Slashdot Mirror


FBI Wants You To Solve Encrypted Notes From Murder

coondoggie writes "The FBI is seeking the public's help in breaking the encrypted code found in two notes discovered on the body of a murdered man in 1999. The FBI says that officers in St. Louis, Missouri discovered the body of 41-year-old Ricky McCormick on June 30, 1999 in a field and the clues regarding the homicide were two encrypted notes found in the victim's pants pockets."

466 comments

  1. I've cracked it! by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The first note just looks a list of IP addresses associated with Twitter accounts communicating with a "Julian_Assange" and the second note appears to be in Arabic (which I can't read).

    I don't understand what either of those have to do with a 1999 murder in Missouri though.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:I've cracked it! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Really? Because I found it to be a facebook account for bin laden

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I thought it was the secret recipe for Coca Cola(R)

    3. Re:I've cracked it! by thomasdz · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, no, no! It appears to be a conspiracy between Slashdot users ganjadude (952775) and elrous0 (869638) to deflect suspicion.

      --
      Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    4. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny, when I cracked it a decompiled file named "TrustDll.dll magically appeared.

    5. Re:I've cracked it! by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      In all seriousness, though, it would help to have these additional details:

      McCormick was a high school dropout, but he was able to read and write and was said to be “street smart.” According to members of his family, McCormick had used such encrypted notes since he was a boy, but apparently no one in his family knows how to decipher the codes, and it’s unknown whether anyone besides McCormick could translate his secret language. Investigators believe the notes in McCormick’s pockets were written up to three days before his death.

      Over the years, a number of CRRU’s examiners—who are experts at breaking codes—have puzzled over the McCormick notes and applied a variety of analytical techniques to tease out an answer. “Standard routes of cryptanalysis seem to have hit brick walls,” Olson noted. Our cryptanalysts have several plausible theories about the notes, but so far, there has been no solution.

      To move the case forward, examiners need another sample of McCormick’s coded system—or a similar one—that might offer context to the mystery notes or allow valuable comparisons to be made. Or, short of new evidence, Olson said, “Maybe someone with a fresh set of eyes might come up with a brilliant new idea.”

      I think the code was probably meant for his eyes only, which means he probably constructed it using abbreviations and codewords that only he himself would understand. Without knowing those, well...good luck.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:I've cracked it! by SomePgmr · · Score: 2

      Some of it looks like windows license keys. I guess between the two, we've solved it. Ballmer, in a field with the candlestick.

    7. Re:I've cracked it! by geekoid · · Score: 0

      I wish they would release there results, just to speed thing up.
      Yeah, I can go through it myself, but it's time consuming. I suspect that the correct unencrypted translation will be full of person references so at that point someone may need to be familar with a specific slang.

      Lets say the street people call a library "Warm Spot"
      He may reference 'Warm spot' and people without that piece of information would know what they were looking at.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:I've cracked it! by Tom · · Score: 1

      That's what they hope to find. If someone has another note, and maybe a translation for it - maybe the guy gave and explained it to him years prior - you have a chance, even with codewords.

      If it's not a cipher but a code, then without such additional help, it's almost hopeless.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    9. Re:I've cracked it! by wreakyhavoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a one time pad. The pad, in this case, seems to have resided in the head of the writer. If statistical methods of attack have failed, there is little hope of solving the code.

      One wonders what information would need saving in such a complex manner. It seems like the memory needed to remember the decoding scheme would be equivalent to the memory needed to remember the information in the first place. Perhaps the notes were intended for someone else, with a key to be provided at another time or location.

      If http://xkcd.com/538/ I guess it didn't work.

    10. Re:I've cracked it! by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Well, true but it's a lot easier to verify a cracked key than it is to find it. If someone, somehow could guess those abbreviations and keywords and provide a plausible decryption it would be quite likely be the right answer. Almost no one can do strong crypto in their head, the solution is probably simple and it's easy to dismiss all the solutions that work like "if you XOR it with 0x745634FA66354345363EBD4647347546FABC346856324957967 you get the secret message" kind.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:I've cracked it! by cforciea · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given that there are repeated segments of symbols, it is almost definitively not a one time pad.

    12. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They said he made those since he was a boy. Maybe just for fun.

    13. Re:I've cracked it! by dcigary · · Score: 2

      Since he has been using the encryption since he was a boy, I'm thinking it's not a very complicated scheme. I'm betting it had something to do with the area he grew up in - for instance knowing what streets intersect with each other, and coming up with a cipher from that.

      If this is the case, you can throw statistical analysis and standard cryptanalysis out the window, as it won't make sense in this context.

      The only way they're going to get this solved is to get into his mind. Go back to where it all started. Look around. Talk to his friends about any "sayings" or "pledges" he might have used with them (think secret phrase to enter a fort). Someone somewhere has the answer.

      (waves to nice FBI agents who I know are reading all these responses.... :) )

      --
      ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
    14. Re:I've cracked it! by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your probably correct but just a note to myself. If I ever kill someone I need to leave a message that is nothing but the output of a random number generator. That will keep them busy for decades :)

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    15. Re:I've cracked it! by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that he did something like leave out certain letters and use nicknames for people and objects at points. On top of whatever he was doing for a code. The reason why, is that as you said almost nobody can do strong crypto in their head and this thing hasn't been cracked using the standard methods. Meaning that it needs to be read without a machine and it doesn't follow an obvious pattern.

      Good luck to anybody trying to decode it because if victim has used nicknames that only the he knew the chances of identifying the correct message even if it is eventually found is negligible.

    16. Re:I've cracked it! by mybecq · · Score: 1

      There appear to be a TON of clues in this document to help break it:

      1. Repetition: "5E" or "SE". Plenty of times.
      2. Numbers appear to be plain text. Three consecutive lines have 71, 74, 75 followed by the same four characters.
      3. Apostrophes and hyphens. Not all of these would be literal, but they are major clues.

      Plus, he has been using this "encryption" for years. The code is certainly something he could do in his head as he writes.

    17. Re:I've cracked it! by xSauronx · · Score: 2

      if it was a windows license key, wouldnt the cipher be cracked already? ;)

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    18. Re:I've cracked it! by Ecuador · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to members of his family, McCormick had used such encrypted notes since he was a boy

      So, wouldn't they have more samples of the encryption to help with the decryption effort? If they have samples from when he was a boy, they might even be an earlier & easier code that evolved to the one in question...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    19. Re:I've cracked it! by DriedClexler · · Score: 2

      If http://xkcd.com/538/ [xkcd.com] I guess it didn't work.

      Aha! That's it! The FBI did it, and they accidentally killed him trying to get the key during a rubber-hose (metal wrench?) attack!

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    20. Re:I've cracked it! by psergiu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunatelly it's something darker. I don't dare to put the message here in plain text for all search engines to find so here's a ROT13 version of the decoded message:

      Jr'er ab fgenatref gb ybir
      Lbh xabj gur ehyrf naq fb qb V
      N shyy pbzzvgzrag'f jung V'z guvaxvat bs
      Lbh jbhyqa'g trg guvf sebz nal bgure thl
      V whfg jnaan gryy lbh ubj V'z srryvat
      Tbggn znxr lbh haqrefgnaq

      Arire tbaan tvir lbh hc
      Arire tbaan yrg lbh qbja
      Arire tbaan eha nebhaq naq qrfreg lbh
      Arire tbaan znxr lbh pel
      Arire tbaan fnl tbbqolr
      Arire tbaan gryy n yvr naq uheg lbh

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    21. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since he has been using the encryption since he was a boy, I'm thinking it's not a very complicated scheme.

      ... -_-

      ok from the top: the FBI and the entire crew that they devoted to this could not solve the code, they have been trying since.. 1999? If he has been doing this since he was a kid, wow, did it ever occur to you that he had a long time to practice and refine his art? Do you maybe see any parallel with artists exercising their talent that have started at a young age, versus those that did not?

    22. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So essentially it's a one time pad with the pad rotting in a grave.

    23. Re:I've cracked it! by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 4, Funny

      So chances are we'll never be able understand it. Shaka, when the walls fell.

    24. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I "made up" a secret code when I was a kid (age 11 or so). As it turns out, I had reinvented the Ceasar cyhper. Presumably they have already tried that method on this though, as it is arguably one of the simplest ones to crack using statistical analysis.

      Good luck FBI!

    25. Re:I've cracked it! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Trrxvrfg Evpx-ebyy rine.

    26. Re:I've cracked it! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      And that in '99 he was 41, and it was handwritten. Probably not a computer guy, and probably a symbol system that's relatively easy for him to remember and apply reasonably quickly.

    27. Re:I've cracked it! by wooferhound · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The larger versions of the encrypted notes are here . . .
      http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/march/cryptanalysis_032911/image/gallery
      It appears that each word ends with an E with some kind of prefix, almost all words end with SE but also common are NE and BE, and sometimes TE and LE
      Could be some kind of variation of Pig Latin ?

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    28. Re:I've cracked it! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Every block of "words" appears to have a suffix like te/se/be, kind of like pig latin.

    29. Re:I've cracked it! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Right. I was thinking the same. I notice, for example, TFRNE appears twice, and then there's the pairing of RLSE and CRLSE that are likely indicative of two words differing only by the addition of one letter, though not necessarily at the beginning.

      I think that P1 or that blob of not-quite-readable text in the upper right (ALSM?) is probably some sort of crypto key.

      I wish the pictures were large enough and crisp enough to read more easily. Just looking at it for a minute gave me a headache.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    30. Re:I've cracked it! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Kadir beneath Mo Moteh.

    31. Re:I've cracked it! by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      My first guess from the second page would go in the direction of "addresses". Or maybe he found an ad for a Zune on AOL for $99.84, and this isn't a code at all, just atrocious writing by someone who is functionally illiterate but has his own language.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    32. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the code was probably meant for his eyes only, which means he probably constructed it using abbreviations and codewords that only he himself would understand. Without knowing those, well...good luck.

      The abbreviations might not even be consistent or the same in each instance. I frequently make reminders in my phone that contain abbreviations that I make up on the fly to minimize what I need to type in (due to laziness and the limited number of characters permitted), just a number can be a code or a time since I remember the rest and similarly, one letter ie enough to remember a name.In longer notes, I just omit vowels that I consider unnecessary.

      This story, however, reminds me of a very, very interesting cryptography challenge I had years ago. Some relatives found my grandfather's diary that he had written using some cipher and in it he had notes about people in the village he lived in since he had a store which also was the post office and he lent people money or let them buy on credit depending on whether he trusted them. Now deciphering and reading those notes was obviously very, very interesting for me as a grandchild!

    33. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "easy" to spot whether something is random.

    34. Re:I've cracked it! by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      From my other post: If he's using it since he was 9 the essence is probably not too difficult. Let's say a variation of pig Latin. (-be -se)
      He might have made some refinements over the years, but the concept probably stayed the same.

      ROT-McCormick maybe? I'd think if it was a substitution system, mathematical analysis would already have shown something like that.
      Part substitution, part something else?

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    35. Re:I've cracked it! by delvsional · · Score: 1

      prse appears atleast 6 times

      --
      Oh Crap, I'm an optimist.....
    36. Re:I've cracked it! by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      my first job out of high school was installing windows 95 on refurbed computers.

      i typed those keys so often, i could generate unique ones at will.

      i tried it on several machines, and they all passed.

      i've since lost this skill...

    37. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like a shopping list copied from the Voynich manuscript.

    38. Re:I've cracked it! by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      It could just be a private writing system for a personal language for a semi-literate, demented, dyslexic street person who is engaged in some kind of activity that has increased his normally very high level of paranoia. I suspect there is a reason we aren't being told much personal info about the victim.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    39. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it ever occur to you that maybe all of the "experts" are blinkered by their own experience? If history shows you nothing else it shows that at least some technological advances come from amateurs and people not even remotely involved with the accepted methodologies. This case could be something as simple as writing the strings from right-to-left - I know I used mirrored writing in school to stop the person beside me from copying my work.

    40. Re:I've cracked it! by Whatsisname · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The unabomber did that sort of stuff. He left tons of false clues in the packages he sent, and it caused the FBI to undergo the most expensive manhunt in its history. Only they didn't even catch him, his writing was recognized by his brother.

    41. Re:I've cracked it! by lessthan · · Score: 1

      I wish the pictures were large enough and crisp enough to read more easily. Just looking at it for a minute gave me a headache.

      I'm not sure how the FBI expects anyone to help. The quality of the images are lousy. I went so far as to print one out and I can barely make anything out.

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    42. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picard and Dathon, at El-Adrel!

    43. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, statistical analysis could show if it is random based on the level of entropy, but this contains far, far, too little text for these methods to work.

    44. Re:I've cracked it! by Whatsisname · · Score: 1

      Not really. Well encrypted data is indiscernible from random data. Same with well compressed data.

    45. Re:I've cracked it! by Froggie · · Score: 1

      Given the repeated blocks terminated in 'e' it could be a one-time pad with the blocks as symbols.

      That said, I wonder about substituting 'e' for a space.

    46. Re:I've cracked it! by master5o1 · · Score: 0

      I went so far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. But that still didn't crack the code.

      --
      signature is pants
    47. Re:I've cracked it! by CoderJoe · · Score: 1

      like that was hard. the windows 95 era keys followed a very simple verification scheme.

    48. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sokath, his eyes opened!

    49. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seems like way too many of his tokens end in E for random distribution

    50. Re:I've cracked it! by nomel · · Score: 1

      I see your point. Growing up, my nickname was XAOECBTU...nothing at all pronounceable or related to english. I assume a street smart guy would give his friends similar nicknames so the cops wouldn't be able to pronounce them without looking like fools!

    51. Re:I've cracked it! by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      i didn't say it was hard. but considering i wasn't trying it was interesting. i only discovered it when i made a typo and robotically hit enter before correcting it, only to have it pass with no problem.

    52. Re:I've cracked it! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I lost several brain cells trying to read your post. I hope your happy.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    53. Re:I've cracked it! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I once accidentally reinvented fractals trying to design a method to animate ants running in what appeared to be a random pattern.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    54. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darmock and Jilad at Tinagra

    55. Re:I've cracked it! by tgatliff · · Score: 1

      There are reoccurring patterns clearly, but some some things (like numbers) seem to be completely unencrypted... For example, "cbe" seems to be an age identifier of some sort...

      I wonder what the age of his family members are ??? 71, 74, and 75 maybe?? We need to know more of the background of this guy.. Was he a loner? A paranoid?? Where was he that night?? Where did he work... If he was "street smart" then solving his little unique puzzle will most likely require understanding what type of person he is and try to determine how he saw the world...

    56. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, up until they track the paper down to the printer you own using the microdots. Way to go master murderer. lol

    57. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Temba, his arms wide!

    58. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lost several brain cells trying to read your post. I hope your happy.

      You hope my happy what?

    59. Re:I've cracked it! by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1
      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    60. Re:I've cracked it! by Meski · · Score: 1

      evil bastard. :)
      But what makes you think google doesn't index rot13?

    61. Re:I've cracked it! by psithurism · · Score: 1

      it was handwritten. Probably not a computer guy

      Uh oh, if he was a computer guy, like me, then we are totally stuck. The handwritten coded notes I keep in my pocket, are 90% of the time just encrypted passwords. There are a huge amount of similarities between words since I use a variation of the same password mixed with the website name for most sites which look kinda like the similarities here.

