Here in the US it's supposed to be ok to be a "stickler" about your due process rights. I'm not sure how things work down under, but my guess is it's supposed to be about the same (only bigger?)
"Obscenity" is already not protected by the first amendment. All these cases deal with material that is not considered under the category of "obscenity."
Actually it's almost the opposite of what you said. You said the owners can prohibit you from taking pictures in a mall, I said they cannot. But you're the one who got modded up so I guess that makes me wrong.
a mall may be private property but it is a public place. Meaning you have an expectation of publicity there. Taking photos in a mall is perfectly legal.
most of the douchebags who think Israelis are so badass just because they know how to fire weapons have never been there. They're a hell of a lot more level headed than most people toting guns in the states.
You don't understand; the security issue with photography goes back to the Alamo, when Mexicans began taking pictures of drunk Americans. That's right, folks, we live in a post-3/6/1836 world now, you better get used to having fewer civil liberties.
Ah Psystar! This is exactly the kind of case I need to save my failing practice!! This calls for a celebration!!! Care to join me for a belt of scotch?
Slashdot Mirror
And if you do "buy into" the consensus of scientific opinion, perhaps you should call it that too.
Doing stuff is overrated. Hitler did stuff! And look where that led! Wouldn't we all have been better off if he had just stayed home and gotten high?
What were we talking about again?
It's just a tax on people who don't understand math.
Here in the US it's supposed to be ok to be a "stickler" about your due process rights. I'm not sure how things work down under, but my guess is it's supposed to be about the same (only bigger?)
The global warming platform from the Republican party is to shoot fossil fuels into the air and yell "yeeehaww!" a bunch.
fixed that for ya ;)
First thing they taught me at the Evil Genius Accademy.
So I guess spelling will be a later lesson?
It's not really 42% -- 50% of the ones who answered the survey was actually the same person logging into 21% of the accounts.
"Obscenity" is already not protected by the first amendment. All these cases deal with material that is not considered under the category of "obscenity."
They're saying that IPv6 is like poison!!!
And if we slice it up on a sandwich with yogurt and garlic, we've got GUITAR GYRO!!! Yum!!
(ducks out the back exit)
Hey I'm british
That describes just about any sort of park I visit
Wait a minute, it doesn't say it was raining there!
Oh, yeah, this is Seattle, I guess it would have been redundant.
a friend of mine who for some reason unknown to me decided to roll a joint in there.
Some unknown reason? Maybe he wanted to get high?
Actually it's almost the opposite of what you said. You said the owners can prohibit you from taking pictures in a mall, I said they cannot. But you're the one who got modded up so I guess that makes me wrong.
Then please explain Dick Cheney. No beard at all!!
yeah but in another universe he trounced MightyMartian with the ultimate comeback, and MM flew back to Mars to cry to his mama!
There's only one universe, the others were just dupes.
I guess it wouldn't be fair to point out that I knew that?
it's a pastry!
Everyone over 30 with an income over $300k a year has a family lawyer.. otherwise you're just a smuck.
fixed that for you.
a mall may be private property but it is a public place. Meaning you have an expectation of publicity there. Taking photos in a mall is perfectly legal.
most of the douchebags who think Israelis are so badass just because they know how to fire weapons have never been there. They're a hell of a lot more level headed than most people toting guns in the states.
You don't understand; the security issue with photography goes back to the Alamo, when Mexicans began taking pictures of drunk Americans. That's right, folks, we live in a post-3/6/1836 world now, you better get used to having fewer civil liberties.
Please stop with this "the terrorists have won" crap. Once we say the terrorists have won, the terrorists have won.
As a Swede myself I have to say: bork bork bork!!
Fixed that for you.
Ah Psystar! This is exactly the kind of case I need to save my failing practice!! This calls for a celebration!!! Care to join me for a belt of scotch?