Slashdot Mirror


The Bitcoin Death Star: KnC Plans 10 Megawatt Data Center In Sweden

1sockchuck writes "Bitcoin hardware vendor KnC Miner has begun construction on a a 10 megawatt data center in Sweden that it will fill with high-powered computers mining for cryptocurrency. KnC has emerged as a leading vendor in the volatile market for ASIC mining rigs, focusing on underpromising and overdelivering. One goal of its move into cloud mining is to cushion any fallout from delivery delays on new hardware, which have been a sore point for miners in the fast-moving Bitcoin market. "Over the next few months we are bringing online enough hashing power to make sure that any delay in the Neptune timeline will be compensated with a completely free hosted hashing packages to all fully paid customers," KnC says in its newsletter."

250 comments

  1. Now even bitcoin miners have better planning by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    than whoever planned slashdot beta.

    1. Re:Now even bitcoin miners have better planning by tburkhol · · Score: 5, Informative

      From Dice's quarterly report:

      Corporate & Other segment revenues decreased 9% year-over-year to $4.3 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2013 from the comparable 2012 period, due primarily to the financial results at Slashdot Media.

      Message: slashdot is losing money, and something needs to change very fast. Whatever /.'s current user base is, it is not a profitable set of consumers, and Dice appears not to be worried if their non-profitable customers go away.

    2. Re:Now even bitcoin miners have better planning by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I got an idea, fire the staff and leave the site running - especially stop the contracts for the designers.

      also, I got news for you - they started the beta in 2013!

      (also the new(beta) site will waste more bandwidth).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Now even bitcoin miners have better planning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about you spend less time bitching and whining and design and submit a better design? Oh right, that would require skill and work.. my bad.

    4. Re:Now even bitcoin miners have better planning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No surprise, Slashdot has been a walking corpse for years. The link aggregation sucks, the stories are all blogspam and 3 days behind every other tech site.

      Slashdot's only real function now is a place for cynical old-timers to gather around remember the good old days of bitching about Microsoft in a familiar ugly green interface.

      Wish them the best of luck finding a new audience for this dump.

    5. Re:Now even bitcoin miners have better planning by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      less time bitching about clearly worse(for me) design that's designed to promote advertising and not a useful site layout? And more time working for free on an idea that would ultimately be rejected, even if completed?

      Where else by Anonymous Coward could we get such brilliant suggestions? Let's just ignore perfectly valid criticism because it annoys you, the mysteriously ambiguous person who doesn't go as far as suggesting there's anything positive about the new design, just how much they don't like those whiners who dare to have an opinion.

    6. Re:Now even bitcoin miners have better planning by Gregory+Arenius · · Score: 1

      Just because revenues are down doesn't mean they aren't making money. The quarterly report doesn't really shed light on whether or not Slashdot is profitable. It just says that revenues are down.

      There is also no breakout of Slashdot itself from the Corporate & Other segment which does include some other companies.

      It also states:
      "Slashdot Media was acquired to provide content and services that are important to technology professionals in their everyday work lives and to leverage that reach into the global technology community benefiting user engagement on the Dice.com site. The expected benefits have started to be realized at Dice.com. However, advertising revenue has declined over the past year and there is no improvement expected in the future financial performance of Slashdot Media's underlying advertising business. Therefore, $7.2 million of intangible assets and $6.3 million of goodwill related to Slashdot Media were reduced to zero."

      So it looks like they already wrote off the goodwill of Slashdot users, which they apparently valued at $13.5 million.

  2. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They need that much power to render the Slashdot Beta javascript.

  3. Why not just keep it? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just keep the Bitcoins they mine?

    Why not just keep Slashdot Classic? Fuck beta.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Why not just keep it? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because mining the Bitcoin miners is more profitable.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Why not just keep it? by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Everyone these days wants to fuck beta. How about a few of us show some charity, drop trow, and fuck alpha too?

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    3. Re:Why not just keep it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Because mining the Bitcoin miners is more profitable.

      ...and definitely more productive that trying to use Slashbeta

    4. Re:Why not just keep it? by niado · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just like in a physical gold-rush - sometimes it is better to just sell shovels.

    5. Re:Why not just keep it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a gold rush, you want to be the one selling the shovels. duh

    6. Re:Why not just keep it? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Good lord. If Beta is this bad, do you have any idea what a steaming pile of shit Alpha is?

    7. Re:Why not just keep it? by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Who is in charge here? Who is the master-beta?

    8. Re:Why not just keep it? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      or Horses, pants ,Whores, teapots, rifles, food stuffs, money transmission services ect

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    9. Re:Why not just keep it? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Maybe some of us like fucking steaming piles of shit. Not me though, I'm outta here once the steaming pile of shit is the only thing left for me to fuck.

    10. Re:Why not just keep it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you meant drop trou and fuck alpha too.

      You're welcome.

    11. Re:Why not just keep it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's a good thing because bitcoin "shovels" is computer hardware and processing power, probably one of the most important "tools" of the last 40 years improving just about any branch of industry ranging from medical technology to entertainment.

  4. Slashdot death rattle by east+coast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Beta will mark an end to some of the most informative and most insightful users from their daily input on Slashdot. Many have voiced disgust but Dice has decided to be tight lipped and head strong in the face of civil disruption.

    If you want a progressive and forward thinking Slashdot you must voice your opinion on the matter now. Dice is moving to what will certainly be a call for exodus.

    Why would Dice buy Slashdot only to destroy it?

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seems to me its a simply case of some web devs justifying their jobs. It doesn't matter if its better or worse - its different and that means they can show some pointy haired managers just how much work they've done and get a pat on the back and potentially prevent their jobs being outsourced to a body shop in Bombangalore for another year or 2.

    2. Re:Slashdot death rattle by sinij · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't understand anyone would think "Beta" is anything other than a disaster, but someone please post where we all going to move to.

    3. Re:Slashdot death rattle by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 4, Informative

      Slashdot is officially being actively destroyed because it doesn't make enough advertising revenue anymore

      From the report:

      Slashdot Media was acquired to provide content and services that are important to technology professionals in their everyday work lives and to leverage that reach into the global technology community benefiting user engagement on the Dice.com site. The expected benefits have started to be realized at Dice.com. However, advertising revenue has declined over the past year and there is no improvement expected in the future financial performance of Slashdot Media's underlying advertising business. Therefore, $7.2 million of intangible assets and $6.3 million of goodwill related to Slashdot Media were reduced to zero.

      --
      The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
    4. Re:Slashdot death rattle by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Try to pick advertisers who make products people reading Slashdot actually care about for a change.

    5. Re:Slashdot death rattle by JWW · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have been reading/commenting at /. since 1998.

      I have a 5 digit userid (of course the beta won't display that anymore).

      I'm gone if the beta is forced on me.

    6. Re:Slashdot death rattle by east+coast · · Score: 2

      An excellent question. This could be the foot-in-the-door some motivated young webdevs are looking for. I'm open to new sites that are willing to take on the feel of the Slashdot community without any of the mind numbingly stupid looks of beta.

      I hope these people who are interested in taking up the reigns and perhaps becoming a voice for the science and tech enthusiasts will step forward with URLs and ideas that are being waylaid by Dice.

      This is an opportunity that is looking for a taker. The time is now.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    7. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Beta will mark an end to some of the most informative and most insightful users from their daily input on Slashdot. Many have voiced disgust but Dice has decided to be tight lipped and head strong in the face of civil disruption.

      If you want a progressive and forward thinking Slashdot you must voice your opinion on the matter now. Dice is moving to what will certainly be a call for exodus.

      Why would Dice buy Slashdot only to destroy it?

      Welcome, Pilgrim.

      To end is to begin. You cannot have everything, and seek nothingness.

      Good luck

      3301

    8. Re:Slashdot death rattle by TWiTfan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the biggest annoyances I found in the beta is the way it handles comments in the User section. Right now, in classic, I can do a quick check of all my posts and see all the replies and mods to said posts in one nice table. In the beta, I can only see them one comment at a time (and have to click on each one to see if there were any replies or mods). Not to sound like a narcissist, but I do like to keep track of replies to my posts. And the shitty beta makes it almost impossible to do that.

      But on the upside, I get to see all my Slashdot "Trophies" on the left!! Woo hoo!!

      Seriously, trophies???? Wtf??

