Step 1. Buy a D-Link 530TX+. I know, it's not on the HCL, but...
Step 2. Go here to get the drivers for the chipset.
Step 3. Have as much fun as Solaris will allow.
Or, if you really need something on the HCL, Netgear still has their FA310TX available from their store, for a rather large shipping charge though:-(
Actually, I started with Slackware in 1997 or thereabouts, because the Linux-Installation HOWTO, or whatever document I found at the time, had step-by-step instructions that were Slackware specific.
I've tried all the others, but nothing beats Slackware's DIY mentality.
Slackware is the Ramones of Linux distros -- it ain't complex, and it ain't pretty, but it works for me.
Slashdot Mirror
I don't think you'll get away with that quite that easily. Ask John Oswald. Same situation, different "license".
FREEDOM! TRUTH! and GREAT MUSIC!
This fall on MTV!
Well, gee, if all 10,000 users contributed just $1 each, there wouldn't be a problem, would there?
Step 1. Buy a D-Link 530TX+. I know, it's not on the HCL, but...
:-(
Step 2. Go here to get the drivers for the chipset.
Step 3. Have as much fun as Solaris will allow.
Or, if you really need something on the HCL, Netgear still has their FA310TX available from their store, for a rather large shipping charge though
You should be using uwm. wm2's frames waste too much precious desktop space. uwm has no such problems.
What I really want to know is why you're using bloatware such as X, though... DO you really need a GUI to do your work?
Hey, they stole the "anti-anti-missle-missle missle" thing from Rocky and Bullwinkle!
Still plenty of months left in the year. Better get to work...
No, he doesn't.
Why would he want the results of executing $DISTRO there?
You may want to try reading the sh man page before speaking next time.
Based on these numbers and the test I just ran, Linux 2.4.0 kicks FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE's ass all over the place in every category.
Sure, I only have a 400MHz K6-III vs. their 850 MHz Pentium III, but it's not like Linux does everything twice as fast; it's much worse than that.
So can a Universal Turing Machine. Your point?
Mac OS X isn't UNIX because a real UNIX system has to ship the Common Desktop Environment.
Works on Mozilla 0.8.1.
Which means Mozilla isn't standards-compliant yet, becuase it should barf because the W3 says you can use <p> without </p> but not vice versa.
No, but you might hear:
"Rambus Loses, Declares Bankruptcy"
:-)
He is too a total loon, otherwise he would have the good sense to attempt not to sound like a total loon.
So which is it, BSD or GNU?
for that Linux box in a toaster:
TOASTY!
Heh, I think I got into more fisticuffs before I started listening to Heavy Metal than after, and exactly zero since I started listening to KMFDM.
When I was more violent, I was listening to stuff like MC Hammer. (I was young. Mistakes were made.)
So there. It's MC Hammer's fault, not Metallica's or KMFDM's.
ME ME ME!
Actually, I started with Slackware in 1997 or thereabouts, because the Linux-Installation HOWTO, or whatever document I found at the time, had step-by-step instructions that were Slackware specific.
I've tried all the others, but nothing beats Slackware's DIY mentality.
Slackware is the Ramones of Linux distros -- it ain't complex, and it ain't pretty, but it works for me.
and I'll say it here too.
Where is this "Moebius-like reality" that America has created for itself?
Have any of you noticed a twist in the fabric of space where time becomes a loop, from which there is no escape?
How about whatever happened happening again?
In any case, Rusty should be forced to listen Orbital's "The Moebius" until he learns that te Moebius is NOT merely a reality distortion field!
Looks like you got 0, offtopic. You'd better rethink your theory :-) :-) :-)
Now my brother's famous, and all I've done is contribute a stinking patch or three to the defunct Utah-GLX project :-P
What is this "inux" you speak of? Does it have better network card drivers than Linux?
If so, count me in!
Not JonKatzish enough -- Johnny Kat would NEVER be caught dead using MLA citations, or any citations at all for that matter.
Heisenberg compensators, of course.
OK, so my theory is correct: you need SCSI to use Solaris/x86 properly.
;-(
It runs IDE drives in PIO mode, which kills a lot of the performance. Especially when your box only has 64 MB and things swap all the time