Slashdot Mirror


Mass Psychosis In the USA?

Hugh Pickens writes "James Ridgeway writes in Al Jazeera that with over $14 billion in sales in 2008, antipsychotics have become the single top-selling therapeutic class of prescription drugs in the U.S., surpassing drugs used to treat high cholesterol and acid reflux. While once upon a time, antipsychotics were reserved for a relatively small number of patients with hard-core psychiatric diagnoses, today it seems, everyone is taking antipsychotics. 'Parents are told that their unruly kids are in fact bipolar, and in need of anti-psychotics, while old people with dementia are dosed, in large numbers, with drugs once reserved largely for schizophrenics,' writes Ridgeway. 'Americans with symptoms ranging from chronic depression to anxiety to insomnia are now being prescribed anti-psychotics at rates that seem to indicate a national mass psychosis.' By now, just about everyone knows how the drug industry works to influence the minds of American doctors, plying them with gifts, junkets, ego-tripping awards, and research funding in exchange for endorsing or prescribing the latest and most lucrative drugs. According to Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, under the tutelage of Big Pharma, we are 'simply expanding the criteria for mental illness so that nearly everyone has one.'"

542 comments

  1. Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No surprise here!

    1. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same thing is happening in Europe as well. In some countries, like Holland, they can prescribe you into euthanasia. The only way to win is not to play.

    2. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by gilleain · · Score: 4, Informative

      and europeans are weak willed socialist groupies! yay we can all come up with fun adhominems!

      It's not an ad hominem, it's an insult you moron. Oh, and "you moron" was also an insult. I'm not saying your argument is invalid because you are a moron, I'm saying you are a moron because your argument is invalid.

    3. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a little bit more nuanced, as usual: http://reload1.vpro.nl/programma/tegenlicht/afleveringen/37930209/

    4. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2

      Thank god for someone understanding what an argumentum ad hominem actually is. I was despairing over that particular bit of nonsense lately, thanks for reinstating at least some of my trust in humanity.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    5. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's exponentially annoying when people use it ad nauseum. It literally makes my blood boil!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      If I shot you right now, most jurisdictions would probably consider that justified homicide. ;)

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    7. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Teun · · Score: 2
      Nobody can 'prescribe' euthanasia, it has to be a voluntary decision and requested by the patient him or her self.

      There are strict rules assuring the sanity of the requester and it has to be reviewed by a medical doctor.
      The doctor has to report and register the request with the local coroner and the procedure will be checked by a commission.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    8. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0

      I hate grammar nazis, really. But - your post is rather intriguing. Would that properly be "Fuck yourselves, mods" or did you get it right with "Fuck yourself mods". Hmmmm. /me scratches head

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    9. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by rainmouse · · Score: 1

      No surprise here!

      Doctors these days are little more than well trained salesmen so it comes as no surprise when people walk out of their shop with the more expensive products.

    10. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like a clit piercing?

    11. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I know you'd think it so blatantly obvious that everyone would know better but unfortunately for a rather large proportion of the population coming to terms with magical thinking is still (unbelievably) insightful.

    12. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Surt · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it is way more interesting than insightful.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    13. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Look, I came here for an argument!
      No, no...this is abuse! (bloody twit)

    14. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe now is a good time to recommend that everybody here read Wilhelm Reich's Mass Psychology of Fascism (pdf). It's the most accurate take on the matter to date.. It actually explores the tension between ancient tribalism and the 'modern' individual

    15. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, judging by the tone of Slashdot articles such as this one....
      Highly paranoid as well.

    16. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a 'general psychotic', I take offense to the implication that I'm American first.

      /I'm batman

    17. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed.

    18. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Tell me how you do that blood-boiling trick. I love the effect on people!
      Last year, I'd learned how to literallly have steam come out my ears.

      Boy! They could really tell. I was ticked!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    19. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Like "We are the Mods". Like, you know, "One for the Mods".

      Like 'Outa the way, scooter boys. I'm Mod".

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    20. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      The comma is necessary either way, as "mods" is the subject of the imperative sentence. The subject is almost always separated by a comma unless it's an implied "you". In determining which is correct, I'd be inclined to move it to the front of the sentence and try again:

      Mods, fuck yourself.
      Mods, fuck yourselves.

      IMHO, "yourselves" sounds more natural, and is therefore appropriate. Any other justification (such as "The Latin rule says some crap about Lain which is irrelevant because we don't speak Latin") is not as valid as "it sounds acceptable and clearly communicates the intention for each mod to fuck himself". ;) If I were writing this in a formal paper (presuming that I write formal papers all the time, and that I regularly suggest fucking oneself in those papers), I'd probably avoid the issue and change it to something more like "Mods, each you you can go fuck yourself".

      We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.

    21. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we're armed too.

    22. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Don't make us come over to wherever you are and start a war that just might result in your death!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    23. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the other 49.9% of jurisdictions?

    24. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orgone energy, sex-economy, blah, blah, blah. Who's out of touch with reality?

    25. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      That's definitely tinfoil hat territory. Why don't you just ask your doctor if s/he is paid by any drug companies? I'm not, I never have been, and the most valuable thing I've ever gotten from a drug company was a dinner worth about $50 while I was in residency.

    26. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Swampash · · Score: 2

      Parent deserves +5

    27. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I read that as hyperbole about the power of the medications, and perhaps how they leave you in a zombified state.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    28. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are... excluding sex from the economy is a major part of the problem

    29. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by meridian · · Score: 1

      Here is my tinfoil hat statement: Al Jazeera has become quite different over the last 24 months. I believe this is an attempt to start a media campain by big brother media to negate the rise in people reporting remote neural monitoring and synthetic telepathy cases which are meant to mimic the symptoms of psychosis. They are using Al Jazeera as "people trust al jazeera" to not be a puppet of big media which I now suspect they are.
      http://www.mindjustice.org/
      http://geeldon.wordpress.com/
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner

      --
      meridian at tha.net
    30. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not psychotic, my voices are real. I just choose to supress them with antipsychotics.

  2. What?! by pinkj · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's crazy!

    1. Re:What?! by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      More like sad.

    2. Re:What?! by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Risperdal killed my father (imho.)

      while old people with dementia are dosed, in large numbers

      I thought FDA recommended against it?

    3. Re:What?! by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      That's crazy!

      Spending like crazy too.

    4. Re:What?! by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

      What?? Are you delusional?

      --
      I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
  3. Science at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ''Americans with symptoms ranging from chronic depression to anxiety to insomnia are now being prescribed anti-psychotics at rates that seem to indicate a national mass psychosis.'"

    Glad to see evidence supports the world's opinion.

    1. Re:Science at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the level of arrogance is astounding.. first you presume that you represent 'the world's' opinion, and second you adhominem an entire country based on preconceived notions. Ok, then I can do the same. So much for your 'multi-culturalism' eh? you know, that pathetic willingness to let barbarians into your countries to build ghettos and sharia courts? weak willed hypocrite!

  4. Sure by mbone · · Score: 1

    I can believe it. Have you looked at our politics lately ?

    1. Re:Sure by FudRucker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      yeah, because the US FedGov wants everyone too doped up to care about how badly they are getting fucked by the system...

      infowars.com

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't knock the Feds. It's hard work keeping a balance among
      druged citizens so they won't OD on music and games but will
      still pay their bills, loans and taxes; with someting left over for
      fattening carbohydrates and donations for animal shelters.

    3. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alex Jones is nothing but a fraud and a liar, please don't push his ridiculous ideas on everyone else here. All he does is profiteer on every single rumor that passes his ears. The only thing he is good for is determining if an idea is complete garbage or not. (Personally, if I find an idea that was pushed by Alex Jones or one of his cronies it helps me quite a bit because I immediately know that there is absolutely no credibility to the idea whatsoever).

  5. Just call it "Soma" ... by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aldous Huxley was spot on ...

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
    1. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      I had the same comparison to "A Brave New World." I've been meaning to go back and read it again. Perhaps this should be required reading.

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    2. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I guess it is. Just nobody told them that it's a warning, not a manual.

      What scares me is that some people actually took it as an utopian novel. 1984 is easy to see as dystopian, nobody wants to live in a world like that, but I actually know people who thought that the BNW looks actually quite nice...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by dgun · · Score: 1

      Yes but in the book, pop culture is all about sex, and sex itself is trivial, and people are brainwashed and have infantile views.....Ok. But where is my helicopter vehicle thingy?

      --
      FAQs are evil.
    4. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by russ_allegro · · Score: 1

      ...I actually know people who thought that the BNW looks actually quite nice...

      Only if you end up an alpha.

    5. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually know people who thought that the BNW looks actually quite nice.

      And I am one of those people. *shrug*

    6. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      THX-1138 was very close to the dystopia that this trend hints at. Everyone had to be on drugs to do their boring work.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not even then. Looking at my IQ and profession and whatnot, I'm an "Alpha" in our society. Does it make me happy? No. I look at the world and it grieves me deeply and saddens me to see how people are unable and unwilling to look beyond their narrow viewpoint and past the confines of what they consider their life. It saddens me that these people do not even want to fulfill their potential anymore and that they cannot fathom the possibilities presented to them. Watching them waste away their life in front of the TV box when there is so much to learn, know and try your hands at hurts me deeply.

      Now think how this would be if I knew that these people were bred that way to be that way and there's no way out for them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Equilibrium also involved drugs to maintain social order. This by suppressing emotional reactions.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    9. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by hitmark · · Score: 1
      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    10. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      I claim that the issue is that of the work day. Once your done working your brain is basically fried, and the TV acts as a kind of relaxant. Basically, the modern workday is stressed beyond reason to keep that growth curve going up up up in a exponential fashion. Anything else and the company is presumed dead and ready for slaughter by the stock market and competition. We are no longer humans, we are worker bees or ants.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    11. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by russotto · · Score: 1

      Only if you end up an alpha.

      The epsilons are happy being epsilons.

    12. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a brave new world" should be "required reading"?

      read it again.

    13. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      Aldous Huxley did make an attempt at the utopian novel after BNW. It's called Island and I'd recommend it as mandatory immediately following the reading of BNW.

    14. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's my orgy-porgy then?

    15. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AH was suggesting the principal character of the story was insane for not conforming to the cultural whims of the new society. Or in other words, 'When in Rome ...' although like most readers I thought 'Brave new world' was about a tourist who couldn't adjust to a society that destroyed individuality and intimacy. How far is our civilisation from that predicament? It is why I like the movie 'The network (1976)' which predicts the enslavement of a media-driven society. The Ray Bradbury novel 'Fahrenheit 451' also suggested a media-driven society caused a dumbing-down of the populace.

    16. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by YankDownUnder · · Score: 1

      Exactly spot on.

      --
      YankDownUnder Veni, Vidi, volo in domum redire
    17. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Your brain is fried after a day at work? Get a job that is less taxing on your brain. I noticed that a while ago, that I, too, worked at my limits and hence felt very bad at the end of a work day. Eventually it led to a burnout.

      Now I have a much less crippling job, and with just 500 bucks a month less. Which doesn't really matter, whether I have 1500 or 2000 left over after everything's paid and done doesn't really matter that much to me. But instead I get a brain that is actually quite relaxed after a day at work and can handle a few hours of leisure coding without feeling completely wasted.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Looking at my IQ and profession and whatnot, I'm an "Alpha" in our society.

      If you have a profession, in the sense that you work for a living, you are not an Alpha, at least not in our society.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  6. They treat more than schizophrenia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm on an anti-psychotic for depression. When everything else failed, this worked.

    1. Re:They treat more than schizophrenia by Manip · · Score: 2

      Exactly what else did the doctor suggest you try? Counselling, Group Theory, Dietary changes? Or was it just, you go in, BANG, prescription for drugs and problem solved?

    2. Re:They treat more than schizophrenia by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Exactly what else did the doctor suggest you try?

      Paying his bill.

      Here in the US we don't have nearly as good medical care as say, Bulgaria, unless you're part of the ownership class.

      You know, they say the health care system in the US is so bad it makes you crazy, which gives me a different insight into this story about psychosis in the US.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  7. Soma by srussia · · Score: 2

    It's a Brave New World.

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  8. Expensive drugs? by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe those drugs are just super expensive. A total number of consumers would be more useful.

    1. Re:Expensive drugs? by Hebbinator · · Score: 5, Informative

      DINGDINGDINGDING

      Most brand-name antipsychotics can go WHOLESALE for 400-500/month, some are even more than that. Most cholesterol drugs are now on the $4 list, or have a $4 equivalent, except for lipitor (debateable whether or not it could be substituted for another statin because of all the studies..) which will be generic soon. Acid-reflux drug sales bottomed out as omeprazole (Prilosec) went generic and over the counter - the PPI class used to be the big money maker here because there were no generic alternatives. The new generation of antipsychotics are ALL still on patent except for Risperidone.

      Also of note: "antipsychotics" are used to treat more than psychosis. They have been shown to be very helpful in several other psychiatric illnesses.. although I must say there are a *LOT* of cheaper/better alternatives for insomnia. These are not "off label" uses, by the way - many antipsychotics have been researched and gained FDA approval for more than one disease/condition. The class name is being substituted for the indication here to cause a stir.. "if you are on an 'antipsychotic,' then you must be psychotic!" A better name would be "selective d-2 receptor blockers with varying serotonin and anticholinergic receptor activity" but its a bit lengthy ;)

      The real headline here should be "PPI and Statin drug sales wiped out by generic replacements, antipsychotics still under patent. Also, some people havent heard about ambien yet."

    2. Re:Expensive drugs? by mewshi_nya · · Score: 1

      Exactly. One of the prescriptions I was one a while ago was 800/month without insurance.

    3. Re:Expensive drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly. although i did not read the article the premise that total dollar = greatest quantity is false unless the actual data substantiates this.

    4. Re:Expensive drugs? by Surt · · Score: 1

      The article, if you FRTA, claims 20M prescriptions. That'd be about 5% of Americans being psychotic.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:Expensive drugs? by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      Everything medical costs 10x as much without insurance. If I were in charge I'd pass two laws:

      1. Everybody providing a medical service must publish a price list.
      2. The medical service provider must collect the same fee from everybody.

      Go to the hospital without insurance. You'll get a $100k bill in the mail. Beg and plead, they'll send you an application for charity care. After submitting in triplicate every financial record you've ever had or not had and spending 100 hours on this, chances are they'll deem you to have a genuine need and offer to settle the bill for a payment plan that only comes to $30k. What they don't mention is that no insurer on the planet pays more than $10k for the same bill, and nobody has to beg for anything. I've seen some crazy explanation-of-benefits statements and they consist of 5 pages of charges where 3/4ths of the charges are simply marked as not allowable, and the rest are paid for 1/3rd the billed amount. The bottom of the letter states that the patient cannot be billed for the difference. Hospitals go along, since otherwise they'd lose half their patients overnight. And then we call the insurance companies evil...

      Plenty of blame to go around in the US healthcare system...

    6. Re:Expensive drugs? by sdguero · · Score: 1

      Or maybe, just maybe, we are a little too reliant on pills to fix our problems. I bet the author of the (likely biased) article has seen a pill popper or two get started with a perfectly legitimate ambien prescription from their doctor. In my experience, people like the stuff they get (ambien, ritallin, viagara, zyrtec, whatever), then just keep ratcheting things up until they get to Oxycontin, Valium, etc. And doctors prescribe it for them! Literally the last thing that person needs is more drugs and here is someone who spent 7 years in school learning how to help people but can't spot a drug addict right in front of their face (or doesn't want too)... It's crazy.

      A perfectly normal, strong, smart person who just likes the feeling of being fucked up will continue to ask for more and some doctors are happy to keep writing prescriptions to the point of destroying a life. I've seen it first hand.

    7. Re:Expensive drugs? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      ... although I must say there are a *LOT* of cheaper/better alternatives for insomnia.

      Yeah. Trazadone works pretty damn well at a cost much less than 25 cents a tablet.

      --
      That is all.
    8. Re:Expensive drugs? by swillden · · Score: 1

      What you say is true, but unrelated. Anti-psychotics aren't part of the drug path you mention. Among other things, they don't give you any kind of a "high", and many of them have some rather unpleasant side effects.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:Expensive drugs? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Melatonin is even cheaper.

      I don't really think you can compare Trazodone to Ambien, though. Trazodone tends to make you feel fuzzy after you wake up, while Ambien doesn't. Traz is also an anti-depressant, though, so for a lot of people it can do double duty.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re:Expensive drugs? by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      That and a generational gap. You'd think I was making it up if I tried explaining in context.

      The area I live in, summarized, has the view if you take pills the pills drove you insane. If you were insane before the pills then you are either a closet gay or pedophile. If you are too young for them to perceive to be a pedophile or gay, then you are snorting the medication to get high.

      Note the last line there. Starting with my mother's generation, unevenly, when they became parents they began seeing psyche health as being something worth checking into. As their kids are now adults they are more willing (due to seeing it help their peers) seek help when something emerges and take their kids for help if something seems off.

      I think it is a three-fold problem:
      * Previous generations were undermedicated due to social stigma
      * Prices keep/kept some economic classes of people from buying the drugs until generics started coming out.
      * Just like anti-vax proponents, you have people who are over medicating more now throwing the number off in the opposite direction.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    11. Re:Expensive drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point of the article(s) is that what you are talking about is influenced by other factors. The point of the article is that there is a trend to use certain types of (not so harmless) drugs for increasingly trivial problems that might be solved through other means.

    12. Re:Expensive drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Working in a pharmacy I can probably get you some alternate drug for dirt cheap if the doctor agrees. Any drug that isn't very complicated to make (the artificial antibodies and whatnot) will generally drop to 10% of their original price or less. I spent a lot of my time as an intern dealing with substitutions for patients without insurance. "Lets see the Ciprodex (R) will be around 558 dollars without tax. Since this is your first time with this infection, I think I can convince the doctor to use this older drop that is 35.50." Any pharmacist worth his salt counts the days down until a generic of anything is available. Don't hesitate to ask a local pharmacist if there is something that you might get swapped to that is cheaper. Privately owned pharmacies are usually happy to oblige.

    13. Re:Expensive drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife took trazadone for insomnia. Very bad news. So-so for helping her sleep, but messed with her brain chemistry pretty badly. She developed a pretty nasty personality. I was considering divorce until we figured out it was the medication.

    14. Re:Expensive drugs? by cavebison · · Score: 1

      Maybe those drugs are just super expensive. A total number of consumers would be more useful.

      This is exactly why I scroll down a few comments before RTFA. They're often invaluable in adding some context or simply rendering TFA redundant.

    15. Re:Expensive drugs? by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      They are really expensive.

      Also, I wonder what kind of anti-psychotic is being prescribed? Some drugs, like Cymbalta, treat Fibromyalgia and are anti-depressants too. So, does that suddenly make all people taking an anti-depressant for treatment of Fibromyalgia depressed sods? No, it means the drug being taken is being used for another legitimate purpose.

    16. Re:Expensive drugs? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it - those 40 days on low dose risperidone were high grade torture.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  9. Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thinking big pharma conspire with doctors to prescribe antipsychotic drugs to healthy people rings of conspiracy theories. Those that adhere to such drivel obviously have psychics problems and should be sent to mad houses so they can be cured by the use of antipsychotic drugs.

  10. det67vasdfe4 by alostpacket · · Score: 3, Funny

    SDFCDXVPIs dsfousDF W3EIUSVCKNP09U Sdf8uiSDKn09 9ac9 9vskn23kjsfd90iasdf sd0-asvn98vns er923ns-sdfnsc90vusd[vfsdv -DJERPDFGN;fv9vbmn0fngb30dvnopsadng4w- df-09idfma-43k5df-0g dsf0g43590d df09gt3 fg0 4

    (I'm Amrecian)

    --
    PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    1. Re:det67vasdfe4 by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I'm Amrecian

      Please, sir, what language do Amrecians speak?

    2. Re:det67vasdfe4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange, I would have guessed you were Welsh.

    3. Re:det67vasdfe4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fracking A! I'm sick of updating my PS3. Please stop posting Sony's damn crypto keys so I can sit around and kill some dudes without rebooting every 2 days.

    4. Re:det67vasdfe4 by BlueLightning · · Score: 2

      Please, sir, what language do Amrecians speak?

      Elngish, of course.

    5. Re:det67vasdfe4 by nagnamer · · Score: 1

      Elngish, of course.

      You must mean "American English". There's no such thing as "English" in English-speaking countries.

      --
      Every harsh word you utter has the right address. It only sounds harsh because the one on the envelope is the wrong one.
    6. Re:det67vasdfe4 by eam · · Score: 1

      No, he meant "Amrecian Elngish"

      Try to keep up.

    7. Re:det67vasdfe4 by nagnamer · · Score: 1

      Try to keep up.

      I give up.

      --
      Every harsh word you utter has the right address. It only sounds harsh because the one on the envelope is the wrong one.
  11. Or Mass Over-Prescription... by Scotland+Tom · · Score: 2

    Or it's just a case of mass over-prescription of antipsychotics. Nothing is normal anymore, EVERYONE has some kind of mental or physical disorder that must be treated by drugs.

    1. Re:Or Mass Over-Prescription... by Bramlet+Abercrombie · · Score: 1

      Just because you are prescribed something doesn't mean you have to start taking it. I was prescribed citalopram and never took a single pill. I'm not going to take a drug that gives people "brain shocks" when they stop taking it, that's insane.

    2. Re:Or Mass Over-Prescription... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the fact that drugs cannot treat any mental condition that is not fundamentally a brain illness (and this means basically all of psychiatric illness) means that they just keep shovelling in the drugs and patting themselves on the back because they think they understand what they are doing and they know no better. It is truly a tragic situtation in which power over peoples' behaviour is vested in such a fundamentally clueless profession as psychiatry.

    3. Re:Or Mass Over-Prescription... by Dreamstalker_wolf · · Score: 2

      I can believe that. When I was very young, I was put on a tricyclic that I recently learned should never be given to children (I don't believe that whoever prescribed it didn't know this). I never was able to find out what the reasoning was for putting me on that stuff, only that it was causing mild depression as well as a host of other odd side effects.

      In my teens, I was put on Resperidone which didn't do shit. That reasoning was schizophrenia...all because I was an avid gamer and fanfic writer. The only thing that happened is my grades sank like a stone because I couldn't concentrate (also a messy almost-accident involving a table saw). My mother took me off of it after I passed out in the car and apparently stopped breathing for a short time. A month later, we see the doc..."She seems to be doing really well! How are the meds going?" "She's been off them for a month." It was quite telling that he couldn't tell I wasn't taking the pills...further proof that I didn't have what I was being "treated" for.

      What did I actually have? Brain trauma in infancy that eventually sorted itself out naturally. I can't help but wonder if had I not been put on all that shit things would have been different.

  12. My nonprofessional observation: by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Thanks to drug companies' advertising, it seems a lot of drugs of different classes are overprescribed. I'm no M.D. but it doesn't seem that antipsychotics would do much good for depression.

    My doctor had me on Paxil for a year or so after my divorce, they were hard to get off of and I'd wished I'd never taken them.

    However, it sure seems like there are an awful lot of really crazy people here in Springfield, many of them violent, who should probably be on medication but aren't. I'm 59 and I don't remember very many nutballs when I was young, but there sure seem to be a lot of crazies these days. I often wonder why, but didn't Reagan throw a bunch of lunatics out of the mental institutions back in the eighties?

    1. Re:My nonprofessional observation: by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Maybe those people are crazy because they're OVERmedicated? And further, because the only things the public health system will pay for on their behalf are shit? I had a county health official prescribe me a pill for respiratory function that it turned out the county health wouldn't pay for (this was a while back in my student days) even when petitioned... something that had been on the approved list just a month earlier, and something for which there was no more effective replacement.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:My nonprofessional observation: by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Maybe those people are crazy because they're OVERmedicated?

      Zoloft + alcohol = crazy fucker.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:My nonprofessional observation: by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Umm, not so much. It's more along the line of alcohol + crazy fucker = really crazy fucker. Especially when you add methamphetamine (or whatever they sold the guy), sleep depression, plain old depression and C-span.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:My nonprofessional observation: by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      However, it sure seems like there are an awful lot of really crazy people here in Springfield,...

      I know! Right?

      At first it was just Sideshow Bob but now it seems like everyone is a bit unhinged: Groundskeeper Willy, Mr. Burns, Smithers, Moe, and the list goes on!

      Hell, Maggie shot someone, and Lisa Simpson even kissed Millhouse! What is this world coming to!?

    5. Re:My nonprofessional observation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard a show on NPR about this. It's actually quite interesting. The author of the book put out that the typical psychiatric patient (housed in a state-run medical facility) of the 70's was ousted in the eighties by a well-intentioned policy that the feds would take over those state institutions. At the time, these hospitals were breaking the budgets of many states - so the states were all too happy to have the feds take it over. Then, when Congress got a hold of it they cut the living **** out of the budgets (it was in the fine-print of the 'contract with America,' if I recall correctly). End result: no more psychiatric care (comparatively).

      Most of the people in our prison system would have been housed in psychiatric hospitals 40 years ago. I don't know, but I'd guess it'd be cheaper to have those hospitals back. The sneaky thing is that we've lost the 'pulse' of the nation's mental health because we no longer have these institutions. So, not many are beating the drum of this epidemic.

      From a very abstract viewpoint, I'd say it's lunacy to expect everyone to act 'normally' when we are constantly being pushed - either by a nosy neighbor, a new policy pushing conformance and intolerance, a higher bill, or whatever. There was a time when we had more 'freedom.' Meaning, we had less pressure on us as a society when there were less people and a smaller economic engine. Can we go back? Not with our current models of operation. The US economic policy is built on expansion - boundless expansion. I'd call that stupid, but I'm not smart enough to understand it all.

      Meh. I've not succumbed to the paxil/zoloft/whatever club. I know MANY who have.

    6. Re:My nonprofessional observation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reagan did throw people out of mental institutions, and we've got some excellent atypical anti-psychotics that have made those people able to lead semi-functional lives, even if they do require support from family/friends to be able to be fully functional. It's a great thing. The meds can be expensive, they can have some side effects, but they've made a world of difference.

    7. Re:My nonprofessional observation: by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I'm speaking from personal experience of 3 people I've known. Alcohol and Zoloft don't mix, it has the opposite effect to Zoloft alone.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:My nonprofessional observation: by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'm sure some are, but I'd wager most are either undermedicated or are in the wrong drug. I knew one guy a couple of decades ago that was totally whacked out, they got him on meds and the next time I saw him was at the poll working as an election judge. On meds he seemed completely normal. I'v known othere, though, that the drugs didn't help at all.

      Your experience with the county health department is typical of what others in your position tell me.

    9. Re:My nonprofessional observation: by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Zoloft, but when I was on Paxil, two beers had me bouncing off the walls. Four or five and I was hallucinating; people turned into cartoons (it was actually enjoyable).

      The Paxil was hard to get off of.

    10. Re:My nonprofessional observation: by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Yep! Sideshow Bob (AKA Klutzo the Klown, or was it Krusty?) died in jail after being arrested for kiddie porn and sex tourism when a jailor sat on him, Mayor Quimby committed suicide, and Mr. Burns just retired.

  13. Everyone wins by alphatel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last year my wife was suffering from some anxiety during her pregnancy. An internal medicine doctor prescribed an anti-psychosis drug to treat bipolar disorder. The list of side effects included just about everything you wouldn't want to happen to a pregnant women. What would a drug like this do to an unborn child, let alone an adult!

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:Everyone wins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Pharms a scourge on society. I don't know a single woman that isn't popping a pill of some kind, and most are gobbling down an entire bouquet of colours every day. The western medical establishment no longer practices medicine, if you want an actual cure for your ailment, go to a Chinese doctor (that hasn't been bought off).

    2. Re:Everyone wins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last year my wife was suffering from some anxiety during her pregnancy. An internal medicine doctor prescribed an anti-psychosis drug to treat bipolar disorder. The list of side effects included just about everything you wouldn't want to happen to a pregnant women. What would a drug like this do to an unborn child, let alone an adult!

      Making sure the child needs anti-psychotics from the craddle?

    3. Re:Everyone wins by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      I did. He got rid of my cold but now I'm hooked on MSG.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Everyone wins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you know there is a barrier between the mother's blood and the baby's, right? Some things make it through and some don't. Maybe the doctor wasn't crazy to prescribe it.

    5. Re:Everyone wins by evilgraham · · Score: 2

      I did too, but 20 minutes later I wanted to cure it again.

    6. Re:Everyone wins by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Instead you will be paying for tiger balls...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    7. Re:Everyone wins by hitmark · · Score: 1

      odd, as pregnancy plays havoc with the hormone balance. In other words, it may well be a short term side effect of the pregnancy. So if one can hang in there for 9 months, the problem should in theory correct itself.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    8. Re:Everyone wins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to Thalidomide victims.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide
      It's a shame how over-medicated Americans have become. When I lived in the US it seemed that about every 3 out of 7 adults were on medication to treat some kind of mental "disorder". (including insomnia) Anyone who isn't a medical doctor who criticizes the practice is met with derision and hostility by those who think that doctors truly have their patients' best interests in mind when they prescribe this type of medication. It's sad that so many people allow themselves to be so easily manipulated by Big Pharma.

    9. Re:Everyone wins by Dreamstalker_wolf · · Score: 1

      Well, you know there is a barrier between the mother's blood and the baby's, right? Some things make it through and some don't.

      Just as extra nutrients ingested by the mother are good for the baby, the bad things can also pass through (crack and Thalidomide babies, FAS, any number of birth defects linked to antidepressants or other medications, etc). That's why a lot of medicines have the warning to consult a doctor if you're pregnant.

    10. Re:Everyone wins by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      Last year my wife was suffering from some anxiety during her pregnancy. An internal medicine doctor prescribed an anti-psychosis drug to treat bipolar disorder. The list of side effects included just about everything you wouldn't want to happen to a pregnant women. What would a drug like this do to an unborn child, let alone an adult!

      That's really shady business--your internist prescribed drugs s/he is not qualified to prescribe. They should have sent you to a psychiatrist. If what you said is true, complaining to the right people could get this person in a whole lot of trouble.

    11. Re:Everyone wins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually anti-psychotics are considered to be the safest option to treat bipolar disorder in pregnant woman since they are not believed to have any effect on the unborn child and there is enough experience with them to back that view. So much so that many of the stronger morning-sickness drugs are actually anti-psycotics which have been relabeled for use, Stematil springs to mind.

  14. Re:bring on the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Go to Fox News if you think only your biased opinion is the correct one.

