Slashdot Mirror
NSA and GHCQ Employing Shills To Poison Web Forum Discourse
Advocatus Diaboli writes with this excerpt from an article by Glenn Greenwald on the pervasiveness of shills poisoning web forums: "One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. It's time to tell a chunk of that story, complete with the relevant documents.. ... Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the Internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: 'false flag operations' (posting material to the Internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting 'negative information' on various forums."
I guess Cryptome was right. Check out the the training materials provided to future forum spies.
This message paid for by the NSA.
How many of the comments on this article will be from shills?
It is all a lie
I saw something about this the other day, and simply figured I'd stumbled across Prison Planet or something similar... any suggestion that it isn't feels really creepy.
Seen the Snowden character assassination even here on Slashdot. "Look at that traitor with the dodgy face, not the highly unconstitutional government surveillance program which basically takes a huge dump over your privacy rights!"
Not that it would do much good here, but God bless 'em for tryin'!
Governments have been doing this for a very long time, the only difference now is the media in which it is delivered.
Previously it was the newspaper and radio, now it is the Internet. Playbook stayed the same.
What better way to disrupt an online forum than make its layout unusable - like beta?
These agencies are tasked with protecting YOUR rights not eroding them. Would you prefer to live in constant fear, as if in Israel? Syria? Egypt? Iran? Pakistan? Mexico? China? North Korea? New Jersey? I didn't think so. Instead of berating you SHOULD be clapping a well-done!
Not from the NSA or that other one. Really. Not.
As far as I know this has been happening all along by anyone with an agenda, I'd bet even Greenwald is guilty of it from time to time. Hell, the NSA is probably learning a lot about the best way to do it by monitoring the internet.
we unchosens (pretend you're not one of us if it suits you) have been here numerous times Ihttp://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=unrepentant&sm=3? so http://youtu.be/RnOXkedBmRs here we are again...
Slashdot only allows anonymous users to post 10 times per day (more or less, depending on moderation). A user from your IP has already shared his or her thoughts with us that many times almost
But cold fjord told us his bosses didn't pay him to shill. Apparantely, he just whores himself out for free.
Shill.
Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
Seems to have missed out on recent election results, that man.
Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
Ironically, the Russians (that gave Snowden shelter) have been doing that same thing for as long as Internet is available there.
This made me wonder if they have a team of volunteer zealots working in church basements or paying an Indian call center troll slashdot inbetween calls.
Also, do you think years ago the Chinese hacked an NSA directors workstation, stole his 10 year plan, and got the Great Firewall of China first to market?
Has anyone actually looked at the slides? To me, they appear so completely, laughably fake. Reminds me of amateur materials for spy / sci-fi role playing dice and books games from the 80s.
Now tell me that I am a shill for discrediting these obviously genuine training materials.
Lots of things I read, from Master and Command to Bourne trilogy, Baroque Cycle, etc., leads me to believe that our governments do employ people just to engage in random malicious acts. Acts which have no particular motivation, no plan; just people doing bad things for no reason.
I guess just to keep everyone on their toes? Why else?
But that's not how I want my tax dollars spent. It just rubs me the wrong way, morally.
It's time to stop. We don't live in the early 19th century. It's time to stop acting like it.
Why waste a bullet when you can label someone a rapist, narcissist, child molester, etc.--and then threaten all their friends into bad-mouthing them, disparaging them online, and so on?
SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
Why should corporate shills get all the good times? Those in the public sector deserve their fair share.
Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
So the NSA invented beta and is pushing it on us to get us to leave this source of information??
I knew beta was EVIL!
Just point them to Usenet, comp.os.linux.advocacy.
well. that would explain why maharishi mahesh yogi was accused of all sorts of things. and why various scientists get "discredited". it would be interesting to consider how best to counteract these measures, although Mr Maharishi Bounces-on-the-Mattress Mahesh Yogi had a tactic that seemed to work: ignore them....
The government is the source of all the false information on the internet?
I knew it. People couldn't be that dumb.
vi? Who's that?
The notion that shills are poisoning the discourse itself poisons the discourse. Shouldn't we then treat whoever brings forward this notion as a troll?
It's not just the NSA. It's evident in forums across the web that there is quick, coordinated trolling of any discussion of climate change or health insurance - the main targets of the Koch Bros' web of disinformation front groups.
