The AC hit every single point. Hell the company I work for, there was a serious problems with upper level management and executives refusing to do so because "it's too complex." It absolutely has to be to the point of being seemless and not seen for them to use it. Just think on the bit with passwords, it's easier to use a FOB or FOB+biometrics in many cases because these people will use phrases that are easy to crack, or simply write them down.
One case I remember, and this was a government office for a largish city. The password for the entire payroll and property tax system, that only one person had access to was written on a sticky note and stuck to the cork board. Sometime earlier, someone had broken in and siphoned off not only the entire staffs payroll info, but had also gotten all the tax information for every person in the city.
When your TDS goes so far that even when they(Trump various offices where he's appointed people) do the right thing, your mind conjures up something in order to reinforce that social and political viewpoint so you can feel smug.
Generally no. And I wish I was even kidding about that, in most cases unless it can be all wrapped into one nice little ball most don't want anything to do with it and still prefer dead-drops for anything important.
and the amount of money to be had by automating away 2 million driving jobs with an average pay of $50k/year (+ taxes, benefits, training, etc) is staggering.
Your average cab driver makes nowhere near $50k and truck drivers have long moved over the $60k hurdle in the US and are moving on $70k, with some companies now offering flat $80k/year plus $0.55-0.78 per mile. At that rate clearing $100k USD driving a truck isn't only possible, it's downright easy.
The real push for "self driving" vehicles like trucks is because there's such a huge shortage of drivers it's stupid. It's not just the US, but Canada as well. 10 years ago they were saying that it was the "best time" to become a truck driver, and they thought they had the shortage all wrapped up. It's far worse now because more companies use trucks instead of warehouses as well as using them as JIT, which greatly reduces the overhead costs of having a large building.
By wrapped up, I mean companies were offing full reimbursement of training. In some places, schools had legal agreements with insurance companies so if you passed a written test you were automatically granted 1yr driving behind the wheel, 100,000mi safety bonus, and 50% reduction in insurance rates for the first 5 years as a owner/operator. Now companies are pushing all this, and tossing in 20k-45k signing bonuses, free satellite, free internet, company cellphone, large sleepers, fridges, for O/O's offering to cover 50% of the cost of a new or used truck, massive discounts in fuel, freedom to pick whatever load you want and on and on and fucking on. Just to get people to sign on.
Dude, you originally said they broke the "system", now you're saying they broke the "piggy bank".
They're not the same thing. Going over budget is not the same as the system breaking. Maybe you're some ivory tower elite who has the privilege of never having to borrow money or carry debt his whole life, but real people have to struggle with budgets all the time, sometimes going over.
It did break the system, it also broke the piggy bank. Maybe you could try reading the AG's report on this? I've linked it a few times. Then you can read the current budget issues, and news articles on it.
Again, you're making mountains out of molehills just like the SJWs.
So, Ontario which has $320B in debt with a population of ~12m people is making a mountain out of a mole hill? I'll remind you that when Greece defaulted they had roughly the same amount of population, with a government that also drove manufacturing and industry out.
Oh, my sweet summer child... You have no idea what it means when the left has a stranglehold on culture
I don't? Oh you bloody fool, making an assumption like that just shows how badly you're arguing that point.
They're not. It's just that nobody gives a fuck in schools what your political leanings are. And why would they? That's not what a school is for
They're not? So why don't you explain why all those universities go out of their way to remove speakers they disagree with. And the students unions do exactly the same thing. I mean really, in the UK it's become so bad that the government is looking to get involved. And even the guardian is arguing against it. These are not one-off things. You seem to fail to understand the difference between what you linked, and what I'm saying. Universities in Europe are, have, and do actively remove/revoke speakers from speaking at their universities. Whether they're old school feminists who's view points no longer "fit" with the new feminist order. Or speakers who argue for more free speech in Europe.
You seem to fail to understand that universities are the place where your views should be tested, and in European countries your views aren't being tested because they're banning people who would challenge them. European universities have been doing this since the 1970's. This same infestation has been going on in US universities for the last 10-15 years, and the same in Canada.
