So, should the society punish so harsh the shoplifters then? Don't you know, it all about the balance, between the cost to punish someone, and the cost of the crime. Just like everything else. BALANCE.
It is really sooo simple. I had a ticket. I decided to fight it. Notice To Appear. At the trial date there were 20 cases. 2 Pleaded guilty (funny guys). 2 decided to plead not guilty, but they did not fight properly so they lost. I fought with claws and fangs. I lost half of their time. I managed to deal adjourment, and at the next trial date, the officer did not appear, so i have won.
So, to summarize it, if of these 20 and some people all had decided to fight, that would mean that instead of 99% convictions, there would at most 3-4.......Anyone wanna to comment? No comment.
CITING YOU: ".............Quantum Theory is supported by all available evidence....................."
Man, you read too, way too much yellow pages. For all empty talk, there is still NO evidence supporting your blah-blah talking. I repeat: NO EVIDENCE. Actually, i am making double joke of you, but don't bother finding out what it is exactly. Keep reading yellow pages.
Hilbert space continuum, fuzzy logic, quantum theory, multi-universe theory, big bang theory, you name them, compared to the simplicity of the GOD, all of them looks ridiculous. And no, when scientist speaks about GOD, he does not mean the "well known" old man with big beard and nice looking eyes, but something entirely different.
And just for the sake of the argument, i will tell you one well known fact. There is no way, i repeat NO WAY one could say whether some planet for example is having speed 0 or speed 1000 km/h. All the math and physic laws are EQUAL in both cases, so, i am asking you, who made the difference??? Who made one object moving, and another staying still???
The idea is laughable not because of the readers, but because of the censorship. Yes, yes, i know, if don't censor the F$$$ words, you could be sued, or at least all the comments could tend to be insults only, but as with the normal conversation f2f, these kind of persons are very fast ignored and banned by the readers themselves. Even Aristotel used to say that when you dialogue (argue), everything is allowed. Except killing each other....maybe....
...but the whole idea of ANONYMOUS voting. Common people, anonymous??? Was not this made a bad word? And just think about, if all the voting is made PUBLIC, then there would not be any chance for false votes, as anyone, at anytime could check and confirm his vote. And as we are grown adults, it is really good to know that your neighbor voted for this "^%$%^$%^$^%$%", and take the appropriate measures of course.....in the good sense of the word of course, and the legal too, and lawful too..
There is this famous song: AC/DC - Dirty deeds done dirt cheeps....
I could not tell my impression of this story more clear and in just one sentence...
Nope, they are simply saying that Google does not support P3P policy, hence, what? What is the punishment for a site that does not support it? Marking it as Evil?
So, right now we don't know if we are eating real food or GMO food, as it is not mandatory to have it written on the product. And my question is, are we going to be "informed" the same way about the fake meat??? What is next, fake politicians? Oh.....wait, they already fake...
Slashdot Mirror
So, should the society punish so harsh the shoplifters then? Don't you know, it all about the balance, between the cost to punish someone, and the cost of the crime. Just like everything else. BALANCE.
It is really sooo simple. I had a ticket. I decided to fight it. Notice To Appear. At the trial date there were 20 cases. 2 Pleaded guilty (funny guys). 2 decided to plead not guilty, but they did not fight properly so they lost. I fought with claws and fangs. I lost half of their time. I managed to deal adjourment, and at the next trial date, the officer did not appear, so i have won.
So, to summarize it, if of these 20 and some people all had decided to fight, that would mean that instead of 99% convictions, there would at most 3-4.......Anyone wanna to comment? No comment.
CITING YOU: ".............Quantum Theory is supported by all available evidence....................."
Man, you read too, way too much yellow pages. For all empty talk, there is still NO evidence supporting your blah-blah talking. I repeat: NO EVIDENCE. Actually, i am making double joke of you, but don't bother finding out what it is exactly. Keep reading yellow pages.
Hilbert space continuum, fuzzy logic, quantum theory, multi-universe theory, big bang theory, you name them, compared to the simplicity of the GOD, all of them looks ridiculous. And no, when scientist speaks about GOD, he does not mean the "well known" old man with big beard and nice looking eyes, but something entirely different.
And just for the sake of the argument, i will tell you one well known fact. There is no way, i repeat NO WAY one could say whether some planet for example is having speed 0 or speed 1000 km/h. All the math and physic laws are EQUAL in both cases, so, i am asking you, who made the difference??? Who made one object moving, and another staying still???
I am happy that he did not work for NASA. God bless America. And yes, the idea of GOD is not scientifically ridiculous.
The idea is laughable not because of the readers, but because of the censorship. Yes, yes, i know, if don't censor the F$$$ words, you could be sued, or at least all the comments could tend to be insults only, but as with the normal conversation f2f, these kind of persons are very fast ignored and banned by the readers themselves. Even Aristotel used to say that when you dialogue (argue), everything is allowed. Except killing each other....maybe....
...but the whole idea of ANONYMOUS voting. Common people, anonymous??? Was not this made a bad word? And just think about, if all the voting is made PUBLIC, then there would not be any chance for false votes, as anyone, at anytime could check and confirm his vote. And as we are grown adults, it is really good to know that your neighbor voted for this "^%$%^$%^$^%$%", and take the appropriate measures of course.....in the good sense of the word of course, and the legal too, and lawful too..
Did you want to say USa? Because, this is the guy who is more interested in your insides, and who is willing to abuse you....
So, you would not mind if he lights on a cigarette? It is his right to smoke, right? Am i right i mean? Which means that you are left. Oh, nevermind.
You forgot to mention the kids. Who does not wanna to kick the baby!!!
This guy is very good example of what the real hacker is, and what they should be. Kudos man.
There is this famous song: AC/DC - Dirty deeds done dirt cheeps....
I could not tell my impression of this story more clear and in just one sentence...
Ubuntu: YES. But only if the version is less than 11.
Fedora in my opinion is going to take the lead.
All you have to do is just to leave and never ever mention this mother f&^&^%&^%&^ in your resume.
Actually, that is what is happening right now, the government is accessing all the "public" information.
In this case, i vote for the copyright. Let them eat the same cake. Is it not ironic, China to defend the copyright, and USA to ignore it!
So, you have a choice: Either fuck and have BB, or be fucked and have iPhone......
Is this really a choice?
That's all i could say.
Short answer.
Does it matter that they are actually right about their accusations? Oh, wait, they are evil, guilty until....forever.
Nope, they are simply saying that Google does not support P3P policy, hence, what? What is the punishment for a site that does not support it? Marking it as Evil?
So, right now we don't know if we are eating real food or GMO food, as it is not mandatory to have it written on the product. And my question is, are we going to be "informed" the same way about the fake meat??? What is next, fake politicians? Oh.....wait, they already fake...
I would not.
Short answer: YES
It is still online, and we are still happy to have it. You guys, i really wish you best luck shutting it down.