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    9. Re:Slashdot death rattle by JWW · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know, I wouldn't fuss if they removed the disable ads checkbox in my classic mode. I'd live with it.

      But the beta site is garbage.

    10. Re:Slashdot death rattle by TWiTfan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if people don't like it, and stubbornly keep choosing the classic interface--no problem. Just FORCE it on them!

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    11. Re:Slashdot death rattle by dysmal · · Score: 1

      Why would Dice buy Slashdot only to destroy it?

      Because some asshats are trying to justify their existence as they try to build "the next big thing". What web clowns don't get and never will get is that IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT!

    12. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Like all the slashvertisements for bitcoin?

    13. Re:Slashdot death rattle by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      If Dice would stop chasing off users with one stupid fucking move after another, maybe more advertisers would come. Slashdot used to have a userbase where 1,000+ comments on a story was pretty common, and even big sites could be "Slashdotted." When's the last time you saw THAT?

      Here's a hint, it was before Taco sold to Dice.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    14. Re:Slashdot death rattle by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Too bad Taco's new site is even worse than Beta...

    15. Re:Slashdot death rattle by 2phar · · Score: 1

      Thanks for re-posting. Funny how when I posted it gradually reaching +5 Informative over an hour, and then suddenly went to 0 Offtopic.

    16. Re:Slashdot death rattle by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      So, can we have a user's buyout of /. then? I'll pledge $20 for first year operating costs.

    17. Re:Slashdot death rattle by wakaranai · · Score: 2

      Ditto

    18. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Koen+Lefever · · Score: 2

      someone please post where we all going to move to.

      Check out AltSlashdot.

      --
      /. refugees on Usenet: news:comp.misc
    19. Re:Slashdot death rattle by noh8rz10 · · Score: 0

      The main issue is that slash dot is losing hecka money right now. Any change is better than no change in their eyes, because no change leads to turning out the lights.

    20. Re:Slashdot death rattle by dciman · · Score: 1

      While my user ID isn't terribly low. I would stop reading and contributing to /. if the "beta" goes through. It's terrible.

    21. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      and even big sites could be "Slashdotted." When's the last time you saw THAT?

      Here's a hint, it was before Taco sold to Dice.

      To be fair, the state of site hosting has changed a lot in the past few years. Even the reddit front page, which drives a ton more traffic than this site ever did, very rarely brings down a site anymore.

    22. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      Are you proposing that tampon ads inappropriate? The Ladies of Slashdot might find themselves wanting a new brand, you insensitive clod.

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    23. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Beta is taking away my OG userid? This aggression will not stand, man.

    24. Re:Slashdot death rattle by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      It's a real shame. In it's heyday, Slashdot was a pretty fucking amazing place to be.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    25. Re:Slashdot death rattle by egcagrac0 · · Score: 2

      The disable ads checkbox doesn't cost nearly so much money as the horde of site visitors running adblock... which given that many of us are technically inclined, is most of us.

    26. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back through the last few stories, posts related to Beta are being mod-bombed across the board.

    27. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is officially being actively destroyed because it doesn't make enough advertising revenue anymore

      From the report:

      How profitable would Dice be if they had not sunk ("literally") the money they did into the purchase of /.???

      Perhaps "adventures" like /. should remain someone's late night hacking project that they share/run with their friends. In that mode it might have been "self-sustaining", but definitely not a replacement for a good "day job".

      So, Slashbeta...please drop off the face of the earth or fall into a crevass in the earth's surface...or better yet, start exploring space and get sucked into a black hole. Any of those horrible endings for you would be better than the torture imposed upon your wacky, fanatical, and kinda loyal community.

    28. Re:Slashdot death rattle by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I left the ads on to help support ./, even though I can turn it off.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    29. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      How is it possible to lose money on a site where the content is all user generated and there are both ads and subscriptions? Don't tell me they're paying top dollar for their "editors"...

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    30. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the rate people are complaining about beta, even if Slashdot reverses their decision in a month or two and never forces beta on people, a lot of people will already be gone. Beta sucks, but it seems moot now that comments to stories are unreadable in beta or classic because of all the beta spam.

    31. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Valdrax · · Score: 2

      I have a 5 digit userid (of course the beta won't display that anymore).

      I didn't even notice that. Geez, it's like they really are just trying to kick all the old users in the teeth with this design.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    32. Re:Slashdot death rattle by jythie · · Score: 1

      Someone has to maintain, upgrade, and replace the infrastructure. It used to be that getting 'slashdotted' overloaded small sites, but slashdot itself has to deal with that load all the time.

    33. Re:Slashdot death rattle by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it will never be enough. They want to make a lot of money, to become the new Gawker or whatever shit it is they are trying to clone. Just having a good, solid site isn't enough.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:Slashdot death rattle by bmxeroh · · Score: 1

      What if we offered Dice to click the ads for them if we get to keep classic? I'd be ok turning off adblock once a week and clicking through a couple of ads for a few minutes.

      --
      Central Ohio Home Theater Installation - The Theater People
    35. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Yebyen · · Score: 2

      Hold on a second, you still have the disable ads checkbox?

      My karma is still 'Excellent' but I don't have the checkbox anymore. What am I doing wrong?

      --
      Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
    36. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This could be the foot-in-the-door some motivated young webdevs are looking for. I'm open to new sites that are willing to take on the feel of the Slashdot community without any of the mind numbingly stupid looks of beta.


      Perhaps colonslashslash.com?

    37. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Wookact · · Score: 1

      It is not up and running yet, and the email address is not working as of 30 minutes ago.

    38. Re:Slashdot death rattle by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      Regardless of how much it costs to operate, revenue has gone off a cliff. Dice had expectations of the revenue they want, and they will keep trying increasingly desperate things to get it.

      Obv not a path to success, but I'm just trying to shed some light on why they might be going down this beta path.

    39. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Yebyen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try using it for a while. You can't link directly to comments, you can't click a username to visit somebody's profile, it seems to delete whole posts (for me at least) whenever that person tries to thoroughly exercise Unicode, instead of just deleting the Unicode characters like Classic. It has really got nothing at all positive over Slashdot Classic in my opinion. It should be clear what the users want, since every single article is crapflooded with comments about "FUCK BETA" and they are actually getting modded up.

      --
      Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
    40. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When logged in I have the checkbox unmarked. I used to not run adblock for slashdot until their moronic ads started breaking the layout of the site. Now, fuck 'em.

      The blatant censorship on media stories comment sections, and anti-science trolling in science news comments indicate that discourse is better handled by 3rd party places like slashdot, reddit, or dare I say dig and even 4chan. It follows the unix philosophy: Do one thing and do it well. I like the good will gifting of gold tier "premium" features on reddit. I've purchased reddit "gold" expressly to reward others above the comment rating system. The gold doesn't affect the post rank, but you can filter by gilded posts, and the categories of interests can be grouped and shared.

      The advent of the 'daily reddit gold goal' seems to be working out great, as it prompts those with credits to be generous when needed. One can also pay for ads to advertize your product on any sub-forum. It was a great thing when atheismrebooted purchased adspace on atheism after the mod revolt (memes are srs business). The point is that the community interaction is great, and viewers can directly fund the site. Things like screenshot saturday and buying adspace on game and gamedev areas of the site can help even small time indie devs launch their products far more efficiently.

      If ad business tells you anything its that you only have to monetize a small portion of the viewership. Selling ads is only one way to monetize, and Dice is dropping the ball like morons. If only they could just peek their heads out of the rectum they've crawled up long enough to realize that the old-media model is going extinct and that the web is INTERACTIVE media enabling different successful monetization strategies than fucking centuries old periodicals.

      All the news here is posted to reddit as well. The decentralized community ran moderation system on reddit helps keep in check the group-think expressed in the rating system. Fuck slashdot beta. If they refuse to shut up and take my money, then they deserve to die. It's not like there are no alternatives. Hell, all the usual suspect sites have RSS. I don't need anyone for news but the outlets themseves, the aggretation systems are about COMMUNITY. Ignoring the community is suicide.

    41. Re:Slashdot death rattle by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      First off, before I say anything else, let me be perfectly clear: I hate Beta as much as everyone else, and if classic (or at least something very close to it) ceases to be available, I'll leave.

      However, this kind of crap disturbs me:

      I have a 5 digit userid (of course the beta won't display that anymore).

      I'm gone if the beta is forced on me.

      That's what you're worried about most?!?