Is there a hidden reason for un-installing NoScript?
Simple? Moonchild threw a hissyfit, no other reason. There was a far longer thread that they nuked the fuck out of a while back on it, and that's what it boiled down to.
Thanks for continuing to prove the old point. You can lead an idiot to knowledge, but you can't make them smarter.
If you actually read the thread, then you'd know that you can only enable noscript by getting into the guts of the browser via about:config as another person pointed out to you.
I am willing to bet no one has ever gotten to the interview stage only to hear no correspondence anymore.
I've got to laugh at that. Hell I can remember it happening 20 years ago, it's only gotten worse. It's actually worse for those who don't work in specialized fields and companies aren't falling over themselves to one-up on the pay scale right now.
Car analogy: Person slashes your tires and you respond by dumping a gallon of oil based paint on theirs.
Fixed that.
This isn't a competition of arseholishness.
You're right, problem is businesses have been stuck in the "well fuck the interviewees because we can simply outsource them." Most companies haven't seen a job market like this since the 1980's, where they NEED warm bodies and they spent years pissing good will away. Then they're suddenly stuck with people who will not respond, because they don't understand that employment is no longer in their hands. Not even joking here, the people who last experienced a job market like this are retired, have been more then 10-15 years in some cases. This isn't even close to the boom back in the late 90's and pre-9/11.
You misunderstand the law and the reasoning by the court. The baker is making art, it is not a public space. Compelling an artist to create something that is fundamentally against their ethos is a 1st amendment violation. On the other hand, social media has become a "public space" because of the large number of people that go there to exchange ideas, politics, points of view, and so on.
Rapists and pedophiles in most countries end up in solitary for most of their lives. The general population has a tendency of killing them, because even a murderer has lines they won't cross.
Except for gay marriage, voting rights, felon disenfranchisement, prayer in school, mandatory standing for the national anthem, etc
Plenty of wide and very disagreements on gay marriage on both sides of the political spectrum everywhere, US? Canada? Hell even in European countries. Voting rights, well that one's interesting. Conservatives want voter ID. Progressives suddenly want voter ID, but only because of the muh russia narrative. But they then suddenly realize that's racist and backtrack quickly. Who'd knew that law and order(something that conservatives generally like), would be against people who've committed felonies losing the right to vote. You'd also find most are willing to allow former felons the right to re-earn the right to vote by becoming productive members of society too. Prayer in school, that one is interesting. Because we've already seen equity being handed to non-christians to be able to pray in classes, which has led to some very interesting court cases. And mandatory standing for the national anthem? Are you saying that conservatives seem to be more patriotic? Or are you saying that you don't like the idea of standing for it, in which case you should probably find a new country?
And, depending on where the line is drawn for "most conservatives", active and vocal parts are significantly against equality with regard to gender, race and religio
I think the word you meant is equity, not equality. You should be able to tell the difference, if you can't then you should go ask your local asian/asian-american who was denied entry to a major university while an african-american was granted entry because of affirmative action. Whole bunch of court cases on that one these days.
I've never heard of anyone serious wanting enforced equality. To say those are the two positions is stupid and wrong.
You misunderstand. They're saying free markets create equality based on ability and skill, and they're against using the state to force equality. I.e. gender quota's, race quota's, and so on. And schools and or businesses dropping more qualified candidates because of laws. Or to put in a simple word: They seem to believe in meritocracy, something that the left now calls racist, sexist, or a MRA construct when they're being extremely stupid.
I've been paying attention to the fact that the two sides are not really all that different, they just do sometimes things differently. The conservatives have been doing these things for centuries, largely under religious guise and/or in family settings instead. So left-wing activists are doing that in schools? Frankly, I don't see how any of the sides is the lesser asshole in this clash.
Oh this is mostly true, of course you've just forgotten that the left pretty much has a strangehold on culture and has for oh 60 odd years at this point in most of the west.
Ahhh, *you* haven't been paying attention to the last century, have you?
Sure have. Did you pay attention to the fact that antifa of today are just like the ones of the 1930's?
Maybe in America, not so much in large parts of Europe. In terms of left-vs-right, I have yet to find a polarized school in my country.