What remains to be seen is whether the Koch Bros' fronts and the NSA are allies in these efforts to poison the watering holes, sharing techniques and perhaps even operatives. There's clear evidence the NSA has spied for American industrial interests, for instance against Petrobas in Brazil, which competes against some of the Koch Bros' firms.
"with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
The NSA is in trouble for domestic spying. Are the targets here domestic? If not, then they are just doing their job.
How many of the comments on this article will be from shills?
None. GHCQ nor any of u...them at the NSA do thi...that kind of thing. The security agencies are business finding threats to national security and the power elite....scratch that last one ....we can't be honest here. Fill in some non-sense about balancing freedom and security. That should keep the plebes fighting among themselves and confused further.
-AC
:DBNR
It's GCHQ, but we all knew that, right?
Seen the Snowden character assassination even here on Slashdot. "Look at that traitor with the dodgy face, not the highly unconstitutional government surveillance program which basically takes a huge dump over your privacy rights!"
What you've just stated is a "dodgy fact." Apparently you can invent pretty much any claim about the constitution, the actual law be damned.
You mean that abomination the PATRIOT Act? That law? The one written by Republicans, supported by the Democrats, signed into law by George W. Bush used with gusto and is still being used with gusto by Obama? That law?
And what about the Fourth Amendment - you know, all that stuff about unlawful searches and seizures - the US Constitution - THE LAW of the LAND is being torn to shreds by corrupt politicians and supported by cowards?
The NSA would never use shills to alter and/or direct web discussions. Most citizens of the western world misunderstand the intelligence enterprise as it relates to counter-terrorism, which contributes to the NSA's limited ability to develop necessary anticipatory knowledge to mitigate risks, or respond to emerging threats. People who insinuate that there are NSA shills on web forums demonstrate a clear affinity and tendency to support for the cyber-terrorists that infiltrate our webspace.
I am Audience.
At best federal agencies hope to sway public opinion. they dont want you to do what they tell you, but rather to want to do what they tell you. the government predicates their position upon the conviction that online forums are no different than a public forum, which could not be further from the truth. Tea Party 'town halls' are a prime example of the FUD and disinformation tactic being used to disrupt a political group in power. Its a functional effort to turn civil discourse into a cattle car by injecting audience that stand, scream, and then immediately sit or defend pointless illogical opinions to run down the clock.
the internet interperets ignorance, malice, and poorly defined opinions and conjecture as spam, and has for 15 years honed tools and systems in online forums to ensure. the 50 clandestine posters in a free software forum defending SOPA or PIPA will, nearly instantaneously, be downvoted to oblivion in a system which is very much designed to keep the topic of discussion of relevance. systems like karma and abuse tracking dont exist in meatspace forums, but these are tools which members can use to shut down abusers or track malicious participants who abuse the tools as well. and finally its worth nothing to poison one forum when in its place dissuaded or frustrated posters can erect 10 more. mobility is a moot concern on the internet; a luxury meatspace forums just dont have.
Good people go to bed earlier.
We don't feed trolls. Even trolls with an official stamp.
But then maybe I'm a shill. Or maybe I'm a victim of shills. Or maybe I'm just biased and easily led because I think that GG is thoroughly intellectually dishonest in at least some of the statements that he does put his own name on.
BTW: If you care to read that one through, it culminates with the best smackdown I remember seeing.
Assume that this report is true (I note that this is not the first time that we have heard this sort of thing) and take the NSA/GCHQ aims at face value and desirable: ie that they are acting to prevent harm to people in their respective countries.
What they appear to be doing is to damage some innocent people to prevent harm to some other people. I can understand that this might be a trade off that is worth paying - paid by the innocent people. I am far from convinced that this trade off is right or moral; but for the sake of this argument - I will accept it.
So: we have an equation, it is worth it if: Number-of-people-protected > Number-of-people-harmed.
It is, of course, more complicated. The above assumes that the amount of harm is the same in each case, this will not be true. Arguably the worst harm is someone being killed. There are lesser harms to individuals: financial loss, loss of reputation, damage to personal relationships (estrangement from families, divorce, ...), loss of liberty - these all seem to be results of the sort of tactics that the article talks about.
The difficult part is ranking the harms, so how much financial loss is equivalent to loss of liberty or death ? Cleverer people that me might be able to come up with a rough ranking.
There is also the general harm to society that is caused by gumming up free discussion and exchange of information.
Once we have done all of the equations: are we, as a society, better or worse off ? This is the big question.
