Slashdot Mirror


Further Updates On Terrorist Attack

Further news of the events going on around the world following the attacks earlier today on New York and Washington. To follow things even more closely, you are encouraged to join realtime CNN coverage in channel #cnn_newsfeed on irc.idlenet.org. (Doubtless there are other similar IRC and IM feeds going on -- please post them in comments.) In addition to the news below, note that CNN has reported that multiple suspects were arrested with a van loaded with explosives in the vicinity of New York's George Washington Bridge. Update: 09/12 04:29 AM GMT by T : Many readers have reported that the van in question was found not to contain explosives, though its occupants were held for questioning. And Giacomo DiGrigoli, international product manager at PayPal.com, wrote with word of a donation fund on the PayPal website where folks can make donations to the American Red Cross.

Contradicting earlier reports, reader Adam Brookman writes: "I can guarantee that no car bomb went off in front of the State Dept. in DC. My father is part of the critical personel at State dept. When I read that I called him. He said he heard the same thing and he also heard that the building was hit by a plane, but neither were true."

Worth reading is this analysis of the motives and some possible suspects in today's violence, at Jane's International Security News. They've picked three plausible attackers. Motive aside, Jack Bryar has a convincing take on who is really most hurt by the attacks today.

babyruth writes: "amazon.com has a Red Cross Relief fund set up on their homepage, where you can contribute online. Only several hundred have contributed so far, let the power of /. help!" Iridium provides a link straight to the donations page, noting that "All standard fees are waived -- all proceeds go directly to the Red Cross." Of course, the Red Cross is -still- in desperate need of blood. If you can donate, please call 1-800-HELP-NOW to find the donation center nearest to you.

iggyflashbulb writes: "CNN reports some oddball group not associated with bin Laden is attacking Kabul at night. Are they taking advantage of the NY situation or did they create it?"

An anonymous reader writes: "Following the sad (and outrageous) mess of these terrorist attacks, results are already starting to impact the country. When a RSM failed on one of our 5500 Ciscos, we recieved the following notice

'Due to a national emergency completion of your case, delivery of your parts or engineer will be delayed until further notice. Several areas of the country have restricted transportation and currently no air traffic is available. Cisco will notify you as soon a we are able to dispatch your order.'

There doesn't seem to any information on Cisco's site."

CERT is in action as well: SilentTone writes: "Ween Hall at Carnegie-Mellon University was evacuated today so the the Computer Emergency Response Team could go into action."

Many readers have been assembling mirrors for the overloaded news sites of the world. Jon Anhold writes: "I've compiled more photos and what not, mirrored many of the sites around to help the load. They're available here: http://ziggy.dreamland.net/wtc/"

Owen Bossola writes: "This is a simple webpage I put up with shots I took all day of the World Trade Center. I go to school across the river at Stevens Institute of Technology and I watched the whole thing from campus. It is absolutely nuts, I'm looking out my window and for the first time, downtown NYC is dark, and there aren't two large buildings gleaming back at me."

rhyder writes: "I was last in the World Trade Center and the attached World Financial Center on Saturday evening. Many people I know work in those buildings, even more live and work in the shadow of those 2 towers.

From the Port Authority of NY and NJ:

  1. The Port Authority
  2. Trade Center Concourse Level Map
  3. Trade Center Plaza Level Map
  4. Trade Center Complex Overview
  5. Area Map showing southern tip of Manhattan and the Trade Center location."
An Anonymous Coward seeks more information about an interview that Washington area readers may be able to provide: He writes: "Fox News channel 5 (local around 6:30ish E.S.T) this evening had an interview with a witness about what he saw at the Pentagon the moment of impact. His interview was the basic 'I was in my car looked to my side..blah blah' but then he said something totally unexpected. He observed a second airplane immediately swing behind the first in a follow like manner and swoop down on the Pentagon only to pull up at the last second, out of the smoke cloud, and fly away. His description of the plane was pretty detailed, saying it was propeller-driven ... He stated everyone around him who were also outside their cars saw the SECOND Airplane following the first and it was also going in."

Anyone else able to confirm this rumor?

Jon Bishop asks: "Why Today? Why did this attack happen on September 11, 2001. Here is a guess. I played with the date commonly used for programming. YYYYMMDD returns 20010911. 911...in 2001. Is this play on numbers intentional or coincidence?" It may be significant that the anniversary of a Congressional resolution "favoring a Jewish homeland in Palestine" falls on this date. Then again, if you go back a century or two, you may find a lot of anniversaries that seem just as significant.

Carl Merritt writes: "Since many sites seem to be creaking under the load today I've dumped every relevant picture and video I can find onto my server, please feel free to suck up some of my unused bandwidth with downloads or links: http://www.binaryvista.com/WTC/ I'll probably leave it up for a couple weeks, or until CNN asks me to remove their pictures ;-)."

An Anonymous Coward writes "I just want to remind everyone that there is still active air cover over at least Chicago. A tanker is orbiting O'Hare and at least what appear to be two F-15s are making the rounds. If you would like more information including frequencies I suggest subscribing to the CARMA mailing list at QTH.net for up to date monitoring information."

Disheartening news from Egypt: soulflakes points to this story of some Egyptians celebrating the attacks today. Here's a BBC piece which indicates the feeling is shared in some other African countries. This doesn't mean that all or most people in any country feel the same way.

yoda389 writes: "I'm getting reports from friends that gas prices are jumping to as much as $5.00 a gallon. There are huge lines at all gas stations here in my hometown someplace in Wisconsin." And ikohl1 writes: "A friend just informed me of how gas prices were raised to $3.50 in a town near where i live. I didn't believe him at first but I found this article on Yahoo."

Gas prices may fluctuate in the short term, but in the long haul, effects on exports of goods physical and abstract may be affected just as drastically: elliotj writes: "MSNBC has a Steven Levy opinion piece on the possible implications of today's attack on America and governmental policy on encryption export restrictions. Personally, I think we need to determine exactly what happened before blaming physical or electronic security measures for a role in the tragedy. I heard the planes were hi-jacked with knives ... that doesn't sound very high-tech or a sign of significant security failings to me. It is the act itself that is so shocking and sickening."

1,093 comments

  1. The van by ottffssent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The van contained no explosives, but the three people involved have been detained for questioning.

    1. Re:The van by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This report has been dismissed by some other sources.

      An up-to-the-minute running report on the whole story can be found on
      7amNews.com -- it's been going since 9am this morning and is pretty concise for those with limited time.


      Another suggestion worth a look is that offered part way down
      this page which suggests that Microsoft's Flight Simulator might be the new terrorist training tool.

    2. Re:The van by Heph_Smith · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thats just what _THEY_ want you to think :P

    3. Re:The van by Mashiara · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Another suggestion worth a look is that offered part way down
      this page [aardvark.co.nz] which suggests that Microsoft's Flight Simulator might be the new terrorist training tool.

      ----
      Bullshit, while it might not require specific type training for the model of the jet it would take experience in flying a large jet to fly one into a building (according to aviation experts back here in europe).

      Fact is that the original pilots did not crash the planes, they would not do it when they are going to die anyways they will rather dump the fuel and crash to the water, then at least some of the passengers would have a chance of surviving and the casualities in WTC would be avoided.

      As for hijacking a plane, it is and will always be doable (the surity measures required to stop determined and smart hijacker would be a commercial disaster, there would not be enough passengers), normally the hijackers just have less drastic agendas and when the plane lands into a western airstrip it can be owned quickly (Germans have special force that can secure 747 in less than 17 seconds [minor hostage casualities allowed, the plane however will propably not fly again])

    4. Re:The van by Faies · · Score: 2, Informative
      The van contained no explosives, but the three people involved have been detained for questioning.

      If you are wondering what the original reason for detaininment was, ABC reported that the three men in custody were seen celebrating upon viewing the initial explosions. Several bystanders then gave information to the police.

    5. Re:The van by Bzk · · Score: 1

      ABC reported that the three men in custody were seen celebrating upon viewing the initial explosions. Several bystanders then gave information to the police.

      Do you think that terrosists that smart and that well-organized to plan something as huge, would be resting near Manhattan and celebrating in front of people ?
      It must just be some stupid people but I don't think we can do anything against them.

    6. Re:The van by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "that smart and that well-organized"

      You will need:
      1 or 2 people per plane.
      A knife or gun each.

      Errrr, thats it.

      America has many enemies. Why wouldnt they celebrate? If you were in Iraq during the bombing, surely you`re not suggesting you`d be walking around with a long face on? Get over it. The only thing you can really do, apart from an israeli style tit-for-tat `rapid response`, which doesnt seem to be exactly calming the situation down, is to find out why people are so mad at America that they are prepared to kill themselves.

    7. Re:The van by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.. as a sikh, I can tell you to take your hindu rashtra and fuck yourself in the ass with it.

    8. Re:The van by garethwi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to a pilot on BBC news yesterday evening, once one of these planes is up in the air, they are very easy to fly. He said the most likely scenario is that they go tthe pilot to fly to New York, killed him, and then flew into the World Trade Centre.

    9. Re:The van by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      If you're a single guy on a plane with a knife, i can tell you that it is entirely impossible to hijack an airplane.

      In this case, they would need guns, a good enough plan to be able to get into the cockpit and get a gun pointed at the pilot before he can radio out "We are being hijacked", and a skilled enough airplane pilot to take over the plane and fly it into the side of a building.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    10. Re:The van by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. CmdrTaco the foreign policy analyst. Scary.

    11. Re:The van by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      skilled enough airplane pilot to take over the plane and fly it into the side of a building.

      Why do people keep talking about the skill needed to fly a plane into a building?

      99% of pilot training is learning how not to crash, how to navigate, how to obey regulations, etc. When you relax all those kind of constraints, what's left is pretty basic and intuitive.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    12. Re:The van by pallex · · Score: 1

      "If you're a single guy on a plane with a knife, i can tell you that it is entirely impossible to hijack an airplane."

      Ok, suppose you were married.

    13. Re:The van by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Find out why they are so mad and then do what?!"

      Read up on the last 50 odd years of history. Look up:
      Vietnam
      Oliver North/contras/nicaragua

      Suprised civilians are getting hurt? Look up:
      Dresden
      Nagasaki
      Hiroshima.

      Also:
      Bhopal, IMF, Libya, framing obviously wrong people over the Lockerbie bomb...

      "then do what"

      Vote for a non-idiot. No point sitting around laughing at Bush`s grammar. He has policies which piss off a lot of people. If you dont want those people pissed off, then you shouldnt have him in charge of the country.

    14. Re:The van by phrostie · · Score: 1

      for every new security measure thye will find a way around it. When are they going to start requiring training of pilots to fight terrorist onboard their aircraft.

      by the way they are pushing Carnivore again. I guess they are wanting to watch us instead of the terrorist armed with boxcutters.

    15. Re:The van by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      You are probably right about the planes not being too hard to fly... In a straight line, or under auto pilot. But, to turn a jumbo jet, and accurately aim it at a target is probably very difficult.

    16. Re:The van by Moofie · · Score: 2

      This illustrates an interesting point, though. Think about what would happen if I were celebrating in the streets of Kabul last night, rejoicing at the Northern Alliance's attacks on the city. Do you think I'd just be questioned by police and released? What about if I did the same thing in Iraq? Or Libya?

      The point is that even in on a terribly dark day, the American people tolerate dissention in a way that is almost unparalleled. These terrorists tried to break our spirits and reduce us to their level.

      They failed. And they will continue to fail. And soon, they will pay handsomely for their folly.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    17. Re:The van by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0

      Is that why you posted as an Anonymous Coward, because you are too cowardly to own up to your remarks. What kind of people are we looking at when a group of people commits these acts of terror then has the indecency to say something like this. Your whole race of people is crazy. Osama Bin Laden proclaimed a holy war against Americans, and for the killing of Americans and Jews. That's completely unfounded, we (Americans) did nothing to the Arab people, I guess this is some personal vendetta he has against us. Then he tried to use a carbomb in the basement of the WTC, that was unsuccessful. Other attacks proceeded, then the whole fiasco yesterday, destroying the 2 WTC towers and part of the Pentagon. All in all, killing around 30,000, and for what? The Japanese tried doing this 50 years ago, they attacked a little place called Pearl Harbor. The Japanese quickly found out that the US is not to be fucked with. I guess the Arab people need to find out the same lesson.

      What the disgusting thing about all this is the news footage of Arab people, adults and children dancing in the streets while thousands and thousands other humans die, while giving the children candy. That fact in and of itself makes the Arab people to me, all crazy.

      I don't know what Bin Laden was trying to prove, flying a couple planes into country with the buildings of the most intelligent and sophisticated military and government. I guess he has a death wish.

    18. Re:The van by connorbd · · Score: 2

      Read some history yourself. Half of us had no say in the matter and the truth is that nobody really knows for certain who won because the margin of victory is just so much statistical noise....

      /Brian

    19. Re:The van by The+Terminator · · Score: 1

      According to an interview with Mr. Fongern, head of 'Vereinigung Cockpit' the german Trade Union of Airline Pilots ('Lufthansa', 'German British Airways' and others) it is possible to fly a big plane precisely into targets like the WTC and the Pentagon when you have the knowledge of an instrument flight rating. If you spend some 5000$ you can easily get access to a simulator for every major plane type. Most Airlines in the world who operate them do offer it. That are those types of simulators which are used by the airlines to practice behavior in extraordinary situations which can not be practiced with real planes. For the navigational training it is sufficient to get the education for PPL.
      The final approach you can practice on MS-FS with a very realistic cockpit of the used planes.

  2. CNN newsfeed closed down. by jallen02 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The CNN news feed will be open again at 8AM ET. It just shut off a few minutes ago.

    Jeremy

    1. Re:CNN newsfeed closed down. by Turnesol · · Score: 2, Informative

      CNN LIVE audio feed


      A sound feed for all those people who dont have access to CNN



      Shoutcast Cluster

      --
      .:work is a selfinflicted handicap:.
    2. Re:CNN newsfeed closed down. by zpengo · · Score: 2

      Some information about the amateur journalism taking place during all this can be found here. (Yes, that's the same website that's in my profile.)

      --


      Got Rhinos?
    3. Re:CNN newsfeed closed down. by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Wow, so true. Just thought about that. This site is true. While many things were not ery clear we had people in the office IM'ing people right across the road from the WTC buildings they knew saying, "Oh no I just saw someone jump from the top of the building", while we all sit around talking about it in disbelief. It was so much more real hearing it from a real person. I felt much more connected throughout the day communicating on /., AIM, and with my co-workers than ever did with CNN.

      Truly scary.

      Jeremy

    4. Re:CNN newsfeed closed down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop Press:

      12/09/01 - 13:30 BST

      The specially-reconvened Warren Commission have concluded that the attacks were
      carried out by "...a single gunman, acting alone ..."

  3. Fox News' reasons for Sept. 11 by Therin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34190,00.htm l

    September Anniversary of Several Past Attacks, Events
    Tuesday, September 11, 2001

    September marks the anniversary of several noted political events and terrorist attacks.

    On Sept. 11, 1922, a British mandate was proclaimed in Palestine, despite Arab protests. It lasted until 1948, after the United Nations authorized a partition of the territory and the state of Israel was established.

    On Sept. 6, 1970, three planes from TWA, Swissair and BOAC carrying more than 400 hostages were hijacked and ordered to the Jordanian airport by the PFLP, in what is known as "Skyjack Sunday." Another terrorist team tried to hijack an El Al Boeing over London but security staff foiled the attempt and captured one of the hijackers, Leila Khalid, alive. The German, Swiss and British Governments all agreed to the PFLP's demands and released a number of terrorists, including Khalid, held in their jails.

    On Sept. 11, 1972, the troubled Munich Summer Olympics, also remembered as "the Olympics of Terror," ended. For 21 hours under live television cameras,hooded gunmen of the Palestinian faction "Black September" held Israeli athletes hostage, killing 11 of them duringa botched getaway and airport firefight with German antiterrorism squads.

    On Sept. 28, 2000, the eve of Rosh Hashanah (the Jewish New Year), Ariel Sharon, then- leader of the opposition right-wing Likud party, visited the Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem. Sharon, accompanied by an entourage of security officers, claimed he was exercising his right to visit the Mount, but his visit angered many Arabs, both Israeli and Palestinian. The day after the visit saw the beginning of what is known as the Al-Aqsa Intifada.

    --
    John 17:20
    1. Re:Fox News' reasons for Sept. 11 by sconeu · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't forget the Camp David Accords in 1977.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Fox News' reasons for Sept. 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score: 3, Interesting?

      I think that with thousands of years of recorded history from different cultures, plus dozens of holidays in different religions and cultures, we can always find SOME anniversary of something or another....

      Really, I don't think that foreign terrorists/whomever made up an elaborate plan based off of an anniversary (especially "9-11?") - they made their own history on this date.

    3. Re:Fox News' reasons for Sept. 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see what else happened on September 11:

      1609 Henry Hudson discovers Manhattan island
      1773 Benjamin Franklin writes "There never was a good war or bad peace."

    4. Re:Fox News' reasons for Sept. 11 by PD · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pentagon ground was broken in 1941.

      Today is International World Peace day.

    5. Re:Fox News' reasons for Sept. 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out 11 Sept 1996, five years ago. The Taleban (formed the previous year also in September) had their first major victory, capturing Jahalabad on the Afghanistan/Pakistan border. Later (27th) they captured the capital Kabul.

      Could this be some present from OBL to his hosts?

    6. Re:Fox News' reasons for Sept. 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Sept. 11, 2001, John Howard (Australian Prime Minister) gives press conference to Australian media et. al. in Washington hotel, 3km away from the Pentagon (aka the Quadrangle) at the time the Pentagon was hit.

  4. No Explosives by matthewg · · Score: 2, Redundant

    There were no explosives in the van.

  5. E-word by Asgard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Aha! Someone finally said the E-word. Will we nowmove to ban all civilian encryption?

    1. Re:E-word by jallen02 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No we can't. We must fight this TOOTH AND NAIL. We can't change our (americans) lives because of the terrorist attack. If we lose even the slightest amount of freedom the terrorists have WON.

      We must fight the good fight and not let people in congress pass new laws. "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.".

      It is a tragic and sad thing that has happened. This is an attack on humanity and civilization and the world as a whole, especially americans tne symbol of freedom and capitalism CANNOT bend, we cannot break, we cannot even flex.

      Will I still fly American Airlines? Yep. I always have and always will.

      I am not going to change my ways of exercising my freedoms for terroists, not now, not ever.

      I think something like this should give everyone new perspective, but I don't think new laws will protect us at all. Just take away our freedoms and let the terrorists win.

      Jeremy

    2. Re:E-word by nhavar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And exactly what freedoms are we talking about giving up? Right to privacy - you'll still have it, when your at home... in private. Right to free speech, you'll still have it. Right to congregate, right to bare arms, right to freedom of religion... exactly which right is it that you think you might lose from this? No matter what laws they pass I don't believe that I'm losing any rights afforded to me by the current constitution so what constitution are you going by? Are you afraid that you might be detained at an airport for a more thorough search, would that be an inconvenience? Yes. But there is no greater inconvenience than death.

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    3. Re:E-word by jallen02 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is more than just rights lost now. It starts a trend, it sets a mindset. It changes pressures and ploys people will use to pass oppresive measures. Don't underestimate the ways people will use this to their advantage. For one I can see bubbling to gun control and several other things. Maybe the chatter will die down but I can see many opportunity seekers trying to "protect" america from things like "guns, terrorists, etc", I mean Hey whats the difference?

      It happens. There are already people whop preach the "restrict encryption use" so that "evil people" can't "secretly" communicate using encryption. Come on laws like the DMCA pass in peacetime! This is still peacetime but people are in a state of shock and sadness and a need to "fix" what is now "broken". People with an agenda will be glad to use anything to their advantage and no I don't think im over-reacting :(

      Jeremy

    4. Re:E-word by duffbeer · · Score: 1

      I agree completely, we need to continue to live our American lives. Go to work, focus as best you can on our professions. I understand MLB cancelling their games today, but barring security threats in the coming days college and pro football should continue. Yes, hang the flags at half mast, say a prayer or give a moment of silence before the games, but continue in our public American traditions, as trite as they may be. Also, I believe it was a mistake to cancel the Emmys on this coming Sunday night. All this barring credible direct threats, of course.

      We should do everything we can to show that terrorist attacks will have the smallest impact possible, even on our most simple activities.

      --
      "This wound is beyond my ability to heal. We need Elvis medicine!"
    5. Re:E-word by Rozpoo · · Score: 1

      Exactly right, we must not run in fear, but rather find those responsible. If it is found that bin laden was behind it, there is no need to have any more American lives lost going after him. Just the President coming on national television with a monitor next to him with a picture of a missle silo in Colorado saying "We are bringing you this live, Afghanistan I am not expert on this type of stuff, but they tell me after 15 minutes, we can no longer disarm these nukes that will be launched at you, and will hit your country in 20 minutes. So you better get ta crackin on finding him, because the way I see it, you dont have much time." I am sure something to this effect would produce results...effective results is a different story.

    6. Re:E-word by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Find those responsible?

      Sure if you feel the need to have revenge. It solves nothin gbut, tends to make people feel better.

      How about dropping support for Isereal and the little pupet dictatorships we have setup in the Middle east?

      How about not being complicit any further in the atrocities commited against the palestiniens?

      Nah... fuck that. They are just sand niggers anyway. Lets just find the evil people who hurt us and hurt them back. Thats garaunteed to solve the problem.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    7. Re:E-word by Zeno_1 · · Score: 1

      How about the right to think that getting on a jetliner will be safe?

      What about the right to think that when I go to work today in a 100 story building, will it get hit by a jetliner?

      How about the right to feel save driving down the road, or taking your kids to the park.

      These are not 'rights' given to us by any constitution or anything like that, they are the rights of humanity I guess you could say. I believe this is what he was referring to..

      Zeno

      (April 16, 1953)
      Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the clouds of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron.
      Dwight D. Eisenhower

    8. Re:E-word by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      I am saying, right now the way our lives are lived, if that changes as a whole we have all lost something. If I am not quite sure what you mean by the rights you have mentioned that we currently have in some way affected these terrorists and their ability to cause this.

      I am guessing that by engineering guns, and rockets, we are taking away from people. Yes that is true but it is a sad reality.

      If we EVER stop doing that, then only the terrorists will have the guns and the and bombs. While I have merely had rights taken away from me. Not only my right to own a gun but also the very rights you mention, the rights to feel save.

      IT is a sad fact of reality and it is purely idealism if you believe that eradicating gun sales will erdaicate the majority of gun problems. We will become a more fearful society overall I believe.

      Jeremy

    9. Re:E-word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but now you're also more willing to accept your OWN government taking away your freedom.

      More monitoring. More police. More FBI, more CIA, more secrets from its own people. More "curfews" (ahem, martial law). More reasons to play international police man.

      Guess what? American goverment got exactly what it wants. You're scared, and more paranoid. You'll put up with more intrusion in to your life.

  6. A lesson to be learned from this... by Patrick+Bateman · · Score: 0
    Certainly the perpetrators must be punished, but the US Gov't does so much to make enemies of the rest of the world, today's attacks should not be a surprise. The UN and the Western World decided to create an artificial state in Palestine, and billions of US dollars flow into an oppresive regime to suppress the native Palestinians.

    --

    Thank you.

    1. Re:A lesson to be learned from this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Certainly the perpetrators must be punished, but the US Gov't does so much to make enemies of the rest of the world, today's attacks should not be a surprise.



      Please stop with the facetious "but the US earned it" comments. Any large-scale power acts in its own self interest. That is just as true today as it was 2000+ years ago when Rome sowed the remains of Carthage, their mortal enemy, with salt. Smaller groups act in their self interest as well - the "recent unpleasantness" in Zimbabwe over land seizures is an excellent case in point. That my self interest may not be your self interest is an entirely normal state of affairs - most affairs of state are zero-sum games. Despite the complaints from around the world about American hegemonism, most of those counries who now use the UN as a forum to complain regularly and bitterly, would not have had access to such a venue if it were not for American desires. The League of Nations was largely an American creation, and the UN was based on the same principles, shoved down the throats of unwilling and relatively ungrateful Europeans.



      Or is this the old "blame the victim" game, legitimized because the victim happens to be big? Does that mean that my 5'2" wife should go out and start pistol-whipping NFL linebackers? They're bigger, meaner, and nastier, so they must have it coming.

      The UN and the Western World decided to create an artificial state in Palestine,



      As opposed to what? The rump state left behind when the Ottoman Empire fell apart? Remember - the Ottoman Empire held all of the Mid-East until the end of WW1. Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, all of the Saudi peninsula states - all of these countries were born on the ashes of the Ottoman Empire. Greece didn't get its freedom all that much earier, either. Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Albania, Austria, and most of Southeastern Europe all come from similar bastard progeny - the old Austro-Hungarian empire. What about Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Finland - all formerly parts of the Russian Empire, freed by the fall of the Tsars. Are they just as illegitimate?



      and billions of US dollars flow into an oppresive regime to suppress the native Palestinians.


      Native? Really? I thought they arrived after the Romans pushed the Jews out, in about 100 AD. If you want to play the "prior posession" game, Palestinians are relative latecomers. Prior art, in this case, goes to the Jews, whether you like it or not. You can use the argument that the Jews are returning, and that the Palestinians have 1800 years of posession, but if that's the case, then you might as well turn around and tell every Native American that they don't have a legitimate claim either - whether the time is 50, 100, 200, or 1800 years doesn't really make a difference, it's whoever was second to last, by your logic.



      What am I saying here? Review ALL of the facts before you make such sweeping statements. Apply your arguments evenhandedly - the law applies to all, not just to some.



      This is a nation-state-level act of war. The deliberate, pre-meditated murder of >10,000 individuals. The destruction of $billions of personnal property. IMHO, once the perpetrator(s) behind this are determined, whichever government is harboring them and their operation should be requested to hand them and their operation over, all giftwrapped with pretty bows, for criminal prosecution. Failure to do so would demonstrate conspiracy after the fact by the national government in an act of war. My personal choice would be to see those responsible charged, in criminal court in the district of Manhattan, state of New York, with 10,000 1st degree murder charges. Presuming they are found guilty, I would like to see them serve those sentances consecutively. I would like to see _every single individual_ in the sponsoring organizations similarly arrested and charged with 10,000 counts of conspiracy to commit murder.

    2. Re:A lesson to be learned from this... by Spike_/\_ · · Score: 1

      I have two problems with what you say.
      First, your argument does not depend on the particulars of US actions in the Middle East, so it seems to justify *any* action the US government takes, however evil or misguided. I'm not a citizen of that US and will never willingly be one.
      2. Suppose these terrorists had known *in advance* that they would be tracked down and executed by the US. Would they still have done it? Hmm - let's think... So you're going to punish them by subjecting them to *one of their own accepted mission parameters*. Scary. That should really deter them next time. I think to punish these people you have to hurt what they value most - and that certainly isn't their lives.

    3. Re:A lesson to be learned from this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Native? Really? I thought they arrived after the Romans pushed the Jews out, in about 100 AD. If you want to play the "prior posession" game, Palestinians are relative latecomers. Prior art, in this case, goes to the Jews, whether you like it or not. You can use the argument that the Jews are returning, and that the Palestinians have 1800 years of posession, but if that's the case, then you might as well turn around and tell every Native American that they don't have a legitimate claim either - whether the time is 50, 100, 200, or 1800 years doesn't really make a difference, it's whoever was second to last, by your logic.

      Well, according to your precious Bible, Palestine was conquered by the Jews from it's native Philisteans (same word as Palestinian, you know), so your logic fails in this case anyway. And if every people driven from their land should be given the opportunity to reclaim it after ~2000 years (especially by such methods of arrogance as the Israeli) then we would live in a very different and chaotic world.

      Fact is - the Jews had no moral right whatsoever to claim the land of the Palestinians, since they had been in Palestine for two millennia - a longer period of time, actually, than he Jews ever were. Should they have been given any land after WWII it should have been part of Germany, perhaps Silesia, which was brutally ethnically cleansed from Germans anyway.

    4. Re:A lesson to be learned from this... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      The current day palastinians are arabs. The philistines mentioned in the bible were not. The current day palastinians have no better claim than any other group in the world. They never controlled that land as a single nation. Since the fall of the 2nd Jewish Temple, that land was either directly controlled by the Romans, Turks(Ottomans) or Britain. Never has that land been under control of an Arab government. The Arabs control 99% of the Middle East land mass. Why do the palastinians (which are arabs) have a right to the last 1%?

    5. Re:A lesson to be learned from this... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      No claim... except currently living there.

      They live there now, under the thumb of an opressive regieme (Isreal), which has prevented
      them from making any sort of forwards progress in years. Not to mention occasionally killing some of them.

      > The Arabs control 99% of the Middle East land
      > mass. Why do the palastinians (which are
      > arabs) have a right to the last 1%?

      Because they live there maybe? Perhaps because
      they have been living there? What gives the jews
      any right to come in and take that last 1% from
      them, just because they control 99% of the land mass.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  7. Remember by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

    I made a web site button that I'm using on sites I admin. I encourage everyone else to either use this one or make their own or something.

    1. Re:Remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, you sandal wearing hippy.

    2. Re:Remember by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I guess I should go out and get me some sandals then. Oh, and I'll have to start doing drugs and wearing peace symbols I suppose. And a VW van of course (to do all my lovin' in).

      Wait a second.. I'd have to change everything about me to become a "sandal wearing hippy". Nevermind. You must have the wrong guy.

  8. thoughts by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was on top of that building two weeks ago. I got the pictures that I took there yesterday. I can't really bring myself to open the package again. I don't think it has really sunk in for me yet. It all seemed so big, larger than life when I was standing there looking up at it and then when I was at the top staring down. I can't believe that the place is gone. I'm thinking of the French kid that took my picture in front of the rest of the Manhattan skyline. I'm angry, but I think I'm too shaken up to be as angry as I will be later.

    I'm not a religous person, but God be with the victims and protect the rescue workers as they do their best. I don't think I will ever forget the images of those people jumping from the top floors. I won't sleep well tonight.

    God bless you all.

    1. Re:thoughts by sporty · · Score: 1
      I share your sentimates (s?). My best friend worked in there until last year. Another best friend works across the street, near debris. I was just there saturday and tuesday of last week.


      The most dishartning came from a friend: Someone from WTC 2 was on the phone with a friend outside of manhattan (NYC != Manhattan). The end of the conversation was escentially, "A plane just went through WTC 1" and the line went dead. I don't know if she survived, but evacuations did start when the first building was on fire. My he

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  9. Dunno if this is faked but scary by Ryokos_boytoy · · Score: 0

    http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&frame=right& th=54ab4d241c34e0cc&seekm=3b8fd177%40monitor.lanse t.com

    Very prophetic and scary. If the dates weren't faked, it all works out.

    --


    If you don't say anything, you won't be called on to repeat it. -- Calvin Coolidge
    1. Re:Dunno if this is faked but scary by Ryokos_boytoy · · Score: 1

      Here is group at google

      I posted the link. Here's where you can get the pdf
      terrorist.pdf

      --


      If you don't say anything, you won't be called on to repeat it. -- Calvin Coolidge
    2. Re:Dunno if this is faked but scary by CodingFiend · · Score: 1

      On 9/4 he said in 7 days he was going away never to return. 9/4 + 7 = 9/11.

      --


      And that's my $0.32 (adjusted for inflation).
  10. oh boy.... read this: by Telek · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb" , "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning"

    - Nostradamus 1654

    City of God = NYC
    Two Brothers = WTC
    Fortress = Pentagon
    Great Leader = G.Bush
    Big City = NYC

    (thanks to Reality to point this out to me)

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
  11. Police scanners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any shoutcast mirrors for NY scanners?

    1. Re:Police scanners? by PenguinRadio · · Score: 1

      There was one earlier. I made a link at http://www.penguinradio.com/nontraditional/scanner s/

  12. More on air cover in DC by PenguinRadio · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) DC Special Operations Police Channel is streamed at http://www.penguinradio.com/

    2) This is a posting from the DC Police Scanner mailing list (qth.net). Very interesting on air cover over DC.
    ---
    FW:------
    --
    All,

    These are my own observations based only on my hand notes taken at the time.

    I started listening to the events around 1030 EDT. The Trade Towers and the
    Pentagon had already been attacked. By that time there was not a peep of
    civil air traffic in the area. One of the first things I heard was Andrews
    tower announcing on their VHF & UHF freqs that their airspace was closed and
    that all intruders would be shot down. That certainly put an exclamation
    point on what I was to hear for the rest of the day.

    Throughout the day the Regan National controller (125.65) was the overall
    controlling authority for the DC area. He authorized all departures and
    entries into the Class B airspace. That role still remains as of 2200 EDT.

    As of 2100 EDT Andrews is starting to return to normal with Airevacs and some
    helos and VIP jets starting to fly in.

    Fighters:

    By 1030 there were two flights of DC ANG F-16s (Wild & Caps) up in Combat
    Air Patrol (CAP). At that time there were news reports of another, missing
    airliner, so I assume the F-16s were up protecting the DC area from that
    possibility. Soon these F-16s were joined by three more F-16s from Langley,
    North Dakota ANG aircraft normally deployed to Langley in an air defense
    mode. The DC ANG flight leader assumed the role as CAP commander trying to
    keep all the aircraft straight. DC ANG F-16s assumed control the airspace
    below 23,000 ft and the Langley F-16s and alter, F-15s took the airspace
    above that.

    After about an hour, two Langley F-15s (First) joined the CAP and took up
    position high above the area. They were also joined by some F-18s up from
    Oceana. This caused some problems as far as refueling was concerned. The
    KC-10s, who had the drogue capability, were ready to RTB and were out of
    fuel. One of the KC-10s (Team 23) took it upon himself to set up to refuel
    his aircraft from the available KC-135 (Tazz) so that he would be in a
    position to refuel both the boom aircraft (F-16s & F-15s) and the drogue guys
    (F-18s).

    In the early afternoon, a flight of two VA ANG F-16s (Fury) came up to the DC
    area to join the CAP group. The CAP commander later sent them back to the
    Richmond area because there were too many aircraft in the DC area. After
    about 30 minutes the VA ANG guys decided to end their CAP around Richmond and
    RTB'ed to Harry Byrd International.

    Tankers:

    By 1030 there were two McGuire KC-10s (Team 23 & 24) up in the area. I'm not
    sure if they were already in the general area when the events unfolded or
    they were scrambled from McGuire. They started refueling the DC & Langley
    F-16s so they could stay in the area. For awhile, in the morning, Team 23
    also assumed the role of an AWACS giving target and vectoring information to
    the CAP fighters. Team 23 eventually recovered at Andrews and refueled and
    went back up in the late PM (1740). What a crew. They deserve a medal.
    They've been up there since at least 1030 this morning.

    Around the same time as the McGuire tankers were noted, two KC-135s from the
    Maine ANG (Maine 85 & 86) were also in the area working with the McGuire
    tankers. I believe that these guys had been up off the East Coast and were
    diverted to the area to support operations.

    Later in the morning and in the early afternoon two OH ANG KC-135s (Tazz &
    Flop) and two PA ANG KC-135s (Steel) also joined the support crowd.

    AWACS:

    About an hour after I started listening, an AWACS (Bandsaw Kilo) was noted
    off the MD/VA coast and started taking control of the airspace. However, the
    DC ANG CAP commander continued to control the immediate airspace around
    downtown DC. Later in the afternoon he was joined by another AWACS
    (Chalice). I'm assuming that these aircraft were deployed from Langley or
    possibly Seymour-Johnson. Bandsaw and Chalice were both in the area until
    quite late in the evening.

    Helos:

    They were so many medevac helos trying to get into the Pentagon area to
    extricate the wounded that I couldn't keep track of all of them.
    Interspersed among the medevacs were several 1st Helo Sqdn (Mussels) getting
    into the Pentagon area to take out some of the military VIPs (JCS).

    There were also a couple of US Navy helos (HU-720) and another ) that came up
    to Andrews from Norfolk. I'm assuming that these were carrying VIPs from
    CincLant. News reports said that the area of the Pentagon that was struck by
    the plane housed mostly USN & Marine offices.

    Late in the PM there were several Nighthawk helos operating back & forth
    between MCAF Quantico and Andrews. I'm assuming that they were shuttling
    military VIPs.

    NCS:

    Huntress assumed NCS role sometime in the late morning and set up on 255.8,
    228.9 & 234.6. Huntress assumed responsibility for designating targets and
    releasing fighters to prosecute these targets.

    The DC ANG F-16s and Langley F-15s as well as the AWACS and tankers have
    been up continuously, -all day. They are still up and it's 2200 EDT. They
    must be bushed.

    These crews certainly have shown a very high level of professionalism and
    devotion to duty. I for one am glad they are up there looking over us. Those
    of you who support our military you can be VERY PROUD of their actions on
    this day.

    1. Re:More on air cover in DC by istartedi · · Score: 2

      That's nice to know, but I can hear the roar here in Springfield, VA (just outside the Beltway) and that's enough for me.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:More on air cover in DC by Rogerborg · · Score: 1
      • By 1030 there were two flights of DC ANG F-16s (Wild & Caps) up in Combat Air Patrol (CAP).

      As an aside, waiting to shoot down a passenger airliner isn't combat air patrol by any stretch of the imagination.

      I mention this as it's indicative of how inadequate our current military is geared to deal with this sort of threat.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:More on air cover in DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI - the New Hampshire Air National Guard operates tankers out of the former Pease AFP in Newington (NH, adjacent to Portsmouth) as well.

      However, I don't believe that they have KC-10's, although the strip could easily accommodate them. They were used during the Gulf War to top off the C5A's that had lifted off from Westover AFB in Chicopee, Mass. I'm sure they were either used or on standby yesterday to back up what you all heard in DC, and provide primary coverage to the coast of northern and central New England, should CAPs have become necessary there as well.

      I wish I knew more about what these fine people in our Guard do, but knowing that they are there, that they do and did respond, and that they are dedicated to their tasks is enough. God Bless them, as well as all the EMTs, Firefighters, and Police officers directly involved, and who are filling in for their fallen comrades. My heart goes out to them and their families. Thank You.

      PLEASE DONATE BLOOD!
      PLEASE DONATE YOUR TAX REFUNDS TO THE AMERICAN RED CROSS!
      PLEASE ASK YOUR EMPLOYER IF THEY MATCH CASH GIFTS!

    4. Re:More on air cover in DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Combat Air Patrol is the term used by the air force, when referencing any sort of airborne patrol action by a fighter plane.

      No military in the world is prepared for this sort of thing. How could you be? What would you suggest they do?

      Think, then post.

    5. Re:More on air cover in DC by PrinceCharming · · Score: 1

      This was very informative, I appreciate your taking the time to post this "log".

    6. Re:More on air cover in DC by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Maybe not by any stretch of the imagination, but certainly by definition in Air Force training manuals.

      It's a technical term. Just because you don't happen to agree with the definition doesn't mean that USAF ought to rewrite decades of institutional jargon.

      And how, exactly, should the Air Force be handling this? Oh, I've got an idea. We'll just make some big signs to attach to the rudders of the F-16's, you know, airborne advertising. Have them say "PLEASE DON'T CRASH INTO ANY BUILDINGS. THANKS FOR YOUR COOPERATION. FROM: YOUR FRIENDS AT THE US AIR FORCE."

      Brilliant. I'll get the elementary school kids right on it. Need more finger paint, though...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:More on air cover in DC by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • No military in the world is prepared for this sort of thing. How could you be? What would you suggest they do? Think, then post.

      Yes, thanks, that's my GOD DAMN FUCKING POINT.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:More on air cover in DC by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Are you really such a fucked up sack of shit that you actually thought that I was criticising the response? The point was exactly and only that we now need a whole new set of definitions, for a new type of war.

      Now, go awau and pick a fight with someone who actually disagrees with you.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    9. Re:More on air cover in DC by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I only thought that because it's what you said. My bad, smart guy.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  13. Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by KenDown · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wasn't there a story on \. the other day about the Govt. raiding an ISP that mostly served Islamic sites? I have searched for it here, but cannot find it now. I was wondering now if they did that because they had some idea that something big was about to go down??

    --
    "You can't play with my yo-yo"
    1. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by jallen02 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not only this but the state department issued warnings about terrorist attacks more than a week ago. Bin Laden was making threats as well, but I put no stock in the Bin Laden thing. The Media is taking Bin Laden and running with him as a thing for most people to focus their anger on (At this point) IMO. He may have done it. You and I cant know yet. Check out this leek. Dated Sep 7th from the state department talking about terrorist activities from extremist groups almost a WEEK ago. Terrorist Warning It even has his name (Osama Bin Laden) in it :(

      Jeremy

    2. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by Dahan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they raided InfoCom Corp., formerly at www.infocomcorp.com. InfoCom denies any connection with this; I don't think the govt. has said anything either way.

    3. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by Oztun · · Score: 2

      Yes that story did happen. This sounds very likely as I have read other stories in the past week or so about Bin Laden communicating through websites.

    4. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by an+ominous+cow+ward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes. This happened in the city I live in, Richardson, TX. The FBI raided an Internet company that was apparantly a front for Osama fundraising. There were also allegations that a temple accross the street was involved. My local news reported that millions of dollars had been funneled to Osama through this operation. It's really screwed up that almost all of the money used to fund the Taliban comes from the US.

      I don't think the raid had any thing to do with these attacks. It came after weeks of investigation, and there was no mention of planned activities. However, I have read that there were interviews in recent weeks where a major attack was referered to by the Taliban and tacitly confirmed by Bin Ladin.

    5. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about all the raid stuff, but I fully admit that I privately harbor the desire to see all of hackerdom, all the scr1pt kiddiez out there, everyone just get together and pull a massive cracking of any organization found to be celebrating this crap as some sort of 'victory' for the anti-Amer crowd. I don't just mean webpage defacings; we're talking an unleashing of Sircam of perhaps epic proportions. I want to see the contents of Saddam Hussein's hard drive sent to media@cnn.com.

      But that's just a fantasy.

    6. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should go after Salon or Plastic. They are as anti-American as they come.

    7. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by GeneralChud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yes there was. but my question remains... where were we? where were our intelligence agencies? how much money do we give them every year to prevent such things? an attack on this level succeeding is disgusting. after the facts have unfolded do we simply have the leads of our security agencies step down or do we hold them criminally responsible as well?

    8. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by OnyxIR · · Score: 0

      The US Government has always seemed a bit too autistic for my liking. Their belief that they are untouchable has led to a apathy which is responsible for what has happened in the US over the past day. You cant fight what you dont believe in, and they never believed it could happen to them.

      The US has been pissing too many people off for too long, without caring about the consequences. Im not saying that they "got what they deserved" or anything like that. But it seems to me that they could have prevented this by taking the threat of terrorism seriously.

      Their attitude to terrorism is a far cry from the attitude to terrorism displayed in other countries such as England where thay have been under constant threat by groups like the IRA for the past couple of years. All I can say is I hope that the US has learned from this and will never allow it to happen again.

      --
      This sig is licensed under the Free Sig Foundation License, you may re-distribute it as long as you retain this notice
    9. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. But they did know that extremist terrorist groups use america as a cash laundry.
      The most famous example for this is the "HolyLand Foundation", which has been acknowledged officially by the US as a charity organization, and only then did they find out that they were supporting the families of suicidal terrorists after they have commited the suicide. If you ask why they were'nt stopped, the reason is this is not a black and white situation. Terrorist organizations spend a lot of money not only over the terrorist attacks themselves, but also on the population of their area - in CHARITY. Yes, you've heard me right, they are not only terrorist organizations, but also charity organizations.
      This way they get to brain-wash children (and possibly recruit them) as early as they go to the "terrorist group" sponsored kindergarden and as late as sponsored universities.
      That's how they manage to get so much support among otherwise usually poor peaceful civillians.
      I know this sounds wierd, but this is the logic of the mediterranian (Believe me, I live there...)

      I'm sorry to say this, but if terrorism barbiques in your back yard uninterrupted, it will eventually come knocking on your front door.

      My hearty regards to the families of the victims.
      May the souls of the victims rest in peace.

    10. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they're quite an intelligent crowd on plastic.

    11. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      • where were our intelligence agencies? how much money do we give them every year to prevent such things?

      Reportedly $37 billion to the NSA alone. Yes, more than education, more than NASA, more than everything except (uniformed) defence and health.

      But bear in mind that US agencies, even the MiB ones, are limited in their responses. Even if they think that they know something is going down, they have strict rules of engagement that prevent them taking the Israeli route of torturing suspects, or just assasinating people when there's any probably cause that they're planning action.

      Also, the CIA in particular has been under strict regulations since 1995 that make it hard for them to plant or use agents within foreign organisations. They are choked with red tape.

      Should we give the NSA and CIA carte blanche to take preventative action (read: kill people , both foreign and domestic, just in case they're planning something)? Last week, I'd have said "No way!". Now, it's not so clear.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    12. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by Djaak · · Score: 1
      Well I saw an interview on French tv that might be relevant : the interviewee has responsibilities in French counter-terrorism organizations and as such has frequent contacts with his American equivalents. What he said basically amounts to this :

      • All western intelligence services and especially Americans were expecting "something" to happen, however :
      • They were NOT thinking about attacks within the American territory e.g., they were expecting something along the lines of the former bombings of US embassies.
      • They were worried about some kind of "high-tech" attack - trying to prevent biological/chemical or even nuclear attacks, and not thinking that something rather "low-tech" like what happened was possible.
      Of course this information comes from an indirect source so it should be taken with a grain of salt.
    13. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by wljones · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do not know what the government knew about the terrorists. The FBI did raid an ISP in Richardson TX that was operated by Muslims and physically located in or near the main Dallas TX area Mosque. Several Muslim families protested this raid of what they called a pure business ISP, with no connection to terrorists. The Mosque has been there some time, and I, a Baptist, have bought books from the associated book store, which is a convenient source of Islamic literature operated by Mulism ladies. Neither the Mosque nor the bookstore present even a hint of association with Muslim radicals.

    14. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's really screwed up that almost all of the >money used to fund the Taliban comes from the US.

      And most of the money that funds the IRA comes from the US too..

    15. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey,

      And most of the money that funds the IRA comes from the US too

      This is true. I say we bomb the people who finance these terrorists.

      Oh, wait, they're americans. I guess it's all right then.

    16. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by astar · · Score: 1

      This sort of arguement rings false to me.

      Perhaps some background on Bin Laden is in order. He was originally funded and trained by the CIA under George Bush Senior. People sometimes call yesterday's result "blowback". Relevant policy phrases are "Islamic card", "Arc of Crisis", "Clash of Civilizations". Some of these are current policies. The problem is not that the CIA does not do enough, the problem is that the CIA, on instructions from people like Bush, run dangerous geopolitical stategies and geopolitics, though dominating our government's outlook, is an insane policy. This is a complex subject, but even in our sorrow, people need to ask if this was not chicken's coming home to roost.

    17. Re:Did the Govt. have an idea about this? by bendude · · Score: 1
      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  14. Air cover by SbooX · · Score: 1, Informative

    Air cover is also being flown over Boston, MA. Earlier today I witnessed three flybys by what appeared to be an F-15 at very low levels over my hometown of Winthrop. An hour ago I saw two aircraft, one following the other fly over Winthrop and head out to sea. If I had to guess, it was a fighter and a tanker but since I couldn't actually see it, dont hold me to it.

    1. Re:Air cover by SbooX · · Score: 0

      Here's the proof: From Boston.com

  15. 2nd plane by gusman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can confirm that a second plane was reported on the local DC television stations, and it was described as detailed above.

    1. Re:2nd plane by caseydk · · Score: 1
      I've been watching the coverage since I got home at 4pm est (I live in Arlington, VA)...

      I did see the interview with the reporter from USA Today, but there was ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about a second plane of any kind involved in that... and he described the last 5-10 seconds before the collision in detail... and i've seen it on different stations/angles and he's never mentioned it...

    2. Re:2nd plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong. my wife heard it on fox five.

    3. Re:2nd plane by GMontag · · Score: 2

      Shortly before the report of the commercial plane, hijacked bear DC and cruising around the Dulles area, AFTER the FAA announced that all airflights were grounded and all civilian flights will land at closest airfield, I saw a Northwest DC9 landing north on the left IAD approach (almost crosses over NRO HQ). A Navy plane was landing shortly after on the right runway.

      That was the LAST civilian flight I saw all day, but shortly after I heard an F-16 on afterburners. Later the report of a hijacked airliner in the IAD area was reported as false.

    4. Re:2nd plane by an+ominous+cow+ward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My guess is that it was some kind of a military escort plane. By this time, they had to know it was a hijacked airplane. If I recall correctly, thhereis a no fly zone over the white house, since that Russian pilot crashed in on Reagan. I'm sure they wouldn't have enforced it on a 757, but they may have sent a plane up to try and get information.

    5. Re:2nd plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in northern VA and a very close friend who works at the Pentagon told me there WAS a C-130 that flew in extremely low within a minute or so after the terrorist airliner had hit; pulling up at the last moment.

      He said that everybody evacuating the Pentagon thought it was a 2nd terrorist airplane and were at a full scared-to-death sprint across the parking lot until they recognized the type of airplane (and presumably insignia).

      West Virginia ANG flies C-130's out of Martinsburg (about 80 miles away form DC). I'm not sure if Andrews AFB has C-130's (about 10 miles away), I've only seen C-141's there. Maybe one of these bases got word of the hijacking out of Dulles and tried to do something?

      (Sorry for anonymous coward post. I tried to create an account but have never received my password )

    6. Re:2nd plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've flown many flights to/from National, on turboprop Dash-8's (mainly from North Carolina).

      Many times, we'd approach from the west side,
      fly at low level around the Pentagon and Arlington
      cemetary, and land heading to the south.

    7. Re:2nd plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Pittsburgh, where a similar event occured. After the four major crashes, local news stations reported two more planes still in the air that were hijacked. One was supposedly hijacked after taking off from Pittsburgh International Airport, and I forget where the other was from. Anyway, it was reported that both WERE DEFINATELY going to be shot down. Approx 30 minutes later, there was an update on the plane that left Pittsburgh saying that it was circling Dullas (spelling?) in DC. I never heard any more about either, but the stories were confirmed by several of my friends as being reported on multiple local stations. Does anybody know anything more about this?

    8. Re:2nd plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're describing the standard "down the river" approach into National or is this an alternate approach that takes you right over the west side of the Pentagon?

      I'm not aware of this approach. I always thought the Pentagon airspace was prohibited, hence the approach that winds down the Potomac over the 14th St bridges. (The side of the Pentagon that got hit is in a location that I've never seen an airplane anywhere near, i.e. the most SW point of the pentagon.)

      I'm not a commercial pilot so I can't speak authoritatively, just a glider pilot in northern VA with some familiarity with DC airspace.

    9. Re:2nd plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trajectory I've flown comes up the west side of the Pentagon (not very close), and wraps around roughly along/above 395, then approaching the airport. I haven't flown in from the south on a jet, just the prop planes, so I don't know how a jet gets in there. Presumably they have a much larger turn radius.

      -Chuck

  16. My feelings. by Spicy+Bisquit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i could easily say something about palestinian squirrels or Osama Bin Koala, but i just am not in the mood. this type of event depresses hell out of me. i know one can easily consider the loss of life and death toll and think "this is horrible". but it is when i think about the small things that really bother me. imagine, everyone on their way to work, listening to the stereo, just rocking out, never expecting that today was the day they die. or the little kid who kisses his mommy goodbye when he leaves for school. it was the last time. and to even begin to consider how the families and friends of those who have died and are missing feel. there are people going to sleep tonight not knowing if they will ever see their spouse, kid, or best friend ever again. so i will try to get my mind off all of this.

    1. Re:My feelings. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah!
      I feel the same way about Hiroshima and Nagazaki.
      2 nuclear warheads... radiation forever...

    2. Re:My feelings. by MrHyd3 · · Score: 0

      It was only used because of an unprovoked attack.

      Nukes : Made in America, tested in Japan.

      --
      -------- Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most. --Ozzy
  17. Re:oh boy.... read this: by vacamike · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    two separate titles(city of god and big city) that mean the same? No, thats not reading into it at all! ::rolls eyes::

    whatever

  18. This was coming by maniacdavid · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to USA Today, this attack was all in the making if Bin Laden is the case. The article is only about 3 months old, but it details on how Osama Bin Laden used encryption inside of pictures most likely to hide possible attacks. They say this is Bin Laden's latest encryption scheme to convey terrorist information. So when the CIA says did not know this was going to happen, really maybe they are covering up the fact that they sort of knew this but didn't think it would amount to anything.

    1. Re:This was coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they knew and told the proper officials and are just now toeing the line to save face.

      "Hey, don't mention that in the breifing, nothing like it has ever happened before."
    2. Re:This was coming by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Encryption in pictures.

      I'll just bet this is going to result in a cry to ban encryption entirely.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:This was coming by WheelDweller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does anyone else remember an airliner going down "without reason" and the pilot was spouting Islamic yadda-yadda on the black box? It was clear-air, no ceiling, beautiful day. I'm guessing they wanted to see if anyone could stop a 'lamakazi' from taking the plane down, or if it'd be stopped by automatic controls or some other source. Does this ring a bell?

      --
      --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    4. Re:This was coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was an Egyptian airline, IIRC.

    5. Re:This was coming by orangesquid · · Score: 2

      Why, so foreign people will have an advantage over US citizens? I doubt it. Probably the major repercussions will all take place *within* the government, especially in the area of intelligence.

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    6. Re:This was coming by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you talking about the Egypt-Air tragedy ? It seems that in that case the pilot wanted to kill himself, there were no terros onboard.

    7. Re:This was coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly.. the terrorists supposedly on these US flights were trained commericially in the US.

  19. Mirror of Images and Photos by Harper · · Score: 1

    I have set up a rather extensive set of image and video mirrors.
    http://www.watership.org/media/

    I have made tar balls of the images and the movies so everyone will be able to set up their own mirror.

    http://watership.org/media/images.tar.gz -(26985k)
    http://watership.org/media/movies.tar.gz -(200189k)

    i am not sure on the copyright issues. But anyone is welcome to dload and set up content mirrors.

    --
    Producing satire is kind of hopeless because of the literacy rate of the American public. - Frank Zappa
    1. Re:Mirror of Images and Photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mirrored at http://wtc.frack.org

      justin cragin

    2. Re:Mirror of Images and Photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.digivill.net

  20. PDF of Seattle-PI by Gnight · · Score: 1

    You can find the front page of the Seattle-PI here:
    http://seattlep-i.nwsource.com/frontpage/seattle_p imaa1x320010911.pdf

    If you use linux view this with xpdf, ghostview seems to render it improperly.

    Good night America, tomorrow is a new day.

  21. The Afghanistan Explosions by matthewg · · Score: 5, Informative

    A group known as the Northern Alliance, an Afghan group opposed to the Taliban and associated with Shah Massooda, has taken credit for the explosions in Afghanistan.

    1. Re:The Afghanistan Explosions by Mr_Person · · Score: 1

      According to CBS, the explosions in Afghanistan were from a burning munitions dump - not any retaliation from anyone.

    2. Re:The Afghanistan Explosions by ethereal · · Score: 1

      The munitions dump is burning because of helicopter rocket attacks by the Northern Alliance. They're basically all that remains of Afghanistan's pre-Taliban government. Maybe they assumed that the U.S. was about to kick some ass in Afghanistan and wanted to ride on those coattails?

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    3. Re:The Afghanistan Explosions by PenguinRadio · · Score: 3, Informative

      The leader of the Northern Alliance is belived to have been killed over the weekend in an ambush. He was charismatic and able hold various factions together. Needless to say, his troops (which control 5% of Afghanistan) are pretty upset.

    4. Re:The Afghanistan Explosions by allusions_ · · Score: 1
      CNN reports some oddball group not associated with bin Laden is attacking Kabul at night.

      The Northern Alliance is the current UN recognised government of Afghanistan. It is also recognized diplomatically as the govt by many other countries.

      Oddball indeed...

    5. Re:The Afghanistan Explosions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be Shah Massooda, recently reported assassinated by the Taliban government of Afghanistan, would it? Jeezus, what a parallel. Kill off their only political leaders, and you'd expect the ragheads to lie down and let you walk all over them. (At least, those nice religious boys in the Afghan and Israeli gov'ts seem to think so). Instead, in Afghanistan you get a full-blown military attack on the capital; and in the U.S...

    6. Re:The Afghanistan Explosions by psych031337 · · Score: 1
      The leader of the Northern Alliance is belived to have been killed over the weekend in an ambush. He was charismatic and able hold various factions together. Needless to say, his troops (which control 5% of Afghanistan) are pretty upset.


      Maybe they got a round of funding from the CIA. Wouldn't be the first time for America to support and help out "contra"-like groups. (Remember Nicaragua)
      --
      +++ath0
    7. Re:The Afghanistan Explosions by SurfsUp · · Score: 2
      "The leader of the Northern Alliance is belived to have been killed over the weekend in an ambush. He was charismatic and able hold various factions together. Needless to say, his troops (which control 5% of Afghanistan) are pretty upset."


      Maybe they got a round of funding from the CIA. Wouldn't be the first time for America to support and help out "contra"-like groups. (Remember Nicaragua)

      Maybe. But realize, other countries can have their own heros, their own motivations. Masood (or was) is a made-in-Afghanistan hero who fought against horrible odds first against Russia, then against the Taliban fanatics, finally losing his life to a suicide bomber.

      This is not only a time for just and strong retaliation, but also for all Americans to search their own souls and examine the deep reasons why it is so easy for these fanatics to whip up hatred against Americans.

      Start by learning learning about how the rest of the world works. Learn how other people besides Americans are raised, what their culture, beliefs, motivations and history. History. How much does it take to understand that this is not an option, it's a matter of survival?

      Still not convinced? Think about nuclear terrorism. Now start trying to know something about the rest of the world. Please.

      This post is not a troll or attack, it is a wakeup call. Please understand the important. Please wake up before something worse happens.

      --
      Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
  22. Site doesn't work by dytin · · Score: 1

    The site you linked to doesn't work. Please repost...

  23. from http://www.skyscraper.org/tallest/t_wtc.htm by klrnsdme · · Score: 5, Informative

    From skyscraper.org

    World Trade Center History and Stats

    The World Trade Center
    Height: 1,368 and 1,362 feet (417 and 415 meters)
    Owners: Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
    Architect: Minoru Yamasaki, Emery Roth and Sons consulting

    Engineer: John Skilling and Leslie Robertson of Worthington, Skilling, Helle and Jackson
    Ground Breaking: August 5, 1966
    Opened: 1970-73; April 4, 1973 ribbon cutting
    The World Trade Center is more than its signature twin towers: it is a complex of seven buildings on 16-acres, constructed and operated by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ). The towers, One and Two World Trade Center, rise at the heart of the complex, each climbing more than 100 feet higher than the silver mast of the Empire State Building.

    Construction of a world trade facility had been under consideration since the end of WWII. In the late 1950s the Port Authority took interest in the project and in 1962 fixed its site on the west side of Lower Manhattan on a superblock bounded by Vesey, Liberty, Church and West Streets. Architect Minoru Yamasaki was selected to design the project; architects Emery Roth & Sons handled production work, and, at the request of Yamasaki, the firm of Worthington, Skilling, Helle and Jackson served as engineers.

    The Port Authority envisioned a project with a total of 10 million square feet of office space. To achieve this, Yamasaki considered more than a hundred different building configurations before settling on the concept of twin towers and three lower-rise structures. Designed to be very tall to maximize the area of the plaza, the towers were initially to rise to only 80-90 stories. Only later was it decided to construct them as the world's tallest buildings, following a suggestion said to have originated with the Port Authority's public relations staff.

    Yamasaki and engineers John Skilling and Les Robertson worked closely, and the relationship between the towers' design and structure is clear. Faced with the difficulties of building to unprecedented heights, the engineers employed an innovative structural model: a rigid "hollow tube" of closely spaced steel columns with floor trusses extending across to a central core. The columns, finished with a silver-colored aluminum alloy, were 18 3/4" wide and set only 22" apart, making the towers appear from afar to have no windows at all.

    Also unique to the engineering design were its core and elevator system. The twin towers were the first supertall buildings designed without any masonry. Worried that the intense air pressure created by the buildings' high speed elevators might buckle conventional shafts, engineers designed a solution using a drywall system fixed to the reinforced steel core. For the elevators, to serve 110 stories with a traditional configuration would have required half the area of the lower stories be used for shaftways. Otis Elevators developed an express and local system, whereby passengers would change at "sky lobbies" on the 44th and 78th floors, halving the number of shaftways.

    Construction began in 1966 and cost an estimated $1.5 billion. One World Trade Center was ready for its first tenants in late 1970, though the upper stories were not completed until 1972; Two World Trade Center was finished in 1973. Excavation to bedrock 70 feet below produced the material for the Battery Park City landfill project in the Hudson River. When complete, the Center met with mixed reviews, but at 1,368 and 1,362 feet and 110 stories each, the twin towers were the world's tallest, and largest, buildings until the Sears Tower surpassed them both in 1974.

  24. Who hit the Pentagon? by genka · · Score: 1

    I work in DC area. I listened to the radio around noon. They had several eyewitnesses descibing the Pentagon hit. All of them talked about "small commuter plane", not a large jet.

    1. Re:Who hit the Pentagon? by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Apparently, a number of eyewitness reports state the smaller plane followed the airliner, but pulled away at the last minute and flew off.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  25. Newsfeeds? by TheLostOne · · Score: 1

    Appearently the CNN news feed (being displayed in #cnn_newsfeed @ irc.idlenet.org) is down till 8AM EST.

    If anybody finds any running newsfeed plz post them :)

    --


    '..that kernel panicked like a nun in a crack house!'
  26. Re:oh boy.... read this: by Linux+Freak · · Score: 3, Informative

    Interesting, but fortunately Nostradamus made a number of predictions which turned out to be incorrect.

  27. Old Stuff by ShadowsMV · · Score: 1

    Probably stuff that has been seen already
    check out www.markvd.net

    --
    This is my sig, there are many like it but this one is mine...
  28. My oh my. by jallen02 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Doesn't Microsoft and software development and /. seem so insignificant when something like this happens? I think, gee I really don't care about Microsoft. They are far less evil than people like this.

    I am pretty much numb. I cant cheer people up, even myself when usually I am the one that makes everyone smile. I am just to stunned. This is such a huge wake up call to the world.

    I bet the doomsday clock gets adjusted over this. World tensions are going up.

    I wish we had cold-war level intelligence still. Jimmy Carter REALLY fucked us over by gutting our intelligence agencies. I blame this on Jimmy Carter for removing our intelligence abilities.

    Yes we can have cold war level intelligence without removing our freedoms, YES it needs to happen. I don't think any of us will ever forget this. We probably all know someone affected by this. I hope you are all okay and can wake up tommorow and enjoy your day as if it is your last. I am not so upset by the loss of life, we lose thousands of people to murder every day. I am upset about the symbolism here and the threats to remove our freedom, that is the truly scary thing.

    Clinton administration were pushovers.

    Jeremy

    1. Re:My oh my. by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute - there were 12 years of deficit military spending under Reagan/Bush at the end of the Cold War, yet somehow it's all Jimmy Carter's fault? For the money that they spent, you could have rebuilt any putative Carter fall-off in intelligence capabilities many times over. Not to mention the question of whether Cold War-style intelligence operations are even applicable to the new rogue-states-and-terrorism foreign policy.

      I think the jury's still out on the Clinton administration's foreign policy - years of perspective are usually needed before we can really understand the present or the recent past. I will point out that the Israelis and Palestinians seemed a lot happier to negotiate when Clinton was running the show, so much so that the fact that they were not able to reach a final agreement before he left office was widely seen as dooming the negotiations by all parties.

      My $.02, anyway.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    2. Re:My oh my. by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Okay, carter started the trend and no one went back on it due to the political sitaution. It is a long debate, I am on the phone right now or I would defend myself. I just think that he did indeed start the trend of reducing our intelligence. Call it off-wing but I bet you hear it a lot soon.

      On another note check this link out. State department warned about "U.S. citizens and interests abroad may be at increased risk of a terrorist action from extremist groups" and ". We are also concerned about information we received in May 2001 that American citizens may be the target of a terrorist threat from extremist groups with links to Usama Bin Ladin's Al-Qaida organization."

      I don't know there are so many factors in something like this it is wrong to blame any one person or group I guess. Anyhow heres a link....

      State Department Public Announcement

      Jeremy

    3. Re:My oh my. by ethereal · · Score: 1

      I think the big problem may be that the U.S. has pissed off so many different groups of terrorists that it's tough to keep good intelligence available on all of them. It was much easier to track one Soviet Union that it is to track umpteen zillion terrorist cells and/or anti-American elements that range about the Middle and Far East, Africa, and South America.

