Slashdot Mirror
Astronomy Hacks
This hack book can be taken two ways. One is as a reference to look up solutions to problems or seek a reference for a better method. Two is as a complete back grounder for the beginner and higher level amateur astronomer. Within it are 65 distinct hacks grouped into four chapters; Getting Started, Observing Hacks, Scope Hacks and Accessory Hacks. No embellishments obscure the text. There are only the hacks, each relating to astronomy the same way a Clymers manual refers to motorcycle repairs. No extenuating plots nor complex character development obstructs the wording. This book just lists lots of techniques, hints and recommendations.
The first chapter, Getting Started, has enough detail to guide the beginner or assist the intermediate practitioner. The standard encapsulation of binocular and telescope types ensues. To provide an example of the depth of detail, consider the binocular. The discussion includes; magnification, aperture, exit pupil, eye relief, field of view, interpupilary distance, prism type and lens coatings. A summary list recommends choices for various budget ranges ($75 to $5000) and gives recommendations on certain manufacturers and models.
The telescope selection hack is equally detailed, with descriptions of the three main types; reflector, refractors and catadioptric as well as criteria and recommendations. The authors are admitted fans of Dobsonian telescopes and tend to give more attention to this type both here and elsewhere in the book.
Safety, as the basis of its own hacks, or as a backdrop for many other hacks, appears throughout. Most is for personal safety, whether by staying in groups or not dropping large, heavy mirrors on toes. Perhaps the recommendations to bring a firearm for protection against four legged predators goes a bit far. The repeated references to courtesy for group viewing is just one of the many indicators of the wealth of the author's experience.
The chapter on observing hacks includes, among others, the principles of light, a comprehensive biological description of our eyes' receivers, and a method for running a Messier Marathon. This chapter revolves around the purpose or goals of amateur astronomers. Accepting that these aren't planning on detecting new stars or planets, the authors clearly convey the simple pleasures of viewing. Whether a person is taking copious notes, simple sketches or photographs, the rewards are many and admittedly differ with each person. Simple hacks to improve style or refine goals aid in refining the reward.
The scope hacks essentially look at scope maintenance, and they can get complex. There are step-by-step cleaning instructions for a 10-pound mirror, including swishing it under the faucet for minutes. The same goes for collimation, with its consideration of Strehl values and diffraction spikes. The reasoning and the simple instructions convince and empower the reader to take charge of his viewing capabilities.
The last chapter, Accessories Hacks, is chock full of the little tips to branching out in one's astronomy experience. Eyepieces and filters get a thorough treatment. Light-proofing your vehicle or using software to build custom star charts round out the suggestions.
In all, whether as a reference or as an introductory read, this book delivers. The background and justification for the hacks give sufficient information to believe in their value without overtaxing the brain. Neat hints, like keeping red pens away from night sites, help any observer from committing blunders. The table of contents and index simply and easily guide readers. While sketches, illustrations and photographs clarify many of the subtle points. There's even a note on the proper pronunciation of Greek letters.
With simple prose copiously sprinkled with personal, humorous anecdotes, the reading is a pleasure. Many references to manufacturers and equipment costs aid in selections today, though they probably won't stand the test of time. As well, there is very little on astro-photography. The authors simply say that this activity demands much practice and much equipment. Fair enough, but given the upsurge in computer literates, this area cries for more information.
Reading car repair manuals helps fix a car's problem or learn more about fixing cars in general. The same can be said for Astronomy Hacks. Each hack includes details, hints and tips to embellish a viewer's night time activities. Most of all it ably empowers you to take charge of your hobby and make the most of astronomical viewing.
You can purchase Astronomy Hacks from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
...or does it seem like the first paragraph of this review has nothing to do with the rest of it? Nice diatribe on the use of the word "hack", unfortunately it is useless in obtaining a quick overview of what the article is about.
If you discover a hack does that make you a hack?
I was hoping this would be about cosmic engineering and turning large stars into Twelve Burst Firestorm with Loud Report supernova fireworks.
The skills used for 'astronomical observing' (astronomy?) take a long time to develop. I feel that a 'hack' involving this science/art-form helps keep people from learning about the wonders of being out in the night sky.
In my opinion, learning from the 'little things' is what it is all about.
How many people will appreciate the red pen reference until they have tried to read a red pen using nothing but red light?
Perhaps it is just me.
If you think about it, the night sky is a lot like the internet- You can look at it for hours and lose yourself in it....
As far as the book goes- a lot of these hacks come in handy- a lot of equipment that would have been out of reach for the hobbyist/am astronomer a few years ago are now somewhat affordable, so it may actually come in handy to know how to polish a 10 pound mirror.
