslims in the United States as recent immigrants. As Klan members they could be expressing the traditional Klan hatred towards immigrants. Or maybe the Klan has decided to add a new line item on the hate list. They might have an added incentive since New York was the target of half of the 9/11 attacks, and maybe the 10 year anniversary planted a seed. I doubt that some identifiable group attacking the US would fill the Klan with love for them. After all, in the Klan's eyes, Jews may be the hidden cabal controlling the world, but they aren't openly killing Americans by the thousands. There was also the "Ground Zero mosque" controversy. I expect more will come out at the trial.

      At first, the Ku Klux Klan focused its anger and violence on African-Americans, on white Americans who stood up for them, and against the federal government which supported their rights. Subsequent incarnations of the Klan, which typically emerged in times of rapid social change, added more categories to its enemies list, including Jews, Catholics (less so after the 1970s), homosexuals, and different groups of immigrants. -- more

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    34. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a long history of Jewish terrorist organizations. You don't hear about them as much because there aren't that many Jews in the world (~0.8% the number of Muslims and ~0.6% the number of Christians).

    35. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit. I wouldn't have settled for less than a whole synchrotron!

    36. Re:A conspiracy... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Umm, pray tell, what has heating up (using microwaves) got to do with ionization? Radiation sickness happens because key elements of cells get damaged. The chemistry of our cells is not designed to deal with intense interference with structures of various complex molecules. Ionizing radiation is called such because it can dissociate molecules into ions - that's a rather significant alteration, the original molecule ceases to exist.

      The sunburn is a very specific reaction to DNA damage and only DNA damage. The DNA is sensitive to non-ionizing UV-B radiation; new chemical bonds are formed when a photon is absorbed and doesn't get converted to heat. This happens without ionization having occurred. The DNA is simply, by design, susceptible to this kind of radiation, and the direct damage mechanism of DNA is a part of a large family of photochemical reactions. In terms of sensitivity per photon, the DNA is about 2 orders of magnitude less sensitive (~0.1% eff.) than the silver halide you'd find in a film emulsion (~20% eff. undoped).

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    37. Re:A conspiracy... by alantus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bitch, please. Muslim terrorists build bombs out of pressure cookers. These Jewish terrorists wanted to build a fucking death ray.

      Except that the terrorists are not jewish. They were trying to get funding by jewish organizations by promising to target enemies of Israel.
      Instead of funding them, the jewish organizations contacted the FBI.

      So no, the jews in this story are not the terrorists, in fact, they are the heroes.

      It lookes like the slashdot editor (samzenpus) is either trying to discredit the jews on purpose or is too stupid to write a decent summary.

    38. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pressure cooker method actually worked. Am I an even bigger genius if I want to build a time machine black hole bomb to destroy the Earth before life evolves, but have no fucking clue how to do so, so I go ask some FBI agents for help on the design? I'd consider rigging up a simple but functional design rather than chasing after a wacky boondoggle to be the smarter move any day.

    39. Re:A conspiracy... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      My x-ray gun is purely for hunting.

      The department of game and wildlife might like to have a few words with you, about that device that is not a lawful hunting weapon :)

      Wow, DNR regulates hunting of mosquittos & houseflies?!?

      Talk about mission-creep! Ha!

      GP never stated what he intended to hunt with his X-ray gun. Due to energy storage/weight/size considerations, anything man-portable might...assuming a brilliant design...be able to kill a very tiny insect-size creature at very close range at best. Ever looked at the amount of hardware and power required to irradiate food pouches for non-refrigerated storage/transport, just to kill bacteria?

      Now, of course, if he went all Dr. Evil with a giant X-ray laser on the moon...

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    40. Re:A conspiracy... by davester666 · · Score: 2

      Are there people that aren't part of the KKK that do trust them?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    41. Re:A conspiracy... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Wow, DNR regulates hunting of mosquittos & houseflies?!?

      No, but mosquittos and houseflies are very small, and not particularly vulnerable to being irradiated with X-rays. Although it may be more effective against the pupae.

      See this article on the eficacy of Gamma Radiation against the housefly.

      The dose-mortality was found to be, essentially 10 Gy fatal to 50%, and 8 Gy to sterilize them.

      This is an incredible amount of exposure, considering half that absorption kills a human, predictably, within 14 days.

      You could infer... that the weapon is potentially more dangerous to the human, than to the fly.

    42. Re:A conspiracy... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you missed the part about them being "pro-Israel"? Terrorism isn't limited to just one religion, you know.
      No doubt there are some Jewish organizations that would have supported their acts.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    43. Re:A conspiracy... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Here in the UK, most of our terrorists for a long time were Irish.

    44. Re:A conspiracy... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      That, and 'the enemy of my enemy.' The religious aspect of the conflict around Israel comes down to Muslims vs Jews. Even if the conservatives aren't big fans of Jews, they detest Muslims - and that makes Jews their allies.

    45. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Muslim terrorists are actually building these bombs.
      Now, the israeli terrorists are soliciting money to build something that sounds so much cooler...

      Now, I hate to be stereotyping but you walked into that yourself...

    46. Re:A conspiracy... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of pro-Israel racists. Of course I don't just mean anti-arab anti-muslim racists, but the full anti-black, "white people are the master race"-racists. This was/is the norm with South African racists, for instance - I remember an account from an ex-neonazi who had visited ideological relatives in SA, and was quite shocked at how his antisemitism wasn't tolerated. Got his first hints of doubt because of it - there can come something good out of anything, I guess.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    47. Re:A conspiracy... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Brooklyn Bridge really was sold. Twice. By the same guy.

      The same guy also sold the Eiffel Tower. He sold that one twice, too.

      He sold them for scrap metal. Really. And he got away with it all 4 times. It wasn't until years later the FBI caught up with him.

      I read about it in one of those Reader's Digest Condensed Books. The book was written by the FBI agent who caught him. It's all on record.

    48. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also Scott Roeder. It's still a terrorist attack if it targets a specific person.

    49. Re:A conspiracy... by bickerdyke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that the terrorists are not jewish. They were trying to get funding by jewish organizations by promising to target enemies of Israel.
      Instead of funding them, the jewish organizations contacted the FBI.

      So no, the jews in this story are not the terrorists, in fact, they are the heroes.

      It lookes like the slashdot editor (samzenpus) is either trying to discredit the jews on purpose or is too stupid to write a decent summary.

      There is nothing like THE Jews in this story. Some Jews were heroes.

      But what other kind of terrorists would ask Jewish organizations for funding? Muslim terrorists? definitly no. Anti-Gouvernment homegron style terrorists? No, don't think so. Neo-Nazis as "pro-Israel"? Aeehmm.. most definitly no.

      --
      bickerdyke
    50. Re:A conspiracy... by surfinokie · · Score: 1

      Splitter!

      --
      Chance 'em.
    51. Re:A conspiracy... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      Umm, pray tell, what has heating up (using microwaves) got to do with ionization?

      Well, if you heat up enough, you'll get ionization (plasma). Of course to heat up to such high temperatures you'd need much more power than your typical microwave oven.

      The DNA is simply, by design, susceptible to this kind of radiation

      So there's not only an intelligent designer, but he intentionally made the DNA vulnerable to UV-B? :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    52. Re:A conspiracy... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that the terrorists are not jewish.

      Has anyone said they're not Jewish? Or that they are Jewish?

      It lookes like the slashdot editor (samzenpus) is either trying to discredit the jews on purpose

      How? By not implying that they're Jewish? The only person who's stated that they're Jewish is FatLitteMonkey.

      or is too stupid to write a decent summary.

      a) samzenpus didn't write it b) samzenpus probably didn't read it

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    53. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy mistake. I made the same mistake when I first read it. Had to go back and read it a couple times before I saw it. Yeah, we all know know that not all terrorists are Muslim. But we're not used to it.

      Short memories. I remember when a large proportion of terrorists were Catholic.

      The British remember a large proportion of terrorists were settlers way back in 1776.

    54. Re:A conspiracy... by mrbluejello · · Score: 1

      Well, if the terrorists were pro-Israel Jews, they may consider trying to find other Jews to support their cause.

      Fortunately the people they spoke to were reasonable people.

    55. Re:A conspiracy... by Ed_1024 · · Score: 1

      You're going to have to pry my X-ray gun out of my cold, dead... Hey! One's fallen off!

    56. Re:A conspiracy... by kaspar_silas · · Score: 1

      Just a bit more than a typical microwave oven. You oven can go to about say 300 degrees celsius equivalent to about 0.05 eV.

      To ionize oxygen or hydrogen (13.6 eV) by heating well that's going to take about 158,000 degrees. The long and the short of it being that ionization by heating is not easy.

    57. Re:A conspiracy... by alantus · · Score: 1

      Except that the terrorists are not jewish.

      Has anyone said they're not Jewish? Or that they are Jewish?

      Yes, FatLitteMonkey said they are jewish, as well as others posting on this story.

      It lookes like the slashdot editor (samzenpus) is either trying to discredit the jews on purpose

      How? By not implying that they're Jewish?

      The summary does imply that they are Jewish, which is why FatLittleMonkey and others are confused.

      or is too stupid to write a decent summary.

      a) samzenpus didn't write it b) samzenpus probably didn't read it

      My bad, gurps_npc was too stupid to write a decent summary, samzenpus was too lazy to read it before posting it.

    58. Re:A conspiracy... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      So no, the jews in this story are not the terrorists, in fact, they are the heroes.

      Be careful with that word "heroes", because the summary is incorrect. The article doesn't state that "Jewish organisations" informed the FBI, but "a ranking member of the Ku Klux Klan". Now, are you going to say "the Ku Klux Klan are the heroes"? I hope not.

      It lookes like the slashdot editor (samzenpus) is either trying to discredit the jews on purpose or is too stupid to write a decent summary.

      If he was trying to "discredit the Jews" he'd hardly have credited them for the KKK's actions in informing the police.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    59. Re:A conspiracy... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      is this whole thing a joke? why would the terrorists solicit money from jewish organizations? also, doesn't the TSA have similar vans already?

      Because they were radical pro-Israel terrorists, perhaps? The real wonder, missing from the summary, is why would they go to the KKK, who are not simply anti-black, but anti-anything-not-caucasian, and therefore quite likely to be anti-Jew...

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    60. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, you've weakened the word "terrorism" to being another word for (attempted) murder.

      What then should we call it, when someone is trying to terrorize the population?

    61. Re:A conspiracy... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      At first, the Ku Klux Klan focused its anger and violence on African-Americans, on white Americans who stood up for them, and against the federal government which supported their rights. Subsequent incarnations of the Klan, which typically emerged in times of rapid social change, added more categories to its enemies list, including Jews, Catholics (less so after the 1970s), homosexuals, and different groups of immigrants. -- more

      Wait... the KKK are anti-catholic?!? Do they not even know their own history? Have they not seen where their outfits come from? Mediterranean Holy Week penitent Catholics....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    62. Re:A conspiracy... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The summary does imply that they are Jewish,

      Where? It says they're pro-Israel, that's all. One can be pro-Israel without being Jewish.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    63. Re:A conspiracy... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      That said, there is an interesting subcultural twist in certain subsections of American conservatism: they don't necessarily like judaism; but their particular flavor of Christian millennialism requires Jews in order to fulfill assorted 'prophesy' related events shortly before the end times.

      Unfortunately this is theologically unsound. The core of this is that the construction of the third template will usher in the Endtimes. But if you believe in the Bible at all, then we are already in the Endtimes, and have been since Jesus "destroyed the Temple and [rebuilt] it in three days" -- Jesus was the third temple.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    64. Re:A conspiracy... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      You think the KKK are reasonable people?!? Do you need a hex key, a posidrive or a flat head driver to deal with that loose screw.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    65. Re:A conspiracy... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      This is an incredible amount of exposure, considering half that absorption kills a human, predictably, within 14 days.

      You could infer... that the weapon is potentially more dangerous to the human, than to the fly.

      I grant that my examples were more for comedic effect than scientific accuracy. It's like an old Robin Williams stand-up line, that after a total nuclear war, all that will be left alive with all the radiation will be the cockroaches and Keith Richards.

      The point still stands that even for humans (barring Keith Richards), the amount of power required for such a weapon to generate any where near a fatal dose within the space of one or two minutes or less at distances of 20 meters or more (say, from a curbside vehicle into the interior of the proximate building) from the X-ray emitter, given the inverse-square rule concerning effective power at a given distance from a radiation source, would be quite impressive to say the least. Five minutes with a calculator should have convinced them to move on.

      This whole thing sounds like one of those wacky FBI "sting" operations where the FBI comes up with some lame plan and method, then finds a moron or three to play it off on until the morons incriminate themselves sufficiently for charges to be brought.

      I can't imagine any actual terrorists that wouldn't do at least a little checking to make certain their Dr. Evil-esque "weapon" will even have any serious life-threatening effect, other than what one would get from a year or two of regular business air travel, before they started plotting an attack.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    66. Re:A conspiracy... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      In case you haven't noticed, not every terrorist and terrorist-wannabe is a genius.

      Five cases in point.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    67. Re:A conspiracy... by SJHiIlman · · Score: 0

      They want to make sure the hunter doesn't have an unfair advantage / 'cheat'

      How is it unfair or cheating to make use of the resources available to you? What if some people are simply better at hunting than others? Is that 'cheating,' too? What nonsense.

    68. Re:A conspiracy... by jythie · · Score: 1

      Because there are jewish terrorists? Israel has some pretty old links to terrorism itself and their groups were (debatably) influential in the state's creation.

    69. Re:A conspiracy... by jythie · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I can recall in college we went over a case study where a line of medical x-ray machines were occasionally killing people with overdoses. Turns out there was a software bug in the keyboard input of all places. Point is, at short range a chest x-ray machine can be rigged to kill. It was still a dumb plan though.

    70. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This winds me up no end.

      "Everyone living in Israel is Jewish" is also false statement. Itâ€(TM)s like says "Everyone living in the UK is Christian", which is far from true.

      75% of Israelis are Jewish

      25% of those Jews are Jews by name only. They do not follow the practices.

      33% of Israelis class themselves as atheist or agnostic.

      Figures not exact but the point is the same. Tarring people with the same brush is no longer helpful in this world.

    71. Re:A conspiracy... by jabuzz · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is all the Irish ones that you spent decades shielding from justice back in the U.K. because it suited you. They where allowed to openly raise funds, and convicted terrorists where not extradited back to the U.K.

    72. Re:A conspiracy... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's more complicated than that. Traditional heating methods only heat the outer surface of food directly, but microwaves penetrate down to a few centimetres depending on the dish being cooked. Food designed for microwave cooking is often supplied in containers that allow everything to be heated at once. Of course it isn't even, the outer edges get more energy dumped into them, but it is pretty effective.

      You are correct, they don't heat from the inside out, but they also don't simply heat from the outside in either.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    73. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, and I thought that it was patterned after the dunce caps that children would be forced to wear in schools in the 19th century...

    74. Re:A conspiracy... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      is this whole thing a joke? why would the terrorists solicit money from jewish organizations?

      Ummm, the first five words of the summary ... "Two radical pro-Israel terrorists" ... so, who else would they go to for money besides people they hoped shared their beliefs?

      I should think if you were radical pro-Elbonian terrorists, you'd seek money from Elbonians too.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    75. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can make plasma in your microwave already. Check youtube.

    76. Re:A conspiracy... by tibit · · Score: 1

      You oven can go to about say 300 degrees celsius equivalent to about 0.05 eV.

      Said someone who never actually used the microwave oven...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    77. Re:A conspiracy... by tibit · · Score: 2

      Tissues are not very transparent to UV-B, so this problem is limited to outer skin layers. Moreover, we adapt over generations by varying the melanin content. It takes about a 100 generations to go from full white to full black, and vice versa (there go the racial arguments, LOL). I'd say that given DNA's efficiency of storing information, the UV-B sensitivity is but a nitpick.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    78. Re:A conspiracy... by torsmo · · Score: 2

      I don't see any non-Jewish pro-Israeli group/individual having the zeal and motivation to carry out a terrorist attack against the enemies of Israel, driven solely by a goodwill for Israel. They must have some other hidden agenda, surely. It's more likely that this group/individual is pissed off at someone who co-incidently also happens to be an "enemy" of Israel.

    79. Re:A conspiracy... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Well, if you heat up enough, you'll get ionization (plasma).

      But this is purely a thermal effect! The radiation doesn't ionize, the radiation heats up the material sufficiently so that the ionization occurs spontaneously due to collisions between atoms or molecules. Just because you have ionization doesn't mean that the radiation is ionizing!!

      Of course to heat up to such high temperatures you'd need much more power than your typical microwave oven.

      This is a rather nonsensical statement. Everything depends on the thermal balance of the sample you're heating up. Without knowing that, you can't make any arguments as to how much power is needed. Hint: low-pressure gases have low thermal conductivity and low volumetric heat :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    80. Re: A conspiracy... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Aren't there recipes for plasma in a microwave? You need corks, burnt toothpick, and a glass I think?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    81. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're splitters!

    82. Re:A conspiracy... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      "Not exact" is a rather generous abbreviation of "adds up to 108% covering only two options."

    83. Re:A conspiracy... by caspy7 · · Score: 1

      Mine is for cooking.
      I like to cook the eggs while they're still fresh - very fresh.

    84. Re:A conspiracy... by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Why don't they try the "Ha! I'll show the mud races what's what by being a successful human being!" a bit more often?

      They do. Have you not noticed how practically all of our leaders are old, rich, white men? The "biggest fans of the white race" are not rednecks who fly the Confederate flag, they're the rich white assholes who make policies that keep black people from becoming successful. e.g. the war on drugs, three strikes laws, welfare reform, and just investing more in white people than other people in general.

      The KKK could disappear from the face of the Earth, and it would make no difference to the vast majority of blacks. It's the institutional racism, supported by supposedly respectable people that's the real problem.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    85. Re:A conspiracy... by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      Dude, this guy built a DIY oxygen plasma etcher using his home microwave oven.

      I guess by heating it's not likely, the electric field strength in the center of the microwave has no problem however.

    86. Re:A conspiracy... by rullywowr · · Score: 1

      So its a lot like the TSA, except the "safe" scanners come to you!

    87. Re:A conspiracy... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They want to make sure the hunter doesn't have an unfair advantage / 'cheat' by using a weapon such as an automatic firearm with high-capacity magazine that guarantees them a kill.

      False, and also false. Hunting magazine restrictions are there to prevent people from using hunting as an excuse for toting around a high-cap mag. It's just another attempt at an end-run around the constitution. Here's another example; even if you have a concealment permit, if you have a handgun on you while you're only allowed to be using a rifle for whatever you've got tags for, you may well be cited for using the wrong weapon for hunting. That's just another infringement of the right to keep and bear arms. They have no constitutional basis to tell me that I don't have a right to bear my sidearm simply because I'm also carrying my rifle.