      I think there have been some situations where the U.S. has made enemies instead of friends; and I think we're going to find out that the rest of the world is not as ready to forgive and forget as the U.S. has been in similar circumstances. It's easy to let bygones be bygones when the goal is to keep the economy on track; when you're more concerned about freedom and/or civil rights for your people, you're a lot less likely to be willing to make up with your past adversaries.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  29. The Northern Alliance by matthewg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is some more information about the Northern Alliance and Shah Massoud.

  30. Re:oh boy.... read this: by slam+smith · · Score: 1

    Typical astrologer, make the prediction vague enough, and you can read "anything" into it.

  31. Re:oh boy.... read this: by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 1
    I always figured New York City was almost as godless as Las Vegas and Lawrence, Kansas.

    I've read this all over the net today and I think the reference of "city of god" being New York is quite a stretch.

    ::Colz Grigor // I was just kidding about Lawrence.

    --

  32. remembering WTC by vluther · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to setup a site remembering NYC and WTC before all of this happened. I've setup a site
    with pictures of more pleasant times..
    Linuxpowered

    If you have pictures of the city/twin towers before this incident, please send them to me.

  33. S6 Submission Queues Open by zpengo · · Score: 2
    The submission queues of S6 have recently been opened to the public. If you have a firsthand account, you can go there to share it with others.

    I'm sorry the code is a little rough around the edges (be sure you fill out the forms completely), but I wasn't expecting to go public with it so soon.

    Please don't mod this down. I'm really not trying to spam; Just giving a place for those without their own websites to publish their accounts without getting lost in the thousands of Slashdot posts. Thanks.

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  34. Conspiracy Theories Galore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The flight numbers of the hijacked planes were 11, 93, 175, and 77. If you add each one together:

    11
    9 + 3 = 12
    1 + 7 + 5 = 13
    7 + 7 = 14

    Weird coincidence, huh?

    My deepest sympathies go out to those who were involved in the tragedies...

    I hope and ask that the government of this nation makes wise decisions regarding this situation.

    1. Re:Conspiracy Theories Galore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Note: The point to the 'conspiracy' was that it comes out as: 11, 12, 13, 14... The attacks occured on the 11th; let's hope that the worst isn't yet to come and that this is only a coincidence.)

    2. Re:Conspiracy Theories Galore by mhandlon · · Score: 0

      September 9th month 11 day.... come on "911" I bet Bush even figured that one out.

      --
      Nyquil = Nectar of the devil
  35. my thinkgeek t shirt by nealrs · · Score: 0

    i guess.... this means i cant wear my thinkgeek perl dolphin t-shirt on a plane anymore.. then again, im not sure ill be getting on a plane for a while. jesus

    a qoute i picked up today from my hallmates at CMU

    i dont know when world war three is going to occur, but i do know world war four will be fought with sticks and stones - albert einstein -- (stolen from jay ling)

    thank you. -n-rs-

  36. Air cover in Pittsburgh also... by Xenopax · · Score: 1

    This isn't offical, but I saw what appeared to be a large plane fying around Pittsburgh with two smaller planes behind it. I would guess this is a refueler with two fighter jets behind it.

    The plane in Somerset hit way to close to home today. Thank god the pilot was brave enough to crash before he got to any major cities, not to be selfish but I'm glad that my hometown of Pittsburgh wasn't hit.

  37. The Sky Fell by Mercuria · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did anybody look up today? Here in the Midwest, while this tragedy can seem so close on the TV it almost vanishes into the background when you step outside and see everything and everyone going about their business normally. Until you look up. When the FAA shut down all domestic air travel, they almost turned off the sky. It was a pure blue here in Iowa today, interrupted only by the occaisional cirrus cloud. Right now, the stars wink alone. The contrails, the glints of silver in the sunset, all gone. Routes out of DSM, STL, Chicago, Kansas City, Minneapolis crisscross the sky daily, but not today. It felt very strange to look up at that barren sky. It's a sight that hasn't been seen in many decades, and I don't expect to see it again.

    1. Re:The Sky Fell by unitron · · Score: 2
      Until you look up.

      or go try to buy gasoline.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:The Sky Fell by CapeBretonBarbarian · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing last night as I looked up at the skies. Up here in Cape Breton we always see 4 or more planes in the night sky winding their way along the northern transatlantic route, but tonight there was not a plane to be seen in the sky. It's been a very long time since I can remember looking up and not seeing a plane in the night sky.

    3. Re:The Sky Fell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I live in Iowa too. By the des moines airport. You are very true. Usually the sky is filled with activity. Yesterday, last night, and today was strangest thing not to see anything in the sky at all. It brings a problem that is a great distance away very close.

    4. Re:The Sky Fell by don_carnage · · Score: 2
      My sentiments exactly -- Thanks for sharing that with us.

      Here in Ohio all is quiet, not a plane in the sky.

  38. It works -- you MUST remove the spaces. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot inserts spaces into long strings of text to keep them from stretching the table. Remove them and the URL works. working link

  39. Condolences and Salon.com article by sometwo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My condolences go out to the friends and family of the victims of this horrific crime. Attending an east coast college, I have talked with many people who are from the areas where the attacks occured. This has hit close to home. I really have no words to describe what I am feeling.

    With that said, I refer you to the excellent salon.com. Their coverage of this event has been extraordinary. I especially hope you read the first-person accounts of the terror. A number: that is difficult to identify with. A person, however, is much different. Remember each one of those thousands was a person, with his/her own life and nothing should be taken for granted.

    1. Re:Condolences and Salon.com article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sincerely hope that we exterminate all the Muslims. I want a new holocaust that will wipe the Muslims off the face of the earth forever.

  40. a curious message board thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&frame=right& th=54ab4d241c34e0cc&seekm=3b8fd177%40monitor.lanse t.com#link1

    Possibly related. If not, the level of coincidence there is still somewhat chilling.

  41. Re:use of illegal video encoders by nhavar · · Score: 2

    please say your just being an ass here and trying (not succeeding) to make a joke.

    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  42. Camp David??? by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    Can anyone comnirm the rumour about the attack on Camp David?

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    1. Re:Camp David??? by stubear · · Score: 1

      No because the plane on that flight path went down 80 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. My girlfriend and I speculated that the flight crew fought back and caused the crash well short of its intended target; Camp David? the US Capitol building? Who knows.

    2. Re:Camp David??? by UpeoWaMacho · · Score: 1

      A National guard buddy of mine belives someone with permision to bring a fire arm on board was there - a us marshall, or a fed, and fought back.

      I am inclined to belive that rather than the crew fighting back

      --
      Upeo
  43. Could this be left-wing extremists? by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The WTC is (was) a symbol of corporatism and globalism. The Pentagon is a symbol of the military-industrial complex. Are there Eco-Terrorists and other extreme-left-wing types that are sick enough to do something like this?

    Everyone just assumes this came from the Middle-East. That's what we thought when OKC happened, and it turned out to be something entirely different.

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by stubear · · Score: 1

      The assumptions aboutthe Middle East are more warranted here due to the level of coordination and sophistication required to hijack the planes and fly them. I find it highly unlikely that eco-terrorists would go to these lengths or are even capable of going to these lengths.

    2. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by fobbman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry, don't buy it. How many extreme greenies know how to fly jumbo jets? I doubt that the American pilots would be able to be convinced to crash their planes into those buildings. We'll likely find out that the pilots were killed before they crashed and that the hijackers were at the controls.

    3. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just or even more likely that right-wing extremists are responsible. Right-wing extremist have committed more terrorists attacks in the US than the left-wing. I was just watching a HBO documentary the other day in which they stated that the Atlanta olympic bombing might have been perpetrated by neo-nazis.

    4. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, neo-Nazis are left-wing extremists. Note that the Nazis were a socialist party. Unfortunately, the left-wing in this country has painted the right-wing as Nazis, when it's exactly the opposite. It's the left that advocates greater government control, not the right. Truly bizarre how this has been turned around.

    5. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by mami · · Score: 1

      The only reason why I don't think that could have been the case is because these people came in the airplanes with KNIVES and cardbord cutters. No American based extremist would have come to the idea to hijack a plane with knives, IMHO, neither left-wing, nor right-wing. To me that's distinctly "a foreign way " to get things done.

    6. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by transient · · Score: 1

      There are extremist left-wing groups who have been known to commit acts of terrorism. However, I hesitate to use the term "terrorism", because the specific example I'm aware of is Playskool compared to what happened today.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    7. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former member of one of the "left wing extremist" groups, I can say with certainty that this is not the case. By and large, even the most hardcore of EF! and ELF members never took action to purposely hurt another human - vandalism and traps were common, but when trees were spiked or engines were rigged to explode, I never saw or heard of a single case in which the company was not warned in advance. Out of all of the enviromental subcultures (hippies, some, rivetheads, etc) the only group that I've ever seen even beat someone up is the skinhead left wingers (usually not SHARPs, btw). The left wing is, by and large, dedicated to HELPING humanity and will not hurt animals or people in general - that's why you don't have murderous left wing commandos.

      The right wing, on the other hand, has no respect for life and has displayed this time and time again.

    8. Re:Could this be LEFT-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh, like those notorious socialists McVey & Nicholls....everybody KNOWS its ONLY the Left wingers that could do anything like this.......
      next thing you know this loon is gonna claim it was CLINTON

    9. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by yulek · · Score: 1

      that is so wrong. the navigation alone required to get a plane moving that fast into a good trajectory to hit those targets requires knowledge of the instruments and aviation theory.

      these planes were DIVERTED and under MANUAL control so your nav analyses is incorrect.

      --
      in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
    10. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      riight, that's why they rounded up the commies, too.


      "My cousin Francis [I of France] and I are in complete agreement -- he wants Vienna, and so do I."

      -- Emperor Charles V

    11. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by MrHyd3 · · Score: 0

      No it was Arabs that did this. We support Isreal and they hate that. I find it wierd that we supported Arabs in the Bosnian crisis and this is the thanks after they pled for our help? I don't know why USA gets involved. Every country owes us money, we come to their rescue and we get shit on? Kind of sounds like a Wife that's beaten by her husband and never leaves......

      --
      -------- Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most. --Ozzy
    12. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by Salsaman · · Score: 2

      I seem to remember, from flying in the States, that there is a large control centre at Bowling Green. Would that be near enough to the towers that they could have aimed for that first ?

    13. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by xZAQx · · Score: 1

      Looks like Japanese to me. After all, "kamikaze" is a Japanese word, and -- apparently -- a Japanse pasttime. I'm not backing up my idea with ANY factual evidence, but, seriously, in order to know how to fly those planes, the person(s) had to learn from a flight simulator which costs millions of dollars (my father works in a flight simulator HQ). Sorry but these Llama-Llama guys don't have that kind of $$$.
      Just my chip-in to the fear factory.

      --

      We dance to all the wrong songs.
      --Refused.
    14. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by nanojath · · Score: 2
      This has come up before, and roots into the whole question of whether this could be home-grown terrorism. I think both are a tremendous stretch. Proven left-wing violent action has to date not risen past the level of vandalism. The idea that those, even assuming they would be so inclined, could scale this level of logistics in a single action is suspect. I think the same can be said of any potentially terroristic domestic movement.


      And while we're on the subject, the same argument applies to the theory, all but presented as fact by our sheep-like media, that Osama Bin Laden is responsible. From, basically, relatively crude vehicle bombings to a hugely sophisticated coordinated terrorism campaign, involving multiple hijackings by men who were obviously highly trained commandos (able to hijack a plane with knives and fly it with such precision) and targetted so sucessfully (in the case of the WTC) that the only possibilities are luck of an unimaginable scale or planning of incredible depth and intricacy. In one action? Occam's Razor tells me we're getting duped.


      I'm not ruling out any possibility at this point, but a very creditable theory that I'm disturbed to have seen only the slightest hints of in the media is that this is a covert action by a hostile foreign government. Not some terrorist cell, not some rogue band. The lo-tech is TOO lo-tech, the high-concept is TOO high concept, and the attack was just too sucessful. And what better way to keep your covert war going than to leave a nice trail of bread crumbs to a handy, notorious terrorist?


      You keep your nation, totally vulnerable to US military might, safe from retaliation. If you manage to provoke a knee-jerk US response, you create more anti-US hatred and potentially copy-cat or piggy-back acts of terrorism which further obsfucate the reality.


      Well, it's all speculation at this point but one nation springs to mind which has a sincere hatred of the USA, a more or less personal vendetta against the family of our President, the military and logistic resources to manage terroism of this scale and (sick, evil) genius. That nation is Iraq.


      And how did they develop these military resources? Hell, I'll give you that one at no extra charge: with the help of the USA.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    15. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by The+G+Man · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Nazis are extreme right-wingers, while the communists are extreme left-wingers.
      However, you must realize that ideologies go in a circle, basically, i.e. the more extreme right or left you get, the more you become like the other side.

      --

      Quoth the zombie, braaaaaaaains
    16. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by nanojath · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You're wrong. Your minimal flight experience doesn't stack up to the 30+ year veteran commercial pilots who are saying the hijacker pilots had to be highly trained. And although they were not small targets they were hit with amazing precision and resolve. No ordinary flake was responsible for this.


      Non-experts like you talking out of their asses are just further confusing this issue. Note I'm not claiming to be any kid of expert - I'm just quoting the people who have some kind of relevant experience. Go to f-in CNN if you wan the details.


      I wish to hell all you armchair commandos would stop blowing smoke about how easy this was. This was a very sophisticated military action and the sooner we abandon the isolated terrorist cell theory as the most viable option and start looking at the military reality (hint - only one nation has basically condemned the US and fully supported the action. Ends with a Q? anyone? Anyone?)

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    17. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I'm sure the 100+ million kiled by militant leftist governments would disagree.

    18. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by patter · · Score: 1

      Either way, someone with a few hours in a good simulator (commerical grade) or an hour or two of stick time in any type of jet craft (very common commerically, again) could pull this off. I've flown Cessna style 172 models, and its very easy to pickup basic flight dynamics.

      My roommate is trying to obtain his commercial license (a fairly expensive process up here). We discussed this for a few hours last night, and while the pilot didn't seem to be an absolutely untrained pilot, anyone with experience in flying other aircraft, and a few hours in a real/simulated commercial plane could easily accomplish this.

      Very, very scary...

      --
      -- If at first you do succeed, try to hide your astonishment. -- Harry F. Banks
    19. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by patter · · Score: 1

      If you are referring to this link:

      http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/12/hijackers.skills/

      You may want to re-read the article (or point me to a better one if I'm mistaken).

      This article only has a veteran pilot admit "they knew what they were doing.", the reporter is embellishing this to claim that they had plenty of skill and experience... Which is not what the pilot said IMHO.

      --
      -- If at first you do succeed, try to hide your astonishment. -- Harry F. Banks
    20. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? by Fesh · · Score: 2
      They knew enough to turn off the IFF transponders, at any rate. If we're talking about people who didn't know their way around a cockpit, I think they'd have probably missed a detail like that.

      I consider myself an aviation nut, and even I would be hard-pressed to figure out where the controls for the IFF are on short notice.

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  44. /. this site by stubear · · Score: 1

    This site needs to be slashdotted. Profiting off a disaster like this is lower than tha act itself

    http://www.cafepress.com/cp/store/productdetail. as px?prodno=1468594&zoom=yes

    1. Re:/. this site by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Or how about

      http://worldtradecenter.com

    2. Re:/. this site by HeyYou82 · · Score: 1

      i agree. i have sent off an email describing my disgust with their selling of that product. i urge all of you to do the same. as for the worldtradecenter.com, all i see are links to redcross things, nothing wrong there.

      --
      - HeyYou
    3. Re:/. this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This link correctly displays the URL in the parent.

      It is a t-shirt that states "I flew a plane into the world trade center, and all I got was this lousy t-shirt", with an image of a plane hitting one of the towers.

      This is pathetic.

    4. Re:/. this site by Xenex · · Score: 3, Redundant
      This link correctly displays the URL in the parent.



      It is a t-shirt that states "I flew a plane into the world trade center, and all I got was this lousy t-shirt", with an image of a plane hitting one of the towers.



      This is pathetic.

    5. Re:/. this site by Xenex · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry for this being posted twice, once anonymously. I'm not sure what happened there... (I'll just blame IE...)

    6. Re:/. this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course if anyone wears that shirt they're going to get the shit beaten out of them.

    7. Re:/. this site by Farrod · · Score: 1

      I bet this store is actually run by the CIA. Whoever buys a shirt was obviously the perpetrator, and we can catch them! Pretty clever I think.

    8. Re:/. this site by Xenex · · Score: 1, Troll

      Why the hell have moderators moderated my post up as funny?

      What the hell is wrong with you people, it's not funny, it's pathetic that a shirt like that is being sold.

      Would somebody please moderate my parent post down; better that then it being high as funny.

    9. Re:/. this site by gidbinn · · Score: 1

      At least E-Bay shows some moral fiber in this context.
      http://cnnfn.cnn.com/2001/09/11/news/wires/ebay_ap /

    10. Re:/. this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and slashdot and VA aren't making any money off the massive amount of hit since cmdrtaco posted this "non nerd" news Hey CmdrTaco whats the rate for hits per bannerad again, oh thats right VA handles all that stuff now..... really, whoever did that t shirt is taking the piss, a very good sence of humor I admit..... I'm sure cnn and msnbc are all going to offer large amounts of money (which their earning to exclusive rights to news feeds) to international stations.....
      You guys make me sick, your feeding of the rest of the worlds pitty for you incident.
      Go captalism! :-)

    11. Re:/. this site by mysticbob · · Score: 1

      use this script:

      #!/bin/sh
      while true
      do
      sleep 15
      wget -a /dev/null "http://www.cafepress.com/cp/store/productdetail.a spx?prodno=1468594&zoom=yes"
      done

    12. Re:/. this site by Sir_Real · · Score: 2

      It is now just a "plain white t-shirt" for $15.00... I think it worked... :)

      Andrew

    13. Re:/. this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, nothing like a national tragedy to get people lining up to have their freedom taken away. You people cry when e-bay bans probably stolen Windows software, but when they ban WTC merchandise which was up for sale before the attacks even occurred, that's fine? Fucking hipocrites.

  45. Business As Usual! by Drake42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is very important that we all get back to 'business as usual' as quickly and calmly as possible. If we give in to terrified speculation, hording gas, selling our stock or other panic moves that will fsck our country then we may as well throw up our hands and say, "Terrorists Win!"

    If we get back to business and focus on providing support for families and blood for the wounded we will come out of this OK.

    God Bless,

    Jason Henriksen

    1. Re:Business As Usual! by Ghoser777 · · Score: 1

      We should be calm, but it will never be business as usual again. We need to take more precausions in respect to terrorism and to airplane safety. If we just ignore them as a society, I suppose that means the terrorists don't win this round. So guess what: they have to blow up something bigger, with more deaths, and effect more people directly!

      That's not to say that we should be calm. But we have to take this seriously too.

      F-bacher

      --
      James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    2. Re:Business As Usual! by Ghoser777 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really hope that this turns out to be a white, blue eyed American. That way the little world that racists try to live in, where all whites are good and every body else is scum, will come crashing down.

      Racism has no place in this dialogue.

      F-bacher

      --
      James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    3. Re:Business As Usual! by JAVAC+THE+GREAT · · Score: 2

      I agree. If you have no excuse to not go to work or school tomorrow, then make every effort to go and be as productive as possible. Put in overtime to do your part to make up for the economic impact this will have.

    4. Re:Business As Usual! by Arandir · · Score: 2

      So when they blow up something bigger and kill more people, we will go back into work and have business as usual again. And again. And again.

      If we lock down this nation in a web liberty killing security measures, then the enemy will have won.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    5. Re:Business As Usual! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I have a question for anyone that is in the know about biometrics. How easily could a plane be setup that would only respond to the pilot/co-pilots commands?

    6. Re:Business As Usual! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Even better, remote controls for the Air Traffic Controllers & cameras on the nose. We have unmanned spy planes, why couldn't we setup an emergency system on planes that are similar?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    7. Re:Business As Usual! by xZAQx · · Score: 1

      That already happened. Does T. McVeigh ring a bell? AFAIK, it didn't change any racists' views on minorities. We should have learned a lesson from McVeigh; he was the poster boy for white angst in a (in their view) "minorities rising up and destroying whites" world and just how far the notion of "crazy asshole" will take you. We learned nothing from him, although we should have.

      --

      We dance to all the wrong songs.
      --Refused.
    8. Re:Business As Usual! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McVeigh was a punk piece of shit. Anybody could've taken a truck full of explosives and blown up that building but let's face it, no self-respecting arab madman or muslim would bother blowing up some obscure federal building in Oklahoma City! Now, hijacking planes and crashing them into the Pentagon and World Trade Center... that's something that gets international attention and shuts down the entire nation tighter than a drum. If it isn't Osama bin Laden then it is someone associated with radical Islamic fundamentalism. I say we start nuking countries starting with Afghanistan and moving to Egypt. Those fucking little sand niggers were dancing in the streets yesterday. We can give them something to dance to when the atomic flash blinds them and the searing heat rips away their flesh. KILL ALL ARABS AND MUSLIMS!!!!

    9. Re:Business As Usual! by Mac+Beckett · · Score: 1

      Americans (and friends) might like to take a look at Aislin's Wednesday morning cartoon for the Montreal Gazette. He does poignant, gallery-class work, when things get serious.

    10. Re:Business As Usual! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Cool. So the terries only have to secure a room on the ground, rather than one in the air. Or else hack the control frequencies and do it from a moving car. Uhh, bad idea Sparky.

      And do you really think that Jane Q. Public is going to climb on a jet flown by remote control? Fat chance.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Business As Usual! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      A lot harder to "secure" a room on the ground than in the air, genius. Hacking the freq. would be a problem, and the system would only be engaged in a emergency.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  46. Re:oh boy.... read this: by Principito · · Score: 1

    I doubt the great leader is GWB. My interpretation for the great leader would be none other than the good ol' United States of America.

    --
    "Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle." -- Plato (427?-347? BC)
  47. Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is more likely that old fashioned counterintelligent-style phone tricks were used rather than fancy encryption.

    After all, if the NSA can probably defeat any encryption if they have reason to suspect they need to. It's nearly impossible to screen the entire Muslim/Islamic community for suspicious rug orders that may or not be instructions.

    - JoeShmoe

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    1. Re:Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by FarHat · · Score: 1

      After all, if the NSA can probably defeat any encryption if they have reason to suspect they need to. It's nearly impossible to screen the entire Muslim/Islamic community for suspicious rug orders that may or not be instructions.


      No one can defeat one-time pads.

      --
      At the intersection of computation and biology.
    2. Re:Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by Nater · · Score: 2

      The trouble with one-time pads is that in order to use them you have to either be generating the pad deterministicly at both the sending and receiving end, or you have to somehow communicate the pad. While the pad itself and the data it hides may be undecipherable, the "infrastructure" required to use it is not.

      --

      I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
      "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

    3. Re:Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2

      Yes, but a one-time pad is a technique and not an encryption format. You don't need to flip any bits around to use a one-time pad.

      If i tell you the word "horpens" means launch a terrorist attack in three days, that's also a one-time pad. Three years later you pick up the phone and hear "Is Mr. Horpens there?" and even if your phone was being listened to there is really know what to convert "horpens" into "launch terrorist attack in three days".

      So I put one-time pads until classic counterintelligence techniques and not encryption. There is always SOME way to compromise a message chain, the danger is when you aren't even aware the chain exists.

      - JoeShmoe

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    4. Re:Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah - the recording industry does it for you - simply agree on a CD (maybe #N on the XXX magazine hit parade), rip the LSBs of the PCM and there's your pad

    5. Re:Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by Nater · · Score: 2

      A one-time pad needs a good bit of randomness in it. CD data is not random.

      --

      I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
      "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

    6. Re:Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Suspicious rug orders' way to show the same type of ignorance the terrorists did.

    7. Re:Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's nearly impossible to screen the entire Muslim/Islamic community for suspicious rug orders that may or not be instructions.

      That's rather racist of you. If you're going to encode secret messages in todays climate, your best bet is stock tips: "Sell all your shares of *insert company headquartered in WTC*, with the current market climate, it will be practically worthless tomorrow."

    8. Re:Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 2

      A deterministically generated pad is not a one-time pad.

    9. Re:Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 2

      As a professional cryptographer, I hear this expression of awed belief in the miraculous abilities of the NSA often, but it's generally borne of a lack of understanding of the subject. It's a shame that the extraordinary work of the open cryptographic community over the last quarter century is so little understood.

    10. Re:Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2

      No, it's not racist. Read the friggin' topic. In Executive Orders, a purchase from a rug dealer was used to activate a sleeper agent who then tried to assasinate President Ryan at the same time his kids were to be kidnapped/killed.

      - JoeShmoe

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    11. Re:Ever read a Tom Clancy novel? by Nater · · Score: 2

      For a strict definition of deterministic, this is true. However, by deterministic I mean some algorithm that will produce the same results for anyone who uses it. An examples that comes to mind is one which uses a PRNG seeded with previous day's trading volume on NASDAQ, combined with say, the New York Times. Use the sequence of psuedo randoms as an index of some sort into the New York Times for the day you send the message and get your pad from the newspaper. That's an algorithm that will produce the same results for anyone who uses it. Strictly speaking, though, it wouldn't be a good OTP because the newspaper is English text and English text has a non-random distribution of letters in common usage.

      --

      I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
      "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

  48. Re:use of illegal video encoders by ultrapenguin · · Score: 1

    Actually, no, I am not.
    There is not a single commercially available (=legal) DivX player available.
    I cannot download one from Microsoft, Intel, or any other software company that I can trust.
    When I can purchase a DivX player at the store or download the codec from a respectable software company, then I will consider using it.

  49. New CNN video of FIRST plane crash in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone have a mirror of this new CNN video?

    1. Re:New CNN video of FIRST plane crash in NYC by Scoob2134 · · Score: 1

      http://www.cnn.com/video/us/2001/09/12/first.plane .hits.gp.med.html

  50. Quicktime Player by willywalloo · · Score: 1

    -seem to host a lot of feeds that supply many views surrounding this issue on the Quicktime Player.

    -FoxNews(conservative)
    -CNN(spoon and fork it to you)
    -BBC(Outside perspective)
    -NPR(detailed, scientific, public perspective)-WGBH Boston.

    You should try this player, I was psyched.

    -walloo

    --
    willywalloo's mostly macly - URL
    1. Re:Quicktime Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.apple.com/quicktime/

  51. oddball group hysteria bogus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "CNN reports some oddball group not associated with bin Laden is attacking Kabul at night. Are they taking advantage of the NY situation or did they create it?"

    This is complete and utter bullshit. Massoud (the rebel leader) is a freedom fighter endeavoring on the quest for civil liberties and democratic government in Afghanistan.

    He successfully fought the Soviets out of the country, going 10 years without defeat. Likewise, he has been fighting the Taliban for the same reasons: to end tyranny and oppression.

    Historically, Massoud has been very, very good to the west. He is probably one of the few allies the US could have in Afghanistan. Most likely he attacked Kabul to show his support for the west and further his cause for freedom. I find it impossible to believe that he would be behind the attack on New York.

    Please use your brain before passing judgment on such a man. Or at least do some research before ranting on slashdot. This is the exact hysteria the terrorists are trying to create.

    1. Re:oddball group hysteria bogus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  52. Re:oh boy.... read this: by fobbman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, and the village idiot will ascend to the throne (a widely-distributed fake Nostradamus prophecy).

    Nostradamus wrote his "prophecies" in a language that only he knew in fear of death. Scholars have been trying to translate his ramblings for hundreds of years and every once in awhile they try and take their "translations" and compare them to modern events. Heck, most studies of his work said that he had no further predictions after 2000/05/05 which was widely viewed to be his prediction of the end of the world. Guess what? We're still here.

  53. There are survivors!!!!!!!!!!!! by SbooX · · Score: 1, Informative

    Peter Jennings just reported on ABC news television that some survivors have indeed been pulled from the rubble! This supposedly comes from the Mayor. Lets keep pulling them out!

  54. Re:use of illegal video encoders by ultrapenguin · · Score: 1

    And of course, as soon as my opinion doesn't agree with the "common slashdot crowd" of content pirates, I get modded down as a troll.

  55. Now for a Rationality Break from the JBS by Baldrson · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Believe it or not, The John Birch Society has one of the more rational responses too the stituation:

    ... 'Fears about the military's role in domestic affairs are unfounded,' Cohen soothingly wrote. 'There need be no fear or foreboding by the American people of the preparations of their government. On the contrary, the greater threat to our civil liberties stems from the chaos and carnage that might result from an attack for which we had failed to prepare and the demands for action that would follow.'

    The approach recommended by Cohen, ironically, complements very well the classic strategy pursued by terrorists. Marxist militant Carlos Marighella, whose tactical blueprint has been followed by terrorists worldwide, explained that terrorists attack innocent people in order to provoke governments "to intensify repression. The police roundups, house searches, arrests of innocent people, make life unbearable.... Rejecting the 'so-called political solution,' the urban guerrilla must become more aggressive and violent, resorting without letup to sabotage, terrorism, expropriations, assaults, kidnappings, and executions, heightening the disastrous situation in which the government must act." Marighella went on to explain how this cycle continues until the existing political order is completely subverted, and a revolutionary regime takes power.

    The gravest danger presented by today's terrorist attacks is that the effort to find and punish perpetrators will become a war upon the liberties of the American people. Yes, those responsible for the attacks must be found and punished with pitiless severity. But at the same time Americans must demand an immediate end to our interventionist foreign policy, which exacted such a tragic price in American blood on this terrible day.

    1. Re:Now for a Rationality Break from the JBS by beardcz · · Score: 1

      > Americans must demand an immediate end to our interventionist foreign policy, which exacted such a tragic price in American blood on this terrible day

      Ending the interventionist policy is what has triggered this action, if indeed it was done by Islamic terrorists and the root cause is the Arab-Israeli conflict.

      While the peace talks were going on under the Clinton administration, most Palestinians had little or no reason to upset the US, as their situation was improving had prospects of improving more. The Palestinians had something to gain by being nice and civil to the Americans, and other Arab states could help the Palestinians by toning down their rhetoric too.

      Once the Bush administration started with it's "hands off" policy (and lets face it, Bush is not pushing the Israelis or Palestinians to come to the negotiating table anywhere near as hard as Clinton did), the situation in the Middle East heated up, Palestinians' situation worsened, other Arab states have more sympathy with the Palestinians, and the US is seen as the enemy rather than a potential ally.

      --
      No sig for me - too lazy to fill one in...
    2. Re:Now for a Rationality Break from the JBS by Baldrson · · Score: 2
      Ending the interventionist policy is what has triggered this action, if indeed it was done by Islamic terrorists and the root cause is the Arab-Israeli conflict.

      The root cause, of course, is Empire -- something so-called "leaders" are continually trying to build despite the explicit statements of will of the founders in whose name they weild power and the efforts of those founders to codify prohabitions against Empire.

  56. And a Russian hacker now owns Taleban.com by fobbman · · Score: 2
    1. Re:And a Russian hacker now owns Taleban.com by cyrii · · Score: 1

      The site is no more... but here's the Google cache.

      --

      -- Be alert. The world needs more lerts.

    2. Re:And a Russian hacker now owns Taleban.com by fobbman · · Score: 2

      My bad, it should have been Taleban.com.

    3. Re:And a Russian hacker now owns Taleban.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taleban.com page changed again - looks like they've been hacked again!

    4. Re:And a Russian hacker now owns Taleban.com by ethereal · · Score: 1

      No, it should be "Taliban.com". I guess I can't complain if Russian hackers can't spell any better than /. editors, though :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  57. No explosive materials for a few days. by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

    My family has a business drilling and blasting rock when new roads or buildings are put in. They can't do any blasting for 48 hours due to a lock-down on all explosive materials.

    1. Re:No explosive materials for a few days. by unitron · · Score: 2

      Just as well. We could do with a couple of days without hearing anything going boom.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  58. Almost concrete proof of Bin Ladin Involvement... by chronos2266 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Over at yahoo news there is a story that states that the terrorists on the flight rosters were names of members of Bin Ladin's terrorist group...check it out for yourself:
    http://us.news2.yimg.com/f/42/31/7m/dailynews.yaho o.com/h/nm/20010911/wl/crash_binladen_dc_4.html

  59. Re:oh boy.... read this: by nhavar · · Score: 2

    This is a false quote this is not an original quatraine from Nostredamas it is a made up quatrane that was used to prove a point about how easily Nostredamas and predictions could be applied. Search the net again or the newsgroups and you'll find this out.

    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  60. Keep Working by matrix0040 · · Score: 1
    this is truely the biggest tragedy america has faced in the recent time. the response of the ppl of new york .. how they got together to face this was praiseworthy. But i'm critical of the other states. lot of things were shut down .. malls colleges etc .. this should not happen. cuz this is what those terrorists want .. they want to take away our freedom .. we should not let them win. The country is and will be vunerable to such suicuide attacks .. it;s very difficult to gaurd against someone who's willing to give his life. But we shouldn't become scared and stop everything. Soon as the authorities tell us that its safe .. we should get back to work.... like what the congress did tonight

    this is a time that the whole country should stand behind NY as they embark on a herculean task of reconstructing and evacuating. but that doesn't mean the rest of the country should stop. they should go on.

  61. False information by LordCodeman · · Score: 0

    "CNN has reported that multiple suspects were arrested with a van loaded with explosives in the vicinity of New York's George Washington Bridge."

    It has been reported that this is FALSE and NO van with explosives ever existed.

  62. Trapped survivors making cell phone calls by ath0mic · · Score: 1

    or so http://www.cnn.com is initally reporting, though that have no further developments at the time of this post. Also from cnn.com Among those presumed dead are the New York Fire Department's deputy chief and first deputy commissioner. Also presumed dead is Ray Downey, who led the NYFD team that helped out after the bombing in Oklahoma City.

  63. Re:use of illegal video encoders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DivX 4.01 is legal. It uses *supposedly* new code, new from the ground up.

  64. Some things from, well, everywhere... by JM_the_Great · · Score: 1

    http://caffeinehigh.net/~jm/Sep112001/

    have fun downloading... and if you have more stuff, IM me at obfuscatedSN or email me at jm@caffeinehigh.net

    --

    --Justin Mitchell
    "2nd Place is a fancy word for losing" --Bender (Futurama)
  65. further predictions by bobalu · · Score: 1

    Actually I recall reading he had made predictions out to 3000-something, so maybe we still have a little more time.

    "In the year 2525, if man is still alive..."

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
    1. Re:further predictions by bendude · · Score: 1

      About your *.sig...

      What the hell have I been watching on TV for 2 days?

      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  66. Gasoline Prices (OffTopic?) by bladel · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm certain that I am not the only one receiving frantic phone calls from friends and relatives around the country about $5-8/gallon gasoline prices. Usually these alerts are retold third- or fourth-hand accounts.

    I drove around town just for kicks, and all the stations had the same prices that were posted Tuesday morning.

    This reminds me of a real-world version of an email hoax, only this one has the potential to be self-fufilling: At each station there were lines of cars waiting to fill up on $1.75 gas.

    Like alot of stories today, this one is getting out of control. Do your part: do not spread these rumors, and challenge the information of those who do.

    --


    Information wants to be Free. Useful Information will cost you.
  67. Re:Terrorism??? by caseydk · · Score: 1
    you're a fucking moron if you ever think that ANY American group would allow 10,000+ american citizens be killed...

    Of course the US is vulnerable to kamakazi attacks from commercial airlines... just like any city without an active air defense system within their borders that doesn't shoot down civilian aircraft...

  68. Re:oh boy.... read this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, let's do this a point at a time:

    New York is NOT the city of God by any stretch of the imagaination. It's certainly gone by many nicknames over the years, but that's most definitely not one of them.
    I could buy the Trade Center being the Two Brothers if the rest of the passage fit.

    The Pentagon is not really a fortress in any important sense. While some military planning goes on there, so do lots of other things. Besides which, as should be fairly obvious after today, it is not very fortified. Finally, the Pentagon isn't doing so well at the moment and I'm not sure it would be very accurate to describe it as enduring. If anything, I would say the US itself is a better candidate for this fortress.

    Now, I'm all in favor of Bush succumbing to just about anything, he's barely a leader and certainly not a great one.

    Most importantly, even given your interpretation, New York is far from burning. There's a lot of smoke and dust from the rubble, but by tomorrow it'll be pretty well out, and there are no signs of war yet.
    Sure, you can claim that I'm being overly literal in my interpretation, but if you take part of the prophecy figuratively, you have to admit the possibility of taking it all that way. Who's to say that by "third big war" he meant a physical conflict?

  69. Too weird for words.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PAGE 170 of the current (OCTOBER) Wired shows a black radical musical group called THE COUP... the CD cover picture shows the World Trade Center buildings with an explosion on one of them half way up.... Looks very similar to todays pictures. Too close of a resemblance. Also note the groups political leanings.

  70. already proven false by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Great Leader = G.Bush


    There's your problem there...

  71. Why the WTC towers collapsed. by farrellj · · Score: 5, Informative

    What freaked me out was the collapse of the twin towers...I know a bit about structural engineering, and knew that these buildings were designed to withstand a passenger jet hitting them. But what really got to me is how they collapsed, like a controlled explosion where the fold the building in on itself.

    One Declan McCullagh's mailing list, someone posted a much better analysis of the collapse than what has been seen in the media...most of the media engineers were mostly wrong. Take a gander at this url: http://www.pfarrell.com/rants/archtower.html.

    This article talks about how the outside latticework of the WTC was actually a load-bearing member, and there were no internal support columns...and this explains why it collapsed the way that it did.

    We can only theorize that the extreme heat of the jet fuel weaking the steel coupled with the fact that these jets were going fast enough to destroy the lattice work on almost all four sides of the structure where they hit caused the eventual collapse of the structures.We can only that what dieties you pray to that they fell in the manner the did...if they had fallen sidewas, in different directions...the death toll would have gone up by possibly an order of magnitutde!

    ttyl, Farrell J. McGovern (No relation)

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    1. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Informative

      No internal support?

      Interesting, because the architect that designed the building was on ABC news earlier stating that the buildings actually had a solid steel core running in the center of the building.

      Jet fuel (Jet-A) burns at a very high temperature, and it was eventually enough to melt the steel core of the building, which is most likely what caused the collapse.

      Again, this is just what I heard on ABC news today....

      (I know a few structural engineers and they confirm this as well)

    2. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Another good reason to avoid Declan McCullough's libertarian nutcase mailing list. Why is it that libertarians will believe anything as long as it's contrary to what everyone else is saying?

    3. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by tshak · · Score: 2

      You are right on the money with the heat issue. One of the actual architects made the same suggestion on the news. Another thing to understand is that although these buildings can handle the impact, the foundation was seriously traumatized. Consider the SECOND airplane, and the foundation of the entire area went through the same trauma. There's just no way the foundations of the buildings in the area could withstand the shock.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    4. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by driftingwalrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about the added weight? A Boeing 747 has a max. takeoff weight of 400 tons. Now, lets be generous and say it was at half that. You have 400,000 pounds being applied to a severely weekened structure.

      I didn't see the jet come out the other side, so it must have stayed in the building. Wouldn't that contribute significantly to the collapse as well?

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    5. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your definition of "withstood" -- each building took a direct hit from a jumbojet fully loaded with fuel. Yet, it sounds like *most* of those who survived the impact had enough time to escape before the buildings collapsed. Some engineers might consider that to be a success.

    6. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm an engineer and i was rather surprised they held up from the initial hit. Especially after viewing some of the different angles, where the 2nd plane almost hits towards the outside edge of the building. I'm sure there would've been some load-bearing columns in there.

      It may have been designed to withstand a passenger jet hit. 1) But planes have gotten bigger since the mid-60s when construction started. 2) Nothing is fail-proof. Especially in this scenario, where the plane's direction and velocity are variables.

      You're probably right about the heat. But also, the fire suppression system was water-based - which if activated would've spread the jet fuel around the building. (like throwing water on a grease fire)

      Tom

    7. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by richard-parker · · Score: 1

      I don't think the weight of the plane was as signficant as one might think. The number of people in the WTC reaches about 25,000 at the daily peak, and at the time of the attack the number of people has been estimated as 10,000. Just the weight of the additional 15,000 people who would normally have arrived later in the day could conservatively be estimated as at least 1,500,000 pounds, so I don't find the weight of a 400,000 pound aircraft as dramatic as it sounds.

    8. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      The implications for the city are huge. Successful public transportation requires that large numbers of commuters go to the same place at about the same time. Similarly, the density of people is what enables the wonderful shops, markets, theaters and clubs of New York. The lack of density is a direct cause of the decline in quality of life.

      I guess only a New-Yorker architect kan believe population density increases quality of life. Otherwise, a very nice article.

      - Steeltoe

    9. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered how they would go about demolishing such a tall building. Ok, I know about
      controlled explosions and such, but these things
      are HUGE. When I saw the pictures of the towers neatly folding together I wondered whether this is just designed in ? Have a structure that is held together by some sort of brace at the top, once that is destroyed the whole thing folds together. And they dont want to admit it now. Far off ? Maybe..

    10. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess only a New-Yorker architect kan believe population density increases quality of life. Otherwise, a very nice article

      In a city, this is true. As pop density decreases in an area (usually because of some economic factor driving people elsewhere) "void" area are created where no one will invest or travel. Decay inevitably follows.

      New York is an amazing example of what a living, breathing city should be like - it has stayed this way largely because of its high population. Other cities that have seen massive outward migration during the last 40 years are empty shells in comparison.

    11. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by psych031337 · · Score: 1

      And don't forget that all that was built 28 years ago. Materials weaken and the bombings that occured years earlier are thought to have done soem structural damages not heavy enough for making the building fall. But they might have added up to it when the planes came in and set the top level of structure on fire.

      Also, some people report to have heard load bangs before the towers collapsed. Is this fact being investigated/denied or something ? Maybe there were some additional car bombs in there just to make sure.

      And maybe they even tried to get down more. Seeing a picture of NY I saw that the Empire State building is just a few miles off the WTC. What about another jumbo going in there?!

      --
      +++ath0
    12. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by driftingwalrus · · Score: 1

      It just seems to me that that weight would be spread out over the entire structure on numerous floors. The weight of the 747 would be focused on one or two floors. I think it was enough to put the building structure right at the brink - the roof falling down on top was just enough to bring the rest down.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    13. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by Telal · · Score: 1

      Yes, I thought it was extremely fortunate that the buildings did fall in the way they did as opposed to tipping over. I wonder if it wasn't intended by the designers that at least if the building should fail, it should fail in safest possible way. If so, they ought to be thanked.

    14. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by Tattva · · Score: 1

      The people in lower floors complained of only a vibration they at first thought was an earthquake. It seems likely that the foundation was designed to withstand the vibrations associated with an earthquake.

      --
      personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
    15. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by fprintf · · Score: 1

      If you read the engineering sites mentioned already, you will see that the load bearing columns are in the center of the building.

      Yes, it is likely that some of them were taken out, but it is not as obvious as you state - nor were they at the outside edge of the building.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    16. Re:Why the WTC towers collapsed. by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      Aha, thanks. I think I know what you mean.

      - Steeltoe

  72. Twin Towers are designed for 2 hour fire by anlprb · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Towers did exactly what they were supposed to do. They were engineered to fold in on themselves so that they do not take our multiple blocks in the City. The amount of fuel that was expended burned a typical 4 hour fire in about 10 min. That fatigued the girders enough that the floors that were affected started falling in on themselves. Each floor is designed to hold two floors worth of debris before they buckle. The floors that eventually gave way were holding much more than that. The buildings did exactly what was needed. They did not take out more than was minimal in a horrible situation. BTW, I am 10 min outside of the city, and the New Jersey Turnpike was shutdown, including all bridges in the area. All ways in and out were shutdown for a while. They are still not letting anyone into the City. It is 12:30AM now.

    --

    One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and TCP/IP Bind them...
    1. Re:Twin Towers are designed for 2 hour fire by beanerspace · · Score: 1

      From what I read/heard, the addition of Jet fuel created super hot fires that eventually melted some of the steel supports. That the building was essentially supported by it's outer shell, but once the girders melted, gravity and kinetic energy did the rest.

    2. Re:Twin Towers are designed for 2 hour fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Learning (or was it Discovery?) Channel had an amazing show on the WTC and how it was constructed. I hope they'll replay it soon.

    3. Re:Twin Towers are designed for 2 hour fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Really? I saw a blast sequence. I just saw a news clip of an up close up of a different angle I havent seen all day. Look closely as the first building falls. You can see a train of blasts falling AHEAD of the falling cloud of smoke.
      like what happens when professionals level buildings.

      I think the design engineers are correct, the WTC CAN survive a jet plane flying to it.. But *nothing* can stand up to a professional demolition job.

      -tried to make an account it didn't seem to like me
      --anyway--
      ---selsynNO@3phaseSPAM.org
      ----DJselsyn-->http://www.3phase.org/notron

    4. Re:Twin Towers are designed for 2 hour fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have assumed that the 'trail of blasts' falling ahead of the building was not explosives but the fire fanned as the building and all the trapped air and flames were forced down with the building.

    5. Re:Twin Towers are designed for 2 hour fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were designed like a tube with supports every 39" apart along the outside of the buildings. Pretty nifty design actually. Like stacking books on top of a cardboard paper towel tube. Unfortunately once it gets a crease the whole thing comes tumbling down.

    6. Re:Twin Towers are designed for 2 hour fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard at lunch today that after the '93 bombing at the WTC the analyst were in full swing on television, and they brought in some expert engineer to explain on air that if the terrorist wanted to bring the towers down they had to hit a specific spot.

      Well, the engineer went on to explain where that spot was, which just happened to be the exact spot both planes hit on the towers.

      The media at it's best.

  73. Does anyone notice the Linux ads? by CaptSwifty · · Score: 1
    I'm watching Fox News Channel, and I keep seeing footage of a Taxi thats covered in debris, that has an IBM "Peace Love Linux" ad on it. Has anyone else noticed this?

    On another note, I hope as many people as possible can be rescued, and the brave men and women of the NYPD and FD that gave thier lives to save people today.

  74. Re:use of illegal video encoders by ultrapenguin · · Score: 1

    How can it use "new" code, if there was never any "old" code?
    The divx "codec" was/is something along the lines of a hexedited microsoft mpeg4 encoder dll that allowed encoding at > 320x200 size and at higher bitrates.
    I would hardly call that "innovation". Take someone else's code, change a couple bits, and call it your own.

  75. Will you be up to the task? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must strike back at those who did this. Innocents will stand in the way. What will you do? Can you do evil without becoming evil?

    1. Re:Will you be up to the task? by JAVAC+THE+GREAT · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the innocents aren't the targets.

  76. Remember the Good guys by q-soe · · Score: 2

    Something for us all to note that many many families lost parents tonight - and we should not forget the firemen and police - over 300 estimated in various media outlets - attempting to rescue people - these are tru non combatants whose only thought was for the injured and dying.

    There is a n NY time story here - but i have copied the text into this post to attempt to cope with the massively overloaded servers they have today

    http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/12/nyregion/12RES C. html

    Firefighters Dash Into Towers; Many Do Not Return
    By JANE FRITSCH

    New York firefighters, impelled by instinct and training, rushed to the World Trade Center yesterday to evacuate victims. Then the buildings fell down. The firefighters never came out.

    More than 100 were unaccounted for, possibly making this the worst disaster in the New York Fire Department's history, explosions having collapsed the two main towers onto the first wave of rescuers as they snaked through stairwells and hallways. In the tumult, the temporary command center set up on a nearby street to deal with the calamity was buried in a rolling wave of concrete chunks.

    Among those who died there were Chief of Department Peter J. Ganci, and First Deputy Fire Commissioner William M. Feehan. Also killed was one of the department's Roman Catholic chaplains, Michael F. Judge, who had rushed to the scene to comfort victims.

    There was no trace of three of the fire department's most elite units, Rescues 1, 2 and 4, officials said last night.

    A police official said last night that some officers at the scene were also unaccounted for, but "we don't have numbers." The official denied reports of 60 missing officers from the department's Emergency Services Unit, and 18 from the Brooklyn North Task Force.

    Police officials said that as the day unfolded, several officers who had been presumed lost had surfaced. "The numbers are not that extravagant," said Assistant Chief Thomas P. Fahey. As night deepened, officials were able to bring in cranes and heavy shovels to begin moving rubble in hopes of finding survivors. At the same time, they had to contend with several fires that were still burning in adjacent buildings, officials said.

    But hours earlier, the notion of a rescue effort seemed remote.

    "We will be lucky if we don't lose 200 or 300 guys," said Michael Carter, the vice president of the Uniformed Firefighters Association, who was on the scene. "There are entire companies we can't find. At this point, it's less of a firefighting operation and more like a war."

    Like dazed and bloodied soldiers, thousands of firefighters and police officers wandered helplessly throughout the afternoon and evening on the West Side Highway, blocked by the danger of further catastrophe from attempting to enter the scene. Officials feared the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, another high-rise burning in the complex. It finally fell in the early evening.

    By 9 a.m., about 200 firefighters had already arrived at the scene, many of them racing up stairways to reach people trapped on the upper floors, fire officials said. Many of the rescuers were from six-person units that specialize in building collapses, and many are now missing, presumed to have died when the buildings collapsed.

    Marite Anez, who was working in an office on the 87th floor of 1 World Trade Center, said that as she and hundreds of others scrambled down stairways, she passed many firefighters climbing up.

    When she reached the first floor, she said, the building collapsed. "You couldn't see anything," she said. "That's when everyone panicked. Everyone was pushing. The fire people gave us light, showed us the way out. The ones who were going up, I'm sure they died."

    Edward Fahey, among the first firefighters to arrive, said he had to dodge bodies that were being propelled from windows on the upper floors.

    Robert Byrne, from a fire company on Houston Street, said he was on the 30th floor when the second plane hit. "We were trying to evacuate civilians," he said. "The hallways were filled with dust and smoke. The whole building was shaking. We feared it would collapse, and the chief said to get the hell out of there."

    Like many survivors, Mr. Byrne seemed oblivious to the soot and dust that covered his body. He stared blankly and spoke haltingly.

    "I managed to get out of the building just a few seconds before it collapsed," he said. "I hugged the wall with a couple of people. We got very lucky. I don't know what happened to the company. Just me and the lieutenant got out."

    From the beginning, the city's emergency response was hampered. Soon after the first plane hit, the command center for the Office of Emergency Management at 7 World Trade Center was evacuated.

    Fire officials set up a mobile unit outside the complex, on Vesey Street, but that was destroyed when the buildings came down. After that, fire officials moved their command post to a firehouse in Greenwich Village, at Houston Street and Avenue of the Americas.

    There were conflicting reports about whether people in the second building were told to evacuate after the first tower was hit. Several people said they heard an annoucement over the building's public address system saying they should stay put, and that the building was secure. Others said they did not hear any announcements.

    One former Port Authority official said that according to procedures drawn up with the Fire Department, evacuations would only be conducted on the floors immediately above and below the fire. With a capacity of 50,000 workers, simultaneous evacuation could lead to chaos, the former official said.

    For many, the only help had to come from colleagues and others who were fleeing.

    A woman who worked for Morgan Stanley on the 64th floor of Tower 2 -- able to walk only with crutches -- was carried down by fellow employees. "It was incredibly difficult," said the woman, who asked that her name not be used. "They had me over their shoulder for 5 or 10 flights and just couldn't do it."

    Another co-worker she knew only as Louis came upon the struggling group, lifted the woman to his shoulder and carried her by himself, she said, adding that the temperature in the stairwell was at least 90 degrees.

    At about the 15th or 20th floor, the woman recalled, a security guard said they were out of danger, and urged Louis to leave the woman and continue on his own. Louis refused.

    "He carried me down all 54 flights, and then out of the building," she said, "all the way to the E.M.T. guys, and he stuck with me until we got one who said I could go in an ambulance."

    After the first building collapsed, people began looking everywhere for survivors amid the rubble. Flames popped out of an ambulance; taxis slammed into buildings. One man walked around calling out, "Is anyone there? Show me an arm. Show me an arm." He got no response.
    Someone asked a firefighter, "Is there anything I can do?"

    "There's nothing anybody can do," the firefighter replied. "There's nothing anybody can do."

    Firefighters appeared utterly dejected and dumbfounded, standing around with their hands on their hips.

    Mike Fitzpatrick, 38, said he and seven other firefighters were in the lobby of the first building to collapse when one became trapped. They had begun trying to cut him out when the second building collapsed, and they couldn't get hear him anymore. Then they had to leave.

    "We stayed because one of our officers was trapped," he said. "We were trying to dig him out -- we were trying to dig him out. He was alive. It collapsed on him."

    By 11 a.m., hundreds of dazed firefighters were on the scene. Many were on their knees; some were crying, their heads in their hands, sitting on piles of debris.

    No one raced toward the wreckage, afraid that more would fall. Some called their families on borrowed cell phones.

    "I love you too," one said. "I'll come home safe -- don't worry."

    A sea of firefighters and police officers slumped against building or sat dejectedly on the West Side Highway for most of the afternoon. Many refused to talk. Many were in tears.

    Lines of fire trucks and other emergency vehicles sat covered with a thick coating of dust and office papers that had floated out of the sky. They had come from Passaic, N.J., Hicksville, N.Y., all over the region, but mostly they had to sit and wait.

    Frank Carino, 36, a New York firefighter, said he had tried to rescue men on the seventh and eighth floors of one building but the ladder of his aerial truck did not reach high enough. "They had broken the windows and they were yelling out at us the stairways were on fire," he said. "One of the men was using a megaphone." He added that he believed the two were rescued by firefighters within the building.

    Another firefighter, who declined to give his name, knelt on the asphalt, a towel over his shoulder and his eyes bloodshot.

    "I saw at least 10 people jump," he said. "I heard even more than that land and crash through the glass ceiling in the atrium. We could hear them crash. We thought the roof was crashing down but then we looked up and saw that people were falling through the glass. Some people fell right onto the pavement." He stopped, unable to continue talking.

    He said he entered the lobby of 2 World Trade Center with his company, but was immediately blown across the lobby. "We did our best to crawl out," he said. "My company is still missing two guys. They went back in to help people."

    By early evening, hundreds of firefighters stood and watched as ladder trucks poured water onto sections of the towers still belching black smoke. The sense of shock and urgency of earlier in the day was gone. As daylight faded, a handful of firefighters, constructions workers and police officers still scrambled over the rubble with flashlights, but found the same thing as teams earlier in the day -- no sounds, no voices, little sign of life.

    The three blocks of Church Street that border the World Trade Center were lined with the burnt hulks of ambulances, fire trucks and police cars left where their drivers had abandoned them.

    At the corner of Liberty and Church Streets, a five-story section of the top of a building loomed over the road, causing firefighters to stare anxiously above them as they walked below. A New York State flag still flew in front of 7 World Trade Center but the building was a blackened mass. Six inches of ash and office paper covered the graves at the St. James Cathedral, across the street from the towers.

    The chaplain who died, Father Judge, 68, was found by firefighters on the street along with his driver. They recognized him and took him to St. Peter's Church on Barclay Street, where they laid his body at the altar. "The church was there and they figured it was a safe place to put him," said Brother Thomas Cole of the St. Francis Friary on 31st Street, where Father Judge lived.

    His body, wrapped in sheets, was later moved to the empty firehouse across the street from the friary. Later, two dozen friars and firefighters, some weeping, held an impromptu service for him there, reciting the blessing of St. Francis: "May the Lord bless you and keep you and show his face to you, and have mercy on you."

    Brother Cole said that Father Judge's morning prayer had been for "peace and joy in our city."

    Rabbi Joseph Potasnik, also a Fire Department chaplain, recalled that Father Judge gave a sermon recently, "a homily about how you have to enjoy each day with your friends and family. He was a remarkable human being."

    *********
    Lets not forget those people who help us when we need them - these guys are truly heroes

    --
    I refuse to argue with Anonymous Cowards - if you want a discussion get an account....
    1. Re:Remember the Good guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually from what I've heard this will probably be the worst loss of firefighters since Texas City went up in flames in the 1940's. Even that was only a few dozen. This could number in the hundreds. Unfortunately I think we're going to see a lot of gruesome "records" recorded with this terrorist attack.

  77. Re:Terrorism??? by jallen02 · · Score: 1

    Look, I can't claim to understand the idea "The us had it coming"

    That is such utter bullshit.

    The people killed, they had it coming right?

    The atack on people and a nation we deserve that right?

    Dont believe for a second ANYONE deserves this, not any person or any country. Not the civlians of the country anyhow.

    Jeremy

  78. Analysis of Events by Matthew+Sullivan · · Score: 1

    www.stratfor.com

    1. Re:Analysis of Events by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      wow, we should really trust these people.

      after all they're responsible for that wonderful DRM technology known as intether. (is anyone using that piece of shit yet?)

  79. opinion pieces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are a pro-capitalist out there check out the opinion pieces on www.capitalismmagazine.com. They are starting a notification email list as well as a discussion list and will be creating a petition.

  80. More Info on possible reasons the WTC Collapsed by vAMP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is quite a nice page on why the WTC collapsed.
    Im surprised how quick the response is to write these articles.

    http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/wtc.htm

  81. Regarding the kooky Usenet guy by Xcott+R13,+3(0,R4) · · Score: 1

    Several people have posted about a mysterious fellow in alt.prophesies.nostradamus, who stated on Sept 4th that he would be gone for good in one week. His other posts predicted a big terrible event, with religious overtones and a suggestion that he was endangering himself by warning of it.

    Keep in mind, however, that self-proclaimed prophets post to this newsgroup repeatedly, making predictions of vague events on specific dates, over and over, playing the odds. This fellow, for instance, posted that something big would happen on 9/01, and became evasive when nothing big occurred on that date. Then the 9/11 prediction.

    Usenet regulars are also familiar with Daniel Min, who spent the past few years repeatedly predicting the end of the world by specific dates. Every few weeks he was sure we'd be hit by a comet on a specific date a few weeks later. Then we have Sollog, who claims just about every news item to be a "hit" for one of his predictions.

    So, take these with a grain of salt. I certainly do hope the gov't investigates this one fellow, but it could very easily be a dead end.

    Etc etc

  82. Call it 911 day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wanted: new CIA director.

  83. One good thing could come. by Proud+Geek · · Score: 2

    If we remove the Taliban from Afghanistan this will all be worth it. They have caused far more suffering on their own people than this attack has caused, or any of Bin Laden's (other?) attacks.

    I tried to give blood, but they don't want it because I am diabetic. I wish I could do something, but I'm persona non grata in this situation.

    --

    Even Slashdot wants to hide some things

    1. Re:One good thing could come. by sharkey · · Score: 2

      If you can't give blood, please give money, if you can. The Red Cross needs funds, and there is a PayPal account listed above.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:One good thing could come. by smari · · Score: 1

      Actually, I heard on Icelandic media that the Talibans have offered to help with anything they can, INCLUDING handing over Bin Ladin over to the US, provided they give proof of him being guilty.

  84. Slashdot in WarTime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to remember somebody writing to Ask Slashdot how would our community operate in a Wartime situation. I think this is a good example of the kind of activity that would go on if we were at war.

    1. Re:Slashdot in WarTime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yep. Hysteria, finger pointing, confusion, pointless acts of mirroring karma-whoring, and trolling in ways that we can only dream of in peace time.

  85. A Call of Prayer for Our Nation by BMonger · · Score: 1

    I keep getting "lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!" when I try to post this so instead here is a link to what I was going to post (but posted in the UserFriendly comment threads).

    A Call of Prayer for Our Nation

    In summary it contains:
    "I went to church at 7pm tonight to pray. A piece of paper was handed out to those that attended. I retype it here for those of you that may not be sure what to pray for, maybe looking for more to pray for, or bible verses to aid you in this time of tragedy."

  86. Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by pedro · · Score: 1, Insightful

    would comprise a truly musical response to this event, should the perps be *DEFINITELY* identified. (very important. DON'T hit the wrong people!)

    I hate to say this last bit, as it hurts me.. but..

    kill *them*, their *entire families*, their *entire extended families*, and their *ancestors* (defilation of gravesites); ALL of their friends, etc. etc, etc..

    Jihad!

    Fire with fire.

    It worked for the Cosa Nostra, and the KGB.. It'll work for us. Show them we can go absolutely nuts without limit, and make it VERY personal. Throw in some Hannibal shit just to make things interesting.

    And no.. this not a joke or a troll.

    If they are not discussing shit like this in washington, they just aren't thinking.

    --
    Brak: What's THAT?
    Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
    1. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by FFFish · · Score: 2

      I think there's a very good chance that they're going to discover that the terrorist organization -- almost certainly Osama bin Laden -- had the cooperation of a national government.

      The consequence of which is almost certainly all-out, no-holds-barred war against that country. And rightly so. There will be civilian casualties, but that's an acceptable consequence of modern war.

      One hopes that a longer-term consequence of any action that's taken will be the creation of a spirit of cooperation toward resolving the problems in the mid-East.

      [yes, I'm assuming that a mid-East faction is to blame. I don't think there's anyone else in the world that hates the USA enough to have done it, nor any others organized enough to pull it off.]

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    2. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's when people only think in terms of revenge and violence that these kinds of things happen. I understand that today's events are very personal to a lot of people, and you're allowed to be disgusted. You're allowed to be angry. You're allowed to be frustrated.

      However, it is NOT a good thing to be bloodthirsty or hateful, no matter how justified you feel.

      I am an American, and I have taken these events very personally. I don't know anybody that was involved, but I can put myself there. I can imagine being in one of those planes. I can imagine my beloved mother, father, or siblings being one of the thousands killed. It hurts, undeniably, but I hate no one.

      Reciprocating violence with violence only perpetuates the problem. Unfortunately, violence the only language far too many people in this world speak.

      -WM

    3. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say we call it Operation Hannibal Express

      Freak the ever loving shit out of those mofos.

    4. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's thinking like this that is the cause of great tragedies in the first place. Please think about what you are saying. You are advocating killing innocent people. Absolutely the people who are responsible for this must be brought to justice.. but no more.

    5. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

      Did you notice one Palistinian organization claimed responsibility for this action after the first two planes hit the WTC, but before the collapse. After everything else happened, they denied involvement in any of this. I'm sure they didn't do it and they realized what our response would (or should) be:

      No holds barred.

      Pave them over and make a parking lot.

      To any country that stands in our way or says we shouldn't take such action, I say "Fsck You!"

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
    6. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by popeyethesailor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yeah sure..
      Just in case, we will do that even if they were from the States, right Commander?

    7. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was tried before and it didn't work for US. Remember Vietnam?

    8. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And displaying weakness only encourages terrorist.

      We need to be proactive- targeted killings BEFORE the terrorists have the chance to kills thousands or tens of thousands of people.

      I just hope our country has the guts to take action and ignore those who want to "talk" while we get systematically killed.

    9. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Reciprocating violence with violence only perpetuates the problem

      Unless you respond so violently that you wipe the problem off the face of the earth and shake the rest of the country into quite resignation. That is the kind of response many americans have come to expect of our country. Yes it perpetuates the problem but you enter into the conflict with the resolution that the problem will be solved!

    10. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no joke or troll?

      i can't beleive mr "commander neal" would let something like this through on a serious site

    11. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >There will be civilian casualties, but that's an >acceptable consequence of modern war.

      What, 15,000+ not enough for you?

    12. Re:Napalm, Magnesium, White phosphorus.. by bendude · · Score: 1

      To reverse this situation and look from the eyes of the perpetrators in the moment they suffered their attack. If they thought "Kill *them*, their *entire families*, their *entire extended families*, etc, etc", you'd already be dead. If they are discussing shit like yours in Washington, then you're already dead. Good luck.

      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  87. Kudos to slashdot and all of us, readers. by tcc · · Score: 5, Informative

    This might be off-topic but In my book it's not, since its about the information covered.

    Slashdot has been my primary source of information, just about all the biggest news feed were jammed, didn't have any tv to watch, and the progress at which people posted here and all the links given, plus the overall stability of the site, I mean, I'm impressed.... I was sure at some point when the server started being overloaded that it would be down for hours, instead, it was just for minutes or simple slowdown but nothing critical like the big feeds which were totaly busted.

    Unfortunately. this is not the kind of event you'd want to happen to test the overall stability of a server and the quality of it's content, but at least it hanged in there, where others that have way more financial power and supposely professionnal staff to do the job, failed.

    Thanks to all the Slashdot team, and us, readers/contributors.

