If a gun company promoted it's product for the pupose of *murder*, then I guess they could be held liable. I don't know of any gun companies that do this.
Yes, guns are designed for killing things. However, not all killing is murder, though. Not even all killing of *people* is murder.
Clicking on the test link brings up a blank window (with or without location bar, depending on how you have dom.disable_window_open_feature.location set), then a JS dialog box pops up that's only identified as "Javascript Application", which contains the text enty phishing field. Meanwhile, the main window goes to the legitimate Google site, until you click the button on the dialog box. After clicking, the new blank window goes away, and the main window returns to the Secunia site.
The fact that the JS dialog box doesn't say what URL originated it is a flaw (IMHO) that ought to be dealt with...
They're not woried about whether the broadcast media will use the technology. Their problem is with whether TV receivers will respect the technology, and since the court has told the FCC they have no right to regulate TV receivers in this manner, it will take an act of Congress to get the Evil Bit mandated. So, yes, a law would be necessary.
The digital cellphone system is already in place. All that is needed is for some manufacturer to make a "car radio" that can play internet streams using the cellphone system.
Of course, this'll eat your miunutes, but minutes are gonna get cheaper, too.
The digital cellphone system with internet connectivity is already in place.
How much would it take to make a "car radio" (or boombox, for that matter) that has internet streaming capability via the cellphone system? This WILL happen someday.
Copyright protection laws establish Fair Use rights to holders of copies of protected works; therefore copyright protection shall not be extended to any work that uses technological or other means to deny Fair Use said work, whether such denial of Fair Use is intentional or not.
Indeed, if your argument is correct, then it seems that the Universe can't have been created by an even more complex system. However, there is still a fallacy present.
The fallacy with this argument is the assumption that if the Universe was created, then its Creator must be a "system".
What leads you to believe that the Creator of the Universe (if we assume, for sake of the argument, that there is a Creator of the Universe) must be a system?
Your argument proves nothing at all about whether the Universe was created, only that it was not created by a "system".
The question of what brought about the Universe is necessarily a philosophical pursuit. It cannot be answered by Science.
...the new standards would describe it as a "continuing investigation that uses observation, hypothesis testing, measurement, experimentation, logical argument and theory building to lead to more adequate explanations of natural phenomena.
So they wanna redefine "science" to mean using the scientific method to discover the truth about nature. Wow. Truly revolutionary. How ever did we arrive in the 21st century without this definition of science? Apparently until now, science was all about making wild-ass guesses to explain natural phenomena...
We use these thingies where I work to log on to just about everything. I see a time coming where these (or similar products) will be used by all manner of financial and other institutions.
Slashdot Mirror
If a gun company promoted it's product for the pupose of *murder*, then I guess they could be held liable. I don't know of any gun companies that do this.
Yes, guns are designed for killing things.
However, not all killing is murder, though. Not even all killing of *people* is murder.
Still not satisfactory.
I'm using Firefox 1.0.4/Linux
Clicking on the test link brings up a blank window (with or without location bar, depending on how you have dom.disable_window_open_feature.location set), then a JS dialog box pops up that's only identified as "Javascript Application", which contains the text enty phishing field. Meanwhile, the main window goes to the legitimate Google site, until you click the button on the dialog box. After clicking, the new blank window goes away, and the main window returns to the Secunia site.
The fact that the JS dialog box doesn't say what URL originated it is a flaw (IMHO) that ought to be dealt with...
Can't the email server just filter on the evil bit at the IP level before passing the incoming message to the mail handling daemon?
Does this mean Windows is finally going to be "a better Unix than Unix"?
"...IDC counted $4.2bn worth of Microsoft Windows server sales.... Unix sales also hit $4.2bn in the period..."
I see. In other words, Unix servers sold account for 4 times the number of Windows servers sold?
They're not woried about whether the broadcast media will use the technology. Their problem is with whether TV receivers will respect the technology, and since the court has told the FCC they have no right to regulate TV receivers in this manner, it will take an act of Congress to get the Evil Bit mandated. So, yes, a law would be necessary.
Different kind of network these days, but the quote still fits.
...because some thug cut them off to gain access to the internet at the library, you insensitive clod!
...like in, acceleration of action as the movie wears on?
..never underestimate the bandwidth of an LP gas truck loaded with DVD-ROMs....
Ping times wouldn't be very satisfactory, though...
The digital cellphone system is already in place. All that is needed is for some manufacturer to make a "car radio" that can play internet streams using the cellphone system.
Of course, this'll eat your miunutes, but minutes are gonna get cheaper, too.
The digital cellphone system with internet connectivity is already in place.
How much would it take to make a "car radio" (or boombox, for that matter) that has internet streaming capability via the cellphone system? This WILL happen someday.
Copyright protection laws establish Fair Use rights to holders of copies of protected works; therefore copyright protection shall not be extended to any work that uses technological or other means to deny Fair Use said work, whether such denial of Fair Use is intentional or not.
...who's gonna go out there (in front of the internet-controlled gun) to pick up the deer after its been shot? Not me!
..how am I going to get my Free iPod, now?
At least they know how to pronounce, "negotiations" correctly...
Indeed, if your argument is correct, then it seems that the Universe can't have been created by an even more complex system. However, there is still a fallacy present.
The fallacy with this argument is the assumption that if the Universe was created, then its Creator must be a "system".
What leads you to believe that the Creator of the Universe (if we assume, for sake of the argument, that there is a Creator of the Universe) must be a system?
Your argument proves nothing at all about whether the Universe was created, only that it was not created by a "system".
The question of what brought about the Universe is necessarily a philosophical pursuit. It cannot be answered by Science.
Hmmm... Well, since Time is a part of the universe, there was no "before" the universe (whether created by God or not).
So they wanna redefine "science" to mean using the scientific method to discover the truth about nature. Wow. Truly revolutionary. How ever did we arrive in the 21st century without this definition of science? Apparently until now, science was all about making wild-ass guesses to explain natural phenomena...
We use these thingies where I work to log on to just about everything. I see a time coming where these (or similar products) will be used by all manner of financial and other institutions.
I say it *is* flamebait.
Intentional invocation of Godwin's Law is poor form.
In actuality, the Dormouse never said, "Feed your head".
Grace slick was just telling us to remember what the Dormouse said (what DID the dormouse say?), after which she issues the command, "Feed your head!"
I just downloaded it here
If Big Music is gonna charge you for music you might copy, then I say they've given up any expectation of copyright protection.
But, IANAL.