Slashdot Mirror


Did Russians Really Penetrate Florida's Election Systems? Maybe (nbcnews.com)

Anonymous readers share a report: Sen. Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat, has reaped the political whirlwind in the 10 days since he proclaimed that Russian hackers had "penetrated" some of his state's county voting systems. The governor of Florida, Rick Scott, a Republican who is running against Nelson for his U.S. Senate seat this fall, has blasted his claim as irresponsible. The top Florida elections official, also a Republican, said he had seen no indication it's true. And The Washington Post weighed in Friday with a 2,717-word fact check that all but accused Nelson -- without evidence -- of making it up. However, three people familiar with the intelligence tell NBC News that there is a classified basis for Nelson's assertion, which he made at a public event after being given information from the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee. The extent and seriousness of the threat remains unclear, shrouded for reasons of national security.

[...] Through a spokesman, Nelson declined to comment. At a, Aug. 7 campaign event in Florida's capital, Nelson said Intelligence Committee leaders asked that he "let supervisors of elections in Florida know that Russians are inside our records." He added that Russian hackers "have already penetrated certain counties in the state and they now have free rein to move about." "Either Bill Nelson knows of crucial information the federal government is withholding from Florida election officials, or he is simply making things up," said Scott, who is seeking to take Nelson's Senate seat, which the senator has held since 2001. But Scott, who as governor has a security clearance, has not actually disputed Nelson's assertion. His spokesman said the governor had not personally called anyone at the Department of Homeland Security to seek a classified briefing to get to the bottom of the matter.

205 comments

  1. I penetrated a russian once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all I got was HPV :(

    1. Re: I penetrated a russian once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      da comrade, is offensive security for ze asshole

  2. "people familiar" by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anonymous sources said that there's a basis that can't be disclosed or discussed or refuted. Sounds legit.

    1. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the reason is classified. County-level government has no legally-enforceable national security information classifications.

      Elections are explicitly local. National security information classes are explicitly federal.

      These "journalists" are hiding behind unverifiable sources and verifiably fake information to enforce the perception of reality they want readers to have. Nothing more.

    2. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They obviously do have sources, and you are obviously the source of verifiably fake information here. Trump will hang for treason either way of course, he's Putin's bitch.

    3. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If elections in multiple states are compromised that makes it federal and since it has the potential to manipulate the government yes it'd be a national security issue.

    4. Re:"people familiar" by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the reason is classified. County-level government has no legally-enforceable national security information classifications.

      Elections are explicitly local. National security information classes are explicitly federal.

      For crying out loud, it's right in TFS and TFA:

      However, three people familiar with the intelligence tell NBC News that there is a classified basis for Nelson's assertion, which he made at a public event after being given information from the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee. The extent and seriousness of the threat remains unclear, shrouded for reasons of national security.

      NBC claims it has three sources who say the intel is federal, and it is classified at that level. And it is not at all uncommon for the media to keep their sources confidential.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    5. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's part of the whole "blue wave" myth. They're trying to implant the idea that, when they lose again in 2018, it's not because Democrats are wildly unpopular and President Trump is a historically popular president, it's because of "Russian hackers."

      Don't forget, we were told constantly in the leadup to 2016 that Hillary Clinton was a sure thing and Trump had absolutely no chance of winning. That no one should even bother voting for Trump, it wasn't worth their time. It didn't work, but Hillary still very nearly stole the election and there are some pretty severe voting irregularities. (Several counties that went deep blue saw turnout rates of nearly 300%.)

      So now they're again trying to pretend that there is no voter fraud while at the same time claiming that there is voter fraud and that it's all Russians. It's an attempt to preset the stage so that when they lose again, they can blame Russia and start overturning valid elections in their favor.

    6. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, elections are local not federal and just because someone, anyone, claims anonymous sources in any amount, does not indicate proof, and is no justification for trust.

      When liars lie repeatedly and hide between unnamed, unverifiable sources, but this time you want to believe what they say, does in now way indicate truth.

    7. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If democrats are so "wildly unpopular" how did they win the popular vote by millions.
      FYI Lying about millions of illegal aliens who appear and disappear without a trace doesn't count.

    8. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I already know the answer but refuse to accept it."

      Well, though. Republicans control the House and Senate, the majority of state governor's offices, and the majority of state legislatures. Democrats do not. Even the most wildly left-leaning projection gives Democrats a slight edge in the House, without changing any of the rest of those realities.

      Face it: Democrats are wildly unpopular, and the media is lying to you to try and cover for their failed attempt to steal the 2016 election.

    9. Re:"people familiar" by AHuxley · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When information is not kept secret and is allowed to be told to the media it is fiction.
      US methods that are secret and the results stay secret for decades.
      Thats what real national security is about.
      Real time results getting told to the media are just more domestic party politics.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Total BS. Nelson is losing and he knows it, so he's starting the "Russians stole it" crap to try and de-legitimize Scott's win. Claire McCaskill of Missouri is saying the same thing.

      It is the same reason the New York times ran a bogus op ed about Georgia voter suppression in preparation for Stacey Abrams, the first black woman nominated to run for governor, losing.

      Considering the left leaning Atlanta Journal Constitution says Black, nonwhite voters on the rise in Georgia, AJC analysis shows that must mean who ever is working to suppress minority voting is doing a piss poor job.

      This is all the Democrats have. They have no message, they are running either as socialists or as Trump resistance. In other words, they want to take every thing you have or they want your vote because you're supposed to hate Trump. They know this is a losing argument so they have to start now claiming "muh Russians did it".

    11. Re: "people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all the Democrats have. They have no message, they are running either as socialists or as Trump resistance. In other words, they want to take every thing you have or they want your vote because you're supposed to hate Trump. They know this is a losing argument so they have to start now claiming "muh Russians did it".

      Phil Bredesen says you are a big fat liar. He wants to solve the deficit, Social Security and more.

      Oh wait, you haven't watched a single ad from your Moscow basement.

    12. Re:"people familiar" by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's also not at all uncommon for the media to just parrot whatever the government says uncritically. that's how we ended up in Iraq.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    13. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the conspiracy theory. Maybe you should look up the definition of "Unpopular", as in Lost the Popular Vote Unpopular.

    14. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Operation Mockingbird. Repeal of the Smith–Mundt Act. Trillion dollar military industrial complex.

      Probably no connection there at all.

    15. Re:"people familiar" by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      It's also not at all uncommon for the media to just parrot whatever the government says uncritically. that's how we ended up in Iraq.

      You're not wrong. But I'd say that bogus WMD intel and post-9/11 paranoia were stronger factors.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    16. Re: "people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, letâ(TM)s believe a stubborn pro-conspiracy slashdot commenter over government officials and NBC news about how this works

    17. Re:"people familiar" by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      Yep! Probably from Senator Diane Feinstein, previous chair of that committee. And one who has LOTS of experience with foreign intelligence mucking about, given the 20 years she had a Chinese mole on her staff...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    18. Re: "people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, letâ(TM)s believe a stubborn pro-conspiracy slashdot commenter over government officials and NBC news about how this works

      No, the opposite. Do not believe statements without evidence. Anonymous sources are not evidence. A person claiming a classification when that classification is irrelevant is sufficient evidence to consider the person might be lying.

      And fix your damn iPhone.

    19. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They obviously do have sources, and you are obviously the source of verifiably fake information here. Trump will hang for treason either way of course, he's Putin's bitch.

      I can't imagine that they will ever let a rich person get severely punished for anything.
      Either they will do the ol' pardon switcharoo or he will get something like a year or two in prison.

    20. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the same reason the New York times ran a bogus op ed about Georgia voter suppression in preparation for Stacey Abrams, the first black woman nominated to run for governor, losing.

      I mean, sure, you can claim that the Georgia thing is bogus.
      But, since they have the history of destroying evidence of election fraud pretty recently it seems pretty likely that they are going to keep doing crap.
      Criminals are gonna criminal and all that.

    21. Re: "people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Useful idiot

    22. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that Republicans commit fraud in Georgia but evidence of it was destroyed? Cite some sources please?

      I'm first to believe that there is fraud in elections like when some counties show over 100% voting but anytime I've seen someone try to point out that it is an interesting coincidence that Hillary supposedly had 3m more popular vote and a report show 3.5 million more people on US election rolls than eligible to vote or that Al Franken won by 372 votes and after the election there were over 200 convictions for voter fraud by at least 170 felons and others who voted twice, anytime those are brought up the left attacks mercilessly declaring all the so-called studies that show no evidence of fraud or the Kobach trial where judge declared it never happened.

      So now when it is liberal Democrat going to lose because she's another poor candidate, now we have either voter fraud or Russia.

    23. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Senate Intelligence Committee? One of their aides just got busted for leaking classified material to a journalist who was sleeping with him.

      Not exactly the most reputable source around, because we now know the contents of that same leak to be bogus. Carter Page couldn't both be already working for the Russians AND a target for recruitment by Russians at the same time. He was already an FBI asset who had previously participated on a sting operation against them, resulting in a successful prosecution.

    24. Re: "people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that Republicans commit fraud in Georgia but evidence of it was destroyed? Cite some sources please?

      Georgia Election Server Wiped Clean.

      Not hard to find.

      I'm first to believe that there is fraud in elections like when some counties show over 100% voting

      Zero counties show that.

      but anytime I've seen someone try to point out that it is an interesting coincidence that Hillary supposedly had 3m more popular vote and a report show 3.5 million more people on US election rolls than eligible to vote

      Well, that's some stupid nonsense since there was only ~60% turnout, meaning that tens of millions of people didn't vote at all.

      You just basically showed yourself an idiot who comes up with bullshit, while ignoring real problems.

    25. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You poor retarded thing. Flail all you want, the evidence is growing exponentially, and Trump will be forced to resign just like Nixon. He is the undisputed worst leader in the history of the entire world. You cannot refute that fact.

      Let's just get rid of him and fast forward to the recovery from the Trump era, aka "America's most Retarded Moment".

    26. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice! I noticed a huge spike in that article on my fake news site, some of the traffic came from a google search for 300% voter turnout. That must've been you :)

      Antifa thanks you for your contribution to the cause! Keep enjoying and spreading the fake news, we're making a killing off of your gullibility!

    27. Re: "people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Zero counties show that.

      Except for the 248 precincts in Detroit that "scanned" more ballots than tallied by poll workers.