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    1. Re:Kudos to slashdot and all of us, readers. by FFFish · · Score: 2

      I'd also like to thank Slashdot: considering the load it's handled today, the software has performed admirably.

      And thank you to Slashdot posters, who have, on the whole, remained level-headed! I had expected the commentaries to quickly run to jingoistic get-em-back nationalism, but there's been very little of that.

      I hope the government is as sane.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    2. Re:Kudos to slashdot and all of us, readers. by bernieda · · Score: 1

      While for some it was a pain to get any kind of news, for certain others (such as myself) there was a certain diarrhea of rumors, especially during the first few hours of the tragedy.

      One of those rumors that quickly vanished was about a few airplanes that suddenly disappeared from the radar screen (I am not talking about any of the four crashed airplanes). I do not recall of any retraction concerning them. Did I missed a media formal apology for a rumor or did those missing airplanes-as-a-topic really vanished from the newscast? Thanks for the precisions.

    3. Re:Kudos to slashdot and all of us, readers. by Fesh · · Score: 2
      I agree on that one. Yeah, I got a bit carried away once I realized that it was a terrorist act... And have been rightly admonished by some of the replies. I'm still very angry, of course... But I don't advocate the random tossing of high-explosives that our nation has gotten a reputation for in the last few years.



      We will find and deal with those responsible. Our job is to do that without doing the sort of evil that was perpetrated yesterday.

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  88. Almost concrete ....huh? by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 2, Informative

    All I saw was "bin laden is linked...bin ladin is linked...." and never a "linked by" or "linked because of". Is speculation passed through yahoo now considered almost concrete proof? Scary...

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Almost concrete ....huh? by chronos2266 · · Score: 1

      He is linked because members of his group have been found within the flight rosters of the flight's that were hijacked. Next time please read the link that is posted.

    2. Re:Almost concrete ....huh? by JAVAC+THE+GREAT · · Score: 1

      Maybe another group used those names knowing they would be linked to bin laden?

    3. Re:Almost concrete ....huh? by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

      Names of suspected ``terrorists'' with possible ties to bin Laden's organization were found on the passenger rosters of the hijacked planes, a government source said.



      Is this what you're talking about? What does this prove? That were desperate for a scape goat? Who knows who was actually on the plane. Do you think making fake ID's and lying about your identity is beneth a terroist? And check out where the information came from. "a government source", theres some iron-clad evidence. Maybe it was bin laden, maybe it wasn't. I'll wait till real facts come in before I speculate.

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    4. Re:Almost concrete ....huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joey, how did you get so old, being so stupid?

  89. IRC CNN FEED by hepkitten · · Score: 0

    Trying this again logged in =)

    The CNN feed is down,. We are working on a new feed. If you have a closed caption decoder card and are preferrably running *nix PLEASE email me (dis@gruntle.org). You will be repayed in some way.

    ~hk_ irc.idlenet.org resident sexual icon

  90. The Middle East Situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As technically astute the /. readers obviously are, unfortunately by some of the posts they are less well informed on world affairs. Afghanistan is now a battleground fought over by proxies of Iran and Pakistan. Apparently Iran is backing the nationalist faction and Pakistan is backing the Taliban. This is obviously a cause for concern for the whole world. It is not inconcievable that nuclear weapons in some form may fall into the hands of religous fanatics. We should all be prepared for this eventuality.

    When the Solviet Union pulled out of Afghanistan and US funding for military operations dried up many religous radical Afghan veterans dispersed to locations thrugout the Middle East. The most public consequence of this was the USS Cole bombing. These veterans have no love of the US and bring their fanatical attitudes and skills to receptive elemements in Middle Eastern countries. Make no mistake, and the military professionals are of the opinion, that this is just the beginning.

  91. Public Training on Terrorism is Required by ClarkEvans · · Score: 1

    It looks like all passengers and flight personnel (including the pilots) on the the flight bound for Pentagon were herded to the back of the plane by hijackers armed with knives and cardboard cutters.

    This just goes to show we have no public training on how to handle this situtation. I don't think a "high-tech" solution, like banning encryption is needed. How about something simple... educate the public?

    1. Re:Public Training on Terrorism is Required by Spinality · · Score: 1

      Uhh... Just remember that these guys were presumably young, very fit, trained in armed and unarmed combat, and totally fearless. It is quite possible that a determined attack by the passengers would simply have resulted (and in fact, for all we know, may actually have resulted) in a bunch of brave people becoming very dead. (Maybe in fact that's how the fourth plane was downed off-target.) A trained fighter can usually beat the crap out of a bunch of overage overweight passengers, despite a little knowledge and courage on their part. The samurai movies don't exaggerate this aspect of combat. The better fighters usually win in lopsided victories.

      JMHO -- Spiny

      --
      -- We all have enough strength to endure the misfortunes of other people. La Rochefoucauld
    2. Re:Public Training on Terrorism is Required by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 2

      Check out:
      http://www.jerrypournelle.com/mail/currentmail.h tm l

      for one uncorroborated story - it claims passengers fought back on the PA flight.

      --

      ---

      Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

    3. Re:Public Training on Terrorism is Required by linzeal · · Score: 1

      They are from new jersey!! Go Vinnies !! You don't screw with those people.

    4. Re:Public Training on Terrorism is Required by ExarKun42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems to me that this could have been prevented by any number of simple precautions on the part of the airlines.

      Hijackings have been a real threat for deecades, yet there has been little done to planes to make it difficult. security in airports has gone up, but once onboar, security is nearly non-existant.

      How to be more secure without unduly troubling passengers?

      -Isolate the cabin. On takeoff, the pilot, copilot and navigator are locked in. Remodel the plane a little so they have a micro-fridge and a toilet. Or, the pilots simply use a different door to enter the plane. If hijackers have to go through a bulkhead to reach the controls, they'll have a lot harder time of it.

      -Prepare the crew. Train random (or volunteer) stedardess in armed and unarmed combat. Train and certify pilots the same way you would a security guard, and issue them a sidearm. Rather than being helpless victims, flight crews can be proactive.

      -Plainclothes safety marshalls. Armed security personnel ride random flights providing for uncertainty in the minds of hijackers. Will this flight be easy? Or will it be "Passenger 57"?

      -Pilot's Panic button/silent alarm. The pilot presses the button, starting a broadcast of black box info, audio/video cockpit monitors, and automatically switches control to a ground station. All this happens silently and instantly.

      -And finally, more vigilant security at airports. A larger security force, cycling through positions will be more effective than a smaller force assigned to the same posts, day after day. If 50 people setting off the metal detector forget their keys, #51 probably did, too. Right?
      After all, nothing happened yesterday. Complacency is the greatest friend of any criminal.

      Anyway, these are just my ideas to prevent this kind of horror from happening again. Take 'em or leave 'em.

    5. Re:Public Training on Terrorism is Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you've been watching too many kung-foo movies; even been in a bumb rush? It ain't fun.

    6. Re:Public Training on Terrorism is Required by kevinank · · Score: 2
      Sky marshals already fly on random flights. I can't see why security guards can't be flown on every
      flight larger than a 727.

      Also flight attendants probably are aware of a
      hijacking well before the pilot is. Pilot cabin
      doors should be locked by default, and attendants
      should probably be able to signal the pilot that a
      hijacking is underway. Then a simple policy
      response would probably be sufficient to guarantee
      that a hijacking takeover attempt would fail.

      In person I can easily see how a terrorist
      could use a bomb threat or helpless hostage to
      persuade a pilot to leave the flight controls,
      but through a policy response that effort would
      (nearly) always fail making it useless to try.

      --
      LibBT: BitTorrent for C - small - fast - clean (Now Versio
  92. This is not Nostradamus. by KFury · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is an urban legend. Even though it was just 'born' today, it's totally fabricated.

    Here's the debunking.

  93. sorry, and a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, this senseless slaugher is such a tragedy I don't really have any words to describe my feelings... I express my condolences to the families.

    However, it's been many hours since the attack, during which I tried to comprehend what happened. Among others, a thought came to my mind: when it became known that the planes got hijacked, and when it later became obvious that they're heading to major cities and not expressing any demands, why weren't the planes shot down outside the cities? I understand that it's cruel for the people on board and their relatives, but they were pretty much doomed anyway, and loss of thousands of other lives could have been prevented. Any comments?

  94. Where is the UN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow I haven't heard any word from the UN regarding this atrocity. Why is that?

    1. Re:Where is the UN? by unitron · · Score: 2

      The UN was evacuated as a security precaution.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:Where is the UN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you're a paranoid idiot. UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan issued an statement early on:
      "We are all traumatised by this terrible tragedy".
      When are you people fucking going to grow up. The general imbecility displayed here and elsewhere may cause greater damage than all this mess could even dream.

    3. Re:Where is the UN? by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      Kofi Annan has strongly denounced the attacks.

      It was just on the news.

  95. Re:Gasoline Prices (OffTopic?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gas in Wis has reached 6 dollars a gallon in some cities, and lines in my town (where it is still 1.80~) are 40-50 cars long at all stations in town (dozens)

  96. Re:oh boy.... read this: by NitsujTPU · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uhmm, cute but incorrect. I don't believe nostradamus's prophecies, but to follow it correctly.

    City of God... Definately not NYC, Jerusalem is the city of God === Jerusalem

    Where the two brothers... 3 buildings fell, and they weren't brothers, they were 1 center with MANY workers and separate offices, if you're going to follow that logic, the brothers must be the people at war. This could be the Palestinians vs Isreali, or perhaps the civil war being played out in Afghanistan. Brothers don't have to love each other, they are just "related" some how. (in prophecies at least, I love my brother) == Inconclusive, but it's 2 political factions

    Fortress... Pentagon, eh, maybe, but that's an office building. Note that they didn't crash into a military BASE where there would be missiles and such to attack them. This is perhaps the US as a whole more accurately, since the US has not suffered an attack on their soil of this magnitude for a long time, but is a symbolically important target to many groups. Of course, the US is very open. Crossing boarders in other countries is much more difficult. Perhaps this could be viewed as the World Trade Center, the warground of what was until not long ago, and I am sure will remain the modern warfare, that is fought at a terminal in stock shares, not with guns. == Also inconclusive

    Great Leader... GWB, Congress, The US... Keep giong, it could even be someone on the other side, the Great Leader of the attack (though I don't think he's so great) == Still inconclusive

    Big City... Eh, NYC

    Still, this is pretty ambiguous. I don't really follow nostradamus nor do I think that this is one of the signs of the end of the world. This is bad, this sucks, this is a shock to us, this isn't apocalyptic prophecy. OBL (not to cast this on him until it's known) is not the sort of charismatic leader to start the kind of war that gets printed in the bible in the end of days. Whoever did this will be brought to justice swiftly and forcefully. This isn't a war they can win. The one in the Bible is one that drags out and is fought hard by both sides. Not to sound overconfident, but I haven't seen the sort of military force yet that I would expect from such a power. Until planes fly over my house that aren't from the US, and start carrying out surgical strikes against us, I won't believe that it is that sort of war. This will not stand, they can not win. The sort of war in the bible, I would be standing out front with my hunting rifles right now gunning down an invasion.

  97. This has been a long time coming by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 0, Troll

    We've been asking for this ever since delta force. It isn't US complacency that caused this. That's like saying the we lost Vietnam because we defeated ourselves -- a self-serving lie to avoid addressing the fact that a few terrorists from Allah knows where got the better of us by hijacking planes using knives.

    This was caused by our arrogant overseas policies. We've treated that corner of the world like our personal whipping boy for five decades, made belligerent demands, and destabilized the area with our political manipulations. We've painted an uncomplimentary picture of their people and their religion in our media, and we wonder why there are a few pissed off muslims about.

    To top it off, we take massive military action, demand reparations, impose sanctions without the approval of the UN, commit war crimes, of which some of our highest leaders have been found guilty (Dick Cheney is an indicted war criminal! So is Bush sr., Norman Schwarzkopf and Dan Quayle.)

    Moral outrage from us is inappropriate. We should be extending the olive branch to these people. This was the act of men driven to extremes by our arrogance. It was not the act of fundamentalists with an irrational hatred of us. Their hatred was indeed quite rational.

    --

    Denial isn't just a river in Italy

    1. Re:This has been a long time coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you retarded piece of shit troll.

    2. Re:This has been a long time coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the f*uck what? So they hated us. That DOES NOT and NEVER WILL justify killing THOUSANDS of our people. Have you no heart?

    3. Re:This has been a long time coming by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the baader meinhof boys said, "The greater the atrocity, the greater the value." You are utterly naive if you don't understand why the killing of innocents is justified to these people, and far preferable to the killing of soldiers.

      Yes, I mourn for the loss of life. But not greatly. I've lost too many family members these past two years to feel sincere grief for strangers. This incident is only outstanding for it's location and it photogenic nature. It will not be helped by me pretending to be touched, like the drama queens who are flooding this site. The reactions I'm seeing are the reactions of people whose lives have made them so numb, that when a major incident takes place they feel alive again, and begin to crave more disaster.

      Did you know it is a common practice in parts of Africa to crack holes in fuel pipelines to steal petroleum? Did you know that this often results in huge explosions? These explosions often kill thousands -- literally thousands -- of africans. If I go through my life feeling soulful grief for those whose lives are foreshortened by incomprehensible catastrophe, I will be paralysed.

      Innocent people die. Get used to it. The US has never been squeamish about murdering innocents. Over 2000 civilians died in Panama.

      --

      Denial isn't just a river in Italy

    4. Re:This has been a long time coming by hellsnail · · Score: 1

      These people can not simply be the blood-thirsty madmen which our media has fed us to believe. Perhaps we should all seek to discover why such incredible acts are necessary to their cause? Why are they so pissed off?

      We see only the shiny surface of this world; most of us have no idea how the world really operates. The western world, led by America, holds much of the world in slavery. The slave states are the first interface to much of the basic elements of our society, from banannas to oil. Also, the slaves are as vital to our society as were the rowers -- chained to their oars -- on ancient ships. Perhaps they sense disaster towards the bow; maybe they'd rather chance the master's whip than face certain destruction.

      Our thirst is unquenchable yet we drink and drink and drink. This is what we're born into and trained for. We are ignorant and stupid.

    5. Re:This has been a long time coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know all about my enemies enemy is my friend but... this is partly the result of bad US policy from years ago coming back to haunt... Iraq was a friend 20yrs ago when the bigger enemy was Iran. OBL was a CIA-trained and US supported friend when the Soviets were the bigger enemy.. These terrorists _should_ be good, they're quite possibly trained by the CIA. Friends chosen tactically for a short term (5-10yrs) reason have ended up being the greater enemy over the strategic term (10-50yrs). About time the US foreign policy was done over a longer time-frame. It's not that it's a recent thing either. Uncle Ho was US sponsored during WWII against the Japanese, look how that turned out....
      The other point is, it hurts when the boot is on the other foot too.... I live in England and have been in-directly involved in two major IRA bombings, both of which destroyed city areas and caused major loss of life. Manchester and Canary Wharf. This was perpetrated by a US-civilians supported terrorist organisation against another western democracy for a religious war. US-Irish quite happily donate funds to buy arms for a religious "Jihad" in my country yet are now venting their righteousness over a similar act done to them. Think about it before people get too "holier-than-thou".
      Yes, I've stayed anonymous but I'm no coward. I just don't want US Redneckism flaming me to hell for the next month....

    6. Re:This has been a long time coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's true in a way.

      I saw the list this morning of companies who's innocent workers died.

      I wondered whether, if someone were to compile a list of how many deaths in third world nations these companies were responisible for, how many that would come to.

      I bet it would be enough to fill those 2 towers many times over. No indignant reaction about how 'they' will not opress 'our' right to 'express ourselves as americans' will negate the fact that we've been taking the world for a ride for some time now.
      ---
      m

    7. Re:This has been a long time coming by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine why not. Gives online life a little frisson. Even if you just sign up a throwaway account, it's good to give these people continuity in their flaming. It's a catharsis thing for them. You might even be saving livesd by giving them someone to strike out at harmlessly online!

      --

      Denial isn't just a river in Italy

    8. Re:This has been a long time coming by Asha2004 · · Score: 1

      Ok NOBODY deserves something like this! Certainly not civilians. This is a horrible happening!
      But the bloodthirsty reactions of some people are absolutely absurt. The "an eye for an eye" idea is uncivilised and proven to be ineffective (since for example that is the israeli policy). Peace will not be established by humiliating and hurting whole populations. Besides bringing the brains behind this attack to justice the fundamentals of foreign policy of the US will have to change. I is and has always backfired, maybe not as directly as now but it has backfired.
      Iraq (Sadam) was funded to fight Iran (Islam)
      Israel is funded to fight palestinians
      Bin Laden was funded to fight the russians in Afganistan. The list of foreign policy decisions the US have made which have turned against them and mostly others is endless (I am not even mentioning asia and south america)

      Let this not so much lead to PAY BACK but more to curing the roots of trouble in the world. Most people may find this to be way to mild but I am convinced that most hatred in the world is caused by feelings of injustice, feelings of powerlessness, and the lack of knowledge.

      greetings Asha

  98. Let's Speculate by dragons_flight · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let me be very clear, everything that follows is speculation. It will probably be days if not weeks before we have a good idea what has happened today. We may never really know all that has led up to this tragedy, but what is the likely scenario?

    We know that 4 planes were hijacked and 3 slammed into buildings.

    Almost certainly all the hijackers on the planes are now dead as well as many many victims. By targeting the WTC and Pentagon they have attacked buildings with both actual and symbolic value to the American way of life. These are places presumably intended to produce as many casualties as possible and demonstrate the vulnerabilities of even our greatest organizations.

    Clearly these people hate America and Americans and are perfectly happy to give their lives to hurt us and create terror. Multiple people prepared to give their lives in the assault suggest a religious group with beliefs that their souls will be honored after their death. Essentially all major religions (e.g. Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism) share a fundamental respect for life, but at many times and places their teachings have been corrupted to justify killing in God's name. In the current case Islam seems the most likely, not because they are especially vulnerable, but because people in Islamic regions seem the most likely to hate Americans at this point in history.

    We must bear partial responsibility for the hate they feel towards us. At some point there was a failure to connect with these people and address their concerns in a reasonable way. Now the world has stepped down a path that will almost certainly lead to even greater destruction. Of course, our unseen attackers bear the greatest responsibility and will hopefully be called to account, but we must wonder if there was anything society could do to redress their grievances before they grew to the point that they perceived violence as their only option.

    What does it take to do this? Most likely you need pilots trained on these planes or one's like them. This ensures that the pilot will in fact fly directly into the target, and minimized the chance of the original pilot conveying that something is wrong. Probably it would be easier to find suicide bombers and send them to flight school than to recruit pilots to be bombers.

    Terrorists would also need weapons. This means either being able to conceal them through security or being able to go around security. If you have money it is probably easier to get weapons that can be walked through a metal detector than to research ways to breach security. This is especially true if you plan to go through more than one airport. Hard plastics and ceramics can be made into some nasty things if cost is not a concern. Alternatively, a sharp obsidian or glass knife with wooden handle could probably be made for a bargain.

    Once on the plane you want to be able to take control and get into the locked cockpit. Threatening passengers might get one to open the cockpit but it's not totally reliable and they would certainly send distress signals first. More preferably one would want to practice breaking into cockpits and have a tool or ram that could do it quickly. A slightly modified piece of luggage might serve as a ram. (I don't know what the locking mechanisms are like but someone taking the time to train as a pilot certainly would have access to them and perhaps figure out how to quickly defeat them.)

    A single terrorist is somewhat likely to be overpowered in the tight quarters of an airliner, and is at greater risk if he has to pilot the plane himself while in a cockpit that can no longer be secured properly. This suggests that you need multiple suicidal terrorists per plane. Two might be enough, but three would be safer because that still gives them a backup even after your pilot takes the controls.

    To continue speculating, we are talking about 8-12 hijackers, at least 4 of which pilots. They would probably want some financial backers and other organizers. It would make sense to have associates to recruit the next generation of terrorists. If they're foreign nationals you need an identity and papers, or some other way to get into the country. Of course securing entrance into the country wouldn't require telling the person you get the false papers from what you intend to do. While they do want some people in support positions, they wouldn't want too many as it increases the opportunities of leaks that would kill the whole project. I'm guessing that somewhere between 10 and 30 people knew about this attack in advance.

    The main cost is in preparation time and finding the right people to go through with it. The point is that you don't actually need an army, expensive weaponry, or lots of financial backing to accomplish this. Of course, having financial backing and encouragement is perhaps rather likely and would make things easier, especially if they come from third world nations where the relative income is quite low.

    Obviously we will have to wait until the facts are known to see how accurate my speculations are, and truth is often stranger than imagination.

  99. Interesting coverage for the Americans by fobbman · · Score: 2

    If you have The Learning Channel on your television sets you will be able to view coverage of the tragedy from the BBC as of 21:34 Pacific Time. Interesting to see what information comes out over there, along with their opinions.

  100. pics off a webcam by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    http://russnelson.com/wtc.html has pics off the wallstreetitalia.com webcam, on the 73rd floor of the Empire State Building. One of them was just moments before the first tower collapsed.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  101. My /. Fortune File Entry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This came up when I posted

    Excellent time to become a missing person.

    ...unfortunately yes.

    1. Re:My /. Fortune File Entry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This morning the QOTD read "Do you smell something burning? -- Joan of Arc." Yes, they're doing quite nicely.

  102. Sadly, this is no longer true by Xcott+R13,+3(0,R4) · · Score: 1
    This is complete and utter bullshit. Massoud (the rebel leader) is a freedom fighter endeavoring on the quest for civil liberties and democratic government in Afghanistan.
    Massoud was killed two days ago.

    http://www.janes.com/security/international_securi ty/news/jir/jir010911_1_n.shtml

    Certainly an eventful month for the Taliban.

  103. Hearded like Cows to the Slaughter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN is reports that passengers were hearded to the back of the plain with cardboard cutters!! Who is the coward again? I've seen Cows get hearded to the slaughter; this is what we get for neglecting education.

  104. Friday's "Worldwide Caution" from Dept. of State by Memophage · · Score: 2, Informative

    I find it interesting that just this past Friday, (September 7th) the U.S. Department of State issued the following "Worldwide Caution" travel bulletin for the benefit of US travelers:

    "Over the last several months, the U.S. Government has learned that U.S. citizens and interests abroad may be at increased risk of a terrorist action from extremist groups. In addition, we have received unconfirmed information that terrorist actions may be taken against U.S. military facilities and/or establishments frequented by U.S. military personnel in Korea and Japan. We are also concerned about information we received in May 2001 that American citizens may be the target of a terrorist threat from extremist groups with links to Usama Bin Ladin's Al-Qaida organization. In the past, such individuals have not distinguished between official and civilian targets. As always, we take this information seriously. U.S. Government facilities worldwide remain at a heightened state of alert."

    [From: http://travel.state.gov/wwc1.html ]

  105. Gas Prices in Oklahoma City by Kenny+Austin · · Score: 1

    My wife saw lines backed out into the street for gas that cost $5 a gallon. She knew I was almost out of gas so she called me and I went to fill up. I waited in line for twenty minutes and paid $1.81, which is only about 30 cents higher then normal, however I do not work in the city.
    While waiting in line I heard on the news that some people had report gas prices as high as $6 to $7 dollars a gallon. There were a few minor car accidents because of the lines backed out into the streets, in some cases for a few blocks, just to get gas. A local reporter had been told by the owner of a local gas station that he had received a call stating that they would quit production of gas tomorrow. A lot of gas stations in the area have ran out of gas (even those selling at $5 a gallon).
    The governor came on the air around 2~3pm (I cannot remember) and stated that since we were not in a state of emergency at the time, the stations were not breaking the law, however people should quit buying at stations that are jacking the prices up and there were hotlines setup to report what stations those were. The oil companies denied saying that production would cease, most people think that was just an excuse on the part of the gas stations owners to jack up the price. By the time I went home (5:50pm), most of the prices I saw where only 30 to 50 cents higher then normal, with the highest prices being at $2 dollars a gallon. The more respectable gas stations were the least affected, every 7-11 that I saw tonight (at least eight or nine) had completely taken their prices off of the sign.

  106. Re:Almost concrete proof of Bin Ladin Involvement. by PD · · Score: 2

    When I worked at American Express I wrote a filter to check credit card applications against the OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) database. The database has names (real names) of terrorists and drug dealers who have had their assets seized by the courts to compensate their victims. The joke at the time was "what terrorist is going to use their real name?" The filter I was required to write checked against the real names of the terrorists.

    So, perhaps you are another person who thinks that terrorists are too dumb to not give a real name. A bastard like Bin Ladin has more enemies than just the US, believe me.

  107. Re:oh boy.... read this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "On the Boards of Used Net, there will be a great troller. Many people will copy chaos, while the poster endures. Many people get sucked in"

    Nostradamus died 1st July 1566. He sure as hell wasn't around in 1654

  108. Perhaps this is a conspiracy by Anonymous+Pancake · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Who's to say this isn't a massive conspiracy to give a reason to beef up the USA's millitary, and turn george bush jr. into a hero by leading the country during a disaster. And as a bonus, they get to blame it on bin laden and finally get rid of that hard-line muslim nuisance.

    Who's to say this isn't an extremely immoral inside job?

    1. Re:Perhaps this is a conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is certainly a possibility. There are a million questions to be asked.

      It's not that I firmly believe in this explanation, but I want people to be open minded about the cause of this tragedy.
      I'm worried that we're too desperate to find those responsible, and that we'll pin the blame on a scapegoat.

  109. Out of touch by mr100percent · · Score: 2


    "The Americans have forgotten that God exists. They have us by the throat and now they find themselves in a science fiction film scenario, but this time Rambo's not there to save the White House."

    I don't understand the people watching the bombings and celebrating, how can they have such a skewed view of Americans? Is it just because they see us as rich?

    1. Re:Out of touch by BeBoxer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe it is you who is out of touch with American foreign policy. You see, we provide weapons to Israel. Israel then uses those weapons to attack Palestine. In some recent cases, being so bold as to launch air-to-surface missles at cars in order to kill the drivers or attack houses in inhabited areas. If you really think that Palestinians who watch their people being attacked and killed by American-made helicopters and jets hate us because we are rich, you need to pay more attention. Not that any of this justifies todays events. But, Palestinians have quite valid reasons for disliking the US. And, as a democrocy, we do bear responsibility for the actions of our leaders. So perhaps you should pay more attention to what our leaders are doing in our name and vote accordingly.

    2. Re:Out of touch by AnarchoFreak_00 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, cause the US does alot of very nasty things if you do the research. The trouble is, they just do what everyone else does, and see the US as one big enemy. They forget, or ignore that fact that innocent people, just like them, where working in the buildings, and not the leaders that they hate. They're probably sitting in a nice cosy bunker somewhere.

      Funny thing is, The US will attack who ever did this. And the civilians of that country will be asking the same question you did.

      I call this concept 'war' and it's a silly waste of human life. But it seems to be ok if the waste of life is the 'bad guys'.

    3. Re:Out of touch by FFFish · · Score: 1, Troll

      It's because the American government has acted atrociously, time and time again.

      And because the American government has supported other governments that have acted atrociously, time and time again.

      And, just as importantly, because their leaders -- religious and/or political -- have been brainwashing their people.

      They celebrate, because they don't value human lives as we do. In some countries, terrorist acts are so common that you live day to day, knowing that you could easily become a victim in an attack.

      [And the brainwashers love it: these scared people are looking to blame someone for the violence and fear. It's easy to make the USA the monster.]

      There's blame to go all around.

      It's a damn sorry situation. The biggest question that needs to be asked is: how can it be resolved?

      [My fear: it can't.]

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    4. Re:Out of touch by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      I don't understand the people watching the bombings and celebrating, how can they have such a skewed view of Americans?

      People are stupid, film at eleven!

      I've seen "serious"(?) comments on various message boards saying things like "We should nuke Afghanistan into a glowing crater" (regardless of whether their involvement has been established and regardless of innocent civilians over there) and some really ludicrous stuff about Islam.

      If you start listening to what everyone is saying, you're going to find a lot of really stupid stuff on all sides. That's just how people are.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    5. Re:Out of touch by linzeal · · Score: 1
      Noam Chomsky for President

      Seriously does anyone in the government speak out against the injustice that israel perpetuates without indignation lately?

  110. Security at Airports maybe not so good by Jormundgard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know if anyone is interested in this, but maybe. When my dad died about a year ago, one of the mementos I got was this army knife that my Grandpa used in World War 2 (It's a Kabar knife - I think they're still standard issue in the armed forces). These things are pretty big, maybe 2/3 my arm length, and if you look at them you can see that they're designed to kill someone.

    So, when I flew home, I threw this in my bag and didn't really remember that I shouldn't bring this on the plane. But it went right through all the security checks, and none of the security people noticed it in my bag. I was kind of surprised that I got it through so easy.

    Anyway, I thought I'd mention it since people are saying that the hijackers used knifes to take over the plane. It can't have been too hard to get them on.

    1. Re:Security at Airports maybe not so good by allism · · Score: 1

      It's entirely possible that the terrorists used weapons that were completely legal to carry on board the plane, since a passenger may carry a knife with a blade up to four inches long onto a plane (think pocket knife, nail file, etc.). One of the passengers who called her husband from one of the planes said that the hijackers were using box cutters, and that stewardesses had been stabbed.

      Unfortunately, freedom requires a certain degree of responsibility.

      Something I've heard repeatedly on the radio here are people who work at airports saying that security is bad, they've seen employees bring contraband into airports frequently. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE??? Don't these people realize they have a responsibility, not just as employees of the airport but as citizens of America and members of the human race, to take action when they see this? Safety and security are not something we can leave up to the authorities without sacrificing great amounts of personal freedom (and I for one am not willing to do that), so it is up to individuals to watch ourselves and our surroundings.

    2. Re:Security at Airports maybe not so good by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

      Some senator or other random person on CNN made the comment that airports are losing their employees to the fast food industry. Maybe he was just venting, but that could explain some of the problem if it's true.

    3. Re:Security at Airports maybe not so good by allism · · Score: 1

      No, he wasn't just venting. I can't remember who it was last night on TV, but they said there is an average of 400% turnover average in airport security nationwide.

  111. Re:use of illegal video encoders by nhavar · · Score: 2

    A> Commercial availability does not equate to being legal. Many items are "commercially available" but have restrictions on them as to be warranted illegal (IE radar detectors, beer, etc.) Linux for quite some time was not a commercially available product... does that make it illegal and since it has the original code that was available during this non-commercial period is that illegal also?

    B> Can you prove what you say about hex edited code. I have seen several people make this claim and not one has been able to substantiate it with code, proof, a site, or a lawsuit from Microsoft to back up the claim. If DivX were in fact "stolen" pirate ware MS would be all over DIVX.COM.

    C>And since when does anyone (especially on Slashdot) consider Microsoft or Intel either trustworthy or respectable?

    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  112. Lots happened today by BinBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    It may be significant that the anniversary of a Congressional resolution "favoring a Jewish homeland in Palestine" falls on this date. Then again, if you go back a century or two, you may find a lot of anniversaries that seem just as significant.

    Yeah, approximately 1 out of every 365 events that has ever happened happened on this day.

    1. Re:Lots happened today by erveek · · Score: 1

      It may be significant that the anniversary of a Congressional resolution "favoring a Jewish homeland in Palestine" falls on this date. Then again, if you go back a century or two, you may find a lot of anniversaries that seem just as significant.

      >Yeah, approximately 1 out of every 365 events that has ever happened happened on this day.

      Actually, 1 out of every 365.25

      --
      -- This void intentionally left null.
  113. Air Cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen a few F-15 and F-16 in groups along wiht a few air tankers flying over Detroit and the surrounding areas.

  114. Why Today? by ipinkus · · Score: 1
    "Why Today? Why did this attack happen on September 11, 2001."

    For an added kick in the nuts, today is UN International Peace Day

  115. Re:oh boy.... read this: by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    This can't be true.

    GW is NOT a great leader :)

    --

    "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

  116. increased bandwidth? by kill.process · · Score: 1

    perhaps the fbi is putting carnivore to some good
    use?
    just a thought.
    this really sucks.
    god bless everyone.

    .:JMT:.

    --
    }:kill.process:{
  117. I am so glad I'm white. by MulluskO · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People are comparing this disaster to the bombing of Peal Harbor by the Japanese. That was a bad time to be a Japanese American. I understand they were sent to interrment camps. It's just as well becuase if they had been outside the camps they might have been lynched.

    Now is not a good time to be of Arabian descent. I haven't heard anything yet, but I predict there will be murder.

    Also, politicians are debating on television how to balance the principles of the bill of rights with the threat that is facing us today. What are they calling for, if not interrment camps.

    I am certain it will be bad. I know that foriegners are about to suffer, but will it become to bad that I will be forced to withold my liberal views for fear of violent retaliation?

    --

    Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
  118. amen brother by gruntvald · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are on the right course. It's a JIHAD.

    1. Re:amen brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bomb the f*ckers responsible back to the Stone Age. And then bomb them some more, just for good measure. How can people be celebrating this catastrophic loss of life?! What the f*ck is wrong with the Palestinians and the Iraqis?! I'm a pro-Palestine person in regards to the whole Israel/Palestine deal, but THEY'RE CHEERING THE FACT THAT WE ARE DYING. Sounds like Israel needs some more "support". And the Iraqis? They want to cheer people dying? We can make that happen.

    2. Re:amen brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that too. I've been pro-Palestine myself but if they're going to behave like barbarians then they should be treated as such. I hope it doesn't come to nukes, but if that's what it takes to drill it into their uncivilized fucking minds that this is simply unacceptable then so be it. Nuke em till they glow.

  119. The day vs. the date by GMontag · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ahem...

    I propose that Sept 11 was selected because the team was in place for weeks waiting for good weather over all targets at the same time.

    Only saw video of WTC 2 strike. If all of the terrorist pilots had that skill level, they needed good visibility, i.e., he was too wobbly to be a seasoned instrumet pilot.

    I suspect that the whole bunch laid in wait until the weather was right in both DC and NYC before they even left for Logan, Newark and Dulles.

    1. Re:The day vs. the date by Telek · · Score: 2

      I doubt that, as there was a warning that this would happen, right around this day. And you don't need clear skys to steer a plane at 400m above ground. There's also way too many other 09/11 references to make it just a coincidence.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    2. Re:The day vs. the date by GMontag · · Score: 2

      Ummm, if the NYC terrorists could not see the WTC buildings at altitude, how would they be able to hit the WTC?

      If the erather was not good, visually at both DC and NYC, at the same time on the same day, how could the pilots hit all 3 targets?

      It is *possible* to do all of this with LORAN or GPS, but the way WTC #2 was flying, I REALLY doubt it.

      Sorry, just experience, not theory.

    3. Re:The day vs. the date by Incongruity · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Only saw video of WTC 2 strike. If all of the terrorist pilots had that skill level, they needed good visibility, i.e., he was too wobbly to be a seasoned instrumet pilot.

      I don't know too many veteran pilots who wouldn't be just a bit jittery and sloppy on the controls when driving their aircraft into a building and certain death for themselves...would you really be able to hold it steady in such a situation? I know I couldn't...

      just my $.02

    4. Re:The day vs. the date by Linux+Freak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      According to this Boston Herald article, a likely reason for this particular date is that today was the sentencing date set for one of Bin Laden's cronies, which was to be held in the federal court building not too far from the WTC buildings.

      (The link is fairly slow but the entire article is worth reading.)

    5. Re:The day vs. the date by mistergone · · Score: 1

      An interesting theory, especially since they'd have to buy the tickets on the day of the flight. Something the FBI will no doubt be looking into when investigating the passenger registry for suspects.

      --
      Gone, Daddy, Gone
    6. Re:The day vs. the date by Surt · · Score: 2

      Not that I think it was a coincidence necessarily, but the easiest argument to make in favor of 'just a coincidence' is this:

      Try to pick a date which would have been meaningless to any hypothetical terrorists because nothing of importance has occurred on that date in any of the last 200 years.

      Unless we discover who is responsible and why, we won't really know if the date meant anything.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    7. Re:The day vs. the date by Telek · · Score: 2

      Jesus christ, /. readers are crazy (not you).

      I posted something I thought was of interest, something that was floating around and looked credible. First it was modded up to +5, Informative, then all the way down to -1, Troll after it was found out to be a hoax. WTF?! It's not like _I_ made the hoax.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    8. Re:The day vs. the date by Telek · · Score: 2

      Insane! The news reports... wow... lots of certified pilots. I'd also assume that the minimum of 3 terrorists per plane is low, because they probably had 2 to fly, and 3 terrorists in the back to handle passengers. Don't forget that the passengers usually didn't know about the pilot/terrorists.

      In any case, I also read that they managed to fly the plane at an altitude of about 10m at 900km/h in order to fly *horizontally* into the pentagon, thus doing the most damage. That can't be easy either. If you could do that, you could land the plane easy, and I know from hours and hours on flight sim that _that_ is not easy =P.

      Go figure. You use the throttle to determine your height, not necessarily airspeed. Once I figured that one out it was a lot easier to land the plane =P

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
  120. Arafat statement on CNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I just saw the statement of Arafat on CNN. He appeared emotional and shocked, his lips trembled as he spoke. He condemned the attack, and seemed sincere although he did not look directly at the camera.

    1. Re:Arafat statement on CNN by spaceling · · Score: 1

      Arafat has long been suspected of suffering from Parkinson's Disease, which is probably the cause of his lips "trembling".

  121. Re:Gasoline Prices (OffTopic?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Diamond Shamrock at the corner of Braker and Jollyville in Austin TX is selling regular for $14.99 a gallon.

    But, I'm sure that it'll be back down to $1.40 by the time anyone can drive over there to check it.

  122. You may not like to hear it but ... by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 2

    According to theregister.com some one put the WTC on Ebay. It was pulled quickly.

    Little 5" copper statues of the WTC can be found on Ebay for $130.

    Tomarrow you will see parts of the WTC listed on Ebay.

    Next week you will be able to buy commemoritive $5 coins minted by The American Mint which will be leagal tender in Libiria.

    21 days from now you will be able to get a 11" x 17" coffie table book detailing the history of the World Trade Center in living color.

    Within a month the insurance policies and wills of those killed will put money in the hands of people not mentaly equiped to handle the responsablitiy of the new money.

    Within the month Pres Bush will sound like an idiot by saying that we need his Missel Defence Shield more than ever.

    Within the year our constitutional rights will be slightly limited in the name of freedom.

    30 years from now no one will have as of yet taken credit for this attack and we will see our freedomes striped down to fight a nonvisable enamy. Any one ever see the movie Brazil?

    I will spare you the darker side of what I see, but I think that these things should hold you over for a while.

    1. Re:You may not like to hear it but ... by fobbman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Looks like the book part has already taken off. It's the #2 best seller at Amazon right now.

    2. Re:You may not like to hear it but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Within the month Pres Bush will sound like an idiot by saying that we need his Missel Defence Shield more than ever.

      Who is the idiot?

    3. Re:You may not like to hear it but ... by nhavar · · Score: 1
      "Next week you will be able to buy commemoritive $5 coins minted by The American Mint which will be leagal tender in Libiria."

      It's actually America's Mint not the American Mint that mints these particular coins. And next time you want to post something you might run it through a spell checker because you just made yourself sound like a complete and utter moron ----"freedomes striped down to fight a nonvisable enamy" --- run Forest, run!


      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    4. Re:You may not like to hear it but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent poster's native language is obviously not English, you are the idiot. I'd like to see how good you are at spelling French.

    5. Re:You may not like to hear it but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poster was probably not a native English speaker.

    6. Re:You may not like to hear it but ... by crypt01inguist · · Score: 1
      Well, duh!

      If I was going to take the time to post in ANOTHER FSCKING LANGUAGE to a bunch of FOREIGNERS I think I could take the time to run it through a FREAKING spell checker in that language. Especially if I was going to post to a group KNOWN for it's spelling & grammer devotees!


      As for you, Mr. Anonymous Coward, exactly how is it that you can so easily deduce the poster's native language? Are you likewise a Frenchman posting to this predominently english-speaking page? Did you feel slighted and defensive that we were picking on someone JUST because they were foreign? Well, hold onto your shorts and GET OVER IT!

      Attention to detail counts.

      Taking the time to proofread your post counts.

      Using the right tags so you don't accidently turn your entire post bold and italic counts.


      If you ignore everything else, consider this: When the information will be unwanted, it must be most accurate and most understandable. Anything that distracts from the message causes it to lose impact. If you rant AND mis-spell, it's easy to dismiss your opinion.


      (sarcasm fueled by rage at the yet-unidentified backers of yesterday's attacks) Of course, You may not like to hear it ... (/sarcasm, etc)

      --
      120 characters?! Who do they think they are, telling me I only get 120 characters? This will never do. I must have mor
  123. Stop skyjacking in the air, not the ground. by Dag+Maggot · · Score: 2, Interesting



    A few simple steps that could lessen the risk of skyjackings.

    1. Cockpit door locked from the inside at all times. (Flight attendants must knock to deliver food and coffee).

    2. Peephole in cockpit to verify who is knocking.

    3. bullet-proof cockpit bulkhead.

    4. As a last resort, all cockpits equiped with shotguns loaded with beanbag ammunition, (to avoid hull peircings).

    These 4 simple safety measures would have prevented this tragedy. Cardboard cutters would not do much against a bulletproof bulkhead. Granted, some passengers may have been killed, but I would postulate that such a mission would not even have been hatched if these safefty measures were in place.

    Dag Maggot

    --

    I have no pants and I must scream

    1. Re:Stop skyjacking in the air, not the ground. by archnme · · Score: 1

      Don't forget:

      5. Train flight crew how to appropriately deal with attempted hijackings.

      In situations such as the past day's, the only way to save the maximum number of passengers would be to alert the authorties and set down at the nearest airport as quickly as possible. It may sound cold-hearted, but the pilot/copilot would need to muster the resolve to ignore what happens to the hostages until they can get the plane landed. Of course, even with training it would still be extremely hard not to cave under pressure when the terrorists start offing the passengers....

      As it is, cockpit doors are typically armoured and lockable, although bulkheads aren't(!)

      --
      If you smoke after sex, you're doing it too fast.
    2. Re:Stop skyjacking in the air, not the ground. by Jordy · · Score: 2

      Frankly, I believe only three measures are absolutely necessary for preventing hijacking:

      * Eliminate all carry-on luggage, period.

      * Wire video and sound in the cockpit and cabins of all plane broadcast to towers 24/7 for monitoring. There really aren't that many jumbo jets in the sky when it comes right down to it.

      * Provide an emergency remote method of engaging the flight control computer and locking out manual override to be controlled by a secure domestic or international military installation.
      Of course, these measures only apply to large aircraft. Small aircraft are a completely different matter.

      --
      The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
    3. Re:Stop skyjacking in the air, not the ground. by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      Nice ideas, but they wont work:

      - Cockpit doors can already be locked (not sure if they are in flight)
      - Hi-jackers probably wont knock.
      - They didnt need bullets probably: knifes and cardboard cutters accordint to the CNN reporter on the plane.
      - Shotguns, yeah right. Could help, could also be captured by terrorist.

      The idea should maybe be this:

      No path to/from the cockpit to passengers AT ALL.

      It should just not be possible to get there from the passengers site. Feed the pilots with small service elevators.

      Gr /Dread

    4. Re:Stop skyjacking in the air, not the ground. by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Eliminate all carry-on luggage, period.

      Allow medical supplies in clear plastic bags.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:Stop skyjacking in the air, not the ground. by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Can they pipe sleeping gas into the cabin in case of hijacking?

    6. Re:Stop skyjacking in the air, not the ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes fuck i want kungfu pilots!!!

    7. Re:Stop skyjacking in the air, not the ground. by ectoraige · · Score: 1

      There's one other point you neglected - In-flight security guards.

      Israel grounded all incoming civilian flights in response to the news, except for those of Israeli carriers - for the simple reason that Israeli airlines always have armed guards on board.

      --
      Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, ybt bss abj. Tb bhgfvqr. Syl n xvgr.
    8. Re:Stop skyjacking in the air, not the ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One one of the flights someone called using a mobile saying that the hijackers were killing stewardesses in an attempt to gain control of a cockpit... That suggests that the door was locked!

      If you were the pilot, could you stay behind your locked door listening to everyone getting killed, when it is your duty to protect your passengers?

  124. A Survivor Story by pmbuko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just got off the phone with my friend whose girlfriend has a nearly miraculous survival story.

    She arrived at work on the 81st floor of the north tower at 8:45am EDT today. The first plane crashed into this tower at about 8:55am EDT about 5 floors above her. After the initial confusion and chaos, everybody on her floor headed towards the exits and began the slow evacuation down the stairs.

    While the first building was being evacuated, the second plane hit the south tower at about 9:05am. An hour later while still making her way down the stairs of the north tower, the south tower collapses at 10:07am. 20 minutes after that at 10:27am, and nearly an hour and a half after the first plane crashed into her building, she makes it to the bottom floor as the north tower begins to collapse down onto her. (Sadly, I assume everybody in floors any higher than 81 probably didn't make it out of the building.)

    She was one of the last people to make it out of the building, but she did not make it far before a door fell on top of her and pinned her to the ground. In retrospect, she was very lucky because the door shielded her from glass and other falling objects.

    After the dust settled somewhat, she was discovered by police and taken to the hospital. She is in stable condition and is being treated for bruises, cuts, and broken bones.

    I can only imagine how she must feel to have been at ground zero and still be alive to tell about it.

    1. Re:A Survivor Story by unitron · · Score: 2, Interesting
      An hour to get down the stairs to get out of a burning building?

      Skyscrapers are really a stupid idea. Even the neat art deco looking ones.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:A Survivor Story by tubs · · Score: 3, Interesting
      After the Bomb attack in 1993 studies were carried out.

      It was suggested that after 3 hours only 50% of the people in the building would have left.

      If that is true I would say she has been very lucky.

      --

      try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

    3. Re:A Survivor Story by unitron · · Score: 2

      I don't believe I've ever been moderated as a troll before. I wonder exactly what the moderator thought I was trolling for, replies from skyscraper fans who think it's fine to be trapped 100 floors up?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  125. To Anonymous Coward by SheepDogg · · Score: 1

    When reading an article on Cnet today I read that the plane headed to the pentagon was being followed and watched by 2 jets. I went back to find the link and Cnet has taken it off the page, or moved it entirely. I don't understand why, if we were following the plane and watching it, did we do nothing about it before it hit killing 800 so far. I assume that is what passer-by's saw when they said they saw a second aircraft swirve off.

  126. Re:Terrorism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is an old mexican saying "Rise crows, and they will peck your eyes out".

    I beleive it's a Spanish saying, actually.

  127. Re:Almost concrete proof of Bin Ladin Involvement. by ElDuque · · Score: 1

    Well if we know these people may be associated with Bin Ladin's organization, and they used their real names to get the tickets, shouldn't that have rasied an eyebrow somewhere?

  128. While we're speculating by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    I really don't buy the red scare theory you've just tossed out. Right-wingers, especially those with military experience would be suspect number one for domestic terror. They're organized in militias, have the will and equipment to do it, have the rhetoric, etc.

    Where are the leftist militias?

  129. Afghanistan by THEpimpinHAT · · Score: 1

    At first I was hearing reports of missile strikes in the Afghani capital, but all such reports seem to have stopped... Was the information simply an unfounded rumor which turned out to be untrue, or is the press holding something back (for any of various possible reasons)?

  130. Re:oh boy.... read this: by AntiFreeze · · Score: 2
    A lot of people have posted that this prophecy is a fabrication, but someone previously posted (I don't remember who) a link to the alt.prophecies.nostradamus with a very interesting message (here).

    Just another weird coincidence? I hope so.

    --

    ---
    "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller

  131. Afghanistan isn't a functioning country by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Afghanistan entry in the CIA World Factbook is worth reading. Foreign policy towards Afghanistan was botched by both the US and the USSR. The country has been in wars, both external and internal, for the last 22 years. The USSR invaded in 1979, the US sponsored anti-USSR groups who kicked the USSR out around 1989, and the result was a mess of armed factions, not a country. There's no real central government left; the Taliban is just the biggest armed faction.

    So there's no country to go to war with. It's another mess like Bosnia. There are 25 million people in an area the size of Texas, some of whom hate the US and some who don't. Now what?

    1. Re:Afghanistan isn't a functioning country by john+barleycorn · · Score: 1

      honestly it does not matter at this point. it has been said befor earlier today, but the US needs to lead the the worldwide war against terrorism. what i mean is this: if you commit terrorists acts we will destroy the very citys/nations/ideals you intend to defend. we will destroy anyone who stands in our way of that goal. in any event every act of terrorism will come with a price...this one cerainly will.

      something else. as of today isreal has little or no political opposition to killing as many palistinians as it wishes. after the display (a party?) on the west bank today few american officials or citizens would shed a tear if the isrealies turned afganastan into dust tommorrow. in the comming weeks expect to see isreal launch major attacks against the afgan's.

    2. Re:Afghanistan isn't a functioning country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      >So there's no country to go to war with. It's another >mess like Bosnia. There are 25 million people in an >area the size of Texas, some of whom hate the US and >some who don't. Now what?

      According to Bush the ones who don't better not get between our bombs and the ones who do. I think America finally has an issue that Joe Sixpack can understand. And you know what? Joe S. does not
      care whether there are innocent people in Afghanistan.
      Joe has blood in his eyes and can't see that they are innocent. One camelfucker or another, they can all die together as far as Joe is concerned.

  132. cnn video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i don't know if anyone has posted this yet, but cnn now has a video of the second plane crash taken from a park in front of the wtc. the plane flies directly overhead. this is unbelievable.

  133. Nope, they are not mulsims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid Slashdotters.

    Let me break it down for your infant digestion.

    1) Fact. The Hi-jackers were *suicidal*. You need a MORAL obligation to do this. No mercenary
    will die for you.

    2) Fact. The Hi-jackers targeted sensitive economical and military positions.

    3) Fact. The Hi-jackers KNEW they could not damage American military infrastructure by attacking
    the Pentagon. That attack was merely symbolic.

    4) Fact. The Hi-jackers DID NOT care about the consequences (they don't think their families
    will be targeted.)

    5) Fact. The Hi-jackers MUST benefit from this, in one way or the other.

    6) Fact. The Hi-jackers NEED support in the target areas. They need backup in the airline
    inductry.

    ***

    Having said that. Let's see the consequences of this attack.

    1) "temporarily" dropping stock prices.
    2) Rising oil prices.
    3) NEED for MORE national defense systems (weapons.)
    4) Rising hatred for the arabs.

    Do you see what I see? The Bush Admin, with Israel orchestrated this whole drama. It is a money
    issue. Muslim fanatics must have caried out the attacks, but they were being LED by Israel.
    As you might know, the whole Islamic militancy is created and fueled by israel.

    Israel needs a cause for constant American support, so they toggle the buttons of the stupid
    arabs. The Arabs lost the war long time ago. Jews are just puppeteering the mummies, and using
    them as scare crows to keep america on its toes.

    WAKE UP WHITE GUYS, you are eaten by Sons of Sam.

    1. Re:Nope, they are not mulsims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your own "facts" demonstrate this is probably an Islamic terrorist act. Expecially because of points 1), 2) and 4).

      Good job at contraddicting your own point!

  134. Apropo, but I do NOT feel fine by Kerinsky · · Score: 1

    This song jumped into my head today, after I read the lyrics I was weirded out...

    "That's great, it starts with an earthquake, birds and snakes, an aeroplane -
    Lenny Bruce is not afraid. Eye of a hurricane, listen to yourself churn -
    world serves its own needs, don't misserve your own needs. Feed it up a knock,
    speed, grunt no, strength no. Ladder structure clatter with fear of height,
    down height. Wire in a fire, represent the seven games in a government for
    hire and a combat site. Left her, wasn't coming in a hurry with the furies
    breathing down your neck. Team by team reporters baffled, trump, tethered
    crop. Look at that low plane! Fine then. Uh oh, overflow, population,
    common group, but it'll do. Save yourself, serve yourself. World serves its
    own needs, listen to your heart bleed. Tell me with the rapture and the
    reverent in the right - right. You vitriolic, patriotic, slam, fight, bright
    light, feeling pretty psyched.

    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

    Six o'clock - TV hour. Don't get caught in foreign tower. Slash and burn,
    return, listen to yourself churn. Lock him in uniform and book burning,
    blood letting. Every motive escalate. Automotive incinerate. Light a candle,
    light a motive. Step down, step down. Watch a heel crush, crush. Uh oh,
    this means no fear - cavalier. Renegade and steer clear! A tournament,
    a tournament, a tournament of lies. Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives
    and I decline.

    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

    The other night I tripped a nice continental drift divide. Mount St. Edelite.
    Leonard Bernstein. Leonid Breshnev, Lenny Bruce and Lester Bangs.
    Birthday party, cheesecake, jelly bean, boom! You symbiotic, patriotic,
    slam, but neck, right? Right.

    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine...fine...

    (It's time I had some time alone)"

    -It's the End of the World as we Know it (and I Feel Fine) by REM

    --

    Damnit I AM acting my age. I'm 15 in hex!

  135. Call to Words: How The Planes Fell From The Sky by Combuchan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Ironically, the question posed by the April Fool's story Slashdot During War? may be answered shortly given the sentiment on Capitol Hil.. We are at the verge of great change in America, and Slashdot may serve as a powerful catalyst of opinion in this Brave New World by culminating the most innovative and intelligent users of the Internet for development of United States 2.0.

    Formally submitting my first diff patch, I fired this letter off to the Federal Aviation Administration, the overbearing bureaucracy whose oversights led to four plane crashes and thousands killed. The trip I took was to Defcon 9.

    I took a trip to Las Vegas in July. My flight from Phoenix went normally except for one serious, disturbing mistake made by Phoenix security checkpoint staff. I thought it was funny at first that such as a glaring lapse of policy occured, but after the tragic events in New York and Washington, I revistited this story and I wonder whether four lapses in "Airport Security" caused the deaths of so many people today.

    Suitcasenuke is the name of a computer I jerryrigged in an old Samsonite suitcase for portability. I have edited this account for clarity, the original is at http://telconnect.net/~sean/suitcasenuke/

    Transporting:
    The finished product is rather heavy and bulky--65 pounds give or take. It barely fit as a carryon. I took America West flight 113 from Phoenix Sky Harbor International to Las Vegas McCarran on a busy Thursday afternoon.

    Approaching "SECURITY CHECKPOINT A," I cut in line by 10 people hollering out to the security staff that I could nto have suitcase nuke X-rayed as the machine is a very sensitive piece of electronic equipment.
    Preparing for this, I had all the fixins to prove to them this frightening apparatus wasn't a bomb. Packed in there were my keyboard, mouse, power cord, vga cable so I could plug it into one of their terminals if need be. The screener blatantly ignores my request to pass it through and I'm eventually in front of the walk-through metal detector. This staffer does not understand English very will and I do not understand his natiove Swahili. Thankfully my brother had already gone through and was also trying to get through to the screener. Five minutes of this, and there are easily sixty people behind me in line.

    Pressed with the queue, he grabbed the suitcase and fit it through the little gap between the metal detector and the X-ray machine and flailed his hand behind him, motioning me to 'go over there.'

    I found myself staring at an unstaffed table with a plane to Vegas to catch, not blow out of the sky. My impatient brother didn't feel like further embattling the screeners and rigamorol. Off we went.

    They didn't plug it in. They didn't swab it for explosive residue. They didn't even open it.

    I smuggled--if that's the right word--a 70 pound suitcase right passed "Airport Security."

    Makes me wish it were a suitcase nuke.

    Now before you go out and arrest me, I beg of you to reconsider airport security policies. For example, arresting people who make bomb jokes at the gate is the embodiment of stupidity and maligned priorities. If I was really going to blow up the plane, would I be talking about it at the security checkpoint?

    How hard would it be to smuggle an 18" polycarbonate machete onto a plane by maybe taping it to your thigh or sandwiching it in your suitcase between a lead plate? Even if I obviously brought contraband aboard, what's the chance the underpayed, undereducated, understaffed, and overly apathetic security screener overlook it or not know what it is? Or would he be too lazy and not even get up and make a fuss about it if he did recognize it? Don't say it's not possible. It happened to me. I did it at an airport with one of the best records in the industry. Phoenix Sky Harbor had two violations last year. Is this one Number 3? Which other violations do you not know about?

    The FAA failed in its security measures four times the morning of 11th Septembenr and as a result, our nation mourns. Could that 18" polycarbonate machete worn by a survivalist or a law-abiding american concerned only with the defense of his legitimate fellow passengers ultimately ensure their safety? Barbara Olson's plane was taken down by two hijackers armed with cardboard cutters. Could a right to self-defense have saved United Flights 99 and 175 and American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 and prevented this atrocity?

    Does the FAA honestly think it will stop a suicidal hijacker on a mission for Allah by having a ticket clerk ask "Have any unknown persons been in the possession of your baggage?"

    Don't cast this off. Please. THe Administration's policies have failed America. I want to see them changed.

    --
    "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
  136. Here's why they got through with knives by fobbman · · Score: 2

    Being a dot.commie who was recently downsized I had spent a lot of time looking through employment classifieds.
    Wanna know how much those fine folks who run the security checkpoints make per hour? Here's what they make in Seattle.

    Makes you wonder why it didn't happen sooner.

    1. Re:Here's why they got through with knives by sharkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Knives aside, hearsay story coming up:

      A person I worked with at a prior job related the following to me: His brother flew on a commercial airline with his shotgun in carry-on luggage. He wrapped it in a few pairs of sweats, then in a couple towels and packed clothing around it in a duffel bag.

      Aside from the fact that this should not have been neccesary, it is not hard for a determined person to circumvent the airline restrictions.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Here's why they got through with knives by dr.matrix · · Score: 1

      Well, I recently did two transatlantic flights,
      Munich - Dallas and Vancouver - Munich, and on both flights nobody bothered to complain about the swiss army knife which I always carry along in my trouser pocket. I was a little surprised at this time, but I am shocked about this obvious lack of security after yesterday's events.

  137. Washington DC Interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I can confirm that there was a man who said a second plane was at the Pentagon. Apparently the plane (which the witness described as grey with 2 big propellers (i.e. not a civilian plane)) looked as though it was diving straight for the Pentagon, but lifted up out of the dust and flew away. I thought it was odd myself that no one else was reporting this...

  138. Re:use of illegal video encoders by unitron · · Score: 2

    the problem was the way you phrased it.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  139. getting wildly OT here now! by Pope · · Score: 1
    If DivX were in fact "stolen" pirate ware MS would be all over DIVX.COM.

    I cannot play DiVX:-) (god I hate that fucking name!) encoded AVI files on my Mac without first having Microsoft Media Player 6.3 installed, and then intructing the DiVX player where to find it when it first runs.
    Therefore I assume that it requires MS's codec, yes?

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  140. Re:oh boy.... read this: by hysterik · · Score: 1

    Actually.. the "two brothers" makes better sense if you think of the US and Israel as two brothers. Perhaps this is more a prophecy to come later, caused by some "chaos".

    Of course, I would like to think all this Nostradamus talk is not true. Can anyone reference anything which disproves this philosophy?

  141. This site makes shirts on demand for anyone by ebonkyre · · Score: 1
    Cafe Press makes shirts on demand for anyone that signs up a "store" (including a lot of Linux shirts) - they did not create this product. While it is a massively tasteless extreme of capitalist endeavor for someone to try and make a buck off of this, make sure you focus your anger correctly.

    1st admendment says they can say it, but also that you can bitch and moan.

    service@cafepress.com
    product number 1468594

    You would probably want to review Sections 3 & 4 of their Member Agreement before writing.
    They do not review items prior to posting, but reserve the right to remove "offensive" items.

    --
    "Time is an abstract concept devised by carbon-based lifeforms to monitor their ongoing decay." - Thundercleese
    1. Re:This site makes shirts on demand for anyone by JLyle · · Score: 1

      Thanks very much for posting this information. It appears that CafePress has removed this item (actually, a picture of a blank T-shirt now appears on that page).

  142. Today's Terrorism: A Critic's Viewpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a response to recent terrorist attacks in the United States, there have been numerous calls to retaliation and increases in counter-terrorism spending. Little media attention has been paid to critics of defense spending and counter-terrorism. The Department of Defense allocates only 1.5% of its budget to counter-terrorism. (US General Accounting Office. Combating Terrorism: Spending on Government-wide Programs Requires Better Management and Coordination (GAO/NSIAD 98-39, Dec 1997)). Though not a paltry sum ($6.7 billion) few critics of defense spending waste time arguing about what amounts to one cent for every dollar spent on defense. Critics of defense spending are instead asking why the US needs to spend ten times as much money on defense as all of its potential enemies combined; or why, after the end of the arms race, the US continues to spend $30 billion every year on nuclear weapons; or why, against the counsel of most Joint Chiefs of Staff, the US must be prepared to fight two major wars concurrently. These are the questions most critics of defense spending are asking.
    Critics of counter-terrorism spending are asking different questions. And many of these are just as vexing. For starters, what is terrorism? My dictionary says, "Terrorism: n. use of violence and intimidation to achieve political ends." Doesn't the US military use violence and intimidation to achieve political ends? Yes, but most people would not call this terrorism. We use the term to mean the use of force by individuals or groups, not part of an official national military, that are politically powerless. [Despite the trembling surrounding this use of the term 'terrorism,' its casualties pale in comparison to those of organized warfare, violent crimes, or automobile accidents, and are dwarfed by the casualties of preventable disease and poverty -- to whose eradication many countries devote many fewer resources. That the fixation on terrorism is so grossly out of proportion to its impact on individuals raises serious questions as to whether the priority currently given to this problem may not be based more on ideological than on strategic concerns.]
    Another natural question, then, is why do groups resort to terrorism? Because they cannot achieve their ends politically. Take the PLO. They have used violence against the Israeli occupation in Palestine. (We memorialize 18th century Americans for having used violence against the British occupation in the Colonies.) Because the Israeli occupation is not democratic, a Palestinian citizen cannot seek a settlement politically. Out of desperation, some Palestinians have resorted to terrorism. The best prevention for this kind of terrorism is democracy. Domestic terrorism is rare in democratic nations precisely because groups and individuals can, to some extent, reach an audience with their complaints, and seek a settlement politically. [Though democratic nations are by no means immune to domestic terrorism; the early labor movement in the US was anything but peaceful. Both government and industry leaders simply ignored the democratic process employed by early labor unions to win safe working conditions and a 40 hour work week. These leaders gave in only when massive, organized, and illegal disruptions - including riots and sabotage -- threatened their interests.]
    So it is natural to ask why high-income countries, and the US in particular, would be targets for terrorists from other countries. If you are a terrorist and want redress for grievances in your own country, you might target the US for several reasons: 1) Your own country is impervious to both democratic appeals and domestic terrorism because it is a police state - civilians are expendable, and the abrogation of civil rights is already commonplace; 2) US news agencies control a good deal of world news coverage. Thus, capturing the attention of the US media almost insures capturing the attention of the world. But very little international news actually makes it into the U.S. press, and of the little that makes it, there is almost no coverage of the internal politics of foreign countries. Thus, most US media may as well tell you: no press until you resort to terrorism 3) The US is the most powerful country in the world and can 'make things happen' in your country; 4) The US may be responsible for the problem you are seeking to redress
    So what can the U.S. do to stop terrorism? 1) US international policy can encourage other countries to establish democratic processes, insuring minorities can voice their grievances without violence. 2) We can decrease the US control over international journalism. And we can increase US coverage of political movements in other countries seeking an audience for - often just - grievances. 3) We can decrease the US domination in world politics, which makes the US a natural target 4) We can stop US military interventions in other countries 5) We can stop delivering arms and military training to dictators and known terrorist groups
    These seem like laudable and effective means for any country to deal with terrorism. However, these are not the means the US has chosen.
    Instead, the US has chosen to 'defend' itself against terrorism using 'counter-terrorism,' meaning the intimidation of terrorists through the threat or actual use of force. The virtues of this policy are that it justifies: 1) Arms sales and economic aid to military states the US has appointed to crack down on terrorism abroad (Nicaragua, Israel, Turkey, Indonesia), while also aiding dictators that serve US economic interests, in the name of 'stability' (Noriega in Panama, Pinochet in Chile, Savimbi in Angola, Pahlavi in Iran, etc.) 2) Serious breaches of civil rights (as with the FBI's Smith guidelines, which sanction domestic wiretaps and searches to "anticipate or prevent terrorism.") 3) US military aggression against other countries, in order to intimidate entire regions (such as missile attacks against Libya, Sudan, and Afghanistan, illegal under international law) 6) Arms sales to known terrorist groups (such as right-wing Cuban, Afghan, and Nicaraguan militias. The terrorist Osama Bin Laden, for instance, was armed and trained by the US during the Afghan resistance to the Soviets) 7) Large defense budgets (of which only 1% is actually spent on counter-terrorism).
    The overall strategy is an old one. A new enemy must be delivered to the US public every so often, in order to justify the massive military spending and military interventions in the Third World necessary to protect US economic interests - access to natural resources, cheap labor, and open markets. With the USSR now dissolved, it falls to narcotics and terrorism to serve as our boogeymen.
    --bill sparks (billsparksus@yahoo.com)

  143. do not go to NYC sperm banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when I heard the call for blood donations, I figured that they might need other bodily fluids as well. but when I got to my local sperm bank to my surprise it was closed and completely locked up. i even saw a guy in there and i was banging on the door but he wouldn't let me in.

    ungrateful bastards, I just wanted to do my part to help our country in this time of need. i even had my dick hard and I was all ready to go too

    1. Re:do not go to NYC sperm banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were banging on the door then you've definitely got the wrong idea.

