:s/arrow keys on my keyboard/simple mneumonic and batch oriented shortcuts/g
:s/switch modes/arrow key all over the damned place/g
:x
cat thepost
I will stick with vi. When I need to work in a terminal emacs and BEINGLAZY(m) j ust seem to much of a pain in the ass. Why would in need to have a text editor b e my browser, my mail client, rss reader and chess opponent (emacs)? Why do I ne ed to arrow key all over the damned place to move around text files when I have simple mneumonic and batch oriented shortcuts(BEINGLAZY(m)) to do that? vi is cl ean and simple. It edits text files. If I need to do something else I would use something else. Emacs seems to me in my humble opinion to have forgotten the Uni x philosophy of "do one thing and do it well" and has instead gone for the do ab solutely everything you can cram in until you run out of key combinations to tri gger them school of thought.
not to mention, I don't think you can do something like::.,+10!sed -e 's:one:another:' | fmt
^ take the next ten lines and replace them with the result of running them through a pipeline that replaces the string 'one' with 'another' and reformat using linebreaks.
very easily.
or
dd 20j p
^ delete this line, move 20 lines down, and paste
but yes AS LONG AS AH HAVE MAH ARROW KEYS I HAS THE BETTAR EDITAR AND YUU ARE STUPID AND OWLD
(translation: I'm an idiot, and since I can only conceptualize arrow keys due to my lack of experience, which concequently
causes HUGE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE because I think of myself as hot shit, I will project all of this onto you by calling
you old, inferior, and stupid)
I only say it this harshly, because I've been there myself. only.. not with vi. I saw the power in that immediately, and knew the pain would be worth the gain.
The plots are based off of 3-run averages, all on the same hardware.
A good portion of the tuning was done against this same hardware as a reference platform, doing the same test, with consistent results (plus improvements) across the development cycle.
Because when your battery loses charge efficiency, you want to replace the battery instead of chucking the phone or being forced to recharge 2-3x day
SD Card:
Ok - show me the phone that has a SSD. Really. And who is using phone storage for speed anyway? also: removable media is always more flexible than fixed media, until such time that the media can hold alll of your data so why *not* have it?
This is a common way of getting advanced features out in 'beta' without slowing down a whole release - it allows users to experiment with the feature without expecting full support or without having to manually install the new feature itself - if you don't want to risk stability, don't use it.
Similary - there are at least 2x similar 'experimental' technologies in RHEL6, which is used by many thousands of companies on mission critical systems:
- Linux Containers are a Technology Preview. - Btrfs is not a production quality file system at this point.
With Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 it is at a tech preview stage and as such is only being built for Intel 64 and AMD64.
and I'm sure other OS'es have similar methods of getting new technologies for customers to try on stable releases.
And that pesky dormatory that you don't like and were trying to get replaced with a shinier one has already been demo'd for you by the unexpected gas bubble that exploded underneath it.
And if the core tenets of believing in the FSM is that you *should* murder people for pasta sauce meatballs, it's no problem for the beliver as long as he/she doesn't do it? I believe in their right to believe that as well, but I wouldn't wish it for them, would you?
And no - you cannot do this with the christian bible. the christian bible is specifically the new testament, which outlines the method and means with which to properly interpret those incitements you speak of. Find me the passage in the gospels or the epistles where Jesus commands his disciples or a disciple commmands other christians to rape and murder, and that following the mosaic law to the letter is the 'correct path', rather than 'righteous application' of the spirit of the law.
Incorrect application of the old testament yes, but this very clearly is *not* provided for *at all* in the concrete texts of the new testament.
The islamic holy book proscribes these types of things directly, and was directly penned by muhammed, who himself is absolutely, consistently, without fail, honored as the 'final prophet of god' in islam.
just because they are religions, does not mean they are theologically the same.
I do agree that many many muslims are far better people than I.
It does not mean that their faith is not founded on clearly and directly defined abhorrent theological falsehoods.
If you have to download every message to read it (or to view the subject), and then delete this copy when you close your browser tab, guess what - the server copy just became a backup of what you had stored on your computer while you were reading it.
Also - how many people keep their email in yahoo mail 'because they would rather have it there as a backup' than to 'have it on their own device where they could lose the data' ?
If you have a badly implemented backup policy, where does your *intent* to have it *be* a backup enter into the equation?
Or are the courts going to start deciding our backup policies for us?
you sir, are wrong, and playing phony (not legitimate) legalese and word games, just like the court did here.
