This makes me wonder how long until ISPs start wanting to phase out nat so they can better see the patterns of usage behind the router. If they can tell that you use your TV and iPad more than your laptop... well, there's gotta be someone who'd pay for that info.
Remember though that "fair use" (in the US) is not a right, it's a defense. You're still infringing, you're just doing so in a way that results in no damages. If you can sustain the case long enough to convince the judge that the use is indeed fair, that is.
The phrasing of the actual draft requirement is "capable of taking control in the event of a technology failure or other emergency", which need not require instant response, merely being prepared and legally allowed to operate the vehicle when the automation can't. Like in the scenario someone posted above where getting out of a parking deck involved going the wrong way down 3 one-way segments.
The actual requirement from TFpressRelease is "Autonomous vehicles will be equipped with self-diagnostic capabilities that detect and respond to cyber-attacks or other unauthorized intrusions, alert the operator, and allow for an operator override", which sounds easier (but probably isn't).
actually, according to this the strong/weak forces do not use inverse square, because they're fundamentally different: they're based on particle exchange and the distance at which the particles can get exchanged is related to quantum uncertainty, which drops off a lot faster with distance than just inverse square.
Electromagnetic is stronger and is also inverse square but it's based on charge differentials, and at macroscopic scales objects tend to be neutral overall which means two planets (for example) have very little charge differential relative to the distance. If you could somehow move all the electrons from Mars to Earth they'd probably be pretty strongly attracted (I haven't done the math... maybe I'll send that one to What If).
until they decide their patent over the modified version covers what you're doing with the unmodified version and you have to defend yourself in court.
While I agree that air pollution is a public nuisance, I'm not sure how that leads to either the assertion that it was caused by legislation or that the legislation that prevents it has undesirable unintended consequences. Can you elaborate?
That'll last til the first time they decrypt something and find another layer of encryption. After that it'll be decrypted and analyzed in real time to see if it looks like reasonable traffic. I see a bright future for steganography.
I dunno. I read it less as "those who oppose Obama must be racist" and more as "I'd rephrase that as 'Trump is saying what the people want to hear so what does that tell you... that people are ignorant and racist'", which doesn't involve Obama at all. I mean, it could be the way you're interpreting it, that's just not the way I did.
who says the tribesman is the one doing the navigating? He's just the intended recipient of the cargo in this scenario. He has no particular need to be aware of the methods used by a truck driver to find him.
Well, you have to make a profit. That means you have to sell higher than first-day prices. Unless they sold out at first day prices, then anyone who hasn't bought by the time the event sells out either just didn't know it was going on or wasn't willing to pay first-day prices. And the ones who weren't willing to pay first-day are unlikely to be willing to pay your prices which are higher, so your market is pretty much the folks who didn't know it was going on until it was already sold out.
Now, if they do sell out at first-day prices, you have a bigger market, but that's a sign they underpriced. Next time they won't do that and you're back to case 1, where your profit is seriously hampered.
The database/lookup table is supposed to be small enough that it can be embedded instead of being a network-service. However, the conversation I was thinking of at the shipping depot is like so: "Take this truckload of vaccines and these two med workers to the San tribe." "Where are they hanging out this week?" "let's see... latest aerial scans show activity around this spring at alpha beta gamma" "Cool, we'll head out in 20."
The giver of the data will probably have used it enough to have it down pat. The receiver, on the other hand, may not, and words are more resistant to transposition errors than coordinates.
For zip codes, it depends a lot on the geography and history. 50061 and 50062 are 40ish miles apart, while 66206 is adjacent to 64114.
MGRS has benefits over lat/lon, but it's back to somewhat arbitrary long numbers, and to at least match 3m it needs 5 digits of easting and 5 of northing, plus the 4 characters for grid and square, so the benefits are not huge.
This system does require machine translation, granted; if you're trying to avoid that, then this system will definitely not work for you. But if you assume machine translation is available (and machines that can handle it are getting really common), then this system can be an easier way to pass the important parts of the data around.
Slashdot Mirror
depends if BTSync has the encryption stuff that's in all the claims of this patent. I suspect that's really the only novel part (if it is at all :)
This makes me wonder how long until ISPs start wanting to phase out nat so they can better see the patterns of usage behind the router. If they can tell that you use your TV and iPad more than your laptop... well, there's gotta be someone who'd pay for that info.
Remember though that "fair use" (in the US) is not a right, it's a defense. You're still infringing, you're just doing so in a way that results in no damages. If you can sustain the case long enough to convince the judge that the use is indeed fair, that is.