  144. NukeMecca.com is still open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone for a retaliation website?

  145. airport security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once was able to get a large Mason jar through airport security, sealed and with no questions asked.

    What if that had contained a poisonous, noxious, colorless gas that could be used to overpower a cockpit. I'd just have to dash in, toss it hard enough that it would break, and voila.

    Meanwhile, the airport security harrassed a guy with a jar of chlorophyl, to the point that he drank (!) some of it to prove it was harmless.

    Airport security is lax at best.

  146. Kabul at Night. by novusomnis · · Score: 1

    Just a note that those attacking Kabul at night might not be who the news is reporting them to be. The weapons they appear to be using would be out of range for small forces to obtain. It might be that we have already started an attack of some sort and are using this as a cover.

    1. Re:Kabul at Night. by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      Makes sense. Te CNN reporter did say missles were flying in from everywhere. I doubt some militia could do tht. The us prob asked cnn reporter to chill so that confusion could be maintained.

  147. Flight Numbers?!? by Arlo · · Score: 1

    Ok, take the flight numbers: 11, 93, 175, and 77

    Do some math.
    11 = Today's Date
    9+3 = 12 = Tomorrow
    1+7+5 = 13 = Thursday
    7+7 = 14 = Friday

    Freaky.

    http://plock.net/post/377/

    1. Re:Flight Numbers?!? by Arlo · · Score: 1

      very true and i would definitely agree...i just found it a somewhat strange occurence.

    2. Re:Flight Numbers?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes agatha christine would be also interested... isn't bill gates 666?

    3. Re:Flight Numbers?!? by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      I fail to see why. They all occured today, not one airline with "magic numbers" per day, with flight numbers tenuously linked to dates.

      -Legion

    4. Re:Flight Numbers?!? by Bluesee · · Score: 2

      Read this. It's a comment by a very strange dude about numbers... There are other comments. This guy seems to know something, or I'm a troll victim, for sure!!

      --
      SDMI: Finally! Music that won't rip or burn! Brought to you by the fine folks at RIAA.
  148. Re:2nd plane -- CRASHED IN COLORADO? by FFFish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I *swear* my newsfeed (CBC TV, Canada) reported a crash in Colorado. There was never a retraction, nor was there any mention of it again.

    NORAD is out in Colorado, although it wouldn't be even scratched by this sort of attack.

    Can anyone authoritatively confirm or deny? There were enough rumours flying around in the AM that it's probably just another... but CBC was pretty good about dispelling the rumours once they were known to be false.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  149. Osama bin Laden is the anti-christ by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

    Didn't Nostradamous say he'd wear a turben? Didn't he say a huge nation would be undermined by his operations?

  150. Local transportation update for NYC by m_evanchik · · Score: 1

    < copy of NYT webpage from 01:00 09/12/01 (real link here, but it is a slow load. >

    Lower Manhattan to Stay Closed

    September 12, 2001

    Lower Manhattan is expected to remain cut off from the rest of the city today, and schools and stock exchanges will be closed.

    Subways, streets and bridges leading to Lower Manhattan are expected to remain closed today. The city's three airports will be closed at least until 2 p.m. The Lincoln and Holland Tunnels will be closed to all but non-emergency traffic vehicles, officials said, but New Jersey-bound traffic on the George Washington Bridge's upper level will be allowed. Westbound traffic on Staten Island's three bridges will also be allowed.

    The Police Department said that no one above 14th Street would be allowed to go south of there. Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani urged people not to come into Manhattan.

    Subway trains will not stop at stations south of Canal Street, a transit spokesman, Bob Slovak, said. PATH service will operate, but officials urged commuters to stay home.

    The city's public schools chancellor, Harold O. Levy, ordered schools closed, probably through tomorrow. He summoned principals, assistant principals, guidance counselors, social workers and school psychologists to go to work "to prepare plans to respond to the tragedy."

    Four downtown colleges -- Pace University, the Borough of Manhattan Community College, the New School University and New York University -- canceled classes today. <end of article copy>

    Here's also a very handy link to subway, bus, bridge and other local transportation info in NYC. It's at the official MTA site, so it's reliable. Basically south of Canal St. is shut down, and all bridges are just for outbound traffic, as of this post. I've found the cops at the bridges to be reasonable if you are on foot and have a compelling/official reason to get on the island.
    God bless America.

  151. Signifigance of today's date... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

    ..my girlfriend pointed this out to me, even though it was super obvious.

    9/11/01 or 911

    Unbelievable.

    1. Re:Signifigance of today's date... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unbelievable how stupid shit that is. and all this bandwidth taken from stuff that matters - news for nerds. not some three freaky buildings collapsing. i haven't got my tech news for today and i'm starting to get pissed off...

      rednecks or ragheads, all the same to me, but please move on to reporting some more interesting news.

    2. Re:Signifigance of today's date... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9/11/01 translates to 91101. Your girlfriend is a stupid whore.

    3. Re:Signifigance of today's date... by ochinko · · Score: 1

      Do you believe that Americans are behind the attack? Because it's only you who put the month in front of a date.

      Muslisms even have their own calendar that has nothing to do with Jesus' resurrection.

  152. Livejournal community by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    Pretty much a realtime conversation right now...

    http://www.livejournal.com/community/wtcdisaster

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  153. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  154. The rockets in Afghanistan are likely linked to... by quintessent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the killing of the opposition leader against the Taliban. He is said to have secretly helped the U.S. get spies into Afghanistan to watch Bin Laden. So the bombing 3 days ago would have been a nice way to prepare for today's events, and the rockets tonight are thought to be the work of opposition supporters.

  155. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  156. Pentagon 2nd plane by GMontag · · Score: 2

    All that I heard was there was a HELICOPTER in the vacinity (not a prop driven fixted wing), that moved to the opposite side of the Pentagon as the commercial flight was crashing.

    Look up my name and see other threads.

  157. Knives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone can buy a 6 or 7 inch fixed blade knife made of cabon fiber for $5 mail order. They've been around for 10+ years and are nicknamed "CIA Letter Openers".

    If you've never seen one of these let me assure you they are more than strong enough to do the job, light, easy to hide and not detectable by metal scanners.

    More to the point, I flew 4 hops last week and didn't once have my big stainless steel timex set off the detectors. And only one security officer checked that my cellphone was working (as opposed to being packed full of C4).

  158. Taliban belived they had "control" of bin Laden by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "All the activities of Osama bin Laden are under the tight control of the Taliban," Usman Shaharyar, a Taliban foreign ministry official, told The Associated Press.

    www.bergen.com/morenews/osama25200106248.htm

    From a newspaper article on June 25th.

    The Taliban seems to belive that bin Laden did not, and would not have had the capability to, perform these terrorist attacks. Are they right? Does bin Laden have them fooled? Are they willing accomplises? Does bin Laden's popularity with the Afgani people cause the Taliban to belive that moving against him would collapse their fragile hold on the country? I'm sure we'll find out more as the investigation continues.

    If it turns out, as it is now being reported, that "box cutter" knives were the weapons used to take control of the plane then the sophistication needed to have pulled this coordinated terror attack would not have been as high as originally thought*. It would, however, have required considerable "out of the box" thinking by the terrorists. It seems the most dangerous weapon in the terrorist's arsenal is creativity.

    * It would still almost certainly have required the terrorists themselves to be able to pilot the aircraft, and that would certainly have required some sophisticated training; but without the need to smuggle weapons on board all the planes simultaneously, the logistics of this act become MUCH simpler.

  159. absolutely right by bobalu · · Score: 1

    No guns, bazooka, missles, or special equipment is required

    You're right, anybody with sufficient training could take out a flight crew with their bare hands. I know at least two mild-manner techie types with black belts that could incapacitate three guys in seconds. The first never sees it coming, the second has no time to react and the third is so outclassed by the attacker he's useless.

    Plus of course, if you're willing to die you can do anything. The adrenaline advantage is on their side. No explosives, no weapons... just murderous intent. So how do you test against that?

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
    1. Re:absolutely right by ProfessorPuke · · Score: 1
      Sure, something could've stopped it. An F-15 on standby at every major airport, ready to scramble towards any jumbo-jet that goes off transponder (or just inexplicably alters its flight-path by 90 degrees).

      Now that this attack has happened, the fighter pilots would be quite willing to splash anything that refuses to instantly follow him away from any populated area or high-value target. And the airliner pilot would KNOW he's serious, and not dare to deviate even a little.

      This still leaves a small window of vulnerability if the hijacking happens immediately after takeoff from the target city- but the aircrew and innocent passengers should assume that if some passenger attacks them that early, he wants to make a kamikaze (rather than simply an unscheduled landing) and will fight to the death, for their own lives.

    2. Re:absolutely right by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      Except that calls from the planes show otherwise. One guy said the hijackers told passengers they had a bomb. The second plane had the woman who called her husband twice, and he relayed the information about the first plane, so she knew what was going to happen.

      -Legion

    3. Re:absolutely right by peter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Everyone claims that this was sophisticated, planned for months, etc.

      That's exactly what I thought when I heard the dudes on the news going on about how this attack required massive amounts of resources, etc. I have no idea how they justify that. They talk about it as if that fact were self-evident. Just because it killed a lot of people doesn't mean it required a lot of resources.

      If I was trying to pull this off, I'd get four groups of hijackers. We'd try to get some stuff we could use as weapons onto the planes. We'd call each other on cell phones to make sure all four planes were ready for hijacking. If not, try again the next day. If we were ready, just take over and fly the planes into something important. How is this hard? With an internet connection, a laptop, and good encryption, the authorities wouldn't have a clue.

      I'm not actually a terrorist, so maybe I'm missing something here... The only thing I can think of is that maybe you would need a big organization to get enough suicide hijackers, and ones who could fly as well. With parachutes, some of the hijackers might even figure out a way to pull it off and survive.

      The only way to defend against this kind of thing once the plane is hijacked is to have SAM sites protecting important buildings. I don't think you could scramble fighters fast enough, unless you have a huge no-fly zone over your important buildings.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
    4. Re:absolutely right by Knobby · · Score: 1

      The only way to defend against this kind of thing once the plane is hijacked is to have SAM sites protecting important buildings. I don't think you could scramble fighters fast enough, unless you have a huge no-fly zone over your important buildings.

      This wouldn't necessarily help. First you need to hit the plane, which could be very difficult if it's flying low across the skyline without hitting a nearby building with your SAM. Second, even if you hit the plane (keep in mind we're talking about an airliner here, not a fighter), there's a good chance the mass of the craft would still barrel into a building or a hospital or a concert in the park.. And lastly, you need someone to make the judgement call, and pull the trigger.

    5. Re:absolutely right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever bother to think about how you would fly a 757 or 767?

    6. Re:absolutely right by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 2

      Maybe I'm being slow, but how does that show otherwise? If I and my five mates had decided to try this, we could also claim to have a bomb. Actually that was one of the first options to spring to mind.

    7. Re:absolutely right by marahnemo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're close. The actual number of people required is eight. One person distracts while the other kills the pilot. Then the distractor stands guard at the door, reassuring all the passengers while the killer pilots the plane into the designated area. This act could have been accomplished by eight very determined terrorists. Consider this when you cry out for the blood of thousands of innocent muslims.

    8. Re:absolutely right by Snootch · · Score: 1
      Everyone claims that this was sophisticated, planned for months, etc.

      If not for heightened security tomorrow, I could have pulled this off with 20 like minded and loyal friends. 5 per plane, and no flight crew of 3 pilots and 5 flight attendents would be able to stop me.


      Hmm...a few facts missing here:

      1. The flight crew aren't the problem - you need to get past airport security with whatever guns you have
      2. You need pilots that can fly a commercial jet, which requires a lot of training, not everyone can do it. The pilot would realise that they were doomed anyway and crash the plane onto an uninhabited spot if you tried to make him or her do it
      3. You need a lot of structual engineering/demolition expertise to pull off such a thorough demolition - apparently they picked jsut the right spot and height to cause a neat implosion, rather than a toppling or anything.


        1. This kind of thing would take one hell of a lot of resources...

    9. Re:absolutely right by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      Maybe I'm being slow, but how does that show otherwise?

      He said this:

      On top of that, with the people on board, the likely fact is that they probably didnt know what was going to happen. If I thought I was going to be okay and things would just work out ("I am not going to kill anyone of you, its only money" would convince me to sit down and ride it out - right into a building) then would I even consider being heroic? No.

      The calls from the two planes show that passengers on those two KNEW they were going to die, yet they failed to act (as far as we know...the one that crashed may very well have been because someone was struggling with the hijackers. If that's the case, that person(s) is a hero).

      -Legion

  160. This is no "crime against humanity" by kzadot · · Score: 1, Troll

    Hiroshima, Vietnam, sanctions against poor starving Iraqis, these are crimes against humanity. This is simply justice, against a nation that has gone crazy with it's own ideals of invincibility and superiority. And especially against the childish and dangerous attitude of George Bush towards foreign relations.

    My hearts go out to all the Muslim people that are regrettabley going to suffer the prejudices that the vengful and misunderstanding americans are going to display.

    1. Re:This is no "crime against humanity" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cute troll, I'll bite.

      Hiroshima: we will not give our lives fighting a ground/water war against a fanatics.

      Vietnam: well, this was a fiasco. It's the same deal.

      Iraq: Iraq started a war. They lost, and sanctions were put into place to keep their government under control. If Saddam weren't so concerned with rebuilding plants for building weapons he should not have, he'd be feeding his people.

      A great number of people in the US do not agree with George Bush. But if Bush has managed to instigate this on his own in 8 months, I'm pretty shocked.

      I submitted a story to Slashdot asking people to not hold prejudice against people of Arab decent. Racism is stupid.

      I don't know how we're supposed to understand this incident that's going to satisfy us. The US has shown that we will not tolerate losses of our people. Perhaps our government acted badly toward that region before.

      But it's only going to be worse after this.

    2. Re:This is no "crime against humanity" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If iraq started the gulf war and the US were so blameless, why were Bush sr. and members of his administration tried and found guilty war crimes?

    3. Re:This is no "crime against humanity" by fscking_coward_2001 · · Score: 1

      War crimes? I don't recall seeing Bush & Co on trial at the Hague. Please explain...

    4. Re:This is no "crime against humanity" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Hiroshima, Vietnam, sanctions against poor starving Iraqis, these are crimes against humanity. "

      this is simply justice, against a nation that has gone crazy with it's own ideals of invincibility and superiority. dead tight. Americans whine when they are the victims, calling cowardly etc etc. When they do it it is for justice & the defence of democracy.

      Its ironic that the Jew parasites live off America and use the money to force Americans to support Israel in its atrocities, and snivel when they are in turn the victims. Where where the tears for the babies killed by the Jude in Sabra & Chatilla refugee camps? wehere was the indignant outrage and headlines. nowhere, thats where. One rule for yanks and the Jude parasite another for the rest of the World.

      America is paying the price for being a Jew ridden Jew loving country.

    5. Re:This is no "crime against humanity" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck them & fuck you, buddy

    6. Re:This is no "crime against humanity" by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

      Only one problem. George W. Bush isn't repsonsible for Hiroshima or Vietnam...and as for his father and the sanctions with the people of Iraq...well...Iraq probably could have fed ALOT more of them if they weren't trying to make chemical weapons, nukes, and stock up on every piece of military hardware anyone is crazy enough to sell them.

      As for Hiroshima...look up what the Japenese were doing with anyone who surrendered to them. Raping civilians (and forced 'comfort women' for their soldiers...on a HUGE scale...which was pretty much the wholesale rape of the mothers, wives and daughters of the losers), murdering civilians, murdering those who surrendered in cold blood, and if you got a quick death you were lucky as alot of it was from literal torture....and believe me...I am not going into ALOT of gory details for the sake of being brief here. This was not a few isolated incidents...this was their way. They were about as brutal as you can be about it. They were commiting crimes against humanity LONG before we struck back with ours...and yes...in my opinion: they had it coming. I'd go as far as to say they got off easy.

      Vietnam? Don't get me started...the arguements on either side of that will be going on for alot longer than I'll be on this earth...and neither side will ever be 100% right.

      Don't get me wrong...my heart goes out to the muslims who are going to take abuse for the actions of a few zealots...but don't kid yourself about the past actions of this country...American's have generally did what they knew as best at the time...and more often than not, they were justified. Out of the things you listed...Vietnam is the only point I'll give you as debatable.

  161. Re:Terrorism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    considering that the US government among other niceties, tested air-borne nukes on civilian and military populations (some in trenches up to 200m from ground zero) in the Utah desert (start here: http://www.nuclearfiles.org/maps/), inoculated people with various viruses and bacilli (http://www.apfn.org/apfn/experiment.htm) to study them, how can you discard the possibility that some faction in the governement would not let 10'000 people die ?


    check your facts first, then be outraged.

  162. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  163. The shock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing that makes me feel the worst is wondering why I don't feel worse than I do about the situation. Thousands are dead, and these bastards have violated the sanctity of our freedom. Yet, I feel ashamed that I am thankful that I wasn't affected. And yet, part of me wishes I was there to do my part in helping people - but again I feel ashamed to understand that the purpose would be to assuage my guilt.

  164. Usamah Bin Laden Commerical by Arkoth · · Score: 1

    Paid for by The U.S Government

    http://www.narrowminds.net/laden.htm

  165. Same in Denver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No planes - kinda nice, but erie as well. There were a couple F-16s scrambled from a nearby airforce base in Colo Springs eariler. But now it's really quiet - not even helicopters or small planes in the air.

  166. T. Herman Zweibel by owenc · · Score: 1

    ... has been quoted blaming 'dirty spaniards' for the destruction of the towers.

  167. bullsh.t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been reading and trying to understan nostradamus works for over ten years now.
    I _never_ saw something that even vaguely resembles that passage.

    I spent most of this day to find the root of this rumor; Or at least a pointer to the passage.
    Nothing.

    This is bullsh.t

    And if anyone tells me the location (within Nostradamus works, not on a fabricated website) I'd be more than happy.
    anti
    ps:
    anti@webhome.de, still didn't look up my /. passwd

  168. please can you move on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i want news for nerds - stuff that matters.

    1. Re:please can you move on? by SheepDogg · · Score: 1

      Check my post below, look up my name, I put news up that I'd like an answer to. Why did we do nothing when we had 2 jets following the plane to the pentagon?

      SheepDogg

    2. Re:please can you move on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't you have laws that forbid shooting down civilian planes?

      anyway, i don't need wtc/pentagon -news, i mean i want tech news, nerd news, computer news, like the day before yesterday. not this terrorist strike shit any more. i'm fed up with it.

  169. More Speculation by J'raxis · · Score: 2

    I do not really think one would need a fully-trained pilot to crash-land an airplane. The hijackers could have told the pilots to fly the plane to New York without revealing they were planning on leveling a building with it. I would guess the pilot would cooperate if he thought the hijackers would merely force the plane to land and then negotiate with the government over their grievances and the hostages, as most hijackers do. Instead, when the plane was within sufficient proximity of the towers, where anyone who knows how to use a steering wheel could operate it, the terrorists could have then wrested control from the pilot and simply aimed the plane in the right direction. Knowledge of how to read the numerous gauges and operation of equipment such as the landing gear would have been quite superfluous.

    It has already been revealed that the terrorists overtook the plane with common knives and cardboard shears (box cutters), which probably anyone could have gotten on board legitimately.

    I would also point to an Arab nation as the source of the attacks, not because of the Islamic religion, but because nearly every Arab nation has more than sufficient temporal reasons for justifiably hating the United States. We are allied with Israel; more than enough cause for the Palestinians. In the 1960s and 70s, Israel invaded several of its neighbors, with our help. We betrayed Saddam Hussein in his war against Iran, then went to war with him when he invaded Kuwait. We currently maintain a dictatorship in Saudi Arabia for economic goals. Prior to Ayatollah Khomeini, we maintained a similar dictatorship in Iran. We have bombed Libya on numerous occasions, and even killed Mohammar Qadaffis own daughter in one raid. We supported the Afghani Mujahadeen in their war against Russia, then withdrew after our goals were satisfied (defeat the communists), leaving them to fight their civil wars themselves.

    Finally, there are numerous stories in the Old Testament (mythology shared by both Christians and Jews) of people killing in Gods name. In fact, one could argue that in several stories, Yahweh was in fact a Hebrew war god much like Mars or Ares from GræcoRoman mythology. The ancient Hebrews prayed to Him before going to battle, He saw them to victory, and they sacrificed much of their spoils to Him afterward. The phenomenon is not a corruption by rulers but, historically, the norm for many religions. Few religions are, under the surface, about universal love and peace.

    1. Re:More Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It is just NOT TRUE that 'anyone who knows how to use a steering wheel could operate it'. My dad flys boeing 737 and he told me that it is _extremely_ difficult to hit such a narrow target at that speed. (you may have noticed that the planes had no flaps or gears out, which would have slowed down the airspeed, making it easier to manouver the plane into the tower) The people flying the aircrafts must have been some extremely skilled and well trained pilots! (fyi: my name is florian beer - i would have signed up but the system didn't work for me...)

    2. Re:More Speculation by Flower · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is also the fact that one of the aircraft did a 270 degree turn before hitting its target. According to the morning radio report I was listening too, this is a difficult maneuver and almost fighter pilotish in its execution.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  170. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  171. Re:Let's Speculate, and let's be fair. by Combuchan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    One of the irritating things about the 'jihad' agianst the USA is that the Arabs who are behind it are frequently called Muslims or Islamic.


    This has got to stop. Islam, at least as far as I understand it, is a religion of peace and devotion . Just look at the tens of millions of the true Islamics, the decent American citizens who love this land and in times of crisis like this unfaitly bear the brunt of our typical narrow-minded hostilities. Our tendency to blame an entire culture for the actions of one nut indicates that we're still carrying Segrigationist-era prejudices.


    Fanatics like Osama bin Laden and what I fear to be a growing proportion of the Arab world follow a bastardized and corrupt version of Islam that somehow justifies horrendous atrocities like September 11th--I think a New York Times columnist called it Islamism, the -ism to indicate it's juvenile delinquency.


    Islamism, Islamist, Islamistic. Let's adopt this term and end an injustice against our fellow Americans.

    --
    "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
  172. Re:What needs to be done! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As stupid and tasteless, and horrible as this is, you've made me smile for only the 3rd time today, and for that I thank you.

  173. Re:oh boy.... read this: by lorenlal · · Score: 1

    Oh, and it's not like the City of God could be Washington either.....

    That's one heaven I don't want to see.

  174. One more thing you can do. by Jamuraa · · Score: 2, Informative

    If any of you don't have a PayPal account yet, you can sign up and get $5 free. My first act: give give it to the red cross fund. Go to PayPal now and sign up!

    --
    You can't see this if you have sigs turned off.
  175. Does Osama Bin Laden's group have TAC NUKES?! by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

    According to a GeoStrategyDirect.com intelligence newsletter published in May, bin Laden's organization is belived to have as many as 20 tactical nuclear devices stolen from Russian forces by Chechen rebels. If this is true, then the recent terror attacks could have been much worse. If bin Laden does have these nukes and plans on using them as an "insurance policy" then it could explain why he would think he could make such an alleged attack with impunity.

    The following text is from a WorldNetDaily news article on May 11th of this year.

    "Russian intelligence sources who are fighting bin Laden members in Chechnya believe [he] has a handful of tactical nuclear weapons," said the report. "Arab intelligence sources say the Al Qaida head has as many as 20 weapons."

    Al Qaida is the name of the terrorist group bin Laden leads.

    The report says "both sides agree" that the Saudi terrorist managed to acquire his weapons by supporting the Chechen cause with money and volunteers, in exchange for nuclear materials and technology.

    www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_I D= 22611

    To view a supposed bin Laden recruitment video, go to:

    www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/06/21/video.binlad en

  176. Why? by JAVAC+THE+GREAT · · Score: 2

    Why does stuff like this have to happen? I'm just trying to live my insignificant life peacefully and quietly. I become upset enough over insignificant things without having to deal with stuff like this and all the potential ramifications. Maybe I should move to Antarctica.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear ya. Once the airlines open back up, I'm out to form my own igloo comunity the hell outta this crazy place. And I'm bringing a big-ass heater.

    2. Re:Why? by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Interesting
      • Why does stuff like this have to happen?

      Because in the past fifty years, US government policy has killed millions of civilians worldwide, all to keep career politicians in office. Everything that you feel now, shock, revulsion, anger, is the same genuine feeling that has existed for years in Beiruit and Baghdad, in North Korea and Vietnam and Cuba, in every place else that has suffered US bombs and US sanctions.

      Because the US parks carrier battle groups on peoples' doorsteps all over the world, threatens civilian populations, then hangs out the signs saying "Make us go away. Just try."

      Because, in the cause of "freedom", the US supported a dictatorship (Iraq) against a theocracy (Iran) then switched sides to defend a monarchy (Kuwait) because it had more oil. There's no principle at work there, just cynical pragmatism.

      I'd go on, but you either know this by now, or you don't. The US is hated on a deep and personal level by large parts of the world. Fear has kept them in check. Now you either need to crank up the fear again, or work on the hatred.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Why? by JAVAC+THE+GREAT · · Score: 1

      Oh, the US killed civilians? I suppose you're arguing that the solution is to kill more civilians. That's what it looks like your saying to me.

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Colin,
      Thank God not all Scottish will tell Americans in their moment of terrible tragedy that we deserve it (whois lookup on your domain name).

      How creative and individualistic of you to adopt the "new" anti-American attitude that often characterizes the emerging persona of a unified Europe. How very clever.

      Why don't you do what smart and caring Europeans do instead. What's that you ask? You are dying to know? Well then, my boy, I'll tell you.

      regarding the tragedy that has just struck my country and my people: stand by us in our moment of pain and don't tell us that we deserve it while we are still in shock and our people are still dying.

      regarding the new unified Europe: look to make Europe the best possible place, and example to the world. Don't take the easy route and simply be anti-American. It really won't get you anywhere.

      Anyway, and I'm sure this will infuriate you: in the long run the US and Europe will move together politically, socially, and economically. It's inevitable.

      You obviously don't have to take my advice. You're free to hate my country, its people, its politics, its foreign policy, and its influence on the world to a point that you see poetic justice when terrorists commit mass murder on my people and destroy symbols of my country.

      In that case I'm also free to think that you are a piece of human excrement. Respond to this with more of your drivel and I'll expound on the last sentence.

      Thank God for all the other Scottish, other Europeans, and around the world all the non-Americans (particularly the Canadians and Australians) who are standing with us, supporting us, and sharing our grief after the horrible events of yesterday.

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha-ha. I hope someone you know died yesterday

    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We didn't see you lot grieving over the lives you took in your various interventions. No, we saw the usual gung-ho yee-haw stuff. For the record (which admittedly is not worth anything as I will post as AC) my condolences go to the families of those killed yesterday... But the victims were no more innocent, no more human than all those killed by American forces.
      "my boy"... You just couldn't lose the arrogant attitude, just for a minute, could you?
      The US and Europe may well move together, but it won't be us moving all the way towards you. Anti-US sentiment is growing, in case you hadn't noticed. A lot of people are pissed off with you about a lot of things. The fact that you just can't seem to see it, just makes it all the more infuriating.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the US must move closer to Europe on many points. I certainly don't want Europe to take any (more) of the bad things from my country. I do want the US to take more good things from Europe: this is already happening; despite our president's backwards stance on issues such as the environment, energy policies (he is after all heavily influenced by oil interests unfortunately), capital punishment, etc the American people have generally more modern views and are moving towards European views continually. I could go on about the reasons why and etc, but then we might have an intelligent conversation and we wouldn't want that would we.

      And, the arrogant "my boy" addition was added to piss you off. I see that it worked.

      I don't believe my country is perfect. I don't like everything my country does. I don't agree with unilateralist foreign policy. I want my country to be just another regular responsible western country in the world. I don't want to see my country piss off any more of its friends and allies by not taking their interests seriously enough. I know that there have been civilians killed by the actions of my government, my military, and other intended or unintended negative civilian consequences. I am not proud of these things.

      I understand European attitudes towards my country. I have lived in Germany, Belgium, Austria, Italy (and the Caribbean) for the past 10 years (currently "based" in Hungary but work in Rome). I speak 3 European languages fluently and can communicate in 3 others. I make a good European judged by European standards for many reasons. Yet I am a hated yank (hated by people like you).

      The point is (rather emotional of course), that it's personally difficult to take when my country has a terrible tragedy and people like you, who hate my country, its people, its policies, its influence in the world, jump out to say that we deserve it.

      You have the right to think the way you do. You have the right to hate my country, hate me, hate my people. You have the right to make the ridiculous hypocritical statement that you grieve for the victims but are thrilled that that my country finally is getting its just deserves (justifiable mass-murder, as long as they are Americans, right?).

      When I watch the news and all the lives ruined, see symbols of my country attacked and destroyed, my people subjected to mass murder, and people like you saying that we deserve it, maybe even a person as full of hate as you can understand my distate for your reaction. But maybe not.

      At the end of the day, living in a free, democratic country like Scotland, you have the right to your opinion (assuming you are in fact the original poster; if not paste in the name of whatever European country you come from).

      But maybe a little bit of understanding and compassion would be in order instead.

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't hate "yanks", I work with a couple, and many of you are capable of rational thought, as you have shown. There does tend to be a side to "some" Americans, though, which really does incense me.

      BTW I am not the original AC from Scotland, but I was the one complaining about the "my boy" comment, it didn't exactly piss me off, I just felt moved to comment on it.

      I'm from England. And my girlfriend is from Budapest.

    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many Americans do you know personally that have the attitudes that you hate so much?

      I'm not saying there aren't any; there are, very many. But my country is very large, and those people do not make up a majority of the population. Reasonable Americans do not have such views. Your country also has plenty with similar attitudes for your own country. I know firsthand. In the final analysis, would there be an equal percentage of hard-core, no-excuses, "England or die" English to like-minded Americans? Maybe not. But maybe so.

      Right now my country is in shock. Even otherwise reasonable people may be saying unreasonable things due to the high emotional levels caused by seeing our fellow countrymen, innocent civilians mass-murdered, and symbols of our nation attacked and destroyed. I have rarely met more patriotic people than the English. I think the reaction of these individual human beings would be very easy for an Englishman to understand.

      But to discuss my country's foreign policy and its impact on the world:
      Did you realize that the average American doesn't have any idea what his country is doing in his name? Do you realize the extent to which American foreign policy is detached from the average American?

      Did you realize that most Americans, given time to think about it, would probably agree with my sentiments? I know for a fact that Americans in general want to be just another western democracy. I know for a fact that Americans, in principle, want to move closer to Europe and other allies (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc).

      It is clear that American foreign policy must be more aligned to the needs of its friends and allies. How it could be any other way is beyond me.

      However, distinguishing between the governement and the people I believe is important, particularly given the above. Where is the real problem? Is it really that my country is a country of gun-toting psycho murderers, intent on destroying anything that they don't like - happy to kill women and children and old people as long as a McDonalds can be built on the rubble? Do my people celebrate when civilians die so that Americans can get some kind of trade advantage (I have no particular incident in mind, but you get the picture)? Or is it possibly that my country's government has on occasion acted overzealously in trying to further my country's interests, knowing that there will not be a backlash from the American people, because they will never know, and those that do will assume that the government acted appropriately, because they understand the situation and, after all, it is their job to handle those things?

      Given that this, in fact, may be the problem, that there is a disalignment between what the average American would want (if were were better informed - particularly about intended and unintended consequences) and some of the government's actions, then is it really the only solution to have a mass-murder committed on my country's soil to bring about change in this regard?

      To tell you the truth, this may very well happen. There may be many positive things come out of this.

      I hope that my country can use the opportunity it has now to forget disagreements in the past with other countries and join together to make a complete, unified, internation reaction to the terrorists responsible, and build on that to improve relations from all sides. This includes countries like China and Cuba, who have denounced the terrorism and have offered support to my country. It is particularly incredible from Cuba, as for Castro (now really getting on BTW) my country's restrictions on trade and travel with his country has been a very emotional issue, besides being of course terrible economically and other bad consequences for the average poor, innocent Cuban civilian.

      I hope that my people will be much more involved and interested in the actions of my government across the world, and will ensure that those actions are always aligned with what I see as what the average American wants: for my country to be a good world citizen, just another good western democracy.

      But that doesn't mean I am happy it happened. That doesn't mean that the event doesn't sicken me. That doesn't mean that I don't feel incribly powerful emotions as I watch that 757 strike the second WTC tower at full speed, thinking about all of the people on board who died, all the people in the building, all the people on the groud, also when they collapsed. So when Europeans, a people I personally love (after all I live in Europe, my wife is European, my daughter has dual citizenship and at 3 years old is completely fluent in 2 languages and also understands Italian) come out and express joy that my country has finally gotten its just deserves through mass-murder of its citizens, the first thoughts in my mind are something along the lines of "fuck you".

      It's not a nice thought. It's a purely emotional reaction. It doesn't really help anybody to say it. I know that I shouldn't react emotionally, no matter what happens. But then, I am human. very human sometimes. Just like the people I get angry at for expressing an opinion I happen not to like.

      And let's look at why this may have happened. I imagine that we will find out that this was not a consortium of people representing civilian populations who have been unjustly wronged by my governement or its military. I don't think anyone considers that a realistic possibility. I imagine that we will find out that this was planned and executed by an Islamic group who hate my country because of its support of Israel, and see my country in a broader sense a symbol of Western Culture, something that they see as contrary to their (mostly cultural, *not necessarily religous*) beliefs and way of life. It is important to understand this. It is also important in this case to understand what is really Islam, the religion, what does it teach, and which parts of the Arab persona actually come from their history and culture. I think that most westerners would be very surprised to learn that most of the things (but not all) that they associate with the Islamic religion actually come from Arabic culture and history and are not prescribed in the Q'uran at all.

      Anyway it's important to understand this because any such country fitting the bill can and may become a target in the future. The UK comes to mind first. Why? The UK is seen as the world's second-largest supporter of Israel. The UK embodies the same western culture that these people hate. You have to understand that these people do not see American culture like Europe does. They do not look at the USA and Europe and say, we hate the USA because of their lack of proper European culture. Rather, Europe actually embodies more of what they find abhorrent, Europe is actually more liberated, more liberal, less sexually-repressed, more tolerant (in some ways) etc, etc than my country. That's why this strike really was an attack on western civilization at the same time. This is not lost on the "Islamic extremists", while it is a point lost on others, Americans and non-Americans alike.

      So anyway what's my point? Just that I have a reasonable understanding of the situation and people's motivations for saying the various things that they do. However that doesn't mean that I won't allow myself an emotional reaction when people express joy at the mass murder of my fellow countrymen, particularly Europeans, a large class of people I love myself.

      David Nichols

    10. Re:Why? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Thank God not all Scottish will tell Americans in their moment of terrible tragedy that we deserve it

      No! No, no no! Nobody, ever, anywhere deserves this. That's my point. That the US is genuinely hated and feared, by good, decent, family folks who are feeling the same horror and anger that you feel right now. The violence has to end everywhere before that will be solved.

      The question was: why us?

      The answer is simply that the US chooses to police the world, and that this was inevitable. It wasn't deseved, it's vile, it's abhorent, but it will keep happening so long as the USA projects power across the world.

      You have a chance to stop that, here and now.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    11. Re:Why? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • And, the arrogant "my boy" addition was added to piss you off... living in a free, democratic country like Scotland

      Um, who are you talking to? I followed up as myself. I don't AC post.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    12. Re:Why? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      For the record, I'll follow up my own post, as it was so badly misinterpreted

      I do not hate America or Americans. These deaths were vile and abhorent, utterly unjustifiable and completely wrong.

      But the question that I was responding to was: why us?

      The US is hated because it projects power across the world, and further, because it is hypocritical in the application of that power and often applies it not through principle, but for political and economic ends, or as a public relations exercise or even just to try out new weapons systems against a hostile enemy.

      The US goes into battle with a cry of "good will triumph" and "we are defending freedom.". Not always. The USA prolongs regional conflicts, preferably by supporting the underdog with arms, but occasionally with direct action. It supported the dictatorship of Iraq against the theocracy of Iran, then when Iraq got the upper hand, sided with the monarchy of Kuwait against Iraq. Where was the "good" side there, and the "freedom"? If the goal was to eradicate evil, to end the conflict, then why stop once the status quo was restored? The invasion of Kuwait by Iraq was wrong, but the ongoing genocide of the marsh Arabs inside Iraq is worse, and the only responses to that are to starve the civilian population, and to enforce no fly zones that are thinly veiled excuses to remind Iraq who the boss is, and to give pilots combat experience (just as they used to use Libya, before that got too dangerous and unpopular). There is no will, nor any apparent desire to actually resolve the plight of the marsh arabs, or indeed to stop denying the civilians of Iraq access to food and medical supplies, now that it is all happening conveniently off camera.

      You can argue with that, and I might very well be wrong. Certainly, the intervention in former Yugoslavia saved tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of lives, and I reserve my cynicism in that conflict. But the plain fact is that while one side welcomed the USA, the other rejected it, and the USA made another enemy. The USA chooses to police the world, and in the process it causes a lot of deaths, and the good, decent family folks suffering those deaths hate the USA, with a heartfelt and genuine passion. They feel exactly the same shock and revulsion and anger that you feel now. It's not right, and it's not justifiable, but that is why this happened, because there are now a sufficient number of people and countries who wish revenge on the USA to support the murderers who did this.

      The way to address that is not to deny it, nor to keep bombing those who hate you, so that they keep fearing you as well, but simply to stop policing the world. The arms companies and the politicians will have to find other things to do, but think of it this way: if nobody hates you, then you don't need a huge military, or the NSA, or even the CIA. In the long term, you could add 50% to health and education spending. Isn't that a goal worth pursuing?

      The USA has a chance to decide now, and for the next century, whether it wants to escalate the cycle of hatred and fear, or whether it wants to actually lead the world and bring the aircraft carriers home for good.

      It's your choice.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    13. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Colin,

      I apologize for misinterpreting your original post and for the emotional language in it.

      It's tough right now for me as an American to start thinking about the points you are making, while they are still pulling bodies out of the ruins of the WTC.

      Of course it's important for us to do an accurate and objective self-assessment of the situation and why it happened.

      This is impossible to do when one is overcome with emotion.

      It's easy to interpret anyone saying something like: "this is why it happened, your country has been murdering civilians and angering the world ever since WWII..." as saying that we deserve it.

      I think the truth will be something a little different from what you have expressed, but how different may be a matter of degrees and interpretation.

      I don't hold with your statement that US government policy has killed millions of civilians worldwide. I am not a foreign policy expert, and am not an expert on history, and I am not acquainted with all of the events, the reasoning, the decision-making processes of my government in the various events that you could probably list better than I, and the aftereffects of those decisions, where civilians have been negatively affected.

      However I do know that neither you nor anyone else can guess accurately what would have been the effects, aftereffects, and other intended and unintended consequences of US inaction in the very events that you see as being mistakes.

      I do know that my country has made mistakes. I know that innocents have been killed because of my government. I have no doubt that my government has made and will make foreign policy mistakes. I am not proud of these things.

      It is part of the American character to act. Americans by nature hate indecision; the idea of sitting back and doing nothing goes against the American character. If we feel that we could improve the situation, then we feel we should act. Naturally that's dangerous because it depends on opinion of the "improvement" (who is being improved? Just Americans? And at what cost?) There have clearly been known (therefore maybe not strictly speaking intended, but "acceptable") consequences and unintended consequences.

      If I take a nice, "friendly" interpretation of your message, then I hear that you are saying that my country and my people are being taught a painful lesson in unintended consequences of flawed foreign policy (i.e. bullying the world).

      This is of course most likely the case. It's a difficult message to hear as this lesson in unintended consequences was delivered by mass-murdering my countrymen.

      You say that you do not hate my country nor its people. I appreciate that. I am one of those stupid Americans who wants everybody to like his country, particularly Europeans, a place I love (I live in Europe and am married to a European).

      You might ask, why then, if Americans want everybody to like them so much, do we bully around the world and cause problems in places we have no just cause to cause problems in?

      Part of it is the facet of the American character I alluded to previously, the need to take action, to do something, to be the hero and save the day. This will sound silly to anyone the least bit cynical but this is firmly part of the American character. We are a young nation. You will say that We are immature in this way, and no doubt you are right. It's also clear that this immature, yet noble sentiment, has been subverted at times for other, less noble purposes. Testing new weapons systems in situations where the US gets no advantage other than excellent real-world test data (and a lot of other ignored negative consequences). It makes me sick. It's probably happened. Anyway in other cases where the right and wrong are not so clear, then obviously it's much more likely that any action either way is going to get condemnation by a lot of people.

      It's clear that our foreign policy will have to move to a state where we have a much clearer view of the American interest, and a careful consideration of the long-term consequences (such as the relationship with the people affected - in the end it really is all about people) before we take action. This will be a sign of the maturing American aweness of the world and attitude to freign policy. Countries like the UK, Russia, China, Iran, etc have had this down since before my country came into existance, no doubt.

      Another thing you should keep in mind is that the degree to which my government has pursued American interests has not reflected the common American's wish to be just another stable western country, a tolerant country, a friendly nation made up of a friendly people, who care about their allies and people less fortunate around the world. I *promise* you that this is what the average American wants. No reasonable American could disagree in my opinion.

      The fact that this, in large part, is not what many people in the world think of when they think of my country indicates a terrible disalignment between the consequences of the actions of my government on the world stage and what Americans would like it to be.

      These things can now change as you pointed out. As sickened as I am by what has happened, I have to give credit to people like you who have made me think this through and try to have an objective view on my country and my people.

      The positive things that will come out of this could be great. It's just what a great nation would do. I hope we prove to be one by: getting more involved in government and ensuring that our foreign policy is in sync with the sentiments above, that we seize the opportunity to improve not only relations with Russia (looks inevitable) and China, but also Cuba and of course the greater Mulsim world in general, who I do not believe represent the mass-murderers who have recently gotten my attention so effectively.

      However as I am still feeling very emotional about the whole ordeal, I would like to publicly thank those people in great places like Canada, your country Scotland, England, Ireland, New Zealand, Wales, Australia (not to mention the whole of continental Europe and other countries around the world), who feel as if they've been hit, who are commisserating with us in our moment of pain. As bad as I feel from the tragedies in New York and Washington, I feel good knowing that there are good people out there, people who really care about my people, that are hurting with us, enraged at the actions of those terrorists, and who will stand beside us throughout (and have stood beside us in good times and bad, even when we were wrong, basically like a family who puts up with their stronger big brother, who sometimes makes stupid mistakes, who sometimes is overly arrogant and makes people angry, sometimes clumsy and steps on people's toes, because he's family, and they know that he is at heart a good person).

      For those people, do we deserve your loyalty, your rage at those who have wounded us, your pain at the death and suffering of our people?

      Not always. But I hope we can prove ourselves to be now and in the future.

      God save us.

      Anyway I guess this counts as an intelligent discussion.

      David Nichols
      Sopron, Hungary

  177. Re:oh boy.... read this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes... Too bad he died in 1566.

  178. My spin... not serious by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    9/11 is the anniversary of the discovery (by euros) of Mann. Island where the WTC buildings were.

    Someone suggested in a joking way: what if it was Native Americans. WTC is a good target for someone getting back at you for trading your nations for beads.

    --This isn't at all meant to be serious-or-even to make you think that it's true--

    I just want people to open their minds to who could be responsible. I don't think Native Americans would do anything like this.

    My money is on Bin Ladin [not the whole Arab community].

    VIDEOS AT THIS SITE

  179. Been expecting this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for a while now.

    It could have been Abba bin Dabba or any number of other Camel Cowboys with money and a popsicle up thier ass.

    Is anyone really surprised that the Punjabs eventually decided to take a whack at us?

    I say it's time to give the Mideast a lesson in how to handle a Nuclear glass refinery.

  180. Giuliani and Martial Law by bmasel · · Score: 2

    The mayor was prepared to announce that Habeus Corpus and Freedom of Assembly would be suspended along with the scheduled Primary Election.

    Then an aide reminded him they were already suspended.

    --
    Ben Masel: 51,282 votes for US Senate in the Wisconsin Democratic Primary
  181. Sentencing for 93 WTC bombing 9/12/2001 by user+flynn · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the sentencing for one of the perps of the 93 WTC bombing today?

    Economic attack anyone? Maybe the WTO opposition had something to do with it.

    --
    In the distance you hear an ominous moo.
  182. Re:Terrorism??? by Linux+Freak · · Score: 2

    Just a small nit-pick, but it's "kamikaze", not "kamakazi". The word kamikaze (meaning "divine wind") is comprised of two kanji characters, kami (meaning god or divine), and kaze (meaning wind). Tell a Japanese person that these terrorist attacks were "kamikaze" attacks and watch how pissed off they get. :-)

  183. Hmph. by Legion303 · · Score: 1
    From Jane's:

    Based upon our specialist analysis, we have identified the following as potential suspects:

    Osama bin Laden and Al-Qa'eda ("the Base")
    The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)
    Saddam Hussein

    The best way to make sure you have the right people is to take them all out. Every one of the useless motherfuckers.

    The more info we get, the less this looks like another American militia job. But something strikes me as odd--doesn't bin Laden usually crow about his attacks after the fact? I haven't heard anything about him doing so tonight. Could it be him, or is it more likely to be another organization?

    -Legion

  184. image/avi site in Aust. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    found a site with most of the images and avi's. It's based in Australia, so some readers may find it a bit faster than the US news sites. Has a mirror of the event time line. http://pyrrhus.dyndns.org/wtc

  185. Carnivore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this is going to be unpopular, but isn't this the type of thing that Carnivore and/or Echelon is supposed to intercept?

    Take a moment and think about it. Then think about the thousands of /. readers who deliberately peppered their emails with "keywords" in an attempt to overload carnivore/echelon...

    I appreciate my privacy as much as anyone, and when I don't want someone reading my emails I use appropriate encryption. Do the same.

    1. Re:Carnivore by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      I know this is going to be unpopular, but isn't this the type of thing that Carnivore and/or Echelon is supposed to intercept?


      Interesting sentiment, but...

      We don't know that Echelon even exists.

      We really don't know that Echelon is literally worldwide. If this was coordinated entirely overseas, it might make Echelon moot.

      The terrorists might not have used e-mail / telephone or any other kind of electronic communications. Apparently the CIA used to track Bin Laden by monitoring his satellite phone calls, but he got wise to that and quit using it. For all we know, he now relies on carrier pigeons or something.

      Even if they did use electronic communication, maybe it was encrypted. I know we are all paranoid, and assume the NSA has the resources to decrypt any and all encrypted e-mail, but maybe that's not the case after all.

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    2. Re:Carnivore by mpe · · Score: 2

      Even if they did use electronic communication, maybe it was encrypted.

      However any organised terrorist, the people involved here certainly are organised, is going to be well aware that their communications are likely to be intercepted.
      Thus they are more likely to use code systems most including bogus communications and communications intended to mislead.

  186. Terrorist Organization Profiles by VB · · Score: 2


    Picked up this list of potentially involved organizations from some dude on IRC.

    Everyone seems to be blaming Osama bin Laden. I hope people do their research completely before resolving to that conclusion. Just imagine we get him extradited to the U.S., try him, convict him, and summarily inject him; only to have the Sears Tower impaled by a Concorde the following day.

    It could be anyone. This thing sucks, but justice is only sweet when it's 100% confirmed to be imposed on those who instigated the original offense.

    --
    www.dedserius.com
    VB != VisualBasic
  187. No planes in Wichita... by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2

    I know the feeling. Here in Wichita, KS we've got a couple of little airports, McConnel AFB, and two semi-decent sized airports. And, of course - Beech Aircraft (er - Raytheon now), Boeing, Cessna, and some smaller aircraft companies. Normally, it's so busy that when Cessna wanted to expaned, they decided on a different site - there's just too much normal air traffic here!


    But today - after they grounded commercial traffic, there was nada. It's so normal to hear the comming and going of commerical aircraft that you never really notice it, until now when it's completely gone.


    However, there's the sounds of aircraft again now - we've got the B1B's, Kansas Air National Guard, and even more importantly, the refuling wing just a couple miles from the house. There's a fairly good amount of traffic comming from ther for the last couple hours, probably mostly from the refuling wing.

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  188. 21st Century Powder Kegs by DoctaWatson · · Score: 1

    Let's assume that some serious actions are going to be taken by the United States (and possibly her allies) in the near future- very likely actions against the Taliban in Afganistan.

    What then becomes of the rest of the world- and who do we end up fighting?

    Pakistan is extremely friendly with the Taliban, and also happens to have a Nuclear arsenal.

    If Pakistan joins the fight, you can bet India will hop on our side to finish off the Pakistanis in an effort to win back Kashmir.

    As I understand, relations are currently strained between India and China, so it would take a bit of diplomacy to make sure China isn't convinced to support Pakistan. Does anyone know the Chinese foreign policy in terms of the mid-east and mid-asia?

    In addition, we have to worry about the other Arab nations that are lending moral support to these attacks. Palestine is just waiting for us to make a wrong move so that the Arab nations will unite against us and Israel. It will take some diplomacy and maybe some mid-east withdrawl to make sure things stay peachy with our Arab friends.

    Bin Laden's number one priority is overthrowing the Saudi government, so we'll likely find support there, despite their friendly attitude to the Taliban government.

    Russia is likely to stay neutral, maybe providing support for the removal of Taliban. Russia hasn't had the best track record in Afghanistan, and it might be best if they stayed out of this altogether. The people of afghanistan are more likely to support an effort to overthrow the Taliban as long as it isn't also supported by old enemies.

    Along those lines, there is likely to be support among the Afghan people themselves who have an interest in seeing the Taliban removed. The Northern Alliance needs help, and is fairly popular in Afghanistan from what I understand. As long as we don't start shelling the villages and killing civilians, we might be able to get the Afghani people to support our elimination of the Taliban, and ensure that a pro-US sentiment is put in place to avoid future terrorist influences.

    Other than that, most of the world shows support. East Asia will likely stay neutral, trying to rebuild it's economy. Western Europe, North/Central/South America, and many other countries seem to be willing to either help us or keep their nose out of our business.

    Can anyone else think of any other possible international ramifications? All of this is assuming that overwhelming evidence confirming bin Laden's involvement in the attack is presented. Not many nations would support an attack that is unwarranted.

  189. VIDEO OF FIRST PLANE? by razorjack · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have a link to a clip of the first plane?

    1. Re:VIDEO OF FIRST PLANE? by Dionysus · · Score: 1

      CNN has one now.

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
  190. Re:Gasoline Prices (OffTopic?) by de+Selby · · Score: 1

    That's a good point.

    The ONLY cause of the gas price increase was increased demand--because some idiots got it around that the prices would go up.

    We have a scanner over here and we sometimes listen to cell calls. Let's just say, all of the "slower" people rushed on down to the gas station for gas. The "quicker" folks tried to explain that this bombing should have no significant effect on gas prices.

    It's too bad self-fufilling proficies(?) can still come true.

  191. Port Authority statements, very New York by Animats · · Score: 2
    The Port Authority, which owns the World Trade Center, the Port of New York, and many of the bridges and tunnels, has been issuing statements. Unlike everybody else's press releases, they're very straighforward. There was a brief expression of regret, followed by a series of reports of services being restored. The PATH trains to New Jersey were running by 5:30 PM, somehow rerouted around the WTC station. That's an achievement.

    I'll bet the rubble is cleared out within a month, and new construction starts next spring. Bigger.

    1. Re:Port Authority statements, very New York by Hub_City · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's two PATH lines, one to WTC (which is the only station outside NJ on that line, and is likely destroyed) and one to the West Village, continuing on to Midtown (33rd St.) The 33rd St. line is the one that's running. To their credit, they've got trains running every five minutes along that line, which means they had more trains in their yard in NJ than they did on the small yard beneath the WTC (which are also likely lost.)

  192. 4 Day Reign of Terror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The flight numbers for the hijacked planes were 11, 93, 175, and 77.

    11 = Today's Date
    9 + 3 = 12 = Tomorrow
    1 + 7 + 5 = 13 = Thursday
    7 + 7 = 14 = Friday

    Coincidence?

  193. the loss by pneuma_66 · · Score: 1

    i woke up this morning, it was a normal day. Then, i read slashdot and saw what happened. As i stared in disbelief at the newscast from cnn, i realized that a large part of my life will be changed for a long time. I live a short ride from new york city, up until recently i worked mere blocks from the towers. I saw them everyday when i drove the williamsburg bridge, i never thought they would be gone in my lifetime. I, as many other long islanders feel that the city was our city. At any moment i could go and experience the wonders of one of the greatest cities in the world.
    i have memories, from my entire life, about going to the city to just look around, shop, and go to shows. Now, the twin towers, one of the symbols of nyc is gone. my life, as the lives of thousands, has been forever changed.
    throughout the day, my phone was ringing all day, with people concerned about my family, and other people we knew. Thankfully, noone i knew was hurt. But others werent as fortunate.
    Roads all throughout the area were closed, everything ground to a standstill.
    Then, during the afternoon, around 2, i hear the sound of a plane. i ran to find the source, worried that another plane was going to hit. I have not felt fear like that in a long time.
    The world is forever changed by the acts of a few. I give my condolences to all who died, and to those who helped save lives.

  194. Erie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The roar of jets just passed over my home in Denver, CO. Erie to realize that they could only be the fighter jets scrambled on alert. It's now totally silent - I think of Ted Kazinski's ranting about jets flying over his land gave him headaches. Ironically Ted was a terrorist that bombed planes for a living.

  195. Condolences from India by gaiusm · · Score: 1

    Hello,
    we were woken from our sleep to watchg the horrific images from the other side of the world. I have visited the USA twice and my memories arte of a relaxed, friendly , peaceful place.
    It is tragic that misguided fanatics were able to create so much terror in such a great country. India stands by the USA in herr hour of crisis .
    Please accept my (and my whole country's) prayers.

    regds, Gaius

    1. Re:Condolences from India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your kind words. It is nice to now that the USA has a friend in that part of the world.

    2. Re:Condolences from India by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Thanks

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  196. Dear God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watching the news cause I cant sleep. A man on the flight that went down in PA called his wife from the plane. Told her that they were going to try to overpower the hijackers, and take the plane down. They knew they would die. He told her he loved her.

    I get really cynical sometimes, about how our government is in the pocket of corporate interests, about how our government puts addicts in jail, how police officers hassle me even though I'm a good kid, how the stupid record companies seem to have forgotten about our fair use rights. I really start to dislike what my country is becoming/has become.

    We were brought up knowing our country was the greatest in the world. You said the pledge every morning. They taught you about your founding fathers, how we fought for independence. You never doubted that the US was the greatest country in the world.

    Then you grow up. The Man® starts getting to you. You see your rights disappearing left and right.

    Then something like this happens. Everything else is bullshit. I remembered why the US was the greatest country in the world.

    Whomever those people were on that plane who took it down are the bravest people I have ever known. Heros.

    It makes me want to be a kid again.

  197. This disgusts me..... by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

    These bastards are already trying to profit off of this tragedy. Sometimes people make me sick. Everyone check out the popup ad on www.novus.com Then find an e-mail address on the site and let them know what you think of it. I know I already did in quite explicit detail...

  198. Re:Enough!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would it still be stupid if you lost a loved one? i was there and saw it, but was fortunate enough to not lose anyone in the chaos. others were not as fortunate...

  199. Mirror by ekrout · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please mod this up, as I feel my collection and connection is one of the best out there [bucknell.edu]:

    http://www.students.bucknell.edu/ekrout/images/911 _In_America/images/gallery/index.html

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
  200. Not to be mean but... by NavelFozz · · Score: 0

    ... isn't there any other news stories? No knew news is on the site since 6am, except for this "Attack on America"

  201. Interestin previous /. posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it just me or does this article suddenly take on new meaning?

    Hosting Provider Shut Down By FBI
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/09/07/0048 21 5

    My hopes and prayers go out to everyone affected by this tragic event.

    1. Re:Interestin previous /. posting by VB · · Score: 2


      How in Hell did you find this? Thank you!!!

      Mod this up!!!

      --
      www.dedserius.com
      VB != VisualBasic
  202. Piloting by Seehund · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Bullshit, while it might not require specific type training for the model of the jet it would take experience in flying a large jet to fly one into a building (according to aviation experts back here in europe).


    I wouldn't think much expertise would be needed as long as the hijackers don't have to take off themselves, then they could force the pilots to navigate towards NY and when close enough kill the pilots and take over the controls. Read this BBC article:



    And a terrorist with no previous flying experience would have found it relatively easy to steer a plane through the final moments of its journey and into its target, David Learmount, Operations and Safety Editor of Flight International, told BBC News Online.

    "It would be dead easy to aim an aircraft at a target that big," he said.



    --
    Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  203. Plastic/wooden knives even better by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    ...and if you think that's funny, come visit me here in sunny Western Australia and I'll show you just how hard Wandoo wood is. If you know Jarrah, try twice as dense. PNG has stuff locally called Ironwood which is even harder. It eats steel sawblades (a sharp high-tensile saw might get three, maybe four inches into a log before it gets too blunt to cut anything). This kind of stuff is dead easy to conceal in other plastic/wooden innocuous-looking items such as walking sticks. There is no defense against it.

    The defense should be in the people. If a hijacker was stupid enough to stand up in an Israeli aircraft, he would be dead before he took ten steps.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Plastic/wooden knives even better by naasking · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I don't know why all the passengers don't just swarm hijackers. They could easily overcome them with sheer numbers. If it happened while I was on a plane, I cannot believe that I could just sit there.

    2. Re:Plastic/wooden knives even better by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

      Me either, with 50+ people on the plane and the hijackers without even have guns. Maybe the hijackers said that if they shut up then they'll land safely. People probably won't believe that for a few years though.

  204. Re:2nd plane -- CRASHED IN COLORADO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FFFish - you posted your crap about the "Colorado" plane several times already. Just for you, here's the secret - IT WENT TO AREA 51.

  205. Re:use of illegal video encoders by norculf · · Score: 1

    Microsoft calls that an innovation. To be fair though, Microsoft changes the bits so the program has more useless features and crashes more often. The Divx crew added useful capability to the software.

  206. Building Ruins by BlackHwk98 · · Score: 1

    After I had woken up from passing out in my chair this evening, I caught that one of the networks "head reporters" had crossed the police line and had gone in to see the wreckage. The reporter on FOX said that there were only 4 floors left where the two towers once stood. 4 of 110, that is a terrifying remainder. I also heard on the radio that people are using cell phones to contact the outside from the rubble, trying to tell rescuers where they are. At first when they said the building was falling, I thought it wa just the top where the plane had hit, not the entire damn thing! God be with those people who are out there looking for survivors.

    --
    Who knew life could be this funny?
  207. With pleasure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.deoxy.org/wc/warcrim3.htm

    Nice US media blackout on this one apparently. Your VP is a fugitive from justice.

    1. Re:With pleasure by Lemon_Eddy · · Score: 1

      What a clever little tosser you are - if you loot at the site you've linked to, you'll see that it's a "fascinating collection of surreal writings and images". You, you clever little gash, have just tried to back up your claim by linking to a site that describes itself as "a YAHOO for denizens of alternate realities." Way to go, champ.

    2. Re:With pleasure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you were nicely trolled. And I did toss after posting that, thanks for noticing.

  208. Re:Enough!!!! by BlowCat · · Score: 1

    You would still have a story to post your feelings. Choice is good. Not everybody on /. is American and not everybody wants to discuss the same thing in all stories.

  209. Small towns also affected by Whatever+Fits · · Score: 1

    I live in a small town of about 10,000 people in the hills (Grass Valley, CA) and there is absolutely nothing worthwhile hitting here. We have a SWAT force in front of our county buildings and an airplane constantly circling over the city. OK, it is just a twin turbo-prop craft, but that just goes to show how it has affected everyone here.

    --
    My name fits again.
  210. Cameras and R/C guns would be better by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    Several cameras at the doors (all angles) and a couple of concealed remote-control instant-acting dart guns would be a better idea, plus a R/C slug-thrower carefully limited to not putting holes in the aircraft's skin.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  211. Re:Enough!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What has that van to do with a loved one?

  212. Scenario 12d (See lone gunmen.)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the planes were hit by the billennium
    bug, and their clocks were just a couple days off.

  213. Re:oh boy.... read this: by farmhick · · Score: 1

    And you would rather have ole Slick Willy back during this?
    Or a cardboard cutout of Gore standing infront of the WhiteHouse? (Because the real one would be over in NORAD mountain, making illigal campaign phone calls.)
    After this, Bush will certainly be a great leader, because this country will be led out of this tragedy. Any way you slice it, unless he flips out, he will be a great leader. Just because you don't like his social opinions doesn't mean you have to cut him down now.

    --
    I have to stop wasting so much time reading Slashdot. It's interfering with my crystal meth addiction.
  214. Mirror For Video / Image Archive by beefdart · · Score: 5, Informative

    We here at school have begun collecting images and video to help out with the bandwidth problem the news sites are having... Here Also feel free to send anything in...

    1. Re:Mirror For Video / Image Archive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might ask your school for extra English lessons while you wait for more news.

    2. Re:Mirror For Video / Image Archive by IainMH · · Score: 1

      Is it your page that throws up loads of dodgy pop-ups beefdart? Please don't do that.

      Don't go to this site unless you want to be pissed off.

  215. Tribute to the United States by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    The following is from an email I once received. I think it is appropriate to post it at this time.

    This, from a Canadian newspaper, is worth sharing.

    America: The Good Neighbor. Widespread but only partial news coverage was given recently to a remarkable editorial broadcast from Toronto by Gordon Sinclair, a Canadian television Commentator.

    What follows is the full text of his trenchant remarks as printed in the Congressional Record:

    "This Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the Americans as the most generous and possibly the least appreciated people on all the earth. Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy were lifted out of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in billions of dollars and forgave other billions in debts. None of these countries is today paying even the interest on its remaining debts to the United States.

    When France was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the Americans who propped it up, and their reward was to be insulted and swindled on the streets of Paris. I was there. I saw it.

    When earthquakes hit distant cities, it is the United States that hurries in to help. This spring, 5 American communities were flattened by tornadoes. Nobody helped.

    The Marshall Plan and the Truman Policy pumped billions of dollars into discouraged countries. Now newspapers in those countries are writing about the decadent, warmongering America.

    I'd like to see just one of those countries that is gloating over the erosion of the United States dollar build its own airplane. Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo Jet, the Lockheed Tri-Star, or the Douglas DC10? If so, why don't they fly them? Why do all the International lines except Russia fly American Planes?

    Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or woman on the moon? You talk about Japan technology, and you get radios. You talk about German technology, and you get automobiles. You talk about American technology, and you find men on the moon--not once, but several times--and safely home again.

    You talk about scandals, and the Americans put theirs right in the store window for everybody to look at. Even their draft-dodgers are not pursued and hounded. They are here on our streets, and most of them, unless they are breaking Canadian laws, are getting American dollars from ma and pa at home to spend here. When the railways of France, Germany and India were breaking down through age, it was the Americans who rebuilt them. When the Pennsylvania Railroad and the New York Central went broke, nobody loaned them an old caboose. Both are still broke.

    I can name you 5000 times when the Americans raced to the help of other people in trouble. Can you name me even one time when someone else raced to the Americans in trouble? I don't think there was outside help even during the San Francisco earthquake.

    Our neighbors have faced it alone, and I'm one Canadian who is tired of hearing them get kicked around. They will come out of this thing with their flag high. And when they do, they are entitled to thumb their nose at the lands that are gloating over their present troubles.

    I hope Canada is not one of those."

    Stand proud, America! Wear it proudly!!