      Though my symbol system is easy to remember and apply quickly, the decrypted text is as messy as the encrypted text. There is a good possibility these notes would be something similar, and may never be decrypted.

    62. Re:I've cracked it! by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Nice one! :-)

    63. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recognized it as a rickroll without putting it through a converter. I find that depressing.

    64. Re:I've cracked it! by psithurism · · Score: 1

      They are clearly just looking for random people or maybe friends of his who might just happen to know a code like that, or purposely hoping the public doesn't embarrass their code breakers. The article talks about how he has been using encryption schemes for years but provides no additional material or any personal information amateurs could use to help decode the notes. We don't even know what the notes might be, yet somehow some random guys, with no knowledge of the notes are going to out do man-years of trained cryptographers?

    65. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunatelly it's something darker. I don't dare to put the message here in plain text for all search engines to find so here's a ROT13 version of the decoded message:

      Jr'er ab fgenatref gb ybir
      Lbh xabj gur ehyrf naq fb qb V
      N shyy pbzzvgzrag'f jung V'z guvaxvat bs
      Lbh jbhyqa'g trg guvf sebz nal bgure thl
      V whfg jnaan gryy lbh ubj V'z srryvat
      Tbggn znxr lbh haqrefgnaq

      Arire tbaan tvir lbh hc
      Arire tbaan yrg lbh qbja
      Arire tbaan eha nebhaq naq qrfreg lbh
      Arire tbaan znxr lbh pel
      Arire tbaan fnl tbbqolr
      Arire tbaan gryy n yvr naq uheg lbh

      its scary you know all the words to that :P

    66. Re:I've cracked it! by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      XAOECBTU = Shay-oh-e-suh-buh-too. Pronouncable, but awkward. Too many hard sounds to not be pronouncable.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    67. Re:I've cracked it! by Cant+use+a+slash+wtf · · Score: 1

      Seems like SE might represent the end of a word, and BE looks like it represents the end of a sentence, like a full stop. Or they may indicate whether something is a verb, noun, adjective or some other syntactical system.

    68. Re:I've cracked it! by degeneratemonkey · · Score: 1

      Cthulu? Is that you?

    69. Re:I've cracked it! by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      rine? Jurer'q lbh yrnea gb ebgguvegrra?

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    70. Re:I've cracked it! by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered about this language.

      1. It was supposedly all references to tales of their people. How were those tales told?
      2. Their language could be translated into individual words, how is this possible if those individual words have no meaning.
      3. Even untranslated, you could hear that the language clearly had some concept of words. Why would they need words if all they communicated was a small set of unchangeable sentences?

      Well, I only wondered about it for a few minutes then realised it was all just fantasy and got on with my life.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    71. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha !! Hilarious. P1 stands for page 1. Now focus on the real stuff please !

    72. Re:I've cracked it! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      The extraordinarily worrying thing is that I could substitute that in my head... I'm so screwed.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    73. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F**k! I got Crypto-Rick-Rolled, mega lame!

    74. Re:I've cracked it! by binkzz · · Score: 1

      People are so paranoid these days! It takes only five minutes to translate if you think outside the box:

      Pick up after work:

      a dozen eggs,
      two cartons of milk,
      some meat (beef or chicken?),
      sugar,
      catfood,
      knife sharpener,
      cleaning agent (preferably with enzymes),
      gloves.

      Don't forget the big match on tv tonight!

      If you can read this you're gay.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    75. Re:I've cracked it! by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      Presumably it would have come about through the evolution of the language. Just like there's plenty of English that doesn't make sense. e.g. you "dial" a phone number but "type" everything else that involves pressing buttons with symbols. The physical dial is long gone leaving just a strange anomaly.

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    76. Re:I've cracked it! by MoeDumb · · Score: 1

      The word "ZUNE" actually appears in the second page, 6th line from the bottom.

      --
      Mod Me Up. You'll make a grown man cry.
    77. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What keeps him from changing and improving his code over time?

    78. Re:I've cracked it! by yahwotqa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, me too, although I was checking for Rebecca Black's Friday first. Shame on me. :)

    79. Re:I've cracked it! by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

      Looking at it, it seems to be a case of adding letters (seems "E" is a likely candidate as well as a few of the consonants), removing letters (vowels seem like most likely candidate), jumbling what's left of the words and some words where he has changed the lettering to (and remembers that particular word like that permanently).

      If he's of normal intelligence, and started doing it as a child, he can't have done more if he wanted to make sure he could read it again without too much effort.

      Not sure whether the numbers are jumbled or not, a child would either think the numbers didn't make sense without the context, or have a simple rule to encrypt them (like half of each number always rounded down, or up [or maybe not always, maybe down or up to the "better" number]).

    80. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since he has been using the encryption since he was a boy, I'm thinking it's not a very complicated scheme. I'm betting it had something to do with the area he grew up in - for instance knowing what streets intersect with each other, and coming up with a cipher from that.

      If this is the case, you can throw statistical analysis and standard cryptanalysis out the window, as it won't make sense in this context.

      The only way they're going to get this solved is to get into his mind. Go back to where it all started. Look around. Talk to his friends about any "sayings" or "pledges" he might have used with them (think secret phrase to enter a fort). Someone somewhere has the answer.

      (waves to nice FBI agents who I know are reading all these responses.... :) )

      Chances are there really is NOT any actual code or system which you'll ever be able to break. What I mean is that it's more of a mnemonic memory device, and not an actual language or code. Although it looks like a code, and probably was developed in his own mind that way, there isn't any kind of consistency or logical method.

      Here's an example. I used to have trouble remembering the order in which I had to file some paperwork, and send some notifications through a couple systems we use in my IT group. I came up with the phrase "The Quick Brown Fox jumped over the Red Rooster". Now, I've emphasized the capitals just for illustration- it's actually only written in lowercase. It's because that phrase is a mnemonic memory device which helps me remember "TQBFRR" which is an acronym that only makes sense if you worked in my office with the specific people and applications we use. So far this seems to be at least somewhat systematic, although some will already have noticed I'm not consistent on my choice of which words are Important to the phrase. But here the plot thickens. Q used to stand for "Quincy" because I had to call him right after I activated the "T"elephone alert system. But Quincy no longer works with us, and actually neither does Sheila... right now it's Darren. So even though the mnemonic doesn't match up anymore, I have an "Invisible Rule" which exists only in my own mind, which transforms "Q" into whoever works in Quincy's former position.
      So although the mnemonic device may have started with some method, it has evolved over time to the point where it really makes no sense to anybody except myself.

      To put it another way, it's essentially a one-time pad.

    81. Re:I've cracked it! by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Can't believe you missed the obvious joke there. Since "a field" is not a valid Clue location, there's no reason to not further break continuity with the game by offering "chair" as the murder weapon :)

    82. Re:I've cracked it! by suso · · Score: 1

      I think the code was probably meant for his eyes only, which means he probably constructed it using abbreviations and codewords that only he himself would understand. Without knowing those, well...good luck.

      This is kinda like solving the whole P=NP thing. If you actually were able to crack his code, I would say its better to keep the technique to yourself because then you know that you have a code that large portions of the government aren't able to crack. I'm kinda surprised that the FBI would release this information.

    83. Re:I've cracked it! by Amouth · · Score: 1

      thats why you use a type writer..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    84. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going with Zau-ek-b'too

    85. Re:I've cracked it! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yeah.. I make notes like that sometimes, though if hand drawn. and some of my directories are named like that. I even sometimes use porklatin and mysterically chosen swearwords for coding, but there it's just that sometimes you need to type a name for something and it doesn't matter what that is, just that it is unique in some way in that context.

      maybe he used them to remind him where his stash was. i employ mnemonics to stay sane(sort of).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    86. Re:I've cracked it! by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      The NSA would most likely not release it, the FBI's mandate is solving crimes like this and it is excellent publicity AND they get one hell of a crowd sourced massively parallel decryption engine the taxpayers don't have to pay for. ;)

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    87. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blame the Universal Translator - it was doing the best it could with what it had.
      What I found curious is that the Enterprise crew made themselves busy matching those phrases with various myths from other cultures..!?

    88. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So here I was reading that thinking it sounded familiar until it started ringing in my ears. I salute you, sir!

    89. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lol'd at my work computer. And then I shrunk into my seat because I knew what that meant.

      forever alone.jpg

    90. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...why did i had to be so curious...

    91. Re:I've cracked it! by cheapsuitdarkglasses · · Score: 1

      waves back . thanks for the appreciation!

    92. Re:I've cracked it! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      oh foolish one. I will just cut up a news paper and randomly pull them out of a bag and then glue them on paper using paste made from flour and water all the while wearing a clean suite. Then I will put rub dirt on it from a trip to an another state.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    93. Re:I've cracked it! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      It could just be a private writing system for a personal language for a semi-literate, demented, dyslexic street person who successfully integrated quantum theory with a general relativity variant that explains the origin of dark matter and all the correct mass/spin/charge values of the Standard Model.

    94. Re:I've cracked it! by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      my first job out of high school was installing windows 95 on refurbed computers.

      00100-1234567-00100. Fifteen years later, and it's still burned into my brain. :-S

    95. Re:I've cracked it! by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      think the code was probably meant for his eyes only, which means he probably constructed it using abbreviations and codewords that only he himself would understand. Without knowing those, well...good luck.

      I think you're really onto something here. Information about Ricky is hard to get from a quick look on the internet. The unpleasant possibility occurs to me that he may have had an excellent memory and yet been some kind of impaired person, perhaps like a Rain Man. It may turn out that even if they crack the notes they may say completely useless things like "Really didn't like that episode of Friends last night".

    96. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you noticed how "arms" could be "anus" if the "u" were upside down?

      Could this be a secret message referring to the First Goatse?

    97. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bastard.

    98. Re:I've cracked it! by FingerDemon · · Score: 1

      Well, our words are made up of individual letters that by themselves have no particular meaning. But you have to learn them first before you can read words. I always thought the culture in that episode just had another level to learn before most language made sense. Perhaps if he was marooned with one of their children, they could have chatted away easily.

      But yeah it was just a show.

      --

      "Contrarily the lookaside buffer might not be the panacea... "
    99. Re:I've cracked it! by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      A ... poorly constructed one-time pad then?

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    100. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About #2, those 3 lines are interesting:

      FLR SE PQ SEON DE 7 1 NCBE
      CDN SE PQ SEON S DE 7 4 NCBE
      PRT SE PR SEON RE DE 7 5 NCBE

      I see tons of patterns

    101. Re:I've cracked it! by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      DOH! Good catch.

    102. Re:I've cracked it! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Maybe. Or that could just be what he wanted you to think. Just saying.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    103. Re:I've cracked it! by cffrost · · Score: 1

      If this is the case, you can throw statistical analysis and standard cryptanalysis out the window, as it won't make sense in this context. ... The only way they're going to get this solved is to get into his mind.

      You've just described Forensic Psychocryptanalysis.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    104. Re:I've cracked it! by munozdj · · Score: 0

      Vg'f gur svefg evpxebyy V'ir rire sryg cebhq bs orvat gevpxrq vagb

      --
      Democracy: Crowdsourcing a country near you
    105. Re:I've cracked it! by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      Sokath, his eyes uncovered.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    106. Re:I've cracked it! by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Man, if he's a computer guy like me then we're totally stuck because the handwritten notes I keep in my pocket aren't exactly coded, but I'll be damned if even I can decipher them!

    107. Re:I've cracked it! by v1 · · Score: 1

      The #1 rule in implementing encryption is "don't make up your own new variety". There are several reasons for this.

      1. you're probably not a very talented crypto-analyst and there are almost certainly some serious design flaws in your method that you are not going to see.

      2. published methods have lots of peer review, and many pairs of eyes tend to find problems faster than one pair.

      3. published methods get used, and become targets. targets attract attention from the other pairs of eyes, (blackhat) and hasten discovery of weaknesses. Openly publicized methods tend to fall even faster by (3) since they have the spec handed to them on a platter.

      Unfortunately he's probably using a variation of shorthand using unrelated letters to make symbols. Without a very large amount of text (or a windfall) to work with, this may prove very difficult. A bit like hieroglyphics in that respect. Despite all the text we had to work with, how many years we had to work on it, and how many tried, look how long it took us, and we only figured it out because we found a crib sheet. And that wasn't even deliberately encoded...

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    108. Re:I've cracked it! by todrules · · Score: 1

      Or it could tell him how to decode the letters right before the "SE". So, maybe SE is one encoding scheme, and NE and BE are others?

    109. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rick roll

    110. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're no strangers to love
      You know the rules and so do I
      A full commitment's what I'm thinking of
      You wouldn't get this from any other guy
      I just wanna tell you how I'm feeling
      Gotta make you understand

      Never gonna give you up
      Never gonna let you down
      Never gonna run around and desert you
      Never gonna make you cry
      Never gonna say goodbye
      Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you

    111. Re:I've cracked it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, Ballmer would have been in the field, with a folding chair. Obviously, Ballmer did it.

  2. Link to the notes: by Moderator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here is a link to the notes:

    http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/march/cryptanalysis_032911/image/gallery

    Of course, what I got out of it was:

    "You are a stupid square idiot bald git aren't you? eh? I'm pointing at you, I'm pointing at you, but I'm not actually addressing you, I'm addressing the one prat in the country who has bothered to get a hold of this recording, turn it round and actually work out the rubbish that I'm saying. What a poor sad life he's got! Frankly your acts crap, anyway anybody could've done it, I hate the lot of you, bollocks to you!"

    --
    The World is Yours.
    1. Re:Link to the notes: by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 1

      Mod parent funny. :D

    2. Re:Link to the notes: by Tigger's+Pet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It would be nice if the FBI got off their arses and provided a copy of the notes in text format so that we could copy/paste them into something more useful as a format for saving and editing - or are they expecting each person to do this themselves?

    3. Re:Link to the notes: by mastershake82 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well... since nobody has any clue as to how it is encrypted... perhaps there is something specific as to how it was written regarding how to decrypt. They don't know that there is, and they don't know that there isn't, so they've effectively provided you everything they have to work with. It's up to you if you think it should be worked in a different format.

    4. Re:Link to the notes: by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if the FBI got off their arses and provided a copy of the notes in text format so that we could copy/paste them into something more useful as a format for saving and editing - or are they expecting each person to do this themselves?

      It's possible the data contains more information than just straight text.
      Ie, the position, alignment could all be part of the code.

    5. Re:Link to the notes: by Motard · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Look at the 'E's. Some are traditional squared off E's and some are like a C with a horizontal line. It could mean something, or nothing.

    6. Re:Link to the notes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Check this out: There was a serial killer, named Michael McCormick that was found dead as well (in 2010). He was 53. Just hinky.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/09/michael-mccormick-suspect_n_531686.html

      I think the 'cipher' looks pretty easy. The guy was a dipshit and apparently didn't trust computers. There are clear patterns and re-uses. I call bullshit.