    28. Re:"people familiar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please enlighten us, what evidence? After over 400 days of searching, over $13m spent by 13 highly partisan investigators, not to mention having the documented assistance from senior members of the FBI, CIA and DOJ, and yet not a single shred of evidence has been presented that Trump or his campaign did anything illegal or even violated campaign laws.

      Hard to say the same thing about the DNC that knowingly and openly obtained "something of value" from a foreigner.

  3. It just wasn't in the cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spied the government today
    They seemed inclined to make us pay
    After one hundred broken treaties and accords
    They could not blame us for our pain

    And if 1000 die tonight
    No one could say just who was right
    Statistics tend to lie, but they don't mean too much
    And I wouldn't trust those that use 'em as a crutch

  4. Is Rick Scott a massive criminal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not maybe..

  5. Re:Did A/C Really Penetrate Your Sister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Makes sense. My sister is dead, which is the only sort of woman would wouldn't be throwing up at the sight of AC's genitals.

  6. None of the stories on Slashdot are news for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This site sucks now. Bring back CmdrTaco and the old OpenSource Tech Slashdot days. Endless political drivel now.

  7. Bring in Voter ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's the only way to be sure.

  8. Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Weird that Russians are suddenly the boogie man again after Romney was lambasted for asserting the Russians were a threat.

    1. Re:Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia wasn't a threat in 2012.

      Russia lost its mind by invading Crimea in March 2014. Ever since they've been aggressively trying to destabilize western democracies. So, Romney was wrong in 2012. Two years later, he would have been right.

      The oompa loompa in the White House now still doesn't believe Russia is a threat to the west.

    2. Re:Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird that the DNC said anyone questioning the election was a "horrifying idea". Since then they have been questioning the election and future elections non-stop.

    3. Re:Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You forgot the Georgia incident 2008.

    4. Re: Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that time The Big O told Putins man that he'd have more opportunity to help after the election?

    5. Re:Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking points recitation robot forgot nothing.

    6. Re:Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your insightful comment, 12 year-old.

    7. Re: Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said he'd have more flexibility to negotiate, which is true and implies nothing more. This was also before Crimea, WMD attacks, election hacks, etc. So you're kind of doubly a moron for mentioning it like it's sinister somehow.

    8. Re:Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democrats needed someone to blame the Wikileaks e-mails on, so both parties are too hawkish on Russia now.

    9. Re:Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And its weird that the massess are suddenly caring about foreign interferance in USAian politics. Mexico and China are equally big players. The media focused on Clintons blow job while ignoring the more serious issue of large campaign donations from the PRC in order to secure the sweet trade deal China worked out with the USA in the 90s.

      I dont have a dog in the fight, im just saying the media keeps the public worried about irrelevant partisan bullshit, while both parties have been corrupted and equally guilty of selling out their country to anyone and everyone. If you want to say Trump has been corrupted, I would agree, but you wont convince me that the last 3 or 4 presidents before him were not equally beholden to foreign players of interest. When you finally kick Trump out of office, for some bullshit, the world will not suddenly be full of free ponies and rainbows.

    10. Re:Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird that Russians are suddenly the boogie man again after Romney was lambasted for asserting the Russians were a threat.

      Suddenly? After they saddled us with a complete idiot.

    11. Re:Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird that Russians are suddenly the boogie man again after Romney was lambasted for asserting the Russians were a threat.

      So... which is it?
      Was Romney wrong and deservedly lambasted?
      Or was he right and now that everyone has come around its time to do something about it?

    12. Re:Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, weird. It's almost like we're reacting to what the Russians are actually doing instead of some immutable concept of whether we like the word "Russia".

  9. Amen, politics sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And there are paid writers on this site blasting with political bullshit.

    This isn't reddit - people here just want tech and will move from this site to any other blogging site pretty quickly.

    (I will, if someone recommends a good one)

    1. Re:Amen, politics sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://soylentnews.org/

    2. Re:Amen, politics sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. No politics on Soylent News whatsoever.

      Oh wait, what's this over here? https://soylentnews.org/search.pl?tid=26

      And what might this be? https://soylentnews.org/politics/article.pl?sid=18/01/26/184203

      That took me less than a minute to find and I've never been to that website in my life. I'll at least commend them for being easy to navigate.

  10. Does it matter? by Kohath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Blue team people (including the news media) will repeat it if it's useful to advance blue team political goals. Red team people will disbelieve it and ridicule it if it's harmful to red team political goals. What really happened is not relevant to the response; this is America.

  11. If the Democrats stay out of office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let whomever hack the system.

    1. Re:If the Democrats stay out of office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YEAAAH be the bitch of everyone!

    2. Re:If the Democrats stay out of office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know our posters say 'make america great again', but our real slogan is 'be a bitch'

    3. Re:If the Democrats stay out of office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not true. I would say without hesitation that I am more conservative than anyone sitting in office in America at present. I'm no one's "bitch". I paid for my own degree with my own money (no handouts because of skin color or immigrations status). I don't ask for anything from anyone. If I want it, I pay cash. I avoid debt like the plague so I don't have to be at the mercy of anyone but God Himself.

      The current administration is not conservative. Not even close. I'm not a Republican, as they are too left for me and almost always have been. The last decent Republican we had was Eisenhower, and before him Teddy Roosevelt.

      This country is in the dog house because of abject apathy and moral relatavism. Men pretending their women. People thinking there is zero differences in the sexes and that all bathrooms are available to anyone who thinks they are a man or woman that day. Letting tranvestites read to children and calling it "good". Allowing homosexuals to come out of the darkness and calling it "good" and equal. This country has a broken moral compass. Trump has the right ideas, but the wrong delivery.

      People think they deserve "free" everything. Nothing is free. Want something? What's wrong with earning it? Build your own wealth and life. Don't rely on others. No one owes anyone anything except treating them with dignity and mutual respect as a human. There are absolutes in right and wrong. There is zero ambiguity in many things. You are born a man, you're a man. All the drugs in the world do nothing to make you a female at the cellular level. Scratch a homosexual and you will almost always find a paedophile. Reason? Most homosexuals were groomed at a young age or were abused and are confused. The homosexual lobby has fought like wildcats to get this purged from current psychiatric materials. The Catholic church has just revealed in its PA investigation that they KNEW 50+% of seminarians were homosexuals yet did nothing about it. And they wonder why there are paedphiles in the Catholic church...

    4. Re:If the Democrats stay out of office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a stinking pile of turd of a post, typical Russian shill AC. Nobody is listening to your bullshit Boris.

  12. Re:None of the stories on Slashdot are news for ne by gettin2old · · Score: 2

    Agreed. Endless political drivel everywhere.

  13. Re: None of the stories on Slashdot are news for n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Embrace trolling, tell everyone to suck your DAMN balls, make apk references, use crude references to shit, piss and assholes, let the mods fiddle while /. Comments embrace shit posting

  14. Did American Really Penetrate Russia's airlines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes.

    I think we can give the Russian's this one.

  15. A politician who makes up stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would think a politician running for a election would make up stuff?. Are they not all liars to a certain extent? The difference is a good liar can make most believe them, a bad liar nobody believes.

    1. Re:A politician who makes up stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite right. Now, anyone who loses an election, no matter their stripes, will blame it on the Russians.

    2. Re:A politician who makes up stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No when republicans lose they blame the mythical millions of illegal immigrant voters.

  16. USA manipulating Russian elections is a fact: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They openly bragged about it in the Washington Post:

    How they funnelled $500 million in campaign money to Yeltsin. The fat alcoholic dancing bear that NOBODY liked. Via the IMF. Versus the opponent's $3 million. Using propaganda like "If Zyuganov comes back, the gulag comes back". And whenever he wanted to go to bed in his hotel, "somebody" had cancelled his hotel room. (Very ... mature. --.--)

    Yeltsin later appointed a somebody as the new head of government... What was his name again? ... Aah, yes... VLADIMIR PUTIN!

    So if the USA thinks that Putin manipulated their elections, then ... I'll just leave you alone with that thought. :)

    1. Re:USA manipulating Russian elections is a fact: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lies and deception from another KGB operation.
       
        When they come out we call them out

    2. Re:USA manipulating Russian elections is a fact: by arbiter1 · · Score: 2

      It would be a shorter list to name countries we HAVEN'T tried to manipulate an election in.

  17. It's a misdirect by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The "Russians are in our systems" is a nice misdirect that hides what's really going on.

    There's no evidence any votes were changed in the last election, but by making unsubstantiated claims and going from hackers to Russian hackers to state-sponsored Russian hackers they can gin up enough fear and outrage to justify censorship aimed at affecting the midterms.

    For example, Facebook recently banned [conservative blogger and political candidate] Avi Yemini for ‘Hate Speech’, won't tell him why he was banned, and denied his appeal. (You can view the banned page here.)

    Lots and lots and lots of conservative viewpoints are being purged online in the runup to the midterm elections, and really scary things are coming up in the news every day.

    Two terms that frequently come up in discussion are "midterm meddling" and "street fight". The first refers to all the suppression of conservative viewpoints, the second refers to the mob-mentality of striking back at people who don't toe the Liberal line.

    (For example, the judge in the Manafort case has received threats, and because the jury hasn't reached a verdict yet the MSM filed a motion to reveal the identities and home addresses of the jury members. Yikes!)

    We live in a scary time, reminiscent of the run-up to nazi Germany.

    Dissenting opinion is being suppressed, sometimes violently.

    1. Re:It's a misdirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol-k, I assume that you forgot to add a tag to your brilliant post, maybe you can get The Onion to run with it

    2. Re:It's a misdirect by TigerPlish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We live in a scary time, reminiscent of the run-up to nazi Germany.

      Loves rallies? Check. (and I don't mean WRC.....)

      Fans the flames of racial division to fire up their base? Check.

      Tars and feathers anyone who dares speak against him? Check.

      Thinks he should have final, unfettered control over everything? Check.

      Dismisses anything he disagrees with as Fake News? Check.

      Who am I speaking of? Hitler or Trump? Or both?

      Your point, I'm sad to say, is lost. The current person in the white house reminds *me* of nazi Germany.

      You're trying to equate the left with Nazi Germany, but that's not how it looks to me. The right is the one that seems like it's stolen the playbook from 1930's Germany,

      Mod me down, whatever.. you think conservatives are the only ones having their speech supressed? Look around, read /. political comments at -1. Try it. It feels like there are two warring factions in /. right now. Perfectly valid points on both sides get modded as -oblivion, Troll.