    This is one of the best editorials that I have ever read regarding the United States. It is nice that one man realizes it. I only wish that the rest of the world would realize it. We are always blamed for everything, and never even get a thank you for the things we do.

    I would hope that each of you would send this to as many people as you can and emphasize that they should send it to as many of their friends until this letter is sent to every person on the web. I am just a single American that has read this, I SURE HOPE THAT A LOT MORE READ IT SOON.

    1. Re:Tribute to the United States by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

      I'm sending this letter to everybody in my address book. I'm sure everybody knows about the terrorist attacks on our country. What some of you might not know is that people in Egypt and other countries celebrated the devastating attacks on thousands of lives in our country. This was shown on television.

      I have never heard of Americans, or people of any *civilized* country for that matter, celebrating the deaths of so many thousands of *innocent* lives. I wish to point out that these same people--the ones who are celebrating right now--benefit from millions or billions of dollars of American money sent to them as foreign aid. The thought of these scumbags celebrating the deaths of those who support them disgusts me beyond belief. I am writing letters to folks in our state and federal governments, urging them to cut off monetary support for these countries. This will serve three purposes:

      1. The money should be used to help those who lost family or friends to the disaster.

      2. The rebuilding of destroyed properties and businesses, which will undoubtedly cost many billions upon billions of dollars.

      3. Cutting off foreign aid to these countries serves as a very mild punishment for their celebrating of the death and destruction in our country. If they celebrate our deaths, let them starve for lack of food and money.

      I urge you to write similar letters, and to urge your family, friends and neighbors to do the same. The time has come to help our victims and punish those who would have us slaughtered.

      Additionally, for posting on Slashdot:

      As the story says: "some Egyptians celebrating the attacks today." Yes, I realize that this isn't the opinion of all Egyptians. But nonetheless, I believe that our country has more important things to do with our money than spend it helping out people who hold Americans--or any people for that matter--in complete disrespect and disregard.

    2. Re:Tribute to the United States by mulhall · · Score: 1

      Let's just say that most people are a little more cynical than that, and altruism, if shown by any nation, is not a characteristic of the US alone. No country has entered armed conflict without economic reasons, sometimes they are harder to see sometimes not. Building an aeroplane? Is that a serious comment?

      You may not like the general opinion held of the US but surely you can understand it? I don't like the way people see the UK, but I know why they do...

      On the other hand you don't have to go very far to see how much people respect the symbols of America; the dollar, Statue of Liberty etc. I was suprised when I was travelling recently to find countries reporting that Big Ben was being cleaned - Front page news!

      It reminds you how much influence we have on other countries.

    3. Re:Tribute to the United States by Syre · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I like it, but it's a bit old... 1973:

      http://www.rcc.ryerson.ca/ccf/news/unique/am_tex t. html

    4. Re:Tribute to the United States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And when they do, they are entitled to thumb their nose at the lands that are gloating over their present troubles.

      When America so consistantly boasts about being the 'Greatest nation on Earth' or the 'brightest beaken for freedom in the world' is it any wonder that many people of other nations will have mixed feelings about this tragety.


      I come from Australia, one of America's closest allies. The feeling I get from most ordinary people here is that it was not surprising that something like this happened. There is a great deal of sympathy but sometimes it is difficult to surpress a private smirk, even though we know it is wrong. Kind of like when something unfortunate happens to an obnoxious, boastful friend.


      The fact is that America is the most powerfull military and economic nation on earth. It has often used it's power for the benefit of the world but sometimes has misused it with dreadfull consequences. Like any nation, it's actions are almost always guided by (enlightened or otherwise) self interest.


      If the US did more listening and less boasting/preaching it may have been able to avert this disaster.

  216. Another analysis by FunkyChild · · Score: 3, Informative

    The civil engineering faculty at Sydney University has another (quite informative) analysis here:

    http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/wtc.htm

  217. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is your to do list. Please don't involve me.

  218. Photos Of falling victims by SheepDogg · · Score: 1

    not sure if anyone has posted this, but rotten.com has some sad pictures of people falling from the WTC.

    1. Re:Photos Of falling victims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      excellent pix...but amateurs shouldnt really skydive. ha ha

    2. Re:Photos Of falling victims by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

      who really needs to look at this... go rent faces of death or something. I've been overwhelmed with sick people today... how depraved

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:Photos Of falling victims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuckin awesome i'm laughin my ass off!!! ;) ;) ;)

  219. Re:from http://www.skyscraper.org/tallest/t_wtc.ht by mpe · · Score: 2

    engineers designed a solution using a drywall system fixed to the reinforced steel core.

    This would explain the huge quantity of dust involved.

  220. Re:2nd plane -- CRASHED IN COLORADO? by hellsnail · · Score: 1

    I heard the same story from a friend here in Calgary but I didn't see it confirmed by anyone else during the day.

  221. IRC coverage by Wizard+of+OS · · Score: 3, Informative

    In #coverage on irc.slashnet.org our operators are posting the latest news on the events. The channel is +m, so please message opers with your (validated) news sources.

    --

    --
    If code was hard to write, it should be hard to read
  222. Re:Almost concrete proof of Bin Ladin Involvement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else think that this Bin Laden stufAnyone else think that this Bin Laden stuff is bunch of crap? Some nefarious super-villain, his hatred of Truth Justice and The American Way driving him to run around the world striking US targets, always staying one step ahead of us with his evil mastermind plans. I can almost hear him laugh: "Bwa ha ha ha Bwa ha ha!!!".

    What's more plausible: A plot out of a Saturday afternoon serial, or the potential propaganda value of attaching a face to an abstract threat.

    Slashdot might not have that many geniuses, but the crowd is slightly above average. But for the most part they're eating it up.f is bunch of crap. Some nefarious super-villien

  223. OT? An appeal to our better natures by TPFH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is hard to say but I feel like I have to say something.

    It goes without saying that this has been a terrible day.
    The loss of life, and a horrible way to die.

    However, I'm even more terrible than the acts of terrorism
    are the possible reactions to these acts.

    We cannot afford to become reactionary. We cannot afford to lose
    our heads. I overhead some co-workers making racist comments today.
    Being multi-ethic and Jewish that rather upset me. Well, I don't
    have to be Jewish to be intolerant of racial prejudice, but it does
    make me feel even more threatened since some people are equally
    racist against Jews as Arabs and Muslims. So I take it personally.

    Anyway, above all, as Americans in this crisis,
    _WE NEED TO KEEP OUR HEADS_

    This is a crisis but we must not let our emotions get out of control
    or the reaction will be worse than what happened today.

    At the very least we need to wait for due process of law and
    have proof of who really committed these atrocities. We cannot tolerate
    harassment and violence against ethnic minorities who may be blamed.
    If it does turn out that the Osama Bin Ladin is responsible for this
    that we cannot tolerate the bombing of civilian populations in Afghanistan.

    The Taliban is a fascist government. Many of the Afghanistan people
    are against the Taliban but they do not exactly have the same freedoms
    of free speech and assembly that we enjoy in this country. Bombing
    civilian targets in Afghanistan, or Iraq, or Yugoslavia etc. etc. etc.
    is just as bad as the atrocities American experienced today.

    Understand that the mainstream corporate media does not widely report
    what our government has done to countries around the world. Also consider
    that our government is partially responsible for placing the Taliban in
    power by supporting them during the Soviet Union's war with Afghanistan.

    Most likely the terrorists who committed these atrocities today
    are only out for revenge. They have no other motive and they feel
    like they have nothing to lose. We cannot win a war against small
    groups of people who are only out for revenge. We need to think
    very thoroughly about the calls to war and what it will really mean.

    This has been a terrible terrible day. History might show this to be
    a day of great change. Now we must decide whether that change will
    be for better or for worse. We need to mourn our losses. I hope
    that I can appeal to our better nature. That we as Americans will
    not give into the madness of this terrible day. I hope that we will
    rally around the call for peace instead of the call for revenge
    that would be the downfall of us all.

    I know that some may take my statements as derogatory.
    Please think about what I have said. While I am critical of
    some of the actions of our government, I do love this country.
    I say what I say is because despite what has happened today
    and in the past I still hope for the best.

    My prayers go out for the victims, their friends and family,
    the spirit of our country, and for the entire world.

    --
    This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
  224. Peabody, MA, blood donors went till 2AM by kcurtis · · Score: 1

    I just got back from donating my wonderful O- blood at the Peabody, Mass., Red Cross.

    I arrived today directly from work, at 5:30ish. I and about 350-400 people donated at this small center (9 beds). The WONDERFUL people at the Red Cross kept going and going, finishing up between 1:30am and 2am. I donated around 1:25am.

    I want to send a huge thanks out to all those doing the work, and the donating. No one may ever read this, but the work and patience of both staff and donors deserves kudos.

    1. Re:Peabody, MA, blood donors went till 2AM by linzeal · · Score: 2

      I donated as much good old AB as I could yesterday. If you have a rare blood type please donate I have been the recipiant of too many needed transfusions to not yesterday. Get a donor card, donate often!!

  225. Re:oh boy.... read this: by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Have a look at this page, the date on the page info shows when it was created. That quote is doctored.

    http://www.ed.brocku.ca/~nmarshal/nostradamus.ht m

    What Nostradamus actually said was "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb"

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  226. "Pearl Harbor". Bad analogy? by TrevorB · · Score: 2

    I hate to say this at a time like this, but I'm not so sure about the Pearl Harbor analogy. Pearl Harbor was a military target, and the attacks on WTC were definately civilian.

    I would think the better analogy would be the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, with a tremendous toll on human life. Perhaps this is a step below and to the side.

    No media outlet seems to mention this much, it seems.

    I'm agnostic, so I can say a prayer for those in New York and Washington without being hypocritical. I'll do the same when America chooses inevitably to take it's vengeance out on other innocent civilians in retaliation.

    Please let me be wrong. There's been enough death already today.

  227. Palestinians celebrating by afrazer · · Score: 1

    Reporters in Palestinian areas have been threatened that their lives may be in danger if they publicize pictures of palestinians celebrating the WTC and Pentagon disasters. This is similar to threats which Italian reporters received when they documented the lyniching of Israelis in ramalla by a palestinian mob a few months ago.

    Here's a report about it from AP (you can find more on this at The Jerusalem Post.

    You can see a picture of this at my page

    Arafat horrified; Palestinians celebrating
    By Mohammed Daraghmeh, The Associated Press

    NABLUS, West Bank (AP) - Thousands of Palestinians celebrated toiday's terror attacks in the United States, chanting "God is Great" and distributing candy to passers-by, even as their leader, Yasser Arafat, said he was horrified.

    The US government has become increasingly unpopular in the West Bank and Gaza Strip in the past year of Israeli-Palestinian fighting, with many Palestinians accusing Washington of siding with Israel.

    In the West Bank town of Nablus, about 3,000 people poured into the street shortly after the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and government targets in Washington.

    Demonstrators distributed candy in a traditional gesture of celebration. Several Palestinian gunmen shot in the air, while other marchers carried Palestinian flags.

    Nawal Abdel Fatah, 48, wearing a long black dress, threw sweets in the air, saying she was happy because "America is the head of the snake, America always stands by Israel in its war against us."

    Her daughter Maysoon, 22, said she hoped the next attack would be launched against Tel Aviv.

    In traditionally Arab eastern Jerusalem, there was a smaller gathering of about two dozen people, many of them young children led in chants by adults. Some drivers passing the scene honked their horns and flashed victory signs from their windows.

    --
    'Most men would sooner die than think, and most men do.'
  228. Re:Almost concrete proof of Bin Ladin Involvement. by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

    All of the news media is currently pointing the finger at Bin Laden. This strikes me as being slightly too suspicious. I have not read a single report that suggests that this could be a military strike by a country such as Iraq.

    Look at the facts:

    Iraq has been bombed heavily by the US over the last few years.

    Iraq has the resources to stage an attack like this.

    Iraq has elite troops who would be capable of hijacking and flying the planes.

    Iraq really hates the US.

    So why is no-one else speculating that Saddam could be behind this?

    HH

  229. The Simple Razor Theory by orbbro · · Score: 2, Informative

    There have been a few posts here about lax security & speculating about how the hijackings were undertaken. Here's my theory: it was a lot simpler than a lot of security & terrorism experts are saying, and even the terrorists are surprised by the magnitude of the devastation they've wrought. Let me explain.

    When I first heard about this at 7am one thing bugged me. How did 4 planes, from 3 airports, belonging to 2 airlines, get hijacked within minutes of each other? I was making a mistaken assumption, however -- the same one that our airport security systems have been making that allowed this tragedy to occur. I assumed you'd need a gun to effectively or meaningfully hijack a plane

    I heard later Tues. that the planes, as far as is yet known, were hijacked by men with KNIVES. Some reports referred to them as "box knives," which implies to me improvised &/or small tools, rather than specialized and combat-oriented weapons.

    Do you know how many times I've gotten on a plane with a 3-inch Spyderco knife on my person? And in my carry-on luggage? For hiking trips in Alaska or just because I carry it most days? It's easy to do. I've even taken a 3" Spyderco through the Boston airport on the way to Westchester NY. So I know first hand that you don't need special ceramic weapons to get a blade past Boston airport security.

    I think that this was a relatively small-time operation, at least compared to what some "experts" are saying. You get 4 guys willing to die for the cause, some luggage, plane tickets, and knives. Train them in the basics of flying these planes (which has been said to be easy once they're airborne), teach them how to kill the pilots quickly with their toys, get them into the US, and send them on their way. It could take as little as a dozen people to plan & execute it, with, say, $20k for direct expenses. A few weeks, plus however long you want to train them with the knives & planes.

    I heard a professional commercial pilot say on NPR tonight that a 180-pound man could break into one of those cockpit doors easily. No battering ram necessary. So the single hijacker gets up 15 minutes before NYC, as if to go to the lavatory, then busts down the cockpit door and kills both pilots. Within 2 minutes of getting out of his seat, he's flying the plane. No one is going to fuck with him at this point because 1) they're afraid of causing the plane to crash, and 2) they're terrified in general, and 3) on some level they expect these guys to behave like all the hijackers we've ever heard of, which is to say that they'll try to negotiate the release of political prisoners or something -- not crash the plane in the next 20 minutes. This theory also explains the reports that no emergency messages were sent from the crashed planes -- the pilots were killed or incapacitated immediately and lost control from that point onward. Thus, also, the frantic calls passengers "were told" to make (according to headlines on washingtonpost.com) to inform unaware authorities of the hijacking underway.

    My conclusion: the hijackers got lucky in that this was totally ruthless, audacious, innovative, and unexpected. I don't think anything like it will happen again.

    --
    "It's an erotic, spectacular scene that captures the thrusting, violent, vibrant world Bohemian spirit..."
    1. Re:The Simple Razor Theory by epsalon · · Score: 1

      I heard a professional commercial pilot say on NPR tonight that a 180-pound man could break into one of those cockpit doors easily. No battering ram necessary.

      Actually, it was reported that as least in one of the planes, the hijackers stabed some stewards and lured the pilots to open to cokpit to see what is going on. That way they got into the cokpit and probably killed all pilots.

    2. Re:The Simple Razor Theory by UberOogie · · Score: 3, Interesting
      They have also started reporting that the plane that went down in PA was retaken by the passengers. A cell phone call from a man to his wife said that they knew the terrorists were going to do something with the plane and that they knew they would probably die and were going to attack the terrorists anyway.

      Aparently, they were successful.

      May whoever's in charge give them peace.

      --
      "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
  230. Possible suspects by smaughster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Besides the suspects mentioned in one of the links, (3 mentioned: Palestinian group, Iraq, Osama), I think a fourth should not be ruled out in advance. Right extremist americans (i.e. T. McVeigh followers).

    --
    I intend to live forever, so far so good.
  231. Another Image mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another mirror of images is at:

    http://wtc.callisia.com

    based on tar file pulled from http://www.watership.org/media/

  232. hmm... why Camp David??? by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

    Why hit the presidents holiday house? the national air guard base is not that far from Camp David, i think that is probably the intended target....

    --
    Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    1. Re:hmm... why Camp David??? by nobody69 · · Score: 1

      Camp David was the site of several mideast-related negotiations. Or in the view of some Islamic fundies, where the US and Israel ganged up on Arabs/Muslims and forced them to capitulate. Camp David has a larger symbolic resonance to the world than an ANG base in PA.

      --
      "Bugger this, I want a better world." - Jenny Sparks
  233. Breaking news by matrix0040 · · Score: 1

    The Boston Herald, quoting a source it did not identify, reported that authorities had seized a car at Logan airport that contained Arabic-language flight training manuals. The source said five Arab men had been identified as suspects, including a trained pilot. At least two of those men flew to Logan on Tuesday from Portland, Maine, the Herald said.

  234. Sigh, People suck. (or BGP in action) by binary617 · · Score: 1

    Domain servers in listed order:
    NS1.WTCA.ORG 63.212.153.3
    NS2.WTCA.ORG 63.212.153.2

    bash$ traceroute 63.212.153.2
    traceroute to 63.212.153.2 (63.212.153.2), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
    4 c1-pos6-1.hrfrct1.home.net (24.7.76.161) 3.852 ms 3.773 ms 3.709 ms
    5 c1-pos3-0.nycmny1.home.net (24.7.69.2) 6.378 ms 6.437 ms 6.406 ms
    6 pos1-0.core1.NewYork1.Level3.net (63.211.54.69) 13.082 ms 13.111 ms 13.073 ms
    7 so-4-0-0.mp1.NewYork1.Level3.net (209.247.10.33) 13.195 ms 13.145 ms 13.308 ms
    8 loopback0.ipaccess1.NewYork1.Level3.net (209.244.2.211) 13.904 ms 13.840 ms 13.943 ms
    9 * * *

    www.digivill.net

  235. Proxies for non-US people? by Evro · · Score: 1

    A (American) friend of mine is in China where I guess they block access to most sites like CNN and basically I ended up pasting cnn.com's story to him in AIM. The news is apparently hard to come by in those parts.

    Are there any frequently updated mirrors and/or free (no charge) proxies that people can use to get info about this? I wrote up a lame perl script that fetches whatever address you put in the url and spews it back to you (but at least it appears to be coming from my cablemodem instead of cnn.com) but that didn't seem to work for him... I guess maybe they filter out urls that have "cnn.com" in them? Anyway, any suggestions?

    --
    rooooar
  236. A Car in Boston Airport Was Found by KidSock · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Boston Globe is reporting that a car was found at Boston airport (name?) with Arabic flight manuals. Apparently they got into an altercation with someone in the parking lot. That person notified authorities about the incedent after hearing of the tragedy when he landed at his destination leading them to this car. They are fairly certain that passports, the flight training manuals, and possibly other information in the car link these people to Bin Laden's "base". One of the suspects was a trained pilot and a member of the Arabic something Leage (?).

    1. Re:A Car in Boston Airport Was Found by jstott · · Score: 1
      The Boston Globe is reporting that a car was found at Boston airport (name?) with Arabic flight manuals.

      Logan airport (the point of origin of two of the flights) is the airport in Boston.

      -JS (in Boston)

      --
      Vanity of vanities, all is vanity...
    2. Re:A Car in Boston Airport Was Found by ecesar · · Score: 1
      More from the Boston Globe (end of page):

      Meanwhile, other officers converged on the Park Inn at Chestnut Hill in Newton, a Boston suburb. Newton police officer Russ Adam said the FBI was conducting an investigation at the hotel.

      News reports said searchers found Islamic papers and a manual on how to fly a 767 airplane in a room at the Park Inn.

  237. Does he need them? by Tyler-Durden255 · · Score: 1

    I mean he can take what 12men? with 12box cutters and razor blades and in one morning they can take out the WTC and part of the Pentigon before 10AM.

    1. Re:Does he need them? by Flying+Cannibal · · Score: 1

      Intelligence agencies know they are always fighting uphill battles versus totally dedicated foes, i mean when your enemy will do anythingfor the cause, even agencies like the CIA and NSA recognize that you CANNOT stop a assasin that will kill himself to kill the target. All it takes it time, organisation and money.

      --
      Killing just leads to more killing.
  238. PLEASE MOD UP by keepper · · Score: 1

    I read this... and i was stunned...

    Get rid of the spaces un the url

    1. Re:PLEASE MOD UP by Ryokos_boytoy · · Score: 1

      I actually sent that URL to the FBI. I don't know if that is genuine but it was way too close not to let them know.

      --


      If you don't say anything, you won't be called on to repeat it. -- Calvin Coolidge
    2. Re:PLEASE MOD UP by keepper · · Score: 1

      I did the same, even sent it to msnbc.

      But no reply yet

  239. How this affects Napster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh... errr, never mind.

  240. Live cam ? by popeyethesailor · · Score: 1

    This page used to broadcast live pictures from one of the decks in WTC.
    Now it's all black... I wonder if that thing is up?

  241. "This is an act of war!" by magi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No shit?

    Americans probably won't find this very comforting right now, but I'll give a short newsbreak: Unless you haven't noticed, you are in war, have been for a long time!

    Look, for the last 50 years, Americans have been bombing cities here and there all over the world, leaving hundreds of thousands if not millions people dead, charred, mothers and brothers wailing over their graves. Sure, Americans were always the good guys, and sure, American bombs only killed soldiers. But hey, even innocent people do die in wars. America just got it first civilian casualties in 50 years!

    So, we can now wait to see how the American reaction will be different from the reaction of those rag-head mad-dog arabs, who cry for eternal revenge after their relatives have been killed and homes bombed to ground.

    Really, get over it.

    1. Re:"This is an act of war!" by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      You're another person that doesn't like UN police actions?

      Well, I don't either.

      Ever since WWII we've been bombing anyone the UN tells us to--and that gets everyone but the UN angry at us.

    2. Re:"This is an act of war!" by magi · · Score: 1

      Somehow I can't share your view that US had been just reluctantly obeying UN's orders to attack various countries.

    3. Re:"This is an act of war!" by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      I never said reluctantly. But always according to UN orders.

    4. Re:"This is an act of war!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in Kosovo!! Just don't hide behind the UN.
      US listens or ignoes UN as it seems fit. Plain and simple. The problem is the "fit" is not
      the american interest. Whose then??

    5. Re:"This is an act of war!" by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      What about Kosovo? We laid off bombing for a while? We did still go in and blow stuff up...

    6. Re:"This is an act of war!" by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      Don't argue with this idiot.

  242. Re:Almost concrete proof of Bin Ladin Involvement. by radja · · Score: 2

    IIRC, iraq also prices its oil in euros..

    //rdj

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  243. Re:use of illegal video encoders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only on /. can a discussion of the worst terrorist attack in the United States' 200+ year history turn nto a flame war over DivX legality.//

  244. Lashkar-i-Taiba claims responsibility for attack by matrix0040 · · Score: 1

    From http://www.dawn.com and http://www.timesofindia.com KARACHI, Sept 12: Lashkar-i-Taiba group fighting against Indian rule in Kashmir today claimed responsibility for the wave of terrorist attacks in the United States.It said suicide bombers had hijacked jets which plunged into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, in attacks which it is feared killed thousands. "The attack was carried out by our fidayeen (suicidal group) led by commander Abu Samama," Lashkar spokesman Khalid Saif said in a statement faxed to AFP. "The attacks on the World Trade Centre and other places were not an act of terrorism but an Islamic duty." (AFP)(Posted @ 11:55 PST)

  245. Re:Lashkar-i-Taiba claims responsibility for attac by maxbayes · · Score: 1

    they deny it now .. check the latest on dawn.com

  246. Getting to People in WTC-area underground? by gotan · · Score: 3

    I heard, there where still some people surviving but locked in by debris. Some of them even used mobiles. I wonder if it might be possible to get easier access through some subway or sewer tunnels, especially since i read, that one subway tunnel passed very close and even had to be considered when building the WTC.

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
    1. Re:Getting to People in WTC-area underground? by PaxTech · · Score: 2

      The PATH train tunnel leads to a station directly underneath the south tower, and there are subway tunnels nearby. As far as using them to get to survivors, I kind of doubt the tunnels have much structural integrity left. I doubt they were built strong enough to have a 110 story building dropped on them.

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
  247. We already knew whether it was Moslems or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several people from the planes were able to make calls before the crashes... according to the BBC at least 2 passengers and a flight attendant, plus one pilot was able to turn on the microphone while it was happening. However, there is NO MENTION of whether or not the hijackers were of middle eastern origin. Clearly, this is being deliberately censored for now. Think about that.

  248. possible implications for /. by __aanekd3853 · · Score: 1

    What are the likely long-term consequences of this tragedy for things like

    * broadband (we saw quite a few servers overloaded, having no TV in the office);

    * Echelon

    ?

    1. Re:possible implications for /. by jariv · · Score: 1

      * broadband

      Freenet -- eazy way to distribute information

      * Echelon

      blowfish + 1024bit/kook krade keys

  249. regarding paypal (please read) by Artifex · · Score: 1

    I just want to quickly remind everyone that Paypal will give you $5 to sign up (according to their front page), so you could sign and give $5 at least without it costing you a dime, theoretically.


    This may not seem like much... but if enough people do it, it will be.


    p.s. no, I don't work for them
    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  250. Not sure why I did this but... by perlchimp · · Score: 1

    I just typed a few domain names into networksolutions to see if they were taken. These were:

    wtccollapses.com
    wtcdestroyed.com
    wtcfalls.com

    Course, the profiteering already began with gasoline and no doubt it will continue.

  251. Why not the White House? by peter · · Score: 1

    What about the White House? Wouldn't that be a likely target? If not, what does it say about the terrorists' goals that they _didn't_ target the White House?

    The targets they did hit are symbols of American power, economic and military. Do they think that American political power is not as important to the public as money and guns? Are they right in that thought?

    --
    #define X(x,y) x##y
    Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
    1. Re:Why not the White House? by stubear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, they believe the White House was a target but apparently it's difficult to discern from the air AND it has SAM implacements on the roof :)

      It is believed that the Pentagon was a secondary target and MUCH easier to see from the air.

    2. Re:Why not the White House? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>> It is believed that the Pentagon was a secondary target and MUCH easier to see from the air.

      Also, the White House, Capitol, Supreme Court, et al. are all in about the most restrictive air space possible that we had at the time. When the wind blows in the correct direction, inbound traffic to Reagan National that has to land in a southerly direction has to follow the Potomac River on an east-southeast heading, then turn fairly sharply to the right to line up on the runway. It would be all too easy for a flight to turn a moment too soon and attack the Pentagon that way - it's only a mile or two from the north end of Reagan National's main runway! The various radio station traffic reporters have had an interesting time down there under normal conditions trying to see what they need to see, and to keep from getting shot down or run over.

      It's obviously too soon to speculate on what changes will come, but I think it's fairly obvious that the problem of overcrowding at certain airports, such as LaGuardia and Washington Reagan will be resolved as a by-product of all this. I'm a frequent flyer and never dreamed that the entire air transportation system in the USA would ever be shutdown, never mind for the reasons that it did. So, it's no longer unthinkable that the FAA might now step in and impose stricter limitations on air traffic in certain places. We'll see...

  252. Not really siblings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel is the manipulative young lover, US is the sugar-daddy with a paunch. Cash flows from US to Israel. Abuse flows from Israel to the US.

  253. Rebuild by logicnazi · · Score: 2

    Someone has probably already said this (there are 4 pages of comments jesus christ) but has anyone started making plans to rebuild the towers?

    It seems symbolically like the right sort of thing to do..especially if we rebuilt them taller than those malasian towers.

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    1. Re:Rebuild by dachshund · · Score: 1

      Did you see the specials on the construction of the WTC? It took more than a decade from beginning to end, I believe. In any case, maybe it's not the best idea to start with the same design. Just finding a new architect and design would take a few years.

    2. Re:Rebuild by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

      No, I think symbolically the right thing to do would be to clear the rubble and build a memorial park.

    3. Re:Rebuild by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think, symbolically the best thing to do would be to rebuild the towers. If we don't, then we might as well admit to the terrorists that they won.

  254. Effects of Attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just how widespread are the effects of Tuesday's attack? Even Goatse.cx has joined the fight against terrorism! Check it out, no gaping anus, just an antiterrorist message!

  255. intelligence by johnrpenner · · Score: 2

    "Have you noticed the way people's intelligence
    capabilities decline sharply the minute they
    start waving guns around?" (Dr. Who)

    1. Re:intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! That came up in my fortune cookie when I logged on this morning!

  256. Latest news by magi · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    NEW YORK (Reuters) -- This morning, on the September 12th, just when the dust had settled in the downtown of Manhattan, a helicopter launched from a helipad near the apparently collapsed World Trade Center.

    Moments later, the helicopter circled the missing towers three times counterclockwise, and *POOF* a huge smoke cloud appeared, covering the entire downtown area.

    As the smoke faded, the two World Trace Center buildings emerged from the midst of the cloud, just as they were two days ago!

    People couldn't believe their eyes. The multitude of TV helicopters patrolling the area immediately pointed their cameras at the strange helicopter.

    On the landing rack of the helicopter, there was posing, in a tailcoat, who else but David Copperfield!

    The city of New York sighed and applauded, and applauded, and applauded. Everyone rejoiced. The world had been saved.

    Then, David Copperfield bowed for the ninth time, waved his wand, and *POOF* the helicopter disappeared in a huge explosion and a smoke cloud.

    1. Re:Latest news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a sick fuck. Of course, I can't blame you -tons of people all over the world hate the United States and the power we wield, the awe we inspire, and the freedom we so cherish.

      ...and David Copperfield can't bring back those 300+ firefighters, 80+ police officers, and thousands upon thousands of those killed by the plane crash, collapse of the towers, collapse of the wing of the pentagon, etc.

      You're a sick, sick fuck. If you actually think you're funny, do us a favor and jump out of the 87th floor of an office building. You'd better pray that David Copperfield saves you then.

    2. Re:Latest news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, we don't have 87 floors high office buildings here, and because we're not american, we can't afford to go somewhere where is ;)

      No offence.

    3. Re:Latest news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God these yankeewankers are stupid. Taking everything too seriously... Bombing civilians in middle east and other conflicts is apparently Nice and Correct Thing to do, but paying back to fat lard yankees isn't.

    4. Re:Latest news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will let Barbro Back and others know what kind of sick fuck they are working with.
      I am sure she will be happy to know that.

  257. How do we prevent another hijacking? by FIGJAM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What do you people thin of stewardesses (and stewards) being given the power of being armed with a stun gun or something like a projectile to knock out terrorists? Of course, additional training would be required but I nobody is talking about what should be done to prevent future disasters like this (in any country).

    --
    Do your best, hope for the best, suspect the worst.
    1. Re:How do we prevent another hijacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh

      oh

      aaah
      Sorry, I was just sitting here thinking about a stewardess putting voltage through my nipples.

    2. Re:How do we prevent another hijacking? by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      American airports could adopt European style security. Right now, you could walk onto an American plane with an AK-47 on your back and attract little attention. (Slight exageration.)

      I think 60 minutes did a special a few months ago were they snuck a bunch of guns and explosives onto a couple of planes easily.

      It's not a question of "better" security. It's using the security we were supposed to have in the first place.

    3. Re:How do we prevent another hijacking? by SedentaryZ · · Score: 1

      Reinstitute the air marshall program (some flights will have an armed officer on board).

      Arm the flight crew.

      Allow flight attendants the option of carrying concealed weapons.

      Allow me, with a legal concealed weapon permit, to carry my weapon on board.

    4. Re:How do we prevent another hijacking? by Ozric · · Score: 1

      Yea A non-lethal lead bag projectile would do the trick

    5. Re:How do we prevent another hijacking? by chaos4ever · · Score: 1

      toting a gun and shooting it is a very bad idea. the bullet from the gun (if fired and misses the target) can pierce the airplane hull/window and cause depressurization. what's even worse is if larger holes result. the negative pressure caused by the flying aircraft would cause passengers who aren't strapped in to get sucked out of the plane. not pretty.
      maybe tasers are more of a way to go? but then, any weapon carried can be used against you if s/he is disarmed. think a-la air force onen (the movie)

  258. Re:Kudos to slashdot and other non-news places by farmhick · · Score: 1

    On a side note, did anyone else notice the number of non-news channels that covered this? VH-1 in particular was covering it very early in the day. All four of the 'home-shopping' or QVC style channels I flipped past were not doing any programming, just a notice about the attacks. Later some started a news feed too. Later in the day other channels such as MT-V, Discovery, HGTV, etc either showed news feed or a notice about the attacks.

    Some here hate large profit-based businesses, some here support them whole-heartedly, and most of us are somewhere in the middle. But I think it reflects on these stations, particularly the shopping channels, that they forgot about the profits they were loosing every second, and did a decent act. Even if the truth was they were unable to broadcast for technical reasons, if it was for any other reason such as a hurricane, they would have been on the air within an hour, feeding from another site.

    While the most praise goes to the rescuers in NYC, I just wanted to say that this should be appreciated in its own perspective.

    --
    I have to stop wasting so much time reading Slashdot. It's interfering with my crystal meth addiction.
  259. Monument I would build in NYC by MamboGilly · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'd like to see three towers built in the place where the WTC once stood, with the middle one much taller than the other two. That way, it would look like a giant middle finger, directed straight at the fuckers who did this.

  260. wise words by Felipe+Hoffa · · Score: 1
    And on Sept 11, 1773 Benjamin Franklin wrote:

    "There never was a good war or bad peace."

  261. I've had enough anonymous cowards for one lifetime by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    hmmm, an anonymous coward who calls for genocide. Maybe we could fly a jetliner into a building highly populated with civillian "sand-niggers". I bet you would think that was a grand idea, wouldn't you? We could make it a holy war against islam. Christ, I'm sick you people.


    Some people think that there was something about the german people that allowed them to be nazis. An opposing view: I see nazis everyday. They just don't have a hitler. Maybe assholes like you should just kill yourselves and leave us civilized, peace loving people alone.


    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
  262. Too obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be trivial to brute force an attack like that - not many CDs are in the hit parade each year.

  263. War where? Against whom? by korpiq · · Score: 5, Informative

    I may hurt your feelings, though I try just speak my mind up. I know I'm touchy now, so try to take the following casually. I trust on the moderators to view this as a foreigner's honest, differing viewpoint.

    1. US Citizens have not had war in their own continent/country for a few, what, hundred years. It shows somewhat in the shockedness of the commentary. Of course this is awful. It does not happen only to someone else somewhere else, neither is what happens to you unique in this day and age. A few surprise attacks and -strikes from last century come to mind. Some of them out of scale, some changing our world for ever.

    2. JFK: one mad US citizen. OKC: a few mad US citizen. Yet every time the foreigners get blamed before the attackers are found.

    I am shocked and afraid of the future now. I live on the other side of the world from there. Most of us do. Live in fear of the US reaction and what that will do for the world. The world we all have to live in. There is no escape from this planet just yet, not even for chosen few US citizens. We must get along. Focus on anything else, and the nature will take care of us for good.

    Sorry if I hurt your feelings; this is just critique that comes to mind while trying to work over the shock by absorbing as much information and commentary about the situation as possible.

    --

    I think, therefore thoughts exist. Ego is just an impression.
    1. Re:War where? Against whom? by ProfessorPuke · · Score: 1
      1. US Citizens have not had war in their own continent/country for a few, what, hundred years.


      Uh? Pearl Habour? The "War Between the States" was 140 years ago, the "War of 1812" was 178...



      There is no escape from this planet just yet, not even for chosen few US citizens. We must get along. Focus on anything else, and the nature will take care of us for good.


      Absolutely right. With high technology/high energy available all around us, improvising a powerful offensive weapon will always be easier and less expensive than maintainging the vigilance to defend against the abuses of a few lunatics.

      While security measures have to be increased too, the fair+equitable distribution of wealth will cut down the recruitment pool for suicidal terrorists (aside from numerous other benefits)

    2. Re:War where? Against whom? by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      Before WWII, Hawaii was not a state, right?

    3. Re:War where? Against whom? by paulschreiber · · Score: 1

      oh bullshit.

      JFK was so not "one mad us citizen" it's not funny.

      Please, don't even go there.

      Paul

    4. Re:War where? Against whom? by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 2
      1. US Citizens have not had war in their own continent/country for a few, what, hundred years.

      Actually, it's right about 60 years. Pearl Harbor was bombed in either 39 or 40, Kiska and Attu (U.S. territory) were occupied by the Japanese about a year later.

      Live in fear of the US reaction and what that will do for the world.


      The Palestinians are often held up as an example of an aggrieved people, so I'll continue to use them as an example. They have accepted a "government" of murders and have dedicated themselves to ensuring that there can never be peace and that they will never be welcomed in Israel. They have also refused to settle in and build new lives for themselves elsewhere. I don't see much evidence of loving forgivness there.

      Compare American reactions to past attacks to the Palestinian reactions. A few years after Pearl Harbor, we imposed a government on Japan which they liked well enough to keep, and paid for the rebuilding of their economy. We behaved similarly with the European Axis powers and the Marshal plan.

      I have no idea where you live, but if it is in one the countries which are automatically suspect such as Libya, Iraq and Afganistan, American reactions are probably the least of your daily worries.

    5. Re:War where? Against whom? by kevinank · · Score: 2

      Just to clarify, I presume the poster meant that the JFK assasination was instigated by one mad US citizen, not that JFK was himself that citizen.

      His point was that many US disasters have initially been blamed on foreign powers (e.g: Cuba), but in the light of reason have been shown to be the work of our own citizenry.

      As a part of the price for a free and open society, I don't object to the fact that US citizens can commit heinous crimes, but I withhold judgement about what happened in this particular case.

      --
      LibBT: BitTorrent for C - small - fast - clean (Now Versio
    6. Re:War where? Against whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its pretty obvious that he means the main land not some island in the pascific, Hawai or some smaller occupied island.

      Asha

  264. Biological warfare? by peter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even more panic and havoc could have been caused by spreading some nasty infectious diseases. Viruses keep killing indefinitely, and with an incubation period. You don't even know if you've got it until you break out. This would cause _real_ panic. The West Nile virus caused some panic, and it's barely a threat at all. Imagine Ebola outbreaks on a couple stock traders who'd been in the stock exchange that day...

    This terrorist attack hit symbols of power, and killed a couple thousand people. I just hope that nobody tossed some Anthrax or something into the mix. We won't know for a while whether any bio-weapons were used, because of the incubation period.

    Terrorist threats are the major threat to the world these days, AFAIK. None of them would be insane enough to use ICBMs, because they couldn't deny involvement very easily if the missile was launched from their base. Screw missile defence. (It's not useless, since a missile could be fired by accident or something. I just don't think it's worth the money it would cost, and that that money could be better spent on health care and stuff.)

    --
    #define X(x,y) x##y
    Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  265. don't sell by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and don't pull stocks out. That would be very cowardly. Of course a bunch of morons are going to panic, sell, and lower your stock values. That dosn't mean you should be one of them. Whether you lose money or not, which is questionable, everyone needs to not sell and support our economy

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:don't sell by DrCode · · Score: 2

      That's okay. Lots of the rest of us will hold and keep buying through our 401K's. Anyone with a little knowledge of history knows that war is as likely to improve the economy as hurt it.

  266. condolences by vunzzz · · Score: 2, Informative

    an online condolence register has been opened at http://newyorkcondolence.com/ or http://nycondolence.com/

  267. Kill all your enemies or look for peace now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Revenge must be either total or not at all.

  268. Change the record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a techie board, if you want to talk terrorism just have one thread for gods sake. The American way of life continuing eh? Not on Slashdot its not.....

  269. Re:oh boy.... read this: by Nivex1234 · · Score: 1

    Read this site to view the truth about the nostradamus prophecy.
    http://fury.com/article/925.php

  270. Re:Almost concrete proof of Bin Ladin Involvement. by greenrd · · Score: 1
    Because Iraq's economy is not just teetering on the bridge of collapse, it has already collapsed some time ago. Iraq really really does not want another Gulf War right now!

  271. How to avoid this in the future by Cryogenes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even one well-trained and armed security guard on each plane - preferably incognito - would be sufficient to make such an attack very difficult, if not impossible. Also pilots need to be able to defend themselves.

    If the airlines can pay for 10 flight attendants, then paying for one extra person shouldn't make a huge difference to their operating costs.

    Given that screening does not work, it's the only thing to do.

    1. Re:How to avoid this in the future by ProfessorPuke · · Score: 1
      Yes, but that "incognito" part is the kicker. If the guard is detectable, then a terrorist can easily kill him first. To maintain guards who are physically powerful and mentally alert, and rotated frequently enough to be unpredictable, will be extremely expensive.

      Ensuring the guard is trustworthy will be even moreso. Putting that kind of dedicated solider in a boring job will cost MUCH more than 10 flight attendants.

      And if this guy is to be carrying weapons, then he can't go through the regular checkpoints with the other passengers. Meaning that the terrorist just has to plan to be on an unpopular flight, so that an accomplice can spot the guard.

      If the guard is a known quantity, he's an ASSET for the attacker- I slit his throat with my glass shank, and then use his firearm to control everybody else.

  272. Re:Enough!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cumon...
    It is a crime against humanity of great meaning! If you have any sympathy for people at all you will say... " fuckin' hell".

    THINK ASS HOLE

  273. Michael Albert's perspective (ZMag.org) by greenrd · · Score: 1

    Michael Albert just posted this to the ZMag updates list. Well worth reading:

    Calamitous Perspective
    By Michael Albert

    Sending a commentary on a topic other than today?s horrific events has
    seemed untenable. Addressing today?s events has also seemed untenable. That
    our web and email server has been inaccessible all day, depriving us of
    internet communications and of access to update ZNet hasn?t helped. It seems
    web traffic was so great that it caused problems in Washington State, around
    Seattle, where our servers are located.

    A simple chronicle of the day?s events would be superfluous. Known facts are
    displayed on every TV station. Reliable deductions are relatively obvious.
    After routine take-offs four planes were commandeered by terror teams and
    simultaneously flown on dramatically distorted trajectories to demolish
    pre-selected targets. The devastation is not yet known, but is certainly
    horrific. What can one conclude other than that devastating suicidal
    terrorist attacks are eminently doable? Annihilating skyscrapers in the U.S.
    or other developed countries is harder than the U.S. bombing cities in
    targeted nations, but it is evidently far from impossible.

    Good-hearted Americans will mourn these innocent and horrible deaths with
    dignity and with respect. Media analysts and politicians, however, will soon
    use pictures of the rubble to seek increased police and military spending
    and greater state interventionary and surveillance powers. They will intone
    that killing civilians is cowardly and warrants swift and merciless
    punishment. They will however ignore having themselves supported the recent
    assault on Yugoslavia that terrorized that country?s civilian population to
    topple its despised government. They will also ignore that the U.S.-led
    embargo of Iraq has caused hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths, again
    to destabilize a hated government. Today?s terrorism was horrendously vile.
    It arose in a terror-infected world.

    People throughout the third world have long had their destiny held hostage
    by distant rulers. First world diplomats and entrepreneurs year after year
    pursue power and profit imposing nearly unimaginable third world calamity.
    Due to our distance from the victims and the endless mass media obfuscation
    of their plight, we first world citizens fail to realize that when a million
    people starve because a poor country?s energies are commandeered to benefit
    multinational capital, it is murder. But, it is murder, and so third world
    populations have long endured near total dependence on choices made by
    distant authoritative leaders who are callous to their futures.

    The same abysmal condition has arrived, to a degree, for populations in
    developed countries. Those who died in today?s attacks also suffered a
    choice made by far away actors callous to the carnage they imposed. First
    world populations may henceforth share not the degrading conditions and
    daily poverty of the third world, but some of the fear of being held hostage
    by others. To try to overcome this condition, but even more to enlarge their
    already grotesquely bloated powers, first world leaders may in coming weeks
    challenge decades of gains in civil and legal rights, trying to turn back
    freedom's clock.

    Can anything curtail the carnage of capital, the carnage of terrorism, and
    the carnage of repressive reaction? Our best hope is to win institutional
    change that reduces profit-seeking and political subordination, while also
    reducing desires to lash out with mindless and inhumane terrorism.

    In coming weeks we may suffer a kind of celebration in America, a
    celebration of security and of power, a celebration of surreptitious
    information retrieval, a celebration of arms growth, and perhaps of
    assassination, all described as virtuous goals rather than uncivil
    abominations, all touted as if the terror victims will be honored rather
    than defiled by our preparing to entomb still more innocent people around
    the world. Normal good-hearted Americans will weep for the suffering that
    today?s events exacted and hope to create a world in which such hate and
    callousness disappears. But I fear that America?s leaders will cynically
    bulk up their ammo belts while seeking to make ubiquitous their listening
    devices?trying to relegate public freedoms to an incinerator.

    In this environment, people of good will must explain as often as necessary
    that terrorism is horrific and insane, but so too is capitalist business as
    usual. And we must not step back from dissent, but must instead work harder
    to oppose all kinds of injustice with massive public demonstrations and
    civil disobedience.

  274. Positives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. We can use this tragedy to unite everybody in the US - whatever race. There are bigger enemies than our next door neighbours.

    2. Tougher security will prevent this happening again (yesterday proved it was lax)

    3. WTC will be rebuilt

    4. The terrorists have had there day - now the whole world is hissing at them and they may well find themselves living in an US-occupied country

    5. The scenes we saw yesterday will bring out the kindness in people - as sick as the sights were, they can be used as catalyst to a more human way of life, as opposed to individualistic.

  275. My thoughts this morning when I heard... by EvilGwyn · · Score: 1

    "Oh my God! The World Trade Towers! And the Pentagon! And...Pennsylvania? WTF?"

    Then I though, well maybe they were making a triple strike against America's Economic Power, America's Military Power and Pittsburgh.

    My thoughts go out to all the people that lost friends or relatives this day. If this post offends you then I am sorry. If it raises even a smile then it has served its purpose -- "To laugh at death is not a crime - so long as you start with your own"

    --
    Phear my l33t homepage.
  276. Re:Call to Words: How The Planes Fell From The Sky by kevin+lyda · · Score: 1

    actually from what i've heard, the faa and other gov't agencies pushed for greater domestic flight security but the airlines (yes, that's private industry) resisted. also the faa has been continually conducting tests of airport security - boston was fined ove $100k because of security lapses. unlike you, the faa has never found security lapses funny and has worked hard to fix them.

    and so now, suddenly realising the gravity of the situation, you yell at them.

    brilliant.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  277. No failure in Airport Security? by Giddeon · · Score: 1


    Many people have suggested that there was a failure in airport security which allowed the terrorists to get onboard the plane... this is not necessarily the case. It appears at this point that the terrorists used knives and "box cutters" to take over the planes. If under 4 inches the knives would have easily (and legally) passed the checkpoints without question. As small as box cutters are (essentially razor blades with handles), they would also be considered fine for flight by security checkpoints. In this case, there *was* no failure in airport security.

    As for longer blades, I found an interesting discussion on airport knife policies, and the ease of sneaking knives longer than 4" here.

    If a person wishes to have a weapon onboard an airplane, there are any number of legal or undetectable ways to carry on, construct, or even fake one. No number of regulations can prevent this... there can only be adequate security measures onboard the plane to deal with such problems.

    ~Giddeon

  278. Bad Day by Biker+Jim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "All you need is love" John Lennon.....
    Hope nothing else goes down,Grab some sleep if you can. Tomorrow I'm gonna finish this old farmers truck so he can get groceries. I'll have a wake for all those poor souls when it's time and I'm gonna go back to work and help a few people keep it together. I'm not going to give up one day to fear or hate. God bless the US

    Right on /. really kept the lines open!

  279. $5!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    yoda389 writes: "I'm getting reports from friends that gas prices are jumping to as much as $5.00 a gallon. There are huge lines at all gas stations here in my hometown someplace in Wisconsin." And ikohl1 writes: "A friend just informed me of how gas prices were raised to $3.50 in a town near where i live. I didn't believe him at first but I found this article on Yahoo."

    Actually, $5/gallon is £3.40/gallon which is 68p/litre. Here in the UK we pay 77p/litre atm - and at one point some places were charging £1/litre (ie $7/gallon) - without a national emergency. Don't complain too loudly!

    1. Re:$5!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, common mistake made by english - US gallons are smaller than UK ones:
      US - 3.785 litres
      UK - 4.546 litres

    2. Re:$5!!! by dachshund · · Score: 1

      Regardless, wouldn't you be concerned if gas prices increased by 200-300% overnight? Or if the prices of any necessities increased by that much so quickly.

  280. New York Condolences by acscherp · · Score: 1

    http://nycondolence.com This website is an expression of deep sorrow for what happened to the victims of these tragic events. Condolances can be posted to this website and will be collected in order to show compassion for and respect to the friends and relatives of these victims. Please post your condolence on this website.

  281. Re:oh boy.... read this: by Janon · · Score: 1

    City of God = NYC

    Two Brothers = WTC

    Fortress = Pentagon

    Great Leader = G.Bush

    Big City = NYC

    Well there probably shouldn't be two references to New York. But what about Jerusalem? What if this has something to do with te Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Surely there is "great thunder" in "The City of God" these days...

    But then again, I actually don't believe very much in astrological predictions, but they might, such as in this case, be rather interesting to play with.

    --

    And poke her, with the soft cushions!!!

  282. Not Pearl Harbor mor like Hiroshima by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I must say that I fully disagree with what has happened in the US at the moment. It was a cowardly and evil act of terrorism.

    I do however think that comparisons to Pearl Harbor are a bit off base.
    Pearl Harbor was a military target, the WTC was a civilian target.
    I'm also not saying that it is payback or justice for what happened in Hiroshima.
    I just think that a better comparison than Pearl Harbor is a comparison to Hiroshima.

    1. Re:Not Pearl Harbor mor like Hiroshima by auximage · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wouldn't say totally civilian though. Think about the hundreds of companies that were contained within those buildings.

      --
      +----------- - - - . auximage
    2. Re:Not Pearl Harbor mor like Hiroshima by dachshund · · Score: 1
      No. Japan and the US were at war. All of the players in WWII demonstrated their willingness to bomb enemy cities, sometimes indiscriminantly. The Japanese killed many civilians and natives all over the Pacific-- look at what they did in China. This isn't justification for the excess that was Hiroshima (although some feel that it was justified). I'm simply trying to point out that the two countries were at war-- Japan by choice-- and city bombings are an inevitable symptom of large-scale war.

      This attack was different. We don't even know why we've been attacked. Are we at war? Will our enemy come forward, or at least tell us that this is the case? Are we guilty of supporting Israel? Think about that. What if we'd dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima simply because Japan supported the Nazis, not because they were actively fighing us? It wouldn't have happened.

  283. Nuclear concern by hoppy · · Score: 1

    I'm not US citizen, so i don't know really well US geography.

    I assume there is a nuclear powerplant around a big city. What happens if someone throw a plane to this nuclear power plant ?

    1. Re:Nuclear concern by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I assume there is a nuclear powerplant around a big city.

      Even if nuclear plants are not near by any big cities, it's not only the nuclear explosion that happens, problem is also all the toxic waste that gets in the air and then it is up to the wind directions what is going to happen.

      What happens if someone throw a plane to this nuclear power plant ?

      All nuclear plants outer structures have been designed to hold for a missile attack.

      Difference with missile and jumbo jet 'attack' is that missile causes explosion outside of outer walls and those should hol, but crashing jumbo might do some damage to outer walls because of impact of weight and speed it has. Explosion caused then by jet fuel shouldn't be enough to break the inner defensive walls.

    2. Re:Nuclear concern by tb3 · · Score: 2

      I used to work in nuclear safety in Canada, and I know that the containment building (the big dome that surrounds the reactor core) is designed to take a direct hit from a large passenger jet. I would assume that US reactors are designed the same way.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  284. Re:Islam is a pig swine religion by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

    and then we come for you you green skinned bastard !

    --
    No but, yeah but, no but...
  285. pakistani group "lashkari toiba" claims responsb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from http://www.newsonweb.com/msn/

    Attack: LeT claims responsibility

    Karachi, September 12: Pakistan-based militant outfit, Lashkar-e-Toiba. today claimed responsibility for the wave of terrorist attacks in the United States.The outfit said its suicide bombers had hijacked jets, which plunged into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon yesterday.

    The attack was carried out by our fidayeen (suicide group) led by commander Abu Samama," Lashkar spokesman Khalid Saif said in a statement faxed to AFP in this southern Pakistani city.
    "The attacks on the World Trade Center and other places were not an act of terrorism but an Islamic duty."

    There was no way to verify the claim independently. US officials have pointed the finger of blame at Afghanistan-based Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden. (AFP)

    Published: Wednesday, September 12, 2001

  286. knives, guns by CrazyP · · Score: 1

    They are saying they brought in knives and used those to hijack the plane. Recently I had my jaw broken and I had to get titanium plates in my jaw. But I asked the doctor if I would set off the metal dectors at the air port and he responded "no, you could bring a gun made out of titanium through the metal dector and it wouldnt set it off." I do not konw if titanium is easy to get a hold of... but I bet if you tried you could. This is scary if there exists a metal that will not set of metal dectors. Think its time to upgrade airport secerity?!?

    --
    How do you take a picture of the best moment of your life?
    1. Re:knives, guns by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of titanium guns out now--and they're nify. Very nifty.

      You really must hold one. They feel light like plastic.

  287. Re:oh boy.... read this: by super-flex-o-matic · · Score: 1

    apart the fact, nostradamus used this kind of 'code-language' to encrypt his research against the inquisition.
    that being the most reasonable source of all his uttering, his theses could be translated as research of chemical or physical reactions.

  288. Re:Call to Words: How The Planes Fell From The Sky by zmower · · Score: 1

    I saw an interview with a man from Flights International on the BBC last night. Apparently security was reviewed under the Clinton administration by a committee chaired by Al Gore (probably post-Lockerbie). All the recommendations of the final report were implemented for international flights but the airlines balked at the internal flight recommendations saying they would slow them down too much.

    --

    Sig pending!
  289. Still being fair... by Monkeychunks · · Score: 1

    As it happens, A Muslim from Libya lived with me for a year, his name was Muhammad. He was one of the kindest, gentlest men I have ever known, and easily the holiest. It's true what you say about the Muslim creed being peaceful. Their treatment of animals particularly.

    However, Muhammad explained that the Islamic call to arms is irrefutable to it's believers. He said that even tough he could never hurt a person unless he or a loved one was in the worst of danger, he did say that he would shoot Salman Rushdie in the street, no question. This shocked me, you would have had to know the man to really appreciate the gravity of his conviction, but the fact is that *The general consensus* amongst Muslims is the very same. If religious law calls for the killing of a person, there's no if's, and's or but's, and only a few Muslims would refuse.

    --
    "We kill to cure, with cures that kill" - Skinny Puppy
  290. Rote Arme Fraction by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 2

    They are in Europe. I don't think they ever did suicide missions. Nor do the right wing terrorists, which make me believe it is religious groups. Suicide missions are so much more compelling when you believe paradice waits as a reward.

    1. Re:Rote Arme Fraction by psych031337 · · Score: 1

      The RAF (or "red army fraction" was active almost exclusively in Germany. It is suspected that they got some basic training in the near east, but that was almost 20 years ago. These days about nothing happens for which they can be held responsible.

      Secondly, EVERY assault or bombing by the RAF was followed by a letter of confession to force their aims and goals (like freeing imprisoned member and such).

      Nowadays the RAF is presumed dead by german authorities.

      --
      +++ath0
    2. Re:Rote Arme Fraction by GrandGranini · · Score: 1


      They officially disbanded a couple of years ago.

      --
      It's almost impossible to have a baseless snobbish opinion of the General Theory of Relativity.
  291. Arming passengers ? by MosesJones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So you are suggesting a nutter with a knife could have taken on the other nutter with a knife. So the solution is that there are no security checks and arm all the passengers.

    The solutions is to monitor internal flights in the same way that they are required to monitor international flights. US internal security sucks, plain and simple. This disaster was created by the US consumer and the airlines desire for cheap hassle free flights. Prices must rise to pay for the security required.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  292. possible anti-hijacking technique by ses4j · · Score: 1

    What if the cockpit was permanently and irrevokably locked off from the cabin? Then the plane cannot be hijacked once it's in the air no matter what the hijackers do. And there's no need for freedom-restricting military security in all airports...

    Scott

    1. Re:possible anti-hijacking technique by flegged · · Score: 1

      And what if something happens to the pilot?

      Preventing anyone entering the cockpit would be extremely dangerous if the pilot(s) were incapacitaed in some way. It has happened before. Passengers have had to land planes. If they couldn't get to the cockpit, there would be no hope. While it would prevent hijacking, it would be too dangerous.

      A better idea may be to have planes controllable from the ground. In the vent of a hijacking, the ground can take over. Then the military security would be needed in the ground control..

      --

      "I think he was truly surprised at how little I cared about how big a market the Mac had" - Linus on Jobs
    2. Re:possible anti-hijacking technique by mpe · · Score: 2

      A better idea may be to have planes controllable from the ground. In the vent of a hijacking, the ground can take over.

      How do you design such a system which cannot itself be used to turn planes in to guided missiles?

    3. Re:possible anti-hijacking technique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have a second set of controls with a third pilot or whoever accessible from the passenger area. this isnt working unless you push a button. in which case it sets of a sort of alert in the real cabin, and the pilot has 10 or 20 seconds to hit an abort button. if he is dead, then he wont push the button =)

  293. Japan's Red Army Claims Responsibility for US Atta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scoop here
    "
    The communist group said that the attacks came in retaliation for US atomic bombs that killed thousands of Japanese in the World War II in Hiroshima and Nagasaki
    "

    (I hope this is needles to say but take this with a grain of salt...)

  294. Mirror with pics and vids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out pics and vids at my site

    Still adding and updating.

  295. Few things of the top of my head by TV-SET · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First of all, I am sorry for all those who have become a victim in any way to these attacks. Said that...

    1. Defenetely, these attacks were counterstrikes to US politics in Middle East and Europe.
    2. I strongly disagree with Bush claiming these attacks being "cowardly acts". I think, that organizing and implementing such plan takes extreme courage, even if performed by a mad man, which I don't think is a case. One should have a clear head to plan all this.
    3. Targets are defenetly symbolic - world's economy center, "world's" military center. Both destroyed within one day, showing that US is not actually such a strong giant as many may think.
    4. Responding fast is doubtly even half a deal. It's like saying "I respawn very fast in Q3". I get killed in the first place anyway.
    5. It is shocking to which extent of globaliztion US can go... as usual... everything shut down nationwide...
    6. Counterstrike from US will cause only more attacks. US is still too powerfull to fight in open space, especially by small countries.

    ...once again, I am sorry for all those who became a victim...

    --
    Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
    1. Re:Few things of the top of my head by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. Defenetely, these attacks were counterstrikes to US politics in Middle East and Europe.

      True, small attacks against military targets in Middle east have left trail of innocent victims there also and those were revenged now

      3. Targets are defenetly symbolic - world's economy center, "world's" military center. Both destroyed within one day, showing that US is not actually such a strong giant as many may think.

      These were my thoughts also, and I third target that I was waiting to be hit was Statue of Liberty. Economy, military and freedom.

      6. Counterstrike from US will cause only more attacks. US is still too powerfull to fight in open space, especially by small countries

      This attack was not propably made by some individual country, at least not directly. So, by going to open war, you'll end up killing a lot of innocent people in those countries, which will then be revenged(again). Only way for US to show it's might is to find the people who were responsible and get them to face trial without killing anybody while doing so. Any military act made now will only lead to more attacks like these.

    2. Re:Few things of the top of my head by be-fan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      2. I strongly disagree with Bush claiming these attacks being "cowardly acts". I think, that organizing and implementing such plan takes extreme courage, even if performed by a mad man, which I don't think is a case. One should have a clear head to plan all this.
      >>>>>>>>>>>
      There is no way anybody can argue that this is not an act of a coward. I'm muslim, and I hate these terrorists for making all muslims out to be cowards. These people are cowards on several points:
      A) They did not officially declare war. Attacking a country at peace is the act of a coward.
      B) They attacked civilians who were just going to work in the morning. These people aren't the ones responsible for America's foreign policy, they aren't the ones championing capitalism all over the world. They were simply people going to work in the morning. Killing in war is something horrible, but maybe unavoidable. Killing in peace is just murder.
      C) They might have had a clear head, but being smart (no doubt, whoever organized this was smart as hell) doesn't make one any less evil.
      D) It takes no courage to take out ones anger on innocents. It takes real courage to stand up for one's self within the framework of society.

      We don't live in a world anymore where violence is condoned. The majority of the civilized world has moved on to a point where violence isn't even considered. In the US, the worst thing that can happen to a politician is that some pundit calls him stupid on TV, or some cameraman catches him taking a shit. Being assasinated by an opposition party isn't even within the realm of thought. Those who still live by the baser human instincts of killing one's enemies should be "replaced", just as modern humans replaced their primitive ancestors.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:Few things of the top of my head by dachshund · · Score: 2
      2. I strongly disagree with Bush claiming these attacks being "cowardly acts". I think, that organizing and implementing such plan takes extreme courage, even if performed by a mad man, which I don't think is a case. One should have a clear head to plan all this.

      Cowardice is not simply about the unwillingness to risk life and limb. Cowardice has something to do with the way you wage your war, the personal honor with which you face your enemy. These men waged war on tired, harmless people by (apparently) carrying a box that they claimed was a bomb. They "fought" against buildings full of innocent people, who had no means of defending themselves. Many, many cowards have held hostages and committed suicide-- it takes no bravery. They stabbed flight attendents quickly, to acheive maximum affect. When the passengers rebelled on one plane (this is the current story), they were unable to even hit a worthwhile target.

      The only evidence of "bravery" that you could argue is these men's willingness to die. Does this mean that every suicide is courageous? In any case, I'm not even sure that this constitutes bravery. Many islamic terrorists are conditioned to believe that death is only a door to Paradise. This belief can be so strongly imprinted in somebody that they simply overlook rational emotions such as fear. Is that bravery? Or a form of psychosis? These men were human bombs, and nothing more. They demonstrated no honor, no real bravery, and no strength.

    4. Re:Few things of the top of my head by TV-SET · · Score: 1
      I'm muslim, and I hate these terrorists for making all muslims out to be cowards.

      Not all muslims are cowards, even if considered those terrorists to be cowards. You are talking about mass media stereotype, not the actual fact.

      A) They did not officially declare war. Attacking a country at peace is the act of a coward.

      Agreed

      B) They attacked civilians who were just going to work in the morning. These people aren't the ones responsible for America's foreign policy, they aren't the ones championing capitalism all over the world. They were simply people going to work in the morning. Killing in war is something horrible, but maybe unavoidable. Killing in peace is just murder.

      I agree that victims were innocent people. But still planning and performing such an action implies putting oneself into a danger, especially considering the powers of CIA and FBI. Making a decision of killing several thousands people is IMHO courages, even if it is a plain murder, and victims are innocent civilians.

      D) It takes no courage to take out ones anger on innocents. It takes real courage to stand up for one's self within the framework of society.

      Well, I might agree that 7-grader kicking 3-graders butt is not corageous. But killing several thousand people is, once again, a different story. Another thing, is that society framework differs for people of Asia from those ones of US. The attack might be a way of standing up in framework for ones, while being a "coward act" for the others.

      Different mentalities should be understood. Therefor, US following the path of terrorists is NOT acceptable. US government cannot start bombing Pakistan or whatever other country just because terrorists' mastermind in hiding there. The same as US cannot hold Dmitriy Sklyarov in prison for what he did in Russia, being russian citizen, no matter wheather it was legal or not.

      --
      Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
  296. Attacks on Kabul by jubchai · · Score: 1

    iggyflashbulb writes: "CNN reports some oddball group not associated with bin Laden is attacking Kabul at night. Are they taking advantage of the NY situation or did they create it?"

    This is not some "oddball group" - the article itself says that the attackers are from the opposition to the Taliban. They are also the U.N. -recognized government of Afghanistan, even if they only control 5-10% of the country. There is no way they created the "NY situation."

  297. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you have to transfer $250 into paypal to get the $5

    so if you don't have a credit card, you're still out of luck

    if I had a card I'd be doing it

  298. PayPal total so far... by Technodummy · · Score: 2



    Total Collected: $204,504.35

    Number of Payments: 8501

    only several hundred had donated at the time this was linked to /.

    way to go slashdotters!

    don't know where to donate? you do now

    1. Re:PayPal total so far... by PrimeNumber · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

    2. Re:PayPal total so far... by synx · · Score: 1

      all since 5pm PDT tuesday....

  299. Second plane - Very important. by nickol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He observed a second airplane immediately swing behind the first in a follow like manner and swoop down on the Pentagon only to pull up at the last second, out of the smoke cloud, and fly away

    This is very important. Pictures, taken at NYC also clearly shows the presence of ANOTHER SMALL PLANE of the same type as described above.
    Please note, that the area in NYC (and, I believe, also over Washington is closed for flights.) Coincidence ???
    See photos here:

    http://www.cyberus.ca/~stany/

    1. Re:Second plane - Very important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where are pictures?!?! I couldn't find any out there....