The other question is: who is better off ? I said ''society'', but is that who this is really who benefits, might it not be politicians, powerful business people, those who work at NSA/GCHQ ? If those who suffer from these actions are different from those who gain - the cost equation changes depending on which camp you find yourself.
I note that some of these same tactics are also used by some large corporates who wish to protect their profits or confine knowledge of their wrong doing.
So: can anyone come up with a cost/benefit analysis, please ?
The slideshow has to be the real thing. Too much thought in it. Especially look at those last few slides. So why is it that we have an NSA again?
Whether it be governments or corporations or trolls, there will always be posters with less than the best intentions.
The ever reliable cold fjord, bringing the gospel of his masters to the unwashed masses. Taking a break from sucking your boss's cock?
I was just thinking, if I wanted to create enough fear that our my enemies would be looking over their shoulders everytime they used the internet, nothing would work better than creating the belief that I was omnipresent on the web. One the one side, people are certain that the government in incapable of managing the simplest of programs or managing it's own affairs, but when given the notion that that same government could orchestrate a massive campaign of internet monitoring and targeted strikes again individuals, most seem to have no doubt of it's validity. Every other week there is a new revelation of the widening scope of the NSA powers to peer into every aspect of our lives and yet when asked, people still believe that same government is buying $400 toilet seats. Perhaps the biggest conspiracy is that the NSA isn't omnipresent, but wants you to think they are.
Right now the social networks are flooded with alleged "discoveries of fraud", according to which the opposition is spreading pictures from protests elsewhere as being from Venezuela right now. It's interesting that the original photos are very easy to find in the internet, but the ones supposedly shared by the venezuelan opposition are nowhere.
Either the venezuelan opposition is dumb enough to get pictures that are widely available and spread them as their own or there's some seeding taking place in hopes that the opposition will get framed by spreading a false pic that was given to them by someone else.
and its called, damage control.
So how is the Teacher Pet project going?
, and most importantly - self restraint - seem to be missing from intelligence services. This has always been the case.
The difference today is that we pretend we're in a "war on terror" because if you don't pretend it's an active war, you can't even begin to justify the ridiculous kinds of constitutional subversion and 'National Socialist' behavior that would make a WWII veteran pick up his rifle and start shooting (probably beginning with Congress.)
It's really pretty simple. America has always been a country with flaws, but at least we didn't promulgate torture as policy, we didn't systematically suspend habeas corpus. We may have always been pretty shallow on the greed and capitalism side of things all along, but we've always aspired to be better.
Now, because 3000 people died on 9/11 because some a**hole wanted to change America, we torture people and call it enhanced interrogation, we detain people (even American citizens) without any form of due process or the hope of habeas corpus, the government actively spies on its own citizens, government bodies lie to Congress without being censured, our government routinely lies to the American people about what is actually happening during drone strikes, we now attack people inside sovereign countries on a regular basis without that country's permission or knowledge, we have a 'homeland security' (how jingoistic and propagandist is the term 'homeland' in that phrase? LOL) The 4th amendment has been corrupted so that anyone can be searched at any time for no discernible reason at all. Last but not least, you can now, apparnetly, order the death of an American citizen without any form of due process at all by perverting the "clear and present danger" rationale.
Congratulations Usama you f***ing c*nt, you managed to change America. Not that it will benefit the Islamic world in any way, you've simply changed our government into the government you always thought it was, to the detriment of both America and the rest of the world (especially the Muslim world.)
Loading...
Do not rule out the possibility that Snowden and Assange are shills.
Assange has done so much damage to freedom of information that personally I have little doubt he is a 'double agent'.
and GCHQ being aware of it. Then GCHQ conning the government, then the government the people.
So they took a play from M$'s book and what the M$ shills have been doing here for more than a decade?
Is it just me, or do others feel that the quality (heh) of Slashdot discussions has deteriorated over the years? Maybe I'm just an old curmudgeon, but it seems like there has been a perceptible infiltration of shills. Will everyone posting on behalf of the Nominal Security Authority please raise your hand?
Sheesh.
The referenced source document (https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/) uses the abbreviations GBR and NZL for two of the members of the Five Eyes community. I worked at one of those five establishments (retired before 1998) and for all of the the 28 years during which I worked there, the standard abbreviations were UK and NZ, as in
CANUKUS Eyes Only and
AUSCANUKUSNZ Eyes Only.