And believe me, you want a highly polished mirror in the summer, when blinds are left open and the neighbour's daughter is out sunning.... Speaking of polishing, I'll be back in a few minutes....
And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
well slap my ass and call me a hacker.. I've been accumulating (and using) years worth of knowledge on band-aiding, skirting tight deadlines, and "just-get-it-done" attitudes.
If only I could find a company to work for who isn't interested in hacks... *sigh*
Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
Am I the only one getting feed up about books with "hack" in the title. It's not like the English language has a shortage of words. Now we got Google hacks, brain hacks and astronomy hacks.
Hacking implies the ability to alter something, which astronomy doesn't really lend it self to, much. I couldn't alter Tempel-1's path to avoid Deep Impact (just kidding), and I don't think I could 'hack' anything else in astronomy.
antipaucity
For a second there I thought the book was about the people mentioned here. [url:http://www.badastronomy.com/]
Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
Well does it?
However, for an expert, a hack is the complete opposite. It's a beautiful, well thought resolution that uses minimal effort.
Or, it's someone who is the complete opposite of an expert...
For example: "Dr. Zell, why do those Thompson hacks insist on writing books about astronomy all the time? They should go find a new planet or something and stop wasting their time! Gosh!"
I am scientifically inaccurate.
When is O'Reilly going to release "Publishing Hacks", with a chapter on pairing "Hacks" with every imaginable topic?
Bartending Hacks
Dog Training Hacks
Wine Tasting Hacks
Lawn Hacks...
Posted by timothy on Wednesday July 20, @03:50PM Fraser Cain (Mark Mortimer) writes "Hacking sounds crass. It manifests images of short cuts, jobs poorly done and people most interested in just finishing, no matter what. In the computer industry, sometimes this perfectly portrays hackers. However, for an expert, a hack is the complete opposite. It's a beautiful, well thought resolution that uses minimal effort. Often only those in the know truly appreciate it. Robert and Barbara Thompson in their book, Astronomy Hacks compile tips and techniques for observing the night sky. Their methods seem simple, yet they include detail to show they are experts who are presenting hacks derived from years worth of knowledge." Read on for the rest of Mark's review.
IIIIIIIIN SPAAAAAAAAAAAACE.
Cool. I might check it out. I've got a lot of friends who are interested in stargazing, but are a little impatient with my attempts to explain things regarding astronomy (one reason I don't wish to be a teacher). I've been casually looking for an easy to use amateur's guide to help me figure out how to make myself understandable.
Also, I like how it's a Hacks book on a physical science. Too many people, even in tech, think that hacking is only about computers. It's nice to reiterate that a hack is any type of bending or slick utilization of the rules to make a job easier. Whatever platform your hack is based on is your business.
#define CLUE 0
I dunno, "astronomy hack" seems more like plumbing your yard for liquid nitrogen using existing sprinkler system pipe, or turning a Mattel Barbie Photo Designer into a functioning spectrograph.
Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
Astronomy should never be hacked!
Didn't anyone see what happenned in Bruce Almighty after Jim Carrey hacked the moon?
-
Hack 18:
Print Custom Charts (PDF)
-
Hack 25:
Learn Urban Observing Skills (PDF)
-
Hack 41:
Counterweight a Dobsonian Scope (PDF)
-
Hack 58:
Enhance Lunar and Planetary Contrast and Detail (PDF)
Enjoy!"Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."
Some of us think it wise to carry a firearm for proctection from two-legged predators as well, for those who think four-legged predators will not be a problem, perhaps you camp in your backyard more than the great outdoors!
Life is but a Beta test...
I liked it; sounds more graceful, requiring more diligence than just bashing into a network.
You never expect irony, do you?
Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
@iyfwrestling
If only the hacks helped me understand the zodiac better, I might be more inclined to buy it.
"Hacking" is doing something with a system that its designer(s) did not expect. Some would say that every observation of the sky not mentioned in the Bible is a "hack". Others, particularly scientists free from such mystical sentiment, would say the only "astronomy hacks" are departures from the telescope manual. Just because a "trick" isn't common knowledge doesn't make it a hack. That's why the term "hack" is charged with connotations, good or bad, depending on how sacred you believe the rules to be.
--
make install -not war
Far from the city lights, I've had two run-ins with coyotes while stargazing. I don't live in bear country; but maybe having something that says "nothing to see here, move along" wouldn't be a bad idea.
No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
Quite neat.
"Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."
I agree, the first paragraph is frivolous. It's a shame the mods don't know the difference between a legitimate, topical critique and a troll.
Did this post just jump a bit, or have I dropped too much acid?