    2. Re:Second plane - Very important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not even a coincidence.

      the aircraft in these pictures are helicopters, probably belonging to police and/or news media, and USAF F-15s flying Combat Air Patrol --well after the attacks began.

    3. Re:Second plane - Very important. by dachshund · · Score: 1
      I looked at those pics, and I didn't see any evidence of another small plane. I saw the towers a few minutes after the second crash, and I should point out that there were several helicopters orbiting. Perhaps one of these, or a small plane chartered by a news organization, is the plane you're talking about?

      Give me the filename of the particular pic you're talking about, and I'll take a look.

  300. News for Nerds. Stuff that matters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I've heard that Slashdot is international.
    Not everyone, everywhere in the World is concerned
    with American problems. I'm very irritated by lack of technical content.

  301. more links by pamri · · Score: 1

    US news sites may be clogged, so here are some non-us sites.
    Reddif USA
    times of India - Lots of photos.
    Dawn - check out the editorial on Afghanistan. BTW, this is a pakistani newspaper, but very credible.
    This is the text version of their site.

  302. aftermath by spoonyfork · · Score: 2
    I live in metro Detroit. Since yesterday morning all commercial air traffic around the airport here has stopped. The only planes flying over head are military aircraft out of the nearby Selfridge Air Force base. I just woke up on what should be a cloudless morning and I can see several fading contrails of the jet fighters cris-crossing the sky. I can hear two high-speed jets in the distance and one is getting louder.

    I am so profoundly sad for the people and families of those who died.

    I want my old world back.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  303. Inequality breeds violence by DrInequality · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The attack on the USA just goes to show that inequalities caused by
    the US government breed violence. It is unreasonable to treat large
    numbers of people unfairly and expect them just to lie down and take
    it. Eventually they will reach a point where their lives are worth
    little and they have no prospects. Then they will become violent.
    This is not the first time either. Anyone remember the LA riots or
    the attack on the USS Cole? I could go on.

    The US has a long history of inequality. At home, hospitals and
    schools are more and more for the rich and we can just build fences to
    keep the poor in their ghettos right? Pay more for the rent-a-cop
    sitting at the border between the nice plush suburbs and the rest of
    the world. But no f**king way the rich will pay more taxes so the poor
    don't want to steal all their stuff!

    And then of course, there is the USA on the international stage. You
    can't go round bombing countries everywhere and not make emenies. It
    only takes a few of them to hijack planes and ... Not to mention some
    of them smuggling suitcase nukes into the USA. Also, the
    unquestioning support of Israel despite the atrocities (on both sides)
    will only lead to religious fanatics as enemies.

    So what does the US do now? Nuke them till they glow?

    In the short term, yes, I'm all for the elimination of terrorists.
    But in the long term it's time that the people of the USA to realise
    that inequality must be reduced. Spend less on defence and more on
    health, education and welfare. Choose a sane international policy,
    stop acting like an international bully.

    Stand up and be counted. Vote. Above all, don't elect another total
    moron like George W. Bush.

    1. Re:Inequality breeds violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure wish I could mod this up. It is so correct.
      We wage _war_ on countries to keep our oil prices
      low so our wealthy can drive their (luxury) autos
      in quantities unequaled anywhere else in the world.
      This incident has really been a wakeup call for me
      in many ways -- mostly that /my/ way of life is
      indirectly responsible for the international
      conditions which /may/ have caused the perpetrators
      of this atrocity to take their actions.

      I'm putting my truck (4x4 toyota) up for sale
      as soon as I get my life straight so I no longer
      need it.

      b

    2. Re:Inequality breeds violence by DrInequality · · Score: 1
      Yes, my point exactly.

      The perpetrators may not be considered rational by many and should be punished. But you can see some chain of logic that drives them to it.

    3. Re:Inequality breeds violence by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      Schools are not more and more for the rich. Every child is REQUIRED by law to go to a school through most of High School. If you want to know why inner city schools get little money, it's social welfare.

      The Democrats started the "low cost housing" idea--besides ruining the lives of many poor people and increasing crime rates--each apartment is worth about $20. Well, school funding is based on property taxes and local millages....

      If you want fair schools, take funding entirely to the state level so every school gets equal dollars per student or have free private school charters for everyone. (Republican ideas.)

      As for the US bombing everyone... We only do what the UN says. And it's not just the US that's the army of the UN. Most Democratic countries bomb along with us--you just don't hear anyone complaing about it. It's in style to hate the US.

      Look at the war we had in Iraq. Most every major nation in the civilized world bombed Iraq--and not just those in the UN!!

    4. Re:Inequality breeds violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm, I am homeschooling. What we call "public schools" are not schools at all. Thanks to whom?

    5. Re:Inequality breeds violence by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      The answer's pretty simple. Democrats.

      I'd like a more advanced curriculum for those who can use it--advanced classes, semester vs year long classes; grades definied by ability--not age; less sports getting in the way; school choice; and state-wide funding, not local.

      But, the stupid kids would feel left behind if the smarter kids go into more advanced classes... We can't have that! Equal opportunity isn't enough, we must enforce equal performance!

      Like shit we do.

    6. Re:Inequality breeds violence by be-fan · · Score: 2

      The Democrats started the "low cost housing" idea--besides ruining the lives of many poor people and increasing crime rates--each apartment is worth about $20. Well, school funding is based on property taxes and local millages....
      >>>>>>>>>
      If there were no "low cost housing," then there would be more homeless and you'd have set of problems.

      If you want fair schools, take funding entirely to the state level so every school gets equal dollars per student or have free private school charters for everyone. (Republican ideas.)
      >>>>>>>>>
      Taking funding to the state level wouldn't change anything. Many states (VA for example) are even less competent than the national government. Every school getting equal tax dollars would work better, but
      A) Rich suburbanites would never agree to it
      B) Its a socialist idea.
      As for free private school charters, you might as well say "give all schools enough money." There is no practical difference between the government paying for private schools (what charters would amount to) and the government paying public schools, and most private schools are not in locations that would be easily accessible to the poor.

      As for the US bombing everyone... We only do what the UN says. And it's not just the US that's the army of the UN. Most Democratic countries bomb along with us--you just don't hear anyone complaing about it. It's in style to hate the US.
      >>>>>>
      Bullshit. The UN *is* the US. Who is there to stand against us? France! Ha! In the UN, whatever the US says, goes. While people might complain, and the US might make a few concessions to keep someone in the security council from voting something down, the US gets its way in the big issues. Take economic sanctions against Iraq for example. France, China, and Russia favor easing or lifting economic sanctions on Iraq. France, China, and Russia are three of the five permanent members of the UN security council, and all have veto powers.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    7. Re:Inequality breeds violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the previous comment is the best way of explaining what just happened yesterday. I also think, reading through the slashdots posts, that it shows just how much the medias are powerfull in the USA, and how much the general USA citizen is misinformed about what his country is really doing inside and outside of its boundaries. What just happened was totally inevitable in my opinion: what else could you expect, with what the US did after the second world war. USA simply decided to give back their "ancestral" territory to the jews, at the same time dispossessing the palestinians of their homes, litterally. Think about it, it's like if someone would come to your house, seize it, give it to someone else, without asking you your opinion.

      As for the bombing of the UN, the war against Iraq.. all of this is bullshit. UN is in good part financed by US money, and USA would never had reacted that way againsnt saddam hussein if they didn't had interests in the oil of the kuwait. Look back at the conflicts in which USA participated, and you'll see that the US goverment dosnt get involved unless they have financial interests at stake, or that, being pushed to the limit, they dont have a choice.

      Dont get me wrong, i'm not saying that i dont care for the hundreds of persons that died yesterday. It's truly something horrible, something nobody deserves. i actually had some friends that maybe died in there. Im just saying that people are for the most part misinformed as to what actions the US is really conducting, and that the US governement should stop intervening and putting his nose in things it sould'nt.

      That being said, i'd like to offer my condoleances, and those of all my colleagues from here in Canada, to the families touched by that horrible catastrophy.

    8. Re:Inequality breeds violence by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      Low cost housing doesn't do anything about homelessness--and never did. It just keeps the poor poor. That's the problem we need to face.

      State taxes for a national program we already have (which is socialist already) is not a socialist idea. And I don't propose giving everyone "enough money" or fix anything huge with cash. I just want to get money out of the equation for poor schools. It's easy. It can done. It's almost free.

      I don't expect private schools to be any better than public. But, it takes away the cynicism going around that public schools offer second-class education and that Reps and Senators don't care because their kids go to private schools.

      I hear countries calling the US isolationist, and others calling it a bully. Well, what are we?

      Have YOU heard of the US pushing the UN around? I've only heard about the US not paying dues, not attending meetings, and not agreeing with other countries--and being voted off panels, made fun of, and ignored because of it.

      The US doesn't decide who goes to war on who. Every country decides and every country acts. Why do OUR forces go in such greater numbers than any others? We have the technology to save the lives of our men, and the citizens we are bombing. We're helping out the only way we can.

    9. Re:Inequality breeds violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unbelievable....we send our money to the whole freaking world and yet we are bullying them. Please...I'm ready to waste a serious amount of people no way are scumbags going to hurt our way of life.

    10. Re:Inequality breeds violence by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      "The US has a long history of inequality"

      Who doesn't ?
      Just look at this example, some people are smart enough to design such complicated things like jets and some people are stupid enough to brag about inequality on some stupid site.
      People are unequal in their capabilities and ..
      Eh fuck it.
      Anyone who falls for leftists propaganda after 100 years of theft, murder and mass destructions caused by communists and leftist followers is NOT worthy any attention.

  304. News, photos & videos by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 1

    Here's what we can see here in Canada. There is a lot of pics and videos in the page, they are all in flash format (videos too). Page is in french but you can see them as well.

    http://www.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/actualite/a tt entat/indexTemporaire.html

    If you want to watch what we can see from our TV set here, here's the live stream from CBC :

    http://radio.cbc.ca/cbcradio.ram (radio)
    http://www.cbcradio3.com/ram/cbctvlive.ram (TV)

    On this page again, it says that about 300 firemens and 85 policemens are reported missing. At the pentagon, there is about 800 deaths.

  305. Poem by John Dunne by Lozzer · · Score: 1

    No Man is an island, entire of itself;
    Every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main;
    If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less,
    as well as if a promontory were,
    as well as if a manor of thy friends or of thine own were;
    Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in Mankind;
    And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;
    It tolls for thee.
    --
    Special Relativity: The person in the other queue thinks yours is moving faster.
  306. Bastards by PingXao · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Too late to get noticed, but not too late to fuck for some karma. I just meta-moderated a whole lot of fucking losers down to hell for "Insightful" garbage mods on bullshit comments.

    I abhor and reject and am fucking pissed at what happened yesterday. By the same token, I detest what a bunch of assholes our politicians are turning out to be. When its a fucking Hollywood movie, everything's AOK , right? But when it's for-fucking-real they're telling parents to TURN OFF THE TV SO THE KIDS DONT SEEIT?

    Now we have hundreds of pussy mealy mouth politicians who (a) ran for office to get rich and who (b) lost themselves and have friends who lost BIG $$$ in the stock market and (c) have been bought and sold by corporate lobbyists - let's see what the fuck they can do about this situation...

    I love this country but make no mistake about it - if the entire US congress were in the wtc today we'd be better off. God help us.

  307. You think this is just an american issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, you must be dumb! I'm British and I can say that I don't believe this. This sets a new precendent for international relations. Expect this to be the face of 21st century warfare. Are you in a nation blessed by not having someone out to get you for something? This is the most significant thing that I can recall happening in my lifetime, the world will not be the same after this. And you want tech' news? How much tech news do you think there is likely to be today anyway, its not business as usual for most people.
    This is not pearl harbour, this is much worse. Pearl was an attack on military targets, on an island in the middle of the pacific, one that I seem to recall was not even part of the union at the time. (Do I have this right, my US history is rather lacking). This is an attack on civilian targets with far more people killed on the US mainland and they got the pentagon. When the US public gets over the shock of this they are going to go simply apeshit. If this had been a straight missile attack by a nation state, exactly where do you think the international situation would be right now hmmm? Even if this had been an attack by a state that could concievibly go toe to toe with the US (which could only be China) do you think that the President *WOULD HAVE ANY CHOICE* but to declare full scale war? Where are you from? Somewhere that an internation war wont effect you? The moon perhaps? Oh and when I say war, we're not talking police actions, the US will be completely behind this one in a way it never was in Vietnam. We would be talking victory by *all* and *any* means necesary.

    Whatever happens the world is not going to be the same after this.

  308. Editorial from boston herald by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America, Israel share terror's burden
    by Don Feder
    Wednesday, September 12, 2001

    On Dec. 7, 1941, Winston Churchill called President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. ``What's all this about Pearl Harbor?'' the prime minister asked. ``It's quite true, they bombed us,'' FDR replied. ``We're all in the same boat now.''

    Today, it's America and Israel that occupy the same small craft in a storm-tossed sea.

    Sept. 11, 2001, was another day that shall live in infamy - New York's World Trade Center demolished by two hijacked planes, while another crashed into the Pentagon - with thousands dead or injured.

    Now, the American people have seen writ large what Israel has endured for the past year - cars exploding in residential neighborhoods, mortar rounds lobbed at apartment buildings, a sniper shooting a baby in its father's arms, a suicide bomber detonating a device packed with nails in a restaurant crowded with young families.

    Since Yasser Arafat's make-believe peace at Oslo in 1993, 632 Israelis have died. Based on Israel's population, that's the equivalent of 34,600 dead Americans.

    Israel is on the front lines, as England was in 1940. But the Jewish state is far from the only target.

    Islamic militants hate America and everything it represents - democracy, freedom of conscience and religious tolerance. The Palestinian Authority regularly calls on the Arab world to avenge itself on the Great Satan.

    ``Attack U.S. interests,'' urged Farouk Kaddoumi, chief of the PLO's political department. The Palestinian Authority's official newspaper declared, ``Conflict with the U.S. is the only way to achieve our goals.'' In a sermon at the Al Aqsa Mosque, the P.A.-appointed mufti of Jerusalem intoned: ``Oh Allah, destroy America, her agents and her allies! Cast them into their own traps, and cover the White House with black.'' As news of New York and Washington filtered to the Middle East, Palestinians in the West Bank city of Nablus celebrated in the streets, chanting and throwing candy.

    The festivities weren't confined to the West Bank. Reuters reported, ``Ordinary Egyptians said Tuesday the United States deserved the wave of deadly attacks toward its cities, saying justice was being served for Washington's `bias' toward Israel and against the Arabs.''

    Analogies have limits. Unlike Pearl Harbor, this time we were on notice. In 1993, Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman's crew bombed the same World Trade Center, killing seven and wounding 500.

    Americans were outraged. Americans were up in arms. And when the smoke had cleared, Americans went back to sleep. We were the last remaining superpower, secure in our invincibility.

    Terrorism was something that happened elsewhere and to others. Why couldn't Israel just negotiate with those people? End the occupation. Give them land.

    Because human life means nothing to those people. Because their malice, their demonic hatred of all who aren't like them, is limitless. Because they recognize no differences between soldiers and civilians, combatants and office workers.

    After Tuesday's dead are buried and the mourners comforted, what then? Alan Cohen, an Israeli psychologist who specializes in the emotional impact of terrorism, told me: ``It's not just you (Americans) who are being attacked. It's an attack on the beliefs and values of America.''

    After the crippling blow they dealt to U.S. Seventh Fleet, the Japanese expected us to go into shock, allowing them to run rampant over the Pacific. Major miscalculation.

    That's the impact the Osama bin Ladens, Yasser Arafats, and leaders of Hamas and Islamic Jihad are hoping yesterday's atrocities will have.

    They are looking for a white flag. They think that if they kill enough of us and strike fear in the hearts of the rest, we'll walk away from the Middle East, allow them to finish off Israel and our other allies in the region, and then come after America in their own good time.

    Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Japanese naval chief of staff who planned the attack on Pearl Harbor, could have set them straight. After the raid, Yamamoto observed that Tokyo had ``awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve.''

    A month before Pearl Harbor, when Britannia stood alone, Churchill told the boys at Harrow: ``This is the great lesson: Never give in. . . . Never yield to force . . . Do not let us speak of darker days; let us rather speak of sterner days.'' Mettle is burnished in the fires of conflict.

  309. Re:from http://www.skyscraper.org/tallest/t_wtc.ht by pallex · · Score: 1

    It came down real fast
    due to lack of good support
    I smell a lawsuit.

  310. flight plan deviation + 20 minutes by madeye+the+younger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What in nine hells was being DONE by air traffic control when the deviation (and subsequent lack of communication) was noticed? WHEN was it noticed? WHERE the fuck was the NY Air National Guard during the 18 minutes after the first impact? Is anyone going to try and sell the idea that 20 minutes wasn't enough time to get LOCAL jets in the air for intercept? Take a gander at the locations of NY squadron locations.

    I'll buy the explanation that noone believed the first one would actually hit. I'm not gonna buy it for the second WTC hit. That plane should have been downed in the river.

    1. Re:flight plan deviation + 20 minutes by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

      A better solution (I think) for the future is to install remote control systems in all aircrafts. That way, if the pilot is identified not to be the original pilot - that is, the pilot is a hi-jacker - through fingerprint identification control built in into the stick, then the air traffic control could take control of the plane and land it on an airport. That way you wouldn't have to shoot down an airplane filled with hundreds of innocent people, and have a high risk that the wreckage would fall onto populated areas.

    2. Re:flight plan deviation + 20 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when a terrorist figures out how to hack the remote control and decides to crash the plane without even being on it...?

    3. Re:flight plan deviation + 20 minutes by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

      Why do we use locks on doors when you can pick a lock, or smash a window to get in? Why do we have passwords on computers when you can hack in anyway? These are not foolproof ways of protection, but it slows down the great majority of the attempts, and also simple and cost-effective.

    4. Re:flight plan deviation + 20 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why do we use locks on doors when you can pick a lock, or smash a window to get in? Why do we have passwords on computers when you can hack in anyway? These are not foolproof ways of protection, but it slows down the great majority of the attempts, and also simple and cost-effective.

      In general, I agree. However, I wonder if allowing the planes to be controlled remotely could be creating more of a problem than it is solving.

    5. Re:flight plan deviation + 20 minutes by dachshund · · Score: 1

      Any sort of remote control should have strict limitations. It should be essentially a way to force-activate the autopilot, get the plane to a safe altitude, and put it on a particular course. But you're right, it could be hacked and it would be a disaster. I like the sealed cockpit idea better.

    6. Re:flight plan deviation + 20 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, maybe a fingerprint system where every few minutes or so the pilot should be identified or the ground tower could take control of the plane..
      Of course if the pilot identifies himself he should be the only one in control (unless we want someone to be able to hijack planes from the ground!).

  311. Re:War where? Against whom? Against assholes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a Finish modding circle jerk? What with this and the guy below...christ.

    The war is against assholes, america has a lot of them, yes, but so does the rest of the world. So get that superglue and get to work on your asshole buddies.

    Maybe you should decide what you want to say before posting.

  312. Hannan Ashrawi (sp?) talks by uebernewby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hannan Ashrawi (sp???), former Palestinian spokeswoman back when it seemed the peace talks were going somewhere, but since not seen as often in public anymore because she disagrees with the way Arafat is running the Palestinian Authority, just spoke on CNN about the "Palestinians dancing in the street" footage we've all seen.

    She claimed the people shown celebrating and dancing are a *very* small minority group and do not in any way represent Palestinians as a whole. Moreover, though small groups of people may have been celebrating when they heard America was hit, celebrations soon subsided when it became clear that possibly thousands had been killed. The general attitude in the West Bank and Gaza is one of horror, disgust and sympathy with American victims.

    Bear in mind that Ashrawi (I really should've looked this up, sorry) is one of the most moderate Palestinians around and that she's also one of very few Palestinians with some authority who's got any idea about pr Western style (as in, she knows it's not a good idea to scream "I will sacrifice *all* of my sons for Allah to make Israel suffer the way we suffer" when a suicide bomber's just blown up a kiddie disco in Tel Aviv - it doesn't do the Palestinian cause any good in the Western eye) so she's bound to say something like this.

    However, if you think about it, she may, partly, be right. I myself have only seen that footage with the guy handing out free food to passersby (you know which footage I mean). Consider that in the 22 hrs since it happened, there hasn't been any new footage of Palestinians dancing in the street. It's always the same clip. If this celebration was going on on any substantial scale, I should think we would've seen more footage of it.

    Disclaimer: I'm not Palestinian, nor am I Israeli, nor am I sympathetic to either cause (in the sense that I don't believe either people should be destroyed to give the other Lebensraum)

    --

    News and bla for computer musicians: http://lomechanik.net/
    1. Re:Hannan Ashrawi (sp?) talks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's also a Christian.

    2. Re:Hannan Ashrawi (sp?) talks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      She's also a Christian.

      And those few words convey a lot of information. The thing with the whole Israel/Palestine thing isn't just religion; it isn't just ethnicity/race; it isn't just political. It's the whole thing. A Palestinian Christian may be treated as an enemy (or potential enemy) by Israel, while a Lebanese Christian in the now defunct SLA (South(ern) Lebanese Army) was backed by Israel, before Israel pulled out of Southern Lebanon.

      An Arab Palestinian Muslim or Christian is treated as an enemy (or potential enemy), but an Israeli Arab Druse might find himself in the Israeli Army.

      A Palestinian (whose family left the region many years back) I once spoke to told me how the worst treatment he knew of were from Druse border guards.

      Meanwhile, some time back a group of Christian Palestinians were organizing a movement to advocate remaining part of Israel rather than being under the control of the Palestinian Authority, if there were a longer lasting peace agreement signed.

      If the Palestinians in Israel ever got a solid piece of land to have total control over, I wonder how long it would be before we hear about how the Islamic-leaning government is treating Christians in some areas. Perhaps a long time or never, but perhaps only a few years... Without going too far off-topic, I think Israel is the safest place for a Christian (unless he or she is Palestinian), with Lebanon being the second safest.

  313. Red Cross Discrimination :( by jaredcat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its at times like this that it becomes particularly painful that the American Red Cross does not allow gay men to donate blood.

    1. Re:Red Cross Discrimination :( by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      I know this is politically incorrect, and maybe insensitive, but isn't that behavior reasonable?

    2. Re:Red Cross Discrimination :( by jaredcat · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is reasonable.. not when there is such a need for blood, and when testing methods are so extremely advanced.

    3. Re:Red Cross Discrimination :( by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      How advanced are the testing methods? I was under the impression it's one of those "many days, thousand dollars, 50% right" type of tests.

    4. Re:Red Cross Discrimination :( by xtremex · · Score: 1

      When you consider that 50% of gay males in NYC are HIV+ , you better BELIEVE they will discriminate!
      This is fact! A gay male in NYC has a 85% chance of getting AIDS by the time they are 30 years of age!

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    5. Re:Red Cross Discrimination :( by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Not any more. Read the Safety page
      Also, as for gay blood doners, HIV/AIDs rates have changed in demographic, and now mainly affect the inner city.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    6. Re:Red Cross Discrimination :( by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At times like this, it is also painful that the American Red Cross won't allow anyone who had spent 6 months in Europe to give blood.

      Or anyone who has used non-perscription intravenous drugs. Or has purchased the services of a call girl. Or anyone who has slept with such a person.

      But unfortunately it is necessarly to exclude groups who are at high risk to blood-borne pathogens in order to protect the quality of the blood supply (the blood is tested, but no test is 100% accurate).

      Yes they "discriminate," but it is in the classic definition of the word. The way you discriminate when you refuse to buy milk that is just past it's expiration date, even though it is entirely possible that the milk hasn't really spoiled yet. Maybe you believe that the Red Cross hates gay men and druggies and whoremongers... do you also believe that they hate people who vacation in Europe? What the #@!! do you want, a life where there are no unfortunate consequences to your decisions? A perfectly fair world?

      Fortunately all over the nation people who can donate blood are lining up by the thousands to do so. If you cannot donate blood, perhaps you could at least donate money or time.

      BTW, I would also say that at times like this it is a shame we don't have a good, mass produced blood substitute yet.

    7. Re:Red Cross Discrimination :( by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      nifty

    8. Re:Red Cross Discrimination :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for good reason, you sick moron.

    9. Re:Red Cross Discrimination :( by jaredcat · · Score: 1
      Yes they "discriminate," but it is in the classic definition of the word. The way you discriminate when you refuse to buy milk that is just past it's expiration date, even though it is entirely possible that the milk hasn't really spoiled yet. Maybe you believe that the Red Cross hates gay men and druggies and whoremongers...
      What I object to is putting gay men in the same category as expired milk, druggies, and "whoremongers". I'm no more virulant than any straight man. If they asked "how many sexual partners have you been with?" rather than discriminating against all gay men, there wouldn't be a problem.
    10. Re:Red Cross Discrimination :( by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      Read the stats.
      Gays are much more likely to be infected with HIV and there is nothing wrong with that "discrimination."

    11. Re:Red Cross Discrimination :( by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

      If by "the same category" you mean "people who aren't allowed to give blood," then I assure you that the category is much larger than the items listed. There is a long list of things that will get you disqualified from giving blood, including age, weight, many activities, travel history, and a lot of medical conditions... so you have a lot of company in that category.

      As far as being compared with expired milk. Do you have something against expired milk? Notice I said "milk just past it's expiration date" NOT spoiled milk. Sure, recently expired milk may be at a higher risk of being spoiled, but most milk just past it's expiration date is still safe and palatable if it has been properly refirigerated. Did you ever think that your preconcieved notions about expired milk (probably based on ignorance and a small percentage of the milk population that does spoil on or before its expriation date) might be hurtful to the majority of recently expired milk that is quite capable of still contributing to the world's food and beverage needs? I'm sure that plenty of the recently expired milk that you have hatefully thrown in the trash was far less virulant than any cookie dropped on the floor or sandwich made without disinfecting your hands. And if some of your milk HAS spoiled on or very shortly after its expriation date, have you ever stopped to consider that it might not be the milk's fault... that perhaps you did not keep your referigerator at a low enough temperature or perhaps you were not prompt enough in returning the milk to the rerigerator after using it.

      BTW, why did you put whoremongers in quotes? I suspect that is some other form of hate speech targeted against escort service and massage parlour customers around the world by your narrow minded philosphy that is still stuck in its outdated thinking that seeks to oppress people based on their business/sexual relationships.

  314. Domestic? Think it through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    While I'll agree that many people are jumping on the "they did it" bandwagon right now. I have to say there's just as many people pointing the finger back at domestic terrorists and "look at Oklahoma" as an example. Yes, look to Oklahoma as an example of what domestic terrorism is about. They hit a federal building, housing offices and peoples that only worked WITHIN the US. McVeigh was angry about domestic policy more than international. The Pentagon, WTC, those are not domestic signs of government. Federal court houses, the FBI, IRS, those are the targets of domestic terrorists. Additionally domestic terrorists are in a "Lone Wolf" mode right now, meaning singular activity. They would not have gone against this and gotten 12-20+ people together without the government catching on pretty quick.

    No this was a clear and deliberate targeting of US's international presence.

  315. The choice to be made... by harkal · · Score: 1

    The u.s. has two options now :

    1) Realize the causes of the problem and stop the irrational behavior towards other nations
    2) Response by magnifying that behavior and feedback the whole problem

    Let all hope they "Choose wisely"...

    --
    HarKal
    1. Re:The choice to be made... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      1- You can't prove/disprove the correctness of policy through mass-murder. That's dumb. If you let an incident like this influence policy, then you are allowing a dangerous (and truely irrational) precident.

      2- Negative feedback to a system makes it stable. (Remember BIBO stability and all that from engineering?) I hate to think about where this is all going, but apparently bin Laden w/ Afganistan has just started WWIII. :'( I pray to God that it won't escilate to include the whole middle east (or Asia or any other place in the world, for that matter).

      If we don't stand up against the evils of the world, who will? I believe (or at least hope) that the world will unite together (US, UK, China, Japan, you name it) to fight against terrorists and anarchists. It's in everyone's interest to do so.

      (Thoughts and condolences to the families and friends of those effected by yesterday's events. It's beyond comprehension and reason why people would do this. It sickens me to my core.)

    2. Re:The choice to be made... by gimple · · Score: 1

      You are foolish if you really believe: a) America should become isolationist and b) a terrorist attack would change our policies.

    3. Re:The choice to be made... by harkal · · Score: 1

      Forgive me for being foolish but I think that we should take notice of actions and reactions, it is the only way to deal with problems

      --
      HarKal
  316. What does he want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I was just wondering if anyone knows what Bin Laden wants?

    All I know is that the media has painted him as a madman who has sworn to destroy america because it is so free, tolerant and wonderful.
    I don't believe anyone with any intelligence will buy that for one second (although the american populace does, by and large, seem to believe that some countries hate america because it so lurrvely).

    Anyone have any good links to sites which actually try and think about his motives? maybe even ones biased towards his cause, at least then we might get a clearer view of why people are willing to die for it.
    ----
    p

    1. Re:What does he want? by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      I've been hearing from the news that he hates our culture--open sex, money grubbing, etc.

      But, yes, some people hate us because we're "so free." When Russia became a capatalist nation, many of it's people felt "out in the cold" so to speak. Under communism they had guaranteed jobs and a very watchfull eye on crime, but now they're worrying about how to get jobs and how crime control is even possible without an oppressive state. The reaction during the changes was, "And this is BETTER?!"

      Many Arab nations are similar. They don't think it's possible that crime can be controlled without the government into everyone's business. (Well, the US isn't a good example of it working, but everyone else is.) These smaller nations are THANKFULL that they are being oppressed and hate us because we are not.

      It's screwey, but that's the way it is.

    2. Re:What does he want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wants the US out of Saudi Arabia, I think, amongst other things. That's probably the most concrete of the things he wants.

  317. OK NOW THIS IS SCARY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    According to this statement from a senator, the american people should forgo a few freedoms to insure security. Big Brother is COMING PEOPLE!!

    " ``This is a war situation we're in,'' Sen. Charles Grassley (news - bio - voting record), R-Iowa, said, adding that Tuesday's tragedy likely would alter Americans' sense of security and lead them to forgo some freedoms for added safety in the future. "

    Its tragic what happened, but our freedoms are about to be tested and/or removed.

  318. Palestine by datarat · · Score: 1

    It's sad to think that the US has been the catalyst for peace between Israel and Palestine, and the Palestinians don't see it that way.

    Unfortunately, I think that shortly they will realize how much we've been calming the Israelis.

    --
    If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  319. Fifth plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yesterday evening the CBC mentioned, again, on the fifth plane that crashed, but again did not provide the location (or the circumstances). American news had reported on it earlier yesterday but then stopped reporting on it. Nobody claimed it was a rumor; they just stopped talking about it. (I'm not the conspiracy type and I'm not suggesting anything by this -- I'm just reporting on what I heard and didn't hear.)


    Any updates on this today?

    1. Re:Fifth plane by madeye+the+younger · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe that was the Korean airliner forced down in Canada. It did NOT crash. Its emergency beacon was activated, reportedly for a 'low fuel' indicator, and someone with common sense AND authority had it landed & checked out. Good show.

    2. Re:Fifth plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not the plane that I'm talking about. The CBC mentioned the fifth plane crash hours after the Korean planes had landed. The crash itself, I believe, happened earlier than the Korean plane landing.

    3. Re:Fifth plane by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

      There was a rumor of a 5th crash near Camp David that turned out to be false.

      If an extra plane goes down they won't be able to hide it. A lot of people will be missing.

  320. Mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice of all these people to put up mirrors
    of the various bits of news, but how are these
    mirrors going to be useful if the majority of
    people hitting the news sites don't know about
    them? Somehow, I think the various news sites
    need to put into action a plan to have some kind
    of distribution system set up for instances like
    what happened yesterday.

  321. Air cover continues today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Air Cover over Boston continues this morning.

  322. Unforseen Sleepers. by Lord_Myron · · Score: 1

    Terrorist have for years used "sleepers". These would be young children trained and brain washed. They are then sent to the US, Canada, and other countries. They blend in get education and regular jobs. Once all the sleepers make it to the places they need to be, they recieve a call, or message and bang. The terrorists could have been the pilot, co-pilot, or any memeber of the flight crew. The resources need for this now really are reduced. All it took was time.

    1. Re:Unforseen Sleepers. by ProfessorPuke · · Score: 1

      Yeesh, and you know this HOW? By reading "The Manchurian Candidate", probably. Even it it were possible for a child to maintain a suicidal hypnotic suggestion for decades, there's no need to go to all that trouble. You can send clearheaded, adult agents into a position to commandeer a plane in just weeks. Why wait years for the same result??

    2. Re:Unforseen Sleepers. by be-fan · · Score: 2

      He probably read Clancy's "Executive Orders." In it, a secret service agent was a "sleeper" and tried to assasinate the president.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:Unforseen Sleepers. by pyz · · Score: 1

      You might be overestimating his abilities here - there was also a movie on this, Chares Bronson vs. russian 'sleeping' agents.

      chrs

      pyz

  323. Large mirror at www.crystalflame.net by Fiery · · Score: 2, Informative

    www.crystalflame.net is mirroring as much as I can possibly find, and linking to the large mirrors that aren't easily mirrorable.

  324. Irritating Rhetoric by datarat · · Score: 1

    I love your generalizations and inaccuracies. This is the biggest piece of reactionary crap I've seen posted yet.

    In every conflict there is a side. The US has intervened in many conflicts, often at the request of one of those sides. Inevitably, the other side views us as the enemy.

    Do you think that the Kuwaiti are complaining because we parked a carrier group off the coast of Iraq? Regardless of oil, do you think it was right for the citizenry there to be subjected to brutal torture and treatment?

    I'm not going to attempt a point by point disagreement here, as you've been amazingly vague. But realize that in EVERY conflict that we've been involved, there were those who were native to the area who WANTED us there.

    --
    If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    1. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US army has been an almost universally incompetent bully, ever since Doug McArthur left it's ranks. Inchon Leap was the last well executed battle the US has had a hand in. Besides the gulf "war" the US has not won a single major engagement since WW2. The polica action against Iraq was one by overwhelming force of arms -- a WW3 sized international army against a single nation that was already in retreat.

      As for intervening, the US record of intervening for purposes of peacekeeping is positively lamentable, from their aborted attempt to assassinate that warlord in Somalia (acting, I add, outside the UN task forces command), to their attempt to resolve the Bosnia situation using aerial bombardment. The US army is incapbable of winning wars.

      May I ask which of the serbs and croats you bombed wanted you there?

      The US army's growth has been a result of the single economic policy that has had the appearance of producing results for the US: arms dealing. Since the US can only sell arms overseas in equal quantities to those purchased by the domestic military, the US army has been forced to grow immensely, to support a global arms trade that exists largely to hide the fact that the US industrial base has been crumbling since 1973.

      The US created the global arms industry. Every nation the US imposes sanctions on is forced to develop it's own arms industry, and we have another player in the game, selling knock-off AK-47s and other things. SCUDs for instance.

      The last quarter of this century has had the failure of US foreign and economic policy stamped all over it. Nixon and Reagan set in motion the events that brought about the WTC disaster. This is not over. Worse is to come.

    2. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by gethane · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a bigger load of bunk. The jealousy of others never ceases to amaze me. Just drop dead please, and do the world a favor.

      And you are so true to your name. I've never understood why people felt the need to post something without using their fake internet name! What? you don't want your little internet community to hate you in the morning for your ridiculous views? Suck it up, be a man, and post your goddamned name.

    3. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 1

      OK. Feel any better?

      You should read John Ralston Saul's "Voltaire's Bastards". He might not be 100% correct, but it is incredibly well-referenced, and little of what I said falls far from his assessment of the global situation.

      --

      Denial isn't just a river in Italy

    4. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by datarat · · Score: 1

      So parroting a published author makes you an authority? Garbage gets published every day, and just because you happen to agree with the author's views doesn't mean that it's a truth.

      As far as being incredibly well-referenced: I know a lot of televangelists who reference the Bible constantly. It doesn't make them Holy.

      But let's deal with the situation at hand. Are you implying that we got what we deserved, and that we're going to get more of it and should just take it because we're such bad people?

      I don't know about you, but that just doesn't work for me.

      --
      If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    5. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The US army has been an almost universally incompetent bully, ever since Doug McArthur left it's ranks. Inchon Leap was the last well executed battle the US has had a hand in.



      Y'know, I love people like you, who don't bother to read, or understand, the data. Douglas MacArther was never a "great" general. He was a f*cking caesar, without the tactical/operational/strategic vision to match. He f*cked up in Washington DC in 1932 (look at what he did to the Bonus Marchers, vs. what he was ordered to do [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/macarthur/peopleeven ts/pandeAMEX89.html), he f*cked up in the Phillipines in 1941-42, he f*cked up in New Guinea in 1942-44, he f*cked up _again_ in the Phillipines in 1944-45, he f*cked up in Korea in 1950, and finally, he picked a Constitutional-level fight with the President of the US, and got himself forcibly, permanently retired.



      On the flip side, the US has done reasonably well in battles since 1950. The Battle of 73 Easting is probably an excellent example. A US Armored Cavalry _company_, with support from 2 more companies, routed and destroyed an _intact_ Iraqi Republic Guard Armored Brigade. 1:4 odds, against the attack, and they won. The only comparable performance of armor was the Israeli defensive stand on the Golan Heights at the beginning of the 1973 War - 2 Armored Bdes (in prepared defensive positions) against 3 Syrian divisions.

      Or do you prefer to look at Infantry engagements? Look at the Battle of the Ia Drang Valley (http://www.lzxray.com/overview.htm), where a 450 man battalion held out against 2000 NVA regulars.

      Or do you want "well-executed" battles? What's your criteria? Combat performance? Victory on the field? Something else? Or is it just that _you don't know_, and are looking for a criteria that'll make the US military look stupid.

      Besides the gulf "war" the US has not won a single major engagement since WW2.

      Really? Panama doesn't count? Nothing that happened in Vietnam counts? None of the _three_ major "engagement" victories in Korea?

      The polica action against Iraq was one by overwhelming force of arms -- a WW3 sized international army against a single nation that was already in retreat.

      Ummm, in case you haven't figured it out, the objective of the exercise is to win, not to fight fair. If you check out the order of battle, it started as a relatively fair fight, forcewise. For example, VII Corps + attached units roughly matched the IRG in force size. The allied forces lined up along the border (1 Syrian division, 1 Eyptian division, 1.5 Saudi division-equivalents, the GCC Bde, 2 Marine divisions) were _outnumbered_ by the Iraqi forces in the Kuwaiti border defenses.

      The fact that the Iraqis threw away almost every single advantage they had (and they had a number) is their own fault. They had large, fixed divisions, with no mobility - something the US military has been exploiting on the attack for 60 years (look at how many troops the US sent against Germany in France - the Germans outnumbered the Allied forces, but the US forces had greatly superior mobility). The US played the battlefield intelligence game with great abandon - 2 Iraqi divisions were tied down in beach defenses looking at a SEAL team diversion and a Marine Bde assault that never occured - the Marines were brought ashore to reinforce 1MEF's regular ground assault.

      Exploiting stupidity is a great way to win wars - ask Guderian whether he thought it would have been fairer to attack the Maginot line in 1940, vs. going through the Ardennes forest.

      As for intervening, the US record of intervening for purposes of peacekeeping is positively lamentable, from their aborted attempt to assassinate that warlord in Somalia (acting, I add, outside the UN task forces command), to their attempt to resolve the Bosnia situation using aerial bombardment. The US army is incapbable of winning wars.

      Really? Ask Kuwait/Iraq about that. Ask the guys who're guarding Slobodan Milosevic in the Hague about that. Yeah, we lose 'em, too - we weren't fighting the same war the other side did in Vietnam, and went home because of it. But "incapable"? You should recheck your math.

      May I ask which of the serbs and croats you bombed wanted you there?

      Ok - ask Croats if they wanted US/allied assistance. You'll find a sea of hands. Or you can ask the same question of Bosnians. Or Ablanian Kosovars, whose oppression was what got Milosevic started, years before he became well-known in the west. (PS - dumbass - learn the players before you start spouting off).

      The US created the global arms industry.

      {snicker} So, nobody sold/etc. weapons on a large scale before the US, eh? Would you, oh enlightened one, care to explain why the most common military long-arm in WW1 was the German Mauser or variation thereof? Why _even the US Army_ used a Mauser variant - the Springfield '03, and that in fact the Mauser and its variants were still the most popular longarm until WW2? Or shall we go back further, say 100 years, and ask why damn near everyone who used a flintlock in 1800 used either a British one (India-pattern Brown Bess, generally), or a French one, or copies thereof? Including the US Army, btw.

      Every nation the US imposes sanctions on is forced to develop it's own arms industry,

      Like Libya, whose military consists of Soviet/Russian equipment? Or Syrian, whose military consists of Soviet/Russian equipment? Or Iran, whose air force consists of a mix of modern French/German equipment, reconditioned US equipment, and modern Russian equipment? How about North Korea, whose military consists of a mix of Soviet/Russian/Chinese equipment? South Africa is about the only good case you've got - and they did it because _everyone_ imposed sanctions on them. Notice that as soon as the sanctions were lifted, they started shopping around - their domestically-produced/rebuilt Cheetahs are going to be retired, apparently in favor of new Swedish birds. Or their navy, which is buying German. Their Army is still driving rebuilt British tanks from the 1950s, btw. A lot of their other equipment was co-developed with the Israelis, btw - the R5 and the Galil are essentially identical rifles, with minor modifications for different environments.

      and we have another player in the game, selling knock-off AK-47s and other things. SCUDs for instance.

      Doesn't take sanctions, or US-as-enemy to get that. Belgium (Fabrique Nationale), Singapore (Singapore Arms), and a host of other "allied" countries sell license-produced knockoff weapons all over the world. The AK-47 is simple enough to produce that any country with a small industrial base can - and generally does. Scuds are almost as simple - since they're basically a V-2 derivative, the basic design is a fundamental first step to a long-range rocket. Look at how many countries produce battlefield MRLs - US, Germany, Britain, France, Russia, China, Egypt, Chile, Israel, South Africa, India, Pakistan, Japan, Korea, and Singapore all come to mind immediately. How many of those are "enemy" states?

      The last quarter of this century has had the failure of US foreign and economic policy stamped all over it. Nixon
      and Reagan set in motion the events that brought about the WTC disaster. This is not over. Worse is to come.

    6. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 1

      It makes me far more informed than you. I can tell the difference between "garbage" and non-garbage far better than you can. I can also think for myself and decide what makes sense and what doesn't. You probably still think copyright violation is justified.

      Second paragraph not worth responding to. If you're going to imply that I made an appeal to authority in your forst paragraph, don't make a weak analogy in your second. It makes you look stupid.

      I don't think you got what you deserved. I do think this is not surprising, and you brought it on yourselves. "Deserved" doesn't enter into it.

      Does thinking work for you?

      --

      Denial isn't just a river in Italy

    7. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by datarat · · Score: 1

      Once again, you make numerous statement for which you have no basis for fact.

      I find it interesting that your opinion, which you have openly stated is derived directly from the works of another, is qualified as free thinking. Meanwhile, my opinion which is derived from an unspecified (in my comments) culling of news articles and sources is considered not thinking.

      Again, I struggle to see how you come to that conclusion. Perhaps it's only because you disagree with me that you need to try to debase my intelligence.

      Your response to the second paragraph (even though you say it's not a response) just shows that you didn't understand the analogy, or were offended by my reference to the Bible. I suspected that would be a mistake, and I find it funny that you seized on it. Personally, I'm not remotely Christian, but I thought you'd get the point.

      Let me rephrase it then. There are a lot of incredibly convincing works that prove that space travel is impossible, men never landed on the moon, and that the Earth is flat. The Greeks had massive amounts of proof that everything can be broken down into just 4 basic elements.

      Need I go on?

      However, I apologize for the assumption I made. I'll even admit that I agree with you on one point:

      We brought this on ourselves.

      We have allowed countless attacks with minimal retribution. We've lived in a soap bubble where we were protected from the horrors that Britain and Israel and countless other nations must deal with on a daily basis.

      Do you honestly believe that if we had spent the last 50 years curled up in our corner of the world that we'd be loved universally? That speaks more of your naivete than it does of my ability to distinguish garbage from gold.

      Lastly, I'll agree with you again. "Deserved" doesn't enter the equation at all. Actions have consequences. Keep that in mind.

      I still want to know why it makes you more informed than I.

      --
      If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    8. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid it's still a weak analogy, no matter how you make it. You have to prove that the book I mentioned is in the same class as the ones you have. You can't do this without at least leafing through the book. By your argument, anything that has ever been written in a book is subject to intense suspicion, sight unseen, on the grounds that some people were wrong in print once.

      I do recommend that you read it if you ever have the chance. It's a well written polemic, and very enlightening, even if you don't agree with his conclusions.

      Besides that, thanks for understanding that I am not making moral judgements or statements, merely discussing the causes of the tragedy.

      --

      Denial isn't just a river in Italy

    9. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 1

      And here I was under the impression that it was MacArthur's tactics that won the Pacific war! Oh boy is there egg on my face!

      Besides MacArthur and Patton, the US has had very few original military thinkers this century. This is why you guys heavily favour aerial bombardment as a tactic. It's something the chinese are counting upon when developing scenarios for possible engagements with the US, as well as the apparent US squeamishness about casualties.

      Panama doesn't dount as a major engagement, you lost vietnam, and you haven't won the Korean war yet, either. So my statement about US inability to win wars still stands. My points about the gulf war were made to indicate the level of overwhelming involvement the US needs in order to win.

      And, despite your apparent military knowledge, you know nothing about the global arms trade. Prior to the mid-sixties and early seventies, selling arms overseas was widely considered unacceptable. It was the US that made the global arms trade the biggest industry in the world. It is certainly the biggest earner in the US, accounting for a full quarter of your GDP.

      You really need to check your facts. Libya is one of the earlist examples of sanctions causing nations to become arms dealers. They have a long history of selling armaments. Israel's arms industry began after the French imposed brief sanctions. Over 27 third world countries are dealing armaments. At least eleven sell fighter aircraft. This is a state of affairs that has come into being since the US entered arms trading.

      --

      Denial isn't just a river in Italy

    10. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • I love your generalizations and inaccuracies. This is the biggest piece of reactionary crap I've seen posted yet

      The question was: why us?

      My answer was to that question, and it is accurate. If you get involved in a conflict with two sides, at least one of them is going to hate you.

      Your point that one side usually wants the US there is both completely correct and utterly irrelevant, as the other side doesn't, and as long as you keep policing the world, people will hate and fear you.

      And I forgot to add: because many US citizens seem totally unable to comprehend that what they now find absolutely intolerable when applied to them was also absolutely intolerable when applied to others.

      This looks like US bashing, but really it isn't. It's just that so many of us saw this coming for so long that we skipped straight past the shock and the outrage and thought: "Welcome to the way the rest of the world feels. Scared and vulnerable." It's a nasty feeling, isn't it?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    11. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • The jealousy of others never ceases to amaze me

        Please understand that much of the world isn't jealous of the USA. It hates and fears it. The way you feel now, the revulsion, the outrage, the anger, that's how good, decent family folks in many countries have felt about the USA for years.

        They don't want to be you, any more than you want to be them. They just want to see you dead, just as you want to see people who you disagree with you dead.

        That's vile, isn't it? Well, welcome to the big wide world.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    12. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Are you implying that we got what we deserved

      The USA suffered the inevitable consequences of its actions. The horror and the barbarity is shocking. Just as shocking as it is when it happens in other countries, out of sight of CNN.

      • and that we're going to get more of it

      Probably

      • and should just take it because we're such bad people?

      You don't have to. Show that you're a world leader. You can't make people stop hating you by bombing them into submission. You can make a choice, right here and now.

      You can take the easy way out, and make the world so afraid of you that other countries will jail or kill anyone who is even likely to draw your attention. Every so often, you'll have to destroy a city or two, just to remind them that you mean business.

      Or you can say that enough is enough, pull back the aircraft carriers, and let regional conflicts resolve themselves within that region. It will be tough, it will take a long time, and your arms industry and politicians will have to find other quick fixes to keep them in business.

      It's your choice.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    13. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Do you honestly believe that if we had spent the last 50 years curled up in our corner of the world that we'd be loved universally

      You'd be hated and feared a lot less, which is largely the same thing.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    14. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by datarat · · Score: 1

      I really do think you're wrong. We tried a policy of non-involvement and isolationism once before, and the result was World War II.

      The weapons are more destructive now, and the stakes are higher. We, as a world, can no longer afford the luxury of ignoring everything outside our borders.

      --
      If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    15. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • I really do think you're wrong. We tried a policy of non-involvement and isolationism once before, and the result was World War II

      The one that ran from 1942-1945 (as I'm now increasingly hearing on gonzo US history programming), or the 1939-1945 one that the USA seriously considered joining on the Axis side before Hitler really lost the plot and it became apparent that Japan wasn't prepared to share the Pacific with the USA?

      Check your history before you flame this.

      I do agree that the stakes are higher now, which is exactly why the USA cannot keep policing the world. I honestly believe that we are seeing a watershed where the USA can decide whether it wants to get along with everyone, or whether it wants to be a global dictatorship. I can't see a third option, unless you count more of this appalling carnage as an option.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    16. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by datarat · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about the fact that before 1937 Roosevelt and the American Congress were isolationist.

      For FDR that changed in 1937 with the Panay incident.

      In fact, if you'd care to look a little farther back, The US entry to WW1 was also preceded by a period of isolationism.

      50 years is a long time to not have major conflict (no, I'm not counting the cold war) between the great powers of the world. The last two times we were isolationists the gap was considerably shorter.

      --
      If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    17. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • 50 years is a long time to not have major conflict

      Korea, Vietnam and the Gulf were minor skirmishes? A higher tonnage of iron bombs was dropped on Iraq during the Gulf conflict (sorry, war, we won that one) than during the whole of WWII! The millions of Iraqi civilian dead (mostly through sanctions and lack of access to basic medical care) is no less of a human tragedy than if they'd been innocent US citizens.

      The people who carried out the WTC murders see themselves as soldiers, and have viewed themselves as being at war with the USA for years. They point out that the USA has been deliberatly targetting civilian populations since 1943, and that they are retaliating in kind using the only means available. Their actions are vile and cowardly, but that doesn't excuse similar actions by the USA.

      The hijackings were utterly abhorent, but no more so than what the US has been doing to civilian populations for the past 50 years directly and indirectly, all in the interests of avoiding a direct military confrontation with an equally matched opponent.

      I just point this out, I'm not necessarily condemning it. The fact is that by policing the world and maintaining the balance of power, the USA has stopped the middle east or Balkans going up in flames and dragging everyone in. It probably was lesser of two evils, but that doesn't mean that it wasn't evil, or that we should pretend that the USA isn't also guilty of appalling crimes against humanity.

      This looks like USA bashing, but that's not the intention. The only aim is to ask US citizens to take a good long honest look at what the US has been doing, and ask themselves whether they are ready to step up to the line again and keep making enemies as well as friends every time that they pick a side to support.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    18. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by datarat · · Score: 1

      We seem to have found the major point of deviation. Past this point I see no further chance of having a useful discussion.

      Yes, Korea, Nam, and the Gulf conflicts were not on the scale of World War II. This is by no means belittling the sacrifices made during any of those conflicts, but in SCOPE they are far different from WWII.

      US Citizens can take a long look at what the US has been doing, but that doesn't mean that we'd find a better way to do any of it, and in case you haven't noticed, no one is particularly interested in apologies at this point.

      This sounds like blind faith nationalism, but that's not the situation. The only aim is to try to make you understand that I, personally, and we, as a nation, cannot let this go unremarked. We have reacted with exquisite control in every previous attack of this sort (if not this magnitude) and done very little other than find the individuals responsible.

      That's over now. Now we'll have a campaign to rid the world of the organizations that support these people. It's not going to be pretty, but neither is shoveling body parts into a body bag for later reassembly.

      One last thing. The US has NOT been targetting civilian populations since 1943. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were sad events, but warning was given which the Japanese Government refused to believe at the time. Since then there has been no other such a massive loss of life in a single attack.

      The Sanctions in Iraq are a simple matter, and I can't believe that you're naive enough to bring them up. That's a lot like a dog blaming you because he yanked too hard on his leash. People have died during the sanctions because Saddam Hussein refused to capitulate. The UN thought that sanctions were more humane. Are you now saying that it would have been more merciful to roll into Bagdad (sp?) with tanks? Or perhaps we should have just let the Iraqi army roll across Kuwait, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia.

      Never mind. Different discussion for a different time.

      --
      If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    19. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • The US has NOT been targetting civilian populations since 1943. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were sad event

      I said 1943. At that time, the European powers were still trying to precision bomb targets. It was the USA that introduced the idea of area bombing in civilian areas. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were just the ultimate evolution of that, unless you count the large scale use of chemical weapons in Vietnam as being equally abhorent.


      • The Sanctions in Iraq are a simple matter, and I can't believe that you're naive enough to bring them up

      I'm sorry? The fuck? You tell that to the good, decent family folks dying in Iraq right now through lack of basic medical care. You ask them who they blame, Saddam or the USA, and then tell me that sanctioning a country back to the stone age on the deranged belief that they will blame their own government is "a simple matter".


      • Are you now saying that it would have been more merciful to roll into Bagdad (sp?) with tanks?

      Yes. What's your problem with that? If the aim of the USA was to resolve the situation rather than just restore the status quo, why stop at the Iraqi border? The loss of civilian life could hardly have been higher than it has been under the sanctions, and with the continuing genocide of the marsh arabs.


      • Or perhaps we should have just let the Iraqi army roll across Kuwait, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia.

      Stop creating straw men. My preference is the other way; if you're going to set up Hussein as the Big Bad Wolf, then the situation isn't resolved until you remove him. Anything else is rank hypocrisy.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    20. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by datarat · · Score: 1

      I don't believe you. You tell us that our foreign policy is wrong and corrupt and we should get out of international politics and then have the balls to tell me that we should have rolled in there and deposed him despite the outcry of the international community, the UN, and the Arab Nations in particular?

      We stopped because of international pressure. The UN proposed the economic sanctions as an alternative to military action.

      So yeah. The Fuck. We played by the rules and now we're the bad guys. Maybe you're not aware that public opinion in the US at the time of Desert Storm was to push Saddam's skanky ass into the ocean.

      Stop blaming the US for capitulation to the requests of it's supposed "allies."

      --
      If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    21. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just want to see you dead, just as you want to see people who you disagree with you dead.

      There have been a lot of intelligent things said mixed in the threads on this topic. This isn't one of them.

      You tend to oversimplify the situation and at the same time look at "what the American people want" with an overly-cynical point of view many times.

      Obviously it's your right to do this; it may come naturally to you being an obviously intelligent person from Scotland (hence not an American).

      I believe I've been able to take the gist of your message to heart, and I think it's fundamentally an important one, even though difficult to take in a time of very high emotions.

      But saying the equivalent that the American people wish for the murder of civilians is plain wrong. No American wants any innocent civilian to die anywhere in the world, particularly due to the actions of his country's government. Now we can get into again the analyses of the effects of taking sides, i.e. when we take action at times either way civilians will die. I think I've covered my point of view in a really long post at a higher level on this thread (anyway maybe nobody will read it or this one either). My point is now that Americans don't want innocent civilians to die, ever.

      The fact that this does in fact happen is obviously something we need to come to terms with and hopefully review our foreign policy as I have written about in detail in the other long post talking about unintended consequences, etc, etc and ensuring that our foreign policy always gives the common man in the areas affected his properer place, etc, etc.

      I guess this thread is dead anyway but that's what I think.

      David Nichols

    22. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • I don't believe you. You tell us that our foreign policy is wrong and corrupt and we should get out of international politics and then have the balls to tell me that we should have rolled in there and deposed him despite the outcry of the international community, the UN, and the Arab Nations in particular

      I'm saying: pick one.

      The rank hypocrisy of the US government (not the people, stop making that confusion) sickens me. They'd rather have a million civilians die off camera in Iraq than lose one US serviceman on camera.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    23. Re:Irritating Rhetoric by datarat · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your opinion Rogerborg. I'm not going to follow this any more as I suspect I've been baited. Instead of answering my statements you merely use inflammatory statements to keep the discussion going.

      We did pick one. We stayed in the international politics game by acceding to the wishes of other nations by backing off of Iraq and imposing United Nations sanctions.

      I'm sorry you're sick. Get well soon.

      --
      If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  325. Gas Prices by FatalException · · Score: 1

    Silly fools.

    I live in Louisville, KY.

    Yesterday the news was reporting that gas was going to be $4 by this morning and $5 by tomorrow.

    Last night I drove by the gas station by my house. Regular was $1.69. There were 20 car long lines at the pumps.

    This morning it was $1.64. Five cents less.

    And there were no lines....

    gg paranoia

  326. Transcript of Tom Clancy on CNN by kikta · · Score: 2, Informative

    I logged this from CNN's IRC live feed [edited slightly for readability], while I was watching it on TV. He says that the evnts of yesterday wouldn't be believable in a book (and he's right, of course). I especially love the way they switch to New York as soon as he points a finger at them...

    Session Start: Tue Sep 11 17:20:07 2001
    *** Now talking in #CNN_Newsfeed
    *** Topic is 'Live CNN Closed Captioning'
    JOINING ME HERE IN THE
    WASHINGTON STUDIO, A
    FAMILIAR NAME, A FAMILIAR
    FACE, BEST-SELLING AUTHOR OF
    SO MANY NOVELS.
    TOM CLANCY.
    MYSTERIES AT THE HEART, TOM
    CLANCY, AT THE MILITARY
    COMMUNITY, THE INTELLIGENCE
    COMMUNITY, PEOPLE IN OUR
    NEWSROOM HAVE BEEN SAYING
    WHAT IS THINK IS LIKE RIGHT
    OUT OF A TOM CLANCY NOVEL.
    BUT HAVE YOU -- COULD YOU
    POSSIBLY IMAGINE SOMETHING
    LIKE THIS TO WRITE ABOUT?
    >> NO.
    ONE OF THE PROBLEMS WITH
    BEING A WRITER OF FICTION,
    IS YOU CAN'T KEEP WUP ALL OF
    THE MAD MAN IN THE WORLD, AS
    MUCH AS YOU TRY.
    AND I -- I FRANKLY WOULD
    HAVE THOUGHT THAT THIS WAS
    NOT A CREDIBLE THREAT TO THE
    HAVE FOUR SEPARATE PEOPLE TO
    DECIDE TO COMMIT SUICIDE IN
    THE SAME WAY IN THE SAME
    MORNING.
    JUDY: WHY NOT?
    >> BECAUSE GIVING UP YOUR
    OWN LIFE IS NOT WHAT YOU DO.
    EVERYONE IS ASSUMING THAT
    THESE ARE ISLAMIC TERRORIST,
    IF SO, THEY HAVE DEFIED
    THEIR OWN RELIGION.
    ISLAM DOES NOT PERMIT
    SUICIDE, IT SAYS THAT YOU GO
    TO HEATING OIL IF DO YOU
    SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
    JUDY: WE HAVE SEEN THE
    SUICIDE BOMBINGS IN THE
    MIDDLE EAST AND ISRAEL.
    >> JUDY WE SAW PEOPLE IN
    NORTHERN IRELAND CATHOLICS
    ACTING LOOISH LIKE SAVIDGES
    AND PROTESTANTS ACTING LIKE
    SAVIDGES AND MUSLIMS ACTING
    LIKE SAVIDGES.
    IT'S BECAUSE THEY ARE FOOLS.
    JUDY: WHAT DOES THIS SAY
    NOW?
    YOU'VE -- YOU'VE DONE A LOT
    OF REPORTING.
    NOT NOT ONLY WRITE FICTION,
    YOU DO A LOT OF REPORTING
    FROM INSIDE OF THE
    INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.
    INSIDE OF THE MILITARY
    COMMUNITY.
    WHAT SDL DOES THIS SAY HOW
    WELL-PREPARED AS A COUNTRY?
    >> EVERYONE ASK THAT KIND OF
    A QUESTION WHEN THINGS GO
    WRONG, AND YOU DON'T ASK THE
    QUESTION WHEN THINGS DON'T
    GO RIGHT AND THE REASON IS
    YOU CAN'T TELL WHEN THINGS
    GO RIGHT IN THE BUSINESS.
    ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I
    HAVE BEEN SAYING FOR YEARS,
    WE NEED TO UPGRADE THE HUMAN
    CAPABILITY -- THE HUMAN
    INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES IN
    THE CIA.
    BECAUSE YOU CAN DO A LOT OF
    SATELLITES AND A LOT OF
    EAVESDROPPING TECHNIQUES,
    BUT YOU CAN'T -- YOU CAN'T
    FIND OUT WHAT IS IN A
    PERSON'S MIND EXCEPT BY
    TALKING TO THAT PERSON.
    AND SO THE AGENCY NEEDS TO
    INCREASE ITS HUMAN -- IT'S
    HUMAN INTELLIGENCE
    CAPABILITY.
    THE CIA HAS ABOUT 20,000
    EMPLOIT ELESS OF A -- IT
    SHOULD BE DOUBLED.
    BUT AMERICA AS A NATION
    DOESN'T LOVE OR INTELLIGENCE
    COMMUNITY.
    AND CERTAINLY THE NEWS MEDIA
    DOESN'T LOVE OUR
    INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.
    JUDY: I WILL HAVE TO
    INTERRUPT TOM CLANCY, I AM
    TOLD AARON BROWN IN NEW YORK
    HAS A DEVELOPMENT.
    AARON?
    AARON: WELL, JUDY, ANOTHER
    IN THE LAST FEW SECOND,
    ANOTHER BUILDING, WE WILL
    SPECULATE CAREFULLY HERE
    THAT THERE WAS BUILDING
    NUMBER 7.
    ONE OF THE BUILDINGS IN
    SUPPORT OF THE WORLD TRADE
    CENTER TOWERS HAS COLLAPSED.
    THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE BEEN
    WITH US FOR A WHILE, YOU CAN
    SEE, INDEED, THE SMOKE COLOR
    HAS CHANGED, GOTTEN MUCH
    LIGHTER.
    SO WE BELIEVE THAT YET
    ANOTHER BUILDING, THIS WOULD
    BE THE THIRD BUILDING HAS
    COLLAPSED.
    LIKELY, BUILDING NUMBER
    SEVEN.
    ALTHOUGH, WE ALSO HEARD THAT
    THERE WERE PROBLEMS AT
    BUILDING NUMBER FIVE.
    AND IT'S POSSIBLE THAT THAT
    ONE WENT DOWN, TOO.
    AGAIN, ANOTHER BUILDING IN
    THE WORLD TRADE CENTER
    COMPLEX APPEARS TO NOW HAVE
    CAVED IN.
    AFTER THESE ATTACKS.
    JUDY?
    JUDY: AARON, WE'RE LOOKING
    AT THESE PICTURES, TOM
    CLANCY AND I AS WE SIT HERE
    IN THE WASHINGTON STUDIO,
    AND JUST AS A COME BACK TO
    TOM CLANCY.
    I WANT TO READ JUST A
    PORTION OF THE STATEMENT
    ISSUED BY SECRETARY OF STATE
    POWELL, COLIN POWELL CALLING
    THESE ATTACKS A TERRIBLE
    TRAGEDY, TERRIBLE TRAGEDY
    BEFALLEN NOT JUST MY NATION,
    BUT ALL OF THE NATIONS OF
    THIS REGIONAL, THE NATIONS.
    WORLD.
    ALL THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN
    DEMOCRACY.
    TOM CLANCY, YOU WERE SAYING
    SURE, WE CAN ASK THESE
    QUESTIONS ABOUT FAILED
    SECURITY, FAILED
    INTELLIGENCE, WHEN THINGS GO
    WRONG.
    BUT WE HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO
    THE ASK THESE
    QUESTIONS, DON'T WE?
    >> HAVE YOU THE RIGHT TO THE
    SAY WHATEVER YOU WANT.
    IT'S A PRACTICAL MATTER OF
    ONE OF THE THINGS THAT YOU
    WANT TO DO, IF YOU OF THE
    WANT TO PREVENT THIS IS TO
    BUILD UP YOUR LINE OF THE
    DEFENSE.
    AND FIRST LINE OF DEFENSE IS
    THE INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITY.
    WHEN OF THE LAST TIME THAT
    THE CNN OR THE NEWS MEDIA
    ISF SAID IN GENERAL TO PUT
    MORE MONEY OF THE
    INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INTO
    THE CIA.
    YOU WOULD NEVER DO THAT.
    JUDY: WE WOULDN'T TAKE THE
    SIDE IN THAT IN TERMS OF
    WHAT DO YOU FUND.
    >> THAT YOU HAVE FAILED.
    WHY NOT HELP THEM SUCCEED
    FOR A WHILE.
    JUDY: ARE YOU SAYING THAT
    THEY ARE SIGNIFICANTLY
    UNDERFUNDED IN THAT AREA NOT
    JUST THE CIA BUT THE FBI?
    >> HUMAN INTELLIGENCE IS
    DEEMPHASIZED.
    THE FBI'S JOB -- IS --
    >> SPYING IS WHAT WE ARE
    TALKING ABOUT.
    >> THAT'S WHAT THE
    INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS DO, IS
    THEY SPY.
    ANDEI HAS 20,000 EMPLOYEES.
    ABOUT 700 OF WHOM ARE
    ACTUALLY SPOOKS.
    AND OF THEM AS MANY AS
    TWO-THIRDS GET OUT AND GET
    OUTSIDE AND DO THE SPOOK
    OPERATIONS AND WE NEED TO DO
    BETTER THAT, MORE THAN THAT
    YOU GATHER THE INFORMATION
    OF THIS TYPE OF PUTTING
    PEOPLE OUT IN THE STREETS.
    SEEING THE COPS GATHERED
    INFORMATION FROM THE
    INFORMANTS.
    THIS ISN'T ROCKET SCIENCE.
    A NUMBER OF HIRING THE
    PEOPLE AND LETTING THEM DO
    THE WORK.
    I HAVE TO TURN IT BACK OVER
    TO THE AARON.

