Slashdot Mirror


Dice Buys Geeknet's Media Business, Including Slashdot, In $20M Deal

wiredmikey writes with the press-release version of news that we'll probably be updating as more details trickle down to the editors: "Dice Holdings (Owner of job sites including Dice.com) reported this morning that it has acquired Geeknet's online media business, including Slashdot and SourceForge. 'We are very pleased to find a new home for our media business, providing a platform for the sites and our media teams to thrive," said Ken Langone, Chairman of Geeknet. 'With this transaction completed, we will now focus our full attention on growing ThinkGeek.' Dice Holdings acquired the business for $20 million in cash. In 2011, the online media properties generated $20 million in Revenues." The AP has a small piece with the news, too. Update: 09/18 16:16 GMT by T : Ars Technica has a story up as well.

466 comments

  1. Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    *looks at Dice's News Page*

    *looks at Slashdot*

    *begins nervously wringing his hands*

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What's the difference? I see Apple PR on both.

    2. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by radiumsoup · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the userbase of /. is so well entrenched, modifying the brand too much would surely kill it.

      see: Gawker

    3. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Soulskill · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is still pretty new to us, but we've been looking at this as a positive thing -- we were worried earlier that if we were rolled into a business that focused entirely on news, we'd be expected to conform to company standards -- see the Gawker sites, for example.

    4. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      Looked at it. Didn't like it much.

      Then read some of the few comments attached to articles. Still didn't like it much.

    5. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      *looks at Dice's News Page*

      *looks at Slashdot*

      *begins nervously wringing his hands*

      What's the worst they can do?

      Hire editors?

    6. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good god what crap... no text flowing, no proper scaling. They might as well just post a PDF. When will websites like that finally get a clue about how HTML is supposed to work?

    7. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Jeng · · Score: 1

      we were worried earlier that if we were rolled into a business that focused entirely on news, we'd be expected to conform to company standards

      Is that why you guys were trying to put out video submissions?

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    8. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You'll know there's real trouble when they actually start censoring comments, instead of just allowing users to mod them. The day that Natalie Portman sex jokes, a racist comment claiming Apple is being run by "a bunch of niggers," or a good old-fashioned flamefest is replaced on /. with a bunch of "This post was removed due to Dice content standards violations" boilerplate is the day a lot of us leave Slashdot for good. Here's to hoping that day never comes.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    9. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by vlm · · Score: 2

      On Dice.com "GitHub for Enterprise, Yes, Enterprise
      When I talk to developers, they go on and on about how Github is one of the most amazing resources"

      Guess what dice just bought today... yes, sourceforge. Great product placement guys. Heck of a job.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    10. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly awe-inspiring, is it? It's not as gaudy as the "OMG Ponies!" theme, but my reaction was similar upon looking at the content.

    11. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Tharsman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh I'm sure: the days of Slashdot are now numbered.

    12. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Jeng · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they start censoring posts you can be sure there that the ability to post anonymously will also be taken away.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    13. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by lxs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Has Netcraft confirmed it?

    14. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think they care about /. They care about ThinkGeek. I'm more worried about Sourceforge. The world could do with /. pretty easily, but Sourceforge serves an important function.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't mean that some idiot won't try. See: Star Wars Galaxies.

    16. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by samazon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      God forbid the news services of /. be held to any kind of standards. Sorry, but I was a reporter for several years and you guys could use someone with a little editorial background on your staff. Not that I know anything about any of you guys, but you let a whole lot of bias slide through these so-called news stories. (Hint: A news article with bias is called an opinion article, and has a dedicated location on most reputable journalistic publications quite separate from the "news" topics.) The "company standards" of Dice seem quite worse, though, so I'm on the "leave /. alone" bandwagon. Too bad Vice didn't buy it, I'm quite fond of Motherboard.

      --
      I have the hiccups.
    17. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by somersault · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you RTFA, you'll see that GeekNet have sold on Slashdot, SourceForge and Freecode, while retaining ownership of ThinkGeek:

      Ken Langone, Chairman of Geeknet, added, "We are very pleased to find a new home for our media business, providing a platform for the sites and our media teams to thrive. With this transaction completed, we will now focus our full attention on growing ThinkGeek."

      --
      which is totally what she said
    18. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The worst they could do? Turn slashdot into a dice.com advertising board. Negative comments? Gone. Advertisements for "related job openings" on every article? Added. Users with lots of comments that have the word "java" in them? Your slashdot inboxes will be full with dice.com adverts.

    19. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

      You got some problem with Indonesia or something?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    20. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Informative

      All too often, "standards" means pushing positive "stories" about advertisers, censoring any content from the public that might offend said advertisers, and generally turning your site into a boring shitfest that no traditional /. user would be caught dead on if Peter Jackson himself came down from geek heaven and offered them them a prop sword from LotR and a handjob in exchange for staying.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    21. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by nherm · · Score: 5, Funny

      In 2012, war was begginng

      Anonymous Coward (AC): What happen ?

      Thimoty: Somebody set up us the bomb.

      AC: We get signal.

      Thimoty: What !

      AC: Main screen turn on.

      Thimoty: It’s you !!

      Dice: This post was removed due to Dice content standards violations.

    22. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      I think "OMG Boring!" would be more accurate. Looking at Dice's news site is like walking into a Baskin-Robbins and finding only vanilla, being served by a butt-ugly clerk.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    23. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by poetmatt · · Score: 0

      "If you had to confirm to company standards" - so you mean actually focusing on quality and not the type of horribly selected random crap we get?

      Articles on slashdot range from "interesting" to "Why the hell did this even make frontpage when it's explicitly wrong and has a misleading headline", to "why are we posting unvalidated tech propaganda", firehose be damned.

    24. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      please.... don't rage me, Mo!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    25. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by denis-The-menace · · Score: 4, Insightful

      See http://digg.com/

      Uh-oh. It looks just like Dice.com's site!
      We are so fucked!

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    26. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by SQLGuru · · Score: 2

      Amen!

      From the guy who surfs the Slashdot comments at -1.

    27. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by reverseengineer · · Score: 5, Funny

      According to Netcraft, it actually died 15 years ago.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    28. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, then I'd be done. For years AC is the only way I've ever contributed to slashdot. And despite that I still get +5 Insightful mods from time-to-time.

    29. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      You are what you eat. This sums up /. perfectly. It's for the community, by the community, and of the community. Pluses and minuses, it makes for interesting reading most of the time.

      Your mileage may vary... ;)

    30. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Lynchenstein · · Score: 1

      You'll know there's real trouble when they actually start censoring comments, instead of just allowing users to mod them. The day that Natalie Portman sex jokes, a racist comment claiming Apple is being run by "a bunch of niggers," or a good old-fashioned flamefest is replaced on /. with a bunch of "This post was removed due to Dice content standards violations" boilerplate is the day a lot of us leave Slashdot for good. Here's to hoping that day never comes.

      "Niggers" run Apple? Oh boy, there's a new one. Stupid racism aside, had they seen the Executive Profiles page? http://www.apple.com/pr/bios/

    31. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by sabernet · · Score: 1

      My calendar agrees with you. /badpun

    32. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Jeng · · Score: 1

      There are times that posting anon is the best way to put out information.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    33. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's for the community, by the community, and of the community"

      As long as the community is a bunch of left leaning nerd morons then yeah, you pretty much got it.

      The real world has a lot more community than that genius.

    34. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Map usernames to dice accounts, via either coercion or subterfuge, to see who trolls Slashdot the most during working hours. ;)

    35. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear!

      The intarwebs are a dangerous place, instead of trying to Disneyfy it, people need to wear fucking helmets.

    36. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by samazon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which is unfortunately why print newspapers are going out of business left and right. You want the short story? I'm working as a GIS hack because I was kicked out of my school journalism program for writing an article about racism in the Greek system, left my first reporting job because my editor caved to an angry advertiser and allowed a retraction to be published that outright called me an incompetent reporter (incidentally, what he was referring to was my publication of a list of low-performing programs in a story about a series of budget cuts that specifically called for elimination of low-performing programs. Six months later, the programs were cut.) and the job I was offered after that vanished six months after I took it, because the investors in the newspaper decided they'd rather have a tax break than the small profits we made. There's no market for true and honest journalism in the world, and now I tell people which property is theirs so that they can sue their neighbors. At least /. is reflexive - it's only as good as what "we" put into it. For now.

      --
      I have the hiccups.
    37. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean the end of the damned Business Analytics slashvertising polls?

    38. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's also the only way to keep your karma from going in the toilet if you post something that goes against the prevailing wisdom (and we NEED those kind of posters on topics where groupthink tends to set in).

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    39. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Netcraft+Confirms+It · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes.

    40. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by nitehawk214 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The worst they could do? Turn slashdot into a dice.com advertising board. Negative comments? Gone. Advertisements for "related job openings" on every article? Added. Users with lots of comments that have the word "java" in them? Your slashdot inboxes will be full with dice.com adverts.

      I don't java what you mean.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    41. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 4, Funny

      like if they start enforcing RTFA through cookies and google analytics event tracking. there'd be a worldwide riot

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    42. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by GNious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Crap, don't have any Dice-points - Someone, roll Parent Post up!

    43. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      "Well enough"? That's a laugh. I can't leave a Slashdot story open on my netbook without it bringing it to its knees a couple of hours later. This site needs a code enema.

    44. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by samazon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TL:DR

      Bias: Lacking a neutral point of view.

      A neutral presentation is the first thing you're taught when you study journalism. Even before the inverted pyramid structure. There is such a thing as ethics in reporting.

      --
      I have the hiccups.
    45. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Jeng · · Score: 1

      I have no problem posting comments that I know will take a pounding since the majority of my comments do not.

      I have had excellent karma for I don't know how long.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    46. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah, to be young and naive and not have any credibility again.

      The S/N ratio at /. has always been relatively higher then other sites. Sure we get our share of troll articles, but compared to crap over at Digg, or the circle-jerking at the main page of Reddit (the sub-reddits are [mostly] great), /. has consistently had an informed community. I don't see that anywhere else where so many geeks of manner of interested have come together.

      Irony: An AC complaining about the lack of community, posting nothing of value!

    47. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by eyrieowl · · Score: 2

      Gawker has standards?

    48. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then I'd be done. For years AC is the only way I've ever contributed to slashdot. And despite that I still get +5 Insightful mods from time-to-time.

      No True Slashdotter browses at anything other than -1.

    49. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I can guess why they want /. and Sourceforge. Sourceforge has a database of developers they can datamine for determining experience data they can sell to 3rd parties. /. is a news site which also has developers, system administrators, etc reading it where they can put job offers. Hopefully this will be unobtrusive like the job ads we used to get in the right hand sidebar of the main page.

    50. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Desler · · Score: 0

      Standards such as being an actual editor rather than posting summaries with spelling, grammar and factual errors? Oh the horror!

    51. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by kelemvor4 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you RTFA, you'll see that GeekNet have sold on Slashdot, SourceForge and Freecode, while retaining ownership of ThinkGeek:

      Ken Langone, Chairman of Geeknet, added, "We are very pleased to find a new home for our media business, providing a platform for the sites and our media teams to thrive. With this transaction completed, we will now focus our full attention on growing ThinkGeek."

      Right, which is why he's concerned for the future of SourceForge.

    52. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by pinfall · · Score: 0

      All too often, "standards" means pushing positive "stories" about advertisers, censoring any content from the public that might offend said advertisers, and generally turning your site into a boring shitfest that no traditional /. user would be caught dead on if Peter Jackson himself came down from geek heaven and offered them them a prop sword from LotR and a handjob in exchange for staying.

      Hi crazyj, I think you are totally correct about this. I also found my job through /. and you can see our latest postings online at dice.com. Thanks!

    53. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      a prop sword from LotR and a handjob

      Everyone has their price; so that's yours, huh...

    54. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Well enough"? That's a laugh. I can't leave a Slashdot story open on my netbook without it bringing it to its knees a couple of hours later. This site needs a code enema.

      Maybe you need a new netbook?

      (insert Ads for netbooks here)*

      -------
      * New slashcode since Dice aquistion, still a bit buggy

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    55. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I AM a butt-ugly clerk, you insensitive clod!

    56. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Thanks.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    57. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ...is like walking into a Baskin-Robbins and finding only vanilla, being served by a butt-ugly clerk.

      At least if it's an overweight butt-ugly clerk, you know that one flavor of ice cream stand a chance of being half-decent... :)

    58. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's also the only way to keep your karma from going in the toilet if you post something that goes against the prevailing wisdom (and we NEED those kind of posters on topics where groupthink tends to set in).

      So what? What has good karma ever gotten anyone?

      I've been here for almost 15 years. I have excellent karma. Not sure how my use/enjoyment of the site is any different than if I had crap karma. I guess I do get to meta-mod. Big whoop.

      I always read at -1 and load all comments, because I've found that I enjoy the downmodded comments as well. I just scroll past any comments/subthreads which seem irrelevant. I've tried browsing at higher level scores and the conversation gets really herky-jerky really quickly. The total democratization of AC posts and the wildly free-as-in-speech, uh, speech, that takes place here is, for me, one of its essential charms.

      --

      Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
    59. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I hereby grant you 2D6 moderation points.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    60. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by MaerD · · Score: 1

      Dice will just get filled with a bunch of accounts belonging to A. Nony Mous, John Smith, and UCant SeeMe.

      --
      I put on my robe and wizard hat..
    61. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I gather you didn't work at the New York Times.

    62. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      I have taken a pounding once or twice. And then they went and found all of my other comments on completely unrelated topics and down-modded them too. And I still have excellent karma. :-)

    63. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which professional journalist even attempts to have a truly neutral presentation? To be honest, which professional journalist has EVER had a neutral presentation? Pulitzer and Hearst - both of whom used journalism to push their own (widely different) political ends?

      Perhaps you believe you have a favorite journalist or news site (Huffington Post, let's say) who you feel are fair and neutral. Take a dispassionate look at their history of positive and negative stories, and you'll discover that they are indeed biased towards one side, often very strongly so. You will also discover, however, that their biases match your own, so you conclude that they aren't biased, merely correctly pointing out the evils of the other side.

      Which news network actually has the most balanced presentation of news? Fox - the one you probably hate the most. (e.g. http://www.cmpa.com/pdf/media_monitor_jan_2009.pdf for an analysis of the last election.) This isn't to say that they are perfect, merely less imperfect than the competition.

      Lawyers are taught ethics as well, but that doesn't mean any of them follow anything beyond the letter of the law.