I wonder who wrote the source document and why the standard abbreviations weren't used.
another report from the university of the bleedin obvious. next will be that some gay journos suddenly find themselves persona non grata. when will these idiots learn,if you can imagine it,its already being done or has been tried in the past. then again,everything seems to suprise americans,they will start panicing soon when one of them realises that the sun comes up in a different place and a different time everyday.
FUCK BETA HARD
So: can anyone come up with a cost/benefit analysis, please ?
For the NSA/CIA, the Koch-brother sponsored right wing zealot groups, etc. the cost benefit analysis is quite simple.
Does it benefit the NSA/CIA/Koch Bro groups and their agendas, directly or indirectly, even a little? If so, do it. If not, don't. There is undoubtably a risk analysis component (how likely are we to get caught?) but the general pattern seems to be to do what they like and rely on their ability to destory the reputation of any people of good conscience who stand up against them, much less report their malfeasance.
What is particularly disturbing about this is the lengths to which they are willing to go, the degree of negative-sum activities they are willing to engage in (they don't mind engaging in massively destructive activities against others for very modest, even minor gains, where the negative impact to their oponents, society or the world dwarfs their own miniscule gains), and the degree of silence from otherwise "good persons" who nearly always opt to do (and say) nothing. It reminds me of the old post-WW II adage which concludes "and when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out" (paraphrased).
The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
Russia is doing this sort of thing pretty extensively. On one of the national forums I happen to frequent we know who these people are - in fact, they are not really in hiding (though they never officially confirm or deny their identity). Human psychology works in curious ways, though - even though the perpetrators are well known, the rest of the community still gets into extensive discourse that includes these people and even allows them to steer discussion in whatever direction they need to. I have to give it to these guys - they are well prepared and master mass psychology quite well.
They can't put anything on the Internet that isn't true!
I thought the Internet was for porn and pseudo truth...who knew people take this stuff seriously? They can post all the lies they want about me... the beauty of the Internet is, you can just hit the power switch.
Sounds like the Rules for Radicals are being turned against the radicals lol.
I just find it interesting that cryptome is blocked on DOD networks.
Sorry to break it to you but we have very rarely held the moral high ground. We systematically killed off the Native Americans. We locked the Japanese in internment camps. We carried out medical and military experiments on US citizens and military personnel without their consent or knowledge. Some of these people died and it took decades for the Government to apologize to the families of the victims. Our government put MLK on surveillance, planned to discredit him and smear him in the public eye. The CIA facilitated drug trafficking. Our government hatched plans to attack US cities to try to drum up support for an invasion of Cuba. The US has a long and rich history of violating human rights in the name of security.
TL;DR: We have been doing this shit for a long long time. Because of our dominance we get to write the history books and therefore your average person is ignorant of the crimes of the US government. It would disturb the general population so they just don't discuss it. Anyone who would care already knows, anyone who doesn't already know probably wouldn't care.
Whatever this piece of shit ColdFjord claims, you can count on a number of things :
1) It is a lie, either in whole or in part.
2) It was written to serve the purpose of the government.
3) It was written by a US government employee who has stated numerous
times that Snowden deserves to be punished. This alone means the enemy
is among is here at Slashdot, and this enemy deserves no tolerance.
4) Slashdot itself is most likely being paid by the US government to tolerate this
crap. Therefore the best days of Slashdot are OVER, even if you don't mind Beta.
It's really pretty simple. America has always been a country with flaws, but at least we didn't promulgate torture as policy, we didn't systematically suspend habeas corpus.
The domestic police departments used to routinely beat people. Until not that long ago, lead slaps/saps were nearly universal among police officers and beatings used as a means of summary justice and extracting confessions. And this was for domestic criminal law enforcement. The tactics were even more severe for breaking strikes, suppressing civil dissent (Chicago, 1968?) and race riots.
I think the idea that violence hasn't been used until five minutes ago by those in power to further their goals is ludicrous. We've just adjusted who is eligible to be beaten.
why worry about it? after all, we are so free today!!
why just the other day it was pointed out how free we truly are.
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...
Standard herd psychology instructs us that you only need to control a relatively small percentage of the perceived crowd support in order to sway the behavior of the whole herd.
You can see this in effect here. When AGW comes up, the tone of the discussion tends to swing either one way or the other after a brief period at the start where it is determined which camp will dominate. After that point, people with opposing views will more often stay quiet for fear of being mobbed by group consensus, and those in the majority feel confident in mobbing.