      Whatever. Bring it on. This country will burn no matter who wins, it's destined for a desconstruction and rebuilding. It's inevitable. It's just a matter of time.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    3. Re:It's a misdirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how you say Facebook banned him for hate speech and then go on to say they won't say why he was banned. There is TONS and TONS of conservative talkers on Facebook so your point falls flat.

      Lots and lots of conservative viewpoints are being purged because they are controlled from Russian addresses. Twitter recently purged millions of bots as well as other fake accounts which celebrities purchased to boost their stats. Keep in mind not only the conservative pages have been removed by Facebook as several liberal ones have been removed as well for the same exact reason.

      Do yourself a favor, stop listening to Alex Jones and other conspiracy theorists like the Federalists. If CNN was actually behaving the way they were then Fox and MSNBC would be all over it as it would boost their ratings. Common sense should win the day here.

      They even go so far as to say CNN attacked her in public when clearly she is in front of her house in the video. The issue was to expose that Americans were being duped by Russians with pages like Being Patriotic. She insisted she only spoke with Americans over Facebook which was simply not true. This doesn't make her a bad person but she was an unwitting participant regardless of her intent. That was the whole point of these pages. As a Facebook user you have no way of knowing that the other person is actually who they say they are. MTV has a whole TV show dedicated to that very issue and is seven seasons deep.

      Rather than clinging to something that is not true they should be angry with the Russians for duping them. Since they are staunchly Trump supporters though they blame literally anything and everything else.

    4. Re:It's a misdirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you were speaking of Bill De Blasio, there. Since everything you claimed applies to him, too.
      Of course, it also applies to Governor Brown and Elizabeth Warren, or Nancy Pelosi and Andrew Cuomo.

      Trump's biggest sin is that he public says the things that politicians like LBJ and Kennedy had said for decades, but used a complicit party media to cover up.

    5. Re: It's a misdirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, the judge in the Manafort case has received threats, and because the jury hasn't reached a verdict yet the MSM filed a motion to reveal the identities and home addresses of the jury members. Yikes!

      Oh no, the media wants the same standard information they get in every other high-profile trial, and our favorite self-confessed Russian troll tries to attack them for it.

      Here's a hint: we don't have star chambers in this country.

    6. Re:It's a misdirect by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Why fight it, why not play the game, just play it smart "OHH MY GOD, The Russians an Chinese will HACK all electronic voting, the only way to be SAFE, the only way to be SURE, MANUAL VOTING NOW". I want to make my mark in history, don't YOU, get that pen and get that vote ballot and make your mark, and if you want too, watch it being counted, every single vote, counted by people, as it was made by people and that count video recorded for the records, it is the only way to be SURE and your VOTE SAFE.

      Personally I don't see anything wrong with that, especially as all indications are, it is not a matter of who has been hacking electronic elections, it seems more a matter of who hasn't been hacking electronic elections, those POS machines need to go and pen and paper need to make a comeback, a vote made by people, should be counted by people, fuck the cost, you lying scummy fraudulent cunts (for anyone who supports electronic voting).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re:It's a misdirect by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Only ONE side is suppressing people's speech. It's the Left. The Right is fighting hard for free speech, which a few years ago wasn't even mildly controversial.

      As for Fake News, they just keep providing more and more evidence. NBCâ(TM)s national affairs analyst John Heilemann said that thereâ(TM)s a decent number of Trump supporters that would be ok with the president killing their parents or grandparents.

      The mainstream media, everyone. Making shit up. How is this not Fake News?

      Here's everyone's favorite publication that just hired a racist, the New York Times:

      "[Trump] is not rounding people up and murdering them without any due process."
      Ready for Goldberg's reply? Sit back:
      "He would certainly like to."
      Seriously - that was her reply.
      The lady who is representing the New York Times.
      She wasn't fired for making things up. Just watch that video and tell me they can write a story about Trump without injecting their personal politics into it. What do you call a mainstream media that invents things out of whole cloth? Fake news.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:It's a misdirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Okie said conservative opinions purged, he meant he and his fascist/neo Nazi mates lies and bigotry of course.
      As usual it is deflection from the fact that Trump is a Putin puppet.
      Only a complete moron would think otherwise after the summit.
      Sad.

    9. Re:It's a misdirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only ONE side is suppressing people's speech. It's the Left. The Right is fighting hard for free speech,

      By running their cars into demonstrating people?

      The free speech you are trying to defend is the right rally a mob to kill people you don't like.

    10. Re:It's a misdirect by davide+marney · · Score: 1

      This is mental. Do you realize just how many people voted in the 2016 Presidential election? 135 MILLION.

      Now, I want to just sit back and watch you manually count 135,180,362 individual pieces of paper, without error (oh, I guess that means we need to do a DOUBLE count just to make sure, right?). And oh, by the way, the entire country is awaiting the results, so you'd better complete that massive counting project as fast as possible, no pressure, just the entire fate of the federal government is awaiting your results.

      Man made machines for a reason. And one of those reasons is so humans would not be tasked with doing repetitive jobs that require extremely small tolerance for error.

      --
      "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
    11. Re:It's a misdirect by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Loves rallies? Check

      You're talking about Obama right?

      Fans the flames of racial division to fire up their base? Check.

      Sorry which group is using identity politics, and which group is stating that they're standing for "americans."

      Tars and feathers anyone who dares speak against him? Check.

      Welcome to politics? No really. Welcome to politics.

      Thinks he should have final, unfettered control over everything? Check.

      Sorry who's that again?

      Dismisses anything he disagrees with as Fake News? Check.

      Well if you're talking about Trump, it seems he really doesn't like CNN. And well, when you have assholes like Jim Acosta trying to ruin peace summit's, or yelling from the back of a large room then claiming "the president refused to answer" I could understand that.

      Who am I speaking of? Hitler or Trump? Or both?

      Good question. If you were talking about Trump, you'd fail pretty hard at matching that all up. On the other hand, many democrats are actively advocating for censorship for anyone that isn't a democrat. They're advocating for political censorship as well.

      Your point, I'm sad to say, is lost. The current person in the white house reminds *me* of nazi Germany.

      Out of curiosity, were you alive then? How about any family that lived through it? I'm guessing that's a no. But hey, if you want some stories, I can get them. While my grandmother is oh 10 years dead, she did live through it. My mom was born in east germany, and still remembers plenty of stuff.

      You're trying to equate the left with Nazi Germany, but that's not how it looks to me. The right is the one that seems like it's stolen the playbook from 1930's Germany,

      So which side is supporting groups like antifa? Why aren't the media reporting when they violently assault reporters or average people? Which side thinks that "punching nazis" is acceptable? Which side has watered down "nazi" to "anything that the left disagrees with." You know what's funny in this? You've got it partly right, antifa is antifa the ones from the 1930's or today. Simply communist agitators, both groups would attack people, both would trash private and public property. The media would not cover their attacks. There were plenty of politicians in the german parliment who supported them. There's plenty of democrats that openly support them, and reporters, and professors...just like then.

      The left is pushing for more censorship of the media, of platforms, of publications under the guise of hate speech. And so far, the right are still saying that free speech is best speech, even when leftists go out of their way to try and shut down public events, ruin peoples lives by mining social media for wrong think, and so on.

      Mod me down, whatever.. you think conservatives are the only ones having their speech supressed? Look around, read /. political comments at -1. Try it. It feels like there are two warring factions in /. right now. Perfectly valid points on both sides get modded as -oblivion, Troll.

      You're right on that, of course it seems to be more-so that even out of those two warring factions on /. one group is pro-authoritarian and the other is anti-authoritarian. One side believes that illegal entry into your country is fine. The other believes in law and order still. Things like immigration laws, no-hate speech laws, 2nd amendment rights, are all "nazi positions" among the most vocal believers of the left today.

      Just like up here in Canada, making the statement that "less immigration is what is needed. The illegals entering from the US should be kicked out. And restricting gun rights will not stop criminals from committing violent gun crime" is a "nazi position." Then

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    12. Re:It's a misdirect by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      By running their cars into demonstrating people?

      The free speech you are trying to defend is the right rally a mob to kill people you don't like.

      Are you talking about charlottesville there? Ever hear of a guy named Dwayne Dixon? No? He's the guy who claims he leveled a gun at James Fields(the guy in the car), and chased him with the gun. That was mere minutes before he drove into that crowd of people. Always more to a story then you think isn't there.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    13. Re:It's a misdirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha I see you have stumbled upon my fake news site. Thanks for letting me mine crypto on your browser, and for all the ad revenue! 50% of it goes to fund antifa, which I'm sure makes you stamp your feet in anger everytime you have to run to one of my sites to find "news" that you agree with (that is wholly made up by me and a few hundred of my friends).

      Seriously, fake news has made me more money than my day job. You conservatives will literally throw money at any idea that makes you feel secure, no matter how batshit insane and self-contradictory it is!

      Anyways, "Dwayne Dixon" says hi, he's actually an editor for a couple of the sites. I hope you find some of the other made up names as believable as that one :)

    14. Re:It's a misdirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only ONE side is suppressing people's speech. It's the Left. The Right is fighting hard for free speech, which a few years ago wasn't even mildly controversial.

      I'm not going to claim everyone aligned with me politically is an angel. There's been enough stupid left-aligned Twitter mobs and the like to make that a farcical claim. But it's just as absurd to claim the right is not suppressing free speech at the same time as its leader (Trump) is encouraging violence against journalists in his public statements (tweets).

    15. Re:It's a misdirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there's a lot of ballots, there's a lot of voters. Some proportion of them are needed to count the ballots. You make sure to have multiple observers to the counting of different political parties to keep everyone honest. Then you have a system where the people know the votes were counted in good faith, unlike a machine where it would take an expert a lot of time to determine what it actually does and a layman would have to trust the expert.

      But I'm not the GP. Personally, I'm fine with using paper ballots with counting machines to get the results quickly. Which is how every election I've voted in does it (in multiple states in the US). I'd say there should probably also be a mandatory hand-count of at least a random sample of the ballots to make sure the machines are accurate, but that can be after the initial results, although before they are certified.

    16. Re:It's a misdirect by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Hahaha I see you have stumbled upon my fake news site

      So findlaw is a fake news site?