      I'm sure this will cost me karma, but I don't give a damn about how many digits your userid has. It tells me absolutely nothing about you, other than that you were probably alive 15 years ago. (Although, I'm sure at least some dead people have passed a userid onto someone else....)

      There are lots of people with low IDs who have been an important part of the community for many years. I applaud those of you who fit into that category. Some people were away for a long time and came back. Great.

      There are also lots of people with low IDs who haven't posted in a decade, and only come on to complain or make some troll-like comment every so often. There are others who only show up when some stupid userid pissing contest gets started. ("You think you have a low number, look at mine!" "No -- you moron, I have only 4!" "Ha -- mine's smaller!" The only pissing contest in the world where smaller is better....)

      I'm not against displaying a userid. I like it because it's traditional to this site. I can see how it was useful back in the day.

      For the record, I've never posted about this before, but I did browse the site for at least a few months back in 1998 or 1999 -- and I'm certain I even signed up for an account and made a handful of posts. But for the life of me, I can't remember the name I signed up under -- I was trying to be clever, and I used a name I never used before. And I don't have access to the email account I used to have, so there's no way to figure it out... not that I care that much. It would be meaningless, because I didn't come back for 6-7 years, and only then did I actually start contributing seriously. Having that number tacked onto my comments would give me an air of respect or legitimacy to some people that I wouldn't deserve.

      I used to care, and one day I spent a couple hours trying to figure out what my old username might have been... but after being really active here for over half a decade, I can safely say that I don't give a crap about that anymore. I don't even notice the numbers, except as identifiers sometimes. I care about posts that are actually helpful and insightful, not about what your name or number is.

      If we want to put some metric that tells us something about your status or contributions to the Slashdot community, how about the total number of modded up posts, or +5 posts, or some karma measure, or the number of modded up posts per year or something? (Just not the stupid Beta "trophies.") That would actually tell me something about whether you're likely to have something good to say, or whether you're a good citizen in the community. Your userid does not.

      I really mean no disrepect here. But if your 5-digit userid is the thing you care about most concerning this move to Beta... well, I think you might want to reconsider your priorities. I give a damn about the community. I give a damn about good structured commenting systems that are clearly displayed and easily accessible.

      And I'd be happy to keep the userid system for tradition's sake -- it ain't broke as far as I'm concerned, except when comments like this come around.

      I care about Slashdot. I don't give a damn about your ego around some meaningless number.

    42. Re:Slashdot death rattle by lgw · · Score: 1

      $6.3 million of goodwill related to Slashdot Media were reduced to zero.

      A better description of Slashdot Beta I've yet to see!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    43. Re:Slashdot death rattle by reikae · · Score: 1

      You are just reading way too much into it. Low id means one thing only, which is that he registered quite some time ago. So he's been around a long time, and the beta will finally drive him away.

    44. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Nightbrood · · Score: 1

      I dug out my old 4 digit UID from an ancient yahoo mail account because of this crap.

    45. Re:Slashdot death rattle by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're right, and if that's all this particular poster meant, fine.

      Except he didn't say, "I have a low id, so that proves I've been around for a while, and I don't like this beta crap." Instead, he complained that that number would not be displayed everywhere, and then said he would leave.

      As I said in my previous post, I have great respect for many of you guys who have been around for a long time and have contributed good things for years.

      But I've also heard a lot of people at various times over the years trying to assert that their low id deserves some other recognition or respect, beyond just when you happened to register. Clearly the implication of GP's post is that he cares that people continue to see his number... for some reason. And that the fact it has only 5 digits is of some significance toward that argument.

    46. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What am I doing wrong?

      Disabling ads, obviously.

      Fuck Beta.

      Captcha: downhill ...

    47. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Yebyen · · Score: 1

      Holy shit it's back. I must be right on the threshold. The nexus of the universe. I can see my house from here!

      --
      Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
    48. Re:Slashdot death rattle by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Trophies were an April Fool's gag, now they're featured?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    49. Re:Slashdot death rattle by JWW · · Score: 3

      Its not about not displaying the userid its about the craptacular posting and commenting system in the beta.

      The lack of displaying the user id is a symptom of the developers paying no attention to how the current system works and operates well.

      Another strike against them is that in the beta following your or other users past comments is incredibly cumbersome and unwieldily.

      In the interest of cleanness they provide so little information on the users' comments pages as to make tracking and following comments and moving through comment threads extremely clunky.

    50. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kuro5hin!

    51. Re: Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you will come back like the bitch you are

    52. Re:Slashdot death rattle by soundguy · · Score: 1

      the aggretation systems are about COMMUNITY. Ignoring the community is suicide.

      You don't seem to understand what the "community" is. It's not Slashdot readers and participants, it's the officers and shareholders of Dice. THEY are not being ignored. Everything here is for their benefit, not yours. You are not the customer. You are the product.

      --
      Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
    53. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      you can't click a username to visit somebody's profile

      You can do that now? I haven't been able to do that since the last redesign. All I get is a link to slashdot.org/~ (no user name after the tilde).

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    54. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, maybe that is it. They must have co-related the drop in revenue to all this old fart users who are the wrong demographics for their ad generating strategy. Afterall such business model of forcing change to existing user base works so well with Microsoft and Apple, so why not. What better explanation than this for the fact that they are still going ahead with beta even after all this open mutiny claims?

    55. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      altslashdot.org

      A preliminary project to build an alternative on slashcode, and stay classic

    56. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Yebyen · · Score: 1

      That's odd. For me, I can click on Valdrax or (32670) to get to /~Valdrax

      On Beta, clicking your username would just expand/fold your comment.

      --
      Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
    57. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But on the upside, I get to see all my Slashdot "Trophies" on the left!! Woo hoo!!

      Seriously, trophies???? Wtf??

      It's called 'gamification', and it's all the rage these days. The idea is that you will be so proud of your 'trophies' that you will do whatever is necessary to 'earn' the next 'trophy'. Or something. Oh, and girls will be very impressed with the trophies you earn as well ...

    58. Re:Slashdot death rattle by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Huh. Weird. Seems to work for me now that I check it here. It doesn't work at home, where I read AC on Firefox with NoScript, and I'm not sure if any of those three things are to blame. I'd swear I tried it yesterday before posting from work, but it clearly does today. No idea.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  5. NSA by Threni · · Score: 1

    They could *own* bitcoin if they wanted, surely (with their processing power, I mean) Why haven't they?

    1. Re:NSA by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      The NSA has no motive to do so. Despite lofty proclamations about changing the world, every bitcoin in existence has a combined value less than $10B. In the big picture of the global economy, that's negligible.

    2. Re:NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because it's easier to let the FBI bust all the illicit drug dealers and take their BTC, one stash at a time. And it won't be long before they find a way to outlaw btc entirely, and then they'll just take it from all the public btc wallet sites and exchanges directly.

    3. Re:NSA by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      every bitcoin in existence has a combined value less than $10B.

      Are you sure? It's just gone crashing down again....

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:NSA by NiteMair · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind, bitcoin can't simply be generated all at once - it is released to the network in specific blocks at predefined times that get smaller and smaller over time.

      In fact, over half of all bitcoin that will ever be created ever will be, and the rest will take another 100+ years to complete.

      The only advantage of having the biggest mining operation in town is to increase your chances of getting those blocks when they're released...

    5. Re:NSA by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      Where are you seeing that? I'm seeing a drop from $820 to $790 over the course of a week. I used 12M bitcoins at $800.

    6. Re:NSA by ledow · · Score: 1

      Only if you believe that they have these almighty processing abilities anyway.

      All I've seen is them putting blackboxes into ISP's, large content providers and forcibly inserting what could be bog-standard commercial hardware into transit links.

      And yet, when something like decent encryption comes up they spend inordinate efforts to place really weak backdoors into it rather than attacking it (either brute-forcibly or by hiring the right brains).

      The more I see, the less I believe the "acres of datacentre" crap, and I never really believed it in the first place.

    7. Re:NSA by jythie · · Score: 2

      Wrong kind of processing power. The NSA would be able to obtain more BTC if they killed the power to their computer center and used the money to buy them on the open market.

    8. Re:NSA by lgw · · Score: 1

      They could *own* bitcoin if they wanted, surely (with their processing power, I mean) Why haven't they?

      There are far less computationally-intensive ways to "own bitcoin". For example, if all the biggest bitcoin wallets are on machines that the NSA intercepted to add keyloggers, then all your bitcoin belong to NSA.