  15. This is surprising... why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The "dumb" half of the country goes manic from the hype on the media, the "smart" half gets depressed by seeing what happening. One half swallows the hype and goes nuts over it, the other half doesn't and descends into hope- and helplessness.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:This is surprising... why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. The dumb half swallowed the hype and elected Obama in 2008.........now the smart half is depressed the country is going down the toilet.

    2. Re:This is surprising... why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you need religion, or music. or maybe both. not the wrong kind, of course.
      I prescribe Mechanic Manyeruke, see if it helps a bit.
      Don't be distracted by him looking at His armpit or the crappy sound quality, concentrate on the women's choir instead, and let the singing lift you.

    3. Re:This is surprising... why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Interesting how the conservatives instantly get defensive and start snapping the moment you mention people swallowing media hype.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:This is surprising... why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feeling depressed, eh? Well.....there's a pill for that.

  16. Well that explains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    the popularity of Facebook and the iPhone.

  17. The TEA Party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    And politics in general. Now there's a reason for me to keep myself thoroughly medicated.

    1. Re:The TEA Party? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And politics in general. Now there's a reason for me to keep myself thoroughly medicated.

      Why? Because you failed to thoroughly medicate the tea party?

    2. Re:The TEA Party? by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      No, but I've always wondered what kind of stuff you have to be on to actually swallow the "easy answers" they're peddling. I guess now I know.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:The TEA Party? by Magius_AR · · Score: 1

      No, but I've always wondered what kind of stuff you have to be on to actually swallow the "easy answers" they're peddling.

      Easy? You mean like "more stimulus! raise the debt ceiling! more stimulus! raise the debt ceiling! more stimulus!". I'm rather amazed people swallow _that_ "easy answer" tripe considering our current mess of an economy.

  18. Re:bring on the trolls by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can't we block foreign IPs from this website? Or at least foreign IPs posting as AC?

    Can we block redneck bigots from this site? Or at least start Americans with karma -1 by default?

  19. The Century of the Self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Check out the BBC show "The Century of the Self"

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/features/century_of_the_self.shtml

    When you see that, it becomes pretty clear that the US population were unsuspecting guinea pigs in what's certainly the biggest experiment in mass psychology ever done. And that experiment FAILED.

    1. Re:The Century of the Self by Surt · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, the US is a nation of failures if ever there was one. You can see how self actualization was an abject failure alright.
      </sarcasm>

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:The Century of the Self by Murfyn · · Score: 1

      "Experiments don’t fail. They give us information. Maybe that information is telling us that dropping our flask on the ground was not a good idea. Data collected. Lesson learned. Next experiment." -from http://www.benchfly.com/blog/ten-ways-to-be-a-successful-scientist/ You are right about the "guinea pig" thing, though.

  20. Re:bring on the trolls by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And while it would be a convenient explanation, the one that's probably more likely is that there is money to be made by selling drugs and hence there is quite some interest to call everyone who isn't "normal" by some arbitrary standard nuts and hence in need of drugs.

    It's a bit like hypertension. When the sales for blood pressure lowering drugs were not high enough, we simply lowered the normal blood pressure ranges from about 130/100 to 120/80 and suddenly a lot of people were in dire need to lower their pressure.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. Al Jazeera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're trusting a article about America from a Arab-nation news service?

    1. Re:Al Jazeera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The state of one's appearance is seen better from outside.

    2. Re:Al Jazeera? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So? We're trusting articles about Iran from US news services, this is just a small leap of faith after that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Al Jazeera? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      "Satire is an imperfect mirror, in which we can see others but not ourselves."

      "Shut up, buttmunch"

          -- Some dudes wearing wigs.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  22. Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of those psychotropic drugs are derived from opiates. Is the US's continued military presence in Afghanistan (one of the biggest opium producers in the world) the unprecedented prescribing of these drugs ("...expanding the criteria for mental illness so that nearly everyone has one") and the need to pay down an ever-escalating debt, connected? Make everyone an addict and then sell them what they want – no quicker 'get rich quick' scheme.

    1. Re:Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I'm aware no antipsychotics are derived from opiates.

  23. Re:bring on the trolls by mutherhacker · · Score: 1

    Foreign? There's no such thing as nations on the internet you imbecile. That's the one good thing about it. And the fact that I can call you an imbecile from the safety my mom's basement.

  24. I am on antipsychotics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am on these class of drugs. For over 10 years now. When I was diagnosed I told my shrink some jibberish about aliens, and was having violent outbursts. I'm not joking about this. I was hallucinating with no drugs, I was messed up really bad. A few really bad LSD trips and down I went, permanent insanity. Tell your shrink that you're telepathic and there are greys, and actually believe it, well they can help you. They helped me get back to "normal" whatever that is, but they no doubt have helped me substantially. Properly used they can save your life, and possibly the lives of others if you happen to have black trenchcoat machine gun thoughts like I had, along with awareness of some kind of alien agenda influencing our technological progress. These were all my own thoughts at the time in college (1997), it was so obvious to me, but not to my doctors.

    I don't know what to say really, maybe I was "too smart" for my own good. These drugs have dumbed me down a lot, just enough to be able to deal with people, while still retaining my individuality.

    1. Re:I am on antipsychotics. by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I am on these class of drugs. For over 10 years now. When I was diagnosed I told my shrink some jibberish about aliens

      I've always assumed that this is why the scientologists don't like mental illness being treated properly...

    2. Re:I am on antipsychotics. by JamesP · · Score: 1

      You are probably one of the few correctly diagnostic persons on Anti-psychotics

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  25. Evidence & Problems by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The point is that it's evidence of overprescription, not of excessive psychotic behavior.

    There is also a problem in the observations in the summary--notably, the mere fact that we are expanding our clinical definitions of psychological diagnoses is NOT a bad thing--the problem is when people treat them wrong. The good thing about expanding and re-working the definitions is that it lets you describe and identify conditions better in each generation than you did in the generation before, and maybe learn something more about how they should be best treated.

    The problem is that almost nobody does real psychotherapy anymore (except for the filthy rich), so in most cases all people do is prescribe medication as if that would treat the problem. There are cases where it will, and there are more cases where it will treat the symptoms, but it often is very much the wrong approach. You can't sit down with someone and cure a psychological issue with a talking-to or folk medicine--they can be complex and very time-consuming and difficult for people to learn to live with or move past or adapt to the world in spite of--but conversations, activities, and the development of a support network in almost every case I have seen has made a bigger impact by far than the use of drugs.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:Evidence & Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is definitely over-prescription but over the years I have noticed a marked increase in anxiety and other mental disorders.

      I blame it on many factors. The media is all about death, terrorist, pedophiles, etc. and they love to control people's emotions. The government is pushing the same agenda and getting more oppressive/invasive in our daily lives. Corporations are invading our privacy left and right. Hackers (eg. hostile governments) are stealing all this information from the above groups. Laws are being introduced at an unheard of rate. Everyone is a criminal these days and people are regularly abused by the system and people meant to protect them. What's the prison population at now? And the list goes on (economy/money problems, etc).

      I believe those factors are playing a large part in creating a society of fear and loss of control. It's no wonder large numbers of people are developing mental disorders.

    2. Re:Evidence & Problems by Sinthet · · Score: 2

      A big problem that results from this over-prescription is the fact that people will believe the way the drug makes them feel is "normal". These drugs are definitely strong enough to be felt and isolated as a cause, and so the uninformed patient will assume that the doctor found something wrong with me, and this pill is fixing it. This creates more demand for the product, which is great for the companies, but with the wide range of effects these drugs can have on different people and personality types, I doubt it's good for the population as a whole.

      I'm not someone who is against drugs, since the drugs here really aren't the problem. Doctor's who take part in this are certainly part of the problem, as are uninformed patients who place 100% trust into (usually) a complete stranger.

      Unfortunately, I don't see a viable way to get rid of either problem.

    3. Re:Evidence & Problems by jamesh · · Score: 1

      A big problem that results from this over-prescription is the fact that people will believe the way the drug makes them feel is "normal". These drugs are definitely strong enough to be felt and isolated as a cause, and so the uninformed patient will assume that the doctor found something wrong with me, and this pill is fixing it. This creates more demand for the product, which is great for the companies, but with the wide range of effects these drugs can have on different people and personality types, I doubt it's good for the population as a whole.

      The other problem it creates is a lack of empathy for those who really do have a mental illness... "Depression? Yeah I had a bad case of that the other day, but I took one of these and now I feel all better. Maybe you just need to take more pills?"

      Maybe the scientologists, while a little extreme, had a point ;)

    4. Re:Evidence & Problems by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      The point is that it's evidence of overprescription, not of excessive psychotic behavior.

      There is also a problem in the observations in the summary--notably, the mere fact that we are expanding our clinical definitions of psychological diagnoses is NOT a bad thing

      Yes it is. If you're a hammer everything looks like a nail.

      Research should be much more focused on what makes a person's mind healthy and resilient. But assuming that most of us possess the keys to our own growth doesn't fit with the economic model of the industry.

      You're 'sick' but we can 'cure' you. And by they way, we need your MONEY. Always more MONEY.

    5. Re:Evidence & Problems by Idbar · · Score: 1

      The evidence could even show the greediness of physicians. The health and drug industry in the USA is a really large mafia, where a dentist can tell you it will fix you a microscopic caries for arbitrarily high costs. Physicians will give you medicine for whatever you don't have, so you keep coming for 'control schedules' and they can keep getting their money (even though normally is a nurse, the one that takes you blood pressure, asks you to open and say "ah", and dismiss you for some bucks).

    6. Re:Evidence & Problems by rMuD · · Score: 1

      I talk to many people that are taking these types of drugs, and the most common reason is financial stress on the family. It is tough to get a job, it is tough to pay the mortgage. Second, these drugs work and without harmful side effects. The news is also a factor, most families are afraid to let their kids outside because a pedophile is going to get their kids! It is all mass hysteria. Also anti-psychotics are being prescribed to treat chronic pain vs. narcotics.

      Psychotherapy is being used by more than the rich, try to get a appointment with a "Talking" doctor, you are looking at 2-3 months wait time. Also things like Agoraphobia, OCD, Social Phobia, etc.. are being diagnosed instead of just being stuffed down and people living in hell for their lives. Cognitive Behavioral Therapists are still pretty much unknown, but that is changing. Biofeedback is becoming more prevalent from Chiropractors to Psychotherapy. If we could only get the public school systems to provide biofeedback to kids that have behavioral issues, it would make their lives so much easier.

      I do find it funny that a newspaper article is causing all this chatter about over-prescription.. Mass hysteria people... this is not something you need to worry about. These medications are not turning people into drug craving zombies. If you want to blame something, blame the medical insurance system.

      Growing up I did not know what anxiety was, later in life I found out it has had complete control of my life. Anxiety, Depression, and Pain will always be part of your life. How you let it effect your life can be controlled. I am in constant pain, but it does not hurt me.

    7. Re:Evidence & Problems by Raenex · · Score: 1

      The problem is that almost nobody does real psychotherapy anymore (except for the filthy rich)

      Psychotherapy is a bunch of pseudo-science/medicine. Just what is "real" psychotherapy, anyways?

      From the above link: "As early as 1952, in one of the earliest studies of psychotherapy treatment, Hans Eysenck reported that two thirds of therapy patients improved significantly or recovered on their own within two years, whether or not they received psychotherapy."

    8. Re:Evidence & Problems by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      and they can keep getting their money (even though normally is a nurse, the one that takes you blood pressure, asks you to open and say "ah", and dismiss you for some bucks).

      We are SO not interested in your sexual peccadillos. Keep your filthy mind to yourself.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:Evidence & Problems by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Is it an actual increase or an increased awareness. The DSM keeps getting bigger and bigger. Of perhaps this itself a a symptom of something common factor. All a mental disorder is fundamentally is a set of abnormal behaviors. An increased focus on what is "normal" in general society could of course lead more people to be anxious about trying to be normal, fitting in and so on. Perhaps the DSM itself, along with involuntary commitment is just another factor of this control.

      Ah, you haven't adjusted well to our control? You must be dangerous (to us), so we're going to lock you up and treat (brainwash or drug) you. Hell the soviets made extensive use of this psychiatric model

    10. Re:Evidence & Problems by Surt · · Score: 1

      Real psychotherapy is empirically proven. And there are plenty of empirically proven treatments. Sadly, there are indeed many 'psychotherapists' out there who know nothing about them.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    11. Re:Evidence & Problems by Raenex · · Score: 1

      According to the 1952 study, not doing psychotherapy is also empirically proven.

    12. Re:Evidence & Problems by Surt · · Score: 1

      Empirically proven in psychotherapy means proven better outcomes than not doing psychotherapy.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    13. Re:Evidence & Problems by Raenex · · Score: 1

      So you can cite this empirically proven research?

    14. Re:Evidence & Problems by Surt · · Score: 1
      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    15. Re:Evidence & Problems by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      "...these drugs work and without harmful side effects."

      No, these are very dangerous drugs. Anticholinergics often cause permanent neurological damage, including lowered intelligence, accelerated dementia, tardive dyskinesia (your tongue has a tendency to hang out and you look and sound retarded), diabetes, obesity and pages and pages more side effects. These drugs do not work all that well except as tranquilizers - they cause a disabling loss of energy that prevents patients from annoying staff in psychiatric hospitals, and this application has expanded to the world at large. Those without real, florid psychoses will not benefit from these drugs and quite likely will be harmed.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    16. Re:Evidence & Problems by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      I meant neuroleptics, not anticholinergics. The latter are often used with the former, and also have some risks, but can ameliorate the side--effects of neuroleptics.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  26. Re:bring on the trolls by ctid · · Score: 4, Funny

    That sounds a bit paranoid to me. Perhaps you should talk to your doctor. You could probably get drugs to help you with that.

    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  27. We approve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are happy our methods to diagnose mental illnesses in others and to cure them has been adopted by the capitalistic USA. We are sad it took this long. We still hope for a formal apology for slandering us and our methods for thirty years.

    The KGB.

  28. Lack of exercise by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, as is obvious from our ever expanding waistlines, Americans are getting less and less exercise?and probably sunlight too). I wonder if this is, at least in part, contributing to our increased depression. Several studies have shown pretty clearly that exercise is a great, if not the best, treatment for mild to moderate depression. So instead if sucking down big pharma and big agra's endless supply of shit, maybe we should try getting off our ass and going out for a run or bike ride.

    1. Re:Lack of exercise by Sinthet · · Score: 1

      This is certainly true. Whenever I need to force my mind off something, I try to go for a long run (at least 4 to 5 miles). I don't want to sound like some kind of freak who gets a sudden high from running a few miles, but the physical exhaustion, along with the long period of continual exercise in a uniform manner borders on a kind of meditation that certainly helps shift your perspective. I recommend people who are depressed try something like this. It's much easier to feel bad for yourself when you're depressed, or just "not care", but trying something like this won't hurt, and if nothing like this works, then go see a doctor.

    2. Re:Lack of exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not a freak, it's well established that exercise improves brain chemistry. And by improves I mean makes you happier.

      There's no citation to speak of but I've heard sound advice on this topic over the years and the general consensus seems to be that if you eat well* and exercise then you're giving yourself the absolute best chance to be happy.

      *Not to excess, I mean home cooked quality food made from fresh ingredients.

      Happy jogging!

    3. Re:Lack of exercise by Brewmeister_Z · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I started dealing with depression about 10 years ago. I have tried many drugs with little benefit but plenty of the worse results such as weight gain, sexual side effects, and mania. I have been hospitalized multiple times on both sides of the spectrum but nothing was ever stated as a physical cause other than stress.

      Only in the past year was a test done to check for imbalances that may lead to depression. It turns out my vitamin D levels were very low. Many people cannot create or absorb vitamin D very well (especially a problem in winter). To treat it, I was told to take 5000 IU of D-3. Guess what, it worked! And within a few days and not 30 days like some drugs that must build up in your body. Now I take a lower dose (2000 IU) as supplement. If I feel a bit off mood-wise, I can take a dose and it makes a difference within 30 minutes. Also, it significantly cheaper. I can get a 100 doses of D-3 5000 IU for $5 or 200 doses of 2000 IU for $6. I would pay at least $25 for a 30 day supply of anything else as a prescription and that is only if my deductible was met.

      Big pharma always downplays nutrition supplements (even studies that support it) as natural cures because they cannot patent it and charge $5 and up per dose. That being said, some of these drugs do genuinely help people with certain conditions. The problem is the lack of diagnosis to determine the cause of the problem and just trying to chase symptoms with drugs that create more problems than they may fix and may take a month before any benefit is seen. With depression, that is a long time to basically go without help and subjected to immediate side effects only to make a person feel even worse about life.

      Exercise and diet is not downplayed because they know that people do not have the drive, resources and/or time for it be a factor in not needing to take their drug for whatever condition.

      --
      I Cater to the Needs of Stupid People. - from a coffee mug Christmas gift
    4. Re:Lack of exercise by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      That, and you're getting a healthy dose of dopamine courtesy of the hard exercise.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    5. Re:Lack of exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I could... but three hours on the train and a full day of work leaves little time left to do much more. Wish I could live closer to work but can't afford it. Think we need a 30 hour work week; the 40 hour work week was thought up when people lived close to work. Or the modern office where you can work from home and go in a couple times a week for meetings... being there everyday is a true was of time and resources.

    6. Re:Lack of exercise by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Now a days it seems like only illegal immigrants are allowed to work with their hands. ( They also have the lowest rate of mental illness).

      [citation needed]

      Or, rather, not - because it's not true. Illegal immigrants tend to have a high rate of mental illness (on top of other health issues). They don't show up in psych clinics all that much because they're illegal aliens and have less access to medical care (along with various stigmas for mental health issues, other societal factors and other reasons).

      So, no, kicking everyone out of the cubicles and making them pick lettuce is not the answer to psychiatric illness in the US. Exercise is important and it helps, but it isn't the only thing....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Lack of exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly correct!

      Mind and body are one - the software is the hardware. Time to get off our asses and make our minds work better.

    8. Re:Lack of exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the main symptom of depression is lack of motivation and willpower, making "getting off our ass" impossible. It's a catch-22. When depression is treated with pharma, one positive side effect is that people find themselves able once again to exercise, which in turn helps with the depression.

    9. Re:Lack of exercise by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

      A number of these drugs have weight-gain as a noted and common side effect. Additional side effects make the head spin, just look up SSRIs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_serotonin_reuptake_inhibitor#Adverse_effects). The side effects are especially nasty for kids. Given how widely these are being prescribed for "off label" uses (that is, uses not originally intended) I really wonder what additional health issues we are introducing into society.

    10. Re:Lack of exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Several studies have shown pretty clearly that exercise is a great, if not the best, treatment for mild to moderate depression.

      Yeah, but the roid rage will kill 'ya.

    11. Re:Lack of exercise by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      In my experience, exercise is the single ebst cure for insomnia. It is very hard not to sleep if you actually push your body to the point where it needs to rest to repair itself.

      The trick, however, then becomes how to get enough exercise to use up your body's energy in the day, without pushing yourself so hard that you run out of time and deprive yourself of sleep when you need it. That's my current problem, way too many nights with 4-5 hours of sleep a night when I would really love to have the time to get 10-12.

    12. Re:Lack of exercise by hey! · · Score: 1

      I recently returned from a five hour bike ride. After taking my shower, I lay down for a few minutes, and got the first runner's high I'd ever gotten in my life. Man, that was some seriously good shit. For about half an hour I had extreme euphoria and really *intense* feelings of well-being; the only downside was a little light headedness.

      If I had a formula for triggering that I'd do it every day.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re:Lack of exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      25D is a steroid precursor, not a happy little benign vitamin from a seemingly guiltless supplement industry (popular media info sets favoring D supplementation is rampant and reflects what is popular, not what is based on solid science).

      Truth is, if 25D tests low (D2 or D3) a pandemic bug problem is likely already gaining dominance (and some get psychosis along with that). New evidence is rolling in at an amazing rate on 25D. The best research includes molecular genomics showing why low 25D is at the scene of the crime. The smartest researchers now know low 25D can indicate a regulatory attempt by an immune system that is compromised with pathogens (bacterial biofilms, virus, fungus, protozoa) that live in complex communicating and competitive communities in us.

      You won't read it from the marketing genius D-council folks but low 25D is often paired with high 1,25D (active steroid metabolite rarely tested) production when D is dysregulated, that results in many serious outcomes, including bone-disolving overdrive. Pathogens use the VDR (D receptor) cell-signalling pathway to ensure a nice immune-suppressed environment for their survival purposes.

      Please, everyone feel free to take more 25D if you want to get that special "on steroids" buzz for a while (immuno-suppression is great for that), but don't mind undermining your mind and immune function as the tradeoff. Selling yourself short taking cheap powerful steroids is a great way to tip the early demise balance against your favor and welcome in ever-earlier onset of diseases of aging/chronic disease.

      Oh, BTW, blood/brain barrier means nothing as many of the nastiest little beasties cross tissue as easily as riding around in blood, and a sick body can have CNS/brain involvement with pathogens and cell signalling.

      Bottom line:
      Got Insomnia or some other sleep disturbance, mania or psychosis?
      Steroids, no matter how powerful or cheap, are probably not a good idea.

      Good news, there is a better solution to the pandemic (impacting both mind and body) than psychotics or steroids but people have to look around for molecular genomics clarity (try bacteriality dotcom), take a responsible medical consumer role partnering with a doctor, and of course, use better info sources than easily mislead popular media for supportive environmental choices per stress, food, light, activity level and sleep habits.

    14. Re:Lack of exercise by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

      Not that I necessarily disagree with anything you say, but the following bit caught my eye:

      Big pharma always downplays nutrition supplements (even studies that support it) as natural cures because they cannot patent it and charge $5 and up per dose.

      Nutritional supplements are a multi-billion dollar a year market, and that they paint themselves as the antithesis of "big pharma" is somewhat ironic.

      --
      If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
    15. Re:Lack of exercise by Brewmeister_Z · · Score: 1

      True, everyone is out to make a buck. Nutritional supplement makers can't usually corner the market on a product like a big pharma could. Some supplement maker may make a product that is a poor delivery method compared to natural sources or overpriced snakeoil in regards to the benefits. There might be dozens of brands for the same product with quality that may vary wildly.

      The big thing to remember is the price difference for some of these products. In my case, $5 for a 3-month supply of vitamin D-3 or $75 of copay to get the equivalent in a big pharma product using prescription coverage. Can't imagine how harsh that would be if I had to pay the full price on some of the meds I have tried.

      --
      I Cater to the Needs of Stupid People. - from a coffee mug Christmas gift
  29. Re:bring on the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foreign? There's no such thing as nations on the internet you imbecile. That's the one good thing about it.

    Please write to me at fakeaddress@nyc.ny.us to discuss more.

  30. Re:bring on the trolls by belthize · · Score: 2

    As an non-native American (family has only been here about 7 generations) I think it's not that far a stretch to say many American's are paranoid delusional at least when it comes to foreigners. It's probably something in the water making them crazy.

    We can count them and see if we reach a couple hundred million, you can be '1'.

  31. Big pharma is going where the money is by waxcrash · · Score: 1

    I remember reading an article years ago about how how the big pharmaceuticals don't invest enough research in antibiotics and how drug resistant bacteria is the new epidemic. The reason the pharmaceutical companies don't research new antibiotics is because there is no money in it. Why create a drug that a person only takes for a few weeks when you can create an anti-psychotic that people will take for years? It's a sad world.

  32. It's our society and pharmaceutical propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of docs prescribe those drugs to help folks sleep. In the US, many folks need help with sleep or think they do.

    I used to worry about my sleep until I found out that not only is sometimes waking up in the middle of the night normal but the pharmaceutical companies brainwashed us with their advertisements that we need to sleep - out cold - for 8+ hours a night. Sometimes I pop awake at 3AM worrying but I eventually go back to sleep. I'm a little tired the next day but it is sure and hell better than any brain fog from meds - especially Lunesta or Ambien!

    Also, anti-psychotics are used for folks with anxiety. Corporate America is causing us A LOT of anxiety about our jobs AND when you factor in our consumerist getting into debt way of life, we're all freaked out.

    We're treating symptoms - not the problem.

    1. Re:It's our society and pharmaceutical propaganda by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Insomnia. It's annoying, but it's not worth losing any sleep over.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  33. Everyone is mentally ill except the Scientologists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and these stats prove it. Time to audit those body thetan copies known as engrams!

  34. Re:bring on the trolls by Sardak · · Score: 2

    I'm an american, and I think you're all fucking crazy, too. The strongest drug I take on any sort of regular basis is ibuprofen. I've been diagnosed with clinical depression, but I'm not taking anything for it. I was originally prescribed a couple of different things, but they had no positive effect whatsoever.

  35. Re:bring on the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask not for whom the bell trolls; it trolls for thee.
     

  36. Meds that make eunuchs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has been documented that lithium in anti-psychotic drugs can cause men to be limp sexually and unable to perform.
    When the lithium is combined with sexual performance enhancers, it can cause a normal pleasure experience to be extremely painful for the guy.

    1. Re:Meds that make eunuchs by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      *sigh* You're supposed to affix those performance enhancer to where your tool used to be when it still worked, not stick 'em up your rear!

      Can't people read labels anymore?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  37. Forced by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Over a decade ago, a school psychologist noticed "odd" behavior in one of my daughters. Under the guise of "vigilence", they looked for people to put on drugs. My girls, in grades 1 and 3, were interrogated -- without my permissions or knowledge -- by a school psychologist, who diagnose them with various psychotic disorders. Why? Because the girls told wild tales -- one claimed to know how to fly, and the other told dark tales ala Poe and Lovecraft.

    This bitch of a psychiatrist demanded that we drug our children, and began the process of forcing us to give the girls "medicine" (i.e., anti-psychotic and ADHD drugs), even when other psychiatrists said that my daughters were fine. When asked why she was so insistent on treating my daughters for something that didn't exist, the offending psychiatrist said:

    "I've been taking these drugs most of my life. I know they're good for your kids."

    Needless to say, I no longer live in Colorado, where this travesty was legal. My girls are intelligent, creative, productive young adults (with lots of quirks, like any smart person). Now that they're adults, they can chose what the do and do not put in their bodies.

    American society is driven by a need by people's to feel like a victim, by fear, and by selfish greed. It is a recipe for disaster.

    1. Re:Forced by garaged · · Score: 1

      That is fscking creepy, congrats for taking the correct and more complex way with your girls, I have two daugthers and that really scares me.

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    2. Re:Forced by improfane · · Score: 1

      Wow. That's horrific. I am glad you moved away.

      I imagine psychiatrists get commission on prescribing drugs. I can't describe how wrong it feels the fact he demanded your children be prescribed too. It sounds like in his medicated state that he must 'convert' others to the same mental state.

      Medicated ostracization.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    3. Re:Forced by shoehornjob · · Score: 2

      Damn right. I have a daughter much like your two. Fortunately we know the school nurse (no psych in 2nd grade) and she would never do something like that bitch tried to do to your kids. "I've been taking these drugs most of my life. I know they're good for your kids." That's the problem right there.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    4. Re:Forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American society is driven by a need by people's to feel like a victim, by fear, and by selfish greed. It is a recipe for disaster.

      Got it in one. We have many issues as any complex and successful society does but this is the single biggest problem in America today. We have given so much attention to real victims (and sometimes rightfully so) that our entire society is basically in a weird Munchausen Syndrom-like scenario where we determined to be victims and get attention and other boons. Read the first 20 or so comments to this article and you'll see EXACTLY what I mean. Then go read some Emerson and Thoreau and ask yourself where those memes went in our society and why this other insanity took over.

    5. Re:Forced by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      How exactly were you forced? Was a court order involved? Or did the psych force pills down your daughter's throat? Or what?

      I'm not doubting your story, I'm just thinking that kind of information could help other parents who find themselves in a similar situation.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    6. Re:Forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've been taking these drugs most of my life. I know they're good for your kids."

      Eerily similar to

      "I've been told religious gospel most of my life. I know it's good for my kids.

    7. Re:Forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All of the psychiatrists I've ever known have been nuts. From the jerk with the super-hero complex who kept patients waiting forever as though his time wall all-important and theirs was not (great if you have low self-esteem to begin with), to the ones who couldn't tell who was supposed to be telling thoughts and perceptions to whom and why, to ones who seemed on the verge of collapsing into a ball of helplessness. I've not met one "normal" person among them.

      Strangely, the psychologists I've known all seem to be well-rounded people who were comfortable with themselves and capable of carrying on a therapy session without spending it all on their own problems.

      But talk therapy can't always cure everything. Sometimes pharmaceutical assistance is in order, if only to make the talk part more effective. And that means another nutso psychiatrist.

      As for drugs being "good for you", that's highly questionable. Modern-day psychiatric medications are no longer the blunt instruments of yore, but they still have side-effects, and the only time I'd recommend them is when the primary effect makes it necessary to deal with the side-effects.

    8. Re:Forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That psychiatrist was being irresponsible. My child had problems from a young age. It almost prevented them from being able to go to school. When my child started taking drugs to treat a bunch of symptoms eventually diagnosed as a combination of ADHD and Tourette's syndrome, it was only after plenty of rigorous tests -- with our consent -- AND we did a double-blind test of the drug effectiveness and to set dosage. We revisited the issue with a double-blind test every year, and the need for the drugs waned over time as they learned coping strategies on their own. Even if the symptoms are sometimes still there, it's manageable. It's to the point now that they probably won't be taking the drugs anymore, and they already aren't taking them on weekends or over the summer. The bottom line was: yes, it helped enormously and I'm pretty convinced it was the right decision. But it was based on actual tests, continual skepticism about whether it was necessary, and not some faithfully-held expectation that drugs were harmless to try or automatically "good for your kids". That's just stupid. It's better not to take such things unless absolutely necessary because all the other options have been exhausted, and only if you're able to negate placebo effects as a factor.

    9. Re:Forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've been taking these drugs most of my life. I know they're good for your kids."

      So the Psych was a pusher?

    10. Re:Forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a bitch to raise as a kid, I put my parents through hell, but they fought tooth and nail to keep me off the drugs. Today, I am quirky and a bit odd but I have a good job that lets me express my creativity so it's not an issue. I love life and I am happy, I am thankful everyday for my parents not killing that part of me with drugs as a kid.

    11. Re:Forced by stephathome · · Score: 1

      That's horrible, and they would probably do the same to my oldest, who is incredibly imaginative and insists that fairies are real. The little fluttery type with wings, not the other sort. I wouldn't consider drugging her out of being herself.