      California used to have a law explicitly protecting the right to carry firearms on public property. Now look at it. You're not even allowed to carry a firearm in a state park. Those are big places where violent crimes can occur in secrecy. How's New York doing? As the coasts, so goes the nation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    88. Re:A conspiracy... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the thermometer expensive? It had to be made to not be an antenna...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    89. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Haters gonna hate!" That's why they are called Hate Groups - cause they hatin'. Doesn't matter what, or who, or why - to them hate is the means and the ends in itself. Humanity at its worst. It sickens me. They should all burn. I hate them...

    90. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was on ABC news last night. I was going to submit it, but there was already a submission so I voyed for it in the firehose. The TV news was more thorough than this newspaper article (sad when TV news is better than a real newspaper). These guys simply hated blacks and muslims, and the FBI found out about them when a Jewish organization they were trying to get funding from turned them in.

      I'm surprised the military doesn't already have weapons like this. Maybe they do?

    91. Re:A conspiracy... by Medievalist · · Score: 2

      I don't see any non-Jewish pro-Israeli group/individual...

      Like United States three-letter agencies that are dominated by professed Christian Armageddonists?

      ...having the zeal and motivation to carry out a terrorist attack against the enemies of Israel, driven solely by a goodwill for Israel.

      Oh, good point. The armagaddonist nutjobs only sponsor pro-Israeli terrorism so that Israel will be around to be destroyed in the Last Days, and the unrepentant Jews sent screaming into Hell.

      It's always amazed me how much of Western government policy is based on questionable interpretations of an Eastern religious book that contains glaringly obvious errors of translation (rabbits chewing cud, insects with four legs, and suchlike).

    92. Re:A conspiracy... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I think this also illustrates an interesting contrast: the Jewish organizations wanted no part of the plot, and not only that, reported the perps to law enforcement; conversely, how many Islamic clerics and mosques have been found to eagerly fund terror plots? Certainly not all of them (duh) nor even a majority of them, but more than enough, historically, and it's likely that while a good many of them declined to be involved, a good number also failed to report the perps to the FBI.
      This is why muslims, even the peaceful ones, tend to get a bad rap; even if they're not participating, they appear too willing to look the other way.
      That said, it's possible that some do in fact report such plots, but that it's kept hush-hush, so that cooperative clerics don't get targeted themselves; we'll never know.
      My gut feeling, FWIW, though, is the former, because AQ and other similar groups must get their considerable funding from somewhere.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    93. Re:A conspiracy... by MondoGordo · · Score: 1

      I was gonna say ... the TSA has these(truck mounted xray machines) and they're "perfectly safe" so how does this constitute a "terrorist plot"?

    94. Re:A conspiracy... by fiann · · Score: 2
      I believe you are referring to the accidents with the THERAC-25? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therac-25

      The Therac-25 was a radiation therapy machine produced by Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) after the Therac-6 and Therac-20 units (the earlier units had been produced in partnership with CGR of France). It was involved in at least six accidents between 1985 and 1987, in which patients were given massive overdoses of radiation, approximately 100 times the intended dose.[2]:425 These accidents highlighted the dangers of software control of safety-critical systems, and they have become a standard case study in health informatics and software engineering.

      Much more detailed write-up on the accidents. http://sunnyday.mit.edu/papers/therac.pdf

    95. Re:A conspiracy... by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      They're also regulated to ensure humane kills e.g. you can't hunt deer with a .22 because you're most likely to just seriously wound them.

    96. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there have been over 70 terrorist attacks perpetrated in the USA by muslims...that have maimed/murdered over 3,000 people.

      http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/americanattacks.htm

      Over 20,000 terror attacks perpetrated in the name of islam world wide SINCE 9/11/2001.

    97. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPLITTERS!

    98. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i was surprised that microwaves aren't ionizing rads since they are often referred to as cooking from the insides

      The frequency of the microwaves is such that it speeds up water molecules is how it heats, not by radiating heat into the food. The increased water heat heats everything else. There's a bar in town that sells bowls of frozen microwave greasy chilli. I like the stuff and will take a few bowls home sometimes. Microwave it for two minutes and the grease on the top is still frozen, break the frozen grease and the beans are steaming. Stir the frozen grease in with the chilli and the heat from the chilli thaws the grease while the grease cools the chili to a temperature that won't blister your mouth; grease and water don't mix.

      What I've always wondered about microwaves is why grill barbecued pork, it always tastes better the next day after it's been in the refrigerator all night and reheated in a microwave.

    99. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The regulations surrounding hunting have nothing to do with fair/unfair. Otherwise baits, lures, long range firearms, high end bows, scopes and a variety of other things would be outlawed. The have to do with limiting disease, preventing over hunting, "traditional hunting" (think HOA, keeping all hunters "the same"), some safety and preventing bad publicity. Automatics/high caps are more of a safety/publicity thing, during hunting season there can be a dozen or so hunters per square mile. If hunters were firing dozens of rounds at a time the chances of hitting another hunter would go up significantly, also the possibility of a bullet riddled dear ending up on social media would cause outrage. Baiting and lures are sometimes limited to prevent game from congregating and feeding from a single source, which would increase the chances of a disease spreading. And sometimes the limitations/requirements are purely "traditional", I can't think of a good reason to limit hunters to using shot for some small game (turkey) while allowing the use small cal rifle on others (squirrel, rabbit, etc)

    100. Re:A conspiracy... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Either a Jewish nut or a fundamemtalist Christian nut, the latter of which wants Israel to survive because its establishment is one of the requirements for the End Times to begin.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    101. Re:A conspiracy... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It's an even worse joke. While Zionist Terrorists exist- it was soliciting money from the KKK that got them turned in. Dumb criminals do get caught.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    102. Re:A conspiracy... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      That's funny because the original Zionist Terrorists were the Zealots, and that's where we get the word "Zeal" from.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    103. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems "black people" do more to keep "black people" from being successful.

      The Latinos and Asians are doing better. I think even the new African immigrants and West Indians are doing better. So I'd say most of the problem is with the "black people". Sticking with a culture that glorifies a lot of bad things isn't going to get you far.

    104. Re:A conspiracy... by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      I don't see any non-Jewish pro-Israeli group/individual having the zeal and motivation to carry out a terrorist attack against the enemies of Israel, driven solely by a goodwill for Israel. They must have some other hidden agenda, surely.

      It's obvious that attacking various enemies of Israel is simply their business plan to attract funding. We all know that the Jews control the banks and have all the money. Who else should they proposition? Mormons?

    105. Re:A conspiracy... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      true but... isn't it fair to say that the type of person who is so rabidly pro-israel that they are going to be terorists are likely to be jewish? also, there are plenty of pro-israel people in the world who are not in israel.

    106. Re:A conspiracy... by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      It's kind of a nuisance that the biggest fans of the 'white race' tend to be walking arguments against it. Why don't they try the "Ha! I'll show the mud races what's what by being a successful human being!" a bit more often?

      Well, it's my argument for why free speech shouldn't be feared. A lot of people would like to ban hate speech because it's bigoted and hurtful to those who are on the receiving end. Of course it is. On the other hand, the best way of stamping out bigotry is by letting the bigots speak their mind and make clear to the world that their arguments have no merit.

      Basically, the fact that KKK members are "walking arguments against it" is to be expected if they are indeed wrong about their positions. It's not surprising at all.

    107. Re:A conspiracy... by dywolf · · Score: 1

      KKK. Read the article on CNN.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    108. Re:A conspiracy... by dywolf · · Score: 1
      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    109. Re:A conspiracy... by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Again: Neither.
      KKK member.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    110. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, more like the Judean People's Front!

    111. Re: A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also tried to sell to the KKK. They are not Jewish and the blogger has his own agenda, obviously.

    112. Re:A conspiracy... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      We tend not to trust KKK members. They tend to be grouped along with Neo-Nazis and other hate groups.

      Hate groups, like, say, far-right religious Zionists?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    113. Re:A conspiracy... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Sticking with a culture that glorifies a lot of bad things isn't going to get you far.

      It seems to have worked pretty well for the old, rich, white men I mentioned above. The crips and bloods don't have shit on Goldman Sachs or Monsanto.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    114. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, most of the terrorists in Ireland were British.

    115. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah if only the UK hadn't been busily encouraging and cooperating with loyalist death squads you might have a point.

    116. Re:A conspiracy... by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Have you not noticed how practically all of our leaders are old, rich, white men?

      Yes I did. Like Barack Obama. And Eric Holder. And Janet Napolitano. And Kathleen Sebelius. And Susan Rice. And Maxine Waters. And Charles Rangel. And Sheila Jackson Lee. And Dianne Feinstein, And Bennie Thompson. And Al Green. And John Conyers. And Elija Cummings. And Maria Cantwell. And Barbara Boxer. And Bobby Jindal. Ad naseum.

      Rich, old, white men. The whole lot of them.

    117. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm almost a Jew. I'm Jew-ish.

    118. Re:A conspiracy... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Do you see that "practically" in there? They exist, but they are vastly underrepresented. There is exactly one African American in the Senate. There are only 6 African American CEOs in the Fortune 500. I could go on, but why?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    119. Re:A conspiracy... by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      It's hard to take your rant seriously when our President is black and was elected twice. Sorry, but "practically" or not, you fail.

    120. Re:A conspiracy... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      And what has he done for the black community that even comes close to approaching the gifts he's given to the overwhelmingly white upper class? Electing an Uncle Tom does not prove that there is no institutional racism. The truth of the matter is that Obama's presidency is nothing more than a means of getting black people to support policies that harm black people.

      To enlighten you, here's a few articles discussing just how little Obama has done for his most dedicated supporters.

      And yes, there's the argument that he is the "president of all Americans, not just African Americans". Which is very true. But the right way to help Americans is to help those who need it the most.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    121. Re:A conspiracy... by sjames · · Score: 1

      If they knew how to be successful human beings, they wouldn't need to boost their fragile ego by blaming other races for their failures.

    122. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to the Cold War, radiation alarms are everywhere. A delivery truck carrying parts for portable x-ray equipment used in construction took a shortcut through downtown Boston a few years ago and tripped alarms all over place.

      http://boston.cbslocal.com/2011/11/29/crews-respond-to-possible-radioactive-leak-near-haymarket-station/

      If you are transporting an xray machine through a city, you are easily trackable. You need a permit, and have to take a specific route.

    123. Re:A conspiracy... by cangrejoinmortal · · Score: 1

      Jewish organizations already have the backup of one terrorist group: The U.S. army.

    124. Re:A conspiracy... by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Read the article after writing my comment (in good /. tradition...)

      I never would have KKK terrorists to support Israel.....

      --
      bickerdyke
    125. Re:A conspiracy... by jythie · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right. We looked at it over a decade ago so my memory was a bit hazy, so reading over it again was fun ^_^

    126. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, you can be anti-Jewish and pro-Israel.

      My brother is a Fundamentalist Christian. I flirted with it when I was in high school, after he converted and tried to "save me", went to a few months of church, met a lot of people who were concerned for my everlasting soul. The vast majority of them had nothing but contempt for Jews, but were very pro-Israel.

      It's not a contradiction at all, when you consider what the book of Revelations lists as the perquisites for the apocalypse. One of them being the existence of an Israeli state. They aren't concerned for the health and well-being of Jews, they are concerned with setting up the proper conditions to kick off the apocalypse. Apparently they are tired of waiting to prove to all of us they were right all along.

    127. Re:A conspiracy... by bluemonq · · Score: 1

      >Neo-Nazis as "pro-Israel"? Aeehmm.. most definitly no.

      You have a really poor imagination.

      1) Hide neo-Nazi leanings.
      2) Target "dem Muslim foreigners".
      3) Pin blame on "the Jews".
      4) Watch sparks fly.

    128. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] they're the rich white assholes who make policies that keep black people from becoming successful. e.g. the war on drugs, three strikes laws, welfare reform [...]

      So what you're saying is all black people are addicted to drugs, criminals, and have no money?

    129. Re:A conspiracy... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Jewish organizations already have the backup of one terrorist group: The U.S. army.

      So I take it then you're cool with the Marines, Navy, and Air Force ..just checking.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    130. Re:A conspiracy... by Hatta · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, what I'm saying is that black people are disproportionately affected by those laws. Rates of drug use are roughly the same between white and black communities. Black people get arrested for drugs 4-5x more often than white people. You can figure the rest out for yourself.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    131. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hunter doesn't have an unfair advantage / 'cheat' by using a weapon such as an automatic firearm with high-capacity magazine that guarantees them a kill.

      Generally in most states you are limited to bows and arrows and rifles that carry 5 rounds per magazine or less.

      How is any form of ranged weaponry -not- an unfair advantage? If you were really hunting, you should already have the unfair advantage of the animal being unaware of your presence...

      If all they wanted to do is drink beer and shoot firearms, they should just buy some land and shoot at the ground.

    132. Re:A conspiracy... by cangrejoinmortal · · Score: 1

      Well, they do a pretty lousy job in not letting the unfair advantage thing.

    133. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why is it that when you microwave a marshmallow, it burns on the inside LONG before it ever starts to burn on the outside?

    134. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were highly successful then they wouldn't need to justify their feelings of superiority through something like race.

    135. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It lookes like the slashdot editor (samzenpus) is either trying to discredit the jews on purpose or is too stupid to write a decent summary.

      Is this the first article you've read on Slashdot? The editors aren't exactly known for their literary prowess, regardless of their feelings towards the Jews.

    136. Re:A conspiracy... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Race and culture are two entirely separate things. Never conflate the two. That said, there are different types of African American cultures. Some are based on a strong worth ethic that loves being around other cultures in America. The other being urban drug dealing cities in which hardly anyone is educated and most women don't even know who in the fuck is the father of their children. I've personally met many blacks from the UK and Kenyon who are scared to hang around this other culture of African Americans.

      Same thing happens all the time with ABC (American Born Chinese). Often an ABC will try and do business over in China thinking they will be successful because of their professional acumen while at the same time relate to other Chinese by race alone to forge better social connections. Nothing for be farther from the truth. ABCs are often looked down as just another foreigner and at worst contempt for being a child of a traitor to the motherland.

      Back to my basic point. It's urban "blacks" (culturally speaking) that need to help themselves. This whole codification through victimization cycle needs to end. Blaming "whitey" isn't going to solve a damn thing for them.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    137. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WANTED!

      At least the pressure cooker ones *succeed*! *cough*

      Now who's the genius?

    138. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and a raven *can* be white and be struck by lightning while being attacked by a gay black female Jewish Mexican Nazi suicide bomber who just won the lottery.

      Doesn't mean it's going to happen.

    139. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pity no one remembers that the biggest terrorists (value of trade, not volume of trade) ARE jews

    140. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya muslim terrorists use pressure cookers, IEDs, rockets, sticks, stones, while jew terrorists use commercial planes, guided bombs, and entire armies of developed countries to invade countries that are probably even weaker than 3rd world countries. So noble.

    141. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the 2 idiots WERE jews, then the jews would not have informed the FBI

    142. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hardly think so, unless you're the POTUS of course

    143. Re: A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False. Are you on the email lists of any Islamic organizations? Do you read their press releases? Islamic organizations do this type of thing all the time. However, the media never amplifies their voice.

    144. Re:A conspiracy... by alexo · · Score: 2

      One can be pro-Israel without being Jewish.

      Also, one can also be Jewish and anti-Israel. Things can be complicated.

    145. Re: A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because as every pro-Israel person knows, the quickest way to get in touch with the Israeli military is through your local rabbi.

    146. Re: A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Project much?

    147. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no sociologist, but it seems to me that it takes being a failure in order to become this enraged against another social group.
      As in "I'd be successful if it wasn't for these ".

      That's why by definition members of hate groups like the KKK will always be, as you put it correctly, walking arguments against their own agenda.

    148. Re:A conspiracy... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      why would the terrorists solicit money from jewish organizations?

      [SIGH] OK, in small words, with low counts of syllables (is "syllables" too long for you? or even "terrorist"?) ... the terrorists are radical PRO-Israelis who want to kill, maim and terrorise non-Jews in general and Muslims in particular. They don't have the moral courage of the suicide bombers etc because the they don't have the balls to either die for their beliefs, or get caught and go to jail. (The damage caused by the X-rays would take days to weeks to show up, by which time they'd be off on their travels to "zap another brownie, who's not wearing a skull-cap". They'd be quite unlikely to get caught unless they were spectacularly [sorry, syllable count ; try "really, really"] stupid, which they clearly were.)

      When caught they'd go out in a blaze of x-rays, then piss themselves and spend the next 200-to-life being raped nightly by Big Mohammed in their cell. "Pour encourager les autres."

      also, doesn't the TSA have similar vans already?

      [more SIGH] I'm not 100% sure of the TSA, but for certain the UK Border Force have a number of fixed and mobile x-ray units for examining lorries and shipping containers coming into the country, in pursuit of illegal immigrants. Modifying such to produce a harmful beam would probably be difficult (vacuum physics can get difficult at high power) and need a fairly un-subtle power source, but it's probably doable. You'd need dose rates thousands or tens of thousands of times higher than medical X-ray machines, and probably hundreds of times higher than (say) weld inspection X-ray machines.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    149. Re:A conspiracy... by anagama · · Score: 1

      replying so I have easy access to your citations.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    150. Re:A conspiracy... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      I'm not 100% sure of the TSA, but for certain the UK Border Force have a number of fixed and mobile x-ray units for examining lorries and shipping containers coming into the country, in pursuit of illegal immigrants. Modifying such to produce a harmful beam would probably be difficult (vacuum physics can get difficult at high power) and need a fairly un-subtle power source, but it's probably doable. You'd need dose rates thousands or tens of thousands of times higher than medical X-ray machines, and probably hundreds of times higher than (say) weld inspection X-ray machines.

      I never accused the TSA of having death beams. I am accusing them of driving around cities with unmarked vans inside which poorly trained "agents" with GEDs fiddle with the controls of secret portable xray scanners. as you say, the dosage on those is likely small so one blast wouldn't hurt you. but what if you were hit a couple times a day (say, whenever you entered or exited a subway station) every day for a year, or several year? are those GED agents going to help you when you get sick?

    151. Re:A conspiracy... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      unmarked vans inside which poorly trained "agents" with GEDs fiddle with the controls of secret portable xray scanners.

      I've no idea what a GED is, nor why you would fiddle with one. "GE Deathrays"?

      You really haven't thought this through, have you? Electromagnetic radiation travels in straight lines (unless you've got a magnetic, electric, or gravitational field so strong that it would rip the iron atoms out of your haemoglobin), so your putative "secret portable X-ray scanner would need to take the form of a doorway, with source on one side and a detector on the other side. Yes, you could disguise such as, say, a doorway ; or hide it in a structure which poses as scaffolding that is part of building work. But that rather mitigates against the description of "secret" and "portable".

