No, the batteries were defective. I have a six year old Nexus, a nine year old Samsung, two ten year old Nokias all on their original batteries that work just fine. I appreciate your efforts, but remember, Slashdot says, *Only one question per post* Please make a note of it. Thank you
Well, the fact is that 'non-removable' is a defect. Popularity has nothing to do with it. My iPhone was split open and destroyed because the battery was non-removable. My cheap android simply shut down because the removable battery just popped out the back when it inflated.
I don't have the numbers, so I can't say. I guess Trump doesn't need to be a 'draw' per se, because all the damn newspapers are 're-tweeting' him on the front page anyway.
More like a bit of advertising. How's Twitter's business these days? Is Trump doing for them what Howard Stern did for Sirius? How many new Trump shows is NBC planning when he leaves office? Does anybody know when that will happen?
Scalia was kind of famous for his regard of 'intent'.
We don't have to be convinced, the judges already are. Aren't conspiracy charges based on intent? I'll admit that divining intent is a bit of voodoo, but the judges are rolling with it. We decide how it goes with our votes.
After skimming through that, it seems that the entire population of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and various other players should be kept out.
(D) Immigrant membership in totalitarian party (i) In general
Any immigrant who is or has been a member of or affiliated with the Communist or any other totalitarian party (or subdivision or affiliate thereof), domestic or foreign, is inadmissible.
But wait! There's more!
Oh hell, the entirety of Section 3 spells it out. Torture, terrorists, on and on, the selective, sparse, politically expedient enforcement makes the whole thing a sham.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [emph mine]
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, but they're a tiny bit labor and resource intensive. With lab grown meat, you might be able to grow yer own on the kitchen counter top.
Which is which?
Where do you want to go today?
Topeka!
There will be a minimum of 3 encryption black boxes before satellite uplink.
Hmm, ROT39... Excellent...
they want to spend their lives in these things
To be honest, a self driving Winnebago is not a bad idea.
So you don't mind if your self driving car rockets straight into a brick wall with your family in it...?
No more than I would if grandpa had a seizure and did the same thing. Who am I gonna sue then?
No, the batteries were defective. I have a six year old Nexus, a nine year old Samsung, two ten year old Nokias all on their original batteries that work just fine. I appreciate your efforts, but remember, Slashdot says, *Only one question per post* Please make a note of it. Thank you
What the UK isn't doing is getting in your face with real-time analysis of your social infractions.
How do you know? Yeah, they might not be in your face, but for sure they are collecting the data.
Well, the fact is that 'non-removable' is a defect. Popularity has nothing to do with it. My iPhone was split open and destroyed because the battery was non-removable. My cheap android simply shut down because the removable battery just popped out the back when it inflated.
I don't have the numbers, so I can't say. I guess Trump doesn't need to be a 'draw' per se, because all the damn newspapers are 're-tweeting' him on the front page anyway.
This is the EU crying everyone should be equal, even when they are not.
No, this is the EU stealing money, because they're broke. Outrageous!
More like a bit of advertising. How's Twitter's business these days? Is Trump doing for them what Howard Stern did for Sirius? How many new Trump shows is NBC planning when he leaves office? Does anybody know when that will happen?
Tune in next week for this and more!
Yes while committing the atrocity of reading the article, it turns out the courts are helping to open things up a bit. So far, so good...
But she probably doesn't have standing, as the theme goes.
Don't try to read anything into it. The 'message' is as phony as a three dollar bill. The laws are simply revenue flow control.
Well there ya go. At least somebody loves you
Peace out
Now, there's a comeback I can believe in! Like so many before, you win the internet. Your gold star is on the dresser.
Hey c'mon! Terrorism is like any other business. When domestic sources can't meet demand, you gotta import.
Scalia was kind of famous for his regard of 'intent'.
We don't have to be convinced, the judges already are. Aren't conspiracy charges based on intent? I'll admit that divining intent is a bit of voodoo, but the judges are rolling with it. We decide how it goes with our votes.
Well, you know, Stalin was a ally while it was convenient. It's an *empire thing*, man!
After skimming through that, it seems that the entire population of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and various other players should be kept out.
(D) Immigrant membership in totalitarian party
(i) In general
Any immigrant who is or has been a member of or affiliated with the Communist or any other totalitarian party (or subdivision or affiliate thereof), domestic or foreign, is inadmissible.
But wait! There's more!
Oh hell, the entirety of Section 3 spells it out. Torture, terrorists, on and on, the selective, sparse, politically expedient enforcement makes the whole thing a sham.
i guess libel slander and defamation are legal.
They are simply bullshit terms to protect powerful people.
then again a pedo like u wouldn't care about ethics, amirite?
Ah, so now you engage in projection. Very revealing!
It couldn't be simpler, but you have convinced me that Poe's law is at play here and you are performing shtick, or is it 'journalism'?
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [emph mine]
Couldn't be more obvious
You seem to believe that judges are infallible.
I don't know what you're getting at. You can show otherwise? I'd love to see it... In the meantime...