    12. Re:Forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My roommate had a similar thing happen at Virginia Tech. At the time he was attending (this may still be true), they had 1 psychiatrist for the entirety of the student population. My roommate has anxiety, but because he's at college they wouldn't prescribe a benzo for him because they feared he would abuse/sell them rather than use them treat his legitimate medical condition (you know, the anxiety that prompted him to see a shrink in the first place).

      They put him on an anti-psychotic instead, he then developed Akathisia (common when anti-psychotics are prescribed to people who don't need them) and had to drop out of that semester because he wasn't able to attend class in his condition. My roommate says that over the years that he was seeing this doctor, he must've been prescribed at least a dozen medications, none of which were meant for anxiety. He was being used as a guinea pig by this doctor.

      Fortunately, when he dropped out and went home he got to see a psychiatrist who didn't have their head up their ass and they immediately prescribed him a benzo for his anxiety, he is doing much better now. He still has times when he feels like the Akathisia is coming back, he says these are absolutely the most terrifying experiences he can imagine.

      This was around the same time when that crazy kid shot up the Virginia Tech campus. With psychiatric care like this happening it isn't the least bit surprising.

    13. Re:Forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That trend was happening in my area, too. The reason for it was that the schools got extra government money for every child with a diagnosed learning disability--ADHD or otherwise--so the school psychologist became the front line in securing more money for the administration to spend on whatever pet projects they wanted (for us it was football, football and football). I lived near the boundary between an affluent and poor area, and the psychologist could offer an additional perk to poorer families willing to medicate their children based on a dubious diagnosis: if you were on welfare, you also got additional money for every "disabled" child. The line to receive Ritalin before lunch every day was astonishingly long, and perhaps half the school was on it.

    14. Re:Forced by hitmark · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "we have been doing it like this for generations, it must be right", the foundation for religion. Tho these days also the basis for a lot of basic political thinking (see Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau being deemed basically infallible).

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    15. Re:Forced by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>How exactly were you forced? Was a court order involved? Or did the psych force pills down your daughter's throat? Or what?

      A female friend of mine was told she'd have to drug her "energetic" boy or have him booted out of school.

      One lawsuit later, and the school decided that the principal had misspoken when he said that. Kid is doing fine, too.

      Over-prescription is definitely a problem. That said, not every prescription is in error. I have several friends for whom their psych meds are lifesavers.

    16. Re:Forced by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Obviously I can't speak for the parent personally, but I imagine that it starts off with a nice concerned conversation, then moves on to a polite but firm phone call with direct threats of escalation, and then it moves on to allegations of abuse filed with the state child protective services organization. Typically these groups confiscate children first, and then you can battle it out in court for a year to get to see them again. Maybe there are some intermediate steps in-between.

      However, courts certainly can order parents to take action and punish you for not doing so.

      I'm not sure which is the greater travesty - the number of kids who don't get proper medical care because their parents are loons, or the number of parents who have to deal with stuff like this.

      I suspect that half of this drugging is for the benefit of the schools. Kids are just so much calmer when they're doped up. For some I imagine this is necessary and allows the kid to actually get an education. However, I've been very successful with my education and I have no doubt that I'd have been drugged if I were in elementary school today.

    17. Re:Forced by Dreamstalker_wolf · · Score: 1

      Sometime around the mess with the resperidone, I had a shrink who wanted to put me on lithium. My mom pressed for an explanation but she refused (okay, you refuse to explain why I need it, we refuse to agree). At the time I also had a therapist (nothing to do with meds, we just talked once a week) who was keeping a very close eye on all this, and she was appalled.

      My mom and therapist gave me the go-ahead to mess with the shrink, with the goal of finding out exactly how her mind worked (interestingly, the shrink also refused to discuss her 'suspicions' with the therapist). After a few carefully-planted seeds, it came to light that she believed all teenagers were psycho.

    18. Re:Forced by vikisonline · · Score: 1

      It is people like you that still give me hope in this world. Hang in there. And good job :) Since then the legal system probably got worse but oh well. Maybe this is an other way for natural selection to happen, I just hope that we will always be able to refuse. I had problems with claustrophobia and panic attacks, and they tried to put me on anti-depressants. I refused. Recently my fiances little sister (8) was diagnosed by her TEACHER with ADHD. I told her mom not to give her anything. I was curious myself, and sat down with her. I thought her matrix multiplications in a half an hour. ADHD my ass.

    19. Re:Forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Not the original poster here, but I can answer this.:

      Simple: There is only one school in your rural area. That school has "rules". You obey the rules, you can send your kids there, you disobey the rules, you cannot send them there.
      But school is compulsory by law.
      Catch-22.
      And do not DARE to try to tell me or even assume, this was not known by that psychiatrist and that she didn't do it deliberately.

      By the way, I'm a psychotherapist. And I know for a fact that the only function and purpose of those drugs is to run away from your problem, and that they by definition never will cure anybody. They are designed, from ground up, to keep you hooked and never cured.

      It is like treating a broken leg, by hammering it with a ice axe with shitloads of painkiller applied.
      You won't feel a thing, and won't heal one bit.

    20. Re:Forced by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Hey, I think that part of the reason for this is that lots of people started to give psychologists lots of authority in their minds, over their minds. They are the reincarnation of priests in former times. And, as a natural scientist, I must say that in times when

      weak correlations of fMRI studies are suddenly the 'answer' to how people work

      and people who fall too far away from the regression line are non-existant in those views and when

      psychology has a dozens if not hundreds of competing theories of how people tick, all beginning with the mostly made-up work of Freud

      I think that questioning the authority psychologists have and are given is extremely important.

      Basic conditioning studies from biology are about the only thing that are supported by sufficient evidence to use for describing what is going on in our brains. And findings from the _medical_ field of neurology. Falsifiable stuff!

      Conditioning to not question authority is probably one of the strongest things going on in modern society.

    21. Re:Forced by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Obviously I can't speak for the parent personally, but I imagine that it starts off with a nice concerned conversation, then moves on to a polite but firm phone call with direct threats of escalation, and then it moves on to allegations of abuse filed with the state child protective services organization. Typically these groups confiscate children first, and then you can battle it out in court for a year to get to see them again. Maybe there are some intermediate steps in-between.

      Unless the kid is almost completely out of control or there are other signs of abuse, the school really doesn't give a shit - certainly not enough to call protective services. And the ability of the state to step in and take the child is really sort of limited. It's paranoid fools like you that spread crap like this (unsupported and unsubstantiated, by the way) that leads to this country's inability to do anything worthwhile via government (which actually is useful when you have parents beating and torturing children). In fact, given your level of paranoia, you might want to consider some anti-psychotics yourself.

      --
      That is all.
    22. Re:Forced by swillden · · Score: 1

      For some I imagine this is necessary and allows the kid to actually get an education.

      For a few, very few, it's really important. These are kids who in decades and centuries past would have just been written of as uneducable. For a lot, though, it's necessary and allows the kid to actually get an education from our education system. I think often 90% of the problem is the approach to education and 10% of it is the kid.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    23. Re:Forced by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      As I said, I can't speak for the parent personally... Presumably it actually happened to him, or he's just making things up.

      I imagine you'll find a broad spectrum, ranging from people who could care less about kids, to people who are moderate, to people who are extreme. If you're unlucky enough to run into the last category, then you can be in trouble.

      I'm sure most cops don't frame people who they don't like either, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't happen.

      In any case, I'm hardly worried about the state confiscating my children, considering that I don't have any. :)

    24. Re:Forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been down that road. My son wrote a rather imaginative and dark journal entry a while back. School authorities got wind of it, the school psychologist freaked out, a school appointed psychiatrist needed to cover his ass, and with that my was forced to stay several weeks in a hospital. Up until this point I had no idea a hospital could do that against the wishes of the parents. Apparently they can.

      They tried to get us to allow them to give him medications, we said no, they had a hard time understanding. "But what if he gets violent?" they asked. Nope, sorry. A) he won't, and B) if he does, call us. Bless my son's heart, he told them he didn't want any either in spite of them pressuring him when we weren't there. He was a model patient, nobody found anything wrong that isn't wrong with all teenage boys, and the episode is finally behind us. This was straight out of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's nest. But they sure did try to get us to let them give him medication. It was insane (pun unavoidable). We laugh about it now, but is remarkable just how swiftly they wanted to prescribe medicine before they ever had any hint of what the problem might be, or even if there _was_ a problem to begin with.

      I will admit, though, that there were some kids with major issues in that hospital! I guess maybe some of them did need drugs, though my armchair diagnosis is that what they really needed was loving parents. You can't buy that over the counter OR with a prescription :-(

    25. Re:Forced by Dreamstalker_wolf · · Score: 1

      At one point, I had a psychiatrist who wanted to commit me and put me on Lithium...no explanation past "your daughter is antisocial and needs this" (okay, you refuse to explain, we refuse to consent). All because I had something called an imagination which apparently you weren't allowed to have past the age of 10. I also had a therapist (nothing to do with meds, we just talked once a week) who was following this very closely and was appalled when my mom told her what was happening.

      I got their blessing (and coaching so it wouldn't backfire) to mess with the psychiatrist. After a few carefully-planted seeds, it came to light that she believed all teenagers were psychotic.

    26. Re:Forced by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      You should have strangled the idiot.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  38. I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I imagine it's pretty easy to become depressed in our society.

    • Consumerism people judge themselves by products (Apple, car brands, discount retailers), they depend on corporate products to do what they could otherwise do, they are powerless to the system, they buy cake mixtures or microwave teleivsion dinners.
    • Devoid of meaning I'd hazard that most people feel that their life is meaningless which brings me to my next point.
    • Life = job People (by necessity) live life a job, not a life. office workers and labourers.
    • Unchecked capitalism Capitalism doesn't feel soft and fuzzy. You feel powerless. Advertising is harmful.

    People who live a job rather than a life do things that advertising and media tell them to do or what other people in their situation do to escape. They turn to alcohol, nightclubs, meaningless sex*, gambling, smoking or anything that is meaningless or self destructive.
    * Not that meaningless sex means anything to Slashdotters but I hope my point is made intellectually.

    I imagine that these factors, plus the fact that everyone seems to be a big asshole these days contribute to people turning to drugs. Ultmately, people feel disconnected from other people, they are ostracized and bullied. Drugs don't solve problems. You do.

      I feel powerless because of the following:

    • My Privacy invaded day by day
    • My Government and the US government is massively corrupt, doesn't tax companies
    • The unjust succeed while the moral wither
    • Everyone thinks they are right so nothing gets done

    As Adam Smith said, agriculture is the root of all progress. Our society is unsustainable and growth seems to be on top of artificial markets. For example, digital markets like the domain market. Or on advertising.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    1. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Servaas · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wasn't this a scene in the extended ultra mega remix ultimate edition Blue-ray disc of Fight Club?

    2. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      I feel powerless because of the following:

      1. My Privacy invaded day by day
      2. My Government and the US government is massively corrupt, doesn't tax companies
      3. The unjust succeed while the moral wither
      4. Everyone thinks they are right so nothing gets done

      While this is all very true, and set to become much worse, if you just take this little pill, you won't mind it at all!

    3. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I took the pill, I wouldn't be taking responsibility for what I feel.

      What is the biological reasoning behind people who are depressed anyway? How can it be evolutionary? Surely it doesn't serve any good purpose besides feeding predators?

      Perhaps it's a side effect of sapience? (of which sapience is a side effect of something else) Perhaps are consciousness and sapience is so unbelievably complex that it simply has 'failures' from times to time, overstimulation or sensitivity. In that case, that makes the pill more like a mechanical fix rather than a cop out.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    4. Re:I Am Not Surprised by clifyt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      " I feel powerless because of the following:

              My Privacy invaded day by day
              My Government and the US government is massively corrupt, doesn't tax companies
              The unjust succeed while the moral wither
              Everyone thinks they are right so nothing gets done"

      This is all external, and nothing is an internal. Your privacy? Who cares...the problem is that you think someone does care. Stop worrying about how others judge you, and it doesn't matter about your privacy. The gov't is corrupt? The gov't has always been corrupt. The world has always had more corruption than it has righteousness. It is far easier to be corrupt than it is to be righteous. What does this matter towards your powerlessness? You have the choice to be corrupt or righteous. This seems as though it proves you have power. Same with the very next argument...the unjust succeed. How are you defining success? Money? Power over others? These shouldn't determine your success. You are allowing it to determine your success and you have defined success in a way that allows the unjust to get the upper hand in your world.

      As for everyone thinking they are right...maybe you need to stop trying to be right as well. I'm probably wrong about all of this...I'm right in my world, but my success in life doesn't depend on you agreeing...if you do, that's cool...but I'm not going to base my concept of success on this. If someone else wants to be right, let them...if you want to be right, don't make your success based on others believing it. Believe that you can be right and someone else can hold an opposing view and still be right too. In most complex situations, there can be multiple paths to the right solution...

      Again, who knows if I'm right...I do know I'm happy more often than most people I know...

    5. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much what Marx summed up under the label of "alienation". And I agree, that's what is going on. Instead of changing the system, we decided to change the mind by means of psychopharmaca. O brave new world....

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    6. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 1

      IT attracts more people that are arrogant and think they are right more than any other industry. They don't want to solve a problem, they want to brag and be an asshole.

      Our society is a massive committe of people trying to argue what is right and what to do rather than just doing it. Government, local councils, nothing actually gets done.

      Privacy is what I want. If you don't give it to me, you deserve the consequences. It costs you nothing to give it. You don't need my address, to listen to my phone calls or track my whereabouts (online or in real life).

      Being watched fires a biological instinct of discomfort that is unfavourable. Think yellow eyes in a forest. It is not a social fear which what you think it is.

      In this discussion you should now understood what makes me uncomfortable and why. Maybe you can help me stop that which makes me feel uncomfortable.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    7. Re:I Am Not Surprised by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      I feel powerless because of the following:

      Why don't you look at your personal life first? It's probably more relevant to your feelings of powerlessness. Is there something you've been meaning to say or do in your personal life but been to afraid to do? Someone that you associate with that just won't respect your needs?

      Now there are systematic factors that push people towards an empty lifestyle. Inflation drives over-consumption by making saving less rewarding.Compulsory schooling teaches that you should judge yourself by how much you are like others, and who well you please authority. Property tax makes it so that you are never secure in your own home. Zoning and occupational licencing makes it difficult (but not impossible) to secure a living that fits your interests, skills, and schedule. Government intervention continues to increase prices of vital services like healthcare by limiting the supply of doctors and limiting the sorts of services a non-MD can provide even though they are qualified, and the cost of diagnostic chemistry and mechanics go down. Patents create monopolies everywhere and prevent innovation and competition

      The solution is to stop asking permission to be an adult. Find a community where they won't rat you out or hate you for the slightest disobedience, and offer goods and services to them and without permission (licensing ) or paying extortion (taxes) if reasonably safe to do so. NH is a good place to start, but agoras can be made or found just about anywhere.

    8. Re:I Am Not Surprised by __aagbwg300 · · Score: 1

      IT attracts more people that are arrogant and think they are right more than any other industry. They don't want to solve a problem, they want to brag and be an asshole.

      What about my industry? I'm a lawyer, you insensitive clod!

    9. Re:I Am Not Surprised by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      A classic description of alienation. It seems to be a driving force for people becoming freelancers where I live - but if you can't escape that way, then perhaps taking the pink pill is a good way out.

      As for your sig: I like the same stuff, and I like Iain M. Banks books too. Also most stuff by Charles Stross - sometimes chilling (his reboot of Ctulhu), sometimes going completely off the rails (Accelerando): see http://www.accelerando.org/ to read that story and see if you like his style.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    10. Re:I Am Not Surprised by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      You could survive depression. You couldn't survive being thrown out of your tribe, or having your head cut off by a petty tyrant for standing up for yourself.

    11. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fuck me, I hate reading this shit. Going to post anonymously for this one.

      Depression on the whole, is not induced by something like "Unchecked capitalism". While there is a subset of them which may have depression due to social circumstances, last I read, this was a very small subset, and it was argued that this might not be actual depression, or might be much lower on the scale.

      Depression is mainly a physical problem you have. It can be induced by drugs, but for many, it's just your unlucky biochemistry. For these people, everything could be awesome. Just won the lottery, got a promotion at work, etc, everything could be better than they could have ever imagined it, but they feel like shit, they have a warped perspective, maybe suicide ideation, and so forth.

      It has nothing to do with some "objective" measure of the quality of their life.

      Please don't talk about shit you know nothing about.

      Also, just so you know, many psychological studies have shown that everything you said about advertising and consumerism, is actually the opposite. Though, there are studies which do come to your conclusion also.

    12. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NH is a good place to start, but agoras can be made or found just about anywhere.

      New Hampshire??? Granted, they have no income tax, but come on. The population is extremely redneck, a group which is just about as xenophobic as you can get.

    13. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I was pretty sure that the sarcasm was more obvious that it turned out to be.

    14. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone who has clinical depression I agree. It's not just feeling down or sad, it's like having the flu all the time and you simply can't get anything done. You want to do things that make you and those around you happy, but often it just doesn't happen and you can't explain why.

      It's frustrating and damaging to everyone in your life, it was absolutely destroying my marriage and the thing is that you think that it's normal. I always just assumed that everyone felt like that all the time.

      After reading posts about it over on Penny Arcade, I realized that maybe everyone didn't feel like that all the time. So I saw a therapist, who immediately saw what was going on. She got me to a psychiatrist who agreed, and I started taking an anti-depressant. I got lucky and the first one I tried worked. Because it's a physical issue, people often need to try different meds to find one that works with their body chemistry. After a few months of easing into them I couldn't believe the difference it made in my life.

      Several years later now and I still take my meds every day under a doctor's supervision. While I really do believe that the pharma industry is predatory in the extreme, I also strongly feel that good doctors can use those tools to make massive improvements in the lives of their patients.

    15. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Nithin+Philips · · Score: 1

      I feel powerless because of the following:

      Why don't you look at your personal life first? It's probably more relevant to your feelings of powerlessness. Is there something you've been meaning to say or do in your personal life but been to afraid to do? Someone that you associate with that just won't respect your needs?

      Now there are systematic factors that push people towards an empty lifestyle. Inflation drives over-consumption by making saving less rewarding.Compulsory schooling teaches that you should judge yourself by how much you are like others, and who well you please authority. Property tax makes it so that you are never secure in your own home. Zoning and occupational licencing makes it difficult (but not impossible) to secure a living that fits your interests, skills, and schedule. Government intervention continues to increase prices of vital services like healthcare by limiting the supply of doctors and limiting the sorts of services a non-MD can provide even though they are qualified, and the cost of diagnostic chemistry and mechanics go down. Patents create monopolies everywhere and prevent innovation and competition

      The solution is to stop asking permission to be an adult. Find a community where they won't rat you out or hate you for the slightest disobedience, and offer goods and services to them and without permission (licensing ) or paying extortion (taxes) if reasonably safe to do so. NH is a good place to start, but agoras can be made or found just about anywhere.

      That idea seems equally misguided. The main purpose seems to create your own artificial tribe that is against most things that the society supports. One might be able to find meaning in that, but it's only a matter of time before the harsh reality catches up.

      Yes, property taxes mean that you can never be secure in your home, but it is simply a side effect of what we have done. My parents' house is in the middle of a drained swamp. There are houses in Nevada that are in the middle of the desert. These modern houses and the people in them cannot survive naturally. Millions of dollars are needed to ensure that these houses don't sink into the swamp or disappear among the sand. The drains, pumping stations, etc. cost more money that one person or even a small group can muster. Primitive people built a small number of houses at the very few rare locations that were safe and survived floods and droughts. That meant fewer humans, today, people can choose to live in places that are naturally unfit for human occupation but it allows us to flourish (at least in numbers).

      I don't believe that making yourself less powerful (as in forming a small group, which leads to loss of accumulated knowledge) does much for survival. If anyone can be a doctor and you don't know what a proper doctor should be like, you are more likely to be deceived by a charlatan. The fact is that there are assholes, and small groups are less powerful against them and they are also less powerful against the forces of nature. This Liberterian utopia, it seems, will turn into nightmare before you know it.

      --
      Einmal ist Keinmal. What happens but once might as well not have happened at all.
    16. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the best slashdot post I've read in years. Bravo

    17. Re:I Am Not Surprised by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Human intelligence long ago passed what is necessary for survival. Our brains are beyond the simplistics of evolution in that manner. Free will makes us more then the beasts. With reason, there will be always be dissonance unless we are omniscient.

      --
      Good-bye
    18. Re:I Am Not Surprised by agentbuzz · · Score: 2

      @improfane: There is a theory stating that submissive behaviors, beginning with the reptiles, were inculcated into populations to decrease unnecessary aggression, thereby increasing the chances of survival of those populations. Social animals try to compete with others, form alliances, attach to objects such as mother and offspring, and attract mates. Submissive behaviors play a part in competition, attachment, and mating. Social hierarchies are arranged, and subordinate types arrest the expression of aggression, but the motive force favoring attack remains. This allows subordinates to continue to look for opportunities to attack even while aggression is suppressed, and a display of defeat can actually be beneficial to the subordinate animal in the long run. If an animal learns helplessness through trauma, more severe motor deficits and other signs of defeat may actually be collected into a "role" of the defeated. The survival value in this is that the "depressed" animal cannot possibly be seen as attacker and so he is at least allowed to survive. Maybe depressed people could incorporate activities into their lives that program them to expect victory and then the subjective symptoms of sadness, immobility, and anhedonia would lessen or disappear on their own. Perhaps melancholy types would benefit from hiking the Appalachian Trail, committing to a year in a martial arts class, playing guitar in public, or working on Habitat for Humanity projects.

    19. Re:I Am Not Surprised by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      To your opening sentence i say a hearty "FUCK YOU". Confidence and ability is not arrogance. I help people, thats my job, the computers are merely tools.

      --
      Good-bye
    20. Re:I Am Not Surprised by mjwx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      * Not that meaningless sex means anything to Slashdotters

      If it meant something, it wouldn't be meaningless wouldn't it?

      Believe it or not, I'm someone who engages in a lot of "meaningless" sex. The problem is not that the entire process doesn't have anything more "deep" then sexual gratification but rather that some people try to attach something else then simple gratification to it.

      Just as the parent pointed out in his post, people use it as an escape and this is actually a good thing(TM) but the distinction the GP did not make is the difference between "an escape" and "living in a fantasy world". Having a vice does not automatically make one an addict, for example, a person who drinks is not automatically an alcoholic because they can be capable of stopping and exercise it at will, the ability to keep under the legal limit or to say "no thanks, I've had enough".

      By the same token, there are people who can have "meaningless" sex without trying to attach anything to it. The same with all the other vices the GP listed, one can enjoy gambling, smoking, drinking or clubbing in moderation without actually becoming a victim to that action.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    21. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 1

      I've been in tons of interviews with guys who brag and think they know everything but know shit. You know, the really cocky guy who doesn't know anything.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    22. Re:I Am Not Surprised by laederkeps · · Score: 1

      Mod +1 "Lucas would be proud"

    23. Re:I Am Not Surprised by agentbuzz · · Score: 1

      Those who roll over others like giant amoebae, with no regard for individual rights, often have no conscience at all. They are textbook psychopaths. They consider humans to be game pieces and derive great satisfaction from getting the pieces to harm each other. The one most consistently observed marker of sociopathy in such people is the elicitation of pity from those who do have a conscience, so you should note unseemly bids for pity. If you know how to recognize sociopaths in your environment, you can avoid them and you can attenuate the injurious behaviors of the "game pieces" that sociopathic leaders have brought under their control. Those tendencies include the willingness to violate your privacy.

    24. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 1

      Yes. When life gets tough and you go to gamble, smoke, a quick lay, drink alcohol or clubbing -- that's not healthy.

      Doing it for fun because you feel like regardless of your circumstances is perfectly healthy.

      In the UK we have a binge drinking culture. Working class people go out at the end of every week for a big drink. It's a generalization. It's an escape. I wouldn't call it a high quality happiness. If you wake up feeling bad or crap the next day then it wasn't happiness.

      The meaingless sex was a joke in that Slashdot people cannot get laid but you knew that, you just wanted to prove the exception to the rule! ;-)

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    25. Re:I Am Not Surprised by mswhippingboy · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, I'm someone who engages in a lot of "meaningless" sex.

      Well aren't you Special (Rx) Specioprin Hydrochloride.

      --
      Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    26. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Veggiesama · · Score: 2

      The adaptive rumination hypothesis (ARH) is a popular though highly controversial explanation for the evolutionary origin of depression.

      Basically, depressed people ruminate. They think deep thoughts. They are overly self-critical, pessimistic, and lethargic. Of course, taken to these extremes, major depression is certainly a disadvantage in any context. But in moderation, there are some activities that might benefit from a less optimistic mindset:
      1. Reflecting on one's self-worth ("Maybe I'm not strong enough to take on that saber-toothed tiger without help...")
      2. Ascribing high likelihoods to the probability of future disaster ("Maybe we won't be able to survive the winter without more food stores...")
      3. Having a proclivity for solitary, non-social activities (inventors, artists, etc.).

      By contrast, optimists might charge head-first into danger without stopping to self-reflect. They might waste all their energy on unfruitful endeavors. And so on.

      It could be the case that depression is like the gene for sickle-cell anemia. A little bit helps you resist malaria, while a lot makes you anemic.

      Of course, ARH is fraught with problems and is by no means widely accepted, but it still shows that there's a possibility that what we think of as a negative quality (depression) could harbor some positive benefits.

    27. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to give meaningless sex a try and see if it's as bad as you say.

    28. Re:I Am Not Surprised by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you funny. That was well done.

    29. Re:I Am Not Surprised by clifyt · · Score: 1

      "IT attracts more people that are arrogant and think they are right more than any other industry."

      I take it that IT is the only industry you've been in? I've been in two other industries, and soon a third that have far more arrogance than IT.

      I started off in entertainment (I wrote a fairly popular musical software for my own use that got picked up by someone in the industry, I got to know them and ended up writing songs for a decade). Entertainment has FAR more arrogance than IT...and worse, its about an art...in which there are no right answers.

      Moved on to psychology (with some IT / programming...I was a cognitive researcher in the AI world)...researchers are very cocky...psychologists seem to think they know more about what you are thinking than you do...luckily, they are right a good deal of the time. I would have my PhD in this area and have a few thousand hours of practice, but...

      Moving from this world to the medical field (as soon as I can pass courses I took 20 years ago and did poorly back then because I never thought I'd need those classes -- but need to pass the MCAT) -- I can safely say surgeons are FAR worse than anyone on my list...and they won't even disagree because 'if they are wrong, people die'...or some other line of BS they have to tell themselves...

      IT is just full of people with poor social skills. Not all...but more than any other field I've ever been in.

      As for privacy, again, you are externalizing your fears. Someone taking away privacy from a fully rationalized person will not cause any problems. Why? because you wouldn't care. I do a lot of things I really don't want people to know about...but if the world finds out that I like to masturbate while watching porn, I'm not going to be upset. Heck, if they find out the kinds of porn I like, I might be a little wierded out about, but I'd get over it relatively quickly. If my health records were released...yeah...I have things in there that I don't want family to worry about, but honestly, it would be a road bump I'd get past. Why? Because it doesn't really matter to me any more. Use to...use to be a VERY private person...and my friends still tease me because I code name a lot of the women I date because I don't want them knowing and interfering...but that is the extent of my privacy these days.

      People that get bent out of shape over privacy do so because they feel things they do should not be broadcast...that they are bad for doing these things. That there is some shame or fear of reprisal. And sometimes its justified...most of the time, it isn't.

      As for the biological sides of this...doesn't work in this manner. When fear is a factor, it might work...we aren't in an environment where there is fear of being watched...it might be a little uncomfortable at first, but if you don't have any other problems, it won't matter. That said we ALL have some mental problems...just like we all have some physical problems.

    30. Re:I Am Not Surprised by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Lack of sex, even meaningless sex, is very bad for someone's mental health too.

    31. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 1

      That's very interesting.

      Being watched does make you feel uncomfortable. It is biological. In the animal kingdom and in our own to a lesser extent, eye contact is a form of non-verbal communication. If you stare down someone, they will biologically have a reaction. It may or not enter the conscious mind, depending on context.

      In a bar with your friends, you will not care how your friends make eye contact with you. A guy on a table far away from you making eye contact with you, that's intimidating.

      The human brain translates high level concepts of privacy into low level ones.

      I don't want you to profit or benefit from my lack of privacy. I don't want to give you the satisfaction of being able to gossip about me.

      Lack of privacy makes people agitated, irritable and uncomfortable. Lock people in a room for a while and you will see this first hand. People need their own space.

      I need to know that I, as a person stand alone and individual in what I perceive. I like being in my room from time to time knowing that nobody else is here and there is silence. I am not necessarily doing anything.

      I hate phone calls. It disrupts my peace.

      If you agree that you don't care about your privacy, that's fine. I will respect your opinion and your privacy anyway. Can you respect my wish to privacy? Not putting my photos on a social networking website? Not trying to look up details about me? Not writing software for a faceless corporation that sells my data?

      "What have you got to hide citizen?"
      This argument has nothing to do with anything. Respect of my comfort and person should be forefront in your mind when you interact with me. My privacy is part of my identity. An individual.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    32. Re:I Am Not Surprised by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much our biochemistry is warped or screwed up by the current industrial food processes (meaning everything from what food we eat to the way it's grown to chemical additives for color, taste, texture, preservation, etc.).

      http://www.iwu.edu/~wellness/environment_folder/behavior_frazzled.htm

    33. Re:I Am Not Surprised by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Perhaps melancholy types would benefit from hiking the Appalachian Trail,

      Isn't that something you tell your wife when you're boinking your Argentinian soulmate?

    34. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always laugh when I hear people complain that corporations should pay more tax. Do you know who pays corporate tax? You do. Tax is just an expense that gets passed along in the price of the product or service. The free market (this apparently horrible capitalism thing) keeps prices down because of competition. If you favor higher corporate tax rates, you might as well just raise your own taxes. The corporate tax rate should be zero. Reducing corporate expenses encourages companies to INVEST IN YOUR COUNTRY, which creates more jobs and capital.

    35. Re:I Am Not Surprised by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Not a tribe, a market be it white, grey or black to circumvent and avoid state (compulsory) "services" or regulations. A community of like minds helps build and strengthen it but is not strictly required to practice agorism. And the harsh reality is the violence is incapable of solving complex social problems, but creates a myriad of unseen, delayed, and ultimately destructive effects.