European schools were the ones to invent deplatforming under the guise of hate speech. You have yet to find a polarized school in your country? How would you know if the viewpoints you're exposed to have already been censored and curated.
Hahaha I see you have stumbled upon my fake news site
So findlaw is a fake news site?
Anyways, "Dwayne Dixon" says hi, he's actually an editor for a couple of the sites. I hope you find some of the other made up names as believable as that one:)
Oh I'm sure, which is why you can see the misdemeanor charges against him.
Every four years, the other side has the chance to do the same thing itself. Apparently this is a venerable American tradition...
There's a problem with your reasoning. The progressive left, and in general political left across the west have been frothing at the mouth and pushing to censor people for the better part of 15 years now. Now you've got an entire group of people that believe that free speech should be restricted if it hurts feelings and/or desire to expand hate speech laws to cover feelings. If you don't think so, you haven't really been paying attention. Things like deplatforming, pulling fire alarms, calling in bomb threats, and so on have been a staple for quite a while. The last oh 7-8 years or so, they've started moving directly into violence. You can see that with antifa most prominently, but can find it with any communist linked group in pretty much any country in Canada, US, or various EU countries.
Universities are pretty damned cancerous these days in terms of stifling speech outside of what's approved, even here in Canada. The debacle with Lindsay Shepard is a good example, especially since these self declared liberals are now labeled as far-right by various media outlets, student unions, student groups, and so on.
racist plays dumb when made the butt of a grim joke news at 11
Progressive discovers they don't like being held to their own standards. Shows that they're not too smart up on the follow up. News at 10, and every 15 minutes.
Do those countries then remove the polling places in minority areas? Do they close the offices in minority areas to make it harder for them to get the documentation? Do they have a well documented history of trying so stop blacks from voting? Are they governed by an unpopular minority party holding on to power through disenfranchisement? No!
Yes. Yes. "Other races" so yes. And Yes. You're so damned ignorant of the world it's surprising you don't go into culture shock just reading about it on the internet.
if citizens matter so much Why is is Ok to make it more difficult for them to vote?
How is it harder for them to vote? No really. EVERY western country besides the US requires ID to vote, some even require national ID cards to vote. Why is it you need ID to get welfare/social assistance, but not to vote. Why do the DNC require ID to vote in their primaries, but claim voter ID is racist.
Since it's been proven that there is no real problem with illegals voting, why is it Ok to disenfranchise those precious citizens 'just in case'?
Considering that some cities and states are now trying to allow illegals to vote in local elections, it seems that we already know that to be false.
The free speech you are trying to defend is the right rally a mob to kill people you don't like.
Are you talking about charlottesville there? Ever hear of a guy named Dwayne Dixon? No? He's the guy who claims he leveled a gun at James Fields(the guy in the car), and chased him with the gun. That was mere minutes before he drove into that crowd of people. Always more to a story then you think isn't there.
Fans the flames of racial division to fire up their base? Check.
Sorry which group is using identity politics, and which group is stating that they're standing for "americans."
Tars and feathers anyone who dares speak against him? Check.
Welcome to politics? No really. Welcome to politics.
Thinks he should have final, unfettered control over everything? Check.
Sorry who's that again?
Dismisses anything he disagrees with as Fake News? Check.
Well if you're talking about Trump, it seems he really doesn't like CNN. And well, when you have assholes like Jim Acosta trying to ruin peace summit's, or yelling from the back of a large room then claiming "the president refused to answer" I could understand that.
Who am I speaking of? Hitler or Trump? Or both?
Good question. If you were talking about Trump, you'd fail pretty hard at matching that all up. On the other hand, many democrats are actively advocating for censorship for anyone that isn't a democrat. They're advocating for political censorship as well.
Your point, I'm sad to say, is lost. The current person in the white house reminds *me* of nazi Germany.
Out of curiosity, were you alive then? How about any family that lived through it? I'm guessing that's a no. But hey, if you want some stories, I can get them. While my grandmother is oh 10 years dead, she did live through it. My mom was born in east germany, and still remembers plenty of stuff.