The phrasing of the actual draft requirement is "capable of taking control in the event of a technology failure or other emergency", which need not require instant response, merely being prepared and legally allowed to operate the vehicle when the automation can't. Like in the scenario someone posted above where getting out of a parking deck involved going the wrong way down 3 one-way segments.
or at least if the computer throws up its hands the licensed driver is legally allowed to drive the car home (assuming it can go, of course).
The actual requirement from TFpressRelease is "Autonomous vehicles will be equipped with self-diagnostic capabilities that detect and respond to cyber-attacks or other unauthorized intrusions, alert the operator, and allow for an operator override", which sounds easier (but probably isn't).
They just finished watching Elysium again and assume that nobody with that much money could possibly want to go somewhere uncomfortable.
The food network is literally the reason I have not cut the cord yet.
actually, according to this the strong/weak forces do not use inverse square, because they're fundamentally different: they're based on particle exchange and the distance at which the particles can get exchanged is related to quantum uncertainty, which drops off a lot faster with distance than just inverse square.
Electromagnetic is stronger and is also inverse square but it's based on charge differentials, and at macroscopic scales objects tend to be neutral overall which means two planets (for example) have very little charge differential relative to the distance. If you could somehow move all the electrons from Mars to Earth they'd probably be pretty strongly attracted (I haven't done the math... maybe I'll send that one to What If).
Sounds ripe for a typical heat pump system using the liquid helium as the refrigerant.
until they decide their patent over the modified version covers what you're doing with the unmodified version and you have to defend yourself in court.
While I agree that air pollution is a public nuisance, I'm not sure how that leads to either the assertion that it was caused by legislation or that the legislation that prevents it has undesirable unintended consequences. Can you elaborate?
That'll last til the first time they decrypt something and find another layer of encryption. After that it'll be decrypted and analyzed in real time to see if it looks like reasonable traffic. I see a bright future for steganography.
You have enough subjective qualifiers in there to make it impossible to answer if you choose to, but my first thought was air quality.
given that they didn't spell out the reason for any of the other amendments, I'm going to go with "no".
Large numbers I'd grant, but I'd like to see the figures for large majorities.
I dunno. I read it less as "those who oppose Obama must be racist" and more as "I'd rephrase that as 'Trump is saying what the people want to hear so what does that tell you... that people are ignorant and racist'", which doesn't involve Obama at all. I mean, it could be the way you're interpreting it, that's just not the way I did.
so the answer to my original question of how to get unicode to work is "don't" :)
ah, I was thinking unicode needed something else, rather than just more digits. (and of course a capable browser and font :)
how does one get unicode to work right here? I'm sure it's doable but I don't recall ever seeing instructions on how to get it to happen.
who says the tribesman is the one doing the navigating? He's just the intended recipient of the cargo in this scenario. He has no particular need to be aware of the methods used by a truck driver to find him.
Well, you have to make a profit. That means you have to sell higher than first-day prices. Unless they sold out at first day prices, then anyone who hasn't bought by the time the event sells out either just didn't know it was going on or wasn't willing to pay first-day prices. And the ones who weren't willing to pay first-day are unlikely to be willing to pay your prices which are higher, so your market is pretty much the folks who didn't know it was going on until it was already sold out.
Now, if they do sell out at first-day prices, you have a bigger market, but that's a sign they underpriced. Next time they won't do that and you're back to case 1, where your profit is seriously hampered.
The database/lookup table is supposed to be small enough that it can be embedded instead of being a network-service. However, the conversation I was thinking of at the shipping depot is like so:
"Take this truckload of vaccines and these two med workers to the San tribe."
"Where are they hanging out this week?"
"let's see... latest aerial scans show activity around this spring at alpha beta gamma"
"Cool, we'll head out in 20."
The giver of the data will probably have used it enough to have it down pat. The receiver, on the other hand, may not, and words are more resistant to transposition errors than coordinates.
For zip codes, it depends a lot on the geography and history. 50061 and 50062 are 40ish miles apart, while 66206 is adjacent to 64114.
MGRS has benefits over lat/lon, but it's back to somewhat arbitrary long numbers, and to at least match 3m it needs 5 digits of easting and 5 of northing, plus the 4 characters for grid and square, so the benefits are not huge.
This system does require machine translation, granted; if you're trying to avoid that, then this system will definitely not work for you. But if you assume machine translation is available (and machines that can handle it are getting really common), then this system can be an easier way to pass the important parts of the data around.