So, what kind of sign does the whole Draw Muhammad thing hold to the world? Maybe something like "we value freedom of speech and aren't going to let some religious fundamentalists shut us up."
and herein lies the problem... muhammad wouldn't even exist if those religious fundamentalists didn't exist... the only reason they're making fun of muhammad is because muslims threaten to kill people that do. so you may think the claim is "we aren't going to let them", when actually it is being heard as "go ahead and try, i'm right here"
keep instigating. it's a really good idea that really smart people really really like.
i am not e-raging... i am pointing out your hypocrisy and ignorance.
keep poking the muslims, who you claim are not peaceful, with a stick and see what happens. that sounds like a really good idea. lets ALL do it! LETS ALL GO ON FACEBOOK TOGETHER! LETS ALL GO MAKE FUN OF MUSLIMS TOGETHER, ON FACEBOOK, AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS)#!^(&!
how is it a troll to point out that when you do something just because it will piss someone else off, that they are probably going to get pissed off and retaliate? freedom of speech = freedom to be stupid, and facebook users are certainly stupid enough to do what they did.
let's all wait for one of the posters houses to get suicide bombed, then we can all decide if we want to participate in the next "piss off muslims" day.
everything you think is equally irrelevant to me... that was my point.
this world has BORDERS. and those borders are defined by LAWS. in pakistan, mark zuckerberg would probably be killed. they don't care that you don't think that is fair. are you going to step up and kill them instead, or keep playing on your computer in a corner somewhere?
What facebook should be ashamed of is that they bowed to pressure from these lunatics.
i am not a member of facebook... i am not a member of any church... i don't give a shit about you. now then,
where does the value come from facebook? seemingly EVERYONE uses it. the second facebook becomes associated with mean people doing mean things just to be mean, SOME people WILL leave. once that happens, it's game over.
telling facebook they SHOULD be ashamed is no different than telling muslims they SHOULD be ashamed. like i said, ass-backwards idiots.
and what sign does facebook hold to the world? "we're a backwards shithole, filled with idiots who will insult your religion just because they know nothing makes you more mad."
in theory, if the code was perfect, no new commits are required... open source is more about seeing first hand that backdoors don't exist, logic pathways are valid, and the realization that a finished solution requires no further work, and thus demands no continued pricing.
... and in this case, international sports that happen as often as presidential elections and probably have higher combined global ratings than any other single organized short-term series of events. but, you're right... it's just some stupid idea to kick something around for no point other than to do it... and what is the point in that? why would anyone care? why SHOULD anyone care? it should be illegal to report on the outcome of sport. right?
me? i'm telling you my guess for what other people might have been thinking... if anything they are guilty of believing sports are worthy of journalism.
Have you even watched any of these games? Of course the sound increases at exciting points of the game...
maybe his TV has smartsound, or some other technology that attempts to keep the volume relatively stable... i'm sure those chips get pretty hot during these games.
It's similar in level and monotony to running jet engines at full throttle on test stands in the stadium, throughout the entire game. It doesn't add, it detracts.
i would totally agree with you, except just this week, with the bases loaded, casey mcghee was at bat in milwaukee while the blue angles were practicing for the weekend air show... they buzzed the stadium right as the pitcher released the ball and casey was forced to take a called strike, and slammed the bat down in disgust. if there were already constant jet engines running during the game, there would be no chance of that distraction ever happening. it might not make anyone more focused, and probably makes them less focused, but also makes them less susceptible to random distraction, and perhaps completely immunized to it. i think it adds AND detracts... i'm not a fan of them.
i hope not... given the examples at the bottom of the article page, there is no loss of the "es" and complete removal of the buzz. the bbc article was wrong. the german sound engineers, using consumer electronics made by korg, were successful.
was at a bar watching a brewers game while the world cup was on the other tv... very annoying. i claimed it would be simple to filter it out, and confused why broadcasters weren't already doing it. no one else cared.
it makes sense you're confused... my entire point was that it can be confusing. i think "the value is unbounded" is significantly less complicated than "the value can be arbitrarily large" because the former doesn't make use of adverbs.
i did a general pornography detection filter as a final project in an image processing class my senior year of undergraduate college... their best hope is around 90% detection with ~15% false positives. for the applications i was shooting for, that wasn't acceptable... for chatroulette, it might be, but even at 95% you're still getting 1/20th of the dicks. if most people on the network are dicks, that might still mean getting a dick almost every time. might as well just start selling boner pills and embrace your market rather than attempt to squash it.
Slashdot Mirror
hilarious.
