PHL still randomly flags, though short lines tend to include almost everyone.
BNA doesn't even use metal detectors any more (they actually have them, but they're off), either pat-down or millimeter wave. Their pat-down was far less thorough than PHL, and there was a pat-down area that had at all times 3 people in it being patted down.
So it's useless, except for one of the major uses of access public hotspots?
My point isn't that it's great or anything, just that equipment that is wifi will connect to almost all other equipment that's wifi, now we have a new thing called wifi that will connect with none of the existing equipment, it is not an ideal situation.
USB 1.0 isn't used much either, but the equipment still works (actually, with USB it's better compatible than wifi, but it's a similar point). This is like some company making an incompatible system, and calling it USB ultra mega (or is that an official standard on USB already?).
With the exception of 802.11a only devices (and it's been a long time since I've seen one), every device I've seen is compatible, all the way back to the first 802.11b card and router I had.
You appear to be talking about someone that already knows how to write web apps learning PHP, I don't think that's what the article writer is, and it's not really what I meant.
But wifi used to mean it worked with wifi, it wasn't just marketing.
They created a user friendly term so users didn't need to know 802.11g. If they lose the trademark, they'll need to come up with another new term, and retrain users.
Because it's a stupid question that's offensive and lacks common sense. She thinks she can learn some magical wizard skill that is not location based, but will allow her to make money without overseas competition, or people that are way more skilled.
I'd say camming is the best bet (it used to pay decent anyway).
Competing locally on WordPress/drupal websites may work too, but the marketing is going to take significant out of house time. I'd suspect one could learn to make decent websites in a couple months, sell them for $600, half week's work, but again, you'll have to seek customers locally.
Would you really want to pay anything to get PHP written by somebody that learned it in a few months?
Will the car be programmed to watch for lights and a siren and pull itself over when it 'sees' them?
Yes, of course it will, because it needs to get right anyway (to allow the cop to pass), if getting right puts it on the shoulder, it should stop. Anything short of that behavior would be incredibly dangerous. Even when I'm not being pulled over, this is the behavior when a cop, ambulance, or firetruck is behind me with lights on. I'm curious how well a car could handle a cop car coming through a crowded street, I imagine that'd be pretty taxing for the software, as you often have to break rules to let it happen.
Re:So how's the Windows version coming along?
on
KDE 4.8 Released
·
· Score: 1
I actually like it a good deal, it feels pretty fast to me too.
Small clickable area I don't like though, and am I crazy to want three lines of text for names, center truncated (like OSX)? I don't want extra long filenames going crazy, and I don't want things in variable sized layouts. There is a need for some whitespace to click the background (to unselect all, or copy to a folder rather than opening a file or copying to a subfolder), but not so much as they show. I am curious too, does this mean the +/- select/unselect are going to be all over the place too, but I need to try it before I assume that I suppose.
Re:So how's the Windows version coming along?
on
KDE 4.8 Released
·
· Score: 1
I'm highly concerned about "Nonrectangular Item Boundaries".
1) I want the whole space an item take up to be the item 2) I've had issues in the past (I think IE in Win95) where I would click the non-icon center of the "e", and not launch.
Actually, all of the dolphin changes look unpleasant.
1) Somebody owns it, if it's the company itself you may not be allowed to fish there anyway. 2) Lower fish population everywhere makes it more peoples' problem, you can form a class. 3) Lack of corporate protection means that liability extends to the owners 4) All polluters are liable, no damage caps and no allowable levels like we have now 5) I don't agree with it, it's just how the libertarians want to handle it. 6) Libertarians (honest ones) like lawsuits, though most libertarian identified people do not, I think it's interesting.
The legal system is supposed to take-up where regulation does not exist (in libertarianism), I think that is even less efficient than government regulation (slower, prevention is the best medicine, and even people have limits to their liability in accumulated wealth.
This will probably help to prevent it from being used for cars for a while (heavy lobbying to think of the children's safety I would suspect).
