It's not way behind, it just has different goals. It's TCP/IP stack is phenomenal, and for most intents and purposes it's the only stack out there. Other OS's are ports and adaptations of it. It does what it does very well... Provide a robust and secure system, within a mature development environment to support database and server applications. It's doesn't try to be full featured or cutting edge like Linux, but rather pull out and distill solid, proven ideas. So on the consumer/desktop side it is pretty much dead except for people who like to play around or use a BSD environment elsewhere and they want something familiar and compatible. You'd never see Unity arise in the BSD community because it's simply too unorthodox. If Mac is the stylish metrosexual young man, and Windows the overweight and somewhat dweebish guy in a suit, then Linux is a gifted adolescent desperately looking for friends, and BSD is an older skilled tradesman who keep all his old tools in immaculate condition.
Where there is ambiguity in law, it must be decided in favor of liberty and justice. BTW malicious compliance is not a legal concept, and would be entirely unjust if it were. To be bound by unexpressed intentions is to be subject to arbitrary whims. The intention of an document may only be found in the words of the document itself. Previous of subsequent orders, relevant law, or common usage or terms may be used to better understand this order, but not statements of "oh by cat, I really meant dog" after the fact. Also none of this relevant instruments would suggest Google has any legal obligation to list any particular site in any particular order. The only exception might be that it may not doctor algorithms specifically to harm competitors because of anti-trust laws.E.g. If bing.com were not the first seach result for "bing" and if it were not on the first page for "search sites" or "web search" then you might have a problem.
Probably not. The order was likely written by the lawyer as a proposed order, and the judge just signed it making it an order. The judge was doing as the plantiff requested and the defendant offered no good legal argument why they shouldn't be obligated to do it.
Listing someone else work, verbatim, with a link to the original is not plagiarism. It could be copyright infringement, but is not plagiarism (which isn't illegal BTW so long as it doesn't involve copyright infringement)
And Google has no reason to list them without getting something in return, though with other people they tend do so in order to serve adds. It would however be absolutely insane to list them when they could lose a million dollars a day for doing so. And beyond this, Google already provides technical means to stop pages from being listed. That this company resorted to legal means rather than the provided technical resolutions doubly means that it is a high risk endeavor to have anything to do with these newspapers.
The motivation is clear. Google is a corporation that want's to make money, (and is in fact legally obligated to it's shareholders to make a best effort to do so) not lose it on some stupid court order from a Belgian court. This will probably resolve after the newspaper signs a waiver and agrees to limit their remedy of copyright issues by either using the technical methods Google provides, or by opting entirely out of Google results.
LSD-25, psilocybine and mescalin, all have potential to treat the same conditions (OCD, PSTD, addictions, and other anxiety based conditions), when taken in a controlled environment under the care of professionals. However the cost of the drug is pretty much free, and it at most takes a few doses spread out over a few month, instead of one or more a day a year or more, with a far lower risk of side effects for most people. Because you can't patent these drugs, nobody is going to go to much trouble to lobby and legalize this use. The first two are also quite effective in low doses (below the pychactive threahold) at treating cluster headaches and migraines.
Is it an actual increase or an increased awareness. The DSM keeps getting bigger and bigger. Of perhaps this itself a a symptom of something common factor. All a mental disorder is fundamentally is a set of abnormal behaviors. An increased focus on what is "normal" in general society could of course lead more people to be anxious about trying to be normal, fitting in and so on. Perhaps the DSM itself, along with involuntary commitment is just another factor of this control.
Ah, you haven't adjusted well to our control? You must be dangerous (to us), so we're going to lock you up and treat (brainwash or drug) you. Hell the soviets made extensive use of this psychiatric model
You could survive depression. You couldn't survive being thrown out of your tribe, or having your head cut off by a petty tyrant for standing up for yourself.
His famous collapse at the reigned horse was him weeping for mankind -- we're all shackled and bound, because if we weren't, we'd be too destructive.
Quo bono? Who benefits from that idea? Certainly not the shackled. And it begs the question, what are the rulers if not themselves men? Angels? Gods? Some people certainly seem to think as much, but of course they are deluded. The most dangerous and destructive mean are those in a position to deceive others, by conflating their personal interests with the "common good". Even more dangerous are those men who have deceived even themselves.
