And Reading Rainbow. Oh wait, it ended a while ago.:(
Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial.
– Justice Louis Brandeis The first book I would recommend is "1984" and the second "Fahrenheit 451". when the power goes out, then what?
Neither of which is legally permitted to conduct domestic investigations. Not even if it's domestic espionage.
Although, since the FBI is responsible for counter-intelligence on American soil, you'd think they'd have an NSA-quality codebreaking team.
Which puts the stink on this whole deal. Either this is not a simple code, or they're testing us.
It's only unlawful if they get caught. Since this issue does not spy on Americans per se, it just asks for support on decipherment. Murder is a crime that has no statute of limitations.
A greater crippling obstacle appears to be (Con)gress, they can't even get their story straight on the budget let alone anything else. Billions are dumped on our so-called "friends" and yet, everybody hates us. If 1/10th of the war budget went to NASA, we would be somewhere past the asteroid belt, let alone fiber optic networks for everyone.
And the company handling these donations, mGive.com, has not waived the transaction fees it charges relief agencies.
These companies profit from situations like this. This is their business case. What did you expect?
Why transfer money the rat bastards didn't earn when there is interest to accumulate. The suffering people will still be suffering whether the money is transferred today $, tomorrow $$, next week $$$, next month $$$$, next year $$$$$, or never $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
I was subjected to monitors and plants in a NASA computer controlled operating system. The building was remote from the machinery it controlled. One problem made itself evident soon after the building was finished, there was no fresh air intake for the building. This led to high levels of CO2 that put people in a very drowsy state. NASA's recommendation required plants that scavenged excess CO2, plants were potted in a hydroponic system, activated clay with water and nutrients. After about six months the plants died and they were removed. Nothing more was said about the experiment. The conclusion recommended an air intake be cut into the building wall to allow a complete air exchange.
As for the monitors, the central control building monitored four separate systems; an electrical system distribution and a lab-wide piping system that controlled and monitored the status of valves for compressed air at various pressures and valves for altitude exhaust used by test cells requiring specific psfa and flow rates. These two watch stations utilized four monitors each. The other two stations monitored and controlled two separate air service equipment buildings, also having four monitors each. The first two stations were manned by one person each and the two equipment service building stations were manned by two people each due to the complexity of services offered.
The electrical distribution and valve control stations were most active prior to service operations and then became static (only monitored conditions, unless more services were added, then became static again). On the other hand, the two air services stations were dynamic, conditions changed as flows and temperatures changed. The issue then became one of data real estate. each operator had two monitors watching up to four, five or six different systems (compressors, exhausters, cooling water, refrigeration, hydraulics, lubrication, turbo-expanders), requiring a constant flipping between data pages on two monitors for each operator. This does become tedious. So, where am I going with this?
One side of the control building had four monitors per person watching a basically static system whereas, the other side had two monitors per person watching several dynamically active systems, two data pages at a time, with constant flipping through the other data pages. A better system would have more monitors (six or eight monitors per operator) for the dynamic systems and fewer monitors for the static systems. Personally, I wouldn't change the number of monitors for the static systems, but would increase substantially, the number of monitors for the dynamic systems. Contrary to popular belief, the eye is quicker than the hand. The hand is only quicker when misdirection is involved.
AC is developed in the rotor regardless of output, slip rings for AC, commutators for DC. As for high power rectifiers, they use AC. I have worked with both rotating elements as well as solid state devices. All the variable speed drives I have encountered have been AC derivations, both solid state and rheostat. Motor sizes from 15 hp to 65,000 hp, 120vAC to 13,800vAC. In the future, and the operative words are, the future, the technology I am familiar with started in the 1950's and basically remained the same except for the control systems.
t seems to also make sense to do your own conversion at the point of use.
The problem with this is it creates massive inefficiencies and waste at multiple points in almost every industrialized house around the world. Remember, these wall warts also draw power even when not charging their companion device. Having a single unit means its becomes very unlikely it won't continuously be in use which is yet another savings.
Consistently, study after study indicates as much as 20% of America's energy use could be reduced by such intelligent moves. The amount of energy consumed via inefficiency in American is literally jaw dropping and yet you're actively advocating the status quo.