      Sunk cost fallacy. Just because people have settled in areas decided hostile to human occupation does not mean that the best course is to continue to do so. There is plenty of space and potential to increase density in those areas which are more geographically suitable.Secondly there are such things a multi-lateral contracts and covenants, which are more precisely defined, with clear up front costs that can achieve cooperation without the danger of mission creep. There are more options that to have a group of so-called representatives making "laws" and to have no complex cooperative behavior. But this sort of thing would be the end stage, not the beginning. For the moment there's no benefit in a head on confrontation or building massive competing infrastructure (It would be for the fourth and final stage of agorism. (Right now we are only on the first and in a few places moving into the second)

      Bigger groups or a large hierarchy isn't always better. Some information is implicit meaning that it rarely travels very far. Is johnny going to rat me out? Isn't a question necessarily answered by polling a larger group, but better answered by a more through polling of a smaller group. I'm not saying make everything yourself or trade only with agorists (then how in the world would anyone become and agorist in the first place?), but that by doing so, you can decrease your risk and exposure, increasing the amount of grey and black market trade you can do and how well you can evade and avoid the red market (common criminals and government agencies)

      And I don't thing you understand what this is trying to accomplish. It's not a transition from a large group to a small one, it's the transition from what one person can do alone to affect his freedom, to what a small group together can do to effect their freedom together (stage 2 of the agorist revolution). No reason why you can't partake in the larger economy as it is advantageous and risk is acceptable. If you run a pizza shop with all the licences and all the taxes paid, you could still do a bit a grey market work by letting trusted friends pay in cash without sales tax or a receipt , keep the cash in your pocket, but leave the expenses on the official books. Then spend the cash where it doesn't create a paper trail. (perhaps the businesses of friends who do the same thing, but this isn't a necessary component.) There are degrees and stages undertaken as each person feels the risk:reward ration is properly low, and each stage is designed to decrease the risk:reward ration of the next stage as well.

      Telling the difference between good doctors and quacks is not a problem, it's a entrepreneurial opportunity. Anybody can call themselves a linux sysadmin, but without prior provable experience or something like a RHCE, you aren't getting hired. Information is getting cheaper and more distributed all the time. Just the other day /. had an article about turning smartphones into iris scanners. Pair this with a $3.00 "quack detector" app and you might be able to access the history or a summary of history about a person's successful or unsuccessful healthcare attempts. Common sense helps as well. A person who's been in town 30 years, probably not a quack, a person who's been in town thirty minutes, probably a quack.

      You've bought into this insidious idea that people are incapable of solving problems without some "authority" to do it for them. Nothing is further from the truth.

    36. Re:I Am Not Surprised by LibRT · · Score: 1

      I disagree with virtually every word of your post, and am no big fan of "poor me/the world is all wrong" self pity, but I will agree with the "life=job" comment: About six weeks ago I concluded I had an irreconcilable philosophical difference with the direction the company, where I had worked for the past nine years, had taken (a very large global company in the financial sector). Now, this wasn't an "I reject corporations!" or some other rallying cry of those who have a poor understanding of economics. I simply concluded the company was making repeated decisions which I considered sub-optimal/ill-considered and that other senior leaders did not share my vision of the way forward. So I resigned.

      The first two weeks without a job were terrible. Not for lack of money - I can remain unemployed for the foreseeable future if I so desire - but for the loss of identity. I didn't realize, until that point, just how much of my identity was wrapped up in a job I was deeply and passionately committed to (and which, upon reflection, consumed a lot of my life).

      Now, after some weeks of reflection, I have begun to separate myself from my "work self", and it has been both difficult at times and deeply rewarding at other times. But I'm definitely a different "me" now. I used to wake up and immediately start thinking of the various projects I was managing and what needed to be done that day. I still wake up and think about what projects I need to work on today, but they're of the "feed yourself occasionally", "take a shower", "make a pot of coffee" variety now.

      None of which is to say that I blame "society" or my former employer or anyone else: I chose to work there and commit to the job in the way I did. I'm just saying that it seemed in retrospect pretty easy for me to get a bit lost in it all and not realize how absorbed and obsessed I'd become, and that I became unable (or maybe I just didn't want) to consider a less-frenetic alternative.

    37. Re:I Am Not Surprised by clifyt · · Score: 1

      Being watched has as many triggers for safety as it does danger. A family member watching you is (generally) a good thing. In the right society, police officers watching is a good thing. In the animal world, the alpha male of the herd watching you can make you braver and feel far safer allowing you to sleep in an area full of predators...not watching for the predators, but watching you.

      Being watched is a biological neutral.

      As a cognitive being, you are far more in control of how you you choose to see the watchers. You can choose if it is a negative, if it is a positive...or if it is an overall neutral.

      I've seen studies where students doing testing (my main field is in assessment of knowledge) where a photo is placed with a forced perspective on the eyes (I think this is what its called...its where the eyes seem to follow you)...doing so with an inspiring figure, you can elicit far better grades that without. You can also retard grades the opposite direction with the right stimuli.

      Either way, the privacy issue is one of fear. You may not want to admit it, but it is. Once you stop externalizing fear, privacy needs go away.

      But then again, fear is built into all of us...its how our species has survived. It also keeps us back in a lot of ways. You thrive far more in an environment that has no fear.

      Would I want a society that DEMANDS that I give away privacy? Fuck no...I wouldn't want to live in one that did that...a society that demands invasion is one that is looking for faults. Then again, I don't have anything anyone can use against me...for instance, dept chair got upset one year because of rumors I was dating a student...looked into things and I got called in...said there was a rumor...and I said Yes I Am...Find In My Contract Where This Is Wrong...and it isn't. The ONLY thing they could have got me on would have been if I would have lied about it...and this is where most of the people in my situation get in trouble...they lie about it.

      So I understand why privacy is a big deal, but at the same time, it is an expression of fear (half of our actions are either expressions of fear or connection / love). Once you stop minimizing fear and maximizing love, it really isn't a big deal. Then again, getting rid of fear works for me...who knows how it works for anyone else. I just wish the privacy freaks would shut the fuck up about those of us that freely give away our privacy and stop acting as if we are idiots for doing so :-)

      Ok...enough from me...I don't care much about psychology any more except as a hobby...I have a study or two I'll probably publish before I get to my next career (based around finding happiness)...but it really isn't something I need to defend...

    38. Re:I Am Not Surprised by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Your privacy? Who cares...the problem is that you think someone does care. Stop worrying about how others judge you, and it doesn't matter about your privacy. The gov't is corrupt? The gov't has always been corrupt.

      That is one of the problems when arguing about how absolutely critical Privacy is to maintaining our Freedom.

      You are making a philosophical argument. You specifically are suffering from what I call "Star Trek" glasses. In an ideal world, or even your envisioned Utopia, privacy might not actually be required, or much smaller levels or privacy would be acceptable. For example, the whole world could know everything about you, where you are, your thoughts about certain subjects. All of it indexed and searchable like Google. Privacy would only exist for sex (when desired) or bodily functions. Perhaps over time, even the need for privacy in those actions would no longer be needed.

      It is not hard to imagine a society or race of beings that have no concept of it, especially a strongly telepathic one.

      However, at our point in history, you also point out that the government is deeply corrupt. Privacy is not just a fundamental human right (one which we can freely give up in the aforementioned Utopia), but a strategic defense.

      Governments have always demonstrated that they are made up of people. Therefore, it is those people that have been corrupt. They will use the tools and resources at their disposal towards their corrupt ends.

      Privacy has always been a defense for the people because it was very difficult in recent centuries to strongly and effectively remove it from the people by force. The technology and communications infrastructure simply did not exist.

      In Sun Tzu's Art of War he specifically devotes a fairly large amount of attention to espionage and spies. It was to gather information, because information was valuable. To quote Sun Tzu:

      What enables the wise sovereign and the good general to strike and conquer, and achieve things beyond the reach of ordinary men, is FOREKNOWLEDGE.

      Now this foreknowledge cannot be elicited from spirits; it cannot be obtained inductively from experience, nor by any deductive calculation.

      Quantities like length, breadth, distance and magnitude, are susceptible of exact mathematical determination; human actions cannot be so calculated.

      Knowledge of the enemy's dispositions can only be obtained from other men.

      Only today has the ability to obtain foreknowledge been so cheaply attained by government and so far reaching. The state police agencies of 50-60 years ago would have marveled at the ability we have today. Far more people would have died had those abusive and corrupt governments had access to the tools and resources we have today.

      To be saddened by the loss of privacy and to be concerned by it is not philosophical ignorance as you imply. The enlightened understanding you speak of is ignorance itself.

      Privacy, Anonymity, and the strength in numbers that we possess is absolutely our best defense. It is not about you, clifyt, judging me. It is about the corrupt government official determining that I am a threat to their social order through knowledge obtained by my lack of privacy. In some countries, that just gets you killed. Maybe ostracized, discredited, etc. The consequences can vary, but the premise remains eternal. As long as corrupt governments exist, or governments at all, we are in danger directly proportional to the amount of Privacy and Anonymity we lack.

      Consider that. Philosophy is wonderful. These thoughts will help us advance and take humanity to heights we can't yet dream of. However, today is today, and today that ideal world does not exist. You might want to be more pragmatic about it.

    39. Re:I Am Not Surprised by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      This is all external, and nothing is an internal. Your privacy? Who cares...the problem is that you think someone does care.

      Seriously? You honestly believe that people's emotional responses are on handy little switches? That anyone who has a problem with losing privacy or freedom is just needlessly torturing themselves or a compulsive whiner? If that's the case then let's teach people to like being robbed as well - I mean who cares...the problem is that you think that you and you alone should get to enjoy having your grandfather's wedding ring. Stop worrying about who's that property is and just go take someone else's dead relative's wedding ring if you absolutely need to have one. And just think of all the misery and anxiety we could eliminate!

      The gov't is corrupt? The gov't has always been corrupt.

      Diseases kill people? Diseases have always killed people. Nothing can, has, or will ever be done about this, so stop getting all worked up about it...

      How are you defining success? Money? Power over others? These shouldn't determine your success. You are allowing it to determine your success and you have defined success in a way that allows the unjust to get the upper hand in your world.

      So when salaries go disproportionately to idiots who proceed to collapse my once-thriving industry, putting me out of work, I'm supposed to react by changing my life goals to "slowly starve as student loan repayments eat up all my revenue while the price of food continues rising" so that I can consider myself a success?

      I get that attitude plays a huge role in personal happiness, but there are some pretty basic limits on what normal people can happily accept - a fact to which you seem oblivious. It must be nice living on a world where you could never conceivably run into them. Or where it's rational to ignore problems so as to not get upset when you can't seem to solve them. You'll have to let us know what color the sky is there.

    40. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 1

      It's not self-pity my friend. It's world pity.

      You need hobbies. Something to live for that is yours and yours only. That will give you an identity.

      A hobby that is not computers that is. I still find that part difficult too.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    41. Re:I Am Not Surprised by cavreader · · Score: 1

      Capitalism depends on the societal belief known as survival of the fittest. This belief tends to irritate those who believe "Everyone Is Equal" when it is obviously not so. I am NOT talking about race, culture, religion, or gender when trying to define equality. I am talking about the equality of contributions to the entire human race as a whole. Capitalism may not be an ideal or even a particularly fair system but it does exist and we need to deal with that. Communism and Socialism are marketed as systems that provide equality and fairness amongst the general population however even these systems have privileged classes and the lack of equality that rivals any found in the US. The world is filling up with people who consume more than they contribute while those who do contribute and succeed are required to make more and more sacrifices in order to provide equality and support to those who contribute little or nothing for various reasons. Any system that tries to create a system like this only ends up creating a race to the bottom where in the end where everyone suffers. I know my opinion sounds heartless and uncaring in the extreme but it in the end it is only the opinion of one person who does not consider himself a member of the elite or the downtrodden only someone who believes we endlessly argue and debate issues today that never really address the true problems and challenges we face. Flame away!

    42. Re:I Am Not Surprised by vivian · · Score: 1

      I think that the problem probably lies partly in the diet.
      The factors you mention would certainly contribute, but lack of good nutrition undobtedly has a large part to play.

      Your brain can't work properly when you are feeding it crap food all day, and unfortunately there are so many more junk food options in the US compared to many other parts of the world, with lots of cheap empty calories to fill up on, and way too much sugar.

      I think if people ate less of the heavily processed foods and more basic fruit veg and meat/fish etc, they would be a little less neurotic and generally feel better about themselves, less depressed and overall in a better state of mind.

      Here's a video about nutrition and behavior by Dr. Russell Blaylock http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W-gba0GPwU

    43. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, yea yea....

      Life also is fucking stressful. I started taking Chantix (a drug that is an anti-psychotic that is now used to help quit smoking... it works fucking wonders). Anyway, my wife has said repeatedly that I'm way nicer and more easy going on Chantix...

    44. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that kind of saying "Who cares if you live in a puddle of shit? Embrace it! And maybe even invite some pigs over and have a wallowing party."?

    45. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Nithin+Philips · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting that the current way of things are right or that we continue keep doing it. I simply wanted to point out that people don't like to let go of things they have sunken time and money into. Fallaciously reasoned or not. If we are to change the way we live, it's only reasonable that we explore paths that do not require catastrophic changes. Agorism requires overthrow of present institutions. No one is willing to cede the power and position that they have acquired without a struggle. Neither are they going to allow such a dramatically different alternative to society to exist anywhere within their reach. The Soviets ticked off America from day one.

      You may find that it is difficult to get people to accept that there are no authorities than not. If there are no explicit authorities then implicit ones will exist. It's simply that people who seem to know a thing or two will get listened to. (Sometimes.) Despite the assertion, telling the difference between good doctors and quacks is not an easy thing. Sometime the cost of that is your or someone else's life. A bad doctor is more likely to kill you than a bad sysadmin. I'm not trying to introduce fear, but I doubt that most people are willing to give up the certainty that they have now (whether valid or not) so they can supposedly have more freedom. And your solution seems to rely on the availability of perfect information, a fallacy if anything. Since no such thing exists.

      I have lived in a place where your connections and likability are more important than the rule of law. If anything it's worse or equally bad as the cruel, cold, alienating society. At least they will leave you alone if you keep your head low. Without a proper outlet for people dissatisfaction (like lawsuits or appearance of justice) people will react violently.

      The point is, the majority won't let you have your utopia. No matter how perfect and foolproof. They like what they have and know. They won't join it. And if you force them, one day the unenlightened will have their revenge (again look what happened to the Communists).

      --
      Einmal ist Keinmal. What happens but once might as well not have happened at all.
    46. Re:I Am Not Surprised by MimeticLie · · Score: 1

      See also: depressive realism

    47. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the biological reasoning behind people who are depressed anyway? How can it be evolutionary?

      This has actually been covered here on Slashdot in a story a while back.

    48. Re:I Am Not Surprised by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      There is substantial evidence mental illness has a huge dietary component. For instance, indigenous peoples around the world just do not experience western diseases as we know them, diabetes, obesity, heart disease, cancers, mental illnesses. Often an indigenous population picks up a western diet, western diseases explode out of nowhere.

      It's been observed with North American Inuit, pacific islanders, Maori, Aboriginals and in asian countries. Dare I say there's more than ample evidence for a causal link between what we eat and a shit load of physical and mental illness.

      Many cultures didn't even have words for depression, and when explained wouldn't have understood what it meant.

      Asside from our obviously shitty psychological environment. What we eat is making us sick and unhappy.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    49. Re:I Am Not Surprised by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      A short supply of doctors is sure to kill people than a larger supply that could more cheaply provide routine care and screening for a larger number of people. Medical licensing was not instituted to deal with quacks (that was just the pretext) The real reason was to weed out competition and the low prices provided by lodge practice (1-2 dollars/year vs. 1-2 dollars per visit) (Roderick Long, How Government Solved the Health Care Crises, http://freenation.org/a/f12l3.html ).

      The soviets didn't tick off the U.S. from day one.They were allies in WWII, and the communist regime was strengthened by grain aide sent to it by the U.S, but that's beside the point. Funny you mention Russia though. Before the liberalization at the end, there are some estimates that 60% of russia's economy was in the black market. If Stalin and seccessors couldn't stop a black market, what makes you think a government which is currently losing a war against stoners and hippies could fare any better? The same government that needed to spend three trillion dollars just to kill one man?

      Funny you mention the appearance of justice. That's all the courts and government in general is about... appearence. It's PR scheme to keep you distracted from what they are really doing. Violently controlling people. What's wrong with the substance of justice? (besides that judges would have to find themselves guilty under the RICO act)

      Rule of law doesn't exist, it a term of art, meant to disguise the basic fact of rule of man. (John Hasnas, The Myth of the Rule of Law) Laws cant' rule you, only people can. Anyways it's not a problem, it's an entrepreneurial opportunity. Fair dispute resolution is a service that the vast majority values most of the time. Customary law, that is practices that develop over time through the resolution of actual disputes is more suited to the purpose than an arbitrary code.

      Let's put it this way. How many people would "cheat" on their income tax if they could save $100 with no chance of being caught. How many for $1,000 with a slight chance... and so on. If people see an advantage for themselves they will join weather they have a full understanding of agorism of not.

      And the choice isn't between what we have now and voluntary society, but between what we are becoming and a voluntary society, and it doesn't look good. What cannot continue mathematically, will not continue. Also I don't believe that government cannot be reformed, it's entire purpose is to concentrate power and control people. it must be replaced with voluntary institutions whose incentives are aligned with those of whom they serve.

    50. Re:I Am Not Surprised by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      Good job you posted anonymously. I think the balance of studies would point to, diet, lifestyle, environmental factors and psychological environment being the main causes of depression. Idiosyncratic and genetic factors cannot account for the entire problem in western society.

      Man indigenous cultures don't even have a word for depression and wouldn't know what you meant if you explained to them.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    51. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always seen the movie Idiocracy as a futuristic documentary.

    52. Re:I Am Not Surprised by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      It's far simpler and less cynical (less commie/pinko) than that. The issues at work are:

      - People are different, we expect/want people to be the same.
      - Many people do have conditions of one sort or another, in the past we called people lazy, undisciplined, mean/evil, bilious, possessed by demons. Now we know that have neurological conditions that makes it hard for them to get along with everyone else.
      - We evolved to function in a certain environment. We don't live in that environment... we've changed it, but we haven't changed. So we have instincts that once saved our ancestors lives (eating whatever, whenever) are now killing us (obesity and all its attendant issues).

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    53. Re:I Am Not Surprised by wazza · · Score: 1

      While not denying the possibility, I think it's a bit of a tangent to ascribe the diet aspect of colonising influence (for want of a better word) to resultant depression amongst indigenous people.

      One thing you inevitably get along with a western-style diet, is a western-style social civilization. I'd be far more likely to ascribe a psychological effect on native people to the recently imported changed psychological & social structure than on something off in the outfield, like the diet that comes with it.

      Surely a changed local psychology is more likely to affect the local's psychological state than something dietary? Call me a fan of Occam.

    54. Re:I Am Not Surprised by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      You know, you can't have "eye contact" with someone unless you're staring at them, too. I suppose you'll respond with some comment to the effect of "but they started it!"

      You don't like for people to look at you. You don't like phone calls. You don't like to have other people around. That's fine. But when you turn "I don't like to be around people very much" into "everyone is watching me and talking about me behind my back", you start to sound, well, paranoid.

    55. Re:I Am Not Surprised by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      Excellent post. I agree with everything you said except for the bit where you say that drugs don't solve problems. If I hadn't had access to LSD and cannabis when I needed them, I would probably still be a depressed anxiety-ridden shut in relying on prescription drugs.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    56. Re:I Am Not Surprised by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Preach it brother - my therapist is really getting run out of ideas for replacing a normal sexual life. Not that I expect much else.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    57. Re:I Am Not Surprised by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Why not computers?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    58. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 1

      I think there must be more to life than science, technology and computers. I just haven't found the non-technical hobby that is right for me.

      Since it's my profession too, I fear that computers will get tiring, like a chore. Haven't found a proper hobby yet.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    59. Re:I Am Not Surprised by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If I took the pill, I wouldn't be taking responsibility for what I feel.

      Are you responsible for what you feel? Do you have any actual direct control over it?

      Also, "responsibility" means taking the long-term consequences of your actions into account, not blaming them on other people, etc. The long-term effects of being constantly miserable and apathetic are likely to be very negative to both you and everyone around you. Given that, in what way is suffering depression a more responsible choice than simply taking the pill?

      What is the biological reasoning behind people who are depressed anyway? How can it be evolutionary? Surely it doesn't serve any good purpose besides feeding predators?

      Heart disease doesn't serve any good purpose either, it's simply a malfunction the body. Brains can also malfunction, especially when acting in circumstances very different than what they evolved in, and depression is one of the possible failure modes.

      Perhaps it's a side effect of sapience? (of which sapience is a side effect of something else) Perhaps are consciousness and sapience is so unbelievably complex that it simply has 'failures' from times to time, overstimulation or sensitivity. In that case, that makes the pill more like a mechanical fix rather than a cop out.

      Does it matter? Either way, it works and solves the problem. Is there some particular reason why one should suffer depression when it can be fixed?

      And animals get depressed too, or at least exhibit all the symptoms.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    60. Re:I Am Not Surprised by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If you run a pizza shop with all the licences and all the taxes paid, you could still do a bit a grey market work by letting trusted friends pay in cash without sales tax or a receipt , keep the cash in your pocket, but leave the expenses on the official books.

      Thus leaving other people to pay for the road that lets you get raw materials and customers and law enforcement that prevents local thugs from breaking your kneecaps if you don't pay an "insurance" - or, for that matter, any other pizza shop owners from simply killing you to reduce competition. Yes, I guess that would increase profits.

      I wonder if there's any "alternative society" movements that aren't just about justifying tax evasion at their heart?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    61. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all

      (if you believe in this thing called "science". if you believe in homeopathy, spirits, afterlife and other weird constructs then of course everything since we invented caves is at fault!!!1)

    62. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Troed · · Score: 1

      Man indigenous cultures don't even have a word for depression and wouldn't know what you meant if you explained to them.

      [citation needed]

    63. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken as someone who doesn't understand supply and demand and elastic and inelastic goods.

    64. Re:I Am Not Surprised by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      in other news, Domestic violence and violent crime in general is down historically, during a severe recession, in spite of setting precedents like you can't spank your children in public. For the most part people are "just trying to get along" at a point better than I've seen in the last 20 years or so. A good portion of that is thanks to people having access to these drugs BEFORE they do something stupid and beat up their kids or get divorced... often because the drugs are economically cheaper than trying to be on your own now.

      I'd argue the only people NOT "getting along" are those like the politicians, businessmen, bankers that are all upset because we haven't bounced back to 20%+ profits again. For the most part "regular folks" have been in a slide since 2000. I know my personal household income DROPPED every year from 2000-2007 (and at least half my friends as well) even though I got "raises" and didn't get laid off. Between demanding longer hours, cut bonuses, increased medical payments, etc my take home has dropped even MORE. Just about every household I know has one person "off the job market" because other than "odd jobs" even official "part time" work is hard to come by (it's mostly full time plus weekends and holidays and without benefits now).

      Back to people though, most younger people are actually NICER in my opinion than in the past. Of course THEY are the ones on "whatever it takes" to work a 40 hour a week job AND go to college at the same time. Since much of the stigma of the drugs has worn off, more people feel confident being on them.

    65. Re:I Am Not Surprised by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Taxation is extortion, factually they are one and the same.

    66. Re:I Am Not Surprised by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Along the lines of what we were talking about earlier, "privacy" is only a concern because there is always something other people in society will "punish" you for. Classic case.... masturbating to porn on the internet... IN a free society why would that be "shameful". It's "freedom" to touch yourself, and it's free speech to post those images... right. Yet we worry about our "privacy" because the combination of those two things that like 50% plus of Americans do in private can make you lose job promotions or make the neighbors hassle you??? The same thing with Facebook... everybody knows kids drink at college, and everyone knows kids have sex "less than carefully". again a huge portion of College goers did it, and brag about it etc... but if there's a "PICTURE" of it... then suddenly you're of "bad moral fibre" (whatever that is nowdays) so you're not qualified to sit in a cube and file TPS reports??? The very idea of "registering" actual offenders is only something new in society since the 1990's... now every body is afraid of doing something that might be "registered".

      Back to having lots of railroad tracks and golden leashes.... Something as simple as being a Ren Faire fan makes people think you're weird... and that's what keeps people in line. My wife has a friend that is very "open minded" and in to all sorts of stuff...(practicing paganism, has boyfriends and girlfriends, LARPs, etc and she's HOT with a boyfriend in a rock band... like a little slashdot fantasy chic!) nothing remotely illegal, but being a lady at 25 she works in rather "uptight" companies and gets really upset about anybody even MENTIONING her on Facebook or even taking pictures at a "black tie" party because something might offend.. Really, she's got a Master's degree and an awesome job.... is something wrong because she's not Mrs. Babymaker (and then her professional career would be toast for not being "dedicated" enough...) That's like the DEFINITION of what's wrong with society right now... she's just not a perfect ENOUGH little worker bee so she's upset about "loss of privacy" all the time.

    67. Re:I Am Not Surprised by mjwx · · Score: 1

      The meaingless sex was a joke in that Slashdot people cannot get laid but you knew that, you just wanted to prove the exception to the rule! ;-)

      The thing I dont get about the stereotypical nerd not getting laid is that, once you start actually trying to get laid it's quite easy especially if you're a young adult (18-25). Nerds and Geeks aren't shunned any more so long as you can carry on a conversation without devolving into OCD level corrections or nerd quotes (although the odd "It's a Trap" or firefly reference dropped at the right time will be well received).

      In the UK we have a binge drinking culture.

      We also have a drinking culture here in Oz, but I dont think it's inherently harmful. Granted some people should not drink but the vast majority can enjoy drinking without a problem. I dont think the majority should be inhibited due to the problems of the minority.

      WRT your sig, have you read Pandora Star or Revelation Space?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    68. Re:I Am Not Surprised by zelda43 · · Score: 1

      Some of these 'drugs' actually provide balance in brain chemistry. I take antidepressants. Wish I had them available when I was young. To talk about drugs in an indifferent fashion is an insult to everyone. Every American has received benefit in some form from chemistry. The drugs not only keep us alive, they also alleviate mental anguish for millions. Anti-psychotics are but one of many that offer the individual the opportunity to reach their full potential. Knowing how various chemistry functions in the brain has brought new possibilities for a better life.

    69. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 1

      I've considered the same. If you're reading this and want to get laid: If you're reasonably good looking, don't stutter, smile, be honest, talk about things that normal people talk about, look conversation topics if you have too. You can get by with girls. Even if you're not amazing looking you can still be hot in other ways; some people like being arrogant and cocky, others can be the 'bad guy'. I am the 'good guy', not 'too nice' but just 'nice enough'. I didn't have problems in college nor any broken hearts either. Girls tell me first hand that I am 'odd' but 'genuine'.

      As far our binge culture:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96TS9qxnqaM
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wphz0Cj_LZQ&feature=related

      There are charities that roam the streets caring for people who are smashed out of their head. Personally, it's a waste of money. If you get drunk and you're out in the streets, why should you get free help? They should get fined!

      I have not read those books but I will definitely look into them.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    70. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 1

      Don't you think it's a thin line though?

      I'd argue that there are lot of people who do not need the drugs and are simply masking some other problems that could disappear from diet, exercise, education, finances, erasing personal demons?

      Mental health is multi-faceted so I guess it's not all cut and dry. I just think that human beings have lived for generations without these drugs, something must be wrong with our lifestyle if we suddenly need them so bad.

      What kind of depression do you have?

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    71. Re:I Am Not Surprised by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I have not read those books but I will definitely look into them.

      The only book(s) I've read out of the list in your sig is Foundation, Revelation Space is hard sci-fi so it's applicable but Pandora Star is a bit more space opera-y (but still good). I'll have to look at the others you've listed. Hopefully Amazon hasn't destroyed the Book Depository yet...

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    72. Re:I Am Not Surprised by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Computers are tools - use them as will, don't feel constrained from their use and your interaction with them at work - not that a non-technical hobby is bad - just keep your options open.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    73. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      Seriously - the first item on your list is Apple?

      It takes a special kind of hate to make Apple responsible for our society's problems.

      Now everyone take your Thorazine and relax.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    74. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 1

      No, consumerism.

      People bin things rather than repair them. People don't do things by themselves anymore, they buy something to do it for them. Apple is just one strain of consumerism that prevents people from thinking.

      It's not blind Apple-rhetoric, it's a symptom.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    75. Re:I Am Not Surprised by clifyt · · Score: 1

      I did work at one point for a politician that went to great extremes to look up my background (deleted the part about the party and his position just before I posted this...could be relevant, but I don't think it really is).

      During the interview, I was asked by one of his staff to explain my online behavior...and I asked if I was being hired for what I did outside of work...and as they hemmed and hawed about it I stated, I Date Younger Women, All Over The Age of 21 And Yes, I Like My Friends To Know This...I made some comment about them not looking hard enough because there were photos of me dancing at a friends show at a gay bar where some dude totally grabbed my crotch just as the photo was taken. I said this should be more of an embarrassment for your people than me showing that I'm a red blooded heterosexual...

      I got the job (consulting) and was asked to come on permanently, which I declined (I felt comfortable getting them up to speed with the subject I knew and hopefully influence them towards my beliefs...but I sure as fuck wasn't going to play propaganda with things I am not an expert on, and they wanted me to give them the opinion they wanted).

      That said, I have an ex that I am still friends with who CONSTANTLY complains about her BF's porn viewing habits...I finally got fed up with it -- and I try to make it a point not to give advice to my friends about relationships considering I am not the greatest at them -- but I said something about You Know I Looked At Porn And Never Said Anything...Did You Bitch About Me Too??? And she responded that, no, she never complained because I was upfront about it and never needed to sneak off in hiding to do it. In her mind, what I did was normal...but since he hid it and was ashamed of it...he was doing something dirty. From a psychological perspective, he was doing something dirty because he felt it was dirty. It is the same thing...if you are constantly in fear of those seeing something that is out of the norm -- you are going to appear weird. If you embrace it, its much harder to impeach your credibility...my weird background that I use to hide (I was a musician for a decade before I got into my current world...along with all the crap that goes on with this world)...it ends up being a point of conversation where I can tell people Yes, I Use To Be A Freak, But Now I Wear A Suit, And I'm Probably A Bigger Freak But I Fit In Better...and it has worked out well...my lack of privacy ends up being a selling point for me...I am an open book except to those so entrenched in deception that they have to believe there is more to it than I am willing to tell...and honestly, they do me a favor by not associating themselves with me as it would be a bad match...