    64. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "The day that Natalie Portman sex jokes, a racist comment claiming Apple is being run by "a bunch of niggers," or a good old-fashioned flamefest is replaced on /. with a bunch of "This post was removed due to Dice content standards violations" boilerplate is the day a lot of us leave Slashdot for good. "

      Surely you don't think they'll announce that they are removing posts. They will simply go into the bit bucket.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    65. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they're going to delete my account :( but I hope not.

      For all those named users, prepare to be data mined! And you guys said it would never happen... Ownership can always change (not to mention data leaks).

    66. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by danomac · · Score: 2

      Karma? Who cares?

      I speak my mind. Sometimes I'm modded up, sometimes I'm modded down (even a similar comment in different articles, one comment would be modded up and the other would be modded down - it's bizarre.) In fact, I didn't even know what "karma" was on /. for the longest time.

      Overall my "karma" is OK right now, but I don't really pay attention to it.

    67. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is if you want to kill the site. You first have to slowly drive users away in order to avoid the huge PR nightmare when it gets shuts down. Few care if a site is shut down that is bleeding users.

    68. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing they may not know, is that at least 10% of their readers have active running websites. Mine is on a single server with APC and Memcache, but it can scale. It wouldn't be that hard, nor take that long (about 30 minutes) to stuff BSD onto a load balancing machine, and then dump the LAMP stack onto 4 machines in the back + 1 more for the database. The single machine is good for about 25,000 simultaneous transactions per second. A load balanced setup with the database on its own box should be good for at least 150,000. I don't know how big /.'s readership is, but I could set up a 'rant like a BOFH' site in about 3 days. The thing is: I'm not alone. If they get all PC on us, we turn around and say "No Dice!"

    69. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by samazon · · Score: 1

      Good professional journalists refrain from injecting their personal opinions in the news that they cover. Part of learning to do that is discovering and acknowledging your biases so that you are aware of how you phrase things when you write an article. No publication is neutral. Your assertion that Fox is fair and neutral is laughable for anyone who has ever watched Fox News, which I have and do. Also, "Dr. S. Robert Lichter, once held a chair in mass communications at the American Enterprise Institute and was a Fox News contributor." is the founder of the CMPA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Media_and_Public_Affairs) - vet your sources, AC.

      --
      I have the hiccups.
    70. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by arth1 · · Score: 2

      /. is a news site which also has developers, system administrators, etc reading it where they can put job offers. Hopefully this will be unobtrusive like the job ads we used to get in the right hand sidebar of the main page.

      Anyone want to take bets on how long before the "thanks for ..." checkbox is gone and replaced with an ad?

      And how long it takes before we get deliberate slashvertising, not just submissions slipped by the editors, but a deliberate mix of content and ads?

    71. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      I once saw my karma go from excellent to good in just one thread. And I wasn't even taking that radical a position.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    72. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by TheSwift · · Score: 1
      If the slashdot founders are smart, they'll just make dotslash.org if dice eff's up slashdot. Cha-ching another $20 million.

      Smooth moves Rob Malda.

      --
      "With patience a ruler may be persuaded, and a soft tongue will break a bone."
    73. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Sounds awesome:

      Lame filter: You haven't taken the RTFA compliance test. Go RTFA and try again later

    74. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Shag · · Score: 2

      Yes, where am I ever going to get my recommended daily allowance of spam, misdirected links, javascript links that don't translate to actual downloads, spam, regularly recurring outages JUST when I need to download something, and spam? Did I mention the SPAM, yet?

      Fuck Sourceforge.

      Oh, and spam.

      As a jobs recruiting site, I'm sure the new owners are quite capable of enhancing Sourceforge to provide all the spam you expect and more.

      Not sure about the links and outages, though.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    75. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by crazyjj · · Score: 0

      Most of the time, I take the position as well. But I've also learned there are certain hot-button topics where you can get really fucked up if you don't support the crowd.

      It's does seem to have gotten better over the years on some stuff. Nowadays, for example, you can get away with mild criticism of Linux and Apple (and even some MS support). There was a time when you would have been crucified for even the slightest insinuation that Linux may not be the greatest goddamned OS mankind had ever conceived (or the suggestion that Apple products may be overpriced for what they offer). Android, Apple's walled garden, Bill Gates' charity work, and the continuing stagnation of the Linux desktop market have softened that a bit and allowed for some criticism. But there are still some topics where you have to watch yourself if you don't want your karma going off a cliff like Lindsay Lohan on a bender.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    76. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by crazyjj · · Score: 2

      Keep the sword.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    77. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but then you get modded to -1 and no one sees your posts anyway. There have been a couple of times where this happened to me -- one time I reposted as a reply to myself and eventually got modded +5, the other time I tried the same thing three times and kept getting modded down while no one could bother to formulate a logical argument or tell me why my non-insulting, non-trolling, on-topic post deserved to be in the gutter. Groupthink and (-1, I disagree) mods often win on slashdot.

    78. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      hmm I wonder how you could make a d20 based moderation system? make a save vs troll? turn karma into a armor class and have tha0? it might work

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    79. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? What has good karma ever gotten anyone?

      If you don't have good karma, then your ability to post comments is severely limited. You might only get to post a few comments a day (like an AC) or have to wait a ridiculously long time between comments. If you don't post here much, though, it isn't a problem.

    80. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      And how long it takes before we get deliberate slashvertising, not just submissions slipped by the editors, but a deliberate mix of content and ads?

      About 20 minutes.

      I predict that Sourceforge will die the Real Death real soon now. For some strange reason, I have this feeling that the new regime doesn't care much for open source/GPLed code...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    81. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by somersault · · Score: 3, Funny

      Aaaaaand.. do you remember back all the way to the start of his comment, ie the bit I was responding to?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    82. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

      How important is Sourceforge, really? Aren't all the cool guys on GitHub by now?

    83. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Neutral journalism: Opinions Divided on Flat Earth Theory

      "Biased" journalism: Eccentrics Propose Earth is Flat, Say Everyone is Deluded

      I'll take "biased". There is objective truth based on evidence. The universe does not care about opinions. Tax cuts do not make the economy grow. Jesus is not coming. Homeopathy does not work. Scientology is a fraud. Ayn Rand was a sociopath writing for future sociopaths.

      The overwhelming victory of "objective" journalism has permitted lunatics to take over Congress and the education system. I've had enough of "objective" reporting. Enough low-information voters seeking low-information reporting. Some people are right, some are wrong. Say the truth and save the world. Really, it is the only hope.

    84. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's also the only way to keep your karma from going in the toilet if you post something that goes against the prevailing wisdom

      It's certainly the easiest way (though it also radically narrows your audience, since you start at a low moderation score to begin with, will accrue negative mod points, and then some people don't read ACs at all).

      It's not the only way. One thing that sets Slashdot apart is that you can post something that goes against groupthink here and still have it modded up. You'll have to work harder on that, as in making a convincing sounding argument, citing your references etc. But it's doable, and there are plenty of upmodded "contrarian" posts to show for it.

    85. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by samazon · · Score: 1

      Your example of "Biased" journalism is not, in fact, biased. It's just a headline. Headlines are sensationalistic sometimes, and that CAN be "bad" journalism, but does not necessarily mean that is it. Let me make this a little clearer for you.

      Objective journalism does not mean apolitical or non-incendiary journalism. It is an article including statements of pure, verifiable facts from both sides of an argument and accurate quotes. Plenty of news stories are based on what people say, whether the story is supportive of the person's views, or exposing that someone is a liar using provable material or reliable sources.

      Biased, bad journalism, uses misleading headlines, quotes taken out of context, and only the facts which support a specific viewpoint to support a case. For example, calling someone a "murderer" who has not been convicted of a crime. In addition to being wrong (innocent until proven guilty) a publication that does so exposes themselves to a potential libel lawsuit. Covering only events of a certain religious or political party when other equivalent events are available for coverage is biased journalism. If I were to say, "In comparison to Reddit, Slashdot is the greatest news source ever" and you were to publish only "Slashdot is the greatest news source ever" that is bad journalism; it seems trivial here, but it's a HUGE deal when covering things like government issues, budgets, and local/national health issues. Bad journalism has the potential to cause riots, outbreaks of illnesses, and to sway the governance of nations. Good journalism, too, can cause - or prevent - these things, but does so in a responsible way.

      --
      I have the hiccups.
    86. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Empiric · · Score: 1

      Knowing the posting history of the general Digg (and for that matter Slashdot) community, I can't even visualize the scale of sheer horror that the top front-page story there (as of now)... is about Jesus. ;)

      --
      ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    87. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by funwithBSD · · Score: 5, Funny

      That explains the smell.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    88. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I've not seen that before. Is Dan Riccio a cyborg?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    89. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I once said something that someone at /. apparently took offense at, because for the next several days, "someone" would go back and downmod every single post I made... but only after some time had gone by, and only posts that hadn't otherwise been upmodded.

      So if I posted a comment and it got modded up to +4, nothing would happen to it. If I posted a comment that didn't get modded either way, about a day later it would suddenly get modded down one, but usually not until after that story had scrolled off the homepage.

      To me, it seemed like such a weird pattern that I figured it had to be that some kind of "bitchslap" mod bot had been sicced on my account. So I emailed the editors about it. Someone emailed me back and said, "No, we don't have anything like that, nothing is happening to your posts but regular moderation from users" ... and after that, the downmods immediately stopped.

      <shrug>

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    90. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      It's not like /. couldn't use some improvement.

    91. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by lgw · · Score: 1

      Some of your examples of "truth" simply reveal your bias. Obviously what you want is stories that confirm your bias. That's perfectly normal; most people do. But it's quite self-limiting to confuse bias-confirmation with truth. Provable truths are the realm of math and abstract logic, everyhting else is just weights of evidence (heck, even "Jesus is coming" should be set aside with "no evidence for this assertion", rather than "false").

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    92. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Dice replaces you clowns with competent editors, it would indeed be a positive thing.

    93. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by OverlordQ · · Score: 2

      Sure we get our share of troll articles, but compared to crap over at Digg, or the circle-jerking at the main page of Reddit (the sub-reddits are [mostly] great)

      Sorry, Slashdot and Reddit are nigh indistinguishable when it comes to political stories. Good luck surviving the downvoting if you disagree with the hive no matter how valid or true your statements may be.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    94. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...and we NEED those kind of posters on topics where groupthink tends to set in..."

      Ok, here's some for you.

      Over the last year or so, 90% of the stuff coming out of the Firehose is either pure urine or cleverly phrased shilling--far more of the latter. I've actually made a game of finding the self-interests of the article poster that are inevitably located somewhere in the linked sources. But, I grow bored with this game--I require actual food for thought.

      MAYBE this change of hands will put a stop to that shit (the shills), and give me something more palatable to chew on.

    95. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by shiftless · · Score: 1

      That's from the user base, not the site.

    96. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by xaxa · · Score: 1

      How important is Sourceforge, really? Aren't all the cool guys on GitHub by now?

      It's important that the content remains, if nothing else.

      At my current job, at least three times when I've looked at the internal documentation for a piece of software it's started with "check out from CVS on SourceForge [here]". This is niche scientific data/web stuff. The code was probably put on SF thinking that would be stable, and a suitable place to share it from, after the funding for the project ran out.

      (NB none of these are our projects. We're one of the larger organisations in the field, we've been around for 250 years and expect to last at least another 250. That's not the case for everyone, though.)

    97. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by shiftless · · Score: 1

      A neutral presentation is the first thing you're taught when you study journalism.

      This isn't "journalism" you fucking stupid noob. This is SLASHDOT. The idiocy you are suggesting is EXACTLY WHAT WE DON'T WANT.

    98. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by ais523 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure. I don't normally buy newspapers, but when I do, I often look for ones with an opposite bias to mine; it's more informative because it's easier to mentally allow for an opposite bias than for an agreeing bias.

      --
      (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
    99. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by samazon · · Score: 1

      This is where I QQ right?

      The banner says "News for Nerds" ... which is what I want.

      What do you want?

      --
      I have the hiccups.
    100. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Well, while you're at it, you might want to check it out from SourceForge, and create a GitHub project for it. Just in case...

    101. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Time to wget sourceforge

    102. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Godin21 · · Score: 1
      This is a bit off topic, but I noticed something that made me smile, and I couldn't let it pass. I know it was a typo, but i think it works better as you posted it.

      each trying to make themselves the lessor of 2 evils.

      So much meaning.

    103. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hire editors?

      No, hire marketeers. They'll ruin anything.

    104. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by fm6 · · Score: 1

      And that's why this kind of acquisition usually destroys the acquiree. As a former employee of Sun employee, I know whereof I speak.

      So long folks. And thanks for all the fish!

    105. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does it have unicode?

    106. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Grin, yeah, it was a typu, but in retrospect I agree, it works better that way.
      But we won't ask how much, based on the theory that if you have to ask, you can't afford it, and I, on SS, damned sure don't think I can afford 4 more years of the same old same old....

      Cheers, Gene

    107. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how long it takes before we get deliberate slashvertising, not just submissions slipped by the editors, but a deliberate mix of content and ads?

      My money's on sometime in the past.

    108. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      The number of down-moderated comments that don't get additional mod points pushing their karma back up (if they're actually insightful, thought provoking comments, with reasoning and fact to back them up) is vanishingly small. I can count on one hand the number of downvoted comments I get that don't end up as 3 or higher by the end of the day. Groupthink on Slashdot is nowhere near as bad of a problem as it is on sites like Reddit, where you'll get buried in downvotes pretty quickly. A limited moderation system does have it's advantages.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    109. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      Interesting. If I wanted to reduce your karma, that's exactly what I'd do. Comments that are getting up-modded are likely to just be up-modded again, and so wouldn't have any effect at all. But comments that didn't get up-modded are ones nobody is really paying attention to, and so would likely stay down-modded and you'd take the hit to your karma.

      My guess is that it was a single user, or small cabal of users who were doing this. And I'm also guessing the editors then told them to knock it off, or took away their mod privileges for abuse. Usually, when you take action against someone, you don't tell the complainer unless it was really egregious, partly to prevent complainers from gaming the system.

    110. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You bias is reflected in what position you consider neutral. Do your best, but don't assume somebody else is deliberately yellow, they likely just have a different 'spot' they consider the center. Readers that care are reading widely and running them all through their own bias.

      On the other hand, there are some who are obviously not even trying; Fox, MSNBC, Dan Rather, Rush Limbaugh. The only reason to even listen for a second is to analyze the herp/derp.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    111. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Someone there does care apparently. They use LAMP for webserving (P=PHP).

    112. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by cyborg_zx · · Score: 2

      "Irony: An AC complaining about the lack of community, posting nothing of value!"

      Double bonus points for injecting political slurring nonsense into the mix as well.