Hack
1. Originally, a quick job that produces what is needed, but not well.
2. An incredibly good, and perhaps very time-consuming, piece of work that produces exactly what is needed.
I swear, we need to just get rid of this word. I mean, that's bad, and not in a good way.
Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
Certainly not for an expert software engineer or developer. Hack == crap.
Loading...
For total night-sky newbies, try Stikky Night Skies. As they say, "Learn 6 constellations, 4 stars, a planet, a galaxy, and how to navigate at night-in one hour, guaranteed." Using a mix of programmed instruction and engaging text, this short-but-sweet book acts as in "installer program" that installs some basic, fun astronomical information into your brain.
They have the first section online here. If you can't already find Betelgeuse, you will be able to fifteen minutes after clicking on this link.
-Mark, simply an extremely satisfied customer, and budding night-sky observer
I think backgrounder should be one word.
1) Go to the local public dark sky observing site on the saturday closest to the new moon.
2) set up the little crap scope that has been in your closet for years
3) spend the rest of the night looking through everyone else's 18" dob
4) ????
5) PROFIT!
1. Cheap USB digital camera with lense removed
2. Pinhole (think aluminum foil and a pin)
3. Observe Sun on your computer
You fill in details.
I was hopping the book would be about "astonomy" but no it is about telescopes. It is kind of like a book about "writing the novel" that covers how to use a word processor.
That's really cool! Why don't they have instructions like this for computer science, programming, or how to drive properly?
Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
"Hacking sounds crass. It manifests images of short cuts, jobs poorly done and people most interested in just finishing, no matter what."
Lol!
Is it just me, or does that perfectly describe Linux?
Maybe I'm weird, but this I think would be a cool astronomy hack. I want to buy a big-ass telescope, hook it up to a computer, and search for near earth asteroids and comets and submit it to the NEO (or similar) project. For some reason, I'm under the impression that amatuer astronomers are useful for tracking near earth objects, although I guess the huge telescopes at observatories are probably even more useful for this sort of thing. And that will give me more impetus to learn celestrial mechanics, how to determine the orbits of objects in space, something I thought would be cool to learn.
Am I totally off my rocker here?
When I saw "astronomy hacks" I thought they meant Google Moon. The "hack" part would be when you zoom all the way in on the surface of the moon. ;-)
Holy cow
Authority questions you. Return the favor.
>I dunno, "astronomy hack" seems more like plumbing
>your yard for liquid nitrogen using existing
>sprinkler system pipe, or turning a Mattel Barbie
>Photo Designer into a functioning spectrograph.
Very funny!
And, it also leads to an idea: a test equipment or laboratory hacks collection. We've all heard about or witnessed the occasional ingenuous non-standard lab trick. Collecting a bunch of anecdotal stories of real lab hacks could make for an entertaining read. It's no stupider than a lot of other collections out there.
Would I buy it in the form of a book? No. Probably not. But if it were an online collection it might be worth a few chuckles. While we're at it, why not a full franchise: cryogenic hacks, optics hacks, frequency domain hacks, etc. }8^)
On a more serious note, I agree that this book title seems misleading. Even someone who knows nothing about optical astronomy like me has run across a few *real* hacks, like the webcam astronomy folks (http://www.usno.navy.mil/pao/QuickCamAstro.shtml and others), or the many mirror-grinders out there turning plate glass into instruments. A few minutes with google turned up dozens of other examples (http://www.britastro.org/iandi/articles.htm, http://www.atmsite.org/date.html, etc.) A
real astro hack book could be interesting. Shame this isn't one.
The Little LISPer (MIT Press, 1980 & c.) uses a variation on Programmed Instruction to teach programming (in LISP) in a format that looks something like this. It's very effective, like the Stikky books.
And waaaay back in 1978, my 7th-grade English text book used this technique to teach grammar/syntax and how to diagram sentences. That stuff is still stuck in my head.
Apparently 99% of current 'programmed instruction' is done through computer-based tutorials, but I wish there were more books out there that used PI the way the Stikky ones do.
It really does feel like an 'information installer program' for the brain!
Why is it slashdotters go out of their way to talk about their wives and girlfriends You may think that the slashdotter stereotype of not having a girlfriend isn't true, but then why would they be so quick to mention them?
Think about it. Searching Google for "wife" on Slashdot gets 14,700 hits. Searching for "friend" gets you only 3,400 hits. Do more slashdotters have wives than those that have friends? Of course not. They just talk about them more.
It's because you think it's out of the oridanry and makes you cool to have a girlfriend or wife that you talk about it so much. It's out of the ordinary because most slashdotters don't have wives or girlfriends, which means the stereotype is true.