    76. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      Wow. The concept of owning an Apple being a symptom is sort of pedal to the firewall "all modern life is bad" rehetoric.

      So, let's get rid of the evil things you don't like. I would suppose that this would mean abandonment of technology or at least dropping back quite a few notches. If repair of electronics is desirable, you're going to need to discard surface mount technology. Maybe drop back to a pre-agriculture model? Think that would make everyone happy? Somehow I doubt it. I'll bet there were people of every age who feel the way you appear to feel.

      But looking at your posts, I think that perhaps the big problem is that you are personally unhappy. For what reasons - I'm not sure. People often attribute their unhappiness to problems other than the real cause, but the question becomes:

      Why do you allow Apple computer corporation to dictate your happiness? I use both Apple and other PC platforms, and the Apple goes a long way toward making me happy because it gives less problems. But why allow any material object to determine your happiness?

      It's an old quote attributed to many people, but yes - people are just about as happy as they make up their minds to be.

      Material things are not intrinsically bad. That some people would become fixated on them is unfortunate, but don't blame the object. Having "toys" is a perfectly fine thing. Gauging your happiness by that is not so good.

      In that respect, I think we agree. What I see as a fundamental disagreement is in your apparent willingness to assign good or bad to the objects and the system that produces them. There may be something there, but to blot out the joy of life? You complain of the USA, while there are countries where you can be killed for an opinion.

      People have turned to alcohol, nightclubs and "meaningless sex" for years before we had the present system. Even in countries that have completely different outlooks. What's meaningless sex anyhow? A person might be single and lonely and go to a bar of an evening. They might meet another there that is of similar mind. That isn't meaningless. It's nature. It isn't long term binding, which is a lot better - but it isn't due to to any of modern societies "evils".

      Anyhow, decide to be happy - it's a lot better. Unless of course being unhappy is your style of happiness.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    77. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 1

      No I am merely drawing conclusions for large swathes of unhappy people in our culture. I take a look around mea nd people are not happy. These are just my theories why.

      Why is it that poor people in villages in distant parts of the world are very content with life but western cultures are not?

      We humans are capable of so much more but there are many things that are holding as back. Call me a armchair social anthropologist if you will, do not take what I say to mean I am talking about myself.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    78. Re:I Am Not Surprised by zelda43 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in general. Though mankind went for perhaps 250k yrs. without medications such as we have now, the life span was very short, society as it existed was very basic. We now live 3-5 times longer, complex social issues combined with the awareness of the world present new challenges to maintaining mental stability. I suspect in early times, a person not capable of normal interaction, was soon departed from life. How many millions of humans lived horrible lives due to war? I was one of them. Just look at the many men and women returning from our present conflicts, suffering the lingering effects of trauma. Of course , and I know it from the drugs gone wild era of the '60's, that misuse is an ongoing issue. Then too, factor in a world population approaching 7billion humans is a great departure from our overall history.

    79. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      Much of what we say is actually about ourselves. We just don't always know that

      Poor people in villages are very happy? I mean, I haven't been there, so I can't say for sure. But the human condition isn't always that great. some societies will stone you to death for adultery, some have bizarre mutilation rituals for women as well as men. In the dark ages the majority of people lived as virtual slave-serfs and the infant mortality rate was staggering, and let's not forget the rampant and deadly diseases and no personal hygiene. If you made it to 30 you were old - and lucky.

      Now there's a recipe for happiness. No Ipads in sight.

      I really think that you are falling for the old grass is greener/noble savage outlook. GIve some thought to the possibility that you might be hanging out with the wrong people. Give some thought to the fact that there are a lot of unhappy people around right now because we just came away form a decade of extreme foolishness, brought about not by technology and some innate evil of modern society, but by greed and mathematical insanity. That's sort of understandable. but it's not an indictment of our way of life.

      Or if you like, continue in your present tack, and hopefully you might realize that there are some folk who have complained as you do all the way back to the primitive culture you appear to desire. Perhaps you can try one of these cultures and see if those people and you are happier?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  39. Counteracting........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pills are to counteract what they put in the water and the vaccinations they give kids.

    But joking aside, seeing a lot of the younger people...I have to wonder if there isn't some kind of exposure people were getting in the mid 80s and early 90s. Can't tell if the trend has continued in future generations yet since they are still growing up.

    1. Re:Counteracting........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each generation is communicating and transferring information at speeds an order of magnitude faster than the parent generation. The issue now is that the speed at which it is increasing is becoming so fast that once you put a few generations between, serious communication issues arise. This is scaring the hell out of the old people that are still 'in charge' and don't know what the fuck is going on anymore and have no hope of ever figuring it out.

  40. Re:bring on the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    can we block socialist passive aggressive sharia loving faggot ewropeons too?

  41. Placebo effect for hypochondriacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of those drugs are no better than placebos, meaning that they do nothing. Therefore, it is OK if many hypochondriac people take them. The result is the same as acupuncture, or any other highly diluted miracle drug, which is basically just water. If it makes people feel better - fine.

    1. Re:Placebo effect for hypochondriacs by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see a big upsurge in the popularity of homeopathic medicine in that case. At least the money goes to mostly-harmless hippies, the side effects are fewer, and it's cheaper.

    2. Re:Placebo effect for hypochondriacs by JamesP · · Score: 2

      Wrong

      They do something. They bind to the receptors and stuff...

      They may be called "placebos" because they don't "fix" the main issue, but they certainly change the chemistry.

      It's like giving ulcer medication to someone with a broken leg.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    3. Re:Placebo effect for hypochondriacs by pac109 · · Score: 1
      Wrong.

      There's nothing in homeopathics to "bind to the receptors and stuff". There's nothing in homeopathics to "change the chemistry".

      It's more like giving a glass of water to someone with a broken leg.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy#High_dilutions

    4. Re:Placebo effect for hypochondriacs by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Where in my post did I mention homeopathy?

      It's specifically saying about "Many of those drugs are no better than placebos" whereas in context means FDA approved drugs.

      Except giving homeopathy is like giving a glass of water (maybe with some sacarose), giving a FDA approved drug is giving a substance designed to bind into receptors.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  42. Why is it nobody is happier? by improfane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ask yourself.

    Why aren't you happy? You (probably) have: electricity, abundance of food and water, computers, video games, (some) free time, a job, a loving girlfriend/wife? Money?

    You're not happy because you cannot be you in this society.

    It's that trite cliche that materials do not bring happiness but they are necessity for happiness. You cannot be happy about something before you have shelter, food and water. (Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs)

    Our society lacks somethin that people need. Drugs really don't give that to you.

    Arguing about happiness on Slashdot. Very odd.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    1. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by derGoldstein · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know that it's cliche, but someone has to bring up nietzsche at this point. He kept pointing out that people in "the modern era" were really just carts on a rail, regardless of their social-economic status. Whoever you are, there are things that "are expected of you", which, if you chose to avoid, either make you "weird", or even downright rejected.

      It doesn't matter that you have food and shelter. These things don't provide you with real freedom. You're still restrained by society and forced to choose between several pre-determined, "acceptable" paths. If you do anything else, there will be social penalties. His famous collapse at the reigned horse was him weeping for mankind -- we're all shackled and bound, because if we weren't, we'd be too destructive.

      We can't change our lives in order to become happy, so the next logical step is to change our brain chemistry. Maybe then we'll be slightly happier broken-in horses.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    2. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      Arguing about happiness on Slashdot.

      Now that makes us happy!

    3. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      His famous collapse at the reigned horse was him weeping for mankind -- we're all shackled and bound, because if we weren't, we'd be too destructive.

      Quo bono? Who benefits from that idea? Certainly not the shackled. And it begs the question, what are the rulers if not themselves men? Angels? Gods? Some people certainly seem to think as much, but of course they are deluded. The most dangerous and destructive mean are those in a position to deceive others, by conflating their personal interests with the "common good". Even more dangerous are those men who have deceived even themselves.

      Also this idea is a self-fulfilling prophecy. A child who is abused and manipulated is far more likely to abuse and manipulate others as an adult. If you stick a kid in a classroom and humiliate and punish him for any deviance from "the plan", they will try to punish and humiliate those they find who have deviated because they have integrated a fear of deviation into their personalty in order to survive the humiliation and punishment of their teachers..

      Social interaction is fundamentally never going to be more respectful of individual needs and preferences, than the degree of the same respect they show to children. Now individuals can analyze and overcome their reactions, but it's a very long process to get it to spread to most people. It's not hopeless it's just hard, and the place to start is to analyze your relationships with you friend and family to reduce and mitigate attempts of control and abuse.

    4. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Why aren't you happy?

      Last time I checked, I was. Checking again... yup, still happy. Well, slightly sleepy - I was catching up with some friends I haven't seen for a few months last night - but aside from that, definitely happy.

      You're not happy because you cannot be you in this society.

      Well, I'm not sure what 'this society' is in your context, but I live in the UK and spend quite a bit of my working time doing things for people in the USA, so I'd say I'm probably in the same society as you. If you can't be happy in this society, then I think it says more about you than about society in general.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Why can't you change your life to become happy? I've done it. In fact, I had a discussion with my boss just a couple weeks ago. He finally caught on to the fact that I'm not a "company man". I laughed, and told him he was damned RIGHT that I wasn't a company man. No ulcers, no worries, no tossing and turning in bed at night. I flat out told him why I work there - it's because I like my work. Just fuck with me, and take the pleasure out of my work, and I'm history. Jobs may be hard to find nowadays, but I'll find something.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by improfane · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man."

      I can be happy in my circumstances but not completely content given all the things that are happening in the world. Call it idealism.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    7. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "We can't change our lives in order to become happy" - no, because we need to change ourselves to become happy. Go to a developing country and they'll almost certainly idolise the West because they are trying to "change their lives to become happy", and have seen the 'benefits' of consumerism.

      Once our basic needs are met, we should spend time removing the junk from our minds, the inaccurate notions and ideas, the misperceptions that have led to us to conclude that happiness depends on something external to ourselves. This is critical to understand, and without deep investigation allows feelings of inadequacy and insufficiency to fester and grow. These feelings can drive some people to work 80 hour weeks, others just have a breakdown.

      The problem is one of focus, but also of education. We aren't taught how to deal with the stresses and strains of life at school, we're just sculpted into workers, cogs in machines. We aren't taught the truth of practices that can rejuvenate our lives, and little is made of balance. Instead, these misunderstandings allow us to be hijacked by advertising and media, and be turned into slaves.

      The current situation isn't sustainable. Just this week I read that the US, on the brink of default, will decide to pay its interest even if it means cutting benefits. This is crazy. Numbers get pushed around so that wealthy investors become even wealthier while those on the lower rungs of society - people who actually need help and suport - are left with nowhere to turn.

      We need heart.

      Apparently during the Roman era, people identified themselves with their hearts - i.e. if you asked a Roman where in his body his consciousness was, he would have pointed to his heart. Whether this is true or not, romance and the heart were certainly dominant in the high art of the pre-1700s - Shakespeare, the Renaissance, etc. Now, we're all logic. Cold, calculating logic, stuck in our heads. I believe that only when these two aspects of ourselves are balanced will humanity reach its true potential. I just hope we don't destroy ourselves or our chance on this planet before this happens.

    8. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Surt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also this idea is a self-fulfilling prophecy. A child who is abused and manipulated is far more likely to abuse and manipulate others as an adult. If you stick a kid in a classroom and humiliate and punish him for any deviance from "the plan", they will try to punish and humiliate those they find who have deviated because they have integrated a fear of deviation into their personalty in order to survive the humiliation and punishment of their teachers..

      This is exactly why the wealthy send their kids to private school. Public school is for the sheep, private school the wolves.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Surt · · Score: 1

      I'm lucky to be even better off, I'm now in the position where jobs are coming begging for me. My 'boss' knows the line of recruiters knocking at my door is a mile long, and I'm staying because I get to do what interests me.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    10. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by captain_sweatpants · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod this insightful!

    11. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'And it begs the question, '

      No, it doesn't.

    12. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      There's truth in that statement.

    13. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Jobs and women - you can get pretty much your pick of either as long as you're confident that you can get pretty much your pick of either.

    14. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by russotto · · Score: 1

      And it begs the question, what are the rulers if not themselves men?

      Two basic possibilities:
      1) There are a few men who are free, who have authority without responsibility, and who wield control over the rest of us.

      2) There are no men who are free; even those at the top are constrained by the society they and their predecessors have built, or by the weight of responsibility on them.

    15. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      There are other solutions that don't cost 40k a year. But you're right, any self-respecting "elite" would never send thier kid to public schools.

    16. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, I think I am relatively happy as an American. I have to admit that I have always been something of a social outsider, and I have made some effort to build a life for myself that is more than simple consumerism.

      We live in an age of technological marvels and abundance undreamed of by past generations - and some parts of the modern world. Compared to all those humans that lived and died in ignorance and poverty so terrible that we can barely even imagine it, we live like gods. This is not an exaggeration. Near-instantaneous communication of huge volumes of information anywhere in the world. So much food, I can kill myself with it if I want to - or if I'm not careful. Flying through the air in a machine that can carry me to distant lands in a matter of hours. Travelling in my private car at 60 mph to cities 300 miles away just for a getaway weekend.

      I have often wondered how people can be so dissatisfied in the midst of so much that is splendid and amazing. I'm not saying America (or the modern world) is perfect. But most of the complaining I hear seems to completely miss the point. If there is a secret cabal (ie Illuminatis) ruling the world behind the scenes, I think they gave us Obama just so disaffected white consumers would have something to bitch about.

    17. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      With the utmost respect to Nietzsche, fuck that!

      Frankly it's not that hard to be whoever you want to be in this society (I live in the states, California if you must know). Make your choices. Stand by them. And take responsibility if they cause harm. If folks ostracize you for being weird or strange, well fuck 'em!

      Typically the folks who are intimidated by the people with strong enough personalities to be themselves are a bit of a downer anyways. I can tell you right now, myself and most of my close friends and family have never compromised our individuality or freedom of spirit in order to achieve social acceptance. Do we raise a lot of eyebrows and butt heads with a lot of folks? Sure! But that's fine because the people we get along with are the really excellent ones. The folks who don't go running away in terror at something unexpected or uncertain tend to be the folks with the potential and passion to lead impressive, awesome lives!

      My point is not to blow smoke up my own ass, but, rather, to say, "Be yourself and fuck what everyone else thinks!"

      And quite frankly, as nerds, we should recognize just how far that attitude can get you in life. Do you think Elon Musk wrings his hands every night worrying about what the VP's of Boeing and Lockheed-Martin think about him? Do you think Bill Gates made his decisions based on who he would impress rather than what he wanted to do? Was Wozniak the kind of fella that would sell out just to get a pat on the back? What about good ol' Feynman? You can't tell me that he was considered "normal," by most folk growing up. His wit alone would have made him unique and quirky.

      So yeah, in America today it is very easy to worry about whether or not you really can be yourself. But if you make a point to stop worrying about it and you just do it, 9/10 times you'll get by just fine. And the haters that want to look down on you for having the courage to be yourself, well, screw 'em. Chances are they are probably just intimidated anyways.

      It's easy to get depressed in today's society (especially if Slashdot is your primary lens to what is happening in the world today!) but that is no excuse to sell yourself out. Be strong. Be bold. Be you. And I promise you life will push you towards others who are just as strong and bold as yourself.

      And just for some practical advice: if you find yourself looked down upon, ostracized, or judged often, try laughing at the folks doing it. It helps show them that life shouldn't be taken so seriously.

    18. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      We lack the ability to self-actualize without being hemmed in by artificial constraints.

      "You can't do that, because*..."

      *where the reason could be any one or more of the following non-exclusive things:

      Only rich people can do that, and you are not rich enough.
      The government says you can't.
      You will be seen as batshit crazy if you do it- (possibly comitted.)
      It will have negative consequences toward your employment. (EG, HR datamining social networking before hiring, etc..)
      Your new mechanical project resembles a bomb to your neighbors.
      Your insistence on doing science at home raises the hackles of civil administrators, regardless of how many state and industry certifications you hold. (Where science could be as simple as analytical chemistry [Administrator: OMG, A METH LAB!], high energy physics [OMG! A BOMB!], cryptographic research [OMG! A CYBER TERRORIST!] Simple evolutionary research on algae [OMG! BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS!] and a host of other kneejerk reactions to simple, and harmless to society, but still useful research paths that could be done at home...)
      Because thats what terrorists do.
      Because "that makes baby Jesus cry"
      Because we already patented that, and you didnt pay us money. ... ...

      The short of it, is that people are leading un-fulfilling lives, because they cannot satisfy their dreams and aspirations, for a whole host of reasons-- Most of which are artificial, and arbitrary in nature. (Usually implemented to protect some other person's financial bottom line.)

      Most americans have conflated "Money" with happiness, rather than seeing it as a means to attain happiness. (A tool, like a screwdriver, or a wrench. A screwdriver turns screws, a wrench turns bolts-- and money turns arbitrary restraints your way so you can self-actualize. Unless used, these tools do nothing.)

      As such, most americans fret over money, use it inappropriately, and labor endlessly to obtain it, leaving little if any time for developing real happiness.

      EG-- corporate dad is fucking LOADED with money-- but still misses his child's ball games, and has a shitty home life, because--- he is married to the office. (why? because he wrongly conflates money with happiness/success, and thinks more is always better.)

      On the flip side of that spectrum, you have those that overspend their money, and live hand-to-mouth while also having big screen televisions, etc..... they impact lower levels of the hierarchy (basic needs) by having a loss of security (no money to pay bills == no food, no water, no electricity, etc...)

      People engage in both behaviors because of social engineering by financially interested parties-- Corporations, banks, churches, etc... "Your manliness is in question if you don't drive a huge ass truck with a V8 Hemi in it!", or "You arent really a woman unless you look like Jessica Alba!" or "You are only as important as your financial portfolio." "You owe 10% of your income to Jesus!" etc.. etc.

      People in the US are unhappy because of these things as well:

      Paranoia: Be it terrorists, drunk drivers, pedophiles, Democrats, Republicans, communists, heathen sinners, heathen scientists, conservatives, liberals, arabs, asians, russians, WHATEVER--- The US has had a revolving culture of paranoia since the 50s. We now ACTIVELY LOOK for threats, even when there arent any, and take the absence of such threats as being an indication of grand conspiracies. Because of our paranoia, we are unable to engage in worthwhile, and satisfying activities like--- Letting our kids play outside, or talking with the neighbor. Instead we envision Chester the Molester with a box of candy in one hand and duct tape in the other pulling up in a panel van--- or envision scary cultists as being our neighbors. Very unhealthy.

      Superiority complex:
      The US has a fixation on being "Number 1!"-- whatever the fuck that means. Number 1 at what-- percentage of the population incarcerated? -- Regardless, being "Number 1" creates a c

    19. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boohoo, society represses me and I can't feel happy because companies aren't getting taxed!!

      Maybe you aren't happy because you are a sniveling whiner?

      Please feel free to top yourself, then I will be much happier knowing I won't have to read your emo drivel ever again.

    20. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      reigned horse

      Are you sure that wasn't Caligula?

    21. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by canadian_right · · Score: 2

      Society has a few purposes, one key purpose is to reign in outlandish and destructive behaviour. You should work, you should follow the law, you should get an education, you should not beat up children, etc...

      The other key purpose is mutual support. I don't need to know 50 trades to live, just one. I trade for everything else the other trades provide. Society provides, police, fire-fighters, courts, and many other services paid for collectively.

      A healthy society stops you from doing evil, asks you to refrain from doing bad, and encourages you to do good. An unhealthy society promotes hate, violence, and bigotry. An unhealthy society makes it very difficult to be happy.

      My modern western society, while it can obviously be improved, is a pretty good society. I do not think that my society is preventing me from being happy, or rail-roading me down one narrow path. I look at most of my European "brothers" and I see good societies, in some ways better than my own. I look south and while I see a country that was once a beacon of freedom, I now see a scared, lazy, selfish behemoth slowly sliding into irrelevance.

      Study after study has shown that material goods do not make you happy. Once you are fed, sheltered and clothed it is family, friends, and social interactions that make you happy.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    22. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Windwraith · · Score: 1

      Don't make a mistake. Politicians and "the powerful" aren't "human". Biologically speaking they are, but those people have forgotten what it is to be human. Just look at the stuff they have made humanity do since our beginnings.

      I laugh whenever I see the cliched movie of the day say stuff like "humans are so hungry for war" or similar. No, the average soldier is a pawn, the ones that create wars are the ones with power, and drag everyone else with them.
      That's what politicians and powerful people have made to mankind. They aren't human, they just share our biology.

    23. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here the madman fell silent and looked again at his listeners; and they, too, were silent and stared at him in astonishment. At last he threw his lantern on the ground, and it broke into pieces and went out. "I have come too early," he said then; "my time is not yet. This tremendous event is still on its way, still wandering; it has not yet reached the ears of men. Lightning and thunder require time; the light of the stars requires time; deeds, though done, still require time to be seen and heard. This deed is still more distant from them than most distant stars---and yet they have done it themselves.

    24. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Josh04 · · Score: 1

      enjoy your hollywood packaged individualism. it suits you.

    25. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by treeves · · Score: 1

      NO there isn't!

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    26. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by unencode200x · · Score: 1

      You: Will I be at my job much longer?

      Magic 8 Ball: Outlook not good.

      --

      Chance favors the prepared mind.
      Perfect is the enemy of good.
    27. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by CFTM · · Score: 1

      I agree that drugs aren't the solution to these symptoms, but happiness can be found within the framework of our society. I'm sure I'll be labeled a troll and that many will decry what a heartless, unfeeling bastard I am for the following statement: Depression is a choice.

      Before anyone starts pounding the table, I have suffered through depression and for a long time viewed it through the lens of the victim. But a mentor of mine spent eight painstaking years teaching me the power of our belief systems, and once I came to understand what she was really saying the statement above became very clear to me. Depression is the result of faulty belief systems and the conflict that arises within ourselves do to adhering to those belief systems. Once seen, belief systems can be changed or destroyed, but whether seen or not they create our reality. It empowered me to be the protagonist in my own drama and to stop blaming aspects of my life that I was unhappy with on factors outside my control.

      Society does not have an answer to this problem, only each individual does.

    28. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      Material wealth staves off unhappiness. Problem is, you don't meed much other than basic nutrition, some shelter and some useful possessions to be happy. Happiness comes from the social structure of the community you live in, and fufillment through experiences, social interaction and little things like hobbies.

      The happiest people I know are into gardening or painting or travelling, make a point of not watching TV and really don't have affluenza or an obsession with the latest shiniest iThings.

      Hyperconsumerism = unhappiness.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    29. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Why aren't you happy?

      Hmm? I'm happy. Why do you ask?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    30. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by korean.ian · · Score: 1

      I know that it's cliche, but someone has to bring up nietzsche at this point. He kept pointing out that people in "the modern era" were really just carts on a rail, regardless of their social-economic status. Whoever you are, there are things that "are expected of you", which, if you chose to avoid, either make you "weird", or even downright rejected.
       

      Obviously that's not unique to the modern era, nor even to "Western" societies. Any brief reading of history or anthropology of a different culture will tell a person that much. Even societies without a real social hierarchy such as the !Kung people of the Kalahari desert (the guy from The Gods Must Be Crazy was !Kung) have expectations which are placed on people.
      The ideas talked about in the GP post relate of course to relative poverty, which while not fatal, can be quite cruel to the psyche. However, since I don't have any definitive answer to what our society lacks (I'd say a little more real compassion, a touch more tolerance, and a little less booze and greed would be good starting points) who am I to argue Nietzsche...

    31. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/07/how-to-land-your-kid-in-therapy/8555/

    32. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by nagnamer · · Score: 1

      You're not happy because you cannot be you in this society.

      Well, I'm not sure what 'this society' is in your context, but I live in the UK and spend quite a bit of my working time doing things for people in the USA, so I'd say I'm probably in the same society as you. If you can't be happy in this society, then I think it says more about you than about society in general.

      "This society" applies pretty much to most 'civilized' societies in the World, where people have laid down rules against individuality and self-expression for the sake of maintaining order and economic stability. You have only three choices. 1. Don't fit in and struggle outside the society for your own sake. 2. Fit in and pretend everything is cool, if you are lucky enough to do so. 3. Fit in and suffer because you cannot pretend everythig is cool. I'm sure there are nuances in-between those options, but you get the idea.

      People can't really be happy in this society, except in the way prescribed by the society itself, which is not really happieness but self-satisfaction. If they did a good job of fitting in, they would be rewarded with success, money, friends that accept them, bosses that praise them. That can make them feel better about themselves, and they might think it's happiness. Consumerist societies make the best of these ego-boosters to give people even more illusion of happiness, and they will fight hard anyone and anything that doesn't agree with how they see "happiness" because their version of happiness is cheap and readily available, and nobody would give that up. (Note that I don't say 'corporations', but 'society'.)

      --
      Every harsh word you utter has the right address. It only sounds harsh because the one on the envelope is the wrong one.
    33. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by nagnamer · · Score: 1

      I can be happy in my circumstances but not completely content given all the things that are happening in the world. Call it idealism.

      I'd call it turning a blind eye. We instinctively know that the society is causing trouble, but we wouldn't give up the possibility of 'happiness' we can attain for ourselves in it.

      --
      Every harsh word you utter has the right address. It only sounds harsh because the one on the envelope is the wrong one.
    34. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by smash · · Score: 1

      Its because there are so many #firstworldproblems to deal with in todays first world society.

      I mean, really just check out the shit that we have to deal with that those lucky bastards in africa and central asia don't need to worry about?

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    35. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by nagnamer · · Score: 1

      I have often wondered how people can be so dissatisfied in the midst of so much that is splendid and amazing.

      They do, don't they? Could it be that life isn't all peaches and creme for the lot? Could it be that even though you might think it is all peaches and creme for them, they instinctively know it's all just pretend?

      --
      Every harsh word you utter has the right address. It only sounds harsh because the one on the envelope is the wrong one.
    36. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      I am happy . And i only have some of the things you mentioned.

      Hapiness is just a state of mind : if you want to be happy , you can be happy , if you want to worry , you can worry.

      All you need to understand is that you have control over it. Sadly most people don't see that , and just live there live chasing something that has always been right there.

    37. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by swalve · · Score: 1

      This society is more or less just fine with individuality and self expression. It only has a problem with it when it starts to interfere with other people's rights to the same. If your happiness depends on fucking with other people, then you are the one with the problem.

    38. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by swalve · · Score: 1

      For the most part you are right. Except that it often isn't a conscious choice. IE, it took 8 years for you to dig yourself out of it, to reframe the way you think about everything to the point that you weren't poisoning your own well with self-destructive thought patterns.

    39. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      I'd argue about the last bit - I've spent many a night shelterless, hungry and thirsty, yet I couldn't wipe that idiotic smile off my face - I was at peace with myself and the world - and weed is still illicit.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    40. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, though finding a life partner seems pretty hard with that attitude. Hell, at 17, tall, slim, and smart, I can't even get a damn one night stand - it's driving me nuts. Not that I'm about to turn compliant, it's more about being between a rock and hard place.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    41. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      Real confidence is good. Most people seem to think confidence is just being a self centered asshole and talking over other people.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    42. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      Here's some news for you buddy - you live a very ordinary, verging on 'American Dream' Californian life. Leave the US, see what happens to minds that didn't grow up there.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    43. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by nagnamer · · Score: 1

      This society is more or less just fine with individuality and self expression.

      You are lucky to have such a narrow view of individuallity and no need for self-expression.

      If your happiness depends on fucking with other people, then you are the one with the problem.

      Hm so wanting sex is a problem where you live?

      --
      Every harsh word you utter has the right address. It only sounds harsh because the one on the envelope is the wrong one.
    44. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As individuals, we feel powerless in the shade of a large society, a sum organism. We are dictated by laws of nature, and laws of society. The latter are much worse and keep getting stronger. Nature dictates what we need to survive, but society dictates how we must live our lives. Much like cells in our bodies work to keep us alive, we constantly work to keep society alive. As individuals we cease to be on the forefront of sentience, instead retreating to a life of repetition and sedentary idling. We operate at a bare minimum level of consciousness the majority of our lives; work a dull job during the day and watching mind numbing television during the nighttime.

        And then we get sad and they pump us full of antipsychotic meds that tamper with your serotonergenic systems.

        Eff society, i'll prescribe myself my own drugs.

    45. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Random thoughts; happiness comes from within, happiness is in essence being satisfied with what you have.

      Consumerist society is based around creating desire, by definition wanting that which you do not have, and in the process making you unhappy.

      Ambition and happiness are to a degree mutually exclusive, or possibly sum factors (ambition + happiness = state of being), the less ambition you have, the greater your potential for happiness.

      It takes a small amount of unhappiness to get us out the door at to work most mornings, to go earn money to buy things we hope will fulfill some desire/need. This isn't a bad thing in moderation.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    46. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      I'm happy. Must be something wrong with me.

      Though of course, too many people see happiness as a goal, some sort of end product in which a person is in a permanent state of near giddy bliss. Wake up in the morning all bubbly and content, the day just gets better and better and continues until you go to sleep, only to have joyous dreams through the night.

      The most unhappy people I know tend to set their goals as just that. And many others buy into the idea, and become unhappy also.

      No, happiness is sort of mis-named. Contentedness might be be better.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  43. Phenylalanine by phrostie · · Score: 1, Troll

    ever read what goes into Coke or Pepsi diet drinks?

    Phenylalanine

    "ADD/ADHD, emotional and behavioral disorders can all be triggered by too much Phenylalanine in the daily diet"

    1. Re:Phenylalanine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There would be no reason to include phenylalanine, as a primary ingredient, in diet drinks. Aspartame is used as a sweetener in such products, and the metabolites of Aspartame are methanol and the amino acids phenylalanine and aspartic acid.
      Norepinephrine is one of our catecholamine neurotransmitters. People with ADHD are often given Ritalin or Adderall to increase norepinephrine levels in the brain. Synthesis of norepinephrine occurs in this order: tyrosine > levodopa (L-Dopa) > dopamine > norepinephrine. The human body synthesizes tyrosine, which is the stock for the two catecholamines dopamine and norepinephrine, from phenylalanine! So far from causing ADD or ADHD, phenyalanine is actually a precursor to the very neurotransmitter that allows us to focus!

    2. Re:Phenylalanine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed...

      That'd be for Phenylketonurics, not the general population.

