Slashdot Mirror


Electric Bikes Get More Elegant Every Year (Video)

Tim Lord first saw Faraday Bicycles at CES, where their bikes drew plenty of attention and a fair amount of media interest. The company ran a successful Kickstarter campaign in 2012, and 2014 is when they are starting to ship their pre-ordered bicycles and hope to get new orders for lots more. Tim's travels later took him to San Francisco, where he had a chance to visit the shop where Faraday bikes are made, and to talk with some of the people who are designing and making them. (If you don't see the video below, please use this link.)

164 comments

  1. Still ugly by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't get why all these electric bikes have you sitting in such an upright position. I don't see why nobody takes an existing touring bike (like a road/racing bike, with drop bars, but a beefier frame and ability to add fenders and panniers), and adds an electric motor to that. With a much more aerodynamic position the motor would be much more efficient, and as most cyclists know, these bikes are much more comfortable anyway. Plus it would be a nice advantage to not have a completely unride-able bike in the case where your battery runs out.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because nobody can see you in traffic and you will be killed. The same reason people do not ride recumbent bikes on city streets.

    2. Re:Still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wouldn't call road/racing bikes comfortable, i find an upright bike much more user friendly. Those racing bikes feel like my butts up in the air and my chin is about to scrape the pavement. How is that more comfortable? Besides being a man i prefer my, ahem, "manliness", un-squished, as happens every time on a road bike.

    3. Re:Still ugly by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      With a much more aerodynamic position the motor would be much more efficient

      With the speed limitations in place for e-bikes in the legislature of many countries?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you want aerodynamic, make it a recumbent. No one except for hard core road racers like the traditional racing position. People like that probably don't want to bother with an electric bike in the first place. Upright is more comfortable for most people, and certain recumbents even moreso.

    5. Re:Still ugly by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I find sitting in an upright position to be far more comfortable.

      But if you want an electric with drop bars, Google is your friend. Here's the first that came up. There are doubtless more.
      http://www.nycewheels.com/bion...

    6. Re:Still ugly by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Informative

      A more efficient motor would mean that the battery could last longer, even if you were limited to low speeds. Speaking of speed limitations though, the literature for the Faraday Porteur says that it has a 350 W motor, which means its too powerful to qualify as an electric bicycle in Europe and many other places. Personally I find that the speed limitations are another big problem. The highest speed limitations I've seen are 32 km/h, which I can easily maintain on my non-electric bike.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:Still ugly by ne0n · · Score: 4, Funny

      No problem, just bolt a giant shark-like fin onto your recumbent so it sticks up into driverspace. Mount LEDs or even lasers to further enhance visibility. Patent pending, of course.

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    8. Re:Still ugly by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I don't get why all these electric bikes have you sitting in such an upright position.

      The racing position is favoured by people who race bikes. Those people wouldn't want an electric bike.

      The upright position is preferred by most people going to work, school etc by bicycle -- there's a better view, and it's more comfortable. Most people aren't bothered by the slight inefficiency, especially if the motor is helping.

    9. Re:Still ugly by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Because drop bars suck big donkey balls if you're not trying go as fast as possible.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    10. Re:Still ugly by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Speaking of battery life, there's no mention of regenerative braking on this thing. That's not going to help much when cycling long-distance, but it will in cities where you'll be accelerating and stopping a lot.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    11. Re:Still ugly by lightBearer · · Score: 1

      If I were designing an electric bike, I'd look at my clientele.

      First, the types of people I find most likely to want an electric are not going to be biking for performance but for practicality and an upright position does several things for you.:

      • Better visibility both for you being able to see and for others being able to see you
      • More comfortable riding position. (sure this is subjective but I ride both and find upright more comfortable)
      • Less frightening for beginners. As someone else said earlier, having your ass up like a cat in heat is not an intuitive position for a beginner

      Second, the mass added by making a bike electric undoes all of the weight savings and aerodynamics provided by having a racing position. It's like those people who ride in all spandex with their sperm-shaped helmet putting panniers on their bike. Why bother? You're counteracting all of the benefits. Might as well be upright, visible and able to look around.

      --
      - No Bounce, No Play -
    12. Re:Still ugly by Bartles · · Score: 2

      Because the target market is the urban, manicured, hipster. Can't you see the natural toned brown leather and creme colored paint? The whole thing is supposed to look like a bicycle that someone found in Aunt Jane's backyard shed. It's not supposed to look cool, comfortable, or modern.

    13. Re:Still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The highest speed limitations I've seen are 32 km/h, which I can easily maintain on my non-electric bike.

      Good for you. I see that you're a very fit cyclist, however, most people are not. Plus, in many parts of the world, like the eastern half of the US in the summer, just pedaling a bike at 10 mph will leave you drenched in sweat in seconds. I think the designer of the bike is targeting commuters who don't have showers at work and who are not extremely fit.

    14. Re:Still ugly by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      A more efficient motor would mean that the battery could last longer, even if you were limited to low speeds.

      It would, and most likely more than any aerodynamic contribution. So would high pressure tires, regenerative energy storage, and driving on quality roads. I think that around 25 km/h, aerodynamics is not likely one of your greatest worries.

      Personally I find that the speed limitations are another big problem. The highest speed limitations I've seen are 32 km/h, which I can easily maintain on my non-electric bike.

      "Big problem?" These are not racing bicycles, and as far as practicality goes, I'm not sure I want to see swathes of people riding around at 40 km/h just because they can.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    15. Re:Still ugly by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      I don't get why all these electric bikes have you sitting in such an upright position.

      Did you actually look at the Porteur? The handlebars are lower on the frame than the seat. That's not exactly an upright position, particularly for a "utility" bike.

      One thing I find odd about this bike is the lack of regenerative braking. Faraday's FAQ notes that "Regenerative braking may be great for cars, but it's not as good for bikes." Anybody know why regenerative braking would be a disadvantage for an electric bike?

    16. Re:Still ugly by SpankiMonki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Speaking of battery life, there's no mention of regenerative braking on this thing.

      Their FAQ claims "Regenerative braking may be great for cars, but it's not as good for bikes." Other e-bikes and the Copenhagen Wheel have regenerative braking, so I wonder if Faraday is making unfounded excuses.

    17. Re:Still ugly by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you wants decent aerodynamics, you don't get a a "traditional" racing bike, you get a recumbent. Recumbents hold the world records for speed by a far margin and it's because they cut the aerodynamic profile in half.

      They are known widely for being way more comfortable than traditional bikes (which is why most exercise bikes these days use 'bent form). You don't get saddle sores from them, but they are much better for your lungs and midsection as well, as bending down in the proper form in racing bikes practically crushes your middle. So I don't get your comfort assertion at all.

      Of course, recumbents often are bigger and that's a down side, as well as visibility being a factor (the aerodynamic win trades off with being lower to the ground). And the ability to "hop" over objects. Uphill is reportedly tougher but I find that is more with newcomers because recumbents exercise different muscles, particularly midsection, and endurance comes from riding a long time.

      I think a lot of the bad characteristics of recumbents is mitigated in the "crank forward" design of recumbents, which is a hybrid of the traditional frame of the bicycle and recumbent - pushing the crank forward like the name suggests, elongating the frame slightly but still being high enough and able to jump objects.

      Google images has a ton of crank forward bikes to view.

      As to the topic, I've been looking into a 1500 watt scooter. Can stand or sit. Can go up serious hills. Looks possibly small enough that I can take mass transit without them bitching about my luggage. Has a 20+ mile range, a little more if I don't go all out. Since it can go 35+ miles, 15 more than I'm willing to go on a scooter of that type, I think I can exceed that easily.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

      I would consider it seriously if my area rained a lot less than it does, like if I lived in Arizona. $1500 is still a lot, but compared to 5 or 10 years back, leaps ahead of what I could have gotten.

      Previously, I was considering a gas powered Sym Symba (a Honda Super Cub remake) but I think that costs $3K, and only goes 45mph. With the electric scooter, I can go on bike paths, but on this, I would have to take roads, and that is too slow plus I would have to get a motorcycle license.

    18. Re:Still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I lived in Florida, I started bicycling the Pinellas Trail in August, where at 97 degrees and 97% humidity, standing still in the shade leaves you drenched in sweat. Riding the bike was actually better because at least you were moving and there was a breeze. I typically averaged 15 MPH over my ride, and I was not fit (but I did have a good bike).

      This was for weekend recreational riding however; your points about commuting are completely valid. I did manage it here in Chicago over one summer, but it was only about a 10-minute ride, so if I paced myself I didn't get that hot. That was the best commute ever: 15 minutes door-to-desk, got to ride, secured garage bike parking... *sigh*

      So what's the point of all this? I like stories.

    19. Re:Still ugly by hey! · · Score: 1

      You can certainly add a conversion kit to a frame of your choice -- they're out there for well under $1000.

      I think the reason for the upgright position is that it appeals to people without any experience bikes. I suspect that's the target market: people who find the idea of bikes appealing but are intimidated by being the motor.

