Medical Professionals (doctors) used to tout the medical benefits of smoking, paid for by big tobacco, what is the difference between being paid by big pharma and big tobacco to promote products they sell? And don't tell me that Big Pharma isn't part of the equation, because they have legal liability laws written specifically for them (and no other industry).
Take a look at the actual packaging on a vaccine, and see potential issues listed as a side effect? http://investmentwatchblog.com...
Here is the problem, one vaccine may be safe, completely by itself. 47 vaccines together have NEVER been tested as such. The "pro science" people are all great, but there has never been a proper scientific study (double blind) on the effects of a full vaccine schedule. Not only that, there hasn't even been an attempt.
The problem is, it isn't science to guess, it is science to properly study, test, document and show efficacy of the full schedule. That has NEVER been done. And until it is, both sides can argue till they are blue in the face, and are both cannot say that the full schedule does or doesn't cause long term health issues (like autism)
Well, there are two issues here, and people love to conflate them together.
1) Spear Phishers got to Podesta, and gained access to his account. The media calls it "hacking" but it wasn't, it was social engineering. One requires expert skills in computers, the other requires basic knowledge of psychology. THIS is all on Podesta for not using 2 Factor authentication.
2) The other bit about collusion with Media, DNC, Hillary Campaign and it even ties into Project Veritas "Bird Dogging" tapes.
These are TWO separate issues, and should be addressed as such. Trump could have flipped the whole "Trump and Putin are buddies" bit by Clinton by saying "I condemn the hack. But that doesn't eliminate the horrible dirty politics of the DNC, Media and Hillary Clinton that was exposed. Hillary, how do you justify Bird Dogging my campaign?"
But Trump is an idiot. He'll never get how to flip attacks back onto the attackers. It requires a kind of mental judo he can't perform.
You're under a false assumption based on binary thinking, that I support Trump.
But, if you're going down the line of who screwing who is worse, Trump didn't screw any of the women, while Clinton is figuratively raping the nation for political gain. Voter fraud is a huge issue, since it affects everyone, regardless of who they are voting for.
As for Attacking Donald, the Press are in cahoots (literally) with the Hillary Campaign are doing a fine job of that, I don't need to pile on. And by being in bed (figuratively speaking) with the Clinton Campaign, are equally complicit with the fraud being perpetrated by the DNC, Clinton and everyone implicated in the Wikileaks scandal (including inciting violence).
So, violence is violence, and shouldn't be tolerated. Clinton is complicit at minimum, and involved directly at worst with everything WikiLeaks and Project Veritas has exposed. But you don't seem concerned about any of that, because Hillary is your vagina candidate (her most notable "qualification")
You obviously don't understand the metaphor. And by restating what I didn't say, make yourself look really stupid. Putting quotes around it doesn't make it correct, it just shows you don't know proper citation practices. You must be a member of the Mainstream Media.
Putting trust (more or less) is often based on experience (bias) but doesn't negate the possibility that the domestic sources information is legitimate.
I have no doubt that the Trump tape is authentic, and trust it is accurate. But the press (MSM) has also been shown to be highly biased against Trump, and supportive of Hillary, and THAT information is coming from foreign sources like WikiLeaks. The fact that US press hasn't covered it much (if at all) is proof that they are not to be trusted.
Simply put, trust isn't about quantity, it is about quality. Broken clocks are correct twice a day, and for a very brief period, I can trust that they are right. Doesn't mean I trust them the rest of the time. That is not confirmation bias, that is having an open mind to look beyond the obvious (the clock is broken, I shouldn't use it at all).
Confirmation bias is only looking to the MSM for "news", in which case, you are unlikely to know much about WikiLeaks exposure of the corruption inside the DNC and its efforts to illegally manipulate the voters. Confirmation Bias is ignoring Project Veritas confirming the WikiLeaks information about "Bird dogging". You think the MSM is going to link those two together and put it on the front page of the NYT or Lead with it on CNN? If this was any (R), you can bet it would be.
So, I do NOT trust the domestic MSM to do its job at all. It is fully incapable of it. That doesn't mean it isn't right twice a day. It just means that it is full of shit the other 23 hours and 58 minutes.
Well, I hate to break this to you, but Democracy will never work. Eventually people gather together enough resources to take whatever they want from people less able to defend themselves from such actions. When you see left wing democratic socialists, they think they have a right (by majority vote) to take whatever they want from others, to support whatever cause (justified or not) they have. They use phrases like "the 1%", and "fair share" and divide people up "Rich vs Middle class vs poor" and always use the majority opinion to simply take via legislation that which they feel entitled to.