    1. Re:Transcript of Tom Clancy on CNN by Fesh · · Score: 2

      Do we have good evidence that the person on the other end of that interview was in fact Tom Clancy? If he spells like that all the time he must have one hell of an editor... Or maybe just caught up in the emotion of the moment?

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  327. The Engineer in charge of construction by brad3378 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I found this link last night when /. was /.ed
    http://www.asce.org/news/pr042900_opalfasullo.cfm

    It's a link about the main engineer involved in the construction of the Twin Towers.

    Although some people may think his team's design was fatally flawed, I believe that the design did it's job. The structure held long enough for what at this time appears to be at least a partial evacuation.

    --

  328. Little picture i found this morning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://four.rh.rit.edu/

  329. They're circling out to Reston VA, near Dulles by wiredog · · Score: 2

    This morning, Wednesday, I can still hear, and see, pairs of them overhead every 15 minutes or so. You know, an F-16 lit by the dawn looks very pretty for being such a deadly machine.

  330. Re:ha ha ha - die American pigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you and fuck jude. I hope we melt your fucking eyes when you animals are bombed.

  331. Re:oh boy.... read this: by roka · · Score: 1

    City of God = NYC
    If you look at it this way:
    Q: What are americans? A: Captialists
    You will see NYC is 'the capitalists city of god'

    Two Brothers = WTC
    Fortress = Pentagon
    It could also be Camp David

    Great Leader = G.Bush
    Bush or America IMHO

    Big City = NYC
    NYC is not yet on fire, just a few buildings ..
    The big city could also mean any other city.

  332. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  333. race summit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    remember the attitude at the race summit? Remember the hate and hypocritical bigotry there? That is EXACTLY what happens when people allow hate to run their lives. It does not matter who is the victim, you cannot substitute one evil with another. YOu can not opperate with inconsistency and self contradiction while you condemn certain select acts of hate in past years where no one is alive that was victim or criminal.... then avoid your own 'side's responsibility and guilt. Enough. YOu liberals and your hate, your hypocricy and your one sided view and forcing of your wills on others ENDS NOW.
    Pick a side... the side for all humanity, or your pathetic little hate filled sides of self concern and hypocricy.

    1. Re:race summit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      YOu liberals and your hate, your hypocricy and your one sided view and forcing of your wills on others ENDS NOW.

      Sorry to disappoint you, but liberals aren't the only people filled with hate, hypocrisy, one-sided viewed and liberals aren't the only people who force their wills on others.

  334. Sick irony: new footage by UberOogie · · Score: 2
    NBC just broadcast newly discovered footage from a fire prevention video that they were filming near the WTC right when the first plane hit. It is entirely new footage of the first plane hitting.

    I can't help but think the fireman in the video was probably one of the first on the scene and one of the casualties.

    --
    "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
  335. Microsoft to blame, soft of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some newspapers have described how anyone can train a person how to fly a Boeing 767 the cheap way - the Microsoft way. Just buy their flight sim, complete with maps of various airports.

    This reminds me of FirstPersonShooters being the reason for various tragic mass killings lately. However,this time, I cannot see how otherwise someone learns how to drive a 767, unless a pilot.

    Hope any upcoming debate stays cool.

  336. Re:su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was mod'd as flamebait? It looks pretty funny to me.

  337. verification please by Stalcair · · Score: 1
    could someone please verify these quotes, and tell me if they really are in the Qur'an?

    "The hour will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews and the Muslims kill them"

    "And kill them wherever you meet them and turn them out from where they have
    turned you out"

    Thank you

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

    1. Re:verification please by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

      I did a search in the Koran, and could not find the first sentence (the hour will come...), but I did find the second one (and kill them...).

    2. Re:verification please by Mubarmij · · Score: 1

      I am muslim. I am not aware of these verses in Quran.

      By the way, my condolences for the Americans on this horrendous act. The perpetuators must be brough before justice, and hopefully soon.. but please, do not just blame my people before there are solid fact.. and even them, blame only those who did this act. Islam is solidly against such acts.

    3. Re:verification please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Islam is solidly against such acts.

      I know Muslims who are against such acts, but would say it is compatible with their religion.

    4. Re:verification please by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Not really. The only provision for violence in Islam is Jihad (Holy War). There are similar provisions in Christianity that were used to justify the Crusades. Both "clauses" are left over from a time when the world was a less civilized place, and fighting wasn't something out of the scope of daily life.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:verification please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry to tell you this but in many parts of the world, fighting still isn't something out of the scope of daily life.

      Just because we can all cuddle together at night doesn't mean everybody else gets to do so.

    6. Re:verification please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, towelhead..

    7. Re:verification please by Delight-Delirium · · Score: 1


      I want to offer my support to what you've said. Some of the reactions that I have seen here and on other forums disgust me. It is the same unthinking desire for violence that drives these attacks on arabs that drove those extremists to commit acts of terrorism. No I am not muslim, I am simply trying to defend a nifty little thing called CIVILIZATION.

    8. Re:verification please by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Sorry to tell you this but in many parts of the world, fighting still isn't something out of the scope of daily life.
      Just because we can all cuddle together at night doesn't mean everybody else gets to do so.
      >>>>>>>
      The rest of the world should just wake up and join the times. Where I come from, one party winning an election would prompt the other party to call for rioting of the populace. This type of behavior is no longer acceptable in the modern world. People's attitudes need to change, and change fundementally. It is easy to say, "Americans can afford to think differently," but honestly, there are several poor countries that enjoy a degree of political and social stability. Besides, those in the middle east don't really have the excuse of poverty, since most middle eastern countries have adequate resources.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  338. found it, Ananova link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's where I read it before. http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_396197.html?m enu=

    "
    Suspected hijacking of Korean plane was false alarm

    A Korean passenger plane forced to land in Canada by military aircraft had not been hijacked as first thought.

    An emergency transponder signal was triggered, but Alaska Governor Tony Knowles said it appeared it was intended to signal low fuel, not a terrorist hijacking.

    Corporal Al Lucier, of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Whitehorse, said the Boeing 747 is believed to have been carrying more than 200 people.

    He said: "(The flight) was escorted in such a fashion because there was communications on the plane that suggested that it could possibly have been a hijacked aircraft."

    The Canoe website reports the US Air Force's Alaska Command scrambled two fighter jets to intercept the airliner 257 kilometres from Anchorage when it was thought it had been hijacked.

    Bob King, an aide to Mr Knowles, said: "We subsequently learned that was not the case.

    "The transponder signal was meant to indicate concerns with fuel condition."

    Mr Lucier said that a Korean cargo plane landed at the airport just before the 747, but that one didn't prompt concern from officials. It too was believed to be low on fuel.

    Military bases just across the border in Alaska were placed on high alert.

    Anchorage police briefly ordered part of Anchorage to be evacuated after flight officials lost contact with the Korean Air Lines flight.

    Story filed: 23:06 Tuesday 11th September 2001

    "

  339. grieved...but a suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that no words can be used to describe my feelings, but I had to post something I was thinking about...

    armed military personel to guard cockpit? perhaps a flight attendant shouldn't have this job.

    My condolences....

    Dan Allen

  340. Who are the more dangerous ? by DeepMind · · Score: 0

    I just was wondering who are the guys to fear. On one side, we have a bunch of well organized terrorists (maybe one thousand guys).
    On the other side, we have millions of "partiot-at-all-price" brainless american guys, ready to iitiate WW3 and to "eradicate all the countries who helped those bastards" (this is a quote from a previous comment), killing one million times more innocent people that the previously mentionned bastards actually killed.

    Sad to say, but if the DEFCON goes one more level up, I would more likely fight against the US than on their side...

    Julien.
    --
    Warning: drinking too much beer while watching Jerry Springer's shows can make you as idiot as an american patriot.

    1. Re:Who are the more dangerous ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just was wondering who are the guys to fear. On one side, we have a bunch of well organized terrorists (maybe one thousand guys).

      On the other side, we have millions of "partiot-at-all-price" brainless american guys, ready to iitiate WW3 and to "eradicate all the countries who helped those bastards" (this is a quote from a previous comment)


      The millions of "partiot-at-all-price" brainless american guys, ready to initiate WW3 and to "eradicate all the countries who helped those bastards" are most definately the guys to fear. Thank god I'm one of them.

      Sad to say, but if the DEFCON goes one more level up, I would more likely fight against the US than on their side...


      Bring it on, baby, bring it on.

  341. Significance of Sept 11th by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any clues? Fox news put up this web page.

    --
    Yeah, right.
  342. Government Cover Up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come no-one has brought up the CNN report that a possible 8, and not 4, planes were in fact hijacked. Also they reported that the one in Penn. was possibly shot down and is now being covered up by the government? After all, what government would own up to shooting down a plane containing its country's own citizens. Considering its possible destination of Washington (Camp David, White House?) and the lack of coverage on the 4th plane, I think this is VERY likely. Any thoughts?

    1. Re:Government Cover Up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lack of coverage might be do to the fact that the other planes causes the most carnage in recent American and world history, while the PA plane hit some trees...I am not denouncing any remarks, only offering the counter view for continuation...what actually happened only God himself knows right now.

      Dan allen

    2. Re:Government Cover Up? by paul_the_nomad · · Score: 1

      That 5 planes were shot down was also reported on BBC World, following a report from a local US TV station, but I haven't heard anything about it since. Obviously, if it is true, it will come to light in the next few hours/days. You can't cover up the crashing of 4 planes.

    3. Re:Government Cover Up? by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

      People saw the PA plane crash..they didn't see any missile hit it.

      If 4 other planes are missing that will be pretty hard to hide. How would the missing people be explained?

    4. Re:Government Cover Up? by mpe · · Score: 2

      Lack of coverage might be do to the fact that the other planes causes the most carnage in recent American and world history, while the PA plane hit some trees...

      It would appear that the FDR and CVR from this plane would be the most easily recoverable.
      Assuming that is that the terrorists did not disable them as they did with the transponders...

  343. Re:2nd plane -- CRASHED IN COLORADO? by allism · · Score: 1

    It didn't crash in the Denver/Boulder area or in Colorado Springs (where the Air Force Academy and NORAD are located).

    I think Canada must be getting some screwy news on this, one of my coworkers is from Canada and her mother called saying she had heard a plane had crashed in the town of Summit, Colorado. There is no town of Summit, Colorado, although there is a county, but nothing has happened there that I've heard about (I live and work about an hour from Summit county).

    However, the "Goodbye to Mile High" football game was postponed, which, to some Coloradans, is more devastating than an airplane crash.

    The local papers here are:
    Rocky Mountain News
    Denver Post

    Neither of these have reported any airplane strikes, but feel free to look for yourself.

  344. Contact Your Attorney General about Gas Prices by Brownstar · · Score: 2

    On the radio in to work today they were interviewing Michigan's Attorney General, Jennifer M. Granholm, about the sharp raise in gas prices. According to the major gas distributors, the price of gas at the retail level should NOT be affected. Any gas stations that have raised their prices significantly are doing so illegally.

    She encouraged everyone that drives past gas stations, in Michigan, that have raised their prices greatly to report it to the attorney general website so that they can take action against said gas stations.

    She also said to remember which gas stations are doing it and never by gas from them again.

    I am also sure that the Attorney Generals of other states will also be looking in to similar cases in their states.

  345. a few thoughts that come up... by psych031337 · · Score: 1

    1. Is this the first time /. took an IRC server to its limits by mentioning it ? (irc.idlenet.org)

    2. Regarding the hot phase: are people with common sense and a net connection actually a faster news service than the established agencies? Kind of a peer-to-peer news ticker?

    3. Regarding the bombing of Kabul last night: was that a "contra" group coming to help of the american cause because they were funded by "oddball" american entitites like the CIA (remember Nicaragua?) ?

    --
    +++ath0
  346. Funding of Terrorist Organisations. by polar+bear · · Score: 1

    I'm English, and I live in the UK. First, let me express my condolences to the people of America.

    One of our respected national newspapers devotes today's first 5 pages to the appalling acts of terrorism yesterday. I would expect no less. The next page has a story titled "Bush refuses to ban Sinn Fein Funding".

    Let me explain the significance of this.

    Sinn Fein is the political wing of the IRA, the Irish Republican Army. A terrorist organization. Much of my childhood (near London) was characterized by the IRA terror campaign. Question: Why are there no litter bins on London stations? Answer: Because the IRA dropped bombs into a few of them, and removing the bins was all that could be done to stop this style of bombing.

    Basically what this means is that it is legal for Americans to fund terrorist organizations. This isn't an empty issue, it is estimated that 70% of the funding of Irish terrorists comes from the US. (Sorry, I can't remember the original source - a much used statistic though.)

    Now I'm not pro- or anti- Bush. My total knowledge of the US political system is based on being in DisneyWorld in Florida in December 2000! Neither do I have solutions for the problems in Northern Ireland. All I'm suggesting is that maybe this would be a good time to get your legislation in order? Surely the implicit support of terrorism (through funding) should be banned?

    1. Re:Funding of Terrorist Organisations. by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Yes- this sort of thing is exactly why we got hit.

      I desperately hope that these events mean we grow up- we've GOT to be better citizens of the world.

    2. Re:Funding of Terrorist Organisations. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      Bush refuses to ban Sinn Fein Funding
      Now, I'm not entirely up on this myself, but what I'd assume here is the difference between state-sponsored terrorism, and some joe donating a few bucks to a political cause.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Funding of Terrorist Organisations. by polar+bear · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I wasn't quite clear.

      We are talking about individuals within a country supporting a terrorist cause, not the country itself supporting a cause.

      I know the US is big on civil liberties (and I support that fully) but I see an individual who funds a terrorist organisation as a guilty party.

      Polar Bear.

  347. Passing of Akamai Co-Founder by MackE · · Score: 1

    One of our many losses yesterday:

    http://akamai.com/html/en/nr/press/press292.html

    I sit here wondering how long it will be before I hear that some acquaintance was lost in this attack. Of course I hope that won't be the case, but who knows?

    Meanwhile, even my home town of 5 or 6 thousand may be sending two firefighters to help cover NYC fire stations while the regular guys are at the WTC either giving it their all or already gave it.

  348. Foreign Viewpoint... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I know the "my enemies enemy is my friend" thing but shouldn't the US be more careful in future?? These terrorists _were_ good, they may have been CIA trained, some years ago... O-B-L was a cia-supported combatant in their conflict with the Soviets,(the bigger enemy) Iraq was US supported during its conflict with Iran (then the bigger enemy) Ho Chi Minh was US supported in WWII against the Japanese (then ,also, the bigger enemy). Spot the trend? It's time allies were chosen on a long-term strategic consideration (10-30yrs) rather than the on-going historical tactical context which is current. It's dificult to accuse people of being religious zealots bent on distruction when, not long ago, they were _your_ religius zealots bent on someone-elses destruction on your behalf.
    Also, it's hard when the boot is on the other foot... I live in the UK and have been affected by two large IRA bombings on English soil; Manchester and Canary Wharf. These are US-civilian supported religious terrorists using terror bombings to promote their own "jihad" against a fellow western democracy. Now the Irish-American community in NYC knows what it feels like to be on the receiving end of someone elses arms-donations. Just to put it in perspective against all the self-righteous comments I've been reading earlier. I'm not condoning any behaviour, just putting over a point. Anyones life should be sacred; black, white, asian, arabic whatever... No political or religious cause is worth ONE life lost on any side.
    BTW, I'm staying anonymous, I don't need flame-junk-mail from the all-in-caps-AOL-redneck militia, thanks....

    1. Re:Foreign Viewpoint... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Idi Amin (sp?) was supported by Israel earlier on.

  349. Americans don't care about the Middle East. by NetJunkie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's that simple. As a general rule, we don't care. The average American has no idea how much aid we send to Israel. They have NO idea why there is a "war" going on in the Middle East. They don't understand why they are fighting for the same land or how long it has been going on. Ask people on the street about the Jews and Palastinians and at least 90% of the time you'll get a blank stare.

    What they do understand is people killing innocent citizens. If people in the Middle East want to change our policy they picked the WRONG WAY TO DO IT. Sure, this is a great way to get news coverage, but you'll get bombed, bad. We're now backed in a corner and the American public DEMANDS a military response. Nothing else will do.

    1. Re:Americans don't care about the Middle East. by DeepMind · · Score: 0
      They have NO idea why there is a "war" going on in the Middle East.
      That's the problem with american people: they've no idea at all.
      Jeez, it remembers me those guys, on TV, who thought France was somewhere in Canada...

      Julien.
      --
      "One day, American people will get smart!" (The American Dream)
    2. Re:Americans don't care about the Middle East. by zmower · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should care. More than you care about sports anyway. :-) Would they be surprised if they knew over 200 Palestinians had been killed so far (this is old data; there's probably more now)?

      Also there is no corner you have been backed into. What is done is done. Screaming for vengence is a mob mentality. I hope wiser voices prevail but I am not confident.

      I figure I know why Bush went to the airforce base rather than Washington; he thought this was the precursor to something much worse. Think China. Fortunately that moment passed pretty quickly. Still gives me goose bumps to think of GW's finger on the nuclear button though.

      --

      Sig pending!
    3. Re:Americans don't care about the Middle East. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how half of the world want the US to go home and the other half bitches about how the US isn't involved/doesn't care.

    4. Re:Americans don't care about the Middle East. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have NO idea why there is a "war" going on in the Middle East.
      And they have even less awareness that drunk drivers kill far more per annum than the Middle East "war", and that there is another war in Central Africa that dwarfs these two by several orders of magnitude...

  350. Re:Gasoline Prices (OffTopic?) by allism · · Score: 1

    Someone in Colorado Springs told us gas there was $8 a gallon there last night. Gas in Thornton (suburb of Denver) was $1.61 - 1.65 a gallon last night, and the prices at the one gas station I passed on the way to work were the same as last night.

  351. Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How difficult would it be to video record every face that gets on every plane ? Later if a plane has problems they have more than a passenger 'name' list, but a passenger 'face' list.

    Sounds easy. Are they already doing that ?

    1. Re:Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was talk on the news today of iris and palm scanning to decrease the likelihood of aliases.

  352. Joint Services Perception Management Exercise 2001 by fg22 · · Score: 0

    Just got that from my UHF Satcom receiver:
    http://geocities.com/fgerlach.geo/jspm2001.html

  353. thank you by Stalcair · · Score: 1
    and while this obviously 'tries mens souls' I try to take a more enlightened view by looking for facts and not jumping to conclusions.

    Thank you both.

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

  354. People who are celebrating by cbull · · Score: 1

    I think one thing we need to think about as a country is what have we (our leaders) done to piss people off so much that they are willing to do something like this? While I'd hate to think that something like this might help a group get what they want, I think we need to evaluate a lot of our policies and maybe make some changes, in order to hopefully prevent something like this from happening again.
    America spends way to much time throwing its weight around. People on /. (for the most part) hate Microsoft. Consider that a lot of countries look upon the USA the same way.

    1. Re:People who are celebrating by bigredlinux · · Score: 1

      While I hate Microsoft...it is a "debate" type of adversary and I would never wish death upon them (unless of course the movie Anti-trust came to a reality as Independence Day came to a reality today)...everyone, watch independence day if you aren't feeling patriotic enough..

  355. Passengers fought back on Pittsburgh flight? by ClarkEvans · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This was posted to Jerry Pournelle's site.

    ...

    Dear Jerry,

    Following is a message which my one of my best friends passed along with permission to distribute to those who might be interested. It fills in the details that I missed in my original conversation with him and attempted to relate to you.

    Tom has given me permission to distribute the message - please feel free to post it if you deem it appropriate.

    Sincerely,

    Art Russell Major, US Army (Retired)

    Message Follows:

    Today was a tragedy for all of America and to my family, a very personal one. Lynn and my Niece Liz's husband, Jeremy Glick was on United flight 93 this morning. When the Hijackers took control of flight 93. Jeremy called my niece who in-turn conferenced him to 911. Jeremy relayed to the police what was happening as the hijacking unfolded. As our niece Liz listened, Jeremy told the police there were three Arab terrorists with knives and a large red box that they claimed contained a bomb. Jeremy tracked the second by second details and relayed them to the police by phone. After several minutes of describing the scene, Jeremy and several other passengers decided there was nothing to lose by rushing the hijackers. Although United Flight 93 crashed outside of Pittsburgh, with the loss of all souls. Jeremy and the other patriotic heroes saved the lives of many people on the ground that would have died if the Arab terrorists had been able to complete their heinous mission.

    Please offer your prayers for all of those who perished or were injured in this tragic of all days and to our niece Liz Glick and her 2-month-old child, Emerson, who are left without their loving Husband and Father.

    May we remember Jeremy and the other brave souls as heroes, soldiers and Americans' on United flight 93 whom so gallantry gave their lives to save many others.

    Lynn, our four adult children and I are headed to New York to be with our family during this time of great sadness

    All of my best,

    Tom

    We find

  356. Terrorism in Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the wake of yesterday's tragedy, the declaration of war by international terrorists against all civilization, how can anybody in their right mind keep playing or supporting games which feature terrorists in a favorable role? Playing a terrorist in a game still provides some kind of understanding, if not support, for the terrorists. Players taking on that role, acting like terrorists, can and does create sympathy. A lot of people play terrorists, taking hostages and blowing up buildings, never ever realizing the true meaning of such acts of terror. As an example, Counter-Strike is one of the most popular online games, making half of all its users play as terrorists! If anything, the terrorist assault on America has shown that terrorists belong to the very worst kind of inhuman humans, right among those who rape and molest children. Would any sane person enjoy playing a game where you are a rapist or child molester? Playing a terrorist, a killer of thousands of innocent people, is not different at all! So now that terrorism has shown its true face, it's about time to reconsider your attitude towards such games, players should boycott games featuring such terrorists as a good and/or playable role, developers should cease making or start altering such games. The aforementioned Counter-Strike modification for Half-Life, being the current leader in multiplayer games, should probably lead the movement and shut down its servers until an update replaces the terrorists with a more appropriate type of player character. Again, playing a terrorist is just like playing a rapist or child molester, show no sympathy and certainly don't support them with your games...

    1. Re:Terrorism in Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Counter-Strike is a game. Half-life is a game where you kill your government's military. Cops and Robbers is a game where you choose 'good' or 'bad' guys. People used to play 'Cowboys' and 'Indians'. Games are games, real life depends on certain people and certain situations. People who don't play these games still watch movies and can't acertain that difference. It's the ability to separate games, movies, ancient books from truth and reality that makes someone mature.

      Throw out star wars, throw out every gun in Toys R Us, throw out boxing, NHL hockey fights and throw out a lot of other things as well. Nope. Just learn to deal with real life, and spend your entertainment time and money with a grain of salt.

  357. Sounds more like a large Columbine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How apt, if the US get attacked by the US? WHO WILL YOU BOMB? because I'm sure that solves the problem, quoting a loyal slashdot comment "lets turn them (always them) into a carpark"

  358. thei sig by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 1

    says it all.

    --

  359. rather.. THIS sig by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 1

    says it all..

    --

  360. Nothing from Sen. Clinton... by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    Does anybody else find it odd that we've heard nothing from Senator Clinton on this?

    1. Re:Nothing from Sen. Clinton... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was interviewed and made a statement from the capitol steps last night. She's appalled and supportive. She also demands everyone's support for her New York Constituency.

      By the way, she says Bill feels the same as she does. If he knows what's good for him.

    2. Re:Nothing from Sen. Clinton... by Mr.Phil · · Score: 1

      she was speaking on NYC tv that we get on our DishNetwork connection.

  361. Response to article posted yesterday here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing that stuck in my mind is one of the first articles posted here yesterday. It basically said
    "I'm not an American, and I don't live in the US, but I hope the US won't do anything rash and retaliate. Only lasting peace can prevent these things, etc.".

    This article really stuck in my mind, and I thought a lot about it. Now that 24 hours have passed since this unprovoked attack, I respond better.

    First of all, let's make 2 assumptions, just for the sake of this post: 1) Osama Bin Laden with the support of Afghanistan masterminded this attack. He is the most obvious suspect, and yes, I remember Oklahoma city. 2) 20,000 people have died as a result of this tragedy. I'm hoping many got out of the towers in time and the numbers are much lower.

    Further more, let's assume that this didn't happen in the US, but in the poster's country, AND that it wasn't a terrorist attack but a bombing raid. Let's assume Afghanistan had a powerful military, and scrambled fleets of bombers, and attacked the poster's country and 20,000 people died during that first attack. Please note that approx 38,000 US soldiers died during all of Vietnam (I think that's the correct #, correct me if I'm wrong).

    Would this poster desire, if the above circumstances were true, that his country just
    come out and say "Gosh, this is terrible. We hope we can make peace against this aggressor, and that they don't bomb our country anymore". Does the poster believe that after Pearl Harbor was attacked the US should just have stayed out of WWII and hoped that the west coast of the US wasn't the next target?

    Please show us a country, that has let itself be bombed and huge numbers of citizens killed, and had a powerful military, that just sat there and hoped it wouldn't happen again. I'll bet they're not around anymore.

    No, I think it's safe to say that whatever country or countries responsible for this tragedy, assuming it wasn't some domestic fanatical group, has just declared war on the US, and there will be a HUGE response. The taliban came out and declared that "US Policy" was responsible for this terrorist act, and that because the US meddles in other's affairs this happened. That may or may not be true, but I'll tell you, if the Taliban didn't like the "old" US policy, they will absolutely hate the "new" US policy!

  362. Canada The day after by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

    Well people are starting to calm down up here that the main even t is over. But there is huge concern about what has happened, how many will survive and what this might lead to. And if you believe in the profits, Nostradomus made a prediction, which so far is being interpreted as this event. Now remember, it's all in how you read it. For all we know, he might have just meant 2 brothers, not the 2 twin towers. Nut it still sounds scary.

    My best goes out to everyone involved, and hope that there are many survivors found but I fear the worst, so best we could all hope for was quick deaths for those who did die.

    my 2 cents plus 2 more, but a sad 2 cents it is

  363. pics/video by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

    http://www.unspeakable.org

    I'm trying to gather as many pic and video as possible then I plan on burning them to CD. Cause something like this doesn't happen that often.

    --
    oogly boogly!
    1. Re:pics/video by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

      Also, if you want to added content, please contact me at crimson@unspeakable.org and I will gladly add your pics/video/whatever to the site.

      --
      oogly boogly!
  364. Sounds very convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its REALLY convenient for the US if is a "arab" because then the solution is really simple, bomb them into the ground, love your boofhead president, kill even more people, and feel american about it. Whats more interesting is if they where not arabs, but internal dissidents, what could be sad is if your government choses to blaim someone and just bomb them anyway (anyone say war economy?) also what hte hell is the "american way" off life? fuck every other country over so you can benefit, funk read some history people YOU ARE NOT THE GOOD GUYS...... a solid diet of chomsky, zinn and most books other history books printed outside of the US for you all.....
    I mean what stunning powers of deduction are being used to determine that is "bin ladden"? there was a article is this american newspaper/website/etc.... not exactly objective..... but I guess nor is your media...... (nbc - General Electric, the biggest arms manufacture in the world.....) let get bombing...........

  365. Usama bin Laden denies involvement by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

    The first semi-official statement from bin Laden: An article (in swedish) in the swedish newspaper Expressen says (13:15 today) that "the saudian dissident Usama bin Laden congratulates those who performed the terror attacks against USA, but denies any involvement, says a person working close with Usama".

  366. Re:What needs to be done! by smartboy2000 · · Score: 1

    bin laden is suppose to be worth 200 million dollars!! his power comes mostly from his money. if his money is in international bank then it must be SEIZED NOW! if it is in some bank in arab country or hidden in swiss bank then HACKERS GO FOR IT. we need to make that money disappear. if bin ladan loses that 200 million he loses the means to carry out his plans

  367. Robert Fisk: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The wickedness and awesome cruelty of a crushed and humiliated people

    By Robert Fisk
    12 September 2001

    So it has come to this. The entire modern history of the Middle East the collapse of the Ottoman empire, the Balfour declaration, Lawrence of Arabia's lies, the Arab revolt, the foundation of the state of Israel, four Arab-Israeli wars and the 34 years of Israel's brutal occupation of Arab land all erased within hours as those who claim to represent a crushed, humiliated population struck back with the wickedness and awesome cruelty of a doomed people. Is it fair is it moral to write this so soon, without proof, when the last act of barbarism, in Oklahoma, turned out to be the work of home-grown Americans? I fear it is. America is at war and, unless I am mistaken, many thousands more are now scheduled to die in the Middle East, perhaps in America too. Some of us warned of "the explosion to come''. But we never dreamt this nightmare.

    And yes, Osama bin Laden comes to mind, his money, his theology, his frightening dedication to destroy American power. I have sat in front of bin Laden as he described how his men helped to destroy the Russian army in Afghanistan and thus the Soviet Union. Their boundless confidence allowed them to declare war on America. But this is not the war of democracy versus terror that the world will be asked to believe in the coming days. It is also about American missiles smashing into Palestinian homes and US helicopters firing missiles into a Lebanese ambulance in 1996 and American shells crashing into a village called Qana and about a Lebanese militia paid and uniformed by America's Israeli ally hacking and raping and murdering their way through refugee camps.

    No, there is no doubting the utter, indescribable evil of what has happened in the United States. That Palestinians could celebrate the massacre of 20,000, perhaps 35,000 innocent people is not only a symbol of their despair but of their political immaturity, of their failure to grasp what they had always been accusing their Israeli enemies of doing: acting disproportionately. All the years of rhetoric, all the promises to strike at the heart of America, to cut off the head of "the American snake'' we took for empty threats. How could a backward, conservative, undemocratic and corrupt group of regimes and small, violent organisations fulfil such preposterous promises? Now we know.

    And in the hours that followed yesterday's annihilation, I began to remember those other extraordinary assaults upon the US and its allies, miniature now by comparison with yesterday's casualties. Did not the suicide bombers who killed 241 American servicemen and 100 French paratroops in Beirut on 23 October 1983, time their attacks with unthinkable precision?

    There were just seven seconds between the Marine bombing and the destruction of the French three miles away. Then there were the attacks on US bases in Saudi Arabia, and last year's attempt almost successful it now turns out to sink the USS Cole in Aden. And then how easy was our failure to recognise the new weapon of the Middle East which neither Americans nor any other Westerners could equal: the despair-driven, desperate suicide bomber.

    And there will be, inevitably, and quite immorally, an attempt to obscure the historical wrongs and the injustices that lie behind yesterday's firestorms. We will be told about "mindless terrorism'', the "mindless" bit being essential if we are not to realise how hated America has become in the land of the birth of three great religions.

    Ask an Arab how he responds to 20,000 or 30,000 innocent deaths and he or she will respond as decent people should, that it is an unspeakable crime. But they will ask why we did not use such words about the sanctions that have destroyed the lives of perhaps half a million children in Iraq, why we did not rage about the 17,500 civilians killed in Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon. And those basic reasons why the Middle East caught fire last September the Israeli occupation of Arab land, the dispossession of Palestinians, the bombardments and state-sponsored executions ... all these must be obscured lest they provide the smallest fractional reason for yesterday's mass savagery.

    No, Israel was not to blame though we can be sure that Saddam Hussein and the other grotesque dictators will claim so but the malign influence of history and our share in its burden must surely stand in the dark with the suicide bombers. Our broken promises, perhaps even our destruction of the Ottoman Empire, led inevitably to this tragedy. America has bankrolled Israel's wars for so many years that it believed this would be cost-free. No longer so. But, of course, the US will want to strike back against "world terror'', and last night's bombardment of Kabul may have been the opening salvo. Indeed, who could ever point the finger at Americans now for using that pejorative and sometimes racist word "terrorism''?

    Eight years ago, I helped to make a television series that tried to explain why so many Muslims had come to hate the West. Last night, I remembered some of those Muslims in that film, their families burnt by American-made bombs and weapons. They talked about how no one would help them but God. Theology versus technology, the suicide bomber against the nuclear power. Now we have learnt what this means.

  368. Solidarity with America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am from Germany and all I can say that I was so shocked and horrified! I cried when I saw the WTC collapse. Perhaps a friend of mine was there at the time of the incident. I haven't heard from him yet.

    Solidarity with America!

    May God be with the families of the victims.

    Hunt down and punish those coward terrorist pigs and those who support them!

    And kick them out of the net!!!

  369. Re:2nd plane -- CRASHED IN COLORADO? by FFFish · · Score: 2

    Thanks, Allism.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  370. Look at this from the other side by clockwork18 · · Score: 1

    --the people of Palestine have been raised on the basic assumption that America is an evil set of corporations and power-hungry rulers that has ruined their lives. This, in essence, is completely true. We have sided with their enemy. We have helped to destroy their innocent civilians and their land. These people have no hope but to commit such acts to attract attention to their situation. God knows we weren't listening before, but look now! I completely understand the motivation behind such an ordeal. America stands on other countries to put itself in a position of power. Even more unfortunately, the Department of Defense is going to start carpet-bombing the country of the attack's origin, even though the person (or people) who organized the strike probably aren't even there. We will end up killing just as many innocent people, and ultimately committing a counter-act of terrorism. I sincerely hope that trigger-happy George W. doesn't jump the gun on this one, but somehow I think that the popular American opinion of "Bomb the bastards!" will prevail.

  371. Re:Gasoline Prices (OffTopic?) by badjohny · · Score: 1

    i live in the northern ohio area, and there was a crazy demand for gas. there were fist fights breaking out at the stations when people were accused of cutting in line. they had to block off the exit to the road, to stop more cars from coming down them. it was crazy. also, i have seen on the news, that alot of our gas station owners are now under arrest for price raising and contributing to the public panic. this is not a rumor, i saw this myself.

    badjohny

  372. Donate to Red Cross via Amazon by rtos · · Score: 1
    Amazon is also making it exceptionally easy to donate to the Red Cross Diaster Relief Fund. Simply get out your credit card and go here:
    http://s1.amazon.com/exec/varzea/paypage/PKAXFNQH7 EKCX/


    If you can't donate blood, please donate financially.

    --
    -- null
  373. The friends the US once have chosen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    now seem to have bitten into the masters hand.

    In the 'Times of India' article reprinted on Emperor's Clothes under the title
    "CIA worked with Pakistan to create Taliban", analyst Selig Harrison is quoted as follows:
    "'The CIA made a historic mistake in encouraging Islamic groups from all over the world to come to Afghanistan.' The US provided $3 billion for building up these Islamic groups, and it accepted Pakistan's demand that they should decide how this money should be spent, Harrison said."
    I disagree. The creation of Islamist terrorist organizations by the CIA has been a key part of U.S. policy, first in attacking the Soviet Union, and since, then, in an on-going war against Russia and the countries of the former Soviet Union and against Yugoslavia.
    Source: CIA in Afhganistan

    But it seems that US policy continues to be not too picky when it comes to new friendships as long as those new friends can be used at weapons against own enemies. The latest love affair with Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), which finances itself partly by drug smuggling, hard core criminality and red light jobs, has pretty good chances to develop into a similar explosive relationship sooner or later.

    Sources:
    Heroin Heroes
    KLA in the USA
  374. F*ck The Innocent Towel-Heads! by tilleyrw · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is a troll and definately flame-bait.

    Yes, an aggressive response to the events of yesterday may take a toll on innocent lives.

    So what? Show the world that you do not fuck with the US!!!

    Speak softly and carry a big stick.

    Theodore Roosevelt

    --
    This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
  375. [REPOST] Can someone offer a translation please. by TequilaMonster · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    [quote]
    Did a search for the group *apparently* claiming responsibility for this attack, The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine. This is report of a claim is unverified, but
    their website is
    http://www.alhourriah.org/urgent.asp
    there is a message that has appeared there in the last 90 minutes.
    can someone translate it please?
    [/quote]

    Subsequently, the claim has been withdrawn, but it might still be interesting to see what they say.

    --
    Tequila - drink of the gods.
  376. Show your support by nodrip · · Score: 0



    I don't have a house, but I do have a web site here. I put a nice picture of the american flag up in remembrance of the people who's lives were lost.

    --


    -- "The best way to predict the future is to invent it."
  377. Stop To Consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's put away the sorrow, the shock and the grief for one moment and stop to consider one thing.

    1. At the end of World War I - the Great War, the war to end all wars - when the Germans and the English were still buddy-buddy, a lot of military conferences were held both in Germany and in Britain where the military leaders of both countries agreed that aviation had come into its own, and that future warfare would deliberately involve civilian populations. The old "let's shoot it out on the hillside and then pop into the pub for a cuppa tea" idea was gone. Countries would bomb one another into submission - specifically, they would bomb each other's civilian populations until said civilian populations forced their governments to capitulate. That was all very agreed on back then.

    2. Berlin has the Kaiser Wilhelm Gedächtniskirche (

    3. The WTC and the Pentagon are more than symbolic for the financial and military might of the US. They're the centres of it. And they've been standing there, wide open, day after day, sitting targets. And it doesn't take an enemy of the US a year involving untold military expenditures and in the trenches fighting to get close enough to attack them. It's all done above board so to speak. At the very worst you fly into Canada or Mexico, get across the border, go to ground, and then rely on the belief that all domestic air traffic is really domestic.

  378. Stop To Consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's put away the sorrow, the shock and the grief for one moment and stop to consider one thing.

    1. At the end of World War I - the Great War, the war to end all wars - when the Germans and the English were still buddy-buddy, a lot of military conferences were held both in Germany and in Britain where the military leaders of both countries agreed that aviation had come into its own, and that future warfare would deliberately involve civilian populations. The old "let's shoot it out on the hillside and then pop into the pub for a cuppa tea" idea was gone. Countries would bomb one another into submission - specifically, they would bomb each other's civilian populations until said civilian populations forced their governments to capitulate. That was all very agreed on back then.

    2. Berlin has the Kaiser Wilhelm Gedächtniskirche (&lt- sp?). It's a bombed-out cathedral spire, downtown, and it serves as a reminder of what war can do. Yet back in those days it took the Allies quite a long time to get close enough to inflict that damage. For all the British bombings of Germany there was always resistance, the Nazis knew attacks would come from the air and were prepared for them. They were on the alert 24/7. The Brits flew into this resistance nightly. You couldn't just walk into Dresden, charter a helicopter, and do damage.

    3. The WTC and the Pentagon are more than symbolic for the financial and military might of the US. They're the centres of it. And they've been standing there, wide open, day after day, sitting targets. And it doesn't take an enemy of the US a year involving untold military expenditures and in the trenches fighting to get close enough to attack them. It's all done above board so to speak. At the very worst you fly into Canada or Mexico, get across the border, go to ground, and then rely on the belief that all domestic air traffic is really domestic.

  379. Just alittle of whats on my mind by TraccerWW · · Score: 1

    I wont post this huge post say this or that.. I'll just leave you with a few thoughts. America will survive, They might not.. Sometime there is a peace that is only found on the other side of war.

  380. Re:"Pearl Harbor". Bad analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. Both Nagasaki and Hiroshima had legit. millitary targets in them. Further more, those strikes ended a war. This may have just begun one.

  381. Time to slap the real culprits by TekkenLaw · · Score: 1

    I'm from India. Yesterday I came home from work, switched on the TV & was dumbstruck by the brutal & horrid attacks on WTC. It was simply unbelivable to see the towers disintegrating before my eyes...live on TV. The first thought that crossed my mind was Tom Clancy's "Executive Orders"..but as usual reality is much bizarre than fiction.
    My hearfelt & deep condolences to all American people, especially those affected directly by the tragedy.
    This has highlighted the real menace of terrorists in todays world & how it affects all countries equally. The time is probably not right to say this, but in a way, the US has brought this upon itself by promoting regimes like Taliban in Afghanistan & Pakistan when it suited US's politics. Now you're seeing the consequences.
    These terrorist nations have waged a proxy-war with our peaceful democracy for decades now..we are paying a terrible price with our people's lives. It's time that US brand these nations as terrorists & take action against these criminals.

  382. VIOLENCE breeds INEQUALITY by dachshund · · Score: 1
    Do you think what happened yesterday is going to do anything to improve the lives of the disadvantaged on this planet? Many, many people all over the world are going to die agonizing deaths before things get better.

    I might add that any sympathy for the Palestinian cause has been severely undermined, even though they may have nothing to do with this (?). They're going to be the ones who truly pay for this attack, even if we never launch a single missile.

  383. Acts of War by notestein · · Score: 0

    I watched from my apartment in NJ as the second plane crashed into the WTC. I watched as they burned and fell. I loved these paragons of human virtue.

    I sent the following email (with the necessary adjustments) to the President, Vice President, my Congressman and both Senators.

    For those that have the moral fiber, and are citizens of the United States of America, should do the same.

    --tim

    Mr. President,

    I am writing to express my expectation that we carry out the necessary
    actions to not only punish those responsible but to destroy their
    capability to prosecute war against us.

    This includes the persecution of war against all states that support and
    give them refuge. Specificly Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan and Libya among others. The complete restructuring of the Middle East is required.

    This action should be swift and without requesting or requiring any
    acknowledgement or approval from any other countries. Allies are useful
    and required under some circumstances but our defense is not contingent
    on anyone.

    I also think that the use of nuclear weapons is acceptable if that is
    most expedient. I would even say that it may be required to establish
    our resolve and put all enemies of western civilization on notice.

    My thoughts are with you in this difficult time. Please do not allow the enemies of the United States of America to escape our judicious sense of rage.

    Demand that Congress declare War and persecute it to its successful conclusion.

    Respectfully,
    Tim Notestein
    Jersey City, NJ 07306
    Appomattox, VA 24522
    tim@notestein.com
    www.notestein.com

  384. But where did the \. article go??? by KenDown · · Score: 1

    As I mentioned earlier, I searched the old articles here and could not find the piece on Infocom's raid. I know it was here, I meta-moderated some of the comments from it about 7 days ago. Did someone force Slashdot to remove it?

    --
    "You can't play with my yo-yo"
  385. Pearl Harbor + Hiroshima, Nagasaki. WTC + ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On August 6 and August 9, 1945 the Americans would take the Japanese by surprise by destroying the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with two atomic bombs. The attack on Pearl Harbor four years earlier was one of the justifications President Truman gave for his decision. Over 240,000 Japanese civilians died --the attack on Pearl Harbor was returned 100 times over.

  386. Re:from http://www.skyscraper.org/tallest/t_wtc.ht by RedX · · Score: 2

    Lack of good support? Those buildings showed exemplary support since they were able to withstand not only collisions with large aircraft traveling several hundred miles an hour but were also able to support the upper levels despite having large holes blown in them. One civil engineer I saw being interviewed said that the twin towers had supports spaced 3.5 ft apart, whereas normal buildings have 10 ft between supports. The building eventually collapsed because the intense heat from the fires weakened the supports at the upper levels, causing those levels to fall onto levels below. To give an example, level 110 fell onto level 109, the support below level 109 is now holding twice the weight than it was designed to hold and the support was also weaked by the heat. Level 109 collaped onto 108, 108 is also weakened by heat and is now supporting 3x the weight, so it collapsed. And so on down to the bottom. Without the fire, those buildings likely would still be standing. Goes to show that these terrorists had this thing planned down to the smallest detail.

  387. This partisan crap must STOP! by TrollMan+5000 · · Score: 1

    Yes, and all the partisan bullcrap is only going to get in the way. We are all Americans, not Democrats or Republicans! Politics is indefinitely suspended.

    Instead people cutting him down, why don't we just stand behind our leader, and show the world we are a united country, not a country of infighting and politics.

  388. Again? by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

    Because in the past fifty years, US government policy has killed millions of civilians worldwide, all to keep career politicians in office. Everything that you feel now, shock, revulsion, anger, is the same genuine feeling that has existed for years in Beiruit and Baghdad, in North Korea and Vietnam and Cuba, in every place else that has suffered US bombs and US sanctions.

    All I have to say to that is...Oh please. So you're basically claiming that a large portion of US government officals engineer the deaths of innocents to further their own motives?

    Gee, even assuming for a moment that your claim's somehow true...Funny how that also sounds like almost every Islamic Fundamentalist i've ever heard about- Religious fanatics, many of whom seem to think terror attacks that kill innocents are the only ways to promote themselves and ensure their happy afterlife.

    Because the US parks carrier battle groups on peoples' doorsteps all over the world, threatens civilian populations, then hangs out the signs saying "Make us go away. Just try."

    Feel like actually backing yourself up with examples? Like one of the other replies here, remember that we're almost always INVITED to be somewhere.

    The US is hated on a deep and personal level by large parts of the world.

    Oh? Go look at the list of apologies and promises of support from foreign governments on cnn.com, and say that again. Since when did groupings of Islamic Fundamentalists and other terrorists become a "large part of the world"?

    People like you spouting this tired rhetoric once again make me sick...As I watch the news this morning, i'm reminded that there is NEVER any reason to kill thousands of INNOCENT CIVILIANS, simply because our foreign policies don't rub them the right way.

    For god sakes, how the hell can you essentially defend the motives of these people, after seeing the people leaping out of the higher floors of the WTC to die in the fall, rather than burning to death?

    1. Re:Again? by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 1

      is NEVER any reason to kill thousands of INNOCENT CIVILIANS

      I hope you said the same thing when US planes were carpet bombing Baghdad.

      --

      Denial isn't just a river in Italy

    2. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For god sakes, how the hell can you essentially defend the motives of these people, after seeing the people leaping out of the higher floors of the WTC to die in the fall, rather than burning to death?


      At least one of whom killed an innocent firefighter.

    3. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US was carpet bombing Baghdad, there would be no Baghdad to speak of. Idiot.

    4. Re:Again? by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      In case the NEVER in capital letters wasn't enough for you, i'll say it again....Any time this sort of mass killing of innocents happens, for any purposes, it's wrong.

      Also...Maybe i'm just overly nieve, but i've had it said to me for 20 years now that two wrongs don't make a right. Quit mentioning stuff like Baghdad and others as if it's some kind of justification...Assuming that it's Bin Laden or some other Islamic Fundamentalist group that did this, all they're doing is acting like vengeful kids, without the maturity to talk things out.

    5. Re:Again? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Yes, the US government engineers the deaths of innocents to further their politican careers and stimulate the US economy. Generally this happens by prolonging regional conflicts through arms funding, but sometimes they have to step in and bomb the winner for a bit to even things out.
      • When one side invites a carrier group in, how do you think that the other side feels?
      • Further to that, the US is liked and respected by most of the world. It is also reviled and feared by hundreds of millions of people. It is possible to be loved and hated at the same time.
      • I do not defend the motives of the perpetrators. I revile, abhor and detest them and all that they stand for. I explain their motives, and suggest that the USA needs to become less hated, rather than more feared. Please understand the difference.
      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  389. Asshole reporters by Legion303 · · Score: 1
    What is it with these fuckheads?

    The anchor on MSNBC right now looks like he can barely contain his laughter as he smiles his way through the recap of yesterday's news. The woman anchor on CNN last night did the same thing. The shithead ABC reporters were shoving their microphones in little kids' (like 6 or 7 years old) faces last night and asking them how they felt after they watched the WTC fall from their classroom windows. How do you *think* they felt, you worthless piece of shit?

    -Legion

    1. Re:Asshole reporters by bigredlinux · · Score: 1

      I realize that these actions are despicable, but recall, we are all shocked and going through many emotions and also tired...there is no doubt that no one, no one can feel light about this...

    2. Re:Asshole reporters by nodrip · · Score: 0



      how many dead bodies are there?.. where are the dead bodies, can you give us a count on the dead bodies, we want to know how many dead bodies there are.. what are you going to do about the dead bodies, dead bodies, bodies everywhere... BAH. show some respect you vultures. what about the survivors???

      --


      -- "The best way to predict the future is to invent it."
  390. I just hope... by dh003i · · Score: 1

    This event is tragic and I hope whoever caused it is discovered and brought to justice, to be trialed for his/her actions.

    However, I hope this does not turn into some witchhunt, where everyone who says anything negative, criticizing, hostile, or even hateful towards the US government is automatically assumed to be some kind of conspiring terrorist, and denied his or her rights.

  391. Anatomy of a Victory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anatomy of a Victory: CIA's Covert Afghan War
    By: Steve Coll, 'Washington Post', July 19, 1992

    A specially equipped C-141 Starlifter transport carrying William Casey touched down at a military air base south of Islamabad in October 1984 for a secret visit by the CIA director to plan strategy for the war against Soviet forces in Afghanistan. Helicopters lifted Casey to three secret training camps near the Afghan border, where he watched mujaheddin rebels fire heavy weapons and learn to make bombs with CIA-supplied plastic explosives and detonators.

    During the visit, Casey startled his Pakistani hosts by proposing that they take the Afghan war into enemy territory -- into the Soviet Union itself. Casey wanted to ship subversive propaganda through Afghanistan to the Soviet Union's predominantly Muslim southern republics. The Pakistanis agreed, and the CIA soon supplied thousands of Korans, as well as books on Soviet atrocities in Uzbekistan and tracts on historical heroes of Uzbek nationalism, according to Pakistani and Western officials.
    "We can do a lot of damage to the Soviet Union," Casey said, according to Mohammed Yousaf, a Pakistani general who attended the meeting.

    Source: here

    Now these gentlemen probably have learned to fly passenger aircrafts. But what about f*cking out of office those US officials responsible for chosing this kind of US allies? Prayers may not be enough.
  392. finally, cooperation by PW2 · · Score: 1

    Why does it take something like this to get politicians to finally take their jobs seriously and really get work done for the country?

    I wish they would work this hard and this serious even in times of peace and prosperity as I expect;

  393. Unite against terrorism!! by beardcz · · Score: 1

    This could be a defining moment in world history if the great powers of the world united against terrorism. Every large nation (democratic or otherwise) has a very good reason to join the fight against international terrorism.

    The US has Islamic terrorists and a few home-grown ones, and the Zapatistas in Mexico next door. The EU has the Northern Irish problem and the Basques in Spain/France, not to mention the Balkans. India has Kashmir and a nasty war next door in Sri Lanka. Russia has Chechnya and its brand of Islamic terrorism (not that I'm defending the Russian actions there), plus some problems in Uzbekistan and other ex-republics. China has been having problems recently with non-ethnic Chinese in North-West China.

    If these countries and others with similar problems (South Africa, Columbia, Algeria, got together and really cooperated, world terrorism could be dealt a death blow. Economic sanctions against countries harbouring terrorists, limitations on training of non-military personnel, restrictions on munitions exports and production, intelligence-sharing, military facility usage, impartial arbitration of grieviences (this is actually the most important of all of the above, if you can eliminate marginalized people you go a long way toward eliminating the conditions that create fanatics and terrorists in the first place).

    If it worked well, world-wide security could be enhanced and protected to the extent that mines could be outlawed (even in the US, one of the few countries not to sign the international ban on mines).

    I'd sleep better at night, anyway...

    --
    No sig for me - too lazy to fill one in...
  394. Remember the Skyline ... WTC 2002 by abde · · Score: 2

    it's not exaggeration to say that America is forever changed by the tragedy.
    We should actively keep it in our minds.

    I made a few small logos/slogans which i'd like to share:

    9-11
    (as in september 11, and emergency)

    Remember the Skyline

    WTC 2002
    (as in, rebuild)

    do copy it and pass it on to others if you think its worth sharing. these
    are meant as an expression of solidarity, of remembrance ... i dont know.

    --
    Don't blame me - I voted for Howard Dean. http://dean2004.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Remember the Skyline ... WTC 2002 by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      One can't access them ...

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  395. NukeBinLaden.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get your banners now. They also need someone to create a message board.

    here

  396. you don't NEED guns! by bobalu · · Score: 1

    You don't NEED guns OR explosives and it's not hard to fly a 757 ONCE IT'S UP IN THE AIR.

    The hard part is LANDING, which is not a problem if you plan to fly into a building!

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
    1. Re:you don't NEED guns! by Snootch · · Score: 1

      Hitting a building at precisely the right point to cause such an efficient collapse would, I imagine, require at least as much skill as landing the plane...

  397. Closed Captioning, Crazy! by kikta · · Score: 1

    That was the closed captioning output being streamed through an IRC channel. It's being typed in real-time by a third person. Tom Clancy was being interviewed live , in person, in CNN's studios, on TV. Sorry about the confusion.

    1. Re:Closed Captioning, Crazy! by Fesh · · Score: 2
      Oh. Riiiight. I thought it was a direct IRC interview. Makes sense now...

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  398. Pittsburgh heros by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    I heard on the radio this morning, that the passengers on the Pittsburgh flight knew they were going to die, and decided to die on their own terms.

    In my mind they are true heros.

  399. Re:Almost concrete proof of Bin Ladin Involvement. by Spotless+Tiger · · Score: 1
    Also:

    • Iraq expects to be bombed anyway - so does not fear retaliation.
    • The bombing of Iraq has almost certainly seen hundreds, possibly thousands, of civilians killed. This might "justify" mass-murder to "eye-for-eye" type terrorists.
    • And Iraq, from what I could see, was the only nation in the world to actually support the bombings afterwards. Everyone else, without exception, condemned it, Arafat, Gadaffi, etc. Iraq by contrast praised the bombings and the lavished complements on the killers themselves.

    Why isn't the media focussing on this? My guess is two-fold: First, there is evidence, albiet weak, that Bin-Laden is involved. This doesn't seem to me to be unlikely even if Iraq was involved. The second is that this is perhaps the nightmare scenario for the media, US government, and some of those advocating the most extreme measures at the moment: What if you really can't do anything to the barbarians who organised this attrocity? What if you can't teach them a lesson, because if they were capable of being taught it, they'd have "learned" by now? What if the act might even have been inspired by a desire to get back at the West for previous lessons?
    --
    Racists should be sent back to where they came from
  400. Safety override for large aircraft by SurfsUp · · Score: 2
    I'm responding to this post because it's near the top of the list and I feel what I have to say is important.

    Large aircraft are, by themselves, dangerous weapons of mass destruction, we can see this plainly now. It is necessary to design and install safety overrides on all large aircraft, so that control can be taken away from the pilot in the event of just such an emergency.

    Everybody reading this is intelligent enough to understand the necessary design elements of such an override system, such as the guarantee of secure operation (encryption, authorization, physical security, etc) so I won't go into it further. But we, the techies, are the ones responsible for pushing this forward, for the protection of everyone, including ourselves. Oh, I almost forgot to mention, obviously the control system software must be open source, the entire design must be open. Imagine the consequences of the security system itself being compromised.

    --
    Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
    1. Re:Safety override for large aircraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      havent you heard of a plane crash caused
      by a safety system like that .
      It basicaly didnt let the pilot pull on the
      stick hard enought because the computer thought it woudnt have enough lift for that manuver and would
      stall .

      just something to think about ,

    2. Re:Safety override for large aircraft by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Great. Make it so the terrorists can do it all by remote control. This is a good idea...why?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Safety override for large aircraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Great. Make it so the terrorists can do it all by remote control. This is a good idea...why?

      Are you suggesting doing nothing? Do you imagine it won't happen again, that the supply of suicidal pilots is exhasted?

      Expect to see armed guards on flights from now on. Hope that none of them is crazy.

    4. Re:Safety override for large aircraft by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Sky Marshals may well be a prudent measure. Remote controlling airplanes is not.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  401. Thoughts by Daverz24 · · Score: 1

    My condolences to all the people who lost anyone in this tragedy.

    I have a 1 year old daughter, and it's sad to know that she will never see the beauty of the WTC in the skyline... only in history books. That someone destroying one of America's largest landmarks, killing thousands and thousands of people is not something out of a movie but will be REALITY to their generation is a sad thing to me.

    When she reads about this in a history book and can comprehend it and asks me why someone would do something like this, I don't know how to give a sufficient answer that will not make her go to bed that night and lie awake hoping that a plane doesn't crash through her window.

    This is truly the end of the innocence

  402. What was the goal? Things I never will understand. by Saggi · · Score: 1

    I completely fail to understand what these terrorists try to achieve. This act of terror will create retaliation if the terrorist behind it comes forward with their case. So they can't. We will never know why they did it. We can't ask them. We will not hear their point of view - even thou I don't think any point of view can justify this kind of terrorist attack.

    The United States and most of the world (I come from Denmark) will reject this attack and will probably become more hostile and unforgiving... is that a goal?

    So all we end up with is the terrible loss of thousands of innocent civilians. And many times that amount of family members who have lost their dear ones...

    Why?

    --
    -:) Oh no - not again.
    www.rednebula.com
  403. I hope they rebuild by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care if Bush has to order them to rebuild and supply all the money from the Social Security budget, I don't want to see bin Laden or whoever destroy the WTC permanently.

    While we're on the subject, I'm glad this happened during the Bush administration. They say he's an even tougher man than his father and that's what we need here. I'm hoping for formal declarations of war against all nations against whom we have strong evidence of state-sponsored terrorism, whether they were involved in this incident or not. None of us is safe until every terrorist-supporting government is eradicated from the face of the Earth.

  404. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No moderator available to mod this up? Cowards.
    Truth doesn't smell sweet some times.

  405. Camp David==the Pittsburgh crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The plane that crashed near Pittsburgh was headed in the general direction of Camp David. There was some speculation CD was the target, but that's unknown.

  406. coincidence? by notext · · Score: 1

    This story was covered by slashdot last week.

    This could be pure coincidence, but I can't help but wonder if maybe the government knew something was coming but didn't know exactly what.

  407. Canadian Blood Services Hotline by clear+doubt · · Score: 1

    is 1-888-2-DONATE (1-888-236-6283)

    For those Canadians who want to help.

    --
    (-me.)
  408. key word is justify by Stalcair · · Score: 1

    I am a Christian, and I no more believe that the Crusades where the work of Christ than do I believe that the Inquisitions were Christian. This is not the forum for a religious debate mind you, but I thought I would shed a little light.

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

    1. Re:key word is justify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A major problem is that most practitioners just follow the leadership or community without much (or any) independent thought. I noticed this quite a bit in Christianity; many practicing Christians just assume what their priest tells them, only because the priest has his/her title (father, pastor, lieutenant, whatever) or because he/she has done some study in the area. I see this in other religions as well, but I live in a primarily Christian area, so for me it's most obvious in Christianity. This has potential to contribute, in some way, to discrimination and even persecution.

      Another problem is the idea that nonbelievers "need to open their heart" or some other bull. Sometimes people think that just because somebody doesn't believe what they believe, the nonbeliever has to be closed minded, stubborn, etc. I can think of friends who I would say know me fairly well, but the second religion comes up, they don't know me. One in particular (who calls herself a practicing Christian) completely does not understand what I'm about and there's no way she will understand, because to her, I am stubborn, closed minded, and I "need to open up my heart". If somebody is a victim of religious discrimination (luckily, I am not), it's harder to empathize if the problem is their closed-mindedness. This, in some small way, helps to justify negative actions against a group of people.

      I met a few Muslims over the years, and I have nothing more negative/positive to say about them as I have about anybody else. But one in particular, stands out; he's nice enough and otherwise a good man, but if we were living in a Muslim area and I was in trouble because of my religious beliefs, I could never trust him. I'd say the same thing about some of my Christian friends as well; anything else, wonderful, but because I'm not Christian, I could never trust them. If we ever started becoming more theocratic, these are people who would not associate with me as much and these are people who would not be there if I needed them. Sadly, this also contributes to discrimination and persecution; they can just disassociate themselves from the receiving end.

      I don't think many Christians, practicing or non-practicing, understand how much some non-Christians (and less mainstream Christians, for that matter) worry about losing that divide beween Church and State. Things are slightly more tenuous than some would like to believe.

    2. Re:key word is justify by be-fan · · Score: 2

      That's my point. While people might advocate violence in the name of religion, it doesn't not mean that the religion condones it. Both Islam and Christianity were minor religions at one point and the "Holy War" clauses were needed to defend the religion. Neither religion advocates violence against innocent people.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  409. Calm down and wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you've probably heard quoted many times yesterday, "Revenge is a dish best served cold." I want TPTB in Washington to make absolutely sure they have the right people and as you've said, hunt them down and kill them. I don't care if that means carpet bombing villages and encampments or sending in night-visioned special forces to murder them in their sleep. These people must die. We cannot allow this kind of evil to continue to exist in the modern world.

  410. Declared war?? by davey23sol · · Score: 2

    Was it me, or did Bush declare War in his latest speach (10:55 EDT) ?

    It sounds like he wants enough money to run war opps (as well as relief efforts).

    --


    "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    1. Re:Declared war?? by breadbot · · Score: 1

      I would hope that unlimited spending will be conditioned by what it may be applied to -- for example, unlimited spending for reconstruction vs. unlimited spending for covert operations. Otherwise it's just too blank of a check, and I would be very nervous if Congress okayed it!

  411. Re:from http://www.skyscraper.org/tallest/t_wtc.ht by SlippyToad · · Score: 2
    Goes to show that these terrorists had this thing planned down to the smallest detail.

    I seriously doubt they expected it to completely collapse. They probably intended to gut it with the fire. But I don't give fucking terrorists much credit for that level of intelligence. They knew they would cause a world of hurt with a lot of fuel and fire. I doubt they thought much beyond that.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  412. Re:Could this be left-wing extremists? Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From : Anonymous French, so sorry for any mistakes. And my keyboard is very baaaaddd, too ;-)
    IMHO, it is obviously an arab/islamist attack.
    U are in serious trouble, acknowledging the fact that there's a big jewish comunity in NYC (moreover in the whole USA).
    But in another way, this may not be the reason. We in France had bombings in 1995 (wasn't this serious, but shocked a lot of persons anyway, it was bombs in the "Metro" [for englishmen : It's like the Tube in London, for U in the USA... I dunno]) It wasn't because we were supporting Jews, not at all ! But because islamist bastards from Algeria (south of the mediteranean sea) were thinking we were supporting the previous "democratic" government of Algeria, just because Algeria is a former French colony. In fact, except for the guys born in France but whose parents are from algeria, nobody gives a fuck about what is happening over there. They wantd their freedom, they got it !
    So it is possible that this comes from other groups( communists like the red army from Japan, or right wing extremes) or maybe... wait a minute... Serbians fans of Milosevic ? Why not ! Serbia isn't a third world country...

    I'm with you in this terrible moment. Let's not the ones who gave founds for this attack alive ! they oughtta be arrested, judged, and killed.
    My GirlFriend got so shocked by this attack she got crying all night.

    We ALL are in instance of war. Let's GOOOOO...

  413. The SubHG/TszHoG-EffU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The SubHG/TszHoG-EffU, a Germany-based subversive resistance movement largely consisting of students of Islamic studies, officially wishes to distance itself from the terrorist attacks on September 11 on the WTC and the Pentagon with which it has absolutely nothing to do.



    We also want to state that we have nothing to do with the hiding of Osama bin Laden, of whose existence we are still not convinced.