      Anyways, "Dwayne Dixon" says hi, he's actually an editor for a couple of the sites. I hope you find some of the other made up names as believable as that one :)

      Oh I'm sure, which is why you can see the misdemeanor charges against him.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  18. Bring in Paper ballots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot the #MAGA. You have great prospects for Trump's voter fraud commission, they too are to stupid to understand that once an entity can get access to the voter system and change votes things equating to poll taxes prevent nothing except making it harder for people for whom the struggle is real to vote, which of course is your goal since only rich lives matter.

    1. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only citizens matter asshole. What is the point of worrying about elections when you do not care about your nations borders. If you cannot muster the courage to protect national sovereignty then elections are irrelevant. And no borders and no elections is just dystopia or worse totalitarianism.

      You are willing to throw everything out just because your bitch lost an election. That is why I will never support the left. They are insane.

    2. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      if citizens matter so much Why is is Ok to make it more difficult for them to vote?
      Since it's been proven that there is no real problem with illegals voting, why is it Ok to disenfranchise those precious citizens 'just in case'?

    3. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non Citizens Are Not Voting, If they are, they are magically leaving no trace of the crime. Accept It.

    4. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      Nope, never! I mean, it's not like there is a record of voter fraud that includes convictions for voting illegally (as a non-citizen)...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      if citizens matter so much Why is is Ok to make it more difficult for them to vote?

      How is it harder for them to vote? No really. EVERY western country besides the US requires ID to vote, some even require national ID cards to vote. Why is it you need ID to get welfare/social assistance, but not to vote. Why do the DNC require ID to vote in their primaries, but claim voter ID is racist.

      Since it's been proven that there is no real problem with illegals voting, why is it Ok to disenfranchise those precious citizens 'just in case'?

      Considering that some cities and states are now trying to allow illegals to vote in local elections, it seems that we already know that to be false.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The heritage foundation? That's a joke right? i mean why not a well sourced and written breitbart article? alex jones a little busy lately? They came up with a few hundred cases out of BILLIONS of votes cast, and half of those are republicans! clearly we need to strip millions of citizens of their voting rights over a .0001% possibility of an illegal vote! If there were really all this illegal voting going on someone more trustworthy than a right wing propaganda shop might report on it, right?. Oh let me guess: it's just proof of how big the conspiracy is!

    7. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      Messenger over message - how tolerant of you! If you looked at the link, you'd see it's a list of CONVICTIONS - meaning hard, actual facts you can look up. Not charges (which are much higher), but actual convictions.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    8. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do those countries then remove the polling places in minority areas? Do they close the offices in minority areas to make it harder for them to get the documentation? Do they have a well documented history of trying so stop blacks from voting? Are they governed by an unpopular minority party holding on to power through disenfranchisement? No!

    9. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Do those countries then remove the polling places in minority areas? Do they close the offices in minority areas to make it harder for them to get the documentation? Do they have a well documented history of trying so stop blacks from voting? Are they governed by an unpopular minority party holding on to power through disenfranchisement? No!

      Yes. Yes. "Other races" so yes. And Yes. You're so damned ignorant of the world it's surprising you don't go into culture shock just reading about it on the internet.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of those nations also mandate voting, which the US would never do because with mandatory voting it is assured that a right winger would never win an election ever again. Right wingers literally resort to disenfranchising voters in order to win; this is proven fact.

    11. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your lying by omission: those small handful of convictions are within BILLIONS of votes. Meaning the problem is MICROSCOPIC and not worth stripping the vote from millions of American Citizens, So Stop fucking with our voting rights. I don't have to 'tolerate' your lies. A lie of omission is still a lie.

    12. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      Non Citizens Are Not Voting, If they are, they are magically leaving no trace of the crime. Accept It.

      Proven false by documentation. So it happens - now we can argue over how much fraud is acceptable - but it happens.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    13. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohh it happens 8/1,000,000,000's of the time! Clearly Millions of citizens should lose their voting rights with your "fixes"!
      Stop fucking with our voting rights.

    14. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Citizens have the right to vote - non-citizens do not. Citizens have the right to own firearms; non-citizens do not. The first right is somehow exempt from proof of identification and ANY perception of ANY restriction; the latter is heavily restricted, requires ID, and is constantly under attack. What is good for one right is good for another.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  19. Heh heh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beavis: Heh heh ... he said penetrate.

  20. Yep, only way to be sure by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    that the "wrong" sort don't vote. Also, don't forget to station police in riot gear in front of all black^X high risk neighborhoods.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Yep, only way to be sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It always amazes me how leftists can claim with a straight face that minorities are too dumb to figure out how to get an ID, but it's Republicans who are "racist" for wanting to secure our elections from fraud. Election fraud is a very real problem and the fact is that we have absolutely no way of knowing how bad the problem is because we don't track it. But we do constantly see pockets where voter turnout manages to hit well over 200%, and there are frequent reports of busloads of voters being dropped off who no one can recognize.

      But no, even though every voter ID provides methods of obtaining free IDs, securing our elections is somehow "racist" because, according to the left, minorities are apparently too dumb to figure out how to get a free ID.

    2. Re: Yep, only way to be sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But no, even though every voter ID provides methods of obtaining free IDs, securing our elections is somehow "racist" because, according to the left, minorities are apparently too dumb to figure out how to get a free ID.

      As we found out in Pennsylvania, the problem was always the government refusing to issue the ID. They literally stood in the way of voters who wanted it.

      So yeah, blame the voters, not the obstructive government officials failing to do their lawful duty.

      Good idea. Claim they're just dumb. Just like everybody else who is the victim of your oppression.

    3. Re:Yep, only way to be sure by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Did you just say that blacks in poor areas are violent? What a racist.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Yep, only way to be sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anything to trigger the libs, eh?
      yur so clever!

      racist plays dumb when made the butt of a grim joke
      news at 11

    5. Re:Yep, only way to be sure by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      anything to trigger the libs, eh?
      yur so clever!

      racist plays dumb when made the butt of a grim joke
      news at 11

      Progressive discovers they don't like being held to their own standards. Shows that they're not too smart up on the follow up. News at 10, and every 15 minutes.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Yep, only way to be sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite version of this "busloads of voters" story is when the security camera tapes were reviewed and no bus ever pulled up. Republicans really suck at lying.

    7. Re:Yep, only way to be sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But no, even though every voter ID provides methods of obtaining free IDs, securing our elections is somehow "racist" because, according to the left, minorities are apparently too dumb to figure out how to get a free ID.

      Every one? Such provisions are not common. And are often technicalities: if ID is free with a copy of your birth certificate, but the birth certificate isn't free, then it's not really a free ID.

      The problem isn't "minorities are apparently too dumb". It's that it's an artificial wall to voting that can be administered inequitably. See towards the end of this section on Wikipedia on the old "literacy test" for voting that many states had:

      Prospective voters had to prove the ability to read and write the English language to white voter registrars, who in practice applied subjective requirements. Blacks were often denied the right to vote on this basis. Even well-educated blacks were often told they had "failed" such a test, if in fact, it had been administered.

      The "literacy test" wasn't really a test of literacy. It just appeared to be one legally, but was administered as a test of blackness. Modern voter ID requirements are often similar. They claim it's easy for everyone to get an ID, but carefully set the requirements so that the IDs that minorities have don't count and the locations convenient for minorities to get to are closed or have very limited hours. Or just straight up give them the run-around when they do apply for an ID.

  21. Did they really have to? by Mnemennth · · Score: 2

    It's not as if the electoral system in Florida hasn't ALREADY been hacked by the current administration. But now Gov. Nosferatu has a scapegoat.

    mnem
    If you presented American Politics as a reality TV show, nobody would watch it.

  22. We've known about their security problems by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    since the 90s. At a certain point we have to accept that it's on purpose...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:We've known about their security problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All these posts here and only this one thread of discussion talking about the real issue. Thank you both for staying focused.

      The rest of you Slashdotters are a bunch of fucking idiots. Hand in your nerd badges, already.

  23. Re:"People familiar with the intelligence" by hyades1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thank you for your comment, Comrade. Mr. Putin will be pleased.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  24. Re:Okian faggot loves to kiss Putin's dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It boggles the mind how you have no idea that you are the useful idiots that Lenin used to spread Communism. Read the list of Communisms 45 goals to destroy the US such as:

    15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the U.S. [Note: In his book, "Reagan’s War," Peter Schweizer demonstrates the astonishing degree to which communists and communist sympathizers have penetrated the Democratic Party. In his book, Schweizer writes about the presidential election of 1979.]

    16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions, by claiming their activities violate civil rights. [Note: This strategy goes back to the founding of the American Civil Liberties Union by Fabian Socialists Roger Baldwin and John Dewey and Communists William Z. Foster and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn among others.]

    17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

    18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

    19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations that are under Communist attack. [Note:The success of these goals, from a communist perspective, is obvious. Is there any doubt this is so?]

    20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

    21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures.

    22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings," substituting shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.

    23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. " Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

    24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

    25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV. [Note: This is the Gramscian agenda of the "long march through the institutions" spelled out explicitly: gradual takeover of the "means of communication" and then using those vehicles to debauch the culture and weaken the will of the individual to resist.]

    Which party does this sound like? Trump has put more pressure on the Russians than any President since Reagan, Obama mocked Romney for calling the Russians the biggest threat but had no problems asking them to be patient until after the election when he would have more freedom.

    You want to talk treason, start there. How about you show a single shred of proof of treason that Trump committed?

  25. Yet more Neocon waffle by najajomo · · Score: 1

    No the Russians didn't penetrate Florida's election systems, it's yet more neocon waffle

    1. Re:Yet more Neocon waffle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know? They told you?

  26. Re:None of the stories on Slashdot are news for ne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh. I see you dont like argueing endlessly about the left vs right thing. Therefore you are an enemy of both. Congratulations! You are a Communist living in you Moms basement who hates black people and worskhips Aldolf Hitler. You combine the percieved evils of both parties into one super duper villianous enemy of goodness.

  27. Election systems have to be secured... by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This has been brought up for decades.

    But say there is an issue with registration fraud, voter fraud, polling station security, vote counting systems, etc and suddenly you get some very suspicious push back.

    Say you want ID to make sure people aren't running around to different polling stations and pretending to be people they aren't... and you get accused of racism.

    Why? Because black people can't get ID cards apparently.

    Say you want to secure polling station security, and you'll get the assertion that polling stations where operate under very lax oversight are beyond repute... even though stories of bags full of pre-filled out voter cards exist everywhere.