Anything with a radio will go the same way (FCC). I expect there to be a field day of regulatory capture in general if complex 3D printing becomes possible.
My point was the shock of my private album popping up on my screen in a public place, I did figure it out, and stop logging in to search, but it was unpleasant to unexpectedly have private info on my screen. When I go to Google+ I expect to have private info display, when I go to Picassa I do to. When I go to google.com I do not.
Perjury is a separate crime, and generally used for witnesses that are otherwise innocent,but lie to protect someone.
It's hard to prove, and would require a separate trial.
Also, you don't generally say "I didn't do it" in court, you say "not guilty", and use the fifth amendment to avoid breaking the oath.
Things said not under oath additionally are not perjury (such as during questioning by police, though often a statement is signed with the force of oath)
Yes, I'm surprised that stuff I market private to only me in plus.google.com comes up in a search on google.com.
I can't be the only one that doesn't want my automatically uploaded photos showing up on screen in a public place. And yes, I know they aren't 100% secure in the cloud, but they are way more secure in the cloud than on screen in the office for example (and yes, I probably shouldn't be putzing about in the office either, but still).
Are you saying that the TSA (1) found something dangerous and (2) are keeping tabs on people ignoring the signs and bringing explosives onto the plane?
This is a level of competency and coordination that surprises me.
Slashdot Mirror
I've flown recently.
PHL still randomly flags, though short lines tend to include almost everyone.
BNA doesn't even use metal detectors any more (they actually have them, but they're off), either pat-down or millimeter wave. Their pat-down was far less thorough than PHL, and there was a pat-down area that had at all times 3 people in it being patted down.
Both are millimeter wave, and not backscatter.
So it's useless, except for one of the major uses of access public hotspots?
My point isn't that it's great or anything, just that equipment that is wifi will connect to almost all other equipment that's wifi, now we have a new thing called wifi that will connect with none of the existing equipment, it is not an ideal situation.
USB 1.0 isn't used much either, but the equipment still works (actually, with USB it's better compatible than wifi, but it's a similar point). This is like some company making an incompatible system, and calling it USB ultra mega (or is that an official standard on USB already?).
If your moral standard excludes consenting adults doing things that don't involve others, then I imagine pretty much everything is unethical.
Generally the deviation I've found is lack of desirability. For example trashmen get decent pay.
With the exception of 802.11a only devices (and it's been a long time since I've seen one), every device I've seen is compatible, all the way back to the first 802.11b card and router I had.
You appear to be talking about someone that already knows how to write web apps learning PHP, I don't think that's what the article writer is, and it's not really what I meant.
But wifi used to mean it worked with wifi, it wasn't just marketing.
They created a user friendly term so users didn't need to know 802.11g. If they lose the trademark, they'll need to come up with another new term, and retrain users.
Because it's a stupid question that's offensive and lacks common sense. She thinks she can learn some magical wizard skill that is not location based, but will allow her to make money without overseas competition, or people that are way more skilled.
I'd say camming is the best bet (it used to pay decent anyway).
Competing locally on WordPress/drupal websites may work too, but the marketing is going to take significant out of house time. I'd suspect one could learn to make decent websites in a couple months, sell them for $600, half week's work, but again, you'll have to seek customers locally.
Would you really want to pay anything to get PHP written by somebody that learned it in a few months?
That's the very thought that inspired my last sentance.
I imagine the flashing lights scenario would be very hard for a computer to do right, and has safety implications beyond the surrounding drivers.
Highway first I imagine, that's a pretty simple problem I bet.
Alert driver for traffic and two miles before exit. Of course I don't want one until it means I can drive drunk.
Will the car be programmed to watch for lights and a siren and pull itself over when it 'sees' them?