      Back-scatter X-ray ... well, it's not impossible (I've done a little cathodoluminiscence work, which goes a fair way down into the UV) ; I can see that X-rays might backscatter sufficiently to provide useful surface composition data. But you'd need horribly high dose rates, and therefore a lot of batteries to power the thing (again, making it less than "portable", or "secret"). You'd do far better using millimetre to micrometre wavelength radio waves, which do scatter from organic materials quite well. But they don't significantly penetrate skin, so they're not X-rays in either a strict or a lax meaning of the term.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    152. Re:A conspiracy... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      it's not my fault you don't know what a GED is. you should have learned that in high school. your argument appears to be "a portable secret van xray scanner would be both impractical, unhelpful and expensive, so it doesn't exist." but you don't know the largesse of the american government! as long as we can throw money at it, we will. until everybody's nads are fried.

    153. Re:A conspiracy... by tragedy · · Score: 1

      That doesn't sound quite right. An x-ray tube is an electrical device. It produces x-rays when it's powered up, but it's not actually made of radioisotopes, so it's not actually any more radioactive than any other piece of electronics when turned off. The article you're talking about seems to be about a truck carrying an isotope source like cobalt-60 or something like that. Also, all the other articles I could find on that incident claimed that the truck was noticed because it had a radiation warning hazmat placard on it and that they brought in the radiation detectors after that. That may be misdirection or bad reporting (entirely possible: the FOX article reported "Officials tell FOX 25 that the average human is exposed to approximately 1 millogram of radiation per day. This truck was giving a reading of around 4 millograms.")

  2. pro-Israel terrorists? by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Funny

    No such thing!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, they're called "Americans" ;-)

    2. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH, SNAP!

    3. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You generally wouldn't think of something like this coming from people associated with the Klan. Maybe they were self-loathing Klan members. Sure, they hate Jews, but they hate themselves more, so they sell to the people they hate (Jews) to injure the people they hate more (themselves). It seems to have worked.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Everybody is a little bit crazy. You never know what will set them off...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      OH, SNAP!

      No, its spelled "Oy Vey!"

    6. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      actually, there sort of is

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    7. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1
    9. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The enemy of my enemy is my friend

    10. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't liberals the new klan? I'm pretty sure they are, they seem to attack every conservative group by any means possible such as the IRS and affirmative action. I think people who worry about the KKK and such are fighting an old long dead war.

      Modern Liberals are the new KKK and you can lump in democrats and republicans as well.

  3. The two were also apparently plotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    to demand that people take off their shoes.

    1. Re:The two were also apparently plotting by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

      to demand that people take off their shoes.

      Maybe they can get jobs with the TSA.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:The two were also apparently plotting by neonmonk · · Score: 1

      That's the joke.

  4. They were probably just broke and ... by lazylion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They were probably just broke and got solicited by undercover FBI goons to make a "terrorist" plot.

    1. Re:They were probably just broke and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They apparently tried to solicit donations from the KK and Jewish organizations. You have to wonder these days if the whole thing was a sting to see if the FBI could find domestic organizations willing to donate to such a thing.

    2. Re:They were probably just broke and ... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      They were probably just broke and got solicited by undercover FBI goons to make a "terrorist" plot.

      Looks like they both had jobs.

      KKK Member Tried to Sell X-Ray Weapon to Kill ‘Israel’s Enemies’

      The FBI charged Glendon Scott Crawford, 49, who is an industrial mechanic with General Electric in Schenectady, and alleged co-conspirator Eric J. Feight, 54, who works for an electronics company in Columbia County, with material support to terrorists, including use of a weapon of mass destruction.

      Crawford told undercover FBI agents dujring a year-long investigation that he is “a member of the Ku Klux Klan, specifically, the United Northern & Southern Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.” -- more

      Given that the KKK tends to hate Jews as much, or in some cases more than blacks, you have to wonder if they really intended to benefit Jews? It seems unlikely. Perhaps they intended to sell them sabotaged devices, or would turn one on them after taking their money. Or maybe their thinking was that it would in some manner discredit Jews generally if an anti-Muslim plot that could be linked to some Jewish people or organizations was found out by authorities. Hard to say. Very strange though. I certainly wouldn't expect genuine racist Klan members to willingly advance the interests of Jews.

      David Duke of the KKK hates Jews/Zionists more than blacks
      United In Hate? Fmr. KKK Leader David Duke Endorses Black Anti-Zionist For Congress

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:They were probably just broke and ... by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

      So as I read it this report says two things:

      1) One of these fellows is supposedly a KKK member (or, rather, posed as one when soliciting funds from another (real) KKK dude
      2) They were pro-Israel and claimed to want to target "enemies of Israel"

      Yet you seem unwilling to accept that any such thing as a non-Muslim terrorist might exist, so you take (1) at face value and then use that to argue that (2) is unlikely to be true and surely they are really actually anti-semites like terrists are suppose to be.

      This argument is silly. Cognitive dissonance is a bitch, I know.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    4. Re:They were probably just broke and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their clever plan was to mess up the markings of "working" and "aiming" end.

    5. Re:They were probably just broke and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be that Christian Zionism has spread so far and wide that even the mf'ing Klan has picked up on it. Which, frankly, kind of creeps me out and gives me even less hope that America will stop being so biased in the Israel-Palestine conflict.

    6. Re:They were probably just broke and ... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Yet you seem unwilling to accept that any such thing as a non-Muslim terrorist might exist, so you take (1) at face value and then use that to argue that (2) is unlikely to be true and surely they are really actually anti-semites like terrists are suppose to be.

      That is an interesting reading since I never write or imply anything like it. How did you arrive at that?

      This argument is silly. Cognitive dissonance is a bitch, I know

      Ah, now I see. Never mind.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  5. Later, in the prison yard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So what are you in for?"

    "Mad science."

  6. Whatever gave them that idea? by MassiveForces · · Score: 4, Funny

    rumor has it they got their x-ray training right under the nose of the TSA without raising suspicion

    1. Re:Whatever gave them that idea? by klingers48 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly when someone tells you that they don't need to learn how to land the X-ray machine is the point you should be ringing the FBI.

    2. Re:Whatever gave them that idea? by cgfsd · · Score: 1

      Why go through all the work of building a death ray? Why not just hand out free cell phones?

  7. What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No muss, no fuss.

  8. Remember, when god is on your side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anything is acceptable. burning witches, executing gays, xraying muslims, rocketing israelis, raping kids, car bombing protestants. its all good as long as god agrees....and if you read your books there are passages that'll help you along :)

    1. Re:Remember, when god is on your side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you miss the part where the Jewish organisations themselves refused to cooperate and instead called the FBI? What's that, it's easier to just use the actions of two lunatics as proof that an entire belief structure is wrong? Ah, my mistake, please continue to help erode our constitutional freedoms like a good little patriot.

    2. Re:Remember, when god is on your side by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      He didn't miss it. His point is, that, with some thought, you can use any religion to justify violence. We had Christians burning witches, we had gay executions in Iran, we had missile attacks on Israel, we had bombs on Catholics and protestants, we had Buddhists murdering Muslims.

      On a side note: Being pro-Israel (what ever that means) does not mean Jewish terrorist. You could claim, they are pro-Israel terrorist. However, my personal opinion is, that not supporting UN resolutions and bombing or frying Muslims is helping Israel. On the contrary it destabilizes the region. From a historical point of view I can understand that Jews and especially Israel do not want to become victims again. And their solution is strength. However, when strength results in violence and the inability to agree to compromises, you loose the safety you try to achieve. Compromises, trust and friendship are much more helpful in stabilizing a region. Look at Western Europe how it evolved out of WW II.

    3. Re:Remember, when god is on your side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Witch burning was carried out by secular courts in the vast majority of cases.

    4. Re:Remember, when god is on your side by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Anything is acceptable. burning witches, executing gays, xraying muslims, rocketing israelis, raping kids, car bombing protestants. its all good as long as god agrees....

      It's not religious zealotry, just self-interest.

      People weren't murdering "witches" because God said to do so... They were doing it because they were convinced the witch next door was hurting someone.

      Lynch mobs weren't running around, reciting biblical verses.

      McCarthyism didn't happen just because god said to do it.

      The LAPD doesn't beat people because God told them to.

      People will justify whatever they want to do. And if you're surrounded by devout believers, you want to find justification in a religious text, because that's all they'll potentially be interested in.

      These days, you can find plenty of atrocities committed are justified by hiding behind the law, rather than the torah/bible/quaran/etc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Remember, when god is on your side by Keith111 · · Score: 1

      And by 'god', you clearly mean the American government. These guys probably got the idea of xraying people from a truck because our government officials actually have trucks that xray shit when they drive down the street that are already suspected to cause health problems. But hey, at least we should feel safe that the only ones xraying American citizens work for the government, right? They probably just slapped a DHS sticker on the side of the van, attached a video display so they can look at people fucking through their walls, and called it an official gov't asset.

    6. Re:Remember, when god is on your side by alexo · · Score: 1

      Gott mit uns.

  9. "X-Ray Weapon" by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

    also known as "Ark of the Covenant". Moses should thank God that the Egyptians didn't have the NSA.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:"X-Ray Weapon" by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2

      also known as "Ark of the Covenant". Moses should thank God that the Egyptians didn't have the NSA.

      it belongs in a museum!

    2. Re:"X-Ray Weapon" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is being researched, I assure you. There are top people working on it. Top people.

  10. Is that it?! by crioca · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gotta say, after everything I've heard on the Internet; the Zionist conspiracy really doesn't live up to the hype...

    1. Re:Is that it?! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Gotta say, after everything I've heard on the Internet; the Zionist conspiracy really doesn't live up to the hype...

      Creating a nation by force and using it to foment hate in the region isn't sufficient for you?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Is that it?! by cangrejoinmortal · · Score: 1

      Tough I'm not pro Israel, much less pro Islamism or pro U.S. (I'm a pacifist you see? I can't support any gun wielding wackos) I wanna make clear that the vast majority of modern (and ancient for that matter) nations were created by force.

    3. Re:Is that it?! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Tough I'm not pro Israel, much less pro Islamism or pro U.S. (I'm a pacifist you see? I can't support any gun wielding wackos) I wanna make clear that the vast majority of modern (and ancient for that matter) nations were created by force.

      Though I'm not pro- any of those things either, for more or less the same reason, I want to make clear that I didn't mean to single Israel out in that regard.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Ironic in light of history by PapayaSF · · Score: 2
    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    1. Re:Ironic in light of history by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      And this is relevant how? It sounds dangerously close to apologism....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    2. Re:Ironic in light of history by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Prior art I would suppose.

      Myself I would think that using microwaves to sterilize your enemies might be more effective.

    3. Re:Ironic in light of history by evilviper · · Score: 1

      How is that ironic? Nazis used to SHOOT Jews, too. And now Jews carry guns. And?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  12. Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Slashdot's report of this news has now clarified to me that one or more of the following is taking place:

    1) The editors at Slashdot who curate the submissions don't bother to check the basic sources
    2) The editors at Slashdot have some sort of Antisemitic agenda

    Why would I say that? If you bother to read the second sentence of the article you will notice that the weapon builders were not Jews. Rather, they tried to get some Jewish organizations to sponsor such a weapon, something which they would have no part of, so they promptly called the FBI.

    Why open your clip with the words "Two radical pro-Israel terrorists"? These same "Jews" also contacted the KKK for funding. They are just a couple of low lives looking to make a quick buck.

    This is purely laughable reporting on Slashdot's part, and I have lost my trust in your ability to report without bias. This is not negligence, it is clear bias.

    1. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      1) The editors at Slashdot who curate the submissions don't bother to check the basic sources

      That's OK, we were all new here once.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Informative

      2) The editors at Slashdot have some sort of Antisemitic agenda

      Why would I say that? If you bother to read the second sentence of the article you will notice that the weapon builders were not Jews.

      The summary neither says nor implies that they were. It's perfectly compatible with the linked article.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by iceperson · · Score: 2

      I've read the article several times and can't find any mention of them being pro-Israel. It seems like the only real "Israeli" connection is that Jewish people were the targets of a scam and did the right thing and alerted authorities...

    4. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      2) The editors at Slashdot have some sort of Antisemitic agenda

      Why would I say that? If you bother to read the second sentence of the article you will notice that the weapon builders were not Jews.

      The summary neither says nor implies that they were. It's perfectly compatible with the linked article.

      You are either lying or you are ignorant and unwilling to perform basic fact checking of your statements or you do not understand what "implication" is. Either way, your statement rings hollow. As proof, below is the /. summary, taken straight from the main page, with the relevant text quoted. Also, below, is additional, relevant text you omitted when you quoted.

      Why open your clip with the words "Two radical pro-Israel terrorists"? These same "Jews" also contacted the KKK for funding. They are just a couple of low lives looking to make a quick buck.

      2 Men Accused of Trying To Make X-Ray Weapon
      Posted by samzenpus on Wednesday June 19, 2013 @08:29PM
      from the firing-the-cancer-gun dept.
      gurps_npc writes
      "Two radical pro-Israel terrorists were caught in upstate NY when they tried to solicit money from various honorable Jewish organizations to build a truck based x-ray weapon. They intended to drive the truck around and then turn on the x-ray machine, focusing on enemies of Israel. But the Jewish organizations they tried to solicit money from refused to participate. Instead they called the FBI, who promptly set up a sting. The men were arrested before the machine was in working order."
      Read the 57 comments

    5. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello kind Israeli Defense Force member!

    6. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol IDF

    7. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by MasseKid · · Score: 2

      Technically, perhaps, it doesn't explicitly say they're jews, but it does heavily imply it, and that's not good editing. Good editing leaves no room for confusion. It's the difference between easy to read and hard to misunderstand.

      The summary DOES say they were pro-israel terrorist, which is incorrect. They were not, they tried to sell this same thing to the KKK (who are anti-jew). Just because you attempted to sell it to a group, and ESPECIALLY if you try to sell it to the opposing group, does not mean you are of that group.

      As far as the original commenter's suggestion that the editors are antisemitic, I doubt it. "Never assume malice, when incompetence will do."

    8. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Straw man attack detected.

      "radical pro-Israel terrorists intended to drive the truck around and then turn on the x-ray machine, focusing on enemies of Israel."

      It does not say the terrorists were Jews.

      This is purely laughable comment on your part, and I have lost my trust in your ability to comment without trolling. This is not misunderstanding, it is clear troll.

    9. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by black3d · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While the editors are pretty bad around here, more people seem to pick up on the facts more quickly than folks here. Much of the discussion still seems to be about "Israel" and "Jews", when these two guys were neither Israeli or Jewish. They're simply far right-wing nuts who figured that Jews would happily "give them money" on the promise that they'd use it to "kill their enemies" - in other words they were counting on their own negative image of Jews to be fulfilled to in turn feed their own greed. They're no more pro-Israel than a shop selling Halal meat in order to cater to their customers needs is "pro-Iran".

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
    10. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How were you modded informative? From the article:

      "Crawford approached Jewish organizations last year looking for funding and people to help him with technology that could be used to surreptitiously deliver damaging and even lethal doses of radiation against those he considered enemies of Israel."

      How are they not pro-Israel? Not everything that you disagree with is anti-semitic. Really the only bias evident is your own.

    11. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Pro-Israel does not mean Jew.

      I had the misfortune to bid a contract to work for some "Christian Zionists" recently.

      They were really, really cheap, to the point that I actually dropped out of the bidding.

      However, they did not wear yarmulkes.

    12. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you're one of those.

      Let me remind you of something you need to drill into your own head if you want to stay on this site and enjoy it in any sense. Are you paying attention? Good.

      Slashdot is not a journalism site.

      I'm going to repeat that for you. Slashdot IS NOT A JOURNALISM SITE. it's not a news network, it's not the AP wire, it's not CNN or Al Jazeera. Slashdot is a blog that got massive and popular enough to employ staff. That's unique and unusual, yes, it's not journalism.

      You were right about one thing though, it is laughable. If you haven't gotten a sense for how fucking retarded things have gotten here, consider the above fact. Slashdot is a blog. Whose blog? Rob Malda's. Malda RETIRED from his own blog.

      Time to move on folks. Nothing to see here, in every sense that matters.

    13. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Pro-Israel does not mean Jew.

      I had the misfortune to bid a contract to work for some "Christian Zionists" recently.

      ISTM that the majority of the "my Israel, right or wrong" sentiment in the USA comes not from Jews, but from the Religious Right, who think their god created the USA to protect Israel for its role as a nation of Red Shirts in their end-times passion play.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    14. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      I've read the article several times and can't find any mention of them being pro-Israel. It seems like the only real "Israeli" connection is that Jewish people were the targets of a scam and did the right thing and alerted authorities...

      Look for "that they intended to use to secretly sicken opponents of Israel", in the very first sentence.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    15. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by jon3k · · Score: 2

      That doesn't make them pro-Israel. That makes them "pro-the-highest-bidder".

    16. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't pro-israel. They're pro-whoever-pays-them. Read the fucking article. For fuck's sake, stop trying to make excuses you anti-semite.

    17. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by alantus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How were you modded informative? From the article:

      "Crawford approached Jewish organizations last year looking for funding and people to help him with technology that could be used to surreptitiously deliver damaging and even lethal doses of radiation against those he considered enemies of Israel."

      How are they not pro-Israel? Not everything that you disagree with is anti-semitic. Really the only bias evident is your own.

      And if they wanted to request funding from Iran they would have offered to use their weapon against the enemies of Iran.
      Would that mean they are pro-Iran?

      I don't know if you are anti-semitic or not, but an anti-semitic would jump to the same conclusion you did without a really thinking about it. Perhaps you are not anti-semitic, you just don't really think.

  13. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by SJHillman · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There's plenty that Israel has done that could be considered crimes beyond survival. However, "Israel" and "Jews" are only slightly more synonymous than "Muslims" and "Iraq".

  14. When I was a kid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back when I was a kid I had an old used book, a collection of Amateur Scientist articles from Scientific American. One of them discussed how to repurpose certain old Vacuum Tubes, from back in the days before transistors, to produce X-Rays. Definitely outside the original operating envelop, but the X-ray photos, taken with film that had to be developed with chemicals, were quite impressive.

    Naturally, by the 70s, when I first saw the article, the necessary vacuum tubes were all but impossible to find. And my parents were somewhat less than enthusiastic about the whole project.

    But, yes, homemade X-ray machines are quite viable! The life expectancy of the person playing with this technology, not so much...

    I feel old. Suppose I ought to thank Mom & Dad for curbing my scientific curiosity...

    1. Re:When I was a kid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A typical pentode tube amp has only about 300 VDC bias. A CRT monitor might be 25 KV so will be a much better source of X-Rays if you remove the heavy lead glass bonded to the front.