      I used to be a regular bike commuter riding about 120-150 miles/week, but when I got a job with a 100+ mile round trip commute I gave it up. When I turned 50 I hadn't been on a bike in fifteen years and confess I did some thinking about an electric bike as a way to get back into it. Instead I bought a folding bike with the idea I could mix public transit and cycling, only to discover, low and behold, that despite being older and fatter, my legs still work well enough. Soon I was going on twenty or thirty mile rides with no motor assist wanted, even on the hills. Young people may blast by me on the hills, but one of the bonuses of age is I don't give a damn as long as I'm having fun.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    20. Re:Still ugly by Tugrik · · Score: 1

      Racing bikes / drop bars are for the spandex clad assassins who'd view any EV assist modes as 'cheating' and the batteries/motor as unnecessary weight. Normal humans who happen to ride bicycles (instead of 'bicyclists') are quite happy with sit-up-comfortably-and-be-able-to-see postures. This is why the Electra Townies and their ilk are so popular with the casual bike commuter set. The SRS BZNS bike commuter types who want the monkey-humping-a-football position aren't the target market here.

    21. Re:Still ugly by Roblimo · · Score: 2

      I have an upright "old people's" trike and because you sit lower on it than on a standard bike, it has a flag. The flag is pretty much standard equipment for Florida old people's trikes.

      This morning I was sitting out on my front porch and an old lady (mid 70s, I'd say) zoomed down the street on an electric trike. Dead quiet, fast as most cars go in our quiet little trailer park. 20 mph at least. Her hair was flying out behind her, and her flags (the real Kool Kids have 2 flags on their trikes) were bent aft at maybe a 30 degree angle.

      I can go that fast on my 7-speed low-rider beach cruiser bike (which I made out of used stuff, pretty much), but my cruising speed in more like 8 - 10 mph.

      So I'm selling my old trike, then I'm going to look for a new (or at least newer) one that I will motorize. Or maybe I'll just figure out a dual-front wheel setup for my lowrider bike. Hmmm....

    22. Re:Still ugly by Roblimo · · Score: 1

      Adds weight and complexity, for one thing.

    23. Re:Still ugly by cruff · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't call road/racing bikes comfortable, i find an upright bike much more user friendly.

      I agree 100%, riding in a lowered position causes numbness in my arms (noticeable after only 10-15 minutes) and causes neck pain. Not everyone who might like an electric bike is 20 years old! Same thing goes for motorcycles.

    24. Re:Still ugly by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depends on the number of hours you put in the saddle. If you just ride an hour or two on the weekend, then a cushy seat and upright posture feels comfortable. If you ride many more hours per week it's a prescription for saddle sores and cut off circulation near the tops of your femurs.

      If you ride a lot, you get used to the drop handlebars, which afford a number of small but significant changes in posture over a long ride, and allow you to use more of your body muscles (along with cleated shoes). Also with drop handlebars you support more of your weight on your hands and legs, so no manhood problems. When I was riding over a hundred miles per week, I found the most comfortable saddle was hard plastic with no padding at all.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    25. Re:Still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same reason most hybrid/recreational bikes have flat bars - for many people it's more comfortable (less weight on your hands, no arching of the back) and rider height gives you better visibility, both for you to see surroundings and drivers/riders/pedestrians to see you. "Most cyclists" don't find drop bars more comfortable. Check out any site, like bikeforums.net to see the questions of drops vs. flat bars and you'll find people saying the pro's/cons of both with the ultimate advice being to try and see which feels better. And big, heavy cruiser or recreational bikes are used all the time for people who ride regularly for fun or commuting. I ride a hybrid that's almost 30 lbs plus panniers 35-70 miles per week.

    26. Re:Still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for the hipster posture.

    27. Re:Still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The aerodynamic position, beefier frame, and drop bars would be too much for the average spindly-armed-tight-pants-wearing hipster.

    28. Re:Still ugly by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      You're thinking too small. Think a bit more radically, and you'll eventually land on the idea of an electric velomobile, which is already readily available. Plus, it also offers better aerodynamics than your proposal, more comfortable seating, and shelter from the elements, in addition to the benefits you cited. Alternatively, you can think even more radically and get something like the ELF, which was successfully funded on Kickstarter about a year ago, adds in shletered cargo space, and has solar panels to recharge the battery for you on-the-go.

    29. Re:Still ugly by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Apparently people in my area didn't get the memo. It seems like I see more recumbents than anything else--and yes, they're easy to see. Of course, I don't drive an SUV.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    30. Re:Still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People in the eastern half of the US are pussies. Do you know how many millions of people bike in that kind of weather and don't have a problem with it? See also most tropical countries.

      People in the eastern half of the US are too used to their fucking air conditioning.

      No comment on your overall point except to say that I am sure the designers appreciate y'all's speculation on their motives. Who, after all, can be said to know their own mind, until told what it contains by an anonymous netizen?

    31. Re: Still ugly by shiruba3094 · · Score: 1

      Which is pretty much what I dint like about it. It looks very retro, and not in a chill kind of way. Maybe tesla could roll out a new line of cars designed to look like the Ford model t.

    32. Re:Still ugly by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      The trick with road/racing bikes is to move around in the saddle. Even on shorter rides, I tend to change hand and sitting positions freqently. Also, don't lock out your elbows. If numbness/"squishing" is an issue, then you might consider using a saddle that has a cutout or depression for the perineal area. After a week or two of riding, it shouldn't be uncomfortable anymore. Actually, it should be more comfortable than well-padded seats over long rides.

      (If you don't do long rides, though, it's probably not worth the time or effort).

      Full disclosure: I'm in my 20s :)

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    33. Re:Still ugly by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Ergonomics. Your back is not going to like the "efficient" position because it's not natural for human back to be bent like that.

      I am something of a cycling oldie, I've been actively riding since I was little and I've come to despise the racing style handlebars that make you want to go into aerodynamic position. Instead I have the wide "horns" style handle bars that let me sit straight.

      And mind you, my average riding speed, including all the stops and climbs is around 20km/h according to my bike's computer, and my normal riding speed on the road is around 30km/h. I will bend down a bit when I go fast using the "horns", but not much unless it's really windy and wind is in my face, making drag too harsh.

      A bit of boasting to show the quality of bikes I ride - I have a downhill slope of 12 degrees that is over half a kilometer long in my city, and I've cloked over 80km/h speed at the bottom of the slope. It's my testbed if I want to check a new bike - it must remain controllable at those speeds. That means at least two point shock absorbers on the frame but also a solidly built frame and wheels that remain stable at those speeds.

    34. Re:Still ugly by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Two reasons: One is that the target user base are people who want an assistive utility bike or are too out of shape to ride at a safe speed in traffic. The people who buy these are pedal mashers who want as little effort as possible to make the bike go.

      The other reason is that E-bikes are legally restricted to 20-25 MPH which a competent road/racing cyclist can exceed with ease without the burden of carrying around a heavy motor and battery pack. It would be sweet to be able to do 35 MPH hill climbs without breaking a sweat on a road bike but that isn't going to happen in a commercial product.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    35. Re:Still ugly by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      It's more comfortable because you have less weight bearing on the saddle. With a sufficiently high cadence your legs will support most of your upper body so your arms aren't as burdened as you might suspect. With the sit up and beg riding position your leg muscles are not configured to bear the bulk of your weight on the pedals.

      I ride a road bike with my hands on the drops 99.9% of the time and it is not tiring unless I ride with slow people who prevent me from using a high enough cadence to support my upper body. I have a sport touring motorcycle with less forward lean that is more fatiguing in the arms because of the lack of pedaling.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    36. Re:Still ugly by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Don't blame incorrect saddle selection and sizing and poor (or no) bike fitting on the bike. Most bike shops don't know how to fit a bike properly to the rider or adjust it so you don't end up with a repetitive motion injury, all most of them know how to do is adjust the height (sort of at least) and ask you "does it feel right?". A shop that knows how to do a proper fitting will get you a the right bike for you, with the right frame size, the right saddle width, adjust the saddle height, level, and fore/aft shift, as well as adjust the height of the handlebars (replacing the stem even, as necessary) to make it as comfortable and efficient as possible. Even Saturday-only recreational riders that maybe ride for an hour or two can benefit from this sort of service, and you'll only need to have it done once.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    37. Re:Still ugly by hey! · · Score: 1

      Subjectively, the bike becomes comfortable when it feels like an extension of your body. It's natural to shift around and be loose rather than stiff. If you were running you'd naturally move around obstacles or change your gait.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    38. Re:Still ugly by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      There are e-bike motor kits galore - Golden Motor (Chinese with a Canadian distributor option) comes to mind, but there are many others.

      Put a motor and battery on whatever bike configuration your heart desires - some of the motors have integrated controllers, others - like the Green Hornet - still require an external controller.

      There are also a number of pre-engineered battery mount solutions, of varying merit.

      End of the day, you'll need $400+ to get any decent range / performance out of a LiPo based conversion kit, you might trim than by a hundred or so if you don't mind using lead acid batteries.

