I can tell you first hand that (Israeli) ladies that are for the first time confronted with an uncircumcised penis love to play hide and seek with the glans:)
With the exception of some exotic materials the thermal energy stored in a material is related to it's weight.
The main advantage of an ice is that there is additional energy needed for the solid to liquid transient, something you probably don't want to try with a rock or piece of steel...
Hey thanks for introducing me to the concept of latitude, I've been photographing for many years and hadn't heard of it.
But when I look at raw pictures of my D800 they have significant information hidden in the dark and bright parts of an exposure and with software it can be brought out, effectively lowering the contrast for the whole picture.
Meaning the limiting factor is the contrast range of the screen or printed media, contrary to our eyes they are not dynamic.
Generally the cameraman will take a (very) different shot depending on the resolution and expected screen size the work is destined for.
Something recorded for a typical (SD) TV program would look odd on a big screen, even when the resolution would be right because it's shot with a relatively narrow view.
I suppose this UHDTV format will result in more immersion due to use of wider angle shots, the significant centre bit would have even greater detail while a good perifial view would now also be available at the same resolution providing you'd moved your eyes or head.
That raped woman had her physical integrity broken which even without the social pressures and drama you describe is sufficient reason for her to be seriously hurt, not only physically but also mentally.
She experienced how she was forced to give up any control what so ever over her own body and dignity, that she was at the mercy of an uninvited person.
Surely that in itself is good reason to not be surprised her suffering goes well beyond the time the physical act took.
Of course we should help her build herself up again instead of giving her further guild and grieve.
But who in his right mind can suggest a woman is not at least to some degree a product of her social environment.
You seem to forget the implications of the 7th. and 10th. commandments, in the authors day any unwedded woman would be the responsibility of her father or (oldest) brother, 'desiring' her is therefore forbidden.
Even before the court's interference all subscribers of the affected ISP (xs4all.nl) were able to use IPv6 where the DNS block doesn't work:)
No, blocking due to a court order based on infringement of IP rights isn't censorship.
Iran and N Korea have had lots of substantial offers of help with their nuclear program, they routinely dismiss them.
One of the offers made was that Russia would enrich the needed Uranium.
Russia is regularly on the receiving end of fundamental Islamic terrorism, all together we can conclude you don't follow the news very much...
Why should in this day and age having sex result in getting children?
I mean like here last year there were on every 1000 teenagers 5 that had a baby, in the USofA it's 64 or so.
Because I'm pretty sure our teenagers have the same sex drive as in other 1st. world countries this has a lot to do with education.
Have you instructed your kids on the subject?
You are fo full of it, NN has nothing to do with limiting something like torrent traffic.
Quite the contrary, they are not supposed to distinguish between any sorts of traffic, all is handled equally.
When a court or legislator deems it necessary to limit or stop a certain type of IP infringement it's easier to mandate right now, NN would only get in the way of the actual filtering.
You are purposely lying or ignorant to state (American) ISP's are right now not shaping traffic based on content or protocol.
First off, in the examples given the court had every reason to decide as they did, like the government needed to prop up the price of wheat and the guy clearly sabotaged it, however sympathetic I as a farm boy can be to his plans.
Selling raw milk is a known health hazard, that stands entirely separate from other health hazards like antibiotics resistance.
The banning of the Pirate Bay in some EU countries has nothing to do with net neutrality or even censorship, it's the outcome (for now) of a simple civil law case driven by the IP-rights holders.
In a country without NN the ISP's could have used DPI to frustrate the use of bit torrent, because of our NN law they had to find the solution on DNS level and we all know how well that works:)
It sounds you agree with the claim corporations are human.
The government is there for and of the population, the (human) population consists for 100% of consumers and that's where a government should firstly pay it's allegiance, only secondary with the corporations.
In my country we have net neutrality by law and anyone can start an ISP just like any other company.
Would an ISP break the NN rules he can be fined and/or shut down like any other company that breaks the law, no special registration needed.
NN makes deep packet inspection rather pointless so there is a lot less chance the ISP would install such an expensive system, it would serve no purpose.
These are not different networks, they are al IP.
Of course even under NN rules there is a possibility for an ISP to allot a certain part of their bandwidth for extra services like IPTV or VOIP, it's for a reason called Triple Play.
But they should not be allowed to restrict the use of other, possibly competing, TV or phone services on the part reserved for internet.
Slashdot Mirror
I can tell you first hand that (Israeli) ladies that are for the first time confronted with an uncircumcised penis love to play hide and seek with the glans :)
No sane person will ever be attracted to this site
Most successful cures started with diagnosis, this should be a good start for recovery.
People were under the impression they were allowed to do things that were harder in other places.
With the exception of some exotic materials the thermal energy stored in a material is related to it's weight.