You're trying to equate the left with Nazi Germany, but that's not how it looks to me. The right is the one that seems like it's stolen the playbook from 1930's Germany,
So which side is supporting groups like antifa? Why aren't the media reporting when they violently assault reporters or average people? Which side thinks that "punching nazis" is acceptable? Which side has watered down "nazi" to "anything that the left disagrees with." You know what's funny in this? You've got it partly right, antifa is antifa the ones from the 1930's or today. Simply communist agitators, both groups would attack people, both would trash private and public property. The media would not cover their attacks. There were plenty of politicians in the german parliment who supported them. There's plenty of democrats that openly support them, and reporters, and professors...just like then.
The left is pushing for more censorship of the media, of platforms, of publications under the guise of hate speech. And so far, the right are still saying that free speech is best speech, even when leftists go out of their way to try and shut down public events, ruin peoples lives by mining social media for wrong think, and so on.
Mod me down, whatever.. you think conservatives are the only ones having their speech supressed? Look around, read/. political comments at -1. Try it. It feels like there are two warring factions in/. right now. Perfectly valid points on both sides get modded as -oblivion, Troll.
You're right on that, of course it seems to be more-so that even out of those two warring factions on/. one group is pro-authoritarian and the other is anti-authoritarian. One side believes that illegal entry into your country is fine. The other believes in law and order still. Things like immigration laws, no-hate speech laws, 2nd amendment rights, are all "nazi positions" among the most vocal believers of the left today.
Just like up here in Canada, making the statement that "less immigration is what is needed. The illegals entering from the US should be kicked out. And restricting gun rights will not stop criminals from committing violent gun crime" is a "nazi position." Then
We know that in the states when the minimum wage goes up, the economy improves... EVERY TIME. It's one of the easiest ways to boost the economy. Now sure, the business people you identify with will lie and claim it will hurt them...but their employees having money helps them becuase it's a Trickle UP economy.
So when people lose their jobs, the economy improves every time huh? Better tell that to the 70k people who lost their minimum wage jobs here in Ontario that it really helped them. You fail to understand when there are significant bumps UP in the minimum wage, you put more people at the poverty line.
Whose fault is that? CEO's, CFO's, investors and whatnot telling companies to shift jobs overseas! It's white guys in suits and ties, not illegals.
And why do they do that, because guys to guys like you the #1 consideration on buying things is how low the price can go. You and society want's the cheapest stuff possible... so they shift jobs overseas to take advantage of the labor differential.
They're screwing YOU and screwing the foreign labor too. The only people who win are investment bankers, CEO's and CFO's and other plutocrats.
You mean the Liberal Party of Ontario? That pushed more regulations, more environmental regulations, more taxes on manufacturing, higher mill rates on manufacturing, higher prices on electricity? I mean I can really keep going, you seem to be pretty ignorant on the topic. Maybe that's not your fault, maybe it's because you've made a comment on a topic you're simply ignorant on.
Hate to break this to you, but the Liberal Party of Ontario did more damage to businesses in the 15 years they were in power then any action by CEO's, or CFO's could. Their entire policy was to drive high paying manufacturing out of the province.
You are implying that the illegals are getting benefits... such a supposition does not jibe with them actually doing the work that we both know they do. I have seen newspaper articles here in the states about illegals who paid into the various tax systems AS illegals using fake id's and whatnot. They are. What do you think SNAP and welfare fraud is mainly caused by in the US? You can look up your own government numbers on that one.
And I have seen articles saying that the illegals paying in (and not receiving) are helping prop up systems such as Social Security, since our population growth is coming from immigration.
And if your illegally in a country, you have no right to it. You seem to not be able to understand that difference between a person who enters a country legally, gains the right to work legally, and a person who enters illegally.
So again, why focus on the immigrants and not the employers?
Slashdot Mirror
The AC hit every single point. Hell the company I work for, there was a serious problems with upper level management and executives refusing to do so because "it's too complex." It absolutely has to be to the point of being seemless and not seen for them to use it. Just think on the bit with passwords, it's easier to use a FOB or FOB+biometrics in many cases because these people will use phrases that are easy to crack, or simply write them down.
One case I remember, and this was a government office for a largish city. The password for the entire payroll and property tax system, that only one person had access to was written on a sticky note and stuck to the cork board. Sometime earlier, someone had broken in and siphoned off not only the entire staffs payroll info, but had also gotten all the tax information for every person in the city.
When your TDS goes so far that even when they(Trump various offices where he's appointed people) do the right thing, your mind conjures up something in order to reinforce that social and political viewpoint so you can feel smug.
What a fucking shitty way to live.
Aren't lawyers using encrypted emails?
Generally no. And I wish I was even kidding about that, in most cases unless it can be all wrapped into one nice little ball most don't want anything to do with it and still prefer dead-drops for anything important.
and the amount of money to be had by automating away 2 million driving jobs with an average pay of $50k/year (+ taxes, benefits, training, etc) is staggering.
Your average cab driver makes nowhere near $50k and truck drivers have long moved over the $60k hurdle in the US and are moving on $70k, with some companies now offering flat $80k/year plus $0.55-0.78 per mile. At that rate clearing $100k USD driving a truck isn't only possible, it's downright easy.
The real push for "self driving" vehicles like trucks is because there's such a huge shortage of drivers it's stupid. It's not just the US, but Canada as well. 10 years ago they were saying that it was the "best time" to become a truck driver, and they thought they had the shortage all wrapped up. It's far worse now because more companies use trucks instead of warehouses as well as using them as JIT, which greatly reduces the overhead costs of having a large building.
By wrapped up, I mean companies were offing full reimbursement of training. In some places, schools had legal agreements with insurance companies so if you passed a written test you were automatically granted 1yr driving behind the wheel, 100,000mi safety bonus, and 50% reduction in insurance rates for the first 5 years as a owner/operator. Now companies are pushing all this, and tossing in 20k-45k signing bonuses, free satellite, free internet, company cellphone, large sleepers, fridges, for O/O's offering to cover 50% of the cost of a new or used truck, massive discounts in fuel, freedom to pick whatever load you want and on and on and fucking on. Just to get people to sign on.
Dude, you originally said they broke the "system", now you're saying they broke the "piggy bank".
They're not the same thing. Going over budget is not the same as the system breaking. Maybe you're some ivory tower elite who has the privilege of never having to borrow money or carry debt his whole life, but real people have to struggle with budgets all the time, sometimes going over.
It did break the system, it also broke the piggy bank. Maybe you could try reading the AG's report on this? I've linked it a few times. Then you can read the current budget issues, and news articles on it.
Again, you're making mountains out of molehills just like the SJWs.
So, Ontario which has $320B in debt with a population of ~12m people is making a mountain out of a mole hill? I'll remind you that when Greece defaulted they had roughly the same amount of population, with a government that also drove manufacturing and industry out.
Oh, my sweet summer child... You have no idea what it means when the left has a stranglehold on culture
I don't? Oh you bloody fool, making an assumption like that just shows how badly you're arguing that point.
They're not. It's just that nobody gives a fuck in schools what your political leanings are. And why would they? That's not what a school is for
They're not? So why don't you explain why all those universities go out of their way to remove speakers they disagree with. And the students unions do exactly the same thing. I mean really, in the UK it's become so bad that the government is looking to get involved. And even the guardian is arguing against it. These are not one-off things. You seem to fail to understand the difference between what you linked, and what I'm saying. Universities in Europe are, have, and do actively remove/revoke speakers from speaking at their universities. Whether they're old school feminists who's view points no longer "fit" with the new feminist order. Or speakers who argue for more free speech in Europe.
You seem to fail to understand that universities are the place where your views should be tested, and in European countries your views aren't being tested because they're banning people who would challenge them. European universities have been doing this since the 1970's. This same infestation has been going on in US universities for the last 10-15 years, and the same in Canada.
Is there a hidden reason for un-installing NoScript?
Simple? Moonchild threw a hissyfit, no other reason. There was a far longer thread that they nuked the fuck out of a while back on it, and that's what it boiled down to.
Thanks for continuing to prove the old point. You can lead an idiot to knowledge, but you can't make them smarter.
If you actually read the thread, then you'd know that you can only enable noscript by getting into the guts of the browser via about:config as another person pointed out to you.
I am willing to bet no one has ever gotten to the interview stage only to hear no correspondence anymore.
I've got to laugh at that. Hell I can remember it happening 20 years ago, it's only gotten worse. It's actually worse for those who don't work in specialized fields and companies aren't falling over themselves to one-up on the pay scale right now.
Car analogy: Person slashes your tires and you respond by dumping a gallon of oil based paint on theirs.
Fixed that.
This isn't a competition of arseholishness.
You're right, problem is businesses have been stuck in the "well fuck the interviewees because we can simply outsource them." Most companies haven't seen a job market like this since the 1980's, where they NEED warm bodies and they spent years pissing good will away. Then they're suddenly stuck with people who will not respond, because they don't understand that employment is no longer in their hands. Not even joking here, the people who last experienced a job market like this are retired, have been more then 10-15 years in some cases. This isn't even close to the boom back in the late 90's and pre-9/11.
Since the developer has blocked noscript from working out of the box, then that'd be a yes wouldn't it?
You misunderstand the law and the reasoning by the court. The baker is making art, it is not a public space. Compelling an artist to create something that is fundamentally against their ethos is a 1st amendment violation. On the other hand, social media has become a "public space" because of the large number of people that go there to exchange ideas, politics, points of view, and so on.
Rapists and pedophiles in most countries end up in solitary for most of their lives. The general population has a tendency of killing them, because even a murderer has lines they won't cross.
Except for gay marriage, voting rights, felon disenfranchisement, prayer in school, mandatory standing for the national anthem, etc
Plenty of wide and very disagreements on gay marriage on both sides of the political spectrum everywhere, US? Canada? Hell even in European countries. Voting rights, well that one's interesting. Conservatives want voter ID. Progressives suddenly want voter ID, but only because of the muh russia narrative. But they then suddenly realize that's racist and backtrack quickly. Who'd knew that law and order(something that conservatives generally like), would be against people who've committed felonies losing the right to vote. You'd also find most are willing to allow former felons the right to re-earn the right to vote by becoming productive members of society too. Prayer in school, that one is interesting. Because we've already seen equity being handed to non-christians to be able to pray in classes, which has led to some very interesting court cases. And mandatory standing for the national anthem? Are you saying that conservatives seem to be more patriotic? Or are you saying that you don't like the idea of standing for it, in which case you should probably find a new country?
And, depending on where the line is drawn for "most conservatives", active and vocal parts are significantly against equality with regard to gender, race and religio
I think the word you meant is equity, not equality. You should be able to tell the difference, if you can't then you should go ask your local asian/asian-american who was denied entry to a major university while an african-american was granted entry because of affirmative action. Whole bunch of court cases on that one these days.
I've never heard of anyone serious wanting enforced equality. To say those are the two positions is stupid and wrong.
You misunderstand. They're saying free markets create equality based on ability and skill, and they're against using the state to force equality. I.e. gender quota's, race quota's, and so on. And schools and or businesses dropping more qualified candidates because of laws. Or to put in a simple word: They seem to believe in meritocracy, something that the left now calls racist, sexist, or a MRA construct when they're being extremely stupid.
I've been paying attention to the fact that the two sides are not really all that different, they just do sometimes things differently. The conservatives have been doing these things for centuries, largely under religious guise and/or in family settings instead. So left-wing activists are doing that in schools? Frankly, I don't see how any of the sides is the lesser asshole in this clash.
Oh this is mostly true, of course you've just forgotten that the left pretty much has a strangehold on culture and has for oh 60 odd years at this point in most of the west.
Ahhh, *you* haven't been paying attention to the last century, have you?
Sure have. Did you pay attention to the fact that antifa of today are just like the ones of the 1930's?
Maybe in America, not so much in large parts of Europe. In terms of left-vs-right, I have yet to find a polarized school in my country.
European schools were the ones to invent deplatforming under the guise of hate speech. You have yet to find a polarized school in your country? How would you know if the viewpoints you're exposed to have already been censored and curated.
Hahaha I see you have stumbled upon my fake news site
So findlaw is a fake news site?
Anyways, "Dwayne Dixon" says hi, he's actually an editor for a couple of the sites. I hope you find some of the other made up names as believable as that one :)
Oh I'm sure, which is why you can see the misdemeanor charges against him.
Every four years, the other side has the chance to do the same thing itself. Apparently this is a venerable American tradition...
There's a problem with your reasoning. The progressive left, and in general political left across the west have been frothing at the mouth and pushing to censor people for the better part of 15 years now. Now you've got an entire group of people that believe that free speech should be restricted if it hurts feelings and/or desire to expand hate speech laws to cover feelings. If you don't think so, you haven't really been paying attention. Things like deplatforming, pulling fire alarms, calling in bomb threats, and so on have been a staple for quite a while. The last oh 7-8 years or so, they've started moving directly into violence. You can see that with antifa most prominently, but can find it with any communist linked group in pretty much any country in Canada, US, or various EU countries.
Universities are pretty damned cancerous these days in terms of stifling speech outside of what's approved, even here in Canada. The debacle with Lindsay Shepard is a good example, especially since these self declared liberals are now labeled as far-right by various media outlets, student unions, student groups, and so on.
anything to trigger the libs, eh?
yur so clever!
racist plays dumb when made the butt of a grim joke
news at 11
Progressive discovers they don't like being held to their own standards. Shows that they're not too smart up on the follow up. News at 10, and every 15 minutes.
Do those countries then remove the polling places in minority areas? Do they close the offices in minority areas to make it harder for them to get the documentation? Do they have a well documented history of trying so stop blacks from voting? Are they governed by an unpopular minority party holding on to power through disenfranchisement? No!
Yes. Yes. "Other races" so yes. And Yes. You're so damned ignorant of the world it's surprising you don't go into culture shock just reading about it on the internet.
if citizens matter so much Why is is Ok to make it more difficult for them to vote?
How is it harder for them to vote? No really. EVERY western country besides the US requires ID to vote, some even require national ID cards to vote. Why is it you need ID to get welfare/social assistance, but not to vote. Why do the DNC require ID to vote in their primaries, but claim voter ID is racist.
Since it's been proven that there is no real problem with illegals voting, why is it Ok to disenfranchise those precious citizens 'just in case'?
Considering that some cities and states are now trying to allow illegals to vote in local elections, it seems that we already know that to be false.
Did you just say that blacks in poor areas are violent? What a racist.
Why do you not even bother to check that your claims aren't going to look ridiculous before posting them?
Are you going to admit you're wrong? Someone already did all the leg work for me, I'll await for your admission.
By running their cars into demonstrating people?
The free speech you are trying to defend is the right rally a mob to kill people you don't like.
Are you talking about charlottesville there? Ever hear of a guy named Dwayne Dixon? No? He's the guy who claims he leveled a gun at James Fields(the guy in the car), and chased him with the gun. That was mere minutes before he drove into that crowd of people. Always more to a story then you think isn't there.
Loves rallies? Check
You're talking about Obama right?
Fans the flames of racial division to fire up their base? Check.
Sorry which group is using identity politics, and which group is stating that they're standing for "americans."
Tars and feathers anyone who dares speak against him? Check.
Welcome to politics? No really. Welcome to politics.
Thinks he should have final, unfettered control over everything? Check.
Sorry who's that again?
Dismisses anything he disagrees with as Fake News? Check.
Well if you're talking about Trump, it seems he really doesn't like CNN. And well, when you have assholes like Jim Acosta trying to ruin peace summit's, or yelling from the back of a large room then claiming "the president refused to answer" I could understand that.
Who am I speaking of? Hitler or Trump? Or both?
Good question. If you were talking about Trump, you'd fail pretty hard at matching that all up. On the other hand, many democrats are actively advocating for censorship for anyone that isn't a democrat. They're advocating for political censorship as well.
Your point, I'm sad to say, is lost. The current person in the white house reminds *me* of nazi Germany.
Out of curiosity, were you alive then? How about any family that lived through it? I'm guessing that's a no. But hey, if you want some stories, I can get them. While my grandmother is oh 10 years dead, she did live through it. My mom was born in east germany, and still remembers plenty of stuff.
You're trying to equate the left with Nazi Germany, but that's not how it looks to me. The right is the one that seems like it's stolen the playbook from 1930's Germany,
So which side is supporting groups like antifa? Why aren't the media reporting when they violently assault reporters or average people? Which side thinks that "punching nazis" is acceptable? Which side has watered down "nazi" to "anything that the left disagrees with." You know what's funny in this? You've got it partly right, antifa is antifa the ones from the 1930's or today. Simply communist agitators, both groups would attack people, both would trash private and public property. The media would not cover their attacks. There were plenty of politicians in the german parliment who supported them. There's plenty of democrats that openly support them, and reporters, and professors...just like then.
The left is pushing for more censorship of the media, of platforms, of publications under the guise of hate speech. And so far, the right are still saying that free speech is best speech, even when leftists go out of their way to try and shut down public events, ruin peoples lives by mining social media for wrong think, and so on.
Mod me down, whatever.. you think conservatives are the only ones having their speech supressed? Look around, read /. political comments at -1. Try it. It feels like there are two warring factions in /. right now. Perfectly valid points on both sides get modded as -oblivion, Troll.
You're right on that, of course it seems to be more-so that even out of those two warring factions on /. one group is pro-authoritarian and the other is anti-authoritarian. One side believes that illegal entry into your country is fine. The other believes in law and order still. Things like immigration laws, no-hate speech laws, 2nd amendment rights, are all "nazi positions" among the most vocal believers of the left today.
Just like up here in Canada, making the statement that "less immigration is what is needed. The illegals entering from the US should be kicked out. And restricting gun rights will not stop criminals from committing violent gun crime" is a "nazi position." Then
We know that in the states when the minimum wage goes up, the economy improves... EVERY TIME. It's one of the easiest ways to boost the economy. Now sure, the business people you identify with will lie and claim it will hurt them...but their employees having money helps them becuase it's a Trickle UP economy.
So when people lose their jobs, the economy improves every time huh? Better tell that to the 70k people who lost their minimum wage jobs here in Ontario that it really helped them. You fail to understand when there are significant bumps UP in the minimum wage, you put more people at the poverty line.
Whose fault is that? CEO's, CFO's, investors and whatnot telling companies to shift jobs overseas! It's white guys in suits and ties, not illegals.
And why do they do that, because guys to guys like you the #1 consideration on buying things is how low the price can go. You and society want's the cheapest stuff possible... so they shift jobs overseas to take advantage of the labor differential.
They're screwing YOU and screwing the foreign labor too. The only people who win are investment bankers, CEO's and CFO's and other plutocrats.
You mean the Liberal Party of Ontario? That pushed more regulations, more environmental regulations, more taxes on manufacturing, higher mill rates on manufacturing, higher prices on electricity? I mean I can really keep going, you seem to be pretty ignorant on the topic. Maybe that's not your fault, maybe it's because you've made a comment on a topic you're simply ignorant on.
Hate to break this to you, but the Liberal Party of Ontario did more damage to businesses in the 15 years they were in power then any action by CEO's, or CFO's could. Their entire policy was to drive high paying manufacturing out of the province.
You are implying that the illegals are getting benefits... such a supposition does not jibe with them actually doing the work that we both know they do. I have seen newspaper articles here in the states about illegals who paid into the various tax systems AS illegals using fake id's and whatnot.
They are. What do you think SNAP and welfare fraud is mainly caused by in the US? You can look up your own government numbers on that one.
And I have seen articles saying that the illegals paying in (and not receiving) are helping prop up systems such as Social Security, since our population growth is coming from immigration.
And if your illegally in a country, you have no right to it. You seem to not be able to understand that difference between a person who enters a country legally, gains the right to work legally, and a person who enters illegally.
So again, why focus on the immigrants and not the employers?
Focus on illegals you mean.