Yes, I was just thinking it was time for my colonoscopy. Now I just have to figure out what's less expensive, the deductible on my insurance or a plane ticket.
To be fair, you would have to friend both the prosecution and the defense so they can research you as a potential juror. But would you really want to do that if the defendant is an alleged criminal?
This is also why they say that you shouldn't sit in a hot tub before trying to conceive. Although they didn't say anything about trying to conceive while in a hot tub.
Remember the protest when Microsoft first added "call home" activation to Windows and Office? Where is it the fury now? We are slowly being conditioned to accept this kind of behavior from companies. Amazon removing 1984, and now Google removing some useless app. At first, people protest, but after a while this becomes accepted behavior, and people don't think twice about it.
Unfortunately it looks like this article has already set off a bit of a firestorm in twitterspace, and I doubt that many of those people actually read the report and understood it. That would take more time than is allowed to post 140 characters.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, I was just thinking it was time for my colonoscopy. Now I just have to figure out what's less expensive, the deductible on my insurance or a plane ticket.
To be fair, you would have to friend both the prosecution and the defense so they can research you as a potential juror. But would you really want to do that if the defendant is an alleged criminal?
This is also why they say that you shouldn't sit in a hot tub before trying to conceive. Although they didn't say anything about trying to conceive while in a hot tub.
Remember the protest when Microsoft first added "call home" activation to Windows and Office? Where is it the fury now? We are slowly being conditioned to accept this kind of behavior from companies. Amazon removing 1984, and now Google removing some useless app. At first, people protest, but after a while this becomes accepted behavior, and people don't think twice about it.
Who knows what "room temperature" will be in 100 years... I mean, did they take global warming into account?
Unfortunately it looks like this article has already set off a bit of a firestorm in twitterspace, and I doubt that many of those people actually read the report and understood it. That would take more time than is allowed to post 140 characters.