    You say that vote counting systems that often use something like Microsoft Access to tabulate the votes of an entire state are perhaps not the best options... and that the digital security of the records has issues... that the underlying digital voting systems themselves in some states are open to abuse... prove it with an 11 year old busting the system... well, no action.

    Frankly, at this point, anyone arguing against this thing can't be doing it in good faith anymore. The overwhelming evidence is that we need reform.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Election systems have to be secured... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say you want ID to make sure people aren't running around to different polling stations and pretending to be people they aren't... and you get accused of racism.

      Why? Because black people can't get ID cards apparently.

      The reform we need is another Reconstrution to stamp out this kind of BS: https://www.acluga.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/aclu-ga-ltr-re-randolph-polling-place-closures-8-14-18.pdf

      Face the fact that black people continue to be systematically discriminated against by shitty people who have to rig the system to stay in charge. That is the real fraud in our system.

    2. Re:Election systems have to be secured... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      if they effectively deny people the ability to vote then you have a supreme court case open and shut.

      Let that not distract you from the other elements.

      And if you refuse to deal with the obvious need for reform... I can't presume good faith.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:Election systems have to be secured... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Because black people can't get ID cards apparently.

      No. Because poor people can't get ID cards because poor.
      And we've arranged this country so that 90% of black people are poor.
      But plenty of poor whites get screwed over too. That's kinda how racism works, there is always collateral damage and it always falls on the weakest.

      Also, the biggest purveyor of the myth of voter impersonation - Kris Kobach the Kansas secretary of state - got his ass handed to him in court because not only could he not prove it in court, he couldn't even prove it in real life either - with all the resources of the state he was only able to find nine, mostly senior-citizen republicans, who genuinely thought they were following the law. For example:

      “I’d vote for president in one state, and local issues in both places,” he told POLITICO Magazine. He said he’d been doing this ever since his property tax bill on a hotel he owned in Goodland had doubled in one year in 2004.

      Because they were provisional ballots, they were never actually counted. But that didn’t matter to Kobach who in 2015, after a local prosecutor’s decision not to open a case, charged Wilson with three felonies and seven misdemeanors.

      But it gets better. Turns out it was all a scam. Kris Kobach of Kansas personally made a million dollars by ginning up fears of immigrants, getting them to pass unconstitutional ordinances and then hiring him to defend them and lose in court.

      Farmers Branch, Texas, wound up owing $7 million to Kobach and a team of lawyers. Hazleton, Pa., took on debt to pay $1.4 million and eventually had to file for a state bailout. Fremont, Neb., raised property taxes to pay for Kobach’s services. None of the towns is currently enforcing an ordinance he helped craft.

      Racism has always been a way for the rich to grift on the poor of all races. Hell, the KKK required its members to buy over-priced hoods from KKK-certified tailors who gave kickbacks to KKK leaders.

    4. Re:Election systems have to be secured... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for a voter ID, but the implementation thus far has been dishonest. It has clearly been meant as a tool for voter disenfranchisement. Passing laws in March on an election year and demanding it be implemented that year is asking for people who have the legal right to vote not being able to. Requiring people to leave the house to get an ID has numerous pitfalls. Placing these registration centers far away or keeping them open for extremely limited operating hours will disenfranchise the working poor and the disabled. Requiring things like birth certificates disenfranchises naturalized citizens from countries that are falling apart and old people born in an era of poor documentation and births outside hospitals. The way voter ID is implemented these days is just a modern version of poll taxes and literacy tests.

      If we were serious about voting we would do a few things: make gerrymandering illegal. Politicians shouldn't get to choose their voters. Making election days a national holiday. Employers may only give employees a half hour to get to the polls and back, which would be impossible by car nevermind public transit. Require a certain number of polling places per population. Having people wait in line for hours to vote is asinine and in many cases is done on purpose these days to promote disenfranchisement, see above re: employers. (I've never had to wait in a line longer than 1 minute to vote.) Register citizens born here at birth to vote. Make voter registration opt out, not opt in. Get rid of electronic voting, because the technology has proven itself too insecure and too error prone. Come up with an alternative to the electoral college. Republicans in California are less likely to vote in a presidential election because what's the point?! Same for Democrats in a place like Wyoming.

      Sum all this up, we aren't serious about voting at all. It's a thing we do to tell ourselves we're still a representative democracy. But there's a lot of built in mechanisms that dilute the power of the vote, nevermind supposedly patriotic Americans working to ensure that even this diluted power is ripped from the hands of the People.

    5. Re: Election systems have to be secured... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they effectively deny people the ability to vote then you have a supreme court case open and shut.

      That isn't how Supreme Court cases work, but yes, there are numerous federal and state lawsuits. Applewait v. Pennsylvania.
      Texas NAACP v. Steen. Ones in Iowa, North Carolina, Missouri, more.

      Let that not distract you from the other elements.

      Like how New Hampshire implemented a system where untrained polling officials were given an unappealable authority to reject voters based on the signatures? We aren't.

      And if you refuse to deal with the obvious need for reform... I can't presume good faith.

      That is exactly why the GOP legislatures are being challenged. They castigate anyone who points out the defects in their proposals or the bias inherent in their actions. They will not act to resolve complaints.

      So they are treated as the blatantly partisan frauds they are. Remember, we know about Kris Kobach. He is the banner bearer and he is human scum.

      All you have to do is mandate the state provide ID. That is what is necessary. Not merely offer free ID. The state must be obligated to provide ID.

    6. Re: Election systems have to be secured... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even though stories of bags full of pre-filled out voter cards exist everywhere.

      Stories. AKA works of fiction. Just like the supposed buses full of illegal voters.

      Anybody telling stories can't be presumed to be acting in good faith, but must be treated as the hysterical liar they are.

    7. Re:Election systems have to be secured... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean this Supreme Court (link to to NYT article from June 25, 2013: Supreme Court Invalidates Key Part of Voting Rights Act)? I don't think they're likely to be very helpful in protecting the rights of minorities to vote from the state they live in.

    8. Re:Election systems have to be secured... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      There's nothing about voter ID in that.

      Look, your political axe is boring. Its tiresome. Don't bother me with your talking points.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  28. Enemies real and imagined by daftdada · · Score: 0, Troll

    More imagined than real. Russiaphobia is a construct of the Deep State working in consort with the Leftist media.

  29. Re: Okian faggot loves to kiss Putin's dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trump has put more pressure on the Russians than any President

    Trump has refused to implement sanctions, has personally praised Russia and just this week recognized Russia's seizure of Crimea despite Congressional instructions to the contrary. Oh, and he met with KGB agents for intelligence on his opponent.

    Oh, and Trump has attacked the EU, Japan, and Australia, tariffs on Mexico and Canada and blamed DC for his costly military parade being cancelled. Good show. I think it is obvious. Trump would side with Cobra, Megatron and Emperor Palpatine.

    Maybe you should leave your alternate reality.

  30. Re:None of the stories on Slashdot are news for ne by Maltheus · · Score: 1

    Everything has been politicized. There is little escaping it these days unfortunately. It's ruining everything.

  31. The obvious solution - get rid of electronic votin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything connected to the internet will gets "attacked", and a lot of those IPs will be from Russia. More neocon / neoliberal fear mongering. If you want to push it in a useful direction, use it to push back against electronic voting machines. They've been a dubious addition because of the possibility of them being rigged by whatever party is in power.

  32. Comical... by p4nther2004 · · Score: 1

    For example, Facebook recently banned [conservative blogger and political candidate] Avi Yemini for âHate Speechâ(TM), won't tell him why he was banned, and denied his appeal. (You can view the banned page here.)

    Except that facebook is a private entity. Just like Free Republic and TreeHouse and lots of other sites.

    But someone...ahem...want to control facebook...and say what they can allow on their site and what they can't.

    But try that with FreeRepublic or others...and...

  33. Space Shuttle payload Bill Nelson strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember: this is the unethical disgusting pig that used his position in congress to force NASA to give him a ride to space on a Space Shuttle as a "Payload Specialist" (a non-astronaut with special skills needed to operate a particular payload who gets trained for a flight to tend that payload on orbit). For NASA back then it was: Fly the jerk to space or lose vital funding. After his flight on the shuttle, he subsequently swaggered around pretending to be a "Right Stuff" style astronaut (with the implication of being a steely-eyed test pilot) and got himself elected to the US Senate where he has pushed his personal agenda for NASA among other things. Oh, the commander on his shuttle flight was an astronaut named Charlie Bolden --- who Nelson demanded Obama make into his NASA administrator and who went on to say NASA's most important mission was "Muslim outreach" while spending 8 years having NASA advertise a "mission to Mars" on its website but having no actual Mars plans and allocating no funds to even plan a Mars mission.

    Bill Nelson is a supremely unethical, scheming, pompous, dishonest jerk.

  34. Re:None of the stories on Slashdot are news for ne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This site sucks now. Bring back CmdrTaco and the old OpenSource Tech Slashdot days. Endless political drivel now.

    CmdrTaco an OpenSource Tech wouldn't have stopped this political drivel.

    Every open forum is exposed to the putinbots. If no-one else is willing to have a political discussion they will just take both sides to lure people into it.

  35. Not a Useful Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's also not at all uncommon for the media to just parrot whatever the government says uncritically. that's how we ended up in Iraq.

    That's not really a meaningful comparison.

    Buying into GOP lies about Iraq got millions killed.

    Buying into possible Democratic "lies" about election insecurity gets better election security.

    I'm fine with the later. Why aren't you?

    I mean, half the god damn country bought into lies about in-person voter impersonation. But voting system security is a step too far? Really??

    1. Re: Not a Useful Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want election security, like showing ID at the polls, but all Democrats seem to be opposed to that type of basic security.

    2. Re: Not a Useful Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Democrats actually work to fix the one hindrance with that idea.

      The GOP, of course, condemns the stupid poor for not having ID.

    3. Re: Not a Useful Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want election security, like showing ID at the polls, but all Democrats seem to be opposed to that type of basic security.

      Not just democrats. The main guy selling that idea couldn't even support it in court. He failed so badly that the judge sentenced him to 6 hours of remedial law school for being incompetent. And that guy was the kansas secretary of state, in charge of elections, not just some rando right-wing nutjob on youtube.

      Meanwhile we have multiple confirmed reports of attacks on election systems. For fuck's sake, the russians even secretly bought one of the companies running the show in Maryland

  36. Mispelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And PraegerU, a conservative non-profit group that produces educational videos on conservative issues

    Its a sad fact that "conservative issues" is now just code for antisemitic propaganda. Conservatism having been reduced to nothing more than white straight evangelical pride is wrecking us. Be better.