Yes, of course it will, because it needs to get right anyway (to allow the cop to pass), if getting right puts it on the shoulder, it should stop. Anything short of that behavior would be incredibly dangerous. Even when I'm not being pulled over, this is the behavior when a cop, ambulance, or firetruck is behind me with lights on. I'm curious how well a car could handle a cop car coming through a crowded street, I imagine that'd be pretty taxing for the software, as you often have to break rules to let it happen.
I actually like it a good deal, it feels pretty fast to me too.
Small clickable area I don't like though, and am I crazy to want three lines of text for names, center truncated (like OSX)? I don't want extra long filenames going crazy, and I don't want things in variable sized layouts. There is a need for some whitespace to click the background (to unselect all, or copy to a folder rather than opening a file or copying to a subfolder), but not so much as they show. I am curious too, does this mean the +/- select/unselect are going to be all over the place too, but I need to try it before I assume that I suppose.
I'm highly concerned about "Nonrectangular Item Boundaries".
1) I want the whole space an item take up to be the item
2) I've had issues in the past (I think IE in Win95) where I would click the non-icon center of the "e", and not launch.
Actually, all of the dolphin changes look unpleasant.
I thought you established they were legal.
1) Somebody owns it, if it's the company itself you may not be allowed to fish there anyway.
2) Lower fish population everywhere makes it more peoples' problem, you can form a class.
3) Lack of corporate protection means that liability extends to the owners
4) All polluters are liable, no damage caps and no allowable levels like we have now
5) I don't agree with it, it's just how the libertarians want to handle it.
6) Libertarians (honest ones) like lawsuits, though most libertarian identified people do not, I think it's interesting.
The legal system is supposed to take-up where regulation does not exist (in libertarianism), I think that is even less efficient than government regulation (slower, prevention is the best medicine, and even people have limits to their liability in accumulated wealth.
A court system.
Those that are damaged sue.
a) whoosh
b) a response to a post about a hypothetical future.
This will probably help to prevent it from being used for cars for a while (heavy lobbying to think of the children's safety I would suspect).
Anything with a radio will go the same way (FCC). I expect there to be a field day of regulatory capture in general if complex 3D printing becomes possible.
My point was the shock of my private album popping up on my screen in a public place, I did figure it out, and stop logging in to search, but it was unpleasant to unexpectedly have private info on my screen. When I go to Google+ I expect to have private info display, when I go to Picassa I do to. When I go to google.com I do not.
You must love the ribbons.
Yes, because the windows start menu runs a photoshop effect.
This is trying to cut the line between in app shortcuts and using the menu, I don't expect to see it take off.
Perjury is a separate crime, and generally used for witnesses that are otherwise innocent ,but lie to protect someone.
It's hard to prove, and would require a separate trial.
Also, you don't generally say "I didn't do it" in court, you say "not guilty", and use the fifth amendment to avoid breaking the oath.
Things said not under oath additionally are not perjury (such as during questioning by police, though often a statement is signed with the force of oath)
No they couldn't
My phone uploads to an album that is set private to me.
Yes, I'm surprised that stuff I market private to only me in plus.google.com comes up in a search on google.com.
I can't be the only one that doesn't want my automatically uploaded photos showing up on screen in a public place. And yes, I know they aren't 100% secure in the cloud, but they are way more secure in the cloud than on screen in the office for example (and yes, I probably shouldn't be putzing about in the office either, but still).
Are you saying that the TSA (1) found something dangerous and (2) are keeping tabs on people ignoring the signs and bringing explosives onto the plane?
This is a level of competency and coordination that surprises me.
I really don't like it (the Google+ Search).
I searched my name to see what came up, and my private from phone folder was across the top of the page.
I don't like the personalization of my search in this way, I don't want checking my email to bring up semi-private photos if my name is typed in.
I want google.com to search the web, not my profile, let me search my profile if that's what I want.
The votes on the kill Americans inside America act shows the senate to be worse than the house though. The two year term appears to help.
The funny thing is our founders (many of them anyway) were afraid of the house, because of the populace.