      Actually mining BTC is for chumps when you can hack systems at will.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:NSA by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      So if it was worth less than $10B and it went crashing down, what is it now worth that is not less than $10B?

  6. Translation by Viol8 · · Score: 0

    "Company finds new online betting infrastructure cash cow"

    Yup , just set up some cloud bitcoin mining facilities and charge some mugs a load of money of which 99% of them don't have a hope in hell of recovering via any bitcoins they recover.

    I wonder if you can pay for the service in bitcoins? Now wouldn't that be ironic.

  7. enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The constant BS about the beta will put people off the site, nevermind the content or look and feel... I think people get it....

    1. Re:enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the troll in me feel happy about you.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]

  8. This layout sucks. Ax it already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, Dice. No one wants this beta bullshit.

  9. Ah, but will it Fuck Beta? by denzacar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. The ability to mine Bitcoin is insignificant next to the power of the Fuck Beta.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Ah, but will it Fuck Beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I find your lack of FUCK BETA disturbing!!!

    2. Re:Ah, but will it Fuck Beta? by DaTrueDave · · Score: 5, Informative

      I will be joining in the Slashcott from Feb 10-Feb 17.

    3. Re:Ah, but will it Fuck Beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom will fuck Beta.

  10. Fuck Beta, Fork Alpha.Time to resurrect slashcode? by seandiggity · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  11. Nobetanobetanobetanobeta... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If the "new site" had been designed by competent programmers, then it would have been a trivial matter to swap between the "new" and "old" interfaces. Apparently it is not. They must have hired the contractors that couldn't get a job working on healthcare.gov.

    Continue to turn the comments threads into a trash heap to drive people away. And don't forget to turn on your ad blocker. Do what you can to get their attention until they publicly acknowledge that this is a mistake -- because they're not going to pay attention otherwise.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    1. Re:Nobetanobetanobetanobeta... by kharchenko · · Score: 1

      Hear Ye! Hear Ye! Fuck Beta!

    2. Re:Nobetanobetanobetanobeta... by jeremyp · · Score: 0

      If the "new site" had been designed by competent programmers,

      And you think the old one was?

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    3. Re:Nobetanobetanobetanobeta... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      No, not really. There's a lot of crap software out there that gets the job done, though, and the original slashdot is one of them.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  12. Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please post this to new articles if it hasn't been posted yet.

    On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design.

    Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

    If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this in a new tab. After seeing that, click here to return to classic Slashdot.

    We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.
    We should boycott slashdot entirely during the week of Feb 10 to Feb 17 as part of the wider slashcott

    Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta
    Commentors - only discuss Beta http://slashdot.org/recent - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

    Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

    Discussion of Beta: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=56395415
    Discussion of where to go if Beta goes live: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&type=submission&id=3321441
    Alternative Slashdot: altslashdot.org (thanks Okian Warrior (537106))

    1. Re:Boycott by mrvan · · Score: 2

      Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system

      Warning: stupid question ahead!

      Okay I've seen beta and browsed for about 5 minutes. I seems to me like a fairly trivial redesign from something that is ugly (but feels like home) to something that is just plain ugly. Below the articles are the familiar comments with mod points in a tree structure that most of the time doesn't make a lot of sense, and a way to filter on comment quality (moderation). I don't see how this is so difficult from the current system, so I probably missed something somewhere.

        Can you explain how it is breaking the discussion/moderation system?

    2. Re:Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post explains it well:
      http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4756871&cid=46166983

      The comment threshold system is fundamentally broken.

      This is the part that kills me. As far as I can tell, there is no way to expand/view the parents or children of highly-moderated posts without viewing at -1, at which point the highly-moderated posts get lost in the noise. Lots of "Funny" replies where I can't even open the parent post to get the context of the joke.

    3. Re:Boycott by DaTrueDave · · Score: 1

      I will be joining in the Slashcott from Feb 10-Feb 17. This is ridiculous.

    4. Re:Boycott by the_olo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, given the diversity of Slashdot audience and their nonexistent ability to organize, a boycott is unlikely to effect any real change.

      On the other hand, Alice Hill - President at Slashdot Media or some of her bosses from Dice Holdings, like Michael P. Durney - President and CEO or Klavs Miller - Senior Vice President, Technology can be quite effective in stopping this madness and idiotic destruction of value, if they care to understand the problem at hand.

      I don't think all of this would happen if they realized that Slashdot's value doesn't stem from it as a news site (of which there are thousands), but as a news discussion site.

      Messing with the comment, moderation and social functionalities and their design over here is playing with fire.

      I don't think these folks understand that people don't come to Slashdot to read carefully selected news (which are not, BTW) in a pretty-glossy presentation, but to participate in or consume/read the discussion. And the new Beta demolishes that.

      If someone else better skilled in writing would make a petition on http://www.petitiononline.com/ and direct it at those guys, that would be so much more effective than ranting here in comments, which these people probably had never looked at, or trying to organize boycotts among a disorganized crowd.

    5. Re:Boycott by mrvan · · Score: 2

      Hmm, that is kind of stupid, but that should be easy to solve, no?

      The 'moderate' link/button is also stupid, but that's quite minor.

      One of the lessons I learnt last year is "never change more than one thing at the same time if it can be avoided". Why did they not just change the ui, keeping the system intact, or change the system, keeping the ui intact? Then, if the new system works, they can always change the ui...

    6. Re:Boycott by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Agreed, it seems fine for my uses. The comment trees have a cleaner layout. Presumably they'll keep on backfilling functionality. I'm less a fan of the new story selections that have a commercial bent. Which cloud hosting provider is best, you guys?

    7. Re:Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's do this! FUCK BETA Yes we scan!

    8. Re:Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to see how deep they actually go. I haven't found a way to see the comments that are nested below a certain level - they are there, because I can see them in classic.

    9. Re:Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh God, URGH! It's like reading a newspaper through a 2" x 2" hole cut in a piece of card! Let me join the throng. FUCK BETA.

  13. I am Slashdot by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Informative

    I submit stories. I read stories. I add comments. I moderate comments. I am the reason that there is ad revenue.

    I am Slashdot.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:I am Slashdot by dmbasso · · Score: 3, Funny

      I submit stories. I read stories. I add comments. I moderate comments. I am the reason that there is ad revenue. I am uglier than an ass-hole stabbing. I went full retard, and never recovered.

      I am Slashdot beta.

      FTFY. :)

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    2. Re:I am Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Beta!

    3. Re:I am Slashdot by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      I'm Slashdot!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    4. Re:I am Slashdot by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Funny

      I submit stories. I read stories. I add comments. I moderate comments. I am the reason that there is ad revenue. I am uglier than an ass-hole stabbing. I went full retard, and never recovered.

      I am Slashdot beta.

      FTFY. :)

      OMG I have a stalker!

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:I am Slashdot by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      I was slashdot. Homepage for 15+ years. But if this beta shit goes through, no longer. I suggest we register http://colonslash.org/ and start over. Maybe I can get a lower UID this time!

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    6. Re:I am Slashdot by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      Nah, sorry to bring you down, but you're not worth stalking. But you've been posting the same thing in the last 3 stories, and every time I read can't help but make the association "you're slashdot" -> "you're this monster being imposed on us". Nothing personal though.

      Btw, "I am [X]" is too cliché for my taste.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    7. Re:I am Slashdot by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I'm Slashdot!

      (apparently you can't reply to a comment with the exact same comment. Please ignore this part.)

    8. Re:I am Slashdot by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      I'm Slashdot and so's my wife.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  14. Bitcoin + Death Star = awesome? by dysmal · · Score: 2

    I would be interested in reading the summary buuuuuuuuut... Fuck you Beta. Hard. With fiberglass insulation for lube.

  15. Better than Butterfly Labs.. by Nightbrood · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin mining is a boat I missed and I have no intention of trying to swim halfway across the channel to catch it. If KnC can actually over deliver and under promise then the more power to them. It would sure beat the Butterfly Labs debacle. Like any gold rush, I wonder if the only people getting rich are the ones selling the shovels.

    Speaking of shovels... can someone help me bury Slashdot Beta?

    fuckbeta

  16. Re:Pfft by cheesybagel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If money is the tool of the Devil then Bitcoin is even worse. Exponentially wasting electricity and semiconducts to generate a unique numeric key. Great!