    7. Re:Link to the notes: by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      in the first note, each group enclosed by parenthesis is a prime number of characters.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    8. Re:Link to the notes: by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      It could mean something, or nothing.

      you know, it could also mean....something ELSE! spooky ;-)

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    9. Re:Link to the notes: by cforciea · · Score: 2

      The other responses have made some points about possible additional information embedded in the spacing of the message, etc, but that seems a lot less important than the fact that some portions of the code are unclear and open to interpretation as to which letter is being represented. Is the second to last character on the first page an 'L', 'C', or '('? Can you say definitively enough for the FBI to rule out other options?

    10. Re:Link to the notes: by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You're correct, but they could have ALSO provided a plain text.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Link to the notes: by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope they have more to work with than what they've provided! Do they have any of the guy's writing that *isn't* encrypted? Do they have an inventory of his possessions? A roster of his acquaintances? Transcripts of interviews with those people? Do they have a specific motivation for wanting to read this particular voynich?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    12. Re:Link to the notes: by yincrash · · Score: 1

      Even outside of all the nontextual stuff that would be lost, I'm not even sure what some of the letters are. They look very ambiguous. Who should decide what letter it actually is? I think it's less helpful to provide a plain text format, because then you could possibly be leading people who would be helpful down an incorrect path.

    13. Re:Link to the notes: by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      I didn't know that 20, 21 and 35 are prime numbers ...
      However, the three indented parentheses in the 5th-last to 3rd-last line have 19, 20 and 21 characters, in that order.

      Indeed, the last lines (those where everything is in parentheses) have the following numbers of characters in their parentheses:
      23
      19
      20
      21
      35
      11,5

      Also, the three indented parentheses look very similar; only a few characters are different between them.
      And of course, "NCBE" occurs almost everywhere at or near the end. And "TFRNE" seems also quite frequent. Also PRSE.
      Somehow I get the impression that "E" tends to be an end of a word (or code unit, or ...). The second note confirms this, because the dashes come almost always after an "E".
      "WLD" seems also a frequent combination.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    14. Re:Link to the notes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Well... since nobody has any clue as to how it is encrypted

      I've decrypted it. It's just his groceries list.

    15. Re:Link to the notes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BE surE to drink your Ovaltine? What a crappy secret message!

    16. Re:Link to the notes: by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      It's not even necessary to decode the writing, if the objective is merely to identify the purpose of the writing, or the time or location it was written, the writing instrument used, etc. It sounds like they have very little to go on, despite the supposed knowledge that the guy wrote this way all his life -- yet there are no samples? And no samples of non-encrypted writing? Ethnicity? Interests? Recorded interviews with his peers?

      The FBI has a lot more to go on than just these two notes and a minimal backstory, right?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    17. Re:Link to the notes: by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Is the second to last character on the first page an 'L', 'C', or '('?

      It's an "E". His words end in "E" unless he's being lazy where it would be otherwise obvious that it's a word ending. "N" is also some kind of ligature.

      I think one comment might be on the right track with "prison cipher". What was this guy's profession? Does he have a criminal background and/or incarceration that we aren't being told about? The things we aren't told about this guy and the circumstances of his murder are probably more important than what we are told. The cipher is probably mostly irrelevant.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    18. Re:Link to the notes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the parenthesis. Maybe it's Lisp code.

    19. Re:Link to the notes: by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Do they have a specific motivation for wanting to read this particular voynich?

      This is the most accurate description of what this is that I think I've seen... it's a "voynich". I don't think they have any real notion of what should even be on the notes, and may likely not relate to anything in the investigation at all. That's probably most indicated by there being no reward offered.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    20. Re:Link to the notes: by trapmore · · Score: 1

      So security through obscurity works ?

    21. Re:Link to the notes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go. My transcription so it may not be perfect but it'll save you some initial effort.
      Using Pastebin since /.'s filter doesn't like enciphered notes.

      Ricky McCormick murder notes

    22. Re:Link to the notes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, to me, it looks like some fucked up piece of Scheme code.

    23. Re:Link to the notes: by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      You're already at +5, so allow me to offer... enod llew

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    24. Re:Link to the notes: by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      *bows* I'd cobbled up mine and posted it but then found you'd beat me to it.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    25. Re:Link to the notes: by Bearded+Frog · · Score: 1

      Here is a link to the notes:

      http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/march/cryptanalysis_032911/image/gallery

      Of course, what I got out of it was:

      "You are a stupid square idiot bald git aren't you? eh? I'm pointing at you, I'm pointing at you, but I'm not actually addressing you, I'm addressing the one prat in the country who has bothered to get a hold of this recording, turn it round and actually work out the rubbish that I'm saying. What a poor sad life he's got! Frankly your acts crap, anyway anybody could've done it, I hate the lot of you, bollocks to you!"

      He's awfully british for an american then.

    26. Re:Link to the notes: by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      He's awfully british for an american then.

      And that's why the Americans could never solve it! QED

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    27. Re:Link to the notes: by casperrr · · Score: 1

      St. Louis, not London. so take out git, prat, rubbish, bollocks and substitute *****, ****, bull****, ****

    28. Re:Link to the notes: by kasperd · · Score: 1

      I noticed how the sequence NCB occurs 19 times. 18 times out of that it is followed by E. I am wondering if the sequence NCBRTSENCBEINC may have been a mistake or if there is a good reason why NCB in this particular case is followed by a different character.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    29. Re:Link to the notes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're correct, but they could have ALSO provided a plain text.

      You're like the guy who loses his keys in a dark alley but insists on searching near the street because the light's better.

    30. Re:Link to the notes: by sfraggle · · Score: 1
      --
      were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
    31. Re:Link to the notes: by MS · · Score: 1
      In fact, there's alot more in those notes than only characters.

      It would be helpful if we get another note of readable text (maybe a booklet from school) - so we compare those characters to other characters he wrote.

      194 WLD's NCBE SE- this must be solvable! :-)

  3. Cracked: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be sure to drink your ovaltine.

  4. And the coded message is... by wcrowe · · Score: 5, Funny

    DRINKYOUROVALTINE

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:And the coded message is... by RedEars · · Score: 1

      Be sure to drink your Ovaltine. Bahaha. Thank you.

      --
      He who forgets will be destined to remember. - EV
    2. Re:And the coded message is... by houghi · · Score: 1

      You sure? I only got the last words: Burma Shave.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:And the coded message is... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The second page reads: "pound pastrami, can kraut, six bagels - bring home for Emma"

    4. Re:And the coded message is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've only deciphered the first part :
      There once was a woman from Venus,
      Whose body was shaped like...

    5. Re:And the coded message is... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Too late. Everybody that's read "A Canticle for Leibowitz" is probably in the nursing home by now.

      (Wanders off in search of a shuffleboard partner)

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:And the coded message is... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Too late. Everybody that's read "A Canticle for Leibowitz" is probably in the nursing home by now. (Wanders off in search of a shuffleboard partner)

      Hahaha. Before clicking on the story, I did tag it with "orshoppinglist".

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    7. Re:And the coded message is... by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      I've read it. I'm 24. This is Slashdot, and that's a geek classic. That, and it was only published in 1960. Assuming most of the audience was 16-30 year olds at the time, the vast majority would not yet be in nursing homes.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    8. Re:And the coded message is... by Dr_Terminus · · Score: 1

      Shoot, I hope there weren't any fallouts around when this guy was killed... I hear those things are nasty!

    9. Re:And the coded message is... by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Nah, I can still sit on my porch and yell at the kids. I'll join you in a couple of months, I guess.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  5. Hmm... by tool462 · · Score: 3, Funny

    There are a lot of nested parens in those notes. It's clearly Lisp code. They should bring Alan Turing in for questioning.

    1. Re:Hmm... by One+Louder · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The more than 30 lines of coded material use a maddening variety of letters, numbers, dashes, and parentheses"

      It's obviously a port of sendmail written in Perl.

    2. Re:Hmm... by IB4Student · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it contains a Scheme.

    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were Lisp, they'd want John McCarthy.

      But this looks like Lisp and Perl mixed.

    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but they chemically castrated him and he committed suicide/was taken out by the government.

    5. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already did but he seems to have "gone missing"

    6. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldn't that mean questioning Alonzo Church?

    7. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      14 - 5 - 3 - 2, I guess they are recruiting.

    8. Re:Hmm... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      bring Alan Turing in for questioning.

      Fine, but you bring the bolt-cutter and shovels this time. And I get first dibs on any jewelry.

      And, once again, why does every mystery end up with me digging up a mathematician?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  6. we are volunteers by alphatel · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If the Fed really wants help they should consider providing:
    • Images at sizes greater than 100kb and 600x600 pixels.
    • Scans with resolutions higher than 96 dpi.
    • Tear up my dossier (I know I must be on it because I'm an American).
    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:we are volunteers by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2

      It's a chance to publicly prove that you're smarter than the FBI's crypto team - what more motivation could you want?

    2. Re:we are volunteers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first note's obviously a treasure map. Anything preceding NCBE is a direction. Probably anything not in parentheses is gibberish.

    3. Re:we are volunteers by wannabe-retiree · · Score: 1

      Yeah- you solve the encryption and then get prosecuted as the murderer. You get to feel mentally superior to the FBI and they get to close the case. It's a win-win!

    4. Re:we are volunteers by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      It's a chance to publicly prove that you're smarter than the FBI's crypto team - what more motivation could you want?

      But do they give you a job, or do they flag your dossier when someone else hires you to work on other encryption, given your relative ability to do things above the FBI's ability to counter?

    5. Re:we are volunteers by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      ooo, i can't tell if this is a bot post or not!

      well done!

    6. Re:we are volunteers by MichaelKristopeit406 · · Score: 0
      i can't tell if ur mum's face is a bot post or not!

      you're an idiot!

      cower in my shadow behind your chosen handled drinking glass based pseudonym some more, feeb.

      you're completely pathetic.

    7. Re:we are volunteers by Xoblau · · Score: 1

      Ya, the handwriting is kinda hard to read. Someone was kind enough to type out the characters though at http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6265981 But of course, there may be clues with the picture itself, and the Fed should have provided higher resolution scans.

    8. Re:we are volunteers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be paid more than their entire crypto team.

    9. Re:we are volunteers by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      ah, now i can tell.

      your algorithm is not about to achieve sentience just yet.

    10. Re:we are volunteers by MichaelKristopeit408 · · Score: 0
      ur mum's face are not about to can tell.

      you're an idiot.

      cower in my shadow behind your malodered pose based pseudonym some more, feeb.

      you're completely pathetic.

    11. Re:we are volunteers by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "If the Fed really wants help they should consider"

      Not waiting 12 friggin years to ask for it.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    12. Re:we are volunteers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a change to get your IP logged as a possible suspect.

      This could be a plea for the public to help, but you know they are recording every IP address that looks at those documents. It is highly likely that the murder will have the urge to look back on that note.

  7. Direct link to FBI article/request by richard+tarantula+ · · Score: 1
  8. if you know how to read these by bugs2squash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you must be a suspect

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:if you know how to read these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I know how to read them how can I prove I'm not a suspect?

    2. Re:if you know how to read these by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Only in many, many other crimes.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  9. Timely? by Monoman · · Score: 1

    Talk about stubborn. They sure waited long enough to ask for help.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    1. Re:Timely? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that they don't share too much information, and only release stuff when it's really necessary. If I were somehow affected by a crime being investigated, I wouldn't want to have to submit to a complete loss of privacy to have a chance at justice.

  10. Castle by AnotherAnonymousUser · · Score: 1

    Pssshhh, Nathan Fillion could've solved this in 45 minutes plus commercial breaks.

    1. Re:Castle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pffft... Adam Baldwin could have shot everyone responsible (and quite possibly some people who weren't) in 15 minutes.

    2. Re:Castle by DaveyJJ · · Score: 1

      Pfffft ... Stana Katic would've had Baldwin on the ground in cuffs before he even drew that weapon.

      --
      DaveyJJ
    3. Re:Castle by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      He keeps his weapon at the ready, always, and seems to have a sixth sense for someone trying to piss him off. Either way, Yvonne Strahovski would have the drop in the end.

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
  11. Sorry by Nemyst · · Score: 1

    Sorry guys, I know my writing's not the best, but no need to put the FBI on the case sheesh!

    1. Re:Sorry by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      The FBI would have arrested that lousy browncoat trator on site!

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  12. John has a long moustache by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
    1. Re:John has a long moustache by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Wounds my heart with monotonous languor.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    2. Re:John has a long moustache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that was also in Red Dawn. Along with "The Chair is against the wall."

  13. Zodiac Killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arthur Leigh Allen.

    But he died. How old was the body when found?

  14. Zodiac is back? by WonderingAround · · Score: 1

    As long as Jake Gyllenback-Mountain doesn't ruin this one with a B list movie I think we could solve what the FBI's been slacking off on for a decade or so.

    --
    It's like the mind going AWOL, it's there somewhere
  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Hypothetical. by TheStatsMan · · Score: 1

    Say you crack the code. Would you divulge the key?

    1. Re:Hypothetical. by cforciea · · Score: 1

      Either you wouldn't need to because the algorithm would be obvious given the plain text, or you would have to in order for anybody to verify your claim.

    2. Re:Hypothetical. by TheStatsMan · · Score: 1

      Or you live in peace with your hidden knowledge. "I never did crack the darn thing..." I suppose it comes down to what's in the notes.

  17. Alternative job listing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who thinks that they've already cracked it and are simply looking for people to hire?

  18. http://maurifail.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rolf this is crazy xD

  19. Burma-Shave! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    The notes look like Burma-Shave ads! Tell the FBI to round up any clean-shaven folks!

    "Throat-wobbler-mangrove!"

    "Burma-Shave!"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  20. I'd like to, but... by Steauengeglase · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't violate the DMCA. Sorry.

    1. Re:I'd like to, but... by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      That's the prize... Prison...

    2. Re:I'd like to, but... by Stray7Xi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can't violate the DMCA. Sorry.

      Seriously, the guy's been dead for 11 years...

      So only 59 more years to go on his copyright. I'll consider downloading it then, until then I'm supporting the artist.

    3. Re:I'd like to, but... by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So only 59 more years to go on his copyright.

      You mean 59 + 20 + 20 + 20 + ...

    4. Re:I'd like to, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FBI is exporting encryption!

    5. Re:I'd like to, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously, isn't this copyrighted?

    6. Re:I'd like to, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It requires one copy so one copyright violation. I will have to be paid $150,000 + income tax on same (~30%) + employer's and employee's FICA and Medicare on same (15.3%) + $70,000.00 for legal fees to break even. Owing to unforseen issues and a slight profit I will have to double the amount to make it worth my time. Also, I will need a presidential pardon for the DMCA. Oh, and no guarantees that I will be able to solve it.

  21. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just a lot of Windows serial numbers!

  22. Re:Here is an enlaged version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugh. Goatse.

    NSFW. Asshole (poster and picture, both).

  23. Nothingness by DreamArcher · · Score: 0

    Probably not even encrypted but just gibberish. FBI wastes 100000000000000000000000000000 man-hours trying to decrypt it. Please send the FBI to change the oil on my car. Money better spent.

    1. Re:Nothingness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the second one actually looks like a recipe. For a while I saw the word cucumber and some timing instructions. Then I started thinking and the subconsciously processed information was lost.

    2. Re:Nothingness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know every FBI oil change comes with a free tracking device install, and then they'll sue you for stealing their tracking device if you take it off, right?