Original did require attribution, and then subsequent revisions did not -
from my observation, most current BSD based projects use the attribution free ones, and even older ones, if active/relavent, are often relicensing under the 2 clause one - see also:
Sounds like they have one - These m!@#$%!@#$%rs are FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT!
from the article:
" Suddenly Trooper Basteri saw the laser—a powerful green beam coming from the shore. It snaked across the water and up towards the helicopter's cockpit. Basteri warned Riley that the blast of light was imminent, and warned him not to look at it.
Riley in turn quickly struggled to bank the copter to the right so the beam wouldn't penetrate the vehicle. But the concentrated stream moved too fast. "
just have them warp drive the hell outta there next time they see the laser beam coming their way - problem solved.
no really.. just write the docs as you go. it doesn't take that long. if it does, learn to type faster, or use your editor more effectively, or stop being so lazy, because those are the real problems.
but the people who OWN java (yes, they own it) say that java is not just a language, but a language+platform+standard kind of technology.. so you cant have one without the other (by their definition)
Kind of like how adobe used to make its software for unix workstations?
No - the problem is market share and $$ - nothing more.
You could write adobe CS for linux, with full functionality, and the same binary-only dial-in-for-license-verification kinds of copy protection (not sure if adobe does this,, but anyhow)
but - they dont want to do it, because of the percieved market share. chicken and egg.
Matlab / Maple / Mathematica, various circuit design software, etc, are all similar 'high end professional software tools' which sell many licenses on linux, period, because they percieve that there is a market share and are willing to support it.
so there is NOTHING limiting the platform, other than these companies marketing / development / etc. plans.
Slashdot Mirror
which is why you use one time passwords and don't print anything sensitive to the terminal.
vi thepost
cat thepost
I will stick with vi. When I need to work in a terminal emacs and BEINGLAZY(m) j
ust seem to much of a pain in the ass. Why would in need to have a text editor b
e my browser, my mail client, rss reader and chess opponent (emacs)? Why do I ne
ed to arrow key all over the damned place to move around text files when I have
simple mneumonic and batch oriented shortcuts(BEINGLAZY(m)) to do that? vi is cl
ean and simple. It edits text files. If I need to do something else I would use
something else. Emacs seems to me in my humble opinion to have forgotten the Uni
x philosophy of "do one thing and do it well" and has instead gone for the do ab
solutely everything you can cram in until you run out of key combinations to tri
gger them school of thought.
not to mention, I don't think you can do something like: :.,+10!sed -e 's:one:another:' | fmt
^ take the next ten lines and replace them with the result of running them through a pipeline that replaces
the string 'one' with 'another' and reformat using linebreaks.
very easily.
or
dd
20j
p
^ delete this line, move 20 lines down, and paste
but yes AS LONG AS AH HAVE MAH ARROW KEYS I HAS THE BETTAR EDITAR AND YUU ARE STUPID AND OWLD
(translation: I'm an idiot, and since I can only conceptualize arrow keys due to my lack of experience, which concequently
causes HUGE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE because I think of myself as hot shit, I will project all of this onto you by calling
you old, inferior, and stupid)
I only say it this harshly, because I've been there myself. only.. not with vi. I saw the power in that immediately,
and knew the pain would be worth the gain.
but yea, in other areas.
GROW UP
Hammer linear write performance is pretty good, since it is somewhat akin to a log-structured filesystem.
Don't buy a shitty nic, and RTFM before buying hardware?
You know - kind of like how Linux still is for some hardware, and definately used to be?
The plots are based off of 3-run averages, all on the same hardware.
A good portion of the tuning was done against this same hardware as a reference platform, doing the same test,
with consistent results (plus improvements) across the development cycle.
Battery:
Because when your battery loses charge efficiency, you want to replace the battery instead of chucking the phone
or being forced to recharge 2-3x day
SD Card:
Ok - show me the phone that has a SSD. Really. And who is using phone storage for speed anyway?
also: removable media is always more flexible than fixed media, until such time that the media can hold alll of your data
so why *not* have it?
Well ! see! This makes you the 16% so like obviously whatever!
More like:
Knowing how to do your actual job makes you better at doing your actual job!
or alternatively:
Pretending to be something that you are not is not the same as actually being that person!
Or - just look at it this way:
The only way to use a *computer* is to program a computer - otherwise, you're just using *software*.
This is a common way of getting advanced features out in 'beta' without slowing down a whole release -
it allows users to experiment with the feature without expecting full support or without having to manually install
the new feature itself - if you don't want to risk stability, don't use it.
