pantyshot is, as the name suggest, a photo of the panties. upskirt is seeing/photoing under the panties. so a pantyshot is the product of photographing someone upskirt.
but firefox blocks when rendering one tab, i would like to use another tab in this time. if i cannot use another tab while the first one is loading, i do not need a tab-browser.
not only this. if you steal the cd from a shop, the shop has pays a lot more than the material costs. So the shop owner has real costs, while torrenting it hits the producer, which may not sell that many CDs. The producer has only the material cost. Of course, some shops may not sell the CDs they already bought from the producer, but then they will not buy that many CDs next time.
best thing to solve complex dependency problems: switch using apt-get and aptitude, because if one is stuck, most likely the other one still finds a new solution getting a few more problem packages installed correctly until all package problems are solved. Sometimes you will need to use dpkg, too. (dpkg -P --force-all packagename is a mighty weapon)
no, it redirects you to google i am feeling lucky, google redirects you to apple.com and there are some tld-guessing mechanism, so firefox may try apple.com if you type in apple.
I do not understand the advantage anyway. no dumb user uses the urlbar, they all use the google input field. and the smart ones manage to type.com after the domain.
who uses it, should understand the principle. not the maths behind it, but the idea. If the user does not understand the basic idea, he will mess up the security.
not that this were real NoScript features. NoScript should block scripts, and nothing else. I can install two extensions, if i want the rest of the features, too.
where can i get lion for free?
opensource != free software!
the problems are the same as with facebook. but facebook belongs to zuckerberg, g+ does not.
pantyshot is, as the name suggest, a photo of the panties. upskirt is seeing/photoing under the panties. so a pantyshot is the product of photographing someone upskirt.
really?
but firefox blocks when rendering one tab, i would like to use another tab in this time. if i cannot use another tab while the first one is loading, i do not need a tab-browser.
you're doing it wrong. i never get spam. i think this depends on the client software. some clients seem to attract spam, others do not.
every email client sucks.
did they code some transition? the typical ubuntu-users needs a wizard or something like this to migrate his data.
large communities like spin or jappy have this function since a long time.
there are three complicated things in computer science:
1) Naming
2) Off-By-One Errors
try using 0001. Somebody may think you use 0000 if you did not change the default. but nobody uses 0001
his luggage has thousands of feet.
try leaving your cave.
not only this.
if you steal the cd from a shop, the shop has pays a lot more than the material costs. So the shop owner has real costs, while torrenting it hits the producer, which may not sell that many CDs. The producer has only the material cost. Of course, some shops may not sell the CDs they already bought from the producer, but then they will not buy that many CDs next time.
best thing to solve complex dependency problems: switch using apt-get and aptitude, because if one is stuck, most likely the other one still finds a new solution getting a few more problem packages installed correctly until all package problems are solved. Sometimes you will need to use dpkg, too. (dpkg -P --force-all packagename is a mighty weapon)
there are LAMPP bundles, so its no problem to learn html/css/php/perl and deploying webapps with it.
why not using a real turing machine? who needs more than one bit per register?
e-what? When i want to message someone, i click on his face at facebook.
yeah, .m would be better. most sites have m.site.tld anyway.
no, it redirects you to google i am feeling lucky, google redirects you to apple.com
and there are some tld-guessing mechanism, so firefox may try apple.com if you type in apple.
I do not understand the advantage anyway. no dumb user uses the urlbar, they all use the google input field. and the smart ones manage to type .com after the domain.
who uses it, should understand the principle. not the maths behind it, but the idea. If the user does not understand the basic idea, he will mess up the security.
to make them expensive. Bitcoin is backey by the energy prices at the moment.
can be added as .so, but the .so is nonfree.
not that this were real NoScript features. NoScript should block scripts, and nothing else. I can install two extensions, if i want the rest of the features, too.