      Which raises an interesting (serious) question. I'm not one of the Google-haters, but I do recognize that to the extent you use their services, you're exchanging a measure of privacy for those notionally "free" services -- and lots of people are perfectly willing to do this. If the FBI wants to track loads of people not implicated in any investigation on the hopes that something turns up (and, really, who doesn't want to do that?), they need consent... Would people sign off on an FBI tracker welded to their chassis in exchange for free oil-changes for life?

      (Whether this program would be productive enough to justify the cost is questionable, but it's an intriguing idea. What level of free services would get most folks to volunteer?)

  24. You mean he's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Verin Mathwin?

    Who knew!

    Just wait for the hour of his death!

    Oh wait.

    1. Re:You mean he's by grrrl · · Score: 1

      haha nice.

    2. Re:You mean he's by Thiez · · Score: 1

      Verin kills Dumbledore!

  25. Thoughts by jeek · · Score: 1

    Is it me, or does the writing suggest that he wrote every other letter spaced out, then went back in and wrote every other letter in the blanks?

    Perhaps the parentheses indicate sets of letters where he did this...?

    --
    If you want to be seen, stand up. If you want to be heard, speak up. If you want to be respected, sit down and shut up.
    1. Re:Thoughts by blair1q · · Score: 1

      No, it looks like he worked out the code letter by letter, moving his hand away from the page each time, possibly to use the pencil as a pointer in his code pad or to do intermediate calculations, instead of writing the letters straight through. The inference I'd make is that he made a cleartext version of this before encoding it, but didn't copy this encrypted version from a scratchpad.

    2. Re:Thoughts by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      no code pad. if you want to use it frequently, it will be something easy to do without any extras.

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    3. Re:Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT makes sense that it must be really simple, since he would likely be able to sight-read the cyphertext and decode it on the fly. Otherwise what's the point of writing yourself a note that will take 20 minutes, a calculator, and a scratch pad to read?

      G.

    4. Re:Thoughts by WasteOfAmmo · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting idea and the start of a simple enough encryption scheme for a kid to develop. Take signal and inject noise. Hmmm, how to write an algorithm that would analyze spaced out letters for statistical significance. Taking in to account that the amount of preceding or appended padding as well as the spacing of signal elements is unknown. Although a starting point is to assume an even spacing.

    5. Re:Thoughts by aralin · · Score: 1

      He is clearly using 'SE', 'BE' and possibly 'NE' as some sort of delimiters. It appears numbers are not encoded. I see other patterns, but not as significant.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    6. Re:Thoughts by SatanClauz · · Score: 1

      I also thought it didn't look written "all at once". Just type it up it in Word and autocorrect, that should do it ;)

    7. Re:Thoughts by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      he used such notes without using a code pad, array paper or other device to help him. they were for his eyes only memory enhancers. as such, we would need a whole lot more of the notes to start making some sense out of them(we'd need that even if he had written in plain english "fucking psychos").

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  26. Re:Here is an enlaged version by kipin · · Score: 1

    Please ban this user posting GOATSE without marking it as NSFW.

    --
    If I can not smoke in heaven, then I shall not go. -- Mark Twain
  27. Lots of patterns by davidbrit2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Weird. There are enough patterns and repetitions to make it look like it's just something simple, like a substitution cipher or similar. The sequence 'NCBE' appears enough times to be statistically meaningful, I'd wager.

    1. Re:Lots of patterns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That probably means it's just a decoy, then.

    2. Re:Lots of patterns by crunchyeyeball · · Score: 1

      Also, virtually every "word" ends with an "E" - this suggests that perhaps the writer had a number of coding schemes which could be carried out in his head on a word-by-word basis, and he's mainly using coding scheme "E" in this case.

      The smallest word I can see is "SE" which appears at least twice - could this be "a" or "I" perhaps?

    3. Re:Lots of patterns by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      What languages did the victim speak, natively? What did he read?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:Lots of patterns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As does:

      PRSE ( at least six instances )
      SE ( nearly sixty times ? )
      RCBRN ( three at least )

      TOO many patterns for this to make sense

    5. Re:Lots of patterns by democrates · · Score: 2

      This is something originally developed by a boy so most likely it evolved over the years to include multiple methods. It may use shorthand/abbreviations, bad grammer, mis-spelling, and slang. A single cipher method is highly unlikely.

      It's probably simple in that it will have one step between plaintext and ciphertext, and words are not transposed. Also it looks like numerics are not encoded

      Brackets or a line around a section could seperate trips, days, people he met, conversations on the phone, or anything, but we can probably safely assume they're in chronological order.

      That 71,74,75 sequence could be revealing. Could they be house numbers, was he a train-spotter, is it a long term plan for his old age?

      And could "NCBE" mean "No Change Behind Eddies" referring to a fruitless search for change dropped by drunks behind Eddies Bar or something?

      What this job needs is detailed knowledge of his life; people, places, interests, habits etc. because without that background there's no way to determine what he's referring to. If all such data were dumped into a database to make a word index, that could help (maybe not so useful I just thought it up).

      But FBI, if background info can't be released, at least make large size scans of those notes available in TIFF format (>12bit) so people have a chance to see what the letters are in the noisy parts.

    6. Re:Lots of patterns by aralin · · Score: 1

      SE is likely not a word, but a word delimiter (space). Also 'BE' and 'NE' fit the profile of delimiters. Interesting words are 'TE' and 'TRF'. 'NC' will be Number something probably + BE = end of word/sentence?

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    7. Re:Lots of patterns by democrates · · Score: 1

      There's another thing that gets me about this. This guy takes privacy measures, and since no similar notes were found in a regular search of his residence, maybe he has a stash well hidden under a loose floorboard or something...

      If these are notes he uses short term and then discards, they may well be trivial, but still might yield information that places him and/or others in the days preceding his murder and thereby open a new line of inquiry.

      But why would he go to the trouble of encoding trivial information. Maybe it was it for fun, control, a sense of achievement/feeling smarter than the rest, or was he hiding something... Could be a mix of motivations, and a mix of topics being recorded, but knowing one motivation to record secret notes would narrow the field.
      I wonder at exactly what age he first started and what events occurred in his life before or around that time, the first motivation could well have carried on, eg he notices girls and starts recording things about them.
      While no-one in his family can decipher the notes, do any of them have any idea WHY he started keeping notes, they'd need to think back, painful as it may be...

    8. Re:Lots of patterns by democrates · · Score: 1

      Ok possibly delimiters, but he has spaces, lines, and brackets to delimit.

      I'm seeing this guy as coming at it from a completely different perspective compared with textbook cryptography, because he started inventing it when he was a boy. Like a programmer, he probably honed his system over time.

      In his scheme, SE is used so much it could be an abbreviation for the status of something he's observing, eg if he was single and straight it's possible he was looking at women and SE stands for "Seems Easy", whereas "South East" is unlikely as other compass directions don't appear. Other letters could be initials for people.

      Where was he and what was he doing when he'd write these notes? Looking at tv, reading comic books? I'm betting the key to this cipher is not a traditional cryptography key, it's dispersed in the minutiae of his life.

    9. Re:Lots of patterns by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

      NCBE is either the end of a sentence, or just a period, as far as I can tell. It's the last thing in each of the circled pieces, and occurs quite a bit at the end of lines on the first page.

    10. Re:Lots of patterns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are similarities in what is around it that I think are more significant than just the NCBE repetition. You could easily garner more information from the parts that are _almost_ identical than the parts that are. Specifically from
      (FLRSE PQsEoNSE 71 NCBE)
      (CDNSE PQsEoNDE 74 NCBE)
      (PRtSE PRSEoNREDE 75 NCBE)

    11. Re:Lots of patterns by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

      I think the guy was probably nuts and just had a thing for certain random character sequences. Something like in A Beautiful Mind...

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    12. Re:Lots of patterns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. PRSE (or PQSE i can't tell) seems to also seem to show up often..as well as WLO (or WLD..again..can't read this well..)

  28. Re:remember how they caught the unabomber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article says the encrypted notes were written by the victim, not the murderer.

  29. Need a genius. by kjdames · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a job for Jacob Barnett.

    --

    Typos... that's just how I role.

  30. I think I see... by aztektum · · Score: 1

    The pirated Windows 98 key I used back then in the second pic.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  31. ooh another clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bake the hall in the candle of her brain.

  32. FBI is grasping by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

    What makes them think that these notes have any clue as to the perpetrator of the murder? They could be shopping lists that the victim made in code for his own amusement; apparently he had been doing so his whole life.

    Cases of murder are cracked daily without needing a note from the victim, coded or not; the FBI should pursue this case the same way. More than likely, the code is a red herring that's tying up resources and focus.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    1. Re:FBI is grasping by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they haven't and aren't pursuing other means?

    2. Re:FBI is grasping by cforciea · · Score: 1

      Given that the murder happened in 1999, my guess is that they have exhausted those other avenues.

    3. Re:FBI is grasping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They could be shopping lists that the victim made in code for his own amusement

      I was about to give you a smart response, but I just realized that I read the wrong article (I read the actual FBI posting, not the commentary on the posting). From the original posting, it seems like there's two reasons for the FBI wanting to crack the code: from a investigative standpoint, it might give some hint as to where the victim was before he was murdered, which might lead to other clues.

      However, since the cryptanalyst quoted also said, "Even if we found out that he was writing a grocery list or a love letter, we would still want to see how the code is solved. This is a cipher system we know nothing about," I'd guess that a large part is just wanting to know the answer to a puzzle that they couldn't solve. If you don't understand this impulse, you're obviously not human, or have no interest in bettering yourself.

    4. Re:FBI is grasping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than likely, the code is a red herring that's tying up resources and focus.

      Somewhere in the FBI's offices...

      Bill: Hey Erin, that crackhead Marcusson from analysis is still harping on about that stupid note we found on the body. He won't let the thing drop. I think the guy is categorically insane. This reminds me of what happened last year when he tried to convince the brass to hire that astrologer nutcase. The guy needs to retire.
      Erin: Maybe we can placate him somehow. Let's put it out on the street. Marcusson will think it's hilarious that we can't solve it ourselves, but at least it'll get him off our backs. Then we can focus on the actual evidence.
      Bill: Not a bad idea. I'll see if we can do that. Let's just hope this kook gets his pension soon.

    5. Re:FBI is grasping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since the cryptanalyst quoted also said, "Even if we found out that he was writing a grocery list or a love letter, we would still want to see how the code is solved. This is a cipher system we know nothing about," I'd guess that a large part is just wanting to know the answer to a puzzle that they couldn't solve. If you don't understand this impulse, you're obviously not human, or have no interest in bettering yourself.

      I hope I'm not the only one who now plans to mail postcards of "code" to the FBI from exotic locations around the world.

      Since, well, they seem to like that.

    6. Re:FBI is grasping by jrumney · · Score: 1

      More than likely, the code is a red herring that's tying up resources and focus.

      Which is probably why they threw this out to the public to solve rather than continue to tie up FBI resources on it. In the unlikely event that it is useful, they still get to benefit without wasting their resources in the most likely scenario of it being a red herring.

    7. Re:FBI is grasping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? We can actually look at more than one piece of evidence at a time? Thanks for the tip, Sherlock.

      -The FBI.

      PS: Seriously dude, don't be such a dumb douchebag.

  33. Dear FBI, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please post better scans. At least 2000 pixels on a side. And in the lossless "PNG" format. Thank you.

  34. LISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like LISP code to me.

    GNU/Stallman strikes again!

    1. Re:LISP by aiht · · Score: 1

      Looks like LISP code to me.

      GNU/Stallman strikes again!

      Why do all the people mentioning Lisp have no idea who made it? It's McCarthy, people, McCarthy!
      (John, not Joe)

  35. it's a trap! by JackSpratts · · Score: 1

    don't do it!

  36. bring home for Emma: by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    just load it into google docs and you'll have an answer before your tea's done

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  37. Re:remember how they caught the unabomber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember 90 seconds ago I RTFA and it said the victim had kept such coded notes himself since childhood. His mom "recognized the mental wavelength" already, so now how does this help?

  38. Re:doesn't the public pay the FBI to do this for u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've been on the case for 11 years. At some point asking for help just makes... oh, I didn't see who made the post. Never mind.

    Pathetic cower behind ;select name from systables

  39. Re:remember how they caught the unabomber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The notes belonged to the victim.

  40. I did it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did it!

    Your's

    Obama.

    tl;dr

    GW Bush

  41. citation needed by MikeyO · · Score: 2

    It's a one time pad. The pad, in this case, seems to have resided in the head of the writer

    How do you know it is a one time pad?

  42. It's either a rant about lawyers by geekoid · · Score: 1

    or he is a secret genius with proteins.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  43. I've decoded it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Message begins

    Murdering you was "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2EZ'" ... lol!

    APK

    With sincere Regards,
    Mrs. McCormick

    P.S.=>. Do not worry little poppet, your HOSTS file will be looked after! apk

    Message ends

    1. Re:I've decoded it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should use your Asperger powers to solve this. I bet you could do it, the rest of us don't have the sheer persistence required.

  44. These scans... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1
    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:These scans... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, those scans are terrible. They barely fill a 3" x 4" area on my laptop monitor. If I zoom in far enough to actually see stuff, they're very, very fuzzy. It looks like they were shot with a digital camera, then cropped. Stick it on a flatbed scanner and provide scans with at least 600 DPI resolution. Then we'll talk. Until then, it hurts my head just looking at it.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:These scans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...are pretty clear: http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/march/cryptanalysis_032911/image/gallery [fbi.gov]

      Those pictures are not clear enough for me. There is still quite a bit of ambiguity in many of the characters due to pixilation. If you can provide a transcription of the contents, it would greatly be appreciated.

    3. Re:These scans... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they aren't clear. you can't tell which way the pen moved from them and they're not even in good focus. and they pop up from the page. actually this could be probably just be due to the god awful design guidelines they're working under to make the site.

      and yeah, actually, it does matter which order he wrote it in and in some blurry areas some analysing of how the pen tip moved, which could be brought out from a bigger scan, would actually help to gain some insight to what he was writing. I'm guessing that single issues or statements are inside ( ). to seperate from the other issues marked down on the paper. now it's hard to tell which symbols are the same with symbols next to them. anyways, I think the approach that it would be some crypto as crypto is usually defined is wrong. it's probably just obscure, not crypted.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:These scans... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      No, those scans are terrible. They barely fill a 3" x 4" area on my laptop monitor.

      Really? On my 22" monitor they are quite clear. I'll bet they look even worse on your iPhone/droid, yes?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  45. it looks like shorthand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can read it, sort of but it doesn't make sense. It looks like instructions and dates. It would be nice to know if he were a drug dealer or whatever.

    Hold it back and just let the nearest words pop into your head

    The ()'s could be different notes like when I put boxes around my notes from class.

    high school dropout guys. I"m guessing he is not mentally encoded 128 bit RSA encryption here.

  46. It's not encrypted by QX-Mat · · Score: 3, Funny

    it's Welsh!

    1. Re:It's not encrypted by blair1q · · Score: 1

      D'LLowh!

    2. Re:It's not encrypted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean Qwghlmian.

    3. Re:It's not encrypted by DaveyJJ · · Score: 1

      Same bloody thing.

