With Intel chipset, i could say only one thing: FORGET about security. Why? Pretty simply, the chipset itself is with already built-in remote control module. Even before booting. Oh, nooo, not true, even if the computer is shut down (but is still connected to the power socket of course).
As you know, in order for you to remotely control any computer, it must have real IP, static IP, whatever IP, or with other words: well known IP. And as you very well know, 99% of your friends (including you) don't have this little feature. The only possible solution to this problem is to have dedicated server, where you could rune your redirector, router, tunneler, you name it. Once you have this server, and he is under your full control, you could use any encryption, any client, any OS.
My experience shows that the evil works best when it is dark.
Or with other words, when the vote is anonymous, then pressure is even bigger, as there is no chance being catch pleasing your boss or whoever else.
When the obvious answer in the era of NO PRIVACY AT ALL is actually, to use it in our benefits, and just avoid any privacy when we are voting!!!
Then, ah then, there will be no false vote, and no need of complicated authentication system, and encryption, and race with the bad guys.....
So i wonder, why no one wants this pretty simple and easy to implement system?
So, let me summarize it:
1.It is OK to do all this surveillance at municipality level, because, you see, it is already done by the private business.
2.But the fact that is is already done by the private business does not mean that it is legal.
3.But because we justified 1, based on 2, now we have 3, it is LEGAL to do all this surveillance.
Now, my friends, do you see why MATH is so important? If you, dear friend, try to prove any lemma or theorem this way, you will repeat the same year again and again and again........
It is funny, but 10 years after my graduation i realized this:
1.You need to have math skills to become good developer, but only as a way of thinking, not as a knowledge how to prove this or that theorem.
2.When i finished my graduation, i wanted to do a lot of libraries solving this or that problem, but i lacked the necessary programming skills. Now, when i have enough programming skills to do it, i am lacking the necessary math skills, funny, ain't?
3.Finally to summarize it, you could develop very good math APIs only if you are very good developer, but once you become very good developer, it is virtually impossible to study again math.......catch 22.
But he is so badly unappreciated, that he is not even translated to any other language, including English of course. I remember one scene only, in Paris, when the new emperor Caligula (yes, it is science fiction, and yes, it is in the future), declared the day he become the new emperor (read my lips, killed the old one) as a holiday, and increased the social pension with 12 pens, and everybody was happy, because this one is different one, and he will make the difference, and he takes care of the poor people.........Eh, classic scene, don't you agree?
And here man, is your proof even for any standard compiler: Run this project with full optimization, and when your program stops inside the Foo constructor, come and shot me in the head:
class Foo {
public:
Foo() {
int i=0;
}
};
static Foo gFoo;
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
printf("after main\n");
}
Because, you are one of these genius, let me give you a free advice: RTFA, or in your case: READ THE FRACKING LANGUAGE SPECIFICATION.
Here, i will do it for you:
"As per the ISO/IEC-14882:2003 document in section "3.6.2
Initialization of non-local objects" paragraph 3:
“It is implementation-defined whether or not the dynamic
initialization (8.5, 9.4, 12.1, 12.6.1) of an object of namespace
scope is done before the first statement of main. If the
initialization is deferred to some point in time after the first
statement of main, it shall occur before the first use of any
function or object defined in the same translation unit as the object
to be initialized.”
If you read the article, you will see that the main problem is of proper handling of the backups, not the actual server application or database, or with other words, here the problem is the "meatware", not the "software"
Man, you did not say what language your company is using, which is kind of arrogant, don't you think? Oh, sorry, i forgot that we must be some kind of Oracles, and that we are supposed to read between the words, and know what kind of pity language your little company is using.
Actually, i am not sorry. If you, my friend, are unable to formulate correctly something as simple as this question, i wonder how you manage formulate anything more than where to go to lunch, which in your case is Waterloo....(but which country i wonder!!!).
I dont know if you realize how picky you are, but let me tell you something that i do know for sure: EVERY senior developer IS picky. Now, try to solve this quiz: When a picky employer meets picky applicant, what would the result be???
YES yes and YES. God bless the judge. And don't forget, thanks to the Apple-Samsung battle we will learn a lot more of what happened behind the scene. One second to take my popcorn and coke....., k, done, let the show start now.
You have to specify the used language too, because, as you "maybe" know, c++ does not have interface, so your question is either silly, or you are just an idiot.
And just to add some more spice, once i was asked how to call a function before the execution of the main method, and after being told how to do it (through static member class...) i politely told the interviewer that this is maybe true for Windows, but is 100% not true for LINUX/UNIX, and is fact compiler dependent, read my lips: NOT BY THE STANDARD, and that only idiots would use such an undocumented "feature" (ok, ok, this last one i did not say, just wanted to ), and that was all. I did not get the job, and i see why there are still looking for the "perfect" incompetent expert c++ developer.
Oh, and i really like the question about the "Dependency Injection", because it shows that you are some stupid java developer, and that you don't even know what the word "injection" means, you moron, but anyway, keep swimming, it is not a fish.
If you need 2-3 months to find a qualified applicant, do you want me to tell you how much an applicant needs to find a proper job? 5-6 months at least. So, my friend, who is going to compensate him during this period? You maybe? LOL, who am i kidding. You are IDIOT.
Slashdot Mirror
Did you read my post??? I did not say email, i said MAIL.
You mean, just like it is in France? Where using encryption to encode your mail is considered criminal?????
They are worth billions, if not trillions of dollars. We need to protect their business model......