    39. Re:Still ugly by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      If you have a battery and a motor adding pounds and horsepower to your bike, the old "shave every last gram of weight and drag" axioms become kind of moot.

      Why put up with the discomfort if you can still "get there" at a decent speed without hunching over?

    40. Re:Still ugly by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I like the Florida laws in this regard: anything under 5bhp qualifies.

    41. Re:Still ugly by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Lots of e-bikes make the excuse - it may be a minimal return for the added cost and complexity. Figure that a car is decelerating a huge mass compared to the wind-drag.

    42. Re:Still ugly by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Because nobody can see you in traffic and you will be killed. The same reason people do not ride recumbent bikes on city streets.

      That's just standard with a motorcycle, people just don't see you. A flashing light is almost a requirement. A home security system comes with such a light (12 volts DC),
      that I almost hooked up to mine.

      I had a lady that had stopped and could tell she was confused, she turned in front of my motorcycle then pulled to the side of the road - thinking she had just noticed me and pulled to the side to let me pass; I gave it gas to pass her, when she flipped a U'ie on me - I hit her in the car door.

      I opened her door and was really going to wail on her (she had just tried to kill me), but pulled back at the last second and the helmet just touched her. bit of trouble out of it, but I got a new bike out of the deal.

      Her kid was standing up in the middle of the front seat, we both looked at each other while I was flying into the window. She said the kid was wearing a seat belt and I let it go; one of the most clueless people I had come across in sometime, I actually felt sorry for her (ignorance.)

      I'm always weary of intersections or cars in general, but she baited me into a situation.

      Bike are different they make no noise and seldom have lights. There's a short hill and a stop sign at a blind corner at the bottom. I had a biker all deck out saying I'm a pro - came flying around that corner and almost hit my car, passed right in front, so close I was hoping they were wearing a diaper as well.

    43. Re:Still ugly by emj · · Score: 1

      If you just ride an hour or two on the weekend, then a cushy seat and upright posture feels comfortable. If you ride many more hours per week it's a prescription for saddle sores

      I've biked 300km during three days in upright position, it's easy and I had not problem. Further, there are thousands of people doing at least 100 km a week in upright position over here.

    44. Re:Still ugly by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      They also cause impotence due to extra pressure on the perineum from the skinny seat and bent over posture. It's much better from your manly bits to be in an upright position. Much less pressure on the nerves and blood vessels supplying those vital areas.

      I never liked the old "ten speed" or racing bikes. Maybe it's because I'm older now, but I'm much happier on a "comfort" or "cruiser" bike. It's easier on my carpal tunnel wrists as well.

    45. Re: Still Ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked on an e-bike project in Taiwan, and regenerative braking thrashes batteries.

      Also, from my time in Taiwan, I can tell you the Farady bike is heavily overpriced. We were able to build similar tech into bikes for about $600 delivered to the bike shop, so about $1000 retail price. As batteries get cheaper, this number will fall drastically. In China they use shittier batteries that are heavy and sell these things for $300-500 retail.

    46. Re:Still ugly by Immerman · · Score: 1

      There's a reason they advise against driving a motorcycle in traffic anywhere a full-sized car won't fit. In some places they go so far as to make it the law.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    47. Re:Still ugly by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I've heard several DIY people echo the sentiment. It's not that regenerative breaking is a disadvantage, it's just that the benefit is far smaller.
      - On a bike your mass is low, and your aerodynamics suck, so most of the energy is spent just keeping the thing rolling forward. Contrast to a car which takes a lot of energy to get up to speed, but far less to maintain it, so regenerative breaking recaptures the larger portion of energy.
      - Often e-bikes do a simple hybrid system with a hub-motor in the front wheel and a normal pedal-driven rear wheel. That saves a lot of mechanical complexity and makes maintenance easier, but also means regenerative braking would be front-wheel only. Not good.
      - Even with a rear wheel motor it's easy for an electric motor to decelerate far harder than most brakes. Getting that fine-tuned can be both overly exciting and rider-specific.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    48. Re:Still ugly by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

      Regenerative braking appeals most to the people who think perpetual motion is possible. "If I go down a hill I'll get back the power I used to go up!" My guess is that most companies offer it more for marketing purposes than for actual usefulness.

      Here's a link to a good breakdown and a quick summary: Not all drive systems are engaged all the time to be able to generate power. Of the ones that are, the amount of potential power to be recovered while braking in normal stop & go is small. The amount that could be generated comes in high bursts, often at too great a rate to be used to charge the battery.
      http://www.ecospeed.com/regenb...

    49. Re:Still ugly by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      You don't use your arms to support your weight on a road bike, you use your "core" torso muscles. Try riding in an upright position until your core strengthens enough to ride in an aggressive road bike position.
       
      Source: 31 year old bicycle commuter on an aggressive road bike

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    50. Re:Still ugly by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      Look into velomobiles. Practically speaking, they have to be tadpole style trikes, but they'll do twenty-forty mph, at least until you add electric assist.

      Some velomobiles are the Mango, the Go-One, the alleweider, for starters. I built my own, but it isn't terribly useful. The useful ones cost $8k-$22k.

      Aside from that, visibility is not a problem.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    51. Re:Still ugly by utrayd · · Score: 1

      I have been using an upright electric bike to comute for nearly one and a half years. It is more like a heavy aluminium commercial frame so will not win any beauty prizes, but with a half kilowatt battery and a three hundred watt motor, it has a range of 30 km (20miles) with no pedalling and about 60km with. I find it comfottable and practical for normal commuting in rain or shine, and try to stand out with hiviz gear. Personally practical beats style anyday. Cost about U$1000 new in New Zealand as a Chinese import.

    52. Re:Still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because the drag from the wind is significantly more when you are upright....

    53. Re:Still ugly by captainpanic · · Score: 1

      I don't get why all these electric bikes have you sitting in such an upright position. I don't see why nobody takes an existing touring bike (like a road/racing bike, with drop bars, but a beefier frame and ability to add fenders and panniers), and adds an electric motor to that. With a much more aerodynamic position the motor would be much more efficient, and as most cyclists know, these bikes are much more comfortable anyway. Plus it would be a nice advantage to not have a completely unride-able bike in the case where your battery runs out.

      The Dutch disagree. In the #1 biking country in the world, everybody rides the upright bike. It's more practical (easier to balance, with more space to carry groceries or other luggage, and an optional extra passenger on the back) and safer (much better overview of the traffic, and easier to look behind you).

      Btw, the real revolution is taking place in China, where millions of people are zooming by on electric scooters. Some little startup who builds bikes in a shed in the USA is not gonna make any impact on the market for electric two-wheeled vehicles.

    54. Re:Still ugly by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Sitting upright also means that every bump goes straight up through your spine. Not very nice to the spinal discs unless you ride a full suspension bike.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    55. Re:Still ugly by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Nice one. Same slope here, but I used to max out at 65kph because I just could not pedal any faster (46-11).

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    56. Re:Still ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, if they would use aero tubes they'll save watts and have more room for batteries.

    57. Re:Still ugly by unimacs · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean it wouldn't have been easier/faster for most people on a bike equipped with drop bars. I'm purposely not calling them racing bikes because not all drop bar bikes are racing bikes.

      From what I understand in places where transportation cycling is very popular in Europe, trips are typically under 5km, terrain is fairly flat, and speeds are relatively slow, so light weight and aerodynamics don't matter that much. Upright bikes make perfect sense.

      For the record, I don't really care if a e-bike has drop bars or not.

    58. Re:Still ugly by Reziac · · Score: 1

      And when I was riding 100 miles a week (much on hills or in wind), I found a big well-padded seat, upright or semi-upright position, and higher/wider handlebars the most comfortable.

      With that setup I could move around -- lean down on the handlebars, lean up and back, use or avoid the wind, shift my butt to change the contact area, change my hand/arm position multiple ways to avoid shoulder fatigue, change my angle against the pedals to rest my legs.

      I can't do any of that on a more 'advanced' bike (which is what I have now, and hate it).

      Additionally, that old 'upright' Schwinn bike weighed 40 pounds (no shit, I weighed it) yet felt light as a feather on the road, plus it was much easier to control on rough ground.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    59. Re:Still ugly by doccus · · Score: 1

      I have an upright "old people's" trike and because you sit lower on it than on a standard bike, it has a flag. The flag is pretty much standard equipment for Florida old people's trikes.

      This morning I was sitting out on my front porch and an old lady (mid 70s, I'd say) zoomed down the street on an electric trike. Dead quiet, fast as most cars go in our quiet little trailer park. 20 mph at least. Her hair was flying out behind her, and her flags (the real Kool Kids have 2 flags on their trikes) were bent aft at maybe a 30 degree angle.

      I can go that fast on my 7-speed low-rider beach cruiser bike (which I made out of used stuff, pretty much), but my cruising speed in more like 8 - 10 mph.

      So I'm selling my old trike, then I'm going to look for a new (or at least newer) one that I will motorize. Or maybe I'll just figure out a dual-front wheel setup for my lowrider bike. Hmmm....

