Slashdot Mirror


Astronaut Neil Armstrong Has Died

dsinc writes "Neil Armstrong, first man on the Moon, has died. NBC News broke the news, without giving other details. Neil was recovering from a heart-bypass surgery he had had a couple of weeks ago. Sad news, marking the end of a glorious and more optimistic era... RIP, Neil." Also at Reuters.

480 comments

  1. A class act by schwit1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And a great pilot. You will be missed.

    1. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I really hoped he would win the Tour de France again. ;_;

    2. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't forget, he was one of the first true engineer-pilot astronauts.

    3. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Neil Armstrong has truly been an inspiration to each and every one of us. What we wouldn't have done to be in his shoes when he made that One Small Step.

    4. Re:A class act by C0R1D4N · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hope we send his ashes there at the very least.

    5. Re:A class act by Niklas+Ohlsson · · Score: 5, Informative

      And with balls of steel, he proved this with the uncontrollably rolling Gemini 8 and the successful manual landing on the moon.

    6. Re:A class act by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Informative

      He was known for his patience and concentration in difficult situations. In early Earth orbit tests, his capsule was spinning out of control off-axis due to a faulty stabilizer nozzle. He used the spares to straighten the ship even though it was difficult to tell which end was "up".

      He later had to bail out of a LEM lander during a test run in the desert just barely in time to open the chute as the lander crashed. He came to work the next day cool and calm as if it was any other work day, yet determined to find out what went wrong.

      And then during the Apollo 11 landing, he took control from the auto-pilot because the lander was headed for some large boulders. Fuel was running out because back then they didn't know the moon's center of gravity was offset from its physical center. The margin was tiny, but he found a way.

      They picked the right guy for the mission.

    7. Re:A class act by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Or launch his coffin into space, if thats the way the family wants it.

    8. Re:A class act by mvdwege · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's even better than that. NASA in the sixties and seventies showed us just how powerful a robust process is.

      A process is fragile if it attempts to solve a crisis by planning ahead for all contingencies. Inevitably an incident will happen that was not planned for, and the whole edifice will fail.

      A robust process assumes something unforeseen will go wrong, and concentrate on making sure that there are adequate resources to respond in an ad-hoc manner.

      NASA's processes in the Apollo project relied on a robust response: when anything went wrong, a highly qualified person was on the spot to think of a response and execute it. Sure they planned for incidents, but the final contingency plan was to have smart people with high stress tolerance to provide incident response 'on the ground'.

      Armstrong was one of the exemplary examples of those people. He was by no means the only one though.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    9. Re:A class act by MtViewGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it was Armstrong's ability to "stay calm" in times of crisis in the two instances you mentioned was the reason why he was chosen as mission commander on Apollo 11. During his days as X-15 test pilot, some test pilots at Edwards AFB thought he didn't have enough "stick and rudder" skills to handle sophisticated test vehicles, but Armstrong proved them all wrong....

      Godspeed, Neil Armstrong.

    10. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "I am, and ever will be, a white-socks, pocket-protector, nerdy engineer -- born under the second law of thermodynamics, steeped in the steam tables, in love with free-body diagrams, transformed by Laplace, and propelled by compressible flow." - Neil Armstrong

    11. Re:A class act by ubrgeek · · Score: 2

      True. His death isn't what brought about the end an "optimistic era." The government butchering NASA's budget had already accomplished that. Curious what his thoughts were on what has become of the agency.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    12. Re:A class act by dpilot · · Score: 2

      In this case, science fiction can be a leading indicator. Even as the moon landings happened, post-apocolypse science fiction was well established. Of course even some of that managed to be the optimistic, "we will recover, we will do better," type. I'd say one signpost of the optimism really dying, though perhaps not the key event, was the corporate-ruled dystopia genre. Government stupidity and butchery was only a contributing factor, not the key one.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    13. Re:A class act by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're thinking of Louis Armstrong.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    14. Re:A class act by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Aim it at Mars.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    15. Re:A class act by bfandreas · · Score: 0

      What? The musician? Performed with Crazy Horse? Rust does sleep after all :(
      Look out mama there's a white boat coming up the river...

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    16. Re:A class act by bfandreas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...they shot one of our own at the moon. Turns out jocks like Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon didn't get ther first.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    17. Re:A class act by bfandreas · · Score: 2

      Why Mars? That's too close. He's got time.
      Let him surf with the Phoenix Asteroids.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    18. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very good. I got it :D

    19. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Curious what his thoughts were on what has become of the agency.

      From the Wikipedia article:

      In an open public letter also signed by Apollo veterans Jim Lovell and Gene Cernan, he [=Armstrong] noted, "For The United States, the leading space faring nation for nearly half a century, to be without carriage to low Earth orbit and with no human exploration capability to go beyond Earth orbit for an indeterminate time into the future, destines our nation to become one of second or even third rate stature".

      On November 18, 2010, at age eighty, Armstrong said in a speech during the Science & Technology Summit in The Hague, Netherlands, that he would offer his services as commander on a mission to Mars if he were asked.

    20. Re:A class act by bfandreas · · Score: 2

      I am OVERAWED by those guys who got their shot. They were pilots AND engineers AND scientists rolled into one. If something went wrong they had to do the math mend things with what they got while widly spinning and slowly asphyxiating. While even getting close to where they got was a huge team effort they truly had to be the best. They were not cargo. They were not passengers.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    21. Re:A class act by Weatherlawyer · · Score: 1

      Truth is often wierder. I was looking for the NASA moon phases as part of my blog earlier and the bookmark just wouldn't open. So I wrote a thread titled: Nasa's moon is down.

      Now I feel guilty.
      As well as sad.

      If only US politicians had half the gumption of those Right Stuff, god would let us go to Mars.
      As it is I'm pretty nigh certain he thinks we are unfit for service.
      Nevertheless there are some good things in there if it can throw up people like him.

    22. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Neil Armstrong has truly been an inspiration to each and every one of us. What we wouldn't have done to be in his shoes when he made that One Small Step.

      Not a damn thing, personally. I'd have wrecked that lander the second I touched the yoke, assuming I hadn't literally shit my life into my pants on liftoff. Some jobs require specific men, and I'd no more want to have stood in his shoes than I'd want to stare down the defense line in an NFL game or suddenly realize I'm in the water halfway across the English Channel.

      Some men are special, and he was one of those few.

    23. Re:A class act by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Armstrong has already been there so it would probably be more fitting to send him to Titan or Phobos, a moon that man has never stepped upon.

      Give the man credit, he did one of the great firsts in history yet was always humble and quick to give credit to everyone else that helped to make it happen, a true class act that many could learn from. RIP good sir.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    24. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First reaction to this news: God fucking dammit.

      I was a few weeks old when he landed on the moon, but the moon landings have always been something AWESOME to me. Awesome teamwork, awesome science and technology and finally... awesome balls of steel by the guys who did it... and the titanium balls of those who did it first.

    25. Re:A class act by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      RIP Neil. You worked hard to get the slot and had fun for the ride.

      I will say that he was a class act until recently. Over the course of the last couple of years, he allowed his politics to take hold. For example, he blasted SpaceX and stated that they would not be capable of launching humans, but spoke of private enterprise being required to take hold in space. Likewise, he blasted Obama for backing SpaceX, while ignoring the fact that the plan started in the mid-90s under NASA, killed by republicans, and then was restarted by Griffin and pushed by W.

      Up until he put his loyalty to his political party, he WAS a class act. One that cared for America. Just in the last couple of years, did he seem to lose that. But I do not think that should taint what he accomplished.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    26. Re:A class act by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      The blame the government meme is getting old for me. If we don't like them, let's replace them. Nullification, Thomas Woods. Read it, Let's make it happen.

    27. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ronald Wilson Reagen ended the "optimistic era."

    28. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF we are to win the battle that is now going on around the world between freedom and tyranny, the dramatic achievements in space which occurred in recent weeks should have made clear to us all, as did the Sputnik in 1957, the impact of this adventure on the minds of men everywhere, who are attempting to make a determination of which road they should take. Since early in my term, our efforts in space have been under review. With the advice of the Vice President, who is Chairman of the National Space Council, we have examined where we are strong and where we are not. Now it is time to take longer strides--time for a great new American enterprise--time for this nation to take a clearly leading role in space achievement, which in many ways may hold the key to our future on Earth.

      I believe we possess all the resources and talents necessary. But the facts of the matter are that we have never made the national decisions or marshaled the national resources required for such leadership. We have never specified long-range goals on an urgent time schedule, or managed our resources and our time so as to insure their fulfillment.

      Recognizing the head start obtained by the Soviets with their large rocket engines, which gives them many months of lead-time, and recognizing the likelihood that they will exploit this lead for some time to come in still more impressive successes, we nevertheless are required to make new efforts on our own. For while we cannot guarantee that we shall one day be first, we can guarantee that any failure to make this effort will be our last. We take an additional risk by making it in full view of the world, but as shown by the feat of astronaut Shepherd, this very risk enhances our stature when we are successful. But this is not merely a race. Space is open to us now; and our eagerness to share its meaning is not governed by the efforts of others. We go into space because whatever mankind must undertake, free men must fully share.

      I therefore ask the Congress, above and beyond the increases I have earlier requested for space activities, to provide the funds which are needed to meet the following national goals:

      First, I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish. We propose to accelerate the development of the appropriate lunar space craft. We propose to develop alternate liquid and solid fuel boosters, much larger than any now being developed, until certain which is superior. We propose additional funds for other engine development and for unmanned explorations--explorations which are particularly important for one purpose which this nation will never overlook: the survival of the man who first makes this daring flight. But in a very real sense, it will not be one man going to the Moon--if we make this judgment affirmatively, it will be an entire nation. For all of us must work to put him there.

      Secondly, an additional 23 million dollars, together with 7 million dollars already available, will accelerate development of the Rover nuclear rocket. This gives promise of some day providing a means for even more exciting and ambitious exploration of space, perhaps beyond the Moon, perhaps to the very end of the solar system itself.

      Third, an additional 50 million dollars will make the most of our present leadership, by accelerating the use of space satellites for world-wide communications.

      Fourth, an additional 75 million dollars--of which 53 million dollars is for the Weather Bureau--will help give us at the earliest possible time a satellite system for world-wide weather observation.

      Let it be clear--and this is a judgment which the Members of the Congress must finally make--let it be clear that I am asking the Congress and the count

    29. Re:A class act by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, many pilots, esp. commercial and military, are engineers. And as to the early astronauts being scientist, that was not as much. Most of them had several degrees, but it was normally related (engineering and math, or engineering and physics).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    30. Re:A class act by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      What, the lead singer of Green Day?

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    31. Re:A class act by Pseudonym · · Score: 0

      I think you're thinking of Karen Armstrong, the famous Australian movie director.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    32. Re:A class act by dpilot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Blame the politicians if you wish - they're not blameless. But they don't carry the real weight. We do - the people who elect. There are also the wealthy and corporations - the power-brokers who make sure that "the right people" are put in front of us, when we vote.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    33. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of Louis Armstrong.

      Yeah, but although he passed all his drug tests, everyone knows he only got to the moon by doping. The usada was going to take the landing away from him coz of that, I heard.

    34. Re:A class act by sackbut · · Score: 1

      Only Schmitt was a geologist/PhD. Scientist of the moon walkers. The rest less than 'not as much': The rest were test pilots who did have other related (aeronautical) degrees. At least of the Mercury original 7, Gemini 8 and Apollo 32 etc. The 4th group of astronauts were scientists. And only one walked on the moon.

    35. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. If you were to screw up or if there were some problem with the spacecraft then people around the world would think of your corpse every time they looked at the Moon. No doubt there was a shitload of glory (which Neil didn't let go to his head), but there was an even greater amount of responsibility. The millions of people that were inspired by the landing could have just as easily been turned away from science and engineering by a catastrophic failure that forever tainted manned spaceflight.

      The second or later landings, however, I would have loved to be on. In the words of the third man to set foot on the moon, Pete Conrad, "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me."

    36. Re:A class act by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Don't look at an historically unprecedented high-point and expect it to be like that all the time and forever. That's not reality. Lately I'm noticing all the statistics about how lousy things are always relative to the late 60's. Well, what about it? it was a unique moment, and America had everything in its favor - youth-skewed demographics, plenty of untapped natural resources, and weak economic competition globally. Was it great, sure, but it's not realistic to think things all the planets will stay aligned.

      And the current mars mission is 1000x more advanced than the manned missions to the moon.

    37. Re:A class act by Canazza · · Score: 1

      No, they'll just come after us and steal all the women

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    38. Re:A class act by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Have you ever seen an actual Apollo spacecraft? Live and up close? They're amazingly rickety and primitive looking; I'd be afraid to take one out on the highway, never mind all the way to the moon.

      When I saw the Apollo 16 (in Huntsville AL), I thought of that scene in star wars where they rescue the princess from the death star and she sees the millennium falcon and says "You came here in that? You're braver than I thought!".

    39. Re:A class act by danversj · · Score: 2

      Correction: After bailing out of the LLTV (Lunar Lander Training Vehicle), he went back to work later the same day - no doubt to start on the mountain of paperwork the incident would have generated.

    40. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Troll?"

      Really?

    41. Re:A class act by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      I normally don't respond to an AC comment, but many thanks for this. I had wondered his thoughts (but never thought to check Wikipedia).

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    42. Re:A class act by rrhal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I saw the Apollo capsule in the Smithsonian - I couldn't spent 15 minutes in one of those let alone go to the moon and back.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. Mark Twain
    43. Re:A class act by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Right. Of course if he'd become political about stuff you actually like or approve of, you'd have applauded him for being your kinda guy. Just because his opinion of who ought to fund/run a particular program is different than yours doesn't mean that he was less of his admirable self when he said it out loud.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    44. Re:A class act by ChinggisK · · Score: 2

      I'd be afraid to take one out on the highway, never mind all the way to the moon.

      Well yea, I don't think they have wheels or blinkers or anything.... I don't think Mr. Armstrong would've taken one on the highway either.

    45. Re:A class act by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      The deaths of Grissom, Chafee and White didn't stop the Apollo program. They were pretty catastrophic.

    46. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool I always bet that slashdot will have a sick bastard joke like this one when someone dies! Cool beanos!

    47. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were second.

    48. Re:A class act by perpenso · · Score: 1

      RIP Neil. You worked hard to get the slot and had fun for the ride. I will say that he was a class act until recently. Over the course of the last couple of years, he allowed his politics to take hold. For example, he blasted SpaceX and stated that they would not be capable of launching humans, but spoke of private enterprise being required to take hold in space. Likewise, he blasted Obama for backing SpaceX, while ignoring the fact that the plan started in the mid-90s under NASA, killed by republicans, and then was restarted by Griffin and pushed by W.

      Up until he put his loyalty to his political party, he WAS a class act. One that cared for America. Just in the last couple of years, did he seem to lose that. But I do not think that should taint what he accomplished.

      I believe you misinterpret his criticism. To me it seems that he was critical of the US government for abandoning the government space program, for relying only on commercial and foreign flights. I believe he was a supporter of commercial space flight. He merely did not believe it was time to abandon government space flight. The criticism of commercial operators seems to merely pointing out one reason why abandoning the government's role was premature. Had a republican administrations chosen to do so he would have been equally appalled. A quote an AC pointed out on wiki seems quite insightful and debunks the suggestion of politics:

      "In 2010, he made a rare public criticism of the decision to cancel the Ares 1 launch vehicle and the Constellation moon landing program. In an open public letter also signed by Apollo veterans Jim Lovell and Gene Cernan, he noted, "For The United States, the leading space faring nation for nearly half a century, to be without carriage to low Earth orbit and with no human exploration capability to go beyond Earth orbit for an indeterminate time into the future, destines our nation to become one of second or even third rate stature"."

    49. Re:A class act by Glock27 · · Score: 1

      True. His death isn't what brought about the end an "optimistic era." The government butchering NASA's budget had already accomplished that. Curious what his thoughts were on what has become of the agency.

      Government funding of NASA has little to do with optimism. Go SpaceX!

      I'm highly optimistic. Now all we need is enough optimism to build nuclear powered spacecraft. Perhaps the nuclear powered Curiosity rover will provide some inspiration!

      (For that matter, we need a major buildout of next-generation nuclear power plants here on Earth!)

      RIP, Neil Armstrong! You did indeed provide "one giant leap for mankind"!

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    50. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! Jimmuh Carter was the downer, RR turned things around again!

      The ignorance prevalent today is stunning, as you demonstrate yet again.

    51. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say that Lovell and Armstrong are the two best Commanders NASA has ever had.

    52. Re:A class act by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they did die on the ground after all and in a simulator. If they'd died in space then the media could have easily decided that space was too dangerous and created a frenzy that stopped the manned space program. Nasa would still have gone to the moon and returned with rocks but they'd have doen it the way the Russians did, with an unmanned lander.

      It's curious how the most significant astronauts of the space race, and in particular Gagarin and Armstrong, have been so thoroughly elegant in their greatness. That elegance that can almost seem like humility. It's easy to admire such people.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    53. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their deaths as well of the deaths of other astronauts in airplane crashes took NASA to the brink of extinction. If you don't believe me then look up Mondale's witchhunt following the Apollo 1 fire during ground testing.

      It should also be noted that the significance of a death in space, especially one where astronauts die stranded on the Moon, would have a substantially greater political and emotional impact on the nation. Imagine if the lunar lander was damaged on landing and the command module had to return with only one astronaut while the other astronauts ran out of oxygen on the surface. How could The Apollo program have survived that image?

    54. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send the ashes to the Nevada desert?

    55. Re:A class act by Teancum · · Score: 1

      The balls that it took for Neil Armstrong to abort the original landing zone and instead look for another place to land is a judgement call that was nothing short of amazing. That he was able to land with less than 10 seconds of fuel left in the tanks shows how close he was to failure as well.

      I don't know what would have happened had the Eagle crashed on the surface of the Moon, but it would have been a sad day.

      Then again, I think there would have been politicians that would have figuratively put some duct tape over the mouth of Walter Mondale and made martyrs of those astronauts, and possibly redoubled the effort to get back and do it right. If anything, the string of successes sort of backfired were it made trips to the Moon seem boring and routine, even though that was hardly the case. I'm not saying that I wish one of the dozen astronauts that actually made the trip to the Moon should have died, but I don't think their death would have ended NASA. The loss of the Challenger and Columbia didn't stop the Shuttle program either.

