Slashdot Mirror


User: Roberto

Roberto's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
391
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 391

  1. Re:Uh on On the Record: Scott McNealy · · Score: 1

    Your comment only makes sense ift the US only has invaded countries recently because of 9/11.

    Since the US has invaded Iraq, that would mean that you believe Iraq was somehow behind or supported 9/11.

    If you believe that, you should be able to show why you believe such a strange thing.

    Also, you would be calling the US administration liars, since that was not the stated reason for the invasion. Or if it was, it was one of many.

  2. Re:Why is this useful? on GNOPPIX: Bootable GNOME CD · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... I am not sure I understand what you mean.
    The computer I described is about 50 times slower than a Duron 1.1

    It also has at least 8 times less RAM, and 10 times less disk. And it can run as many rxvts (sorry, xterm is heavier) as you want.

    I just tried it with 30, and it didn't even slow down.

  3. Re:Why is this useful? on GNOPPIX: Bootable GNOME CD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I do run Linux on a P75, with 16Mhz of RAM.
    It can do web browsing (graphical), play MP3s, read email (using mutt).

    It even works as a mail server for use when disconnected (masqmail).

    It has development packages (gcc), fancy text editors (fte).

    It also has a 800MB disk.

    It is a Toshiba Libretto 50ct.

    Now, you may say, so what? Well, it's just as much a Linux as any other Linux. It's just not KDE or GNOME.

    So yes, it is choice that makes Linux require a larger box. Because if you choose carefully, you can use a smaller one, too.

    Here's the URL for how I did it:

    http://www.pycs.net/lateral/stories/4.html

  4. Re:I would blame Daniel Soong on No Americans Need Apply · · Score: 1

    Newbieeeeeeee!

    And mine is not only way way way lower, it also has three sevens. ;-)

  5. Re:For the non-technical on KDE 3.2 Alpha 1 Finally on FTP · · Score: 1

    No problem.

  6. Re:For the non-technical on KDE 3.2 Alpha 1 Finally on FTP · · Score: 1

    You can also provide money.

    But yes, basically all a non-technical person can do is that which:

    a) Doesn't need technical knowledge.
    b) Those with technical knowledge are not doing.

    Your post simply says "It's a shame and discgrace that thpse who are doing all that hard work of writing code and then giving it away are not also doing that hard boring work someone else could do".

    Your post is stupid.

  7. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever on KDE 3.2 Alpha 1 Finally on FTP · · Score: 1

    Well, system('kfmclient ...') is not a shell script, but I won't hold that against you ;-)

    You want a C lib? There is one, too. Of course it means you are linking all of kdelibs to your app, too, and then, why not use it, right?

  8. Re:KDE most impressive open source project - ever on KDE 3.2 Alpha 1 Finally on FTP · · Score: 1

    Today, creating non-C++ KDE apps is simple. Just get PyKDE. Loads easier than C++-KDE, really.

    Also, it is possible to use KDE's infrastructure without being a KDE app.

    For example: ioslaves for network transparency.

    Say you want to get a file through HTTP as if you were a KDE app?

    Just call

    kfmclient copy http://whatever /wherever

    and wait() on it.

    Want to open a file using the KDE mime-type associations? Just call

    kfmclient exec url

    Want to make your app use KDE icons for mimetypes and such? This one is trickier, because the helper doesn't exist AFAIK, but it is very doable.

  9. Re:Follow the money. on KDE 3.2 Alpha 1 Finally on FTP · · Score: 1

    Venture capital usually has more than 6% of the shares, too.

    You say "Canopy representatives". I think it's more "Canopy representative" (I could be wrong).

    Troll Tech is not pro-Linux or anti-Linux. Troll Tech is a company, they are pro-themselves. That is what companies are by definition. Ignorance of such obvious thing is a recipe for disappointment.

    And I say that even though I actually LIKE Troll Tech.

  10. Re:Follow the money. on KDE 3.2 Alpha 1 Finally on FTP · · Score: 2, Informative

    Canopy doesnt fund Troll Tech.

    Canopy owns some 6% or whatever of Troll Tech.

    Maybe you are not familiar with how corporations work, but usually, the company pays dividends to the stockholders (or not), but the company doesnt send the stockholders the companys bills.

    Canopy did finance Troll Tech once, when they bought the shares. Around 1998, IIRC. You know, when Caldera was still a Linux company.

  11. Re:Just what the world needs... on Woz OK's Apple I Resurrection · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course you can, silly!

    Let's consider a few examples:

    a) Tom Clancy. He is a talentless hack. He is very successful. Mind you, he is a pretty good talentless hack.

    b) Michael Bay.