    2. Re:When I was a kid... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      It's been awhile since TV repair class, but I seem to remember that it's the high voltage tube, not necessarily the CRT, that was the primary source for x-rays.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:When I was a kid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CRT is the high voltage tube. Its the electrons hitting the screen that emits X-rays. The lead is added to the heavy glass faceplate to soak them up and get just below FDA requirements.

    4. Re:When I was a kid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:When I was a kid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there was an X-ray trap/deflector/shoeld IIRC that made sure that high energy electrons did not hit some place they were not supposed to hit. The principal purpose was not protecting the viewers from damage IIRC but mostly the phosphors. Or was that an ion trap? Sounds almost more plausible.

    6. Re:When I was a kid... by kaspar_silas · · Score: 1

      some CRTs went higher than that. However even with no shielding the dose rate would be too low to be a weapon. Admittedly you might not want to sit in front of it for years..

      The clue being the heat. In the X-ray range 1% of the electron beam is converted to X-rays the rest to heat. This is why X-ray tubes are either on for short periods, water cooled or have massive metal anodes.

  15. weeeeak by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    So they're going to potentially cancer them to death? Wow. It'd take a nuclear reactor to power an Xray beam powerful enough to give someone massive radiation poisoning or melt them or something and then you might as well just throw the nuclear reactor itself at them, lol.

    1. Re:weeeeak by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Informative

      no, you should read about the foot x-ray machines some shoe stores used in the 1940s, they gave some people 20 REM of dose! It doesn't take that much power to make dangerous levels of X-Ray radiation.

    2. Re:weeeeak by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Exactly, the gear could be man-portable. This is actually an amazingly brilliant plot, you're not around when the victim dies, you leave no evidence on the victim, even if someone spots you during the assassination they couldn't tell you're killing the person (just holding a suitcase near them or backing them with a backpack). This is the most impressively clever thing I've heard of in ages, I'm kind of jealous I never thought of it myself.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:weeeeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked for the US on Hugo Chavez.

    4. Re:weeeeak by Nivag064 · · Score: 1

      I remember them!

      I used to go into shoe stores by myself as a young child to look at the bones in my feet - totally oblivious of any possible danger...

      This was when I lived in Wallasey, United Kingdom.

    5. Re:weeeeak by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Need I remind you: Kids! Don't try this at home!

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    6. Re:weeeeak by joe_frisch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was really hoping that no one would think of portable radiation generators for this. The only way to stop this is to control some very broadly useful technologies - high voltage generators, vacuum equipment. The basic problem is that a clever person can do a huge amount of damage with readily available, difficult to regulate equipment. Unless we eliminate the situations that motivate terrorists (politically very difficult), we will either need ever increasing security and monitoring, or we will need to accept that a fair number of people will die. I'm willing to accept the deaths, but I don't think most americans are.

    7. Re:weeeeak by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      This is actually an amazingly brilliant plot,

      Except for the fact that directing the x-rays is pretty damn hard so every time you radiate the target, you radiate yourself. The amount of shielding required to prevent that makes portability significantly less practical.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:weeeeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except when you forget to change the batteries. Then you have a mob of people really pissed off that you sterilized them.

    9. Re:weeeeak by sploxx · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is actually not a new idea. In East Germany, the STASI is alleged to have done that:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/352461.stm

      Pretty scary and brutal stuff.

    10. Re:weeeeak by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you'd need something the size of a "truck" to carry around that much shielding.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    11. Re:weeeeak by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you'd need something the size of a "truck" to carry around that much shielding.

      Unlike the suitcase and backpack the previous poster postulated.

      The problem with the truck is that it is going to be a lot further away from your target, which means lots of juice. You park a truck with a constantly running diesel generator outside of someone's house, people are going to notice pretty quick.

      You've also upped your costs to the point where you are going to need funding from people who are probably going to report you...

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    12. Re:weeeeak by femtobyte · · Score: 2

      It's hard to re-direct an x-ray once it's made, but typical X-Ray tube Bremsstrahlung sources are fairly directional to start with. Orient the tube in the right direction, and you can be standing in far lower flux than your target. The Cobalt-60 sources used for industrial radiography to X-ray whole buildings (while keeping the operator shielded) would also be nasty in the wrong hands.

    13. Re:weeeeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC the Aum cult also was working on something like this.
      They also I think had a microwave oil drum incinerator for victims.

    14. Re:weeeeak by richlv · · Score: 1

      or a widespread use of detectors. which might catch other sources and for the majority of the population be like a rock against tigers... but still a much better alternative than regulation of everything

      --
      Rich
    15. Re:weeeeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...]Unless we eliminate the situations that motivate terrorists (politically very difficult)[...]
      We should choose to do this thing, not because it's easy, but because it is hard.

    16. Re:weeeeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did think of it. Just buy some old Amana RadarRange's and you've got some relatively powerful emitters.

    17. Re:weeeeak by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Doubtful since pretty much every house in the US has a Xray machine that would kill anything exposed to it quite quickly.
      If they could focus the power into a directed laser like beam it would already be powerful enough.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    18. Re:weeeeak by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Unless we eliminate the situations that motivate terrorists (politically very difficult)

      Doing the right thing is hard. That's never a good excuse to do evil.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    19. Re:weeeeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can run a compact 6-megavolt X band medical linac on fifty kilowatts or so. That'll produce a 6 MV (peak) photon beam with a dose rate of roughly 4 gray per minute at one metre. The generator would be a 400 kg beast, the linac itself is about 40 cm long (but requires a heap of support systems) and you need to water-cool the thing.

      An uncollimated, uncontrolled beam from such a unit would, at a range of one metre, make you pretty damn sick with a 15 second shot, and a lethal dose in a bit over a minute. (Scale by inverse square for larger distances.) The effects take a few hours to a couple of days to really show up. You get a much higher dose rate if you shoot the raw electron beam. (Look up the Therac 25 for an example.) When making photons, you lose about 98% of the energy to heat in the brehmsstrahlung target.

      So yes, I'd say the thing is *technically* plausible, but there is no way in hell you'd be able to build it yourself. And you couldn't buy it either, as linacs are both expensive and heavily regulated. You need a string of licences proving radiation safety compliance just to sign a contract to purchase one. Same deal for a lower energy, lower intensity kilovoltage tube system; there is just no way to get your hands on the necessary parts without a LOT of people documenting exactly who's buying it for what purpose.

      (Source: I work with these units on a daily basis. Posting AC because I'm not here often enough to have registered yet.)

    20. Re:weeeeak by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You park a truck with a constantly running diesel generator outside of someone's house, people are going to notice pretty quick.

      You will want to look into the "APU", the aux power unit which are typically installed on semi trucks now that many states have idling laws. They typically contain a generator and an air con unit in a muffled box. Some of them are really quite quiet. Also, you could put a bunch of batteries in the truck, and run the machine off of an inverter, then charge the batteries back at home base, possibly adding a substantially upgraded alternator on a separate circuit to help with this while the vehicle is in motion or at least running.

      You've also upped your costs to the point where you are going to need funding from people who are probably going to report you...

      Good call.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:weeeeak by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Can I get an Amen?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re:weeeeak by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      nonsense, a centimeter of lead around most the tube will do the trick for device in vehicle.

    23. Re:weeeeak by sjames · · Score: 1

      So how were the terrorists planning to get their targets to put their foot in the machine?

      It's more than a bit difficult to columnate X-rays, so they would lose a lot of power with distance.

    24. Re:weeeeak by sjames · · Score: 1

      While it was probably not a great idea in retrospect, it seems to have done remarkably little harm.

    25. Re:weeeeak by sjames · · Score: 1

      So what happened to the epidemic of foot cancer?

    26. Re:weeeeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't stop smart people from acting violently through any level of security and monitoring. They'll find a way around it. It terrifies people that there are risks we cannot mitigate, so people try to deny it (e.g. calling for more security). If it wasn't an X-ray machine, it'd be a chemical weapon, or an electrical one (e.g. electrified storm grates), or even an acoustic one (e.g. shattering glass on tall buildings).

    27. Re:weeeeak by Mathinker · · Score: 1

      > Unless we eliminate the situations that motivate terrorists (politically very difficult)

      Never mind the politics, it's frankly logically impossible, as far as I can see. What about the people whose ideology is against a society which lacks such situations (linked, of course, to only one such possibility, and not to imply that other possibilities might be much more desirable)?

    28. Re:weeeeak by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      unknown since no records kept

    29. Re:weeeeak by sjames · · Score: 1

      We don't need records to see an epidemic of the size that one might expect if the radiation was as harmful as we thought.

  16. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by similar_name · · Score: 2

    It's one thing to be an AC troll but someone modded this insightful. Did they not read it right?

  17. This sounds familiar... by supersat · · Score: 2

    This sounds almost like what the government is already deploying. In one context, x-ray trucks are terrorism. In the other, they're part of the counter-terrorism effort.

    And yes, I know the doses would be different, but where do you draw the line?

    1. Re:This sounds familiar... by blueg3 · · Score: 2

      This sounds almost like what the government is already deploying. In one context, x-ray trucks are terrorism. In the other, they're part of the counter-terrorism effort.

      And yes, I know the doses would be different, but where do you draw the line?

      That's like saying giving someone an injection with a needle that's been sterilized with bleach is the same as giving them an injection of bleach. Hey, they both contain *some* bleach!

      Quantity is important.

    2. Re:This sounds familiar... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This sounds almost like what the government is already deploying. [...] And yes, I know the doses would be different, but where do you draw the line?

      That's like saying giving someone an injection with a needle that's been sterilized with bleach is the same as giving them an injection of bleach. [...] Quantity is important.

      So, you trust our government to be cautious and scrupulous about the amount and nature of radiation they use to survey the public, and to use a precautionary principle where there is any doubt about whether they are endangering your life?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:This sounds familiar... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      So, you trust our government to be cautious and scrupulous about the amount and nature of radiation they use to survey the public, and to use a precautionary principle where there is any doubt about whether they are endangering your life?

      I didn't say that. But I do happen to be familiar with how much X-ray radiation you typically use in Compton backscattering scanners.

    4. Re:This sounds familiar... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Your failure to doublethink is doubleplussungood.

  18. The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 0

    Really glad to hear that it was Jewish Americans who turned the crazies in. Hopefully many of the mosques in America that encounter radical and/or terrorism sympathetic persons will rise to the occasion and do the same when they hear something actionable, instead of waiting for the government to find the bad guys without assistance. And for knee-jerk liberals who are about to pile onto me: yes, Wahhabi and other radical literature is very widely available and promulgated in American Islamic circles. The FBI wasn't spying on mosques to eavesdrop on people agonizing over temptation to eat bacon. And yes: I do personally know some Christian "crazies", and if I ever hear something actionable (i.e. dangerous and illegal) I will also call law enforcement. (Did I dodge the knee jerk liberal piling-on?)

    1. Re:The system worked by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really glad to hear that it was Jewish Americans who turned the crazies in. Hopefully many of the mosques in America that encounter radical and/or terrorism sympathetic persons will rise to the occasion and do the same when they hear something actionable, instead of waiting for the government to find the bad guys without assistance.

      That is, in fact, the norm rather than the exception.

      Did I dodge the knee jerk liberal piling-on?

      No, you just told us that you don't know how liberals think.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:The system worked by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      Hopefully many of the mosques in America that encounter radical and/or terrorism sympathetic persons will rise to the occasion and do the same when they hear something actionable,

      Yeah, they never do that!

      The FBI wasn't spying on mosques to eavesdrop on people agonizing over temptation to eat bacon

      Yeah, that's totally why american muslims distrust the FBI.
      Man, they sure are dummies to think the FBI was spying on them because of pork!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:The system worked by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Actually from reading the article it was the KKK that called the FBI. Talk about strange bedfellows.

      ""Crawford has specifically identified Muslims and several other individuals/groups as targets," investigator Geoffrey Kent said in a court affidavit. According to the indictment, Crawford also traveled to North Carolina in October to solicit money for the weapon from a ranking member of the Ku Klux Klan, who informed the FBI. Crawford claimed to be a member."

      The FBI led the pair along for a while by supplying parts and money to build the device.

    4. Re:The system worked by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      I'm curious. Why do you think the Feds spy on mosques?

    5. Re:The system worked by citizenr · · Score: 2

      Actually from reading the article it was the KKK that called the FBI. Talk about strange bedfellows.

      ""Crawford has specifically identified Muslims and several other individuals/groups as targets," investigator Geoffrey Kent said in a court affidavit. According to the indictment, Crawford also traveled to North Carolina in October to solicit money for the weapon from a ranking member of the Ku Klux Klan, who informed the FBI. Crawford claimed to be a member."

      The FBI led the pair along for a while by supplying parts and money to build the device.

      Sounds like FBI was helping them in hopes of incriminating a lot of KKK members, but KKK saw right through (:P) FBI sting.

      FBI is trying to salvage another failed self manufactured terror. They will probably claim NSA spying helped them catch this.
      This might be a result of an order from DC to somehow pull 50 foiled terror plots out of their asses.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    6. Re:The system worked by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Did you read the link I posted?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:The system worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bacon is disgusting and hastens your death, Mazel Tov.

    8. Re:The system worked by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      You're an ignorant and bigoted idiot because FBI Director Robert Mueller has credited the American Muslim community with helping catch the bad guys; over 60% of all terrorism arrests since 2001 came about by tips from the Muslim community. Wahabi literature isn't "widely available," you obviously haven't been to a single mosque and are just engaging in ignorant fearmongering.

    9. Re:The system worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care to address your point directly, but I must say that I do not believe that anything Mueller says should really be taken as a credit toward anything or anyone.

    10. Re:The system worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All those pile-ons remind me of the Southpark episode Goodbacks and stopping the future from happening. The x-ray gun terror plot fits right in that world.

    11. Re:The system worked by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Bacon is disgusting and hastens your death, Mazel Tov.

      Nope, modern preservatives are disgusting and hasten your death. Traditionally cured bacon with no toxic salts is delicious and health. Gura math a theid leat.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    12. Re:The system worked by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about their motivation. Not if but why.

    13. Re:The system worked by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      They do it for exactly the same reason they put japanese americans in internment camps during WWII - it is easy for them to do and they don't give a damn about the impact on the innocent and effectiveness is something to be worried about later.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    14. Re:The system worked by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you assume every KKK member is a blood crazed fanatic.

      There are plenty of groups around the world that peacefully avoid integration. Just because they feel their race is superior doesn't mean they're out to kill everyone else.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    15. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 2

      That is, in fact, the norm rather than the exception.

      To some degree, but not enough yet.

      No, you just told us that you don't know how liberals think.

      My observation is that some liberals, when they encounter a statement against Islamism, respond with knee-jerk defense of "Islam" as this idealized, peaceful religion that is cruelly maligned for no reason whatsoever by mentally deficient redneck American Christians. They can't get it into their minds that the actual core religion (not a perversion thereof) of a substantial fraction of humanity wants to kill us. Case in point: a professor at a local university who regularly travels to Pakistan for international peace-oriented academic conferences. He and I have corresponded at length in letters to the editor and email, and I've been disgusted by his failure to see the obvious, for example a book by a top legal scholar and judge in Pakistan that acknowledges that the only reason Muslim nations shouldn't war against the non-Muslim world is that it isn't practical right now. In other words, al-Qaida is merely foolhardy and jumping the gun, not morally wrong in their objective of militarily defeating the non-Muslim world.

      That kind of blindness is pervasive in liberal culture, for reasons I can't really understand. Protecting the feelings of peacefully-intentioned American Muslims is fine, but when I criticize Islamism, I'm not talking about peacefully intentioned Muslims. So it's sort of a red herring fallacy liberals use.

    16. Re:The system worked by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Because it's human nature to target the outgroup. Whether they actually stop any terrorist plots is secondary to them appearing to make people safer by harassing people who look and act differently.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    17. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's totally why american muslims distrust the FBI. Man, they sure are dummies to think the FBI was spying on them because of pork!

      Actually, the FBI was finding and disrupting Islamists who expressed violent intentions, and the mosque surveillance program was terminated for reasons of political correctness despite the fact that it was finding bad guys.

      I have a problem with bugging mosques because they are mosques, because that's a problem under the first amendment. However, if radical activity is detected in a mosque (which it has been in many, many mosques in America -- see my point about distribution and discussion of Wahhabi literature), then they become fair game, politically incorrect or not. Same thing for Christian churches where people are talking about engaging in violent criminal acts or talk approvingly of violence. If the investigation goes through all the proper requirements with a judge, then I say wiretap those people.

    18. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      You're an ignorant and bigoted idiot because FBI Director Robert Mueller has credited the American Muslim community with helping catch the bad guys; over 60% of all terrorism arrests since 2001 came about by tips from the Muslim community.

      That has happened some, and it's great, but the Boston bombing indicates that there are still too many cases where it doesn't work that way. In those cases, either the mosque attendees need to "rise to the occasion" as I said above, or we need to aggressively wiretap -- to be clear, not wiretap just any mosque, only where we see smoke so to speak.

      Wahabi literature isn't "widely available," you obviously haven't been to a single mosque and are just engaging in ignorant fearmongering.

      Wait a minute, I thought you said above that there were all these terrorism arrests happening in Muslim communities with the aid of mosque attendees. So are they arresting non-Muslim terrorists who just happen to wander into mosques and be reported? /facepalm

      And yes, Wahhabi literature is widely available. You can sit down at a kindergarten in Mecca or Riyadh and hear this stuff. And the Saudis are spending their $$$ to promulgate it widely in the USA. Good grief, do you want me to google it for you?

    19. Re: The system worked by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Boston could not have been prevented by the Muslim community. Dhohar never really attended any mosques, and his older brother didn't share his ideas with anyone at the mosque. You'll recall the only witness accounts at the mosque of his being there state he was thrown out of one for yelling and distrusting the sermon. (It was a sermon on how we Muslims should act more like Marting Luther King Jr.) The leader, Imam Suhaib Webb, threw his full support behind the Boston police.

      Again, we're talking about the American Muslim community, which doesn't tolerate Wahhabism. I've been to dozens of mosques in a number of states and have yet to see any Wahhabism. The American Muslim community is a patriotic bunch.

    20. Re:The system worked by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you assume every KKK member is a blood crazed fanatic. There are plenty of groups around the world that peacefully avoid integration

      The KKK, however, is not one of those groups. Or at least they weren't in their heyday (the group is now a pathetic shadow of what it was in the early 20th century) - in fact, they were a classic example of what we now call "domestic terrorism".

    21. Re: The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      Again, we're talking about the American Muslim community, which doesn't tolerate Wahhabism. I've been to dozens of mosques in a number of states and have yet to see any Wahhabism.

      Maybe you just don't read or speak Arabic?

    22. Re: The system worked by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      An old report from a conservative group. As I've said, I've been to many mosques and none have such literature. My mosque is disgusted by such stuff and so is the community. After this article came out, many mosques looked on their library shelves and threw away such dusty publications. They have no relevance to our community not reflect any American Muslim views.