Bye bye happiness. Hello....what, what is left!!! Hellooooo loneliness.
So, if i f%^$^%$% you, without your consent, that does not mean that i rape you, nooooo,i am just f^^%$^%$^% you.
With Intel chipset, i could say only one thing: FORGET about security. Why? Pretty simply, the chipset itself is with already built-in remote control module. Even before booting. Oh, nooo, not true, even if the computer is shut down (but is still connected to the power socket of course).
Ok, so, i have the VNC client, my friend has the VNC server, now, only if i could remember what his IP is.. and port..
As you know, in order for you to remotely control any computer, it must have real IP, static IP, whatever IP, or with other words: well known IP. And as you very well know, 99% of your friends (including you) don't have this little feature. The only possible solution to this problem is to have dedicated server, where you could rune your redirector, router, tunneler, you name it. Once you have this server, and he is under your full control, you could use any encryption, any client, any OS.
My experience shows that the evil works best when it is dark.
Or with other words, when the vote is anonymous, then pressure is even bigger, as there is no chance being catch pleasing your boss or whoever else.
When the obvious answer in the era of NO PRIVACY AT ALL is actually, to use it in our benefits, and just avoid any privacy when we are voting!!! Then, ah then, there will be no false vote, and no need of complicated authentication system, and encryption, and race with the bad guys.....
So i wonder, why no one wants this pretty simple and easy to implement system?
So, let me summarize it:
1.It is OK to do all this surveillance at municipality level, because, you see, it is already done by the private business.
2.But the fact that is is already done by the private business does not mean that it is legal.
3.But because we justified 1, based on 2, now we have 3, it is LEGAL to do all this surveillance.
Now, my friends, do you see why MATH is so important? If you, dear friend, try to prove any lemma or theorem this way, you will repeat the same year again and again and again........
It is funny, but 10 years after my graduation i realized this:
1.You need to have math skills to become good developer, but only as a way of thinking, not as a knowledge how to prove this or that theorem.
2.When i finished my graduation, i wanted to do a lot of libraries solving this or that problem, but i lacked the necessary programming skills. Now, when i have enough programming skills to do it, i am lacking the necessary math skills, funny, ain't?
3.Finally to summarize it, you could develop very good math APIs only if you are very good developer, but once you become very good developer, it is virtually impossible to study again math.......catch 22.
Perl, Python....script, any script language..
But he is so badly unappreciated, that he is not even translated to any other language, including English of course. I remember one scene only, in Paris, when the new emperor Caligula (yes, it is science fiction, and yes, it is in the future), declared the day he become the new emperor (read my lips, killed the old one) as a holiday, and increased the social pension with 12 pens, and everybody was happy, because this one is different one, and he will make the difference, and he takes care of the poor people.........Eh, classic scene, don't you agree?
Nope, it is 99%
class Foo { public: Foo() { int i=0; } }; static Foo gFoo; int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { printf("after main\n"); }
Here, i will do it for you:
"As per the ISO/IEC-14882:2003 document in section "3.6.2 Initialization of non-local objects" paragraph 3: “It is implementation-defined whether or not the dynamic initialization (8.5, 9.4, 12.1, 12.6.1) of an object of namespace scope is done before the first statement of main. If the initialization is deferred to some point in time after the first statement of main, it shall occur before the first use of any function or object defined in the same translation unit as the object to be initialized.”
If you read the article, you will see that the main problem is of proper handling of the backups, not the actual server application or database, or with other words, here the problem is the "meatware", not the "software"
Man, you did not say what language your company is using, which is kind of arrogant, don't you think? Oh, sorry, i forgot that we must be some kind of Oracles, and that we are supposed to read between the words, and know what kind of pity language your little company is using.
Actually, i am not sorry. If you, my friend, are unable to formulate correctly something as simple as this question, i wonder how you manage formulate anything more than where to go to lunch, which in your case is Waterloo....(but which country i wonder!!!).
I dont know if you realize how picky you are, but let me tell you something that i do know for sure: EVERY senior developer IS picky. Now, try to solve this quiz: When a picky employer meets picky applicant, what would the result be???
YES yes and YES. God bless the judge. And don't forget, thanks to the Apple-Samsung battle we will learn a lot more of what happened behind the scene. One second to take my popcorn and coke....., k, done, let the show start now.
You have to specify the used language too, because, as you "maybe" know, c++ does not have interface, so your question is either silly, or you are just an idiot.
And just to add some more spice, once i was asked how to call a function before the execution of the main method, and after being told how to do it (through static member class...) i politely told the interviewer that this is maybe true for Windows, but is 100% not true for LINUX/UNIX, and is fact compiler dependent, read my lips: NOT BY THE STANDARD, and that only idiots would use such an undocumented "feature" (ok, ok, this last one i did not say, just wanted to ), and that was all. I did not get the job, and i see why there are still looking for the "perfect" incompetent expert c++ developer.
Oh, and i really like the question about the "Dependency Injection", because it shows that you are some stupid java developer, and that you don't even know what the word "injection" means, you moron, but anyway, keep swimming, it is not a fish.
Funny, but did you "win" a working software too? Oh, sorry, i forgot that all the software works, one way or another....
And just to add something, it takes one month to find proper applicant, and it takes one month of work, to know for sure, if he/she is good fit.
If you need 2-3 months to find a qualified applicant, do you want me to tell you how much an applicant needs to find a proper job? 5-6 months at least. So, my friend, who is going to compensate him during this period? You maybe? LOL, who am i kidding. You are IDIOT.