    56. Re:A class act by Teancum · · Score: 2

      In fairness to the grandparent poster, those who were selected to be astronauts on Apollo were sent through a training program that was as intense as any graduate program, and I may dare say PhD program. They had some of the best and brightest scientists in the world teaching them in a small classroom setting about almost everything that they would encounter while not just going to the Moon but what they would be seeing once they got up there.

      BTW, Harrison Schmitt was one of those who pushed to see that happen in the astronaut corps too, and I'm glad that he was able to succeed. Others were involved to get that to happen, but I would dare say that these folks who went to the Moon could have certainly qualified for graduate degrees in several scientific disciplines by the time they actually got to the Moon.

      Schmitt instead had a crash course in how to be a test pilot, which he seemed to do rather well at himself. Schmitt was an accomplished pilot in his own right, which is how he got the job of being an astronaut in the first place.

    57. Re:A class act by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, it WAS a republican admin that killed off our human launching. W killed it in 2004, and yet, Neil did not object. And when others that he had known and worked with recommended leaving constellation because of how bad the situation was, Mr. Armstrong chose to blame O.

      I will say that up until 2 years ago, he had left politics out of the equation. However, that changed then.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    58. Re:A class act by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but a number of the lunar astronauts actually had classes on what they were looking at. Schmitt was simply the guy whos primary focus was science (which was really too bad; most of them should have been).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    59. Re:A class act by arth1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      What we wouldn't have done to be in his shoes when he made that One Small Step.

      It'd be painful, but I'd force my size 13 feet into his size 10 boots if I could.

      But no, I wouldn't want to be first. That honor I gladly give to the daredevils like Neil Armstrong. He will be remembered, and it's well deserved.

      At least he did not get to "celebrate" December 13 this year, when it will be 40 years since the last man on the moon.

      As for the first man... Well, it's one of my earliest childhood memories. My father had bought us a TV for the occasion. In a wooden cabinet with a lockable sliding door. The screen was far smaller than most monitors today, but we thought it was huge. As was the realization that humans walked on the moon! While it might not have been the direct reason for my becoming an engineer, it certainly influenced it. I learned how to use a slide rule before I could ride a bike because of Armstrong, Aldrin, Gagarin and all the other great pioneers.

      And as I raise a glass to Yuri once a year, I will raise one to you too. You live in our dreams. One day man will go to space again and explore strange new worlds. One day. Thanks for proving it possible.

    60. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like he can read your message. He's dead.

    61. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! Jimmuh Carter was the downer, RR turned things around again!

      The ability of Baby Boomers to believe what they see in movies

      FTFY

    62. Re:A class act by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A process is fragile if it attempts to solve a crisis by planning ahead for all contingencies.

      The problem with your robust/fragile thesis is that NASA's primary methodology was the one you call fragile.
       

      A robust process assumes something unforeseen will go wrong, and concentrate on making sure that there are adequate resources to respond in an ad-hoc manner. NASA's processes in the Apollo project relied on a robust response: when anything went wrong, a highly qualified person was on the spot to think of a response and execute it.

      Which is precisely what NASA didn't do. They spent months creating a set of mission rules that spelled out what to do in the case of a wide variety of casualties and circumstances. They then fine tuned those rules in the process of training controllers and astronauts to respond reflexively when they encountered a change of circumstances, a casualty or problem, or any other deviation from the current flight plan. (I say current because each mission had a whole raft of plans... for an earth orbit mission in case they couldn't execute TLI, for a lunar orbit mission in the even of a LM problem, etc...)

      Sure they planned for incidents, but the final contingency plan was to have smart people with high stress tolerance to provide incident response 'on the ground'.

      You're correct - that was the final contingency plan. Executed only if no other option existed. That is why their process was so robust - because there were layers to the plan.

    63. Re:A class act by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I think it was Armstrong's ability to "stay calm" in times of crisis in the two instances you mentioned was the reason why he was chosen as mission commander on Apollo 11.

      He was assigned to be mission commander of the Apollo 11 crew because that was his position in the rotation after serving as backup commander on the Apollo 8 crew. When he was assigned to the Apollo 8 backup crew nobody knew that 11 would be the landing mission. Had there been a serious problem on 8, 9, or 10 - 11 would have been another test or dress rehearsal.

    64. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's lonely out there in space. Perhaps Earth is a more fitting final resting place for him after all.

    65. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least he did not get to "celebrate" December 13 this year, when it will be 40 years since the last man on the moon.

      For the record, that would be the Apollo 17 mission.

    66. Re:A class act by EdIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought of that scene in star wars where they rescue the princess from the death star and she sees the millennium falcon and says "You came here in that? You're braver than I thought!".

      I didn't take it as a real insult to the Millennium Falcon (always capitalized), just that Princess Leia was a little bit bitchy.

      What amazes me about that scene is how Han manages to keep his shit together and not throw her Hotness to Vader on the way out. Think about everything he had to deal with up to that point:

      - Effective death sentence from Jabba the Hut for losing a shipment
      - Stuck on a backwater planet just trying to get a drink and figure out what the fuck he is going to do next
      - Jedi, of all people, booking passage trying to get away from Imperials... and Imperials just love Jedi at this point.
      - Gay golden robot annoying as hell second guessing his decisions every other second
      - Sarcastic midget robot that just beeps all the time
      - Greedo, getting all up in his shit when he is trying to get the money to appease Jabba
      - It's implied... but you know Chewbacca probably shed like a mother fucker on that ship, lord help Han, when Chewy drops some super-fiber induced dump in the bathroom. Not a great idea to be burning matches in enclosed spaces with combustible gases on a star ship
      - Smart ass little blonde kid that has only seen that backwater planet, but already knows everything at 18.
      - The Death Star
      - Seriously, the fucking Death Star. What the fuck is that? A Star Destroyer was not big enough for the emperor, he needed a god damn movable planetoid full of storm troopers? Those same guys Han was just shooting at not moments before. You know the old saying... the Millennium Falcon may do the Kessel Run in 12 parsecs, but galactic communications are near instantaneous......
      - Tractor beam pulling him to the aforementioned planetoid of fuck my life.
      - Jail break goes horribly wrong. Han can't act for shit over the radio. Screws the pooch big time.
      - Her bitchiness. Kind of hot, Han knows she has a rough day, but seriously not even a little gratitude?
      - Stuck in a garbage compactor
      - What the fuck is that smell?
      - No.. No... What the fuck is in her with us
      - Garbage compactor is... well... compacting
      - Need Gay Golden Boy's help. Out of everyone Han knows, it's fucking Threepio that needs to nut up and come to the rescue
      - Sure.... I don't mind fighting a whole bunch of troops. You guys go ahead, me and Chewy are going to fuck their shit up

      - Bitch insults my ride just as we are about to get away.

      Yeah. I think Han was the very model of self restraint to still let her on the ship. I would of told Chewy to get the fuck on the ship and gone back to the bar alone.

    67. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1000x more advanced in tech maybe, but way less in doing something new.

      Building a space station with artificial "gravity" would be progress. Building a working farm in space would be progress.

      Sending expensive toys to Mars for scientists to play with is not much progress.

      I'm looking at this from a long term perspective of humans. Eventually we will have to get off this planet. The achievements I mentioned would be necessary steps. Sending toys to Mars = already done that in the 1960s.

      And no, settling in Mars in the near term would be a stupid idea. Leaving a gravity well for another even less hospitable gravity well is stupid.

    68. Re:A class act by unixisc · · Score: 1

      No, that was Lance Armstrong

    69. Re:A class act by unixisc · · Score: 1

      And a great pilot. You will be missed.

      Absolutely! This achievement of America was a major watershed in a space race that at the time looked like it was a Soviet dominated enterprise.

      The only major achievement in Space that I can think of is landing the Rover on Mars. Nothing else. Both the Challenger & the Columbia disasters set it back, and nothing has enabled it to recover. Rover was a good breakthrough, but it would have been worth establishing the feasability of colonizing Mars, initially for scientific and engineering goals, and at some point, ultimately, manned colonization. Since overpopulation is stated to be a major problem, setting things up so that people could move there would have been a good beginning. Since neither the US nor Russia seem to have the stomach to do that any more, guess it’ll be up to the Chinese.

      As someone else put it here, the Eagle has left. RIP, Mr Armstrong!

    70. Re:A class act by hvm2hvm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And that's why Harrison Ford is actually the main actor in that movie and why he became a huge star while the others disappeared.

      --
      ics
    71. Re:A class act by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

      So basically, he was what all dev-ops want to be when they grow up?

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    72. Re:A class act by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Right. NASA makes sure that the final contingency is to be flexible by using an expert at the point of crisis to think up a response on the spot, and you maintain that it used a fragile process.

      I even specifically mentioned they did plan for incidents. Nowhere does it say in my post that a robust plan means only relying on flexible response by local experts.

      Do you just disagree for the sake of disagreeing? Because this post made you look exceedingly dumb.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    73. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he went back to his desk THE SAME DAY the flying bedstead crashed.

    74. Re:A class act by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      The guy with the stretchy arms?

    75. Re:A class act by CptNerd · · Score: 2

      Apollo 1 was not a simulator, it was going to be the first one launched, but it was the only thing they could do a full rehearsal in. I was 8 when it happened.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    76. Re:A class act by JustOK · · Score: 1

      His shoes were back on Earth.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    77. Re:A class act by Zippy_wonderslug · · Score: 1

      MSNBC actually posted the name Neil Young when they first put up the announcement of his death.

    78. Re:A class act by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      And if the Apollo 1 fire never happened, Gus Grissom would have commanded Apollo 11. Deke Slayton (the guy who picked the crews) stated this in his autobiography.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    79. Re:A class act by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Do you just disagree for the sake of disagreeing?

      No, I didn't disagree, I corrected your errors and muddled thinking. There's a difference.
       

      Right. NASA makes sure that the final contingency is to be flexible by using an expert at the point of crisis to think up a response on the spot, and you maintain that it used a fragile process.

      Since I didn't call anything a fragile plan... this is either a lack of treading comprehension or more of your muddled thinking. The only place I even remotely alluded to fragility was to point out that what you called fragile was in fact their primary methodology.
       

      I even specifically mentioned they did plan for incidents. Nowhere does it say in my post that a robust plan means only relying on flexible response by local experts.

      Yes, you specifically mentioned that they did plan for incidents - and dismissed it as a 'fragile' process. (Nowhere did you acknowledge the role of the planning and training in NASA operations. You completely missed the layers involved.) Then you made two contradictory claims about men in the loop - one stating (incorrectly) that they were the process, and another stating they were the final contingency. (And both implying that the controllers used nothing but ad hoc procedures.)

    80. Re:A class act by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Deke was doing everything in his power to ensure that one of the Seven landed on the Moon. That's why Cooper, despite being on management's sh*tlist, was penciled in for Apollo 13. That's why as soon as Shepard returned to flight status he was assigned the next possible command slot (despite his lack of flight experience), taking Cooper's slot.

      (Note to pedants who don't know as much as they think they do: Yes, Alan Shepard was originally slated to fly Apollo 13 - but management overrode Slayton and swapped the 13 and 14 crews so Sheperd had more time to train.)

    81. Re:A class act by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Actually, it WAS a republican admin that killed off our human launching. W killed it in 2004, and yet, Neil did not object. And when others that he had known and worked with recommended leaving constellation because of how bad the situation was, Mr. Armstrong chose to blame O. I will say that up until 2 years ago, he had left politics out of the equation. However, that changed then.

      You are mistaken. In 2004 Bush supported a government space program working side-by-side with commercial efforts. He support Ares, Constellation and Orion. In 2010 Obama decided we only needed the commercial side. Armstrong's objection seems to be the lack of a government program. You seem to be completely mischaracterizing things. Note Armstrong's use of the phrase "indeterminate time" in "... to be without carriage to low Earth orbit and with no human exploration capability to go beyond Earth orbit for an indeterminate time into the future". At worst you could say there was a short gap in the Bush plan between shuttle retirement and an operational Ares/Constellation/Orion. That is something entirely different.

      "The Vision for Space Exploration (VSE) was a visionary plan for space exploration announced on January 14, 2004 by President George W. Bush. It is seen[by whom?] as a response to the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, the state of human spaceflight at NASA, and as a way to regain public enthusiasm for space exploration. It was replaced by the Space policy of the Barack Obama administration in June 2010 ... The Vision for Space Exploration sought to implement a sustained and affordable human and robotic program to explore the solar system and beyond; extend human presence across the solar system, starting with a human return to the Moon by the year 2020, in preparation for human exploration of Mars and other destinations; develop the innovative technologies, knowledge, and infrastructures both to explore and to support decisions about the destinations for human exploration; and to promote international and commercial participation in exploration to further U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests."
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vision_for_Space_Exploration

    82. Re:A class act by sackbut · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But most of the training was about getting there and back again. And a you mentioned, it was a struggle to get training on the science of geology, etc. at the risk of getting flamed: engineering is not (ncessarily) a science.

    83. Re:A class act by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered how Shepard's crew would have handled 13

        The mission success depended on stretching the LM resources to the limit, and Fred Haise had a reputation among the astronauts as the "go-to" guy on the LM systems. Ed Mitchell, not so much.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    84. Re:A class act by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Too bad they're going to take his moon landing away from him after the doping scandal.

    85. Re:A class act by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Many knowledgeable about the Apollo program seem to agree with you as Shepard's crew was pretty weak overall. (Though to be fair 'weak' by astronaut standards is still ferociously competent by day-to-day standards.)

    86. Re:A class act by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      And if 13 ended up claiming the life of the crew, the entire program might have ended right there. The public was rapidly losing interest, and Nixon/Congress were slashing the NASA budget.

      If the Cortright commission was investigating 3 deaths rather than a "close call", the ensuing shutdown and hand-wringing might have provided the impetus to cut even more missions. As it was 20 had already been killed, and part of the fallout from 13 was the cancellation of 18 and 19.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    87. Re:A class act by Teancum · · Score: 2

      Agreed. But most of the training was about getting there and back again. And a you mentioned, it was a struggle to get training on the science of geology, etc. at the risk of getting flamed: engineering is not (ncessarily) a science.

      It took a little convincing to the NASA brass that the astronauts needed to be trained in basic sciences, such as chemistry, physics, and geology. They thought it was a waste of money, but once they were convinced of the need they went full in and get the classes set up and gave those astronauts in depth training on basic science, not just applied science or engineering (which astronauts were heavily involved with doing as well).

      Yeah, I'd agree that science is not engineering. Engineering is the ability to take knowledge gained from scientific investigations and to apply that knowledge into building stuff. Being a good engineer takes a very different mindset than you find with a scientist, sometimes to the point it become annoying to a decent engineer. An engineer doesn't care why a machine or a physical phenomena works, all they care about is that it does work and they will leave explaining why it works to scientists. To an engineer, the whole point of a scientific inquiry is to get a deeper understanding of how things work.... so you can build something either better (more efficiently or faster) or something simply completely different and get fellow engineers to say "wow, I didn't know you could do that!"

      Scientists on the other hand "get in the way" of engineers because they see something that "looks weird" and don't really care if the device they were working on ever gets completed. In fact, the best way to get a scientist excited is to say that a machine doesn't work as expected, especially when it isn't a bone-headed engineering mistake (like forgetting to plug the thing in) that caused the machine to be working funny.

    88. Re:A class act by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Actually it was (IIRC) 15, 18, and 20 that were cancelled.

    89. Re:A class act by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      you thinking what i'm thinking?

      a Mars mission Kickstarter project?

    90. Re:A class act by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      yes.

      effectively saying "if you can't say something nice don't say anything at all", while saying something quite nasty in the same post?

      comes across as one of those aspies that go from idolatry to outright hate at the slightest infraction of their own standard (that changes minute-to-minute).

    91. Re:A class act by WillHirsch · · Score: 1

      What we wouldn't have done to be in his shoes when he made that One Small Step.

      Jumping on the bandwagon here, but I don't think he'd have appreciated it as the air rushed out of his pant legs...

    92. Re:A class act by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      She shit tested him. He passed. With flying colors.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    93. Re:A class act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This!

      Plus, after all that. the dude takes his money (where? 'cuz he never paid Jabba ...who had to send freaking Boba Fett after him).

      And then comes back to clear the way so Gay Golden Boy can take a (second) shot after he was penisy about shooting rats in the dumpster back home, only to get a chocolate medal wrapped in tin foil, but only for him. Co-pilot get zero credit for the deed. Who knows? Maybe Chewie was the one that convinced him to come back to where all the shit with fighting a freaking planetoid of a battlestation. Alas, no medal for the walking carpet....no respect either.

      And they say the "Hero's Journey" was the blonde kid's? Really? I say Han was the real hero.

      Plus, he shot first! Always does, always will. No matter how many re-edits and re-tellings and re-whatevers it goes through.

    94. Re:A class act by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      I actually owned a Stretch Armstrong as a kid.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    95. Re:A class act by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Darn it. Now I've got that song in my head.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    96. Re:A class act by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I considered him King of the Nerds. Far more than a pilot, he was an engineer, taught engineering and was a self-described nerd.

      He was one of us.

    97. Re:A class act by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, they came damned close to losing Apollo 13, yet they still only had a few more landidngs afterwards.

    98. Re:A class act by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Yes, he was an engineer, pilot, and astronaut, but most of the other astronauts were as well. And you couldn't say he was one of the first of any of them at all. He's my dad's age, the Wright Brothers were the first pilots, and my grandmother was an infant when they took off. Armstrong didn't get to space until the Gemini program (although he got close in the F-15 rocket plane), and there have been engineers since the invention of the steam engine (they were called "tinkers" before the invention of the engine).

      All of the astronauts were pilots then, and most were engineers. Actually, almost everyone having anythiong to do with the space program were nerds of one kind or another.

  2. Oblig xkcd by myrdos2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://xkcd.com/893/

    RIP Neil.

    1. Re:oblig xkcd by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1, Funny

      Gah! Someone posted this during the same minute as me!