      --
      DaveyJJ
    4. Re:It's not encrypted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Distawrwydd, twp!

    5. Re:It's not encrypted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody will be able to decipher it then...

    6. Re:It's not encrypted by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      You just need an endless supply of booze.

  47. I got it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It says "drink more ovaltine"

  48. oh well.. by slick7 · · Score: 1

    So much for the taxpayer funded NSA (No Scrutiny Allowed) or the drug funded CIA (Criminals In Action)

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    1. Re:oh well.. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Neither of which is legally permitted to conduct domestic investigations. Not even if it's domestic espionage.

      Although, since the FBI is responsible for counter-intelligence on American soil, you'd think they'd have an NSA-quality codebreaking team.

      Which puts the stink on this whole deal. Either this is not a simple code, or they're testing us.

    2. Re:oh well.. by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Neither of which is legally permitted to conduct domestic investigations. Not even if it's domestic espionage.

      Although, since the FBI is responsible for counter-intelligence on American soil, you'd think they'd have an NSA-quality codebreaking team.

      Which puts the stink on this whole deal. Either this is not a simple code, or they're testing us.

      It's only unlawful if they get caught. Since this issue does not spy on Americans per se, it just asks for support on decipherment. Murder is a crime that has no statute of limitations.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    3. Re:oh well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some other-acronym agency employee on weekend anonymously might have better luck.

    4. Re:oh well.. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      legally permitted to conduct domestic investigations?
      Your local http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_center has a wonderful mix of CIA, FBI, Department of Justice, US Military and state and local level government task forces. Mix in a bit of the private sector too. Read about it via Fox news http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,399042,00.html
      Or http://iowaindependent.com/2983/iowas-intelligence-fusion-center-connects-the-dots

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  49. Relevance? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 0

    They were found in his pockets. He has been known to use such notes since he was a boy. How is wasting their time by solving these going to further the investigation? I imagine had he the time to encrypt them naming his killer in such a way, then he would have just written out a description of the killer, assuming he didn't know the killer. Which he probably did. Most likely it was some suspected illicit activity and they are hoping that he has information for something else in these messages.

    I'd bet it's little more than a sub cypher of some type, given his education and the recurrence of letter patterns in the first note.

    Perhaps backwards?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:Relevance? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yes..none of the people who have worked on this thought of that, well done. I wonder if the ROT 13'd it..idiot.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Relevance? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      So lets see some examples from that lifetime of writing in code... And how bad was his spelling when he didn't write in code? Did he speak only English?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  50. Text version of the code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've retyped the code of the first note (to as good an extent as I can given the 600x600 resolution). Here's the results, and don't shoot me if there's a mistake:

    (mndmknearse-n-d-ta-knare)
    qtfrnenptnsenpbsercbbnsenprseinc
    prsenmrsedprehlduldncbe(tfxlftcxlnlbe)
    al-prppitxlyppiyncbemekseincdrcbrnseprse
    wldrcbrnsentsgnentxse-crsle-citrsewldncde
    alwlpncbetsmelrserlsevrglsneasnwldncbe
    (nopfsenlsrencbe)ntegddmnsencurercbrne
    (tenetfrnencbrtsencbeinq)
    (firsepqseonde71ncbe)
    (cdnseprsednsde74ncbe)
    (prtseprseonrede75ncbe)
    (tfnqcmspsolemrdelusetotewldnwldncbe)
    (194wld'sncbe)(trfxl)

    Actually all uppercase, but the fitler wouldn't allow me.

    1. Re:Text version of the code by Hermanas · · Score: 2
      Oops, wasn't logged in. Here's the second note.

      alpnteglse-se erte
      vlsemtse-ctse-wse-frtse
      nwldxlrcmspnewldstsmexl
      dvlmt6tunsencbexl

      (munsarstenmunarse)
      klse-lrste-trse-trse-mksen-mrse
      (saegnsesenmbse)

      nmnrcbrnsepte2ptewsrcbreee?? (unsure about this)
      86mlse74sprkse29kenobole173rtrse
      35gleclgsejunitxedkqsepseshle
      651mtcsehtlsencntxtrsnmre
      99.84.s2unep2sencrseaoktsensrsenbse
      njreqnsepvtsewldncbe(jxqrl)
      ntosenrsein2ntrlercnamsentsrcrene
      lspnsengspesemkserbsencbeavxlr
      hmcrenmbencbe 1/2munddlse
      d-w-m-ymil

    2. Re:Text version of the code by hldn · · Score: 1

      [quote]d-w-m-ymil[/quote]
      quite obviously means day - week - month - year - millenium.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    3. Re:Text version of the code by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      It would be useful to know if the guy normally wrote/spoke as a coherent person or as a complete whack-a-doo. Surely they have writing samples from this guy that aren't encrypted. Or someone knows him who can describe how he spoke, generally how he thought. Considering the FBI have that kind of material to work with (and anything else they'd like to dig for), I don't see much chance for lay persons to get anywhere. And there's no reason to think the victim had anything particularly auspicious to say, so it's hard to imagine that this could be the Voynich manuscript of the 21st Century.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:Text version of the code by patjhal · · Score: 1

      This is obviously the language used by Elroy which was mistakenly sent in to that song contest. Eep. Oop. Ork. Ah. Ah.

    5. Re:Text version of the code by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Interesting; looks at-a-glance like the beginning of a Warren Zevon song from Transverse City, he chants a chemical structure at the beginning (second song I think). (It was the numbers and hyphens, I believe, that made me think of that.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    6. Re:Text version of the code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mine copy has xorlx after that d-w-m-ymil; I don't think he could XOR with LX in his head.

      Also, at the top it's easy to misread as ERTE - just look at his T's they are all perfect, this is actually more a + than a T.

    7. Re:Text version of the code by onepoint · · Score: 1

      there is a problem ...
      if you look at the notes that are published, every now and then
      letters match up in the columns or offsets

      first thing I saw was that, a 2 or 3 unit offset

      then I started thinking like a kid, so what frame of mind would these patterns or phrases be.
      born in 1958ish
      add 9 years ( when he first started this code ( i think ) )
      1967

      well, you got I dream of genie, the monkeys, the odd couple, brady bunch, and other shows

      I'm guessing that some of the phrases might be reduced to abbreviations

      so that even in ncbe is a stop word, it might have a specific connotation to some tv-show or phrase while growing up, and that would give us another clue to work with.

      I keep on thinking that those 71,74, 75 are related to auto

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    8. Re:Text version of the code by Sean · · Score: 1

      I don't think your transcription is very accurate... The FBI should release a high resolution version because some of the characters are very questionable.

      You missed line 3: "pnrtrseonprsewldncbe"

      I believe "njreqnsepvtsewldncbe(jxqrl)" is actually "nsreqnsepvtsewldncbe(jxqrl)" because "nsre" shows up frequently.

      "ntosenrsein2ntrlercnamsentsrcrene" could be "nmsenrsein2ntrlercb?nsentsrcrone" or "nmsenrsein2ntrlercb?nsentsrcr6ne". The first character looks like a scribbled out mistake. The question mark I can't even guess at.

      "xdrlx" is missing off the last line.

      Anyway, this might not be cyphertext at all. It could actually be passphrases.

    9. Re:Text version of the code by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Given the variable spacing between characters and that in several places seemingly identical characters are drawn differently... What's the point of rendering it in text?

    10. Re:Text version of the code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good start. Thank you for doing this. There's a wikipedia article on this now, so consider adding your transcription.

      First line is (mndmknearse-n-S-M-knare) and it could be an insertion after the first N of line 2.

      I think the first character of the second line is a mistake and cross-out. There are no Q's.

      I think the second line is tfrnenp[i]nse etc., because his T's and L's are pretty clearly drawn.

      Third line has a WLDNCBE, not a uldncbe.

      Fifth line ends in another WLDNCBE.

      Sixth line, I read the beginning as alwldn.

      Line 8 ends in BEING, not beinq.

      I think line 9 starts with fLrsepRse...

      Line 10 is (cdnseprseOnse74ncbe). Another scribble-out, which I should give someone a clue how his code works ...

      Line 12 I think the Q is actually an R. Again, I don't think there are Q's.

    11. Re:Text version of the code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think line 6 ends in another mKse. It makes sense given the repetition of trse trse.

      I think line 7 ends in mrse like line 8.

      I'm guessing the ?? line ends in BRNSE, which also appears later.

      I'm pretty sure the "86" is actually a 36, and "nobole" is "nosole" with an S scratched over something else.

      "35" is probably "3S." He puts an upward serif on the tail of his 5 later. "unitxe" is "unutxe." Slip of the finger. Also another Q that's an R.

      "651" could also be "6Si." ncntxtrsnmre = ncutctrsnmre. u could be a v, since it's unclear whether he consistently tails his Us.

      99.84.52 is more likely. Coincidentally the end of a jazz club's phone number. sensrse is probably senskse, if it's really a K earlier in the line too.

      "njreqnse" = "nsReOnse." I think jxqrl is 3xorl.

      ntose = nmse, and I think 2ntrlercnamsentsrcrene = 2ntrlercBRNsentsrcrBne.

      "gspese" = "gspse"

      "nmbencbe" = "nmrefcbe"

      I read it as d-w-m14mil, but the other reply may also be correct. Append xdrlx.

    12. Re:Text version of the code by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Good find!

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    13. Re:Text version of the code by lupinstel · · Score: 1

      All I can figure out is something about Ovaltine.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
    14. Re:Text version of the code by Dr.+Gamera · · Score: 1

      "quite obviously"... or is coincidental. Does "gddmn" mean "goddamn", or is that coincidental too? Maybe "se" means the characters before it are either plaintext ("nearse") or abbreviated plaintext ("gddmnse" => "goddamn"? "nptnse" => "and put in"? "inputing"? "and put on"?)

    15. Re:Text version of the code by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      To add more information which is likely pertinent:
      There is very careful indentation in the text, as though it may be a program or written in the form of a program. The text could be indicative of a whitespace program, though Whitespace is a programming language for the insane, and you should beware if you attempt to go down that rabbit hole.

      (the three endline characters at the end of a whitespace program indicate its termination, so if there are other documents, DIGITAL documents of his, this would be the biggest indicator of such a thing)

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    16. Re:Text version of the code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (firsepqseonde71ncbe)

      firse pqseonde71
      firse p s o 1
      firse pos1
      first post
      Quite clever troll...

  51. Solved! by messiuh · · Score: 1

    These -ARE- encrypted.

    It is a combination of several Diablo CD-Keys

    1. Re:Solved! by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      The other dozen CD key jokes weren't doing it for ya, eh?

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  52. bt5wld(mhnzljn)(... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the first one he mentions slippy and kobe. Was he a lakers fan? Not enough time to play with this more, but I wonder if he was a gambler from some of the other stuff.

  53. Mercury Rising by XXeR · · Score: 1

    Just find an autistic kid, problem solved!

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120749/plotsummary

    1. Re:Mercury Rising by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You mean like this one?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  54. One time pad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but if he was using a one time pad, won't this be impossible to crack? Seems like the simplest way to encrypt something like this anyhow.

    1. Re:One time pad? by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      Too many repetitive letters to be true OTP. There are several repetitive sequences. It appears to be more akin to a sort of compression to my eyes...

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  55. thats it? by mugnyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    McCormick had used such encrypted notes since he was a boy

    and all we get are two examples? Lame.

        Why doesn't the FBI provide some of the research they've already done? Collaborate instead of simply asking someone to do your work! For example, higher quality scans, unique symbols, symbol frequency, symbol distance matrices, other known writings of the victim. Can we get some more environmental clues? victim's known proper nouns, background, travels, language(s) exposed to, favorite pop culture topics, etc. This all seems like a lot more detective work should be done. Solve the murder, not the puzzle.

    And they use a snail mail address for contact? Is this article from the 1950's?

    1. Re:thats it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's look at this logically. Assuming it's not a doodle --- and I have known people that doodle random numbers when they think- then let's ask what the note is FOR. Since only he can read it, this is a note to himself. People generally only do that as an aid to memory, either to record what they have just done OR list things to be done. First thing would be to try and assemble a timeline of a 2 week period around the murder and see what he was up to... then see if any of the patterns of letters have any identifiable correlation with events.

    2. Re:thats it? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      perhaps their research so far was sending it to crypto firms along with a check.. ? while in reality, they should be hunting for witnesses who saw him write notes like that

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  56. Re:maybe it's just gibberish by hedwards · · Score: 1

    One thought I had was this is a form of short hand cross with a minor cipher. Meaning that it's not intended to be a message for anybody else to understand, but to jog the memory of the victim. Meaning that it's more like an asymmetric encryption system than what the FBI is considering. Which would make it more or less impossible to solve because most of the information was destroyed when the person was killed.

    I'm not familiar enough with the case to know, but it seems rather unlikely that this is the only evidence if the killer wasn't methodical and yet it happens to be left at the crime scene. Sure it could happen, but it seems a bit convenient that it was not known about.

    Suggesting of course that the killer didn't know about it and that more likely than not there isn't any information that any living person would understand.

  57. Magic Answer! by uvsc_wolverine · · Score: 2

    Just give it to Angela on "Bones." She'll just happen to have recently finished writing some program that will figure it out in under an hour based on a grainy picture of the note.

    --
    This space for rent...
    1. Re:Magic Answer! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Bones - A less plausible Scooby - Doo

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Magic Answer! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Or give it to CSI. They will write a VB GUI to crack it!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:Magic Answer! by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      LOL
      I'm not sure, but I think it was Chloe in 24 who did that.

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    4. Re:Magic Answer! by Kosi · · Score: 1

      I'd rather place my bet on Charlie Eppes, Amita and Larry (Numb3rs). I prefer to hear some of Larry's thoughts instead of having to watch Angela flirt with her fuck of the week.

  58. Re:remember how they caught the unabomber by hedwards · · Score: 2

    It's already known that the victim wrote the notes and devised the code, any possible information that isn't known would be contained in the text. I'm betting that it's never deciphered. Just because it's more likely that it's a key to something locked in the victims brain.

  59. Re:remember how they caught the unabomber by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

    I hope they're not still listening to those snake-oil profilers after a decades long track record on par with dowsing rods.

  60. Plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't get fooled, it's just a plot from the Hoover boys to find new suspects

  61. I've got it. by Octopuscabbage · · Score: 1

    It says "Youmadbro?"

    1. Re:I've got it. by Speedcraver · · Score: 0

      No, it says "Don't taze me bro!". At least that is what I got out of it.

  62. License Keys by sxedog · · Score: 1

    For Microsoft Office suite of products That is what they look like to me.

    --
    If it ain't broke, DON'T fix it.
  63. Cracking the code won't solve any crime.... by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

    ...unless he wrote the notes while being murdered.

    Murderer: "Whatever are writing, Ricky?"
    Ricky: "Your descrip.... I mean a screenplay I'm finishing up. Almost done, just a few more minutes. How much do you weigh, out of curiosity."
    Murderer: "200lbs, I work out, at that gym down the street. OK, hurry up then, I'm late for dinner."

    They are using it as nice way of asking "We can't crack this encryption, but are very curious about it, so help us please. Oh yeah and some guy was murdered..."

