Is there anyone on Slashdot that honestly feels there's even the slightest probability that SCO will win?
There is always a possibility that IBM *could* settle with SCO, which would throw the entire Linux community into chaos and make things even worse. While it looks like IBM intends to fully-pursue the case, there is a chance this could happen and it could benefit IBM as well, by branding them as one of the few sources of "legitimate" Linux as dictated by SCO.
If we all know they're going to lose, why do people keep posting stories about it?
It's important to make as many people as possible aware of the ongoing activities involved in this case. I probably don't even need to mention that being "right" is no guarantee of a fair trial. Public opinion is a very powerful influence in cases like this, just look at SCO's FUD campaign. It's the OS community's responsibility to clear that cloud of smoke.
I submitted a story days ago about how a study from the American Association of Pediatrians linked television to A.D.D., CNN and the other networks even picked it up... would have made a great story here. But no... let's install Linux in a mythical dead badger... That's not funny. It's not even pathetic. How about the./ editors submit a story on the drugs they're taking when they review submissions?
Don't use Outlook. Don't click on attachments (other than known filetypes that aren't compromised such as.jpg or.mp3) Whatever e-mail program you use don't enable html e-mail or microsoft's browser
Problem solved. No anti-virus needed. No X updates a day.
I've been online since 1992 and have never been infected with a virus/worm. It's simple.
Anti-virus software doesn't mean a thing if you don't have a policy in place. Screw AV software. It is a false sense of security.
The worm/virus explosion is because RBLs are WORKING, and spammers are finding less IP space they can operate from. Their only alternative is to infect client PCs and turn them into proxies. Any mail admin can tell you this is what's happening. RBLs are working. Now if we can get the ISPs to enforce their Terms of Service and shut down compromised PCs, along with the authorities who may at some point get off their lazy asses and start putting some of these spammers in jail, we'd have 99% less virus/worm propagation. Occam would agree. Lobby your District Attorneys to stop prosecuting Tommy Chongs and do something in the public interest and the world will be a better place.
It seems to me, instead of all this back room dancing, Microsoft should just follow their traditional plan if they want to destroy Linux. They seem intent on hiding their true contempt for this stable product and its threat to their core OS tree, so they work deals with companies like Sun and SCO to nick away at Linux and avoid any posture which might indicate Linux as a major contender.
It seems to me, if they were smart, Microsoft would do what they've always done. Come out with a MS-branded version of Unix that at first was open, and then progressively turn it into a bloated, un-compatible mess that only works with their products. They did this with DOS; they should just do the same thing with Linux. The way I figure, Microsoft Linux 2006 will run everything, then by the time Microsoft Linux 2008 comes out, it suddenly won't run Apache or Sendmail, etc.
This reminds me of something that happened a few years back. We were contacted by a certain very large fast food chain (who shall remain nameless) and they wanted to use some of our technology on their web site. They felt what we were doing with surveys and other systems were superior to everything else out there. The problem? They were in bed with Microsoft and Microsoft offered to provide free programming for their web site. Even so they were willing to pay us to integrate our technology into their web site because they felt it was better than anything Microsoft could offer. The problem was, because MS was willing to whore itself out to a large corporate client, we were forced to low-ball the value of our services in order to get the job to the point of losing money (and whoring ourselves out as well). In the end, we felt it just wasn't worth it.
This kind of practice is rampant in the industry. A company with large resources gives away inferior products and services in order to maintain business. A classic example of how the larger companies intentionally lose money to maintain the status quo, stifle innovation, and keep smaller operations from getting good contracts.
Obviously in the case of Real verses WMP, it's two big companies, but you'd think MS might also jump into the whorehouse against Real, but since WMP is the crux of a lot of suspected anti-trust activity, maybe they won't? In any case, all this stuff is really bad for consumers and the industry.
I don't know what version of Realplayer I have, but if I dare click on a link, when the program launches, it still installs that insideous tkbell.exe "worm" in my startup. I'm sick of Real.
It just seemed to me that an entity to protect people from spam fraud shouldn't encourage people to save and exhibit that spam. That's about as appropriate as the Mormons promoting coffee (when substances like coffee are antithetical to the church's tenets). Yea, that bit was the odd one, but I couldn't resist the dark-roast, medium-grind aroma of irony.