If given the choice, 120vAC hurts a lot less than 125vDC. They both suck, however, AC voltage goes to zero during its cycle, DC doesn't.
But, D/C does have many uses once its at a consumption point.
I never understood why we don't have converters in every house. Simply deliver the power as A/C and provide for A/C and D/C in every house. Keep A/C for things like laundry and dish washing and D/C for most everything else in the house. There would be many advantages to such a dual scheme. Just imagine how much more efficient everything would be.
If you need different frequencies, voltages, or reversible rotation DC is the way to go. A combination of AC and DC can give you a myriad of options.
Truthfully both approaches are valuable, and we would be a poorer planet without either of these men
Without Edison there would have been a lot less tortured puppies, cats horses and elephants.. Edison arguably invented very little, instead taking the inventions of people who worked for him and claiming then as his own.
Edison: "Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration."
Tesla: "If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found the object of his search. I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety percent of his labor."
The genius of Idiotson was in how he and all the banksters screwed Tesla. Yet, if the rumors are true, HAARP will screw them all back with a vengeance. AC is still the prime motive force in electrical generation and always will be.
The mafia could learn a thing from these guys about how to avoid consequences.
They did, the Italian government has no death penalty, it's just too bad it's not the same for an organization that doesn't exist, at least anyone is willing to talk about.
Slashdot Mirror
Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.
– Joseph Stalin
And Reading Rainbow. Oh wait, it ended a while ago. :(
Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. – Justice Louis Brandeis
The first book I would recommend is "1984" and the second "Fahrenheit 451". when the power goes out, then what?
Neither of which is legally permitted to conduct domestic investigations. Not even if it's domestic espionage.
Although, since the FBI is responsible for counter-intelligence on American soil, you'd think they'd have an NSA-quality codebreaking team.
Which puts the stink on this whole deal. Either this is not a simple code, or they're testing us.
It's only unlawful if they get caught. Since this issue does not spy on Americans per se, it just asks for support on decipherment. Murder is a crime that has no statute of limitations.
So much for the taxpayer funded NSA (No Scrutiny Allowed) or the drug funded CIA (Criminals In Action)
A greater crippling obstacle appears to be (Con)gress, they can't even get their story straight on the budget let alone anything else.
Billions are dumped on our so-called "friends" and yet, everybody hates us. If 1/10th of the war budget went to NASA, we would be somewhere past the asteroid belt, let alone fiber optic networks for everyone.
Too big to change the clock, too big to fail...HMMM
...for movies and stories, why not for ads?
Why not for the truth?
Caveat Emptor
Alas, the most corrupt will communicate off the record anyway.
This is a key point, as various politicians in recent years have been caught using non official email accounts for their "official" duties.
That's why the voter has the right to recall any politician who fails to live up to their campaign promises.
Big Deal, the government's intelligence flat-lined back in 1913, and still going strong?!
Not only do you still have your Big Brother, you have less control of them.
Contractors in government, contractors in war, contractors in the penal system.
Snooki for president, the Situation for Vice President
Constitution? We still have one of those?
We need a tax on these congressional meatheads and their inane laws that line their pockets, about 30 to 50 years would be appropriate.
All the other countries are doing it :-P
If all the other countries were jumping off of bridges would you do it?
Six billion flies eat shit, will you too?
rule 34!
Would a magnetic jelly be apropos? With some aether butter on a sesame seed bun?
The fourth domain of life must be the politicians, they appear to be intelligent but are mostly flat-liners.
These companies profit from situations like this. This is their business case. What did you expect?
Why transfer money the rat bastards didn't earn when there is interest to accumulate. The suffering people will still be suffering whether the money is transferred today $, tomorrow $$, next week $$$, next month $$$$, next year $$$$$, or never $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
I was subjected to monitors and plants in a NASA computer controlled operating system. The building was remote from the machinery it controlled. One problem made itself evident soon after the building was finished, there was no fresh air intake for the building. This led to high levels of CO2 that put people in a very drowsy state. NASA's recommendation required plants that scavenged excess CO2, plants were potted in a hydroponic system, activated clay with water and nutrients. After about six months the plants died and they were removed. Nothing more was said about the experiment. The conclusion recommended an air intake be cut into the building wall to allow a complete air exchange.