Take a look at the whole Slashdot Beta outcry. When more than half the posts were complaining about Beta, the Slashdot lords actually responded.
But these are just pocket instances. In the context of the whole internet and society at large, a highly consolidated stance in one forum will be counterbalanced by the opposite view in another.
Cohesive group consensus across the whole of a large population becomes very unlikely, and the decision makers can simply follow their agendas without worrying about large blocks of public opinion forming which might actually result in real pressure to stop them.
Mobs need to feel like a mob to act like a mob. When you keep a herd factional through the injection of artificial objections, the mob never coalesces into something which gets out of control.
There are whole disinfo thrusts designed just to promote stupid, argumentative view points in order to confuse any given issue. Confusion prevents herds from stampeding.
Then, when the leadership really wants something to happen, (like a war), the media kicks into overdrive to create the impression of a cohesive message and the confused cattle follow because their own ability to decide amongst themselves has been so exhausted and the need to move in SOME direction due to a high state of anxiety is overwhelming. -And that state of high anxiety is maintained through a variety of controlled pressures.
The system works really well, as we have seen. The oligarchs haven't been stymied at all in their activities. They got all the wars they wanted and maintain control to this day.
It means we can't trust people on the internet. This should come as no surprise. Experienced internet users already know not to take things at face value, not to feed trolls, and not to take anyone's "word for it". In civil, learned communities (like Slashdot, for example) a "shill" is fighting an uphill battle when trying to spread disinformation--anything that's posted here will be carefully examined. Even in volatile, less-learned sites (4chan's /b/, for example), they'll still have to trudge through a hundred miles of skepticism and snark to convince any sizable demographic of any one thing.
I'm not saying "shills" can't be effective on the internet. I'm just saying I'm glad I don't have their job.
Isn't it the dilettante who is too ignorant to see through the shill who ultimately poisons the discourse? The shills are usually hyper-polite. It is the hobbyists who start to amplify the shill's message and get hurt feelings when they are corrected that start with the swearing and personal attacks.
Usenet is much harder to control than web forums, so making it useless by posting endless rubbish would be attractive.
I don't know of any country that holds any 'moral high ground' and there are virtually no countries without a checkered past or present, BUT many of them manage to hold onto their identity through times of crisis and not forget what made them special.
Post 9/11 America is fundamentally different from pre 9/11 America in ways that previous generations of Americans would be (and probably are) horrified by.
We've basically given up many of the things that made us standout (despite our moral outrages.) Due process, habeas corpus, NO torture, the 4th amendment.
I'm not sure what history books you read in school, but mine clearly covered slavery, Native American genocide, racism, sexism, et cetera... College/University went further of course, but high school was pretty thorough about how deeply flawed we (and every other country made up of human beings) had been.
Interestingly, that same education made it clear that post 9/11 America has introduced changes that quite closely mirror changes in 1920/30's in totalitarian governments where those in power fear the truth as the government clearly does now in America, and believe that the end justifies the means.
This one thing alone, I believe, is the antithesis of what I believed America to be based upon - that the ends do NOT justify the means. That how you play the game is more important than the results.
That being true to being an American was more important than if you were killed because of it.
Now, that's criminally easy of me to say without having to offer any sacrifice, but I truly believe that.
"They who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Possibly our greatest American.
Loading...
You apparently ignored the part about it being American policy.
You are also grouping all forms of violence as being the same thing. The police beating an actual suspect during the race riots in 68 could be entirely justified depending upon the context. It could also be entirely unjustified depending upon the context.
Also, I'm not arguing that we've only suddenly started using violence, I'm arguing that we've only suddenly started accepting torture as policy. That we've started accepting unreasonable search and seizure as policy. That we've suddenly allowed the suspension of habeas corpus. That we've suddenly allowed Americans to be killed without being charged with a crime or any form of due process. That we've suddenly allowed the intelligence arms of our government to flat out lie to congress without repercussion. That we've suddenly accepted that our government spies on us extensively in whatever legal means they can AND in clearly illegal means (which are in turn lied about in congressional investigation...)
Loading...
Infiltration, astroturfing and reputation destruction are as old as the hills. Such as this not really amusing story of a Muslim organization turning in a member who was hyping terrorism, only to discover he was an FBI infiltrant:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/2946...