    The director that possesses the most incoherent cinematographic language in history. Armaggeddon: 36M opening weekend.

    c) Michael Bolton.

    Need I say anything? Other than he has sold like 8 million records or something insane like that?

  12. Re:Heh. on Sun to Build Alternative Desktop ? · · Score: 1

    RTFA. The very first word is "Bangalore". And trust me, this ain't Bangalore, Kansas.

  13. Re:Not a new platform on Sun to Build Alternative Desktop ? · · Score: 1

    Yes, it can be done. Use a VNC session on the server, then start a VNC client fullscreen as your session on the "sunray".

    When you logout, all you close is the display, and the session in the server doesn't notice.

  14. Re:lets compare apps... on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 1

    Yes, the idling is the biggest problem. KRN lacked lots of error checking on the network status (This was my first real C++ program, and my first network client :-). So, if the server dropped the connection, it basically locked.

  15. Re:lets compare apps... on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 1

    You mean someone still uses it? I am shocked :-)

    Sadly I can not help you with your problems. It would involve installing a KDE 1.1 development environment, and it would be kinda hard to work on an app I don't use :-(

  16. I am stupid! on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 1

    I thought this was an answer to MY post :-P

    I am very sorry.

  17. Re:The only once inside the GNOME-community on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 1

    I am "diluding" myself because I don't know "who XML is NOT the easiest way"? Not to mention I didn't say anything of the sort.

    All I said is that you CAN have hierarchical key-value files, which is, I think, pretty much a fact.

    Therefore, stop arguing about random stuff, please.

  18. Re:But it makes up in one huge way.... on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 1

    Well, Borland got one that was cheap enough to include on $249 Kylix

  19. Re:But it makes up in one huge way.... on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 1

    Make that "those who don't expect to make $1500 ever".

    Qt doesn't have a per-project license.

  20. Re:Question on licensing on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 1

    If you want it to be rereleased BSD after 10 years, you would still be 5 years away from getting Qt 1.0. And trust me, Qt 3.1 is a lot better ;-)

    And there are obvious ways to abuse the per-copy scheme you propose. TT has no way to audit or control your licensing, you could be writing a internal use app using this scheme, and never sell a copy, yet you get to keep it proprietary, and TT has made you a gift they didn't intend to do.

    As for all the stuff about how TT should make the money or "change careers"... why? They are doing fine. They seem to be making money. Why change horses in midstream?

    Again: why should they do it? What is in it for THEM. I know what is in it for you (or me ;-)

  21. Re:The only once inside the GNOME-community on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 1

    Uh.... KConfig?

    If I read an entry for a font, I either get a font or an error.

    Oh, well, it lacks the equivalent of enums and ranges, but it is a parser, and it validates.

  22. Re:The only once inside the GNOME-community on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 1

    Oh, so you can't have hierarchies in pair-value files.

    Yeah, right. Wake me up when you feel the sarcasm.

  23. Re:Provocative Article on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 1

    What old mail program?

    KDE has changed window managers, yes, but it has been an evolutionary path. In fact, the author of the new one was the same as the old one.

    You didn't mention the real one which was change of the file manager. But it was changed for a new implementation of the same goals, not a wholly new thing with wholly new goals.

  24. Re:lets compare apps... on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 1

    I hardly ever run into a site that can't be used in konqueror. And since Apple is contributing the Safari patches, I would expect Konq to get even better.

    About IRC programs... I find xchat's too loaded for me. But I am a simple IRC user. But what do you mean by bloated? Does KVirc use significantly more resources than XChat?

    Juk is a specialized tool, it's meant for the guy with a bazillion directories full of music. For that job, it is very good.

    If you want xmms, use xmms. The UI is completely unlike both KDE and GNOME anyway, and you can get a kicker applet to control it ;-)

  25. Re:Question on licensing on Has GNOME Become LAME? · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And what's in it for TT?

    YOu start with an option where they may make no money at all, yet they have to give you support. Then, once you start to see that you will get money from your app (some of which would go to pay TT)... you switch to the other scheme, and they only get the flat fee!

    What you want is TT to take the risk involved in the first scheme, while topping your expense at the fixed cost of the flat fee. No company is going to increase their risk FOR YOU!

    Really, what you want is charity. Like the part about "I'd hoped Trolltech might have recouped whatever costs they have and then released Qt under something like the GPL"

    Even ignoring for a moment that Qt *is* released under the GPL, why on hell would someone who makes a living selling a product stop selling it just because he has recovered the initial investment???? That makes zero business sense!

    It's like saying "hey, I bet Disney has recouped costs from The Lion King, why don't they make it FDL?"