    113. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      I use to do that for fun when I got 15 mod points at a time...

    114. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Y2KDragon · · Score: 1

      They're not that smart. The day I see a Dice.com logo on this page, I'm signing off for good. !@#$%-ing job scammers.

    115. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by d3bruts1d · · Score: 1

      Gawker has standards? Must only apply to Fleshbot.

    116. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Inda · · Score: 1

      Blocked at work for being "...part of a group of web pages categorised as: Social Networking."

      If that happens to /. the future is obvious.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    117. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sadly that is true of Politics and Religion in general. People *don't* want to hear the truth because that would mean they would have re-think their mental foundation. Most people would rather crucify the messenger instead of listening to the message.

      Human nature really hasn't changed in a few thousand years. :-/

    118. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by highphilosopher · · Score: 1

      But I thought trolls regenerated.

    119. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, keep the hand!

      Ah screw it, forget the whole thing!

    120. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      New owners may change things, but we do hope they realize that what works well and is not broken, should not be radically changed. Change is good, and so, be prepared for revenue generating activities to start appearing.

      SourceForge is my real concern. It is a jewel of a source for phenomenal open source software. It could also host from time to time, adverts for Dice.

      Will Slashdot go on a subscription basis? Dice is the one to decide.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    121. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by VENONA · · Score: 1

      In many cases, it probably depends on the workflow that a project uses. You don't get mailling lists on GitHub. Don't laugh at mailing lists--they're important to a lot of projects, including the Linux kernel. Also, Subversion support is still experimental on GitHub. If I had an older, mature project, based around these two things, I'd want to stay on Sourceforge. For example, there are probably lots of libraries dating back to the days when Sourceforge was the best of few choices, and that are nice and stable, get the job done, and require only maintainance. Why fix it if it isn't broke? Infrastructure doesn't have to be cool to be very, very useful.

      Sourceforge also provides a means of distributing or completely elliminating download bandwidth needs. http://scipy.org/ is the Web site for important numeric Python stuff (scipy and numpy). But the download links point to Sourceforge. They also use GitHub; for some a mix of services is best.

      So, yeah, I'd say Sourceforge is still important to a lot of people. Not all of whom are aware of it.

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
    122. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Does anyone run a mirror of Sourceforge? If not, now would be the time for someone properly equipped to do so.

      I remember when Digital River bought ftp.cdrom.com and proceeded to dump all the hosted archives with no warning. I no longer trust any sale of an important archive site to do better.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    123. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a long time Slashdot reader, personally, I welcome Dice.

      They have invested in a community, not a news site.

      I believe Dice realizes this, and will allow the site to remain faithful to what its readers expect.

    124. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, SPS. I do the exact same, though I remain AC. If they start removing comments due to content I would no longer be able to trust the site and would look elsewhere.

    125. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      omg that looks like a page on an url for sale ... mediabusiness ???

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    126. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot "But I'm not bitter, no, I'm not bitter..."

    127. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old and stable ones are still on sourceforge.

    128. Re:Let's Just Hope They Leave Well Enough Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you want?

      Kosh: Never ask that question.

  2. Focus on building ThinkGeek? by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As in the retail sales? That doesn't give me a warm and fuzzy feeling for Slashdot...

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    1. Re:Focus on building ThinkGeek? by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Va Research aka VA Linux aka VA Software aka SourceForge Inc aka GeekNet is a clusterfuck of failure. Like the Banjamin Button of companies, going from $320/share to under $1 in 2011. (They would have been delisted but the rules were temporarily suspended after 9/11). And now they're a web store that could be run by the "CEO" in his spare time.

      Does anybody buy their shit? I know some ./ people did to support slashdot but other than their ads here, I wouldn't know of them.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Focus on building ThinkGeek? by jigamo · · Score: 1

      In Geeknet's financial results last quarter, ThinkGeek's revenue is growing and looks like the most profitable part of the business. The media sites (Slashdot, Sourceforge, and Freecode), on the other hand, are producing less than 1/3 of the revenue of ThinkGeek and are decreasing. So it looks like Geeknet is trying to focus on the more profitable pieces and extract whatever value it can from the media sites (dumping Slashdot to focus on Thinkgeek).

      As to what it mean for Slashdot, I think we'll just have to wait and see.

      --
      Save money on your cell phone bill: Republic Wireless
    3. Re:Focus on building ThinkGeek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Geeknet is the company selling Slashdot. They can go focus on building a mountain of cheesy puffs if they want to, it really won't have any effect on Slashdot's future.

  3. $20,000,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you telling me that Slashdot is worth less than a cheapy mp3 player full of songs? Sheesh! To Dice: if it ain't broken, don't "fix it".

    1. Re:$20,000,000? by jigamo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In this article, it mentions that the revenue for Slashdot, SourceForge, and Freecode (the 3 acquisitions) was $20 million last year. I'm not totally sure what it means to sell them for 1 year's revenue, but the article interpreted that fact as as a suggestion of trouble within the 3 sites.

      --
      Save money on your cell phone bill: Republic Wireless
    2. Re:$20,000,000? by Tharsman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think slashdot is not even worth the cost of the MP3 player battery for them. They likely aquired the whole bag in order to get their hands in SourceForge.

    3. Re:$20,000,000? by Bramlet+Abercrombie · · Score: 1

      This price does seem low, but it doesn't mention the expenses incurred generating that revenue.

    4. Re:$20,000,000? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      with $26 million in expenses then that number suddenly isn't so great. (I don't know and severely doubt that's the case, but it is possible.)

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:$20,000,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I heard the negotiations were converging towards $8 million. Then one of the Dice guys logged on Slashdot and said, "Wow, check this out! Warp drive might be possible!" GeekNet's CEO then dropped a timely hint about Paul Allen and Stephen Wozniak possibly being interested, and the deal was done.

    6. Re:$20,000,000? by pavon · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to an article on TechCrunch, these three sites have a yearly profit (EBITDA) of $5 million. From what I've read the purchase price (3*profits + some) is typical of acquisitions of mature companies. It is neither insane dot-com buyout (expecting unrealistic growth), or clearance corner liquidation of assets (expecting to bleed it till it dies).

    7. Re:$20,000,000? by jigamo · · Score: 1

      Could you share where you found that expenses number?

      --
      Save money on your cell phone bill: Republic Wireless
    8. Re:$20,000,000? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2

      I suspect Slashdot was a secondary consideration - the other assets seem more of interest to a company like Dice.

    9. Re:$20,000,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't know and severely doubt that's the case"

    10. Re:$20,000,000? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      In this article, it mentions that the revenue for Slashdot, SourceForge, and Freecode (the 3 acquisitions) was $20 million last year.

      Wow. Who knew that all of our loving and hating of certain consumer products could bring that kind of money into a website. Now I understand why we had a story about a mobile device being more powerful than a Cray.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:$20,000,000? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      No. I don't think you do. I was pointing out that todays mobile devices are more powerful than supercomputers from the 80s just the other day, and I have nothing to gain monetarily from it.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    12. Re:$20,000,000? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      You're Timothy?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    13. Re:$20,000,000? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      So now you are saying Timothy has nothing to gain from it after implying in your last post that the article was posted because there was something to gain rather than because it was interesting? If you will be a moron, please at least be a consistent one.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    14. Re:$20,000,000? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      So now you are saying Timothy has nothing to gain from it...

      I reaaaallllllly don't know how you read it that way. See that little question mark at the end of my post?

      I'll rephrase the question, hopefully your brain damage is only temporary:

      Are you the person who submitted the story? I want to know why you said this: "I was pointing out that todays mobile devices are more powerful than supercomputers from the 80s just the other day, and I have nothing to gain monetarily from it."

      Please take a moment to notice that there are no declaratory statements in there and that I did not in that, or in my previous post, say that you did or did not have anything to gain. If you have voices in your head screaming that I am somehow implying something instead of asking a very basic question, please take your medicine and ignore them. If you feel up to it after that, please answer my question so I can understand why you're declaring what you do or do not have to gain by somebody named Timothy posting a story.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    15. Re:$20,000,000? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      A) A rhetorical question is a declaratory statement
      B) I'm obviously not timothy, so it is natural to assume the question was rhetorical
      C) You clearly cannot understand what I wrote. Figure it out for yourself now that you know I am not Timothy
      D) I just looked at your posting history, and the brain damage is clearly on your side
      E) Have a nice life. Now off you go ...

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    16. Re:$20,000,000? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      B) I'm obviously not timothy, so it is natural to assume the question was rhetorical

      It is not obvious at all. For all I know 'Zero__Kelvin' is a sockpuppet of his that he uses for a number of possible reasons. Anybody posting at +2 would see this as an obvious possibility. I really wanted to see you claim that you posted a story on Slashdot but not because it's an ad-driven site. The only problem is you're not the guy who submitted it, so your entire statement was a waste of bandwidth. Pity.

      C) You clearly cannot understand what I wrote. Figure it out for yourself now that you know I am not Timothy
      D) I just looked at your posting history, and the brain damage is clearly on your side

      Heh. Yep, it's my fault you attempted to pose as somebody else. "My post wasn't in error, it was uhh... just too sophisticated for your puny brain to comprehend! Uhh yeah that's it!"

      Bet you wish Slashdot had a edit button, dont'cha?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    17. Re:$20,000,000? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Not legally, but there is a huge hint as to where in my post if you read the entire thing.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    18. Re:$20,000,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah we don't think geek - we are geeks !

    19. Re:$20,000,000? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      "Yep, it's my fault you attempted to pose as somebody else."

      Nobody tried to pose as anyone else, you moron.

      "Bet you wish Slashdot had a edit button, dont'cha?"

      No. But I do wish Slashdot had a delete moron button, because idiots like you have pretty much ruined Slashdot before Dice got the chance.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    20. Re:$20,000,000? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      No. But I do wish Slashdot had a delete moron button, because idiots like you have pretty much ruined Slashdot before Dice got the chance.

      I apologize somehow making your point unclear.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    21. Re:$20,000,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 million dollars. hmm, was the million a typo or did they pay in Zimbabwean dollars!?!? ;-0

    22. Re:$20,000,000? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Are you telling me that Slashdot is worth less than a cheapy mp3 player full of songs? Sheesh! To Dice: if it ain't broken, don't "fix it".

      Yes, it turns out that merely having users is not as valuable as Facebook would like you to think. Unless those users help earn you revenue in some way (like purchasing your products), there really isn't much money to be made in showing ads to them. (I know, you're going to point to Google,but Google's ad network lets them earn ad revenue even when people are on other sites)

    23. Re:$20,000,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Citation needed]. I looked at the numbers (my VC company was in talks to buy /. but decided against it) and let's just say they are wrong. (Posting anonymously, fuck the NDA).

    24. Re:$20,000,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in the mergers and acquisitions industry (for tech companies specifically), and 3-5x EBITDA is very much in the clearance corner realm in terms of valuation. Even reasonably well-valued technology companies (as opposed to insane .com companies) can reach 2-3x *revenues* in a difficult market.

      For an extreme example, Gamestop, trades on the stock exchange at c. 3-3.5x forward EBITDA. This is a company that operates in an industry which is expected to disappear (physical game sales), and that has already stopped growing. But even without a control premium, it trades on the stock-market at valuations similar to what Geeknet's media business went for in this transaction.

  4. Oblig by broginator · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our new Dice overlords.

    --
    s/[stupid comments]/[intelligent discourse]/gi
    1. Re:Oblig by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      Perhaps things can get better. Taco-- get back on the horse, dammit.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:Oblig by Erbo · · Score: 1

      I came here to say that. :-)

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    3. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard it was a miniature donkey...
      http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/miniature-donkey-sex-bust-576142

      SEPTEMBER 18--A Florida farmhand arrested for having sexual contact with a miniature donkey explained to cops that the Sunshine State was “backwards” since its residents “frown on zoophilia,” according to a police report. ...

    4. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia our new Dice overlords for one welcome I!

    5. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This wouldn't have happened if Steve Jobs was alive

    6. Re:Oblig by mounthood · · Score: 2

      I for one welcome our new Dice overlords.

      I'd like to remind them that as a trusted moderator I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKbFb6TPVEA

      --
      tomorrow who's gonna fuss
    7. Re:Oblig by brainiac · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Dice Overlords !

      (slow day)

    8. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Societ Geeknet, Dice roll you!

    9. Re:Oblig by tobiah · · Score: 1

      hear hear

      --
      "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
    10. Re:Oblig by Naso540 · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new Dice overlords.

      I'd like to remind them that as a trusted moderator I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKbFb6TPVEA

      Ha - awesome pull from the past.

  5. I, for one, welcome our new Dice overlords. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Had to be said.

    1. Re:I, for one, welcome our new Dice overlords. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I for one don't. I'm merely here for the free food. This is just distracting the wait staff.

    2. Re:I, for one, welcome our new Dice overlords. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      "first you get slashdot.org, *then* you get the power, THEN you get the women."

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  6. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dice Holdings is the greatest company in the universe. Be prepared for exciting articles about how Godly Dice Holdings is.

  7. Sold for 1X revenue? by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did someone have a casino loss to pay off?

    1. Re:Sold for 1X revenue? by ottothecow · · Score: 2
      That's what I was wondering....

      Are we missing something? I'd love to buy an entrenched business for one year's worth of revenue...even if revenues were slowly declining.

      --
      Bottles.
    2. Re:Sold for 1X revenue? by sartwell · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think someone realized that all Slashdot readers use adblockPlus!

    3. Re:Sold for 1X revenue? by vlm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Terror of what happens to future earnings when igoogle goes away along with my /. RSS feed.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Sold for 1X revenue? by jeffasselin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They may have been doing 20mil in revenue, but they don't mention what the profits were (or probably losses).

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    5. Re:Sold for 1X revenue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here is an even better deal for you: Walmart has a revenue of $443 billion in 2012 and the market cap is only $248 billion.

    6. Re:Sold for 1X revenue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Revenues != Profits

    7. Re:Sold for 1X revenue? by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2

      Cool. Do you think they would take a cheque?

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    8. Re:Sold for 1X revenue? by shiftless · · Score: 1

      No, but your stock broker will.

  8. And please, Mr. Geeknet by aglider · · Score: 1

    Would you explain us what'd be the future of /.?

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by Soulskill · · Score: 5, Informative

      The media business part of Geeknet is being moved over as a whole. So, all of our projects and priorities are continuing unchanged. In fact, we just had a meeting about this, and the folks from Dice were very clear about not wanting to interfere with the community.

    2. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 1

      Is there a chance that Taco will return? Let's start a kickstarter to bring him BACK!