    3. Re:Phenylalanine by agentbuzz · · Score: 1

      I hadn't logged on when first I posted the below, so I have re-posted logged on as myself. There would be no reason to include phenylalanine, as a primary ingredient, in diet drinks. Aspartame is used as a sweetener in such products, and the metabolites of Aspartame are methanol and the amino acids phenylalanine and aspartic acid. Norepinephrine is one of our catecholamine neurotransmitters. People with ADHD are often given Ritalin or Adderall to increase norepinephrine levels in the brain. Synthesis of norepinephrine occurs in this order: tyrosine > levodopa (L-Dopa) > dopamine > norepinephrine. The human body synthesizes tyrosine, which is the stock for the two catecholamines dopamine and norepinephrine, from phenylalanine! So far from causing ADD or ADHD, phenyalanine is actually a precursor to the very neurotransmitter that allows us to focus!

    4. Re:Phenylalanine by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      This isn't quite accurate.

      Phenylalanine is one of the components of Aspertame (ie. NutraSweet). So diet soft drinks contain phenylalanine - which is why diet drinks have the warning Phenylketonurics: Contains phenylalanine. "Regular" (ie. sugar-based) soft drinks do not contain phenylalanine. Corn Syrup is still sugar: it's a combination of glucose (the simplest sugar), and fructose (yet another sugar).

      Phenylalanine is an ammino acid (ie. the class of chemicals that are the building blocks of protien).

      Everything with protien in it (meat, eggs, dairy products, soy, nuts, seeds) contains it. It's impossible to avoid consumption of phenylalanine, as protien is a necessary part of the human diet - vegans still must consume non-animal sources of protien, such as soy.

      A Human genetic disorder (Phenylketonuria) results in the inability to metabolize phenylalanine, which results in a buildup of the stuff in the blood of affected individuals, and it's necessary for them to eliminate unnecessary sources of phenylalanine from their diet - such as those containing Aspertame.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    5. Re:Phenylalanine by tgd · · Score: 1

      Easy there, fireball.

      This story is no place for actual facts.

    6. Re:Phenylalanine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what's inside an iPhone?

      Lithium.

      "Lithium treatment is used to treat mania in bipolar disorder."

    7. Re:Phenylalanine by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      Why did this get modded Troll? A bit out of context, but from the mayoclinic

      "If you have PKU, phenylalanine can cause mental retardation, brain damage, seizures and other problems. "

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  44. Life sucks, dudes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact is that a lot of people live unfulfilling lives.

    1. Re:Life sucks, dudes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact is that a lot of people think they have to live unfulfilling lives, when in fact they don't.

  45. Advertisement and propaganda by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Forms of advertisement and propaganda that are commonly used in US, rely on subjecting the viewer/listener to extreme emotional pressure, as person's current state (not owning a product, acting in a manner different from one being prescribed) is portrayed as miserable, ridiculous or immoral. As a result the goal is achieved (some of affected people buy products and obey the norms of thoughts and behavior promoted by propaganda, to get rid of negative self-perception) however both those who comply and those who don't, have to deal with constant stream of insults and manipulation directed toward them from all forms of mass media. After decades of this escalating pressure, people become mentally unstable, stupid, and incapable of normal emotional reaction to real-life events.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    1. Re:Advertisement and propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh fuck you, you fuckin' fuck!

    2. Re:Advertisement and propaganda by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Great point.

      Interesting thought experiment to extrapolate what might be done about it...

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  46. Re:bring on the trolls by garaged · · Score: 1

    Yeah, there is the money thing, but more important, there is the "stupud people" thing, what worries me most is that at least 2nd world war was started because germans were stupid enough, we are now in a similar fashion but with americans

    --
    I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
  47. Things haven't really changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be that people would self-medicate with nicotine and alcohol. Nowadays it has become socially unpopular to smoke and drink that much, so prescription drugs have taken over. Is that so bad? I don't think so. You never hear about anybody who loses their job because they can't stop taking Zoloft or kills somebody because they were driving under the influence of Paxil!

    Of course part of it is that when you go to the doctor with a complaint, you kind of expect him to do something.

    dom

  48. Re:bring on the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other half of this argument is that, intellectually speaking, the mindset of modern psychiatry has no solid foundations from which to make judgements, so Big Pharma can easily undermine their thinking so that psychiatric decisions fall in favour of Big Pharma. They are very clever and subtle in how they do this.

  49. Re:bring on the trolls by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    t's a bit like hypertension. When the sales for blood pressure lowering drugs were not high enough, we simply lowered the normal blood pressure ranges from about 130/100 to 120/80 and suddenly a lot of people were in dire need to lower their pressure

    There's that, but I think considering how badly we're being served by a particular segment of the corporate and ownership classes, there are reasons that they would want us on anti-psychotics. If there were not these anti-psychotics and anti-depressants and alcohol and street drugs, there would have been a violent overthrow of the government already. There are certain weaker-minded people for whom Fox News and the corporate media is enough. For the rest, there's a pill or powder.

    Of course, the other possibility is that psychosis is the appropriate response to America circa 2011.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  50. I am actually Schizo, tried most of this drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic. During the long process of treating and coping with this disorder I have tried most of the common anti-psychotic medication. In particular:

    -Zyprexa, olanzapine. Worked like charm in the beginning, but failed eventually leeding back to psychosis
    -Risperdal, risperidone. Worked but resulted in awful trembling, not nice
    -Haldol, haloperidol. Absolutely the worst of the worst, awful muscle stiffness
    -Leponex, clozapine. Potentially the most dangerous anti-pschycotic, because of posibillty of low white cell bloodcount. Extremely sedating, but in the end it cured my schizophrenia almost completely, leeding to rehabilitation and a job. (This one was also served with talk/psycho therapy.)

    I have learned both how useful these drugs are AND how strong they are.
    The drugs are really difficult to stop once taken regularly.

    I take these medication because of a genuine illness, and would only recommend to use these meds in case of severe and diagnosed mental illness.

    Why would you take something so strong if you are experiencing only mild symptoms, or to treat life as is?
    You would not take anti-cancer drugs because of sleeplessness would you?

    So be smart and take care of yourself and your children.

    1. Re:I am actually Schizo, tried most of this drugs by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If they put you on clozapine, it had to be bad.

  51. Re:bring on the trolls by memyselfandeye · · Score: 1

    It's probably something in the water making them crazy.

    We must protect our precious bodily fluids from water fluoridation of our public water supply by communist spies. So I demand that the President launches a full scale preemptive attack against The former USSR, China, Berkley, and Harvard.

  52. Re:bring on the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And by your own post you are as much a Bigot if not more.

    Try holding yourself to the same standard you demand of others.

  53. That explains some of the drivers I see. by kmdrtako · · Score: 1

    Clearly a lot of drivers I see on the road are over-medicated.

  54. It exist by koan · · Score: 1

    "Mass Psychosis In the USA?" Yes it exist and effects nearly everyone in the population, it's called Television, don't laugh...how else can you explain FOX news or TV shows where a serial killer is the hero?

    We have all been mislead, driven mad, outright lied too, and given values that have no depth and are meaningless, all by television.

    8 or more hours a day of murder, rape, and stupidity eventually takes its toll.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:It exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how else can you explain FOX news or TV shows where a serial killer is the hero?

      Women. Serial killers receive love letters from women all the time.

  55. It's not my fault!!! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm a victim! It's the environment! My mom was cruel to me! Hormones make me eat too much! Video games make me violent!

    All I need is some understanding. And another pill.

    Or I'll kill you.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:It's not my fault!!! by dcollins · · Score: 1

      No problem, we've got your pill right here for the low-low price of $800/month.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  56. Oh please by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

    antipsychotics have become the single top-selling therapeutic class of prescription drugs in the U.S

    Big Pharma forcing shit down our throats for profit. Just like every other corporation in this country: out for the bottom line. Clinical depression is a bitch. I saw first hand what these so called" thereputic drugs" did to my mother. Take this for the depression take this for the pain take this so your liver doesn't explode. Where does it end? When do the doctors stand up and say NO. Remember the Hippocratic Oath? Oh and the only reason these so called thereputic drugs are the top selling drugs is because the US government thinks mary jane is as toxic as heroine and cocaine. Serves no medical use my ass. The war on drugs was born from racism and hate. When are we going to focus on bigger problems like methamphetamines and crack. Those are far worse problems than smoking weed. Legalization and taxation. This country is broke and needs a massive infusion of cash yet the government chooses to ignore the obvious sources. Oh yeah my mother just wanted to die after my father died. They had been together for 40 years and he was her anchor. Those drugs the doctor prescribed kept her going for a few years after dad died but in the end she didn't go easily. So much for dignity.

    --
    "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
  57. Off Label Use? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    Anti-psychotics are an interesting class of drugs in their own right. That said, many drugs have uses other than their primary one.

    http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/?productid=8&pageaction=displayproduct

    As you can see there, some anti-psychotics are used to treat depression, OCD, and PTSD. Each of which, I believe represents a larger section of the population than people who are actually psychotic. I would not be surprised if the off label use in the larger population of those patients, could easily dwarf the real psychotics, or at least swell the numbers quite a bit.

    And I do believe it to be somewhat common, a couple of times different people told me what medications they were on, and I looked them up to find out one was an anti-psychotic, that was being given for an off-label indication.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    1. Re:Off Label Use? by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      LSD-25, psilocybine and mescalin, all have potential to treat the same conditions (OCD, PSTD, addictions, and other anxiety based conditions), when taken in a controlled environment under the care of professionals. However the cost of the drug is pretty much free, and it at most takes a few doses spread out over a few month, instead of one or more a day a year or more, with a far lower risk of side effects for most people. Because you can't patent these drugs, nobody is going to go to much trouble to lobby and legalize this use. The first two are also quite effective in low doses (below the pychactive threahold) at treating cluster headaches and migraines.

    2. Re:Off Label Use? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      um well.... yah. All true. Can't argue with that. However.... sadly their usefulness is not recognized.

      Maybe once pot is legalized some of the money being wasted on this stupid battle that we shouldn't have to fight, can be funnelled into MAPS to expand their research and try to change some minds. So far there is some evidence for these things, and books like LSD Psychotherapy by Groff or the Secret Chief are great but, only can do so much.

      Once pot is legal though...well there are twice as many potheads as the next 3 major illicit drugs combined. That should really take the wind out of the sails of the drug warriors, and hopefully it should be easier to make progress. There is already talk of shuttering the ONDCP, and that would help cut out a lot of the static in the signal.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:Off Label Use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever seen the side effects on many anti-psychotics? These actually include psychosis, diabetes, and other illnesses. These pills can make a healthy person actually ill.

    4. Re:Off Label Use? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Um.... I was merely stating facts, not advocating for their use.

      Their side effects are fucking crazy, its true. Thorazine, after a single dose, can cause a permanent parkinsons-like syndrome. However, that doesn't change that off label uses of some of these are common.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  58. A gramme... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is better than a damn.

  59. Re:bring on the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you saying we should not block nazi-loving wife-beating undereducated superstitious drunkard merkins?

  60. logical explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    logical explanation, surely, how der Fuehrer Shrub managed to get elected TWICE.

  61. Not surprising! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

    Parents don't want to deal with their kids. They'd rather drug them and let the TV babysit. After all, being a parent is hard and a complete life changing event. If its not, you're doing it completely wrong. Most parents completely fuck up their children by trying to be their friend rather than their parent. And even then, a large number of parents are extremely poor parents because they don't want to be a good parent by ever telling their child, "no." A parent who doesn't believe in saying, "no", and standing by it, is no parent at all.

    Those caring for the elderly don't want them able to resist. Compliance makes for a happy worker. They'd rather medicate them which makes them compliant.

    The explosive grow of these medications says nothing about the mental health of American citizens consuming these medications and everything about those prescribing and who are providing medicating. Its disgusting.

  62. Re:bring on the trolls by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Erh... no.

    WW2 was a direct result of WW1. The combination of feeling like they didn't really lose the war, or at least would not have lost it on the battlefield (seriously, the Germans were deep in France and Russia by the time they surrendered) if some politicians and schemers didn't "assassinate" the German military and very humiliating peace conditions (Clemenceau insisted in conditions that should render Germany harmless and could only hit deeply in the heart of a nation as militaristic and proud as Germany was back then) could only lead to a longing for revenge and a continuation as soon as Germany could muster the strength. There has been much speculation whether WW2 would have happened without Hitler, and my only conclusion is that yes, it would have. Differently maybe, and let's be glad a strategic dilettante was at the helm. But I digress.

    Germany was not stupid. Germany was wounded and furious. It longed for revenge after the "disgraceful" peace treaty of Versailles. With America, I'd say it's hubris, not really feeling wronged by "the world".

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  63. The single greatest epiphany of my life by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    was when I realized most people are nuts. I don't mean that as an insult or exaggeration. I mean that people with a tenuous grasp on what is actually happening around them are the rule, not the exception. It actually hit me pretty hard, because several people very close to me kept exhibiting horribly irrational and self-destructive behavior, and I kept expecting them to stop doing it because, hey, no rational person would do these things, right? It was just a momentary lapse in judgement, right? Wrong. And it wasn't just being irrational or emotional. It was a total disconnect from the reality of cause & effect.

    I'll say this, successful people learn early that the majority of people are nuts, and to avoid those people. I say if we can tank a welfare mom up on drugs so she can look objectively at her choices and say, "You know what, I'm not going to vote for the guy that keeps saying he's gonna cut my kids health insurance!", then more power to those of us who at least try to be rational.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  64. Re:bring on the trolls by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If you're a mentally sane person in this time and age, I guess you have to get insane from witnessing what's happening.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  65. Quid pro quo between shrinks and drug companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think lot of the over-diagnosis and subsequent over-prescription of 'illnesses' and medications such as these is due to a quid pro quo between psychiatrists and pharmaceutical companies. There is no objective basis for many, if not most, psychiatric diagnoses and as a result psychiatry is viewed by many as being a pseudoscience. In fact since most psychiatric diagnoses are not only unproven but actually unprovable, psychiatry literally cannot accurately be called a science. This rather unconvenient truth irks many psychiatrists, so having the ability to 'treat' said questionable diagnoses with colorful little pills enhances their status greatly. Pharmaceutical companies, on the other hand, need a group of individuals who are willing to do almost whatever it takes to increase the prescription of said colorful little pills, so the relationship is symbiotic between the two of them, while being parasitic to the public at large. Psychiatry is basically no more than an unholy combination of sales, marketing and R&D all rolled into one for the pharmaceutical industry.

  66. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely right, for those interested an interesting term that should be researched is called "dhimmitude".

    Here's something to get you started: http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=b5Q&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&sa=X&ei=aJohTobODKniiAKizf2cAw&ved=0CBsQBSgA&q=dhimmitude&spell=1&biw=1600&bih=740

    I can handle all the cheating, lies, and other bullshit, since we get that from everyone. But the "dhimmitude" mixed with the *horrendous* acts against human rights perpetrated by sharia law (look up "honour killings" and the punishment of rape victims) makes Islam one of the most fucking horrible religions on the planet.

    So every time I meet a Muslim and we're chatting and I'm starting to think they're a nice person who I could be friends with I quickly apply a litmus test and ask them if they endorse dhimmitude or sharia law, because, to be fair, not all Muslims believe in all things...but if they say yes then I tell them to fuck off before I will literally beat the absolute shit out of them, it makes me so angry and so hurt to think of all the women being abused by this religion.

    No one should condone this shit from any member of our society.

  67. Re:bring on the trolls by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And even if drugs don't solve his problems, the right ones will solve ours, if used at at least LD50 levels.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  68. Re:bring on the trolls by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    And by your own post you are as much a Bigot if not more.

    Try holding yourself to the same standard you demand of others.

    Mod parent up.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  69. Ever wonder why republicans pushed medicare part D by WindBourne · · Score: 0

    Now, you know. A drugged up stupified mass can be lead by the nose. Heck, you have idiots being arrested because they threw a fit in a place that they had to have Faux news on the TV. Kind of makes me wonder if drugs, plus some subliminal message is not producing results.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  70. more knowledge, more insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you don't think I am typing this out of free will, do you? lol

  71. Terminology by chowdahhead · · Score: 1

    The vast majority of prescribed antipsychotics are atypicals. While they are FDA approved for schizophrenia and type I bipolar, they are also useful off-label in treating major depressive disorder, augmentation in dementia, and even for sleep disorders. The same is true of antidepressants. Tricyclics are often used to treat neuropathic disorders--usually pain, and SSRI's are used off-label for bulimia, Raynaud's, and fibromyalgia. Psychiatric medicine is perhaps the least understood of all areas of medicine. Increased utilization of medication doesn't necessarily correlate with an increase in incidence of disease or inappropriate management of therapy. Historically, this has been linked to improvements in diagnosis rates, and sometimes because the use of a medication has expanded.

  72. Smart Pills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What America really needs is to be mass-dosed with nootropics.

    Except for the politicians. They should all be forced to take the classic smart pills instead.

  73. Re:bring on the trolls by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    I sometimes wonder if when they cure one disease they invent another. And I mean invent, not discover.

    Some of our neighbors have a three year old boy. He's been diagnosed with some kidney problem I can't even remember, let alone pronounce. And yet he's perfectly healthy.

    Thirty years ago, you'd have just said he needs to pee a lot.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  74. Mass psychosis would explain BitCoin... by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 1

    Right?

  75. Rampant Derangement Syndrome by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0

    Well, some of the Bush Derangement Syndrome has faded away, though it's still easy to spark off a spontaneous two-minute-hate in the koskiddies or doglaketards just by flashing a single image of dubya at them.... but it's been replaced by the hatred of big-ears hatred in the freepers, i.e. Obama Hate Syndrome.

    In today's polarized environment it should be no surprise that the ragers are ragin' on.

  76. What fools! by Immortal+Poet · · Score: 1

    A drug that once was thought to have a very limited application turns out to have a very broad application. In other news, heart attack and cancer patients all stupidly think they have headaches because they keep taking aspirin to remedy their condition.

  77. Blame psychiatrists by grimharvest · · Score: 1

    Who insist on charging prices that nobody but the rich can afford, so that they can buy their mansions, Jaguars, yachts, etc. Up to $600 an hour or more for him to ask you some obvious questions, and you to do all the work. So instead, go to a clinic, get your pills, and on your way. The same problem with the entire healthcare industry. They're apparently never rich enough, and are really not concerned with helping people, despite the Oath.

  78. America's war on drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not surprised by this. Most of the people who really need drugs are locked up in prison for self medicating. Can't be taking money away from the corporations now can we? With so many people locked up it's no wonder the governments going broke. Corporations values pushed on to the people are just making them miserable. But hey, buy this it will make you feel better. If not it's probably all the terrorists fault isn't it.You need something else to declare war on to detract you but you can't really afford that any more can you? Wars cost so why do you keep voting for the people who create them? That's right it's because your crazy. Now take another pill, sit back and relax and tune into Fox for some more therapy.

  79. You're a Christian, Right? by malsbert · · Score: 1

    We should be giving it to all those delusional theists...

    Seriously; If you Christian types think you will "deflect" the criticism of your little brain fart of a religion, By screaming bloody Muslim every chance you get, then you are wrong,

    Matthew 10:34 (ASV) -- "Think not that I came to send peace on the earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword."

    Lucas 12:51 (ASV) -- "Think ye that I am come to give peace in the earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: ..."

    In conclusion:

    "A Christian." == "Someone who have not read the Bible."

    "A Fundamentalist Christian." == "A Christian that have read the Bible.

    Muslim == Christian == bat-shit crazy people.

    --
    "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot.
    1. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you secularists think you can deflect blame by attributing the violence done by secular governments in the western world to the christian churcches, you are wrong.

    2. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by malsbert · · Score: 1

      Care to name a few?

      --
      "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot.
    3. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      No, I am an atheist. I think muslims are homicidal bat shit crazy while christians are just oppressive bat-shit crazy.
       
      And, I notice you didn't refute anything but rather resorted to non sequitur and ad hominem.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the wars western nations are currently engaged in are conducted by secular governments. Yet, these wars are often seen as the war of one religion against another even though on the western side, religious authorities are completely out of the decision making and would be unable to start such a war even if they wanted to.

    5. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by malsbert · · Score: 1

      The People's Republic of China.

      They may call China a "Republic", That do not make it so.

      You may call your country "Secular", That do not make it so.

      What is it you print on your money? "In God we trust." ON YOUR MONEY!

      --
      "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot.
    6. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by malsbert · · Score: 1

      No, I am an atheist.

      And by "atheist" do you mean Atheist or atheist

      And, I notice you didn't refute anything but rather resorted to non sequitur and ad hominem.

      Why would i refute you? I am an Atheist and as such i have no need to defend religion of any kind.

      ps.

      Abdul is a muslim there for Abdul is a homocidel bat shit crazy. (Ad hominem).

      As for "non sequitur"!?!? were did i make anything that even looks like a Logical argument?

      --
      "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot.
    7. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean you were just throwing out some flamebait. Nice of you to admit it.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    8. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the various supreme court rulings preventing the state from sponsoring a particular religion do.

    9. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      The People's Republic of China.

      They may call China a "Republic", That do not make it so.

      No, just calling China a republic doesn't make it one. The fact that it doesn't have a monarch makes it one.

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    10. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by malsbert · · Score: 1

      It takes a little more then that. A true Republic is ruled by philosopher-kings, See; Plato. Needless to say; there is and have never been, a true Republic.

      --
      "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot.
    11. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      It takes a little more then that. A true Republic is ruled by philosopher-kings, See; Plato.

      No, it doesn't. "The Republic" is simply a translation of his title. It's not a definition of a republic. The word comes from Latin, not Greek. A republic is simply a country where the ordinary people, or some of them, have a say in the rule of the country, rather than having hereditary ruler.

      Needless to say; there is and have never been, a true Republic.

      Sure there are. There are all sorts of republics currently in existence, from democratic republics, like the USA or Ireland, to single state republics like the PRC.

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    12. Re:You're a Christian, Right? by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      If you're interested in such things, you may wish to read through http://www.freelance-academy.org/plato-republic/On_title_of_Republic.pdf

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  80. In constant danger ! by Quietlife2k · · Score: 1

    Is this not what happens to a people under the stress of being told that they are constantly under attack from all sides ?

    Between "terrorism", "cyber-terrorism", and the rising local fears and money troubles, is it any wonder that the signs of stress are showing ?

    Not that I don't think that such drugs are over prescribed, far from it, rather than seeking the cause they are more likely to medicate the hell out of the symptom.

  81. Scary but not surprising by erroneus · · Score: 1

    It really fits with the standard way of thinking in the US for most people. "What? Germs are the cause of disease? Kill all germs!!" (Not realizing that we need germs to be healthy and to keep our immune systems strong) Got a headache? Take a pill! Feeling a bit sad? There's an app... err a pill for that too!

    Most people in the US don't know how to think. They get a symptom and look to someone else to tell them what's wrong and what they need to buy. Wonderful conditioning we've got here isn't it? We are certainly not responsible for ourselves when we can offload that to someone else... and then later blame and sue them for side-effects and unintended consequences.

    1. Re:Scary but not surprising by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Drugs over-prescribed? Never take a pill!

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  82. No News Here by Chardansearavitriol · · Score: 1

    They did with ADHD, they did it with depression, they did it with erections. Watch out for those anti-psychotics though; a large number cause weight gain, which is not good.

  83. "A gram is better than a damn" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, in the words of George Orwell "A gram is better than a damn" (1984)

  84. Re:bring on the trolls by presspass · · Score: 1

    "It's no good thing to be well adjusted to a sick society".

    Too lazy to look it up...

  85. America the drugged nation by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

    May of these antipsychotic medications require careful adjustment of the dosage regimen to avoid problems with mentation or emotional control. Different forms of pseudo-paranoia and irrational reality testing are common problems.

    It is self evident that if a mind altering drug is being given for a reason that does not exist, then there can be no correct dosage regimen. Any use of the drug at all is going to distort behavior and belief systems.

    This could explain a lot of contemporary American politics.

    Would it be unreasonable to require American political candidates to publish the list of medications they are currently using? That might be a good first step in addressing a serious national health problem that has a direct impact on national politics.

    --
    Will
  86. Re:bring on the trolls by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    I sometimes wonder if when they cure one disease they invent another. And I mean invent, not discover.

    Some of our neighbors have a three year old boy. He's been diagnosed with some kidney problem I can't even remember, let alone pronounce. And yet he's perfectly healthy.

    Thirty years ago, you'd have just said he needs to pee a lot.

    Idiot. I suppose that you, from your vaunted position as a 'neighbor', can diagnose a disease condition ("some kidney problem") and immediately dismiss it because everything that medicine does is bad. Thirty years ago, someone with high blood pressure or diabetes would be ignored because there wasn't much that we could do about it. Now there is. The incidence of strokes and heart failure is decreasing - not as much as people had suggested - but it's decreasing. Thirty years ago diabetes was a death sentence. Now it's just another chronic disease. But that means that Big Pharma is milking it for all it's worth since we can't 'cure' it.

    There is an amazing amount of black and white thinking here. The world is complex, people more so. Yep, big Pharma is, in part, evil. So is the Law, Medicine, Politics and McDonalds. Sometimes I think the average Slashdotter should really be locked in the basement and left there. FWIW, the Al Jezeera article was pretty lame. It conveniently ignores the fact that human behavior is one of the biggest problems that humans face and we've been trying to chemically modify it for thousands of years (think tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, opium and other 'natural' solutions) and that despite this, we don't have very good tools for doing so.

    Recently, Al Jezeera has made some inroads into good journalism but every now and again, they can't help themselves and revert to type.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  87. Better diagnosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this more about better diagnosis and the advancement of medical science in the "developed" world?
    I'm sure if you asked someone 1000 years ago they would say we all die of cancer and no one does in their time. People still got cancer, it's just the diagnosis which has been improved or in the case of cancer, discovered.

  88. Patients want it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Doctors can't get gifts by law.
    2. Doctors do not make $ from prescriptions.

    Patients request this stuff. I blame the commercials.

  89. The headline is definitely misleading by sl3xd · · Score: 4, Informative

    TFA's headline talks about anti-psychotic medications, yet the article itself is about the entire class of psychoactive drugs.

    Antipsychotics are a small sliver of the class of psycoactive drugs.

    Antidepressants are psychoactive, but they are not anti-psychotic. The same applies for anti-anxiety durgs, such as Xanax, mood stabilizers for bipolar disorder (such as lithium), and for drugs used for Attention Defecit, such as ritalyn.

    The problem is TFA lumps drugs used for depression and anxiety disorders in the same category as drugs used for treating schizophrenia.

    In other words, the headline is misleading. Psychoactive != antipsychotic. The headline is purposefully misleading the reader into thinking that because someone takes a psychoactive drug, they are psychotic, and since americans take a lot of psychoactive drugs, Americans are psychotic.

    This isn't a surprising headline for a news service whose primary audience isn't fond of Americans.

    I'd expect to see the same sort of headline in a Scientologist publication.

    --
    -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    1. Re:The headline is definitely misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'd expect to see the same sort of headline in a Scientologist publication.

      so americans should take more psychoactive drugs to fight xenu..? :O

      alright.. just lemme turn super saiyaji.. over 9000 baby... over 9000... >:-o

    2. Re:The headline is definitely misleading by sjames · · Score: 2

      No, the drugs they mentioned by name are all classified as anti-psychotics even though they get used for other things. They did not include drugs classified as antidepressants in their numbers.

      There is a great deal of crossover in uses including anticonvulsants, antidepressants and antipsychotics. In part that's because they really have no earthly cklue what the diseases are or how the drugs treat (or fail to treat) them. They just try one after the other until the patienmt stops complaining so much and call it good.

      If the rest of medicine worked like psychiatry, people with a broken leg would be given increasing doses of a variety of opiates (often 3 or 4 different ones all at the same time) until they no longer seemed to mind dragging themselves across the floor.

    3. Re:The headline is definitely misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, my math is probably all wrong too, but just to get in perspective: if those medications are expensive like some other posters said, let's say, US$200/month on medication, then ~1,89% of the population are on those kinds of medication. Is that too much? Serious question, I have no idea what people consider a widespread medical condition.

    4. Re:The headline is definitely misleading by retroworks · · Score: 1

      Correct. Not that over-prescription of antidepressants isn't also a problem. But it's basically just an alternative to self-medication (alcohol) used for the same reasons in other nations.

      --
      Gently reply
    5. Re:The headline is definitely misleading by kwikrick · · Score: 2

      Yes, these drugs were originally created to cure a specific disorder, however, it seems to me that many psychiatrists take a rather experimental approach to prescribing drugs;they try lots of different drugs on a patient until the patient stops complaining. To cure the side effects, they just add some more drugs to the cocktail. I've seen this happen to a close friend who's stared out with mild depression, was put on various psychoactive drugs, developed various other disorders (I believe due to these drugs) and who almost killed herself by taking an overdose.

      My impression is that psychiatrists do not really know how to diagnose and cure people. I'm not saying these doctors are stupid. Clinical psychology / psychiatry is perhaps one of the most difficult studies and i believe it is basically still in its experimental stage. Definitions and practice are changing all the time. It does seem that definitions of mental disorders are blurring and people are diagnosed a disorders more and more frequently.

      Drug companies are cleverly making use of the doctor's confusion by pushing lots of drugs on the market of which the effects are not really predictable, giving false hope to doctors and patients.

      Beware of well meaning psychiatrists.

      --
      assignment != equality != identity
    6. Re:The headline is definitely misleading by notknown86 · · Score: 1

      This isn't a surprising headline for a news service whose primary audiencIe isn't fond of Americans.

      Yeah, but do you guys even have news organisations that aren't accepting money from big pharma in some form or another?

    7. Re:The headline is definitely misleading by sl3xd · · Score: 2

      You know, I'm not a fan of the pharma industry; but I have to admit they are stuck between a rock and a hard place - on one hand, they have products that really are wonders of the modern era. It takes decades and billions of dollars to research a drug, and even longer to get any sort of governmental approval. Charities they aren't.

      What I can't excuse is the amount of money that's spent on "marketing" these drugs - often several times more than the cost of a drug's development and approval. That is, in my opinion, completely immoral to make a drug take 5-10 times longer to become profitable. The only reason I can think of that shareholders aren't in an uproar is because anybody who complains is "marketed" to with strippers.

      On the other hand, whenever I hear "Big Pharma", my bullshit meter goes off. That's because, more than anything else, it's the catch phrase used by the "Nutritional" industry to sell their snake oil - products with no scientific basis at all, no regulation by any government agency, and a marketing department and expenditures that often puts the pharmaceutical companies to shame - enough that many doctors call them "Big Placebo", which is well earned scorn. People die because of false claims made by the nutritional companies, and unlike a pharmaceutical company, there's no recourse because there's no regulation.