Also this idea is a self-fulfilling prophecy. A child who is abused and manipulated is far more likely to abuse and manipulate others as an adult. If you stick a kid in a classroom and humiliate and punish him for any deviance from "the plan", they will try to punish and humiliate those they find who have deviated because they have integrated a fear of deviation into their personalty in order to survive the humiliation and punishment of their teachers..
Social interaction is fundamentally never going to be more respectful of individual needs and preferences, than the degree of the same respect they show to children. Now individuals can analyze and overcome their reactions, but it's a very long process to get it to spread to most people. It's not hopeless it's just hard, and the place to start is to analyze your relationships with you friend and family to reduce and mitigate attempts of control and abuse.
Why don't you look at your personal life first? It's probably more relevant to your feelings of powerlessness. Is there something you've been meaning to say or do in your personal life but been to afraid to do? Someone that you associate with that just won't respect your needs?
Now there are systematic factors that push people towards an empty lifestyle. Inflation drives over-consumption by making saving less rewarding.Compulsory schooling teaches that you should judge yourself by how much you are like others, and who well you please authority. Property tax makes it so that you are never secure in your own home. Zoning and occupational licencing makes it difficult (but not impossible) to secure a living that fits your interests, skills, and schedule. Government intervention continues to increase prices of vital services like healthcare by limiting the supply of doctors and limiting the sorts of services a non-MD can provide even though they are qualified, and the cost of diagnostic chemistry and mechanics go down. Patents create monopolies everywhere and prevent innovation and competition
The solution is to stop asking permission to be an adult. Find a community where they won't rat you out or hate you for the slightest disobedience, and offer goods and services to them and without permission (licensing ) or paying extortion (taxes) if reasonably safe to do so. NH is a good place to start, but agoras can be made or found just about anywhere.
And if you want to access it ten years from now? Twenty? Fifty? If you don't know how the document was made, how are you supposed to access the data inside?
Intstall the package, compile it ourselves, or make or use the spinoff Gubuntu. Personally I like XFCE the best of anything I've tried (unity on gnome3, xfce, gnome2, and kde)
Treason only lies in waging war against the U.S. or in aiding it's enemies. Copying per se can not be either of these things. Ditribution may be, but not the copying. But everyone knows there's not such thing a treason really. http://www.lysanderspooner.org/node/44
8 is just the nightly build of 6. 5 is the stable, 6 is the beta, 7 is the alpha, and 8 is the probably won't work but if you insist, we'll let you try anyways. When 6 becomes stable, add in version nine and move all the descriptors one version up.
For other projects it would be like comparing the latest stable vs the git tree or SVN repository.
If it can't be avoided, then don't say anything substantial, don't affirm or deny anything. "What there's a password on my computer? How queer, I don't seem to remember having any passwords."
FGPA's are commodity hardware. No reason to believe they also won't improve in the next five years, even more so than a conventional CPU. as nobody can really see a way to get the manufacturing tech down below 14nm.
The batman protocol just needs to know that direction the nodes around it are sending data in. It also support mutiple network devices on a single node so you can interconnect between physical layers based on the density of people using the mesh. Some places could use wireless a/b/g/n, or even ethernet
It might be, but you'd have to use spread spectrum, hi-fi recievers, and transimitters that would reduce their broadcast power when more than a certain number of nodes were in range.
That's why you should hand-count the ballots and publicly announce the count for each polling place, and the meanwhile the boxes should never leave public view.
If your presentation isn't properly organized, not way in hell that your slide presentation will be.(power point just being one program that does computerized slides) That said,they are also pretty good for what slides were originally for. Presentations with a lot of pictures do well with power point. They are good at illustrating complex relationships or odd organization.At a certain point it would be more appropriate to provide handouts, but some people are just too lazy.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not way behind, it just has different goals. It's TCP/IP stack is phenomenal, and for most intents and purposes it's the only stack out there. Other OS's are ports and adaptations of it. It does what it does very well... Provide a robust and secure system, within a mature development environment to support database and server applications. It's doesn't try to be full featured or cutting edge like Linux, but rather pull out and distill solid, proven ideas. So on the consumer/desktop side it is pretty much dead except for people who like to play around or use a BSD environment elsewhere and they want something familiar and compatible. You'd never see Unity arise in the BSD community because it's simply too unorthodox. If Mac is the stylish metrosexual young man, and Windows the overweight and somewhat dweebish guy in a suit, then Linux is a gifted adolescent desperately looking for friends, and BSD is an older skilled tradesman who keep all his old tools in immaculate condition.
