Who mentioned teenagers? What about a woman who got married at 20, had children over the next 5 years, and then her husband was killed in a traffic accident?
They put a lot of effort into backwards compatibility in each version. They've been known to create "shims" to duplicate previous undocumented/buggy behavior that a particular app depends on that get loaded for just that app, because they know that if you update windows and your app stops working, it's not the app using unsupported functionality that's gonna get blamed.
In a rational world, advocating contempt would either be ignored (because it doesn't make a rational case and nobody will listen) or would be supported (because it makes a rational case and needs to be said).
I'm saying that GMO food makers could sue non-GMO food makers for defamation when the non-GMO makers try to distinguish themselves by mentioning that they're not GMO. Something like this case about milk and bovine growth hormone. I have no problem with someone who wants to avoid GMO (for whatever reason floats their boat) being able to get the information needed to do so. I do have a problem with saying "GMOs are bad, even though we have no evidence, because they scare me". Unfortunately there's an area in between, where someone could say "My stuff isn't GMO, and you know what that means *nudge nudge wink wink*" and imply superiority without actually proving it or saying anything bad about GMO. I can't think of a good way to resolve that given my personal feelings on freedom of expression, but I have hope that as time goes by folks will start to be less fearful.
True, but it's a different wildly incorrect usage of quotes:) Quotes for emphasis are a pet peeve of mine, but this didn't trip my breaker and I'm just explaining why:)
actually, while emphasis is one thing that can be interpreted as, it seems valid to interpret it as "I'm going to use the term customer to indicate one use case but it doesn't have to be a customer, but I just don't feel like using 'person' instead".
Depends on the system. Some systems are specifically designed to handle multiple levels of material and control access based on the authorizations of the logged in user. The code has been modified to tag all information in the system with its security level and prevent data transfer from a high security window to a lower security window by pretty much any means other than manual transcription.
As I recall they were intended for use on ships, where space limitations makes having entirely separate systems less feasible. Also, this was about 20 years ago; they may have changed their policies since then.
A single woman backed by modern medicine. Lacking that, the odds of making it to a dozen children is not good, and the odds of all the children surviving is worse.
Fair point. I suppose one could theorize that long distance requires sensitivity on both ends, while short range with eye contact can be single ended. But that's just a theory. So really, we're down to her sensing that Luke made it off the Death Star 2 at the end of ROTJ and maybe being more receptive to Luke's call in Empire. I suspect they're counting the Empire part in their 10 seconds.
Slashdot Mirror
at least, of having them often enough that "remount as writeable only when needed" isn't viable.
More like "when I take the wrong turn at the rental place and run over the tire spikes they should just trash my tires, not melt down my engine block"
I had not heard that the user had the ability to de-throttle non-binge sources. Thanks!
Some streaming content. Not all (though it will throttle all. Yeah, slowed down and still counts against data). not really "neutral".
Not certain it's relevant. The claims never use the term daisy chain, and that's where the legal force is.
failure to sufficiently research your target is a major failure in any attack.
Creation: God will fix it if He feels like it. Or not. His ways are mysterious!
Who mentioned teenagers? What about a woman who got married at 20, had children over the next 5 years, and then her husband was killed in a traffic accident?
They put a lot of effort into backwards compatibility in each version. They've been known to create "shims" to duplicate previous undocumented/buggy behavior that a particular app depends on that get loaded for just that app, because they know that if you update windows and your app stops working, it's not the app using unsupported functionality that's gonna get blamed.
"willing to consider" is also a far cry from "willing to buy at this point"
which, again, is very much parallel to a license plate.
In a rational world, advocating contempt would either be ignored (because it doesn't make a rational case and nobody will listen) or would be supported (because it makes a rational case and needs to be said).
I'm saying that GMO food makers could sue non-GMO food makers for defamation when the non-GMO makers try to distinguish themselves by mentioning that they're not GMO. Something like this case about milk and bovine growth hormone. I have no problem with someone who wants to avoid GMO (for whatever reason floats their boat) being able to get the information needed to do so. I do have a problem with saying "GMOs are bad, even though we have no evidence, because they scare me". Unfortunately there's an area in between, where someone could say "My stuff isn't GMO, and you know what that means *nudge nudge wink wink*" and imply superiority without actually proving it or saying anything bad about GMO. I can't think of a good way to resolve that given my personal feelings on freedom of expression, but I have hope that as time goes by folks will start to be less fearful.
Lead was known to be poisonous by 100 BCE. I suppose that technically means "up to 6400 years".
The problem comes when those who don't label take up "you labeling is implicit defamation of unlabelled stuff" - and win.
What I read is that it's called "Daesh" because it doesn't deserve to be called a "state".
No, just that astrology gets dissed and that's unwelcome.
a well-and-paranoidly-configured firewall, then :)
True, but it's a different wildly incorrect usage of quotes :) Quotes for emphasis are a pet peeve of mine, but this didn't trip my breaker and I'm just explaining why :)
actually, while emphasis is one thing that can be interpreted as, it seems valid to interpret it as "I'm going to use the term customer to indicate one use case but it doesn't have to be a customer, but I just don't feel like using 'person' instead".
Depends on the system. Some systems are specifically designed to handle multiple levels of material and control access based on the authorizations of the logged in user. The code has been modified to tag all information in the system with its security level and prevent data transfer from a high security window to a lower security window by pretty much any means other than manual transcription.
As I recall they were intended for use on ships, where space limitations makes having entirely separate systems less feasible. Also, this was about 20 years ago; they may have changed their policies since then.
Don't forget "with less risk to the user than getting into melee range".
A single woman backed by modern medicine. Lacking that, the odds of making it to a dozen children is not good, and the odds of all the children surviving is worse.
Fair point. I suppose one could theorize that long distance requires sensitivity on both ends, while short range with eye contact can be single ended. But that's just a theory. So really, we're down to her sensing that Luke made it off the Death Star 2 at the end of ROTJ and maybe being more receptive to Luke's call in Empire. I suspect they're counting the Empire part in their 10 seconds.
sensing Luke under Cloud City is the only one that comes to mind.