    1. Re:Cracking the code won't solve any crime.... by PPH · · Score: 1

      If his murder was involved with some criminal activity, his accomplices may know how how to crack the code. Once the FBI has a few of them identified, they may get some idea about the motive.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  64. Smoke me out? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    Nice try, FBI. I'm not revealing my leet skills to you that easily.
    First you make a list of who can crack your uber-encryption, then you round us up.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  65. Some ideas. by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    The thing isn't too complex. He's using it to write long notes, so you don't want to do a lot of work encrypting your text.

    If he's using it since he was 9 the essence is probably not too difficult. Let's say a variation of pig Latin. (-be -se)
    He might have made some refinements over the years, but the concept probably stayed the same.

    Then there are the groups of 4 and 5 letters. No idea about that.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
    1. Re:Some ideas. by realperseus · · Score: 1

      The 1st thing that popped in my mind upon seeing the notes was the game show "Wheel Of Fortune". Perhaps the letters in the note equate to the letters that would be picked to spell out/almost spell out what the author wanted to code/hide?

      --
      "Trusting every aspect of our lives to a giant computer was the smartest thing we ever did.." Homer Simpson
  66. It's A Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Grandfather was friends with one of the people who cracked Enigma without the aid of a captured machine. He died in 2005.

    Pitty they couldn't have gotten this out, say, seven years ago.

  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. F.B.I. ycaripsnoc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all a test by the F.B.I. to find some new cryptographers.

  69. This line looks familiar by cve · · Score: 1

    FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8

    1. Re:This line looks familiar by todrules · · Score: 1

      Hey! Watch the language! This is a family site. Sheesh.

  70. Readable In Real Time? by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    For handwritten notes to be writeable and readable quickly for anyone even with a great mind, you have to have "a method".

    You can't memorize an encryption algorithm and execute translation both ways so you can use it when writing on paper. You need to be able to "visualize" the results both ways quickly to be usable.

    Hence, I would like to know what phrases the man commonly used and whether other handwritten English text documents from him are in existence to use as do comparisons with? What types of activities and people did he associate with, and their names? All it takes is a reused phrase to be recognized to often break these types of codes.

  71. Re:remember how they caught the unabomber by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    Seems like the family and/or the FBI could be helpful by also showing other encrypted writing and plenty of samples of his unencrypted writing. I'm sure (at least I hope) the FBI has *much* more to work with than these two notes.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  72. It's a recipe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How to serve man!

  73. defintions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tewe definition
    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tewe

    TfrNE definition

    http://books.google.com/books?id=Gja7l4jg5V4C&pg=PA603&lpg=PA603&dq=TfrNE+definition&source=bl&ots=8wsxmplyip&sig=s-4nYXuipwdSFIJVkDXZD9ABNEI&hl=en&ei=aWKSTaPVLOS_0QH2y6DNBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBwQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

  74. My magic decoder ring says... by Something+Witty+Here · · Score: 1

    It is actually the lyrics to the Kingsmen version
    of the song Louie, Louie. Verse 3 mentions a
    "grassy knoll" and something about @!&ABo((~`={{vb
    3:42xyzzyZnorFFoo
    NO CARRIER

  75. It's not coded! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just a dump of Hans Reiser's filesystem...

  76. It just says.... by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

    42

    Does that make sense to anyone?

    --
    #include <sig.h>
    1. Re:It just says.... by Xoblau · · Score: 1

      Now you are on Gag Halfrunt's hit list. You have been warned.....

  77. My guess by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1

    It was the Albino

    1. Re:My guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The walrus was Paul.

      Turn me on, dead man.

  78. Hasn’t anybody noticed the Es? by Evi1M4chine · · Score: 1

    Nearly every letter ends in E. Many even in SE or TE. CBE and BE are also not rare in the first one.
    There is also a distinct shortage of certain letters for most of the text.
    Numbers are generally unencrypted. There’s even a ½ in there.

    I can not imagine why a simple statistical analysis (or even better: generic parallel pattern recognition, like with a neural net that’s big enough) wouldn’t render something useful for this text. It’s full of patterns.

    But remember: There are mental diseases, which make you think you say or write something that makes sense, while actually it doesn’t. Like those people using only normal words, and even grammar, but constructing sentences that make absolutely no sense.

    And you know what they say: If you interpret long enough, you will always come up with something that makes the sense you want. :)

    --
    I must be some kind of leader... Since Slashdot is following me to the grave. ;)
    1. Re:Hasn’t anybody noticed the Es? by PPH · · Score: 1

      But remember: There are mental diseases, which make you think you say or write something that makes sense, while actually it doesn't.

      Welcome to Slashdot.

      Mod this comment +Filbert.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Hasn’t anybody noticed the Es? by todrules · · Score: 1

      Mental diseases aside, there are some people who play word games in their head. I was one of them. It was actually pretty complex, and I would do it all the time barely even thinking about it, and I was just a kid. I would manipulate words in my head and apply the "rules" of the game. But, I could have easily taken that "game" and then used it to encode my writing. Maybe he did something similar since he started at such a young age.

  79. Already have my hands full... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with the Voynich Manuscript.

    1. Re:Already have my hands full... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      perhaps he was trying to translate the Voynich manuscript, and got to close, and a secret society had him killed. (lots of his words end in e, lots of the words in the Voynich manuscript end in the same symbol. Just saying)

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  80. Done and done by mugnyte · · Score: 1

    Funny enough, the decrypted doesn't make any more sense:

    #include
    typedef unsigned int uint;
    char ctb[512]="33733b2663236b763e7e362b6e2e667bd393db0643034b96de9ed60b4e0e4\
    69b57175f82c787cf125a1a528fca8ac21fd999d10049094190d898d001480840913d7d35246\
    d2d65743c7c34256c2c6475dd9dd5044d0d4594dc9cd4054c0c449559195180c989c11058185\
    081c888c011d797df0247074f92da9ad20f4a0a429f53135b86c383cb165e1e568bce8ec61bb\
    3f3bba6e3a3ebf6befeb6abeeaee6fb37773f2267276f723a7a322f6a2a627fb9f9b1a0e9a9e\
    1f0b8f8b0a1e8a8e0f15d1d5584cd8dc5145c1c5485cc8cc415bdfdb5a4edade5f4bcfcb4a5e\
    cace4f539793120692961703878302168286071b7f7bfa2e7a7eff2bafab2afeaaae2ff";
    typedef unsigned char uchar;uint tb0[11]={5,0,1,2,3,4,0,1,2,3,4};uchar* F=NULL;
    uint lf0,lf1,out;void ReadKey(uchar* key){int i;char hst[3]; hst[2]=0;if(F==\
    NULL){F=malloc(256);for(i=0;i>2)^(lf0>>16))b=((lf1\
    >>12)^(lf1>>20)^(lf1>>21)^(lf1>>24))lf0=(lf0>1)\
    |(a>1)|(b>8)+x+y;} void \
    CSSdescramble(uchar *sec,uchar *key){uint i;uchar *end=sec+0x800;uchar KEY[5];
    for(i=0;i=0;\
    i--)key[tb0[i+1]]=k[tb0[i+1]]^F[key[tb0[i+1]]]^key[tb0[i]];}void CSStitlekey2\
    (uchar *key,uchar *im){uchar k[5];int i;ReadKey(im);for(i=0;i=0;i--)key[tb0[i+1]]=k[tb0[i+1]]^F[key[tb0[i+1]]]^key\
    [tb0[i]];}void CSSdecrypttitlekey(uchar *tkey,uchar *dkey){int i;uchar im1[6];
    uchar im2[6]={0x51,0x67,0x67,0xc5,0xe0,0x00};for(i=0;i6;i++)im1[i]=dkey[i];
    CSStitlekey1(im1,im2);CSStitlekey2(tkey,im1);}

  81. This is not ciphertext. by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    It's just part of the script that Charlie Sheen wrote for his violent torpedo of truth concert.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  82. its a commercial! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make sure you drink your ovaltine.

  83. Driving directons by Neutral_Observer · · Score: 0

    Another site ponted out that the numbers are Interstate roads. Follow on down the 71. Continue on the 74. Bear right on the 75.

    1. Re:Driving directons by Neutral_Observer · · Score: 0

      Guy was murdered in ohio and dumped in st louis...

  84. Amateur Cryptographer Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm swinging a guess, but to me it looks like it's been encrypted twice. Blocked after running through a Vignere or a similar cipher. I don't think it's a code because the repetition doesn't match with any standard frequency analysis, I just did it, and codes in English have serious weaknesses there. It looks as if he used a paper based key and transcribed as he went because of the corrections. I suppose he could have memorized the pad he used but the corrections indicate he didn't know it well enough to avoid mistakes. He didn't spend a great deal of time making it "right" before committing it to paper. It looks blocked 5-4-3 or maybe 5-4-3-2. There are no single characters so either the messages were fixed length, it's salted with characters to make it fit the fixed length (most likely imho) or he was way careless in spacing. The latter doesn't seem right because he went through the trouble to encipher the message... seems like a lot of work to end up being careless unless he was in a hurry which makes even less sense.

    So that's my seven minute analysis... now I have something to do tonight!

  85. Visual Basic by JustTech · · Score: 1

    I'll create a GUI interface in Visual Basic, see if I can decrypt this

  86. It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Announcing anything productive makes you an instant "person of interest." What guarantees does the FBI have you won't turn your m4d skillz against the Homeland?

  87. Re:maybe it's just gibberish by C_L_Lk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Has anyone considered that maybe these notes ARE the one time pad for decrypting another message that hasn't been discovered yet?

  88. What it says is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just found Barrack Obama's birth certificate from another country and I plan to go public with the fact he can't run for the senate in Ill.

  89. Did anyone try to remove the by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    frequently occurring filler?

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  90. Is (ACSM) the key, maybe? by DaveyJJ · · Score: 1

    On page one there's the (ACSM) up in the corner ... maybe written down to remind the guy what the key is or how to translate it? What if each letter in the message is offset by some sort of repeating pattern based on those four letters?

    --
    DaveyJJ
    1. Re:Is (ACSM) the key, maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the problem, writing maybe hundreds of algorithms, brute-forcing, and checking each result :)

  91. Larger Images by pgn674 · · Score: 1

    I stumbled across even larger versions of the images, which don't seem to be linked to from the FBI site: note1_large.jpg, note2_large.jpg

    1. Re:Larger Images by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      Good job, those are MUCH better.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    2. Re:Larger Images by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  92. Second letter dropped on many words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As I read through the notes, I noticed what looks to be many misspelled words with their second letters (especially vowels) missing combined with initialisms only the author or his close friends would understand. As an example: gd dmn is "God Damn."
    I suspect the author had a form of dyslexia.

    1. Re:Second letter dropped on many words by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way looking at it. In the first line, when my eyes scan over it, it reads something like "The impulses get" and then my brain goes 'wait what?' and i go back to re-read, and it vanishes back into the text. Its almost as if someone took two messages, dyslexiaed/letterdropped from both of them, then mingled the messages letter by letter or word by word. Most codes i see don't look like much of anything, but looking at this, it seems like a message is about to just fall out of it, if only my eyes moved in the right pattern.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  93. Terminal E's by devnull17 · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice that most of the words end in E? That seems likely to mean something.

    According to the biographical details, the guy was "street smart" but lacked formal education. Based on his very white-sounding name, it's a good bet that he didn't speak any exotic foreign languages, or have access to the mathematical techniques that cryptanalysts are trained to look for. Seems like pretty good rationale for releasing it to the public—clever people with no formal training might actually be better at solving this kind of thing.

    Of course, it could all be in some crazy, made-up language that existed only in the guy's head. And even if it's not, it could just as easily be a grocery list. But there's enough numeric data in there that if I were tasked with solving this case, I'd be intrigued, too. Hell, I'm intrigued anyway.

    1. Re:Terminal E's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      He might have been an Asperger, so created his own language (Aspergers use language inappropriately, or so my trick-cyclist told me before I tried to commit suicide, and can include inventing words nobody else uses).

      In that case if it was unique and only decoded by his own brain-map of what the symbols meant, we are never going to know what it was about unless the significance of the most often recurring 4 letter sequence is discovered by accident.

      For instance, is NCBE a weight (of drugs), measure (foot, feet, yard - all unlikely)?

      Are the numbers uncoded, so 71, 74, 75 NCBE means 71 gram, 74 gram, or 71 yard, 74 yard, not worrying about pluralising with a "s", and all the other grammar rules ("lacking formal education").

      I cannot help but wonder if the paper was in fact a distraction ploy by his murderer, unless they are definitely the victim's own handwritting.

      Has anyone looked for foreign DNA on the paper?

      I assume so.

      That is more likely to catch the killer if large enough traces exist from dead skin cells of the murderer.

  94. Code? by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 1

    Hey, it compiles without error. It crashes when run. I'm thinking this has to be Windows code. Where was Gates in 1999?

    --
    Place nail here >+
  95. Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its the serial key for Windows 8

  96. Oh My God! by Xoblau · · Score: 1

    I typed KLSE-LRSTE-TRSE-TRSE-MKSEN-MRSE into my Windows 7 install and... Kaboom! It turned into Ubuntu 10.10 with Unlimited FREE-FOR-LIFE Amazon EC2 account! Hurry, try it! It says 2 accounts left!

    1. Re:Oh My God! by PPH · · Score: 1

      Nope. It was the code to enable the backup Rustock control servers. If that string appears anywhere on the 'Net. They automatically go online.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  97. Solved it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's using a sequence of letters to correspond to a single letter. Repeating patterns such as ncbe actually equate to 1 letter.

  98. Ixnay ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... on the aptray.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  99. First thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think a good place to start would be to analyze the man who created these codes. Since he is a highschool drop out we may conclude that he probably isn't a genius. My guess is that he doesn't know much about the new age crypto algs, like those you would need a computer to create. Since he has been doing this since he was a child, we can further that assumption by saying that he probably did not use a powerful computing device to create the code. Since the FBI has likely already poured over these codes, we can assume that standard crypto algs have already been considered, such as the affine/vigenere cyphers (since they would have been relatively easy to crack).
    Based on these assumptions, I would say that he very likely created some type of one-time pad cypher or perhaps a substitution cypher, or perhaps some hybrid of the two. In this case, we may assume that in order to create the code he used some very popular or familiar source [text] in order to generate the code letters. While it may be possible to crack the original code without knowing what this original pad source is, it would certainly benefit the effort to have more information on the murderer's life style both as a child, and as recent as the murder, so that more probable information can be ascertained about the encoding.

    In short, more information about the case/man may be helpful, even if it does not seem immediately relevant.

    1. Re:First thoughts by Tolvor · · Score: 1

      I don't totally agree with you. He has been working on this code/cipher for years so his personal algorithm has probably gone through several revisions, becoming tougher with time. It is complicated enough that even with his years of playing with that cipher he still makes mistakes.

      This really has the look of a code done completely in the persons head without the need of a sheet to do calculations on. There are too many mistakes, and the writing shows haste and carelessness, not the slow process of copying out the resulting code blocks as they are calculated. The three simplest codes that people start using is the simple substitution cipher (ex A becomes Z), transposition ciphers (ABCD becomes CABD) and the Playfair cipher. Next comes the Vigenère cipher, but that is usually too difficult to do in your head.

