Only if you buy from your local quasi-monopoly. On aliexpress, you'll get them for 40EUR with delivery. Just get your prescription from optometrist. The only problem is that it usually takes more than a month for them to get delivered.
If you buy polarized glasses, remember that they will result from bad image quality to black screen when viewing any LCD screen. That's why such glasses crashed from their peak popularity levels.
In case of larger sellers, the difficulty of getting a refund is approximately equal to difficulty of typing in "I'm going to give you a one star review if this isn't addressed" and pressing "send".
Aliexpress is a ridiculously competitive marketplace, and most of the bigger sellers will literally have a boilerplate statement on their sales page that they would like you to give them a five star review, and if you plan on giving them lower than that, please contact them first to figure out alternatives.
Take a look on aliexpress and if you get questions about quality, remind yourself that East Asians are people who both use them the most and rely on them the most, with their education system being as competitive as it is. This is not the field where they save money. It's just that with modern technology, making lenses is dirt cheap.
For the record, Trump was aggressively championing a Boeing aircraft over Lockheed Martin one, and against all of the competition from European aircraft for Finland's fighter tender. This debunks your hypothesis completely.
The difference between modern civil societies and barbarism is that even in event that this was your daughter, if you're a decent human being, you will be able to say something among the lines of:
"This was an abhorrent crime, but we have a justice system and I'll let that manage the response".
Not that I'd expect a sociopath such as yourself to understand.
You provided excellent evidence for my point. Not only did you show no evidence for high number of child murderers, but you had to dig thirty years back into the past just to find a single murder case.
So you are arguing for book burning. I literally had no other arguments, and your desperate deflections into irrelevant topics of "but can you start a bonfire in your backyard" demonstrate that you understand very well why your stance on book burning is utterly unacceptable by modern standards of liberty.
Then live according to your values, don't play games that generally are kept cheater-free to a meaningful extent and stick to games utterly ruined by cheaters.
Funniest part of your desperate gaslighting is the fact that I have university recognised certification that I have better control of English than approximately 90% of native speakers.
The far more likely context is the upcoming EU parliament elections, where it seems that pro-EU parties are going to get a serious beating as the anti-EU sentiment is rapidly climbing across most of the member states. One way to curb this would be to sensor any news painting EU in a negative light as "disinformation" and anyone spreading it as "bad people with bad agenda".
Mainstream media across EU is largely on board with this and has been for many years. So to lock the information down completely, one needs to attack the remaining vectors. That would be major social network platforms. Facebook, twitter and google shoved their own necks into the noose when they signed on, because one of the key reasons these platforms are popular is because they allow people to talk about things that mainstream will literally persecute you for talking about. The good part here is that this isn't about them, but internal power struggle within EU. So people within those corporations who signed on are likely banking on the fact that they're very much outsiders in this fight, and by taking side with the authorities, they will be kept out of it.
And now you **"want to talk about" the exact thing you gaslit in a different reply. Hey asshole. Fuck you too. Let's talk about why you gaslight people in such a blatant manner, and then demonstrate clearly that it was intentional by talking about the very thing you tried to just lie about, demonstrating clear understanding of what was said.
Slashdot Mirror
MS got crushed in this generation's console war by Sony, and got crushed in the PC market on its own OS by Valve.
The only way for them to E3 it that is left, is to get into crossplay.
Only if you buy from your local quasi-monopoly. On aliexpress, you'll get them for 40EUR with delivery. Just get your prescription from optometrist. The only problem is that it usually takes more than a month for them to get delivered.
If you buy polarized glasses, remember that they will result from bad image quality to black screen when viewing any LCD screen. That's why such glasses crashed from their peak popularity levels.
In case of larger sellers, the difficulty of getting a refund is approximately equal to difficulty of typing in "I'm going to give you a one star review if this isn't addressed" and pressing "send".
Aliexpress is a ridiculously competitive marketplace, and most of the bigger sellers will literally have a boilerplate statement on their sales page that they would like you to give them a five star review, and if you plan on giving them lower than that, please contact them first to figure out alternatives.
