Slashdot Mirror


User: fatphil

fatphil's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,087
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,087

  1. Re:Time to leave, Slashdot is dead. on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    I'm in a +zone, so I will be one of the earlier goodbyes.

    My one week is to wean myself off /. I've done it before, I can do it again.

    Yay - more time for usenet!

  2. Re:Comment view on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    On my phone I can't even slide the sliders to show all, it moves the whole page around under my finger instead.

    Total UI fail.

  3. Re:And that's exactly what I asked for. on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    > comments are at the top of our list of features that need more work on the Beta site

    Why was it not top of the list of features *a year ago*? Because those in decision-making positions don't understand what's important about the site. And if they lack that insight, they shouldn't be running the site any more.

    cue: "I can change" from /Team America/

    Coming up with promises about future improvements cannot magically undo the gross incompetence that you've already displayed. You can't polish a turd.

  4. Re:And that's exactly what I asked for. on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    I'd rather be in a community with the 300000 people who are interested about the comments. Let the 3000000 people who aren't have a broken slashdot-2.0 to themselves. And not even know of each other's existence. What kind of a community is that?

  5. Re:Resurrecting Technocrat.net on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    This, a million-fold. (Well, probably several hundred thousand-fold.)

    I've turned my back on slashdot before, but slid back into their clutches, as I felt some loyalty. Now they are DICE, all that attachment is gone.

    I now read slashdot for the links ... to upcoming slashdot replacements.

  6. Re:Resurrecting Technocrat.net on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    I remember the last time you shut down technocrat, it was many years ago after slashdot pissed me off with changes (they'd clearly not tested in a javascript-free environment), and I just thought to hell with it, I know somewhere better.... Ooops, too late.

    But you're right, it is all about the articles. Responsibility for that is of course easily distributable. On think that I think is overlooked is the fact that the people who are best equipped for hunting out topics for coverage aren't necessarily the best ones for creating a well-written and researched summary. Maybe a multi-layer system where the front end contributors, the ones with 100 RSS feeds at their fingertips, just submit a very brief *fresh* link, and someone else who has expertise in the field creates the summary for it. It there's a maths story, I'm your editor...

    And finally, at least once a month I say "I miss Groklaw". It can never be said too much.

  7. Re:Lack of Unicode is intentional (5:erocS) on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    > I can copy and paste things from the articles ... without it shitting all over itself.

    Even the things from the summaries. Everything it is prepared to send to us, it should be prepared to receive from us.

  8. Re:Credit where credit is due on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    Maybe you've not worked in a company where changes like this have been foisted on employees and users. This situation is scarily similar to one of my recent past positions. With that knowledge and experience of how these things are done from the inside - yes, it is dripping with incompetence, and wrong-think. And downright lies too, I might add.

  9. Re:Credit where credit is due on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    If you don't understand the difference between "go in reverse gear" and "go into reverse gear", then you're ill-equipped to enter into a semantic argument.

  10. Re:Credit where credit is due on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1


    Thanks for the car analogy - damn, have we given up on flaming and got back to traditional slashdot contents already?

  11. Re:Slashdot BETA Sucks. on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    Response received...

    Respecting the contents of private mail, I'll say no more apart from the fact that I am remarkably impressed with his turnaround time for emails (and perhaps I'm not blacklisted to hell and back after all).

  12. Re:Slashdot BETA Sucks. on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    Mailed.

    Alas, my domain name is heavily associated with spam (as spammers use it as a from address, for example) and there's also a cunting "IP address reputation" website (100% commercial, not one of the free blacklist that I make good use of myself in the other direction) who are trying to strongarm me into paying them money for them to take me off their blacklist, so it might never get through.

  13. Re:Why? on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    I'm glad you got the reference I was making.

    And as I don't think I'll be around much longer to use them (not that you could ever "use" them anyway), I'm glad one of us got mod-points for my post.

  14. Re:We really would like a new interface on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    Someone mentioned that they'd finally fixed that unicode issue. I guess there's only one way to test that (and make the test results public):
    Müük otsinguvõimalusi

    After previewing... oh bollocks, I guess I misread.

  15. Re:Credit where credit is due on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They can't go in reverse gear with the brakes on.

    We want them in reverse gear. And we want an apology, and an admission of total incompetence amongst those who were in decision-making positions.

  16. Re:"Slashdot Classic" link not available in the fo on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    Delete all cookies. Disable javascript. Keep rejecting any cookie apart from ones that are absolutely essential to you logging in. Alternatively, don't log in (and just use lynx). Then you should have the late 2000s view that the rest of us who refer to "classic" see. Of course, it's still a bit different from the real classic that we remember from the 90s, but it's good enough.

  17. Re:Time to leave, Slashdot is dead. on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    Last post will be at about 23:59 on 9th. Then there will be the boycott.
    Then, hopefully, there will be an implosion, heads will roll, Alice fucking Hill will be updating her CV to include "I am an abject fucking failure". Cross fingers, and before long, actual sanity will be restored.

    Until then, replacements are welcome, this may be the *only* tech site I'm signed up to, but that doesn't necessarily mean I'm loyal, /per se/.

  18. Re:Slashdot BETA Sucks. on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1

    I remember when Bruce postsed his office telephone number in a slashdot story. I'd make use of that right now to tell him to get moving, if it wasn't for the fact that it was about 5 jobs back!

  19. Re:Why? on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    But apart from the data being presented, the style in which it's presented, and the user's interaction with that data, there's basically very little wrong?

    All we need is a picture of Alice Hill's head on a spike as the logo, and it would be perfect.

  20. Re:Fuck Beta on Slashdot Tries Something New; Audience Responds! · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    But they're now saying "slow down".

    I hereby promise no more than 15 flames per story, until either (a) Slashdot beta is buried, and there's an apology, an admission of incompetence, and the head of Alice Hill on a plate; or (b) Slashdot? What's that?

    Fuck slashdot beta.

  21. Re:NoBeta! on Major Internet Censorship Bill Passes In Turkey · · Score: 1

    Anagram:

    Slashdot beta =
    Hated, so blast (out of existence, clearly)

  22. Re:Seen as 'insulting' and "menaces" on Major Internet Censorship Bill Passes In Turkey · · Score: 1

    Never underestimate the "menace" that is slashdot beta. And it's an insult to those who've been reading since the 90s. slashdot beta would be banned un Turkey, know that.

    Fuck me, I never believed I'd just be a contributor of noise and nothing more to a story, what have DICE done to me?

    However, I think it's important - continuing to post the quantity I normally would gives us a way of measuring the activity drop during the slashdot boycott on 10th-17th. Remember - delete all your cookies, and disable 3rd party cookies too, before you shutdown on the end of the 9th, so in case you accidentally reload favourite tabs. And disable the RSS feed too, so you're not tempted to give them page views.

  23. Re:Pfft on The Bitcoin Death Star: KnC Plans 10 Megawatt Data Center In Sweden · · Score: 1

    When 50% of the cost of the centre was for its power supply and its cooling. And that doesn't take into account actually running the things. Look at TPC benchmark declarations, and the costs of the systems, there's a breakdown of the cost - power is the single biggest thing. Processors, RAM, storage, interconnects, etc. don't come close.

  24. My own web page which identifies the primary sources *precisely*, you fucking dipshit. How can you be too stupid to even read? Don't answer that, your answer would almost certainly be stupid, as I've started to detect a pattern.

  25. Re:WTF People ( beta comments ) on New Zealand Spy Agency Deleted Evidence About Its Illegal Spying On Kim Dotcom · · Score: 1

    Not quite true. They have to know that they are in the process of killing /. stone dead. Silence will just let the frog boil.

    Consider it a boycott. With noisy picketting.