another tool not for the OP. There were the mozilla editor, then nvu, kompozer, now someone mentioned bluegriffon... all the same software with different maintainers, and i do not doubt bluegriffon will be abandoned as well.
i second the "learn html, use a real editor" part.
then you're adding some randomness from choosing the chunk. Now you have two problems: 1) there are not that many possiblities of choosing the chunk (n over k, if you know binomial coefficents) 2) the human is not very good at choosing something randomly. there will always be predictable patterns, thus lowering the entropy of the parts you need to brute-force.
there may be 100 popular generators. then this is a factor 100, which is not very much, if you compare it with the number of guesses for the correct randomseed...
and this random input is the seed, you need to brute-force. the generator uses it then to generate pseudo-random numbers from it, computing passwords based on there numbers. the seed of jiggling the mouse is not that strong, that it cannot be brute-forced, if you have enough computing power.
1) Guess your password generator, therefore the routines used. 2) brute-force the random-seed, generating passwords with the pseudorandom-sequence started by the brute-forced seed, hashing the paswords, all on the GPU.
now your passwords are still insecure.
I think you need a real random source (as some device counting radioactive decay) to create the passwords in a secure manner.
1.0 is for me as developer the release, which features everything i think my software should have, with no known bugs at releasetime. Thus 1.0 is a hard release. Then its easier to follow, i.e. releasing Bugfixes-Release as 1.0.1, working on 1.1.1 as Release with new features.
he wanted to change from 2.6.X to a Y.X scheme. Now he NEEDED to increase 2, or should he have continued 2.6.39, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9,...? This would be confusing, using 3.X is okay.
well, lets use a base-40 system. So it counts till 3.39 and then overflows to 4.0. The Big Question is: Will there be a 40.0 kernel? Or will it be 1.0.0?
this site does not answer the most basic questions. as... how does the miner avoid, that two persons mine the same coin?... how is guaranteed that no coin is double-spent? yes, you can prove its double-spent, but you cannot prove its not. you can only say "i have no proof its double-spent, yet"... its anonymous, because nobody knows who's behind the number, which spent the money? cool, than my bank account number is anonymous, too... its pseudonymous in the very best case.
they had ICQ until the protocol changed, then they removed it and added some version later irc, as there the protocol will not change (behind closed doors)
firefox on android sucked the last time i tried it. But the defaultbrowser is pretty much okay, if you want any more try opera for android. both are much better than firefox there.
Slashdot Mirror
another tool not for the OP. There were the mozilla editor, then nvu, kompozer, now someone mentioned bluegriffon ... all the same software with different maintainers, and i do not doubt bluegriffon will be abandoned as well.
i second the "learn html, use a real editor" part.
you want to get the goatse-guy into trouble?
never ever use such a function.
It may seem to be clever, but a spammer can see in the headers, that it's faked.
http://www.applebitch.com/2011/01/17/ios-users-may-need-malware-and-virus-protection-in-2011/
yet
and you need to brute force every password in the list, not one attack over all at the same time.
******* is my password! And nobody will guess THIS.
then you're adding some randomness from choosing the chunk. Now you have two problems:
1) there are not that many possiblities of choosing the chunk (n over k, if you know binomial coefficents)
2) the human is not very good at choosing something randomly. there will always be predictable patterns, thus lowering the entropy of the parts you need to brute-force.
there may be 100 popular generators. then this is a factor 100, which is not very much, if you compare it with the number of guesses for the correct randomseed ...
and this random input is the seed, you need to brute-force. the generator uses it then to generate pseudo-random numbers from it, computing passwords based on there numbers. the seed of jiggling the mouse is not that strong, that it cannot be brute-forced, if you have enough computing power.
now we can do two things
1) Guess your password generator, therefore the routines used.
2) brute-force the random-seed, generating passwords with the pseudorandom-sequence started by the brute-forced seed, hashing the paswords, all on the GPU.
now your passwords are still insecure.
I think you need a real random source (as some device counting radioactive decay) to create the passwords in a secure manner.
1.0 is for me as developer the release, which features everything i think my software should have, with no known bugs at releasetime. Thus 1.0 is a hard release. Then its easier to follow, i.e. releasing Bugfixes-Release as 1.0.1, working on 1.1.1 as Release with new features.
he wanted to change from 2.6.X to a Y.X scheme. Now he NEEDED to increase 2, or should he have continued 2.6.39, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, ...? This would be confusing, using 3.X is okay.
well, lets use a base-40 system. So it counts till 3.39 and then overflows to 4.0. The Big Question is: Will there be a 40.0 kernel? Or will it be 1.0.0?
> File revisions
use nilfs2
try pressing escape or right-click. this at least works with kde ctrl-alt-esc xkill-feature.
or try potrace
the hard part is how to use vi to change it.
this site does not answer the most basic questions. ... how does the miner avoid, that two persons mine the same coin? ... how is guaranteed that no coin is double-spent? yes, you can prove its double-spent, but you cannot prove its not. you can only say "i have no proof its double-spent, yet" ... its anonymous, because nobody knows who's behind the number, which spent the money? cool, than my bank account number is anonymous, too ... its pseudonymous in the very best case.
as
you haven't thought this to the end ...
if you can click on "John Smith", you can try every password you can think of without even the need of knowing his login-name.
they had ICQ until the protocol changed, then they removed it and added some version later irc, as there the protocol will not change (behind closed doors)
opera had icq-support build in some versions ago ...
firefox on android sucked the last time i tried it.
But the defaultbrowser is pretty much okay, if you want any more try opera for android. both are much better than firefox there.
now search for maverick meercat and for leopard.
hm, no genetic programming, train a neural net with input / correct output for single letters and then for whole words and see what you can get there.