      Yup.. I'm also a member of the white hair club.. Got an electric scooter. Would have loved to get a Motorino.. these are the caddilacs of electric scooters. Unbelievable quality. Didn't have 2500 bucks though.. and that's where they start. Worth every penny though. I got a davinci instead. Looks like a typical european scooter. I stopped riding regular bicycles after my high blood pressure worsened, and it's really nioce to finally be able to make it up these hills. The idea of a recumbent isd good for wind resistance but they really *are* unsafe in traffic. Best I saw was a completely enclosed aerodynamic electric scooter with a flywheel to keep it upright.If you do it yourself with a trike I'd enclose it somewhat, and do some research on batteries, especially LiFePO, and good hub motors. Or you could buy one already done, but I'd avoid getting a cheap one, incidentally., as you get what you pay for with these things. I'm going to save up for a Motorino though!

    60. Re:Still ugly by Reziac · · Score: 1

      My old (built ca. 1968) Schwinn and I did some serious downhill speed too. Maxed out at about 60mph (knowing the speed of the cars I was passing). No shock absorbers, but very solid (the bike weighed 40 lbs.) Upright and wide handlebars... which in my experience give you a whole lot more control than those narrow curled things at knee level.

      Going back up the hill was not so fun. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    61. Re:Still ugly by chilvence · · Score: 1

      Most people use meat technology suspension. You see a bump, you suspend your self with your arms and your legs. Springs are just dead weight and spongy pedalling.

    62. Re:Still ugly by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      And then the rear wheel rebounds and the sadle kicks you into your particulars. Suspension also keeps the wheel on the road. My spine is damaged already, I take dead weight and spongy pedalling any time.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    63. Re:Still ugly by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      A good electric motor with electronic controls should be able to work as both drive and brake. The differences in motor design vs generator design are mostly due to the lack of good electronic controls. But designing the electronic controls for this bike will be a big job and they are right to put it off until later.

      It looks like they have the people to do it, it will just take time. It is done for the cars, but the bikes are a new application.

      They would need motors in both wheels, though, for braking. I wonder if there is any advantage in having drive motors in both wheels?
      I suppose the best arrangement would be one motor, with regular hand breaks on both wheels. For safety backup and sudden breaking.

  2. Pretty cool but.... by tempestdata · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think that bike is pretty cool, and I've been lucky to never have a bike stolen, but at that price tag, they better have put a LOT of thought into security before I would consider buying one.

    Also, is it just me or does that bike scream hipster?

    --
    - Tempestdata
    1. Re:Pretty cool but.... by Cornwallis · · Score: 4, Funny

      At that price it does nothing but scream hipster.

    2. Re:Pretty cool but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hipsters who drag their bikes into the office because they are afraid of theft

      hee hah hoo

    3. Re:Pretty cool but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It screams hipster so much so that I actually want to punch the bike itself...

    4. Re:Pretty cool but.... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Yup, no way in HELL I'd commute on this bike unless I had a secure place to keep it at work.

      (I actually do; I could just tuck the bike into one of our server rooms. Mmm, climate controlled bike locker! But most people don't have this luxury. Also I bet if all the employees started bike commuting, management would put a quick stop to it)

    5. Re:Pretty cool but.... by number6x · · Score: 1

      Regardless of what you pay for a bike, it is worth about $25 US.

      Because that is what the guy who stole it will get at the junkyard for it when he sells it. Unless it is made from carbon fiber. Then it is worth less than $25 because it has less metal.

      The best place to get a bike to commute on is at a garage sale. Let the hipsters ride the expensive dutch bikes and the nu-freds ride the road bikes.

    6. Re:Pretty cool but.... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Rightfully afraid; this is Miami. Bikes will vanish relatively quickly if locked outside. Also assholes who realize they can't steal it because you used a good lock will just vandalize it instead.

    7. Re:Pretty cool but.... by InitZero · · Score: 1

      Theft isn't anymore an issue with this bike than a regular bike. My non-motorized bicycle costs about the same as the Faraday Poser. Heck, at more than 40 pounds - twice what my bike weights - the Faraday is probably safer than a regular bike.

      As a regular cyclist, I'm of two minds on electric-assist vehicles. On one hand, anything with two wheels, quite, minimally polluting and fun has my seal of approval.

      On the other hand, my experience has been that people who tend to ride electric bicycles (and gas-powered pit bikes and powered scooters of the Razor style) tend to be jerks who ride on sidewalks and terrorize pedestrians.

      Cheers,
      Matt

    8. Re:Pretty cool but.... by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, my experience has been that people who tend to ride electric bicycles (and gas-powered pit bikes and powered scooters of the Razor style) tend to be jerks who ride on sidewalks and terrorize pedestrians.

      +1

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    9. Re:Pretty cool but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. If I wanted an electric bike, I would buy something else. If this turned out to be the best option, I'd have to strip most of ridiculous looking parts off and repaint the thing before I would ride it.

    10. Re:Pretty cool but.... by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      I would love a bike that would literally scream "hipster!" when you press a button or something.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  3. so its a moped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm confused why anyone would buy this when you could buy a cheap moped, scatter or motorcycle for less than this. Not only that a cheap motorcycle gets great mileage and will get you everywhere... They're also not so easy to steal as seems to be a hshugeissue in bit cities

    1. Re:so its a moped? by Roblimo · · Score: 1

      Got me. My 1996 Jeep Cherokee cost me less than an electric hipster bike -- and I don't think I've ever paid more than $150 for a bike in my whole life. I've got maybe $125 in my current (highly customized) bike, including lights and a pretty good lock.

    2. Re:so its a moped? by emj · · Score: 1

      You can not get a good bicycle that cheap, sure you can spend lots of time renovating old bicycles, but they probably did cost a lot more than $150 when new.

    3. Re:so its a moped? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      So you never know the feeling of riding a really good bike.
      Just as a comparison, my commuter bike was worth about EUR2000 in parts (I build my bikes myself) and it is not an electric bike.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  4. Austrian E-Bike concept from vivax looks better by Mastacheata87 · · Score: 1

    You should take a look at the product of this austrian company if you're looking for good-looking E-Bikes that don't look like E-Bikes at all.
    They put their motor in the seat tube and it merely assists the pedaling,
    Aside from the battery pack that disguises as a tool-pack right underneath the saddle you can't see it's an electric bicycle on the outside.

    Their system is supposed to work in almost any off-the-shelf frame (with limitations for carbon frames).
    They also have some carbon frames that work with their system, though apparently this doesn't work with most "stock" carbon-frames.

    Have a look at their website: http://www.vivax-assist.com/en...

  5. They aren't really bicycles. by Eevee · · Score: 2

    The main problem with e-bikes is they don't fit the bicycle category; they're really underpowered motorcycles. One of the first things I noticed in the clip was a brag about being able to go 20mph--most urban bike traffic will be going at half that speed, say 8-12 mph. (For example, one of the local biking groups shows that 18-20 mph is for top cyclist in a paceline.)

    These really don't belong on multi-purpose trails or in bike lanes. The speed differential between them and normal bikes is just asking for accidents.

    1. Re:They aren't really bicycles. by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Informative

      20 mph is 32km/h. I can easily maintain that on the flats with my bike, and my bike isn't amazing, and I am not in that good shape. The speeds you see quoted on that website are the overall average speed for the entire ride, which will most likely contain a few hills. The stopping distance of a bike, or even an e-bike is short enough that even going 30 km/h when everyone else is going 15 km/h will still give you plenty of time to react to other cyclists.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:They aren't really bicycles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Secondly you can go 20+ mph without a second of experience. These are really death machines for almost everyone involved.

      BTW they are not legally allowed on most every separated bike/multi-use path in the United States due to federal law.

    3. Re:They aren't really bicycles. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I think those figures are average speeds. My top speed (on the way to work) is about 30km/h, which is just under 20mph. I don't attain that speed for long before I need to slow to turn or stop at lights, so my average is much less.

      The British recommendation is, "As a general rule, if you want to cycle quickly, say in excess of 18 mph/30 kph, then you should be riding on the road." (that seems a bit fast to me, but I'm not sure what kind of non-road they mean.)

    4. Re:They aren't really bicycles. by Jhon · · Score: 1

      "The main problem with e-bikes is they don't fit the bicycle category; they're really underpowered motorcycles."

      I have an e-bike that I would not classify as an "underpowered motorcycle". It's a power assist bike. The motor doesn't activate unless I pedal.

      The bike will go zero mph if I don't move my legs. With "lazy" pedaling, maybe ~10 mph. I an also set how much "help" I get.

      The advantage of a bike like this is that the battery can be smaller, last longer and keep the overall weight of the bike fairly low.

      I USED to ride this daily to work (with power assist) so I didn't show up hot and sweaty. I would ride home with the power assist turned off. My responsibilities changed so I now use the bike more for leisure.

    5. Re:They aren't really bicycles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to ride at maximum speed in a bike lane or MUP on this bike or any other bike just like I don't have to peg the speedometer when I'm driving down the road. The bike is throttled via the computer by the cyclists pedaling speed. Like any traveler on any surface, you just have to use good judgement on speed given your surroundings. While many, including me, cycle for commuting, recreation and chores just fine under human power, e-bikes will help and encourage those who might not be cycling or cycling less because of some combination of fitness, distance, terrain and resulting sweat/fatigue that currently discourages them.