      Don't take my word for it, go visit a mosque for yourself.

    23. Re: The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      There is always going to be more work to do, because for one thing, there will always be disaffected young people (of all faiths or lack thereof). With that said, it is good to hear your very positive anecdotes on the matter. Cheers, and thanks for a generally civil discussion.

    24. Re:The system worked by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      They can't get it into their minds that the actual core religion (not a perversion thereof) of a substantial fraction of humanity wants to kill us.

      Whoop! There it is. The only true muslim is a psycho-muslim. Just like the westboro baptist church are the only true Christians. Of course the non-muslim who can't read arabic, has never been to a mosque in his life is imminently qualified to tell all those people they aren't real muslims.

      All the parts of the quaran that talk about peace don't count because they've been 'abrogated' but all the parts that talk about warfare in specific cases actually apply everywhere and always because thats the excuse the crazies use to rationalize violence in pursuit of their own goals and obviously bloodthirsty nutjobs are the people best qualified to understand a religion.

      Stupid libtards, they'll never learn!!!

      I know you will never change your mind, your premise is basically unfalsifiable just like any conspiracy theory. This summary is for everyone else who might possibly have started to be fooled by your bullshit.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    25. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      Whoop! There it is. The only true muslim is a psycho-muslim. Just like the westboro baptist church are the only true Christians.

      Nah, that's not what I said. If you want my real personal opinion, there isn't any "true Islam", because Islam is a false religion. Beyond that, you could argue about which factions of Islam best represent the teachings of Mohammed, but that's a conversation that isn't going to make anybody happy. Suffice it to say that in every Muslim majority nation today, you should be very nervous if you convert away from Islam, because the unambiguous teaching handed down from antiquity is that you should be killed for your infidelity.

      My point is that the religion of Mecca and Riyadh is a bad, murderous religion. That Islam is bad. Okay? If the Islam of Denver or New York City is benign, that's wonderful. But there are many Islams. And many or most of them that we find overseas are bad religions in terms of their nasty teachings and social effects.

    26. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      P.S. @jay-wren: Notice that it is YOU who are making claims about what is the "one true Islam", or that such a thing even exists. I acknowledge diversity. Why don't you?

    27. Re:The system worked by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Notice that it is YOU who are making claims about what is the "one true Islam",

      A phrase i've not used nor intimated, while you wrote: "the actual core religion"

      And that is the last response you'll get from me in this thread, your brand of crazy is never worth the effort to engage with.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    28. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      A phrase i've not used nor intimated, while you wrote: "the actual core religion"

      You are, of course, misquoting me. The rest of that sentence was "actual core religion (not a perversion thereof) of a substantial fraction of humanity", which doesn't contradict my point that there are some people's religions out there help them keep their noses clean, while other people's religion is existentially evil in its effects.

      If you either apostatize or insult the so-called prophet in Riyadh or Tehran or many other places, then the local religion says you must be put to death. When the twin towers fell, some Muslims rejoiced all around the world, because of their individual religious beliefs, i.e. their religion. Note that I wasn't talking about the religion of Joe "friends-with-the-local-rabbi" the imam in Chicago. As I said, there are many Islamic religions (if you like), and many of them stink very badly.

      So typical of liberals to acknowledge only the parts of the world they want to believe in. Such as that jihad only means a struggle of the inner psyche. The fact that there is diversity in the world is ironically overlooked. But it's a dirty little secret that most of your liberals today actually hate diversity. But that's another can of worms.

      And that is the last response you'll get from me in this thread, your brand of crazy is never worth the effort to engage with.

      That is a typical liberal response to indisputable facts - turn to ad hominem and hope all the unpleasantness of being contradicted goes away as soon as possible.

    29. Re:The system worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but when I criticize Islamism, I'm not talking about peacefully intentioned Muslims.

      Then maybe you should fix the problem and stop using overgeneralized terminology?

    30. Re:The system worked by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The rest of that sentence was "actual core religion (not a perversion thereof) of a substantial fraction of humanity",

      Breaking my promise - but that is a distinction without a difference. Unless you are prepared to say that what you mean by a "substantial fraction of humanity" is really a minority of muslims with extremist views. I'm pretty sure you didn't mean that, because everything else in your argument falls apart if you did.

      If you either apostatize or insult the so-called prophet in Riyadh or Tehran or many other places, then the local religion says you must be put to death

      No, the extremist theocratic government says that you must be put to death. Dictators who have co-opted a religion and encouraged extremism for their political goals are, by definition, not representative. That's like saying the Inquisition defines christianity.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    31. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      Consider this Pew Research poll, which found that in Egypt, Jordan, and Pakistan, there were 84%, 86%, and 76% of the populace, respectively, who favored the death penalty for leaving Islam. How does that fit with your characterization? Poorly, it seems to me. Fundamentalist Islam is no less "Islamic" than modern liberal Islam. They are both Islamic religions and can both make very credible-sounding arguments from their religious texts. Recall that Mohammed wasn't above lopping off people's heads for trivial reasons.

    32. Re:The system worked by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Consider this Pew Research poll, which found that in Egypt, Jordan, and Pakistan, there were 84%, 86%, and 76% of the populace, respectively, who favored the death penalty for leaving Islam. How does that fit with your characterization? Poorly, it seems to me.

      Consider the same poll which found that in Azerbaijan, Kazakstan and Turkey there were 93%, 96% and 89% of the populace, respectively, who opposed the death penalty for leaving islam. How does that fit with your characterization? Poorly, it seems to me. Clearly there is something else beyond simply being muslim that is going on in the countries which favor the death penalty for apostasy.

      And that's the problem with guys like you - its all confirmation bias based on ignorance which you end up characterizing as "indisputable facts."

      Fundamentalist Islam is no less "Islamic" than modern liberal Islam.

      Well at least you've dropped the charade that you aren't here to tell muslims you know better than they do about their religion.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    33. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      Consider the same poll which found that in Azerbaijan, Kazakstan and Turkey there were 93%, 96% and 89% of the populace, respectively, who opposed the death penalty for leaving islam. How does that fit with your characterization? Poorly, it seems to me.

      But I didn't make any generalizations about everybody who calls themselves Muslim, but rather specifically about Islamists, so I'd say it fits my views pretty well. My clarification on that point was sufficient that any misunderstanding on your part is likely intentional. However, _you_ said that Islamists are a tiny minority, and basically just an odd handful of despotic dictators enforcing unwanted religious extremism on the otherwise good folks in their countries. Do you grasp how many millions of people live in Egypt? That's what I was talking about earlier when I said a substantial fraction of humanity. We're not talking ancient history, we're not talking a few hundred. In the immortal words of LBJ, "I'm talkin' P. E. E. P. U. L! I'm talkin' folks!"

      Fundamentalist Islam is no less "Islamic" than modern liberal Islam.

      Well at least you've dropped the charade that you aren't here to tell muslims you know better than they do about their religion.

      The primary answer to that question, as you'll recall is that I'm happy to tell all Muslims that they follow a false religion. And as far as whether fundamentalist Islam or modern hippie Islam is more true to the teachings of Mohammed, I believe I made it clear that it was something that "could be argued", and further "could be argued both ways". You were the one who implied that there is only one true Islam, by which of course you meant the "nice" one, remember? I, on the other hand, acknowledge great and wide diversity in the false religion of Islam.

      So why do you give (some of) the imams in let's say Chicago more credit than those in Saudi Arabia, Iran, or Egypt? Do you know more than the latter about their religion? Based on some of your words like "co-opted", you seem very confident that fundamentalist Islam is not true Islam. Did you get that idea via a rational process, or is it just what you want to believe?

    34. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      but when I criticize Islamism, I'm not talking about peacefully intentioned Muslims.

      Then maybe you should fix the problem and stop using overgeneralized terminology?

      If you would pay more careful attention to what you are reading, then there wouldn't be a problem. Now run along now, my aggrieved little AC.

    35. Re:The system worked by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      But I didn't make any generalizations about everybody who calls themselves Muslim, but rather specifically about Islamists

      And just WTF is an "islamist?" When you hang your hat on stats that imply entire countries are "islamist" then whatever your definition is, it ain't precise enough to be meaningful.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    36. Re:The system worked by obscuro · · Score: 1

      Really glad to hear that it was Jewish Americans who turned the crazies in.

      Sorry Black Parrot, it was the KKK that turned them in.

      --
      Every rule has more than one consequence.
    37. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      But I didn't make any generalizations about everybody who calls themselves Muslim, but rather specifically about Islamists

      And just WTF is an "islamist?" When you hang your hat on stats that imply entire countries are "islamist" then whatever your definition is, it ain't precise enough to be meaningful.

      Like most or all words in the English language, it can be used with different shades of meaning, so it's important to clarify how you're using the term. I think the most formal definition would focus on Islamism as simultaneously religious and political movement(s) to promote government systems that makes non-Muslims into second class citizens and institute the old forms of sharia law. I tend to use the term specifically for those who want to see the nasty elements of sharia law enacted (mistreatment of women, gays, non-Muslims; death penalty for people who change religions or non-Abrahamic religious affiliates who refuse to convert; disallowing free speech about politics or religion, and that kind of thing).

      Honestly, if I lived in a Muslim majority country that held to modern Western "hippie Islam", that just found ways to reinterpret the teachings of Mohammed into the same good ideas that came from Jesus or Buddha or Thomas Paine or MLK, that actually doesn't sound so bad to me. As you noted, some Muslim majority nations are leaning that way, which is wonderful. (Ten percent of a nation wanting to kill me for insulting their prophet is still enough to justify my pointing a finger and shrilly screeching about them, though.)

    38. Re:The system worked by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Come on man, linking to danielpipes? That's one of the top 5 muslim-hater websites. He's one of those nutjobs who lost his shit claiming Obama was a former muslim with all kinds of massive geo-political implications. A man is known by the company he keeps. Maybe you'd like to cite his buddies Robert Spencer or Pamela Gellar to?

      country that held to modern Western "hippie Islam" ... As you noted, some Muslim majority nations are leaning that way, which is wonderful.

      Wow, way to profoundly misunderstand the situation. Countries like Azerbaijan and Kazakstan aren't even remotely close to being westernized there ain't nothing progressive about them. They don't have much religious craziness because the dictators there never needed to cultivate it in the first place, they inherited a massive state control apparatus from the USSR. The whole concept of "western hippie islam" is so much arrogance built on ignorance. You keep saying shit like that you are surprised people judge you a bigot?

      Turkey on the other hand has been basically a democracy since the 1940s so there wasn't a dictator looking to harness religion for his own purposes.

      (Ten percent of a nation wanting to kill me for insulting their prophet is still enough to justify my pointing a finger and shrilly screeching about them, though.)

      There will always be assholes. You want to point fingers look at Russia - 30% of the country thinks sending Pussy Riot to hard labor camps notorious for frequent and regular rapes was appropriate and only 5% think they shouldn't have been punished at all. If the death penalty was legal in Russia some of those 30% would surely have thought that appropriate too. Until 1856 the death penalty for homosexuality was basically law of the land in the USA. Islam is nothing special when it comes to nasty conservatives.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    39. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      Come on man, linking to danielpipes? That's one of the top 5 muslim-hater websites.

      After your contributions to this thread, you don't have much credibility to say who is a "muslim-hater" and who isn't.

      He's one of those nutjobs who lost his shit claiming Obama was a former muslim with all kinds of massive geo-political implications.

      I vaguely recall information on Pipes' website like what you describe, but I don't recall it being a "nutjob" article. My recollection is that Barack Obama Sr. was a Muslim, and therefore according to fundamentalist Islamic law, Obama Jr. was considered a Muslim at birth, and would not be allowed to be of any other religion. Fortunately, Obama was born in the USA, where we let people choose their own religions. It's not clear what you disagree with from that information, and I've never read anything by Daniel Pipes claiming Obama is secretly harboring Muslim beliefs in his heart and waiting to unleash a horrible caliphate coup within America. Was that what you thought Pipes said? (If so, link please.)

      country that held to modern Western "hippie Islam" ... As you noted, some Muslim majority nations are leaning that way, which is wonderful.

      Wow, way to profoundly misunderstand the situation. Countries like Azerbaijan and Kazakstan aren't even remotely close to being westernized there ain't nothing progressive about them.

      As you noted elsewhere, even the most Western of Western nations haven't acted so Western even in the last century, so it's a relative term. But nonetheless, almost all nations on earth right now have some key elements of Western civilization, and most are moving in the direction of having more. But it's a vague concept and debatable in many ways, and I don't feel like rabbit trailing on it.

      They don't have much religious craziness because the dictators there never needed to cultivate it in the first place,

      There it is again: your idea that religious craziness is foisted on people by dictators. I'm not sure that's the case in most instances. My understanding is that Iran is kind of like this, but many other nations haven't fit that mold.

      The whole concept of "western hippie islam" is so much arrogance built on ignorance. You keep saying shit like that you are surprised people judge you a bigot?

      I don't think anything you could say would surprise me. Furthermore, I've noticed that you have strong objections to certain facts, and seem to prefer that people simply pretend those facts don't exist.

      (Ten percent of a nation wanting to kill me for insulting their prophet is still enough to justify my pointing a finger and shrilly screeching about them, though.)

      There will always be assholes. You want to point fingers look at Russia - 30% of the country thinks sending Pussy Riot to hard labor camps notorious for frequent and regular rapes was appropriate and only 5% think they shouldn't have been punished at all. If the death penalty was legal in Russia some of those 30% would surely have thought that appropriate too. Until 1856 the death penalty for homosexuality was basically law of the land in the USA. Islam is nothing special when it comes to nasty conservatives.

      I strongly agree with everything you said in the last paragraph.

    40. Re:The system worked by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      After your contributions to this thread, you don't have much credibility to say who is a "muslim-hater" and who isn't.

      I say YOU are a muslim hater. You are smart enough to avoid the spittle spewing crazy rhetoric but you still use the same arguments that trivialize the vast majority of muslims who aren't crazy and put the blame for the ones who are crazy on their religion.

      Every once in a while you let your own crazy slip out - like how your apologia for daniel pipes brushed over the entire issue - that what the fundies think matters. When the SPLC calls the guy out, the argument is pretty much over.

      There it is again: your idea that religious craziness is foisted on people by dictators.

      No not "foisted," cultivated either as a useful tool or as a side-effect of their absolutism. The Saudis support the salafists because it is a useful tool for them, so did Mubarak encourage the muslim brotherhood to a lesser degree. It worked so well that even Gaddafi thought he'd give it a try in the 90s but it didn't take because of his very public flamboyant lifestyle. In other places under conflict like Pakistan, Palestine, Syria, Iraq, etc the fundies become popular because religion is a unifying force. In a country with long-term stability and without massive inequality there is very little opportunity for fundamentalism. Look at most muslim-majority countries back through the 1960s - far less extremism because there was far less stress on their societies. Afghani cities were some of the most relaxed in the entire region.

      Furthermore, I've noticed that you have strong objections to certain facts, and seem to prefer that people simply pretend those facts don't exist.

      No, I have a strong objection to your mis-characterization of certain facts. Numbers without context are meaningless - your context is that of ignorance of and is biased towards bigotry. You've never been to a mosque and you get your information from guys like Daniel Pipes a hater and a war-monger.

      Islam is nothing special when it comes to nasty conservatives.

      I strongly agree with everything you said in the last paragraph.

      Then why all the focus on islam?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    41. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      I say YOU are a muslim hater.

      That's too strong. I hope I don't hate Muslims as people. In fact, those Muslims I personally know I'm actually rather fond of... (which I know, and I'll save you the trouble: "some of my best friends are black people" yada yada"...)

      You are smart enough to avoid the spittle spewing crazy rhetoric but you still use the same arguments that trivialize the vast majority of muslims who aren't crazy and put the blame for the ones who are crazy on their religion.

      But.. but... it is their religion. Again, there are many Muslims whose extremism is derived directly from their revered religious texts and reinforced by the preaching of their religious clerics. To say it's not from their religion is disingenuous. To say it's not from their religion because there happen to be nice Muslims who reject those religious teachings, is merely playing with words. To say that there is only one true Islam, which is the peaceful one, seems arrogant and is clearly debatable, since millions of Muslims disagree with that.

      Every once in a while you let your own crazy slip out - like how your apologia for daniel pipes brushed over the entire issue - that what the fundies think matters. When the SPLC calls the guy out, the argument is pretty much over.

      The SPLC has become sort of a joke, as even many liberals know. It does some good things, but the main purpose for its existence for a long time now has been to raise funds for itself. I am in the habit of double-checking things they say, and slapping their name in this conversation is no substitute for clarifying exactly what Daniel Pipes wrote that's objectionable.

      No not "foisted," [snip your various interesting thoughts which I appreciate you thinking through and typing out...]

      Furthermore, I've noticed that you have strong objections to certain facts, and seem to prefer that people simply pretend those facts don't exist.

      No, I have a strong objection to your mis-characterization of certain facts. Numbers without context are meaningless - your context is that of ignorance of and is biased towards bigotry. You've never been to a mosque and you get your information from guys like Daniel Pipes a hater and a war-monger.

      Sorry, but if the percentage of people in Egypt who believe apostates should be executed is anywhere close to 80%, that's not a meaningless number. And I disagree with your characterization of Daniel Pipes, at least from what I've read.

      I strongly agree with everything you said in the last paragraph.

      Then why all the focus on islam?

      Why not? Are there certain jerks in the world who are off limits to criticism?

    42. Re:The system worked by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      To say it's not from their religion is disingenuous.

      Every religion has shit in it. Even the people who say Jesus was 100% non-violent can't explain away his beating of the money-changers and then there are all the others who are happy to point at the verses in the new testament where jesus says that he's basically there to update the old testament but not to throw it out, so all the crap that was in there still gives them carte blanche. Even Buddhists occasionally decide that all the Buddha's teaching about non-violence don't apply to themselves.

      People who want to find justification in religion for violence and cruelty will find it no matter what. The violence and cruelty does not stat with their religion, it starts with their hearts. They're just looking for a way to avoid responsibility for their actions.

      Sorry, but if the percentage of people in Egypt who believe apostates should be executed is anywhere close to 80%, that's not a meaningless number.

      Numbers without context ARE meaningless and the only context you have for understanding what's going on over there is the crap that guys like Pipes serve up in a vastly over-simplified western-lensed form.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    43. Re:The system worked by sideslash · · Score: 1

      Enjoyed the exchange. We probably have less real disagreement than either of us would be willing to admit. Cheers, dude!

  19. Oy! Why get messy with animal carcuses? by ivi · · Score: 1

    Mine is purely for target practice...