    3. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the folks from Dice were very clear about not wanting to interfere with the community

      Riiight. And we'll just have to take their word for it...

    4. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by vlm · · Score: 1

      the folks from Dice were very clear about not wanting to interfere with the community.

      Hey Soulskill, so far almost all ? the commentary has been negative, near certainty the dilbertian overlords will F stuff up or best case just leave the place alone.

      As a contrarian viewpoint has anyone on either side suggested they might actually do something positive, dare I say synergistic?

      UTF-8 and ipv6 its 2012 after all.

      dice.com initial impression of the story selection is kind of tech journalist / lite stuff. Like for noobs. /. could be for people who graduate from dice ("look ma, now I can write hello world") while still being in their fold of sites. Meanwhile the most noobish of /. submissions probably belong on dice. I would be thrilled with more "/. articles" on /. and "dice articles" on dice...

      I get the gut level impression that dice might be able to encourage more, and more interesting, /. interviews. Ditto book reviews. Hopefully not all astroturf.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      G4 said that about TechTv when they bought it and it became G4TechTv. It is now G4 and the only show that was held over was X-Play.

    6. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Having worked at a private company that went through a buyout by a public company I can tell you this means absolutely nothing.

      They typically won't change anything for a year while they do due diligence on the company and go through the books with a fine toothed comb. After they full understand the business they will reveal what they intended to do all along.

    7. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by tepples · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could follow Taco to his new business. Let's all invade The Washington Post's tech section and turn it into the Slashdot that we used to know.

    8. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taco saw what was coming. For all his grammar errors and dupes he really was smarter than the rest of his crew.

    9. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by aglider · · Score: 1

      I didn't ask *how* the thing will be done.
      I asked about the future of /.
      I presume that Geeknet has been acquired for some reasons.
      Let's say it's for advertisement collection. How will this change /.?
      Let's say it's for a business version of Geeknet. So /. is no business and will probably spinned off/sold off/whatever.
      I hardly believe Geeknet has been acquired for reasons other than profit.
      What'd be the answer about the future of /.?

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    10. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by Soulskill · · Score: 1

      How will this change /.?
      Put simply: I haven't heard anything about changing Slashdot. I would guess (and this is only a guess) some links that already exist in the header and footer will change, and that some of our regular ads will be swapped out for Dice ads. (Which would have no effect on you if you ignore the ads anyway.) As far as I can tell, Dice is mainly just interested in owning a tech news community.

    11. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by Soulskill · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's some negativity. We know how our readers respond pretty well, so we expected it.

      I'm hopeful that we'll get some much-needed support for our engineering crew, and some time set aside for fixing lingering problems that we've wanted to tackle for months/years. We have a huge, huge list that's we would really like to get to.

      I haven't spoken with any of their editorial staff yet, but I'm also hopeful they can put some resources into helping us out. We're running a pretty light crew these days, and it'd be great to get some help running interviews, doing reviews, making better videos, etc.

    12. Re:And please, Mr. Geeknet by aglider · · Score: 1

      Dice is mainly just interested in owning a tech news community.

      This is scary in its own ...

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  9. Please keep the URLs working by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dice,

    Please preserve the old stories and comments at their current URLs instead of running over the place with a bulldozer like the acquirers of Digg did. Many of us have hundreds of bookmarks that we don't want to see broken.

    Thanks,
        Everyone

    1. Re:Please keep the URLs working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prediction: sf.net (the domain) will be the first to go. You have any idea how much that must be worth?

    2. Re:Please keep the URLs working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bookmarks? Those are so last century, who still uses bookm- eyes youtube bookmarks.. oh.

    3. Re:Please keep the URLs working by Soulskill · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't think this will be an issue, but I'll make sure everybody's aware of it.

    4. Re:Please keep the URLs working by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      While I agree that keeping bookmarks working is a Good Thing - what on Earth are you doing relying on an online service for preservation of data that is important to you?

      Now would be a good time - regardless of the intention that URLs and the data they present will probably remain the same - for you to use something that downloads your bookmarks.

    5. Re:Please keep the URLs working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, Digg, after purchase, buried itself. Even through the bad, I still lurked a little on Digg. But start taking away content and the way I was previously digesting it, I'm gone.

    6. Re:Please keep the URLs working by Bigby · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Federal government will put /. on the National Historic Register list and preserve it.

    7. Re:Please keep the URLs working by islisis · · Score: 1

      A decent point and idea - any suggestions for software/plugins which could do this?

    8. Re:Please keep the URLs working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please do. Thank you.

    9. Re:Please keep the URLs working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think this will be an issue, but I'll make sure everybody's aware of it.

      Worst-case scenario: find a way to preserve a mirror or distribute a tarball/archive?

      Yes, it'd be large, but there is a lot of industry history in /.'s comment database. The loss of the Slashdot archives would be on a par with the loss of the USENET archives when DejaGoog's searchability started to break, or the obliteration of Geocities before it could be completely spidered/archived/mirrored. 90% noise, 9% signal, 1% stuff that was never written about/archived/documented anywhere else.

      The corpus of text incorporated in the database is of significant historical interest. Even the 90% noise is important as a source from which changes in writing styles can be analyzed, the first use of certain industry terms/jargon can be observed, etc. Places like the Computer History Museum should have a copy of it, even if they can't/don't/won't make it generally available to the public for years/decades.

    10. Re:Please keep the URLs working by Geof · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Please don't break the existing content.

    11. Re:Please keep the URLs working by antdude · · Score: 1

      Someone should archive /. before it is too late!

      http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://slashdot.org seems to have archives, but I don't know how well.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    12. Re:Please keep the URLs working by partyguerrilla · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for Street Fighter, right?

    13. Re:Please keep the URLs working by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      I simply save them to archive (MAFF addon for FireFox) - piecewise, or by opening a bunch in tabs and saving those tabs to an archive (can extract if needed).

      But if you already have an extensive list of bookmarks, I'd imagine you should be able to easily turn the bookmarks into an html page, and then let e.g. HTTrack loose on it.

    14. Re:Please keep the URLs working by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      $ wget -c --mirror http://slashdot.org/

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  10. Better Overlords? by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hope Dice proves to be better corporate overlords than the ones that sent CmdrTaco packing.

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:Better Overlords? by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 1

      I do too. Perhaps Malda will return!

    2. Re:Better Overlords? by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Was he fired? I accepted the public story: he cashed out.

  11. Oh Goody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Og goody, now there'll be more of a drive to monetize Slashdot. That can only be good for the quality of stories posted... Right?...

  12. Taco Come Back by RapidEye · · Score: 4, Funny

    Save us CmdrTaco, you're our only hope!

    --
    "Murderer? Well, that's a harsh word. I prefer to think of myself as a Mortality Technician."
    1. Re:Taco Come Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some time later: "CmdrTaco? Now thats a name I haven't heard in a long time...a long time."

  13. I hope they don't just let it languish by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Already some discussion on this over at Hacker News.

    Anyone know if Rob would want to take back control of Slashdot if we ran a Kickstarter to get it back in the hands of someone who gives a shit?

    Not that I'm saying Dice will treat /. badly... but I don't have high hopes for innovation.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by Nemyst · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Considering what "innovation" did to Lifehacker and other Gawker sites, I think the last thing you want is innovation.

    2. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Both extremes are bad. If they just leave it completely on its own and ride its ad revenue into irrelevance, that's just as bad as bulldozing it and rebuilding, Digg-style.

      As Futurama's "God" once said, you have to use a light touch. Here's hoping Dice knows what they're getting into.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    3. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think you can beat $20M with a Kickstarter campaign?

    4. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by TheSpoom · · Score: 2

      No. I think after a year or so, give or take a few months, the remaining value might be significantly lower.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    5. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by xaxa · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why do you need a kickstarter?

      The code is here. Get a domain and some hosting, post some interesting stories. If you edit the summaries, and avoid flamebait articles, people might look!

    6. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by TheSpoom · · Score: 2

      If they fuck it up, I might do that (though I'd probably take the moderation system of Slashcode and other bits and redo it in something a little more modern than Perl).

      The problem is that it's not the code that makes Slashdot what it is, it's the community. Barring a severe fucking-up, a fork would likely not be successful.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    7. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the bright side, we know that ./ will never be as bad as HN. Sure it's more knowledgeable than /g/, but somehow worse.

    8. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the code -- specifically its lack of unicode, arbitrary html entity whitelist, and bloated heap of buggy javascript that brings computers to their knees trying to load, sort, and unhide (I read at +0, with -1s collapsed, not hidden) 500 posts -- is essential. Without that code, the drunk-monkey editing standards and crack-addled mods would seem out of place somehow

    9. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Getting people to take a look is the easy bit. Getting people to post interesting comments is the hard bit. Bruce Perens ran a Slashcode install for a while that typically posted more interesting stories than Slashdot. I don't think I ever saw more than 50 posts in a story, and most were in the 0-25 range. And with only 25 comments in a popular story, there's not enough to encourage you to reply, so even people who knew about it ended up spending more time on Slashdot.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've done everything perfectly, it will appear as if you've done nothing at all.

    11. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by Stanza · · Score: 1

      I've tried to run slashcode before.

      I love perl, but there is a great example of why I think perl gets a lot of hate. It's pretty rough.

      Having tried to use livejournal, reddit, and a few others, I note that the most difficult to use projects seem to use perl (Livejournal I'm looking at you).

      Having said that, I think a lot of people are looking for a good place that has a slashdot-like community talking about nerd stuff. Hacker News is pretty good, but there is quite a different focus there.

    12. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      What? Taco hasn't given a shit about this place in a long damned time. Besides, isn't he putting on airs over at the Washington Post these days?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    13. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone still read the Gawker sites? - Heck, I almost forgot they exist. I do remeber when Lifehacker was interesting but it has been a looong time....
      But then it's been a long time since I actually logged into /. I recall a couple times since the millennium.
      When did anyone call /. SlashDot by the way? No commandline skills or what?

      (Grins)

        - Archillies

    14. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is /. - all stories are flamebait... a clone should be too!

      - Archillies

    15. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found that remark particularly amusing, since it's just the sort of thing someone would say if said someone didn't exist... hmm, the most effective way to act is as if you weren't even real, that sure is convenient. There's a saying, while we're quoting shit, that the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled, was convincing the world he didn't exist. Again, convenient. Rather than trying to evaluate the "evidence" provided suggesting "god" or the "devil" exist, I simply imagined what the world would look like if the whole thing were a bunch of made-up bullshit, and evaluated how such a world would compare and contrast with our own, and I found that a world in which the central figures of all mythologies (including the Judeao-Christian-Islamic "god") were basically phony, made up by people who were sick in the head in one or more ways, was INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM THE REAL WORLD.

      In short, (and you can quote me on this, my name is Anonymous Coward,) Existence does NOT imply creation.

    16. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that Slashdot will be burned down for insurance money, but it'll be made to look like an electrical thing?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    17. Re:I hope they don't just let it languish by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Heh. Mention God and the militant atheists swarm. I put a capital G on that too, doesn't that make you angry?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  14. Leave it alone by Psykechan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dear Dice,

    Take a look at the history of Digg to see what happens when you mess with a community site. You have a choice to make. If you screw it up, people will leave.

    1. Re:Leave it alone by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      Digg, the classic case of taking something that works--and then killing it by getting greedy. Kevin Rose and the investors went from "Let's aim for moderate success" to "WE'RE GOING TO ALL BE BILLIONAIRES!!!" to "Hey, anyone pay the power bill this month?" in record time.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  15. Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by MRe_nl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dice Holdings has acquired the online media business of Geeknet. This includes such notable tech sites as Slashdot, SourceForge and Freecode.

    The acquisition price is $20 million, which the companies say is the same amount the properties generated in revenue in 2011.

    In case you're unfamiliar with the sites, Slashdot is a user-generated tech news site. You used to hear the term "slashdotted" a lot, when as site got so much traffic from the site that its servers crashed. There's actually a sizable Wikipedia entry about the "Slashdot Effect".

    SourceForge is an open sources software site for developers, and Freecode is a large index of Linux, Unix and cross-platform software and mobile apps.

    Slashdot gets over 5,300 comments a day and 3.7 million unique visitors per month. SourceForge gets 40 million unique monthly visitors, and about 80% of them are from outside of the United States, according to Geeknet. Freecode gets about 500,000 unique visitors per month.

    "The acquisition of these premier technology sites fits squarely into our strategy of providing content and services that are important to tech professionals in their everyday work lives," said Dice Holdings Chairman, President and CEO Scot Melland. âoeThe SourceForge and Slashdot communities will enable our customers to reach millions of engaged tech professionals on a regular basis and significantly extends our company's reach into the global tech community.â

    "We are very pleased to find a new home for our media business, providing a platform for the sites and our media teams to thrive," said Geeknet Chairman Ken Langone. "With this transaction completed, we will now focus our full attention on growing ThinkGeek."

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    1. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by vlm · · Score: 1

      important to tech professionals in their everyday work lives,

      (Grizzled tech gladiator raises his arm in salute toward emperor) For those who post to /. while at work, we who are about to be downmodded salute you! SPQR!

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Slashdot communities will enable our customers to reach millions of engaged tech professionals on a regular basis and significantly extends our company's reach into the global tech community.

      And with this, Slashdot is dead. Dice effectively bought the brand name so they could productize it. Dice has *no* use for the community or news, it's far too.. unconventional.. to be used for corporate gain. The brand name however.. that can bring in the money. Your slashdot user account might as well be a cnet.com user account now.

    3. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      The acquisition price is $20 million, which the companies say is the same amount the properties generated in revenue in 2011.

      Something sounds very wrong with those numbers. The ratio I usually hear of company sale price to earnings is on the order of 5 or 6 to 1. If said properties had $20m in revenue, the sale price for them should be over $100m

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    4. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Aren't those numbers usually calculated based on the net income, not revenue?

    5. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't be worth anything if everyone stops coming here.

    6. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by equex · · Score: 1

      5300 comments per day? That's about the size of some minor subreddits. I would have sold too.

      --
      Can I light a sig ?
    7. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dontcha think they're maybe factoring in the upcoming decline in value now that they belong to Dice?

    8. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's an entrenched brand name, the website isn't the point, they can slap the brand name on all kinds of things and many people associate the name alone with tech smart people without really ever coming here. They'll start advertising 'slashdot quality' level resumes to their clients. Then they can sell the brand name for $3million to some hardware company who can start slapping it on mice, keyboards, and web cams. The brand name can be productized, the users who are leary of the slightest bit of overlordness however have no value-add. They'll try to sell access to our personal info and monitoring services to businesses, but most of us will have seen the writing on the wall by then and left.