    6. Re:They aren't really bicycles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To expand on this...I live and cycle-commute near Cambridge (UK, not MA) - one of the areas with better-than-usual cycle infrastructure in this country.

      I would say that my commuting route (NCN11, for those playing at home) is a good (for the area - one should really look to the Netherlands for real bike provision) and well-used shared-use cycle/pedestrian trail at about 2 metres wide, and with a reasonably well-maintained surface, with sightlines of >200 metres when the weather is good.

      I would feel uncomfortable averaging more than 30 km/h (18 mph) along it during daytime and good weather - more likely averaging 26 km/h (16 mph). At night, or in poor visibility, I would ride below 24 km/h (15 mph) even with excellent bike lighting.

    7. Re:They aren't really bicycles. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And motorcycles don't move unless you are pulling back on the throttle. your point?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:They aren't really bicycles. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      In cities, that may also include stops at red lights.

    9. Re:They aren't really bicycles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pedal assist ones are allowed. It wouldn't be a federal issue anyways.

    10. Re:They aren't really bicycles. by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I don't know about "top cyclists" - I do know that the pro women's cyclists do "pleasure rides" through Miami before and after events, I followed a couple of them a couple of times, and they "cruise" at 18mph - once (when I was 20 years old) I hung with them for about 20 minutes at that pace on my mountain bike, then sprinted past them, turned down a side road and then virtually collapsed from exhaustion.

    11. Re:They aren't really bicycles. by Jhon · · Score: 1

      Stalker much?

      One possible point is that you are a prat who still hasn't answered my previous question in another thread yet continue to follow behind me and make annoying comments that are usually either entirely untrue based on shear ignorance (see my previous question) or just deliberately obtuse (see this one).

      But thank you for making me feel loved.

  6. A real hodpodge for the price by CaptBubba · · Score: 5, Informative

    For $3500 the components are a real mixed bag. Sure no visible battery is nice, but other bikes have that too and 195Whr is very low as far as e-bikes go. A brooks leather saddle is very nice, but Avid mechanical disc brakes are entry-level. That's not to mention the really questionable choices of a belt drive and bamboo fenders.

    Compare it to something like the Stromer Elite: http://www.electricbikesla.com...

    Same price, nearly double the battery (approx 350Whr), no visible battery, a standard shimano sora chain drivetrain any bike mechanic can work on, and hydraulic disc brakes.

    1. Re:A real hodpodge for the price by zacherynuk · · Score: 1

      I too was looking at the avids and thinking what the weight of overall system was, for stopping distance.

      Unsure of the the demographic audience but I can see a few upper-class WAGS walking their dogs with these.

    2. Re:A real hodpodge for the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the high price may command better components than those offered, there are benefits of the belt drive over chain - low/virtually no owner maintenance especially if you commute in or after the rain where muck could just cover everything in the drivetrain in a single ride. Again, though the high price might be better justified with more expensive hydraulic brakes, mechanical has enough stopping power and any more might be dangerous for the casual commuter rider. The Faraday also has integrated lighting, which is a just one less thing for the commute worry about (charging, stowing off-bike.)

    3. Re:A real hodpodge for the price by DavidMZ · · Score: 1

      Another good alternative in the same price range would be the Grace Bikes: http://www.grace-bikes.com/

    4. Re:A real hodpodge for the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curious about why the mechanical disk brakes, belt drive and 'boo fenders are a problem.
      . I have several pair of avid 'entry level' mechanical disk brakes that I have used for XC racing for years without problem. They're cheap and easy to maintain and work fantastic. Hydraulic brakes are a lot harder for the average joe to work on in their garage.
      . I have > 10000 km on my original belt drive and cogs. I'm about to go on a 2000 km trip with them, and am planning to make no replacement. They are so much more reliable than chains that there is no need for a mechanic. I just don't know where to start.
      . Bamboo fenders are a problem? It's all about the treatment. They look nice and can be durable if they're well made.

      I'm not sure about the price myself, but the mechanical component choices don't seem to be off to me.

  7. Not in my experience by langelgjm · · Score: 2

    The racing position is favoured by people who race bikes. Those people wouldn't want an electric bike. The upright position is preferred by most people going to work, school etc by bicycle -- there's a better view, and it's more comfortable.

    That really depends on how far you have to go. In my experience, upright seating might be more comfortable for short distances, and it's probably easier to get on and off. But I bicycle to my office most days, about 4.5 miles one way (which is not long) on a road bike outfitted with a rack and panniers. It is not a "racing" position, but I do lean forward and have drop handlebars. The seat is level with the handlebars.

    That position removes a lot of weight from your crotch area, and transfers it to your arms. I find sharing the weight between two areas to be more comfortable, although it requires proper positioning of the handlebars, wearing gloves, and switching grip positions to keep hands and wrists comfortable.

    The view is fine, and is amplified by a rear view mirror. Also wearing a high-visibility vest will do much more for your visibility than the difference between the two positions.

    Then, the nice thing is I can remove the panniers and easily ride 30 miles or more on a weekend in a reasonable amount of time without needing a second bicycle.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    1. Re:Not in my experience by xaxa · · Score: 2

      I also cycle to work, and it's about the same distance (6.5km). I use an upright position.

      Out of about 80 bikes that are locked outside my building, only 4-5 are racing bikes. If I was in the Netherlands, Germany or Denmark it would be more like 1 / 80.

    2. Re:Not in my experience by emj · · Score: 1

      Out of about 80 bikes that are locked outside my building, only 4-5 are racing bikes. If I was in the Netherlands, Germany or Denmark it would be more like 1 / 80.

      Far less than that, normally people do not use racing bikes for everyday use. I stood in a busy bicycle intersection and saw ~200 upright bicycles not one racing bike.

    3. Re:Not in my experience by swillden · · Score: 1

      I cycle to work and I prefer a road bike. But my ride is 25 miles one way, and takes better than an hour on my road bike. I also have a more comfortable bike, but it takes a good 20-30 minutes longer to get to work if I ride that. But most people won't ride as far as I do.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Not in my experience by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Not every bike that has drop bars is a racing bike but that is a common misconception. Drop bars are also very common on touring bikes which are typically used for carrying loads and riding longer distances. They will not have the bars set nearly as low relative to the saddle as a racing bike would.

      Drop bars are nice, - not only for the more aerodynamic option of riding in the drops but for the other hand positions they give you. This is why many people like them. It is really about comfort believe it or not.

      If people prefer an upright bike it is no skin off my nose. We are all different.

    5. Re:Not in my experience by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      You know, it is possible to use the racing positiuon on a cruser bike. Your arms are not in as good a position, for that, as on a racer. But to use the upright position on a racer, you have to let go of the handlebars. -Not- a good idea, on normal roads with bumps.

      I think the racer bikes are used mainly because people think bike racing is cool. But I am an engineer, and my idea of cool is different...

  8. I built one 10 years ago by jakedata · · Score: 2

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/04/10/03/2137229/e-bike-e-xperiences/

    Based on a steel mountain bike frame, it's decidedly INelegant and heavy, but super-effective on a commute that rarely exceeds 20 MPH by car.

    I got a solid 7 years out of a 36V 10AH NiMH battery pack before it croaked. Now it is resting in the basement until I decide to re-power it with some flavor of lithium.

    In the original post I asked if the Golden Island machinery motor was any good. Neither the motor nor the controller gave me a day's trouble though the original wire was too thin.

    I also asked about lead-acid batteries. They were garbage. Too heavy and the power faded below a useful level long before they were considered discharged. I got a good deal on an NiMH pack and was very pleased with it overall.

    I have since lashed up a 48V test pack and really enjoyed the power it gives. The original controller seems to work fine at 48V, the capacitors are all rated 60v.

    The best thing I did was add a Watts-UP meter so I can keep an eye on remaining capacity and monitor power flow.

    The most alarming thing about the bike is the brakes which are marginally adequate for the combined weight of bike and rider. They need to be upgraded before I hit the road again.

    1. Re:I built one 10 years ago by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      If you're slapping NiMH batteries of any reasonable capacity on top of a steel frame, you will want disk brakes. The weight of the whole package including the rider is going to be far too much for anything less.

  9. Footage / sound by timothy · · Score: 2

    I know the sound varies from OK to less OK on here; that's because I somehow flubbed the audio recorded separately. Robin (Roblimo) Miller in editing the footage together did a great job of patching over some of the crazy industrial noises from the adjoining shop (which makes, of all things, electric motorcyles; the places are not related). I didn't realize I'd have a chance to shoot this video, so the footage is all from a point-and-shoot Canon camera that I bought via Craigslist for $80 a few weeks before; I think it did a credible job of focus, etc.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:Footage / sound by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      Actually Timothy, that was one of the first Slashdot videos I have really enjoyed and watched the whole way through. I really do mean that as a compliment, but I see how you could take it either way ; )

      Keep up the good work and I'm sure it will only get better.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    2. Re:Footage / sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one thing you need to do next time is to narrow the stereo field to around 25%. And you had the channels backwards. When the guy on the left was talking the sound came out of the right speaker and vice versa.