I think such things are to be expected. It sucks, but if you've a security vulnerability in any system, you can expect it to be exploited. The question we should be asking is, can online groups adapt to account for such possibilities, and how?
"The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." George Bernard Shaw
We've basically given up many of the things that made us standout (despite our moral outrages.) Due process, habeas corpus, NO torture, the 4th amendment.
This is the only part that confuses me. You seriously think that we upheld the values of our constitution up to 9/11 and then just threw them out the window? You really think the US Government didn't violate due process and habeas corpus before 9/11? You claim that people of the WWII era would be disgusted with the current state of things. I completely agree. They also would have been disgusted with the state of affairs 50 years ago too if they had knows about it. I guess I just disagree that things got dramatically worse after 9/11. Things have always been very very bad. But as time passes we just forget, gloss over, and move on; we end up romanticizing the past and start pretending the present is much worse.
Unethical Human Experimentation
Eugenics
Torture
Drug Trafficking
It is really important to be critical of our current government. It is also really important not to ignore or forget that our previous governments have violated the constitution and our laws on a massive and criminal scale. Most of the time they acted with impunity.
My daughter has constitutional history and government this year at school (junior high level stuff), I just love the chapter on the First Ammendment and all, I can't believe the teachers, who I actually like because they are awesome people, can teach this with a straight face. They even spoke to the parents about their mock government exercise they'd be doing soon to teach the kids how congress works... during the government shut down. The whole roomful of parents dissolved into nervous laughter at the teacher's statements.
I'll keep my mouth shut while she learns this stuff, but this why it's not worth voting or anything else, we already lost and there's no winning it back. Yeah, I'll keep sending money to the EFF and stuff, they occasionally win one for the good guys, but this myth that voting matters is what's holding us back from actually fixing any of this.
I have no patriotism to teach her, it's all dead. There is still good in the world, even in the US, but there's almost none in the government. We're done here, can't wait to get out. And yes, there are a lot of places that are way better than here, don't fool yourself. I have no intention of trying to hold back the ocean's tide with the other vast minority of folks who really want to fix crap. There's places that are already like I wish the US was, better to go there and contribute my efforts to something that will make a good thing, better.
The organisation is called "GCHQ" not "GHCQ"
This is the only part that confuses me. You seriously think that we upheld the values of our constitution up to 9/11 and then just threw them out the window? You really think the US Government didn't violate due process and habeas corpus before 9/11?
You keep missing the part where I specifically use the term "as policy." I believe there have been incidents of everything imaginable under the sun involving the U.S. government; however, pre-9/11 these were not standard government policy in a time of peace. This is entirely the reason behind the bullsh** title "War on Terror" - it can never ever end, so justification of behaviors that could be potentially stomached as short term aberrations can continue ad nauseum.
The U.S. is not at war with anyone other than itself right now.
Loading...
The organisation is called "GCHQ" not "CHCQ"
I wonder if shills have invented this whole beta controversy
let me see, if they have at least fixed this then it might have been worth the effort, let's try writing Icelandic thorn
It would be far easier for the NSA to destroy Slashdot by buying it, then changing the way the forum works.
That explains Dice and the new slashdot beta!
Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
Still no Icelandic letter support. I'm sure there are even more failures and inefficiencies lurking around every corner like grues.
its almost time, i can't wait.
it wont be pretty but it will be worth it
The obvious next step is to have their friends report them for thoughtcrime.
Just saying...
You keep missing the part where I specifically use the term "as policy." I believe there have been incidents of everything imaginable under the sun involving the U.S. government; however, pre-9/11 these were not standard government policy in a time of peace.
Assmasher I really think we are in near agreement. I guess we just disagree about the definition of the phrase "as policy". If the President condones it, leaders in Congress condone it, the Attorney General condones it, the Joint Chiefs of Staff condone it, the directors of the FBI, CIA, and other 3 letter agencies condone it, then I consider it standard policy of the government. Just because they didn't make a press release announcing they were going to violate the constitution doesn't mean it wasn't the policy of the government to violate the constitution.
This is entirely the reason behind the bullsh** title "War on Terror" - it can never ever end, so justification of behaviors that could be potentially stomached as short term aberrations can continue ad nauseum.
There has always been a war on terror, it was just called something different. Replace terror with communist. Replace terror with drugs. I agree that the US government uses "war on X" to justify criminal acts. I just believe that it started long before 9/11.