As opposed to who's privacy policy? Yahoo? Hotmail? Online privacy policies are largely unenforceable so they're meaningless in the first place. TrustE certified? Yea, right... that company is like the fox guarding the henhouse. There is NO privacy policy anywhere on the net that has much legal ground unless it pertains to kids under the age of 12.
Today is the first blow of many that will take SCO's stock back to the penny-stock pink sheet.
I'd tend to agree with you except it looks like SCO is trying to manipulate the price by buying back its own shares:
Form 8-K for SCO GROUP INC
11-Mar-2004
Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure
Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure.
The board of directors of The SCO Group, Inc. ("SCO") has authorized management, in its discretion, to purchase up to 1.5 million shares of SCO's common stock over the next 24 months. The repurchase program is effective immediately. SCO has approximately 14.4 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Any repurchased shares will be held as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate purposes.
The repurchase program will allow SCO to repurchase its shares from time to time in accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission on the open market, in block trades and in privately negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions and other factors.
Forward Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements regarding SCO's implementation of a stock repurchase program. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties may affect the timing and amounts of stock purchases under the program and other circumstances related to repurchases under the program. Purchases under the program are subject to the discretion of management based on market conditions and other factors including the trading price of SCO's common stock, availability of stock, alternative uses of capital and SCO's financial condition. Other risks and uncertainties related to SCO's business are described in SCO's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Will the threat of SCO litigation slow down Linux adoption? Not likely. The lawsuits have been in the air for a year now, yet sales of Linux-based servers continue to pick up steam. In the fourth quarter of 2003, they grew 51% over the same quarter last year, according to Gartner. In comparison, sales of Windows servers were up 15.9%, and Unix servers dropped 4%. In the last two years, Linux' share of the server market has grown from 2.7% to 7%. With big computer makers like IBM, Hewlett-Packard (HP ), Dell (DELL ), and now even Sun Microsystems (SUNW ) selling Linux boxes, there's little reason to think Linux will lose its momentum.
I think Seinfeld is funny. But like "Friends", it's so mundanely-contrived that you have to suspend a lot of common sense in order to buy into the goofy things the characters do. It's a good show in the spirit of the Three Stooges. On that level, it's vicerally entertaining.
The thing about Seinfeld that makes it worthy of a symbol of the decline of television as an information/art medium is that for several years, this show was held as the premier example of television's appeal, yet it had ultimately no point. And that's a good symbol of television's value to our culture, or lack thereof.
I wouldn't put Chappele and Quinn in the same category. Chappele is a brilliant and incisive comedian who uses racial issues to call attention to hypocrisies in the human condition that transcend cultural ideoms. Colin Quinn however, is a C-List stand-up comic who must have found a genie in a bottle in order to get his own TV show. When he and his guests address racial issues, they're not done in any tasteful, thoughtful or funny way, unless you think a white guy saying "nigger" is funny because you couldn't get away with it yourself and there's some perverse satisfaction in watching, not unlike how we seem to enjoy fat guys making fun of themselves. Quinn's show is essentially subtle racist commentary packaged in a mildly amusing manner. When he stereotypes Jews or Irish people, he doesn't do anything beyond whoring these cultural generalizations for a laugh. But wait, that's so un-PC it must be something really innovative.. yea right.
But I agree with what you all are saying.. I'm just having some fun with the characterizations.
What? How does that work? If you couldn't compile OpenSSH using your current zlib headers and libs, then you wouldn't be able to install the OpenSSH binary either.
I could compile OpenSSH. I just got a warning about a library being outdated and in need of updating because of known vulnerabilities. I didn't try a package version but I'd venture to guess there are no such checks when binary installation is involved.
I liked American Idol when it first came out and was called, "The Gong Show". I enjoyed it again as "Showtime at the Apollo". I thought it was OK when it came out again and was called, "Star Search". Its amusement has worn thin in the wake of heavily un-original performances being identified as creativity and talent.
You think it takes a lot of talent to emulate Maria Carey or Luther Vandross? Every church in the Southern half of the United states has at least one choir member who can sing like the best on the show.
If American Idol were made by nerds, it would feature programmers from all around the world submitting code... for Tetris... some better than others, but it's still Tetris, with the occasional pong diversion.