    2. Re:Oblig xkcd by suso · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, think this is a more obligatory XKCD:

      http://xkcd.com/202/

    3. Re:oblig xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nasa is not sending any more people to the moon until they figure out why everyone who went there is dying.

    4. Re:Oblig xkcd by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Only he's got it wrong. The comments are in the wrong order! It's fake, dude!eleven

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    5. Re:oblig xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...and in the year 2035 they will conclude that going to the Moon has a 100% mortality rate.

    6. Re:oblig xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you get bonus credit for making it a link.
      Good job. Gold star for you!

    7. Re:Oblig xkcd by thehickcoder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The alt-text on that comic is one of my favorite quotes ever.

    8. Re:oblig xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      related:

      Neil Armstrong - Apollo 11 - July, 1969

      Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin - Apollo 11 - July, 1969

      Charles "Pete" Conrad - Apollo 12 - November, 1969

      Alan Bean - Apollo 12 - November, 1969

      Alan Shepard - Apollo 14 - February, 1971

      Edgar Mitchell - Apollo 14 - February, 1971

      David Scott - Apollo 15 - July, 1971

      James Irwin - Apollo 15 - July, 1971

      John Young - Apollo 16 - April, 1972 (also on Apollo 10, without landing)

      Charles Duke - Apollo 16 - April, 1972

      Eugene Cernan - Apollo 17 - December, 1972 (also on Apollo 10, without landing)

      Harrison Schmitt - Apollo 17 - December, 1972

    9. Re:oblig xkcd by beltsbear · · Score: 1

      Funny, but those guys sure live a long time. Most of them are in their 80's though a few have died younger.

    10. Re:oblig xkcd by 32771 · · Score: 1

      My favourite answer lies somewhere in the following article:

      http://www.nss.org/settlement/nasa/spaceresvol3/pmofld1a.htm

      "This discussion of geochemical availability and extractive metallurgy implies that extraction of minor elements in space is questionable unless specific natural concentrations are discovered or energy becomes very inexpensive. The relative costs of scarce and abundant metals will become even more disparate in the future on Earth as well as in space. "

      Anyway, he was a key part in the opening ceremony for our pyramids, I will always remember him. Rest in Peace Mr. Armstrong.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    11. Re:oblig xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, it has come to this.

    12. Re:Oblig xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would you mind explaining how the sentiment is any better than "zomg there's terrists everywhere, we should spend all our money on national security"?

    13. Re:oblig xkcd by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      That's because moon rocks are poisonous. He only live 40 more years after exposure to them!

    14. Re:oblig xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heart

    15. Re:oblig xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, but those guys sure live a long time. Most of them are in their 80's though a few have died younger.

      And some of them can still kick some ass!

    16. Re:Oblig xkcd by dissy · · Score: 1

      Simple.
      The former causes things like computers and MRI scanners to exist.
      The latter causes things like humans whom build computers and MRI scanners to not exist.

      Seeing as you used a computer to make that post, you seem to be availing yourself of the money spent on the first a lot more so.

  3. oblig xkcd by Lord+Lode · · Score: 5, Interesting
  4. World's Greatest Pioneer by systemidx · · Score: 2

    May he rest in peace.

    1. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Dupple · · Score: 2

      and Tranquility

      --
      Watch those corners
    2. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by catchblue22 · · Score: 3, Informative

      He had The Right Stuff.

      I really used to like that movie. Ed Harris as Neil Armstrong. Perfect casting. One thing I really got out of that movie was how NASA originally wanted to have the astronauts as ballast, giving them little or no ability to pilot the craft. Neil Armstrong was one of the astronauts who protested, and forced NASA to outfit the capsules with pilot controls. If you look at the Gemini capsules, they actually do resemble airplane cockpits if looked at from the right perspective.

      Off to the wild blue yonder. RIP

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    3. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      Ok. Scratch my post. It was John Glenn in that movie, not Neil Armstrong. Still, an enjoyable movie. It just didn't portray Neil Armstrong.

      [embarassed]My bad.[/embarrassed]

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    4. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by SAN1701 · · Score: 1

      Well, except for the part that Ed Harris was actually John Glenn, and Armstrong, for not being in the Mercury program, wasn't even in the movie (he started at Gemini), yeah, I agree with you.

    5. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Ed Harris was John Glenn.

    6. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ed Harris played John Glenn

    7. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, sorry to burst your bubble, but Ed Harris played John Glenn in The Right Stuff. The character of Neil Armstrong was not in that movie, since the movie dealt with the Mercury program, not the Gemini program.

      They could certainly make a Right Stuff type movie about the Apollo program and Armstrong in particular, I'd watch that. Even though it shows its age, I still think the Right Stuff is a pretty good film.

    8. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm. Ed Harris portrayed John Glenn - first American to orbit the Earth.
      The Right Stuff was about the Mercury astronauts.

      RIP Neil Armstrong

    9. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ed Harris played John Glenn. Neil Armstrong was in the astronaut class of '62.

    10. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the self-correction. Note that it still didn't stop at least six people from leaping in and correcting you again.

      Of course, they're all wrong: Ed Harris played Gene Kranz :-).

    11. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of John Glenn.

    12. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      One thing I really got out of that movie was how NASA originally wanted to have the astronauts as ballast, giving them little or no ability to pilot the craft. Neil Armstrong was one of the astronauts who protested, and forced NASA to outfit the capsules with pilot controls.

      Among the many errors in that movie is this one - Neil Armstrong had nothing to do with that decision. That came from the Mercury Seven.
       

      If you look at the Gemini capsules, they actually do resemble airplane cockpits if looked at from the right perspective.

      And that cockpit was largely designed by Gus Grissom (as was much of Gemini's design overall).

    13. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Among the many errors in that movie is this one - Neil Armstrong had nothing to do with that decision.

      Note that you're correcting an error in the parent post, not in the movie. If you'd read one of the eight+ correction posts that came before, you'd know that.

      But you at least signed your name ....

    14. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid that Ed Harris played John Glenn, not Neil Armstrong.

    15. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a bit of correct is needed here.

      Ed Harris portrayed astronaut John Glenn. The movie "The Right Stuff" was about the Mercury Seven astronauts, Neil Armstrong was part of NASA Astronaut Group 2 aka "The New Nine".

      IMHO a much better movie was the HBO mini-series "From The Earth To The Moon".

    16. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Niel Amstrong was not a Mercury astronaut and Ed Harris played John Glenn. Read the Imdb page.

    17. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Ed Harris was cast as John Glenn (as per your IMDB link)

    18. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harris played John Glenn.

    19. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ed Harris played John Glenn. The Right Stuff was about the original seven astronauts in the Atlas program. There was no Neil Armstrong character in the movie.

    20. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ed Harris played John Glenn. Neil was not one of the original seven, whose last names all began with C, G, or S.

    21. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of John Glenn. Neil Armstrong was not one of the Mercury 7.

    22. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er... Ed Harris played John Glenn. I don't think Armstrong was in it because it was about the Mercury program.

    23. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude... Ed Harris played John Glenn. Niel Armstrong wasn't portrayed in that movie, which was about the Mercury 7, not the Apollo astronauts.

    24. Re:World's Greatest Pioneer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Ed Harris's character was John Glenn.

  5. Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by dtmancom · · Score: 1

    But at least they were able to get men on the moon. The USA can't even get people into space at the moment.

    1. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The boomers were teenagers or just graduating college when Armstrong walked on the moon. It was the generation before. There's a reason they call them "the greatest generation".

    2. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by firex726 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Technically most of the astronauts and people involved with NASA/Apollo missions were NOT boomers.

      Neil was born in '30, while the Boomer generation was from '46-'64.
      Moon landing was in '69, so the Boomers would have been at most 23 yrs old at the time, so they would have just been finishing college and entering the workforce.

      The Boomers were responsible though for the eventual budget cuts to NASA and education, but still reaped the benefits of it's hay day.

    3. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No beef with the baby boomers, but weren't they in high school in the 60s? It was their parents who put people on the moon.

    4. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Surely you should be blaming the cost of a war in a faraway country called Vietnam for the moon-shot cancellations?!

    5. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by firex726 · · Score: 2

      Not really, because the major budget cuts did not happen till after Nam; when the Boomers started getting elected into Congress and the older generation retiring/dying off.

      And besides, do we need further moon missions? We've been there lot's of times, we know what's there and have a crap ton of stuff on it's surface and in it's orbit. Until it becomes more feasible to put a permanent presence there it'll be a waste to keep sending people to hang out for a few days and collect rocks.

      We'd probably get more benefit my concentrating NASA on more terrestrial endeavours.

    6. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA can't even get people into space at the moment.

      No reason we couldn't.

      We have the technology. We have people with the skills, or the capacity to learn the skills.

      We're just not putting money into it.

      That's a choice. You may not like that choice. But don't use your sneering condescension to look down on people for making a choice that you don't like. Especially since as already pointed out, Neil Armstrong was not in the Baby Boomer generation. His children? Yes. Him? No.

    7. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, because the major budget cuts did not happen till after Nam; when the Boomers started getting elected into Congress and the older generation retiring/dying off.

      And besides, do we need further moon missions? We've been there lot's of times, we know what's there and have a crap ton of stuff on it's surface and in it's orbit. Until it becomes more feasible to put a permanent presence there it'll be a waste to keep sending people to hang out for a few days and collect rocks.

      We'd probably get more benefit my concentrating NASA on more terrestrial endeavours.

      Then don't send people for a few days on the moon. Build a fucking moonbase already.
      We have the technology, we have the means. Of course, while our Congress is plenty with anti science dorks it's already half a miracle they haven't defunded the entire public school system. We're "educating" a mass of ignorant fools. The only thing they will aspire to in life is what they see in "idocracy" the future of the US.

    8. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by firex726 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I call BS on the idea that we have the tech/means for a moon base right now.

      Cursorily is only like the 2nd non-terrestrial craft to use something other then solar for power. And a moon base would need a fuck ton more power then Curiosity could produce. (almost half it's total weight is devoted to the power system)

      Plus you have to take into account Oxygen, Water, Food. We can recycle some, but it's far from enough to be self sufficient. They would still need regular supply runs from Earth, like the ISS.

      How about cosmic radiation? The moon is after all outside the van allen belt. And even with shielding, the previous missions were timed to keep radiation exposure to a minimum.

      The most ideal plans at current call for a moon base in 2014, with a four man team, rotating out due to the previous issues I noted and regular supply runs. (Near the pole so it'll get near constant sunlight for solar power)

    9. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by dpilot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, and they gave birth to some of the worst brats ever - Us. (I'm a late boomer, so I'm part of that generation, but I try to do better.)

      Study the Bible a bit, and you'll see that the Hebrew nation survived every adversity thrown against it, except one. Prosperity - got them every time. Seems to me that has something to do with our current situation.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    10. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We absolutely have the means to do it. We lack the will. Its expensive as hell and the world runs on cost-effciency. A moon base is the first step in the ultimate insurance policy and people dont want to pay up.

      --
      Good-bye
    11. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you use Abraham's fables as a factually accurate historical artifact? Especially on a site that is for Nerds IE: well educated people who seek knowledge.

    12. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Sta7ic · · Score: 1

      If we can run a space station, we can run a moon base. One of them won't be in a constant state of free-fall, even if we'd need to figure out a way to balance the nonstop solar radiation with the need to not fry the occupants.
      It's all about the cost and the energy ... and the will to make it happen.

    13. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Well then Mr. PhD, care to point me and the rest of NASA to this magic technology?

      NASA engineering that have spent their careers studying such things feel there are still outstanding hurdles that need to be addressed before we can make a moon base a reality.

      With current tech, even if we had a moon base it'd be fucked if something happened to the Earth as they would still need shipments of supplies.

      Cosmic Radiation is Ionizing and will have effects on humans, the least of which is sterility.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_threat_from_cosmic_rays

    14. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by firex726 · · Score: 1

      The ISS like a moon base received regular supply shipments, ever hear of a Soyuz & SpaceX. Thing is though getting out to the moon is a lot farther and more dangerous.

      We do have the will, that's why NASA is already planning/training for the moon base. Space exploration, like anything in science is not something you do on a whim, it takes decades.

      Remember the old Sat 5 rockets, actual construction time was not too bad for it, what took so long as to build the machinery that was used to build the parts for it. They basically had to design and build an entire factory from scratch for a very specific set of parts. Which is what we're going to have to do again; we can't just call up Lockheed and Boeing and ask for a rocket by next Tuesday.

      Plus the ISS is inside the VA belts so it's got a much greater degree of protection.

      There is a big difference between a space station being "run", and in relatively easy reach should the need arise; and a moon base being self sufficient in the event of an earth catastrophe.

      You're also exaggerating the "free fall" aspect. At the altitude it's at there is still a thin layer of atmosphere, enough that over time friction slows down it's orbital speed and it needs the occasional boot. Without that atmosphere slowing it down, it's speed is actually enough to keep it in orbit.

    15. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Teun · · Score: 1
      Because it recorded several thousands of years of human experience?

      And who claimed it was "factually accurate"?

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    16. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by bfandreas · · Score: 1, Troll

      A work of fiction devised by man as an allegory of what it means to be human will point out that adversity begets excellence. While the literal truth is doubtful there is something to be learned from it. Simply dismissing it as a work of fiction with no value whatsoever is not the enlightened thing to do.

      Your attitude is what gives us atheists a bad name. While the faith is as laughable as they come denying the value of one of the oldest texts in human history is equally laughable.
      Hot damn, we dug up the cylinder of Cyrus the Great which decrees that all the captive peoples of Babylon were free to go and pratice their faiths. So muddled as it may be there even is a grain of historical testimony to be found in those fables. Let's mock the faiths and learn from their writings. We are not fettered by fairy-tale beliefs and pointless dogma.

      Sorry, pet peeve.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    17. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by ravenknight · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cursorily is only like the 2nd non-terrestrial craft

      Bzz! Wrong. Voyager 1,2; Galileo; Viking 1,2; New Horizons, etc see wikipedia for a larger and more complete listing.

    18. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Space stations have a lot of constraints that a permanent moon base doesn't have.
      We don't have to build the moon base on the surface, we can dig and built it underground. If that is not enough to shield its inhabitants from cosmic rays build shelters. Space is cheap on the moon. It's not like there are moonquakes ready to bring down the moon caves on you. As for resupply, for pete's sake, it is a 3 day trip. Oh MY GOD 3 fucking days in space we can't do, and yet we plan a mission to mars. Give me a break.
      We can build a moon base, but that needs the same kind of medium long term political and economic committment that Kennedy make back in the day. You know something that only governments (with the kind of resources at their disposal) can do, to the distress of those free market thinkers.

    19. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Who says it has to be "manned" by humans? If anything is lacking right now, it's our 3D printers. But it's catching up. If we can combine them with Easy Bake Ovens as a smelting furnace, we got it made.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    20. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by firex726 · · Score: 0

      Those are radioisotope heaters, they were not used for the main power production, why do you think they had solar panels.

      Radioisotope heaters are much more efficient for longer periods of time to keep things operating, and provide minimal power. Most of those are either no longer operational or in Low-Power/Standby modes as they don't have enough juice to fully function as they did while in system and near a source of light.

      As I recall the voyager craft just recently (couple years had to have additional system shut down)

      Somehow I don't think a moon base would last long on 1 watt of power.

    21. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I should have answer this previously:

      How about cosmic radiation?

      That's the easy part. Live underground, or bury your hut in moon rock. It will block radiation and provide good insulation. You probably still could have glazed windows for a room with a view.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    22. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      And who claimed it was "factually accurate"?

      There are some parables I would call exactly that. Facts can be taught in story form. When you throw a witch into an oven, she will burn.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    23. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Neil armstrong was not a baby boomer. In fact, baby boomers were born in the 50's, so many of them were teenagers to kids when Armstrong landed.

      It was baby boomers that voted in reagan who gutted much of our science R&D as well as ran up massive deficits, followed by the likes of W, who also gutted science and our balanced budget.

      Yes, we baby boomers are the one responsible for allowing bad presidents and parties to gut our nation. Even now, the space program was gutted by W/neo-cons. These same neo-cons are the ones who are responsible for preferring that American human launch be held up until 2022, using Russian and possibly Chinese launchers, rather than allow American private launchers to take hold.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    24. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Nor am I in the "literal truth" camp, in any way, shape, or form. But as allegory and insight into a group of people that became and lost (and regained and re-lost, etc) a nation, the Bible has an uncommon depth to it, including a depth of time.

      Do I believe Jonah lived in the belly of a whale for 3 days? No way. Do I believe that the author thought that Hebrews were shirking their religious responsibilities, and chose to exemplify it through a story with a character he named "Jonah"... sounds reasonable to me.

      Plus though there doesn't appear to be any historical record of Jesus, there are independent historical records that do a reasonably decent job of corroborating equivalent parts of Biblical history.

      Others on this subthread have said essentially the same. One other thought... We live in a fact-saturated world. We can have some idea of what's happening almost anywhere in the world, at our fingertips. I don't think we're mentally equipped to understand what it's like when news travels almost exclusively by word-of-mouth, where most of the population is illiterate, where it may be easier for us to find out what's happening on the far side of the world than for them to find out what's happening in the next village. There are the simple facts, and then there's the psychological underpinnings that those knowledge constraints put on one's very way of thinking.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    25. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Baby boomers never gave a shit about spending money....why do you think we are in this financial mess?

    26. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by ravenknight · · Score: 1

      Um, according to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Voyager_Program_-_spacecraft_diagram.png, Voyager doesn't have any solar panels. nor did Galileo, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Galileo_Diagram.jpg > Somehow I don't think a moon base would last long on 1 watt of power. RTGs don't provide a lot of power (yay for thermopiles) -- and I never said anything about moon bases.

    27. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that people taking the bible as a combination of literal history and a manual for life has a lot to do with the current situation of the United States

    28. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we need is to have a worthy adversary to goad us into being a wee bit more aggressive about space. I mean, it's nice that the US and Soviet Union are no longer seriously planning to nuke each other anymore, but let's face it... both superpower space programs kind of stagnated into dull incrementalism after the Cold War ended.

      China is the most likely country to fill that role, but it's almost a shame we don't have, say, the Saudis right behind them. All it would take is one televised speech using the words 'moon' and 'Allah' in the same sentence to make our elected officials in Washington start writing huge checks to make NASA's dreams come true. China might be intensely nationalistic, but they're comfortably atheist and largely content to make money & exercise bragging rights. Ditto, for India -- Hinduism is largely indifferent to Christianity, as long as Christians don't actively antagonize them and piss them off (sadly, the same can't be said about a large plurality of Christians, who are seemingly incapable of not trying to forcibly convert everyone unfortunate enough to be around them.)

    29. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by baKanale · · Score: 2

      Cursorily is only like the 2nd non-terrestrial craft to use something other then solar for power.

      There have been over 50 other spacecraft that were sent up equipped with radioisotope thermoelectric generators before Curiosity, at least 10 of them being interplanetary probes.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator#Space

    30. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You must be young. There are books from the 70s and 80s that address everything you're complaining about with viable solutions. Cosmic rays are a problem? Fine, live in buried habitats. That's been a feature of every moon base design I've ever read, except for The Millenial Project, which recommended a water shield instead (and included proposals for where to get the millions of kilograms of water necessary to shield an entire crater). Those designs even included ways of piping in filtered sunlight, so the residents wouldn't suffer from depression induced by light-deprivation.

      Need power? Fine, land a nuclear fission reactor. Doesn't matter much which specific technology. We have it, and it doesn't even have to be engineered to survive operating in hard vacuum, because it can be buried too, in a pressurized chamber. You'd most likely use one of the designs used in naval submarines or aircraft carriers, since they're already designed to travel well.

      Oxygen is easy. Even without any system whatsoever for regenerating oxygen from carbon dioxide, we know how to fly big tanks of compressed oxygen. And all the serious proposals included such regeneration systems, many of them incorporating plants.

      Which leads to the next thing. Food. NASA has already done studies of what species of wheat would best grow in lunar conditions using minimally improved lunar material as soil. There's an entire corpus of material on the subject of how we might develop food self-sufficiency at a lunar base, and it's fairly obvious that it's possible. It's just a matter of GOING and doing the in situ research necessary to prove which ideas actually work. Until then, the solution of putting food on rockets and launching it is technology we have, and understand very very well. SpaceX just did precisely that, delivering to the International Space Station. It's so easy, it can be done on a budget.

      Water is even easier. The human metabolism actually produces excess water as a byproduct, and treating water is something that's exceedingly well understood. It's not even remotely rocket science. It's science-based, but it doesn't take a scientist to run a wastewater treatment plant. It barely even takes a person, anymore. The ones in common use across the world are largely automated. Most of them don't even have very many moving parts. You'd be amazed what holding ponds in sunlight can do. Meanwhile, getting a system going with sufficient free water to start with is just as easy as solving food. You put a booster under it and you launch it. We know how to do this. Most serious proposals for putting massive amounts of water into space call for freezing it first, since it behaves better under launch conditions as a solid. Yes, people have actually considered that.

      In short, we do in fact have ALL of the technology required to establish a long-term habitable lunar base. Becoming self-sufficient is then only a matter of additional research, which can only be done at an inhabited base. And we already know what research must be done. It's just a question of actually performing the experiments.

      And doing it at all is solely a question of money, which is solely a question of will. There's more than enough free-floating capital doing absolutely nothing on Earth except generating commodity bubbles. The people who own it don't have the imagination to spend it.

    31. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by thrich81 · · Score: 1

      Apollo's 18, 19, 20 were canceled in the 60's -- well before the Boomers had any influence. The major tilt of the US budget since then has increasingly gone to social welfare programs used by the parents of the Boomers. Medicare and Social Security (for better or worse -- I don't want to get into that argument) have increasingly gobbled up the federal budget and until 2011 no Boomer was eligible for Medicare on the basis of their age. The 'Greatest Generation', not the Boomers, were the recipients of all this government largess during the decades since Apollo.

    32. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Also, the moon is in tidal lock with Earth, always showing the same face. This in turn (npi) means that its polar areas are mostly perpendicular to the sun. and won't get a lot of solar radiation. The moon doesn't have a strong magnetic field, but it has one, so the polar regions where the solar radiation doesn't hit head on will be safer.

      Other radiation, sure. But we know how to dig.

    33. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by riverat1 · · Score: 2

      The way to neutralize the effect of cosmic radiation is to bury the base in regolith or even tunnel under the surface. And oxygen is not a problem on the Moon. There is plenty of oxygen waiting to be liberated from from moon rocks.

    34. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by smallfries · · Score: 0

      No. You are taking an extremely superficial view of the problems and claiming that we know the solutions. If you take your points together then they claim that we can build a viable closed eco-system. The experiments that have been conducted so far show that we cannot. We still do not know how to engineer a closed-loop that can survive for more than a few months and every experiment so far has had to shut down or risk killing the participants.

      Sure we know how to build bunkers - do we know how to do large scale construction in a hard vacuum? Can we build a fission reactor large enough for a small city, launch it by rocket and land it on another orbital body? Or is it so easy to assemble it over there using our well-developed space construction skills?

      It must be some utopian blend of crack in that pipe that you are smoking. Nobody is claiming that we can't learn how to do these things given the will and the experience, but to claim that they are already solved problems is just ridiculous.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    35. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your last paragraph deserves a +20(insightful)...

    36. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by M1FCJ · · Score: 2

      I call BS on the idea that we have the tech/means for a moon base right now.

      Cursorily is only like the 2nd non-terrestrial craft to use something other then solar for power.

      Hah!
      Pioneer 10 & 11, Voyager 1 & 2, Viking 1 & 2, Galileo, New Horizons and on and on and on...

      You must be joking. Nuclear power usage in space craft is not new, it's not even new on Mars! We have two of those slowly cooling down right now

    37. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cursorily is only like the 2nd non-terrestrial craft to use something other then solar for power.

      What ARE you on about? All the outer solar system missions required nuclear power RTGs. Both Pioneers, both Voyagers, New Horizons, Casini, Galileo....just off the top of my head.

    38. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      No, I answered your objection. You said we don't have the technology. I said we do have the technology. All of the science required is well understood, minus the closed loop ecosystem, which I did say we don't know how to do. Reread my second to last paragraph.

      Are there engineering problems still? Certainly. But that's just engineering. There is no guesswork involved. The conditions are known. The materials we have are known. The problems to be solved are all known. It's just a matter of applying what we know, and for that, my final paragraph is the only point that matters.

    39. Re:Be as nasty as you want to the Baby Boomers... by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, I think that I skipped over your penultimate paragraph. I'm not the poster that you were replying to though...

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  6. A true loss by mykepredko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the greatest men of the last century - thank you for your contributions to mankind.

    1. Re:A true loss by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      One of the greatest explorers of all time; right up there with Columbus, Magellan and de Champlain.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:A true loss by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0, Troll

      One of the greatest men of the last century - thank you for your contributions to mankind.

      I am sorry the guy is dead, and I don't mean to be disrepectful, but this is way overstating his importance. Neil wasn't the quarterback, he was the football. If he wasn't available, the next guy in line would have done the job.

    3. Re:A true loss by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Selection of non-military may have been purposeful.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:A true loss by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      It sounnds from the article like Neil himself shared parent's view...as do I honetsly. He did some great things, but it seems an injustice to put all of the credit in his lap when there were several other people on the mission with him.

    5. Re:A true loss by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

      Selection of non-military may have been purposeful.

      It was definitely on purpose, to end run around any claims from other countries (USSR) that the US was doing this as a military mission.

    6. Re:A true loss by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, if "if he didn't do it, someone else would have" is a qualifier, he sure is on par with Columbus. The technology was available and if it hadn't been him, someone else would have tried to reach China by sailing west.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:A true loss by bfandreas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He was NOT cargo. He was NOT some monkey who got aimed and shot at the moon.

      That generation of astronauts(and kosmonauts) had to be able to do complicated math and astonishing engineering feats while spinning out of control and slowly asphyxiating.

      To put it bluntly and to use a car analogy:
      Those guys were the ones who had to devise and install a new braking mechanism in a car that goes 500mph straight to a curve that leads to a nasty drop. Resourcefulness, knowledge, physical fitness, level-headedness and pocket protectors.

      Of all the great who participated in the moon program, they were -had to be- what Nietzsche wrote about. Prime underwear on the outside, cape over the shoulder and a giant S painted on the chest material. With pocket protectors. The people in the tin-can WERE Plan B. And C. And D.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    8. Re:A true loss by Weatherlawyer · · Score: 1

      Well, if "if he didn't do it, someone else would have" is a qualifier, he sure is on par with Columbus.

      Not!

      Armstrong didn't kill anyone or enslave the rest of the people in the area he visited. Or in the region Columbus did all that damage to.

      But as is stated in a post below this (at the time of writing: by fm6 (162816) Alter Relationship on Saturday August 25, @07:55PM) he was just a man and part of a team. But he symbolised the rest of the team and was its ideal.

    9. Re:A true loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounnds from the article like Neil himself shared parent's view...as do I honetsly. He did some great things, but it seems an injustice to put all of the credit in his lap when there were several other people on the mission with him.

      Yea, that's because he had humility and modesty, rare traits these days. Ask any good captain of any good crew and he'll tell you it was all his men. Ask the men, they'll tell you it was all the captain. Maybe the backup pilots could have also landed the capsule... maybe they would have all crashed and burned. But he wasn't the top of a very short list for nothing- he got there through talent and hard work and deserved what he got. You want to know what a actual Hero looks like, look at him... his willingness to acknowledge the others who were part of the team is just more proof of that.

    10. Re:A true loss by surfdaddy · · Score: 1

      We went to the moon BEFORE we invented the friggin microprocessor!!! Now that's scary.

    11. Re:A true loss by thrich81 · · Score: 1

      Let's cut ShanghaiBill some slack here -- he's right that the next guy in line would have done the job. The Apollo schedule was so fluid that it was not possible to say for sure which mission and crew would be the first lander. For a while, Apollo 10 looked like it would be the landing mission and it, like Apollo 11, was crewed by three space flight veterans (not true of the later Apollo missions). So, not denigrating Armstrong's achievement, any of those Apollo mission commanders were up to the job. Deke Slayton states as a fact in his autobiography that if Gus Grissom had not been killed in Apollo 1, he would have seen to it that Grissom would have commanded the first landing mission.

    12. Re:A true loss by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I've already responded to this stupidity (and been thoroughly flamed for it) but since then I've read all the obituaries for him. These were instructive, since he's rarely been in the news since his retirement from the astronaut corps.

      And here's one fact that leaped out at me: Neil Armstrong got really mad when people hyped up his achievement and called him a great man. He thought that kind of hype minimized the hard work of thousands of people who helped the Apollo program succeed.

      I agree.

  7. Honorary Citizenship by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Neil Armstrong, honorary Mooninite.
    "On the moon, our weekends are so advanced they encompass the entire week."

    1. Re:Honorary Citizenship by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the proper term for a citizen of the Luna be a "loonie"?

  8. I'm too young... by flogger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm too young to remember his accomplishments firsthand, but because of his accomplishments with the help of the entire infrastructure of the space race, I was able to grow up with the dream of living in a future in which I could visit the moon and mars... Now I feel that dream has died right along with him.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
  9. Re:Allegedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I hope your balls fall off. Show a little respect FFS.

  10. Re:Allegedly by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

    I urge you to go tell Buzz Aldrin your opinions.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  11. The final step for a man. by Guano_Jim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And a loss for all mankind.

    Godspeed, Mr. Armstrong.

    1. Re:The final step for a man. by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

      Beautiful sentiment. If only it were not just a day after my mod points expired... Mr. Armstrong will be greatly missed.

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    2. Re:The final step for a man. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Just last night, as I was putting my 5 year old son to sleep, I was advocating his growing up to be an astronaut.

      There is no greater goal to strive for than to advance all of humanity beyond our planet.

      Godspeed, indeed.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    3. Re:The final step for a man. by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Death is not a loss. It's a change. We shouldn't cling. We shouldn't weep. Rejoice in the riches he left us.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  12. Re:I guess he was not Headstrong... by firex726 · · Score: 1

    If only he was Heartstrong.

  13. The state of space travel is a sad one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The fact he lived so long and yet didn't see other people go to mars, or even back to the moon is an offensive reality, I really hope things change within the coming decades.

    1. Re:The state of space travel is a sad one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that they will. I leave you to wonder why.

    2. Re:The state of space travel is a sad one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - I wonder...

    3. Re:The state of space travel is a sad one. by lilfields · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Other people went to the moon after Armstrong, not many, but several. It was really halted because it was/is so dangerous, expensive, and there weren't any yields from the moon that we can't get from orbit, which is vastly safer.

    4. Re:The state of space travel is a sad one. by catmistake · · Score: 3, Informative

      There were twelve.
      Neil Armstrong - Apollo 11 - July, 1969
      Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin - Apollo 11 - July, 1969
      Charles "Pete" Conrad - Apollo 12 - November, 1969
      Alan Bean - Apollo 12 - November, 1969
      Alan Shepard - Apollo 14 - February, 1971
      Edgar Mitchell - Apollo 14 - February, 1971
      David Scott - Apollo 15 - July, 1971
      James Irwin - Apollo 15 - July, 1971
      John Young - Apollo 16 - April, 1972 (also on Apollo 10, without landing)
      Charles Duke - Apollo 16 - April, 1972
      Eugene Cernan - Apollo 17 - December, 1972 (also on Apollo 10, without landing)
      Harrison Schmitt - Apollo 17 - December, 1972

    5. Re:The state of space travel is a sad one. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness the airplane didn't suffer the same fate.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:The state of space travel is a sad one. by thrich81 · · Score: 1

      You really can't say that when right now there is a permanently crewed space station in orbit, and uncountable robot missions to other planets in the Solar System. Not as exciting as a crewed moon landing, but definitely not sad.

  14. Sad News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Astronaut and first man on the moon Neil Armstrong died today. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

    1. Re:Sad News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Truly an American icon.

      I grant you that, but as a non-American I'd like to add: Truly a human icon.

    2. Re:Sad News by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Truly an American icon.

      I grant you that, but as a non-American I'd like to add: Truly a human icon.

      Mod parent up. Gagarin and Armstrong regardless of their home country were, and maybe still are a great inspiration for millions of kids. Rest in peace.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    3. Re:Sad News by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Also find a person of the right age in any part of the west and show them the iconic picture of the Challenger explosion. They'll remember instantly.

      That's the one I remember most vividly. In some way I do envy those who as kids got to see Armstong when he landed on the moon instead.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    4. Re:Sad News by ACS+Solver · · Score: 1

      Yep, on that note.

      Being born in the USSR and growing up in ex-USSR, and being exposed to US-centric culture through the Internet, I've seen a fair amount of both. And it saddens me to see how Yuri Gagarin is mostly hailed as a Soviet/Russian hero and achievement, with Neil Armstrong being hailed as an American hero. Space travel is the single most spectacular thing achieved by mankind. Gagarin and Armstrong, as the first to fly in space and to walk on another celestial body, are heroes for all of humanity and should be remembered as such. What they did was - figuratively and literally - above countries and national borders. And the next person to join their league will be whoever first walks on Mars.

      With Armstrong's death now, there's a sad feeling of manned space exploration being essentially over. I'm not alone among the geeky population to be fascinated and captivated by space travel, but I've recognized for a while now that the romantic visions are not going to come true anytime soon. 8 years from the first human in space to the first human on the Moon (with space programs that were competing, not cooperating), and nothing for the last 40 years. Just as the development of some areas, computers first and foremost, exceeded everyone's wildest dreams, space travel turned out to be far less impressive. The best we can expect for the next 2-3 decades at least is a Mars landing (largely by a country wanting to signal its might), and a small research outpost on the Moon.

      So that's going on a rant, but Armstrong's death is sad in more ways than one.

  15. One small step... by BeerCat · · Score: 1

    ...and he's taken the last giant leap for mankind.

    Doesn't get any more legendary than that. RIP

    --
    "She's furniture with a pulse"
    1. Re:One small step... by Guppy · · Score: 1

      ...and he's taken the last giant leap for mankind.

      Godspeed, on his journey to the unknown continent from which no traveler returns.

    2. Re:One small step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh noes! It goes like this:

      That's one small step for mankind, one giant leap for a man.

      RIP

  16. Thank you, Neil Armstrong by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mr. Armstrong, I watched you jumping about on the moon when I was nine years old. It was unbelievably cool! The future seemed to be one of boundless possibility.

    Now I'm older, and more cynical, and the world hasn't really turned into the place I thought it would be at this point - but whenever I think about your trip to the moon I'm suddenly a wide-eyed nine-year-old that still believes anything can happen. It gives me hope that mankind really will solve it's most vexing problems, once it finally decides to do so.

    Thank you for everything, sir. I hope your eternity is a pleasant one.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was a wide-eyed seven-year-old in Germany - and you mirror my feelings one hundred percent.

      *bows*

    2. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      I wasn't around then, but I've been reading up on him and all the rest of the Apollo astronauts since. I'm filled with wonder every time I think about it.

      Thank you for everything, sir. I hope your eternity is a pleasant one.

      Well put. Fare well, Mr. Armstrong.

    3. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another boy from Germany ... watched Neil Armstrongs first steps when i was 8y, deeply impressed and believing in a bright future.

      Now deeply sad and depressed where mankind got 40y later. We - me including - didn't make much out of this.

    4. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      That is actually maybe the biggest gain from this "small step". Not so much that he went to the moon. We didn't really "get" anything sensible out of that (ok, a few technology advancements, but let's be honest here, a few government research grants would have been a hell of a lot cheaper).

      But what we got was a sentiment. It convinced us that we can accomplish anything, even the most daring, outlandish goals, if we put our mind to it and if we truly want it. How many did actually think it's possible when Kennedy held his famous speech, that we'd put a man on the moon and get him safely back to earth within a decade? But a nation pulled together, not caring whether this party or that party, but united behind a dead president's wish. Notice how the moon program wasn't halted when the other party got into power, just because the idea came from the other political side?

      A project like this could unite the US again, right now I see a nation divided, with everyone looking out only for himself and not caring about the country, only asking what the country can do for him.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I was minus thirteen years old when it happened and I was so impressed that I decided to be born as a nerdy child and a future engineer!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by bfandreas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When I was that age I got to see Challenger blown to smithereens :(

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    7. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was about 3 yrs old and remember being woke up from sleep to watch. It is one of my first memories.

      I became an aerospace engineer, rocket scientist working for NASA-JSC.
      I worked on GN&C software, then on mission control software for spacecraft control centers around the world.
      While working at JSC, I met many astronauts, worked with some on specific problems and drank beer with a few. We shared stories. One of the most colorful was John Young, he always seemed to have an interesting story to share.

      I never met Mr. Armstrong. My loss. However, my father was very similar in manner to what Mr, Armstrong appeared from the outside. Dad was an engineer, pilot and career military. He was simply wanted me to
      * do my best
      * try my hardest
      * be happy in whatever I chose.
      I've tried to do those things, plus have fun at the same time.

      We need people like Neil AND my father to teach and set high expectations for others. Human space exploration makes every human better by every attempt. I'm hopeful that multiple countries will pick up were the USA has dropped the ball.

    8. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by agrif · · Score: 2

      We got the sentiment that we could do anything, yes. But it also gave us, at least briefly, a reason to be humble.

      To me, at least, this is the most important thing to come out of the Apollo program.

    9. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      You and me both. It's impossible to quantify the difference in effect on the generations, but I can't imagine there isn't one.

    10. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Notice how the moon program wasn't halted when the other party got into power, just because the idea came from the other political side?

      That's because by the time the other party came to power (with Nixon's election in 1968), the Apollo program had already been gutted during the budget battles of 1965 and '66. The Apollo program coasted into the landing running on inertia and fumes.
       

      A project like this could unite the US again

      Except, it didn't unite the country in the first place.

    11. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      I was 16 at the time. I still remember going outside after watching the broadcast and staring up at the Moon in wonder. I went outside tonight and looked at the Moon and it brought tears to my eyes. Godspeed Neil Armstrong.

    12. Re:Thank you, Neil Armstrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is actually maybe the biggest gain from this "small step". Not so much that he went to the moon. We didn't really "get" anything sensible out of that (ok, a few technology advancements, but let's be honest here, a few government research grants would have been a hell of a lot cheaper).

      I think a lot of people who worked on the returned moon rock samples, picture and variety of other data that came back on that and subsequent Apollo missions would disagree. What about the mirrors they set up for lasers to bounce off!? We learnt what could be done. That isn't nothing.

  17. NBC fixed the name by tbq · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least NBC fixed the headline. It first read "Astronaut Neil Young, first man to walk on moon, dies at age 82."

    1. Re:NBC fixed the name by imuffin · · Score: 1

      What an absurd mistake! I just read the article there and it still has another glaring error. They misquoted him. The article quotes him saying "... one small step for a man," when in fact he said "...one small step for man." His original words were grammatically slightly confusing, but MSNBC didn't need to correct them.

    2. Re:NBC fixed the name by tbq · · Score: 2

      I saw that too, but that is a common mistake made, and Armstrong did say multiple times that it was what he meant to say.

    3. Re:NBC fixed the name by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      For some time Armstrong claimed that he indeed did include the "a, and that a transmission glitch must have caused it not to have been sent. After much scrutiny of the tapes NASA concluded that the word "a" was not said at all. It was important to the astronauts that they got their recorded words right for historical purposes. And in all honesty, Mr. Armstrong kinda' blew it by not reciting his prepared speech exactly right, and it must have bothered him enough that he attempted to hide his mistake. These guys took pride in everything they did, and didn't ever want to be seen as "wrong" in the public's eye, NASA's pride and future was always on the line. He had practiced that little speech over and over. Shit happens. As has been noted, the man truly had "balls of steel". It's kind of funny to learn that this is what made him sweat a little bit.

    4. Re:NBC fixed the name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well NBC there was John Young, first man to smuggle a corn beef sandwich into space.

    5. Re:NBC fixed the name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least NBC fixed the headline. It first read "Astronaut Neil Young, first man to walk on moon, dies at age 82."

      But Neal Young is always walking on the moon.

    6. Re:NBC fixed the name by Torodung · · Score: 1

      Of course, their mistake was that rock and roll will never die, unlike Armstrong. RIP.

    7. Re:NBC fixed the name by catmistake · · Score: 1

      After much scrutiny of the tapes NASA concluded that the word "a" was not said at all.

      Not only incorrect on all counts, you obviously just made up everything you just claimed. The scrutiny of the transmission supports Armstrong's claims:

      "The 'a' was intended," Armstrong said. "I thought I said it. I can't hear it when I listen on the radio reception here on Earth, so I'll be happy if you just put it in parentheses."

      Although no one in the world heard the "'a," some research backs Armstrong.

      In 2006, a computer analysis found evidence that Armstrong said what he said he said.

      Peter Shann Ford, an Australian computer programmer, ran a software analysis looking at sound waves and found a wave that would have been the missing "a." It lasted 35 milliseconds, much too quick to be heard. The Smithsonian's space curator, Roger Launius, looked at the evidence and found it convincing.

      NASA has also stood by its moon man.

      "If Neil Armstrong says there was an 'a,' then as far as we're concerned, there was 'a,'" NASA spokesman Michael Cabbage said shortly before the 40th anniversary of the Apollo 11 mission.

      ...

      And in all honesty, Mr. Armstrong kinda' blew it by not reciting his prepared speech exactly right, and it must have bothered him enough that he attempted to hide his mistake... It's kind of funny to learn that this is what made him sweat a little bit.

      You deserve to be punched in the face by Buzz Aldrin.

  18. Fly me to the moon by bfandreas · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtFBRJFN3p8

    We will get back there. Not today. Not tomorrow. But eventually.

    RIP Neil Armstrong

    --
    20 minutes into the future
  19. What will happen to his remains? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    A lot of people ask to have their remains sent into space, but he's already been there. Has he said what he wants done with his remains?

    Of course, as best we know, nobody has operable technology right now to place a person on the moon...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:What will happen to his remains? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Probably Arlington National Cemetery. He was a service man, after all.

  20. A great loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just sad to hear this.

  21. he was by maeda · · Score: 1

    One of the greatest, you will be remembered

  22. Re:Allegedly by game+kid · · Score: 1

    Oh that would be fun to watch.

    When I saw this on Slashdot's front page, my heart sank like "oh god no". Then I saw the comments under TFA about how the site managed to have it as "Neil Young" in the headline...a more dubious feat, but disturbingly typical for the proofreaders at NBCNews.com for some reason. (I read 'em daily so I've seen their fumbles too often...slow down a bit guys!)

    Anyway, RIP Neil Armstrong. I hope we can step on the moon again soon.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  23. The real story: the Earth landings were a hoax by seifried · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone knows the real Neil Armstrong never left the moon, who do you think started building the first military moon base, and was later put in charge of it? In fact the entire Apollo program was designed to deliver astronauts to the moon, and then fake an Earth landing and use body double to replace them. Did you see how big the rocket needed to get all that crap to the moon was? And how small the lunar module was, no way did it have the power to escape to orbit and enough fuel to return to Earth. The Moon landings were real but the Earth landings are a HOAX!

    1. Re:The real story: the Earth landings were a hoax by seifried · · Score: 1

      For people down voting this, you may want to have your humour/sarcasm glands checked.

    2. Re:The real story: the Earth landings were a hoax by Hartree · · Score: 2

      The old usenet maxim still holds: There is no ironic humor so blatant that someone on the net won't take it seriously. ;)

    3. Re:The real story: the Earth landings were a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No I won't! It's perfectly possible. Stop judging me!

  24. A true steely-eyed missile man by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A moment of silence for one of those who used math and fire to punch a hole in the sky.

    1. Re:A true steely-eyed missile man by houghi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't tell me the sky is the limit when there are footsteps on the moon.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:A true steely-eyed missile man by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      - Paul Brandt - "There's A World Out There"

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
  25. Re:Allegedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's no proof that you actually have a brain, either. Funny how you can sit there typing a message that can be broadcast instantly all around the world from your house, on a computer that is engineered to sub-nanometer precision, you can take medication that is engineered on a molecular level, and you can drive a car made of composites that were only dreamed of 50 years ago, yet you refuse to believe in the Apollo program.

    So what, pioneer, voyager, viking and all the rest are fake, too? Curiosity is fake? To what end would the government continue to fake all these programs - considering the glee with which it cuts NASA funding wouldn't it be easier to just not to fake them in the first place?

  26. A hero by AbrasiveCat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    One of my heroes. He will be missed.

    I was little during the moon landing and thought it was pretty cool! It was only later when I came to appreciate the hazards and the guts to do the moon landing.

  27. Pilot, Engineer, Professor .. A Real Role Model by perpenso · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A class act. And a great pilot. You will be missed.

    Navy pilot - combat veteran, test/research pilot, aerospace engineer, university professor. Of course he was most famous for being an astronaut, commander of the Apollo 11 mission and the first to walk on the moon.

    He inspired generations of scientists and engineers. Because of Armstrong and his fellow astronauts my friends and I in elementary school knew math and science were important and were highly motivated to pay attention. We had real heroes are role models.

    1. Re:Pilot, Engineer, Professor .. A Real Role Model by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not just a role model for kids in USA, but all through out the world.
      For once here we have a true world hero.
      A million thanks Mr. Armstrong.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    2. Re:Pilot, Engineer, Professor .. A Real Role Model by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      oh, come on mods, lighten up!

  28. We stand on the shoulders of giants by niks42 · · Score: 1

    And Neil was a giant of Mankind. Thank you for being there, to lift us up and show us a view beyond our horizons. You will always be remembered, and admired along with all those who worked as part of the biggest and most successful team ever assembled, to take that one, small step for all of us.

  29. Arguably the most important American ever by Grayhand · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If we do become a space faring people to future generations he will likely be the best remembered American. Name anyone that accomplished anything greater in the last 200+ years? There is only one person in all of human history that will be remembered as the first person to step foot on another world. Even to this day it's likely the greatest accomplishment of us as a species let alone as a nation.

    1. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Even WWII will fade relatively and the first thing remembered will be the walk on the moon.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You better hope so. If Germany had won WWII, chances are pretty good we would have got to the moon a whole lot sooner! Where do you think the US and Russia got those rocket scientists from?

    3. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by shipbrick · · Score: 5, Informative

      "A scientific colleague tells me about a recent trip to the New Guinea highlands, where she visited a stone age culture hardly contacted by Western civilization. They were ignorant of wristwatches, soft drinks, and frozen food. But they knew about Apollo 11. They knew that humans had walked on the Moon. They knew the names of Armstrong and Aldrin and Collins." from A Pale Blue Dot by Carl Sagan

    4. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by DerekLyons · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Name anyone that accomplished anything greater in the last 200+ years?

      Jonas Salk, who eliminated polio. Louis Pasteur, who discovered germs. John Snow who proved that cholera spread via contaminated water and thus strengthened the case for public sanitation immeasurably... And just missing your 200 year deadline, Edward Jenner who introduced and championed vaccination.
       
      In just one field of human endeavor (medical science), these are people who caused change.
       
      As important as the moon landing is historically, Neil Armstrong was just a cog - the guy standing in the right place at the right time to be picked to pilot the mission.

    5. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      We are a sapcefaring people now, we just rarely leave the ship.

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These were also people that accellerated the destruction of most of the earth ecosystems by overpopulation.

    7. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Those rockets were pointed at Coventry. Not the moon. And they got there quite a bit sooner. Who knows, maybe they'd even reached Moscow or New York? The sky is the limit.

      What a brilliant application of human resourcefulness and ambition.

      Sorry, but I can only react with sarcasm to such a ludicrous statement. The Nazis never thought beyond acquiring farmland. They were so narrow-minded it's not funny anymore. They'd rather fund archeological expeditions to prove Teh Master Race was descendant of the Norse gods themselves before they'd waste money and resources and perfectly good weapons to go to the moon. Why should you impress somebody you are bound to subdue by force?

      They were THAT deluded. And screwed. That weapons programme was their way of searching for a silver bullet to win the war.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    8. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      The hyperbole befits the achievement.
      They. Were. On. The. Fucking. Moon.
      I've never been to New Guinea.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    9. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      These were also people that accellerated the destruction of most of the earth ecosystems by overpopulation.

      No. That were Adam and Eve. Silly fornicating buggers.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    10. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      If we do become a space faring people to future generations he will likely be the best remembered American. Name anyone that accomplished anything greater in the last 200+ years?

      Nikola Tesla

      And I say this with the utmost fondness for Armstrong and manned spaceflight. I also say this as one who was too young at the time, to witness the landings on the moon.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    11. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      If we do become a space faring people to future generations he will likely be the best remembered American. Name anyone that accomplished anything greater in the last 200+ years? There is only one person in all of human history that will be remembered as the first person to step foot on another world. Even to this day it's likely the greatest accomplishment of us as a species let alone as a nation.

      I'm sure you'll get quite a lot of names in your little fishing expedition. And that is a good thing! We've achieved so much in the last 500 years or so(and quite a lot less in the thousand years before that). There are many great names and achievements to name and there will be a lot more further still.

      So this might be a flamewar that actually warms my heart :)

      But I'm not so sure I'd list Thomas Hobbes and his Leviathan. The notion of "nation" now feels so...limiting. It has served its purpose. Time to let it go.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    12. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we do become a space faring people to future generations he will likely be the best remembered American. Name anyone that accomplished anything greater in the last 200+ years?

      Nikola Tesla

      And I say this with the utmost fondness for Armstrong and manned spaceflight. I also say this as one who was too young at the time, to witness the landings on the moon.

      1,000 years from now no one will know who Nikola Tesla was.

      But you'd better fucking believe that they'll know what Neil Armstrong did.

      First. Person. To. Go. To. Another. Celestial. Body.

      WALKED ON THE FUCKING MOON!!!

      It doesn't get any more significant that THAT.

      The first creature that crawled out of the ocean onto land? Hundreds of millions of years ago? Bah, it could crawl right back. It didn't have to cross a quarter million miles through the complete death of space to reach another fucking planet.

    13. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These were also people that accellerated the destruction of most of the earth ecosystems by overpopulation.

      No. That were Adam and Eve. Silly fornicating buggers.

      If their fornicating was buggery then there would not be overpopulation.

    14. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Those were simpler times. They didn't know their knee from their ear-hole.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    15. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by igny · · Score: 1

      If we do become a space faring people to future generations he will likely be the best remembered American. Name anyone that accomplished anything greater in the last 200+ years? There is only one person in all of human history that will be remembered as the first person to step foot on another world. Even to this day it's likely the greatest accomplishment of us as a species let alone as a nation.

      I doubt that the space faring people would forget Yuri Gagarin.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    16. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name anyone that accomplished anything greater in the last 200+ years?

      Jonas Salk, who eliminated polio. Louis Pasteur, who discovered germs. John Snow who proved that cholera spread via contaminated water and thus strengthened the case for public sanitation immeasurably... And just missing your 200 year deadline, Edward Jenner who introduced and championed vaccination.

      In just one field of human endeavor (medical science), these are people who caused change.

      As important as the moon landing is historically, Neil Armstrong was just a cog - the guy standing in the right place at the right time to be picked to pilot the mission.

      Fucking bullshit. The same thing is true of everyone you just listed, and just about everyone else, except perhaps artists/composers.

    17. Re:Arguably the most important American ever by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      It doesn't exist. New Guinea was faked on a soundstage in mexico.

  30. A hero, but without the hype please by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sigh. Not to minimize Armstrong's achievements — which took courage, brains, and skill — but he himself would probably wince at your hype. One of the greatest men in the 20th century? He led a historic space mission. That's a big deal, but it's not in the same class as wiping out smallpox, discovering relativity, defeating Nazi Germany, holding a nation together with a third of its workers unemployed, laying the foundations of the computer revolution...

    1. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by sackbut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that his great humility and quiet nature was what made him the perfect choice to do why he did. He was not the leader although he did command the moon landing mission. he was one who recognized and acknowledged the efforts of all who enabled him to do what he did.

    2. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      And Columbus sailed some other King's ships and blundered into the Americas.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Yep. Columbus is overrated. He didn't invent the ship. Or even the sail. Or the fire he put his kettle on. Heck, he didn't even scrub his own deck or sail by himself. He wasn't even the first. Let's forget that loser...

      I wonder where this notion of the GP came from. Since when is standing on the shoulder of giants something that diminishes achievement? Being somebody who was remarkable even within a remarkable team is something to be remembered.

      While it may be true that Armstrong didn't like to be a symbol for human aspirations he was one nevertheless. We celebrate his memory since we like to celebrate human resourcefulness. Our ambition. Our achievements. We should do so more often.

      If I want to be depressed by somebody pointing out our failings and shortcomings then I'll read the news or visit some sort of religious ceremony. Now it is time to remember one of our greatest moments. And if Armstrong has to be appropriated to that end then so be it.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    4. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Well, what the hell do you expect? Show me anybody else who could go that far on an 18 dollar travel voucher?

      You know I can't find that in Google? I think he put a picture of it in one of many books I read on the landing. That's how I remember it anyway.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. Not to minimize Armstrong's achievements — which took courage, brains, and skill — but he himself would probably wince at your hype. One of the greatest men in the 20th century? He led a historic space mission. That's a big deal, but it's not in the same class as wiping out smallpox, discovering relativity, defeating Nazi Germany, holding a nation together with a third of its workers unemployed, laying the foundations of the computer revolution...

      ORLY?

      If, in thousands of years, humanity has spread off this Earth, who's going to be remembered as FIRST?

    6. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yuri Gragarin.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I'd actually place Columbus several greatness levels below Armstrong. His sole claim to fame is that he stupidly did something that didn't know he'd done, and did it before anybody else. His geography stunk, he repeatedly drove men under him to mutiny, and he had a huge ego, By blind luck, he was the first to chart a route across the Atlantic, but European navigators were all over the place, and would have charted the route in the next few years in any case.

      Note that if you're a blue-water sailor and you're trying to use 16th-century tech to travel from Europe to India (as many people were), it's pretty much impossible to avoid stopping in Brazil. "Discovering America" is not a big achievement.

    8. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by fm6 · · Score: 0

      Sure, he was an admirable guy, and deserved recognition. But "among the greatest men of the 20th century"? Please.

    9. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Yes, "among". Mankind taking a step off of this rock for the first time is a huge deal. It is as big as the other achievements that you list. Although Armstrong did not achieve it alone, most of the rest of your list are not solo endeavours either.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    10. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Nobody ever accomplishes anything alone, but some people have unusual qualities that allow them to do great things. Whatever qualities Armstrong had (and yeah, he was an impressive guy) they were shared by the rest of the Astronaut Corps, any one of which could have stepped in and taken his place if necessary.

      Now, the astronauts were and are an impressive bunch of people, but are they all among the greatest people of their time?

      I'm not trying to run down Armstrong's achievements. I'm just think that describing him in hyperbolic terms is stupid. I say this as one of the leading pundits on the Internet.

    11. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Gagarin, actually.
      And most younger people not born in Russia never heard the name :-(

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    12. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yuri Gragarin.

      Right. Because people remember the first guy who test-sailed Columbus' ships.

      What was his name again?

    13. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except he never survived a trip to and from another world.

    14. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be joking. Defeating Nazi Germany was probably the greatest misfortune ever to befall the Western world.

    15. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      He was hardly test-sailing. He is and always will be the first man in space, definitely one of the biggest achievements for mankind for the 20th century. That doesn't lessen the Apollo mission crews achievement but I would still rank it as more significant than landing on the moon.

    16. Re:A hero, but without the hype please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about Al Gore or Barak Obama?

  31. Curiosity by nastav · · Score: 2

    There was a time when I was hopeful that humanity would form colonies on Moon or Mars, or perhaps even terraform there. It became extremely clear in the last couple of decades that infrastructure projects - the kind requiring massive investments and and resulting in long-term (only) benefits - are no longer easy to fund. This statement holds true for everything - space exploration, bridges, high speed railways, safer investments in nuclear energy, better fuel alternatives, improved roads - if it lacks immediate gratification and short-term economic and political upside, it is no longer generally funded.

    This reality notwithstanding, we (as a species) are making some serious (but very slow) progress into space. There are concerted efforts by private organizations to build manned space vehicles, and helped by prizes like the Ansari X prize. Even government sponsored work - like Curiosity landing on Mars successfully - is stirring up public's imagination (although I'm afraid not enough to overcome the forces that prevent infrastructure investments across the board). Up and coming economies - especially China - are interested in making a name for themselves as innovators. This desire to establish a brand in the world stage is seemingly fueling China's space program (as it once fueled America and Soviet Russia's programs). India might yet join in and make real investments (but given India is India, there is no end to it's tendency to fail despite having all the talent and resources it needs to succeed).

    So I think Armstrong might have died being disappointed at what we have achieved so far, and what we have not - but I suspect that he did not die thinking that we have given up, or that our future in space is bleak - I suspect that he'd have instead known that there is still hope, and that we are making progress - just that our progress isn't structured and US-centric as one might have imagined a few decades ago.

    --
    -- obligatory (but true) caveat: my comments my own, and don't reflect my employer or colleagues' positions.
    1. Re:Curiosity by bfandreas · · Score: 2

      I do share this sentiment.
      Per aspera ad astra.
      If mankind ever will need an epitaph, this will be it.
      It was a monumental effort carried out by many. And it was the embodyment what it means to be human. Ambition. For the heck of it. Cooperation. For our betterment. Because it is there. Somebody has to and it bloody well better be us. Maybe it IS made of cheese?

      Ambition and curiosity got humans were we are now for better or worse. It is the very fibre of our being. It is said that if we want to survive we will have to take to the stars. The truth is, if we survive we will take to the stars. Or the nearest non-boring planet.

      The first fishy bastard who dragged his butt into the mud didn't have a name. But if you ask yourself if ambition or curiosity drove that fishy bastard onto dry land you'll find that this notion strings a chord. That's how we think. That's who we are. I guess some fool will have asked Armstong why he agreed to be shot at the moon. And I'd like to think the question confused him. Why not? Could be a laff.

      True, there are no practical flying cars. We dont live on the moon. In fact we haven't been there for some time. Partly propably because it's already been done before. Instead we have Mars in our sight.

      Not today. Not tomorrow. But certainly within the next hundred years we'll shoot one of our own up there. Can't have the robots have all the fun.

      Once you dragged your butt out of the sea into the mud then there's no going back. We are no quitters like whales and dolphins. We'll stick to it.

      Per aspera ad astra.
      Turns out "aspera" will always be an uphill battle.

      RIP Neil Armstrong
      But not RIP human ambition.
      AD ASTRA!

      --
      20 minutes into the future
  32. RIP Mr. Armstrong by oakgrove · · Score: 1

    Godspeed.

    --
    The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
  33. People who don't believe in heroes... by NemoinSpace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Never met Neil Armstrong. I suspect one day we will have a memorial park at tranquility base.

    1. Re:People who don't believe in heroes... by tengu1sd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would be nice if the Chinese were willing to do that. Maybe as a tourist attraction?

    2. Re:People who don't believe in heroes... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      As long as they can sell cheap crap figurines of him, I'm sure they're game.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:People who don't believe in heroes... by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      As long as they can sell cheap crap figurines of him, I'm sure they're game.

      Wallmart would be happy to stock them.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    4. Re:People who don't believe in heroes... by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2

      Maybe. Then again Neil thought we'd have bases on the moon in his lifetime.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtdcdxvNI1o&list=FLKnSIcVRgL9Ea8K_bErh3yA&feature=mh_lolz

      Go to 6:10 for his depressingly wrong prediction. Aside from that, it's also a great interview. I can't imagine todays interviewers asking questions even close to this interesting. There's not even one "how did it feel" question in there.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    5. Re:People who don't believe in heroes... by lopgok · · Score: 1

      That is because Neil Armstrong was being interviewed by Sir Patrick Moore https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Moore Moore is a pretty famous amateur astronomer, who is quite well educated in astronomy. Sorta analogous to Carl Sagan.

      If you had a contemporary interviewer of similar stature fo Moore, I suspect they would ask similar questions.

      The only question is would it air on prime time TV. In my opinion, British TV is generally far more scholarly than US television.

  34. An ambassador of humanity by zugurudumba · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hundreds and thousands of years from now, people who made the first moon landing possible will live on through the name of Mr. Armstrong, who will continue to appear in the history books. Thank you, Mr. Armstrong.

    --
    Sig
    1. Re:An ambassador of humanity by zugurudumba · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also, please say hi to Mr. Gagarin for us.

      --
      Sig
    2. Re:An ambassador of humanity by coastwalker · · Score: 2

      With Armstrong gone the age of American space exploration slowly begins to come to an end. There is still hope for the future though as the Chinese seem determined to take on the mantle. But at this moment we have to salute the Apollo program, all who worked on it and the focal point, the first man in history to walk on another world Neill Armstrong. An explorer who went back to college after this momentus event. What a guy!

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  35. Re:Allegedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Go pour salt in your eyes.

    Why?

    Because being that fucking egregiously stupid should HURT.

  36. One small step for man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's one small step for man, one giant leap for hnnnngh!

  37. Naval Aviator - Combat Pilot by perpenso · · Score: 4, Informative

    He was non-military, for one.

    He was a former Naval Aviator who flew combat missions in Korea. This experience probably made a significant contribution to his ability to remain focused and calm.

    Retired is not "non-military".

    1. Re:Naval Aviator - Combat Pilot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most ex-military would disagree with you and be offended by your ignorance.

  38. Threes by albeit+unknown · · Score: 1

    After Phyllis Diller and William Windom died this week, I thought about the proverb of death coming in threes. Crap.

  39. Another Step down for this graph by maijc · · Score: 0

    Another Step down for this graph http://xkcd.com/893/

  40. Too bad by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

    It's too bad we lost a great adventurer.
    May he rest in peace. :-(

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
  41. My Earliest Childhood Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is of him and Buzz Aldrin walking on the moon. My dad worked for Grumman and worked on the LEM.

    A great man has left us. RIP.

  42. A hero, don't discount him by plover · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree that he would probably have considered it hype as well, but I disagree that he wasn't in the same class. He inspired a generation of kids to become engineers, pilots, and astronauts. He rallied the entire globe around a peaceful cause. He was a leader. And he was the face of NASA, and the proud face of what America was capable of. And in 1969, in the middle of the Cold War and the Vietnam War, amidst huge problems around the country with race riots in Watts and Minneapolis and Chicago and Baltimore, here was this Great American Hero that we could all agree had made a remarkable achievement. We needed Neil Armstrong to be who he was.

    --
    John
    1. Re:A hero, don't discount him by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The achievements you mention are pretty big. But I just can't place them on the same level as, say, Jonas Salk, whose research saved hundreds of thousands of kids from being crippled for life. Or Alan Turing, whose work on codebreaking machinery saved thousands of lives during WW II, and this before he went on the help lay the foundations of modern computer science. Or...

  43. Rest in Peace... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The first true World Hero. At the center of a great collective effort they put the right man. And he never wanted to steal the credit from the team. You will be missed.

    1. Re:Rest in Peace... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The first true World Hero..

      I'm not taking anything away from Armstrong here, but no, if we're limiting this epithet to humans who've travelled in space, then that was Gagarin my friend, even in the 'commie hating' US at the time.

      Armstrong was indeed another global hero, I remember being allowed to stay up late to watch the moon landing by my father, a die-hard communist. There was no political rhetoric that night from him about the 'evil US'.

  44. One of my first memories by spineboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was 4 and remember being rushed inside by my parents and grandparents. Many people were crowded around our TV, as not everyone had one yet.

    That blurry, slow, staticy picture would forever inspire me to love space and science.

    We need more of this for our future. Money better spent on building and science as opposed to destruction....

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:One of my first memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine too. I was the same age and my dad worked on the LEM.

    2. Re:One of my first memories by srobert · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was 6. My grandmother was watching with me. She told me that when she was my age, they hadn't yet flown the first aircraft. I think she was born in 1892. I extrapolated from this that by the time I grew up, there would be colonies on the moon, and I'd be living the life of George Jetson. I'm disappointed. But if it hadn't been for the Apollo program, I might not have become an engineer.

    3. Re:One of my first memories by Weatherlawyer · · Score: 1

      I was 6. My grandmother was watching with me. She told me that when she was my age, they hadn't yet flown the first aircraft. I think she was born in 1892. I extrapolated from this that by the time I grew up, there would be colonies on the moon, and I'd be living the life of George Jetson. I'm disappointed. But if it hadn't been for the Apollo program, I might not have become an engineer.

      So you are the one we should blame?

      Don't be too hard on yourself, I'm sure there were others.

    4. Re:One of my first memories by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 2

      I was 11. I remember that the nation's focus was on the space program, and this was quite a while before I really became aware of politics. The news was always about that next big step toward a moon landing. It was a weekend, and my father, the TV hater that he was, was sitting along with us in front of the black & white TV watching the landing. This was the only time I ever saw him actually being amazed by something that he saw on TV. We all knew that the whole world was watching this, and that everything would be different from now on. To this day I still have that dog-eared copy of the local newspaper from the next day.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    5. Re:One of my first memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FOAD.

    6. Re:One of my first memories by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Extrapolation is an uncertain business :)

    7. Re:One of my first memories by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was 10, the day they landed I was so absorbed with the TV I sat on a plate of spaghetti and meat balls. It's hard to describe how important the TV was to people that day, the only other event I can think of that has come close to gluing that many people that strongly to a TV is 911. Every boy at my school wanted to be an astronaut in the same way we all wanted to be Superman, I think one Aussie eventually made a trip on the shuttle, still no sign of Superman. I do think it inspired millions of kids but it also set expectation too high and by the end of the 70's kids my age had worked out they were not going to be an astronaut and many of them lost interest, rather than being glued to their TV on the last moon shot they were calling the entire Apollo project a waste of money, nothing more than cold war saber rattling.

      Big science is bigger than ever these days, and with the internet it's cheaper and faster. It just does things more quietly, more of of background hum than a climatic touchdown. A Higgs bosun here, an MRI machine there, an internet everywhere. Some amazing space pics, some dire warnings, and all but forgotten smallpox. I agree we could do with a lot more of it, but it's how we use it that counts.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:One of my first memories by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I was 11. I remember that the nation's focus was on the space program, and this was quite a while before I really became aware of politics.

      If you were young enough that you weren't aware of politics, how were you old enough to know with such certainty what the nation's focus was? I suspect you've simply absorbed the legends that have come to surround the Apollo program and confused them with your own experiences.

    9. Re:One of my first memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Higgs BOSON.

    10. Re:One of my first memories by mwehle · · Score: 1

      I was 11. I remember that the nation's focus was on the space program, and this was quite a while before I really became aware of politics.

      If you were young enough that you weren't aware of politics, how were you old enough to know with such certainty what the nation's focus was? I suspect you've simply absorbed the legends that have come to surround the Apollo program and confused them with your own experiences.

      There's likely truth to this. I was eight when Apollo 11 landed, and while I found it inspiring, I remember my father being pretty uninterested in getting our portable television down from the shelf. Nixon was in the White House, the Vietnam war filled the news and was far larger than the space program in the consciousness of many people I knew. The landing was a few weeks before Woodstock, and a couple months before the first public stories on My Lai.The Chicago Seven trial was underway. For many of us, while the Moon landing was exciting, it was pretty much a sideshow to more important events of the day.

      --
      Wir sind geboren, um frei zu sein - Rio Reiser
    11. Re:One of my first memories by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      it kills you that you don't have a red pen for the internet, doesn't it?

    12. Re:One of my first memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your grandmother didn't realise that your country was going to be taken over by third worlders, who obviously are going to turn it into the same sort of shithole they ran away from.

      Why was there no BLACK space program in Africa?

      Oh, I don't know about that...

    13. Re:One of my first memories by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the slightly related story of Sir Patrick Moore. He's the host of The Sky At Night, a TV program about astronomy on the BBC, and a pretty amazing individual himself. He has famously met in person the first man to fly (Orville Wright; his brother had died before he was born), the first man in space (Yuri Gagarin) and the first man to walk on the moon.

      He's 89 and still going strong. He has presented The Sky at Night every month since its inception in 1957, only missing one episode due to food poisoning. The Sky at Night is the longest running television show with the same presenter in the world.

  45. One giant loss for mankind... by Kilobug · · Score: 1

    RIP Neil Armstrong. You'll forever rest among the heroes of humanity, alongside with Gagarin, Newton and Einstein.

    All around the world, regardless of politics, religion and nationality, you inspired people and opened the future. You were the first human to ever walk another world. To cross the immensity of the hostile void, and to actually walk on the moon. You made us all make that giant leap. You changed forever the way we think, at night, when we looked at that silvery crescent up there.

    I wasn't born when you did it, and yet, you still inspired me to love science and dream of a better future. Future generations won't forget you. The best tribute we can make to you is continuing what you started. More than ever, we should continue the space program. Unite humanity together to send people on Mars and beyond. That would be the best way to honour you, Neil Armstrong, hero of humanity.

  46. how does one country produce Armstrong AND Obama? by NemoinSpace · · Score: 3, Funny

    stupid statement,
    Armstrong wasn't born in Kenya.

  47. A rat done bit my sister Nell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:A rat done bit my sister Nell... by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Multitasking problem solving. Can do both.
      Would've been better if solving that problem hadn't involved incarcerating a substantial portion of the population.
      Funnily my first thought was Old Blue Eyes singing "Fly me to the moon" and not Gil Scott-Heron. And the revolutions ARE televised :/
      Died last year and the linked video is blocked in this country due to commercial interests. That's stomping and peeing on the mans grave. Not cool.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
  48. Godspeed on your final journey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So passes Major General Neil Armstrong. Born in August of 1930, died this day in the 2012th year Anno Domini. Veteran of the Korean War. Test piliot when man was trying to go as fast as possible. Father, grandfather. Part of the Gemini missions, part of the Apollo program, Congressional Gold Medal recipient, Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient, first human being to ever walk on the moon. American hero.

    You were the first of a handful of us to ever walk there, let alone leave our planet. Those first steps on the moon will always be yours sir. I can only imagine what it was like. Godspeed on your final journey and may you rest in peace Mr. Armstrong.

  49. Mourn His Passing by ks*nut · · Score: 1

    This is indeed a sad day as we have lost one of the world's great explorers. The population of this planet has some very tough decisions to make in the course of the next few years; decisions that will make a huge difference in the quality of life, if not the future of our species. Let this moment be a time for inspiration and I hope that it helps us realize that we can recapture that spirit of adventure that led a modest man from Ohio to accomplish one of the greatest accomplishments in human history.

    1. Re:Mourn His Passing by Heebie · · Score: 0

      This is indeed a sad day as we have lost one of the world's great explorers.

      Correction, we've lost one of the greatest explorers of our **planetary system**, (the Solar system, named after our star, Sol), he cannot be called simply one of the world's greatest explorers, it doesn't say enough about him or his comrades. How many people in the history of the world have been where he went? A dozen or so? He was the elite of the elite of the elite, and hopefully there will be others that get the opportunity to follow in his rocket-trail! (They wouldn't get far enough by following in his footsteps!) Unfortunately, younger generations don't seem to be inspired by him quite the same way, or at least not in the same numbers, as kids in the 1960's & 1970's did. I wholeheartedly agree with the need for tough decisions. Choosing not to explore space, and learn how to "get there" dooms the human race to die with this planet in a few billion years. (if we don't die off sooner for reasons other than the sun expanding into a red giant.) Explorers of his calibre will be needed to get humankind to places where we can continue expanding our knowledge of the universe, and more importantly, simply continue being. R.I.P. Neil Armstrong!

  50. He was a pilot, not a passenger by perpenso · · Score: 4, Informative

    Neil wasn't the quarterback, he was the football.

    When the football has a bad spin or tumbles it does not correct the spin/rotation itself. Armstrong did so with a Gemini capsule that was in danger of going out of control. Similarly he had to land Apollo 11 manually when the computers were hazarding the ship. He was a pilot, not a passenger.

    1. Re:He was a pilot, not a passenger by justthinkit · · Score: 1
      So he was Jerry Rice, catching even the worst throws.
      .

      "The quarterback" was the thousands of engineers & technicians working for decades to perfect the pass.

      --
      I come here for the love
    2. Re:He was a pilot, not a passenger by perpenso · · Score: 1

      So he was Jerry Rice, catching even the worst throws.

      Nope. If we must continue with the silly analogy he was the pilot who turned a "bad throw" into a "good throw" in flight, after the quarterback threw it, before the receiver caught it.

  51. If he chose to be cremated... by epp_b · · Score: 3

    ...then may his ashes be scattered among the moon's dust.

    Were I American, I'd be proud to see my taxes pay for such a mission. Heck, I'd be proud to see my *Canadian* tax dollars pay for it (though, it might only get them 99.742% of the way there ;)

    What a hero and what a sad day.

  52. to infinity and beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess Toy Story 4 is out of the question now.

  53. Goodbye, hero. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am just glad Armstrong got to see the current crop of Internet moguls and other billionaires finally picking up the ball the U.S. government dropped, virtually the instant he set foot on lunar soil. A whole generation of aeronautical and astronautical engineering got a pink slip then. It was a travesty.

    Guys, honor this man's memory and don't let us down again.

  54. I gotta say it.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Good Luck, Mr. Gorsky!

    :)

    Good Luck Mr. Armstrong.....RIP

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:I gotta say it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    2. Re:I gotta say it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:I gotta say it.... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fucking idiot. Don't you have a birth certificate to find or something?

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    4. Re:I gotta say it.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I know it isn't true...but is a great story none the less....and when I think of Neil,I think of it...and I smile.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:I gotta say it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Usually, the nutcases who believe that the moon landing never happened are poles apart from those who are looking for the birth certificate

    6. Re:I gotta say it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure nature is diverse enough to provide nutcases in any group of people.
      I wonder what happens if you bring both together, and then shout "Elvis lives ! " .

    7. Re:I gotta say it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be surprised. Once you stick your head up your own asshole, it doesn't matter if you got it there by bending forward or bending backward. Most conspiracy theorists end up believing in all of them.

  55. RIP Neil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You showed the world that if you put your mind to it anything is possible.

  56. Good luck Mr. Gorsky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He also had a pretty good sense of humor.

  57. "The Eagle has planted" by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Love ya Neil. Thanks for being a legendary kind of guy.

  58. One last breath for a man by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 2

    One last breath for a man, one enduring legend for mankind

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
  59. Re:Allegedly by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 0

    > I hope your balls fall off.

    Awesome.

  60. How To Be a Role Model, Hero, Human by zentec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was fortunate to get a first hand viewing on TV of all the Apollo missions while bouncing on the knee of my father. The Apollo 11 astronauts were my first heroes and not long after I could read I enjoyed every book, magazine and encyclopedia article I found about them and their mission.

    Armstrong is the model on how to be a hero; do something exemplary and treat it as just another day at the office. Embrace knowledge, challenge your mind and enjoy your job. And when it's over, it is over. Armstrong shied away from the public spotlight and certainly passed on what would have been many lucrative opportunities to cash-in on his fame. Instead, he remained pretty much the same person after the mission as before.

    Sad day today, to know of the loss of a great person.

    1. Re:How To Be a Role Model, Hero, Human by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Sad day today, to know of the loss of a great person.

      Agreed. I was 12 when Neil made that "one small step, one giant leap". It inspired me to a career in technology and aerospace.

      What I find truly sad and infuriating is that, today in the US, a war veteran like Neil Armstrong would likely be put on a DHS terrorist watch list, not given the opportunity to advance all of humanity.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  61. Bad month for Armstrongs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been a bad month for Armstrongs, hasn't it?

  62. Re:Allegedly by JustOK · · Score: 1

    We've always had computers and cars. For at least 6000 years or so.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  63. Who? by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're thinking of Louis Armstrong.

    You are getting people confused...Louis Armstrong was the guy who landed on the moon.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Who? by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      That was Neil Diamond. That's why the Beatles wrote Loose Seals in the Sky with Diamond. Learn your archiology.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Who? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Learn your archiology."

      The Archies were another band entirely.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    3. Re:Who? by muridae · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, you are thinking of Kenny Rogers; he wrote Loose Seals.

    4. Re:Who? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I love Seal

    5. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MY POWER MY PLEASURE MY PAIN!

    6. Re:Who? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

      No that was Lance Armstrong, Louis won the french cycling competition.

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    7. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait wasn't that Lucy ? She didn't land on the moon ?

       

    8. Re:Who? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      That was Alice Kramden

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  64. Surprising? No. Inevitable? Maybe not by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    It's not like a person's bodily tissues failing after decades of service should be a surprising or unexpected event. Probably, the fault is in our own DNA, causing our cells to give up and fail according to a schedule.

    Perhaps instead of arguing over healthcare or corporate taxes or other petty trival issues we should as a species work on stopping these biological decay processes, and since that is a very complex problem, develop methods to preserve ourselves if we fail before the cures can be developed.

    I bet if Mr. Armstrong had been successfully cryogenically frozen, the people of our future would make a considerable effort to bring him back.

  65. The truth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 82 year old mother says "Well, if he's my age and he's dead then I'm glad I never went to the moon."

  66. Re:Allegedly by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For very obvious reasons it cannot be staged. The biggest one being the Soviets.

    The whole thing was a HUGE publicity stunt and a big dick waving contest between the US and the USSR. Considering how easy it was for the USSR to get spies to some key positions in the US, I don't doubt that they had a pretty good view on the whole moon program, too. A chance to expose that program, a program that the whole nation dedicated considerable resources to and that was watched by people all over the globe, as staged would have been an absolutely priceless PR victory for the USSR. If they only had had a HINT of a chance that this could have been debunked, they certainly would have jumped on that opportunity. Everyone all around the globe had their eyes on that event. You really think they would have let the opportunity slide to expose the US as fakes?

    It seems to me that trying to stage it and keep it hushed up would have required more resources than simply doing it.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  67. Re:Allegedly by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't want to steer this discussion away from the topic, but this is exactly why no theist will ever be able to convince me about the "truths" of his religion. How am I supposed to believe that those word-of-mouth stories that are thousands of years old could be true when people believe in such ludicrous things as "the moon hoax", despite the fact that it was a much more recent event and there are tons of material evidence to support the fact that there was *no* super-competent con man who supposedly managed to trick thousands of engineers into thinking that they are not building a fake rocket and that they are not receiving fake telemetry not from the Moon? People *want* to believe in the irrational, they find something irrational everywhere they look. Human capacity for self-deception never ceases to amaze me.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  68. A 'motivational' tribute by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

    I made a little 'motivational' tribute here
    Keep exploring, Mr. Armstrong!

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  69. State Funeral? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I do understand that the US is in financial difficulty, it strikes me as important that the first man to walk on the Moon---on another celestial sphere---should be given a significant send off.

    Frankly, I think the funeral should be at least on par with that expected for a _sitting_ president, and probably beyond. It may well end up being the most important funeral, or the most important man, in the history of the United States, if not the world.

    Neil Armstrong deserves a state procession---an international procession. America and the World owe both he and his generation that much at least.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:State Funeral? by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I do understand that the US is in financial difficulty, it strikes me as important that the first man to walk on the Moon---on another celestial sphere---should be given a significant send off.

      Frankly, I think the funeral should be at least on par with that expected for a _sitting_ president, and probably beyond. It may well end up being the most important funeral, or the most important man, in the history of the United States, if not the world.

      Neil Armstrong deserves a state procession---an international procession. America and the World owe both he and his generation that much at least.

      He deserves exactly what every other person deserves when they pass away.** Their last wishes granted.

      It's nice and all that we sit back and "demand" these glorious sendoffs, but in all honestly, I'd much rather respect a man of honor and whatever wishes he had for his end.

      (** = I was going to use the words "leave this world" in reference to his celestial passing, but he's kind of BTDT already. ;-)

    2. Re:State Funeral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a veteran, so he has a right to the Honor Guard 21 gun salute and a funeral and burial at Arlington, if he or his family wanted it.

    3. Re:State Funeral? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Assuming the family would even be okay with it, it wouldn't happen. This is not the kind of person we stop everything for so we can watch the live event on television for twelve straight hours on the news and interrupting all other programming. There won't be a parade or any huge events or memorials. Now, if he were James Brown, Michael Jackson, or Anna Nicole Smith -- that would totally happen. But not for a dead nerd that walked on the moon before half of us were born.

      That NBC reported it as "Astronaut Neil Young" for awhile, frankly (and sadly), tells you everything you need to know. The president will say a few words about him and that'll be that. After today, we won't see any further coverage.

  70. I think I speak for all of us when I say by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    that I won't be whoring myself for karma.
    all too easy....

  71. On the bright side by joeflies · · Score: 2

    He will still continue to give no fewer interviews than he did before

  72. The geek inside me is dying a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm absolutely not related to this great pilot, I wasn't even born when he took his giant step, yet...

    As a guy whose first (and of course unfulfilled) vocation at 6 yo was astronaut (sorry, firemen, you're still too close to the ground), who watched documentaries on space and astronautics over and over again, who attended an astronomy club at 14, who had a large poster of the man in situ above the bed (I know, it was Aldrin actually), and whose most notable deed in the domain was helping in ruining an innocent bystander's crocodile shoes after a hazardous SaturnV model rocket launch...

    call me stupid but today, I feel a bit like an orphan.

  73. The geek inside me is dying a little by SweetDrake · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm absolutely not related to this great pilot, I wasn't even born when he took his giant step, yet... As a guy whose first (and of course unfulfilled) vocation at 6 yo was astronaut (sorry, firemen, you're still too close to the ground), who watched documentaries on space and astronautics over and over again, who attended an astronomy club at 14, who had a large poster of the man in situ above the bed (I know, it was Aldrin actually), and whose most notable deed in the domain was helping in ruining an innocent bystander's crocodile shoes after a hazardous SaturnV model rocket launch... call me stupid but today, I feel a bit like an orphan.

  74. Ironically, by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    They staged his death on the same sound stage as the moon landing. Nice way to bring it full circle. Truly, one of the finest actors of his generation. Today's robots lack the same grace and elegance he had, but they work for scale. Damn Budget cutbacks!

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  75. RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go in glory dude.

  76. Re:Allegedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm, care to sell me that computer of yours? I'll give you my house for it. And if you explain me how you to build that working, fully usable computer with sub-nm scale features, you'll have to excuse me for a moment while I try to get a multi-billion credit to start mass production (Intel would provide it instantly).

  77. "Timothy" needs an editor by hyades1 · · Score: 2

    "Sad news, marking the end of a glorious and more optimistic era..."

    I'm sure Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins will be happy to hear that the "era" ended with the death of one third of the Apollo 11 astronaut team, and that the era is defined in terms of one man among several who spent time on the Moon.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:"Timothy" needs an editor by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Some might argue that era went up in smoke together with the Challenger...

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    2. Re:"Timothy" needs an editor by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      You make an excellent point...one I wouldn't argue against.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  78. Re:Allegedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    fully usable computer with sub-nm scale features

    Sub nano-meter precision. Not features. Derp. What you figure Intel with it's 16 nm process in research right now is working with an error of greater than 10%?

  79. The man in the white suit by pbjones · · Score: 1

    I remember the white suit and dodgy video, in a hall full of school kids.
    RIP.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  80. Good night, sweet prince by zill · · Score: 1

    Now only 8 living humans have set foot on another world.


    That number will be zero soon, and might remain zero forever.

  81. Re:A hero, with the right stuff by AbrasiveCat · · Score: 1

    As a follow up. For those who have read Tom Wolf'e's "The Right Stuff", and remember the end of the book, Neil Armstrong had the right stuff!. The comment, I believe was partially in regard to ejecting from his plane at just the right/last minute. It was later he joined the astronaut corp. Some more background some might have missed. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/space/armstrongfull.htm

  82. In before the atheists by DSS11Q13 · · Score: 0

    "he's not resting, he is just atoms and water and pudding, there is no god, science, Mitt Romney, midichlorians!!!"

  83. Bad luck, Buzz. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somebody had to be second.

    1. Re:Bad luck, Buzz. by bfandreas · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh don't be shy. You can log in to reply, Buzz.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    2. Re:Bad luck, Buzz. by dr_dank · · Score: 3, Funny

      Michael Collins would chime in also, but he's busy circling the block.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Bad luck, Buzz. by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

      Pretty certain this is the one step to another world that Buzz is glad he didn't make first.

      RIP Neil, it was one fantastic journey.

  84. Re:Allegedly by bfandreas · · Score: 1

    Dogma always gets in the way. Religion sadly doesn't have a monopoly on that. In that case it'd be easy to identify the kooks and send them on their merry way to another continent. Or place them on the B Ark.

    The Giant Space Goat cometh(and Armstong never set foot on the moon and the Earth is 6251 years old). Here's your bunk. We'll follow you shortly. Promise!

    --
    20 minutes into the future
  85. Re:how does one country produce Armstrong AND Obam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same way it produced Armstrong and the tea party.

  86. Thank you Sir by Anti+Cheat · · Score: 1

    Neil Armstrong. You gave me not only hope for a future, but had me dreaming of what fantastic things were to come. You as my role model, was why I made a career in aerospace.
    Thank you Mr. Armstrong.

  87. America, the Eagle has left. by pallmall1 · · Score: 2

    America, the Eagle has left.

    --
    3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    1. Re:America, the Eagle has left. by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was literally less than 24 hours old when Apollo 11 launched. I spent my childhood years dreaming of an upcoming adult life where being an astronaut would be as common as being a plumber, or an accountant. I eagerly read The High Frontier, eagerly anticipating orbital space stations and living in one.

      I watched the Challenger explosion as a teenager, and soon after watched Congress, then subsequent administrations, all of them - they went and fucked up the whole space idea beyond all recognition. I eventually gave up those dreams with heavy resignation as a young adult.

      Throughout it all? Armstrong, Aldrin, and many others among them kept the dream alive. Because of them, we now have Zubrin, Musk, Bigelow, and a whole cadre of people working like hell to make the original dream into reality. I'll likely be dead of old age before that original childhood dream becomes reality, but with a little hope and a lot of work, it may yet get there.

      Armstrong was one of the pioneers. Certainly, you could say he lucked out, yadda yadda... but I disagree. His coolness under pressure made Apollo 11's mission possible (and successful) when nearly any other astronaut would have aborted too early or gotten everyone killed.

      Godspeed, Mr. Armstrong.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:America, the Eagle has left. by Teancum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      By far and away, at least to me, the greatest accomplishment that Neil Armstrong ever made for the manned spaceflight program of America was not the landing on the Moon, but rather his survival after flying the Lunar Landing Research Vehicle, designed to test astronauts on a real flying vehicle that was supposed to behave like the Lunar Lander would do on the Moon.

      It was also the closest that any astronaut got to dying but somehow survived, and it was amazing the Mr. Armstrong didn't die on the day his vehicle crashed and forced him into using the seat ejection mechanism.

      Anybody who flew in that vehicle was simply nuts, but it did provide the engineers working for Grumman enough information to be able to safely get those folks to the Moon and back. I also don't think anybody else in the NASA astronaut corps could have been successful at landing the Eagle in the Sea of Traquility during the month of July, 1969.

    3. Re:America, the Eagle has left. by dryeo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interesting read though I'd consider Gemini 8 spinning out of control to have been pretty close to killing astronauts, couple of years earlier too. Of course it was Neil who saved that mission as well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_8#Emergency

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:America, the Eagle has left. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You and me have similar experiences with this. I was a bit older (8) at the time of Apollo 11. The High Frontier was the most influential book I read in my teen years. I too was saddened when the powers that be just called it all off. It would have been a great way to divert the arms race into something productive. A space colonization race. Smaller minds than Gerard O'Neil and people with less balls and skills than Neil Armstrong got to call the shots.

      RIP. The dreams you inspired will live on.

    5. Re:America, the Eagle has left. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was also the closest that any astronaut got to dying but somehow survived, and it was amazing the Mr. Armstrong didn't die on the day his vehicle crashed and forced him into using the seat ejection mechanism.

      Astronauts did die.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_1#Fire

      Not to mention Challenger and Columbia.

    6. Re:America, the Eagle has left. by Teancum · · Score: 1

      I was aware of that. If you want to get picky, there were a few others as well, including a few astronauts who were in the Gemini program as well as one X-15 pilot who died after earning his astronaut badge.

      See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Mirror_Memorial#Honorees

      Re-read what I said. Neil Armstrong showed a tendency of being able to get out of life threatening situations almost without a scratch. He didn't seek out those situations, but he had a calm and collected attitude about life and flying that allowed him to be able to pull out of the problems that came his way.

      I don't think most of those other accidents where people died could have even been survived, with possibly the exception of the Columbia accident (which was sheer management incompetence and not anything to do with the pilots). Well, Challenger shouldn't have flown either, but that was also NASA violating their own flight safety rules too.

    7. Re:America, the Eagle has left. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I was literally less than 24 hours old when Apollo 11 launched.

      I was seventeen and working at a drive-in theater. I wrote about the 40th anniversary of the landing in my journal, if you're interested.

    8. Re:America, the Eagle has left. by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      George and I had one thing in common - too pre-occupied at the time. My mother insists that she pointed my face to the TV in the hospital dayroom, but my priorities as a newborn were a bit different, so I don't remember a thing about it. OTOH, it literally soaked my childhood from the earliest cogent thoughts onward.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  88. Now thats a hero.... by widget54 · · Score: 0

    He had "the right stuff".

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  89. Re:Surprising? No. Inevitable? Maybe not by bfandreas · · Score: 1

    I'm not quite sure he'd appreciate to be switched back on again as some weird Moon-zombie from the past.

    We as a race are quite a lot and we as individuals have a lot of different interests. While some like going to the moon others like to research age.

    The notion that a people should pour all its efforts into one big undertaking is simplistic at best and fascist at worst. While I myself have trouble chewing gum while walking I'm quite sure that a lot of scientists can research a lot of different things at the same time without too much trouble.

    Better also throw in a philosopher ot two in there because immortality is bound to be messy.

    What's the Kickstarter URL? Will I get a T-Shirt?

    --
    20 minutes into the future
  90. Re:how does one country produce Armstrong AND Obam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have we seen his birth certificate yet?

  91. Inspiring others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up on Merritt Island and saw all the moon shots. I stayed up on a school night to watch Apollo 17 go off at night. I wanted to be an aerospace engineer, but my friends' dads were getting laid off, so I went for physics instead because it was science.

    I got hired as a software developer and worked on science/weather satellite systems, and many other wonderful things. After years of dreaming I got my pilot's license. I can't get very high into space...but it's as high as I can get myself. My life has been guided by the inspiration I got from the space program.

    I'm not the only one. When leaving AirVenture via Appleton this summer, the TSA lady suddenly whispered, "That's Gene Cernan over there!". Her co-worker didn't know and didn't care. Even though us science geeks might see her as just middle-aged and unglamorous and in a reviled job, she was excited and inspired by seeing the last man on the moon.

    Later I got to shake his hand and saw several other people got up, just to be near a person that's walked on another world. They were inspired too.

    So to Neil Armstrong, thanks for your bravery, your skill and may you rest in peace, knowing that you and your compatriots engaged in the greatest adventure humanity ever carried out and providing the inspiration that we can be more than squabbling primates.

  92. Damn he left too soon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now he won't be able to enjoy the upcoming iPhone 5. Why couldn't you hold on one more month man? This thing is gonna be GLORIOUS!!!!

  93. Re:Allegedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope your balls fall off. Show a little respect FFS.

    He'd have to grow 'em first.

  94. Never thought I'd have to say this.... by J4 · · Score: 2

    I do not look forward to the day when there is no man left alive who has set foot on the moon.

  95. Thank you, Neil by YankDownUnder · · Score: 1

    You gave me imagination, dreams - and especially anxiety listening to your trip, and then watching it in year 1 class. Thanks, mate. Cheers on your new adventure - I'm sure the technical and engineering aspects of your new journey will be extremely interesting! Peace!

    --
    YankDownUnder Veni, Vidi, volo in domum redire
  96. Sad. by ballpoint · · Score: 2

    I'm out of words - his passing touches me deeply.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    1. Re:Sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Sandusky did?

  97. Re:Surprising? No. Inevitable? Maybe not by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    So you think that experiencing absolutely nothing, forever and ever, like you never existed is better?

  98. Re:blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not enough of them.

  99. Re:Allegedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > There's no proof that you actually have a brain, either

    Wut... Of course there is. You cut a person open, there's their brain. We nailed this one like.. hundreds of years ago.

  100. Re:Surprising? No. Inevitable? Maybe not by bfandreas · · Score: 1

    Yes, well, that's why I called for a couple of philosophers.

    I'm afraid I'm quite unsuitable for such musings since I completely forgot how it felt before I existed. I supose life before conception was dull.But decomposition could be a profound experience.At least you'll not be alone since there are a multitude of helpers of the grave.Perhaps some sort of flute would be in order for the more unruly worms that are bound to show up like trolls in a B-list blog's comment section. Sounds like a marvellous opportunity to quit smoking.

    I've not been before. I can do it again.

    --
    20 minutes into the future
  101. Re:Surprising? No. Inevitable? Maybe not by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    Are you being flippant? You don't experience ANYTHING. It does not matter if the universe ceases to exist the moment you die : from your perspective, it does.

    After you die, it doesn't matter if you were Jeffrey Dahmer or Neil Armstrong. For YOU, your life experiences never even happened.

    To me this prospect is far more upsetting than some religious view of heaven or hell.

  102. I love Slashdot for days like today... Godspeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even though I have no account here, I am grateful when I'm able to read the many inspirational, insightful comments on a sad day...

    I know Neil Armstrong was a naval aviator but I couldn't help but remember this at the same time and thought it was appropriate.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzQYd_INSOg&feature=relmfu (High Flight F-104)

  103. and what a great voice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love his rendition of "when the saints go marching in". He'll be missed!

  104. Re:Allegedly by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 1

    I don't want to steer this discussion away from the topic, but this is exactly why no theist will ever be able to convince me about the "truths" of his religion. How am I supposed to believe that those word-of-mouth stories that are thousands of years old could be true when people believe in such ludicrous things as "the moon hoax", despite the fact that it was a much more recent event and there are tons of material evidence to support the fact that there was *no* super-competent con man who supposedly managed to trick thousands of engineers into thinking that they are not building a fake rocket and that they are not receiving fake telemetry not from the Moon? People *want* to believe in the irrational, they find something irrational everywhere they look. Human capacity for self-deception never ceases to amaze me.

    Fascinating. I take the opposite lesson, that despite the all of the evidence for the moon landing there are deniers just 40 years after the event. I can imagine in 2000 years most people not believing the story of the moon landing. From their standpoint, how could a primitive technological society who just learned about spaceflight manage to get to the moon and back. And then for some reason just "stopped" going all of a sudden for 50-100+ years.

    From a theological standpoint, if Jesus arrived today as in the BIble there would be just as many disbelievers 2000 years ago as there are today despite all of the video and news stories generated.

  105. Re:Allegedly by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    But then the conspiracy nuts will just counter that the Soviet Union was an invention of the CIA for the purpose of funnelling boatloads of money to the military-industrial complex.

  106. "Watch this, its important" by perpenso · · Score: 1

    I'll add another "me too". I was 5. My Mom found me and took me to the TV and said "Watch this, its important".

    1. Re:"Watch this, its important" by rk · · Score: 2

      I was 19 months. I don't remember it, but my parents sat me in front of the TV and I apparently watched it pretty intently. My dad took pictures of it right off our black and white TV. My parents encouraged my intellectual development, and I was in love with space ever since I was a kid. Due to their influence, the inspiration of Apollo program, some hard work and a fair bit of luck I'm lucky enough to have contributed in my own small way to several Mars missions. Neil Armstrong was and is one of my heroes and the influence his example has had on my life cannot be overstated.

    2. Re:"Watch this, its important" by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I refused to go to bed. I was three years old. It's one of the first things I can remember.

      RIP. The stuff ratio has tilted towards wrong.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  107. Re:Surprising? No. Inevitable? Maybe not by bfandreas · · Score: 1

    Of course I'm being flippant. Otherwise it would be impossible to maintain a straight face.

    The prospect of complete and untter nonexistance can be maddening if you spend too much thought on it.

    But then again the wind is southerly. This is a hawk. That is a handsaw.

    --
    20 minutes into the future
  108. Conservatives are at fault, not a generation. by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

    The Boomers were responsible though for the eventual budget cuts to NASA and education...

    Let's be slightly more realistic here: no specific *generation* is responsible, conservatives are. Even when outnumbered in terms of registered voters, they very often win because more of them actually do vote, do so along party lines & as told by an authority figure, and are far less prone to burning out to the point of apathy. (They also have the "mission from god" mindset that condones just about any misbehavior that will let them defeat their rivals.)

    The closest we can come to realistically blaming a generation would be to focus on the Boomers' parents, though... As a group, they were much more conservative (as their support of McCarthyism demonstrated & shows like All In The Family depicted) and really disliked the more liberal nature of the Boomers as a whole. They turned out in far greater numbers to vote than the Boomers, so as owners of expensive property here in California, they were the ones that wrecked our education budget passing prop 13 so their property taxes wouldn't keep increasing, elected Ronald Reagan & Bush I as Presidents & Reagan as governor of California. That set the stage for the political situation we have today.

    From what I've read, a significant percentage of that generation was against spending on the space programs. The Baby Boomers were young enough to be entranced with the space program; that's why space-based science fiction shows & movies were so wildly popular with their generation. Psychologically/politically, the norm is for people to be at their most liberal in their 20s, remain in favor of educational spending while raising kids, and only start feeling threatened enough by the world to favor military/police spending in their senior years.

    --
    Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
  109. Mod parent up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need it simply to use as evidence when in 10 years Fox News claims he never existed. (FYI, they ran a thing a dozen years back saying the landing never happened and that Neil Armstrong lied. They pushed it quite heavily for a short bit-- I think it was an experiment in propaganda.)

  110. Thank you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You were an inspiration to generations. I stood and looked at the moon as a 6 year old, wondering what it was like where you were. I lived in awe and admiration of you and your generation not just accomplished, but also the scope of your dreams.

    I once had the opportunity to hear you speak, and it only increased my respect for you.

    You and your brethren will be sorely missed.

    God speed to you Neil Armstrong, may spend your eternity among the stars...

  111. Ed Harris was *John Glenn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ed Harris was *John Glenn*

  112. My very first clear memory by treeves · · Score: 1

    was watching the moon landing in July 1969 on a black and white TV at my grandparents house in California. I was two months away from turning three years old. That was something all Americans could take pride in the accomplishment of, even though it was a brave few who actually did it.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  113. Re:Surprising? No. Inevitable? Maybe not by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    Your argument is ultimately based on the belief that you are going to die, and it is impossible to avoid, and so you might as well make weird witticisms about it.

    People have been doing things like this for thousands of years.

    However, maybe, just maybe, the civilization we live in has developed sufficient technology and infrastructure that it doesn't have to be this way.

  114. a normal death for a man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a legend birth for the man kind

    RIP Neil :|

  115. If I may.... by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    Neil Armstrong: Some people dream of riches, some of fame, some of power. Neil, I don't know what you dreamed but it inspired too many people for you to leave us so soon. I only wish I could be half the man you were, may you rest in peace among the heavens you connected us with.

    --
    -
  116. I don't usually post.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But i feel compelled to today. I'm not American and I don't like everything the US does or stands for, but admire it immensely in lots of other ways. Neil Armstrong for me encapsulates the WIN spirit and attitude of the US, the headstrong, confident, unstoppable attitude of a by gone generation, and boy did he bask the US in a glory the whole world had to stop and watch. If I was an American I'd be in mourning right now. Sad day for everyone when an old fashioned bad ass bites the dust.

  117. Re:Allegedly by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    The conspiracy theorists have got an answer to that: cheap grain imports from USA.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  118. RIP by chebucto · · Score: 1

    I remember a story from one of the Apollo documentaries: he went out to test on a rocket-powered LEM simulator, which involved hovering ~5 metres above a concrete pad and landing. It malfunctioned, crashed, and he ejected with seconds (at most) to spare. An hour after his near-death experience, he was in his office, wokring as if nothing had happened. Another astronaut came in and asked him about the crash; he said something to the effect of 'no big deal'!

    A brave, hardworking, and modest man. RIP.

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
  119. Citizens of Terra Salute You! by DevotedSkeptic · · Score: 1

    Mr. Armstrong you were not just an American hero or icon, you were our first off-world ambassador. I hope, as i am sure you did, that we can all work together to touch the stars and never stop exploring. Rest easy as you took the first step we must take up the yoke and take the further steps on other unexplored places in this solar system and beyond.

    --
    Chief Thinker www.devotedskeptic.com
  120. Living legend by MrKaos · · Score: 1
    Now legend.

    Thank you for a life of inspiration.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  121. Sadly, Neil Armstrong died from a "scam" by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 2

    From: http://www.drfuhrman.com/library/PCI_angioplasty_article.aspx "Interventional cardiology and cardiovascular surgery is basically a scam based on a misunderstanding of the nature of heart disease. Searching for and treating obstructive plaque does not address the areas of the coronary vascular tree most likely to rupture and cause heart attacks. If there was never another CABG or angioplasty performed or stent placed, patients with heart disease would be better off. Doctors would be forced to educate our citizens that their heart disease risk is determined by what they place on their forks. Millions of lives would be dramatically extended. To abandon the theory of stretching and cutting out areas with plaque would shut down interventional cardiology, nearly all cardiovascular surgery, and many suppliers of the biotechnology. In many cases, interventional cardiology is the major income generator to hospitals. The ending of this ill-conceived, out-dated and ineffective technology would dramatically downsize hospitals in the United States and free up over $100 billion annually in medical care costs. Besides being ineffective, interventional cardiology places the responsibility in the hands of the doctor and not the patients. When patients finally realize they must take control of their heart problems with aggressive dietary modifications (and when needed medications for temporary periods) we will essentially solve the health crisis in America.
    The sad thing is surgical interventions and medications are the foundation of modern cardiology and both are relatively ineffective compared to nutritional excellence. My patients routinely reverse their heart disease, and no longer have vulnerable plaque or high blood pressure, so they do not need medical care, hospitals or cardiologists anymore. The problem is that in the real world cardiac patients are not even informed that heart disease is predictably reversed with nutritional excellence. They are not given the opportunity to choose and just corralled into these surgical interventions.
    Trying to figure out how to pay for ineffective and expensive medicine by politicians will never be a real solution. People need to know they do not have to have heart disease to begin with, and if they get it, aggressive nutrition is the most life-saving intervention. And it is free."

    When I heard about his treatment a couple weeks ago, I tried to figure out how to contact him, but to no avail. Neil Armstrong benefited from the best of 1960s technology, but sadly did not benefit from the best of 21st century medicine (aggressive nutritional intervention). Sad. We could have had him healthy and vibrant and as a witness to the better side of human kind for another decade or two. Instead some heart surgeons can afford to make a few more payments on luxury cars and big houses.

    We just lost Martin Fleischmann (just as LENR aka "cold fusion" is resurging) probably from the same kind of widespread nutirional ignorance in the medical profession.

    Some attempts by me to try to help with improving human health:
    https://www.changemakers.com/morehealth/entries/health-sensemaking
    http://www.changemakers.com/discussions/discussion-493#comment-38823

    Something to keep in mind:
    http://www.pdfernhout.net/to-james-randi-on-skepticism-about-mainstream-science.html#Some_quotes_on_social_problems_in_science
    "Much of what medical researchers conclude in their studies is misleading, exaggerated, or flat-out wrong. So why are doctors -- to a striking extent -- still drawing upon misinformation in their everyday practice? Dr. John Ioannidis has spent his career challengin

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    1. Re:Sadly, Neil Armstrong died from a "scam" by Elijah+Lynn · · Score: 1

      This is so true. Also, I often use this same analogy when comparing our ability to accurately count votes in America. "We can land a man on the moon with great precision but cannot count numbers such as votes accurately". Okay, that is off topic. I am often amazed at how "smart" some programmers seem to be yet they are completely ignorant when it comes to making connections between food intake and longevity and overall health. Such an oddity.

  122. Hospital bungling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I knew what'd happened that caused his death. 82 is not that old anymore. I've seen too many seniors die on account of hospital-borne infections and other screwups.

  123. I watched the moon landing on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was a little kid 7 and really thought walking on the moon no big deal, just wanted to ride my bike. Mom was livid.

  124. JFK's Moon Speech by fufufang · · Score: 1

    I think it is the time for everyone to revisit John F. Kennedy Moon's Speech. I wish I was alive in that era. Everything sounded so exciting and promising.
    http://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/ricetalk.htm

  125. Dear Mr. Armstrong, by anlprb · · Score: 1

    It will be discussed over and over, but this man did what countless generations before him dreamed about. We can never truly quantify the amount of change that has occurred because of his stepping on a celestial body. May he rest in peace and look back with pride on what has been accomplished because of what he was willing to dare. Remember, there is no tow service once you pass the ionosphere. There was no way to get back if they landed safely and had a problem. NASA delayed the video feed so that if something went wrong, it wasn't broadcast live on TV. They would just say that signal had been lost. He ignored these risks and put his life on the line.

    Mr. Armstrong,
    From all your fellow Eagle Scouts; Thank you.

    --

    One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and TCP/IP Bind them...
  126. Re:Allegedly by mooingyak · · Score: 1

    The whole thing was a HUGE publicity stunt and a big dick waving contest between the US and the USSR.

    If only there were someone worth waving our dicks at now.

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  127. Re:Allegedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much as it pains me to be off topic, I noticed you got modded insightful, so I'll challenge you.

    Similar to Armstrong, Christ's life did not take place in a vacuum. (pun intended). Almost everyone in the region knew him or of him. Much like today's news, most people were able to evaluate it and take judge whether it made sense or not.

    The people who were there, simply found the events and the claims to be credible.

    They SAW him...heal the sick... give sight to the blind...raise the dead ...and even appear to people 40 days after his Resurrection The fact is that MOST people aren't stupid. But people with axes to grind and the kooks get all the press, much like today. Most people that saw Armstrong walk on the moon believe it happened - even to this day. So do their children, so will their great great grandchildren. Believe or don't - you would trust an expert in science, but you won't lend an ear to an expert in theology. Your own argument proves you wrong. Even Thomas would not have been so jaded.

    But you probably don't know that before they emerged from the spaceship, Aldrin pulled out a Bible, a silver chalice, and sacramental bread and wine. There on the moon, his first act was to celebrate communion.

  128. Very sad by Dabido · · Score: 2

    It's sad that he has passed away. I remember it being all over the news when they landed on the moon (though, being only four at the time I didn't stay up to watch it). I do remember in 1972 staying up late at night to watch the last Apollo missions beams live on TV. It was a great thrill (especially for someone as young as myself).

    It is also sad that it has also brought you the lunatic fringe. I'm in several arguments with people who are busy slamming him and calling him a liar and a fraud etc and saying he never walked on the moon. In spite of them not being able to prove the things they are saying, they just refuse to acknowledge any evidence (including 3rd party evidence) that man has been to the moon. I guess you just can't argue with stupid.

    --
    Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  129. Heroes departing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As we got below 30 feet or so, I had selected the final touchdown area. For some reason I'm not sure of, we started to pick up left translational velocity and a backward velocity. That's the thing I certainly didn't want to do, because you don't like to be going backwards, unable to see where you're going. So I arrested this backward rate with some possibly spasmodic control motions, but I was unable to stop the left translational rate. As we approached the ground, I still had a left translational rate which made me reluctant to shut the engine off while I still had that rate. I was also reluctant to slow down my descent rate anymore than it was, or stop (the descent), because we were close to running out of fuel. We were hitting our abort limit."

    "I guess that, at that altitude, running out of fuel wasn't a consideration. Because we would have let it just quit on us, probably, and let it fall on in."

    Rest in peace and Tranquility.

  130. Re:Allegedly by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Yup. As odd as it sounds, the USSR protected our freedom. As long as they existed, our politicians had to act as if they were the good guys.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  131. Re:Allegedly by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And you really think they cared too much whether some people starve to death if they could put the US to shame? Stalin sure didn't give half a shit.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  132. Re:Allegedly by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    Stalin was long dead by that time and Brezhnev certainly did care. And that's why the USSR was not the worst place to live back then.
    I don't say that conspiracy theorists are right, though.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap