Archives of the Invisible Space Goat, Chapter 1, page 37. You would do better proving things exist rather than insisting people prove that things don't exist. Otherwise please provide proof that my citation is not real.
Let's see. Chapter 1, page 37. "Dunbal is a jerk". Not really relevant. Prove it doesn't say that;)
Yeah, we need a citation for the GP's "No". What was he thinking posting such nonsense without a citation.
It's bio us that we are living in a computer simulation. Some Silicon Valley big shots say so and in Amerca, the richer you are, the righter and smarter you are.
At least we can see something is going on there. the simulation thing is just the end point of a logic chain.
Another seed of that fruit is an apostrophe signifies possession. It's or its is basically users choice. Showing up another symptom of today's cultures, everyone is so sure that what they know (think) is fundamentally correct they can't even be bothered to check.
Here you go. First article on google complaining how little work he does down there but confirms for you he does at least some. Plenty of white house staff follow him down there too or do you think they're all just on free holidays. Even the secret service alone operating would call for it, no doubt its actually there. Pretty fucking shocking if it's not but you just seem unable to accept the fact its called for.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry...
Yeah TFA is shit. You'd like to think there is an actual secure network that wouldn't even be detectable by their methods, but this is Trump so you can't take it for granted.
No, listen and understand. This is a complex idea so bear with me. Any where the president, or leader of any country does work should have a network suitable for that kind of thing. I'm not saying rip it all out and install the strongest network ever for the benefit of the guests, fuck them they can use trumps pre installed weak shit, no one cares about them, at all. The issue is if sensitive, potentially extremely sensitive materials is passing that shitty network. This isn't about a country club, its about where the leader of a nation does his work.
I'm not worried about open wifi at all. You're the one obsessed with that. The fact there is open points at all just shows there is more than one network. TFA identifies that one and one that has weak security. The question is if there is one with strong security that is appropriate for presidential work. You'd like to think there is one entirely wired, installed and approved by secret service that wouldn't be detected by a sniffer on a boat. Before you respond again. If you are going to mention the open wifi and ask why its a problem then don't bother.
" If he is doing presidential work there, do you not think it should be on a secure network, maybe separate to the one everyone else is using"
Bingo. Why is the President of the United States doing sensitive work at a public golf resort? Shouldn't that be done at a secure facility of some sort? What does that have to do with open wifi access points?
Because he's a fucking idiot and spends basically every weekend there. Do you honestly think the country only gets run while he's in the oval office?
Nothing at all, you're the one fixated on open access points. The government doesn't need to purchase it at all, just install a secure network or at least shore up what is there. They can take it all out again when he's done.
It's a wonder the security is anything less than water tight
You still haven't worked out much about how Trump has operated his businesses yet after all this time? Competency is optional but a flashy outer appearance is mandatory.
Yeah but he didn't have the secret service breathing down his neck or the tax payer to fund his kit before.
I think you are missing the point. if Trump does any kind of sensitive work there on a network like the one described then it's just asking for trouble. If he is doing presidential work there, do you not think it should be on a secure network, maybe separate to the one everyone else is using? Before January, yeah this was just another gold club/resort like any other and no one would give a shit. After he stops being president it will go back to that, but while he is president and spending loads of time there it's status is a bit different. Do you not agree?
Because it's a lot easier to break a network open once you're in. It's not that there's open access points, that's be be expected really. The problem is all the other shitty security. Once someone is in there's no telling where they could go and what they could get is only limited by what's on the network. I wonder how much the members register would be worth? That's before you get to any real sensitive information that might be on there. Do you really expect Trump to vigilant with any of that? If it's as bad as they say though basically every foreign power will already be in it and will have been since day 1 probably. You only have to hope he's sensible enough to use the right networks for the right data, or at least, has some one to do it for him.
The answer to your question is hell no. Seems like Trump disagrees though and if he insists on going there all the time it should be locked up as tight as the white house. In terms of network security anyway for as long as he is pres.
It is. It is the personal resort of the president of the USA where he goes every weekend and I assume does at least a little bit of work. A resort that is now also filled with lots of people rich and powerful enough to buy access to it plus secret service, fbi and whatever else alphabet agency is relevant. A resort just like any other.
There is open wifi everywhere. Most businesses that host customers have them. Mar-a-lago is a country club. What does webcams and microphones have to do with Wifi? What planet do you live on?
Mar-a-lago isn't just a country club anymore though is it. Open networks aside, they probably just gobble up whatever they can of whatever connects to them. The rest of the piss poor security at the president's personal retreat filled with a bunch of the richest and most powerful people in the country though? It's a wonder the security is anything less than water tight. Would the same standards be acceptable at the white house? It's just another home office after all. Unless the whole thing is one giant honey trap and they have a second secret network that has all the good stuff on it of course.
Slashdot Mirror
Jailing might be a bit extreme, but deporting is just fine by me.
Deporting where? If you deported this guy to where he was from you would have sent him to exactly where he went to.
Don't speak to this animal.
Archives of the Invisible Space Goat, Chapter 1, page 37. You would do better proving things exist rather than insisting people prove that things don't exist. Otherwise please provide proof that my citation is not real.
Let's see. Chapter 1, page 37. "Dunbal is a jerk". Not really relevant. Prove it doesn't say that ;)
Yeah, we need a citation for the GP's "No". What was he thinking posting such nonsense without a citation.
It's bio us that we are living in a computer simulation. Some Silicon Valley big shots say so and in Amerca, the richer you are, the righter and smarter you are.
At least we can see something is going on there. the simulation thing is just the end point of a logic chain.
Glad that I cleared that up for you.
Well, it could be. It could also be a swarm of interstellar teapots that use the stars to get their tea just that much hotter. Probably not though.
Another seed of that fruit is an apostrophe signifies possession. It's or its is basically users choice. Showing up another symptom of today's cultures, everyone is so sure that what they know (think) is fundamentally correct they can't even be bothered to check.
The Swedish stubbornness has cost the UK tax payer over £50,000,000 to date.
I'll take what is numbers pulled from your ass.
Hi, can I have the password?
Are you a member here?
No
Fuck off then.
Here you go. First article on google complaining how little work he does down there but confirms for you he does at least some. Plenty of white house staff follow him down there too or do you think they're all just on free holidays. Even the secret service alone operating would call for it, no doubt its actually there. Pretty fucking shocking if it's not but you just seem unable to accept the fact its called for. http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry...
Are you that naive? Do you think he just does no work down there, because he does.
The fact its a golf resort is irrelevant, its where the president is. Get that though your thick skull.
It's not public, it's members only which is essentially private.
Logic would dictate there are more networks at play but, well, you know.
That does seem to be the overriding issue here, yes .
Yeah TFA is shit. You'd like to think there is an actual secure network that wouldn't even be detectable by their methods, but this is Trump so you can't take it for granted.
No, listen and understand. This is a complex idea so bear with me. Any where the president, or leader of any country does work should have a network suitable for that kind of thing. I'm not saying rip it all out and install the strongest network ever for the benefit of the guests, fuck them they can use trumps pre installed weak shit, no one cares about them, at all. The issue is if sensitive, potentially extremely sensitive materials is passing that shitty network. This isn't about a country club, its about where the leader of a nation does his work.
I'm not worried about open wifi at all. You're the one obsessed with that. The fact there is open points at all just shows there is more than one network. TFA identifies that one and one that has weak security. The question is if there is one with strong security that is appropriate for presidential work. You'd like to think there is one entirely wired, installed and approved by secret service that wouldn't be detected by a sniffer on a boat. Before you respond again. If you are going to mention the open wifi and ask why its a problem then don't bother.
" If he is doing presidential work there, do you not think it should be on a secure network, maybe separate to the one everyone else is using" Bingo. Why is the President of the United States doing sensitive work at a public golf resort? Shouldn't that be done at a secure facility of some sort? What does that have to do with open wifi access points?
Because he's a fucking idiot and spends basically every weekend there. Do you honestly think the country only gets run while he's in the oval office?
Nothing at all, you're the one fixated on open access points. The government doesn't need to purchase it at all, just install a secure network or at least shore up what is there. They can take it all out again when he's done.
You still haven't worked out much about how Trump has operated his businesses yet after all this time? Competency is optional but a flashy outer appearance is mandatory.
Yeah but he didn't have the secret service breathing down his neck or the tax payer to fund his kit before.
I think you are missing the point. if Trump does any kind of sensitive work there on a network like the one described then it's just asking for trouble. If he is doing presidential work there, do you not think it should be on a secure network, maybe separate to the one everyone else is using? Before January, yeah this was just another gold club/resort like any other and no one would give a shit. After he stops being president it will go back to that, but while he is president and spending loads of time there it's status is a bit different. Do you not agree?
Because it's a lot easier to break a network open once you're in. It's not that there's open access points, that's be be expected really. The problem is all the other shitty security. Once someone is in there's no telling where they could go and what they could get is only limited by what's on the network. I wonder how much the members register would be worth? That's before you get to any real sensitive information that might be on there. Do you really expect Trump to vigilant with any of that? If it's as bad as they say though basically every foreign power will already be in it and will have been since day 1 probably. You only have to hope he's sensible enough to use the right networks for the right data, or at least, has some one to do it for him.
Sorry this is a public resort.
Well, it's members only. Could me or you turn up? I don't think so. And it may well be there's a second network. I hope so.
The answer to your question is hell no. Seems like Trump disagrees though and if he insists on going there all the time it should be locked up as tight as the white house. In terms of network security anyway for as long as he is pres.
It is. It is the personal resort of the president of the USA where he goes every weekend and I assume does at least a little bit of work. A resort that is now also filled with lots of people rich and powerful enough to buy access to it plus secret service, fbi and whatever else alphabet agency is relevant. A resort just like any other.
There is open wifi everywhere. Most businesses that host customers have them. Mar-a-lago is a country club. What does webcams and microphones have to do with Wifi? What planet do you live on?
Mar-a-lago isn't just a country club anymore though is it. Open networks aside, they probably just gobble up whatever they can of whatever connects to them. The rest of the piss poor security at the president's personal retreat filled with a bunch of the richest and most powerful people in the country though? It's a wonder the security is anything less than water tight. Would the same standards be acceptable at the white house? It's just another home office after all. Unless the whole thing is one giant honey trap and they have a second secret network that has all the good stuff on it of course.