Is this what our version of an "idol" has evolved to? Someone who sounds like someone else but a little better? Yea, they find some people who can sing, but the real talent and idols weren't all about vocal masturbation and 32nd note chromatic scales. That's just my opinion. YMMV.
I always build from source. IMO, it's the only way to go. A smart admin does not trust anyone else's executables when the alternative exists of building your own code on your own system.
More importantly, when you build your own from source, you're often reminded of outdated dependencies that need to be upgraded. I recently compiled a new version of OpenSSH and found out that I had a vulnerable copy of zlib on my system. Had I installed a package, I might not have known.
Why would people be less interested in television when there's so many good things on?
* Real World - network executives get young kids to the point of alcohol poisoning and videotape them for your amusement
* Fear Factor - out-of-work hollywood actors line up to eat bugs for your amusement
* Tough Crowd - Colin Quinn and his buddies validate your racist tendencies
* The Apprentice - A dozen yuppies compete to get close enough to see if Donald Trump's hair is actually a new, sentient life form.
* American Chopper - All of America tunes in each week to see if this will be the show where Paul Jr. hits Paul Sr. over the head with a tire iron.
* Rush Limbaugh - Only in America can the Vice Presient of the United States be seen calling in to an Oxycotin addict's tv/radio show.
* Seinfeld - A "show about nothing"; of course it will be a huge hit. Each week we anxiously look forward to an entirely new paradigm shift in obsessive-compulsive behavior.
* The Osbournes - Watch burned out rocker being slowly driven crazy by his own family.
* X-Play - This is a show that's all about Morgan Web's sweater pies, but I think there's a side theme of gaming, but I'm not sure.
* Almost everything on WB - Lame urban sitcoms that have revitalized the laugh track industry.
* Survivor - Amuse yourself by watching Mark Burnett dangle rice and toilet paper over the heads of starving, back-stabbing media-whores on a deserted island.
* Law and Order: SVU - It's like Dateline NBC with worse acting.
* Will and Grace - Yet another show about 30-something beautiful single people. I just can't get enough of homo/hetero-erotic lust triangles. Rumor has it, Mr. Roeper will return during sweeps week.
* CSI: Miami - Someone died; someone's hiding something; someone's an arrogant/evasive prick; someone's hair is in the wrong place. Not since CSI: Topeka, CSI: Fargo and CSI: Van Nuys has CBS come up with an intriguing, compelling and creative series.
* American Idol - Innovative show involving no-talent hacks (who have slept with the right people) criticizing no-talent hacks.
I'd write more but it's time for the Jimmy Kimmel show.. gotta go.
What's really sad is that I bet some of the "high rollas" on this site are actually buying themselves gifts from alternate accounts, or are company shills designed to motivate a much smaller number of legitimate members to compete for more intangible crap.
Ultimately, you have to respect a venture like this, that can make a person alternate between thoughts of "WTF This is sick" and "Wow, this is genius". It's both interesting & entertaining, and profoudly sad and pathetic as well. What an eloquent microcosm of capitalism, superficiality and materialism.
A few years ago, I discovered one of my servers slowed to a crawl. Upon further inspection it was one of (the more prominent) price-grabber systems hammering various client sites collecting prices. Many of them seem to open tons of simultaneous connections and effectively DOS'd the server. We had to complain for two days to get them to back off. I'm not a big fan of these sites, and most of the time the shipping/availability as indicated isn't accurate.
Ahh, I stand corrected. I thought that he had originally owned it so I'm not sure what I was thinking, but for sure, you can bet if they do have new owners, the show's honesty will be lobotomized.
Travelling to London faster is nice, but I'm holding out for technology that allows our baggage to travel just as fast.
Re:CNN Errors and the quarter mile
on
X-43A Hits Mach 7
·
· Score: 1
This really ticks me off. How tough is it for CNN to research their news so that they can avoid a ten second soundbyte being riddled with inaccuracies?
Slashdot Mirror
I submitted my story before then and it was rejected. bleh.
Is there anyone on Slashdot that honestly feels there's even the slightest probability that SCO will win?
