You may wish to re-read the story. Police officer in question clearly stated that she her reason for taking the camera was aiming to protect the person who was having mental problems and was photographed by random third party in process of police getting him under control.
Where did you get that I was claiming this was done? I was merely pointing out the most common thing people do with such videos, and what officer said she was trying to prevent.
And it's your kind that makes police behave as badly as they did in this case. Huge asshats with a hard on for getting away with being asshats based on freedoms which assume that most people in fact will not be asshats. And you'll never bother to look in the mirror for the reason, it'll be someone else's fault.
It should also be punished by popular opinion, peer pressure and running into moments like these. Because if everyone was an ass, this would be a very shitty world to live in.
One of the necessities behind having the level of freedom that we have is that people do not abuse these freedoms en masse. This is usually kept in check by social rather then legal means.
It's noted that the person being arrested was having a mental health breakdown. Photographing people having that and then posting it online is usually classified as "cyber bullying".
Jewelry is woman's safety net. Basically when a wealthy man dumps her for a younger model, she'll still have her jewelry for financial support. It's an ancient tradition that is unlikely to go away any time soon, and one that will keep price of gold and gems up.
Shmups, once you learn how to control them with a mouse, you'll never go back to joysticks, UNLESS it's a shmup with a very low speed of movement (think touhou focus mode).
Depends on keyboard. PS/2 interface limitations are long gone in the age of USB keyboards, and this is mainly limited by the microcontroller used in the keyboard itself as well as how keys are linked to it.
For example, my G15 handles six simultaneous key presses. In some combinations it can handle even more, but six is what it's advertised for.
I am not American. Most of EU countries allow for this AFAIK. I know for a fact that mine does.
Finally, this isn't a "fishing expedition" by the very definition of concept. I sat on the same network as everyone else at home. When you hit me with a port scan that scans wide array of ports with known vulnerabilities, you can expect me to start looking into it. Most sane users with good knowledge of computer networking would just IP block the guy at that point and report it to local admin.
"Fishing expedition" by definition is what the guy who is scanning campus ip/ports for known vulnerabilities is doing. It's hard to take your complaints seriously when they're copy/paste material from whiny internet white knights who don't even have their basic terminology straight.
Funny how all of you (are there more then one?) are posting as AC, and all want police involved, with severe consequences for all parties involved.
That's incredibly confrontational and carries heavy penalties for all involved, including victims who have to be questioned about their private lives and how they know by the police.
I still recall how one admin I knew answered some dumbass with similar, utterly clueless PoV: "do you also try to teach your father how to fuck?"
In most countries, laws specifically allow network administrators to check for security risks with these methods. Private users? In many cases illegal as that would indeed be invasion of privacy. Network administrator? Legitimate action needed to maintain safety and integrity of network.
About the only way for that plane to "crash into the ground" would be if the landing gear somehow broke. The plane was sitting on the ground when fire started.
The problem with "small electrical fires" is that they tend to become "large electrical fires" and eventually "catastrophic electrical fires" as fire propagates along electric cables quite fast.
Considering that fire appears to have started in the battery of the APU, it could be a possibility. Battery fires are notorious for being somewhat unpredictable.
Slashdot Mirror
You may wish to re-read the story. Police officer in question clearly stated that she her reason for taking the camera was aiming to protect the person who was having mental problems and was photographed by random third party in process of police getting him under control.
Where did you get that I was claiming this was done? I was merely pointing out the most common thing people do with such videos, and what officer said she was trying to prevent.
Decent human beings.
Two-way nature of the relationship between politicians, vs one way relationship of bully and his/her victim.
Not "automagically" but "automatically". In fact, not just police officers, but most decent human beings do that.
The fact that you find this so surprising says little about the police officers in question and a lot about you as a human being.
And it's your kind that makes police behave as badly as they did in this case. Huge asshats with a hard on for getting away with being asshats based on freedoms which assume that most people in fact will not be asshats. And you'll never bother to look in the mirror for the reason, it'll be someone else's fault.
Nice rant. Now get off the high horse and read the actual story.
The cops are trying to keep asshat who filmed someone having a mental health breakdown from posting a video on youtube. They did it badly.
But you certainly are in a rush to miss who's the asshat in the story and who just had the best intentions but failed in execution.
And next time you want to go somewhere via horse pulled cart, you should put that cart before the horse.
It should also be punished by popular opinion, peer pressure and running into moments like these. Because if everyone was an ass, this would be a very shitty world to live in.
One of the necessities behind having the level of freedom that we have is that people do not abuse these freedoms en masse. This is usually kept in check by social rather then legal means.
It's noted that the person being arrested was having a mental health breakdown. Photographing people having that and then posting it online is usually classified as "cyber bullying".
Jewelry is woman's safety net. Basically when a wealthy man dumps her for a younger model, she'll still have her jewelry for financial support. It's an ancient tradition that is unlikely to go away any time soon, and one that will keep price of gold and gems up.
Shmups, once you learn how to control them with a mouse, you'll never go back to joysticks, UNLESS it's a shmup with a very low speed of movement (think touhou focus mode).
Depends on keyboard. PS/2 interface limitations are long gone in the age of USB keyboards, and this is mainly limited by the microcontroller used in the keyboard itself as well as how keys are linked to it.
For example, my G15 handles six simultaneous key presses. In some combinations it can handle even more, but six is what it's advertised for.
As we've seen in concrete examples, locals prefer the latter. And they're the ones that get to vote.
Notably their locals would have probably preferred islamist authoritarian regime in Western countries too. But here, we get to vote.
That was sort of true. Then Arab Spring happened.
You may want to note where Kuwait is located.
So we have a darth vader life sized doll, a big wheel of cheese, an automatic workbench with motorized saw and a barrel of lube.
Possibilities are limitless.
I am not American. Most of EU countries allow for this AFAIK. I know for a fact that mine does.
Finally, this isn't a "fishing expedition" by the very definition of concept. I sat on the same network as everyone else at home. When you hit me with a port scan that scans wide array of ports with known vulnerabilities, you can expect me to start looking into it. Most sane users with good knowledge of computer networking would just IP block the guy at that point and report it to local admin.
"Fishing expedition" by definition is what the guy who is scanning campus ip/ports for known vulnerabilities is doing. It's hard to take your complaints seriously when they're copy/paste material from whiny internet white knights who don't even have their basic terminology straight.
Funny how all of you (are there more then one?) are posting as AC, and all want police involved, with severe consequences for all parties involved.
That's incredibly confrontational and carries heavy penalties for all involved, including victims who have to be questioned about their private lives and how they know by the police.
I still recall how one admin I knew answered some dumbass with similar, utterly clueless PoV: "do you also try to teach your father how to fuck?"
In most countries, laws specifically allow network administrators to check for security risks with these methods. Private users? In many cases illegal as that would indeed be invasion of privacy. Network administrator? Legitimate action needed to maintain safety and integrity of network.
I think that few if any of them are open about it.
No, but lithium batteries tend to have highly flammable lithium as base.
About the only way for that plane to "crash into the ground" would be if the landing gear somehow broke. The plane was sitting on the ground when fire started.
The problem with "small electrical fires" is that they tend to become "large electrical fires" and eventually "catastrophic electrical fires" as fire propagates along electric cables quite fast.
Considering that fire appears to have started in the battery of the APU, it could be a possibility. Battery fires are notorious for being somewhat unpredictable.