I really don't think Peter Jackson sees himself in such authority to re-write the story that much. Else he'd be thrown into the fire of Mt.Doom by Tolken fans with big feet.
Seems to me that its a mindset issue, that terorist mindsets like bush and bin Laden are the problem, not the mechanics.
Such technology should always be counter balanced with consideration of problematic mindsets, who are the controller behind such technology and machinery.
Is such technology making it possible to effectively shut down major highways during rush hour by simply getting ahold of the controls of the technology to do so?
In warfare, isn't control over communications and transportation top targets?
Let me suggest that open source allows one to see how something is done. It doesn't mean you have to copy the code, but perhaps better understand the functioning details of solution possibilities.
As such, licenses may not be so much an issue here, but it is always good to give credit where it is due, even if it is just referenced material.
....mention any other open source that can be used as an example of already existing functionality that is like this or can contribute to it, perhaps directly.
Interesting, last night I read a reply that someone thought my post was funny and realizing I had made an error, I corrected it in another message... Now that post finding my original post funny is gone and the one I'm replying to is here. Even after I set the threshold to -1 (in case someone moded down teh "funny" one to troll), I still do not see the post text I saw last nite. But looking at the post numbers, my last post was done two messages after the one I'm now responding to. So where was it last nite after I made the correction?
OK so the anonymous cowards are someone or two that have editing after post ability.
Maybe this is why I could not find a post I made in the past,what should now be in the archives, regarding longhorn.
Ok so slashdot is being paid by MS....
And you are asking me questions so to help MS.....
Your claim "Anybody who's looked at the output of your average programmer will easily be able to verify that your statement does not hold true for all programmers." is not a claim but a question to me as to how to tell the difference.
Programming is the act of automating complexity by putting simpler complexities together, and done so to make it easy to use and reuse the complexity.
The act is very recursive and common knowledge even reaching the second nature level.
This makes it clear that there has been a major failure of computer science to recognize even the most fundamental physics of programming.
Most software patents are not valid once bounced off the wall of what cannot be patented, for the natural laws of the physical phenomenon of our creating and using abstractions is three for thre what cannot be patented. And we can add to this mathmatical algorythims... making it four for four.
.... that MS is market testing possibilities of what to add to longhorn. Which amounts to the request for comments and other ideas and specifics issues... They will then sekll back to you and those who gave in the request.
Re:How blind are you people? Or is it arrogance?
on
Microsoft's new CLI
·
· Score: 1
How blind are you people? Or is it arrogance?
on
Microsoft's new CLI
·
· Score: 1
- a new MS Shell..... integrated with.net and the what ever you call it standard (to be) GUI package so you take the sum of programming concepts and datatypes and boil them down into a non-conflicting package (Programming issues). In this you also create a GUI system to provide standard GUI functionality (2nd primary UI). Interface these to a Command Line Interface (1st primary UI) and considering the 3rd UI is IPC (inter process communication abilities and somewht inherent in.net ) ------ you have the three primary UIs together and with them you you can create an autocoding environment. add to that voice to text translation.....
From what I have seen of the comments being made on/. regarding the article..... there is an enormus depth of blind ignorance regarding what MS is up to.
Somehow all this is beginning to remind me of Record Club of America...
So for small monthy payments you can buy this device but because we run a free embedded version of Linux on it we can better compete price wise with they likes of Apple and MS..... OR give you so many free songs to get you going, which you will receive so many dl credits for upon the receipt of each of your payments.
Where the free songs are paid out of the savings we get from using embedded linux.
Its really more likely that a big bang would contain a much richer spectrum of vibration. But the further you are away from the source the lower it will sound, as the higher frequencies of sound don't travel as far. Examples are of hearing the rumble of a rocket or space shuttle launch from 30 miles away comparied to just a mile or two, where you hear the higher frequencies, crackeling. Or the low frequencey rumble heard in northern Asia when the indonesian volcano exploded in teh 1500s physically causing the so called dark ages (about a decade long). Or the bass from a car stereo traveling a good distance, even thru walls, but not the higher end.