  414. Re:oh boy.... read this: by pamri · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and the village idiot will ascend to the throne (a widely-distributed fake Nostradamus prophecy).
    Assuming, nostradamus meant the US
    Village - Texas
    Idiot - GW Bush
    So, do some research before you post.;-)

  415. The Repressive Backlash Starts by tom's+a-cold · · Score: 1
    From Associated PRess:
    ``This is a war situation we're in,'' Sen. Charles Grassley (news - bio - voting record), R-Iowa, said, adding that Tuesday's tragedy likely would alter Americans' sense of security and lead them to forgo some freedoms for added safety in the future.
    No extra points for guessing which freedoms the good Senator would like to dispense with.
    --
    Get your teeth into a small slice: the cake of liberty
  416. We Shot Down the PA Plane!!! by xZAQx · · Score: 1

    Clearly, the plane that went down in PA was supposed to go somewhere else, not the woods. Some people in the media and government officials have speculated that it was bound for Camp David, other's say Pittsburgh. At any rate, _something_ interrupted the flight plan for that plane. At first I thought perhaps a passenger or few got up the balls to smash the hijacker-pilots face into the steering column, however a friend of mine postulated that perhaps we shot it down (we as in the USAF). The more I thought about it, the more plausible it sounded. Then this morning my girlfriend IMs me and and said that she heard from a caller on the Howard Stern show this morning that the caller (from Somerset PA) heard an explosion in the sky above, then saw the passenger plane going down with two jets soaring up through the smoke. If this is true, I find it entirely justifiable for the USAF to shoot down that plane. Although they killed innocent people, the loss of life was -- I'm sure -- reduced by downing it in an unpopulated area. Good job.

    --

    We dance to all the wrong songs.
    --Refused.
    1. Re:We Shot Down the PA Plane!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the last message on this page at Jerry Pournelle's site for an (unconfirmed) explanation.

    2. Re:We Shot Down the PA Plane!!! by gurulegend · · Score: 1

      I think there was a bomb on board that detonated when passengers revolted.
      I read about the use of liquid explosives to get through security.

    3. Re:We Shot Down the PA Plane!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think the hypothesis that the usaf shot down the plane in penn. is entirely plausible. and as abhorrhent it may sound to shoot down our own civilian plane, god knows how many more lives were saved. what's more, imagine what would have happened to our country had that plane hit the white house or the capitol as it was apparently supposed to... all aboard that plane (the hijackers obviously excluded) are martyrs and heros in my book.

  417. Trust/Blame Nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I want to firstly mention that I am encouraged to see general sentiments here lean towards not acting rashly/hastilly.

    However, with the "obvious" finger leaning towards some sort of large terrorist organization, and particularly with news outlets spouting sketchy information linking various Arab organizations to this, I think it is important to consider just how accurate US intelligence can realistically be.

    Here's an idea:
    If you wanted to definatively turn international public opinion against the Arab world, or draw America into supporting Israeli actions against Palestinians, how would you do it..? Stage a terrorist attack that America could not possibly dismiss, perhaps?

    I would like to start a discussion here which considers the possibility that the seemingly "obvious" culprits here, while convenient targets for cathartic retribution, might not have anything to do with the tragedies in NYC and DC.

    (With all respect to those who have chosen careers in law enforcement, the FBI has had some terrible gaffs recently and this might be a usefull exercise..)

    1. Re:Trust/Blame Nobody by nebby · · Score: 2

      Nice job speculating based on nothing, you uninformed self-righteous slashdot loser.

      --
      --
  418. Why that particular day? Clear weather. by mikosullivan · · Score: 1

    A lot of us couldn't help but notice that it was a beautifully clear, sunshiny day yesterday, so counter to the deeply sad feelings we all had. As I was pondering this and the question of "why today", I realized the two issues are tied: the terrorists picked yesterday because of bright clear weather so they could see their targets and line up their approches from a long distance.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  419. Re:use of illegal video encoders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but did the terrorists use Linux?

  420. freedom requires vigilance by Stalcair · · Score: 1
    unfortunately our society and country as a whole is getting soft. Valor has been replaced with rhetoric, honour has been replaced with egotism, and courage replaced with bravado and posturing.

    It is sad that it takes things like this to wake people out of their soma induced stupor. I keep hearing things like "now is the time for us to come together and be kind/nice". Excuse me whilst I wretch. EVERY TIME is the time to be kind and work with not against your fellow man.

    There will probably be a lot of touchy feely movements (with a lot of showboating and posturing), that will soon disipate. It is like with new mothers... after birth, their hormones make them love themselves, their baby, the world, and everything... then a week later the baby is found starved to death because the mother neglected it while screwing her fifth boyfriend of the week... its temporary and not legitimate. I sincerely hope that people learn that it is vigilance and consistency (and continuity) that is important... if people are touched by this and make a LIFE CHANGE to be better people, then that is great. But I have seen too many post tragedies in which the love of your neighbor is really only a fear induced fad. Hate to sound cynical, but I think there are many that need to learn that introspection is the first and last step to enlightenment.

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

    1. Re:freedom requires vigilance by be-fan · · Score: 2

      unfortunately our society and country as a whole is getting soft. Valor has been replaced with rhetoric, honour has been replaced with egotism, and courage replaced with bravado and posturing.
      >>>>>>>>>>>>
      That's a damn good thing. Back when "valor" and "honor" ruled humanity, politics was one big pissing contest between world leaders. It is "valor" that encourages a suicide bomber to take out a club, and "honor" that keeps those in the middle east at each other's throats. At least developed countries now do "sissy" things like politcal mudslinging, rather than "manly" things like try to kill each other...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  421. Religions are not free of blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't mean this to start a flamewar, but after all the incredible horrors religions has done over the years (yesterday's events might be an exemple), why is religion still so widespread (especially amongst the poor). Why do people who believe in god need a Religion (as an atheist I do not understand this). I would be as ashamed to be christian or muslim as if I were a Nazi, and I'm quite sure that if there were less religious people, there would be less suffering? Haven't any of you noticed that there are so many religions that most of them simply have to be wrong? If you are a person reading this, ask yourself if you actually were able to choose your religion, or if it was imposed since birth all your life?
    Of course my post is a little offtopic but I really would like answers on this subject (AOL rednecks please restrain yourselves), as I think a world without Islam, Christianity and other religions would be a much better one.

  422. A warning five years ago: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    A warning five years ago:

    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/archive/1996/d om /960729/security.html

    Searching my bags for guns and knives is NOT
    infringing my civil liberties. Please do it.

  423. It was two stinkin' helicopters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, the guys launching the attack are part of an alliance of the formerly ruling groups of Afghanistan. *Of course* they still have a few helicopters capable of launching a few missiles at a single ammo dump in Kabul. The entire attack reportedly consisted of two helicopters flying up and launching missiles from just outside the city.

  424. Munich Olympics doesn't fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Munich Olympics link occured to me as well, but I looked it up, and one thing does not fit: The Olympics might have ended on the 11th, but the actual terrorist attack took place on the 5th. The whole thing took place in only one day, so the only thing that was going on on the 11th was the mourning.

    This act itself was actually intentionally committed on the anniversary of the 1970 event (OK, so it was a day early, but by the time they intended to kill the hostages, it would be the anniversary), hence the name of the terrorist group responsible, Black September.

  425. poll by norm_z · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it is good time to set up a new poll. I would like to see what the reaction of world is.

    e.g.,

    kill all those bastards,
    call for peace,
    ...

  426. The war on Iraq was obviously not about oil, idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was obvious before, during, and after the war with Iraq that fighting them would *decrease* our supply of oil, not increase it. If we wanted more oil, we'd simply continue buying the same Iraqi and Kuwaiti oil from Saddam Insane.

  427. Gas Prices by albanac · · Score: 1

    In what kind of weird national setup can $5 US per GALLON be considered expensive?

    ~cHris
  428. Scary Comments from a Newsgroup by TheOnlySwight · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine sent me the links in the text below, I have cut out the relavent passages and put them below with the links for reference. I wanted to post it to make sure, that IF there is anything to this that authorities might see it. Read on... pretty scary? or incredible coincidence? First claims: Date: 2001-08-31 11:03:37 PST Something is going to happen tomorrow. This is a witness against everyone on this newsgroup. I hate this newsgroup, and everyone on it sucks. REPENT! You are all evil liars! Do not be so evil, and be holy. You are going to get me killed because of the truth of my mouth. I am not telling you what is going to happen until it does, because an EVIL and adulterous generation seeks for a sign. Date: 2001-09-04 12:40:28 PST Wait 7 days, and then maybe I'll answer this post. You see, I am going away in seven days, and you will not hear from me again. X Final Claim: Date: 2001-09-11 07:43:26 PST 7 days ago I said in 7 days from then I would explain the meaning of my 911 prophecy. A witness against everyone in America!!! US, the cry of your sins has reached unto heaven!!! Now I go away. The witness is thus completed. After the witness, if the people don't repent, there will AN EVEN GREATER witness, and an EVEN GREATER punishment if the people do not repent. (Of course they wont! Only individuals repent, never the whole nation!) Don't be stupid SUSA. Bin Laden is not responsible for these attacks. SATAN himself, the GOD of the EARTH is responsible for these attacks, your own KING!! Check your history, you'll see! They are a test to see if Americans are STUPID ENOUGH to go to war with a completely INNOCENT country over it. To see if America is STUPID ENOUGH to arrest INNOCENT people over it. DAMN YOU CHRISTIANS!!!!!! DAMN YOU POLICE MEN!!!!!!!!!!! DAMN YOU GOVERNMENT WORKERS!!! DAMN YOU MILITARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DAMN YOU TEACHERS!!!!!!!! DAMN YOU CHRISTIANS!!!!! The cup of your sin in almost full. God is going to pour out his wrath all over America. Get the hell out right now. Do not be partakers of the sins. Quit your jobs. Go out into the deserted areas of the earth. Live there instead. The world will be destroyed. This is unavoidable. You can only try to take a few people with you as you go. What more can you do?

    1. Re:Scary Comments from a Newsgroup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god i hope the fbi crawls all over this fuck.

  429. Re:oh boy.... read this: by TequilaMonster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyway - THIS is the 'correct' interpetation

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two Brothers torn apart by chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb. The third big war will begin when the big city is burning."

    It's quite clear that he was referring to Man U's downfall in the Premiership.

    City of God = Stadium of Light (Sunderland)
    Great Thunder = Kevin Philips hat trick - Crowd go wild
    Brothers torn apart by chaos = The Nevilles can't defend - No change there
    The fortress endures = Sunderland unbeaten at home
    Great leader will succumb = Alex Ferguson throws a tantrum and quits
    The third big war will begin = Arsenal V Leeds United FA cup final
    Big city is burning = Arsenal win 2-0 - Leeds United fans go on the rampage

    heh

    --
    Tequila - drink of the gods.
  430. Issue EVERY passenger a gun! by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    The nature of air piracy has changed. Before this, if you were the unfortunate victim of a hijacking, you would have a reasonable chance of living through the event if you kept your head down.

    No more.

    After watching yesterday's video I know one thing, I'd rather go out in a hail of bullets than cowering in the back of the plane, while it slams into a building. Give every passenger a gun and the scumbags wouldn't even make it to the cockpit door.

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  431. Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved lives, this didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved the lives of millions, mostly Japanese women and children. Have you seen the footage of children being trained attack U.S. troops with sticks to force them to kill the children? And all of that was part of a twisted attempt to make the Americans decide it wasn't worth continuing the fight and ending Japan's military attacks and civilian massacres.

  432. ESHELON!? by Alsee · · Score: 1

    CNN has reported the government has recordings of phonecalls "intercepted" after the event discussing the targets hit. Apparently these calls directly implicate an organization funded by Bin Laden. Public information on this is very sparse.

    This is perhaps a direct product of ECHELON.

    While these results are clearly valuable, it still leaves open questions of benefit VS potenital for abuse.

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  433. What about Mossad? by Robber+Baron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about Mossad? An effective way to eliminate your enemy is to get another nation pissed-off at them...

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:What about Mossad? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't risk it. Although I think that the agent provocateur scenario is very likely (Bin Laden sounds like a red herring to me...although I wouldn't mind taking him out just on principle) Israel knows that without MASSIVE American military support, they would not be able to hold on. Their country would be overrun in a matter of weeks, if it were to come out that they were responsible for this.

      Crazy Jewish fundamentalists? Maybe. Unlikely, but possible. The Israeli government? Absolutely not.

      Iraq? Now you're talkin'.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  434. Left-wing extremists more likely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right-wing extremists would have hit law enforcement or U.N. facilities. They hit the World TRADE Center, the focus of everything left-wing fascist types oppose.

  435. even better by chaos4ever · · Score: 1

    look beyond the planes. the WTC towers were supposed to withstand direct impact from a Boeing 707 craft, and, from what i've gathered, the main airfleets of commercial us airlines used craft of that size at the time and after the WTC was built. mentioning survival from a 767 would be a different barrel of monkeys, but would still understandably not topple a set of towers immediately.
    i'd turn to the 1993 bombing as the true test of structure soundness. here's a quote i found from WNYF:
    "The blast was centered on the B2 level. It was so intense that it caused the collapse of the steel reinforced concrete floor to the floor below (B3 level), which in turn caused more collapses. Tons of debris were piled onto the B6 level floor. A steel fire door that opens to the B2 level from a stairway from the B1 level was blown off it's hinges and embedded into a wall 35 feet away. .. The blast just so happened to be located at the point where it could do the most damage."
    judging from the statement, i'd say that the blast had potential to toppled the building, and for a building to sustain damage like that, well, let's just say that the infrastructure was very very sound. had it failed then, many more deaths could have resulted, as there would have been no time to evacuate at all.
    i'd give more kudos to the civil engineer for sustaining the bomb blast than the 767, more for the fact that from what i've heard, the building was built mainly to survive a collision with an airplane, and not on a bomb blast, though the plane incident is far more ghastly than the bomb, mostly because it ultimately destroyed the twin towers and killed many, many more people.

    1. Re:even better by brad3378 · · Score: 1

      While watching the CNN coverage this afternoon I learned that Bin Laden earned a degree in Civil Engineering in 1979. It's a shame that he's apparently using his knowledge to harm others.

      It would be tough to be a civil engineer buiding a structure competing against a terrorist with that kind of background.

      --

  436. Re:Call to Words: How The Planes Fell From The Sky by kettch · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure, (too young) but didn't their used to be something called the sky marshals? Plainclothes guys who would fly on all domestic flights who were authorized to carry weapons.

    This is maybe something that the FAA should consider bringing back. I know that it is dangerous to have guns, but even a fast acting tranquilizer blow gun in a guy's pocket could have taken out the bad guys when their backs were turned and saved thousands of lives. Heck, there are hundreds of ways to kill/incapacitate someone with your bare hands.

    --
    Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
  437. Very little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All that would happen is the scattering of some nuclear fuel and waste. The cleanup would be slow, but few would die.

  438. I don't want to rush to judgement... by Gorimek · · Score: 2

    ...but have you noticed that you never see Osama bin Laden and Bill gates together?

  439. Re:Enough!!!! by b0r1s · · Score: 1

    then find a new site ... really simple choice, isnt it?

    --
    Mooniacs for iOS and Android
  440. Hatred and Misplaced Revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The United States has been on poor terms with countries in the Middle East for some time; consequently, many Americans harbor a low-level dislike for Arabs and Muslims. But the recent attack on our country has brought that dislike to the surface; now, we run the risk of that dislike turning to blind hatred.

    Did you see? "Kill All Arabics" written in the dust on a New York street.

    There is a precedence for hatred of race, and it inevitably shames us. During World War II, Hitler painted Jews as being the source of all Germany's problems; the country's blind hatred of the Jewish populace led to the slaughter of countless Jews. Throughout the 1900's, many American people persecuted Blacks, believing them to be sub-human. Is it true? Most of us believe that this is now only the policy of White Supremacist groups, such as the Klu Klux Klan. So, do we now start hating all Arabs and Muslims? Even if they are Americans? Our own people?

    The United States is often called the world's melting pot. People of every race and nationality have come to make their homes here. My grandparents were European immigrants. Perhaps your ancestors were immigrants as well. If the IRA stages an attack on our country, do we turn against all Irish? If the Japanese Red Army bombs our cities, do we condemn all Japanese? If madmen bomb Oklahoma, would we cry for the death of all Americans? Why is it that some now call for the death of all Middle Easterners?

    The recent attack on our country by a handful of millitants is their attempt to push us into irrational behaviour. They are waving a red flag at us, hoping we'll rush, like bulls. Do we take this bait and condemn all Middle Eastern Americans? We risk lashing out at people who would be our friends and are our allies. The heart of our country has never been attacked before, and it has thrown us into a frenzy. Our true enemies want to toss us into confusion; to set us against our own people.

    We must not be pushed into this.

    Thomas Sanders
    te_sanders@yahoo.com

  441. Hiroshima saved millions of lives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole point of using nuclear weapons against Hiroshima was to save lives on both sides, including many Japanese civilians. I fail to see how this attack in New York saved anyone.

  442. Sites' reactions renew my faith in humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing I find amazing and wonderful is how many non-news sites, even sites dedicated to humor in poor taste and so on, are showing respect in the wake of this tragedy. I find these links incredibly impressive, considering the kind of content you usually find there:

    http://www.portalofevil.com
    http://www.somethingawful.com (copy & paste, links from here to there get redirected)

    And most incredibly:

    http://goatse.cx

    I am not being a troll here. Yes, obviously that is a goatse.cx link I just posted. But before you mod this message down, just click it. And prepare to be amazed.

  443. Revenge and Misplaced Hatred by Thomas+Sanders · · Score: 1

    The United States has been on poor terms with countries in the Middle East for some time; consequently, many Americans harbor a low-level dislike for Arabs and Muslims. But the recent attack on our country has brought that dislike to the surface; now, we run the risk of that dislike turning to blind hatred.

    Did you see? "Kill All Arabics" written in the dust on a New York street.

    There is a precedence for hatred of race, and it inevitably shames us. During World War II, Hitler painted Jews as being the source of all Germany's problems; the country's blind hatred of the Jewish populace led to the slaughter of countless Jews. Throughout the 1900's, many American people persecuted Blacks, believing them to be sub-human. Is it true? Most of us believe that this is now only the policy of White Supremacist groups, such as the Klu Klux Klan. So, do we now start hating all Arabs and Muslims? Even if they are Americans? Our own people?

    The United States is often called the world's melting pot. People of every race and nationality have come to make their homes here. My grandparents were European immigrants. Perhaps your ancestors were immigrants as well. If the IRA stages an attack on our country, do we turn against all Irish? If the Japanese Red Army bombs our cities, do we condemn all Japanese? If madmen bomb Oklahoma, would we cry for the death of all Americans? Why is it that some now call for the death of all Middle Easterners?

    The recent attack on our country by a handful of millitants is their attempt to push us into irrational behaviour. They are waving a red flag at us, hoping we'll rush, like bulls. Do we take this bait and condemn all Middle Eastern Americans? We risk lashing out at people who would be our friends and are our allies. The heart of our country has never been attacked before, and it has thrown us into a frenzy. Our true enemies want to toss us into confusion; to set us against our own people.

    We will not be pushed into this.

    Thomas Sanders te_sanders@yahoo.com

  444. Equality is injustice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sort of equality you propose is the same injustice socialists propose. As for the rich and taxes, you can't get elected to a major office in the U.S. without first describing your plans to cheat the rich. Bush, for example, recently got a tax cut proposal passed which increase the share of the tax burden paid by the rich.

    The need now is to crush all governments who sponsor terrorism. Once idiots like you are no longer in power anywhere on Earth, the world will be a much better place.

  445. Responsibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/america s/newsid_1537000/1537534.stm

    "Mr Bin Laden's organisation openly seeks "to kill Americans and the allies, both civil and military," and declares that this is the responsibility of every Muslim."

    Is it then the responsibility of every American to kill members of Bin Laden's organization? I would say yes.

  446. At-Risk Data Centers by pik0 · · Score: 0

    Two things. First an observation, then a question, both related.

    At the risk of saying what may be completely obvious, I think that, in light of this recent, deliberate and vicious attack on the WTC, it is abundantly clear that placing such critical financial workers and systems in such an easily targetable location, was less than completely prudent. I would hope that when all of this is rebuilt, and it will be, that, because we live in what can easily be called, the internet age, all of these data centers, workers and support staff will be properly placed in many disparate locations around the country. From my vantage point, it would seem that 50,000 people don't necessarily need to be so tightly packed together in such a death-trap.

    Question: How are our critical financial data systems surviving this attack and how soon might we see a restoration of economic mechanisms? I welcome all speculations.

    Thanks,
    Andrew

  447. We should do an FS/OS Body Count by alexborges · · Score: 0

    We are allways online, if any OS programmer is dead, its not easy that their family would (or could) post something about them...

    Maybe somebody could check (by phone?... news feeds like slashdot probably has the numbers) to see if everyone of the american or american-based project leaders are okay...

    Alex

    --
    NO SIG
  448. You're right, it's at Adequacy by typical+geek · · Score: 2

    Adequacy has an account (from Jerry Pournelle's site) about passengers attempting to overpower the terrorists on United flight 93, the one that crashed in Pennsylvania. Probably not a coincidence.

  449. NOT TERRORISM....WAR by alexborges · · Score: 0

    Terrorism is a kind war act that intends to provoke terror and to extract as much propaganda as possible from it (it does not go against military targets, its e psychologicall). Nobody has vindicated this act, noone has said we did it.

    Guerrilla, on the other side, is a kind of war that attempts to achieve the normal objectives of conventional war (to ce ause military and economic cost to the enemy). The fact that the enemy has not said he did it doesnt show that he is afraid, it shows that he is smart.
    This way he can extract the most of his attack because it will cost the US much more than if they vindicated the attack.
    Maybe they are silly and will be crushed, but it looks like they at least think they are in a war. It also looks like the US is at defcon3, its obvious that CIA provoked the Afghan incidents in the afternoon, but they dont say because standard conventional war information tactics prohibit this.

    So its not terrorism, its a WAR, a conventional guerrilla one (think about it, you couldnt hit NY with a warhead, but the utter simplicity of these jerks did it -and real cheap too).

    Alex

    --
    NO SIG
  450. NY response. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attention New Yorkers. I may not be the best at giving advice. But, rescue, clean up and rebuild. Show these cowardly bastards that you are not intimidated.

  451. Asbestos danger? by jwachter · · Score: 1

    Looking at the broadcasts of all the emergency workers covered in soot made me wonder what kind of threat is posed by inhaling the dust in lower Manhattan.

    For example: The use of asbestos in building construction was curtailed at around the same time that the WTC was completed (I admit my source is a "father of a friend"); was any used in constructing the WTC?

    My prayers go out to the victims and their families.

    Jonathan

  452. Ironic picture of WTC in Wired magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check this out: link. Just a tad bit ironic.

  453. Can't be done... by marcus · · Score: 1

    ...economically anyway.

    There's no way that the US gov could police us all for *any* particular purpose. For example, they can't even stop us from funding drug lords in Columbia and we *do* have lots of laws against that. They are smart enough to not even bother trying to stop us from "just sending money to my relatives overseas".

    Please explain this to your peers. I wonder if the UK has banned Sinn Fein funding itself? Did it have any effect? Has anyone been prosecuted for breaking said law? I really am curious since from my point of view from this side of the A the reason that it has not been banned is so obvious that it certainly should not merit press coverage, discussion, or debate at all.

    Sorry to lay it out like that, but since I have honestly no position on that particular situation, perhaps I can objectively add that what some call "terrorists", others call "freedom fighters", or heroes. Yes, I can say that even in light of what has happened here. I can understand why some in Egypt would celebrate. I can still be angry and have a desire for vengance as well...

    OTOH, you can bet that the various agencies will be analyzing all trades in stocks, precious metals, oil futures etc. on the various exhanges around the world so that perhaps they can find leads to people that did know that this was coming. Perhaps a few speculated with a number of well placed orders figuring that they could make material gain as well as "spiritual". I would not be surprised if they do find a few that opened accounts and shorted some stocks the day before, bought a bunch of gold, and then sold after, etc.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  454. Re:Almost concrete proof of Bin Ladin Involvement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's more plausible: A plot out of a Saturday afternoon serial, or the potential propaganda value of attaching a face to an abstract threat

    Well, considering this whole incedent sounds like a bad movie...

  455. nostradamus by dollargonzo · · Score: 1

    "in the city of god (tall buildings, sparkly), two brothers (the towers) will fall in chaos; the third war begins in the burning city"
    nostradamus 1654

    there is a little more, but i cant exactly remember the rest...

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    1. Re:nostradamus by T.+Will+S.+Idea · · Score: 1

      city of god !?!?!?!?
      Come now, not even the most rabid New Yorker would go that far!
      I'm not going to start panicking just yet.
      Now if you told me that the Cubs had just won the pennant, it's bomb shelter building time.

      --
      If electricity is produced by electrons is morality produced by morons?
    2. Re:nostradamus by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      You are an idiot. Read the other hundreds of idiots who posted this very same idiocy before you did for more information.

      -Legion

  456. NYC is not Oklahoma City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, the outpouring from Slashdot is nice and all but NYC!=OKC. We saw catastophe, we cried, and now we're trying to figure out when we can get back to our offices (mine is 7 blocks from the towers).

    Last night I went to a bar and while alot of us were glued to the TV and making phone calls, others were shooting pool and having an okay time.

    NYC prides itself on being tough-as-nails and kudos to Giuliani for conveying that to America. You saw no photo-ops of him surrounding himself with school kids for a "moment of silence" like GWB when what was needed was action.

    Also, we have plenty of pictures of the WTC, thank you very much. Why not try to finding some of the Pentagon?

  457. you are not offbase by Stalcair · · Score: 1
    what you have said (and what is often repeated) is exactly the problem. Let my just state a few other things to see if it helps (I am not a teacher, mind you). First of all, Christ advocated seperation of Church and State and the value of personal choice. He also was against judgements against your neighbors, but as a side let us remember that there is a difference between judging actions and judging individuals. When you say that Christianity has done horrible things in the past, you are right. However, remember that regardless of the type or name of organization, history if full of people who by self proclamation claim to 'represent' their organization, yet act in horrid ways that go against the very foundation of what they claim to represent. The key (and this is in the bible) is to police yourself and the company you keep. Someone once said that "Religion is the worst thing that could have happened to someones personal relationship with God". I tend to agree.

    So, even if religion is taken out and politics is substituted in, the same applies, as history proves so many times to those that wish to learn. Personally I am prompted to ask that you and others not 'judge' Christians by the actions of the bad, but I realize fully that this is a two way relationship. I trully empathize, as I had massive issues with elitism and hypocricy in my youth.

    Well, I really have got to get back to business, as I am tremendously busy, but thought I would share. I enjoy civil intellectual discussions and if you want to discuss this, email me. And be careful about them redneck statements, I am a DSL redneck!!! Not AOL, I do have SOME dignity! hehe

    In closing however, rereading your comment on the Nazi comparison and the world being better off without religion, I will say this. If you look at the teachings of Christ, not some pediphilic groping priest, you will find all the elements for a very enlightened and loving society. It is when people either rebel for the sake of sheer rebelling and spitefullness or let emotional zeal cloud the true lessons that you have problems... I suppose that you will find that lesson in every other aspect of life as well.

    "He Who Knows Others Is Wise. He Who Knows Himself Is Enlightened." -Tao Te Ching

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

  458. Jesus would never wish for revenge, President Bush by jonnydigital · · Score: 0
    Bush claims to be a Christian, and as such should have Jesus Christ as his role model, right?

    Jesus would never wish for revenge. If President Bush orders a retaliatory (sp?) attack of any kind, then he proves himself a HYPOCRITE, as well as a childish coward no better than the terrorists who destroyed the World Trade Center.

    Not to mention... he will be the man responsible for the greatest world war this planet has ever seen.

    --

    jd

  459. Sept 11 is Moslem holiday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why Sept 11? Check your global calendar.

    It's a holiday in Pakistan honoring the death

    of their Moslem founder, Pissar, who liberated Pakistan by terrorizing the Brits and Indians.

    Probably one of the most successful terrorist campaigns ever.

    I don't recommend flying Dec. 25, as that's

    Pissar's birthday...

    As for whether the terrorists in the WTC attack could calculate how much fuel they needed, I doubt it. The planes seemed to be aimed in a way

    to try to push each tower into the other. They

    flew at high speed to help accomplish that. If

    the first plane had destroyed both towers, I wonder what the secondary target would have been.

  460. S11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I noticed the date of the incident is September 11.



    This corresponds to the date of the demonstrations done against the
    World Economic Forum on September 11 a year ago.



    After searching on the Internet (google.com) a site turned up:
    www.s11.org. After going to the site I saw pages talking about plans
    in the future to go up against global coporations. S11 appears to be
    a group that harbors a strong hatred for global corporations and
    governments.



    One thing that struck me as unusual was one of the index pages had
    something written to the effect of "On September 11, 2000 at 9am we
    were successful in stopping the World Economic Forum." I found this
    unusual because on September 11, 2001 around 9am (NYT) the 2 planes
    crashed into the World Trade Center.



    Yesterday I did a whois (Internet) lookup of s11.org. There were a
    couple of unusual things about the whois record for s11.org. The
    record (at the time I looked at it) was created on September 11,
    2000. The other unusual thing about the record was the expire date
    was set to September 11, 2001.



    I remember the contact for the whois record having a California
    address. A Los something city I cannot remember the name for.



    A few hours ago I attempted to go back to the s11.org site but was
    getting time out errors. After that I did a whois lookup on the same
    domain but the domain records had been changed. The whois record now
    shows a Last Update date of September 12, 2001 and is owned by a
    domain name squatter.



    It is quite unusal that the whois record for this domain name changed
    so suddenly at this point in time and is now owned by a different
    organization.



    Even though the site has disappeared, you can still see some cached
    pages of the original s11.org site by going to google.com and
    searching for s11.



    You can also see a graphic of the same 'global justice' graphics used on the S11 site at another site:



    www.channel6000.com



    One other set of unusual information that seems to indicate a
    well-planned attack are the relationship easily found between flight
    numbers of the hijacked planes and the date:



    The flights that were hijacked, from United and AA, were numbered as
    follows:

    11, 93, 175, and 77
    11 = Yesterday
    9+3 = 12 = Today
    1+7+5 = 13 = Thursday
    7+7 = 14 = Friday

  461. lunar calendar by paulschreiber · · Score: 1

    Remember that not everyone uses "our" calendar. This may be a significant date on other calendar systems.

    Paul

  462. You mean Quaid-e-Azam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Founder of Pakistan, aka Mohammed Jinnah

  463. Condolences for American People from Portugal by racme_2000 · · Score: 0

    I want to show my condolences to American People.

  464. Beeing shot down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --
    and decided to die on their own terms.
    --

    beeing shot down hardly can be said to be "on their own terms"

  465. ok, one more thing by Stalcair · · Score: 1

    I often was persecuted for this and basically told to shut up an never ask questions, but in reality Christ tells us to very much question your own faith. Otherwise, how strong is it trully, and how would you expect it to hold up in trully trying times. It would be like the Marines sitting down recruits and showing them a nice video demonstration of 'How to be a Marine' then actually being suprised (in a real situation) when half of them blow their own heads off, and the other half run and hide. Steel is tempered by will, skill, strength and also pressure and intense heat. It is my belief that we should strive to achieve that within ourselves.

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

  466. Afghanistan's website is DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.afghanistan-ie.com is off the net.

    Dave (Can't remember login)

  467. Re:from http://www.skyscraper.org/tallest/t_wtc.ht by Moofie · · Score: 1

    The buildings were struck by a fucking airliner. I'm pretty sure that wasn't in the goddamn design specs.

    Came down real fast, my ASS. The towers held together fine until the fires melted the steel structural members.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  468. Re:from http://www.skyscraper.org/tallest/t_wtc.ht by pallex · · Score: 1

    I`d just watched a program which mentioned how it was built, and how it was a new design which was weaker than other types of building. Fair call about the design specs! But that point notwithstanding, would it still be standing today if it had been built with more support?

  469. Help the victims by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    Please send this letter or something similar to your representatives in Congress. Email is largely ignored, so I recommend printing and mailing. You can find your senators' mailing addresses at http://www.senate.gov/senators/senator_by_state.cf m

    Dear [Senator],

    People in Egypt and other countries were filmed celebrating the September 11 attacks on America that destroyed thousands of lives.

    These countries receive billions of dollars in foreign aid from us--paid for by those whose lives were destroyed or altered forever by the attack. Their celebrating of these horrible acts show total disrespect and disregard for human lives, not to mention a complete lack of appreciation for the support that has continued to benefit them.

    I strongly urge you to stop financial aid to these countries.

    The money should instead go to victims and their families, not to those who celebrated their untimely deaths. And, of course, the money should be used to rebuild the destroyed properties and pay for the expensive investigations and other actions that must take place.

    The hard-earned money of those who died should NOT go to those who celebrated their deaths.

    Encourage your family, friends, coworkers and neighbors to do the same. Billions of dollars will be needed to rebuild the damage. Donating money is a good deed, but the United States must use these billions that we now need, not send it to those who celebrated carnage and destruction.

    1. Re:Help the victims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is pretty stupid. A few hundred misinformed people dancing in the streets and you want to cut off aid to an entire country? Maybe this is the kind of reaction these terrorist want, us to stop supporting moderate middle eastern countries who are not sponsors of terrorism?

  470. Breed crows and they�ll devour your eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The myth of Frankenstein, the monster that turns against its creator. Facts:
    - Still dont know the perpetrators
    - Bin Ladens fight in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union was funded/supported by USA when it suited its purposes, the same can be said of Sadam Hussein fighting Iran or General Noriega in Panama.
    - As a result of its policy during and after the cold war, America has direct/indirectly waged wars in foreing soil: Vietnam, Nicaragua, Granada, Panama, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Palestine, Colombia. The public opinion has always been kept ignorant of the real issues/causes of the problem, everything is reduced to a goodie/baddie situation. War and its horrible consecuences are always somewhere far away.

    - Americas latest policy of isolation has obviously not worked, long-ignored problems have come home. Now the pain that other countries have felt for generations is known on the land that has caused a lot of it. Globalisation to the full meaning of the word.

    - America has lately been behaving like a rogue-state: not signing the Kyoto Agreement, not signing the non-proliferation of biological weapons agreement, starting the star-wars fantasy missile shield program. All this is contributing to the scalation of the arms race again all over the world: China will increase its defence budget, one of their enemies India will follow, then Indias enemy, Pakistan will follow, etc. It looks like the goverment wants to go back to the paranoid 50s, this will make the arms industry very happy.

  471. Echelon?? by edibleplastic · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry that I can't substantiate this at all, but during one of the news reports, a reporter mentioned that the US will be using what he called a "Black hole" that will capture thousands and thousands of phone call conversations which they will then go on to analyze for specific keywords. Did anyone else see this? Is this an admission of Echelon?

    1. Re:Echelon?? by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      Using it now will be futile, as the attack is going to be talked about on the phone lines extensively for awhile. Echelon would be hitting keywords every couple of seconds at the very least, unless they're looking for words in certain languages.

      -Legion

    2. Re:Echelon?? by JSkills · · Score: 1
      Also realize that Echelon - even if it does exist and is fully functional - is likely not prepared to effectively deal with steganographic methods of communication reportedly being employed by certain key individuals.

      Check this: Wired Article

  472. Hey Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please consider changing today's fortune.

    "Death is life's way of telling you you've been fired. -- R. Geis"

    Isn't particularly appropriate right now.

  473. Re:from http://www.skyscraper.org/tallest/t_wtc.ht by Moofie · · Score: 2

    Sure, there's a trade-off between light weight and ultimate strength. You can ALWAYS build a building stronger. The trick is to build is strong enough, because otherwise you're wasting money and construction time.

    If the building had been twice as strong, it might still be standing. However, it might also not have been built. This is the engineer's dilemma: How strong is strong enough? It's a tough call.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  474. Did the terrorists know what was going to happen? by Chriscypher · · Score: 1

    It's incredible to imagine any fanatical organization attracting a dozen suicide terrorists for 4 teams of ~3 per plane.

    What seems more likely is that only the terrorist pilots knew these were suicide missions and that other members of the team were given other explanations for their mission goals.

    I have heard hearsay accounts of children being recruited used as couriers, but in fact unknowingly carried bombs to their own demise. The best suicide bomber would be one unwary of their purpose and personal death, less likely to tip off security with anxiety or have second thoughts and spoil the plan. After the fact, no one is alive to tell other members in the terrorist organization and affect morale/ discredit leadership.

    This offers another possible explanation to the crash in PA, where fellow terrorists may have discovered their true purpose en route and wrestled the plane to the ground, in addition to other possibilities voiced, such as military shootdown or victim heroics.

    --
    "You have liberated me from thought."
  475. What about Wean (not Ween)? by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 2

    Errr... I happen to work in Wean Hall. Classes were cancelled at CMU yesterday, and managers in SCS were encouraged to let their groups go (and across campus, in other schools, likewise AFAIK). However, Wean was not 'evacuated' - I was there for several hours, and there were a few other people there as well. Slashdot, please update this claim - Wean was not evacuated.

    --
    --Matthew
  476. Support the ones who DON'T hate us by DrCode · · Score: 2
    We've had experience before when WWII ended. Japan had been led by militants, but that didn't mean all Japanese were our enemies. We got rid of the bad guys, and supported the country in setting up a democracy.


    Our enemy isn't Afganistan, but the terrorists operating there and the Taliban who support them. They have plenty of enemies themselves, and we can support them. If we're smart, we'll also help the country rebuild.

  477. Re:Jesus would never wish for revenge, President B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Chrisitans are supposed to be spineless wimps? Give me a break!

    It's weaklings like yourself who encourage terrorists to act because they do not fear reprisals.

    I pray we have the guts to act with enough overwhelming deadly force that no one in future will try such a stunt again!

  478. arrests in providence, rhode island by dimitri_k · · Score: 1

    Providence area stations are showing video of a young arabic man being led off a stopped train (from Boston) in Providence. The man is in handcuffs. They report that possibly a second man (not caught on video) was also taken into custody.

    --
    sig is
  479. Hijack Commercial Planes Plot dates back to 1993 by cebadams · · Score: 1

    A plan to hijack commercial planes and fly them into U.S. targets was reportedly incorporated into a terror strategy by Ramzi Zhmed Yousef, who was sentenced to life imprisonment for masterminding the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, Inquirer News Service reported. The plan was first uncovered in Manila in 1995 after police arrested four suspects in a plot to assassinate Pope John Paul II, and was passed on to U.S. officials by the Philippine government. At least four of Yousef's partners in the 1993 bombing have remained at large, increasing suspicions that they could be involved in the Sept. 12 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C.

    http://www.inq7.net/nat/2001/sep/13/nat_4-1.htm

  480. What should be the response to violence? (#2) by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I sent this to my friends:
    _________________

    Everyone,

    As is often the case, the Economist seems to have the best story: America under Attack

    Also see The Economist front page

    Stratfor provides interesting and more complete analysis.

    Lax Security One of the important points made in the article is that security in U.S. airports and on U.S. airplanes before the bombing was lax compared to the security in Europe.

    George Bush had Increased Support for Israel. The Economist article does not mention that the Bush Administration in the U.S. had recently increased its support for the Israeli government and therefore also Israeli violence. The Clinton administration, in contrast, was more careful not to do things which could be interpreted as an incitement to violence.

    Once again, intelligence agencies were useless. It is amazing to me that "intelligence" authorities claim that they did not have any idea that there would be an attack like this. Below is a link to an album cover from a band called "The Coup". It is black American "Party Music". The album was sold long before today's bombing. The album cover shows both towers of the World Trade Center in New York in flames:

    The Coup -- Party Music, album cover shows the World Trade Center towers burning.

    If black rap artists can have this idea, why didn't the intelligence agencies have it? The idea was not particularly innovative, since the World Trade Center had already been bombed once. Did the intelligence agencies think that those who did it would just stop trying?

    From one of the Stratfor articles: "Reuters is reporting that Arabic satellite television channel MBC warned Sept. 8 that followers of suspected Saudi terrorist Osama bin Laden were planning a major attack on U.S. and Israeli interests in the next two weeks."

    Violence is Assumed. Commentators on three of the largest U.S. TV networks, NBC, CBS, and ABC, have made comments that assume without debate that the U.S. will engage in military action in retaliation. One U.S. senator said on TV that the U.S. response should be comparable to the U.S. response to the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor. One of the U.S. responses at the time of Pearl Harbor was to be the only country that has ever used nuclear weapons. Is the senator suggesting that?

    This is my reply to the many people who are recommending violence as an answer to violence:

    Do you have any thought that violence in retaliation might be a mistake, and might just invite further violence? Those who say no may change their minds after they consider the following issues:

    The U.S. government (not necessarily the U.S. people) has a history of thinking that violence is the answer. The U.S. government killed 2,100,000 people in Vietnam and maybe 150,000 people in Iraq. The U.S. has bombed 14 countries in 30 years, killing a roughly estimated 3,000,000 people. None of the people who were killed were in any way directly threatening the U.S. These people had mothers and fathers, friends and families and wives.

    Most of the citizens of the U.S. had, and have, no idea of the beliefs of the people that their government killed. Most people in the U.S. cannot even locate the countries the U.S. government bombed on a map of the world. People cannot be thought to have chosen violence when they do not come close to understanding the issues. It is often the government that chooses violence, not the people.

    No matter how violent a country is, or how many people a violent country kills, there is still an inexhaustible supply of people in other countries who also want to engage in violence. Violence can be unending. Do you want that?

    No matter how angry you are, there are thousands of people who are more angry than you. Do you want them to attack you?

    As was mentioned above, the Bush administration recently increased U.S. support for the violence of the Israelis. This was sure to make the people being killed by the Israelis unhappy. Do you find it surprising that some of them are motivated to violence also?

    There are many countries where people are severely distressed by Israeli violence. Recently there was a TV news story about street violence in which Israelis were killed. The Israeli counter-attack was shown on TV: A helicopter fired rockets at a building, causing huge explosions. It is not important in this instance whether the Israelis are the aggressors. What is important is that a significant number of people in the world think they are the aggressors.

    The problems between the Jews and the Arabs have existed for 3,300 years. The Jews say that they are the "chosen people" of God. The Jews say that Arabs are descended from an illegitimate child of their tribal founder, Abraham, and a slave girl.

    It is not difficult to understand the thoughts of the Arabs. It is not difficult to understand that it is annoying to live next to a group of people who claim that they are superior, and that Arabs are inferior. It is not difficult to understand that it is annoying to live near people who claim that you are a descendent of a bastard and that God doesn't like you as much.

    It is also not difficult to understand that the constant claims of the Jews of superiority over everyone else (including people of European descent like me) are mentally de-centering to Arabs who happen to be psychologically conflicted.

    Violence is caused by mentally de-centered people. Mentally de-centered people engage in violence. It's that simple. Being violent toward them makes mentally de-centered people even more mentally de-centered. That's why violence is not a good answer to violence.

    The U.S., and all those who hate violence, should take very strong action. But the action must be designed to cure the problem of highly-conflicted, mentally de-centered people. Whatever that response is, it must be more sophisticated than violence.

    The terrorists are extreme examples of mentally disturbed people. Remember that those who crashed airplanes into the buildings cannot possibly benefit from their own actions. They are dead. Someone who is willing to commit suicide is about as mentally de-centered as it is possible to be.

    Does the U.S. really have a place in a dispute that began 3,100 years before the founding of the country? How many people here really understand this dispute? What percentage of the citizens of the U.S. can even find Israel on a map of the world? I think the percentage is low.

    I find the arrogance of my Jewish friends annoying, too. However, there are many differences between myself and the terrorists. I am less conflicted. I am better educated. It doesn't matter to me what other people have been saying for thousands of years; I don't believe Jews actually are superior. I don't live in an area where I am at risk of being killed by Israelis. I am not Arab, so I am not the target of the strongest claims of Jews that they are superior.

    I can also understand why Jews would find Arabs annoying. There is an element of the Arab culture that allows Arabs to think that lies are sometimes acceptable. My Arab friends have sometimes lied to me over trivial issues. To someone who values careful thought, lies are extremely repugnant.

    Should we be giving Israel money when that will be seen as us a choosing to enter a 3,300 year-old conflict? The U.S. government gives billions of dollars every year to Israel. If anything, this money seems to have made Israel weaker. The Israelis have spent money they didn't earn; this is always a corrupting influence; they have had problems with inflation. It can hardly be said that the people of the U.S. give the money; most have no idea that money is going to Israel. So, the people pay the money, but the government gives it away. Rightly or wrongly, sensibly or crazily, the Arabs see this money as encouragement of Israel's violence toward them.

    On this particular issue both cultures are crazy! They've been killing each other since the time of the Pharaohs! What does this have to do with the U.S.? Do we walk into bars and take part in any fight that is happening there?

    The U.S. has a history of secret interference with the governments of other countries. We often hear about secret activities of the U.S. government after it is too late to object. The U.S. supported the killing of president Mossadegh of Iran, and then supported an extremely weak man, the Shah of Iran. (See Iran 1953: Making it safe for the King of Kings) [thirdworldtraveler.com], for example.) This provoked a revolution in Iran that was hostile to the United States. Citizens of the U.S. were kept hostage.

    The U.S. secret agencies' secret answer to the anti-U.S. sentiment was to support Saddam Hussein of Iraq against Iran. We supported Saddam Hussein's violent war against Iran. However, when Saddam Hussein became violent toward another country in the region, we spent billions of dollars to kill an estimated 150,000 Iraqis and destroy their property.

    When executives do things openly they make lots of mistakes, and are sometimes held accountable, usually in a very peaceful way, and usually by their own staffs. When executives do things in secret, there is little accountability, and the mistakes can become huge.

    Anyone interested in the activities of secret U.S. agencies may have been interested in a segment of the CBS show "60 Minutes" about the secret involvement of former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in the killing of Chilean General Rene Schneider. The show aired on Sunday, September 9, 2001. General Schneider was a strong supporter of democracy. Here are links to information about U.S. interference with democracy in Chile:

    National Security Archive Chile Documentation Project [gwu.edu]

    PBS News Hour: "... evidence of a policy to undermine democracy in Chile and to support dictatorship there" [pbs.org]

    Hinchey Report, CIA Activities in Chile [state.gov]

    Iran, Iraq, and Chile are just three of the countries that have suffered from secret U.S. involvement. There is some discussion of U.S. government interference in Saudi Arabia below. Also, don't forget Nicaragua. I asked someone who went to Nicaragua during U.S. involvement there whether it was possible to see the wealth that the U.S. government was pouring into that small country. The amount was said to be about $1,000,000 per day. I was told, no, there was no evidence of the money that was spent.

    There is a cycle: 1) The U.S. government influences other governments in hidden ways, including arranging the killing of foreign leaders. 2) Some members of the countries with whom the U.S. has interfered want to retaliate violently to the violence of the U.S. 3) The U.S. uses the violent retaliation as a justification for more hidden activity.

    Invading countries and killing the residents and destroying their property is not a way of relating I consider socially skilled. Why do the citizens of one country think they can kill the citizens of another? If killing is the answer, can't the U.S. ask a better question?

    The interference in the affairs of other countries by the secret U.S. agencies has prompted some people to retaliate. These people who retaliate are called "terrorists" in the U.S. The terrorists make everyone in the U.S. less safe. So, U.S. citizens have, in some ways, gotten less security for the money they spent on secret activities.

    The violent attitude toward people outside the U.S. has, predictably, spread to the internal police forces in the U.S. When some religious fanatics decided to do stupid things in Waco, Texas, the U.S. government responded by bringing in very violent-minded people. The result was that people were killed.

    There were people who didn't like the activities of the U.S. police forces in Waco. There were people who were psychologically de-centered by these activities. One of them, Timothy McVeigh, bombed a U.S. government building in Oklahoma. So then the U.S. government killed him.

    Secrecy encourages people not to trust. Violence encourages violence.

    We tend to hear about the activities of secret U.S. government agencies about 30 years after they occur. What are they doing now?

    It is 10:00 o'clock. Do you know what the U.S. government is doing? No, it is a fact that you don't. You don't know any other time, either. You cannot even know how much of your money is spent on secret activities, because the budget for secret U.S. government agencies is hidden in other appropriations.

    Definition of a terrorist: The other country's CIA.

    There is in the U.S. very little attempt at understanding other cultures. Arab friends of mine have described situations in Saudi Arabia that are extremely volatile. Apparently Osama bin Laden, and many average Saudis who live in the U.S., feel very unhappy with U.S. influence in Saudi Arabia. They think that there should be political parties and democracy in Saudi Arabia. However, the U.S. government strongly supports the dictatorial regime of the house of Al Saud. Residents of Saudi Arabia, for example, are not allowed to leave the country without an exit visa. They are potentially prisoners of their own country.

    Why not ask ourselves why Osama bin Laden is willing to go to so much trouble to promote terrorism? Maybe we would learn something. I am NOT saying Osama bin Laden is right about anything, and definitely his violence is reprehensible. Nevertheless it may help to understand him. According to Arabs to whom I've talked, there is considerable good reason to be dissatisfied with the secret actions of the U.S. government.

    As other people have said in the past, the U.S. government has a history of supporting corrupt dictatorships. The U.S. government supported Pakistan against India! India is the world's most populous democracy. It has been suggested that the preference for supporting dictatorships is due to U.S. government corruption. A dictator is almost certain to be willing to support embezzlement of U.S. government money, and to keep it secret. Trying to arrange embezzlement would be very dangerous in a democracy because of the danger of being discovered.

    Under the stress of conflict, people show how they truly think. It has always annoyed me that people who call themselves Christian often reveal that they don't really believe in the important messages of Christianity, and that they don't even understand those messages.

    Basically, Jesus Christ's idea of not returning violence with violence means that we can vigorously protect ourselves, but that any response must be the true minimum necessary to achieve security. This is a theory that can be recommended even to the majority of people in the world who are not Christian. The theory seems to fit the facts. The facts seem to be that violence always has severely negative side-effects that overwhelm any effect that might be seen as positive.

    Answers? Prevention is an answer. Better understanding is an answer. Being charitable long before any problems begin occurring is a good answer. And maybe there are times when we just don't know the answer.

    There is often considerable misunderstanding about non-violent methods. One reason to suggest non-violent methods is that they can be extremely powerful. For example, suppose that representatives from the U.S. knew Osama bin Laden's family. Or suppose that you understood how money is transferred to bin Laden. Or suppose the U.S. was so well-liked in the region that bin Laden had difficulty finding supporters. One of the values of non-violent methods is that literally hundreds of them are available, and many of them are far, far cheaper than violence.

    The desire for non-violence is a desire to be extremely powerful. Those who are really powerful can have a strong influence just by voicing disapproval.

    There are many people who support violence because they want to act out their own personal anger, while at the same time hiding their internal conflict from themselves. It is a fact that such people would be FAR more comfortable if they could be helped to understand and take responsibility for their anger. Acting out anger is like a drug. It provides only temporary relief, and it makes the person who does it more angry. Having un-recognized anger is like carrying a 100-pound sack of cement on your back wherever you go. Un-recognized anger drags you down 24 hours per day.

    Violence is not a good answer to violence.

    Regards,

    Michael Jennings

    Michael Jennings
    P.O. Box 14491
    Portland, OR 97293-0491
    U.S.A.

    E-Mail: M_Jennings@USA.com

    This letter maybe sent to anyone by email without permission from the author, provided that no changes are made. If you print this article with no changes, you may give it to anyone you know. Other use requires permission. Copyright 2001.

    Please mention errors and shortcomings to the author.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  481. re: the second plane at the pentagon by gmr2048 · · Score: 1

    I too heard the interview with the guy claiming to see a second (chase?) plane at the Pentagon. Has anybody else heard more? I searched the usual places (google and deja/google) but came up dry. I *really* want to find out if this guy was on crack or if there was something else going on. Creepy cool.

  482. (Link to Story) Re:A Car in Boston ... by ecesar · · Score: 1
  483. SPOT Satellite images of NYC by gmr2048 · · Score: 1

    SPOT satellite image of Manhattan, acquired on September 11 at 11:55 AM EST, 3 hours after two planes crashed into the World Trade Center. The colors result from the use of infrared bands to identify the actual fire hot spots (see red spots near the base of the smoke plume). The .tif and .jpg files were created with SPOT 20 meter resolution imagery. The SPOT satellites orbit at an altitude of 822 km.

    http://www.spot.com/home/news/NYC-091101.jpg

    http://www.spot.com/home/news/NYC-091101.tif

    This copyrighted image may be used free of charge, with the appropriate copyright attribution, as follows:

    (C)CNES/SPOT Image 2001

  484. I disagree by Stalcair · · Score: 1
    and in my message it states why. The bastardization of the concepts and words is the problem, not the ideology that they really stand for.

    Politics is when a person can confortably sit behind a nice protected site and send 18 yo's to kill and be killed, or order a strike on one area 'for the people/humanity' yet ignore another area that has equal or even greater problems of the same type, and finding out it was a political deflection and personal gain that was the true motivation.

    Honor is personal and does not say if you look at me wrong, I wrong you back. It is the thing that keeps you quiet and humble in the face of adversity (being spit on and cursed) because you know that your cause is righteous. Honorable people do not resort to violence, only cowards who are afraid of solving the problem do.

    Who is trully the coward, the bully that beats on a weaker foe, or the one who helps him up and faces the ridicule from his 'friends' with upraised eyes?

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

    1. Re:I disagree by be-fan · · Score: 2

      I know "honor" and "valor" don't really mean that. But in the course of history, has honor and valor *ever* meant in reality what it does in the dictionary?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  485. Re:2nd plane -- CRASHED IN COLORADO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard of the colorado plane on ABC (and maybe also CBS), they even had footage of it, so there were many reports of it.

  486. Alternative CNN Newsfeed IRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On us.slashnet.org port 6667, #cnn_mjd is carrying an alternative version of the CNN newsfeed
    which is much easier to read.

  487. They don't all hate us by Splinterscat · · Score: 1

    Got this as spam at the office - apologies if you've seen it....

    Widespread but only partial news coverage was given
    recently to a remarkable editorial broadcast from
    Toronto by Gordon Sinclair, a Canadian television
    commentator. What follows is the full text of his
    trenchant remarks as printed in the Congressional Record:

    "This Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the
    Americans as the most generous and possibly the least
    appreciated people on all the earth.

    Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and
    Italy were lifted out of the debris of war by the
    Americans who poured in billions of dollars and
    forgave other billions in debts. None of these
    countries is today paying even the interest on its
    remaining debts to the United States.

    When France was in danger of collapsing in 1956,
    it was the Americans who propped it up, and their
    reward was to be insulted and swindled on the streets
    of Paris. I was there. I saw it.

    When earthquakes hit distant cities, it is the
    United States that hurries in to help. This spring, 59
    American communities were flattened by tornadoes.
    Nobody helped.

    The Marshall Plan and the Truman Policy pumped
    billions of dollars! into discouraged countries. Now
    newspapers in those countries are writing about the
    decadent, warmongering Americans.

    I'd like to see just one of those countries that
    is gloating over the erosion of the United States
    dollar build its own airplane. Does any other country
    in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo
    Jet, the Lockheed Tri-Star, or the Douglas DC10?
    If so, why don't they fly them? Why do all the
    International lines except Russia fly American Planes?

    Why does no other land on earth even consider putting
    a man or woman on the moon? You talk about Japanese
    technocracy, and you get radios. You talk about German
    technocracy, and you get automobiles.

    You talk about American technocracy, and you find
    men on the moon -! not once, but several times -
    and safely home again.

    You talk about scandals, and the Americans put theirs
    right in the store window for everybody to look at.
    Even their draft-dodgers are not pursued and hounded.
    They are here on our streets, and most of them, unless
    they are breaking Canadian laws, are getting American
    dollars from ma and pa at home to spend here.

    When the railways of France, Germany and India
    were breaking down through age, it was the Americans
    who rebuilt them. When the Pennsylvania Railroad and
    the New York Central went broke, nobody loaned them an
    old caboose. Both are still broke.

    I can name you 5000 times when the Americans raced
    to the help of other people in trouble. Can you name
    me even one time when someone else raced to the
    Americans in trouble? I don't think there was outside
    help even during the San Francisco earthquake.

    Our neighbors have faced it alone, and I'm one
    Canadian who is damned tired of hearing them get
    kicked around. They will come out of this thing with
    their flag high. And when they do, they are entitled
    to thumb their nose at the lands that are gloating
    over their present troubles. I hope Canada is not one of
    those."

    Stand proud, America!

  488. Chemical Weapons by thatrez · · Score: 1

    Chemical Weapons

    As a volunteer fireman, yesterday I spent on a standby at my firehouse both watching the news and hearing it over my handheld police scanner. Now, I heard that the van by the GW Bridge, which supposedly contained "bombs", did in fact contain Chemical Weapons. I myself heard a Haz-Mat (Hazardous Materials) team dispatched to the location of the van, and then radio silence on two key frequencies for quite a while. Keep in mind that if it had been a bomb, the bomb squad would have been dispatched. In addition, over the buff pagers I heard that it was suspected to contain chemical weapons, from another buff who heard the police originally who pulled over the van. I confirmed this with a friend of my family who works in the DA's office who said the government does not wish this to be made public as of yet. Also, I can find no sites on the web reporting this. Although once the state of panic has dissipated, I'm sure the government will let us know more on this. God Bless and I hope all of you are okay; my heart goes out to those still buried and those who lost their lives.

  489. Absolutely, positively not by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 1

    "Are there Eco-Terrorists and other extreme-left-wing types that are sick enough to do something like this?"

    Absolutely, positively not. Left-wingers are by definition compassionate people who place an extremely high value on life. Only right-wingers could possibly be evil enough to have done this.

    (What on earth did I mean by that?)

  490. Re:from http://www.skyscraper.org/tallest/t_wtc.ht by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, if you read up on the various links about the design of the building it WAS designed to survive being hit by an airplane. A 707 to be exact.. But that combined with the fire was just too much...

  491. Why the attack happened on the 11th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't anyone pay attention to the news? The 11th is the anniversary of the Camp David accords between Egypt and Israel.

  492. more on the taliban by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't know if they're responsible, but they still are one screwed up group...

    a little about the taliban here

  493. That's a negatory, good buddy! by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 1

    UN didn't send you into Iraq. The Somalia mission that tesulted in a number of US casualties was not nder UN command. The US carrier groups in the gulf aren't there on UN orders. The war on drugs in South America isn't UN ordered. Panama wasn't UN ordered. The missile attack on Quadafi wasn't UN ordered.

    --

    Denial isn't just a river in Italy

    1. Re:That's a negatory, good buddy! by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      Good use of language.

      The UN didn't SEND anyone into Iraq, but the UN security council was a large organizer of those countries that attacked Iraq--though not through an official charter. The UN then imposed sanctions on Iraq. Our carriers are there enforcing those sanctions now.

      Somalia was UN humanitarian aid work that went bad. So yes, they were behind it. It's the unanimous resolution 794(1992) that brought the US into it. It was "to help create a secure environment for the delivery of humanitarian aid in Somalia" and authorized, under Chapter VII of the Charter, the use of "all necessary means" to do so.

      But you're right, the drug war in South America, Panama, and the whole Quadafi shindig weren't UN ideas.

    2. Re:That's a negatory, good buddy! by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 1

      The UN wasn't in any way involved in the US mission in Iraq that resulted in US deaths. That's a misconception spread by the US media.

      The UN's humanitarian aid work in Somalia went quite well, despite what you may have been lead to believe.

      --

      Denial isn't just a river in Italy

    3. Re:That's a negatory, good buddy! by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      I was wrong that the UN action against Iraq was not official.

      Here's the resolution: 678 (29 November 1990) "Authorizes Member States ... to use all necessary means" to bring Iraq into compliance with previous Security Council resolutions if it did not do so by 15 January 1991. [Quote from bottom right of first page, item 2 under 'The Security Council.'] (Link: http://www.un.org/Docs/scres/1990/678e.pdf)

      I didn't mean that the Somalia aid was a failure. It just went into a short, unplanned direction.

      Now, there is a UN resolution demanding that Israel return all illegally obtained land since the early 1970's. We should've supported that one... Oh, well.

  494. not Iraq...Somalia by The+Ultimate+Badass · · Score: 1

    damn it.

    --

    Denial isn't just a river in Italy

  495. how Paul Revere must have felt by bigredlinux · · Score: 1

    I stayed home from work today because the thought of programming just seemed insignificant compared to the disaster of the present time. After reading some news posts, I thought about running out to get an American flag to hang at my apartment...after determining that Home Depot had flags, I immediately raced out to pick one up. Once I arrived and found that there were still flags left (they were selling them off the walls) I put it across my handle bars and started to ride. I thought about hanging the flag on my apartment and it seemed so weak, so trite and Bush and all the other leaders told us to be strong. The sentiment here in California (Santa Barbara) has not been particularly strong and not many people have been saying much...passion started to come over me and I began to feel this burning in my heart to ride...so I began, much like forest Gump is portrayed on his long run...I started riding down the street towards UCSB...cars honked, people gave thumbs up...I knew I was on a mission...someone had to bring hope to this small city so far away. As I continued to ride, the passions grew, more people honked, I began to shout things, patriotric things. I don't think in my whole life I have ever appreciated what it meant to be patriotic. And now, by no rational choice of my own, it had overcome me. I continued to ride, sometimes shouting, sometimes in silence, always in remorse of my fellow citizens who lie in the rubble in our two strongest cities. Countless people responsed, countless people didn't...but if I gave even one single person hope or pride then I felt it to all worth it. In the middle of my ride, I began to feel pain and thrist. Parched, I stopped into a nearby gas station and asked the attendant if he would so kind as to spare a drink from the fountain sodas. I told him I was bearing the American Flag and had forgot to bring along my wallet (all I had were CC), and he kindly assisted me (Chevron). I continued on, not sure when I would stop, not sure what else would happen, but I had to, for what else can one do in the wake of such tragedy than to try to share feelings with the reast of society that remains alive, but still affected.

    "Stand tall America, show your support!"

    Dan Allen

  496. For the love of gawd, mod this to 25. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This man deserves a pat on the back, a thumbs up, hell, a slap on the butt.

  497. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  498. Re:oh boy.... read this: by bendude · · Score: 1

    unless you take it from a different perspective.

    Try this...
    The terrorists are evil, so the American's must be good - God's people. Where is the heartland of these God's people? NYC?

    B.T.W. this is not my perspective.

    --


    Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  499. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  500. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  501. Re:oh boy.... read this: by Telek · · Score: 2

    apparently he said no such thing either, it was a student in 1995 (or sometime around then) who was doing an essay and under the infinite monkeys principle said that if you make enough sufficiently vague prophecies, there are enough events that happen in the world for most of them to become "true". The "the third great war" was added later by some unknown person.

    Doesn't mean that I should have been modded to -1, Troll. Christ moderators, it's not like _I_ made up the rumour. I could understand a bunch of (-1, Overrated), but not flamebait and troll.

    [/gripe]

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
  502. Re:The war on Iraq was obviously not about oil, id by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
    • It was obvious before, during, and after the war with Iraq that fighting them would *decrease* our supply of oil, not increase it. If we wanted more oil, we'd simply continue buying the same Iraqi and Kuwaiti oil from Saddam Insane

    At what price, and with what reliability?

    OK, so it was a PR exercise. Pick your reason, but defending a monarchy from a dictorship that was previously being supported against a theocracy, all in the name of God and Freedom is laughable.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  503. Truth: The CIA and Isreal are responsible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CIA did this. Isreal helped.

    Expensive oil. High unemployment. Getting rid of palestine. More excuses for more surveillence. And war is money. You are all being fooled.

    Whoever did this knew there was going to be war as a result. They didn't care. Anyone, even "terrorists" care enough about their own cause and country not to do this. Who wouldn't have to worry about that? Why, the USA.

    All telecommunications entering or exiting the United Stated are already monitored. All ISP internet activity is already monitored. All communications in Afgahastan, and all terrorist groups who are being blamed are all already being monitored. Why didn't anyone foresee this?

    The USA will support a genocide of the middle east for more free oil, just like Iraq. Lots of jobs, lots of tax dollars being spent on weapons. Good public opinion and a surge in nationalism. More paranoia. All things the USA have to GAIN from these "attacks", and the war which will follow.

    Isreal has some of the best trained military in the world. They have soldiers dedicated enough to perform the kamikaze. They have a lot to grain by a revolt against Palestine.

    Goodbye problems, hello holocaust of innocent people. For money. Die for oil suckers.

  504. good luck by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

    Sorry I can't help you out, anonymous coward, but you'll need to find a way to live long being stupid from someone else. You're sadly mistaken about me. Good luck tho, I know its hard for morons like yourself to live past 22. Damn thats old!

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
  505. Link to Latest version. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


    See the latest version of the letter above at What Should be the Response to Violence?

    One of the headings: "The CIA trained Osama bin Laden."

    --
    Bush's education improvements were