There is always a possibility that IBM *could* settle with SCO, which would throw the entire Linux community into chaos and make things even worse. While it looks like IBM intends to fully-pursue the case, there is a chance this could happen and it could benefit IBM as well, by branding them as one of the few sources of "legitimate" Linux as dictated by SCO.
If we all know they're going to lose, why do people keep posting stories about it?
It's important to make as many people as possible aware of the ongoing activities involved in this case. I probably don't even need to mention that being "right" is no guarantee of a fair trial. Public opinion is a very powerful influence in cases like this, just look at SCO's FUD campaign. It's the OS community's responsibility to clear that cloud of smoke.
People need to send an email to enforcement@sec.gov and request a formal investigation into this stock situation with SCOX.
went something like this...
"Your honor, I'm just a caveman. I was frozen in some ice millions of years ago and thawed out..."
I submitted a story days ago about how a study from the American Association of Pediatrians linked television to A.D.D., CNN and the other networks even picked it up... would have made a great story here. But no... let's install Linux in a mythical dead badger... That's not funny. It's not even pathetic. How about the ./ editors submit a story on the drugs they're taking when they review submissions?
Don't use Outlook. .jpg or .mp3)
Don't click on attachments (other than known filetypes that aren't compromised such as
Whatever e-mail program you use don't enable html e-mail or microsoft's browser
Problem solved. No anti-virus needed. No X updates a day.
I've been online since 1992 and have never been infected with a virus/worm. It's simple.
Anti-virus software doesn't mean a thing if you don't have a policy in place. Screw AV software. It is a false sense of security.
SPAMMERS...
The worm/virus explosion is because RBLs are WORKING, and spammers are finding less IP space they can operate from. Their only alternative is to infect client PCs and turn them into proxies. Any mail admin can tell you this is what's happening. RBLs are working. Now if we can get the ISPs to enforce their Terms of Service and shut down compromised PCs, along with the authorities who may at some point get off their lazy asses and start putting some of these spammers in jail, we'd have 99% less virus/worm propagation. Occam would agree. Lobby your District Attorneys to stop prosecuting Tommy Chongs and do something in the public interest and the world will be a better place.
It seems to me, instead of all this back room dancing, Microsoft should just follow their traditional plan if they want to destroy Linux. They seem intent on hiding their true contempt for this stable product and its threat to their core OS tree, so they work deals with companies like Sun and SCO to nick away at Linux and avoid any posture which might indicate Linux as a major contender.
It seems to me, if they were smart, Microsoft would do what they've always done. Come out with a MS-branded version of Unix that at first was open, and then progressively turn it into a bloated, un-compatible mess that only works with their products. They did this with DOS; they should just do the same thing with Linux. The way I figure, Microsoft Linux 2006 will run everything, then by the time Microsoft Linux 2008 comes out, it suddenly won't run Apache or Sendmail, etc.
My prediction for the future:
3. Java is dead.
In the future? Dude. Look around you now.
This reminds me of something that happened a few years back. We were contacted by a certain very large fast food chain (who shall remain nameless) and they wanted to use some of our technology on their web site. They felt what we were doing with surveys and other systems were superior to everything else out there. The problem? They were in bed with Microsoft and Microsoft offered to provide free programming for their web site. Even so they were willing to pay us to integrate our technology into their web site because they felt it was better than anything Microsoft could offer. The problem was, because MS was willing to whore itself out to a large corporate client, we were forced to low-ball the value of our services in order to get the job to the point of losing money (and whoring ourselves out as well). In the end, we felt it just wasn't worth it.
This kind of practice is rampant in the industry. A company with large resources gives away inferior products and services in order to maintain business. A classic example of how the larger companies intentionally lose money to maintain the status quo, stifle innovation, and keep smaller operations from getting good contracts.
Obviously in the case of Real verses WMP, it's two big companies, but you'd think MS might also jump into the whorehouse against Real, but since WMP is the crux of a lot of suspected anti-trust activity, maybe they won't? In any case, all this stuff is really bad for consumers and the industry.
I don't know what version of Realplayer I have, but if I dare click on a link, when the program launches, it still installs that insideous tkbell.exe "worm" in my startup. I'm sick of Real.