  17. Re:Pfft by u38cg · · Score: 0

    Is that more or less than a jiggafuckbeta?

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  18. Beta vs Classic Slashdot... by bayankaran · · Score: 1

    What are the ways this community can keep alive the classic Slashdot...if not today, tomorrow some sort of 'improvement' will be forced up on the site and it will be too late.
    What about a new website following open source ideals? Or what about a fund to buy Slashdot from Dice? Or bribe the managers and PHBs so that they keep the classic version alive?
    There should be a way out.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
    1. Re:Beta vs Classic Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are the ways this community can keep alive the classic Slashdot...if not today, tomorrow some sort of 'improvement' will be forced up on the site and it will be too late.

      What about a new website following open source ideals? Or what about a fund to buy Slashdot from Dice? Or bribe the managers and PHBs so that they keep the classic version alive?

      There should be a way out.

      Uh, you don't think pages and pages of "Fuck Beta" isn't a clear enough "out" for you? Certainly is for me.

      Honestly, I'm not too concerned. Given the overwhelming negative feedback for FuckBeta, if they in their infinite wisdom decide to continue to march forward with this abomination anywhere near its current state, the amount of backlash will likely spin off another site...one that might get back the focus back to the news that matters.

  19. Re:Pfft by fredprado · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That describes practically every data transaction we do involving money in this world, and it is still much better than printing paper and transferring it by truck, train or plane between one place and the other.

  20. Fuck Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from an AC too.

  21. My First post by cageybee · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been a lurker for a long time, probably a couple of years before registering for an account, and have never posted a thing (I have moderated over the years) I'm going to break that tradition now for: Beta is awful, please please keep access to Classic. I cannot read Beta on any device other than my home PC. If I can't read your site, I will not be coming back. Please do not completely break Slashdot

    1. Re:My First post by David_W · · Score: 2

      I hate OT posting, but I'm going to do it anyway this time... I'm sorta with you there, in that I just added a signature to my account for the first time ever, just to decry the state of Beta. I'm disappointed that none of the complaints we've registered over the last few months have been addressed at all.

      Here's what's still wrong with Beta that particularly vexes me:
      - Contrast is awful. Too much gray everywhere.
      - Sidebar takes up way too much space, particularly when it is carried through in the comments section. Slashdot is about the comments, period. (Also that darn footer is way too big too, although that doesn't affect the usability, just the appearance.)
      - The Read More crap. I don't want to see part of the article or part of the comments, I want to see it all.
      - "Shazbot! We ran into some trouble getting the comments. Try again... na-nu, na-nu!" I know that shouldn't continue once it is out of beta, but it still tells me the emphasis is on the wrong thing. Slashdot is about the comments!
      - Yes, this one is silly, but we are geeks... we don't want to know it was posted "about an hour ago", we want to know it was posted at 2014-02-06T17:52:00Z...
      - And did I mention, Slashdot is about the comments?

      Amazingly enough, I'm pretty fine with Classic the way it is. You want to have the goofy beta interface as an option, go for it. Leave Classic as a permanent option and we'll be cool. Just stop trying to be like Gnome, Firefox, and Microsoft and presume you know what's good for us even if we don't, because while we may not, really, you don't either!

    2. Re:My First post by Nightbrood · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Like you, I signed up for my account and then was happy to lurk for years... After this beta stuff popped up I decided I should voice my opinion. If Beta is the direction they intend to go then I do not intend to follow.

      As another poster has stated, we submit the news, we comment on the news, we moderate the comments. We are the community and we are the product that DICE has been selling to advertisers. DICE should pay attention because without the community they do not have a product. At this point, they cannot say the community did not give them fair warning.

  22. Interesting Post by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    In that it continues showing off the problems of the beta site. Thanks for the reminder! DOWN WITH THE BETA.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Interesting Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG I will lose my status as most active, oververbose, user.

      FUCK BETA IF YOU DON"T WANT VD

  23. Expected response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "If you like your classic slashdot. You can keep your classic slashdot."

    1. Re:Expected response by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, IIRC, when Dice bought Slashdot, that's pretty much exactly what they said. They gave the usual, BS "We promise we won't change anything guys," spill. Of course, 5 minutes after saying that, they started fucking with stuff. Some of the most embarrassing were those paid sponsor videos they started trying to pass off as regular submissions. You would think that they would have known better than to try to bullshit such an intelligent userbase with some retard-obvious shit like that.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:Expected response by doesnothingwell · · Score: 3

      Traffic is king, block slashdot on your router for the week so you won't be tempted. If beta is still here on the 18th its over.

      --
      They can have my command prompt when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    3. Re:Expected response by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Some of the most embarrassing were those paid sponsor videos they started trying to pass off as regular submissions. You would think that they would have known better than to try to bullshit such an intelligent userbase with some retard-obvious shit like that."

      Exactly! We don't read the article and we sure don't watch the video.

    4. Re:Expected response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the words of Douglas Adams "That is the first useful or intelligible thing anyone has said all day!"

  24. Who is jiggawatt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like some dude from Thailand. Who is he?

  25. About the proposed boycott by knarf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've seen many calls for a boycott, and such a thing might be in order to get the powers that be to understand that the future of /. is rather bleak without actively participating users.

    One thing is missing from these boycott calls: a means of communication before, during and after the proposed boycott. Without such a means of communication nobody will know whether the boycott is successful or not. At the most they'll head for /. - thereby negating the effect of the proposed boycott - to see whether it is as empty as intended.

    If anyone has a suggestion for a good place to discuss and connect during the boycott, please speak up. Understand that many /.-ers are wary of all the social boondoggery which infests the web so don't come with suggestions like 'facebook' or 'twitter'. A newsgroup would work, as would another discussion forum. That newsgroup should have a web interface, preferably one which does not require you to login using a Google/Yahoo/Microsoft/Facebook/Twitter/other-big-data-vacuum account.

    Any suggestions?

    --
    --frank[at]unternet.org
    1. Re:About the proposed boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A pretty cool guy with a 4 digit UID made #slashdot-refugees on freenode. That would be one option.

    2. Re:About the proposed boycott by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      The boycott is the wrong approach. Better to protest by clogging up the comment threads with #fuckbeta until they abandon plans.

    3. Re:About the proposed boycott by knarf · · Score: 1

      IRC is good for ephemeral communications but it is inferior for more long-term discussions. A web forum is probably best given the target audience.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    4. Re:About the proposed boycott by Wookact · · Score: 1

      I often find myself disagreeing with you, but on this day we have come to the same conclusions, that beta sucks.

    5. Re:About the proposed boycott by Nightbrood · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea. I also propose that it should have a posting system that allows selected users to increase or decrease the visibility of posts that the community finds interesting, funny, off topic, etc. To ensure that system is not abused, I would propose a second system that rates the validity of scoring given to user posts. This would provide the community an effective way to communicate during the boycott.

      Oh wait that sounds like Slashdot Classic...

      fuckbeta

    6. Re:About the proposed boycott by root_brewski · · Score: 1

      The "slashdot" subreddit isn't active at all, but it's got the qualities you describe. Sign in with username and password, nothing else required. Link here: http://www.reddit.com/r/slashd...

    7. Re:About the proposed boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SlashNET is an IRC network that was part of /. a long time ago
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SlashNET

    8. Re:About the proposed boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The boycott is the wrong approach. Better to protest by clogging up the comment threads with #fuckbeta until they abandon plans.

      I thought the same thing. But then it occurred to me... what the corporate overlords will see is a raise in the number of comments once they announced the complete transition to Beta. Which must mean that Beta is good for business, right?

      Fuck Beta.

    9. Re:About the proposed boycott by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Is Kuro5hin still around? ;)

      It's a shame there is such a disconnect. /. Really was the start of Web 2.0. Looks like it will be the start of 3.0ooohpleezewhybother as well.

      I'm sticking /. into the hosts file next week to resist temptation. Pretty clear management doesn't read slashdot though. The web designers must have gotten their feelings hurt and stopped as well...

    10. Re:About the proposed boycott by knarf · · Score: 1

      This is probably one of the better options, even though the S/N ratio on reddit often makes me long for a Dolby C switch on this here laptop.

      Sooooo... boycottperson, please add a hint to gather at the slashdot subreddit for boycott-related communications. Open a thread there and keep it alive.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    11. Re:About the proposed boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sensibleerections.com might be a good bet. Kind of like /. only not as techical and with a previouse porn portal direction. That has kind of passed. It is an orphan site, though with a core that is very loyal. If you folks join in a big way, don't take the poll.

