The problem is, ad networks should be held accountable for the ads they are dishing out. If they don't want malware, then they should actually do their job and vet the ads before promoting them. THEY are promoting them, right? They are the responsible party.
You're right. But on the one case, which was proof enough against the actual demand... "Find actual evidence of non-citizens voting". I did, and yet, you come in and say "that isn't good enough".
Great, lets have a scientific study on voter rolls and verify who voted and who cheated to vote. LETS have that conversation.
The problem is, the left doesn't even want to have any evidence generated, so they then can keep saying "Don't conflate evidence and data". See how that works?
The poorest Americans are "relatively rich" to the people who get voter IDs in India. Funny, how "relatively" is relative, and also nullifies your very point. Thanks.
They've discriminated against certain classes of valid voters
Um no. There is no discrimination with Voter ID. Everyone has the exact same opportunity to vote, and get the required ID. Everyone has to figure out how to get the ID (free if necessary).
What you're basically saying is, those "certain classes" are incapable of doing what every other person can do. Which is pretty damn insulting to those classes. I'm not even sure you realize how insulting that is.
But then again, getting those people to vote lock step with the very people insulting them is par for the course for liberal democrats.
How do you know. We aren't even allowed to even ask that question, scientifically. It is as if that just wanting to ask the question is a crime in some places. Namely "RACISM!!!!"
We can't know the extent of the problem unless we attempt to measure it. We can't measure it, because... RACISM!!!
Homelessness has increased substantially under Obama, yet where is the blame. Had this been an (R) administration, everyone would be blaming it. Part of the problem is the groupthink of the electorate.
Ads are a vector for malware, because the ad networks don't actually monitor their ads. IMHO class action lawsuit for Malware distributed by Ad Networks, killing each network that offers up infected ads. Pretty soon, only reliable ad networks (hahaha) will remain.
I know, doesn't actually fit the leftwing narrative. Funny, how people who WANT to vote can find ways to vote, even illegally.
The Left's view that an entire certain class of people CANNOT figure out how to vote, and we must help them vote, is about as repugnantly racist as you can get. Basically, the left's view is "______ people are too stupid to be able to fill out the forms to get a free Voter ID"
Except third world countries, with way more voters, seem to have solve the Voter ID problem. There is a reason why certain people love to claim "Racism" because it shuts down rational thought, and you don't have to actually fix the real problem.
While I am sure there is "racism" out there, it isn't the real problem. The real problem are the people enabling failure to keep a class of people voting lock-step with the (D) party. And the (R) party just can't figure out the language to call the (D) party on their racist policies.
unilateral disarmament by the US would serve as a model for other countries.
Right up there with "gun free zones will reduce gun crimes" as really stupid pink vision enhanced liberal logic. It looks good on paper, but ignores reality.
I disagree. Power is not found in taxes, but rather in the threat of government over its citizens. But lets go with your definition, just for a second.
What about a government that HAS the power to tax, but has restrained itself? My question here, raises the idea that power and restraint = control. Uncontrolled power is a tyranny.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm getting to the point of just assuming that anything in the Cloud is insecure. That assumption makes security so much easier. There is no security.
The problem is, ad networks should be held accountable for the ads they are dishing out. If they don't want malware, then they should actually do their job and vet the ads before promoting them. THEY are promoting them, right? They are the responsible party.
You're right. But on the one case, which was proof enough against the actual demand ... "Find actual evidence of non-citizens voting". I did, and yet, you come in and say "that isn't good enough".
Great, lets have a scientific study on voter rolls and verify who voted and who cheated to vote. LETS have that conversation.
The problem is, the left doesn't even want to have any evidence generated, so they then can keep saying "Don't conflate evidence and data". See how that works?
relatively rich
The poorest Americans are "relatively rich" to the people who get voter IDs in India. Funny, how "relatively" is relative, and also nullifies your very point. Thanks.
What if we paid people to get their voter ID? You know, "Get your voter ID, and we'll pay you $1"
You'd still have a reason to complain, because it cost more than $1 to get to the place where you pay for the voter ID.
Liberals always have an excuse why something can't be done, when they don't want it done.
Again, not Constitutional Rights.
You have to have ID to buy a gun. A constitutional right. I rest my case.
They've discriminated against certain classes of valid voters
Um no. There is no discrimination with Voter ID. Everyone has the exact same opportunity to vote, and get the required ID. Everyone has to figure out how to get the ID (free if necessary).
What you're basically saying is, those "certain classes" are incapable of doing what every other person can do. Which is pretty damn insulting to those classes. I'm not even sure you realize how insulting that is.
But then again, getting those people to vote lock step with the very people insulting them is par for the course for liberal democrats.
extremely miniscule problem
How do you know. We aren't even allowed to even ask that question, scientifically. It is as if that just wanting to ask the question is a crime in some places. Namely "RACISM!!!!"
We can't know the extent of the problem unless we attempt to measure it. We can't measure it, because ... RACISM!!!
Homelessness has increased substantially under Obama, yet where is the blame. Had this been an (R) administration, everyone would be blaming it. Part of the problem is the groupthink of the electorate.
Ads are a vector for malware, because the ad networks don't actually monitor their ads. IMHO class action lawsuit for Malware distributed by Ad Networks, killing each network that offers up infected ads. Pretty soon, only reliable ad networks (hahaha) will remain.
So, by marking this "troll" you're saying that America can't do what India and Mexico can? Every eligible voter getting a photo ID?
Wow, that is some country you live in.
http://grandville.wzzm13.com/n...
I know, doesn't actually fit the leftwing narrative. Funny, how people who WANT to vote can find ways to vote, even illegally.
The Left's view that an entire certain class of people CANNOT figure out how to vote, and we must help them vote, is about as repugnantly racist as you can get. Basically, the left's view is "______ people are too stupid to be able to fill out the forms to get a free Voter ID"
It usher in the age of Gozer!
Except third world countries, with way more voters, seem to have solve the Voter ID problem. There is a reason why certain people love to claim "Racism" because it shuts down rational thought, and you don't have to actually fix the real problem.
While I am sure there is "racism" out there, it isn't the real problem. The real problem are the people enabling failure to keep a class of people voting lock-step with the (D) party. And the (R) party just can't figure out the language to call the (D) party on their racist policies.
But but but ... quality medical devices! FDA approval sticker! Triple certified !
Because, we have to make sure they can't fail in a life or death situation!
Takes both, actually.
If not the same day, the same week as me.
I know, right ... (waiting for lower number to one up me)
But, with the new features built into Windows10, Windows updates can come from anywhere!
What could possibly go wrong with that??
unilateral disarmament by the US would serve as a model for other countries.
Right up there with "gun free zones will reduce gun crimes" as really stupid pink vision enhanced liberal logic. It looks good on paper, but ignores reality.
Not technically a loop. It is an iteration. Never really like calling it a loop. ;)
I disagree. Power is not found in taxes, but rather in the threat of government over its citizens. But lets go with your definition, just for a second.
What about a government that HAS the power to tax, but has restrained itself? My question here, raises the idea that power and restraint = control. Uncontrolled power is a tyranny.
Its not a loop if it stops on its own accord. Loops are ... never ending, by definition.
Personally, I would love to see Trump vs Sanders. And perhaps a good showing from a Libertarian Candidate to really screw up the Electoral College.
the correct term is duty which carries more weight than responsibility. You can shirk responsibility, but you better not shirk your duty.