    Targets -look- like animals,
    but not one of them has to die. :-)

    1. Re:Oy! Why get messy with animal carcuses? by GarethIwanFairclough · · Score: 0

      Mine is for x-raying x-ray machines while some hipster is being x-rayed by the x-ray machine. [sarcasm]Also, why not get messy? I like messy! It means we have to employ someone![/sarcasm]

  20. Nazi scum! by Baldrson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Obviously the Jews that turned in the pro-Israelis are self-hating Nazi scum!

    1. Re:Nazi scum! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Obviously the Jews that turned in the pro-Israelis are self-hating Nazi scum!

      Actually, I liked this passage the most:

      Crawford also traveled to North Carolina in October to solicit money for the weapon from a ranking member of the Ku Klux Klan, who informed the FBI.

      You've got to be a special kind of insane for the KKK to immediately rat you out to the FBI.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Nazi scum! by swb · · Score: 1

      I've read that by the late 1960s many significant Klan leaders were informers, many of which were paid by the FBI to form their own "klaverns", recruit members, etc.

      I don't know what it's like now, but I suspect being a high-profile right wing racist is probably only a hobby you can get away with by being an informant.

  21. Where'd they ever get such a clever idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...oh wait...

  22. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's saying the fact that Jews survive is their biggest crime. Are you aware of that?

  23. I used to work with stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    http://www.balteau.com/upload/normal/ceram35_hx.jpg

    Big old X-ray tubes that are used for taking pictures of welds in bulkheads, etc. I heard a story that some guy in the '80s killed one of his co-workers on purpose by aiming the tube through a wall at his victim. Having worked with the bigger tubes, I can see it.

    1. Re:I used to work with stuff like this by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      Do you need a permit to buy this sort of gear? Could you modify one of those tubes with a zone plate http://www.xradia.com/technology/basic-technology/focusing.php and have a longer range version?

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  24. Where are those honorable Jewish organisations...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why do they let Israel do what the lovely American Jewish activist
    (Anna Baltzer) helps document, eg, on YouTube:

    "Life in occupied Palestine" (about 1 hour in length)

    + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrOdCG7RrvE

    (She says most of the road-blocks are -within- the occupied territories,
    not on the boundaries with Israel. Seems like harassment to me, for 1.)

    I, for one, was -appalled- to see the way people are treated - within
    Israel's borders - behind the tall, metal "Palestine wall" of separation.

    I see/hear -nothing- about any of this on our media... nor even, eg:

    + http://jewish.tv/ -or-

    + http://aish.com/ -nor-

    + http://613.org/

    which I consider otherwise -excellent- sites!

    (OK, last time I checked, 613.org was just
    a bit -amateur- but only in web site styling,
    not in its content.)

  25. Odd morning by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What's that big truck in front of our office?"

    "I don't know, and why is your spleen showing on my laptop?"

    1. Re:Odd morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet these guys were really just planning to set up a body scan porn site.

  26. Re:Canard or a set up by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    Nowhere does the article or summary say or imply this was an Israeli operation. Rather, a couple of nutcases decided on their own to attack those that they perceived as enemies of Israel.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  27. radical terrorist by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    "radical terrorist" is something interesting. That suggests there could be some "moderate terrorist". Anyone encountered that weird kind of terrorist?

    1. Re:radical terrorist by hyades1 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes. A "moderate terrorist" is anyone in a roomful of conservatives who peacefully states that there is overwhelming scientific support for the reality of Global Warming.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    2. Re:radical terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're misinterpreting the term radical, the terrorists wanted to create more free radicals via X-rays.

    3. Re:radical terrorist by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "radical terrorist" is something interesting. That suggests there could be some "moderate terrorist". Anyone encountered that weird kind of terrorist?

      They don't tend to be called 'terrorists'(because, by virtue of being moderate, they use violence to achieve ends that good, upstanding, people agree with); but nothing about being a terrorist actually requires any particular flavor of agenda, just the presence of somebody opposed to whatever your agenda is, and the willingness and capability to employ coercive violence and fear.

      Somebody like Sir Arthur Harris would arguably qualify. He was an ideologically unexceptional commander of British air forces during WWII, and implemented the British 'saturation bombing' efforts against civilian targets and infrastructure. As he candidly described it:
       
      "the destruction of houses, public utilities, transport and lives, the creation of a refugee problem on an unprecedented scale, and the breakdown of morale both at home and at the battle fronts by fear of extended and intensified bombing, are accepted and intended aims of our bombing policy. They are not by-products of attempts to hit factories."

      If that doesn't qualify as 'terrorism', I'm not certain what would; but he's a deeply un-radical figure, pretty much heading to the office every day to implement the (widely prevailing) logic of "Total War" in the service of his government, a not-exactly-radical line of business.

      (I don't particularly mean to pick on the British, relatively staid people who execute what are unambiguously terror tactics aren't especially uncommon, or confined to any particular nation, he just happened to be a good example that I hit on quickly.)

    4. Re:radical terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "radical terrorist" is something interesting. That suggests there could be some "moderate terrorist". Anyone encountered that weird kind of terrorist?

      The grass fed people at large somehow think "terrorism" means "do scary things", so maybe "radical terrorism" is what they now have to call "do scary things with a specific goal"?

      It's like their watching a man kick an ant mound and think it's a devious ploy to make the ants overreact - because that's what happens - and his actual intent is _completely_ lost on them because... well... it doesn't make much sense.

    5. Re:radical terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about "honorable Jewish organizations", that suggests something interesting too.

    6. Re:radical terrorist by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      No, as opposed to just "radical". "Terrorist" is the modifier. "These radicals who've become terrorists" and not, "These terrorists who've become radical".

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    7. Re:radical terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't it Al Gore (a flaming liberal if there ever was one) that thought so highly of Global Warming?

    8. Re:radical terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a moderate terrorist is some who shouts BOOO! to scare people as a political statement.

    9. Re:radical terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That suggests there could be some "moderate terrorist". Anyone encountered that weird kind of terrorist?

      Yes, the NSA has seen a lot of those and have thwarted dozens of moderate terrorist plots. Moderate enough that one did not hear anything about them up to recently. They are recording calls from millions of moderate terrorists, people who are plotting to overthrow the government by elections, who are trying to weakening our defenses by sowing dissent and disseminating radical literature like the U.S. constitution, an outrageous political paper raging against their true king not worth the paper it is printed on.

      Moderate terrorists are the worst kind since they are so insiduous.

    10. Re:radical terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, Sir, are a genius! or maybe a "passive Truther" who has been radicalated......

    11. Re:radical terrorist by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      "radical terrorist" is something interesting. That suggests there could be some "moderate terrorist". Anyone encountered that weird kind of terrorist?

      That's not what it says though -- it says "radical pro-Israel terrorist". It's an interesting quirk that certain adjectives now appear to be qualifying other adjectives, but it's a perfectly natural phenomenon. Such adjectives are slowly transforming into "bound morphemes" -- almost like prefixes. So "radical" here is a bound morpheme that affects the adjacent word, clarifying that it's non-mainstream pro-Israeli-ism in play.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    12. Re:radical terrorist by nojayuk · · Score: 1

      The US government is planning to supply weapons to moderate revolutionaries in Syria, if they can find any.

      "What do we want?"

      "Gradual change!"

      "When do we want it?"

      "In due course!"

    13. Re:radical terrorist by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Such bullshit. Scorched earth tactics, which is what Sir Harris is describing and are intended to create the exact same circumstances he articulates, have been employed during wars for centuries.

      Did I say anything about him pioneering or inventing such tactics? Indeed, didn't I specifically say: "relatively staid people who execute what are unambiguously terror tactics aren't especially uncommon, or confined to any particular nation"?

    14. Re:radical terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't it be "terrorist radical" then?

    15. Re:radical terrorist by evilviper · · Score: 1

      That suggests there could be some "moderate terrorist". Anyone encountered that weird kind of terrorist?

      Why yes, as a matter of fact, I was moderately terrorized once....

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:radical terrorist by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      But this was during WWII and it's reasonable to adjust your views of what is acceptable when your country is in an existential conflict.

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    17. Re:radical terrorist by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      But this was during WWII and it's reasonable to adjust your views of what is acceptable when your country is in an existential conflict.

      That's one of the reasons why he qualifies as a 'non-radical' terrorist. He's pretty definitely using terror tactics, he goes so far as to specifically deny the then-current excuse(if you were basically OK with bombing the fuck out of your enemies; but didn't want to sound crass, then you would just be attacking 'military infrastructure and factories' with some unfortunate-but-inevitable collateral damage, he was more honest than that); but he's using them in service of about the least controversial objective in Britain at the time.

  28. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by murdocj · · Score: 0

    Yeah, God forbid that the Jews have a way to survive.

  29. Re:PRISM Deflection. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Sure, except this was another example of citizens volunteering information about obvious terrorists. PRISM wasn't involved.

  30. Relied on tips, not on spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apparently the spying didn't get any results, again

  31. Summary contradicts headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Headline says the they're accused of building a weapon. Summary says they're accused of conspiracy to commit murder. Who to believe? I could RTFA, but what if that lists a third possibility?

    1. Re:Summary contradicts headline by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Headline says the they're accused of building a weapon. Summary says they're accused of conspiracy to commit murder. Who to believe? I could RTFA, but what if that lists a third possibility?

      These two things are not mutually exclusive. In this case, I'd assume that he is accused of attempting to build a weapon; but that the 'weapon' he was trying to build (by virtue of having no ballistic, explosive, or even particularly sharp, components) probably doesn't fall under any of the stock weapons possession charges, so the feds, in lieu of maybe getting some hilariously tiny occupational health and safety violation fine assessed, are going after him on the 'conspiracy to commit murder' angle, which is actually a crime for which nontrivial penalties exist.

  32. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Someone probably read it as "the Jew's only crime is surviving" which may have been worthy of an insightful. Either that, or they thought the mod was "inciteful".

  33. cooked meathballs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    couldn't resist...

  34. Re:Canard or a set up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nowhere does the article or summary say or imply this was an Israeli operation. Rather, a couple of nutcases decided on their own to attack those that they perceived as enemies of Israel.

    ... and I have a bridge for sale! Send me some money and I'll send a pic!

    No really, you have to try very hard to believe they were after anything but money from people unable to report the scam afterwards. Notice how the undercover agents had to give them money, and that produced a remote control. Remote to what... I mean they probably just dressed up a RC plane/car radio and turned around asking for more "funding". No doubt they would have constructed SOMETHING if the agents offered a sweet enough deal, maybe that's bad enough in itself, but "terrorism" revolves almost entirely around intent, and they were 99.999999% likely bluffing about actual risks they would be willing to take.

    I'm not saying they should get off lightly, just that calling me a nutcase for trying to sell a bridge on the Internet makes one look kind of daft.

  35. "The Guild" by Nova+Express · · Score: 1

    "both said they were committed to building the device and named the group 'the guild,' the indictment said."

    Vork and Zaboo, no!

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  36. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Timothy McVeigh. Blew up Oklahoma building.

    Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber.

    David Koresh and the Branch Davidians.

    So many idiots going in and shooting up schools.

    Not one of them muslim.

  37. They were doing it wrong :) by davidwr · · Score: 1

    They are supposed to "Ask Slashdot"

    How can I build my own industrial-strength truck-mounted x-ray machine

    then wade through the 90% of responses that amount to "do your own homework" and 9% of slightly-but-lethally-wrong answers in hopes of finding the 1% of answers that are close to correct and not lethally broken.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  38. Not the damper diode.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2

    The damper only sees several kV pulses, not enough to generate X-rays strong enough to get out of the tube.

    The culprits in old color TVs were the HV rectifier, the HV shunt regulator, and the CRT itself.

    Good article on the TV X-ray issue in the April 1968 issue of Popular Science, available on Google Books.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  39. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by AJWM · · Score: 2

    Koresh and the Branch Davidians were hardly terrorists. The FBI shot first.

    The idiots shooting up schools are just that, idiots. They're not doing it to terrorize for some political or religious end.

    I'll give you McVeigh and Kaczynski.

    --
    -- Alastair
  40. Israel sponsers the UK's ultra right-wing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The most violent, racist, ultra-right-wing party in the UK is known as the EDL (English Defence League). It is openly financed by Israel and zionist groups within the UK that have links to Israel. The 'Star of David' is the unofficial symbol of EDL, and proudly appears at many of their mass 'actions'.

    The current version of the KKK in the USA is pro-zionist and anti-Muslim. It follows the same racist logic as the evangelical movements in the USA, all of which are zionist, and all of which support and encourage Israel's many Crimes against Humanity.

    Israel is the most racist state on the planet. Only in the last year it was caught sterilizing (usually without their knowledge) black immigrant women in Africa before they were given permission to enter Israel. Israel is also the centre of the illegal world trade in organs harvested from living donors.

    Israel and Saudi Arabia are the siamese twins of depravity that the US takes greatest pride in protecting. Rich Saudis in need of organ transplants have the work done in hospitals operated by Israel. The previous owner of the organ will frequently be a half-dead Turk (half-dead AFTER letting an Israeli 'doctor' illegally harvest his/her organ). Other 'donors' are not so lucky, like the Serbs kidnapped in Kosovo for the sole purpose of organ harvesting (go Google if you don't believe me).

    Israel boats that it has nuclear war-heads aimed at EVERY major Muslim civilian population centre on the planet. Israel boats that any attempt by any world court to hold it accountable for its war crimes will lead to these weapons being used.

    The owners of Slashdot are zionists, of course, and were proud to deny Iranian citizens access to the open-source facilities they host alongside Slashdot. They did this as part of the Israel sponsored program to encourage war against Iran. Apparently the depraved racists of Israel are the only people in the Middle-East entitled to nuclear technology. Every-one else is too 'sub-Human' according to the zionists. Where have I heard THAT logic before?

    1. Re:Israel sponsers the UK's ultra right-wing by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      Rich Saudis in need of organ transplants have the work done in hospitals operated by Israel.

      Actually, most Rich Saudis come to the US for major medical procedures, specifically the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. It has gotten so bad that many of the hotels and taxi services in Rochester now have their storefront signs in both English and Arabic.

    2. Re:Israel sponsers the UK's ultra right-wing by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      " ... evangelical movements in the USA, all of which are zionist ..."

      I've never understood that. You're talking about "Christian evangelicals" I assume. Jews openly reject the teachings of Christ and deny him messianic status. How then can a group of Christians be such rabid supporters of a Jewish state? Is this a temporary alliance against Islam or something?

      Then again, there's a lot of stuff about religion that doesn't make any sense to me.

    3. Re:Israel sponsers the UK's ultra right-wing by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      Hmm, that's an awful lot of accusations without citations.

  41. x-ray lasers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are feasible, but take a moderately powerful nuclear explosion to power them. So, basically you get one shot, and the delivery system is vaporized at the same time! :-)

    1. Re:x-ray lasers by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of operating X-ray lasers, at DESY in Hamburg, at SLAC (where I work) in California, and in Japan near Kyoto, with a few more under construction around the world. They are great research tools, but they are not useful for weapons: cannot be pointed, required enormous (kilometer-scale) equipment, and have average powers that are just not very dangerous.

  42. Re:PRISM Deflection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it is called dark sarcasm. See, the comment refers to this news info timed to switch on the paranoid dendrite in the sheeple, so the PRISM thing seems necessary and justified, even if they aren't directly related.

    zenlessyank was here

  43. Please don't feed the troll. by drainbramage · · Score: 2

    Dan Rather has been doing this for years.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  44. High IQ by 1jpablo1 · · Score: 1

    And here I was thinking all jews have superior IQ.

    1. Re:High IQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Higher than yours, apparently.

    2. Re:High IQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You weren't wrong... well, ok, there was this one Jew who was as smart as God, totally throws off the curve, but when you average it out... you get the idea.

    3. Re:High IQ by 1jpablo1 · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on, even I can see that this plan has some ...uh ... flaws...

    4. Re:High IQ by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      Why do you say that? Because someone DARED to differentiate a segment of the human population?

      Based on anecdotal evidence accumulated in the U.S.A. I think the idea of Jews having higher IQs on average than the rest of the population is an entirely plausible hypothesis. My guess is that a real study would put the median Jewish IQ almost +1 std. deviation above the median of the rest of the country.

      If racial/ethnic differences don't conform to your naive "we're all the same" world view, tough shit. The truth isn't politically correct.

  45. Yo Dawg by Zynder · · Score: 1

    You did that all wrong. When you state a convoluted mess like that, you have to preface it with "Yo Dawg! I heard you liked...."

    At least that is what my teenagers tell me.

  46. No "enemies of Irael" here by sir-gold · · Score: 1

    If you are looking for enemies of Israel, the LAST place you should look is the US.

    The US (and it's WWII allies), are the ones responsible for creating Israel in the first place, and without CONSTANT military support from the US, Israel would quickly cease to exist.

    If a bunch of crazy Jewish terrorists WANT to attack the US, I'm all for it. Hopefully it will wake people up and make them question why we have been propping up a failed ideal (and pissing off the Arabs) for the last 60 years.

    1. Re:No "enemies of Irael" here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) USA had very little to do with creation of Israel. Until 1967 it was not even Israel's ally.
      2) Israel does not receive "military support" from USA. Israel receives targeted aid for purchasing military hardware from USA (just under 1% of its GDP). Without it Israel will quickly cease to exist ...as a recepient of obsolete US military hardware. Its own arms industry would greatly benefit from this move, whereas a metric sh*tload of US jobs will be lost.
      3) Speak for yourself. Your ideal has failed on May9th 1945. Everybody else's is thrieving.

    2. Re:No "enemies of Irael" here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The US (and it's WWII allies), are the ones responsible for creating Israel in the first place,

      It's Lawrence of Arabia, not Jim-Bob.

      After the UK was done with Israel, we still had a use for them, so we picked them up.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  47. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    Is creating terror for non-religious, non-political reasons not still terrorism?

    Even if the guy's sole motivation is to get his 15 minutes of fame, using terror to achieve that goal makes him a terrorist.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  48. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if the idiots and Koresh had just happened to be muslim, wanna bet they would be immediately categorised as terrorists?

  49. Really now? by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dr. Fred Mettler, the U.S. representative on the United Nations' Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, was unfamiliar with the specifics of Crawford's plans but said it's unlikely such a device could work. Radiation can be narrowly beamed, as it is in some cancer treatments, but the accelerators require huge amounts of electricity, are not easily portable and any target would have to remain still for a long time.

    "I don't know of any of these that you can use like a gun to aim at someone on the street," Mettler said.

    http://www.labx.com/v2/adsearch/detail3.cfm?adnumb=491358#MoreDesc

    Mobile unit, runs on batteries, would fit in a van. However....its only a mobile xray unit. Claims ~1900 exposures per charge. I doubt it is made to run in continuous output.... and still only going to be effective at a very short range.

    Maybe if you parked a van along a route that your target walked several times a day, for multiple days.... and his path took him within a few feet of the side of the van....and the van.... its not a metal body is it? That's going to be a problem too. Not entirely impossible that a dangerous dose could be delivered, and by dangerous I mean like, increasing his chance of cancer and possibly thyroid or kidney issues in his old age sort of dangerous.