Sound may not travel thru a vacume, but the question is, at what point would sound be stopped by such a vacume during the sequence of an anti-vacume explosion?
I believe there is a general assumption that MS really wanted to win the case.
What should be understood is the advantages MS would gain in losing.
Teh fact that prior art itself that was not presented by MS but of MS products, should be plenty reason to suspect MS didn't want to win the case, but only create the illusion.
Perhpas the question to ask now is how is MS using other companies to do their bidding, like SCO..
MS does not have the resources to do it right, but they sure as hell can do what they can to put constraints on the abilities of others to.
slap an autocoding engine on top of what is a non-conflicting sum of programming concepts and data types (with a bytecode layer and excecution engine) and slap a patent on it. and in the mean time while you are waiting for the patent, you copyright integrated databases used by the autocoder.....
I have no idea how the url got changed to include "slashdot.org" so I'll try again. maybe it was a firebird problem...as preview gave me a slashdot page empty of a preview.
One place where I've mentioned what MS is up to. I've also mentioned it here on slashdot but slashdots search engine sucks. But anyway, I mentioned Longhorn specifically along the same lines as that link while getting one response that I'm either an idiot or a genius.....
Slashdot Mirror
Metaphors, Analogies and the REAL
...training program?
a bit more (easy access)
There's plenty more... I've just begun drawing connections into that thread... Shall I introduce you to the woman in red
open source project
I really don't think Peter Jackson sees himself in such authority to re-write the story that much.
Else he'd be thrown into the fire of Mt.Doom by Tolken fans with big feet.
for when fools will do it for you.....
Seems to me that its a mindset issue, that terorist mindsets like bush and bin Laden are the problem, not the mechanics.
Such technology should always be counter balanced with consideration of problematic mindsets, who are the controller behind such technology and machinery.
Is such technology making it possible to effectively shut down major highways during rush hour by simply getting ahold of the controls of the technology to do so?
In warfare, isn't control over communications and transportation top targets?
... so to help promote SP2/NX which is media wise being used to soften up the consumers to heavier DRM Technology.
MS to intro hardware-linked security for AMD64, Itanium, future CPUs which failed to mention BSD already using it???
Or does this mean they are looking for a fall guy?
Let me suggest that open source allows one to see how something is done. It doesn't mean you have to copy the code, but perhaps better understand the functioning details of solution possibilities.
As such, licenses may not be so much an issue here, but it is always good to give credit where it is due, even if it is just referenced material.
Fixed link to AROS
I also like what freedestop is doing with dbus, as it reminds me of the Amiga IPC usage that AREXX makes use of.
....mention any other open source that can be used as an example of already existing functionality that is like this or can contribute to it, perhaps directly.
Not getting into the programming details but AROS is open source Amiga clone I believe having some of this...
Shrug
Interesting, last night I read a reply that someone thought my post was funny and realizing I had made an error, I corrected it in another message... Now that post finding my original post funny is gone and the one I'm replying to is here. Even after I set the threshold to -1 (in case someone moded down teh "funny" one to troll), I still do not see the post text I saw last nite. But looking at the post numbers, my last post was done two messages after the one I'm now responding to. So where was it last nite after I made the correction?
OK so the anonymous cowards are someone or two that have editing after post ability.
Maybe this is why I could not find a post I made in the past,what should now be in the archives, regarding longhorn.
Ok so slashdot is being paid by MS....
And you are asking me questions so to help MS.....
Your claim "Anybody who's looked at the output of your average programmer will easily be able to verify that your statement does not hold true for all programmers." is not a claim but a question to me as to how to tell the difference.
Was it the same black cat? Deja Vue...
"only the psuedo computer science does back it up"
should read "only the psuedo computer science does NOT back it up,"
using computers to put things together...
Programming is the act of automating complexity by putting simpler complexities together, and done so to make it easy to use and reuse the complexity.
The act is very recursive and common knowledge even reaching the second nature level.
This makes it clear that there has been a major failure of computer science to recognize even the most fundamental physics of programming.