This is why we have a democratic republic, one that used to have an outline of how powerful a government should be (no very) and a defined purpose (to protect the liberties of the People). Those people who think Government is the only solution to the problems government creates, are creating a beast that will eventually eat them up. They are just too ignorant and haven't learned from history.
Unfortunately, pointing to the obvious isn't going to change the mind of the Parent Post contributor. They will no doubt, double down on the excuses they have for voting for the person they have chosen, regardless of how hypocritical it actually is.
Man has an uncanny ability to justify just about anything he does. An enlightened man is one that admits he is hypocritical and knows when he is.
Actually, we know who a lot of these people are. However, they are sufficiently insulated against the orders they give that they can claim "no knowledge" and.. thus they get away with it. The next excuse, when they actually get caught is "I don't recall". And when that doesn't work, people end up dead, or unable to communicate because their internet was cut off mysteriously by unknown agents (probably Russian, wink wink)
But you don't care, you'll vote for them anyway, being a binary choice.
Well, I am promoting the ideal that you are in control of your own destiny, why would I become someone who places all that control in an external... like government? The person whining about the rich business owner, who is unwilling or unable to become one themselves will be promoting the idea that the only "fairness" comes from his sense of entitlement to the earnings of someone else, via government thuggery.
It is that proverbial and easy road to travel, paved with good intentions. OR as my daddy used to say, "Things that are hard to attain are most valuable, things that are easy to attain, no matter how good, are not valued at all" If you work hard, and are unique (and valuable) you'll have your reward. Not everyone is special, some (most) are common, ordinary and unrefined.
I didn't make that argument at all. I suggested those that are whining about "business owners getting rich" should quit their jobs and become one, and stop their whining.
The other option is to not whine about people taking risks, providing jobs for whiners, who are getting rich. They should be better off than their employees, and the jealousy of people like the initial whiner should be ignored. I'm sick of the whole "punish the rich for being successful" crap the left wing peddles.
Its not that molehill that is the problem. It is that all the molehills people like you keep piling up, increases the size of the mountain that existed from the beginning of time. The phrase "straw that broke the camels back" comes to mind.
a few hundred dollars a month? minimalized numbers aren't a logical arguemnt, though I am sure it helps you win some with people who don't actually know what things actually cost.
Unless you're going for virtually "no coverage" (aka "Bronze"), it gets expensive, really quickly. I hope you don't get sick.
And for "There certainly are more resources available to help a budding entrepreneur." I am sure you're ignoring the licenses, fees and all the regulations (some quite stupid) you'll have to follow too.
For all the left's talk about "big business" and targeting them for abusive taxation and regulation policies, those also affect the smallest of mom n pop corporations. And all of that builds up barriers to entry to market. Here is a good article explaining how that hurts small businesses.
Because there isn't a very real risk that Clinton would start a nuclear third world war.
You're not paying attention then. There is a lot of talk about real war happening now, by both Russia (nuclear power) and North Korea (Nuclear Power). And Clinton is inexorably tied to both with her four years of SoS and the complete ineptitude of the "Obama Doctrine" (whatever that is).
I rather doubt you'll believe me, but please do a google new search for "war, north koread south korea", and see "brink of war" declaration, and "war russia threatens syria".
You'd be hard pressed to figure out how Trump is involved in either. But a typical leftwingers like yourself has long used "nuclear war" option to scare people into voting for disgusting people like Hillary. Again, I don't think you'll believe me, and I doubt you'll actually admit that the threat of war (nuclear or otherwise) is all on Obama and Clinton at this point. We don't need four more years of her Failed policies.
The Hillary camp is just as likely to say that Trump's recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital is likely to cause problems in the Middle east, especially with countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, neglecting that those countries sponsor both Isis and the Clinton Foundation. yada yada yada "my nuanced foreign policy"
Trump is an idiot no doubt. Any well rounded person could have a field day in a debate with Clinton. It is easy to make tacit links between actors all over the place, in this case, Hillary and Isis are linked in ways that she can't possibly deny. Though I am sure she will try.
Slashdot Mirror
Medical Professionals (doctors) used to tout the medical benefits of smoking, paid for by big tobacco, what is the difference between being paid by big pharma and big tobacco to promote products they sell? And don't tell me that Big Pharma isn't part of the equation, because they have legal liability laws written specifically for them (and no other industry).
Take a look at the actual packaging on a vaccine, and see potential issues listed as a side effect?
http://investmentwatchblog.com...
Here is the problem, one vaccine may be safe, completely by itself. 47 vaccines together have NEVER been tested as such. The "pro science" people are all great, but there has never been a proper scientific study (double blind) on the effects of a full vaccine schedule. Not only that, there hasn't even been an attempt.