So, what kind of sign does the whole Draw Muhammad thing hold to the world? Maybe something like "we value freedom of speech and aren't going to let some religious fundamentalists shut us up."
and herein lies the problem... muhammad wouldn't even exist if those religious fundamentalists didn't exist... the only reason they're making fun of muhammad is because muslims threaten to kill people that do. so you may think the claim is "we aren't going to let them", when actually it is being heard as "go ahead and try, i'm right here"
keep instigating. it's a really good idea that really smart people really really like.
keep poking the muslims, who you claim are not peaceful, with a stick and see what happens. that sounds like a really good idea. lets ALL do it! LETS ALL GO ON FACEBOOK TOGETHER! LETS ALL GO MAKE FUN OF MUSLIMS TOGETHER, ON FACEBOOK, AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS)#!^(&!
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
you are NOTHING.
let's all wait for one of the posters houses to get suicide bombed, then we can all decide if we want to participate in the next "piss off muslims" day.
The point is that facebook should be ashamed, but not for the reasons that you suggest.
i didn't suggest they should be ashamed OR suggest any reasons.
you are NOTHING.
this world has BORDERS. and those borders are defined by LAWS. in pakistan, mark zuckerberg would probably be killed. they don't care that you don't think that is fair. are you going to step up and kill them instead, or keep playing on your computer in a corner somewhere?
you are NOTHING.
What facebook should be ashamed of is that they bowed to pressure from these lunatics.
i am not a member of facebook... i am not a member of any church... i don't give a shit about you. now then,
where does the value come from facebook? seemingly EVERYONE uses it. the second facebook becomes associated with mean people doing mean things just to be mean, SOME people WILL leave. once that happens, it's game over.
telling facebook they SHOULD be ashamed is no different than telling muslims they SHOULD be ashamed. like i said, ass-backwards idiots.
so the difference between us is that we're all equally as bad...
ur mums face is ugly.
"we're a backwards shithole, filled with idiots who will insult your religion just because they know nothing makes you more mad."
kill them all.
17-18 years ago it did... maybe they just rounded.
if they sell stuff, they expect you to sell their stuff to your audience.... presumably for a cut of the profit.
in theory, if the code was perfect, no new commits are required... open source is more about seeing first hand that backdoors don't exist, logic pathways are valid, and the realization that a finished solution requires no further work, and thus demands no continued pricing.
just as offtopic or irrelevant as pointing out that broadcasting location makes life less private.
eating food lowers hunger
... and in this case, international sports that happen as often as presidential elections and probably have higher combined global ratings than any other single organized short-term series of events. but, you're right... it's just some stupid idea to kick something around for no point other than to do it... and what is the point in that? why would anyone care? why SHOULD anyone care? it should be illegal to report on the outcome of sport. right?
... so he posted the flaw online.
i'm pleased with him that he did.
me? i'm telling you my guess for what other people might have been thinking... if anything they are guilty of believing sports are worthy of journalism.
nah, they understood... i think it was more a respect for accurately representing what was happening at the game...
Have you even watched any of these games? Of course the sound increases at exciting points of the game...
maybe his TV has smartsound, or some other technology that attempts to keep the volume relatively stable... i'm sure those chips get pretty hot during these games.
It's similar in level and monotony to running jet engines at full throttle on test stands in the stadium, throughout the entire game. It doesn't add, it detracts.
i would totally agree with you, except just this week, with the bases loaded, casey mcghee was at bat in milwaukee while the blue angles were practicing for the weekend air show... they buzzed the stadium right as the pitcher released the ball and casey was forced to take a called strike, and slammed the bat down in disgust. if there were already constant jet engines running during the game, there would be no chance of that distraction ever happening. it might not make anyone more focused, and probably makes them less focused, but also makes them less susceptible to random distraction, and perhaps completely immunized to it. i think it adds AND detracts... i'm not a fan of them.
i hope not... given the examples at the bottom of the article page, there is no loss of the "es" and complete removal of the buzz. the bbc article was wrong. the german sound engineers, using consumer electronics made by korg, were successful.
was at a bar watching a brewers game while the world cup was on the other tv... very annoying. i claimed it would be simple to filter it out, and confused why broadcasters weren't already doing it. no one else cared.
it makes sense you're confused... my entire point was that it can be confusing. i think "the value is unbounded" is significantly less complicated than "the value can be arbitrarily large" because the former doesn't make use of adverbs.
i did a general pornography detection filter as a final project in an image processing class my senior year of undergraduate college... their best hope is around 90% detection with ~15% false positives. for the applications i was shooting for, that wasn't acceptable... for chatroulette, it might be, but even at 95% you're still getting 1/20th of the dicks. if most people on the network are dicks, that might still mean getting a dick almost every time. might as well just start selling boner pills and embrace your market rather than attempt to squash it.
the value can be arbitrarily large.
the value can arbitrarily be large.