It just seemed to me that an entity to protect people from spam fraud shouldn't encourage people to save and exhibit that spam. That's about as appropriate as the Mormons promoting coffee (when substances like coffee are antithetical to the church's tenets). Yea, that bit was the odd one, but I couldn't resist the dark-roast, medium-grind aroma of irony.
* Dept of Homeland security launches new, "show us your funniest pipe bomb" contest.
* SCO announces $1M contest for "best stolen Unix code snippet".
* Elizabeth Glazier Foundation promotes AIDS awareness campaign encouraging people to tell them their funniest unprotected sex story.
* Church of Latter-Day Saints sells Joseph Smith-emblazoned coffee mugs in its gift shop.
* DEA announces new contest: "What's the stupiest thing you've done while high on crack?"
* Diebold unveils ad campaign around their new contest: "Show us your funniest fake voter registration card."
* Mothers Against Drunk Driving sets up survey on their web site encouraging people to vote for their favorite alcoholic beverage.
As opposed to who's privacy policy? Yahoo? Hotmail? Online privacy policies are largely unenforceable so they're meaningless in the first place. TrustE certified? Yea, right... that company is like the fox guarding the henhouse. There is NO privacy policy anywhere on the net that has much legal ground unless it pertains to kids under the age of 12.
Today is the first blow of many that will take SCO's stock back to the penny-stock pink sheet.
I'd tend to agree with you except it looks like SCO is trying to manipulate the price by buying back its own shares:
Form 8-K for SCO GROUP INC
11-Mar-2004
Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure
Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure.
The board of directors of The SCO Group, Inc. ("SCO") has authorized management, in its discretion, to purchase up to 1.5 million shares of SCO's common stock over the next 24 months. The repurchase program is effective immediately. SCO has approximately 14.4 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Any repurchased shares will be held as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate purposes.
The repurchase program will allow SCO to repurchase its shares from time to time in accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission on the open market, in block trades and in privately negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions and other factors.
Forward Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements regarding SCO's implementation of a stock repurchase program. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties may affect the timing and amounts of stock purchases under the program and other circumstances related to repurchases under the program. Purchases under the program are subject to the discretion of management based on market conditions and other factors including the trading price of SCO's common stock, availability of stock, alternative uses of capital and SCO's financial condition. Other risks and uncertainties related to SCO's business are described in SCO's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
SCOX is at $8.40/share
tick.. tick.. tick..
From an article today on Businessweek
I think Seinfeld is funny. But like "Friends", it's so mundanely-contrived that you have to suspend a lot of common sense in order to buy into the goofy things the characters do. It's a good show in the spirit of the Three Stooges. On that level, it's vicerally entertaining.
The thing about Seinfeld that makes it worthy of a symbol of the decline of television as an information/art medium is that for several years, this show was held as the premier example of television's appeal, yet it had ultimately no point. And that's a good symbol of television's value to our culture, or lack thereof.
I wouldn't put Chappele and Quinn in the same category. Chappele is a brilliant and incisive comedian who uses racial issues to call attention to hypocrisies in the human condition that transcend cultural ideoms. Colin Quinn however, is a C-List stand-up comic who must have found a genie in a bottle in order to get his own TV show. When he and his guests address racial issues, they're not done in any tasteful, thoughtful or funny way, unless you think a white guy saying "nigger" is funny because you couldn't get away with it yourself and there's some perverse satisfaction in watching, not unlike how we seem to enjoy fat guys making fun of themselves. Quinn's show is essentially subtle racist commentary packaged in a mildly amusing manner. When he stereotypes Jews or Irish people, he doesn't do anything beyond whoring these cultural generalizations for a laugh. But wait, that's so un-PC it must be something really innovative.. yea right.
But I agree with what you all are saying.. I'm just having some fun with the characterizations.
What? How does that work? If you couldn't compile OpenSSH using your current zlib headers and libs, then you wouldn't be able to install the OpenSSH binary either.
I could compile OpenSSH. I just got a warning about a library being outdated and in need of updating because of known vulnerabilities. I didn't try a package version but I'd venture to guess there are no such checks when binary installation is involved.
apparently you've never WATCHED american idol...
I liked American Idol when it first came out and was called, "The Gong Show". I enjoyed it again as "Showtime at the Apollo". I thought it was OK when it came out again and was called, "Star Search". Its amusement has worn thin in the wake of heavily un-original performances being identified as creativity and talent.