Similary - there are at least 2x similar 'experimental' technologies in RHEL6, which is used by many thousands of companies
on mission critical systems:
- Linux Containers are a Technology Preview.
- Btrfs is not a production quality file system at this point.
With Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 it is at a tech preview stage and as such is only being built for Intel 64 and AMD64.
and I'm sure other OS'es have similar methods of getting new technologies for customers to try on stable releases.
And that pesky dormatory that you don't like and were trying to get replaced with a shinier one has already been demo'd for you by the unexpected gas bubble that exploded underneath it.
And if the core tenets of believing in the FSM is that you *should* murder people for pasta sauce meatballs, it's no problem for the beliver as long as he/she doesn't do it? I believe in their right to believe that as well, but I wouldn't
wish it for them, would you?
And no - you cannot do this with the christian bible. the christian bible is specifically the new testament, which outlines the method and means with which to properly interpret those incitements you speak of. Find me the passage in the gospels or the epistles where Jesus commands his disciples or a disciple commmands other christians to rape and murder, and that following the mosaic law to the letter is the 'correct path', rather than 'righteous application' of the spirit of the law.
Incorrect application of the old testament yes, but this very clearly is *not* provided for *at all* in the concrete texts
of the new testament.
The islamic holy book proscribes these types of things directly, and was directly penned by muhammed, who himself is absolutely, consistently, without fail, honored as the 'final prophet of god' in islam.
just because they are religions, does not mean they are theologically the same.
I do agree that many many muslims are far better people than I.
It does not mean that their faith is not founded on clearly and directly defined abhorrent theological falsehoods.
people != theology.
If you have to download every message to read it (or to view the subject), and then delete this copy when you close your browser tab,
guess what - the server copy just became a backup of what you had stored on your computer while you were reading it.
Also - how many people keep their email in yahoo mail 'because they would rather have it there as a backup'
than to 'have it on their own device where they could lose the data' ?
If you have a badly implemented backup policy, where does your *intent* to have it *be* a backup enter into the equation?
Or are the courts going to start deciding our backup policies for us?
you sir, are wrong, and playing phony (not legitimate) legalese and word games, just like the court did here.
There are various 'flavors' of the BSD license -
Original did require attribution, and then subsequent revisions did not -
from my observation, most current BSD based projects use the attribution free ones,
and even older ones, if active/relavent, are often relicensing under the 2 clause one - see also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
Sounds like they have one - These m!@#$%!@#$%rs are FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT!
from the article:
"
Suddenly Trooper Basteri saw the laser—a powerful green beam coming from the shore. It snaked across the water and up towards the helicopter's cockpit. Basteri warned Riley that the blast of light was imminent, and warned him not to look at it.
Riley in turn quickly struggled to bank the copter to the right so the beam wouldn't penetrate the vehicle. But the concentrated stream moved too fast.
"
just have them warp drive the hell outta there next time they see the laser beam coming their way - problem solved.
you are absolutely correct - especially because there is something called 'adaptive software filtering'
no really.. just write the docs as you go. it doesn't take that long. if it does, learn to type faster, or use your editor more effectively, or stop being so lazy, because those are the real problems.
Not to mention that UNIX's 1st 'official' funding at bell labs was to develop TYPESETTING applications for DOCUMENTS
(see nroff - which is used to render man pages.. aka TFM of RTFM on a unix system)
Fag!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_F_Word_%28South_Park%29
but the people who OWN java (yes, they own it) say that java is not just a language, but a language+platform+standard kind of technology.. so you cant have one without the other (by their definition)
Plenty useful for me over a LAN .. what do you base this off of?
Oh right - it was useful over 10Mbit lans, but not now with GigE ???
Yes, some applications (which require heavy LOCAL graphics processing) will work better DUH LOCALLY
but this has always been the case.
Because Stalin didn't try to take over all of europe either?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comintern
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cominform
Noooooo a captcha!!!!!
Kind of like how adobe used to make its software for unix workstations?
No - the problem is market share and $$ - nothing more.
You could write adobe CS for linux, with full functionality, and the same binary-only
dial-in-for-license-verification kinds of copy protection (not sure if adobe does this,, but anyhow)
but - they dont want to do it, because of the percieved market share. chicken and egg.
Matlab / Maple / Mathematica, various circuit design software, etc, are all similar 'high end professional software tools'
which sell many licenses on linux, period, because they percieve that there is a market share and are willing
to support it.
so there is NOTHING limiting the platform, other than these companies marketing / development / etc. plans.