    12. Re:About the proposed boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone could start a thread on /g/, for those with lax workplaces.

    13. Re:About the proposed boycott by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      One thing is missing from these boycott calls: a means of communication before, during and after the proposed boycott. Without such a means of communication nobody will know whether the boycott is successful or not. At the most they'll head for /. - thereby negating the effect of the proposed boycott - to see whether it is as empty as intended.

      It would be nice, but there is no requirement to discuss before, during, and after. Either Dice fixes what they are doing and the majority stay (some have already left over this) or people build their own Slashdot-like website. I'll come back on the 18th and look around. I'll know if things are back to normal or if they addressed the problems. If things really go south here, check out one of the other alternative slashdots that are being worked on. It will take some time for this to finish shaking out.

      -- Common Joe

      Valentines Day Slashcott: Boycott Slashdot because "Fuck Beta!": February 10 - 17

      Support Okian Warrior's alternate slashdot idea! Information can be found here: www.altslashdot.org.

  26. Re:Pfft by Goaway · · Score: 2

    That describes practically every data transaction we do involving money in this world,

    No, it does not, in any way.

  27. VHS_Mob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that the VHS_Mob controls this Deathstar we will crush and Betas that oppose us!!
    FUCK BETA

  28. Re:Pfft by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

    When did they start measuring data centres in how much electricity they consume? What happened to megaflops, or MIPS, or TPS ?

  29. Re:Pfft by omnichad · · Score: 2

    When they're big enough to require their own power plant?

  30. Beta commenting is confusing. Who knows where thi by soab · · Score: 1

    It will no longer be an obvious badge as we're all just a name over in Beta.

  31. Re:Pfft by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exponentially wasting electricity and semiconducts to generate a unique numeric key.

    It is far better than the damage done by gold mining, which can result in erosion and mercury contamination. But even the environmental damage done by gold mining is better than Slashdot Beta.

  32. Dice Jumps the Shark by skillrod · · Score: 1

    Please remove the Beta so we can get back to enjoying our dayjobs.
    F the B

  33. Why sell a money press? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly! Why would anyone in their right mind sell a magic money press? Develop the ASICs and run it yourself is the only way to get rich here.

    There are other companies like Butterfly Labs doing exactly this. Their "shipping date" is conveniently right about when mining difficulty gets hard enough that their product is only marginally viable and for a short time at that. You have to know that the ASICs exist right now and they're using them until the profit curve is right to sell. Any other course of action would be stupid.

    1. Re:Why sell a money press? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone in their right mind sell a magic money press? Develop the ASICs and run it yourself is the only way to get rich here.

      Why would anyone sell digging tools to California Gold Rush miners? Obviously, digging with a shovel for gold yourself is the only way to get rich....

    2. Re:Why sell a money press? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      They say that the people who always do the best out of a gold rush are the guys selling the shovels. Even if you're a die-hard bitcoin supporter, you need to accept that there is some risk to it. Selling a computer has no such risk. Kinda like staying with /. with the beta looming has a risk to it, where simply moving to a different site has no such risk.

    3. Re:Why sell a money press? by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      The difference is marginal utility. You can only use one shovel at a time, owning a hundred shovels doesn't let you mine gold any faster than the guy with only one. Someone with a hundred Bitcoin mining rigs can mine 100x as many Bitcoins as somebody with one.

      If there's no drop-off in marginal utility as you own more of the machines, and if we assume anyone who has the skills and capital to manufacture ASIC Bitcoin miners obviously has the skills and capital to use them (safe assumption, IMO - the required skills are the ability to lift a computer and plug it in, and the capital is just rack space and electricity), why sell them?

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    4. Re:Why sell a money press? by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Ummm .... I think he was referring to the fact that the people who made the most money during the California gold rush were the people who sold picks/shovels/mules to the prospectors.

      The same thing is going on here - it's far more profitable to sell the ASICs to miners than it is to plug them in and use them.

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:Why sell a money press? by nolife · · Score: 1

      That is the reason most ASIC miners are vaporware. When these specialized mining rigs are readily available and can be sent to your house in less than a week, their RTO will be questionable. This isn't like the California gold rush where you actually had to travel there, set up a camp and then start mining day to day while you also lived there. The actual mining was the work and although there was profit to be made selling the tools to allow other to do that, the tools needed were just a small part of the whole process. With ASIC miners, the tools and electricity do EVERYTHING, you just sit there.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    6. Re:Why sell a money press? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      That's because of uncertainty though. With the ASICs, whoever buys them is guaranteed to make less potential money than whoever sells them - the seller could simply have plugged it in earlier and run it up until the time of the sale. The only way the pricing makes sense is if the seller either expects bitcoins to decrease in value shortly, or if the payback is long enough that selling 10 machines nets them enough money to build 15 - but that only works if the next 15 will produce fast enough to pass the original 10 in a reasonable amount of time - which is unlikely, since a rapid payoff would have made it far harder to use a decent discount rate on the future value of the initial 10 in the first place.

      They're not selling shovels. They're selling gold minds with a known mining speed which contain a guaranteed quantity of gold.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    7. Re:Why sell a money press? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the "shovels" and "picks" of bitcoin is computer hardware boosting processing power, which is nowadays benefitting all branches of industry. Earlier on it was mainly defence and .

      "The same thing is going on here - it's far more profitable to sell the ASICs to miners than it is to plug them in and use them."

      Well yes, at this point in time. Any investment in bitcoin mining equipment so far is speculation / somewhat high-risk investment. But once (if) people start buying and selling everyday stuff and services like coffee, burgers, haricuts, taxi fares, cleaning (or whatever) with the coins their value will likely multiply many many times over the current exchange rates.

  34. What a waste of electricity by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

    This is really totally stupid. So they are wasting 10,000 kilowatt of electrical power on some artificial "currency".

    1. Re:What a waste of electricity by KermodeBear · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What about the currency is artificial? It is no more artificial than the US Dollar. One is just generated using an algorithm while the other is generated by updating a row in some bank's database or by literal printing of dollars.

      Neither has an intrinsic value. The numbers in your bank account right now have no intrinsic value. They only have value because people will accept your numbers in exchange for their goods and services. Things like BitCoin are no different. It has value not because it has an inherent value, but because someone is willing to offer you other things for it.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    2. Re:What a waste of electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is really totally stupid. So they are wasting 10,000 kilowatt of electrical power on some artificial "currency".

      We waste a fuckton more power keeping that fake pile of shit we call the "stock market" afloat. Stop picking on bitcoin already. They're no more artificial than most of the other financial tools in play today.

    3. Re:What a waste of electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mining doesn't have to be so power hungry. That's what happens if you choose a proof-of-work scheme
      that's computationally intensive. A scheme that minimizes computation and maximizes random access to
      GBs of memory, like Cuckoo Cycle, will require large investments in RAM but relatively little power.

  35. How much... by Brad_McBad · · Score: 1

    ... of those bitcoins will it cost to fuck beta?

  36. The Slashdot effect has been replaced. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is now known as the FuckBeta effect.

  37. Slashdot Beta's Death Star by Robotron23 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    CowboyNeal: Governor Alice. I should have expected to find you holding Beta's leash. I recognized your foul stench when I was brought onboard.

    Alice Hill: Charming to the last. You don't know how hard I found it, signing the order to terminate Slashdot.

    CowboyNeal: [sarcastically] I'm surprised you had the courage to take the responsibility yourself.

    Hill: CowboyNeal, before Slashdot's execution, I would like you to be my guest at a ceremony that will make the Beta shitfest operational. No tech site will dare oppose Dice now.

    CowboyNeal: The more you tighten your grip, Hill, the more tech sites will slip through your fingers.

    Hill: Not after we demonstrate the power of this revamp. In a way, you have determined the choice of the website that will be destroyed first. Since you are reluctant to provide us with the location of the rogue site relaunch base, I have chosen to implement Beta's destructive power on your favorite website of Slashdot.

    CowboyNeal: [shocked] No! Slashdot is peaceful. We have no hot grits. You can't possibly–

    Hill: You would prefer another target? Then name the system! [stepping closer to CowboyNeal and pinning him against Slashdot's editors] I grow tired of asking this, so it will be the last time. Where is the revamp based?

