RIM Trying To Woo Customers With Porn, Gambling Apps?
AZA43 writes "Everybody knows that BlackBerry-maker RIM is hurting these days. But is it hurting enough to try to attract new customers with the promise of porn and/or gambling apps? A new rating system added to RIM's BlackBerry App World store suggests that it just may be that desperate. The new 'Adult' rating covers, 'graphic sexual content, graphic nudity,' 'graphic violence,' and gambling apps 'as permitted by law.' And that suggests RIM will allow this kind of content into App World, in stark contrast to Apple's no-porn-on-the-iPhone stand."
Why are you asking a question... isnt reporting supposed to answer questions?
It is like when the news asks "Why are gas prices so high?" and then never answer it, but instead focus on the woes of the common person having to pay $200/week because they opted in on that oversized pickup that made their penis seem bigger.
Rant Off....
Why not! are they like a catholic company or something!!
I'm not even sure App-facilitated access to porn would be even a latent concern for me the next time I buy a smart-phone. What could compete with the glory of undulating breasts in 1080p?
Why would that be "desperate"?
I know my iPod touch had a porn app... it was called Safari.
Giving a new definition to RIM job.
I hope the gambling apps will be tested to be fair and 100% legal in areas as permitted by law.
Now why can we in the US have legal on line sports betting?
RIM is from Canada: fewer puritans, healthier attitude towards sex.
no-porn + app store lock in = anit trust
MS and apple look out.
I usually associated the impending death of shopping centers with the presence of video stores, like Blockbuster. Dollar stores are also a sign things are less than fashionable in the prospective renter department.
RIM going in this direction is effectively encouraging undesirable, unfashionable business, which could be their death knell. Sure, there's a market for such things, but it's not going to be in the board room, sensitive as business is regarding Harrassment claims.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
I'm going back to the Blackberry now that amateur hour is starting!
Are you fucking serious? Porn? Just because there is an adult rating you equate it with porn?
Why not just change the name of this site to the "Apple Felcher's Worship Site" and get it over with?
Blackberrys were mainly used because of the messaging capabilities, security, and corporate centralized control they provided. For RIM to be moving in this marketing direction seems like an unprofessional use of the products whom they cater to.
Life is not for the lazy.
what?
look out for what? "anit trust"?
I'm not sure you understand what anti trust is all about... but yea, keep on nerd ragin' away. JOE DRAGON!
Antitrust does not and has never meant "it doesn't have all the options I want". One of the criteria monopoly tests is that no substitutes exist. Since Android does have that option, you are out of luck trying to argue that in court.
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
Yeah? Well, I'm going to go build my own mobile marketplace! With blackjack, and hookers! In fact, forget the mobile marketplace!
"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
blackberries have had "sideloading" and ability to load audio files as ringers and chimes since forever, they have always been more respecting of personal freedom, i can load any compatible and signed OS image regardless of what my carrier wants bundled. only thing i could ask for would be the ability to load OS images signed by other parties/ untrusted keys and simply have the security chip authenticate only against things that recognize the other signing keys as meaningful
Snowden and Manning are heroes.
Slightly on topic, I always wondered why "sex and violence" are mentioned in the same breath so much. It's usually by people who have hang-ups about sex. They want to portray sex as a bad thing, so they always bracket it in with violence which is unquestionably bad. It's a bit like Sen McCarthy who tried to smear the Screen Actors' Guild by repeatedly asking "Have you ever been a member of the Communist Party or the Screen Actors' Guild", implying that the two were related. Or like clueless bookstore managers who group Sci Fi and Fantasy in together as if they're the same genre.
However these people do more than consider sex and violence to be equally reprehensible, they actually consider sex to be worse than violence. Hence it's okay for a TV show to show someone getting their head sliced off and blood everywhere, but God forbid if anyone should get a glimpse of a nipple, vagina, penis, and other such parts of the human body which (practical though they may be) are evil! Murder? Fine. Lovemaking?! Think of the children!!
I'm speaking of American TV of course. Other parts of the world have less Victorian attitudes to sex.
Drill baby drill - on Mars
I would love to be able to play on PokerStars or BC's PlayNow.com while watching TV - no longer hindered by cables or relatively unwieldy laptops.
With a brand name like that, it was only a matter of time, really.
Apple's no-porn-on-the-iPhone stand
A quick GIS shows that there's at least one instance of porn on an iPod stand.
Last post!