Take a look on aliexpress and if you get questions about quality, remind yourself that East Asians are people who both use them the most and rely on them the most, with their education system being as competitive as it is. This is not the field where they save money. It's just that with modern technology, making lenses is dirt cheap.
Yeah, it's completely out of spec to stick the lens into your eye.
So don't do it.
"Your taxes didn't go down because news said otherwise. Regardless of what your tax return shows. News said otherwise."
Trump Derangement Syndrome at its finest.
Latest news from Reuters suggests that plane suffered some kind of a problem that caused it to emit smoke while in the air:
https://www.reuters.com/articl...
Could be anything from engine trouble to a bad case of Mohammedianism.
For the record, Trump was aggressively championing a Boeing aircraft over Lockheed Martin one, and against all of the competition from European aircraft for Finland's fighter tender. This debunks your hypothesis completely.
The difference between modern civil societies and barbarism is that even in event that this was your daughter, if you're a decent human being, you will be able to say something among the lines of:
"This was an abhorrent crime, but we have a justice system and I'll let that manage the response".
Not that I'd expect a sociopath such as yourself to understand.
You provided excellent evidence for my point. Not only did you show no evidence for high number of child murderers, but you had to dig thirty years back into the past just to find a single murder case.
No shortage of murdering kids in the country where there's a massive shortage of murders in general? Have you seen then murder numbers?
Citation or crawl back under your bridge on the "lack of shortage of child murderers in Japan".
So you are arguing for book burning. I literally had no other arguments, and your desperate deflections into irrelevant topics of "but can you start a bonfire in your backyard" demonstrate that you understand very well why your stance on book burning is utterly unacceptable by modern standards of liberty.
As I noted in my original post, if you're not here to blow hot air, and aren't a cheater/cheating software developer, why are you here?
Follow up with your statements and grab that huge payout from building anti-cheat software that actually works and meets your requirements.
Book burning is also completely legal under the First Amendment. You can burn books all you want.
So thank you for sharing that you support book burning.
Yes. Because rampant cheating kills games. What other reason do you need?
We are in agreement. The only thing to add is that this is one of the countless cases where "side product" is more important than the core one.
Then live according to your values, don't play games that generally are kept cheater-free to a meaningful extent and stick to games utterly ruined by cheaters.
Funniest part of your desperate gaslighting is the fact that I have university recognised certification that I have better control of English than approximately 90% of native speakers.
But you can keep grasping at straws.
The far more likely context is the upcoming EU parliament elections, where it seems that pro-EU parties are going to get a serious beating as the anti-EU sentiment is rapidly climbing across most of the member states. One way to curb this would be to sensor any news painting EU in a negative light as "disinformation" and anyone spreading it as "bad people with bad agenda".
Mainstream media across EU is largely on board with this and has been for many years. So to lock the information down completely, one needs to attack the remaining vectors. That would be major social network platforms. Facebook, twitter and google shoved their own necks into the noose when they signed on, because one of the key reasons these platforms are popular is because they allow people to talk about things that mainstream will literally persecute you for talking about. The good part here is that this isn't about them, but internal power struggle within EU. So people within those corporations who signed on are likely banking on the fact that they're very much outsiders in this fight, and by taking side with the authorities, they will be kept out of it.
So far, batteries only catch fire. I guess they have more... interesting chemistry in the works.
That's easy. Just talk to islamists about them in appropriate tone.
You just blatantly gaslighted my other post here:
https://slashdot.org/comments....
And now you **"want to talk about" the exact thing you gaslit in a different reply. Hey asshole. Fuck you too. Let's talk about why you gaslight people in such a blatant manner, and then demonstrate clearly that it was intentional by talking about the very thing you tried to just lie about, demonstrating clear understanding of what was said.
You need a citation that having significantly more tax income leads to better economic outcomes for the region?
Ok. My citation is basic mathematics.
English is my third language, and yet even I know the difference between "poor" and "poorer".
It takes a zealot to intentionally gaslight a post you're replying to by pretending that they have the same meaning.