      Honestly, you'd be better off just mixing down to mono for a piece like this. There really is no reason to have stereo dialog.

  10. Elegant isn't important. by SuperBanana · · Score: 0

    The problem isn't elegance (by which I assume they mean style. Bicycles have been refined over 150 years, and are VERY elegant when it comes to their mechanical design, provided you're not shopping at Wallyworld or the very bottom of the market. NEVER buy a "big box" store bike, for a ton of reasons.) People ride all sorts of bikes. The problem is safety (the number one concern people have is fear of being hurt by drivers. Nobody answers "why aren't you biking?" with "oh, if only the bikes looked better"), infrastructure (on many levels, ranging from traffic sensors that detect bikes, to intersections and roads designed to accommodate more than just motor vehicles, to secure lockups, to being able to take a bicycle on other transit systems, etc...this is slowly starting to change), and societal attitudes. Namely that bicycles are toys, not serious transportation, and thus should not be accomodated...which is a bit circular...and a lot of attitudes and bias that should seem oddly familiar to anyone who has studied gender and racial bias. There's a great article out there from a psych magazine noting that cyclists are treated like any other minority outgroup. For example, emphasis of negative attributes, assumption of guilt, harassment and violence against them, etc.

    Which is why so many cyclists now use helmet cameras to record their travels; it's to document the harassment (because people claim it doesn't happen, when it does), but also to have evidence if you're hit, because the driver is going to claim "I didn't see them" and they were doing nothing wrong, witnesses are going to think you were "flying" even if you were well below the speed limit, etc. There's a famous case of a DC cyclist who was cut off; the driver and two witnesses claimed he ran a red light. Surprise! Traffic camera video shows the light was green, and continued to be green as he lay on the ground unconscious after having slammed into the side of the car that had just cut him off. I generally find that drivers have far less understanding of the basic rules of the road and what cyclists are allowed to do or aren't, which is ironic, given that they're the ones piloting the massive machine that can (and does, to the tune of 40,000 a year in the US alone) kill people.

    We live in a country where we had a network of well-maintained roads, which were the result of cycling clubs petitioning the government for roads that were rideable. Bicycling was HUGE in the late 1800's; it even factored into women's rights, believe it or not. Then the motor car came along. And people were horrified at the deaths and injuries; speed limits were imposed. The automobile industry panicked; customers wanted to go fast, unimpeded. So they fought back with a campaign of ridiculing pedestrians and cyclists. As the automobile became a symbol of success and achievement, suddenly if you had a car you were the elite, and if you were on foot or on a bicycle, you were not. You were poor, or stupid, or whathaveyou. And the American Dream became driving a car to your suburban house which was nowhere near the market, post office, bus stop, train station, your office, etc. We've only just started to slowly realize the idiocy of this and do more mixed zoning and transit-oriented development.

    Just as it became the fault of the "jaywalker" for daring to step into the street except where specifically allowed to, suddenly it became the fault of cyclists when motorists plowed into them. We expect someone operating a power saw or a gun to be careful around others...but put them in a car, and suddenly we expect everyone else to be careful of them. And to protect themselves against you by dressing in foam hats and clothing that makes them look like traffic cones with all sort of blinking lights. Drivers can spot a 2 foot pothole, but can't spot a 6 foot tall, 3 foot wide object in the road? Riiiiiight....

    This attitude spread in many places, except for the Netherlands, for example, where the car came relatively late...and Dutch society revolted after the skyrocketing inj

    1. Re:Elegant isn't important. by Roblimo · · Score: 2

      I live in the part of Florida (Manatee & Sarasota counties) that has the highest bicycle accident rate in the state. The bikes rarely cause accidents - crappy drivers do, and we've got a load of them around here.

      Because of this, combined with poor balance and general weakness since my 2010 heart attacks, I don't ride on the main roads but stick to side streets around my home that have low speed limits.

      Sometimes I think it would be nice to have a powered bike so I could keep up with traffic better but then I remember that I have a car. So I'll probably do a 6-speed or 7-speed trike as my next cycle-type transport device. And it probably won't have an electric assist unless one pops up really cheap on Craigslist. And even then, probably not. I need more exercise.

    2. Re:Elegant isn't important. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's right it's all the car driver. The Bicyclist never tuck into blind spots, jump on and off the side walk, and violate nearly ever pedestrian and vehicle law there is.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Elegant isn't important. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You got it all:
      Elitist:
      ". NEVER buy a "big box" store bike, for a ton of reasons."

      Entitled:
      "infrastructure " i.e. we want you to design the city for us..at other peoples expense.

      Persecution
      " and societal attitudes. Namely that bicycles are toys, not serious transportation,"
      "noting that cyclists are treated like any other minority outgroup."

      Superiority
      " I generally find that drivers have far less understanding of the basic rules of the road and what cyclists are allowed to do or aren't"

      Exaggeration. Also out of context factoid
      "and does, to the tune of 40,000 a year in the US alone"

      Pointless factoids:
      "Bicycling was HUGE in the late 1800'"

      Paranoia
      "So they fought back with a campaign of ridiculing pedestrians and cyclists. "

      Lies:
      Just as it became the fault of the "jaywalker" for daring to step into the street except where specifically allowed to, suddenly it became the fault of cyclists when motorists plowed into them.

      "Bicycling is the most energy-efficient way to move,"
      nope.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Elegant isn't important. by emj · · Score: 1

      "Bicycling is the most energy-efficient way to move,"
      nope.

      Yes it is. (I'm not going to bother with the rest since it's just your opinions)

    5. Re:Elegant isn't important. by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

      The reason you don't buy bikes from a big-box store: they don't use standardized components, the components they come with don't last long (and then when it's time to replace them, surrrrrpise, your local bike shop can't find something that fits) and there are a lot of basic design flaws with the frames and such. It's not "elitist" to say "that bike you bought from Wallyworld is a waste of money because it's going to fall apart."

      I'm not entitled if I want the roads *I PAID FOR JUST LIKE YOU* to be designed to not EXCLUDE me.

      Cyclists ARE a persecuted group and I'm not going to debate that with you. Go argue with a black man about whether there's still racism Because Obama, or something.

      Bicycles are the most energy-efficient transportation method. Google it.

      I'm not going to bother responding to your other ignorant crap. Google it.

    6. Re:Elegant isn't important. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Isn't it wonderful FINALLY being able to label yourself as a member of a "persecuted group"? It must feel great, after being left out so long.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  11. bike security by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    1)Buy a U-lock.
    2)Change out anything "quick release" (aka quick-steal") to bolts or security skewers.
    3)Put the U-lock through the rear wheel, inside the frame's rear triangle. Now neither the wheel nor frame can be stolen.
    4)Attach the U-lock to something that is solidly and directly attached to the ground. Signposts that are bolted to something don't count. Porch railings don't count. Etc.
    5)Remove lights and such.

    Don't subscribe to the "cheap crappy bike nobody would want to steal." Guess what there's a large market for, and guess which bikes are the easiest for criminals to unload? It's hard to sell a $1k bike. Not so hard to sell a $100 beat-up bike.

    Don't buy bikes from guys selling them out of the backs of vans, fly-by-night-looking shops, flea markets, etc. THEY ARE PROBABLY STOLEN.

    Lastly: REPORT STOLEN BICYCLES. One of the reasons they continue to be stolen is that nobody bothers to report their bike getting stolen.

    1. Re:bike security by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Don't buy bikes from guys selling them out of the backs of vans, fly-by-night-looking shops, flea markets, etc. THEY ARE PROBABLY STOLEN."

      those horrible poor people selling bike they are all criminals, don't trust them. THAT IS HOW YOU SOUND, Jack ass.

      Here is you precious uLock Security:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:bike security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A u-lock is only slightly better than any other kind of lock, in that it might be a little tougher to cut through. You can open them with a bic pen fairly easily though, depending. Locks which are both thick enough to resist bolt cutters (angle grinders or oxyacetylene torches being a foregone conclusion) and which have a non-trivial lock are not common. That as much as anything is the reason why bikes are commonly stolen.

      The best bike lock is the electronic one on the door to wherever you keep your bike. Anything else is a challenge only to the uninformed.

  12. Re:Obama awarded four Pinocchios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to slashdot, Glen Beck! One of the first things you might want to do here is friend cold fjord.

    Happy posting!

  13. Re:Obama awarded four Pinocchios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh I understand you lot just can't stand to have your sacred cows challenged and always fallback to ad hominem attacks rather than using actual substance or logic.

    Yes we understand that.

    You know, unless you are somehow trying to assert that in fact 7 million Americans now have access to health care that did not prior to the ACA, because we all know it to be complete and total bullshit.

    But hey, if it makes you guys feel better than that's all that really matters huh?

    Keep voting for socialists! Someday one of them might actually do something good!