You think it takes a lot of talent to emulate Maria Carey or Luther Vandross? Every church in the Southern half of the United states has at least one choir member who can sing like the best on the show.
If American Idol were made by nerds, it would feature programmers from all around the world submitting code... for Tetris... some better than others, but it's still Tetris, with the occasional pong diversion.
Is this what our version of an "idol" has evolved to? Someone who sounds like someone else but a little better? Yea, they find some people who can sing, but the real talent and idols weren't all about vocal masturbation and 32nd note chromatic scales. That's just my opinion. YMMV.
I always build from source. IMO, it's the only way to go. A smart admin does not trust anyone else's executables when the alternative exists of building your own code on your own system.
More importantly, when you build your own from source, you're often reminded of outdated dependencies that need to be upgraded. I recently compiled a new version of OpenSSH and found out that I had a vulnerable copy of zlib on my system. Had I installed a package, I might not have known.
Why would people be less interested in television when there's so many good things on?
* Real World - network executives get young kids to the point of alcohol poisoning and videotape them for your amusement
* Fear Factor - out-of-work hollywood actors line up to eat bugs for your amusement
* Tough Crowd - Colin Quinn and his buddies validate your racist tendencies
* The Apprentice - A dozen yuppies compete to get close enough to see if Donald Trump's hair is actually a new, sentient life form.
* American Chopper - All of America tunes in each week to see if this will be the show where Paul Jr. hits Paul Sr. over the head with a tire iron.
* Rush Limbaugh - Only in America can the Vice Presient of the United States be seen calling in to an Oxycotin addict's tv/radio show.
* Seinfeld - A "show about nothing"; of course it will be a huge hit. Each week we anxiously look forward to an entirely new paradigm shift in obsessive-compulsive behavior.
* The Osbournes - Watch burned out rocker being slowly driven crazy by his own family.
* X-Play - This is a show that's all about Morgan Web's sweater pies, but I think there's a side theme of gaming, but I'm not sure.
* Almost everything on WB - Lame urban sitcoms that have revitalized the laugh track industry.
* Survivor - Amuse yourself by watching Mark Burnett dangle rice and toilet paper over the heads of starving, back-stabbing media-whores on a deserted island.
* Law and Order: SVU - It's like Dateline NBC with worse acting.
* Will and Grace - Yet another show about 30-something beautiful single people. I just can't get enough of homo/hetero-erotic lust triangles. Rumor has it, Mr. Roeper will return during sweeps week.
* CSI: Miami - Someone died; someone's hiding something; someone's an arrogant/evasive prick; someone's hair is in the wrong place. Not since CSI: Topeka, CSI: Fargo and CSI: Van Nuys has CBS come up with an intriguing, compelling and creative series.
* American Idol - Innovative show involving no-talent hacks (who have slept with the right people) criticizing no-talent hacks.
I'd write more but it's time for the Jimmy Kimmel show.. gotta go.
What's really sad is that I bet some of the "high rollas" on this site are actually buying themselves gifts from alternate accounts, or are company shills designed to motivate a much smaller number of legitimate members to compete for more intangible crap.
Ultimately, you have to respect a venture like this, that can make a person alternate between thoughts of "WTF This is sick" and "Wow, this is genius". It's both interesting & entertaining, and profoudly sad and pathetic as well. What an eloquent microcosm of capitalism, superficiality and materialism.
A few years ago, I discovered one of my servers slowed to a crawl. Upon further inspection it was one of (the more prominent) price-grabber systems hammering various client sites collecting prices. Many of them seem to open tons of simultaneous connections and effectively DOS'd the server. We had to complain for two days to get them to back off. I'm not a big fan of these sites, and most of the time the shipping/availability as indicated isn't accurate.
Ahh, I stand corrected. I thought that he had originally owned it so I'm not sure what I was thinking, but for sure, you can bet if they do have new owners, the show's honesty will be lobotomized.
Travelling to London faster is nice, but I'm holding out for technology that allows our baggage to travel just as fast.
This really ticks me off. How tough is it for CNN to research their news so that they can avoid a ten second soundbyte being riddled with inaccuracies?