    9. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      But... but.. but.. we can keep the great SmartPhone OS war alive, right?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    10. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny thing about noise. You gain bring up the gain, but it's still noise.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      and 3.7 million unique visitors per month

      Is that counting all the multiple user accounts held by government and industry shills? :)

    12. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what's 4chan get, like a million? Should Dice will buy them for $400M?

    13. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      5300 comments by adults with real jobs in a very narrow focus of IT. You may not be able to hawk your etsy made pichachu beanies here, but this is a great place to advertise your new low to medium end server lines, particularly if you are IBM, Dell or HP, who have pretty much propped up the site for the last decade. Aaron Sorkin makes the same argument for his shows like The West Wing and Studio 60 (and I guess, The Newsroom) that even if your audience is smaller, they're in a much higher purchasing bracket (or influence the purchases being made) than someone who watches Ren and Stimpy (on average).

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    14. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Have you been here long? 'slashdot quality'? Seriously?

      Might as well buy up 4chan and advertise 'btard quality'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, shit; they've censored your sig. It has begun!

    16. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Now nobody'll know how I feel about butt. :(

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    17. Re:Slashdotted, text/Webpro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually scan past the names, so your sig is how I'd recognize you. Same with Geekoid, Hairyfeet and a few others. Someone else had a sig about that but uh...I don't remember the name.

  16. I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new Dice Holdings overlords.

  17. Fork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is it time for a fork of Slashdot?

    1. Re:Fork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if I can stick the fork in your eye.

  18. New Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I for one welcome our new polyhedral overlords. May they smite our enemies with the pointyness of a d4 and bathe us in the glory of a d100

    1. Re:New Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're just a projection of a hypercube and work in several dimensions....

  19. Who is Dice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Dice a real company or a shell? If Dice is some sort of holding company, who controls holding interest?
    Not ready to jump on any conspiracy theories just yet, but if you witness a core values shift in geeknet or geeknet properties in the coming months it might be time to make some noise.

    It's important to know that open source projects are inherently "social" in that 100% of their value is their use and developer base. OSS licenses free the code from potential bad actors (OSS software cannot be bought out, purchased, or shelved). If a social site (Like Slashdot) or a project site (Like sourceforge) become tainted, the users and developers can pick up and move elsewhere.

    If one day you wake up to find Slashdot's staff has been replaced and there is a new flood of posts extolling the virtues of DRM, the evils of net net neutrality, and the joys of Microsoft's easy and simple enterprise licensing - You know it's time to go elsewhere. And that's ok, because you know everyone else will be coming with you.

    1. Re:Who is Dice? by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

      Easy to answer. It is owned by a pair of private equity firms, so this could go good or bad. Looking at the history of these firms, it does seem like they tend to leave well enough alone in entities that they acquire. Hopefully Dice allows Slashdot to continue in peace (unlike the recent events of oddities in videos, SlashBI, and CmdrTaco's departure).

  20. The Past by fermion · · Score: 1
    I take it to mean that Sourceforge, Slashdot, and even Thinkgeek is the past. Dice has to be one of the most sleazy job sites on the net. I am sure they are going to do anything they have to in order to increase the profits on these properties. Already I am reading slashdot less because of the pop over ads on tablets. Why does everyone think if you have a tablet you like to have more intrusive ads.

    Its like I am a very ambivalent about this because, you know, the sun also rises to whatever crap is going to happen will happen. If /. et al is not profitable, and the owners want to take the money and run, then that is life. If /. has been taken over by radicals and corporate interests who care more about protecting revenue than having a discussion, then these are the consequences. I am pretty sure Google has a legion of employees here to protect their interests, as well as everywhere else. Have you seen the android wiki page? Total market speak, and unlike other pages, there is no one calling them on it. Can't have a discussion here on Google without getting moded down immediately. But enough of the conspiracy theories. It is just wait and see.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  21. :-( Oh... by eagee · · Score: 2

    I honestly don't have a problem with Dice, they seem like a fine company. It's just that slashdot is the last place on the internet I still go for nerd news that isn't mostly crap. I wish it still had real humans behind it instead of a faceless corporation. *sigh*

    1. Re::-( Oh... by Soulskill · · Score: 1

      The people running Slashdot aren't changing at all. Plus, Geeknet was a corporation, and it owned Slashdot before today.

    2. Re::-( Oh... by kadams54 · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Fooled me. Here I thought I was interacting with real humans every time I visited Slashdot's offices. Silly me.

  22. Care to Elaborate? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is still pretty new to us, but we've been looking at this as a positive thing

    Hey, I mean, you'll have to forgive me if I can't discern whether you're saying that under duress or while you're busily shredding documents or while you're issuing cyanide capsules or if you're genuinely optimistic about the move. So if you have the time, I'd like to know what aspects of this make your statements genuine. As you noted with the Gawker thing, I get a little uptight about my small little things being bought up and consumed by bigger fish. The bigger the fish that eats you up, the more layers of direction come down upon you. People complain about comments being un-editable and static but I love that. It makes this feel permanent, it allows me to verbally pin people down, etc. But if Executive A five layers removed from you decides it needs to be his way, what are you gonna do? On top of that, how would you have handled the Microsoft source code and Scientology spats if there was someone with money looming over you reminding you of the stakes and telling you to back down?

    -- we were worried earlier that if we were rolled into a business that focused entirely on news, we'd be expected to conform to company standards -- see the Gawker sites, for example.

    Okay, fair enough. However, I know very little about Dice. And to counter your argument, an advertising company bought MySpace which used to be a social networking site. And now, surprise surprise, it's more ads than user created spaces. You can argue that MySpace was dead already. You can argue that some change had to be made. But I want to know why you feel safe to pick this out to be a plus and not a minus for my overall Slashdot addiction. How do I know Slashdot isn't going to become a vector tool to get eyeballs over to Dice's bread and butter jobs site?

    If you have doubts or genuine concern, I'm not asking you to be the turkey with the long neck when farmer Dice comes around looking for his first meal so feel free to reply as Anonymous Coward. I mean, I'm not talking about my employer on web forums so I understand but your arguments should stand on their own -- sans Slashdot icon.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Care to Elaborate? by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Funny

      while you're busily shredding documents or while you're issuing cyanide capsules

      I think you just described a typical day at Yahoo.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    2. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Soulskill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, I'll answer what I can; we editors are not part of the decision-making process, so I first heard this news only a few hours ago myself. This is my reaction from what I've heard today from the higher-ups. Duress isn't a factor -- in fact, one of the quotes from the meeting I most liked was in response to a question about whether we were posting news of the announcement on Slashdot, and how the community would react. The Dice folks simply said, "Let them talk." I'm sitting in a conference room right now next to a gentleman from Dice, and he's just been curious what people are saying; hasn't suggested any comments or messaging at all.

      As far as being consumed by a bigger fish, keep in mind that Geeknet (aka SourceForge aka VA, etc) was a bigger fish itself. If you think about Geeknet's business, it was rather broadly spread. Slashdot's a news site, ThinkGeek's an e-commerce business, Sourceforge is its own thing. They have common roots, but they don't really go together. I've been aware of Dice, but not terribly familiar with it, but wouldn't you say its business would tend to fit Slashdot better than ThinkGeek?

      As far as the MySpace situation.. well, not all companies are alike, and not all companies see value in the same way. The crew currently running things is more concerned about the Slashdot user experience than some others have been in the past, and that's been a plus. Obviously, I can't see the future, so I don't know how it's all going to play out. But my initial impression is positive. I'm thrilled at the possibility of getting a bigger investment into Slashdot, both from an engineering perspective and an editorial perspective.

    3. Re:Care to Elaborate? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Gawker... *sigh* I remember Gawker. I used to visit several of their sites every day until I could no longer use their comment system.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    4. Re:Care to Elaborate? by icebraining · · Score: 2

      People complain about comments being un-editable and static but I love that. It makes this feel permanent, it allows me to verbally pin people down, etc. But if Executive A five layers removed from you decides it needs to be his way, what are you gonna do?

      Well, considering /. still doesn't support unicode, I think they can say "too hard, can't be done" and get away with it.

    5. Re:Care to Elaborate? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is my reaction from what I've heard today from the higher-ups. Duress isn't a factor

      The problem is they would say that no matter what. Higher ups always use major change as an opportunity to say there are no troubles anywhere. It could be true, but it could just as easily not be true.

      If you think about Geeknet's business, it was rather broadly spread. Slashdot's a news site, ThinkGeek's an e-commerce business, Sourceforge is its own thing. They have common roots, but they don't really go together. I've been aware of Dice, but not terribly familiar with it, but wouldn't you say its business would tend to fit Slashdot better than ThinkGeek?

      No. If you think about it what SlashDot, SourceForge and ThinkGeek had in common was a core group of users that was very similar. That meant leadership when thinking what to do with all of the properties had only one audience to keep in mind.

      Slashdot users are just a tiny subset of people Dice serves. The general concern would be that there might be an attempt to bring Slashdot to a more general audience since that is what the people that run Dice understand - the broad market, not just the technical niche.

      I hope you are right and they really are thinking about carrying on as before. I expect some change is inevitable, but again I'm hoping it's not some kind of push to bring in more general users.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    6. Re:Care to Elaborate? by grub · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      "I'm sitting in a conference room right now next to a gentleman from Dice, and he's just been curious what people are saying; hasn't suggested any comments or messaging at all."

      Show that 'gentleman' this link and they will, hopefully, cancel the deal.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    7. Re:Care to Elaborate? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sitting in a conference room right now next to a gentleman from Dice, and he's just been curious what people are saying; hasn't suggested any comments or messaging at all.... my initial impression is positive. I'm thrilled at the possibility of getting a bigger investment into Slashdot, both from an engineering perspective and an editorial perspective.

      Translation: "The walls have ears, and I haven't yet figured out my bailout strategy."

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    8. Re:Care to Elaborate? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The Dice folks simply said, "Let them talk."

      That's a great promising attitude and good to hear as long as they weren't twirling a diamond studded ivory cane while sipping Hennessy in their top hat and monocle as they spat it out ;-)

      I'm sitting in a conference room right now next to a gentleman from Dice, and he's just been curious what people are saying; hasn't suggested any comments or messaging at all.

      Okay, I would say one thing to him: "There are these nebulous things that set Slashdot apart from the other news sites like Reddit, Digg, etc. These things cannot really be quantified well. Something's can like the comment and moderation system. Somethings cannot like the nice blend of stories and story types on the frontpage (I think the FAQ called it a "breakfast burrito"?). So your message to him should be that the Slashdot staff knows these things and Dice does not. But most importantly the second those things go away, then you are no different from Reddit or CNN's Tech Site or whomever. And it's going to be all the much easier for me to just roll on over to the biggest site that has the same implementation of how I get my news. I'll take my book reviews, comments and ball and play elsewhere. Your autonomy protects that. I love that you stood up to Microsoft and tried to stand up to Scientology. I don't think someone with money at risk looking over your shoulder would have allowed that.

      As far as being consumed by a bigger fish, keep in mind that Geeknet (aka SourceForge aka VA, etc) was a bigger fish itself.

      Totally agree. Honestly, it felt like you guys might have lost some of your autonomy in that move. I don't criticize it, I don't know the whole story but I wouldn't believe you if you said it had no effect at any point on Slashdot-related decisions. Personally, I prefer a lot of little fish for me to pick from even if it means competing standards and difficulty communicating across sites. I don't like one massive behemoth that dictates what the rules are to everyone who wants to play. So it's a natural worriment to me when yet another bigger fish gobbles you up. Hopefully it isn't negative but I can't help but default to it being negative.

      I'm thrilled at the possibility of getting a bigger investment into Slashdot, both from an engineering perspective and an editorial perspective.

      I will come back to a site that is under such heavy load that I cannot reach it. I will not come back to a site that is yet another news aggregator no matter how quick their servers are.

      I'm glad that they're concerned about the user experience. I'm glad that you're cautiously optimistic (although I also feel like you haven't a choice). My concise fears are about the questions that come down that say "How can we direct more eyeballs at our job listings or perhaps inject job listings into Slashdot without risking too much of the overall Slashdot user experience?" Will you play that game?

      --
      My work here is dung.
    9. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Dice folks simply said, "Let them talk, Mr. Anderson, when they have no mouths."

      FTFY

    10. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Antipater · · Score: 1

      As far as the MySpace situation.. well, not all companies are alike, and not all companies see value in the same way. The crew currently running things is more concerned about the Slashdot user experience than some others have been in the past, and that's been a plus. Obviously, I can't see the future, so I don't know how it's all going to play out. But my initial impression is positive. I'm thrilled at the possibility of getting a bigger investment into Slashdot, both from an engineering perspective and an editorial perspective.

      So you're saying we're just going to have to roll the...

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    11. Re:Care to Elaborate? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > People complain about comments being un-editable and static but I love that. It makes this feel permanent, it allows me to verbally pin people down, etc.

      That is very true, but if we could "append" a one-liner (say limit it to 120 chars) to address typos that would help. I believe there is an optimal balance between static and dynamic. /. is too far static and reddit is too far dynamic.

      Ideally though I'd love to see that after the thread is closed for someone with super-mod points to summarize the comments. I've done that on Reddit say "What's your favorite Sci-Fi movie" .. instead of late-comers having to waste their time reading ALL the comments they can just read one post which is a summary.

    12. Re:Care to Elaborate? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      joints?

      Okay, clearly I've been in California too long.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    13. Re:Care to Elaborate? by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's pretty bad. I kept suggesting to Nick Denton (when he deigned to join in the comments) that they should really take a look at the /. commenting system as a way of achieving what he said he wanted (greater inclusivity, good discussions). He never responded...and I'd get that, if he came up with something even remotely usable, but the commenting system there is insane, and not only is it insane, every time people start to get used to it, they completely change it yet again.

    14. Re:Care to Elaborate? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Oh grub. If you hadn't outed yourself as Dr. Bob, DC, this would never have happened.

      It's Obama's fault.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    15. Re:Care to Elaborate? by grub · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe I was just mocking Bob...
      I see he was on the other day.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    16. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Soulskill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll make sure he sees your comment.

      I understand your worries about our autonomy. As an editor, it's a worry I've had for years, any time a part of the organization has changed. It's part of the job description. Cautiously optimistic is a good way to put it. Here's another reason why I feel that way: they clearly know what Slashdot is like; if they wanted to change how we do things, it would be much easier for them to just fire us all and bring in new people who don't already have very strong opinions about what Slashdot should be.

      To be frank, I have no idea if or how Slashdot and Dice will be integrated. I don't have any information about it, and I don't know that anybody does. Perhaps the 'Jobs' link at the top of the page under Channels will change. I assume there will be a link in the footer. Sorry, I wish I had more information to give you. All I can promise is that we editors will continue to fight for user experience.