  14. Why buy a whole bike? Just upgrade yours! by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    The Copenhagen Wheel is a much better concept, and cheaper, too.

    It goes farther, runs longer, weighs less, uses regenerative braking to charge on the go, and best of all, you can remove it easily for security purposes.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  15. Sadly by geekoid · · Score: 1

    the riders aren't.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Re:Why buy a whole bike? Just upgrade yours! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is much more pragmatic. I wouldn't leave a $3500 bike locked up anywhere. Removing the wheel in shady neighborhoods (most everywhere?) is the only practical solution to problem of theft.

  17. Strongly disapprove by kheldan · · Score: 2

    People are getting fatter and fatter, they need to be the engine so they can lose the excess baggage, not spend $3500 on something that allows them to continue to be lazy. Also E-bikes are way overpriced for what you get. I recommend getting a regular bike and saving yourself $2500 to $3000 instead. If it's really just for transporation then buy a used scooter or small motorcycle, they're a much better value.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Strongly disapprove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some of us already exercise, aren't gigantic tubs, and just want to get to the fucking store without being drenched in sweat or climbing in to a $20,000 killing machine. Stop designing for the lowest common denominator.

    2. Re:Strongly disapprove by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      I got a Currie Tech Trek from Walmart.com, $450 plus $100 for an extra battery pack. It does well. If you want to convert another bike to e-bike, they also have a neat electric bike wheel, with batteries and everything in the wheel, powered by something like bluetooth.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    3. Re:Strongly disapprove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I strongly disapprove of your strong disapproval.

      I bicycle about 3000 miles per year, and I don't really want a motorized bike, but your absolutist position is bad.

      Someone hopping on an ebike like this and riding will not be working as hard as if they were on a plain bike, but hey, at least they are on some kind of bike and pedaling. Bikes like this don't do 100% of the work, you still pedal. I have heard that you just feel like you have a really stiff tailwind.

      And in fact I know someone who doesn't bike very often because he is overweight and the hills just kill him. I have suggested maybe he should get an ebike just for the hill assist.

      A scooter or motorcycle is for people who don't want to exercise at all, just travel. An ebike is for someone who wants to exercise, but wants to have it easier and/or go faster.

    4. Re:Strongly disapprove by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Yes, because I love arriving at my destination drenched in sweat. Thanks for making the choice for me.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Strongly disapprove by noblebeast · · Score: 1

      You're looking at this all wrong. Rather than look at the consequences of avid bike-aholics switching to an e-bike, look at the consequences of people who drive a car everywhere switching to an e-bike. That's going to result in less laziness, not more.

      --
      Its not so bad as long as you can keep the fear from your mind.
    6. Re:Strongly disapprove by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Yes, because I love arriving at my destination drenched in sweat. Thanks for making the choice for me.

      Go talk to the fixie-riding crowd, they seem to ride a bike everywhere, in street clothes, and to hear them talk about it they aren't 'drenched in sweat' when they get where they're going.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  18. pffffft.... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    Oh please. I know 200+ pound guys who were bombing on mountain bikes before disks were invented, they survived just fine with cantilevers. A decent steel frame doesn't weigh much more than aluminum or carbon fiber, maybe a couple pounds, plus another 10-20 pounds for the battery and motor.

    Not saying disks are a bad idea, but no, an electric bike isn't so heavy that it just can't be stopped without them.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    1. Re:pffffft.... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Not sure about exact numbers, but when I switched from steel to aluminum I could pedal up the hill in my city (about 12-13 degrees for around 600m) all the way without significant problems. Steel bike, not doable for me. I think I managed it once, and I literally had to stop to rest at the top.

      On the newer aluminum bike, I had no problems getting back to speed after climbing the whole way without needing any kind of rest.

      You can certainly make due with a steel bike, I made due with them for at least a decade and a half. But aluminum is a very obvious upgrade. In computer terms, for me updating to aluminum bike was a bit like upgrading from HDD to SSD. It's a completely different experience in terms of weight of the bike. Suddenly you can do things you never could do before, ranging from cycling up hills and still going normally to just grabbing your bike, lifting it and carrying it for extended distances when necessary.

    2. Re:pffffft.... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Cheap steel bikes can weigh north of 40 lbs, yep. Heavy Aluminum bikes can weigh north of 32 lbs. My roommate has a folding aluminum bike, it's 36 lbs before you add on the rack, fenders etc.
       
      I have a late 70's lugged steel frame bike, it weighs about 24 lbs, probably closer to 26 now with the rear rack and fenders.
       
      By comparison my aluminum road bike weighs about 21 lbs, only a 5 lb difference between the two, but 19 lbs lighter than a cheap Walmart bike! A modern $1200 aluminum bike can weigh less than 18 lbs
       
      TL;DR not all steel bikes are made the same.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:pffffft.... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Modern 26" MTB steel frames weigh about 2500g where comparative aluminium frames weigh 1700g or so. Not a big deal, really.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    4. Re:pffffft.... by jakedata · · Score: 1

      No room for disk brake on the front as the motor is a massively oversized hub. The goal is to put a disk brake on the rear and a heavy-duty cantilever on the front.

      Until I can justify the price of the battery pack I want, it doesn't matter anyway.

  19. Recumbents are great if you're gong straight, and by markass530 · · Score: 1

    not so much if you want to turn. or having to hug the side of the road

  20. yea, but no by markass530 · · Score: 1

    your numbers are wayyyy of , sorry you are very misinformed

  21. Lots of talking heads by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    And not a single moment of the thing in operation. I smell a fish. And the price! Jeeze!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  22. Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Stromer Elite doesn't look totally gay like this thing does.

  23. Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If people looking into this wanted a regular bike, they would already have one. I know it bothers you that others don't really give a shit about peddling everywhere, but that's the case. Whether you want to admit it or not, there are many downsides to riding a bicycle that an electric bike will (only partially) resolve.
    You are likely not the intended audience.
    People that drive a car only a few miles at most (especially in a warmer climate) are much more likely to buy something like this.

  24. Still illegal in NYC by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    For all the wrongheaded transit ideas in NYC, banning electric bikes is on the list of bad ideas. Something between a bicycle and a taxi cab is needed, and Americans don't do mopeds.

  25. Light up that recumbent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too late. I see these with LED light stalks all the time.

  26. Crap by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

    From someone who built his own electric bike, the one shown is pretty crap. zero suspension on a heavier than normal bike is a bad idea, and will limit what you can do. Also 250 watts is nothing, i know thats all that is legal in europe, and actully too powerfull for australia, but you can have 750 watts in america, and i havn't met a cop with multimeter yet; ultimately the more power, the more usefull, and fun (although it adds to the price of motor and battery). Lastly its too expensive, mine using a mountain bike frame, 1kw motor, and 1/2 kwh battery cost around $2000, it dosn't look as pretty, but it will kick this bikes ass (full offroad capable and will do 55kph on the flat if the wind is blowing the right way).

    --
    Rocket Surgeon.
    1. Re:Crap by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Actually, for riding on the streets, a typical bike suspension is completely unnecessary and just uses more energy.

    2. Re:Crap by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      If the bike is light enough and you stick to the smooth road no suspension is fine (a lot if not most bikes have no suspension). If your bike has the weight of a motor and a battery on board, and you like to take immiginative shortcuts over curbs, side walks, and parks, then front suspension is preferable (maybe even rear suspension if your bike weighs enough). Most suspension can be manually set these days, so if you ussually obey the law and only ride on the road you can set it to be quite stiff. You are right though, horses for courses and all.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
  27. Do what I do then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use some sense. Go slower or pedal. Your car can go 100+ but you don't. You go the speed of the traffic.

    I use my motor to get up hills mostly. I rarely pass regular cyclists. My bike weighs 50 lbs so everyone pedals faster than I do.

    On the downhill part of my commute home regular bicyclists have no trouble outdistancing me even if I do use my motor.

  28. That's not a violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bicycle are allowed to switch between the road and the sidewalk.

    Tucking into blind spots? It's more usually, "I'm faster than you so I can cut around you. Ooops, I was wrong about that."

  29. Very cool, but not very powerful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is for helping your commute, not removing it. They describe it on Kickstarter as having "motor assist" not completely electric power. 350 watts is low, but enough to ease some hills. If you want a capable electric vehicle, make it yourself. I made a 2250 watt (3 horsepower) 20 mph top speed, 12-15 mile range out of standard hobby aircraft parts. Not terribly convenient, but very powerful.

  30. Re:Why buy a whole bike? Just upgrade yours! by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Nope you should buy the wheel I invented... its powered by an interocitor for infinite free energy so you never need to pedal or recharge it...and just like the Copenhagen wheel it isn't actually available yet either.

  31. What's that? style? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not bad, but you can improve your style, look at some italian bikes:
    http://www.velorapida.com/Shop/p/45/mimetic-bicicletta-elettrica-vintage-in-stile-camouflage
    http://www.bellabici.it/index2.html
    http://www.elciclo.it/web/bici-elettriche-artigianali/bici-leonardo
    http://littleitaly.motorinizanini.it/

    There are also cardanic ones

  32. Re:Recumbents are great if you're gong straight, a by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    That's why I recommend crank forward type of recumbent, it turns well enough and doesn't look weird compared to a full on recumbents:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    Obviously doesn't have the full aerodymic efficiency of a full bent but it has the comfort.

