This was what had me intrigued, set up WEP between two of them, and hook one into the router and the other one into a switch and you've created a secure, reasonably fast link between floors in the house.
Does anyone know if this will work? The specs on the site are a little sketchy.
Remember the amount of #1 is directly related to the amount of #2. If you're just now figuring this out, or haven't witnessed the full fury of a woman scorned for computers, I don't recommend it.
And remember this, If Mamma ain't happy, nobody's happy.
I've gotten a stovetop griddle (great for making a family load of bacon and eggs), movie tickets, countless meals, short term loans when I ran into unforseen expenses, a really nice pear tree that will be going up in my yard as soon as we close, and the love and respect of my family. Even if I didn't get anything from being the resident geek for two families, I would still do it for all the times I've been helped out when I needed it.
I have a higher education and I believe in God. I'm a Christian and I have no difficulty in being a rational believer in God. I find more evidence for belief than disbelief.
Apart from flaming the spatial Nautilus, there's nothing short of a rant in generalities here. Nothing is mentioned specifically, and it's just the author whining about GNOME's design principles. Are we sure this wasn't written by Rob Enderle?
Normally, these motions are standard, but I think this one may fly since IBM is waiving the Novell / Old SCO APA claiming that Novell maintains oversight of the whole UNIX business and has told SCO to sit down and shut up. That alone may actually get this motion approved.
If they could just license it to online stores, maybe. But that still cuts into ITMS, and I think Jobs will say flat out no. Licensing it to harware manufacturers would eliminate the need for people to buy iPods in the first place.
A. All copyrights and trademarks, except for the copyrights and trademarks owned by Novell as of the date of the Agreement required for SCO to exercise its rights with respect to the acquisition of UNIX and UnixWare technologies. However, in no event shall Novell be liable to SCO for any claim brought by any third party pertaining to said copyrights and trademarks.
B. All Patents
So unless SCO can show that they need these copyrights to exercise it's rights to UNIX (not likely since they just admin the licenses), and UnixWare (they might have a case here) rights, and that they have asked Novell to give them up, they are totally talking out their ass.
Combine this with WinInternals' pstools (which adds pskill) and you can now admin a Windows box with the majority of the tools you use to run *nix boxes. You get a shell that can run scripts, telnet, nfs, ls, grep, vi, and kill.
Course the kernel still sucks and you can't do squat that needs a registry edit, but you can get a lot done.
We just renewed a batch last month and they didn't mention squat to us.
The worst part was a box that started spitting this out last night that I inherited with no documentation, and no idea how the thing was configured. I've spent all day with the vendor having them fill in the holes in their documentation and get the damn thing back up and running.
Except that in the 1992 BSD case the Judge ruled the comments didn't count towards copyright violations, just the code. So, by the logic, someone could have taken the code, left in the comments as a guide, and wrote a new implementation, AND,/b> still be free and clear as far as the law was concerned.
Very interesting article referenced in discussions at Groklaw by quartermass, IBM announced after buying Sequent that they planned on adding NUMA to Linux, and it was already running with NT and (eventually) 64-bit NT.
And does this qualify as a modification or an addition? If you're making somthing that exists better, that's modification. If you're adding features that were not present in the initial codebase (things like NUMA and RCU that the USPTO thought was original enough to grant a patent to), then does that fall under the same heading as a modification?
Slashdot Mirror
This was what had me intrigued, set up WEP between two of them, and hook one into the router and the other one into a switch and you've created a secure, reasonably fast link between floors in the house.
Does anyone know if this will work? The specs on the site are a little sketchy.
Did I miss something, or can't you mount a network drive with the mp3's on them and fake out iTunes? This is what I do on my desktop.
1. Happiness at home
2. Happiness with your game
Remember the amount of #1 is directly related to the amount of #2. If you're just now figuring this out, or haven't witnessed the full fury of a woman scorned for computers, I don't recommend it.
And remember this, If Mamma ain't happy, nobody's happy.