      This doesn't look like it uses a one-time pad since there is too many weird repetitions, notably NCBE and WLD. I'd say something like a combination of a Playfair cipher, simply because there are some things in the message he couldn't encrypt like the 's at the bottom, and the inc near the top of page 1. The circled bit in the top right really looks like a key (and I'd bet the key is obscured by a substitution cipher).

      The weird repetition really makes me think of Playfair ciphers, but the problem is the grouping. Playfairs always result in 2-letter groupings, and this message shows a lot of five letter groupings (ex page 1, line 2, block 1 "TFRNE") and even using Playfair would not result is so many NCBE.

      That NCBE really puzzles me. Anyone who knows enough about codes to use one would know about the problems with such an obvious repeating element. As other people have mentioned it almost looks like a symbol for the period, but why use a four character replacement, and why be so obvious about it?

      I did test out a few Playfair blocks to see if I could get anywhere, but obviously I am missing a few steps somewhere.

      Anyone else think that the lines in the middle that have 71, 74, and 75 are steps/directions? It almost looks like the first phrases there are "first", "second" and "third". The part at the bottom almost appears to be an address (194 XXX's (NCBE) XXXXX) the last five either being "drive" or "court"

  100. I guess the FBI cant get any NSA computer time by Marrow · · Score: 1

    I guess they shouldnt have said so many uncharitable things about the NSA after 9-11.

  101. Ive seen this recruitment method before! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In "The Last Starfighter"

  102. Windows Product Keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're a bunch of Windows ME product keys...

  103. only Snail Mail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? They've just asked thousands of people for help but want them to mail in their results? No email address? Either they're stupid or need the solver's handwriting - implying anyone who can decrypt it must know the encryption table and hence must know the victim. But how would that help?

  104. Looks like directions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Page 1 appears to be directions. If you look at his numbers, they are highway numbers leading from Kansas City, MO into North Carolina.
     

  105. ITS A COOKBOOK !! Arrgghh oh nooos by gearloos · · Score: 1

    OMG It's a Cook Book! eek Thus proving that the government is in fact aliens.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  106. In other unrelated news... by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

    "The FBI is seeking the public's help in breaking the encrypted code found in two notes discovered on the body of a murdered man in 1999"

    In other unrelated news, the FBI has launched their new recruiting campaign...

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  107. sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could probably figure it out, but I'm afraid I'd get sued by Sony.

  108. I dunno by slapout · · Score: 1

    Looks like Lisp to me

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  109. I think... by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking "SE" is a space. that would make N an "A", I believe. Okay slashdot. go!

    1. Re:I think... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Maybe certain xE codes are non-alphanumeric characters? SE is a space, BE is a period?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  110. Tanagra, when the walls fell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have sort of pointed out, there's a good chance it's based on allusions that have meaning only to the author.

    If that's the case, it's pretty much a lost cause. Is it even clear that he meant to provide the identity of people persuing him? It could just be a shopping list or something.

    OTOH, if I were going to do an allusion cipher I'd probably make it less rambling. Maybe it's stego. I had my passwords stegoed on a business card for a while. It was very simple--the password was embedded in a long string. I only had to remember the start letter.

  111. There are two types of Es in the notes by istartedi · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen anybody else mention that there seem to be two types of 'E' in the note. One is is like a left paren with a dash to make the 'E', the other is more like a regular E.

    Perhaps the way the letters are written is significant. You'd think the FBI would have thought of that and analyzed it though. You'd think their crypto guys would have experience with codes where the font matters. A font code is also simple enough for a kid to use too so it fits.

    Also, as others have pointed out, better scans would help.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:There are two types of Es in the notes by Jstlook · · Score: 1

      I can't help but notice most of his letters are written more than one way. Note the U with and without a tail, upper and lowercase T's, P and roe (presumably used interchangeably), D's closed at both the top and bottom, and some of his Ns look like umlauts, and his W's seem to be all over the map.

      I would be very inclined to assume the E's are all spaces and remove them. There's a noticeable amount of repititon - WLD, NCB, PRS, TFRN, RCBRN, TRS, MKS, NMR
      I'm also curious: Did he own a vehicle? What was the make and model? Are there important events in 71, 74, and 75 (that seems like a longshot, as the highway theory posted elsewhere seems more on target)? Who are / were his friends (and more importantly, their initials)?

      Honestly, I'd assume it's not so much encrypted, as it simply is shorthand. There's very few vowels (except E), and lots of repetition otherwise. I'd look to things he didn't encrypt and start with what his vocabulary actually was. Unfortunately, they didn't post any of that. Ho Hum.

      --
      ---jstlook ---For that is the way of Elves, for they say both yes AND no, and mean every word of it. --- J.R.R.T.
    2. Re:There are two types of Es in the notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen anybody else mention that there seem to be two types of 'E' in the note. One is is like a left paren with a dash to make the 'E', the other is more like a regular E.

      Perhaps the way the letters are written is significant. You'd think the FBI would have thought of that and analyzed it though. You'd think their crypto guys would have experience with codes where the font matters. A font code is also simple enough for a kid to use too so it fits.

      Also, as others have pointed out, better scans would help.

      There are also a few lowercase letters amongst many uppercase.

  112. ode-ca? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it looks pig-latinish

  113. It's not encrypted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just in his own made up language :)

    > McCormick had used such encrypted notes since he was a boy

    Kids make up languages.. :P

  114. epic rickroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    watch it turn out to be a rickroll...

  115. Once again the FBI by Nyder · · Score: 1

    wastes it's time on unimportant stuff.

    Female Body Inspectors, my ass. You are all about a dead dude on this one.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  116. Rooky mistake by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    You my dear have committed a so called rooky mistake as you most likely have employed security through obscurity. It must be so because nobody can even find some sort of system, the FBI is pissed like hell and you wind up dead on /.

    OTOH, only the truly great wind up dead dead on /.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  117. No Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry this guy is no genius.

    Hes using his own short hand and its pretty obvious that he was taking notes on how the gambling scheme he was involved in ... worked.

    Take a step back and use a dumb ass approach (he obviously wasn't very bright), a computer won't solve this or tell you who killed him ... hes not making ciphers or anything like that, hes just dumb.

    If you read between the lines its very clear that he's seeing what wild or making notes on it.

    I had a bunch more here on what I got out of it but I googled some short hand on cards and lost it!

    1. Re:No Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second note on this is directions to a location, which he separated out.

      The first seems to be the location, while the rest are directions to this location.

    2. Re:No Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're obviously the killer!

      *grabs pitchfork*

  118. What makes them connected to the murder? by kmoser · · Score: 1

    If they're encrypted, they could be anything (e.g. a recipe). What makes the FBI so sure they're clues to the murder?

    1. Re:What makes them connected to the murder? by Yaur · · Score: 1

      I would bet money that they already know what it says and they looking for someone who has the inside knowledge to make sense of the parts that don't decipher into anything intelligible. I say this because the cypher comes apart very easily and its hard for me to believe that the FBI lacks the skills to decode it.

    2. Re:What makes them connected to the murder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bluffing

  119. Not an 'encryption'? by humbro · · Score: 1

    The arrangement of the numbers seems to exclude an alphanumeric encryption, greatly simplifying any possible encryption. Also, this more closely resembles a modern day teens phone text, or possibly a memory aid, similar to what I have seen some students do in preparation for a test. It would seem more likely to me that this is just an abbreviation or condensation, like the first letter of each word. For instance, the first sentence of this post would read 'TAOTNSEAAEGSAPE', or something similar. When I was younger, I remember making 'super secret' doodles that were annotated in a similar fashion, in the most complex encryption I could devise on my own, to prevent others from reading them. There would likely appear to be structure in the message, since language has rules and guidelines that govern which words make sense in what order, that gives the semblance of a simple encryption. Anyway, that is my guess with my limited knowledge of encryption... LOLGLGTGTTYL.

    1. Re:Not an 'encryption'? by humbro · · Score: 1

      I was looking to see if I could find any of my old 'super secret' doodles, and I managed to locate one. Unfortunately, the method of encryption I used is largely based on the individuals memory of what the original words were, rather than a process that can be reversed. This makes decryption rather tricky for anyone other than the writer since there is no one-to-one correlation between the letter and the word it represents. It also makes it nearly impossible to decipher the designs that one made when they were ~10 years old and forgot about for nearly 20 years.

  120. Advanced learning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA:

    "McCormick was a high school dropout, but he was able to read and write ..."

    Is this considered someting worth mentioning in the USA? Where I live we learn to read and write in first class primary school...didn't know it was considered an advanced in the US...

  121. Another case of FBI in-eptitude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could figure out the Zodiac notes in SF and now this. Sounds like another serial killer on the loose or it could be the same. Its difficult to tell from the lack of information. Face it either way the FBI didn't get their man then or now.

  122. Cops and computers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • * Why is the resolution so unbelievably crappy? The scans look as if they were photographed on a wooden table with a cellphone and the screenshot of that faxed to a mimeograph.
    • * If they have done "extensive analysis", couldn't they at least bother to include the transcript?
    • * According to members of his family, McCormick had used such encrypted notes since he was a boy Where are all his older notes? The more data, the easier it gets to decode. A cryptanalysis unit should know that.
  123. I'm onto something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the first few characters decode to
    46 DC EA D3
    Hmmm, looks like hex. Might be an intermediate code, maybe the key to something else? I'll play with it some more and see if I can crack it.

  124. Larger versions of the notes by bl968 · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 51230 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Setec Astronomy)"
    1. Re:Larger versions of the notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here is some more info on ricky

      http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=2&sqi=2&ved=0CCgQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRicky_McCormick_murder_notes&rct=j&q=ricky%20mccormick%20murder%20news&ei=t2ueTc2gEo7Nswbh-v2BAg&usg=AFQjCNG4Vd6030PRXNr8DsaF98HgLZp0Dw&cad=rja

  125. be smartfish :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember guys, if you solve it you become the prime suspect :) What happened to the guy who found a stolen laptop with sensitive information and called the police? Ahem ahem :)

    There are supposedly larger pictures here:

    http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/march/cryptanalysis_032911/image/gallery

    If you break them remember to use TrueCrypt or something to send them back; these might be TSA related after all..

  126. Not too hard... by Cronock · · Score: 1

    It appears to be just a hand-written Microsoft Activation Key.

  127. Calling father Ted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are lots of repeating 4 letter groups. My guess is that NCBE is 'Feck' and PRSE is 'Arse'. One group has to be 'Grls' but that lies outside my experience.

  128. relational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess...he is using some sort of phonetic code. He is mixing in self conceived sounds in combinations with memories/location associations. He then dropped in some extras. If he did this and you only have 2 samples to break his code.....good luck with that.

      Also, he may have just been writing gibberish and imagining it actually meant something, just the act of thinking and writing would help cement memories.

  129. Other agencies? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    Isn't this what we pay all the uber-brains at CIA, NSA, DIA for? What was the last estimate of the supercomputing power at the NSA?

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  130. Isn't 99.8 an FM radio frequency? by Leemeng · · Score: 1

    Not sure if he wrote 99.8H or 99.84. It might be an FM radio station. Here's a list of MO radio stations: http://www.ontheradio.net/states/missouri.aspx

  131. Don't read it loud! by rippeltippel · · Score: 1

    ...just summoned Cthulhu in my kitchen... help...

    1. Re:Don't read it loud! by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      The key is to get as many people as possible chanting the incantations in a short time, that way Cthulu is popping from place to place so fast (every 1/4 second or so) he doesn't have time to do anything bad.

      I call it it Cthulu-pong. Sort of a denial of service attack if you will.

  132. At a glance... by kfsone · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice the missing letters?

    J (or maybe his J looks almost like his T), Q and Z.

    There are a few instances of characters that could be either a U or a V, but could also be one of his oddly shaped N characters.

    First impression from both pages is of a missouri-dialected "Feersum Enjin". And later on, in the middle of the first page, I noticed ""NTE GDDMN SENCURE RCBRNE""...

    I guess the point is they're hoping people /not/ tainted with handwriting analysis reports and victim backgrounds might come up with; but I immediately find myself wanting to know things like: was he a truck driver, are these scribbled notes (suggesting a short hand) or pontificated (suggesting an encryption). Sports fan? (did he write up the plays to a game?) Or a PC gamer? (is it a cheat sheet for a game, directions for a mud/adventure)

    Lastly, most folks seem to be assuming left-to-right ... If it was right-to-left, ES could easily be "espacio".

    --
    -- A change is as good as a reboot.
    1. Re:At a glance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me both notes use the same key and cipher... as both have an abundance of ncbe.... the second note doesn't seem to have a key or something listed somewhere, so it's likely he uses the same key for multiple notes (possibly all his notes).

    2. Re:At a glance... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Another nice find! GDDMN SENCURE is almost certainly "goddamn secure" - a phrase anyone devising a cryptosystem solely for his own pleasure is likely to encrypt.

      This gives us the clue that some words may have wovels removed, and some may have consonants sprinkled liberally into them.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  133. Thanks FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It must have been a victim of the "Killer by serial numbers". You can actually activate a Windows 98 instalation with one of the CD keys on the second page.

  134. Think i got it by Combatso · · Score: 1

    Note #1: Shopping List
    Milk
    Eggs
    Bread
    Frozen Corn
    Bacon

    Note #2: To Do List
    Wash Car
    Take dog for a walk
    Sign up for self defence classes

  135. non conventional cypher? by generic · · Score: 1

    It's not a conventional cypher so standard cryptanalysis won't work. It could be a rotating key depending on line number or word position where simple frequency analysis would be thrown off. You'd need more samples to look at, and try to develop a pattern.

    --
    Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
    1. Re:non conventional cypher? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I don't claim to be any sort of crypto nerd, but I wonder if its not simply a really odd position shift code. for example, If i needed a code i could decrypt quickly from my head, but wanted it to be obscure enough that the average person looking at it was not going to get it, I would write lines of code on multiple pages. Heck it can be in straight english, if your shift is complex enough.

      for example, imagine on page 1, i wrote "TISAILGTCFDU" and on page 2 i wrote " ESTANOAOOFEN" Now, each of those pages alone are useless. this reads decoded 'TESTING CODES IS A LOT OF FUN" It is done by writing the first letter on the first page, going to the second page, looking for your pen mark, and writing the next letter, then returning to the first page, seeing your second letter as though you would trace it, and writeing the third letter after it, leaving a space between the first and third letters. You finish a line across the pages, and then continue the phrase, this time filling in available spaces left in the previous lines. the result is a garglemesh of letters. If you did this, and added random word breaks, you have a coded message on multiple pages that reqires both of them to decipher a readable message. if you know how to look at it, you can hold the two pages up to the light, put one line above the other, and read the message with a little effort.

      A code like this is its own codex, and relies on the entire message being available to decrypt it. I've played with the images the FBI provided in photoshop, and don't see that this is exactly what has been done, but I figure that whatever sort of code it is, it had to be easily readable/create-able for this guy, and could easily rely on some physical form of cryptography like i demonstrated here.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    2. Re:non conventional cypher? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      er, i think it actually decodes as "TESTING OUT CODES IS A LOT OF FUN". was not paying attention to my own work there.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    3. Re:non conventional cypher? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      aha, no, "TESTING A CODE IS A LOT OF FUN". see? even the guy that designed it gets screwed up..