    I would put up pics of full on recumbents but there are so many varieties of type, short wheelbase to long wheelbase, to canopied ones like a velomobile, that it would be pointless, as what holds for one might not hold for another.

    I'm guessing a short wheelbase recumbent with the crank over the front wheel should handle turns well also but that is just a guess.

  33. add a capacitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a capacitor to soak up the braking burst and trickle it into the battery pack.

    That said, regenerative braking likely adds complexity and weight and might require a different motor design. Also, an ideal implementation would need some kind of brake-by-wire system which would be more complicated than off-the-shelf disk brakes.

  34. A racing bike is more comfortable? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Yeah right... your an idiot but at least you are not alone. In the Netherlands, one of the most cycle friendly countries in the world, the "normal" bike is known elsewhere in the world as the Dutch model. It is the upright because it is the easiest and most comfortable to sit on for typical city commutes where you are not trying to kill yourself like some drugged out courier.

    You can see a huge difference with the US where the majority of bicycles are hobby bikes, not used for daily commutes. This translates to electric bikes, in the EU 250 watt is the limit, in the US it goes far higher and frankly, that is insane. If you add a throttle option (illegal in the EU) you just got yourself a moped. 2KW throttle electric bike is just a motor cycle without the rigidity or the brakes.

    There is a very simple reason you see very little electric racing bicycles. If you use them for your hobby, the point is to use your own leg muscles to go fast. Adding an electric motor is like adding an electric motor to a stationary exercise bike. It reminds me of people who equip mountain bikes with 1KW motors in each wheel. Just buy a cross motor already and be done with it.

    Electric city bikes are about making your commute easier while still doing a bit of exercise. I got one myself, the 250 watt engine gives just that extra boost to keep going so that when the wind is against you (ain't it always) you don't give a shit. Neither with slight uphill gradiants. I also find I don't hate it as much when the lights are against me because it takes far less effort to get back up to speed again which has made me a saver rider since there is no need to take risks to cut the number of times you need to slow down.

    Also, the more forward you sit on a bike, the more you are crushing bits. Racing bikes comfortable? That must be why the most common bicycles are racing bikes. Oh wait. They are not.

    Just maybe bike makers know more then you about what sells.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  35. TRY an electric bike by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The bending over you do to reduce drag isn't needed on an electric bike because even with just 250 watt, you basically got another set of legs pedalling. I got one myself and the biggest difference you notice straight away, apart from the insane acceleration (even mopeds have a hard time keeping up) is that WIND, the eternal enemy, is NO LONGER A FACTOR. Whoosh, GONE!

    And the upright is not about BEING seen, in either position you are at the height of normal car windows, so plenty visible, it is about how easy YOU can see.

    There just isn't a market for electric racing bikes. Not just because most racers don't want a support engine OR because the weight of engine and battery would triple the bike weight but because most build their own custom bikes and the best electric bikes use custom frames (mid-motor is where things are going).

    The market for electric bikes simply ain't the health freaks, it is the people faced with a commute that is just to uncomfortable to ride themselves but who are not opposed to moving their legs a bit. People like me, I am neither fit nor unfit, I could ride 30 miles, I have done so when needed BUT I wouldn't do it of my own choice. I have a choice, go by car (longer commute and more expensive), cycle all the way (about 45 minutes) NO FUCKING WAY, go train + bus (extra waiting time kills commute time) or train + electric bike. WINNER! Fast, bit of excersize (downside, pants starting to fall down), cheap.

    I am the target of the bike in the article. You are not.

    This is no different from the eternal and rather boring debate about how electric cars don't have enough range to drive to another continent. NOT THE TARGET MARKET.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  36. What a moronic piece by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Fat people are not going to on a pedellic to begin with, they are going at most for an electric moped.

    And if you buy a 500 dollar bike, you are not buying the same class of bike as 3500 dollar electric bike. 500 dollar bike is equal to a 1000 dollar electric bike.

    Never go into business, you have no idea about market segmentation.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  37. Re:Recumbents are great if you're gong straight, a by markass530 · · Score: 1

    ??? Whats the point of all that? and how do you stand up and ride on that thing?

  38. I've ridden an e-bike for a decade by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    I've ridden an electric bike for 10 years now. They're great, I love mine. But they have a ton of issues:

    • Thieves. This is a big one. E-bikes are worth a lot more than bicycles and just as easy to steal. Oh, and if you lock your bike well? They'll just steal the battery, it's worth a good chunk of change.
    • Cost. Mine cost $300, but holy fuck $3,000? God damn. Affordable transportation this ain't.
    • City life. I live in a city where the inner city isn't actively hostile. It's also not a megacity. There are bike lanes on most streets. This makes riding a bike a breeze. Without these elements...eh. You wouldn't exactly be able to drive 5 miles down to the grocery store next to the freeway like in America. I mean, you could, but it's slow and dangerous.
    • Pedals. They are so useless that most people take them off. You can't pedal an e-bike like a bicycle, it's too heavy due to the frame and battery.
    • Battery life. I generally get 30 minutes out and 30 minutes back. This covers most of my usage cases. However, when you have to run errands all over town, you can get low on battery.
    • Running out of battery. It sucks. It happens, too, and due to Murphy's Law it will always happen at the worst possible time.
    • Recharge time. It takes 6-8 hours to recharge from almost empty.
    • New battery cost. Assuming nobody steals your bike or battery, you'll need a new one every year. Mine cost 1/4 the price of a new bike, and that's with your trade-in. If some scumbag steals your battery and you need a new one, it costs even more. Actually I need one right now.
    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  39. For F. sake, I don't want an *elegant* e-bike ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... I want one you can't steal. Or that is significantly unfeasable to steal. Two long integrated articulated heavy-duty locks and QR codes etched into the frame at various places once I buy one with my name and ownership certificate at the end of the URL and an alert if I reported it stolen. Plus hidden RFID Chips to do the same. And an optional hidden UMTS/GPS Module in sleep mode, powered by the batteries and integrated into the electronics so I/the authorities can track it down and/or lock down the power unit / motor / controls with a cryptocode if the need arises. And a battery and an electronics/controls unit you can remove and carry with you with zero fuss.

    Oh, and it should be sturdy enough for everyday use. Have yet to see an uncustomized bike, e- or otherwise, that offers that.

    Once that happens, *then* I'll seriously consider shelling out 2000 Euros for an E-Bike. Until then they are a toy for people with to much money.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  40. cylinder lock flaw is TEN YEARS OLD by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    "Here is you precious uLock Security"

    Welcome to TEN YEARS AGO. Seriously, that was in 2004. Kryptonite recalled them rather quickly, and most of the cycling community is well aware of the problem. Thanks for 'splaining to us something we already know, jackass. Why don't you try finding someone you know who bikes, and asking to see what their u-lock key looks like?

    For more than ten years, the standard has been a flat/square key. They're sufficiently strong enough that thieves don't bother with them, mostly because there are still people who use cable locks, which can be cut with a variety of tools.

    And yes, the people selling bikes at flea markets and out of the back of vans ARE selling stolen bikes. Legitimate used bike sales are private individuals on various forums including Craigslist (thieves have noticed that people patrol Craigslist looking for their stolen bikes) and via shops which increasingly stock used bikes.

  41. Faraday in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I first heard of the concept, I wanted to RUN out and buy one. Then I thought some more.

    .

    i) Will I need a registration -- a license plate -- for this thing in my state? If not now, then in the future? Seriously, why would this bike not be classified as an electric motorcycle?

    ii) The price is a showstopper. $3500 for a heavy-framed bike with mid-to-high-end components. I've bought $1400 bikes in the past, but I can't see how a model like this should cost more than twice the price of something like a classic Fuji F.

    iii) It is absolutely the ugliest fucking bicycle I've seen in a long time.

    iv) Got to assume Li-Ion batteries. If so, you wind up with all the problems surrounding this technology. Heat, fire/explosion potential, danger of exposure to the elements, expensive replacement. Not a showstopper by any means, at least for me, but just one more thing.

    v) It's one thing to buy a multi-kilobuck specialty bike that you don't normally ride into town and lock up in front of a Starbucks. Something like this, apparently meant to be a general-transportation vehicle, is gonna be a thief magnet. Ergo, esp., given i) above, that probably means buying vehicle insurance -- including liability and PIP, since this thing seems like it could do some damage to pedestrians in a higher-speed collision.

    Other than that, I still have to say that I'm lusting after one of these things. Maybe Faraday will follow-up with a lower-cost model. You'd think by now that mfrs of these types of pioneering products would realize that a Segue business plan can severely limit growth. Once the technology is shaken out on the road and the company assembles robust distribution & manufacturing mechanisms, I'd hope that Faraday would release a lower-end model at a sweeter price point. At $500 or $600, I'd probably buy two.