  37. Screw You and the Nihilism You Rode in On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The nihilism of people like you is the real problem here.

    We can't fix a problem if we don't talk about it. People like those at blackboxvoting.org have been warning about election insecurity for nearly 2 decades now and its been talked about here on slashdot for just as long. But now that the general populace is waking to the problem, guys like you are pretending its just politics. Whether you are doing it out of cynicism, ignorance or malevolence, you are the problem. Fuck off.

    1. Re:Screw You and the Nihilism You Rode in On by Kohath · · Score: 1

      We can't fix a problem if we don't talk about it.

      We can't talk productively about problems because the people who decide what gets heard only care about their partisan agenda and about sending virtue signals to their tribe. They don't value fact or truth.

    2. Re:Screw You and the Nihilism You Rode in On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, McFly? Here are people trying to talk productively and YOU are the one shooting them down because you perceive them to be political. Newsflash dumbass, everything is political. Politics is how stuff gets worked out in a free society. Hiding behind an accusation of virtue signaling is just a nihilist cop-out.

    3. Re:Screw You and the Nihilism You Rode in On by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Here are people trying to talk productively...

      What's the product of all this productive talk?

    4. Re:Screw You and the Nihilism You Rode in On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What's the point of talking?"

      Your nihilism runs deep AF, man. You realize that's an anti-free speech position right? Without talk there is no action in a democracy.

      Talking is the necessary first step to reaching political consensus. And consensus is how you achieve policy changes. This is all democracy 101 stuff dude.

  38. I agree, even though I disagree with ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the concept of "conservatives" or "liberals" or whatever.

    Look up the "Adam Ruins Everything" episode on how cannabis became illegal.
    It was literally done to terrorize blacks, latinos and hippies, and for no other reason.

    Right now, any political view that does not fit the line of the rulers, is just called "Russian", and crushed. Like yelling "It's coming straight at us!" as an excuse, right before shooting an animal, in that old South Park episode.

    There are som insanely dumb and evil viewpoints out there. Like conservatism, liberalism, libertarianism, socialism, communism, "representative" democracy (as opposed to real democracy), etc.

    But I would defend their right to have any view anytime! Because as soon as we start banning viewpoints, we stop being a free country.

    It is how we treat what we consider the worst in our society, that shows our true morals and the true rights of our society.

    (Even child-rapist mass-murdering CEO-politicians can be fixed. We just have to not slack off, and *try harder*.)

  39. Re:"People familiar with the intelligence" by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Closing your eyes, and covering your ears saying "nananananana I cant hear you!" isnt helping you guys look like adults.

  40. Bill Nelson leaks classified information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, three people familiar with the intelligence tell NBC News that there is a classified basis for Nelson's assertion, which he made at a public event after being given information from the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

    So this information was classified and Bill Nelson leaked it. Isn't that some sort of federal crime?

  41. Dennis Prager is Jewish by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    Dennis Prager is a Jew who has spoken out against anti-Semitism. In your alternate reality, how does that make him anti-Semitic?

    1. Re:Dennis Prager is Jewish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard the term kapo?

      He wouldn't be the only one, like this jewish doctor.

      Or how about uncle tom?

      Being a jew who promotes anti-semitism just means your jewish identity has been subordinated to whatever bullshit you are selling.

  42. Communist violence put Hitler in power by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    We live in a scary time, reminiscent of the run-up to nazi Germany.

    Germans initially supported Hitler because he promised to end the rampant Communist violence in Germany.

    If Leftists do not want another Hitler, they should avoid becoming violent Communists, a variety of Leftist (the same people who sent whole families to the guillotine).

    1. Re:Communist violence put Hitler in power by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Hitler because he promised to end the rampant Communist violence in Germany.

      Which he made up.

  43. You mistake the source by alternative_right · · Score: 0

    Fans the flames of racial division to fire up their base? Check.

    Black Lives Matter, the Obama presidency, and the Hart-Celler act seem to have done that.

  44. Misdirection by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    Lots and lots of conservative viewpoints are being purged because they are controlled from Russian addresses.

    Which ones, and what percentage of the accounts banned were these?

    Sounds like a pretext, not a diagnosis/analysis.

  45. Revisionism by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    It was literally done to terrorize blacks, latinos and hippies, and for no other reason.

    Clearly not because it was adored by the counterculture, correlates highly to morally disgusting behavior, and that most stoners are totally useless.

    Nope, couldn't be.

  46. Who votes Left? by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    If democrats are so "wildly unpopular" how did they win the popular vote by millions.

    Minorities and single women vote Leftist, as do people in cities.

    Those who could survive a night in the forest alone do not.

    1. Re:Who votes Left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...And that means what exactly? besides your condescending attitude toward civilization, I'll take note of your own post using the word 'ALONE', as in YOU. I guess that's the 'Popular' thing somehow?

    2. Re:Who votes Left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only people who vote conservative are also the same people who regularly die from self-inflicted, accidental gun shot wounds. Needless to say, conservatives are also the people who end up lost in the woods and never found again, because you cannot be a right winger without literally being retarded. The upper echelon right wingers know that, and depend on you lower tiers being retarded to keep them in power.

  47. Politics has taken over life by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    After WW2, everything went Leftist.

    Seventy years later, all of it is failing

    Our choice is to either be in denial, or to fight it.

    There really is no middle ground any longer.

    1. Re:Politics has taken over life by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Our choice is to either be in denial, or to fight it.

      Where "it" means ass-hats like you, right?

  48. Sign of the times by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    /.'s readership has aged. What's news for nerds and stuff that matters is different when you're 40 instead of 20. Also, there's just plain less tech out there, at least of the sort that makes good fodder for a site like this. There's been a lot of device convergence. e.g. instead of lots of cool gadgets we've all got phones and a laptop. We're also starting to hit physical limits of silicone so fewer big leaps in tech.

    There is still cool stuff going on in tech of course, but it's all really, really high level. The average /.er isn't going to understand a 50 page paper on how particle physics effects CPU die size and how such and such wavelength of lazer applied in such and such situation may someday lead to shaving off half a micron. There's nothing wrong with that, most folks (myself included) won't get that. But it means the domain of problems that are fun to blather about on a forum is smaller.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  49. Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    from lower income people. It's a defacto poll tax. There's been several studies on it. Anywhere it's been implemented suddenly there are DMV closures and extra fees for the Id. Also extra hoops to jump through for when women get married.

    The amount of voter fraud isn't just statistically insignificant it's laughably so. No matter what anyone tells you nobody's busing in illegals to vote for Hilary (that sounds like trolling when I write it, but it was a real conspiracy theory that had to be addressed and debunked on national news).

    Yes, there is somebody trying to steal elections. But they're doing it with voter suppression, not fraud. This is also why you will see armed police in body armor outside polling offices in poor, often black, neighborhoods. They're not there to keep the peace.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If its suddenly closed or have illegsl fees... Shouldn't it be reported? The idea of voters id isnt bad. Just implementation.
      Theres like 2 years left, get to it!

    2. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The ids were offered at no cost to low income people. This was made clear from the start.

      Bad faith has to be assumed.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad faith is on the part of those implementing these laws. I know you say it's an open and shut SCOTUS case, but anyone who is low income has neither the time nor resources to bring a case against the state. If civil rights groups take up the cause, it is very likely that sorting everything out will take past the election cycle to solve the problem.

      Bottom line: You saying I'm arguing in bad faith does not negate the active disenfranchisement that is occurring every time one of these laws is rolled out. The same mistakes keep happening. The reason is obvious: these laws are not designed with the best policy in mind. These laws are not written in good faith. They're meant to disenfranchise vulnerable people. Don't be naive.

    4. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Nope. Your only possible problem is the expense of the ID and that was addressed many times with these voter ID laws.

      Free IDs were offered to low income people as part of the negotiations and that had no impact on people saying it was racism. The position is intellectually bankrupt and either is ignorance of the issue which you're posturing yourself to not be... or it is deceit. Either way... *shrug*

      The tribalistic talking points are boring. There are people that want to pervert the ballot box because they know their ideas actually aren't very popular or good. And that is why games like this get played.

      Anyone paying attention can see it plain as day. Sadly, a lot of people just aren't. The life blood of democracy is information and education. And there are a lot of people spreading bullshit and encouraging ignorance.

      That is how we got to this place. The corruption is easily dealt with via a few easy fixes that wouldn't hurt anyone but the corrupt. But if you find the corruption either convenient or necessary to your tribalistic political postures... So much for democracy and we'll probably regress back into some flavor of tyranny... where upon people that keep thinking like peasants will ultimately get that status again.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    5. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Free IDs were offered to low income people as part of the negotiations and that had no impact on people saying it was racism.

      The problem isn't the financial cost of the ID, it is the actual cost of going through the process of getting it. People at the bottom of the economic ladder in this country often work multiple part time jobs and have little to no control over their own schedule. Government offices by comparison are seldom open much beyond 8-5 M-F. These people would often risk losing their jobs to try to get to these offices, and they wouldn't have any idea how long they would need to be there.

      On top of that, what type of documentation would be needed to get a voter id? Many of these people don't know where their birth certificates are or where / how to get a replacement. Few of them have passports are few of them can afford international travel.

      Also important to take into account is where they would need to go to get such an ID. Many of these people are dependent on public transportation; if the new office goes up outside the core of the city you are then placing a burden on them to get to this office. It is not uncommon for it to take 1-2 hours each way to get from the core of a large city to a suburb by public transportation. Don't suggest uber as a reasonable alternative, as these people don't necessarily have that kind of disposable funds.

      So yes, voter ID is voter suppression. Whether you want to call it racism or not is up to you, but it is without a doubt voter suppression.

    6. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'm not interested in your talking points. The entire issue is very obvious.

      They were offered free and subsidized and it basically boiled down to the argument that black people can't get ID's never mind that they do get them to drive etc.

      It is not supportable and when you make unsupportable arguments it leaves anyone judging the matter to question why you're making objectively unsupportable arguments.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    7. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were offered free and subsidized and it basically boiled down to the argument that black people can't get ID's never mind that they do get them to drive etc.

      It's not just black people, it's anyone who isn't living near a location that is going to be tasked with issuing these new and undefined IDs. Can you name even one state that actually came up with a coherent plan for what the ID would consist of, how it would be made, where, and how long it would take? In other words what would be the deadline that someone would need to apply for this ID by in order to vote? The state houses that keep proposing voter ID keep playing hide and seek with this critical information, and without exception they are GOP led houses.