I've gotten a stovetop griddle (great for making a family load of bacon and eggs), movie tickets, countless meals, short term loans when I ran into unforseen expenses, a really nice pear tree that will be going up in my yard as soon as we close, and the love and respect of my family. Even if I didn't get anything from being the resident geek for two families, I would still do it for all the times I've been helped out when I needed it.
I have a higher education and I believe in God. I'm a Christian and I have no difficulty in being a rational believer in God. I find more evidence for belief than disbelief.
They are both owned by the Canopy Group
No, the Canopy Group and Novell were both founded by Ray Noorda, the Canopy Group being the company he started after being booted out of Novell.
In that it's supposed to be a review and is just a rant, I'd call that a Troll.
Apart from flaming the spatial Nautilus, there's nothing short of a rant in generalities here. Nothing is mentioned specifically, and it's just the author whining about GNOME's design principles. Are we sure this wasn't written by Rob Enderle?
That's why we dumped all our Sun HW and switched to Fujitsu. Kept the OS and our apps, just got more reliable hardware.
doh!
yes.
Sorry.
Normally, these motions are standard, but I think this one may fly since IBM is waiving the Novell / Old SCO APA claiming that Novell maintains oversight of the whole UNIX business and has told SCO to sit down and shut up. That alone may actually get this motion approved.
If they could just license it to online stores, maybe. But that still cuts into ITMS, and I think Jobs will say flat out no. Licensing it to harware manufacturers would eliminate the need for people to buy iPods in the first place.
This sounds like the clones argument all over again. Agreed, while Steve Jobs is at the helm it will never happen.
DAMMIT! DAMMIT! DAMMIT!
I need a spellchecker plugin for Firefox.
That is friggin hysterical.
Schedule 1.1(b) Excluded Assets (Page 2 of 2)
V. Intellectual Property:
A. All copyrights and trademarks, except for the copyrights and trademarks owned by Novell as of the date of the Agreement required for SCO to exercise its rights with respect to the acquisition of UNIX and UnixWare technologies. However, in no event shall Novell be liable to SCO for any claim brought by any third party pertaining to said copyrights and trademarks.
B. All Patents
So unless SCO can show that they need these copyrights to exercise it's rights to UNIX (not likely since they just admin the licenses), and UnixWare (they might have a case here) rights, and that they have asked Novell to give them up, they are totally talking out their ass.
No, just looking for ways to not switch gears between aix and windows servers.
That's the beta, released back in July. The final comes out tomorrow.
Combine this with WinInternals' pstools (which adds pskill) and you can now admin a Windows box with the majority of the tools you use to run *nix boxes. You get a shell that can run scripts, telnet, nfs, ls, grep, vi, and kill.
Course the kernel still sucks and you can't do squat that needs a registry edit, but you can get a lot done.
We just renewed a batch last month and they didn't mention squat to us.
The worst part was a box that started spitting this out last night that I inherited with no documentation, and no idea how the thing was configured. I've spent all day with the vendor having them fill in the holes in their documentation and get the damn thing back up and running.
And we've related Sun to running BIND on SunFire and older Netra boxes we've found lying around.
For the rest of our Unix needs, we're recycling older Power4 boxes and picking up new ones where we need them.
Finally something Lotus Notes is good at
You mean like it's excellent ability to avoid the worms and virii that bring down Exchange/Outlook systems?
Except that in the 1992 BSD case the Judge ruled the comments didn't count towards copyright violations, just the code. So, by the logic, someone could have taken the code, left in the comments as a guide, and wrote a new implementation, AND,/b> still be free and clear as far as the law was concerned.
Very interesting article referenced in discussions at Groklaw by quartermass, IBM announced after buying Sequent that they planned on adding NUMA to Linux, and it was already running with NT and (eventually) 64-bit NT.
Why all the fuss now?
And does this qualify as a modification or an addition? If you're making somthing that exists better, that's modification. If you're adding features that were not present in the initial codebase (things like NUMA and RCU that the USPTO thought was original enough to grant a patent to), then does that fall under the same heading as a modification?
Again, I don't know, just asking.