Article smacks right into the tormented relationship of people with sex (power and money).
Got nothing else to worry about?
Good that the page has a thumb-down button.
RIM is a Canadian company - people may not be as burdened there
worked for VHS.
Normally /. is up in arms over any attempt to censor developers. Now somebody is saying "we won't censor developers, but we will make it easy for users to self-select" and they're getting trashed for it.
Seems a little hypocritical.
What, you mean some company doesn't impose their pathetic puritanical standards on their customers? OMG alert the presses!
-- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
Um, you can't. It might be available to you, but so was online poker at one point. The legalities either haven't been pushed through the courts or, more likely, the feds have not decided to exert their immense pressure on these on line betting places.
I hope the gambling apps will be tested to be fair and 100% legal in areas as permitted by law.
If by "fair" you mean "heavily weighted in the favor of the company who runs it", I'm sure your hopes will be satisfied.
"Oh no... he found the
Genius.
It seems the power of porn and technology has been underestimated over and over.
Porn drove the Video Cassette business and is probably responsible for VHS defeating the superior Beta format.
It is also probably responsible for the huge early popularity of the Internet.
Barring backlash from prudish regulators this move can't be underestimated . . .
-- Mean People Suck
Idiots, those over payed executives surely do not have expendable income to spend on fucking & gambling! This is the best idea I've ever heard come out of rim so far.
Just because they accept mature content on their network you flag them as desperate? Who the hell approve article here?
I posted this elsewhere in the discussion but it might get buried and missed. While the article has an interesting graphic which describes an adult rating that clearly includes porn ( http://blogs.cio.com/sites/cio.com/files/u80/BB_AppWorldRatings.jpg ), the actual RIM dev blog ( http://devblog.blackberry.com/2011/11/blackberry-app-world-content-ratings/?CPID=TWDNPI&Date=113011 ) has an entirely different graphic ( http://rimdevblog.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/app-world-content-rating-1.jpg ) which _prohibits graphic sexual content._
I don't know about you but I think I'll take my information from the actual source and chalk this article up to nothing more than FUD...
Sex does sell and it sells well. But, it's painful to watch a company that was once so very great, reducing itself to offering porn & gambling to garner some market share. It might even work - but it would be the kind of success that makes you want to take a shower to get the ugly off.
http://www.busyweather.com/
When I first read this on Slashdot, under the description /. shows "Read the 69 comments". Perfect timing. Shame on you /.
Dear CIO.com - I just wanted to take this opportunity to welcome you to the electronic age and to the Internet. Just a tip for you that pornography and gambling (the work of the very devil himself) is readily available on nearly every open and closed platform, mobile or fixed that exists today.
I can appreciate your wanting to elevate your cute little website by attempting to cast RIM in a bad light as Research in Motion is already in the media quite a bit lately. You may as well jump on the bandwagon as it's fashionable to kick someone while they are down it seems. Too bad Microsoft wasn't doing this on their Windows Phone platform too so you could shit on both companies at the simultaneously and be a real champion!
Excellent move stating that you admit to not seeing any apps of "that" nature, and that you think it's "good" that the company is not restricting apps based on content. By doing this, you have successfully convinced me that you are an unbiased contributor that has nothing personal against RIM. I trust you have no ulterior motive at this point - thank goodness you made those comments, I feel much better about your impartiality now.
I wanted to thank-you for crow-barring a quote from Steve Jobs into an article related to RIM. It's really important to always compare what everyone else is doing against Apple. It was a real eye opener knowing that the immortalized Steve Jobs is still protecting all of us users by not permitting pornographic or gambling applications on our phones - what a terrible world it would be if I could play cards or see some tits on my phone. Steve Jobs, thanks for looking out for us.
Mr. Sacco, admit it, you have an iPhone and love it don't you? Fact is, RIM now has a mechanism in place where content can be classified and filtered according to the user. My cable company has pornography channels, but you need to be of age to access those channels. I applaud BlackBerry in not restricting what can be delivered over the App World just because some religious or enlightened asshole has a problem with gambling or porn.
By the way, the BlackBerry PlayBook is great as you can watch porn on it, spunk on the display and easily clean if off.
I just wanted to take this opportunity to welcome you to the electronic age and to the Internet. Just a tip for you that pornography and gambling (the work of the very devil himself) is readily available on nearly every open and closed platform, mobile or fixed that exists today.
