Of course it logs it to the journal that is there it sends all data from stderr, stdout and syslog. It even collects output from other processes that have with the daemon to do and stores them together, like systemd own actions.
For example for nptd, here we can see that ntpd shutdown since it couldn't reoslve the dns names and systemd restarted it, it's a common problem with ntpd that it doesn't retry itself. Several of these lines comes from stderr
fultra@ubuntu:~$ journalctl -u ntp
-- Logs begin at mån 2015-06-22 18:39:49 CEST, end at mån 2015-06-22 18:52:45 CEST. --
jun 22 18:40:07 ubuntu systemd[1]: Stopped LSB: Start NTP daemon.
jun 22 18:40:08 ubuntu systemd[1]: Starting LSB: Start NTP daemon...
jun 22 18:40:08 ubuntu ntp[925]: * Starting NTP server ntpd
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[933]: ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o Mon Apr 13 17:00:14 UTC 2015 (1)
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntp[925]:...done.
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: Started LSB: Start NTP daemon.
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: proto: precision = 0.106 usec
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: ntp_io: estimated max descriptors: 1024, initial socket boundary: 16
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Listen and drop on 0 v4wildcard 0.0.0.0 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Listen and drop on 1 v6wildcard:: UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Listen normally on 2 lo 127.0.0.1 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Listen normally on 3 lo::1 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: peers refreshed
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Listening on routing socket on fd #20 for interface updates
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Deferring DNS for 0.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org 1
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Deferring DNS for 1.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org 1
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Deferring DNS for 2.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org 1
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Deferring DNS for 3.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org 1
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Deferring DNS for ntp.ubuntu.com 1
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[944]: signal_no_reset: signal 17 had flags 4000000
jun 22 18:40:11 ubuntu ntpd_intres[944]: host name not found: 0.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org
jun 22 18:40:11 ubuntu ntpd_intres[944]: host name not found: 1.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org
jun 22 18:40:11 ubuntu ntpd_intres[944]: host name not found: 2.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org
jun 22 18:40:11 ubuntu ntpd_intres[944]: host name not found: 3.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org
jun 22 18:40:11 ubuntu ntpd_intres[944]: host name not found: ntp.ubuntu.com
jun 22 18:40:15 ubuntu systemd[1]: Stopping LSB: Start NTP daemon...
jun 22 18:40:15 ubuntu ntp[1049]: * Stopping NTP server ntpd
jun 22 18:40:15 ubuntu ntpd[938]: ntpd exiting on signal 15
jun 22 18:40:15 ubuntu ntp[1049]:...done.
jun 22 18:40:15 ubuntu systemd[1]: Stopped LSB: Start NTP daemon.
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu systemd[1]: Starting LSB: Start NTP daemon...
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntp[1457]: * Starting NTP server ntpd
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1465]: ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o Mon Apr 13 17:00:14 UTC 2015 (1)
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: proto: precision = 0.175 usec
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: ntp_io: estimated max descriptors: 1024, initial socket boundary: 16
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen and drop on 0 v4wildcard 0.0.0.0 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen and drop on 1 v6wildcard:: UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen normally on 2 lo 127.0.0.1 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen normally on 3 eth0 192.168.0.3 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen normally on 4 lo::1 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen normally on 5 eth0 fe80::226:18ff:feae:582e UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: peers refreshed
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listening on routing socket on fd #22 for interface updates
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntp[1457]:...done.
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu systemd[1]: Started LSB: Start NTP daemon.
Why does this clearly wrong statements keep getting posted? It should be well known by know by everyone that systemd has captured stderr and uses the exit status since day one. In fact the old SysVInit was the one that didn't capture stderr at all or cared about the exit status.
In Europe (or at least in the Nordic / Scandinavian countries) a Sauna is not just a place to relax in but it's a place where you get to get clean. Historically Saunas where used before the invention of the shower or the bath tub. And I don't think that you shower or batch with your swimwear on in order to get clean in Australia?
Compiled with millions of drivers, filesystems and other functionality that this LiteOS kernel probably doesn't need yes but remove all that and it shrinks vastly in size. If LiteOS only have to support a single piece of hardware then they can remove lots and lots of stuff.
It's only > 2mb if you include tons of drivers and functionality that they probably stripped. Since it's a IoT for their own hardware they probably only have support for the very tiny subset of hardware that they have and drivers are a big part of the kernel.