      And, of course, there's Homeopathy, ever railing against "Big Pharma", while conning people into spending obscene amounts of money for purified sugar and water; and killing people conned into believing that water will cure their staph infection. If homeopathy were true, then it's literally full of shit, and is in fact more potent than shit because it's been diluted.

      At least pharmaceutical companies use science to try to help people, and can prove they are providing a real benefit. Nutritional and Homeopathy companies are motivated purely by profit - selling placebos which do nothing but make the customer poorer.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  90. What? No comments about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this propaganda coming from Al Jazeera?

  91. Influence The Minds Of Doctors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can Big Pharma so easily influence the minds of doctors? It is true that doctors are only human beings and subject to the same psychological foibles as most other people, but they are also quite different in having been intensively educated and trained. Doctors are supposed to have attained a greater level of consciousness and should be able to remain exclusively scientific in their prescribing of drugs. It may be possible for big companies to brainwash and delude the average (or below average) citizen, but doctors, as well as all professionals that serve our society, should be immune to such deceptive practices.

    1. Re:Influence The Minds Of Doctors by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 1

      How can Big Pharma so easily influence the minds of doctors? It is true that doctors are only human beings and subject to the same psychological foibles as most other people, but they are also quite different in having been intensively educated and trained. Doctors are supposed to have attained a greater level of consciousness and should be able to remain exclusively scientific in their prescribing of drugs. It may be possible for big companies to brainwash and delude the average (or below average) citizen, but doctors, as well as all professionals that serve our society, should be immune to such deceptive practices.

      Listen, man, it's not just big Pharma that is trying to influence us (although God knows they do their bit).

      The pressure comes from all sides. Staffers at nursing homes and group homes, social workers, the patient's family, and-- this is the part that gets me-- very often from the patients themselves. It doesn't matter to them that they weigh 300 pounds, that they are going to die early from uncontrolled diabetes. It also doesn't matter whether the medication is "working" in any reasonable sense. The medicines zonk them out and keep them from getting too feisty. And that, to many people, is success.

      There are a lot of other pressures too-- there is subtle pressure from the legal system (you will get sued if someone flips out and hurts someone, but you don't get sued for making them fat and lethargic). There's also a kind of pressure from within. Doctors like to feel that they're doing something, and they like to feel that their treatments are helpful. And the kind of interventions that would actually make sense (talk therapy, behavioral interventions, a nicer place to live) are often just not available to us.

  92. I doubt Americans are more psychotic by williambbertram · · Score: 1

    I really struggle with these broad, "America is crazy" type ideas, and all the resulting "It's because of TV!!" type responses. It reminds me of Tom Cruise declaring mental illness a hoax. I can tell you right now that it is not. My father was a severe paranoid schizophrenic, and let me tell you that it is some scary, terrifying shit that cannot be faked, and it's not caused by watching too much television. Until you've looked into the eyes of someone you love and see no recognition, see a complete stranger who's not even aware of their own identity (or you have a disorder yourself), you have no insight into mental illness. Then seeing that person waste away and die in a care home... This is no trivial thing to be diagnosed by armchair doctors, and dumbass actors who worship aliens.

    One thing I would be curious to see is how many kids on psych drugs come from broken homes. I come from a broken home (and no I'm not looking for boo hoo hoo's, it's relevant to what I'm saying), and were it not for my dear Grandparents raising me, I would have probably wound up with some kind of psych disorder too. Looking back, before I moved in with my Grandparents, I remember myself on a really bad path. Antisocial behavior, skipping school, smoking dope... After moving in with my Grandparents who actually cared about me and spent time with me, things seemed to be infinitely better in retrospect. So yeah, based on my experience, I could see the 50%ish divorce rate could be part of the problem with the number of people with psych disorders. I've heard "It takes a village to raise a child", and one person is not enough to get the job done right. In my past, I really tie what I think of as early stage psych disorders directly to being in a single parent, single income home. Maybe this isn't the case for everyone, but I can sure see how being a kid on your own could facilitate psych disorders, lead you down a path of crime, etc.

    I have a son now, and I can tell you that the memories of my Grandparents have made me a dedicated parent. Without a good parenting role model to look back on, who knows what kind of parent I'd be? So not only is divorce a devastating thing for kids, in my opinion it can be cyclical.

    Is there an off the cuff "Dr. Phil" type solution to all this? Hell no. Maybe there is no solution at all. Do I think a lower divorce rate would lower the number of kids on psych drugs? Yes 100%. Obviously a lower divorce rate does not guarantee a healthy upbringing. There are abusers, molesters, and just bad parents even in 2 parent homes. I do honestly believe that if the divorce rate were to somehow drop (like I said, maybe there is no solution here), percentage wise there would be enough of an increase in good home lives to reduce the number of kids on psych drugs.

    Unfortunately, what do you do with the existing "damaged goods"? Our government seems to think budget cuts to mental health programs is the right idea ( http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2011/01/state-budget-cuts-slash-mental-health-funding.html ). After witnessing the level of care my father received, I can't imagine this will help anyone. This is an "off the cuff" remark, but I really pisses me off that we can hand over 2 trillion in tax cuts to the richest people in the country, and pay for several wars, but we can't find a few pennies for people who are legitimately in need of care.

    So what is my answer to "why is America crazy?" Priorities. We are completely fucking upside down in how we see the world. Money is everything, and anything that does not generate income is viewed as expendable. Family oriented social programs, care of old people, sick people, injured vets... It all takes a back seat to our corrupt politicians and the trillions in bribe money we pay to their campaign contributors, and bailouts to criminal bankers. Am I bitter? Yeah. I'm bitter. Watching your dad wither and die in a care home, while my tax money pays for war and lobbyist bribes will do that to a person.

  93. Modern Psychiatry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one thing most Slashdotters and Scientologists agree on.

  94. How is it by h4x0t · · Score: 0

    that doctors are still being wooed by the drug companies when this is and has been for some 20+ years an obvious case of conflict of interest? It's an entirely new class of absurd....

  95. Not just psychotic, criminal too by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Almost everybody I know is a criminal, it's just that most of us never get caught.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  96. Re:Really? by toriver · · Score: 1

    I guess the Christians do all of those things for the lulz. (Or based on the 1775 book by a French philosopher which ranged the various "races" making sure Western Europeans came out on top...)

  97. Re:bring on the trolls by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    ... we're never gonna survive, unless...
    We get a little crazy

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  98. I'm a shrink and I can tell you why this is... by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 5, Informative

    The expansion of antipsychotic use has nothing to do with the number of people being diagnosed with psychotic disorders. AFAIK, that number hasn't increased much.

    The real reason is that over the past 10 or 15 years, antipsychotic meds (i.e. dopamine antagonists) have been used with increasing frequency in patients who do NOT have psychotic symptoms. ("Psychotic symptoms" basically means either hallucinations or delusional thinking). Many of these meds are marketed as "mood stabilizers" for bipolar disorder-- and the criteria for bipolar disorder are so broad and so subjective that just about anyone can be diagnosed with it. Indeed, one of the popular "screening tools" for bipolar disorder is something called the Mood Disorders Questionnaire, which is a bit like those Scientology quizzes that tells you whether Scientology is right for you. (It always is). The MDQ was designed by doctors who work for drug companies-- I've met one of them.

    There are three other groups who tend to get lots of antipsychotics-- the elderly (especially in nursing homes), the mentally retarded, and people with plain old depression. The last one is actually the easiest to justify, since there are some studies which suggest that certain antipsychotics can work as adjunctive treatment for depression-- they have managed to get FDA approval for that indication. The first two-- elderly and MR-- are impossible to defend. They don't benefit the patient, they cause cognitive slowing and deterioration of functioning, and they increase overall mortality. Lilly in particular has been guilty of marketing their antipsychotic (Zyprexa) to nursing homes and claiming that it improves "behavioral disturbances of dementia". It doesn't, and they eventually had to pay out billions of dollars in fines.

    Any psychiatrist with half a brain knows what's going on here. In the mid 90s all the new antidepressants (Prozac, etc) started to go off-patent and the drug companies lost a major cash cow. Ever since then, the drug companies have sought new indications for dopamine blockers, since they are mostly still on-patent, and most of them are fiendishly expensive.

    1. Re:I'm a shrink and I can tell you why this is... by bitrex · · Score: 1

      There is an issue I haven't seen mentioned in the article or in the discussion, but that I hope will become more common knowledge: many of these anti-depressant and anti-psychotic medications can cause devastating withdrawal symptoms upon attempting to reduce or discontinue them. I've never spoken with any mental health professional who has acknowledged openly that such effects exist, but all the studies are available on the Web, along with patient support websites like www.paxilprogress.com. It seems some drug companies have started to put small blurbs about "discontinuation syndromes" in the list of drug side-effects in an attempt to mitigate their liability.

      I believe all psychoactive medications are, to a greater or lesser degree depending upon individual physiology, going to have the same issues of drug tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal that many "street drugs" have. When one is modifying the sensitivity of serotonin, dopamine, or norepenephrine receptors with chronic consumption of a medication, causing them to up or down-regulate depending on the drug, when the drug is removed there is going to be a massive over or under sensitivity situation - the same kind of situation that arises in benzodiazepine or opiate withdrawal. How could one expect different?

      Decades after the introduction of the typical antipsychotics the mental health industry grudgingly recognized that iatrogenic effects like akathisia, tardive dyskinesia, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome could result from the use of the medications - but perhaps because anti-psychotics were generally only prescribed to the seriously mentally ill who could be expected to be on them for life the withdrawal syndromes did not get a great deal of exposure. Now with atypical antipsychotics prescribed more and more for off-label uses, and SSRIs, many "less severe" cases may find that their medication becomes less effective over time, and then find out to their horror that there is no easy way to cease taking the pill. As I mentioned, the mental health professionals I've encountered have in general flatly denied that any of these dependence issues exist, which brings to mind the quote from The Life of Galileo: "He who does not know the truth is only a fool. He who knows he truth and calls it a lie is a criminal."

    2. Re:I'm a shrink and I can tell you why this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good post. I checked out the MDQ questionnaire. So everybody is bipolar?!

    3. Re:I'm a shrink and I can tell you why this is... by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 1

      You're right, and I love the phrase that Pharma uses: "discontinuation syndrome". It means exactly the same as "withdrawal syndrome", but if you call it a withdrawal syndrome then you are suggesting the medications might be addictive.

      That said, usually the withdrawal from these meds isn't a big deal. With antidepressants the withdrawal symptoms are usually gone in a week if they happen at all (and if you taper gradually you can avoid any withdrawal symptoms in, oh, 99% of people). Withdrawal symptoms from the antipsychotics (usually movement disorders associated with dose reduction) do exist but they are rare-- I'm not sure I've ever really seen a case.

      The bigger issue is whether these medications have more subtle and long-lasting aftereffects, especially when given for long periods or to developing brains-- e.g., if I stay on Prozac for 10 years and then stop it, am I more likely to get depressed later in life than if I had never taken Prozac? Unfortunately, it's damn near impossible to prove one way or the other.

    4. Re:I'm a shrink and I can tell you why this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...the mental health professionals I've encountered have in general flatly denied that any of these dependence issues exist,..."
      Yeah, even with the antidepressant Effexor (venlafaxine) which has a persistent (months, sometimes years-long) withdrawal effect which can happen even with normal variations in blood concentration while taking the drug (even the extended-release version).

      It's like getting an electric shock whenever you move your eyes or even change visual focus, tens of thousands of people have reported it, there are whole active web forums of people with the problem, yet the manufacturer still denies it, calls it a rare "discontinuation syndrome", and insists that their drug isn't physically addictive.

    5. Re:I'm a shrink and I can tell you why this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Zyprexa. You are better off drinking St. John's Wort tea. Plus it has way less complications and side effects. I got prescribed Zyprexa and got catatonic afterwards. I slowly recovered, but I was never the same person again.

    6. Re:I'm a shrink and I can tell you why this is... by supersonic75 · · Score: 2

      Some words on this:

      I think that it's important to acknowledge that ALL antipsychotics are basically just fancy sedatives. Don't let you anyone tell you otherwise (i.e., that the newer antipsychotics "pinpoint symptoms" like auditory or visual hallucinations, etc). They serve one purpose, and one purpose only and that is to dull the brain down (which in turn may or may not have an efficacious effect on symptoms of psychosis and subsequent behavior). We have not really come all that far since Thorazine except to have improved (some) of the side effects (if an MD wants to argue this, I'll be happy to substantiate my point on every level, including molecular). Sometimes the meds help people, sometimes not.

      So while I appreciate what Pickens reports, I also think it's important to understand that these drugs are used to serve many purposes; however, I think that the reason why they are being prescribed in such vast quantities is more emblematic of the times than anything else. Nobody really wants to work with out-of-control behavior when one can simply dispense a pill. I recently worked with a patient who served some time at Riker's last year for trafficking, and he told me that "EVERYONE is given Seroquel (an antipsychotic known for its sedating effects, particularly in a non-psychotic population) at night to keep them calm". This man was a credible source of information, and I was pretty shocked at his report. There used to be a real stigma attached to these drugs (obviously I'm not saying that's a good thing), but now they're becoming household names in certain populations.

      The whole notion of giving antispychotics to kids scares the hell out of me on a lot of levels, especially when it comes to brain plasticity at a young age. It can really fuck them up, and they often learn nothing about their own behavior (unless by some stroke of luck they have a talented and caring counselor or therapist). I've assessed 12 to 15 year-old girls who do quite well in school and have friends, but who come from very hard family or otherwise challenging backgrounds whom are prescribed alarmingly high doses of antipsychotics (as well as antidepressants), when in fact they have NO psychotic symptoms whatsoever but merely conduct and behavioral issues.

      In addition to this, their families are sometimes eager to have them hospitalized so that they can get a little "vacation" away from the kid. Once the child is on a psychiatric inpatient unit, they are going to damn well get pretty serious meds 99% of the time, because that's how it's done. So now you have a child who is an identified patient and whom is usually misdiagnosed, so that insurance will pay for the treatment and meds (this is the same reason why the elderly earn these diagnoses; nursing homes need to get paid for the meds that they use to keep them calm). The diagnoses "Schizophrenia" and particularly "Bipolar Disorder" are tossed around like they were the common cold, and when I ask these patients (young and older alike) if they know what it means to have these disorders, at least 75 % of them have absolutely no idea. I once had a young woman break down in tears in the Psychiatric ER, because I said to her, "you're not Bipolar and the sooner you can think of yourself as being an extremely emotional person and not a sick one, the better you might start to feel." She's in individual therapy and has been doing pretty well for over 3 years. She used to thank me every time I'd run into her in the hospital.

      I also worry about and hate the fact that these extremely powerful meds are being dispensed by (often well-meaning) health professionals who have very little psych training, and applaud clinicians that have the wherewithal and resources (sadly a lucky few) to continue to experiment with alternatives to psych meds, or at least administer them as a last resort rather than a first line of defense.

      At any rate, just wanted to weigh in.

  99. Clear break from reality in 1980 by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...when the American electorate decided to go with the pleasant movie fantasies of a has-been B actor in the beginning stages of Alzheimer's disease instead of the unpleasant energy and economic realities explained quite plainly by an engineer who happened to be president at the time. Yes, America broke with reality 30 years ago, which is more or less the definition of psychosis.

    Any hope we had of energy independence and a stable economy died then. Arab oil and economic decay through debt spending were in. Whoopee! And hasn't that worked out well?

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:Clear break from reality in 1980 by tgd · · Score: 1

      ...when the American electorate decided to go with the pleasant movie fantasies of a has-been B actor in the beginning stages of Alzheimer's disease instead of the unpleasant energy and economic realities explained quite plainly by an engineer who happened to be president at the time. Yes, America broke with reality 30 years ago, which is more or less the definition of psychosis.

      Any hope we had of energy independence and a stable economy died then. Arab oil and economic decay through debt spending were in. Whoopee! And hasn't that worked out well?

      Sounds like someone didn't take his pills today.

    2. Re:Clear break from reality in 1980 by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      I did take it, but it was the frikkin' *red* pill. Dang it. Things just haven't been much good since then.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    3. Re:Clear break from reality in 1980 by shinehead · · Score: 1

      So true, peak oil was recognized by the Carter administration. If we had adhered to to the policies of conservation and energy self sufficiency we would be in a very different place now. Oil is running out, prices MUST go up, we have to revert to a less energy intensive economic model since there is no alternative energy source that can replace oil. I think the older east coast cities can handle the change but Atlanta, Dallas, and Los Angeles are fucked.

    4. Re:Clear break from reality in 1980 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UFO spotting, solar power installing, lust with my heart? America broke with reality before 1980.

  100. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, we ARE psycotic, so DON'T mess with us!! We KILL you!!

  101. Re:bring on the trolls by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Fuck off, you don't know him, you don't know shit and you don't know me. I'm certainly not one of those who thinks that because doctors couldn't cure XYZ, or said my father had three months and he survived for six, then all the medical business is invalid. So you can shove that strawman up your ass sideways. But a business is what it is. Businesses don't like becoming obsolete. If a miracle cure for everything turned up tomorrow what do you think would happen to it? They'd hide it in a drawer, in a basement with no stairs and a sign on the door saying "beware of the leopard".

    His parents think he's fine too. Read it slowly: there is nothing wrong with him. He's had surgery. No change. Well, at least they didn't make things worse. They still got paid though.

    Don't even get me started on all the mental and psychological disorders they've made up.

    Now get off your high horse, its back isn't strong enough to carry a fat cunt like you. And in case you missed it, fuck off.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  102. Funny by Das+Auge · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's funny when you think about it. Some Americans take drugs to feel better about themselves, but non-Americans talk shit about Americans to make them feel better about themselves. Well, I guess the later is cheaper...

  103. Tea Party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That also explains the "Tea Party" ?

  104. Facts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe America to be heavily medicated.... yet now people take Al Jazeera to be a factual resource?
    Have you even watched that network?! (Yeah, no blatant bias there, lol.)

  105. we need medical reform now by markhahn · · Score: 1

    a big part of the problem is that we've permitted doctors to form a medical mafia, and what we need is something closer to "healthcare engineering". as a guild, the medical establishment is structurally prone to rackets, and the relationship between big pharma and doctors qualifies.

  106. The Problem and the Solution by cbarcus · · Score: 1

    As has been noted in other comments, there is plenty to be depressed about in the United States (and elsewhere). In fact, to be content is to be oblivious and fortunate to have adequate resources. I too have fought to keep my child off of medication (a faulty ADHD diagnosis in this case), and so I can totally appreciate what people are struggling with. Having to deal with systemic incompetence in psychology can be very distracting, especially considering all of the other concerns normal people typically have to deal with.

    It takes ample energy to train competent psychologists, and unfortunately that is seen as being a luxury in our current economic environment. We've effectively had 40 years of an energy crisis (often denied) with no end in sight, and unless this condition is dealt with, the problems are very likely to continue. Malnutrition (obesity) is widespread as well (and growing), and this can be largely attributed to poor quality nutrients (cheap carbohydrates). As people continue to lose their jobs (minus more risky and indebting "stimulus packages"), we seem to have little to look forward to as the economic system continues to contract.

    There is a way out of this mess. A very promising, but not very well-known or understood, form of nuclear energy production has been largely ignored for the better part of those past 40 years, and it is long past due to pursue agressive development of it. That technology has been discussed in this forum (Slashdot), and it remains by far the most promising energy solution we have. Unfortunately, treating the widespread fear of nuclear energy is not an easy task, and that fear continues to hamper promotion of this solution.

    The anti-nuclear movement needs to concede on our need to develop sources of electrical generation that will afford a great net energy ratio. Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors promise to dramatically reduce the cost of building plants, enabling a scaling capability that no other energy solution can match (we could have thousands of reactors within decades). The high temperatures at which these reactors operate remove the need for water cooling, thereby safeguarding our rivers, aquifers, and shorelines. The inherent safety features of this design (above a certain temperature, the fuel expands checking the nuclear reactions) means that we'll never have another meltdown. The excess neutrons produced in the core facilitate the elimination of long-lived radio-toxic isotopes, reducing the waste problem to about 300 years (down from about 10,000). The potentially low cost of electrical production (through a massive improvement in efficiency) will enable a revolution of the chemical industry, allowing for cheap synthetic carbon-neutral fuels and fertilizer, and we'll be able to sequester enough carbon to return our atmosphere to a pre-industrial state.

    This innovative machine can provide us the hope that we need to transform our society from the sorry excuse that it currently is, to the potentially great one that we all know it can be. It is our escape pod from this depressing and reinforcing cycle of decay, confusion and division, to one of renewal and political unity.

  107. Transformation of the American Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before: "Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?"
    After: "Do I feel psychotic? Well, do ya, punk?"
    Buy your pills now from the nearest dealer!

    ---
    98% of the people who tried the product were experiencing changes in their lives. All liabilities may be reserved. FDA approval pending on the lobbying budget for the coming year .

  108. Of course people are crazy by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Of course people are crazy. Just look at how many of them anthropomorphize animals to the point that they no longer can identify them as no being human. Heck, our society has gotten to the point that they are offended by the idea of "buying" a dog, and instead want people to "adopt" them.

  109. Prozac has been the most prescribed drug by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    I was on a benefits committee for a major university and it was noted by a physician member that Prozac was the most prescribed drug for all the various health insurance plans provided by the university. He suggested it would be cheaper to just dump it in the town's water reservoir. It would be a more economical distribution system. This was ~15 years ago. Not news.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  110. Re:bring on the trolls by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

    Can we block redneck bigots from this site?

    You are aware that the word redneck evolved as a racial slur for people who were born in the United States to mixed parents of Native American and Caucasian descent right? Combining that old racial slur with the word bigot is not only hypocritical, but also extremely ironic as, at the time of its inception, redneck was used to label people, put them down, and cast them out of "civilized society," for being related to savages. So well done.

    Or at least start Americans with karma -1 by default?

    *Snicker* That's delightful. So you want to start all Americans off with a moderation handicap because of the cruel words of one American? And you support doing that after complaining that said American is a bigot? Nothing like a fresh pot of hypocritical bullshit in the morning to start off your Saturday eh?

    Don't get me wrong, the orginal poster was an asshole saying some stupid shit. But when it comes right down to it, your post is no better. In fact, it might be a little worse due to the added holier-than-though attitude. High five for going above and beyond though!

  111. The world is more interesting than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The drug companies want everyone doped up. They think of it as expanding their market. Big pharma is corrupt on so many different levels it is worth investigating just so you know what type of bullshit passes in our society. The "FedGov" that you refer to is a collection of individuals, who cannot agree on the most basic things because of entrenched ideologies. They want you to buy into their koolaid, and couldn't care less if you are on antipsychotics when you do.

    You statement is a typical example of cynical blank and white thinking. The world is more interesting than that.

  112. Mother's little helper by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    "Kids are different today, I hear ev'ry mother say
    Mother needs something today to calm her down
    And though she's not really ill, there's a little yellow pill
    She goes running for the shelter of a mother's little helper
    And it helps her on her way, gets her through her busy day"

    Mick Jagger and Keith Richard.

  113. Upon closer examination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look at the US there's some sort of problem over there, or a single culmination of problems? Let me explain.

    The US spends more on education than any other nation yet is only below average in comparison to other countries.
    The highest gun related crime rate in the world. A country with a continual fight against drugs that its citizens consume en mass.
    A country which has an overwhelming christian majority, a religion of peace allegedly with the most active army in the world. Regularly "liberating" other peoples' countries.
    A people that glorify celebrities that are alcoholics, drugs users etc. Celebrities that supposedly epitomize looking great and yet Americans are "blessed" with some the worst obesity rates anywhere.
    A nation that is associated with possibilities and dreams like some sort of fairytale wonderland and yet has such practices as "redlining".
    America is a country that has yet to give their own citizens healthcare and yet the same big companies that represent healthcare are medicating everyone over the counter...
    You know, I can go on and there are much worse facts to quote...but really, is it a surprise Americans are on antipsychotics?

    In short, they say "God bless America", if Jesus is your lord and saviour I gotta say, that jew don't like you American folks.

  114. Kinda Right by no1home · · Score: 2

    While of course it is a strong overstatement to say all of us Americans are insane in some way, it is true that Big Pharma and our simplistic views of life are turning us into mass consumers of psychotropic medications, legally.

    In some ways, I was one of those the system tried to abuse. I say that not to inflame the argument- I know the people involved did not INTEND to do me harm. Luckily for me, I have good parents who resisted the BS. Way back in early grade school, they said I was having trouble and that I should be put on Ritalin, that I had ADD or ADHD. My mother, being smart person who can think for herself, looked at the situation and removed most of the processed sugar junk from my diet. I got sufficiently better that the matter was closed.

    But wait! There's more! It turns out I am one of those unlucky few who actually was born bipolar! 35 years ago, we didn't really know these things, so I went without diagnosis, let alone treatment. And the argument still rages, can a child BE bipolar? (My case is a clear argument that, yes, a child can be bipolar).

    And there's still more! Once I was properly diagnosed, by two separate, unrelated psychiatrists who were unaware of each others diagnosis (I call it the 'blind taste test method of diagnosis), I began treatment. Over a decade of trying this, that, and the other medication. You know what finally worked? Testosterone replacement therapy and vitamin-B complex, along with some mental trickery I do for myself. This is MY solution and not medical advice. But the idea is, they mostly want to sell you drugs, expensive drugs. You MUST take control and find the underlying cause for yourself! And you must be intelligent about it.

    Which leads me to...

    RANT ON

    I don't see much hope these days. I work closely with the public and it makes me want to kill. It makes me want to remove the right to vote and breed. It makes me um... depressed... again. Americans want to blame an external source for their problems and take a magic pill to make it all better. I know this. I went through that phase of trying to find something outside of me that made me screwed up and I wanted an instant fix for it. Most Americans, it seems, don't get past that phase- ever. It's the immigrant's fault. It's my spouse's fault. It's my parent's fault. As I told an ex of mine many years ago, so the fuck what! You're an adult now. Act like one and figure your shit out; take responsibility for who you are today and make yourself better. Ask for help if need be, of course. I had to and it worked. My shrink helped me figure out the testosterone issue. She's one of the good ones.

    So is Big Pharma really to blame? Or are they just capitalizing on our nature? That's a trick question. We are BOTH to blame.

    RANT OFF

    I apologize for the rant. This is a sore subject for me and working with the public the last several years has not helped! :) But try to imagine the conversation I have to have sometimes:
    Me: I'm bipolar.
    Them: Ya, so is everyone else these days.
    Me: Yes, I know. It's being WAY over-diagnosed now, but I really am.
    Them: Yep, they all say that too now.

    If they only knew the real pain. The guilt of the pain my disease has caused others. Hell, they still wouldn't give a shit. Many of is Americans are too self-absorbed to notice. I wonder if there's a pill for that...

    --
    I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

    Persecutors will be violated!
    1. Re:Kinda Right by sdguero · · Score: 1

      Your post is incredibly self absorbed.

    2. Re:Kinda Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually comes in the form of a suppository.

    3. Re:Kinda Right by no1home · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your honest opinion. Just trying to state my experience with the system in question.

      What is your experience with this system? How has it affect you, if at all, or you it?

      --
      I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

      Persecutors will be violated!
    4. Re:Kinda Right by xero314 · · Score: 1

      Many of is Americans are too self-absorbed to notice. I wonder if there's a pill for that

      There are no known treatments for Narcissistic Personality Disorder, which is the worst manifestation of being self-absorbed. And why would someone want a treatment for it when it is likely to help you become a CEO or other important and powerful person. Just saying, being self-absorbed is a product of modern western culture, as Lasch explains it, and not a product of chemical imbalance.

    5. Re:Kinda Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting insight. Since my experience with psychoactive drugs is solely the recreational use of legal and illegal substances I strongly have to agree that those drugs should only be a last resort to treat supposed psychological illnesses. The side-effects the prolonged use of most of the common psychopharmaca can have not only on your body (severe kidney/liver damage, teeth grinding, acne, gradual loss of motoric function etc.) but also on your brain (loss of empathy, killing neurone connections etc.) makes them the neutrone bomb of psychology in my eyes.
      Take ritalyn for example. Chemically it is derived from Methamphetamine (like most ADD/ADHD drugs) and its effects are almost the same. Now the horror stories about meth spinned by media are entirely untrue and the hypocrisy in condemning meth and silencing any inconveniently lively children with ADD drugs is an entirely different issue. The point is, that the dangers ritalyn poses to the body of young children far outweighs its "benefit" of increased focus. My little cousin whose parents would not be convinced to refuse ritalyn treatment has been taking it for 2.5years and has developed acne at the age of 11, intensely grinds his teeth while asleep and has quit his soccer team to focus on his schoolwork (granted, that was most likely parental influence).
      By the way: there is a drug that increases empathy. It is called MDMA (or ecstasy, when pressed into pills with Methylphenethylamin/Speed) and was unfortunately outlawed. Go figure

    6. Re:Kinda Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of is Americans are too self-absorbed to notice. I wonder if there's a pill for that...

      I guess a dose of potassium cyanide would be one of the few things that can help here, they wouldn't notice much but at least stop being self-absorbed.

    7. Re:Kinda Right by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      While not quite in the same position as you, all I can say is that I understand - I'm sorry, but we have to live through it.
      I know it's not appropriate, especially on this site, but a hug would be quite in tact here...

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    8. Re:Kinda Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been taking zyprexa for some time now and I guess it really helped me. The tricky part, for me, was in finding the correct dose and the correct medication
      and accepting that taking it was necessary. I'm not someone who was ever terribly mentally ill, but I did suffer (briefly) from psychotic episodes many years ago.
      This mostly induced after some canabis abuse years during college. Without the medication I could perhaps function as an artist, but in this day-and-age where work, family and amusement seem to account for a 48-hour day, it's easy to just take a pill.
      I also know from pas experience that without this (slightly dosed) product my life would be a lot more difficult.

      There's a lot of criticisism on the pharmaceutical industry (which I work in) and I follow it to great extend (although it
      is the sales of it, that always seems to be the problem).

      But the bigger picture is: "these medications help people to have a better life"

      It took me a long time to accept that taking this drug is a part of my life... and there are other choices of doing fine without any psycho-active drug for me:
      - Take a lot of vacation
      - Don't go the college, because exams are realy stressfull (trigger for...)
      - Don't have a job as a software engineer (realy stressfull, lot's of 'mother why do we work?' questions possible ;-))
      - Don't buy a house,car, electronics so that 'less-paid' job is also more than sufficient
      - Take on a healthy lifestyle (food, no alcohol, no sigarets, no coffee, sports...)