    17. Re:Care to Elaborate? by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 2

      Soulskill: ROT13 in your head! He will have no idea what you're typing! You can do it!
      Are you in danger?
      Do you think you can take the shill?

    18. Re:Care to Elaborate? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      I've given up. I still occasionally browse the headlines on io9, Lifehacker, Gawker, and some others. But I no longer even attempt to read the comments or contribute. It's just too hard. Commenting shouldn't feel like "you are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike."

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    19. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 5, Funny

      " I'm sitting in a conference room right now next to a gentleman from Dice ..."

      Does yuor frend from Dice understand stenography? Because often I find innocent responses mght have hidden meaning.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    20. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tell the guy sitting next to you that a long time reader hopes that you actually might.. gasp.. CHANGE SOMETHING now that a company with capital might be able to hire someone. I asked Rob Malda in his Reddit AMA exactly this question (why the site is so damn anachronistic and resistant to ever actually doing something to improve the experience). He basically told me no money, and no will to do it from the higher ups.

      Slashdot is from another era, and I've largely moved on to reddit for interaction. The user community is stale, the features are from the early 2000s, and the model is like a damn electronic magazine rather than a site for user driven content. It still has good articles though, but it just needs to actually innovate rather than stagnate. The people complaining about change are just the same old people that always complain. Fuck 'em.

    21. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did notice today that the check box to turn off advertising disappeared. Coincidence?

    22. Re:Care to Elaborate? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      one of the quotes from the meeting I most liked was in response to a question about whether we were posting news of the announcement on Slashdot, and how the community would react. The Dice folks simply said, "Let them talk."
      I don't like that at all. When left to talk, chances are, people aren't going to think of the most positive thing. This is exactly what I tell management every time somebody leaves. For the love of $DEITY, make an announcement that so-and-so is leaving, and what your plan is to backfill them and so forth. But every time, they leave gossip to fill the void, and it willingly does, and drops morale, and people leave, and the cycle repeats.
      At least Dice could make some sort of official position statement, whether true or not, it works out better for them in the long run, rather than let the tongues wag.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    23. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Cinder6 · · Score: 2

      Still shows up for me.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    24. Re:Care to Elaborate? by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      >> Obviously, I can't see the future

      You can if you subscribe

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    25. Re:Care to Elaborate? by akpoff · · Score: 1

      All I can promise is that we editors will continue to fight for user experience.

      So you're going to block comments by userids above 1459? ;-)

    26. Re:Care to Elaborate? by tragedy · · Score: 2

      No. No. No. Always use double-ROT13! For extra security.

    27. Re:Care to Elaborate? by letchhausen · · Score: 1

      As Homer would say, "It's funny cuz it's true..." And I for one welcome our new media overlords....

      --
      Hey, you think your house is cool?
    28. Re:Care to Elaborate? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole point of Slashdot is that it serves as a news aggregator / discussion forum for a very narrow category of people. From money making perspective, it lets you do fairly targeted data mining and advertising. If they bring it to a more general audience, then what, exactly, would be its value to anyone?

    29. Re:Care to Elaborate? by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You and I know that. Does Dice?

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    30. Re:Care to Elaborate? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'd hope that they did some research on what, exactly, they're buying before signing the deal.

    31. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      Ok if you are so close to people from Dice I think it's only fair to ask this question: What is Dice expecting from acquiring Slashdot? Seriously, go ask them just that and bring it back. We can discuss it later.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    32. Re:Care to Elaborate? by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Any sort of technological knowhow like stenography will be a plus sign.
      Generally salespeople and managers just aren't that geeky.
      Reddit, for example, run by fairly competent people.
      Everyone that tries to cater to geeks needs to be a little geeky themselves.
      Especially in a place like Slashdot.
      Doritos.

    33. Re:Care to Elaborate? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I knew there was a reason they wrote Slashcode in obfuscated Perl (but I repeat myself).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    34. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Requiem18th · · Score: 2

      Unless they weren't trying to buy Slashdot specifically, but some other aspect of Geeknet. So they might understand SourceForge and want to use it in their jobs business, but disregard Slashdot and integrate it into their news division.

      Example, ORACLE --some say-- acquired Sun Microsystems for Java, in which case acquiring MySQL was just a nice bonus. If you think ORACLE was interested in MySQL too, there still OpenOffice, on which they were clearly not interested and yet acquired anyway.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    35. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't let them fuck it up...
      dice.com the site itself has turned into (yet another) fugly bloated invasive site the last few years and many people i know now avoid it.

    36. Re:Care to Elaborate? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Just because it does one thing now does not mean they do not envision they can re-purpose for the general case.

      Even if they know exactly what it does now that is no guarantee of anything.

      I'm not predicting they will, I just like to bring up the possibility... I remain cautiously optimistic they will let the site have self-direction for a while yet, until it is proven otherwise.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    37. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steganography. Not stenography.

    38. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Yes. I knew that, but in my rush to implement the technology I screwed it up completely. In my defense, I have been working with Microsoft products against my will lately.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    39. Re:Care to Elaborate? by TheGothicGuardian · · Score: 1

      There's a Firefox add-on called "Kotaku Fix" that I think originated in Chrome which restores the Gawker commenting system to something similar to how it was a few iterations ago.

    40. Re:Care to Elaborate? by tobiah · · Score: 1

      Or we could manufacture Dice's intentions and discuss that. And we did!

      --
      "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
    41. Re:Care to Elaborate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As everybody knows, you should only use odd levels of ROT13 encryption, even levels have a non-trivial chance of collisions which may impair their security. :-D

    42. Re:Care to Elaborate? by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      That's why I've been using Graham's number-level rot13 for some time now.

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  23. Top ten effects of Slashdot being bought by Dice by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    10 ) Consolidates Slashdot and Thinkgeek into ThinkSlash, you can moderate items but you also get promoted product placements under every +5 post.

    9 ) Last answer on polls now always "Man I could use a new job".

    8 ) All posts with word "Monster" auto-modded to -1.

    7 ) User profile now includes mandatory job history and expertise fields.

    6 ) Tired of too many Apple stories? Too bad.

    5 ) Freed of need to bring in ad revenue because of Dicean sugar daddy, Slashdot now works full time on original goal - Cowboy Neal as first man on Mars.

    4 ) Anyone with a five digit UID or lower gets to be a bit player in the next Dice.com SuperBowl commercial.

    3 ) Troll posts now forwarded to employer to free up jobs for more highly moderated users.

    2 ) Big plans for edgier SlashDot after future additional purchase of SuicideGirls.com

    1) JOBS FOR EVERYONE!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. Don't do a Digg by Dynamoo · · Score: 1

    The recent takeover of Digg killed what what was left of it stone dead. On the other hand, Reddit's corporate parents leave it well alone and it has prospered. There is a lesson to be learned there.

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:Don't do a Digg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... that we need to kill reddit? :p

  25. Preserve the Golden Goose by AllanL5 · · Score: 2

    SlashDot, ThinkGeek, AND SourceForge? Man, that's about 1/2 my normal browsing. I agree trying to change stuff will kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. But I've seen a lot of dead geese in my time.

    1. Re:Preserve the Golden Goose by jigamo · · Score: 1
      --
      Save money on your cell phone bill: Republic Wireless
  26. Re:Farewell slashdot... by Jeng · · Score: 1

    Why is it only AC's that bother to post that they are leaving?

    No one knew you were here before, and they don't give a shit that you aren't here now.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  27. IT job listings on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coming soon (except for those reserved by editors, of course)

  28. A user announcing this speaks volumes by ReallyEvilCanine · · Score: 0
    A user provides sketchy details and a link to a content-less press release, and that gets posted, while Taco et al. sit around & scratch their asses. Par for the course, really. At least there won't be another 10,000-word navel-gazing post from Malda about temporarily becoming a "millionaire". At least, not until FB buys out this deal when it all rolls over.

    woof.

    1. Re:A user announcing this speaks volumes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI Taco doesn't work here anymore.

    2. Re:A user announcing this speaks volumes by JustOK · · Score: 1

      He never really worked here before

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  29. Revenue Last Year: $20M by Captain+Hook · · Score: 1

    According to http://investors.geek.net/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=697536. Group Revenue for 2012-Q2 is $23.1M.

    Is the summary about your own company wrong?

    --
    These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    1. Re:Revenue Last Year: $20M by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2

      that's company-wide, not for the media subset.

  30. This thread by Sparticus789 · · Score: 1

    Is going to hit 1000 comments no problem.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
  31. Dice is run by a bunch of by naroom · · Score: 5, Funny

    This post was removed due to Dice content standards violations.

    1. Re:Dice is run by a bunch of by billybob2001 · · Score: 1

      You could have tried rolling a saving throw.

      May be the new moderation.

    2. Re:Dice is run by a bunch of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is EXACTLY the moment in my slashdot reading that I wait for (and is frequently posted AC).

      Slashdot is made of self-moderation, AC comments, and trolling (for good/bad), and technical accomplishments/changes. Any of those items which leave make it worse.

  32. Who cares by finkployd · · Score: 2

    This site jumped the shark when it was renamed Slashdot from Dips and Chips :P

    1. Re:Who cares by TopSpin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This site jumped the shark when it was renamed Slashdot from Dips and Chips :P

      Chips & Dips supposedly... I wouldn't know as I have no memory of it.

      A lot of low UIDs replying to this story. Grow or die, as they say. Problem is I'm not sure Slashdot scales. I know it is really easy to upset the user base. It won't take many blunders to kill off what is still here.

      It's up to you Dice. You're definitely the bull in the proverbial China Shop now. Someone with more vision than I might find a way to build on the Slashdot brand without wrecking it, but that will take talent beyond anything we've seen so far.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    2. Re:Who cares by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

      It jumped when they required accounts to post... I resisted for a long time hence the UID, doh.

  33. Welcome!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new corporate overlords.

    Now can I get a job?

    1. Re:Welcome!!! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new corporate overlords.

      Now can I get a job?

      I am not personally aware of anyone that has gotten a job through a Dice posting, but I'm sure at least one or two such people exist. My company posts jobs on Dice (it's pretty expensive), and we haven't received any applicants from them that even warranted an interview. Admittedly, that could be more due to their userbase. All of our Dice respondents were out-of-state by at least a thousand miles, for an entry level position.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  34. Re:Top ten effects of Slashdot being bought by Dic by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    Tired of too many Apple stories? Too bad.

    At least some things never change.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  35. Job ads per news thread? by dhalsim2 · · Score: 1

    After checking out news.dice.com, my guess is that they'll keep /. more or less the same, but add a list of related jobs to each news thread.

    1. Re:Job ads per news thread? by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      Can't wait to see an "Apple fucking sucks!" comment with a "Would you like to know more about working at Apple?" ad.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    2. Re:Job ads per news thread? by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 1

      You can and will wait as you will never see it, that comment will be deleted by our welcome overlords.

  36. SourceForge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seeing this story makes me think about SourceForge. That used to be a thing. Today it is no longer hip. It seems like GitHub is now the go-to location that SourceForge used to be.

    It strikes me that GitHub is to SourceForge as Google is to Yahoo. SourceForge deserves some respect for coming first, but the experience is "heavy", less modern. Pages are full of images and ads and visual distraction. Page loads are generally slow from all that content. GitHub did to source code hosting what Google did to search interfaces in the 90s: they trimmed the fat. It has a very light feel and footprint. It doesn't get between you and the code. It has different ideas and goals about how to make money, which do not compromise the experience.

    I guess GitHub had the benefit of coming later, thus not having all the baggage of what is now 2 decades of hosting projects. Still, seems like a missed opportunity for SourceForge.

    1. Re:SourceForge by vlm · · Score: 2

      Maybe simpler explanation. The web is flat so any bar to entry means someone else will provide a lower bar and eat your lunch.

      The bar to creating a project on SF is not very high, but there's humans involved and I gotta spec out license and blah blah and write descriptions and it takes about 5 minutes. My project can't have the same name as someone elses project, etc etc. This is how project centric hosting sites work.

      On github its click "create a repo" and you don't technically need much other than the name, so that's all they ask and it just works. I'm git cloning my new repo in about 30 seconds, or so. This is how dev/user centric hosting sites work.

      A zillion hours and a zillion commits later, here I am still right where I started.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:SourceForge by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      Maybe the will add and host a git repository for the SourceForge active projects, that could help breath some life back into it.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  37. Digital Illusions by Trracer · · Score: 1

    My first thought was "What does Digital Illusions CE ( http://www.dice.se/ of Battlefield 3 fame) want with slashdot?".

    --
    English is not my first language, so cut me some slack -: Om du kan lasa det har sa kan du Svenska :-
    1. Re:Digital Illusions by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      My first thought was "What does a standup comic want with slashdot?"

    2. Re:Digital Illusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares, I like it already.

    3. Re:Digital Illusions by Upphew · · Score: 1

      of Pinball Dreams/Fantasies/Illusions fame.

  38. Sorry, But Its Still Dead, Jim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh I'm sure: the days of Slashdot are still numbered. (FTFY).

    This site died the first time it was sold. I go back to the year 1998 and I can tell you that Slashdot lost its "mojo" (or "jumped the shark" to use one of slashdot's old memes), a LONG time ago. Just the addition of the face***k link was proof of that.

    Like everything on the Interwebs, /. is here today, gone yesterday.

    1. Re:Sorry, But Its Still Dead, Jim. by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      As a long time member I can agree wholeheartedly with the above....As soon as the site tried to expand its' appeal and began accepting general ads things went to #@$@

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    2. Re:Sorry, But Its Still Dead, Jim. by PNutts · · Score: 1

      According to DiscoveryNews, Slashdot has been dying since 2008.

    3. Re:Sorry, But Its Still Dead, Jim. by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So you're saying that Slashdot died in 1999, when Rob sold it to Andover? Which is a couple years before I even started using it.

      The dumb thing is that site revenues when it was still Rob's personal site were about $20K. Not even enough to make it a full time job for him. That sale transformed his hobby into a serious business.

      I'm reminded of a Marine Corps joke. The first recruitment drive occurred at Tun Tavern on November 10, 1775, The story goes that the first marine to sign up looked at the next guy to come into the tavern, sighed, and said "Oh, it's not like the old Corps!"

      That said, I"m not optimistic about this sale. DICE runs the most appalling useless, spammy recruitment site in the business. And that's saying a lot. I assume they're good at making money, but it's not clear to me how. It certainly has nothing to do with maintaining a useful web site.