Where there is ambiguity in law, it must be decided in favor of liberty and justice. BTW malicious compliance is not a legal concept, and would be entirely unjust if it were. To be bound by unexpressed intentions is to be subject to arbitrary whims. The intention of an document may only be found in the words of the document itself. Previous of subsequent orders, relevant law, or common usage or terms may be used to better understand this order, but not statements of "oh by cat, I really meant dog" after the fact. Also none of this relevant instruments would suggest Google has any legal obligation to list any particular site in any particular order. The only exception might be that it may not doctor algorithms specifically to harm competitors because of anti-trust laws.E.g. If bing.com were not the first seach result for "bing" and if it were not on the first page for "search sites" or "web search" then you might have a problem.
Probably not. The order was likely written by the lawyer as a proposed order, and the judge just signed it making it an order. The judge was doing as the plantiff requested and the defendant offered no good legal argument why they shouldn't be obligated to do it.
Listing someone else work, verbatim, with a link to the original is not plagiarism. It could be copyright infringement, but is not plagiarism (which isn't illegal BTW so long as it doesn't involve copyright infringement)
And Google has no reason to list them without getting something in return, though with other people they tend do so in order to serve adds. It would however be absolutely insane to list them when they could lose a million dollars a day for doing so. And beyond this, Google already provides technical means to stop pages from being listed. That this company resorted to legal means rather than the provided technical resolutions doubly means that it is a high risk endeavor to have anything to do with these newspapers.
The motivation is clear. Google is a corporation that want's to make money, (and is in fact legally obligated to it's shareholders to make a best effort to do so) not lose it on some stupid court order from a Belgian court. This will probably resolve after the newspaper signs a waiver and agrees to limit their remedy of copyright issues by either using the technical methods Google provides, or by opting entirely out of Google results.
LSD-25, psilocybine and mescalin, all have potential to treat the same conditions (OCD, PSTD, addictions, and other anxiety based conditions), when taken in a controlled environment under the care of professionals. However the cost of the drug is pretty much free, and it at most takes a few doses spread out over a few month, instead of one or more a day a year or more, with a far lower risk of side effects for most people. Because you can't patent these drugs, nobody is going to go to much trouble to lobby and legalize this use. The first two are also quite effective in low doses (below the pychactive threahold) at treating cluster headaches and migraines.
Is it an actual increase or an increased awareness. The DSM keeps getting bigger and bigger. Of perhaps this itself a a symptom of something common factor. All a mental disorder is fundamentally is a set of abnormal behaviors. An increased focus on what is "normal" in general society could of course lead more people to be anxious about trying to be normal, fitting in and so on. Perhaps the DSM itself, along with involuntary commitment is just another factor of this control.
Ah, you haven't adjusted well to our control? You must be dangerous (to us), so we're going to lock you up and treat (brainwash or drug) you. Hell the soviets made extensive use of this psychiatric model
You could survive depression. You couldn't survive being thrown out of your tribe, or having your head cut off by a petty tyrant for standing up for yourself.
His famous collapse at the reigned horse was him weeping for mankind -- we're all shackled and bound, because if we weren't, we'd be too destructive.
Quo bono? Who benefits from that idea? Certainly not the shackled. And it begs the question, what are the rulers if not themselves men? Angels? Gods? Some people certainly seem to think as much, but of course they are deluded. The most dangerous and destructive mean are those in a position to deceive others, by conflating their personal interests with the "common good". Even more dangerous are those men who have deceived even themselves.