    CowboyNeal: [looks at Slashdot for a moment, then, resigned] AltSlashdot. They're on AltSlashdot.

    Hill: There. You see, editors? She can be reasonable. [to sysadmin] Continue with the operation. You may launch Beta when ready.

    CowboyNeal: [panicked] What?!

    Hill: You are far too trusting. AltSlashdot is too small to make an effective demonstration, but don't worry. We will deal with your revivalist friends soon enough.

    CowboyNeal: No!

    Fuck Beta! Everyone get in touch with Alice Hill, the person who actually runs the show at Dice - her LinkedIn.

  38. What is the model? by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

    I don't understand the business model of renting hashing out to people. Either its profitable so you effectively lose money by renting it out, or its not profitable so noone in their right minds would rent it off you!

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
    1. Re:What is the model? by mark_reh · · Score: 2

      When people offer money for something, someone somewhere will figure out a way to deliver what they want. The guys who are building the data center are smart and are doing so with real money. They need a return in real money, not play money (bitcoin). I'll bet all my bitcoins that they don't accept bitcoin as payment. Like the guy said in Scarface, "never get high on your own supply". They are selling to people who fantasize about getting rich on bitcoins. There are plenty of such people around, many on this forum, who would pay real money for a chance to make some play money.

    2. Re:What is the model? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the business model of renting hashing out to people. Either its profitable so you effectively lose money by renting it out,

      Not true. It might be profitable for people elsewhere but not for you or for people who already have a data centre to put the mining rigs in, but not for you.

      or its not profitable so noone in their right minds would rent it off you!

      And you can't sell kit to people not in their right minds because.... ?

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  39. NO to Beta by mccotter · · Score: 1

    Do not make beta mandatory. Keep classic.

  40. Do you have any salsa? by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Your sitting in it.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  41. They should post a job ad by Dareth · · Score: 1

    They should post a job ad to get someone to fix this place up. Wonder what job ad site they will choose?

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:They should post a job ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't believe it's dying until netcraft confirms it.

  42. subject line is required in Beta?? by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    And your name is Robert Paulson.

  43. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seriously am I the only one that is getting tired of this F**K Beta virginal posturing on every post? I come here for "News for Nerds and stuff that matters" and on every post I have to see all this whining and moaning... seriously kids.. it is getting old quick and accomplishing close to 0. Please at least try to grow up!

  44. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like they're moving on up!!

  45. Re: Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats ridiculous

  46. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You make some insightful points and I agree, but I would just like to say Fuck Beta. Thank you for your time.

  47. That's a perfect use of precious resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Filter error: You can type more than that for your comment.

    I can or I must?

  48. Re:Slashdot death rattle - Hit them where it hurts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Contact the advertisers. Tell them that you will leave when Beta is forced on everyone.

    Suggest to the advertisers that they request from Slashdot the number of users selecting classic vs beta.

    Suggest that they watch the traffic when the beta becomes the real,

    Suggest that they might want to get a hedge on their advertising dollars such that if traffic falls off they do not have to pay as much or at all.

    Suggest that they start investigating places that will still have an active readership in a few months.

    We are not Slashdot's customers. We are their product. If Slashdot's customers see a diminishing product with the advent of "New" Slashdot, we might see another "New Coke" moment.

  49. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what? You "fuck fuck beta" types get on my nerves.

    Fuck Fuck Fuck Beta.

  50. subject is required by Beta by Andrewkov · · Score: 2

    Beta needs more whitespace.

    (Yes, that was sarcasm)

  51. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If gold were to collapse the stuff still has industrial uses. Energy used to mine a collapsed cryptocurrency is a betaesque waste of resources.

  52. A man made a wooden image of Mercury... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A man made a wooden image of Mercury and offered it for sale. When no one was willing to buy it, he cried out that his statue could bestow wealth and heap up riches to anyone who bought it. One of the bystanders said to him , "My good fellow, why do you sell such a statue when you yourself can enjoy the good things he has to give?" Why," he replied, "I am in need of immediate help, and he tends to give his good gifts very slowly!"

  53. Better use of electricity than beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    youbetcha

    capt: trolls

  54. test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    test

    1. Re:test by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      Slashdot Beta really stinks.. please dump the whole thing!

  55. FUCK BETA by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

    FUCK BETA. I want my classic back. And one more thing, FUCK BETA!

  56. Re:Pfft by fredprado · · Score: 1

    Sure it does.

  57. Bitcoin is a nauseating waste of energy. by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    All that power frittered into stupid algorithms. What a terrible waste Bitcoin is.

  58. Why sell mining rigs? by raynet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This one puzzles me somewhat. If one can make money by mining with ASIC rigs, why would anyone sell or rent them, wouldn't they make more money by mining? If they make more money by selling or renting, then wouldn't that mean that mining is silly?

    --
    - Raynet --> .
    1. Re:Why sell mining rigs? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      This one puzzles me somewhat. If one can make money by mining with ASIC rigs, why would anyone sell or rent them

      It is possible to make money by mining in theory, depending on the conversion rate, BUT that has become a lot harder.

      IN ANY CASE: (1) It is not possible to earn more than 25BTC per 10 minutes (on average) by mining.

      (2) Mining is high-risk. You don't know what the network difficulty will be, AND you don't know what the conversion rate will be.

      (3) There is no such limit on how many BTC's worth of bitcoin miners you can sell per 10 minutes.

      (4) As the network difficulty rises, participants need more powerful miners --- so you can sell more.

      (5) Selling electronics is a well-known industry. You can structure your business to generate predictable profits.

      (6)If your customers are content with pre-orders, and you don't promise a firm delivery date.... you can operate the miner yourself after production, and delay delivery. You profit from operating the miners for the first month or so -- when the extra hash capacity is the most profitable. By the time your customer gets it: the miner will be able to produce 50% or 75% less, due to the increased network difficulty, BUT they still have to pay you the same.

    2. Re:Why sell mining rigs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to sell hugely overpriced mining rigs in order to raise the money needed to fund their own mining operations. The rigs you see for sale are grossly inflated in terms of the labor and cost that went into them.

      It's a scam, much like Slashdot Beta, or the claim that marijuana is harmless when peer-reviewed science has unambiguously proven otherwise. Just another misdirection.

    3. Re:Why sell mining rigs? by stymy · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin prices are very volatile. It's a death knell for a business if your revenue can drop by 50% or more in the space of a few weeks. You'd need to keep a ton of cash on hand just in case. While you might make more money in the long run mining bitcoins rather than selling rigs, it's very hard to run a real business that way. Selling the rigs is the lower-risk, lower-reward option.

    4. Re:Why sell mining rigs? by r0kk3rz · · Score: 1

      This one puzzles me somewhat. If one can make money by mining with ASIC rigs, why would anyone sell or rent them, wouldn't they make more money by mining? If they make more money by selling or renting, then wouldn't that mean that mining is silly?

      Because they don't have the captial to manufacture the mining equipment without pre-orders, and once people pay for pre-orders they are obliged to sell the completed device

      However if I were them, I would run each completed device for a week or so for "Quality Testing", then package and ship the device to the customer.

    5. Re:Why sell mining rigs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's a time-tested strategy ... for example, did you know that overall, the people who made the most money during the gold rush were not the miners, but those who sold the miners equipment and supplies. Mining has risk (you might not find gold), selling supplies does not (all miners, successful or not, need shovels, pans, clothing, shoes, etc.).

    6. Re:Why sell mining rigs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want to get the currency stable and into usage. If just one or a few people worldwide had any bitcoins, other people would not accept them as payments. It must become widespread before slowly getting acceptance as a payment. If someone made their own money and called them "dolans" and were the only ones in the world having "dolans" they would not be taken seriously.

  59. Doomsday Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why oh why did I choose "bitcoin fuck beta" as the trigger phrase for my trending activated doomsday device. Just what are the odds???

  60. STFU about the beta, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can everybody STFU about the beta? I like it. I remember the one before the last one, and everyone whined back then as well.

  61. Re:heating building and burning fuel by JcMorin · · Score: 1

    How about how much Visa burn as energy to secure its network? How many buildings? Employee who burned fuel every day to go to work? That's energy too... and the result is the same, they both securing their network.