    4. Re:Sorry, But Its Still Dead, Jim. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep.

      That was when it was invaded by "reputation managers" from companies like Burson Marsteller and Waggener Edstrom.

      Now half the people here are paid to endorse Microsoft or Apple products.

  39. This is Obviously going to be Awesome by InvisibleClergy · · Score: 1

    I mean, remember when Oracle acquired Java from Sun? That was awesome, right? I mean, I'm sure that Dice is buying Slashdot and SourceForge out of the goodness of their hearts, rather than trying to turn them into profit-making machines. Right?

    ...right guys?

    1. Re:This is Obviously going to be Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of right, But I want to actually see the dot's connected. I'm open to the possibility they are GOOD, and trying to do GOOD.

      I'm arg() over here http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3126413&op=Reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=41375541

  40. No no no no. by MRe_nl · · Score: 5, Funny

    God doesn't play with Dice.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    1. Re:No no no no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Union, Dice play with you.

    2. Re:No no no no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might not play with dice Himself, but He designed the universe as a giant roulette wheel.

    3. Re:No no no no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God doesn't play with Dice.

      Don't tell God what to do.

  41. damnation! someone haxorzd my NTP by DECula · · Score: 1

    but the remote sites still aren't showing April 1
    WTH?

    --
    dreaded scurrilous bit-twiddler from Oklahoma
  42. Multiples by sjbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm not totally sure what it means to sell them for 1 year's revenue

    Buyouts and mergers are typically done as a multiple of some portion of the earnings or revenue of the company. It's a quick and dirty way to estimate the value of a company without doing a lot of math. Typical multiples for companies are between 0.8-1.2X annual revenue or 3-5X annual EBITDA (earnings before taxes, interest, depreciation and amortization). The multiple is usually adjusted up or down depending on the prospects of the company, the industry it is in as well as the economic climate. Software companies might command a higher multiple than a bricks & mortar retailer. Comparing buyout multiples to historic trends is a good way to identify bubbles as well as gauge the economic climate.

    A multiple of 1X annual revenue is a fairly typical price to pay for a company. Doesn't necessarily mean it is a good price but it is about what I would expect someone to pay. In short, I wouldn't read too much into the price paid.

    1. Re:Multiples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that in addition to the assets a comapny holds? Like property, physical hardware, investments? I would like to know so I know how to price my business that is brick and mortar (nothing to do with tech.)

  43. Dice content standards violations by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

    Patty cake, patty cake
    Baker's man
    If your chick's on her period
    Fuck her in the can

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  44. adblockPlus? I've moved on by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I use adblockPlusPlus.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  45. Typical price by sjbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are we missing something? I'd love to buy an entrenched business for one year's worth of revenue...even if revenues were slowly declining.

    Actually that's a fairly typical price for a buyout. Most buyouts are done as a percentage of revenue or EBITDA. Revenue multiples of around 1X annual earnings is a pretty typical price for a firm though it varies by industry, prospects and economic climate. Typical revenue multiples for any buyout is 0.8X-1.2X annual revenue or 3-5X EBITDA.

    Remember that if you buy a company for its annual revenue, eventually you have to make that money back. If the profit of the company is say 10% of revenue it will take 10 years to recoup the investment.

  46. Did they get a discount? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would presume that they would have had to pay more to get the geeknet holdings without slashdot.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Did they get a discount? by tokul · · Score: 1

      Slashdot as ad space for tech audience. If site maintenance costs are not covered by ad revenue, nothing stops them from closing the site and getting profits by selling hardware assets.

    2. Re:Did they get a discount? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1
      First of all, that was supposed to be a joke. That said:

      Slashdot as ad space for tech audience

      I don't know what slashdot you've been reading, but I mostly see ads here for conservative news sites. I can't tell you how many "Repeal teh evol socialistism obamacare now!" ads I've seen with the frowning picture of Obama on it on this site. Conversely, it has been a long, long, time since I last saw a tech ad that wasn't to thinkgeek.com. All the other tech sites just pay for the front-page slashvertisements we call "articles".

      If site maintenance costs are not covered by ad revenue, nothing stops them from closing the site

      Shh! Don't suggest that already. The deal is only hours old!

      getting profits by selling hardware assets.

      That's amusing. You don't honestly think they really still buy new hardware for this place, do you? What would be the point of that? If they sold all the hardware they still have running this site, they'd be lucky to recoup enough funds to pay for its removal.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  47. Time will tell by davidwr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the folks from Dice were very clear about not wanting to interfere with the community.

    This is exactly the thing I would expect a new owner who sincerely believed in leaving a good thing alone to say.

    This is also exactly the thing I would expect a new owner who had other plans to say.

    Only time, not words of reassurance, will reveal Slashdot's future.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Time will tell by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Why would it. It is one of the few places where the most private people post honest points of view. (I said honest not correct) the Data you can extract out of slashdot is gold. Especially for dice. Who want to figure out how to get tech people jobs, and want companies to use dice to request for jobs.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Time will tell by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      What an excellent post! Have you considered a career in data mining? We have a list of related jobs if you just click here...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Time will tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on today's /. posts so far it's either a slow weird news day or something weird is happening, so, I guess slashdot is dead, long live slashdot

    4. Re:Time will tell by inKubus · · Score: 1

      I think it has to have something to do with the headhunter business. The issue they are going to have is that everyone on Slashdot is good and doesn't need a job.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  48. don't count on that kind of epic change by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Funny

    To Dice: if it ain't broken, don't "fix it".

    That has never been the motto here. Why would it take hold now?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:don't count on that kind of epic change by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Funny

      To Dice: if it ain't broken, don't "fix it".

      That has never been the motto here. Why would it take hold now?

      If it ain't broken, fix it until it is.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:don't count on that kind of epic change by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      To Dice: if it ain't broken, don't "fix it".

      That has never been the motto here. Why would it take hold now?

      If it ain't broken, fix it until it is.

      And of course once you break it, you are never, under any circumstances, allowed to directly undo that which broke it. Instead you must write new code until the problem is solved, a new problem exists that makes the previous new problem look insignificant, or people just stop complaining.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  49. Digg is better now by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Digg v4.0 was a disaster. But the new Digg is better than the old site, which was being utterly overrun by sock-puppets and people gaming front page runs.

    When they dropped comments NOTHING of value was lost.

    I actually read digg.com more often than I used to because the new system works better at ferreting out interesting stories.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  50. a note to DICE by cynop · · Score: 2

    just remember Dice: if it ain't broken, don't try to fix it

  51. only 20 million? by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    If a media center made 20 million over the last year, (and presumably similar figures the previous 2 years) then it should have sold for no less then 60 million. Someone needed the cash!

    1. Re:only 20 million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's 20 mil in revenue smarty. You do know what revenue means don't you? Here's a hint: It's not the same as profit.

    2. Re:only 20 million? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Revenue, not profit. This is standard, even introductory, economics. The sites apparently turned about about 5M in profits, which makes 20M very much in line with an expected buyout price.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    3. Re:only 20 million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You honestly don't understand something as simple as revenue vs. profit? Seriously???

    4. Re:only 20 million? by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      You do know what revenue means don't you? Here's a hint: It's not the same as profit.

      So... it's one of the steps before the ???? part?

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    5. Re:only 20 million? by iplayfast · · Score: 1

      Missed that it was revenue not profit, ignore my comment :)

  52. I for one by mandark1967 · · Score: 3, Funny

    welcome our tumbly, six-sided overlords.

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  53. recruiter spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So now we can expect the top stories posted on Slashdot to be recruiter spam?

    1. Re:recruiter spam by Soulskill · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No. You have my word on that.

  54. Re:Top ten effects of Slashdot being bought by Dic by Nemyst · · Score: 2

    On the flip side, perhaps this'll be the death knell for SlashBI.

  55. Re:adblockPlus? I've moved on by Lithdren · · Score: 1

    I use Adblock#

  56. So Fork it. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Honestly, if the real core of Slashdot still existed, they could fork and probably retain 50% of the membership. I'm betting they all have "non compete" clauses that were attached to a hefty payout though....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  57. Re:Top ten effects of Slashdot being bought by Dic by vlm · · Score: 1

    ... first man on Mars

    Thank god. I thought for sure this list would have a goatse joke.

    Anyone with a five digit UID or lower gets to be a bit player in the next Dice.com SuperBowl commercial.

    ... And there it is

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  58. Employment integration! by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

    Now when we look for a job they can link our Sourceforge contributions to our resumes! That should be good.

    They won't link our Slashdot IDs to our Dice account... Here come 10 years of batshit crazy comments back to bite you!

  59. Get off my lawn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in my day, sonny, ads came in two flavors, the tall kind that looked like this: 1
    and the round kind that looked like this: 0

    If we wanted to block our ads we had to do it manually, with tall ad-blockers to block the tall ads and round ad-blockers to block the round ads.

    Oh, and we had to keep track of our ad-blockers too. We didn't have any of this newfangled ad-collection that you have with your newfangled "managed" ad-blockers.

  60. More Quotes from Dice, via TechCrunch by jenningsthecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the news piece on TechCrunch:

    "Dice has been talking about building content and user engagement to be top of mind and more integral to professionals doing work, and if you think about SourceForge and Slashdot, it’s about user engagement to help you do your job... We don’t want to change the experience today. What will happen over time is that the Dice.com site is will operate more seamlessly connected to these sites. But the sites themselves will keep their look and feel and will run on their own... That absolutely includes editorial independence. We think that’s really key. We don’t profess to add much from an editorial standpoint. We will give the user bases on our sites and those the ability to interact with each other. Our goal here is to make them part of the overall tech and engineering experience at the company."

    Translation: 'We are Borg. You will be assimilated.'

    Damn. I'm gonna miss this place.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:More Quotes from Dice, via TechCrunch by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Dice has been talking about building content and user engagement to be top of mind and more integral to professionals doing work..."

      Wow, I for one welcome our new marketing-bullshit overlords.

    2. Re:More Quotes from Dice, via TechCrunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, if was forced to change one thing about /. then it's the look and feel. The rest is pleasently entertaining and sometimes informative.

  61. So what is going to happen is: by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 2

    1) Buy Geeknet
    2) ? ? ?
    3) Profit!

    Now I am curious to learn about phase two...

  62. Not a wrong number by dereference · · Score: 1

    Something sounds very wrong with those numbers. The ratio I usually hear of company sale price to earnings is on the order of 5 or 6 to 1. If said properties had $20m in revenue, the sale price for them should be over $100m

    Earnings and Revenue are not the same. Revenue is basically just the gross income (with some adjustments). Earnings are net, meaning revenue minus expenses. In services (rather than products) industries, a sales price equal to the annual revenue is quite typical.

  63. What is Dice? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    Wait ... I thought Dice was a C compiler for DragonFly BSD. No?

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  64. $20M Seems low by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    In the world of the internet I keep hearing of deals that go in to the bazillions for companies that I have never heard of. So 20M for a collection of products that are pretty central to the whole online thing is just odd. Any explanation as to the low price?

  65. Thanks for all the fish... by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see any kind of integration beneficial to Slashdot readers. Warts and all, we are a community and any "integration" is an attempt to turn us into a commodity.

    1. Re:Thanks for all the fish... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      George Wallace, is that you?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand_in_the_Schoolhouse_Door

      Not all change is bad. Slashdot has been somewhat limping for a while now due to dips in readership. Anything that could improve traffic would be a good thing for Slashdot:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot#Traffic_and_publicity

    2. Re:Thanks for all the fish... by Rival · · Score: 2

      I second this, very much. "Community, not commodity" is a wonderfully concise way of looking at it.

      Many of us are tired of being gone over with a fine-toothed comb any time we venture online or in public. We submit when we feel we have to, for the purposes of maintaining contact with distant family members, or accessing information that is required for our jobs, or when we are forced to use goverment-"secured" means of travel.

      The reason we come HERE, rather than going to some other site, is to get away from all the PII-tracking, big corporation, big brother insanity that is going on out there. We don't WANT integration to Facebook. We don't want to tweet our comments. We don't want job offers that are "relevent" to the things we say or look at, whether here or elsewhere on the internet. We don't want to sign in with our real names. We just want to come here and be left in peace to discuss things with each other, as we always have.

      Granted, Slashdot is noisy, ridiculous, and slow sometimes. But this is how we've made it. We know each other and we recognize outsiders. We have our own memes and we have our own values. We don't want changes. Just keep the site up and leave us be, and we'll stay. Try to take over and remake the place, and we'll likely be forced to leave.

      It was hard enough seeing Rob leave, but I understand his decision and totally support him in it. After 13+ years of being here, I decided that I would keep on here as long as I could to keep the community alive. I don't want to say goodbye, but at such time as there's no community left, there will be no more reason for me to stay.

  66. What?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait.. WHAT??? NO!!! I can't live without my slashdot! WTF?!?!? Does this mean slashdot is on death row??

    1. Re:What?!?! by sulphurlad · · Score: 1

      clang clang....
      Dead Site Walking, We got us a Dead Site Walking.......
      clang clang....

      Harmonica playing soft blues in the back ground.
      Sneering guards with mirrored sun glasses walking /. to the chamber.....

  67. Does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that God will no longer play with us?

  68. Upside? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, lots of suggestions about what could go wrong. How about making some suggestions about how the /. community could benefit from what Dice has to offer?

    I don't know much about Dice other than it's a jobs site a la Monster. So maybe Dice wants to pursue the LinkedIn model from the other side? In other words, if you look at what LinkedIn has been doing, they started with a social platform and now they're making hard ties to job search sites and even promoting their own job boards.

    What if Dice is starting with the job boards and bolting on the community? In that case, the community is where the real value is. /. should be able to get something out of this deal... What do we want from a job board?

    Personally, I want options. My job doesn't suck hard at the moment, but I've been burned in the past and have learned to adopt a mercenary perspective. What have you done for me lately, Dice?

  69. A tribute to the greatness that was Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    (Time to dig out this classic)

    A long, long time ago \ I can still remember \ How the trollers used to make me smile \ And I knew if I had to boast \ That I could try to get first post \ And maybe I'd be happy for a while

    But moderators made me shiver \ With every minus they'd deliver \ DoS scripts couldn't stop it \ They scored them all "Offtopic" \ I know that it's cheap crack they smoke \ And meta-moderation's broke \ At first I thought it was a joke \ The day that trolltalk died

    -- Chorus --
    Bye, bye, MEEPTy, OOG, and Grits guy
    Drove the Cruiser like some loser who starts posts with a *sigh*
    Those Steve Woston posts that we all knew were a lie
    Wonder what became of girls petrified?
    What became of girls petrified?
    --

    Did you write a bunch of Perl? \ And did it make you want to hurl \ Feces at the Wall? \ Can you believe these lame-ass polls? \ Do you post big stretched-out assholes? \ Can you make the goatse.cx link not show? \ Well I know you think that Siggy sucked \ Will the real Bruce Perens please stand up?