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  136. Some ideas by Celarent+Darii · · Score: 1

    It does seem to be written from left to right however, as the text is mostly flush to the left margin. If it was written from the right to the left, usually people make the text flush from where they begin writting.

    "SE" definitely looks like a space or some token marker, perhaps a shorthand for "Stop. End" like a telegraph.

    As a kid I was fascinated by two kinds of cyphers, such as the "Tic-Tac-Toe" cypher where the letters would be put into a grid and you used the grid shapes as keys to the letters, basically a substitution cypher. A variant could be made using some well known secret word or phrase that provides the key substitution. Subtitution cyphers can be broken using frequency analysis, which is the first thing you can check with the computer. If it were that easy they would have solved it by now.

    He seems to correct himself in the middle of writing (for instance see 3rd line of 2nd note, where he corrects the 'T' into an 'R', and on the first note where he corrects the first letter of the second line). This makes me think that it is more than a substitution cypher but something perhaps he counts from a certain letter to get the next one (it's easy to make mistakes counting if you are thinking of the thing you want to write), or that his key could easily miss from one letter to another. The difference from 'T' to 'R' is not very far away, so he could have miscounted in applying his algorithm.

    The fact that there seems to be some delimiting symbols ('SE' is a marker of some sort) means perhaps that the algorithm had some kind of break points where to reapply. If it was a simply one-to-one correspondence he probably wouldn't use two letters for substitution of a space. It might be something simple like removing all the letters but the first and last (SpacE), with spaces following the same rule.

    Also there are some lines that are very similar, for instance (3rd to last lines of 1st note):

    (cdnseprsednsde74ncbe)
    (prtseprseonrede75ncbe)

    They only differ in a few letters, namely CDN -> PRT; DNS -> ONR and the two numbers. If the message was an address or describing something with numbers (a car model year for instance) then there could be clues for trying certain transformations.

    The fact that the encryption doesn't seem to encode numbers might be significant. If it were a sort of rotating cypher, where each letter is substituted and then counting from the last letter the next substitution, normally you wouldn't include numbers as then it would be difficult to subsitute past 9 (at least for a boy who doesn't know modular arithmetic).

    The fact that he corrects himself so often in my opinion means that the encryption is something more complicated than a simple one way substitution. If he used it for a while there would be less errors (after awhile using substitution cyphers you almost automatically write v for e or whatever). It seems to be some kind of rotating count where errors are more prevalent.

    It would really be helpful to have more examples of his handwriting and to know more about his personal habits. Breaking passwords is also more often trying to guess what a person was thinking at the time than actually trying symbols (at least when a human tries to decypher them). I wish the FBI would release more of his writing, especially his unencrypted text as that would give hints on his spelling habits and level of education in general.

  137. Here there be madness Re:Link to the notes: by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Thank you for this link Moderator (189749)
    http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/march/cryptanalysis_032911/image/gallery

    Look at the E, note that it seems to be different in different places, the middle line is short, offset left, offset left and the right half is longer than the top or bottom, etc. Some E's look like a C with a middle line, some E's have a top line longer, some have the top line angled up, etc So with just that you can make a matrix of the differing E's and assign each an identifying symbol...

    Now about the R, notice the solid vertical left line in one, the dual left line forming a vertical oval in another, the top loop being tilted up or down, etc.

    Maddening isn't it?

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  138. Lots of parenthesis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's obviously LISP.

  139. Say... by Syberz · · Score: 1

    Isn't that the leaked HD-DVD key?

    --
    ~Syberz
  140. Pig Latin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With most of the words ending in 'E', it's either Pig Latin or perhaps Ubudubee.

  141. Perfect by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    I have no mod points and I must scream.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  142. Re:Here is an enlaged version by Kosi · · Score: 1

    Please ban parent poster for falling into one of the more obvious goatse traps and then even lamenting about it. If you haven't gotten it before, this is Slashdot!

  143. I might be off base here, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'm not convinced this is a real case. I did a prelim search of keywords within the time frame of the listed murder date until now. There are articles from that year listed, but looking at the sites in more depth will tell you that all of the references to "Ricky McCormick" are actually entries from the last couple of days. I also did a quick obit/article search from a couple of local papers, and nothing seems to come up. Obviously a simple 'net search in a case which was reported to have happened in 1999 isn't all that reliable - but I do find it interesting that someone took the time to write short stubs in websites that would be indexed as being from 1999, when in fact the entry dates are recent. This sounds to me more like a scenario conceived on the premise that people will ignore the vague background information and focus on the cipher itself.

    I would also like to point out that the victim is described as a "street-smart, high-school drop out" who was born around 1958. Assuming that he had been writing this mysterious code since he was "a child", that would all but eliminate the chances of any modern computing references being an influence on the code itself. This would be a straight cipher, my guess would be in English, with a possible Midwestern dialect influence on the overall outcome of the message (although I doubt it if this is a feeler-skills test, since that would require the breaker to not only crack the code but then search out 1960's Midwestern slang if any came up in the final product).

    If this is all the information to be given for this exercise, then you could probably start the topic search with things like directions, addresses, grocery/supply lists, drugs, proper nouns (names of people or landmarks), cars, job, etc - things that might have been stereotypically on the mind of a poor middle-aged Midwesterner in 1999. If I were going to take a crack this, I'd start with a brainstorm of generic keywords and phrases, and see if any of those plug into a pattern of some sort.

    Lastly, I found it interesting that in several of the stubs, a snail-mail address is listed if you want to send any info in directly. You'd think a simple email would suffice these days, but perhaps they're looking for people who also understand the value of discreetness? (That last extrapolation was pulled directly out of my ass, I know, but anyone cruising this as an opportunity for future employment might be happy for details, maybe?)
    Feel free to throw rotten fruit at me if I've jumped the shark at all...

  144. Re:maybe it's just gibberish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you read the article?

  145. Comic Book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably stupid. I know nothing about comic books.

    The phrase (194 WLD's NCBE) stuck out to me. Search on the internet for 194 World's and a Superman comic book comes up. N - Comic Book - E? Maybe some sort of Expo?

    If we knew something about the guy, his interests, his hobbies, it would be a heck of a lot easier to relate to it. They don't give you much to go on at all.

  146. 13 Year FBI Investigation Concludes. by scup · · Score: 1

    13 years and several million dollars later the FBI announced today it successfully deciphered the grocery shopping list of murder victim Ricky McCormick of St Louis, Missouri.

  147. Possible Solution by jerlensla · · Score: 0

    From yahoo news article comments:

    "I keep trying to post a reply explaining how I get this info but its taking too long to type and when someone replies it all gets erased, so I'll try to be quick and save what I write as I go along....also, I want to make clear that I dont care about getting credit, just solving this tragic event...finally, if you have never worked with children with autism, you may not understand the logic or find yourself frustrated
    I first noticed the hyphens on page 2 and quickly identified that as a set of numbers; phone number, address, or social..etc. Remember, Mr McCormick created this language as a child, and therefore you MUST think as a child:

    ALPNTE GLSE - SE ERTE
    VLSE MTSE - CTSE - WSE - FRTSE

    I started with breaking up CTSE-WSE-FRTSE

    I then associated numbers to letters: A=1, B=2, etc. (I have now noticed people posting this on the thread so others are doing the same thing now, so I feel even more confident now)

    Starting with CTSE
    C=3
    T=20
    S=19
    E=5
    *Keep 3 because it is the first number and smallest* T-S=1
    E-1=4 (See how I repeated that twice? That is the "law" of 2 and you'll see it again and again in this code, and its the reason he repeats letters twice in patterns.)

    WSE; W=23, S=19, E=5
    23-19=4 (the law of 2) add 4+4=8, then 19-5=14(the law of 2) 14/2=7
    again...(the law of 2) You get two 7's....the answer is 877!

    Finally, I did it a 3rd time and got 314-877-6400

    THEN I Googled the phone number (for the gentleman who accused me of being a farce) and found the Missouri Institute for Mental Health with that phone number...I quickly noticed the address as Arsenal Street and found those letters within the code:

    ALPNTE GLSE - SE ERTE
    VLSE MTSE = Arsenal Street (You use the same A twice b/c it is the first letter and the law of 2 remember?)

    NOTE: If you are a computer scientist or math teacher and are pulling your hair out right now, then you will now realize why the FBI is asking for help, right? You don't use logic, you use children-like rules, which is sort of how the mind of some people work, such as autism champs! LOL

    Finally, after you use those letters to get Arsenal Street....the remaining letters are:

    PGLSETEVLSEME = 5400 (using the same math formula for the phone number and always, the law of 2!)

    Coincidence? I get 5400 Arsenal Street 314-877-6400

    Now, here is the tricky part...the next paragraph then changes "laws"...its no longer the law of 2 and the alphabet...its a game where you find the letters before a repeating letter:

    Here is the next 3 lines:

    PNRTRSE ONDRSE WLD NCBE
    NWLD XLRCMSP NEWLD STS ME XL
    DULMT6TUNSE NCBEXL

    I immediately noticed the "N"s and wrote out all letters before the N's:

    PODEPUE

    NOW...I Googled PODEPUE...and got nothing...then I googled "podepue" and "missouri" and I got Susan Depue from the Missouri Institue for Mental Health. So for the gentleman who thought I had the answers and then Googled to make the answers fit (that doesnt even make logical sense does it?)...that's how I found her name in the pattern and confirmed with Google her association with the letter code....

    Finally, I didnt even have to keep doing that, just kept staring at the code and I got the medications being wrong, the "mg" letters you'll see (after separating the "bad" letters), you'll get a message about the wrong dosage (see XL? He's talking about medications because I've gone through this where pharmacies think XR instead of XL, or EL, and that could cause you a serious health problem). Get it?

    The paragraph below that seems to be a social security number or numerical code, the page titled "NOTES" is all incriminating evidence to point to the people responsible for hurting this man, the first page are directions, or a diary of where he travelled and what he did, and once all that is solved you'll get a story about the crime committed
    email: dannysantopiettro at yahoo "

    1. Re:Possible Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a moron. You are constantly changing the rules to suit your needs. First you subtract twice (and spout off about that being the "law of two"). Then you subtract and add (and spout off about THAT being the law of two). Are you taking your meds? Holmes, you are not. Oh, and shut the fuck up about the "law of two." you keep say that gibberish like it justifies your idiocy.

  148. Odd Indentation by Ancantus · · Score: 1

    What i find odd is that his shorter lines are always on the center of the page. Perhaps he started writing from the middle, then expanded outwards. Otherwise, he would have had to know exactly how long each of his lines were going to be before he wrote them. Really interesting stuff.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. -- Isaac Asimov
  149. crowdsourcing project site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So there are lots of great comments, some on the topic of generating ideas towards a solution and lots of good humour ones. However for the purposes of doing a project like this is there an appropriate free site that could act as a collection point for all of the good comments, observations, and ideas? Sort of a wiki but some sort of comment section like /. where comments are evaluated and voted up and down, etc. It just seems that on /. this story will: 1. disappear off the radar in a day or so or sooner; 2. fill up with funny, interesting, and other off topic (solution related) comments.

    For those of us that are interested in the idea of attempting to solve the problem (even if futile it is still interesting) having a crowdsourcing project site for this would be great. Thoughts? Suggestions?

  150. missing info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More info on case may also prove to be helpful, ie: map of area found, last known address, name of hospital & distance from, how long in hospital, staff names, prescriptions, friends... How can anyone solve this not knowing the victim at all? Good luck to all of you working on this!

  151. Observations by emo65170 · · Score: 1
    Looking at the 2 letters, it seems to me that these letters use some kind of phonetic shorthand emphasizing consonants.
    • Letters SE may relate to a word with a "sss" or "sz" sound
    • U may be short for "You"
    • R may be short for "Are" or "Or"
    • LSE may be short for "Else", "Lease", "Lies"
    • WLD may be short for "Would", "Wild", "Weld", "Walled", "Willed"
    • RLSE may be short for "Release", "Realize", "Rails"
    • NE may be short for "Any"
    • NCU may be short for "And see you"
    • PLSE may be short for "Please" or "Place"

    Line 7 in P1 seems to be something about someone demanding something, "Or Else" (money?)with instructions to follow in three parts.
    The "Notes" page seems to be directions to somewhere. Perhaps for the dropoff? 36 miles on 74 S, or S Parkway, or SE, 29 (Is that an exit?) I 73

    1. Re:Observations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron who thinks he is a genus. Spouts a lot of crap to make himself sound smart, but offers no real solution.

  152. Sounds like a cry for free labor. by kuzb · · Score: 1

    The FBI can do their own fucking work for a change.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    1. Re:Sounds like a cry for free labor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't the FBI try posting it on Amazon's Mechanical Turk with a 5 cent pay out.

  153. Well, 1/26th of them do. by ReedYoung · · Score: 1

    Nearly every letter ends in E.

    --
    "I can't imagine how things could get any worse!" (some guy) "That could just be failure of imaginatioÂn on your p
  154. I just lost interest. by ReedYoung · · Score: 1

    There is no reward being offered, just the knowledge that you may be solving an intriguing murder mystery, the FBI stated.

    --
    "I can't imagine how things could get any worse!" (some guy) "That could just be failure of imaginatioÂn on your p
  155. Looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a substitution cypher... Noting that WLD is both used frequently throughout both messages and appears to be used possessive as well as it is found with an apostrophe once throughout note 1, and found other places without said apostrophe.

    Not sure that the brackets have any meaning other than an emphasis, they appear to be used as an enclosure, not appearing to be indicative of replacing anything else.

    Interesting to note that PRSE and NCBE are common throughout, and WLD NCBE appear to be paired in both notes. I wouldn't be surprised if these notes are related via topic.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the base is set off of a simple child's toy, such as a cracker jack toy decoder and a few letters mixed up from the original as years went by, paired with some possible shorthand and spelling errs...

    Would be nice to have an idea how his speech patterns were.

  156. FBI is hiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMO, this article is about scouting for new cryptoanalysis talent at the FBI.
    The article is even kind enough to provide the address to apply to.
    Remember to show all your work.

  157. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it has a look to it like the pages in Neues Archive des criminalrechts

  158. 17 USC 1201(e) by tepples · · Score: 1

    There is a statutory exception for circumventions performed in the course of an investigation by a bona fide law enforcement agency. See 17 USC 1201(e). I imagine that anyone participating in this competition would be deemed "a person acting pursuant to a contract with the United States", though I'd check with the FBI first to make sure such a contract is in place.

  159. it's his mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT says:

    REMEMBER THE MILK

  160. I like codes *dumb grin* by Cazekiel · · Score: 1

    This doesn't look like a cryptogram/code, more like his own language; a mix-up of words. I swear I see 'first', 'second' and 'third' in one note. Looks like he scrambles words while replacing a few when it's a related group of words.

    --
    You want to know how to help your kids? LEAVE THEM THE F*&K ALONE. --George Carlin
  161. Other Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously these letters have nothing to do with the murder if they were wrote 3 days befor his death then what the heck does it have to do with the killer what he knew he was gonna be killed and who done it i don't think so i think it's about getting the killer to come forward and start a forum with him to eventually catch him and if it works great.I think they should close the book Open it again (without the letters) and start over from the beginnig and this time don't worry about the letters ya never know