The Chinese and Russian intelligence agencies want you to *think* it's the NSA.
Given that Snowden is an obvious KGB double agent he's doing a masterful job of deceiving everyone.
Assmasher I really think we are in near agreement. I guess we just disagree about the definition of the phrase "as policy".
- I agree.
Our primary difference is that I believe that the pervasiveness and solidification into "policy" of the erosion of our basic rights in the name of "security" is significantly different post 9/11 than pre 9/11.
The "Patriot Act" (another horrifically inappropriately titled bill) is a perfect example.
There has always been a war on terror.
- Here I have disagree. My problem with the "war on Terror" is that it can never be won or finished, and that's why they chose it. This is why it was never termed the "war on Al Qaeda" because the administration that established it doesn't want there to be a quantifiable measurement that could signify the end of the "war on..." It's a crude attempt to legitimize what is basically a 'martial law' style approach to suspending and re-interpreting hugely important aspects of the Constitution.
Loading...
Now that the progressives are in charge?
http://slashdot.org/~daveschroeder
wake up masher sounds like you've drinking a bit too much of that constitutional kool-aid all "democracies" have been screwing over their citizens from day 1. this just didn't happen under Obama's watch and blaming him is weak cop out.
here is a good example that Chomsky uses at http://www.salon.com/2013/12/2...
"So, for example, if you go back a century ago, right after the U.S. invasion of the Philippines — a brutal invasion that killed a couple hundred thousand people — there was a problem for the U.S. of pacification afterwards. What do you do to control the population to prevent another nationalist uprising? There’s a very good study of this by Alfred McCoy, a Philippines scholar at University of Wisconsin, and what he shows is that the U.S. used the most sophisticated technology of the day to develop a massive system of survelliance, control, disruption to undermine any potential opposition and to impose very tight controls on the population which lasted for a long time and in many ways the Philippines is still suffering from this. But he also points out the technology was immediately transferred home. Woodrow Wilson’s administration used it in their “Red Scare” a couple years later. The British used it, too."
pick any period in history and these power hungry cunts have always been trying to stay in power no matter what. I haven't got any answers just know that what we call democracy is not working because it always allows the people in power to get away with shit.
The best way to fight trolling and character assassination is not to engage in it yourself. And to totally discount anyone who does. And to demand evidence. It hardly seems necessary in /. to remind people how easy it is create fake web sites, blogs, whatever. This kind of sabotage only works if you let it.
Depends on the presenter, really. It's hard to tell exactly what was being represented by some of the graphics/images without knowing what the presenter was saying.
You can't believe anything Lamer has posted. I read that he eats baby seals and hates children. I personally have been a victim of his false accusations regarding a flock of sheep. He is actively destroying the environment by pouring barrels of oil into the rivers and salting farm fields. He wears bloomers under his clothes.
@Alain Williams: "What they appear to be doing is to damage some innocent people to prevent harm to some other people"
What they are doing is damaging innocent people in order to prevent the truth coming out about the criminal activities of NSA/GCHQ. Specifally targeting online activism, bombarding individual phones with bogus msgs, setting up honey-traps, write fake blogs, send forged msgs to colleagues, neighbours, friends, ruin relationships.
Don't get me wrong, I don't blame Obama - although he's not doing enough to reverse this trend and is, in fact, establishing some new ones (targeted killings of American citizens without charging them with a crime.)
The start of all this I blame on neo-conservatism which has a fundamental tenet of using fear to get what you want. That doesn't make the Bush administration entirely responsible because we stood by and let it happen.
We're not a demoncracy anyhow, we're an oligarchy now (and have been in the 19th century as well) thanks to the idiocy of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
Loading...
It would be easy to avoid if people stop spending the majority of their communicative lives online, and post less. Rather, have forums read more like open source coding comments, thus the onus falls on the individual to investigate whether something is feasible or not, and weather or not a follow up statement must be made.
I was privileged, several years ago, to go from several years exposure to U.S. commercial broadcasting with its entertainment media advertising to observe the beginnings of European commercial broadcasting, with advertising appearing as a new phenomenon. To me the credulity of the European advertisement audience was striking, a bit shocking, really, in fact, I was a bit worried by it, especially in the wake of my personal efforts to warn and explain. Callous built up quickly, however, and it was not long before the European exposed to commercial advertising was as cynical and disbelieving as his and her United States counterparts. In general, I am happy to report, meaning my few explanation and warning efforts were not a significant factor. In fact, I was usually disbelieved, and so heard, "hey, you were right." after, instead of "I learnt from you."