    The bots don't have a clue. \ Man, I dig those trolls from Shoe! \ I was a rabid Free Speech advocate \ With a Red Hat T-shirt and a Free Beer gut \ Bought my Sony laptop working Pizza Hut \ The day that trolltalk died

    -- Chorus --

    It's been two years since the IPO \ And LNUX sinks to all-time lows \ But that's not how it used to be \ When Spiral showed how it was done \ Trolling as Jon Erikson \ Who worked for NPO Technologies \ Oh and while they tried to filter posts \ Somebody rooted Slashdot's host

    "Crack Slashdot? That's absurd!" \ Better go change your password \ While JonKatz wrote a Hellmouth book \ By using posts he simply took \ And we flamed him till he was cooked \ The day that trolltalk died \ And we were singin....

    -- Chorus --

    10 grams. Inchfan. Didn't log out. Goddamn \ The mods will find the sid real soon, man \ You can't hide if you aren't AC \ Your bud (George here) tried BSD \ A dead Streetlawyer's tips were free \ And WIPO helped letsriot turn Nazi \ 70 made his percents up \ While 80md warned "liberals suck"

    The moon does not exist \ It's just a liberal myth \ Oh and as Taco tried to take a nap \ We forced him to invoke bitchslaps \ Do you recall the flood of crap \ The day that trolltalk died? \ We started singin....

    -- Chorus --

    Oh and then we were wearing out "All your base" \ And started posting monospace \ The better for our penis birds \ So come on, be a zealot, be a dick \ You don't think Anne Marie's a chick? \ Because lying's all we do about HURD

    So go and push for BSD \ And say GPL isn't free \ Slow down, cowboy! The limit \ Is one post every minute \ Now tell the right wing facist slime \ Infringing on Your Rights Online \ That they can't censor all the time \ The day that trolltalk died

    -- Chorus --

    I met a troll they called The Rev \ And asked him if CD BREAK HEAD \ He said, "That's old. Get over it." \ And with all the courage I could muster \ "Imagine what a Beowulf cluster...." \ But it wasn't worth the trouble to submit \ The karma caps are just plain jive \ And everyone's moved to K5

    The steelcage has grown rusted \ And Geekizoid is busted \ The three sites I don't see for weeks \ Segfault, kernel, Comp-u-geek \ Code is not art. This ain't Freshmeat \ The day that trolltalk died

    -- Chorus

    http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=20351&cid=2172299

  70. Dice is the nickname by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    of the new boss. His first name is Andrew. Be afraid; be very, very afraid.

  71. Re:Farewell slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm too lazy to sign in man. That's why. I have better things to do such as eating tacos on my lunch break.

  72. bring back the old school post limits! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hopefully they'll bring back the good ol' days when ACs could post as much as they want (with a 2 minute limit between posts). the current limit of ten posts a day does not make me want to make an account it just makes me visit the site much much less. i used to waste hours on here back in the day but now that there's all these post limits and the wacky way the comments work with that dhtml or javascript or whatever the fuck that bullshit is that is constantly busted ... uggh. make slashdot not frustrating again and it might be worth something.

  73. Re:Farewell slashdot... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Why is it only AC's that bother to post that they are leaving?

    No one knew you were here before, and they don't give a shit that you aren't here now.


    He didn't even leave, he posted again, two posts down. In fact, he is the most prolific poster on this thread.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  74. Re:Sorry, But Its Still Dead, Jin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry. -- Maek Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"

  75. Mod Parent WAY up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was wondering this too. Either $20 million was somehow a loss for the company in yearly revenue, or something is rather fishy with this sale.

    That said, this is the wrong place to make an adboard, Everyone here knows far too much about ad blocking techniques for Dice to make any revenue from it unless they start serving from the slashdot domains....and even then we'll just kill scripts and ignore the huge white spaces.

  76. Eternal September by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great timing! You couldn't have picked a better month to introduce a technical niche community to a wider audience.

  77. Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am rather impressed by the valuation of such a sale. Once upon a time in a different decade, even a different millennium, Slashdot was useful and informative. These days I only come here for the Jokes....err I mean, the "articles". Slashdot died (sometime around 2004) and went to some weird purgatory where it has existed in limbo and hoovering just about /b/ ever since.

  78. Dice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jobs for some, tinny Anonymous flags for others.

  79. Ideas by TopSpin · · Score: 1

    – Limited revisions, with history. Correcting grammar or spelling mistakes would be nice, but posters can't be allowed to game the conversation. Do something novel like enforcing a maximum hamming distance.

    – Mobile site; slashdot has not adapted to portable screens and touch.

    – Do Not Remove Anonymous Posting. Auto-mod it into the basement, whatever, but there is an element of mod-point armed group-think around here that needs to be countered.

    – Faster accept/reject of story submissions... it takes days sometimes.

    – Moderation fix: only early replies are likely to get moderated. Mixing in new replies with the early replies might help, particularly if they are from those with worthy karma.

    – Interviews and Q&A with significant people in OSS.

    – Fix the paid subscribers feature. Either remove it or give it a reason to exist.

    --
    Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    1. Re:Ideas by tobiah · · Score: 1

      all good

      --
      "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  80. Mmmm..... Bitcoin spam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know if Rob would want to take back control of Slashdot...

    So what you're saying is, you haven't seen enough Bitcoin articles lately?

  81. Eroding Market Share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just Dice's response to it's quickly eroding market share in the online job listing market. LinkedIn [http://www.linkedin.com] has hammered them lately. There was a time in the past when Dice dominated everything. It eclipsed the previous job site, Monster.com [http://www.monster.com], and quickly grew to an industry leader. I landed many jobs from Dice.com between the years 2000 and 2007. I've noticed lately, however, that there has been a dramatic swing. Ask anyone who hasn't been working before 2005 about what job board they use and they will most likely answer LinkedIn. It's all about the social media aspect now and LinkedIn does that well.

    Dice is probably looking at ways to integrate the different platforms into a job search and work sharing platform. The fact that they acquired SourceForge hints at their desire for some kind of collaboration and sharing/publishing of artifacts. That's what is so scary about the Slashdot acquisition. Are they planning on folding it into a new business model? If that's the case then you can say goodbye to Slashdot in it's current incarnation. I don't have figures, but I would be willing to bet that Slashdot is not that great of a money maker. Why it's still around, who knows, but don't expect Dice.com to shell money out for something and then not turn around and try to monetize it.

  82. Re:Top ten effects of Slashdot being bought by Dic by debug42 · · Score: 1

    11. Each /. post has a video of Cat Miller reading TFA verbatim

  83. Dice Buys Geeknet's Media Business, Including Slas by fredan · · Score: 2

    ... yeah, what ever.

    a more important question:

    will dice provide slashdot with an ipv6 address or not?

  84. The New Slashdot - SLASHING PRICES! by Cito · · Score: 1

    Buy all your Geek and Sundry Items here at Slashdot where our Mascot "Dot" Slashes prices on all online prices!

    tons of ads that will never get seen cause people use adblock plugin

    owners will beg users not to run adblock so they can make money

    sales will drop

    slashdot store dies and is redirected to thinkgeek or dice.com

    that's probably how it will go.

    I've seen dozen sites shut down over adblock, heck there is a stupid online critic review site that is slowly shutting down cause they beg users not to run adblock so they can get paid and people still use adblock me included.

  85. $20M? Chicken feed... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Any one of those properties was worth more than $20M alone. Somebody just gave them away.

  86. Consider the Reddit Experiment by confuscan · · Score: 1

    Consider the Conde Nast experiment with Reddit which appears to be working out so far, five years later.

  87. Re:Top ten effects of Slashdot being bought by Dic by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Now THAT was funny!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  88. Re:Top ten effects of Slashdot being bought by Dic by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

    On the flip side, perhaps this'll be the death knell for SlashBI.

    "...ding dong the witch is dead the witch is dead the witch is dead ding dong the wicked witch is dead.."

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  89. Why owned by a corp? by Minter92 · · Score: 1

    Like all social media slashdot.ORG should be a property of the community not a some corp looking to gain profit.

  90. Skills data mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would imagine user data and post histories could be mined in the process of targeting job posts?

  91. Ignorant about news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! The Dice news people are VERY poor at choosing news and formatting it and writing about it.

    It may be the end of Slashdot. It's amazing that such ignorant people have $20 million.

  92. Look on the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...maybe the new owners will FINALLY fix the fscking moderation system.

    Nothing here is more broken than that.

    Although... the inability of registered users to post more than a few anon comments in a row could really use a fix, too.

    And we need the ability to undo bad mods -- that whole "destroy all your mods to fix one mistake" is crap.

    ...I guess it's too much to hope for. Sigh.

  93. sourceforge - are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not looking good for sourceforge right now. They have monumentally failed with moving projects from the old style interface to the new one. On the surface, everything looks ok and shiny, but once you begin the process of moving a project over, you find you hit a total dork wall of fatal errors, leaving your project in limbo. It's undocumented chaos. See here:

    > Forking/cloning repo code in project rosegarden from
    > file:///nfs/classic/sf-svn/r/ro/rosegarden failed. The SourceForge
    > engineering team has been notified.

  94. One word: by gwslyon · · Score: 1

    TechTV Or is that two words? Yeah, call me jaded, but every time I hear "we bought X and we'll keep X running the same way forever!", I know it means "we'll merge the product and slowly kill it off as we take the few pieces we do like and roll it into our own product." And yes, I choose this to be my first post on Slashdot. Despite being registered for a while, and even lurking since 2000 (not a typo) before that. Now if you'll excuse me, I have some old DVD's of the Screensavers I want to re-watch as I archive old Slashdot threads...

  95. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In soviet russia. Dice rolls you.

  96. Quick, make backups by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I expect sourceforge to be gone in 6 months.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  97. GIthub by Safety+Cap · · Score: 0

    Yeah, pretty much.

    --
    Yeah, right.
  98. Shacknews too... by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

    The Gamefly guys did a bang up job when they flipped the switch on Shacknews after the buyout. That had to be one of the most atrocious changes I've seen. I haven't been back to see if they've changed anything back. One comment thread per story? Who thought that was a good idea.

  99. All Your Nerds are belog to US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Make Your Time.

  100. I for one welcome our new Job Providing Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new Job Providing Overlords.

  101. Re:removing posts by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Oh, but if they ever do, one of y'all will catch it, do the necessary screen shots, and it will spread like wildfire.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  102. Re:Something sounds very wrong with those numbers. by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Good, this far down someone besides me finally noticed that too. "Bought a site for 1 year's worth of revenue, and the rest is free cash"?!

    That's either a typical Slashdot factual error, or something dear-gawd scary just showed up.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  103. Re:removing posts by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Agreed .. which is why I said they won't announce it rather than claiming that nobody will ever know about it.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  104. Sad, sad day by davevt5 · · Score: 2

    I've largely lurked for the past 15 years but /. is the first site I've visited each day for my entire adult life. This is a sad day for me and for all slashdotters. If they try any unified login bullshit or site enhancements I will die.

  105. Re:not wanting to interfere with the community. by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Good effort, but I'm gonna trade a month's worth of mod points on this one.

    You mean well, but they are absolutely going to interfere. Now, maybe they hope their interference will balance out plus-and-minus to a net of zero, but if everything was crispy, they wouldn't have bought it.

    So the question is what do they interfere with and how much. We're burned by now, burned badly. There's been a lot of cheap attempts at "monetizing" going on. An existing company doesn't sell a cash cow, and a new company doesn't buy a cash-sink. So something's gotta give and like always, the "Higher Ups" don't want to tell us.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  106. best wishes by decora · · Score: 2

    good luck to you guys.

  107. Welcome to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new 6 sided overloads... ... they have 12 sides you insensitive clod.

  108. Re:Top ten effects of Slashdot being bought by Dic by bidule · · Score: 1

    1) JOBS FOR EVERYONE!

    I have sad news for you: Jobs is dead!

    --
    ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
  109. Feels a bit ironic by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

    that while Slashdot has covered 15 years of change in the online and computing world, change here seems... different. eh well, it'll all be Facebook in 3... 2... 1.... /6 digit slashnumber, seen enough changes already

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  110. Bye love by stanlyb · · Score: 2

    Bye bye happiness. Hello....what, what is left!!! Hellooooo loneliness.

  111. Archive & Mirror NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Have some old Slashdot pages bookmarked? The time to archive and mirror them is NOW! Sure, for years you may have been able to Google ancient Slashdot pages and sift through cool comments preserved so well throughout the years, but like many other sites, you cannot trust archive.org to have mirrored everything - or sometimes anything at all!

    Archive & Mirror NOW, before it's gone.

  112. Re:Top ten effects of Slashdot being bought by Dic by djsmiley · · Score: 1

    Then he wont mind being divided up...

    --
    - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  113. They might be, for SourceForge. by jd · · Score: 1

    For a start, it'll be a lot easier to post jobs.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  114. Innovation vs invention by jd · · Score: 2

    There's probably some scope for innovation - the codebase could probably do with a security audit or three, and/or a complete rewrite in a more intelligible language (Brainfuck, perhaps) or something respectable and powerful (AspectC++ or D would be the obvious choices there, you can then have it as a SOAP application rather than use the increasingly slow Apache server).

    We also need more pink ponies. And cowbells. There is a distinct lack of pink ponies and cowbells.

    As far as invention is concerned, there needs to be a complete rethink of the metamoderation idea (nobody uses it any more) and the firehose (which nobody ever used to begin with). Moderation abuse is commonplace, with trolls openly posting how they're abusing moderation to attack views contrary to their own and push agendas, so we need SOME sort of metamoderation, but clearly it needs to be a lot more effective or it's going to sit and rot like the existing system. The firehose, again, is overwhelmingly ignored. Users aren't using it to pre-screen stories for typos (and editors ignore the advice if they do), nor are they using it to encourage the sorts of stories wanted (with the result that those same users then whine about there never being any good stories). We need a replacement that people WANT to use.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  115. Dice Trying To Kill You by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

    Why do I think this shirt will suddenly disappear from ThinkGeek's listings: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/9d0b/

    Also, this: http://www.dorktower.com/2012/08/14/your-dice-dork-tower-14-08-12/

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  116. Re:Top ten effects of Slashdot being bought by Dic by srobert · · Score: 1

    "Anyone with a five digit UID or lower gets to be a bit player in the next Dice.com SuperBowl commercial."

    At what level of compensation. I suggest we bargain collectively.