Yeah. My current "least-evil" printer brand is Brother. they don't seem to require chipping 3rd party refils (hp) and the drivers don't entierly suck (Epson, ugh)
Usually the trick with refilling cartridges is not the ink, it's replacing the dmca-protected chips that enforce the manufacturer's monopoly on their cartridge market. Don't buy printers that use them.
> Windows 9x could be entered and exited at any time just like any other DOS program the fact that people still believe that this implies that win95 ran as s DOS program is a testament to how well the Chicago team hid the internals of what actually went on behind the scenes.
you didn't read Raymond's article properly, did you? win95 had support for DOS drivers and programs, but that doesn't mean that win95 was DOS. if you just ran win32 code then DOS was out of the picture, the real-mode VM didn't need to run.
Win95 "ran on" DOS the same way that your Linux machine runs on JavaScript. Just because you have a VM spun up running a compatibility layer for legacy programs doesn't mean your OS is based on what that VM emulates.
Put yourself on the right side of ignorance: read this
the most impressive thing about windows 95 was the sheer number and variety of existing machines that it not only ran on, but ran on with support. (Yes, trolls, not 100%)
developers aren't interested in advisers or clients telling them how to code. they're interested in learning the requirements and domain-specific knowledge that those people have that helps them design the best product to fill their needs. the best language with which to convey these requirements isn't code. it's not photoshop (UX designers: listen) it's english. preferably spoken, maybe loudly, in a room with coffee and whiteboards, lots of both.
i just ran this on my i5-3570K running win7: >timecmd "systeminfo | find 'System Boot Time'" systeminfo | find 'System Boot Time' Results of execution:
Exit code 2
Time of execution 10.121
that's 10 seconds.
i just had to reboot to install about 6-weeks-worth of updates.
> Another version of.NET means update times get increased again
which is wrong.
since 4.6 REPLACES 4.5, there's no additional patches to install.
ongoing, you either install the 4.5 patches, OR the 4.6 ones. not both.
i feel sorry for whoever hired you that you still don't understand that, and you're supposedly responsible for so many systems. and what's worse, i have explained it to you several times and you still refuse (probably out of some ignorant pride) to accept your misunderstanding. actually, since you're responsible for running bulk windows updates, i'm not entirely surprised...
Slashdot Mirror
it sounds like your interpersonal relationship skills are still on the school playground...
oh wait, are you still in school?
NO. there's no excuse for being an asshole.
Oh that supermodel!
I'd recommend not shelling out the $2K for dreamforce. It's probably not for you...
Fucking morons. Who the fuck builds a real bomb and brings it into class and shows it off to everyone?
If the kid was a real terrorist then the first anyone would have seen of his bomb would be the shrapnel blasting its way through their eyeballs.
Very brief
all hail! the high-priestess of internet printer discussions has spoken and judged us: not worthy.
Yeah. My current "least-evil" printer brand is Brother. they don't seem to require chipping 3rd party refils (hp) and the drivers don't entierly suck (Epson, ugh)
Usually the trick with refilling cartridges is not the ink, it's replacing the dmca-protected chips that enforce the manufacturer's monopoly on their cartridge market. Don't buy printers that use them.
My last HP printer refused to scan if the ink was low.
I used "last" there as meaning not only "previous" but also "final".
Steve Jobs was a genius at creating a single product: Steve Jobs.
> Windows 9x could be entered and exited at any time just like any other DOS program
the fact that people still believe that this implies that win95 ran as s DOS program is a testament to how well the Chicago team hid the internals of what actually went on behind the scenes.
you didn't read Raymond's article properly, did you? win95 had support for DOS drivers and programs, but that doesn't mean that win95 was DOS. if you just ran win32 code then DOS was out of the picture, the real-mode VM didn't need to run.
Win95 "ran on" DOS the same way that your Linux machine runs on JavaScript. Just because you have a VM spun up running a compatibility layer for legacy programs doesn't mean your OS is based on what that VM emulates.
Put yourself on the right side of ignorance: read this
the most impressive thing about windows 95 was the sheer number and variety of existing machines that it not only ran on, but ran on with support. (Yes, trolls, not 100%)
System 7? Not so much.
systemctl emacs <filespec>
FPGA
It's not symmetric like that.
developers aren't interested in advisers or clients telling them how to code. they're interested in learning the requirements and domain-specific knowledge that those people have that helps them design the best product to fill their needs. the best language with which to convey these requirements isn't code. it's not photoshop (UX designers: listen) it's english. preferably spoken, maybe loudly, in a room with coffee and whiteboards, lots of both.
Ha! I had forgotten that plane! There was also a banner on building 16 that read "Built with Visual C++" which wasn't entirely true...
Yeah, suck it Windows for not using slashes or dots.
does suspend sedation "Just Work"? does two-finger tap for right-click "Just Work"? does wi-fi roaming "Just Work"?
oh i know. it's open source... i should just STFU and fix it myself, right?
i just ran this on my i5-3570K running win7:
>timecmd "systeminfo | find 'System Boot Time'"
systeminfo | find 'System Boot Time'
Results of execution:
Exit code 2
Time of execution 10.121
that's 10 seconds.
i just had to reboot to install about 6-weeks-worth of updates.
it never crashes.
you're doing it wrong.
> stuck using Visual Studio 5
Visual Studio 97
not wrong. the post i was replying to was this:
> Another version of .NET means update times get increased again
which is wrong.
since 4.6 REPLACES 4.5, there's no additional patches to install.
ongoing, you either install the 4.5 patches, OR the 4.6 ones. not both.
i feel sorry for whoever hired you that you still don't understand that, and you're supposedly responsible for so many systems. and what's worse, i have explained it to you several times and you still refuse (probably out of some ignorant pride) to accept your misunderstanding. actually, since you're responsible for running bulk windows updates, i'm not entirely surprised...