    So two things:

    1. He went to jewish groups, after going to the Klan:

    Crawford also traveled to North Carolina in October to solicit money for the weapon from a ranking member of the Ku Klux Klan, who informed the FBI.

    But Doesn't the Klan hate the Zionists? Huh? This guy is just playing the I hate muslims thing....ok, that works I guess. Still, a bit of a douche move to pitch it to the Klan and then adopt the "Enemies of Israel" spiel. Good salesmanship I guess.

    2. This seems overly complex and expensive. Shit, at that point, why not just buy some laser diodes and have a hand portable device capable of blinding someone permenantly from a safe distance, and instantly? Oh.... wait... that would only cost a few hundred bucks.

    So I am thinking the scam artists who were looking to take some people for some cash they couldn't rightly sue him for the return of, got caught up in a bigger con game where the FBI set them up to con us into thinking that we really need their protection.

    I bet you if they didn't arrest them when they did, they would have driven off with the van and disappeared, gone back to the KKK and offered their services, and then shopped around for more suckers. If they finds out it doesn't expose film, they would have had some films made up and claimed its too dangerous to be nearby while it runs.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    1. Re:Really now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mobile unit, runs on batteries, would fit in a van. However....its only a mobile xray unit. Claims ~1900 exposures per charge. I doubt it is made to run in continuous output....

      That one cannot run continuous, just for 1-2 seconds maximum. The X-Ray tube is driven from a huge capacitor bank which needs to recharge itself after each shot from the built-in 10 or 12 car-like batteries. The X-ray tube also cannot handle the thermal load of continuous high-power operation.
      1900 exposures per charge surely refers to clinical use dose per pulse, not maximum output.

      I'm an engineer in medical X-ray, not a well-informed terrorist. *g*

    2. Re:Really now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've hit in a very interesting artifact of modern politics.
      Classically, the KKK does hate "the jews" or zionists or whatever you want to call them. Today? Oddly, they don't. In fact they love them and often identify with the struggles of Israel again Islam. It must be a very confusing time for an old grand dragon.

      To understand this one must realize what the KKK actually is. It's not an autonomous hate group. In reality it's an extension of the conservative political machine. It's just an older, less socially acceptable version of the tea party. Both groups like to believe they're autonomous and independent but they're really controlled by the interests of a few.

      So, why the change? Classically, "The Jews" or Israel or whatever has been politically aligned with liberal democrats. As a political enemy of American conservatives, it was the KKK's job to hate the Jews. Sometime in the late 80s and early 90s, for reasons I'm not aware of, Israel politically shifted to alignment with American conservatives. (Research the "Neo Conservative" movement for more information) Today you have nearly every ultra-righting media outlet droning on and on about the plight of Israel. Weird times.

      This isn't the only similar instance, and it's important to note that many foreign powers are not really aligned with the United states, but only one particular political faction in the United States. When the bushes were in charge we were awful interested in things that benefited a lot of foreign oil interests. Today? Well, there's a reason we're letting certain foreign dictators be toppled that we supported in the past.

  50. Re: But if they happened to be muslim idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the idiots or Koresh just happened to be Muslim, you can bet they would have been classified as terrorists.

  51. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1
    You forgot
    • Eric Rudolph and Army of God
    • Animal Liberation Front
    • Aryan Nations
    • Ku Klux Klan
    • Black Liberation Army
    • The Convenant, The Sword and the Arm of the Lord
    • Jewish Defense League
    • The Order
    • Phinneas Priesthood
    • Wade Michael Page
  52. Wrong weapon or Wrong location? by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

    So these guys were soliciting money to build a weapon to target enemies of Israel.

    Was their crime that they didn't use a drone, or that they wanted to do it in the U.S and not in Pakistan or Afghanistan?

    Couldn't you just send money to General Atomics?

    1. Re:Wrong weapon or Wrong location? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dimona, Jericho-III, US TAX-Dallers!!!! NewYorkers are already Zoned out largelie due to Bloomburgs Direct!
      ADL, AIPAC, Lansky affiliates pipe-bombed a Christian-Palestinian with full FBI support! LA Times carried the story. This article is smart goy bait!
      Injectable White-Phosphourous or Nano-Thermite, at Camp X-ray?

  53. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

    I believe the Branch Davidians shot first when the ATF agents were on the roof.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  54. Quote from fictional MD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This appears to be a quote from a character from the book "Feeders".

    I'd guess that the only thing wrong, though, is that there'd almost certainly be no benefit from more than, say, 2 chest X-rays per year, even for older, at-risk patients (and certainly younger patients should have much less reason to be exposed).

    1. Re:Quote from fictional MD by jomama717 · · Score: 1

      It's from Repo Man.

      --
      while [ 1 ]; do echo -n -e "\xe2\x95\xb$((($RANDOM&1)+1))"; done
  55. Oh goody gum drops by mitcheli · · Score: 1

    Bad enough we have to deal with radical Islamic terrorists, now we have to deal with Jewish ones too? Now we just gotta get the Christian radicals out there and we can relive the dark ages!

    --
    Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
  56. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought he was going for sarcasm. The people who actually believe that tripe don't use or understand the longer words in that post.

  57. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fascism combines elements of both the right and the left while being moderate on few, if any, aspects.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  58. Something doesn't seem right about this. They couldn't scrape up a few thousand dollars on their own?

    "Hi! Will you give us some money so we can buy a powerful X-ray and a remote control for it so we can burn down people? No? Do you know anyone who might?"

    Like Checkov running around San Francisco asking where the nuclear vwessels are.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  59. Great, now please jail the TSA folks by mysidia · · Score: 1

    These guys were just attempting to build a weapon, they aren't successful, they go to jail (good).

    TSA agents are scanning people every day with harmful X-rays....

    They're allowed to continue, and nothing bad happens to the people who allowed this.

  60. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Belial6 · · Score: 3

    A coworker that was living down the road from the Davidian compound tells me that the Dividians had been legally shooting rifles on their property. A neighbor made a noise complaint and the local sheriff had already been out and worked out a compromise to resolve the complaint. As the story goes, the issue had already been resolved with the kooky but harmless Davidians.

  61. Has he thought this through? by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2

    A solid science story, and people are going off on tangents. First thing I though, yeah this is a brilliant plan: How long would you have to point an x-ray machine at someone before it would even cause radiation sickness? Several hours or something? Remember, all EM radiation falls off with the square of the distance, so if someone sits in a truck with an x-ray machine pointed at you from across a parking lot, it is losing a lot of potency. It would be much simpler to go stab the person with a broken bottle if you really don't like them that much.

    Also, this thing is hardly going to be medical grade safety, so I give you 50/50 odds that the operator ends up dying of radiation poisoning before any of his 'victims'. Finally, you can generate EM radiation without nuclear material, but that would suck down quite a bit of power to create something as energetic as x-rays. This guy going to power that off his car's cigarette lighter ac adapter?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Has he thought this through? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The time issue could be solved by planning. Watch the local mosques. Are there any which routinely have a queue outside? You don't want to just irradiate people to death, that gets you caught in short order, you just want to dose them enough that they come down with six types of cancer in a couple of years.

      As for power, a quick google finds most portable generators are around two kilowatts. A death-ray-truck devoting half the space to the x-ray machine and HV power supply would still have room to cram in, say, a 2x2x3 stack - that gives you 24KW of power. Would that be sufficient? The team had engineering knowledge, so they could handle the task of bodging twelve out-of-phase generators together into one useable power source.

    2. Re:Has he thought this through? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0

      The inverse-square law only holds for something that radiates in a radial pattern. (That sounds redundant but it's not.) You get around that by focusing it with a large reflector or series of reflectors. How would they disguise it? Hell if I know, but maybe you could if you were clever.

      Also, x-rays are of a longer wavelength than visible light, so generally speaking they should attenuate less than visible light in the air. I don't think the gases of air generally absorb much at x-ray wavelengths, either, but I'm not sure. I would have to look it up.

      So... if you focused your beam, yeah I think you could do a lot of damage.

    3. Re:Has he thought this through? by yet+another+SanTiago · · Score: 4, Informative

      The inverse-square law only holds for something that radiates in a radial pattern.

      More or less everything radiates in a radial pattern (has spherical wavefron) and is subject to the inverse-square law. Even lasers have some divergence. Better focus (by e.g. reflectors) would give you lower angle of divergence and therefore higher initial power density, but that is all.

      x-rays are of a longer wavelength than visible light,

      Definitely not. X-rays have significantly higher frequency and therefore shorter wavelength (380-740 nm for visible light and 0.01 - 10 nm for x-rays).

    4. Re:Has he thought this through? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Remember, all EM radiation falls off with the square of the distance, so if someone sits in a truck with an x-ray machine pointed at you from across a parking lot, it is losing a lot of potency.

      That's only true for point sources. For beams, it depends on how focused they are. At the extreme end, a laser beam loses almost no intensity with distance.

      The difference between point sources and beams is pretty much the same as between exploding gunpowder in free air vs. using it to propel a bullet.

      Also, this thing is hardly going to be medical grade safety, so I give you 50/50 odds that the operator ends up dying of radiation poisoning before any of his 'victims'.

      Probably, but with reasonable beam strength that still gives him at least months to spread cancer. In fact he never once needs to turn the thing on; he just needs to drive around, make sure his path can be tracked (but not too accurately), be caught, and let FUD do the rest.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:Has he thought this through? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      The truck part is key if they rig up a PTO generator off the transmission. You can easily get 50+kW off of a transmission PTO or full engine output from a power tower.

    6. Re:Has he thought this through? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Depends what you mean by 'truck.' I assumed they were going to use a large work van, not a giant container-moving vehicle. Those are harder to get, and generally (I'm not sure how it works in the US, but over here they do) need a specialist license. The obvious plan is to find a sizeable gathering of targets - some sort of festival or queue, perhaps - then park nearby with the Death Ray pointed at them. That way you can potentially get a few hours of exposure in. That done, move on to another city - travel the country, leaving a trail of cancer in your wake.

    7. Re:Has he thought this through? by NonUniqueNickname · · Score: 1

      +1 accurate

    8. Re:Has he thought this through? by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      No, it still follows the inverse square law due to dispersion; it's just that your initial gain is very high compared to a isotropic radiator.

    9. Re:Has he thought this through? by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      Gah, not dispersion, divergence.

    10. Re:Has he thought this through? by fiann · · Score: 1

      Um, no. X-rays are a much SHORTER wavelength than visible light and therefore attenuate MORE than light. X-rays have a wavelength of between .01 nm to 10 nm. Visible light falls between 380 nm and 740 nm. X-rays are readily absorbed by air. That is why large nuclear weapons are relatively safe from a radiation standpoint. With a smaller explosion you can be safe from the blast and heat but still receive a deadly dose of radiation. With larger yield weapon you would most likely be killed by the blast or thermal energy well outside the range of deadly radiation. Absorption of xray radiation by the atmosphere is actually responsible for much of the thermal energy and blast effects in a nuclear weapon. If you detonated one in space you would get little to no blast but you would get a pulse of heat and a huge dose of radiation.

    11. Re:Has he thought this through? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2

      PTO's are not limited to class 7 and higher trucks. Even vans (at least cutaway vans with the pickup chassis) and pickup trucks have PTO openings on the transmission. Ford F450/550 and Dodge 4500/5500 chassis are essentially longer pickup chassis with somewhat heavier suspensions. They have PTO options. Plus there are ways to modify drivelines for power towers or engine mounted PTO's. But in the case of special license, trucks weighing up to 26,000 lbs (11.8t) gross weight (class 6 and below) do not need any special license class or endorsements. You can get a pretty big truck in that class, with a van body up to around 26 ft (7.9m). Any one of those trucks can have a PTO opening as a standard part of the transmission.

      You wouldn't bother paralleling a bunch of crappy portable generators, noisy as hell and the vibration would be staggering. It would sound like an angry swarm of robotic bees, you can't hide that in a smaller vehicle.

      High power X-ray machines have 3 phase power supplies, they just don't make any high power equipment in single phase. So now you start needing larger generators, mostly diesel or in some cases using an industrial gas engine (Ford is a popular gas engine for small stationary backup generators). Again, more noise and vibration to deal with. A PTO generator with idle control is a bit more discreet and available off the shelf as an idling truck is not an uncommon sight. Bonus points if it is painted or lettered to be a utility or contractor truck.

    12. Re:Has he thought this through? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Pickup truck is no good - you couldn't conceal the Death Ray in an open-backed truck. A large van with PTO should be workable.

      Also, hello NSA!

    13. Re:Has he thought this through? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1, Informative

      "More or less everything radiates in a radial pattern (has spherical wavefron) and is subject to the inverse-square law. Even lasers have some divergence. Better focus (by e.g. reflectors) would give you lower angle of divergence and therefore higher initial power density, but that is all."

      No, not accurate. Look it up. While sources DO tend to radiate radially, proper focus can bring it under control and beat the inverse-square law. Attenuation and scattering are NOT the same as inverse square.

      "Definitely not. X-rays have significantly higher frequency and therefore shorter wavelength (380-740 nm for visible light and 0.01 - 10 nm for x-rays)."

      Yes, you caught me on that one. I was looking at frequency, not wavelength. I don't mind admitting when I'm wrong. But I'm not wrong about inverse-square. I say again, look it up. Even just Wikipedia. It only applies to something that is radiating in all directions. That is how the mathematical formula is derived in the first place. Quote Wikipedia [emphasis added]:

      "The density of flux lines is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source because the surface area of a sphere increases with the square of the radius. Thus the strength of the field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source."

      When the radiation is not being emitted in a radial pattern, it does not follow that formula. Therefore it does NOT apply to a beam focused by a reflector. And scattering is a completely different matter.

    14. Re:Has he thought this through? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Um, no. X-rays are a much SHORTER wavelength than visible light and therefore attenuate MORE than light."

      Yes, I know. I was thinking that the wavelength is longer, when actually it is shorter. My mistake. But I'm not mistaken about the inverse-square law.

    15. Re:Has he thought this through? by hutsell · · Score: 1

      A solid science story, and people are going off on tangents. First thing I though, yeah this is a brilliant plan: How long would you have to point an x-ray machine at someone before it would even cause radiation sickness? Several hours or something? Remember, all EM radiation falls off with the square of the distance, so if someone sits in a truck with an x-ray machine pointed at you from across a parking lot, it is losing a lot of potency. It would be much simpler to go stab the person with a broken bottle if you really don't like them that much.

      Also, this thing is hardly going to be medical grade safety, so I give you 50/50 odds that the operator ends up dying of radiation poisoning before any of his 'victims'. Finally, you can generate EM radiation without nuclear material, but that would suck down quite a bit of power to create something as energetic as x-rays. This guy going to power that off his car's cigarette lighter ac adapter?

      The unworkable ramifications of their idea you pointed out in your comment would mean they (hopefully you meant the possible morons, not the comment you replied to) hadn't thought it through. However, their technical backgrounds seem to indicate otherwise. From TFA:

      ... Crawford, an industrial mechanic for General Electric in Schenectady, knew Feight, an outside GE contractor with mechanical and engineering skills ...

      Although the qualifications aren't a guarantee against doing something stupid, my thinking was along the same lines as yours and that they would also be aware of the same problems. It's for those same reasons (which I didn't feel necessary to elaborate on and probably should have) that I'm inclined toward believing it's really a scam and should be handled by an organisation like the now defunct Bunco Squad that worked on stopping confidence games; the Brooklyn Bridge being one of the more historical/hysterical famous.

      It would be interesting to see the plans or schematics --- if any.

      --
      Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
  62. Bogus Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeez, they'd have to light up Obama thousands of times for this to have any effect - no way would it kill him. He probably gets more X-rays from a flight in Air Force 1.

  63. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Koresh and the Branch Davidians were hardly terrorists. The FBI shot first.

    The idiots shooting up schools are just that, idiots. They're not doing it to terrorize for some political or religious end.

    I'll give you McVeigh and Kaczynski.

    Why are we limiting this to the US? Chechyan rebels, the IR fucking A?

    You've got terrorist organisations in all colours and religions. Saying only Arabs are terrorist is naive to the extreme.

    BTW, a lot of mass shootings accompany extremist ideologies. Norway's Anders Brevik for example. So you're wrong with that one too.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  64. If what you say is true ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is just CIA/NSA propaganda. Grocery store celeb news mags for people "afraid". Something "terrible" is gonna happen one day if we don't justify our fucked society.

    If what you say is true, not long from now they will arrest some "terrorists" from China, some other "terrorists" from Cuba, from Russia, and from North Korea will be arrested too, and their "weapon of choice" will be ranging from "portable gamma knife" to "dirty bombs" and everything in between

    Yep, NSA is here to save the United States of America, and they will catch the "terrorists" and parade them in front of all of us to gawk at

  65. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you are part of the problem. If we call everything that is harmful to a civil society terrorism, the word loses its meaning.

  66. An XRay weapon? really? by TCMok1 · · Score: 1

    I thought this was a science fiction but it's really a thing huh? How the well is this weapon gonna work? Shoot high intensity XRays and hope their enemies get cancer in the near future? The idea is pretty awesome on paper though.

  67. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing how many people manage to survive without murdering other people. If you assassinate and murder people, you should not be surprised when you are called an assassin and a murderer.

  68. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by dave420 · · Score: 1

    No - that's just being an asshole. Terrorism is the threat, or use of force in order to coerce a people into political change. 15 minutes of fame doesn't quite meet the requirement.

  69. "honorable Jewish organizations" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's an oxymoron, if ever there was.

  70. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    The biggest crime of the Jews is the fact of their survival

    Seeing that you post here, you're obviously not dead yet, and thus I conclude you've survived so far. Therefore you're guilty of the exact same "crime".

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  71. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by neonmonk · · Score: 2

    Chechyan rebels? And what religion do you think their creed flies under?

  72. unthinkable as Capone on the Titanic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feds, Klan, New Yorkers? Where Bloomberg in all of this, i mean hes got a television network which feeds peoples brains radiation, also solicits stock purchasing!
    Honestly though, this looks like a setup from a page of the .pdf "THE UGLY TRUTH ABOUT THE ADL"
    These ADL and so-called-white-supremacists killed a Christian-Palestinian in LA with a pipe-bomb
      Meyer Lansky`s kid too, smells filthy :/

  73. Bizarre by benjfowler · · Score: 0

    Muslims, particularly arabs, LOVE silly conspiracy theories -- the crazier the better.

    When I was at college, I had some Pakistani guy claim to me that the jews were told not to come in to work on 9/11. Needless to say, my opinion of him dropped through the floor at that point. This is COMPLETELY normal for arabs and muslims. Probably because you have to be credulous, stupid and a bit nasty to begin with.

