Slashdot Mirror


User: mike1210

mike1210's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
110
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 110

  1. Hi there, Kirk Strauser! on Santorum Suspends Presidential Campaign · · Score: -1

    Thank you for giving us your real name, Kirk Strauser.

    That you've been added to the 'Do Not Hire' list will hopefully be the least of your problems.

  2. Kill the faggots on Santorum Suspends Presidential Campaign · · Score: -1

    It looks to me like a lot of faggots here on Slashdot need killing for denigrating Rick Santorum using the terminology of that faggot Dan Savage.

    Tie them to wooden fences in Wyoming and beat them to death.

  3. Re:This is The Talk that never ends... on Internet Responds To Racist Article, Gets Author Fired · · Score: -1

    That you went to a "Trayvon Martin March" means you're stupid. That you're more afraid of white frat boys means you have no sense of survival.

  4. Only because the truth is "racist" on Internet Responds To Racist Article, Gets Author Fired · · Score: -1

    Everything John Derbyshire wrote in regards to the average intelligence and average criminality of blacks is demonstrably true, and based on observable reality.

    When you can't argue with the facts, just demonize the writer as "racist".

    Humanity is naturally self-segregating, and will segregate along racial lines as long as there exists freedom of association. Desegregation, on the other hand, is unnatural and requires force to impose for even brief periods.

  5. Re:As a business owner on Ask Slashdot: How Have You Handled Illegal Interview Topics? · · Score: -1

    Property rights and contractual obligations are not "fictions", as evidenced by the fact that to destroy private property rights, people like you had to terrorize and murder vast numbers of people over the course of the 20th century.

  6. Re:As a business owner on Ask Slashdot: How Have You Handled Illegal Interview Topics? · · Score: 0

    No. I'm sorry, but trying to discriminate against someone like this IS actively harming and cheating someone else.

    Since there are countless potential employers, any harm done is very minor, and it's not "cheating" under any reasonable definition of the term.

    My right to work trumps your entitlement to be an asshole.

    Sorry, but Amendment I of the united States Constitution is clear: I have the right to freely associate with those whom I wish, including in the course of business.

    If you have a problem with that, perhaps we can force you to hire Rick Santorum, or somebody like him, for a hefty salary. And if you try to discriminate against him, we get to kill you and your entire family for non-compliance.

    How would you like that?

  7. Re:FOR AMERICA WAR IS PEACE MORE THAN ANY OTHER VA on Iran Blamed For Major Cyberattack On BBC · · Score: -1

    Nice litany of lies you have there. Where did you get it from? The KGB?

  8. Re:FOR AMERICA WAR IS PEACE MORE THAN ANY OTHER VA on Iran Blamed For Major Cyberattack On BBC · · Score: -1

    Funny you should say that, since Ho Chi Minh spent over a decade behind a desk in Moscow under Stalin's supervision.

  9. Commie bullshit on Book Review: Occupy World Street · · Score: -1

    "Sustainability" is code word for 'Total State'; nothing more than totalitarianism, only now using the environment as justification. It looks to me like the book is merely just another commie screed.

    "Ross Jackson" needs to have his brains blown all over the walls of his home.

  10. Re:Liar on The Specter of Gasoline At $5 a Gallon · · Score: -1

    Yeah, the French are so much better off, that thousands of them die in heat waves!

    In America, we can afford air conditioning. And to say that the average Swede is better off than the average American is laughable.

  11. Re:No rule of law in New Jersey on Dharun Ravi Trial: Hate Crime Or Stupidity? · · Score: -1

    OMG, I'm gay! How can I join?

    All you have to do is become a member of, and/or donate to any one of the numerous "gay rights" pressure groups.

    I wish I could kill everyone who I disagreed with

    Idiot. We aren't talking about mere disagreement. We're talking about agents of the State committing violence against someone for the "crime" of turning on a webcam.

  12. Re:Hate Crime Or Stupidity? on Dharun Ravi Trial: Hate Crime Or Stupidity? · · Score: -1

    But I do have the right to "Act out", publicly or privately, provided I do not physically assault others.

  13. Re:Hate Crime Or Stupidity? on Dharun Ravi Trial: Hate Crime Or Stupidity? · · Score: -1

    Hate crimes are about attempting to stop bigotry and prejudice

    As a human, it is my God-given right to be as "bigoted" and "prejudiced" as I want. Any "law" that tries to "stop" me is therefore unjust, and those who enact and enforce it need to be gunned down.

  14. No rule of law in New Jersey on Dharun Ravi Trial: Hate Crime Or Stupidity? · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    This is, of course, a show trial put on by the Gay Mafia.

    Given that the two had no information as to Clementi's psychological instability, there's no way that Ravi and Wei could have reasonably believed that this prank might drive Clementi to kill himself, and therefore, to say that Clementi's suicide was an intended result is preposterous.