I don't get it either but it's not "stupid" per say since it will get you (if you use the standard 2048-bits size) a password with a length of 372 that is infeasible to crack. It doesn't solve the key storage problem though since he apparantly stores his public key only and one cannot extract the private key from the public which is what makes it kind of stupid.
Why is it ok if it's a company issued phone? Just because it's a company issued phone does not mean that they have the right to do whatever the want with it.
Good luck breaking an AES256 encrypted block of data in 10minutes. There have been flaws discovered in AES since it's NIST approval that makes it weaker than initially thought yes but there is still no known exploit of a full 256-bit AES than to use brute force.
Instead of writing these made up answers to the "secret question" it's far better IMHO to just have your password generator generate a new 40 random character string and use that.
Kindergarten might have been the wrong word, I'm not a native English speaker. Over here you can have you child on child care / day care or whatever the proper English word might be from more or less the day it's born.
However, why I brought up the study done on the "Kindergarten" was that it showed that we adults treat girls and boys differently even when we ourselves believe that we treat them equally.
And having such a big external factor kind of skews the "my boy choose X himself" big time.
I have a 12 year old boy who loves to cook, clean and likes to watch My Little Pony. I have also a 13 (to be 14 in august this year) year old girl who likes to watch slasher horror flicks and working out in the gym (power lifting) with me.
Should I take this as evidence that all girls likes power lifting and that all boys like to cook and clean? Or can it have more to do with the fact that the kids gravitate towards a "favourite" parent, in this case my boy gravitates more towards my wife while my daughter gravitates more towards me and that this explains quite a bit why they like the things that they like (regarding the Brony-stuff I suppose that the bright colors and happy stories somehow plays well with his autism).
Slashdot Mirror
So post one of those easily reproductable steps then.
Of course it logs it to the journal that is there it sends all data from stderr, stdout and syslog. It even collects output from other processes that have with the daemon to do and stores them together, like systemd own actions.
For example for nptd, here we can see that ntpd shutdown since it couldn't reoslve the dns names and systemd restarted it, it's a common problem with ntpd that it doesn't retry itself. Several of these lines comes from stderr
fultra@ubuntu:~$ journalctl -u ntp ...done. :: UDP 123 ::1 UDP 123 ...done. :: UDP 123 ::1 UDP 123 ...done.
-- Logs begin at mån 2015-06-22 18:39:49 CEST, end at mån 2015-06-22 18:52:45 CEST. --
jun 22 18:40:07 ubuntu systemd[1]: Stopped LSB: Start NTP daemon.
jun 22 18:40:08 ubuntu systemd[1]: Starting LSB: Start NTP daemon...
jun 22 18:40:08 ubuntu ntp[925]: * Starting NTP server ntpd
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[933]: ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o Mon Apr 13 17:00:14 UTC 2015 (1)
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntp[925]:
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu systemd[1]: Started LSB: Start NTP daemon.
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: proto: precision = 0.106 usec
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: ntp_io: estimated max descriptors: 1024, initial socket boundary: 16
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Listen and drop on 0 v4wildcard 0.0.0.0 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Listen and drop on 1 v6wildcard
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Listen normally on 2 lo 127.0.0.1 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Listen normally on 3 lo
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: peers refreshed
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Listening on routing socket on fd #20 for interface updates
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Deferring DNS for 0.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org 1
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Deferring DNS for 1.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org 1
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Deferring DNS for 2.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org 1
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Deferring DNS for 3.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org 1
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[938]: Deferring DNS for ntp.ubuntu.com 1
jun 22 18:40:09 ubuntu ntpd[944]: signal_no_reset: signal 17 had flags 4000000
jun 22 18:40:11 ubuntu ntpd_intres[944]: host name not found: 0.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org
jun 22 18:40:11 ubuntu ntpd_intres[944]: host name not found: 1.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org
jun 22 18:40:11 ubuntu ntpd_intres[944]: host name not found: 2.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org
jun 22 18:40:11 ubuntu ntpd_intres[944]: host name not found: 3.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org
jun 22 18:40:11 ubuntu ntpd_intres[944]: host name not found: ntp.ubuntu.com
jun 22 18:40:15 ubuntu systemd[1]: Stopping LSB: Start NTP daemon...
jun 22 18:40:15 ubuntu ntp[1049]: * Stopping NTP server ntpd
jun 22 18:40:15 ubuntu ntpd[938]: ntpd exiting on signal 15
jun 22 18:40:15 ubuntu ntp[1049]:
jun 22 18:40:15 ubuntu systemd[1]: Stopped LSB: Start NTP daemon.