I think we can look for the same exponential curve to cynicism in the present case, as netters learn to come the nits and lice out of their net-fare.
It would be nice to get paid to do what I can't stop myself from doing anyway.
Oh ... would I have to take a drug test?
There is a problem. You are essentially revisiting the foundations of freedom and democracy. This isn't bad exactly, after all fundamental civics still have value. As an educational tool if nothing else.
No, the issue is that modern democracies were founded as a reaction to systems of rule that employed exactly these tactics: Secret courts, Star Chambers, capricious rule by a tiny elite, lack of accountability and fairness, rules that changed "just because" the person in charge changed, or simply changed their mind, or the rules became inconvenient.
What were monarchies in the 14th and 15th centuries have now become secret, unaccountable, capricious and self-interested spy agencies. It's a different mechanism of gaining and holding power but the interests and purposes are the same.
You can revisit the principles of the French and US Revolutions, and the evolution of Britain to a democracy. What you'll learn is that we don't want to go back to those systems. And in certain ways we have allowed ourselves to be pushed/scared into doing exactly that. It's not a question of "how many free people can we afford to damage in order to secure the nation." The issue is that harming those free people damages the nation.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The way to protect yourself from such evil government
tactics is to always digitally sign your post. The
program GentleGPG has this ability. Just 'Retreive'
you message into the window and click the Sign button.
It will be digitally signed like this message. All
other messages in your name will bedeniable.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=1LLp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Interjection of false data? Attacking non-believers and discrediting them?
So, we're saying that the NSA is behind Global Warming?
You seem to have missed out on recent redistricting.
Don't worry, you will learn to love your local gerrymander, in time. It's totally in your best interests!
Frankly, if they still don't get that abusing the hand that feeds them tax dollars isn't in America's best interest, then they don't deserve to be an organization. Let the CIA and FBI pick up their responsibilities and disolve the NSA altogether. They are a waste of money, a waste of manpower, and are wasting our liberties.
This is exactly what the FBI and CIA would do to people in this country, they tried to destroy MLK-Jr in the press by going around saying he was an extremist/communist, and they did this with several other people [the list is too long for this posting], including reporters who tried to find out why the White House and other agencies were doing these smear tactics.
All I'm saying and trying to do here is get younger people and older people to realize this stuff is nothing new.
I'm not going to give out citations on this because is has been public fact for years, and now your going to complain about the NSA using these same tactics, they adopted from the FBI, and CIA to smear or discredit someone, as a waste of time and money, as well as being a complete violation of civil rights!
Yes the NSA is suppose to be monitoring for these "terrorists" threats, but so was the FBI and CIA and look at there histories and they went far beyond what they were supposedly for.
Know them by the newness of the accounts, and the talking points, oh those fucking talking points.
Was the author a shill or an inventor ?
Shut up and drink your Cool Aid !
Mmmmm...Grape !
See you in camp !
Did Greenwald just say that if you disagree with him, Snowden, or Snowden's pals in the PRC and former USSR you're a "government shill"?
I'd note, by the way, that injecting misinformation into "stolen government documents" after the fact isn't only a piece of cake, it's old hat.
Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
Recently I have started thinking why there's this much hustle about the NSA. I know what happened, I mean they don't seem unhappy,nor worried. It's not possible that the NSA had been so unvisible, and after 2-3 mistakes (however huge) get so much exposed, & the Authority does nothingto protect them & get them behind the curtain again. As I see, they're up to something. They must have been creating a huge Power Empire that 1. They don't need the NSA much longer; 2. It's not reasonable to haste to rescue the NSA; 3. The NSA has to be immolated to keep all busy, so the new organization can freely grow up & flourish. I think it's time for us to stop blaming a certain one (person, organ, etc) & start to decry the attitude, behaviour, etc that we hated most, in that certain one. This way, the nation may make its way through this darkness, otherwise, I think we will perish, like every other civilization before; they all first fell into darkness & chaos, & then perished.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/05/us/new-inquiry-into-cia-employees-amid-clashes-over-interrogation-program.html?hp
lucky your NSA would never do anything like this
You think the NSA wouldnt do this as well?
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/05/us/new-inquiry-into-cia-employees-amid-clashes-over-interrogation-program.html?hp