The main advantage of an ice is that there is additional energy needed for the solid to liquid transient, something you probably don't want to try with a rock or piece of steel...
What you need to set it up and keep it running is distributed via the same repositories and servers where you get the Unity encumbered Ubuntu.
So Canonical is still spending money on it and I am grateful for it.
Hey thanks for introducing me to the concept of latitude, I've been photographing for many years and hadn't heard of it.
But when I look at raw pictures of my D800 they have significant information hidden in the dark and bright parts of an exposure and with software it can be brought out, effectively lowering the contrast for the whole picture.
Meaning the limiting factor is the contrast range of the screen or printed media, contrary to our eyes they are not dynamic.
And who claimed it was "factually accurate"?
Freedom Respectfully disagrees
Maybe it's due to space restraints but the concept of a dedicated TV room is over here quite rare.
Generally the cameraman will take a (very) different shot depending on the resolution and expected screen size the work is destined for.
Something recorded for a typical (SD) TV program would look odd on a big screen, even when the resolution would be right because it's shot with a relatively narrow view.
I suppose this UHDTV format will result in more immersion due to use of wider angle shots, the significant centre bit would have even greater detail while a good perifial view would now also be available at the same resolution providing you'd moved your eyes or head.
This is not the rumoured cubistic Apple logo!
Indeed.
Surely the authors don't claim that 86% of rapes in the U.S. go unreported?
It might very well be, as a matter of fact it would not surprise me when so few rapes (non consentual sex) go unreported.
That raped woman had her physical integrity broken which even without the social pressures and drama you describe is sufficient reason for her to be seriously hurt, not only physically but also mentally.
She experienced how she was forced to give up any control what so ever over her own body and dignity, that she was at the mercy of an uninvited person.
Surely that in itself is good reason to not be surprised her suffering goes well beyond the time the physical act took.
Of course we should help her build herself up again instead of giving her further guild and grieve.
But who in his right mind can suggest a woman is not at least to some degree a product of her social environment.
You seem to forget the implications of the 7th. and 10th. commandments, in the authors day any unwedded woman would be the responsibility of her father or (oldest) brother, 'desiring' her is therefore forbidden.
Even before the court's interference all subscribers of the affected ISP (xs4all.nl) were able to use IPv6 where the DNS block doesn't work :)
No, blocking due to a court order based on infringement of IP rights isn't censorship.
Who's the blasphemer, I live in a Constitutional Monarchy, don't you insult the Queen!
Iran and N Korea have had lots of substantial offers of help with their nuclear program, they routinely dismiss them.
One of the offers made was that Russia would enrich the needed Uranium.
Russia is regularly on the receiving end of fundamental Islamic terrorism, all together we can conclude you don't follow the news very much...
But is a general rule good enough when the subject includes a nuclear reactor AND Bill Gates?
I mean like here last year there were on every 1000 teenagers 5 that had a baby, in the USofA it's 64 or so.
Because I'm pretty sure our teenagers have the same sex drive as in other 1st. world countries this has a lot to do with education.
Have you instructed your kids on the subject?
Quite the contrary, they are not supposed to distinguish between any sorts of traffic, all is handled equally.
When a court or legislator deems it necessary to limit or stop a certain type of IP infringement it's easier to mandate right now, NN would only get in the way of the actual filtering.
You are purposely lying or ignorant to state (American) ISP's are right now not shaping traffic based on content or protocol.
First off, in the examples given the court had every reason to decide as they did, like the government needed to prop up the price of wheat and the guy clearly sabotaged it, however sympathetic I as a farm boy can be to his plans.
Selling raw milk is a known health hazard, that stands entirely separate from other health hazards like antibiotics resistance.
The banning of the Pirate Bay in some EU countries has nothing to do with net neutrality or even censorship, it's the outcome (for now) of a simple civil law case driven by the IP-rights holders.
In a country without NN the ISP's could have used DPI to frustrate the use of bit torrent, because of our NN law they had to find the solution on DNS level and we all know how well that works :)
The government is there for and of the population, the (human) population consists for 100% of consumers and that's where a government should firstly pay it's allegiance, only secondary with the corporations.
In my country we have net neutrality by law and anyone can start an ISP just like any other company.
Would an ISP break the NN rules he can be fined and/or shut down like any other company that breaks the law, no special registration needed.
NN makes deep packet inspection rather pointless so there is a lot less chance the ISP would install such an expensive system, it would serve no purpose.
These are not different networks, they are al IP.
Of course even under NN rules there is a possibility for an ISP to allot a certain part of their bandwidth for extra services like IPTV or VOIP, it's for a reason called Triple Play.
But they should not be allowed to restrict the use of other, possibly competing, TV or phone services on the part reserved for internet.
NN is about opening up, not about restricting.