    This reads like another insane middle-eastern conspiracy theory.

  74. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 3

    I think you are part of the problem. If we call everything that is harmful to a civil society terrorism, the word loses its meaning.

    However, it has already lost its meaning because white folk are no longer being classed as terrorists. The classic example being Anders Breivik -- when he struck they cried "terrorist". When it turned out he was a white supremacist, the word disappeared.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  75. They wanted to shoot a parody movie, that's all by gtirloni · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they really liked this video clip.

    Seems like fair use.

    --
    none
  76. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, and it never was, otherwise all armed robbers would be terrorists.

  77. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

    The biggest crime of the Jews is the fact of their survival, and as such, every person not supporting their demonization, dehumanization, and double standards against Jews and Israel is a terrorist by definition. Truly, how low can those Juice stoop? What will they think of next...

    Calling out Israeli oppression, torture and killing of Palestinians is not demonisation, and it is not dehumanisation. The majority of those who call for the Israeli government and military to be brought before judges in The Hague do not condone the Palestinian suicide bombers, so it is no double standard to say that serving soldiers should not be firing live rounds into school playgrounds.

    I feel sorry for the people of Israel, I really do. Prior to World War 2, Europe was a horrible place, defined by xenophobia and division; xenophobia and division that had been managed and manipulated by nation-builders since the Renaissance to create a rabid type of patriotism that medieval kings would have killed for, and which powered the engines of imperial expansion. World War II was the culmination of this philosophy, and the actions of the German Nazi regime shone a mirror on all of us.

    World War 2 became a breakpoint, where we had to change, and within Europe we put our energies into building bridges across countries. Before the explosion in mass tourism, town twinning and exchanges were set up so that we would mix across borders and see that people from other countries are human, just like us.

    Gradually, over time, we got to the point where countries that had previously been at war practically ceaselessly for centuries were now sitting at a table, putting the final touches onto a plan to share a currency.

    The second half of the 20th century was a time of unprecedented peace in Europe, and I feel very lucky to have been born into that.

    But unfortunately for the people of Israel, they missed all that. A great many of them left Europe before the reconciliation began, and they have a folk memory that has retained the very worst of the treatment their ancestors received in Europe.

    The people of Israel genuinely believe they are reviled by a racist, backward Europe. They believe themselves to be hated with an intensity greater than the animosity shown to (innocent) Muslims in the backlash after the Woolwich attack, an intensity of hate has no currency outside of a few extreme hate groups. They believe this, and they should be pitied for it.

    I once heard the Holocaust described as "Europe's dirty little secret." Again, the implication was that Europe hates Jews, and therefore buries this. But the Holocaust is the most widely recognised war atrocities in the world, and one of the most widely discussed features of World War 2. Discussion of the Holocaust centres around the Jews, and what is swept under the carpet is the Gypsies, the Poles, the gays, the disabled... all the other people the Nazis abused institutionally. Oh, and that's not to forget the atrocities committed by the "good guys": the firebombing of Dresden, the looting and pillaging, and the betrayal of the Cossacks at Leinz. The use of nerve agents in WWI, the military tactics that disvalued human life. We have done many bad things and continue to downplay them, but the Holocaust of the Jews is no secret.

    So let's get one thing clear: "the Jews" have commited no crime, but the "State of Israel" exists in contravention of international laws, and commits regular atrocities that break those laws. An attack on the State of Israel is not an attack on the Jews.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  78. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    The biggest crime of the Jews is the fact of their survival

    Seeing that you post here, you're obviously not dead yet, and thus I conclude you've survived so far. Therefore you're guilty of the exact same "crime".

    Yes, and the poster is clearly a Jew, and an Israeli. This is what an unfortunately high number of Israelis believe the outside world thinks of them. They have an institutionalised paranoid victim complex. It's sad, and I pity them, but it does not excuse the ongoing and regular atrocities perpetrated by the Israeli government and military.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  79. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by SJHillman · · Score: 1

    I fear the point went so far over your head you didn't even hear the whoosh. Israel may be mostly Jews, but not all Jews are in/from Israel. Gypsies have done pretty well surviving without having their own country, as have many other groups that have been largely persecuted. My entire point is that Israel has done some shitty stuff but you can't blame "Jews" any more than you can blame "Muslims" for 9/11 or "Christians" for the Inquisition. "Jews" and "Israel" are not one and the same no matter how much people seem to think they are. There's plenty of Jews living elsewhere in the world with little or no ties to the country of Israel.

  80. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are 6 billion people on earths. Among them more than one billion are christians and more than one billion are muslims. Trying to determine who is more prone to violence by listing a handful of examples in a slashdot post is just an exercise in futility. If 0.01 percent of one group engaged in terrorist actions while 0.001 percent of the other group did. You'd have a group 10 times more prone to terrorist violence (while still having a large majority of peaceful members). But seeing that by posting examples would require you posting 100 thousand names for one group and the 10 thousand names for the other group and saying one list is longer than the other.

  81. Anything can be used to justify violence... by postermmxvicom · · Score: 1

    Sure religion can, but what about economics or evolution? Just a little bit of thought applied to those and you can justify whatever violence you want. The REAL point is that there are evil people. They can and will use any philosophy, science, religion or technology to do bad things.

    It saddens me greatly too see people on the internet blindly jumping on the 'religion is the problem' bandwagon. It's just as bad as any of the 'videogames, guns, books, dancing...etc' is the problem thinking.

    Can we just accept there are bad people and bad people do bad things with anything? Can we jail just those people without the need to take away everyone else's freedoms?

    --
    One last thing: Sometimes I wonder; "Is that someone's signature? Or do they type that at the end of each post?"
    1. Re:Anything can be used to justify violence... by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      I am not saying that religion is the problem. The problem is how it is used to justify bad things. Of course philosophies can be used in the same way. They even used the enlightenment to do unenlightened things (see Robespierre)

  82. My podunk hometown made a story on Slashdot by NastyNate · · Score: 1

    They were building this 'weapon' in an abandoned garage (used to be shorty's) in Schaghticoke NY.

    Thats twice in the national news in less than a month. The other time being for the dipshit cool kids on the yearbook staff leaving mean captions in the book that they meant to remove before printing.

  83. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by wildstoo · · Score: 1

    Of course white people can still be called terrorists, but only if they've DDoSed a corporate website or similar... simply add the "cyber-" prefix and you're ready to go (to court).

    Yes, it's ridiculous.

  84. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, the reason they stopped calling him a terrorist is because they decided they were not going to be terrorized or give him a platform. They didn't want him to be seen as a soldier fighting a war or on some kind of crusaded. They demoted him to a simple criminal, a deranged murder.

    We could learn a lot from that.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  85. The last ones to try a x-ray weapon . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . was the nazis. After testing on prisoners, they found it impractical.

    These "friends of Israel" should consider who they are emulating . . .

  86. Which is more effective? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which types of ionizing radiation are most easily produced, and most deadly? Having worked on very high powered military aircraft radar, the only warning we were given was that it could cause blindness if exposed to the beam. We had ISAR radar that was interlocked to the weight-on-wheels switch. That prevented it from radiating on the ground. The WoW switch could be bypassed. I had heard anecdotal stories of birds literally falling out of the air, dead, from being exposed to the beam. The beam was wide too, the antenna rotated at 120 RPM.

  87. Try the standard missing info bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there is this bit, why is the KKK connection missing from the summary? All the other articles mention it but not this one. Selective journalism? Haha, I am funny. Journalism, by Samsenpus.

  88. Patsies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see the feds found a few more patsies to drum up some press. The "Plot" was encouraged by them, they paid for it & they gathered the research materials for the construction of the "weapon". And I can't think up a single reasonable way this could have been used as a weapon. People would have had to line up and stand within feet for a few minutes for a lethal dose of radiation. At most they may have been able to increase the chances of developing cancer by a percent or so in their victims.

  89. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's bullshit. Perhaps you're choosing to ignore the hundreds of white terrorists that were murdering women and children while out shopping with their cowardly bombs. Or how these white terrorists were forcing taxi drivers to deliver bombs to set locations or face having their family wiped out. Yes, believe it or not, the IRA were all white, and were branded terrorists too.

  90. The guild?! by Shirogitsune · · Score: 1

    FTFA: Crawford brought Feight, both said they were committed to building the device and named the group "the guild," the indictment said.

    I knew it! The Guild of Calamitous Intent really needs to get their act together and reign in these crazies. I blame Phantom Limb.

  91. Sounds like a Dan Baker Plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CERN is compromised and the accelerator is tuned to produce Pions that decay after passing through the planet at a Nuclear facility in a foreign country.

    Literally making heir nuclear weapons impotent in the silos.

    They discover this and decide to launch a preemptive strike before the warheads are rendered useless.

    Only James Bond can save us.. oh wait.. wrong superhero

  92. No mention yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that this plot was discovered without the NSA's wiretapping?

  93. A Nazi method by EdgePenguin · · Score: 1

    One of the ways the Nazis considered sterilising Jews and other undesirables was to use a concealed X-ray machine. This was later abandoned when they decided to go for mass murder instead.

  94. If your local Grand Dragon thinks you're crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your local head of the KKK thinks you're crazy... I'm sure the local KKK head saw right through this and called BS as a setup and notified the FBI, and it's also intresting to note that this would have just been some cockamamy plan by some nut job that would have gone no where if it wasn't for the design assitance and parts sourcing from the FBI it's self. So it's kind of like the FBI created the threat and say pats themselves on the back and say "Yay we stopped a terrorist threat" when in all likley hood it would have gone nowhere if the guy was left to his own devices (if this guy isn't a plant in and of it's self). Anyone who is serious is going to keep his mouth shut and not go blabbing around town to your local KKK or whatever and say I have a plan to build a death ray wanna help. It's about as smart as going from person to person on any random street corner and asking for a drug hookup.

  95. Thank goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank goodness we have the NSA tapping into our emails to foil these sorts of dastardly plots. ... What's that? It wasn't the NSA?

    Well at least it was the FBI... ... What's that? It was private citizens who turned them in?

    Gee, it's almost as if it isn't worth it to trash our constitutional protections for a bit of security.

  96. Re:PRISM Deflection. by mrjimorg · · Score: 1

    It wasn't involved this time, but PRISM is there to protect you from THESE kinds of people. These are really scary people! They're going to kill you if you don't give up your rights and let us spy on you. Next we need a camera in every room of your house- you know, just in case.... we're getting off the point- which is that these people are scary! And you should fear them. Now.

  97. Is this 24x7 news on CNN and the like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the next 2 weeks?

  98. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    That of the Lone Wolf. It's only Islamic to piss off the Russian Orthodox.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  99. Figures not exact but the point is the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's 133% !

  100. the original Democrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The KKK is a group of folks who hate anyone different. But yes, they have always been anti-Catholic, but really they are anti-immigrant. And for a long time being anti-immigrant and being anti-catholic went hand in hand in certain social circles (racist white protestants). And it was not really that long ago in American history that Catholics from Italy and Ireland were despised by a vocal minority.

    Just because the robes look similar do not mean they have the same origin. But that's a very interesting connection you've made. If the early KKK members knew about this, it was more than likely done to mock the Catholic Church and use its symbols against it. But I suspect they weren't worldly enough to have know of this, and just wanted some easy costume to hide their identity so they could terrorize people they didn't like.

  101. Terrorists? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    s/David Koresh and the Branch Davidians/FBI and BATF/

    Burning 76 men, women and children alive is not what I'd call due process. (Janet Reno, to her credit, specifically directed the FBI to not use pyrotechnics, but they ignored her orders)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  102. Also tried to sell to KKK, hardly pro-Israel, just by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These guys also solicited the KKK in South Carolina so calling them pro-Israel is ridiculous or perhaps the blogger has another agenda.

  103. Why does this keep coming up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think most of the attention was on Koresh because of the new religion he formed. Rather than us being a religiously tolerant society, the Branch Davidians were getting harassed and threatened. The Davidians started collecting weapons, a terrible idea, which escalated their problems to a federal level.

    The message from the Clinton administration was clear. They won't tolerate new religions, and were unwilling to peacefully negotiate with followers of new religions.
    I blame Clinton and Reno because they were in charge when what amounted to a military operation on American soil against its own citizens devolved into a total blood bath.

    To this day I am strongly against the militarization of our police forces. The arms race that our CIVILIAN government believes they must participate in has done nothing but restrict our freedom and killed innocent people.

  104. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    That's bullshit. Perhaps you're choosing to ignore the hundreds of white terrorists that were murdering women and children while out shopping with their cowardly bombs. Or how these white terrorists were forcing taxi drivers to deliver bombs to set locations or face having their family wiped out. Yes, believe it or not, the IRA were all white, and were branded terrorists too.

    Reread what I wrote:

    However, it has already lost its meaning because white folk are no longer being classed as terrorists.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  105. Weapon of Mass Destruction? by BostonPilot · · Score: 1

    >>They were charged with conspiring to provide material support for use in preparation for a weapon of mass destruction. If convicted, they each face the possibility of up to 15 years in prison.

    So, uh, what *exactly* is the definition of "WOMD"? 'cause if they're being charged with this I'm sure I must not understand what it is...

    Wikipedia says:

    >>A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a weapon that can kill and bring significant harm to a large number of humans and/or cause great damage to man-made structures (e.g. buildings), natural structures (e.g. mountains), or the biosphere in general. The scope and application of the term has evolved and been disputed, often signifying more politically than technically. Coined in reference to aerial bombing with chemical explosives, it has come to distinguish large-scale weaponry of other technologies, such as chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear. This differentiates the term from more technical ones such as chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons (CBRN).

    which doesn't sound like what they were intending to build...

    Paul

  106. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by sjames · · Score: 1

    No, it makes him a crazy person. Otherwise, that bolt of lightning that struck close to my house and tracked in through the cable connection was a terrorist.

  107. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by sjames · · Score: 1

    The very day of the 9/11 attack, I commented that our best course of action was to round up those responsible (if we could find any alive) and move on. I also predicted that instead we'd spend a few years jumping at shadows, snipe hunting, generally trashing everything good in society and trying to relate everything to 9/11.

    Sadly, I was correct.

  108. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by sjames · · Score: 1

    You mean the heavily armed paramilitary style LEO who was clearly identified by lettering on his back where the Davidians couldn't see it?

  109. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by cangrejoinmortal · · Score: 1

    Whoa whoa, what have to do those guys in ALF with the rest of monsters you list here? They wouldn't hurt rabbits nor human beings.

  110. NSA and Prism to the rescue by Agent0013 · · Score: 2

    So if we are supposed to accept the NSA recording our phone meta-data and storing email and internet traffic so they can stop terrorists, why is it they didn't stop these people? It always seems that it's regular people on the plane noticing someone trying to light their underwear or whatever. Nobody stopped the Boston bombers. But at least we have this backtrack of meta-data to look at. Who cares about the dead, we give up the freedom so we can have the full picture after the fact. That way the movies made years later can be accurate.

    --

    -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  111. Well, well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who are the terrorists NOW?

  112. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by murdocj · · Score: 1

    I think the whoosh is on your end. No, not all Jews are from Israel, and yet it's comforting for all Jews to know that after thousands of years, there's one country where there isn't a chance that they will be a hated minority. Unlike Muslims, Hindus, Catholics, etc that have many nations where they can feel comfortably in the majority, there's only one country on earth where that's true for Jews.

    Got it?

  113. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    Whoa whoa, what have to do those guys in ALF with the rest of monsters you list here? They wouldn't hurt rabbits nor human beings.

    Well there have been car bombs.

  114. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Not one of them muslim.

    And THAT is why it's reported as news. It's when islamic terrorism stops making headlines because it's the "new normal" is when you should worry. In fact, for much of the Middle East, it's just that. You never know when a bus full of people will blow up or a car bomb goes off. Or how about many of those countless IEDs. Nope, just another day in paradise. Pay no attention to that as it's no longer news worthy *yawn*.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  115. US Army already tried it - FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pulsed millimeter-wave weapon - easier to build than most things on "Instructables" .. inverse square law killed that idea after about 350,000,000 in R&D costs. How do I know? I was on the development team back in the day. Government Contractors managed to suck a bunch of money out of DARPA however.

  116. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sure sure give the hasbara low-life a score of 4

  117. This sounds like a bad comic book movie.... by ender89 · · Score: 1

    Seriously these terrorists (lets just call them villains until we know if their intent is to strike terror into the heart of whoever they are fighting, shall we?), sorry, villians decided that they were going to build an X-ray gun and they got caught because they were soliciting money? This sounds like a horrible stereotype from a bad movie, that the jews (or honorary jews, being a friend of Israel) got caught because they were too cheap to pay for their superweapons themselves and too ... lazy? hands off? isn't there a stereotype about jewish people staying away from manual labor? to steal the parts themselves. Its like they want to be stereotyped.

  118. Is This Really Terrorism? by obscuro · · Score: 1

    I find the KKK extremely distasteful. I find race and religious hatred distasteful. I see no problem saying mean things about the President of the US as long as they aren't death threats. These were clearly scary, rude assholes building a terrifying weapon which merits extremely close ongoing scrutiny.

    As far as I can tell, however, that's all these guy were. They were haters seeking funding for a prototype of a weapon that they said they wanted to sell to Israel. Being a hater is shitty but legal. Developing weapons is basically legal although there are legal restrictions that I doubt these guys obeyed. Selling weapons to a US ally is legal. Their stated intent was to build a weapon that would be useful against the enemies of Israel. Was there another stated intent that nobody has reported on yet?

    If they didn't state an intent to illegally harm people with this weapon, then how are these guys guilty of terrorism. It seems to me that they are guilty of being dickheads and possibly guilty of some forms of endangerment or trafficking in weapons.

    --
    Every rule has more than one consequence.
  119. Good and thanks for the idiots. by niftymitch · · Score: 1
    I have no clue how they attempted to do this but only an idiot would do what I think I read.

    Doing harm to someone with X-rays is moderately hard if they are a moving target.
    that is not to say that it could not be done....

    Now what I want to know is if this was 'catcheable' via PRISM and modern big brother stuff. If these guys were not fools one might imagine that many folks could be hurt for the price of a used car.

    We have a serious social problem that causes folk to think seriously about doing stuff like this. We -- we who live on the earth.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  120. ninnies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds JDL. at least the version i had to deal with in the 70s working in an org' which the poobahs in their org considered anti-Israel (anti zionist extremists, yes. anti israel or jewish people, anything but). the poobahs wd send kids out to attack us in the street who had no idea of how to defend themselves, much less attack anyone physically. i really felt sorry for those kids. wd like to have laid on the poobahs what i had to lay on the kids now and then.

  121. Re:ninnies NO. wacky geeks YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    egg on face. i just posted the preceding nonsense, THEN looked at the originating article. they def'ly weren't jewish of any stripe, just WASPy, wacky geeks trying to get $ for a toy.