The problem is, it isn't science to guess, it is science to properly study, test, document and show efficacy of the full schedule. That has NEVER been done. And until it is, both sides can argue till they are blue in the face, and are both cannot say that the full schedule does or doesn't cause long term health issues (like autism)
but the whole "bear" thing is a give away! Only Russia knows about the "bear" thing.
Well, there are two issues here, and people love to conflate them together.
1) Spear Phishers got to Podesta, and gained access to his account. The media calls it "hacking" but it wasn't, it was social engineering. One requires expert skills in computers, the other requires basic knowledge of psychology. THIS is all on Podesta for not using 2 Factor authentication.
2) The other bit about collusion with Media, DNC, Hillary Campaign and it even ties into Project Veritas "Bird Dogging" tapes.
These are TWO separate issues, and should be addressed as such. Trump could have flipped the whole "Trump and Putin are buddies" bit by Clinton by saying "I condemn the hack. But that doesn't eliminate the horrible dirty politics of the DNC, Media and Hillary Clinton that was exposed. Hillary, how do you justify Bird Dogging my campaign?"
But Trump is an idiot. He'll never get how to flip attacks back onto the attackers. It requires a kind of mental judo he can't perform.
This is SpearPhishing, a highly targeted personalized attack.
You haven't listened to Harry Reid at all, have you?
You're under a false assumption based on binary thinking, that I support Trump.
But, if you're going down the line of who screwing who is worse, Trump didn't screw any of the women, while Clinton is figuratively raping the nation for political gain. Voter fraud is a huge issue, since it affects everyone, regardless of who they are voting for.
As for Attacking Donald, the Press are in cahoots (literally) with the Hillary Campaign are doing a fine job of that, I don't need to pile on. And by being in bed (figuratively speaking) with the Clinton Campaign, are equally complicit with the fraud being perpetrated by the DNC, Clinton and everyone implicated in the Wikileaks scandal (including inciting violence).
So, violence is violence, and shouldn't be tolerated. Clinton is complicit at minimum, and involved directly at worst with everything WikiLeaks and Project Veritas has exposed. But you don't seem concerned about any of that, because Hillary is your vagina candidate (her most notable "qualification")
You Chickenshit liberals are all the same.
You obviously don't understand the metaphor. And by restating what I didn't say, make yourself look really stupid. Putting quotes around it doesn't make it correct, it just shows you don't know proper citation practices. You must be a member of the Mainstream Media.
Both sides have decided that. It isn't just (R) or (D) doing it (don't know which you implied), it is actually both.
And both sides are looking at maintaining their power, instead of what is best for everyone.
Democracy, two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
It never works out in the end.
And it hasn't worked out in Scandinavia.
https://fee.org/articles/the-m...
https://www.bostonglobe.com/op...
http://www.thenewamerican.com/...
If all you listen to is Left-wing news and Bernie, you'd never know socialism doesn't work.
AC Troll know nothing shows lack of insight. Color me surprised.
"You are very close to committing suicide, or having an unfortunate drowning accident while hiking alone ... or something"
Putting trust (more or less) is often based on experience (bias) but doesn't negate the possibility that the domestic sources information is legitimate.
I have no doubt that the Trump tape is authentic, and trust it is accurate. But the press (MSM) has also been shown to be highly biased against Trump, and supportive of Hillary, and THAT information is coming from foreign sources like WikiLeaks. The fact that US press hasn't covered it much (if at all) is proof that they are not to be trusted.
Simply put, trust isn't about quantity, it is about quality. Broken clocks are correct twice a day, and for a very brief period, I can trust that they are right. Doesn't mean I trust them the rest of the time. That is not confirmation bias, that is having an open mind to look beyond the obvious (the clock is broken, I shouldn't use it at all).
Confirmation bias is only looking to the MSM for "news", in which case, you are unlikely to know much about WikiLeaks exposure of the corruption inside the DNC and its efforts to illegally manipulate the voters. Confirmation Bias is ignoring Project Veritas confirming the WikiLeaks information about "Bird dogging". You think the MSM is going to link those two together and put it on the front page of the NYT or Lead with it on CNN? If this was any (R), you can bet it would be.
So, I do NOT trust the domestic MSM to do its job at all. It is fully incapable of it. That doesn't mean it isn't right twice a day. It just means that it is full of shit the other 23 hours and 58 minutes.
these people do not want democracy to work
Well, I hate to break this to you, but Democracy will never work. Eventually people gather together enough resources to take whatever they want from people less able to defend themselves from such actions. When you see left wing democratic socialists, they think they have a right (by majority vote) to take whatever they want from others, to support whatever cause (justified or not) they have. They use phrases like "the 1%", and "fair share" and divide people up "Rich vs Middle class vs poor" and always use the majority opinion to simply take via legislation that which they feel entitled to.