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu systemd[1]: Starting LSB: Start NTP daemon...
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntp[1457]: * Starting NTP server ntpd
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1465]: ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o Mon Apr 13 17:00:14 UTC 2015 (1)
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: proto: precision = 0.175 usec
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: ntp_io: estimated max descriptors: 1024, initial socket boundary: 16
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen and drop on 0 v4wildcard 0.0.0.0 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen and drop on 1 v6wildcard
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen normally on 2 lo 127.0.0.1 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen normally on 3 eth0 192.168.0.3 UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen normally on 4 lo
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listen normally on 5 eth0 fe80::226:18ff:feae:582e UDP 123
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: peers refreshed
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntpd[1467]: Listening on routing socket on fd #22 for interface updates
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu ntp[1457]:
jun 22 18:40:24 ubuntu systemd[1]: Started LSB: Start NTP daemon.
Why does this clearly wrong statements keep getting posted? It should be well known by know by everyone that systemd has captured stderr and uses the exit status since day one. In fact the old SysVInit was the one that didn't capture stderr at all or cared about the exit status.
So there is no public shared showers in Australian bath houses?
both
In Europe (or at least in the Nordic / Scandinavian countries) a Sauna is not just a place to relax in but it's a place where you get to get clean. Historically Saunas where used before the invention of the shower or the bath tub. And I don't think that you shower or batch with your swimwear on in order to get clean in Australia?
No it wasn't. The patch that caused this problem was a fix to another problem that where introduced in 3.14-rc1.
Compiled with millions of drivers, filesystems and other functionality that this LiteOS kernel probably doesn't need yes but remove all that and it shrinks vastly in size. If LiteOS only have to support a single piece of hardware then they can remove lots and lots of stuff.
So you are comparing a complete distribution with something like LiteOS that is only supposed to support an IoT?
It's only > 2mb if you include tons of drivers and functionality that they probably stripped. Since it's a IoT for their own hardware they probably only have support for the very tiny subset of hardware that they have and drivers are a big part of the kernel.
The use XEN so of course they where affected.
Yeah, you're fucked then, one wouldn't be too surprised if such a site also stored the password in plain text using a varchar(8) in their database.
I know, that is why I wrote infeasible ;)
It pretty much sucks
+1
ROT13, see you can rotate that for ever!
I don't get it either but it's not "stupid" per say since it will get you (if you use the standard 2048-bits size) a password with a length of 372 that is infeasible to crack. It doesn't solve the key storage problem though since he apparantly stores his public key only and one cannot extract the private key from the public which is what makes it kind of stupid.
Why is it ok if it's a company issued phone? Just because it's a company issued phone does not mean that they have the right to do whatever the want with it.
We better get on Kickstarter to fund a company bashing tire iron then.
Which makes the attack vector kind of infeasable. Or atleast way more time consuming than the 10 minutes promised by AC.
Good luck breaking an AES256 encrypted block of data in 10minutes. There have been flaws discovered in AES since it's NIST approval that makes it weaker than initially thought yes but there is still no known exploit of a full 256-bit AES than to use brute force.
He is 8, he is definitely a minor :)
Exactly
Instead of writing these made up answers to the "secret question" it's far better IMHO to just have your password generator generate a new 40 random character string and use that.
Kindergarten might have been the wrong word, I'm not a native English speaker. Over here you can have you child on child care / day care or whatever the proper English word might be from more or less the day it's born.
However, why I brought up the study done on the "Kindergarten" was that it showed that we adults treat girls and boys differently even when we ourselves believe that we treat them equally.
And having such a big external factor kind of skews the "my boy choose X himself" big time.
I have a 12 year old boy who loves to cook, clean and likes to watch My Little Pony. I have also a 13 (to be 14 in august this year) year old girl who likes to watch slasher horror flicks and working out in the gym (power lifting) with me.
Should I take this as evidence that all girls likes power lifting and that all boys like to cook and clean? Or can it have more to do with the fact that the kids gravitate towards a "favourite" parent, in this case my boy gravitates more towards my wife while my daughter gravitates more towards me and that this explains quite a bit why they like the things that they like (regarding the Brony-stuff I suppose that the bright colors and happy stories somehow plays well with his autism).