I can appreciate your wanting to elevate your cute little website by attempting to cast RIM in a bad light as Research in Motion is already in the media quite a bit lately. You may as well jump on the bandwagon as it's fashionable to kick someone while they are down it seems. Too bad Microsoft wasn't doing this on their Windows Phone platform too so you could take a dump on both companies simultaneously and be a real champion!
Excellent move stating that you admit to not seeing any apps of "that" nature, and that you think it's "good" that the company is not restricting apps based on content. By doing this, you have successfully convinced me that you are an unbiased contributor that has nothing personal against RIM. I trust you have no ulterior motive at this point - thank goodness you made those comments, I feel much better about your impartiality now.
I wanted to thank-you for crow-barring a quote from Steve Jobs into an article related to RIM. It's really important to always compare what everyone else is doing against Apple. It was a real eye opener knowing that the immortalized Steve Jobs is still protecting all of us users by not permitting pornographic or gambling applications on our phones - what a terrible world it would be if I could play cards or see some boobies on my phone. Steve Jobs, thanks for looking out for us.
Mr. Sacco, admit it, you have an iPhone and love it don't you? Fact is, RIM now has a mechanism in place where content can be classified and filtered according to the user. My cable company has pornography channels, but you need to be of age to access those channels. I applaud BlackBerry in not restricting what can be delivered over the App World just because some religious or enlightened mental case has a problem with gambling or porn.
By the way, the BlackBerry PlayBook is great as you can watch porn on it, splunk on the display and easily clean if off. Gotta do this anyways, because you always get fingers prints on the screen - good opportunity for some house keeping!
thank you thank you -- i'll be performing tonite at RIM Joint
I don't recall any time RIM saying they have the same morals as apple claims it has. Like it or not sex sells and it looks like RIMs going to feel out the water They owe it to their stockholders to try whatever they can to make money.
Jack of all trades,master of none
Who's that?
well, didnt RIM really develop 'push' technology? :)
At least if you side-load apps. Google's Android Marketplace terms also ban porn, but are enforced after the fact, it seems.
More T!
Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
All right RIM, you've sold me: porn and gambling on the blackberry is the way forward. You know what, forget the blackberry.
In puritan US of A, that's news!
If a company's subscriber base grows by 25% in the past 12 months, are they desperate?
Sorry, just fed up with all the misinformation in the US. I am more and more convinced of a conspiracy by Apple as every day goes by.
FACT: RIM is growing (get your heads out of your US is the world ass holes) .... you'd probably buy the playbook since it does pretty much the same thing as an iPad.
FACT: RIM is debt free
FACT: RIM is generating BILLIONS in free cash flow each year
FACT: Unless you drive a Ford, you probably have QNX in your vehicle.
FACT: If you actually pick up a playbook that costs half of the iPad cost
FACT: In Canada, The Playbook is actually eroding the iPad market share, not the other way around.
IRONY: I've seen apps at i tunes that are sexual in nature. APPLE IS DESPERATE! Where the hell is that headline
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Yes but crying "anti-trust" because MS or Apple wants to impose conditions you don't like is not understanding what the term means.
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
Yeah, but that is in Canadian Dollars . . . yeah? . . . oh? . . . never mind!
Two words... Las Vegas.
Heavily weighted is fine, same as a casino. 0 chance of actually coming out ahead is not fine.
The graphic seems to be a crop of actual "content ratings table" found on App World.
You can see it in this article. If you go to app page linked in the article and click on its rating, the aforementioned table does appear.
if a company allows customers to buy apps from providers, given that both parties are fully aware of what is sold and how much is paid.
When i buy a device, i don not hire a nanny. At least i cant remember having signed a contract which forces the manufacturer of my phones to watch over my habits.
If we decide that gambling apps are bad due to the addiction they may cause, lets make a well-defined law about it. If we can not show that then *please* let the customers buy it. If we can show that porn causes rape (which i dont believe), then lets make a law about it. Otherwise lets focus on the conditions under which porn is produced.
I find it a good thing that i have the freedom to buy (respectively: not to buy) porn or gambling apps.
I live near a shopping mall that was dying but got new management and over the last several years has recovered and is now an important part of the neighbourhood. Lots of new stores and lots of people around all the time. Naturally the video store noticed the recovery and closed last year. So I would say the opposite is true as well.
Is there any chance this will reduce the number of older MBA's on Wall St. from gambling with other people's money and blowing their salary on hookers?
Alas, I fear even few of them use BlackBerries anymore...