    With the help of the government schools and universities, sodomites have been urging people to not only indulge their abnormal sexual desires, but to identify themselves by it, being told that such desires are perfectly right and should not be resisted. Still though, Clementi obviously believed that what he was doing was shameful and wrong, and he killed himself for it. If anybody "shares blame" for Clementi's suicide, it's the "gay rights" advocates.

    The prosecutors (persecutors) in this case need to be shot to death. For allowing the case to go forward, the judge also needs to be killed.

  15. Re:Kill "Dan Savage" on Is Santorum's "Google Problem" a Google Problem? · · Score: -1

    Of course by "publicly expressed his personal disapproval of homosexual perversions" you mean wanting to legislate discrimination into our laws and ram intolerance down our throats.

    I thought those who you seem to be advocating for loved having stuff rammed down their throats.

    That aside, I challenge you to post the titles of, and links to, legislation that, while a Senator, Rick Santorum introduced which would "legislate discrimination into our laws".

    He said a bunch of stuff that offended people, and the offended people didn't just sit idle and take it.

    And instead of acting like ordinary humans and producing cogent and halfway intelligent replies to Santorum's message, they chose instead to act like sub-human monkeys throwing feces. Not exactly a way to win many converts to your cause.

  16. Prove it on Is Santorum's "Google Problem" a Google Problem? · · Score: -1

    You'd be hard pressed to prove that Rick Santorum is "obsessed" with faggots, or has advocated in any way for the government banning faggotry.

    Maybe you should be shot to death.

  17. I wish they really were the Taliban... on Is Santorum's "Google Problem" a Google Problem? · · Score: 0

    ...then I would get to enjoy watching Internet videos of you having your throat slit and your head cut off.

  18. Re:Cyberbullying on Is Santorum's "Google Problem" a Google Problem? · · Score: -1

    He tried to use his political power to dehumanize gay people

    I fail to see how expressing a personal opinion against homosexual perversion is "dehumanizing gay people".

    This thing that calls itself "Dan Savage" needs a baseball bat shoved up his ass. Then again,he would probably enjoy that.

    The best people like myself can hope for is that Rick Santorum becomes Maximum Leader, and kills all these faggots who've been demonizing him.

  19. Kill "Dan Savage" on Is Santorum's "Google Problem" a Google Problem? · · Score: -1, Troll

    Santorum got exactly as he deserved. He attacked a group of people relentlessly

    Of course, by "attacked relentlessly", you mean that he publicly expressed his personal disapproval of homosexual perversions.

    "Dan Savage" needs to be shot to death.

  20. Re:"falling over 100% of their previous ranking" on US Plummets On World Press Freedom Ranking · · Score: 0

    I'd urge everyone to read this article that drives a stake in the "job creators and lower taxes' lie

    You don't look at how high the highest tax bracket was, because due to all sorts of loopholes, very few people actually paid the 91% marginal rate. Instead, you look at what percentage of GDP the government seizes:

    For the United States, I defined "high taxes" as the federal government taking more than 18.1% of GDP, for during the Reagan Revolution, the archetype of "voodoo economics" the largest portion of GDP taken by the federal government was slightly more than 18%. Alternatively, I defined "a high taxes period" as any period where the federal government took substantially and persistently more than 18% of GDP.

    Average growth during high tax periods was 1.08%, average growth during normal times was 2.45%. Every high tax period was a long period of economic stagnation, malaise, or decline or else contained a long period of decline. Such events were rare during normal tax periods.(Source)

  21. Not an honest report on US Plummets On World Press Freedom Ranking · · Score: 0

    These "press freedom" rankings are obvious bullshit.

    In at least two of these countries ranked higher than the United States on this list, one can be arrested by asserting that certain historical events did not happen as alleged.

    That, and there's no way the servile, state-dominated press of places like Sweden can outrank the United States in any honest report.

  22. Re:Internet wins... on House Kills SOPA · · Score: -1

    There is no "rightward shift". American politics has always been moving further and further to the left.

    Those who say Democrats are "right wing" are usually those who also think Stalin was too soft on the Kulaks, or that Pol Pot was a moderate.

  23. Re:Hawking: I would not be alive without the NHS on How Stephen Hawking Has Defied the Odds For 50 Years · · Score: 0

    As I've written in this thread, I'll bet that Stephen Hawking has really, really good private health coverage. There's no way that he's going to let himself die in a third-world NHS hospital such as Mid Staffordshire, though he should damn well be required to.

  24. Re:You know, I'm normally against quotas on Microsoft Patents Bad Neighborhood Detection · · Score: 0

    No, the last thing I want is a government bureaucrat dictating to me just whom I may sell my house to.

  25. Re:Best care money can buy helps on How Stephen Hawking Has Defied the Odds For 50 Years · · Score: 0

    No doubt Stephen Hawking has private health coverage as well. There's no way he's going to let himself die in an NHS hospital, though he should be required to.