Most software patents are not valid once bounced off the wall of what cannot be patented, for the natural laws of the physical phenomenon of our creating and using abstractions is three for thre what cannot be patented. And we can add to this mathmatical algorythims... making it four for four.
and teh patent office shoudl damn well know this already only the psuedo computer science does back it up, because it is biased by the money carrot.
.... and contact Archive.org
.... that MS is market testing possibilities of what to add to longhorn. Which amounts to the request for comments and other ideas and specifics issues... They will then sekll back to you and those who gave in the request.
oops! typo
Autocoding project proposal
- a new MS Shell..... integrated with .net and the what ever you call it standard (to be) GUI package .net ) ------ you have the three primary UIs together and with them you you can create an autocoding environment. add to that voice to text translation .....
/. regarding the article..... there is an enormus depth of blind ignorance regarding what MS is up to.
so you take the sum of programming concepts and datatypes and boil them down into a non-conflicting package (Programming issues). In this you also create a GUI system to provide standard GUI functionality (2nd primary UI). Interface these to a Command Line Interface (1st primary UI) and considering the 3rd UI is IPC (inter process communication abilities and somewht inherent in
From what I have seen of the comments being made on
Or maybe its just arrogance?
The project
Many are not going to realize they cannot see any further than following MS....when it becomes to late.
Ben Franklin and Winston Churchill both said, but in different words:
Those willing to sacrifice freedom in exchange for security will have neither and deserve neither.
Somehow all this is beginning to remind me of Record Club of America...
So for small monthy payments you can buy this device but because we run a free embedded version of Linux on it we can better compete price wise with they likes of Apple and MS..... OR give you so many free songs to get you going, which you will receive so many dl credits for upon the receipt of each of your payments.
Where the free songs are paid out of the savings we get from using embedded linux.
Its really more likely that a big bang would contain a much richer spectrum of vibration. But the further you are away from the source the lower it will sound, as the higher frequencies of sound don't travel as far. Examples are of hearing the rumble of a rocket or space shuttle launch from 30 miles away comparied to just a mile or two, where you hear the higher frequencies, crackeling. Or the low frequencey rumble heard in northern Asia when the indonesian volcano exploded in teh 1500s physically causing the so called dark ages (about a decade long). Or the bass from a car stereo traveling a good distance, even thru walls, but not the higher end.
Sound may not travel thru a vacume, but the question is, at what point would sound be stopped by such a vacume during the sequence of an anti-vacume explosion?
If the GPL is invalid, what other licensings would also be in question?
How about any licensings that violates or circumvents a persons constitutional rights (US)?
Might such a thing also extend to employment contracts?
I believe there is a general assumption that MS really wanted to win the case.
What should be understood is the advantages MS would gain in losing.
Teh fact that prior art itself that was not presented by MS but of MS products, should be plenty reason to suspect MS didn't want to win the case, but only create the illusion.
Perhpas the question to ask now is how is MS using other companies to do their bidding, like SCO..
Doesn't this fall under some sort of homeland security thing?
Such the exposure is the right and duty of real americans?
"The human body is designed to run on scaracity...."
tell that to groups like Christians Childrens Fund.
MS does not have the resources to do it right, but they sure as hell can do what they can to put constraints on the abilities of
others to.
slap an autocoding engine on top of what is a non-conflicting sum of programming concepts and data types (with a bytecode layer
and excecution engine) and slap a patent on it. and in the mean time while you are waiting for the patent, you copyright integrated databases
used by the autocoder.....
in the end, you enforce your IP rights.
Market cornered.
I have no idea how the url got changed to include "slashdot.org" so I'll try again. maybe it was a firebird problem...as preview gave me a slashdot page empty of a preview.
anyway
an autocoding tool project
and as an extra, since I had to correct the link..
more information on autocoding and a link to an excuse to ignore the research and links
Some things you cannot patent or otherwise claim rights to.
One place where I've mentioned what MS is up to. I've also mentioned it here on slashdot but slashdots search engine sucks. But anyway, I mentioned Longhorn specifically along the same lines as that link while getting one response that I'm either an idiot or a genius.....
Guess I'm a Genius... duh!