As for the monitors, the central control building monitored four separate systems;
an electrical system distribution and
a lab-wide piping system that controlled and monitored the status of valves for compressed air at various pressures and valves for altitude exhaust used by test cells requiring specific psfa and flow rates. These two watch stations utilized four monitors each. The other two stations monitored and controlled two separate air service equipment buildings, also having four monitors each. The first two stations were manned by one person each and the two equipment service building stations were manned by two people each due to the complexity of services offered.
The electrical distribution and valve control stations were most active prior to service operations and then became static (only monitored conditions, unless more services were added, then became static again). On the other hand, the two air services stations were dynamic, conditions changed as flows and temperatures changed. The issue then became one of data real estate. each operator had two monitors watching up to four, five or six different systems (compressors, exhausters, cooling water, refrigeration, hydraulics, lubrication, turbo-expanders), requiring a constant flipping between data pages on two monitors for each operator. This does become tedious.
So, where am I going with this?
One side of the control building had four monitors per person watching a basically static system whereas, the other side had two monitors per person watching several dynamically active systems, two data pages at a time, with constant flipping through the other data pages. A better system would have more monitors (six or eight monitors per operator) for the dynamic systems and fewer monitors for the static systems. Personally, I wouldn't change the number of monitors for the static systems, but would increase substantially, the number of monitors for the dynamic systems. Contrary to popular belief, the eye is quicker than the hand. The hand is only quicker when misdirection is involved.
Dammit Jim, I'm a doctor, not a cake baker!
Conspiracy or not HAARP exists.
As to why or for what reason,who knows. A good place to begin with is Tesla's "Colorado Springs Notes".
No, not necessarily
AC is developed in the rotor regardless of output, slip rings for AC, commutators for DC. As for high power rectifiers, they use AC. I have worked with both rotating elements as well as solid state devices. All the variable speed drives I have encountered have been AC derivations, both solid state and rheostat. Motor sizes from 15 hp to 65,000 hp, 120vAC to 13,800vAC.
In the future, and the operative words are, the future, the technology I am familiar with started in the 1950's and basically remained the same except for the control systems.
t seems to also make sense to do your own conversion at the point of use.
The problem with this is it creates massive inefficiencies and waste at multiple points in almost every industrialized house around the world. Remember, these wall warts also draw power even when not charging their companion device. Having a single unit means its becomes very unlikely it won't continuously be in use which is yet another savings.
Consistently, study after study indicates as much as 20% of America's energy use could be reduced by such intelligent moves. The amount of energy consumed via inefficiency in American is literally jaw dropping and yet you're actively advocating the status quo.
If given the choice, 120vAC hurts a lot less than 125vDC. They both suck, however, AC voltage goes to zero during its cycle, DC doesn't.
But, D/C does have many uses once its at a consumption point.
I never understood why we don't have converters in every house. Simply deliver the power as A/C and provide for A/C and D/C in every house. Keep A/C for things like laundry and dish washing and D/C for most everything else in the house. There would be many advantages to such a dual scheme. Just imagine how much more efficient everything would be.
If you need different frequencies, voltages, or reversible rotation DC is the way to go. A combination of AC and DC can give you a myriad of options.
Truthfully both approaches are valuable, and we would be a poorer planet without either of these men
Without Edison there would have been a lot less tortured puppies, cats horses and elephants.. Edison arguably invented very little, instead taking the inventions of people who worked for him and claiming then as his own.
Hear, hear!
Edison: "Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration."
Tesla: "If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found the object of his search. I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety percent of his labor."
The genius of Idiotson was in how he and all the banksters screwed Tesla.
Yet, if the rumors are true, HAARP will screw them all back with a vengeance.
AC is still the prime motive force in electrical generation and always will be.
>
The mafia could learn a thing from these guys about how to avoid consequences.
They did, the Italian government has no death penalty, it's just too bad it's not the same for an organization that doesn't exist, at least anyone is willing to talk about.