Also this idea is a self-fulfilling prophecy. A child who is abused and manipulated is far more likely to abuse and manipulate others as an adult. If you stick a kid in a classroom and humiliate and punish him for any deviance from "the plan", they will try to punish and humiliate those they find who have deviated because they have integrated a fear of deviation into their personalty in order to survive the humiliation and punishment of their teachers..
Social interaction is fundamentally never going to be more respectful of individual needs and preferences, than the degree of the same respect they show to children. Now individuals can analyze and overcome their reactions, but it's a very long process to get it to spread to most people. It's not hopeless it's just hard, and the place to start is to analyze your relationships with you friend and family to reduce and mitigate attempts of control and abuse.
I feel powerless because of the following:
Why don't you look at your personal life first? It's probably more relevant to your feelings of powerlessness. Is there something you've been meaning to say or do in your personal life but been to afraid to do? Someone that you associate with that just won't respect your needs?
Now there are systematic factors that push people towards an empty lifestyle. Inflation drives over-consumption by making saving less rewarding.Compulsory schooling teaches that you should judge yourself by how much you are like others, and who well you please authority. Property tax makes it so that you are never secure in your own home. Zoning and occupational licencing makes it difficult (but not impossible) to secure a living that fits your interests, skills, and schedule. Government intervention continues to increase prices of vital services like healthcare by limiting the supply of doctors and limiting the sorts of services a non-MD can provide even though they are qualified, and the cost of diagnostic chemistry and mechanics go down. Patents create monopolies everywhere and prevent innovation and competition
The solution is to stop asking permission to be an adult. Find a community where they won't rat you out or hate you for the slightest disobedience, and offer goods and services to them and without permission (licensing ) or paying extortion (taxes) if reasonably safe to do so. NH is a good place to start, but agoras can be made or found just about anywhere.
And if you want to access it ten years from now? Twenty? Fifty? If you don't know how the document was made, how are you supposed to access the data inside?
Intstall the package, compile it ourselves, or make or use the spinoff Gubuntu. Personally I like XFCE the best of anything I've tried (unity on gnome3, xfce, gnome2, and kde)
Treason only lies in waging war against the U.S. or in aiding it's enemies. Copying per se can not be either of these things. Ditribution may be, but not the copying. But everyone knows there's not such thing a treason really. http://www.lysanderspooner.org/node/44
Maybe by then 2013 ReactOS will be at a stable release or at least a general beta phase. When finished it should be ABI compatible with windows XP.
11.04 isn't bad, it's just unity that's horrible. You can still log in with gnome 2 if you want.
8 is just the nightly build of 6. 5 is the stable, 6 is the beta, 7 is the alpha, and 8 is the probably won't work but if you insist, we'll let you try anyways. When 6 becomes stable, add in version nine and move all the descriptors one version up. For other projects it would be like comparing the latest stable vs the git tree or SVN repository.
Only if you got caught.
Actually you can and may be. With civil contempt there is no limit on the length that it may last.
If it can't be avoided, then don't say anything substantial, don't affirm or deny anything. "What there's a password on my computer? How queer, I don't seem to remember having any passwords."
FGPA's are commodity hardware. No reason to believe they also won't improve in the next five years, even more so than a conventional CPU. as nobody can really see a way to get the manufacturing tech down below 14nm.
Copying is not theft.
High use areas could be augmented with Ethernet or fiber interconnects, directional gigabit wireless or plain old wireless.
The batman protocol just needs to know that direction the nodes around it are sending data in. It also support mutiple network devices on a single node so you can interconnect between physical layers based on the density of people using the mesh. Some places could use wireless a/b/g/n, or even ethernet
It might be, but you'd have to use spread spectrum, hi-fi recievers, and transimitters that would reduce their broadcast power when more than a certain number of nodes were in range.
That's why you should hand-count the ballots and publicly announce the count for each polling place, and the meanwhile the boxes should never leave public view.
If your presentation isn't properly organized, not way in hell that your slide presentation will be.(power point just being one program that does computerized slides) That said,they are also pretty good for what slides were originally for. Presentations with a lot of pictures do well with power point. They are good at illustrating complex relationships or odd organization.At a certain point it would be more appropriate to provide handouts, but some people are just too lazy.