This is why we have a democratic republic, one that used to have an outline of how powerful a government should be (no very) and a defined purpose (to protect the liberties of the People). Those people who think Government is the only solution to the problems government creates, are creating a beast that will eventually eat them up. They are just too ignorant and haven't learned from history.
It is worthwhile, but only if you play one of the debate drinking games available. And yes, there is a website ...
http://www.debatedrinking.com/
Unfortunately, pointing to the obvious isn't going to change the mind of the Parent Post contributor. They will no doubt, double down on the excuses they have for voting for the person they have chosen, regardless of how hypocritical it actually is.
Man has an uncanny ability to justify just about anything he does. An enlightened man is one that admits he is hypocritical and knows when he is.
Party before all else. Loyalty to the party has killed America.
I will say this, once and again. you are not your ID. You ID helps identify you, but that isn't absolute.
Actually, we know who a lot of these people are. However, they are sufficiently insulated against the orders they give that they can claim "no knowledge" and .. thus they get away with it. The next excuse, when they actually get caught is "I don't recall". And when that doesn't work, people end up dead, or unable to communicate because their internet was cut off mysteriously by unknown agents (probably Russian, wink wink)
But you don't care, you'll vote for them anyway, being a binary choice.
Well, I am promoting the ideal that you are in control of your own destiny, why would I become someone who places all that control in an external ... like government? The person whining about the rich business owner, who is unwilling or unable to become one themselves will be promoting the idea that the only "fairness" comes from his sense of entitlement to the earnings of someone else, via government thuggery.
It is that proverbial and easy road to travel, paved with good intentions. OR as my daddy used to say, "Things that are hard to attain are most valuable, things that are easy to attain, no matter how good, are not valued at all" If you work hard, and are unique (and valuable) you'll have your reward. Not everyone is special, some (most) are common, ordinary and unrefined.
I didn't make that argument at all. I suggested those that are whining about "business owners getting rich" should quit their jobs and become one, and stop their whining.
The other option is to not whine about people taking risks, providing jobs for whiners, who are getting rich. They should be better off than their employees, and the jealousy of people like the initial whiner should be ignored. I'm sick of the whole "punish the rich for being successful" crap the left wing peddles.
Its not that molehill that is the problem. It is that all the molehills people like you keep piling up, increases the size of the mountain that existed from the beginning of time. The phrase "straw that broke the camels back" comes to mind.
a few hundred dollars a month? minimalized numbers aren't a logical arguemnt, though I am sure it helps you win some with people who don't actually know what things actually cost.
FYI, here is the best resource on how much it costs https://www.thebalance.com/how...
Unless you're going for virtually "no coverage" (aka "Bronze"), it gets expensive, really quickly. I hope you don't get sick.
And for "There certainly are more resources available to help a budding entrepreneur." I am sure you're ignoring the licenses, fees and all the regulations (some quite stupid) you'll have to follow too.
For all the left's talk about "big business" and targeting them for abusive taxation and regulation policies, those also affect the smallest of mom n pop corporations. And all of that builds up barriers to entry to market. Here is a good article explaining how that hurts small businesses.
https://smallbiztrends.com/201...
Not that facts matter to most people, vain emotionalism is the ruling factor in decision making these days.
Nothing like Strawman and fake anecdotal evidence to prove your point!
Everyone knows it is better to be on welfare where you get free Obamacare in that case. Duh.
Because there isn't a very real risk that Clinton would start a nuclear third world war.
You're not paying attention then. There is a lot of talk about real war happening now, by both Russia (nuclear power) and North Korea (Nuclear Power). And Clinton is inexorably tied to both with her four years of SoS and the complete ineptitude of the "Obama Doctrine" (whatever that is).
I rather doubt you'll believe me, but please do a google new search for "war, north koread south korea", and see "brink of war" declaration, and "war russia threatens syria".
You'd be hard pressed to figure out how Trump is involved in either. But a typical leftwingers like yourself has long used "nuclear war" option to scare people into voting for disgusting people like Hillary. Again, I don't think you'll believe me, and I doubt you'll actually admit that the threat of war (nuclear or otherwise) is all on Obama and Clinton at this point. We don't need four more years of her Failed policies.
The Hillary camp is just as likely to say that Trump's recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital is likely to cause problems in the Middle east, especially with countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, neglecting that those countries sponsor both Isis and the Clinton Foundation. yada yada yada "my nuanced foreign policy"
Trump is an idiot no doubt. Any well rounded person could have a field day in a debate with Clinton. It is easy to make tacit links between actors all over the place, in this case, Hillary and Isis are linked in ways that she can't possibly deny. Though I am sure she will try.