A very real time control system I designed for an F1 car rebooted about every 60ms, by design. If there was some combination of conditions that screwed the pooch, it's ok. The conditions would change and the thing would reboot within 60ms.
Reliable systems have to cope with the idea that software is unreliable.
I used to work in an F1 team. Trust me, some of the parts are fragile. The trick is to find them before you get to a race and to make good tradeoffs between fragility, weight and weight distribution.
Science is pretty darned useful actually. Guarantees are few, but the overwhelming evidence of serial correlation in the world about us suggests that there's an objective reality outside our heads and it's worth looking at to see how it works.
It's not a 'either way' thing. Your construction of God is extremely unlikely. That the universe is as we see it is far more likely. Hanging onto wrong and worse, promoting it as the truth is evil.
Slashdot Mirror
It love your extreme specificity. "Up", "plentiful", "an amazing rate", "almost certain".
My trip home from work will take "a few" minutes.
How many skyrockets did the world count?
I was referring to the writing on the wall, not the cake in the basement.
Do keep up.
>The_Cake
False
But they're all unsupported by evidence. So it doesn't matter.
I went with the standard Western Monotheistic model, since he said God, not gods or the godhead.
To be fair, you could spend $100k on a Merc or a BMW and get something that looks like a $40k Merc or BMW but is less reliable.
>What the hell is wrong with having a well-coded, responsive design website?
It doesn't work offline.
Dr Spock parents Mr Spock
Because drop bars suck big donkey balls if you're not trying go as fast as possible.
A very real time control system I designed for an F1 car rebooted about every 60ms, by design.
If there was some combination of conditions that screwed the pooch, it's ok. The conditions would change and the thing would reboot within 60ms.
Reliable systems have to cope with the idea that software is unreliable.
I used to work in an F1 team. Trust me, some of the parts are fragile. The trick is to find them before you get to a race and to make good tradeoffs between fragility, weight and weight distribution.
>Reminds me of amateur materials
It's hard to find a good pony-tailed adobe jockey with clearance.
There is no good theology. We already established that.
I think he needs to explain that. I'm not in his head.
>Which facts are being attacked here?
They're not being attacked. They're being neutralized. Read the parent.
Assange is a dick. Therefore murdering journalists is ok.
There is no logical connection between the two.
Been there. Done that. The book is on my shelf.
Science is pretty darned useful actually. Guarantees are few, but the overwhelming evidence of serial correlation in the world about us suggests that there's an objective reality outside our heads and it's worth looking at to see how it works.
>"as we see it" may just be a local maximum reversal of entropy that is entirely overwhelmed by the chaos elsewhere in the universe.
But that's exactly what we see.
I don't see why not.
It's not a 'either way' thing. Your construction of God is extremely unlikely. That the universe is as we see it is far more likely. Hanging onto wrong and worse, promoting it as the truth is evil.
Indeed.
What's so hard about EBNF?
It seems pretty simple to me.
He should have spent some time trimming the fat out of Lord of the Rings. It was too long.