  62. Slashdot Beta doesn't copy titles? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Informative

    If I had to choose between more banner ads on Slashdot and the current beta I'd go with the extra ads hands-down. I've had the option to disable ads for a long time but I left them on.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Slashdot Beta doesn't copy titles? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Same here. The ads on /. have been remarkably unobtrusive and, presumably, paying their bills.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Slashdot Beta doesn't copy titles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had them turned on here for a while, but turned them back off until they admit the beta was a failure.

    3. Re:Slashdot Beta doesn't copy titles? by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I am sad. This looks like the end for Slashdot. If beta does not kill it, then lack of revenue will. :(

      *sigh*

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  63. Re:heating building and burning fuel by Chas · · Score: 2

    How about how much Visa burn as energy to secure its network?

    I dunno. Ask the nerds doing security how active they are, and then check their candy bar and Mt.Dew consumption.

    How many buildings? Employee who burned fuel every day to go to work? That's energy too... and the result is the same, they both securing their network.

    Yes, but the energy costs of printing real money is fairly low, and non-constant.

    The energy costs of PRODUCING Bitcoins (which is what the GP you were responding to, wrongly I might add) is incredible.
    More comparable to what YOU are talking about are the costs of maintaining a Bitcoin "market". Which is a whole different set of power expenditures.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  64. Re: How the fuck does this thing work, why is it r by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 0

    You would think that they would have known better than to try to bullshit such an intelligent userbase with some retard-obvious shit like that.

    You're talking about slashdot, correct? Have you ever used that site and looked at the comments? I'll be surprised if half of the people even notice the page changed. As long as it's shiny, they'll be happy.

  65. Re:heating building and burning fuel by fredprado · · Score: 1

    Yes, but the energy costs of printing real money is fairly low, and non-constant.

    On the other hand the energy necessary to produce the paper and the ink used are significant, and the energy used to circulate this physical money is constant and several orders of magnitude higher than the energy necessary to circulate virtual money.

  66. Freenode #slashdot-refugees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freenode #slashdot-refugees

  67. Re:heating building and burning fuel by Goaway · · Score: 2

    How about how much Visa burn as energy to secure its network?

    Per transaction handled? Far, far, far less than the Bitcoin network.

  68. Editors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot has editors?

    1. Re:Editors? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Of course. You don't think that those summaries are promoted as is from the firehose, do you? Someone has to mangle them into a mixture of incomprehensibility and deception.

  69. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exponentially wasting electricity and semiconducts to generate a unique numeric key.

    It is far better than the damage done by gold mining, which can result in erosion and mercury contamination. But even the environmental damage done by gold mining is better than Slashdot Beta.

    Which in turn is far better than exploding all the nuclear bombs around the world leading to environmental damage.

    Just because there's something else out there that's worse doesn't mean we should embrace something that's only bad. Especially when this "only bad" Bitcoin mining waste isn't replacing mining for gold. It's done in addition to mining for gold.

  70. Re:Pfft by wakawakka · · Score: 1

    Well, it's not as if there are not many kilograms/tons of rare metals in a Bitcoin data center's equipments..

  71. Re:Pfft by fatphil · · Score: 1

    When 50% of the cost of the centre was for its power supply and its cooling. And that doesn't take into account actually running the things. Look at TPC benchmark declarations, and the costs of the systems, there's a breakdown of the cost - power is the single biggest thing. Processors, RAM, storage, interconnects, etc. don't come close.

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  72. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet even printing paper and delivering it by truck is better than Beta. You also get the news much earlier.

  73. The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..The more FUCK BETA you'll get on your fingers...

  74. Re:Pfft by TheSunborn · · Score: 1

    Nope, it is getting anoying. But still: beta is so so much more anoying that all I want to say is

    Fuck beta.

  75. CO2 coins by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Can someone please link to calculations performed on how many CPU/GPU/FPGA/ASIC hours have been wasted "mining" for bitcoins and, estimates on the resultant carbon emissions?

    And, oh yes, Slashdot Beta sucks.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:CO2 coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I recall, he left and then some time later Dice bought Slashdot. I believe both did not happen at once.

  76. Speaking of Death Stars - have you seen beta? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Slashdot Beta is chock full of Death Star.

    Where's an X-Wing when you need one?

    It could target a Bitcoin with a 10 Megawatt laser and hit it 9 times out of 10 and then the Slashdot Beta Empire would be no more.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  77. CmdrTaco by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Commander Taco regrets selling his baby to these butchers. I, for one, am not feeling a lot of love for him right now...

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  78. Re:Pfft by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I suspect that, proportional to the distribution of the currency, that hasn't been true for more than a year now.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  79. Re:heating building and burning fuel by zieroh · · Score: 1

    The energy costs of PRODUCING Bitcoins (which is what the GP you were responding to, wrongly I might add) is incredible.

    Not as incredible as you might think. The current generation of ASIC mining hardware is quite a bit more efficient than the generation before, and the next generation is more efficient still.

    And Bitcoin miners are a drop in the bucket compared to worldwide computer use. They're probably a drop in the bucket compared to all the computers used by all the people who collectively make up the finance industry.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  80. FUCK BETA by gregorio · · Score: 1

    FUCK IT

  81. for the love of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Noble Sweden which has given us so much, stay away from this btc nonsense - what a waste of energy - metaphorically but mostly literally.

  82. Money creation by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin is not different from ordinary currencies, after all: the more money you have, the more money you can create.

    With USD or EUR, banks create money through loans. With BTC the mechanism is different, but the result is the same. Now we just have to wait for banks to join the BTC fest.

  83. I will leave as well... 4 digit here. by furry_wookie · · Score: 1

    Sashdot UID# 8361
    Member since ~ 1997-2000

    Been here since the beginning....considering leaving.

    --
    -- Given enough time and money, Microsoft will eventualy invent UNIX.
  84. Re:heating building and burning fuel by Skal+Tura · · Score: 2

    Economies of scale at play.

    If visa had 1/100th of the users, they still would have most of the costs and energy expenditure related - since their main energy expenditure is not the computing power.

    Bitcoin is still small - just wait until it grows a bit more, since the energy expenditure per transaction expands by the hashing over and nothing else. It will eventually level off.

    Besides, this point is moot.
    The operational differences in bitcoin as a value totally exceeds the expenditure in energy consumption.

    Unless you happen to be one of those who likes their money depreciating, arbitrary limitations, someone snooping on your payments and very high transaction costs

  85. Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they're focused on shitcoin. The biggest scam ever.

  86. Um... guys? by erfunath · · Score: 1

    So I get that the beta sucks, but aren't we going to discuss these stories a bit too? If Dice gets the idea in their heads that we're all unappeasable *and* that /. is unprofitable, they'll give up on the paint job and just sink the whole ship.

    1. Re:Um... guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ship is already sinking.

  87. If datacentres take over, new coins will be made by Kris_J · · Score: 2

    Anyone throwing a huge amount of money at ASIC mining doesn't know where the profitability is in cryptocurrency. The place to earn your money is in the first few weeks of any new coin, even more so if they offer a hashing algorithm that is resistant to ASICs or GPUs. It's savvy technicians getting pools up for the launch of new coins that should be doing well, not bloated companies who mindlessly throw more SHA-256 hash at bitcoin.

  88. Re:Pfft by fredprado · · Score: 1

    Then you suspect wrongly.

  89. Re:Pfft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wait, you're not talking about high frequency trading? the stuff for which they lay undersea cables and build new microwave relays?

  90. Move to another crypto-coin by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Exponentially wasting electricity and semiconducts to generate a unique numeric key. Great!

    Then move to another crypto-coin.

    - Litecoin use a different hashing algorithme which is *NOT* scaling exponentially with generation. (Good CPUs can still pose a challenge to mid-range GPUs, FPGA and ASIC deliver the same performance range as graphic cards, only at a lower power consumption. Even when companies start selling Scrypt ASICs, your graphic card won't be worthless).

    - Quarkcoins are a good test-case for newer generation SHA-3 family of algortihms (the current winner and other contender).

    - Primecoin is even an entirely different beast.
    Instead of simply generating hashes, primecoin generate actually useful research data in the field of mathematics.
    (my personnal current favorite)

    - Not happy with any of these? Then try imagining a way to generate even more useful result during mining (Hey, can someone invent a valid way to turn BOINC or Folding@HOME into an actually useful crypto-currency?) The code to the bitcoin protocol is free, launching a new coin nowaday is mostly trivial. (as you can see with all the multiple alt-coins emerging everyday. Even joke coins like Dogecoin).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]