      But I have the choice to:
      - Accept the fact that my brain is slightly out of touch without zyprexa
      - Take the pills
      - Try to find and solve chalenges both professionaly and personally without al the stress that brings
      - Enjoy who I am and what life has to offer

    9. Re:Kinda Right by no1home · · Score: 1

      I really empathize with your situation. I really thought I would be medicated for the rest of my life. It just turned out that, even after a decade of playing with dosing and combos, it just didn't work for me. I came to terms with needing to be medicated to function, which was hard at first. In my particular case, things went a different direction and the only medication I'm now on is androgel.

      As you are an example of, and I thought I was, some people really do benefit from and even require these medications. Of that, I have no doubt.

      That's what makes the debate difficult. We like to make things black-and-white, when, in truth, it isn't so simple. These medications DO help people and are necessary. It's the combo of marketing and weak wills that makes the big money for the industry.

      --
      I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

      Persecutors will be violated!
  115. No need to despair! by mevets · · Score: 2

    There are a variety of anti-psychotic pharmaceuticals that can help straighten you on your keel. Talk to your doctor about Cannabidiol today.

    * side effects may included drowsiness, hunger, giggling, Pink Floyd, intense focus, preoccupation with Bruce Lee, socialist leanings, belief in conspiracy theories, and enjoyment of life. If you experience any of these side effects, Cannabidiol may be just the thing for you.

    1. Re:No need to despair! by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Tip from your friendly neighbourhood biochemist - it's not just the cannabidiol, it's the ratio between tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol that counts. Might also induce appreciation for the Greatful Dead, you missed that in your list. Apart from that, a highly valuable substance, indeed. Shame this town is dry like the Atacama in this regard.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    2. Re:No need to despair! by koona · · Score: 1

      Tip from your friendly neighbourhood biochemist - it's not just the cannabidiol, it's the ratio between tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol that counts.

      More pertinant is the prevalence of, specificaly, the delta 9 radical of tetrahydrocannabinol.
      C. sativa rules, couch dope's fer fools What town was that bro?

    3. Re:No need to despair! by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      I freely admit that I have been outnerded on this one. But hey, I am a protein structure guy that left academia for quite some time in the end - been a while since I went over the theory of cannabis. The town's Munich, Germany. The pigs are unpleasant around here these days.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  116. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live my job. In my precious few minutes of spare time I play with my kids and wife and go fishing and do a few other hobbies. We don't have a TV. We don't have any iPhones or iPads. We drive old cars. We own a tiny cheap house in a blue collar town. I drink a few beers now and then. I don't go to nightclubs, I don't cheat on my wife, I don't gamble, I don't smoke. The only magazine I read is QST.

    You make a few good points but overall I think you make sweeping generalizations with nothing to back them up.

  117. both governmernt and congress need it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that both both government and congress of USA are in urgent need of anti psychotic drugs. Communist block in eastern Europe disappeared 20 years ago and yet military spending are still increasing.

  118. Re:bring on the trolls by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

    Can we block redneck bigots from this site? You are aware that the word redneck evolved as a racial slur for people who were born in the United States to mixed parents of Native American and Caucasian descent right?

    WTF? Do you have a citation for your etymology, aside from "pulled out of your ass". Mine is below. It's about white-skinned field workers who got sunburnt necks.

    redneck
    "cracker," 1893; attested 1830 in more specialized sense ("This may be ascribed to the Red Necks, a name bestowed upon the Presbyterians in Fayetteville," from Ann Royall, "Southern Tour I," p.148). According to various theories, red perhaps from anger, or from pellagra, but most likely from mule farmers' outdoors labor in the sun, wearing a shirt and straw hat, with the neck exposed.

    *Snicker* That's delightful. So you want to start all Americans off with a moderation handicap because of the cruel words of one American?

    *Hee haw* No, it was "irony", demonstrating how idiotic the original post was by making an equally stupid and bigoted suggestion. Though responses like yours make it seem more reasonable.

  119. CRA-Z by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ''Americans with symptoms ranging from chronic depression to anxiety to insomnia are now being prescribed anti-psychotics at rates that seem to indicate a national mass psychosis.'"

    Finally, a good explanation for the tea-party phenomenon.

  120. I am schizophrenic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am schizophrenic and anti-psychotics have helped me well! I was suffering from delusions before taking the medication and I suffered for a long time. But just after taking the medication for a few weeks I got better.

  121. We are living in a very unnatural world by itsphilip · · Score: 2

    First off, not all of the drugs listed are antipsychotics. Second, a lot of people need these drugs. Humans have evolved to wake up with the sun, and go to sleep not too long after sunset. Now we stay up all night. Naturally, that's going to make you a little bit crazy. 10,000 years ago, we didn't eat lots of carbs or ingest loads of chemicals, we ate natural fruits, veggies, and meat. Most of us now don't have to worry about hunting or foraging, and now that the desperate struggle for survival is over for many of us, we have time to look inward and think about thoughts and emotions. I don't know about you guys, but any time I have time to look inward and deal with emotions, I go a little bit bananas. That's why we need an unnatural solution in many cases to help us cope with this incredibly unnatural world. It's not worth freaking out over; take a Xanax and chill :-).

  122. The word "literally" gets abused again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, it is ad nauseatingly annoying when people use "literally" to describe bullshit that did not happen. Your blood did not literally boil, that is total bullshit.

    1. Re:The word "literally" gets abused again by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      My post is composed of electrons. Bullshit contains electrons, however so do many other substances. Ergo, containing electrons is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for being bullshit.

      There four, you're momma is a strawman.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:The word "literally" gets abused again by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Sweet Cthulhu, I will find you. Stop baiting the poor semantic nazis. They can't help themselves.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  123. Re:Really? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Recently, christians have been killing each other over their own religion. I suggest you choose something in this millenium before you spout off.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  124. The issue is drug company profits... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    Here's the deal. Anti-depressants are some of the largest money makers for the pharmaceutical industry (I don't know why... Maybe because life here in the States can be depressing?). The patents on the SSRI's and SNRI's were expiring. The drug companies needed something new, fast. However, newer SxRI's didn't show enough additional benefit to allow them to be worth trying to get them approved by the FDA. So, they took their old anti-psychotics and tested them in conjunction with the SxRI's and they had enough of an effect to become approved by the FDA. So the drug companies now have new psychodrug lines that will make the profits for the next ten or so years and you get a lot of new antidepressant ads on the TV.

    --
    That is all.
  125. Life is pain, Highness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who says differently is selling something.

  126. Addiction by Msdose · · Score: 2

    The vast majority of the over-prescribed drugs have no medical efficacy. The only quality they have is that they are addictive. The drug companies see this as their business model, and so produce new addictive products. Their control of the government protects them from low cost competition (DEA) at a cost to the taxpayer of 100 billion dollars a year. The government forces users to obtain their drugs from pushers, who steer them toward the most addictive (profitable) drugs. So the drug companies use doctors as pushers. In Canada, doctors write huge numbers of prescriptions for drugs which the government pays for (especially Oxycontin), then sell them out the back door for cash.

  127. Are you kidding? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Never have I felt more depressed than if I have to run (or even just walk for the sake of walking)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Are you kidding? by Sinthet · · Score: 1

      Make sure to do it at your own pace. As in, you should be tired but not exhausted and painfully gasping for breath(rather, keeping it rhythmic); try aiming for distance rather than speed (which comes by itself with practice). Having an MP3 player with you also helps a lot.

      Seriously, I'd recommend you give it another shot (without starting with a negative mindset). I hated running until I was pressured into it, embarrassed, and started to run on my own to improve myself. You'll be amazed that after two weeks or so, you're able to run the same distance while expending much less energy.

      Maybe it won't work for you, I'm not trying to suggest cross-country running is a panacea and everyone will love it, but most people get turned off and disappointed when they feel the pain and difficulty and don't stick around to reap the rewards.
      At the very least, it's great for your health :).

    2. Re:Are you kidding? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Some people just don't get the rewards. I've done pretty intense physical training in my life (the first four weeks of football practice in high school always resulted in a 10-15 pound weight loss despite eating as much as I wanted to of anything I wanted to) and while I can definitely say that I'm a happier person generally if I exercise a lot, the exercise itself actually makes me feel like crap.

  128. Quality of Food, Water, Air, and materials. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's known as Agenda-21, from the Security & Prosperity Partnership.

    Do you not think it might have something to do with the fact that bio-degrading plastics will absorb into the skin of anyone that uses it?

    How about that much of the food today uses neuro-toxins to game taste buds to effect the artificial flavor rather to hide the tasteless fact that the food is might be more like "doof" that has no actual health benefits (chips, noodles, gum, beverages, filler, cruft)?

    How about the fact that the United Kingdom fluoridates 2% of their tapwater while the United States fluoridates over 60% of their tapwater: a process began only in NAZI-controlled Germany to discard waste-product (fluoride) from an aluminum rendering project and a nuclear-enrichment project?

    How about the fact that the Air quality is worse from HPHV sprayers for industrial paints are increasing, while according to military documents they guise that spraying Aluminum Oxide into the atmosphere will reflect at-least 2% of sun-light to reverse some of the solar heating away from the ground while inducing "cloud seeding" to shade the ground?

    The United States induces commerce by causing problems we don't know about: the remedy is market stimulus in the form of the people looking all-hell everywhere in a panic to pay someone else to reverse the symptoms caused by the sinister activities of someone else. Rather than shoot and hang the offenders, we are demanded by psychologists to be tolerant and threatened by courts to be drugged if we speak against this, and if you haven't noticed the military conquests are US Government agencies and corporations expanding against other countries to spread the same kind of "civilization" (domesticate the non-timid) against anyone else that progresses to remove the standard of living from the wealthy bankers or even raise the power classes into a more intelligent lifestyle that exceeds the class of celebrity idiots they are somehow predented to idolize and worship today with the bogus polls of minority fanatics.

  129. Re:bring on the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you also saying we should not block freedom hating, face saving, pandering, weak-willed cowards?

  130. Americans are mentally ill. Nothing new here. by isochroma · · Score: 0

    Americans are mentally ill. Nothing new here.

  131. Re:Really? by shinehead · · Score: 1

    What does the Torah say about Goyim?

  132. No intrinsic motivation by jawahar · · Score: 1

    As per research studies there is no such thing as intrinsic motivation.
    http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/inmotiv.htm

  133. It's amazing... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...how many depressed people this topic brought out.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  134. The best part is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that these comments seem to be agreeing Al Jazeera has the best interest of the US Population in mind. I'm pretty sure that the lack of US based advertisers on that website indicate something important here.

  135. Brave New World discussion by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I've heard "it's a warning, not a manual" before, about 1984, but it works here too.

    As for seeing BNW positively, I've even done that sometimes.

    Some people don't understand that there's too much of a good thing.

    The BNW world first tried a society of all Alphas, but it didn't work (the intelligentsia not tolerating menial labor? been there done that.)

    I long since saw BNW as excellent sci-fi: not only well-written tehcnology but also a well-written discussion of its effects upon society.

    I also noticed a dig at the consumerism, since a desire for overly complicated games was one thing pushed via the social indoctrination

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  136. Follow up to Angell article by jnorden · · Score: 1

    The NYT piece by Marcia Angell is excellent, really worth reading all the way through. The second part of her article can be found here:
    here.

    I found the most infuriating bit of information to be that Irving Kirsch had to use the freedom of information act to get the FDA to release all of the study data it had on the antidepressants he analyzed. I assume he succeeded because the patents had expired, so the FDA was no longer able to treat the data as "proprietary". It is really criminal that drug companies aren't forced to release all the information that they've collected about a drug once it is approved.

  137. K.Flay, CRAZYtown by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    dig this song; its lyric sure fit the discussion theme here:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XJXySZ2aiM
    http://www.kflay.com/site/lyricsmp#crazytown

    Did you ever think that just maybe
    We’re supposed to be a little bit crazy
    Can it be?
    We’re really this mentally diseased?

    OCD narcissistic, manic depressive slit your wrists
    Hyperactive ADD, generalized anxiety
    Drug addicts, agoraphobic
    Panic attacks, we’re all just so sick
    In the head, need medicine quick
    Gotta stock up on prescription slips
    Had a breakdown of a nervous kind
    Pop a little xanax to unwind
    Paranoid schizo half the time
    Bipolar and borderline
    Way fucked up when it comes to sex
    Shit dick cunt that’s tourette’s
    Stay in bed, we’re too depressed
    Post traumatic stress effects
    Bulimics barf, anorexics starve
    Fast food binge inside our cars
    Multiple personalities
    Like hi it’s I, myself, and me
    We got trichotillomaniacs
    And autistic braniacs
    All insaney to the max
    So doped up on prozac packs
    Histrionic plus delusions
    Tangled dendrites, mad confusion
    Klepto narcoleptic
    All psych wards so antiseptic
    Take your Zoloft, Paxil
    Wellbutrin, Cymbalta, homie
    What you using?
    Ativan and Lexapro
    Don’t act like you do not know

    Did you ever think that just maybe
    We’re supposed to be a little bit crazy
    Can it be?
    We’re really this mentally diseased?

    As I stare at an ink blot
    Thinking why I think the thoughts I think
    Paying 20 g’s a year straight to my shrink
    To analyze me on a couch
    And while he’s zoning out
    I’m tuning in to my inner child
    So that explains why I get wild
    On the weekend drinking no tomorrow
    Sleep around to ease my sorrow
    And it all relates to what happened in second grade
    I am told there is a name for what is wrong inside my brain
    And that fact alone makes me feel like I’m hardly that insane
    I’ve undergone psychoanalysis
    My dreams all full of phalluses
    Psychotropics I imbibe
    So happy to be prescribed
    What I get from Pfizer’s not much different from Budweiser
    In the end, you and I just fated to pretend

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  138. Medicine = death in a pill by luk3Z · · Score: 0

    Avoid medicines and you will be healthy.

    --
    Recipes for USA bankrupt - http://tinypaste.com/0d66f dd = dollar deluge (printed in the infinity)
  139. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While of course it is a strong overstatement to say all of us Americans are insane in some way, it is true that Big Pharma and our simplistic views of life are turning us into mass consumers of psychotropic medications, legally.

    In some ways, I was one of those the system tried to abuse. I say that not to inflame the argument- I know the people involved did not INTEND to do me harm. Luckily for me, I have good parents who resisted the BS. Way back in early grade school, they said I was having trouble and that I should be put on Ritalin, that I had ADD or ADHD. My mother, being smart person who can think for herself, looked at the situation and removed most of the processed sugar junk from my diet. I got sufficiently better that the matter was closed.

    But wait! There's more! It turns out I am one of those unlucky few who actually was born bipolar! 35 years ago, we didn't really know these things, so I went without diagnosis, let alone treatment. And the argument still rages, can a child BE bipolar? (My case is a clear argument that, yes, a child can be bipolar).

    And there's still more! Once I was properly diagnosed, by two separate, unrelated psychiatrists who were unaware of each others diagnosis (I call it the 'blind taste test method of diagnosis), I began treatment. Over a decade of trying this, that, and the other medication. You know what finally worked? Testosterone replacement therapy and vitamin-B complex, along with some mental trickery I do for myself. This is MY solution and not medical advice. But the idea is, they mostly want to sell you drugs, expensive drugs. You MUST take control and find the underlying cause for yourself! And you must be intelligent about it.

    Which leads me to...

    RANT ON

    I don't see much hope these days. I work closely with the public and it makes me want to kill. It makes me want to remove the right to vote and breed. It makes me um... depressed... again. Americans want to blame an external source for their problems and take a magic pill to make it all better. I know this. I went through that phase of trying to find something outside of me that made me screwed up and I wanted an instant fix for it. Most Americans, it seems, don't get past that phase- ever. It's the immigrant's fault. It's my spouse's fault. It's my parent's fault. As I told an ex of mine many years ago, so the fuck what! You're an adult now. Act like one and figure your shit out; take responsibility for who you are today and make yourself better. Ask for help if need be, of course. I had to and it worked. My shrink helped me figure out the testosterone issue. She's one of the good ones.

    So is Big Pharma really to blame? Or are they just capitalizing on our nature? That's a trick question. We are BOTH to blame.

    RANT OFF

    I apologize for the rant. This is a sore subject for me and working with the public the last several years has not helped! :) But try to imagine the conversation I have to have sometimes:
    Me: I'm bipolar.
    Them: Ya, so is everyone else these days.
    Me: Yes, I know. It's being WAY over-diagnosed now, but I really am.
    Them: Yep, they all say that too now.

    If they only knew the real pain. The guilt of the pain my disease has caused others. Hell, they still wouldn't give a shit. Many of is Americans are too self-absorbed to notice. I wonder if there's a pill for that...

    Apply max pressure on IRS to check these docs financial records. Compel these prescribers to work in last frontiers of Africa with their booties for ten to thirty years

  140. Manufactoring diseases by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I think the pharmaceutical industry is the next one up for a News of the World scandal; they certainly work hard to earn it.

    They have for many decades worked deliberately to make as much money out of as little actual investment as possible, and three important points in their strategy are 1) to misinform everybody about what a disease is, and 2) to give the false impression that their research is incredibly expensive and 3) can only be conducted by private companies.

    The thing is that if they go about inventing drugs that actually cure diseases, they receive money once, and when the disease is eradicated, it is all over; which is why so little has been done to cure things like malaria, and so much is done to treat the symptoms of less serious, but incurable conditions.

    And of course, it makes good business sense to get as many customers for your existing products, like Chlorprothixene (Cloxan, Taractan, Truxal) which is an old anti-psychotic drug - one of the notorious "chemical cosh" drugs, with serious side effects, like weight gain and addiction. Giving it for insomnia, or calling it "bipolar disorder" when you are sometimes a bit sad and sometimes quite glad is simply a cynical calculation to get you hooked on unnecessary drugs. Using cannabis would probably be much healthier, but of course nobody can claim to owh the patent for it.

    As for how expensive it is to develop drugs - I'm sure they can "prove" it by showing us their accounts, but when the group of people who control the expenses are the very ones that would benefit from making it as expensive as possible, where is the incentive to make it cheap?

    And the thing about "only private companies" - where does that come from, do you think? That whole ideology is yet another lie that big money and their cronies have fostered, and it has been easy. Why is it that public projects are always seen to god so badly over budget? Well, for one thing, all big projects tend to do so, private or not, but you never hear that "IBM has spent ten times as much as planned on X"; only the failures of public enterprises are plastered all over the news. And of course, a big, private enterprise that does work for the government has little incentive for delivering on time and within budget - the longer it takes and the bigger the budget overrun, the more profit, so why would they be efficient? However, if you look to China, where the big entrpreneurs ARE state owned, they bloody well do deliver on time and budget. Shouldn't that make you think?

    There was a time, not so long ago, when being a government employee was considered something honourable and a degree better than other jobs; but we have let the big money run the show, and now we have news media that cynically fabricate twisted lies, big companies that consider it immoral to show social responsibility, politicians who wouldn't dare fart in private without getting the written approval of Fox News, and churches that tell us that taking care of the weakest and poorest is against God's will because it might hurt the profits of the church.

    So, somebody out there is going to tell me I'm a bloody communist, and that he would rather trust his health, savings and morals to a private company that letting the state do things to the benefit of all. Strange, considering that while the government is at least in principle elected by the people and the state is answerable to us, the public has little influence on who is in charge of private companies, and they answer only to their investors. Call it Communism is you like, but the people should take the power back that rightfully belongs to them.

  141. chemical imbalances by Sheepy · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    The shift from "talk therapy" to drugs as the dominant mode of treatment coincides with the emergence over the past four decades of the theory that mental illness is caused primarily by chemical imbalances in the brain that can be corrected by specific drugs.

    I don't understand this theory as it seems, to me, that "mental illness" and "chemical imbalances in the brain" are the same thing with no cause/effect relationship between them. It also seems that psychotherapy and drug therapy are attempts to treat the symptoms via the two respective faces of the same metaphorical coin.

    Is there anything online that explains this cause/effect theory?

  142. Re:Really? by toriver · · Score: 1

    Why? Islamophobes tend to yammer on about Muhammed's antics, and that was even longer ago...

  143. How did this come about? by hessian · · Score: 1

    I agree with everything you've said, and have only one thought to offer:

    All of these bad things -- consumerism, meaninglessness, joblife and rampant capitalism -- originate in the demand by individuals that life be convenient and tailored to them.

    We don't have a Hitler, Genghis Khan or Sauron to blame for this one. Only ourselves, and our handy tools like democracy, self-expression and freedom which apparently let us become self-obsessed little voids of meaning.

  144. antipsychotics aren't only for psychosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many antipsychotics are prescribed for treatment of mood disorders: Bipolar Disorder and Depression, as well as for pain management. There is an increase in psychiatric diagnoses, but not limited to traditional psychotic disorders: Schizophrenia and its related disorders. Also antipsychotics are being prescribed more for teens and even children.

    I take an antipsychotic, Seroquel, for treatment of Bipolar Disorder; after trying many meds over many years this seems to help me. I experienced the side effect of elevated cholesterol, a mystery since I am vegetarian - but there is a history of elevated cholesterol in my family. Reducing my dose brought my cholesterol level back to normal with no effect on its therapeutic value. One thing I like about Seroquel is that unlike many medications used to treat Bipolar Disorder (Lithium, Depakote, Lamictal) regular bloodwork is not required.

  145. hehe by malsbert · · Score: 1

    Hello there dave-boy, Maybe you should reread your original post? Did you really think anyone would reply to that, with anything but a flame!?!?!

    --
    "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot.
  146. Explains a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What other way could a socialist politician with only two years political experience get elected president unless there was serious psychosis out there?

  147. Prenatal ultrasound is a marvel. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    I sometimes wonder if when they cure one disease they invent another. And I mean invent, not discover.

    Some of our neighbors have a three year old boy. He's been diagnosed with some kidney problem I can't even remember, let alone pronounce. And yet he's perfectly healthy.

    Thirty years ago, you'd have just said he needs to pee a lot.

    Well, when I was 29, I had a major health incident. The first warning was a serious kidney infection. The doctors had sent me to get my kidney scanned in a few different ways (ultrasound, nuclear, CAT) and discovered that I had a "stricture in the ureteropelvic juncture": i.e., the junction between my left kidney and the tube that connects it to the bladder was deformed and narrowed, making it hard for liquid to drain from it. This stricture most likely was there before I was even born, and 29 years of living with that had caused my left kidney to become an infection-prone rock garden that was only about 25% as functional as the healthy right kidney. Thankfully with today's tech they didn't have to open me up to fix me; they stuck a tube into my kidney (without anesthesia!) and then shot it with lasers (with anesthesia during the lasers bit).

    But guess what? Today they discover this sort of stuff prenatally, with routine ultrasound scans during pregnancy, and thus can treat it during childhood before it becomes as complicated as that.

    1. Re:Prenatal ultrasound is a marvel. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Were you better afterwards that you were before? He's exactly the same.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Prenatal ultrasound is a marvel. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      Were you better afterwards that you were before? He's exactly the same.

      Well, I'm no longer at a serious risk of dying from a kidney infection. What do you think? And you know, it would've been nice if somebody figured this shit out and treated it when I was a child. It'd have been nice to grow up to have two fully functional kidneys.

      You don't describe precisely what's the boy's condition, but hey, you're missing the point, which is that medical conditions that are minor at birth, if left unchecked, may compound over decades and threaten your life (or just outright kill you!) in adulthood. We are now increasingly able to detect, monitor and treat such issues early in life. This does lead to a lot of children receiving minor treatment for issues that wouldn't even be in the radar 30 years ago, but hey, better safe than sorry.

      I'm going to quote from a reference page on what I had:

      UPJ obstruction is the most common cause of neonatal and antenatal hydronephrosis, occurring in 1 per 1500 live births. Prior to the use of prenatal ultrasonography, most patients with UPJ obstruction presented with pain, hematuria, urosepsis, failure to thrive, or a palpable mass. With the enhanced ability and availability of prenatal ultrasonography, urologic abnormalities are being diagnosed earlier and more frequently. Fifty percent of patients diagnosed with antenatal hydronephrosis are eventually diagnosed with UPJ obstruction upon further workup.

      Initially, most children are treated conservatively and monitored closely. Intervention is indicated in the event of significantly impaired renal drainage or poor renal growth.

      So, 0.06% of children born (presumably in the USA) show some evidence of antenatal kidney problems similar to what I had. In the end only about half of those in the end are diagnosed with the condition. Most of these are monitored periodically to make sure that complications aren't developing, and given conservative treatment, with an eye on whether the issue corrects itself—and it often does as the child grows.

      All this shows is that today we can detect a lot more than we could 30 years ago, we can detect it earlier, and we can better keep an eye on it. Where's the bad?

  148. Alzheimers epidemic by bobkoure · · Score: 1

    There seem to be a lot more cases of Alzheimers out there.
    Part of the progression of that disease is becoming delusional, so anti-psychotics are not an unreasonable thing to try.
    As to whether they actually help, well, who knows? There isn't even an agreed-upon model for the disease.

  149. The DSM IV connection by dino213b · · Score: 1

    Before you condemn American people for being unstable, you may want to step back and examine the relationship between medicare, medicaid, and substance abuse clinics in the states.

    Short story is that some substance abuse clinics have started to diagnose abusers with mental disorders in proportions never seen before. Why? Possibly because state and federal funds will unquestionably reimburse for treating users - but the DSM IV diagnoses cost astronomically more than weaning drugs. This trend alone is responsible for pharmaceutical ramp-up, as drug prescriptions went up more than 100-fold in some places.

    The Baltimore Sun investigated this trend and wrote up a series of articles. http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2010-11-07/health/bs-md-bbh-housing-day-two-20101107_1_mental-illness-rowhouses-that-bbh-rents-interviews-with-former-patients

  150. there is a reason for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason for it is that pharma factories strike a lot of money by keeping the USA drugged.
    So dont be supriced that these pills keep your disorders, (at first they tend to help but later they becomme addictive.).

    I know of no other nation that is drugged like this, and also where it is legal to own weapons.
    One must be crazy too live there.. and thats maybe a reason people take it ??.
    There is no good (mental) health program so 1 out of 10 people has been in jail there also.

  151. sounds right by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    This is a country where not just a sizable fraction of the population, but several highly regarded leaders of one of the two major political parties, was and probably still is convinced that Obama is some kind of socialist Muslim Kenya-born double agent and that the most important task facing the nation is to depose him. That sounds like a wide open market for antipsychotics to me.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  152. Depression by Altus · · Score: 1

    Anti-psychotics are a class of drug that get used to treat several different problems

    Some anti-psychotics are used to supplement anti-depressants. The ones that are are not generic at this time. As a result, a prescription for a few mg of something like abilify, which helps to boost the effectiveness of prozac and other anti-depressants can cost well over a thousand dollars a month. At that kind of price, its easy to understand how so much money can be spent on these even when they are not being prescribed to people who are psychotic.

    You cant go by cost, that results in the newest meds being the biggest because they are sold at such an unbelievable price. Number of prescriptions might be more interesting, but still misleading for off label and even alternative on label uses.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  153. dementia meds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Antipsychotics are being percribed in dementia cases because culturally, we don't have a system for elder care, especially not one that includes the currently rising epidemic level number of dementia cases. Crowded, understaffed nursing homes often don't have a better way of dealing with people who are freaking out because of disorientation

  154. Re:bring on the trolls by garaged · · Score: 1

    As much as I like your explanation, and the alternate path theory makes some sense, what is the % of germans that feel proud of their role on both world wars?

    No matter hitler, there were a lot of stupid people willin to feel superior enough to kill some other countries just because they felt it was the correct thing to do

    --
    I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
  155. Re:bring on the trolls by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Today? Not many. But you have to understand a bit of German history to understand why WW2 could even happen.

    In the 19th century, the average German was more proud of his country and to be a German than the US citizen ever could be. Flags in the garden? Please, not so petty! A painting of the Kaiser in the living room and at least one relative in the military! The German society of the late 19th century was a very militaristic society, having a military title was almost, no, cancel that almost, it was being part of the aristocracy. It permeated society and you'll notice that if you look at pictures or paintings of Kaiser Willhelm II, he'll always wear a uniform. Pride and honor were the assets of the time, a dishonorable discharge from the military was worse than getting shot.

    I am not really exaggerating here. The pre-WW1 Germany was one of hubris. Imagine, half a century of military victory after victory, no matter who the opponent may be. Even France had been brought to its knees in less than a year in 1870/71. The general sentiment was that no army on this planet, not even all armies combined, could hold a candle to the German.

    When WW1 started, people were enthusiastic. This was a war everyone wanted, in the beginning there was no need for conscription, the volunteers were more than the army could actually equip. It quickly changed, but that's another thing.

    And this army lost the war. Worse, it lost while still standing deep in enemy territory. The western front was deep in France at the ceasefire. Now, explain this to a soldier who considered himself part of the best army of the world: You are in enemy territory, you actually beat the enemy back into his own turf and you LOST!

    It didn't take much to convince these people that not the military but the politicians lost the war. That they assassinated the heroic effort of the military who fought brave and relentlessly. Add the shameful peace conditions (that the "politicians" accepted) and it's easy to see why in such a country a democratic system has no chance. It has no support in the population. The military, though, has.

    It was easy now for a rabble-rouser like Hitler to play on this sentiment. The shame of a humiliating peace treaty, the feeling of the "invincible army" being assassinated from betrayers within and the promise to change this made it very easy for him to climb to power. That didn't take "a Hitler", though. Anyone playing on these feelings would have had it easy to gain support from the masses. The promise to make Germany strong again and eliminate the ignominy of the peace conditions would have elevated anyone to the position.

    Germany after WW2 and especially the development since led to a completely different outlook. Don't compare the Pre-WW1 Germany to the one today. You'll find few similarities in the general sentiment of the people. Germans may be "proud" of the economic power they are today, and that they are a key player in the EU, but the chauvinistic and militaristic attitude is pretty much over.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  156. "It is no measure of health..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... To be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society" - J. Khrishnamurti

    * I'll part on those words of wisdom from a great man... basically stating it's "ok to be sane in a crazy world!"

    APK

    P.S.=> I think they say it ALL, for me, & better than I ever could + FAR more succinctly... apk

  157. Thanks for the link, Good read :) by malsbert · · Score: 1

    If anybody else is into this sort of thing, Checkout this freelance academy thing, I have not read it all :) but it looks like the "real deal", That is; no fancy HTML/JAVAScript, Just the "info".

    --
    "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot.