"how to avoid being the victim of a phishing scam" needs to be a part of their baseline training.
And THAT was fundamentally my point. Don't punish the teacher. Punish the school which set them up for this failure.
So then are the employers on the hook for negligence in their duties to empower their employees with knowledge.
I'm not sure if this is a question or not. Structure says yes, lack of question mark says no. If it is a question the answer is yes.
And what about willful ignorance?
When ignorance is willful it's a different topic. You can't punish someone for not doing something you never told or trained them to do. On the flip side If you have provided train, training records, policy documents, confirmed people understand the policy and then it still happens, we're no longer punishing idiots for not using computers right, but punishing employees who breached company / school policy.
Fundamentally my point is that a lot of people will scapegoat this issue with the person who got caught without actually solving the institutional problem that put them in that position in the first place.
I test drove a Nissan Leaf with ProDrive, which is a lane following assist tech. It uses steering wheel feedback to make sure you're paying attention, and it felt like I was constantly fighting the car to drive.
Back off and let the car do its thing. If you're fighting it then you're not actually using the technology as intended. I am driving a 2018 model Nissan Qashqai this week and it's especially great on the highway. Rest your hand on the wheel and let the steering wheel do the work.
You mean the Silly Valley big talker who created the company that is well on the way to being the first manufacturer to lose their EV credits when they ship too many EVs beating those "expereienced" people?
it's about teaching people to find/prepare healthy food within a given budget.
This implies that finding / preparing healthy food isn't the cheapest option. Many people would find if they learnt to cook, spent just a few minutes a day in the kitchen and ate healthy, they'll likely have fatter wallets as a result.
do you ask them if they are prepared to pay more in taxes
Why bother? The answer is no. Humans in general object to paying taxes in any form for any reason. They hate taxes, the taxation system and the notion that someone should take their hard earned money. The only part of the system they can get behind is that they feel entitled to benefits. This isn't even a left vs right issue, though the extreme right takes this to the logical extremes where I even heard one person say the government should not be building roads but that all infrastructure should be privately funded on a user pays basis, ignoring that the resulting infrastructure would collapse.
Queen missed the mark:
"I want it all, I want it all, I want it all, And I want it now!"
but they forgot the part about "But I don't want to pay for it".
Seriously though, there's nothing good about the earpieces on a modern phone. There's also no evidence that new technology that you have never used is some kind of "crap workaround". For all you know this may be the techonology that blows your mind.
No the joke is the idea that a CPU is not forward compatible to any system which doesn't rely on some fancy new instruction only available in new ISAs. The punchline of that joke is that motherboard chipsets are complicated enough not to have driver support backwards compatibility for more than 10 years.
When did CPUs become cheap USB webcams in terms of soft/firmware support?
You'll find out, to within a certain margin or error, in a couple of months of travelling, and have some great experiences along the way. Either you'll never see the same place twice, or you'll fall off an end.
So you're telling people that it's easy for them to prove their point if based on their belief they are going to commit suicide? That's a hard sell by any standard!
I bet that the teacher is not going to be at least reprimanded
And so he shouldn't be. The onus is not on ensuring everyone is not an idiot. The onus is on the people employing the idiots to empower them with knowledge. I'm willing to bet you this teacher has never so much as heard of the term "phishing" much less knows what to look out for.
Punishing people for things they don't know is not a winning strategy.
1. Foreign manufacturers need to secure alternate sources for components.
Any clever suggestions? Specifically we're looking for chips that are compatible and act as a PHY interface to a world of technology locked behind US patents. Got a list of alternative suppliers?
Trump is many things but neither a buffoon nor an animal associated without a coherent plan. He's intelligent and out for blood. Better described in the animal world as a weasel.
Don't confuse his ramblings as senseless or incoherrent. He's never said anything that hasn't been solely for his own personal gain. The trick is understanding what he cares about (Hint: Not Americans.... unless they can increase his wealth).
Best I can tell no one on Slashdot uses Linux. Plenty of people use Debian, Ubuntu, Arch, CentOS, and Android. Hell the crazies here may be found running BSD or Slackware. But no one here actually uses Linux anymore do they?
I'm not on some horse. Hell there's no horses around here. No one has said anything about others, just pointed out that the USA has fuck all green credentials. The USA has so much to be proud of. It's quite sad to see people thinking its green credentials are among them. Though it is funny watching you people get triggered any time the USA is pointed out at not being #thebestest at something.
Give us a call when you stop being the most carbon emitting persons in the world. Until then, the only people even trying to get on horses here are you.
If you think it is only potential then you're not at all paying attention.
What makes you think that can change?
Willpower. The USA is only showing the might that it wants to all the while showing restraint knowing full well that international opinion is actually still a valuable currency.
Our Navy can't even steer around civilian ships safely
Taking a couple of isolated incidents shows nothing about might. In fact a lack of display of might breeds exactly the kind of complacency that allows a few ships to crash into each other. And in the end, as long as the missles fly, no one will care if a ship or two goes down due to misdirection. Just because you have structural issues doesn't mean you don't have might.
And those top-notch soldiers who fought in Iraq? Those are now ex-military gun owners. I'd bet on them in a fight.
A bunch of mentally wounded men suffering from PTSD and utterly failed by metal health system of America with only a small fraction of the gear they had in the past and no command structure which fundamentally underpinned their entire training? Look I'll save you the trouble, just send me whatever money you were going to bet and then neither of us will need to watch that sad one sided affair. Life isn't like the movies. Leave the old guard overthrowing governments to Willis, Stalone, Ludren and Schwarzenegger.
Slashdot Mirror
Implying that this is a choice. Remember at the edge of that sailing trip is the worlds biggest and most powerful waterfall :-)
"how to avoid being the victim of a phishing scam" needs to be a part of their baseline training.
And THAT was fundamentally my point. Don't punish the teacher. Punish the school which set them up for this failure.
So then are the employers on the hook for negligence in their duties to empower their employees with knowledge.
I'm not sure if this is a question or not. Structure says yes, lack of question mark says no. If it is a question the answer is yes.
And what about willful ignorance?
When ignorance is willful it's a different topic. You can't punish someone for not doing something you never told or trained them to do. On the flip side If you have provided train, training records, policy documents, confirmed people understand the policy and then it still happens, we're no longer punishing idiots for not using computers right, but punishing employees who breached company / school policy.
Fundamentally my point is that a lot of people will scapegoat this issue with the person who got caught without actually solving the institutional problem that put them in that position in the first place.
I test drove a Nissan Leaf with ProDrive, which is a lane following assist tech. It uses steering wheel feedback to make sure you're paying attention, and it felt like I was constantly fighting the car to drive.
Back off and let the car do its thing. If you're fighting it then you're not actually using the technology as intended. I am driving a 2018 model Nissan Qashqai this week and it's especially great on the highway. Rest your hand on the wheel and let the steering wheel do the work.
And not some Silly Valley big talker?
You mean the Silly Valley big talker who created the company that is well on the way to being the first manufacturer to lose their EV credits when they ship too many EVs beating those "expereienced" people?
Yeah what a failure he is.
The $35k is not available.
I know right, kind of like there are production issues or something going on.
If it's supposed to be assist technology then why market it as "autopilot"?
Because an actual autopilot is nothing more than an assist technology and ignorance is a reason to educate rather than a reason to appease.
it's about teaching people to find/prepare healthy food within a given budget.
This implies that finding / preparing healthy food isn't the cheapest option. Many people would find if they learnt to cook, spent just a few minutes a day in the kitchen and ate healthy, they'll likely have fatter wallets as a result.
Socialized doctors have free range to impose unnecessary procedures and run up the consultations count in order to maximize charges to the government.
Ironically the only place where I've heard this happening is the USA.
do you ask them if they are prepared to pay more in taxes
Why bother? The answer is no. Humans in general object to paying taxes in any form for any reason. They hate taxes, the taxation system and the notion that someone should take their hard earned money. The only part of the system they can get behind is that they feel entitled to benefits. This isn't even a left vs right issue, though the extreme right takes this to the logical extremes where I even heard one person say the government should not be building roads but that all infrastructure should be privately funded on a user pays basis, ignoring that the resulting infrastructure would collapse.
Queen missed the mark:
"I want it all,
I want it all,
I want it all,
And I want it now!"
but they forgot the part about "But I don't want to pay for it".
What article were you reading?
If you don't have a bezelless phone, you don't have a bezelless phone.
have a good earpiece
[Citation needed]
not some crap workaround
[Citation needed]
Seriously though, there's nothing good about the earpieces on a modern phone. There's also no evidence that new technology that you have never used is some kind of "crap workaround". For all you know this may be the techonology that blows your mind.
18 months useful life from a CPU is a joke.
No the joke is the idea that a CPU is not forward compatible to any system which doesn't rely on some fancy new instruction only available in new ISAs. The punchline of that joke is that motherboard chipsets are complicated enough not to have driver support backwards compatibility for more than 10 years.
When did CPUs become cheap USB webcams in terms of soft/firmware support?
Divisive?
And just how is this security flaw tending to cause disagreement or hostility between people?
Have you ever read Slashdot comments before?
It is 50% sarcasm, and 50% marketing reality. Go to www.ubuntu.com and see if you can find the word Linux anywhere on the front page.
You'll find out, to within a certain margin or error, in a couple of months of travelling, and have some great experiences along the way. Either you'll never see the same place twice, or you'll fall off an end.
So you're telling people that it's easy for them to prove their point if based on their belief they are going to commit suicide? That's a hard sell by any standard!
I bet that the teacher is not going to be at least reprimanded
And so he shouldn't be. The onus is not on ensuring everyone is not an idiot. The onus is on the people employing the idiots to empower them with knowledge. I'm willing to bet you this teacher has never so much as heard of the term "phishing" much less knows what to look out for.
Punishing people for things they don't know is not a winning strategy.
I didn't do anything "evil" with it
So you only committed 13 felonies?
1. Foreign manufacturers need to secure alternate sources for components.
Any clever suggestions? Specifically we're looking for chips that are compatible and act as a PHY interface to a world of technology locked behind US patents. Got a list of alternative suppliers?
Trump is many things but neither a buffoon nor an animal associated without a coherent plan. He's intelligent and out for blood. Better described in the animal world as a weasel.
Don't confuse his ramblings as senseless or incoherrent. He's never said anything that hasn't been solely for his own personal gain. The trick is understanding what he cares about (Hint: Not Americans .... unless they can increase his wealth).
Best I can tell no one on Slashdot uses Linux. Plenty of people use Debian, Ubuntu, Arch, CentOS, and Android. Hell the crazies here may be found running BSD or Slackware. But no one here actually uses Linux anymore do they?
I wouldn't call it exactly cross platform so much as a triumph of reverse engineering.
What does the result have to do with the method?
I'm not on some horse. Hell there's no horses around here. No one has said anything about others, just pointed out that the USA has fuck all green credentials. The USA has so much to be proud of. It's quite sad to see people thinking its green credentials are among them. Though it is funny watching you people get triggered any time the USA is pointed out at not being #thebestest at something.
Give us a call when you stop being the most carbon emitting persons in the world. Until then, the only people even trying to get on horses here are you.
errr.. Lundgren wtf spell chequer!
potential might
If you think it is only potential then you're not at all paying attention.
What makes you think that can change?
Willpower. The USA is only showing the might that it wants to all the while showing restraint knowing full well that international opinion is actually still a valuable currency.
Our Navy can't even steer around civilian ships safely
Taking a couple of isolated incidents shows nothing about might. In fact a lack of display of might breeds exactly the kind of complacency that allows a few ships to crash into each other. And in the end, as long as the missles fly, no one will care if a ship or two goes down due to misdirection. Just because you have structural issues doesn't mean you don't have might.
And those top-notch soldiers who fought in Iraq? Those are now ex-military gun owners. I'd bet on them in a fight.
A bunch of mentally wounded men suffering from PTSD and utterly failed by metal health system of America with only a small fraction of the gear they had in the past and no command structure which fundamentally underpinned their entire training? Look I'll save you the trouble, just send me whatever money you were going to bet and then neither of us will need to watch that sad one sided affair. Life isn't like the movies. Leave the old guard overthrowing governments to Willis, Stalone, Ludren and Schwarzenegger.