      It is abundantly clear that voter ID is something that is proposed only to suppress the vote. Just because the con man your parents voted into the white house keeps bitching about voter fraud doesn't mean it's somehow magically true; indeed it has been roundly disproven - or at the most courteous cases shown fully without merit - every single time.

      Of course the GOP isn't about to give up on voter suppression though even if they can't get voter ID through; they just announced their intention to close over 2/3rds of the voting precincts in one majority black district in Georgia where 1/3 of the people are at or below the poverty line. They know what happens when more disadvantaged people are disenfranchised from voting ...
       
       

      objectively unsupportable arguments.

      There are unsupportable arguments in this thread, but they are not the ones that are being posted in reply to your comments.

    8. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      circular reasoning... the concept was rejected and thus fleshed out plans didn't happen... requiring the fleshed out plans when you rejected the basic concept is nonsense.

      Again... Let it go. This argument fools none but the fools.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    9. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is something that only gets proposed in election years, and only in years when the GOP expects to lose. Furthermore they never propose it early enough in the year for it to be deployed in a manner that would actually be accessible to most people before the election day would come about; hence it is indisputably an attempt at voter suppression. The voter ID crap is hardly any better or less transparent than the robocalling initiatives that have tried to convince democrats to vote the day after election day.

      Your hand waving is looking a lot like a surrender here. Have you considered telling your parents that their party should really just try running candidates that aren't fascist goons? They would get more votes that way and have less need to suppress the vote to hold on to power.

    10. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Nope, Al Gore and Hillary both whined about the voting process when they didn't win.

      Look, the fact that you perceive a threat to your political power by increasing integrity of the ballot box is the smoking gun here.

      That you don't see how transparent this is... well... you need to work on your mask. It has some big gaps.

      Here is the proof to the point.

      I'll let YOU come up with the way voter ID would work. My only condition is that you ensure that the IDs are only issued to people that should be allowed to vote.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    11. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, Al Gore and Hillary both whined about the voting process when they didn't win.

      Al Gore and Hillary Clinton both won the popular vote in the presidential election. Neither ever campaigned - before or since - for voter ID. Your statement is not supported by fact.
       
       

      Look, the fact that you perceive a threat to your political power by increasing integrity of the ballot box is the smoking gun here.

      Except voter ID doesn't do anything for "increasing integrity of the ballot box", unless by that you actually mean "decrease availability of voting for people of lesser economic means" - which no sane and intelligent person would equate to be the same thing.

      Not a single accusation of voter fraud from the GOP has panned out to be supported by reality, and they have been investigated thoroughly - often by law enforcement with conservative leanings. Not. A. Single. One.

      That should tell you something right there.
       
       

      I'll let YOU come up with the way voter ID would work. My only condition is that you ensure that the IDs are only issued to people that should be allowed to vote.

      The only problem - which is one that only certain people see to be a problem - that you are proposing to solve here is to reduce the number of poor people who can vote. This has been shown to be the case, repeatedly. If your parent's party didn't work so hard to screw over poor people then maybe they could actually try to campaign to them instead and they wouldn't need to work so hard to keep them from voting.

      Do you even realize how much the Trump tariffs are hurting people of middle and low income? It appears Trump himself does not. People are noticing that they are getting screwed here, and they are planning to vote. The GOP needed to figure out a better strategy for this election than voter disenfranchisement.

    12. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Both suggested changing the voting system. Argumentum ad Autism is not a valid rebuttal.

      You've proved my point by saying that the details of how it is applied don't matter. So all the ticky tacky this and that on the issue is conceded by you in that as a smoke screen.

      We could come up with literally ANY way of applying more reasonable standards to the ballot box and you'd reject them it on one specious pretense or another. Yes, specious... because you were focusing on the ticky tacky when you just conceded that isn't your real problem. You want the ballot box open to exploitation and abuse.

      You'll make any kind of false moralizing argument you think will confuse the dull witted... and move forward with this concept of gaining power by gathering together a critical mass of the unaware and gullible.

      So be it.

      You are legitimately a test for this republic. If we cannot overcome you, then we were unworthy of our freedoms and you'll cause us to slip into tyranny. Time will judge.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    13. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both suggested changing the voting system

      At most, they suggested it as private citizens as they each either lost their jobs after the election or had no single full time jobs prior. Neither ever tried to pass a law to change the voting system. In other words, you are not comparing two similar things when you compare this to the state representatives who are attempting to change the voting system in the interest of preventing people they don't agree with from being able to vote in future elections.
       
       

      Argumentum ad Autism is not a valid rebuttal.

      Though slinging silly insults is often a sign of knowing that your argument holds no merit.
       
       

      because you were focusing on the ticky tacky when you just conceded that isn't your real problem

      You ought to look up the meaning of concession as there was none in the previous comment.
       
       

      You want the ballot box open to exploitation and abuse.

      Hyperbolic projection is not a good way to show that you have any grasp on the matter being discussed, or that you have an interest in having a serious discussion of it.
       
       

      You are legitimately a test for this republic. If we cannot overcome you

      So you want to "overcome" democracy? There are places that have already accomplished that. Why don't you go move to one of those places?

    14. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      argumentum ad autism is not a silly insult. You made a myopic rebuttal that attempted to argue against a forest with a tree.

      A trait of autism is being myopic. You made an argument that either suggested you're autistic or think I'm autistic.

      I'm not autistic... and whether you are or not... the argument fails on the previously stated basis.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    15. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      argumentum ad autism is not a silly insult

      Either you used it as an insult, or you had absolutely no idea what you were talking about. Certainly we can agree that you have none of the qualifications required to render a diagnosis of autism, and furthermore that even if you did you don't know the AC well enough to make that diagnosis.

      Being as you have now abandoned the topic entirely, is that your admission that indeed voter ID is indeed nothing but an attempt at voter suppression? The argument has been laid plainly at your feet multiple times now in this thread by multiple people. All you can muster in response is "nuh-uh".

    16. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      "we"?

      Well, MY "we" thinks you didn't understand what I was saying if you think I was making a medical diagnosis of autism. My "we" thinks you're actually doubling down on yet more myopic arguments... failing to see the forest for the trees. My "we" even explained what "we" were talking about. And yet, your "collective" didn't grasp a pretty simple observation and statement even after it was explained very plainly.

      Odd. Your collective might want to get checked out. Consistently not grasping a broader perspective and instead fixating on minor points of no relevance is a symptom of the "spectrum".

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    17. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your concession on the topic of voter id being a mechanism of voter suppression - as demonstrated by consecutive comments where you did not mention it at all and instead focused on attacking the people who commented on it - is duly noted. A more mature person than yourself would have opted for a more mature way to acknowledge the failings of their argument.

      The problems with voter ID are not in any way

      minor

      and that has been plainly laid out in this discussion. Voter ID without exception has been proposed by conservatives who stand to gain power by keeping economically disadvantaged people from voting. Voter ID has been repeatedly proposed as a "solution" to a problem that nobody has been able to demonstrate the existence of; similarly many constitutional concerns have been raised pertaining to the proposed implementations of such an ID - notably not one of which you have attempted to address.

      I very highly recommend you spend some time reading up on this matter. You seem to be very sorely lacking in information on it. If you had spent as much time reading up on the topic as you've spent coming up with petty insults in response to the comments posted here you might have been able to participate fully in this discussion.

    18. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I could as easily cite you as confessing to be a pedophile as you could cite me as conceding that the voter ID issue.

      As to insults, argumentum ad autism as pointed out to you now three or four times was to address your myopic arguments. If you think it is insulting to point out an argument is myopic then you're probably one of those people that finds anyone that contradicts you to be "triggering".

      Frankly, as I said, your position is laughable and unsupportable. I even proved that you don't care about the minor ticky tacky issues by offering to let you design the system yourself. You made it clear that none of the ticky tacky issues actually matter and what actually bothers you is any system that prevents people that shouldn't be allowed to vote by law from voting.

      You conceded.

      The logic on this is really inescapable and yet... you don't see it.

      What am I to assume here if someone doesn't 1+1=2?

      Do you not understand?

      Do you understand and are trying to play some sort of game with me?

      Either way, you're not interesting and this is boring. Kindly go back to your proctor, check out a jigsaw puzzle, and enjoy your life time supply of pudding.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    19. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your myopic arguments

      ,br>
      You really should look up that term. The responses posted here have shown the enormous un-addressed - if not intentional - failings of the voter ID campaigns that have been presented that lead to vote suppression.
       
       

      If you think it is insulting to point out an argument is myopic

      No, though calling the argument myopic is at best hypocritical if you care not at all about the voter disenfranchisement that will inevitably come from voter ID - that is of course unless disenfranchisement and vote suppression is actually your goal.

      Your insult is when you keep trying to describe other people as being autistic. Certainly you're intelligent enough to realize that your attempt to sling that as an insult is apparent, are you not?
       
       

      offering to let you design the system yourself

      That is not how that works. You are advocating for a system that is designed to suppress the vote, period. You are pretending that somehow it would not do that, which is ridiculous. What would be the purpose of proposing a fix to it when you refuse to see it as broken? That would be like telling the Ahmish they could get to market faster in a Freightliner; they have no interest in it.
       
       

      any system that prevents people that shouldn't be allowed to vote by law from voting.

      Thank you for admitting that you don't want poor people to vote. I wonder what you might think about that when you finally find yourself on the job market.
       
       

      You concede

      You abandoned the discussion twice and now are trying to paint me into a corner. That doesn't work. Your proposal favors voter suppression. Accept it and move on or just don't bother hitting reply.

    20. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I offered you the ability to set how it would work. You proved my point by rejecting it even if you could control all the variables.

      That's checkmate.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    21. Re: Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have not given any valid reason for needing voter ID. It is abundantly clear that just as with other advocates of this terrible idea you are out to suppress the vote to improve the chance of your favorite candidate winning. There is absolutely zero data to justify this, and if you have even a fourth grade education you would know that. Even the groups commissioned by the gop could not find evidence of voter fraud. Just because you want to call it something other than a poll tax doesn't make it something other than a poll tax.

      Your bias is documented and noted, your surrender accepted.

    22. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To recap:

      You previously showed you don't understand the meaning of "myopic" in spite of attempting to use it repeatedly here.

      You also showed that you don't understand that calling someone autistic is an insult.

      You followed up by showing that you don't understand how moving the goalposts does not aid your argument.

      Now you've shown that apparently you don't understand how chess works, either.

      And of course through all this, multiple times you have attempted to abandon the actual topic of discussion in order to instead attack the person who was attempting to have a discussion with you. It has been plainly laid at your feet that the voter ID initiatives are all about voter suppression, you have not once made anything resembling a reasonable response to that. You have also repeatedly avoided requests to provide any rationale for why voter ID should be considered in the first place (aside from of course for those who want to implement voter suppression) as indeed voter fraud has not once been demonstrated to have occurred in any of the claims laid out thus far.

      What school system do your parents send you to, kid? I want to make sure my kids never go near it.

    23. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      ... So you've gone from myopic to full retard?

      Daring move in your quest to make a bigger ass of yourself with every post.

      Definition:
      https://www.dictionary.com/bro...

      "
        Ophthalmology. pertaining to or having myopia; nearsighted.
      unable or unwilling to act prudently; shortsighted.
      lacking tolerance or understanding; narrow-minded.
      "

      In any case, you're officially the python's black knight. I know I know... Only a flesh wound.

      *coconut claps off into the sunset*

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    24. Re: Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Actually, no.

      Signing up for voter registration could provide the ID very easily and the cost could be rendered irrelevant but bundling it with existing ID systems such as driver's licenses etc.

      That is you get issued a special version of it that signifies that you're eligible to vote.

      Pretty much everyone has a government issued ID of some description. Driver's licenses, personal state issued ID, passports, etc. We can provide a special stamp these that signifies that you're eligible to vote.

      The cost of altering the ID etc would be near zero and would not add any cost to the ID holder.

      Then we would allow polling stations to scan your ID in much the same way that a liquor store can scan your driver's license.

      What you're ultimately saying is that you want more security on alchohol in a liquior store than the ballot box at a polling station.

      You haven't a leg to stand on. You're just mouthing transparently absurd talking points you heard somewhere. You've demostrated no ability to think for yourself by not issuing a unqiue idea even once in this discussion.

      I'e been dynamic the entire time. I've been responsive and able to offer point and counter point off the top of my head. I have been willing to work with you.

      But you literally can't do that because you're not even thinking about it. You're just vomiting your sad talking points.

      You're basically a political chat bot that has failed the Turing test.

      We're done here. Good day, sir.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    25. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you went far enough to find the definition of the word that you've been misusing; congratulations. now if only you would take a moment to realize how it is supposed to be used, you might realize that it is a much more appropriate label for everything you have written than anything that has been written in response to what you have written here.

      though your clear willingness to abandon the topic at hand to instead attack the other side on a personal level could perhaps be an indication that you realize there indeed is no merit to your side of the argument. are you just playing devil's advocate here to give yourself something to do? is that why you don't care that there is no justification for what you propose or that it is indeed a vastly larger threat to the validity of our democracy than the "problem" that it claims to aspire to solve?

    26. Re: Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Signing up for voter registration could provide the ID very easily and the cost could be rendered irrelevant but bundling it with existing ID systems such as driver's licenses etc.

      That would not be an "irrelevant" cost. DMV offices do not have access to criminal records or citizenship info. Linking those databases would be anything but trivial in almost all cases. It would increase the cost to run those offices, and the costs of those licenses. It would also increase the amount of time it would take to issue such a license.
       
       

      Driver's licenses, personal state issued ID, passports, etc.

      It's not trivial for a DMV to serve such a function. State ID is usually issued at a government office, but what do people need them for? Passports are only important for people who travel internationally, and that rules out most of the people who are less than 50% above poverty as they can't afford it.
       
       

      The cost of altering the ID etc would be near zero and would not add any cost to the ID holder.

      Very plainly and obviously not true.

      Another thing that needs to then be accounted for is how often would a "voter ID" need to be renewed? Most states require a driver's license to be renewed every 4 or 5 years, would that suffice? How would renewal be done? And what interval would they expire at? If they expire too close to an election day, you'll end up with elections where not only are we going to mostly see only relatively wealthier people voting (because less affluent people won't be able to get a license to vote) but mostly the party faithful as other people won't check their IDs in time to realize they need to renew them. It's well documented that few Americans vote more than every 2 years (many don't even vote more often than every 4 years if that), why are you interested in reducing voter participation?
       
       

      What you're ultimately saying is that you want more security on alchohol in a liquior store than the ballot box at a polling station.

      Voter suppression does not in any way improve security of the ballot box, it only helps to elect your favorite candidates. You're trying to justify a poll tax by giving it a veneer of somehow not being a terrible and anti-democratic idea.
       
       

      I'e been dynamic the entire time. I've been responsive and able to offer point and counter point off the top of my head. I have been willing to work with you.

      No literate person could possibly reach that conclusion based on what you have written.
       
       

      You're basically a political chat bot that has failed the Turing test.

      You wrapped up with another silly insult and you're claiming that the person who has thoroughly debunked your claim is some sort of automaton?
       
       

      We're done here.

      Indeed. Your argument failed days ago and you have been in personal attack mode ever since. The only thing peculiar here - though not really surprising - is that you keep claiming to have reasons to declare yourself a "winner" here.

    27. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Notice how even though you spent lots of time throwing out baseless insults... you spent zero time explaining how I misused the word.

      Strange. It is almost as you have no argument. Almost... as if...

      No, just kidding... you're full of shit and know it.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    28. Re: Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Nope, you revealed yourself to be a liar almost immediately. And the cost of linking databases is in fact trivial. I work in that field. I link massive databases with billions of entries in them all the time to databases they've never been linked to before.

      Possibly the government has a problem with this because they're often run by idiots and the corrupt. But it isn't hard and we do it all the time.

      I say again, GOOD DAY, SIR.

      http://heeereswilly.ytmnd.com/

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    29. Re: Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you revealed yourself to be a liar almost immediately.

      That is an allegation you cannot support. Where was there a lie in reply to anything you wrote here? There was not one. Why did you feel the need or justification for leveling such an accusation?
       
       

      And the cost of linking databases is in fact trivial

      No, it isn't. Especially when you're dealing with databases that have been separate for decades. Ever consider how many "Joe Johnson"s there are in your state? If you even took a look at the criminal db of your state, where you only see charges filed against people, you will likely find that there are some in your state with the same name and birthdate; it happens quite often. Think of how many others there are as well (for example "Mohammed Mohammed").

      There is nothing trivial about trying to link these databases.
       
       

      I work in that field.

      I very highly doubt that, as if you did you should have realized that this is not at all trivial.
       
       

      I link massive databases with billions of entries in them all the time to databases they've never been linked to before.

      You have a documented record of having trouble with facts and truth here, so I see no reason to believe your claim. Your writing style further suggests that you are not nearly mature enough of a communicator for a company to ever trust you with such a vital task.

      Considering how quickly you fly off the handle in a discussion here on slashdot, I shudder to think of what you would do if a left join suddenly went bonkers on you and locked up your server, or if you found out the hard way that you did not sufficiently sanitize the inputs you took for a table and now you've been struck by little bobby tables...

    30. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice how even though you spent lots of time throwing out baseless insults

      if by "throwing out" you mean trying to discard and ignore the ones you are using, then sure. if by "throwing out" you mean directing at you, can you show even a single case in this thread where someone insulted you? you have a long record here of lobbing insults at anyone who points out the faults and clear ulterior motives of the plans you endorse here. but where did they insult you? certainly not in the comment you just replied to.

      that's one of the amazing things about a democracy; you don't have to agree with it when you live in it. you are free to endorse strategies to undermine it if you want, and nobody will come and arrest you for it. you can openly promote plans to suppress the vote in general or in specific cases, and nothing bad will come of you. that is not possible in many other government systems. many other systems leave you stuck with the leaders that you have and the systems that place them there. if you can convince the government to suppress the vote at a local, state, or federal level, then it can be done (though the voting rights act and other acts have generally been placed to prevent such actions - which sadly just leads people to try to craft crazier and crazier justifications for voter suppression). it has, of course, been noted that you have not provided the smallest shred of justification for why these types of people should be denied the right to vote; you just keep telling us that it needs to happen because you don't want them to vote. you can pretend you don't have partisan motivations behind this but it has been shown again and again (and again and again) which direction these people vote when they are able to do so.

    31. Re: Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by the way, you might feel better knowing you're not the only slashdot member who is openly opposed to democracy.

      or maybe it will just harm your snowflake mentality. either way, you're not as special and unique as you think here on slashdot. you can hate democracy all you want here; just don't tell yourself that nobody else does.

  50. Russia is not a military threat by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they're a political threat. That's the problem with the world, it's complicated. You can't just say "Russia is not a threat". That's not the entire story. But folks want a one word answer for everything. They want to go back to simpler times the never really existed...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  51. No, the Russians didn't hack the election by najajomo · · Score: 1

    No, the Russians didn't hack the election. such uttereances are part of a neocon plot to distract the American voter from who really rules America. ref ref

  52. Re:Did A/C Really Penetrate Your Sister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TIL: Anonymous Coward is Bruce Jenner.

  53. YES, YES THEY DID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who let a trumptard make a topic >. Yes. Yes they did. We may need to make prisons for the criminally dumb. Or at least strip them of the right to vote. THis stuff isn't a joke. Everything about our was of life and basic human decency is at risk when you pander to this level of insanity. It has to stop.

  54. Re:None of the stories on Slashdot are news for ne by McGruber · · Score: 1

    This site sucks now. Bring back CmdrTaco

    , Jon Katz,

    and the old OpenSource Tech Slashdot days. Endless political drivel now.

    There was a lot of drivel back then too!

  55. I'm on Reddit? by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    Let's keep the discourse useful. That usually means congenial and informative. Your message was neither.

  56. Communist violence in Weimar Germany by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    In Jan 1919, 50,000 Spartacists rebelled in Berlin, led by the Communists Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Leibknecht.
    In 1919, communist workers' councils seized power all over Germany, and a Communist People's Government took power in Bavaria.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/g...

    Even before the constitution had been drawn up there was a serious challenge from the left. Many hoped to see a Russian style revolution in Germany. The left wing Spartacus movement led by Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg began a revolt in Berlin in January 1919. They seized building throughout the city. The government fled the city.

    http://www.historyhome.co.uk/e...

  57. A question in the title... then the answer is NO. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. Click-bait title, Move along.